Loading...
2014-382-Minutes for Meeting May 28, 2014 Recorded 7/15/2014DESCHUTES NANCY BLANKENSHIPOFFICIAL CLERK OS V4 �y������ COOMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 07/15/2014 08:15 24 AM IIIIIIIIIiIIuIIIIIIIIIII II III Do not remove this page from original document. Deschutes County Clerk Certificate Page Deschutes County Board of Commissioners { 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUDGET MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2014 — Morning Session Allen Room, Deschutes Services Building Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Mike Maier, Clay Higuchi and Bruce Barrett, Budget Committee, Wayne Lowry and Teri Maerki, Finance Department and, for a portion of the meeting, Nancy Blankenship, Barb Hagen, Jeff Sageser, County Clerk's Office, David Doyle, Legal Counsel and Timm Schimke, Solid Waste; David Givens, BOCC. Meeting minutes were taken by Kelli Candella. Bruce Barrett opened the meeting at 10:17 Am.: CLERKS OFFICE Nancy handed out two handouts (attached). Discussion on Recording Revenues, 2009 was lowest Revenue year. Annual revenues have continued to increase over the last few years until September 2013 to February 2014; there was a decline due to interest rates increasing. March and April saw a modest increase, Clerk's office checked in with other Counties and. they saw similar trends. Recording Mortgage documents there is a two -prong base fee. There is a $5 per page fee, first $48 is distributed to other departments, large documents are important for higher revenue to Clerk's office. Some of the areas of disbursement include Surveyor's Office, Affordable Housing (State) as well as other State Mandated areas. Question asked what does the State do with money for Affordable Housing. Goes back to the communities. Clay stated he was not aware Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 1 of 6 that first $48 distributed out of Clerk's office. Tony DeBone asked if fee structure had changed much. Jeff Sageser stated not much change has taken place. Budget Committee agreed that information on the distribution of recording fees collected should be distributed for General Public to consider when looking over the Clerk's budget. Are fees charged by Clerk's Office comparable to other Counties, yes they are, most fees are mandated, and GIS can be more or less in other Counties? Deschutes County is about in the middle for non -mandated fees collected. Revenue for recording fees — page count is more than half of what total is, financing of homes helps fund Department. Negative umber shown on hand-out (August 2013) started falling; this was during the evaporation of the Refinance business, applications down 57% in first Quarter. This is again due to the interest rate increasing and Application submittals in decline for refinancing of homes. Please refer to handout for trend graph New Home sales Blue Line lower driver Existing Horne sales Red Line Based on National trend both New and Existing Home sales are trending upward. One-third of sales locally are cash sales, this has a negative impact on department's revenue, fewer pages recorded for this type of transaction. Budget includes $900,000 income projection from recording fees. Cautiously optimistic that current trend will actually bring in $1 - $1.1 million for 2015. Alan asked if Deschutes County is considered to be at the middle of the pack for fees, this might be the time for the Board of Commissioners to consider raising recording fees. Per Nancy, most fees are Statutory mandated. GIS fees collected goes to GIS fund. Clerk's office has reduced staff due to no General Election for FY 14/15, loss of $10,000 revenue due to having no General Election this year. Department has increased the extra help line to assist in the elections, on -call staff is also available to cover needs. Alan Unger stated he is very impress with how the Clerk's office runs its business. Nancy is proud of the turnaround for a recorded document, record, scan and able to mail next business day. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 2 of 6 Measured performance discussion, 96 — 97 %, next year projected to be lower. Per Nancy this is due to long-term employees having a lot of vacation accrual, many times staff is low and coverage is less. Voter confirmation cards are an example; holding on to them until about 200 are ready for mailing. This could hold up some cards for a few months. Mike Maier believes standards should not be lowered for measurement. Tony DeBone asked if Marriage Certificate filings increase with the change in marriage law, Nancy stated eight licenses filed recently. Passport service is not big revenue. Voter registration is stagnant. Discussion concerning getting the word out to push for voter registration. Last election very low turn out. Nancy will push out a campaign to "Get Out the Vote." Naturally, during a General Election percentage of ballot turn is greater. Marketing dollars is under the Secretary of the State Budget. Need to get to young students, get them involved early. Tony DeBone asked if we can do an incentive, Nancy stated that was illegal. Clerk's Office hosted Redmond Proficiency Academy, brought them in to see how election process works. Problem is during an actual election when everything is moving, this is a bad time to bring in outside for education. Secretary of State focused on getting people registered; emphasis should be on getting people to vote. Nancy will be attending a conference with all State Clerks; Nancy will bring up issue of changing law to get more people to cast their vote. General discuss on other options, i.e. registering a vehicle in Deschutes County, automatic Voter registration, this has not passed, cannot force people, they have the right to register, and to vote. On -Line voting — Nancy states that this is way down the road. Too many easy ways to hack system, therefore vote may be skewed due to hackers. Tony DeBone, elevate "Exercise Your Vote" over the auto registration to vote push. SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT Timm provided a presentation, attached for reference. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 3 of 6 Mike Maier asked about education and marketing budget, budgeted $100,000 for this purpose. Tony De Bone indicated that the 3 — 5 year projection meetings have helped, reminds Budget Committee of bigger picture. Refer to Excel spreadsheet. 4% annual cost increase built in 1 % Interest Rate 6% assumed Waste flow growth, no increase to tip fee projected. David Givens: 5 year; $5M cap reserve fund, 6.2 million — cell construction and closure planned for area B. Al asked what status of debt represented in this project is, Timm stated it is bonded. Tony DeBone asked if road transfer would remain in, Timm stated yes. Clay assumes level of tonnage going forward is returning to level in 2007 or 2008. Timm stated is included growth in projection. Mike Maier asked projected date of Knott Landfill closure still figured to be 2029. That is the projected date but may be 2030 — 2034 depending on recycling and air gas. With new technology may not have to close. In 2019 begin looking for options and determine what to do with Landfill site. Mike Maier inquired what the cost would be to complete professional study to evaluate and complete process of study. Per Timm, approximately $300,000 — 400,000. Discussion expanding operations, need to increase tip fee, Timm stated that he would not increase operations until next cell is in the bank. Board of Commissioners must approve making changes to operations hours. Timm provided a presentation document (attached) that gave Budget Committee costs of changing operations, hours, days and other options. Tammy Baney asked about possible summer time changes that would allow for opening on Sunday. It was suggested that Solid Waste conduct a survey asking customers options they would be open to, extended working hours on days already open, bring back Sunday operations, or combination. Business is currently 75% Franchise waste. Sunday and Monday were typically lightest usage days, taking Sunday away impacted small business and public. Taking a weekday away affects Franchise business, small business and public. Discussion on Fire Free, dates, hours of operation during Fire Free. Contracts through Ed Keith, ten-day period for yard debris. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 4 of 6 Clay stated that it appears as if yard debris is centered on Project Wildfire, not servicing public as we can. Discussion on Fire Free days to include more Saturday service as an option. Timm stated he currently works with HOAs during Fire Free to allow them to contact Solid Waste if they need additional weekend to collect and dump their yard debris. If dates were extended, they would lose the promotional value in debris clean up with citizens. Timm reiterated that Solid Waste is not the driver of the Fire Free clean up. Tony De Bone asked what the mission statement of Solid Waste is, are we meeting that statement during peak season. Mike Maier understands Tony's statements but feels like a Customer Service survey should be completed, ask the questions... Are you satisfied with hours of operations? Would this type of survey be accurate? Tony asked if the County is capturing waste that may be dumped on public land because of the hours of operation as they are now. Timm stated that in the beginning, there may have been a small amount of dump but feels like those that dump will do so regardless of cost. Mike Maier would like to see us consider a raise in the tip fee, this could help fund a change to operation hours. Tony Debone mentioned that operations need not change year-round, limited to summer schedule with return to Sunday open, look at all options as well as what would cost be. Alan Unger inquired on considering Road transfer to fund modified operation hours. City of Bend residents cannot burn in City limits; need landfill to be open on weekend in summer months. Bruce Barrett suggested looking at vehicle count during Sunday business; landfill was well utilized on Sunday per Timm. Discussion on Negus Transfer station converting to scale to increase funds vs. judgment call on every load. This would take some planning for layout, as current layout is not conducive for recycle and a set up for scale house. Timm stated that any changes to operation would have a big money impact. Consider charging an extra dollar to be open on Sunday, and/or open extended hours during the week until 6:00 p.m. Again it was suggested that Solid Waste have customers complete survey. Being no further discussion, the session ended at 11:57 am. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 5 of 6 DATED this 28th Day of May 2014 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST SIGNATURES: 7/?Az Bonnie Baker, Recording Secretary 11/ i(21 w_ Bane y, B y, Chair Anthony DeBone, Vice Chair Alan Unger, Commissioner Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 6 of 6 BUDGET COMMITTEE AGENDA Wednesday, May 28`h, 2014 9:00 AM • Reconvene the Deschutes County budget meeting 9:00 - 9:30 AM Fair and Expo Center (Funds 617-619 and 601) • Introductions • Budget discussion 9:30 - 10:00 AM County Assessor's Office (Fund 001-02) • Introductions • Budget discussion 10:00 - 10:15 AM Break Program Budget Tab/Page 4 / 141 4/115 10:15 - 10:45 AM County Clerk's Office (Funds 001-05, 001-06 and 218) 4 / 121 • Introductions • Budget discussion 10:45 - 11:45 AM Solid Waste (Funds 610-614) • Introductions 4 / 161 • Budget discussion 11:45 - 1:00 PM Elected Officials Compensation Committee (Lunch - Discussion) 1:00 - 2:00 PM Road (Funds 325, 328-340) 4 / 147 • Introductions • Budget discussion 2:00 - 2:15 PM Break 2:15 - 3:15 PM 3:15 - 4:15 PM 4:15 - 4:45 PM Community Development (Funds 290-303) • Introductions • Budget discussion Community Justice (Funds 230 and 355) • Introductions • Budget discussion Justice Court (Fund 123) • Introductions • Budget discussion 4/127 3 / 80 3/96 Page 1 4:45 — 5:15 PM BUDGET COMMITTEE AGENDA Wednesday, May 28th, 2014 Natural Resource Protection (Funds 326-327) • Introductions • Budget discussion Continue the Deschutes County budget meeting to Thursday, May 29th, at 9:00 AM Program Budget Tab/Page 4/157 Page 2 Total Page Count (total is more than Just deeds and mortgages) CY Jan Feb Mar Apr May tun 1ul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total 2007 33,137 30,070 33,143 32,961 29,350 29,533 27,267 26,251 21,104 22,406 21,337 22,187 328,746 2008 19,800 19,953 23,260 21,633 20,294 18,579 16,184 15,571 16,980 16,507 11,918 15,048 215,727 2009 17,466 19,169 22,673 22,441 2.2,202 24,628 25,475 18,248 18,724 19,646 19,882 21,921 252,475 2010 18,460 16,860 19,699 20,753 22,423 24,691 22,134 25,177 28,102 24,729 22,007 22,862 267,897 2011 19,238 18,070 19,328 18,872 17,368 17,268 19,699 18,256 21,886 19,986 18,528 22,081 230,580 2012 16,406 20,334 23,058 22,030 23,454 22,571 22,504 25,198 21,344 24,651 21,842 24,470 267,862 2013 21,958 20,585 22,222 22,936 24,661 23,018 25,440 23,028 17,429 18,298 15,553 15,576 250,704 2014 12,807 12,345 15,363 16,238 12-13 Diff 13-14 Diff -41.68'%,-40.03%-30.87%-29.2(Y% 33.84% 1.23% -3.6391 4.11% 5.15% 1,9896 13.0596 -8,61ta 18.34%-45.7791 -16..79% 36.3595 6.41% Mortgage Page Count CY Jan Feb Mar Apr May lun 1u1 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total 2007 23,180 21,423 2008 11,818 12,581 2009 8,766 10,859 2010 7,245 7,331 2011 9,682 8,236 2012 9,273 11,005 2013 14,080 13,600 2014 7,216 7,149 12-13 Diff 13-14 Diff-48.7S% 47.43% -36.65% -33.73% 23,397 20,808 20,323 20,548 18,077 17,460 13,969 14,018 13,473 13,707 220,383 14,831 13,976 12,232 10,194 8,990 7,439 8,003 7,926 5,040 7,017 120,047 12,864 12,131 12,271 13,558 12,497 7,628 8,294 8,633 8,976 9,225 125,702 8,035 8,077 7,202 7,880 7,678 7,889 10,868 11,255 11,507 12,460 107,427 9,733 8,175 7,504 7,043 8,135 7,873 9,026 9,922 9,369 13,043 107,741 13,248 12,839 14,081 13,380 13,556 15,572 13,344 16,127 14,767 16,953 164,145 15,095 14,853 16,995 15,023 16,238 14,753 11,044 10,951 9,884 9,005 161,521 9,563 9,843 51.84% 23.58% 13.94% 15.69% 20.6996 12.2896 19.78% -6.26% 47-24% e2.10%-91#.07% 46.8895 1.60% Chart 1. Mortgage purchase applications declined as rates rose 200 1510 11E10 170 160 ---4,e._ mvby. to.., .ppl a (or P...c+.Arm (15) -^en.,.,4.113ew,/r 30-v, 111.119.1106 .sea (rail 11 17 13 14 Source, MBA. FRB, Haver Anorytrc>t. Dpursche Bank F7esaoecr, 5.2 4.8 4.4 4-0 3-6 3.2 38.00% 36.00% 34.00% 32.00% 30.00% • New Construction Permits - Fiscal Year - Over -Year (Source: Deschutes County COD) FY 11/12 Comparison 32.24% FY 12/13 Comparison 36.45% 1 1600 1400 1200 1000 F100 600 400 -New Home Sales, in thousands (LEIS) """"" Exlstlne Home Sales, in thousands (RHS) 200 555 Acf'v51c>'' S� o`� C� 5� s' :yam 4 - S Tr-4- Fp O� .iyo ScC �� 4- 'el" Deutsche Bank, Business Insider, data from Bloomberg Trrnd rlsionT 3f - Published May 2014' Location: Deschutes Co.nty Property Types. Al Reseental Prop - 40 Property 51an:srs • :u. Lot Sces Pnee RasBe. $3 - No L-0 SOFT Range: 0 • yo ,.rr 44116; i7 • No L.m:r Year 8ud1: 0 - No 4m1 Number of Homes For Sak vs. Sold vs. Fended (Feb. 2013 - Apr. 20141 Bedrooms: 0 - 04o _ M. 7000 6500 6000 5500 5000 tit 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 Number of Homes 2400•- 2200 2000 - 1800 -- 1600- 1400 -- 1200 - 1000 - 800 - 600 - 400 200--I 0 1417 1324 1564 1=ar Sala - Sdd ^-+^• Ptcr arc 1 4868 2'13 31.3 413 5'13 6 2158 2324 2278 990 1794 1612 1723 734 601 155T 3 7/13 &13 4713 013 1)r13 i213 P^L ?' 4 3'14 coy'-5 rer,a'yra51'r4. rC 4 C24110 Pre. *Oh /e 4,8fd1 ei. $i*.141NIN11//8.rip [wars Saoe0tlY � Or.14 Chirp r Apr. % /yr.13 �Fri %bhr. 54 Fes. gYly.�CAAr.11 13 •,, 202 034 45X 1612 l5j4 L 17% 1435 N.4i9. 376 3181 2191G306 381 1 333 334 -03%V. :46 4e7 1605 473 \ ens 432 21%ae 0412 413 303 4113 5113 e113 90 803 4483 1W3 11713 013 1114 b/4 S14 4714 Rr;le 13)4 1417 1561 1735 1I 2424 215E 33)8 1444 1331 1723 1811 1597 1714 1812 3149349ry 440 98 61ti 721 875 728 p8 516 45i 324 243 438 413 648 666 Shc 310 381 331 470 02 486 531 440 413 3N 343 217 295 318 3p6 Penile/ 372 424 473 483 443 581 432 415 3A 204 291 355 3?5 487 705 Moms aMer1ry(CNsel Sales) 5.1 3.9 41 36 31 42 43 4.7 4A 5.1 5.1 7.4 SA 5.5 46 limas of Ympriory(Perlded SON 3.6 33 33 38 42 4 5 5 52 8.1 82 45 4.9 37 36 Arsomhon babe posed Sales)% 19.6 25.5 X.4 276 25.8 73 232 212 21 19.5 167 116 17.6 183 21.9 Absarprin it* fended Saks) 4 22.1 79 302 26.1 23.7 249 79 87 193 10.4 12.1 222 3/4 260 27.9 Pon Ptah Prat 348 407 411 410 401 4313 428 420 433 417 418 420 429 430 418 84.3431R123 242 274 279 335 290 303 284 2961 284 3)7 306 310 272 2Y1 245 So. S41Ft Pm, 132 10 144 144 01 154 352 155J 155 157 153 LS8 148 158 154 Snle4gt01 % 97 96 88 98 08 0 9e eel 98 07 97 97 98 A9 e6 911809aV 13R.r 01 95 ea re 97 15 861 oe1 96 94 83 94 95 95 95 8ayaml Orin 171 147 130 135 136 114 114: 12 •r5 1 ,tE 148 136 138 144 e1299 200 219 235 239 235i 251i 2391 242 236 255 248 2481 235 245. Nqm. aR NANO War Mil. bawl old=area* 41Men] 1rM1Lfl N ep4; V444ecartCake or 4La-pi44:44re:e•4a.'�,fe`�Y 34.:'P47?4 Nw=.kcr Tr In29oaatepaat Inwow/ 444 4pprb MPAty. CO2 .Tarrectyh Arno. r mnvL:.•J•1xwkt1a14a estO aet.6i4r 74 "avc rmslm 70!3 C-e1e eV +t 742.14a i'resente. to Bo.r. .f •mmi i• •r. • . 2014 Vision Statement C!? (. V bA Rs 0 O C •� O V E v cra 7-4 COCU PA.� O (i) L) cn cU Otap cu CA cu O XCU o"--4 CU o • 1'4 -E w Mission Statement cu °' 4_4 TU co .E zu/ � � � V V 4u ',1,) 7:6 .7.14 c„. cu U CJ] cuz v) V MI o (/) o � � o c� recordation. < � � . \ \ � \ & County Clerk Election Supervisor Elections Customer Service Clerk Recording Supervisor Archive Customer Service Clerk Recording Customer Service Clerk Recording Customer Service Clerk Recording Customer Service Clerk 15 Beckey Nelson Recording Customer Service Clerk Nancy Blankenship Barb Hagen Meiodie Kirk Jeff Sageser Susan Bourdage Shirley Boone E 0 @ (5 E m 0_ Tracy Moore N N c _0 4J U W • • Election Administration • Voter Registration to c 0 U Qa cc • • Recording of Real Property Documents C 0 ca L 4--+ 0 on a) cc 0 LE cn 'a-) 4-,C L co U 4J (n N E O 0 CZ N tn v U J Q1 fa 'L L. (0 2 on .5 1d) Microfilming & Digitizing Records • Archive & Records Center (1) C 0 ;J ca U a. 0 (/7 0 Q. v) cn Ca (J) D i 0 4- C CU Q 0.0 V) (1) W 0 0 I- CL • • Board of Property Tax Appeals Finders Keepers • Business Licenses • U CU • cn CU v) G1 C O Q ✓ 0 O .O I 0_ i al 17 W U W • VI in 47 O . ▪ a° L •L cn C CU CD . 470 a-+ w c �i- LA To O w ru +• 0) E 1 0 County Customer V) ateJ U O 0) +-+ 0 E 0 o_ CO 4J 0 0 N 42 0) U Q) 0 services OJ w a U cu L v E 0 r� V mote Deschutes Coun CO +-+ 0 N ro cu 7• ro U N 0 c N Q) 00 O S CO ca CC C U a) 4- a) C 0 d N al ro U_ v ro a & a s vis o fa C v O ro 0. in u_ 0 C C 0 2 A a. EIS;a?m- 0 0 CY b C b C © O 0 CS 6 A O a r r 0 fl a co } 0 V w 2 a blic services Objective #5: Ensure accurate, secure and 7- rCf c in 0 c a c ro v a -0 v -0 00 U U1 N 0 C1 0 O O_ N ra 0 4- 0 Q) fQ ^c W U v a ro L v ro v L a r0 on _c (J 0 t_ 0 co LE v co O ro O 0 4- 0 0 CU bA a) � ▪ v • rro U a a a ZizCZ 'FY 2010 included voter confirmation cards Five Year Outlook '' \ • Oregon Centralized Voter Registration • Increase automation • Sorter connectivity/integration • Developing technologies to improve efficiencies • Online development • Cross -state voter registration (ERIC) • New tabulation equipment • Review business practices to increase efficiencies and security • OCVR Maintenance • Postage • Toursfor groups and individuals • County College • Observer training for parties • eRecording (paperless recording) • Microfilm and its future • Records Management Systems • OCR application • Microfilm (Permanent Record) . . . / u • Equipment upgrades • Ongoing process review • Increased costs • Community awareness • Technology Advances E > co >-• b .' 0 0 c s u Election Administration Voter Registration Recording of Real Property Documents Microfilming & Digitizing Records } Y • Email storage & retention solution • Migration and availability of 99 years of Commissioners' Journals • Protection of server — tools to evaluate • New normal — refinancing revenues not expected in foreseeable future • Since FY 2000 contributed $9.5 million to GE; 1 year required $32,675 in GF funding (see last slide) • Digitizing records - agreement with Family Search • Other records • Privacy issues • Plat map restoration • Secretary of State vendor • Plan drafted • Update plan and test• • Retirements: retaining knowledge and skill base • Business practices • Office reconfigurations 111 Five Year Outlook \\� \ • Revenues • Building online resources for customers \ • Preservation • Planning for the unexpected • Ongoing process review \ C : co _1 iiil Business Continuity Planning All Services m N N o n 00 rn n rn m1 krCA o o N N N M 00 CT) O O O (NJ rn r 1 r-i -1 o 0 0 0 0 0 N NNNN N U U� LL LL u • . • • • • N 00 CO dr U N m r N 0 `-' Ln oo CT) N m oo rl Ln • 0 0 0 o a o o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N LLL�U�UUL • • . • • . • • a t of A 0 ia ma C la O (Lj 2 e (0 M r N M O N N (a OD N M 0 O tti 0 0 r r M O N O r 0) 0 M (0 M 0) u) O) N M N O u] M(0 O O(0 .- C-M 0) OD r O (n R N0 M OO D) :~ M O O O r r p r D) 0 O) W N m 2012 I O0 O r 0 004f) if) 0 N r (4) (D OD N M M N O OD OD N M O 0 M O M t~ O O W N CO r r OD 0 0 0 0 o 0) o a) r O) ([) W N r o N Nr• t+ u] M N a0 N 0 OD V 0 _ N N N O m M O O cn c0 r` c0 0) r _ C•1 C0rroroa)o0omai(Dcci r r .- OD N 1 ) O O N (O C v N M r m N m N N r (f) ON) 1- (() (D W (MD � W (NO 'd' 0) tv a) Q) a) O O O O O OO co r r r r t~ 0 '? 2009 r OD n N M t• r 0 OD V M 0 ((7 W r- r M N 1M+ O (~() N (0 0) n aD 0 O r r 0 0 O 06 M A (0 (D v. o GrD O N N O M (V d' O N M aD (p (0 N - N 7 O N C Or 'Q' r (O U t O O r N (') Oi C7 N r a) 141,700 I r~ p b N OD O M OD V N N u) (0 O M M m t` d-M (D O O M M 0 0. u) V �' m m f+ M (D M r v v (O (O (O (O M' N O 0) Oi N N tti w O N o 0 M 0) a) u0) r� m 0) i•) o m m .-- r 0 M N M M N CD O M N V V� (0 ^ OD (D (D c N r ti O (O r N p 6 N 0 (p M0 O 0)) N 07 ,CN P 0 (D a0 0 O 0 0 0 .,t (D r C-N-OD o O N N a (f) 0 0 4- 4) c5 r r (0 M c+1 (O O( N OD m 0) I+ 0 M fv (D N M (() m V OO 0) 4) O O (n 0 0 M N N V M tt M (') N r CD ' N (9 o N.-COOr()NNNNmQM M r,tt- V N (D OD r• (f) N OD CO. N(0 O r CO. 0(0 v- r (D N OD O O N t` 0N u] a0 N V O 0 0 M a M ((0 (n N r � M N 40 Oi co aD O r r N N r r m 0 OD O N 0 (0 (D ( O N (0 M O M (D0 0 0) M N r M 0) 0) M r M OD O O r r m 0 OD OD r r r r r O C. N p p 0 N a0 O V,- 4" N 0 0 O 0 M (Oc) V M M O OD r M O ti (O 0) r~ tv m O O O O r O O M t- r r r r 'M^` M M m O) m tM+ 40 M (0 M 4 (D 4 (OD 0 0 N (D O? O 0) O r M (D V, V r (O m OD m .--- O r o a) a) aD ti O M as 0 mr-605c r (n V r r� M M v M (D m m (D N m m (0 N r O M C 4 M ry m CS M aD m r o m N (DOoom(DrODv r r O ti O) a) r 0 O r (•') M 0 0 (f) m tv O O N O (D N 40 M P 40 N (O M r (n N R N M R O N (0 u? r r- m D) 0) m 0 m r r` o n (C m 0 0 v 0 O J O) a 0 n o- 2 Q 2 n n Q M QU z C a 0 } EXHIBIT "B" co u Fri } 6 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ RESERVE FUNDS ONR o o. PV rio } ,\) i REVENUE REQUIREMENTS WASTE FLOWS (Tans) /$MW }\ ## 9 0 rj N cc 4 C.; z Zi 7 • • re o o 73% of Total 19% of Total 27% of total if) cso x—i 71-I co (NI r-- c\i cS 4 4 <5 oc5 .sf) %-ca N. Li.) CY) CY) Cr\ CD rl cow 1111-1 o c-.1 cri' Ni r-- 1..6s (-6' H cr NI c\I rt.) \---1 Cll cu 4—) cA ct 4—) 4— .4—) 0 b.0 ;--• , 0 Z CU 0 0 ' Z Z CA < * • * $ Total Tons Total Transfer t N CO O N CO O O N 4 oo ri co aU ti. $1,195,397.00 Northwest it 0 CU 1/4.0 CrN r—I cNi UN U 0 Ct i CO L N. CD 0 CD „i .? 1 a) 1 na co oo NI r--- v) t---: tr5" Lri .c5. cu 4 O a) a) C C O Ni `O N N rl $1,195,397.00 Scenario 3 - Combine Scenarios 1 and 2, VI 0 N O N +a n 0 0 ct oas 0 v W ►� • Equipment Operator • Landfill Attendant $28.00 per day oo N co 00 oo • $150,556.16 Combined Changes • • Open Sunday & Expanded Hours at Knott & Negus only e 4