Loading...
2014-386-Minutes for Meeting June 16,2014 Recorded 7/24/2014 DESCHUTES NANCY BLANKENSHIP,�COUNTY CLERKS CJ X014.386 COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 07/24/2014 08'03'56 AM II1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIu II III 2 14-388 S �vTE �U O Z ADeschutes County Board of Commissioners '� 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, JUNE 16, 2014 Commissioners'Hearing Room-Administration Building- 1300 NW Wall St.,Bend Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Dave Doyle, County Counsel; Nick Lelack and Peter Gutowsky, Community Development; and about a dozen other citizens. Chair Baney opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT William Kuhn of Sizemore Road said his property is about four miles from the recent wildfire, and he wanted to talk about wildfires, weeds and other things. Several neighbors have been working with BLM to help the wildlife habitat, Tumalo Wildlife Corridor, with some authority to put up signs, close roads and put up kiosks to help educate the public. On April 26 they were clearing fire fuels from BLM land and putting some of the vegetation across trails used by motorcycles. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 1of12 Just before the wildfires, he was with people from the Department of Agriculture and some students seeking some rare vegetation. They found some of it. He was out pulling cheat grass the day of the fires. He has collected a lot of it. They don't have a joint ownership agreement in his subdivision. He has been trying to get this into place for 17 years. He sent certified letters to the other party with no result. He has appealed but can't sell his property until there is an agreement. "You guys" have let this go on for years. While the fire was raging, he realized he can't get permits to fix certain things on his property because `you guys' won't do your job. He did not cause this situation and it is not his fault. The others can't get permits either, but they don't even live there. If his house had burned down, at least he would have gotten some money out of it. Chair Baney observed they are aware that there is a long history on this issue. Dave Doyle agreed to review the information and meet with Mr. Kuhn. 3. Before the Board was Consideration of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-332, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Household and Conditionally Exempt Generator Hazardous Waste Management Program. Timm Schimke gave an overview of the item. The scope of work also includes holding two satellite collection events — one is Sisters and one in La Pine. There was an event in Redmond last year. The cost went up but is within the normal range for past years, with the extra events. DEBONE Move Chair signature of Document No. 2014-332. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 4. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of the Adoption of Document No. 2014-333, the Community Development Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2014-15. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 2 of 12 Chair Baney opened the hearing at this time. There was no opening statement necessary since it is not a land use decision. Nick Lelack gave an overview of the Plan. LCDC has to be able to work with the County on some amendments, in particular Haner Park and similar developments, but LCDC has to take the lead. Some of this also has to do with managing river flows, which is overseen by the State Water Resources Department. This project is being addressed by various groups handling river issues that are actively pursuing change at the State level. William Kuhn testified that he proposed a text amendment in 2003 regarding unfulfilled obligations of a prior issue of a conditional use. That specific text amendment is at the bottom of page 3 on the 73-page document. He is grateful it is on the agenda for this coming year, but wanted to encourage the Board to raise the level of this. It was supposed to be done this past year but wasn't. He wants more commitment on the County's part. He also has a comment regarding enforcement of County Ordinances, in particular the decision to not use enforcement on someone in Sisters who wants to host weddings. He has been doing this inside but wants to build a building for this. He knowingly entered into contracts to do something that he knew was not legal or not acceptable, and the Board was not willing to tell him he should not be doing this. He either has the right or he doesn't. If it was him, he'd get signatures on a petition from neighbors and bring the community in. Chair Baney stated that this was mis-reported in the media. They will not sit outside his property and wait for an infraction, but will respond to complaints. No individual is on abeyance if they are subject to Code enforcement. Paul Lipscomb lives in Cloverdale and wants to support the Code enforcement conditions of the work plan, and in particular the inclusion of the text amendment regarding pending Code violations. The rule of law is important to maintain public confidence in equal application. He was pleased that they are using volunteers to do some surveying on violations, in particular around mobile home parks. Apparently there are many mobile home spaces developed without planning or septic approval. He suggested something should be done about this. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 3 of 12 It seems to be not too onerous to survey other jurisdictions to see if they have provisions or processes in place if someone wants to expand a current use, and certify they are in compliance with requirements. It would not be up to the County to police this, but it needs to be shown they are in compliance. If there is opposition, it will be easier to determine the level of the problem. If there are going to be Code provisions, they need to follow them and be in compliance. It should be a simple matter and a certification should be adequate. It is interesting to note that a mobile home park has asked to be allowed to expand, but it would be good to know if that operator is in compliance at this time. The same kind of analysis would be appropriate in other situations. He said thanks for the important work and he is proud of the work the Planning Division is doing. Andy Hyde asked for removal of this requirement. It will penalize homeowners. This is another layer of bureaucracy if there is a clear violation of a Code. Most get resolved voluntarily and the homeowner should not have to get a permit, for example, a water heater. He feels this wording should be removed and to continue with the enforcement in place. The County would be checking for compliance already. He supports the rest of the recommendations. Paul Dewey for Central Oregon Landwatch said that this is a good record of what is being done by the County, which is huge. On the Bend UGB, he would like to encourage staff to work with the City, and the County previously gave the City great advice that was not followed. They have new leadership now and he thinks staff would be heard this time around. The City needs the help. Regarding the Goal 11 exception for South County, it belongs with DEQ to initiate, rather than the County, and let DEQ take the lead. At the bottom of page 3, pending code violations, he urged them to do so. Other counties have. It is not redundant. He knows Code enforcement resources are stretched and it is not a burden for people to show they are compliant with the law before getting other approvals. A number of times important Code violations have occurred and the neighbors and County don't have resources to pursue it. Other counties have done this for a long time. It is a basic rule. The tracking system on the top of Page 4 is important since land use regulations are becoming more complex. He would like this applied to agricultural lands events as well, with the cumulative effect of these to stay informed. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday,June 16, 2014 Page 4 of 12 On page 5, exploring storm water management practices, this is vitally important. The City of Bend decided against treatment of stormwater and started an injection system instead. It is better not in the river, but originally the City was to treat stormwater, but now will inject it. This may not be an appropriate remedy. It is important to know what is being injected into the groundwater. Regarding review of surface mining codes and updating inventory, especially Latham, these really need updating. As development has grown around them or the sites have evolved, more information on dealing with them is needed. Item #22, firewise standards for destination resorts, might need to be moved up. The County went through an extensive planning process for Community Fire Plans. They were adopted into the Comp Plan by reference. These are refreshed regularly. Mr. Dewey said they need to be in the Plan and not reference material. They need to be enforced. A lot of effort went into these plans and they belong in the Comp Plan. Bill Robie, representing the Central Oregon Association of Realtors, supports the work plan with one exception. They have a good working relationship with County staff. There are a lot of big, important projects. In that vein, the text amendment that really should be minor or removed is a solution is search of a problem. Staff talked about Code enforcement and about 1% of problems result in a fine. The inclusion of this should not be a priority. It might be used to exacerbate issues between neighbors. Often Code violations happen because someone is not aware of it. Tony Aceti said staff is doing a great job. He is involved and attends a lot of meetings, and there is a lot of expertise at all levels. He is concerned about the non-resource type land zoning timeline. There has been community input. He asked if this will take years to implement. If there is a big influx of people wanting to be involved, he wants to be part of the stakeholder input on this. The Deschutes Junction master plan needs to stay on top, since it has been in the works for more than four years. He is a stakeholder and wants to share input. There are changes of circumstances in that area, commercial and industrial uses already in place so an expansion of those is appropriate, and no real farming is happening there. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 5of12 He noted that in his situation, 80% of the soils he has is class 7 or 8. He has water rights that have not been used for 15 years. Transportation changes affected the land as well. If this becomes part of a master plan, there are lands around there that have a higher and better use than agriculture. This property does not fit the overall classifications. He asked if there will be a frontage road. Chair Baney said that ODOT would take the lead on this. He wants to be part of a stakeholder and community for input. It conies down to how they look at open space. When LCDC was doing the "Big Look', they indicated there is a lot of open space in Deschutes County. Mr. Aceti was told that someone can designate their land as open space, but mostly this has to do with public lands. Hindering someone from doing more than having open space is not appropriate. He does not think someone should be convicted of a violation before the process is done. He wants to be an active part of the resource lands conversation, and the Deschutes Junction master plan discussion. Commissioner Unger is comfortable with the plan as presented. The Planning Commission is supportive. He understands the destination resort part is applicant driven. Regarding Code enforcement, there are good discussions and they are on the right track. Concerning Haner Park, they are being asked to created conditions that the County can't institute. They can work with the Water Resources people and others, but can't make direct changes. Commissioner DeBone stated that a Goal 11 exception was mentioned, and the County will be a partner. The DEQ steering committee suggested the County be involved in coordination with the DEQ. The text amendment regarding permits was interesting. It may or may not be a big issue requiring a lot of staff time. He is not interested in changing the proposed plan at this point. He thanked all for the work on this. It is a big, rolling project with a lot of input. Chair Baney feels this will clarify what they are going to invest in. The economic downturn helped them get more focused on this. She asked about the Bend UGB issue. The County is assisting the City as needed and when requested. Mr. Lelack said they are committed to helping the City, and they have a good consultant team now. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 6 of 12 Chair Baney said the County needs to know what they can take the lead on; the Goal 11 exception in particular. Mr. Lelack said this is a partnership and the DEQ has to do the heavy lifting on this. The County is assembling the application but DEQ will be on it, and DLCD is also involved in justifying the Goal 11 exception. DEQ and the County will be co-applicants. Firewise communities, #22, is not what is being done today, but this is added in perpetuity. All need to be firewise communities going forward. She asked if this should be added into Code. Peter Gutowsky stated that rural residential subdivisions don't require firewise standards. They have done some retroactively, the historic resorts, but subdivision code does not include this. Chair Baney stated that Ed Keith does work with communities on this. Developers want to do it right but need to know it is available to them. Mr. Gutowsky stated that Brooks Resources has expressed an interest in a development west of Bend, and were recommended to contact Ed Keith. Through Project Wildfire, they have a few tools to make these developments resilient. His understanding of the CWPP is that this County is one of the few that has this in place throughout. It deals predominately with defensible space, sweat equity programs and other processes. It allows the Forest Service and BLM to expedite this process on public lands. Regarding land use, this is put together by other agencies as well and there are no specific standards for new developments. It is important that it is referenced. Chair Baney said that the Code is the law, and it would be very hard to marry this up if there are no specific well-defined rules for all. Mr. Gutowsky said the CWPPs get updated on a regular basis as some get treated and others rise to the top. Commissioner Unger stated that the changes are best being referenced so they don't have to revise the Comp Plan for every change that comes along. Chair Baney supports this being a reference document. Chair Baney is concerned about the item on page 3, prohibiting issuance of a permit if there is an existing violation. She wondered how many would be affected, and sees Code as dealing with the many rather than the few. She proposed this being removed for a more robust discussion. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 7 of 12 Mr. Anderson clarified that this item would initiate a discussion and. presupposed that it would be adopted. If the County initiates an amendment, there could be changes. Chair Baney feels that a text amendment uses a lot of resources. They have to balance the few and the many, and she does not understand how large this issue is. Other issues perhaps need more attention. Mr. Lelack said it would be a significant issue for a very few properties. Commissioner DeBone said this is a wide-open discussion and does not want to lock this down to use it against someone unless it is clear. He would consider removing it for more discussion. Chair Baney stated she does not know how many permits are issued if someone is already in Code enforcement. Perhaps there is another option than a text amendment. Commissioner Unger feels they need to put this to bed so they won't have to grapple with it forever. Mr. Lelack said that regarding destination resort mapping amendments and this amendment, they could slide this to table 2. They will hit the 30-month mark for destination resort mapping soon. An applicant can then apply to initiate changes for this. Chair Baney said she would like more discussion regarding the permit issue. It could be added at another time if appropriate. She wants data on how many properties it might involve and how other counties handle this. Commissioner Unger said they can't take it off the work plan and expect work to be done on it. Mr. Lelack said this will be a part of the Code Enforcement Policy update in August as well. Chair Baney says it states `initiate text amendment' and she feels it should be worded differently. Mr. Gutowsky asked about the destination resort mapping changes. They can remove or hear from someone who wants to add. Any amendment would be borne by the applicant. The Board agreed. The hearing was closed. UNGER: Move approval of the 2014-15 work plan with the minor changes, as discussed. DEBONE:: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 8 of 12 DEBONE: Move approval with the exception of the minutes, which have not yet been reviewed. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Consent Agenda Items 5. Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-354, Amending an Intergovernmental Agreement, extending Measure 57 Funding for Adult Parole & Probation 6. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-242, a Lease to Oregon State University for Office Space in the South County Services Building 7. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-059, Transferring Appropriations in the Sheriffs Office Fund 8. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-081, Transferring Appropriations within the Risk Management Fund. 9. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-082, Transferring Appropriations within the Transient Room Tax Funds 10. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-083, Transferring Appropriations within the Solid Waste Fund 11. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-084, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Grant Projects Department 12. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-085, Transferring Appropriations within the Community Development Fund 13. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-086, Transferring Appropriations within the RV Park Fund 14. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-087, Transferring Appropriations within the Annual County Fair Fund 15. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-088, Transferring Appropriations within the Board of County Commissioners Fund 16. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-089, Transferring Appropriations within the Victims Assistance Fund Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 9 of 12 17. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-090, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Property Management 18. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-091, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Non-Departmental 19. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-093, Transferring Appropriations within the Natural Resources Fund 20. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-094, Transferring Appropriations within the Adult Parole & Probation Fund 21. Board. Signature of Resolution No. 2014-095, Transferring Appropriations within the Administration Fund 22. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-096, Transferring Appropriations within the Legal Counsel Fund 23. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-097, Transferring Appropriations within the Law Library Fund 24. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-098, Transferring Appropriations within the Fair and Expo Center Fund 25. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-099, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Tax Office 26. Approval of Minutes: • Business Meeting of May 19 and June 4, 2014 • Work Sessions of May 19, June 2 and 4, 2014 • Budget Meetings of May 27, 28, 29 and 30, 2014. CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE BLACK BUTTE RANCH COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 27. Before the Board was Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014.080, Transferring Appropriations within the Black Butte Ranch County Service District Fund. DEBONE: Move approval. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 10 of 12 CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 28. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District in the Amount of $17,899.99 (two weeks). DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 29. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District in the Amount of$7,177.78 (two weeks). DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. RECONVENED AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 30. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County in the Amount of$2,468,853.55 (two weeks). DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 11 of 12 31. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA None were offered. Being no other items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 11:25 a.m. DATED this / Day of 2014 for the Deschutes County Board of Commission s. Tammy Barley, Chair ad(0120A'L--- Anthony DeBone, Vice Chair ATTEST: OaNt- Alan Unger, Commissioner Recording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 12 of 12 G d z� BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest Date // Name U a I l i a '� Address Phone #s E-mail address nIn Favor - Neutral/Undecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes No vi-Es ; BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING - "` REQUEST TO SPEAK � Agenda Item of Interest ` Date z��6 Name WI..., Address Phone #s E-mail address In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes No �01-ES �O w GZ n/ "{ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest Date Name A /t C6 Ad) Address J r L' L (--;-vc t.-7>-(...5 Phone #s �5 `— � / - E-mail address_ /; �. S c... - ( (-�//i Favor [ Neutral/Undecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes ,)PI % 0 ,,,, ‘4" 7. •eilt I BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK-4-1---- Agenda It T of Interest L/ Date C/1(10 Name NI 9 Address S 4 <) i Air 'i .. ( Phone #s E-mail address In Favor ri Neutral/Undecided APP osed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes iNo 0 ro0 , GZ Nefec BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest w q r k i 14,1 Date 4)44. Name su1 adWc , Crn1-! 1 6 r°50y1_ Ls 4 wc.�C14 Address 60 S 9Q46( S10 1-7 ',136 4,( Q c `779-2 Phone #s 5/1(- '-1A- S//6S E-mail address 10 4.6 w d y c 104 ,/d<.G 17 a, C4 rrt In Favor NeutraIIUndecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? n Yes No __ _ U BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest 4)6(V- q►•\ Date 6)16 0 Name 1 cc'oL Address 7%1 5 A) Q look VAN C 1r ()PA d_ 0 6� 1D Phone #s 5y •Q -'1')14 E-mail address 11 I G C,(i1)4►1 In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes No U"r�TE` �G BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest _ Date Name ;-1',n f Address ,?(e 3 5 yZ /9/ 7 f ? ? / Phone#s /0/,q �/ E-mail address In Favor — Neutral/Undecided [ Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? j Yes No 1 cq E •1) 0 %:)., u Lumv Q .su, 4,‹ a. CU Ct (, .(7) E O Ct E O U O lD O cu 0 co _c a) -o +-• _c a CD ID L.. ((J 1 0 U 2 U ro Q FL -0 a) O co = �C cn a o 0 0 c co a o a a4 o 0. o — 0 a 0 o a .-§ u - ° co C CD = = a a •- cn 0 0 s- ra Q. .� a) +a �V = - O = a) O •U Q Cl) -o co a E -oQ s_ _c C o +-• co 0 o C o E a c cn o 17°)w co co u a oili o a a a • > 0 0■ C4 0 be to -0 ,v -0 0 WU 4-2 0 = 0 L o Li) CL CO 0_ m O 0 -c -15 a — , ' , oh / ■■,''■ , 5 ,11,„:,, (3:3),,,it' k\tIsi,,,, {„,,,o r • q" " .,,0 :. r , 6- W t 111" .M.r �,� °' ':,.�ffiA: d. „ ›.4 a ..o. ,.,:t1 6 d. :� are ? 124 Ce .'1 1:a '''''- ' ` ,4 4, ., '::,' i 0 $ v ? CS r itt< a t ' l''}i, , :,--4..;:,,, ,i ,c ,, ,,,. ,,,,,:,, 5,t, A, , fkweMrl9 ® .� q �,. q .:.. py'A m§ "� '� e,+e t!1 C}' «�+1 ,,,,,t ,.... ., ,, ,,,,,,,.., %›... 1 ' • ', 1,,:?,,i, , - 4..i . , ,, ,... ... .4, . ,...., , , = ,...., ,7,T,to Zu -4* -----. '. '1 ' - 0 1--I V H J wY 03 W z _W tn (D ,._ V) W o OA c/f u) = — ”— W �n cu .1-• C p4 -cs I ezt _ c E u tn _— aMI CL 1::r.13.4 c z r' 13)0 ca o c� E_ 0• - U LLII Q as O ° a O CO CO 0 a a o� m • C) • O 7 In V NJ OA U L o too LI- _ U 'Z5 co ID V v) Q U O O U U ro o au o cn O cn L L_E Z 0_ 4 —� j •� o = U 0 Q� o 0 4) U J Q i 2 4 _ U Qco CD 0 U I:4 -i-) m U U a CD CD m PA ci) • • . • . i C Cm) ca L CO III -0 CU LL CL C z= E _ ca C n3 O i 5 n 0.) CU U a ..c .. C V) CD _ W C13 CL 0.0 0.) C CU CU CO EI.4 bis Tu U 3 W C i Vf in CD _C 13.0 3 4_, CO 4-• cn CZ .0 +.� U u >"' 4-co Cl) �E of u w _vi in CU �+ ° .—V+ E = cu Q Li o p_ ° � a 0 LI E a) cu o a t° u 0) L..) 0 U - �1A W 0 3 s2 c is•11 r) U co 0 CL 0 lif■ Vf = Ce • (XI • • • i,:rrtg4.*,d3 U fa U 0 7 co -0 U fa CA 4- C C.) a 0 vi o N9 v) W cn co z > s [—I O' O O � ♦ i z V O 0 tn 0 .I— .F., 0 CU s U CC co °� a '7) °Zi . CO i. fa CU V) 4a Cii W U i Z E 0 cu c - O V �_ ca el, `88 c•� .i = (ini C E - W Cano) al WI O•— O O •> U = O V •ca r�o CL ca 2 E Q W aCI • • • cII ��AA C / 5 CO VI C in a) L L U C -D a) cn 4-1 a Z a) CL U U as ca 13-4 .., a 0 a p6 U GL 0 W Q 0 0 4-1 E a4 0 E 141 U cli c� a u CU V1 Q � V O � � O W Q O .� ._ . D O. p7 ; v V Q Li) v) a s s V H u i c L CU g Cfl a . +-+CL p 0 1=1 CU • • L Y p ��€, '€tea o 1. 1,, 'i 1...-kiii, i?•. - , , i Z a) A 1 co t b.0 ,s �1, 0=4 11) O ^ ?{ vi) A.,r-- ,.--° -t-:,-:4-,1 '. .".,,',.. Allio1/4#t -°""""--''' . ' C4 . 0 CI Ca • J - Ca LT-ii eL U C CO .— ,,,,tc,,,d.,.:,-,t,,,,,,..":**,,,,,„..:,:,,,‘,.;''' . ,..,,t7,,..'I.:2;01:',11/,g .01— txo d:, "'°A,. ro I. c:c .. . , *., „ . , . .. , . . .. . , .. .. , ,,„ . . ... .. . . . . . . ... . ... .. . . .CI.) 2 • 41 • ,,',,i,,,ilt q ',,'9 - '' 0 E �.1,.� pI9 • ORS a 0 '. �� p re,,gxy q4�k � 'S „ FP Z til n (.3 .. A� E"4. 3' ,P i �4 �n ffi 17 qq'qq '' 1:::L., „, ll nE q d� 4 �^' i .2 e,S �3�$, M'� Y. ti,, \d F' 1:4 a V/ ', ":/•q•"•• r Pi _ Ia,ia E . O ':F�y aka"k & 1 y 0 g■ H c 'ai«k9 p € IF€' d 4 p€' 1•!t '+ ,i`�'k 9{ k•.:"(y•- d., n'', . `V ::01',: ''' a.Imml� 9 C 9 " t�&tidk.. E 2E g . b ! � qqql qq ' ' ' '' t * ''' ‘111 :.'t' 2 Eno ,E, P S hyyy W di$ I 0 ¢ S ' ! It .6,,," ! ' i i I4 :- .� 1 4 i. U • O y S. CL U 5. 0 r Z ' l o. 5 V `- •OA ■i■ +�.+ � CO (21mil a) 06 -o VI) 5. a� .— a) C tn o .� 0 .- cn •� u, co T3 •— c CL CO CD .. C) E u m E Q c 0 13 H C — CO ct a. C o .. •� CL Lt i '0 O. +0 c T3 t.A O (1 O �n i_ ft; • 00 cc co Q 2 I . Q 2 • d , tl • .. ,�i u � .V�' y � 5'�w`jf % $ � dRd'n, : �� 1d � � .,a Wray•'„ ut 5 Ery' x'per ,j 4�d •, « w ''' i : . - . , ..-:-.,..:.;.,„t. ' ' '''' irt*fi!rf.''.11%/4 . ' liii r:I-4 E >, 4.• 0 111(24 w .a 0 a Lo — O 0 ra . "I. . — u(/) l 03 W •o El."4 •CI) I— • -U 0 O g0... (13 i V a V p a) CMIli-- 0 • Z. • • i 4.•1 0) CO 13 = V/ o •_ Cl) u a E E co U co 0 can V a co w♦ 4 > c 4-' O L O co a4 to to 0 4.+ co 2 0-4 ci t Q a 0 0 8 W J w I- CZ 701 Z RI V =I. O n r:4 O o - 114 •.1..1.+ CO •-Q U — O O a co ) C -CS C+ > • • p ta) .— 3 0 C _co 12.p pp O `~ .0 Q. L •0 C i dA CD +1 C o O E c .v ^ U F� a9 i D W co u <4 ?,- a LE 5 I 2 I= (%" C.) ❑ • • a) M TS al M e uaP '^ L 1 c .— 4 cu L O .11 a LL 1:3 L VI CU S CU U CD MI 101— 0 42-0 ' I _ •p = non O Q. 0 CP. o a aJ C 0 w w °' I L L. 0 CB O z co E o 0Z5 .o .-cu ai 'Cr O cn (1) w 0 tin u CD a) ca •— C .i..� .O Ga O L2. Q O 0 Cl) = L u fa 0 Q N W O a ' 0 ,c u al off r-i N 0 c� = au - +a c M--� cn v w •E > o co ca M G� GJ i = O cc D a w Z • • • • $"�� r ,,te�aa xs , t •� � 4 kL 1. Ix9 E /.KK Et yc E 9 4. op, ,,,,,, ,,, , :. '"E fi .yy re pr''!';;‘,.''' fi Y..3...E ....� Y yf W' 1 E .rei. "{ Y uay yt E,�, . , yr Yy+ S y, k .■ ,, ;6' d 3 p E E, EEEE' c 3 RRR ,,.'L.�S 31Q ,re.H f>^jE{4kt f ) D 1:'.E C C.a : $ i U Jy' a f A •..'d a, ® re .p•, . la • ' } R E' T dBEd . . t R ' -CI 03 'ill C. 0 �4 € P E :ia g: ey •� .A g, 't t ' V t r E O U^ V i y �P V a & '' Q :;;.. tw I- .. eI— ,/�/ �� .� t S ,fPF 'vim 1JS.ta �d O � . 0 g T V' db. �;4 y Y' ' Sew R�E ;. a u R �. sK; o (613 X CL s. b.0 0 _R-,,J4. Y E . L YaTRr byrYB '+m,+P,,. 'r,,y ,ptR q , r +� _ ar ' md "�. ,>�, 78E mK:i v E�l'� t ,fit».a u t g.e 6 ., ,? a4 O. • '�N'•i. a rani " { F» _" 4 1 Y^ t W -c T CU >ft _o O as) CU C zip if) O 1 U O '- i E O O 0 V) O _O O aA V bA O w .i -o 0 CU CU sa i CU O o = s 03 4-I V aU VJ /0 • CU) CD Q C Q co •op F-+ a C ea al. (Ts.0 ._E s cD D Qo �► +.1 4-' c - m v V CD 0 Q 4-i • • Nick Lelack From: Haner Park HOA Board <hanerparkhoa @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:31 AM To: Nick Lelack Cc: Terry Cunningham; Shaun Retz; Jerry Steiner; Rick Kay; Board Subject: FY15 Work Plan Director Lelack, Thank you for continuing to keep the Haner Park HOA informed and involved in the work of the Community Development Department. We have reviewed your proposed work plan for FY15 and offer just a few comments. There were no items in Table 1 that indicate prioritization or participation in any efforts related to the Upper Deschutes and the water flow issues. The recent grant announcement related to this work would hopefully involve the county. In Haner Park, many of our member properties are adjacent to the river and experience the negative effects of the current water management practices. The extreme winter low flows followed by summer highs are causing significant erosion, tree loss, habitat damage and fish kills. As we have improved our properties, we have been held to higher standards by the county related to the wild and scenic river. In some cases, conservation easements have been required, yet there seems to be little effort to keep it actually wild and scenic. The County should be an active and engaged partner in the efforts to moderate the flows to as close a natural condition as possible. Additionally, our members would like to see item#29 in Table 2 moved up in priority to initiate the work in FY15. We recognize this is a significant work item and that you have a very full work plan. If some initial work could start in FY15, we are prepared to support your efforts. Thank you for your work, Sarah Medary Haner Park Homeowners Association 1 Nick Lelack From: Mark Hansen <Hansen@tellatin.com> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 2:16 PM To: Nick Lelack Subject: FY15 Work Plan Director Lelack, Thank you for continuing to keep the Haner Park HOA informed and involved in the work of the Community Development Department. We have reviewed your proposed work plan for FY15 and offer just a few comments. There were no items in Table 1 that indicate prioritization or participation in any efforts related to the Upper Deschutes and the water flow issues. The recent grant announcement related to this work would hopefully involve the county. In Haner Park, many of our member properties are adjacent to the river and experience the negative effects of the current water management practices. The extreme winter low flows followed by summer highs are causing significant erosion, tree loss, habitat damage and fish kills. As we have improved our properties,we have been held to higher standards by the county related to the wild and scenic river. In some cases, conservation easements have been required,yet there seems to be little effort to keep it actually wild and scenic. The County should be an active and engaged partner in the efforts to moderate the flows to as close a natural condition as possible. Additionally,our members would like to see item#29 in Table 2 moved up in priority to initiate the work in FY15. We recognize this is a significant work item and that you have a very full work plan. If some initial work could start in FY15, we are prepared to support your efforts. Thank you for your work, Thank you, C. 51ark5!ansen Home Owner in Haner Park and Member of Haner Park HOA 1 Nick Lelack From: Carol <cyetter©q.com> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:57 PM To: Nick Lelack Subject: Haner Park Re: Community Development Department Work Plan, 2014 Dear Mr. Lelack: We would like to urge the board of commissioners to re-prioritize item 29 that has to do with rezoning Haner Park. We believe it would be in the best interest of the homeowners as well as the best interest of the county to rezone our subdivision. We have been a part of Haner Park since 1964, either as guests or home owners, and have observed first- hand the changes to the river banks by irresponsible boaters and by the dramatic shifts in water levels due to irrigation practices downriver. We homeowners are held to a higher standard by the county because of the Wild and Scenic River designation. We cannot upgrade our residences without paying higher fees for variances due to the F-2 designation. A rezoning of Haner Park would ultimately bring greater revenue to the county because the value of our properties would be increased. We hope the county, in it's collective wisdom, will see the value of prioritizing rezoning Haner Park. Thank you for consideration of our request. Sincerely, Richard and Carol Yetter 52092 Old Wickiup Road La Pine 6525 Corvallis Road Independence 1 iiYOF city of Prineville 387 NE THIRD STREET • PRINEVILLE,OREGON 97754 - r f OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Phone: (541)447-5627 FAX:(541)447-5628 EMAIL:broppe@cityofprineville.com cityofprineville.com Web Site:www.cityoforineville.com June 16,2014 \- J I r Nick Lelack Director, Community Development Department Deschutes County 117 NW Lafayette Ave Bend, Oregon 97701 Re: COID Application Pending for TA 13-4, BOCC Public Hearing July 2.2014- City of Prineville Submittal to the Record Dear Mr. Lelack: I am writing on behalf of the City of Prineville in support of Central Oregon Irrigation District's (COID or District)Juniper Ridge Project,and to respectfully encourage the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners to approve the District's recommended text amendment so Phase II of this important project can be constructed in the upcoming construction season. The City of Prineville takes water conservation seriously. We have initiated a series of actions to strengthen our water resources management and improve fish and wildlife habitat in the Crooked River. Our City is conserving water to manage our demands, developing new wells to bolster our existing supply, and collaborating with many of the irrigation districts in Central Oregon, including COID,to make all of these solutions work better. The District's Juniper Ridge Project will yield meaningful benefits, including real water conservation,renewable hydropower generation,and enhanced fisheries habitat in the Deschutes and the Crooked Rivers. We understand that COID, in collaboration with the Deschutes River Conservancy and North Unit Irrigation District, has developed a plan to transfer some of the water conserved from Juniper Ridge Phase II to North Unit. These water supplies will enable North Unit to reduce the amount of water it diverts from the Crooked River, leaving more flow instream for salmon, steelhead and recreation. The State of Oregon,the Deschutes River Conservancy, Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, and many other local, state and federal agencies, support this innovative plan. We do,too. This organization is an Equal Opportunity Provider The City of Prineville is pleased to be a part of the Deschutes and Crooked River Basins' efforts to cooperatively and creatively solve our common problems. We support COID's proposed text amendment so the District can construct this important water conservation project.On behalf of the City of Prineville, I encourage the Board of Commissioners to approve it quickly. Sincerely, Betty Roppe,Mayor / . • cc: Board of Commissioners This organization is an Equal Opportunity Provider S woo ‘Alf (:>‹, 2:1 { Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 "N, (541)(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., MONDAY, JUNE 16, 2014 Commissioners'Hearing Room-Administration Building- 1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up card(provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject of a public hearing will NOT be included in the official record of that hearing. 3. CONSIDERATION of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-332, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Household and Conditionally Exempt Generator Hazardous Waste Management Program — Timm Schimke, Solid Waste Department Suggested Action: Move Chair signature of Document No. 2014-332. 4. PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of Approval of the Adoption of Document No. 2014-333, the Community Development Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2014-15 —Nick Lelack, Community Development Suggested Actions: Open hearing, take testimony, move adoption of the 2014- 15 Community Development Work Plan. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 1 of 8 CONSENT AGENDA 5. Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-354, Amending an Intergovernmental Agreement, extending Measure 57 Funding for Adult Parole & Probation 6. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-242, a Lease to Oregon State University for Office Space in the South County Services Building 7. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-059, Transferring Appropriations in the Sheriff's Office Fund 8. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-081, Transferring Appropriations within the Risk Management Fund 9. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-082, Transferring Appropriations within the Transient Room Tax Funds 10. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-083, Transferring Appropriations within the Solid Waste Fund. 11. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-084, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Grant Projects Department 12. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-085, Transferring Appropriations within the Community Development Fund 13. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-086, Transferring Appropriations within the RV Park Fund 14. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-087, Transferring Appropriations within the Annual County Fair Fund 15. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-088, Transferring Appropriations within the Board of County Commissioners Fund 16. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-089, Transferring Appropriations within the Victims Assistance Fund 17. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-090, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Property Management 18. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-091, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Non-Departmental 19. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-093, Transferring Appropriations within the Natural Resources Fund Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 2 of 8 20. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-094, Transferring Appropriations within the Adult Parole & Probation Fund 21. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-095, Transferring Appropriations within the Administration Fund 22. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-096, Transferring Appropriations within the Legal Counsel Fund 23. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-097, Transferring Appropriations within the Law Library Fund 24. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-098, Transferring Appropriations within the Fair and Expo Center Fund 25. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-099, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Tax Office 26. Approval of Minutes: • Business Meeting of May 19 and June 4, 2014 • Work Sessions of May 19, June 2 and 4, 2014 • Budget Meetings of May 27, 28, 29 and 30, 2014 CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE BLACK BUTTE RANCH COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 27. CONSIDERATION of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-080, Transferring Appropriations within the Black Butte Ranch County Service District Fund Suggested Action: Move Board signature of Resolution No. 2014-080. CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 28. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 3 of 8 CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 29. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District RECONVENE AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 30. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County 31. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible,please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker @deschutes.org. PLEASE NOTE:At any time during this meeting,an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2)(e),real property negotiations;ORS 192.660(2)(h),litigation;ORS 192.660(2)(d),labor negotiations;ORS 192.660(2)(b),personnel issues;or other executive session items. FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note:Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners'meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting,please call 388-6572.) Monday, June 16 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session--could include executive session(s) 4:00 p.m. Mobilization Ceremony, at Bend Elks Ball Field Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 4 of 8 Wednesday, June 18 11:00 a.m. Oregon Youth Challenge Graduation—Fair/Expo, Redmond Monday, June 23 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting—includes public hearings and adoption of budgets for fiscal year 2014-15 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Tuesday, June 24 11:00 a.rn. Annual Luncheon Meeting of Board of Commissioners with the Black Butte Ranch County Service District Board—Black Butte Ranch 1:00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, June 25 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session--could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 26 8:00 a.m. 9-1-1 Director Candidate Interviews—at 9-1-1 5:30 p.m. Joint Meeting of the Board of Commissioners and Planning Commission Friday, June 27 8:00 a.m. 9-1-1 Director Candidate Interviews—at 9-1-1 Monday, June 30 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Tuesday, July 1 8:00 a.m. Sisters Chamber of Commerce Event— State of the City—Sisters 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 5 of 8 Wednesday,July 2 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) 5:30 p.m. Public Hearing on Central Oregon Irrigation District Text Amendment Thursday, July 3 8:00 a.m. Joint Meeting of Board of Commissioners with Sisters City Council, City Hall 11:00 a.m. Performance Management &Department Update—Legal Counsel Monday, July 4 Most County offices will be closed to observe Independence Day Monday, July 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Wednesday, July 9 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Monday, July 21 10:00 a.rn. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Tuesday, July 22 1:00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, July 23 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 6 of 8 Thursday,July 24 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update—Natural Resources Management —at Road Monday, July 28 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Monday, August 4 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 s.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) ( ) Tuesday, August 5 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting Wednesday, August 6 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Thursday, August 7 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update—9-1-1 County Service District Wednesday, August 13 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Monday, August 18 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 7 of 8 Wednesday, August 20 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session —could include executive session(s) Monday, August 25 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Wednesday, August 27 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Thursday,August 28 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update—Sheriff's Office, Part I Tuesday, September 2 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting 5:00 p.m. County College Presentation Wednesday, September 3 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session—could include executive session(s) Thursday, September 4 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update—Sheriff's Office, Part II Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible,please call(541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker(ci)deschutes.org. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 8 of 8