Loading...
2015-184-Minutes for Meeting April 20,2015 Recorded 5/14/2015 DESCHUTES BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERK W �0�5�184 NANCY COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 05/14/2015 08'18;58 AM I afe Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 „rdrp (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, APRIL 20, 2015 Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Tammy Baney and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; David Givans, Internal Auditor; Judith Ure, Administration; and for a portion of the meeting, Susan Ross and James Lewis, Property &Facilities; David Givans, Internal Auditor; Ashley Beatty, District Attorney's Office; Dave Doyle and Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; and ten other citizens including media representative Ted Shorack of The Bulletin. Chair DeBone opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of Grant Application. Ashley Beatty gave an overview of the application, which is for a violence against women grant. This would address some gaps in service in the County, in particular for a bilingual domestic violence investigator. The grantee is the federal Violence Against Women Association. An investigator position currently exists under the District Attorney; this would expand it to full-time. The position would be evaluated after the grant concludes, and other agencies have already indicated they are supportive. They will know about the award in June. Tom Anderson said this is not in the next proposed budget, but can be included. Advertising for these types of positions include the caveat it is grant funded. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 1 of 14 Pages BANEY: Move approval. UNGER: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. 2. Presentation/Update by Bend Metro Park & Recreation District. Scott Wallace and Don Horton gave an overview of the presentation; along with City of Bend Manager Eric King, and Sally Russell of the Bend City Council. The focus is on Mirror Pond and its future. This has been discussed for at least a decade, relating to sediment build-up and how to handle this ongoing problem. The last time it was dredged was in 1984. Various committees have been formed to deal with this situation. Bend Park & Recreation District is the largest adjacent property owner to the Pond so is heavily involved. Discussions have taken place but not much action has occurred, so the District tried to push for more activity on the process. In 2013, they approached the public for input and drew up some plans for how to handle the Pond. There are various private and public entities involved. Most want to preserve the Pond with some environmental considerations, attempting to not burden the public or any entity with an unfair amount of the cost involved. The committee has begun to answer some of the questions about a path forward. The governing bodies are on board with the concept at this point and are discussing strategies for funding. Representative Buehler has introduced HB 3283, which has a committee hearing tomorrow, in order to pursue lottery fund bonding for this process. Don Horton said that the community was split on how to handle the Pond. A designer dredge project would mean placing some sediment in parts of the pond to have more of a natural river state. About 4,000 people provided input. In general, the environmental community is supportive. The City's storm drains empty into the Pond and this should be addressed as well. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 2 of 14 Pages He referred to an oversized drawing of the Pond and the area around it. There will always be an issue with sediment being deposited. They may be able to create some public space around the powerhouse structure. Riparian restoration. can be included as well as public access to the water. They are working on a public-private partnership, and funding could come from development of a building in an urban renewal district scenario. Some properties along the river are publicly owned while others are not. HB 3283 is an economic development bill to help with this project. Funds were requested two years ago. They would like to be further along with the project but this current funding will not be available for three years, if awarded. He asked for support from the Board while they attempt to get more support from those on the City Council who are not yet behind it. Mr. King said the City was previously stopped at the dredge/no dredge part of it. There are other models to look at, including what was done in Portland. Some Bend councilors are concerned about the extent of development. The highest and best use next to the river is not parking lots. Ms. Russell stated that the Council was concerned about how intense the development should be. Mr. Horton said the District has been dealing with the overall picture. Mr. Weber said that it is important to recognize that the pond management/ sediment issue needs to be on a parallel path and be addressed as soon as possible next year. The negations with PacifiCorp are critical to this. The ad hoc committee needs to concentrate on the sediment issue. Commissioner Baney asked if lottery funds could be used for the pond issue. Mr. Horton replied that those funds, if awarded, would not be coming that fast. The community also is not supportive of another bond. In addition, removing one dam will not address the concerns of those who want to have a free-flowing river, which is not possible with the necessary water users. Many people consider the Pond iconic and want it to remain. Mr. Anderson asked about the private-public partnership and if there is a master plan for this. Mr. Horton stated that they could not take all the parking areas without replacing them somehow. There is no phasing plan at this point. Parking is a big concern of the downtown business owners as well. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 3 of 14 Pages Mr. Anderson asked if they would solicit a master developer. Mr. Horton stated they probably would need to do so, to analyze the needs so they can build appropriate space. Ms. Russell stated that the Council wants to be involved in this as well. Chair DeBone asked what they want from the Board at this time. Mr. Horton said they need support with the House Bill to move it forward for funding. They want to be sure they have a community consensus of the overall plan, with the understanding that there will be some change. Commissioner Baney said that if the funds don't come to this community, there will be no chance for these lottery funds for a couple of years. These are capital dollars that don't affect the other funds going to the counties. The funds will go to someone. Commissioner Baney likes the riparian changes and ideas of redevelopment, but wants to support the vision of BMPRD and the community. Proper planning and details are important. In the letter of support, she would like to see it acknowledged that she wants to see the Council more united. They need to be sure these concerns are addressed. Chair DeBone said there is no down side to getting funds for planning. Commissioner Unger stated that there needs to be competitive balance. It is good that they can keep the Pond but also have a river, and are seeking ways to pay for this. He supports the good work that has been done and the lottery funds are well suited for this purpose. Chair DeBone added that he is not comfortable with lottery funds in general because those who can least afford it often purchase the tickets. Commissioner Baney said she feels some of this money should go to help the most vulnerable populations. All agencies have a responsibility to these people, and housing and transportation are fundamental needs that are not being met. She has never seen the need greater than it is now. Economic development to her means in part addressing the lack of suitable housing. Mr. Horton stated that the District is not allowed to make decisions regarding housing. SDC's might be waived, but that is sometimes not appropriate. Mr. Weber stated that all public agencies have a role in this issue. BANEY: Move signature of a letter of support for HB 3283. UNGER: Second. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 4 of 14 Pages VOTE: BANEY: Yes. UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. 3. Finance Update. Wayne Lowry stated that the investment report shows things going well with the portfolio, with the yield creeping up each month. By October, they should have a nice array of investments that can earn more than they are now. The market is somewhat variable at this time. There are about 40 positions vacant, which is typical. Some are at 911, most others at Health and the Sheriff s Office. The Clerk's projected revenue is much higher than it has been in a while, about $300,000 ahead of the estimate. Community Development is still strong and will end the year with about $1.6 million, with much being used to build up reserves. The Road fund will be better because the forest receipts bill was approved. They may get another $800,000 this year and about $1.2 million next year. It is not known if this will affect PILT or SRS payments in the future. Regarding Solid Waste, it is ahead of projection, but so far, they have not decided to be open on Sundays again. The reserves needs should be addressed. pertaining to the next twenty or so years. This will be discussed at the budget meetings. Mr. Anderson said it is more than just the current revenue stream; they need to focus on some big future obligations. Liabilities are about $200,000 more than budgeted in Risk, but the ending balance should be lower than budgeted. Erik Kropp said that some of this is workers compensation claims. Usually it runs about $40,000 per month, but this year they had two very high claims. The Health Benefits Trust is on track and doing well. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 5 of 14 Pages The Fair and Expo Center's food and beverage fund is generating more revenue than the previous arrangement. The beginning fund balance at the start of the year was zero, but it should be about $143,000 positive this year. There are a lot of new events being booked. Some of this might be because of increased advertising through the new 1% room tax. 4. Video Lottery Fund Prioritization. Judith Ure spoke about the status of lottery funds for 2015-17, which is a bit larger than this year but not by much. Third quarter revenue was lower than expected and fourth quarter may be similar. She is using conservative numbers for next year. EDCO provided a worksheet and they are asking for a little less this coming year. They are not asking for coverage for Founder's Pad and venture capital projects. Commissioner Unger said other counties hire people to handle economic development, but it is better to use a private entity with more p � P Y community support. Chair DeBone stated this is positive for the region and he supports it being an annual decision. The Sunriver Chamber of Commerce is getting about $21,000 now, but they want $100,000 more to fund their staffing requirements. Mr. Anderson told them they needed to be specific about what they would do with additional funding. Commissioner Unger stated that they should boost their website, and better define their mission. They are very different from other chambers. Commissioner Baney said that COVA is in the same area now. The Chamber seems to want to be a visitor center as well. Mr. Anderson would like to use room tax funds for at least what they are getting now, per the COVA agreement last year. After COVA created a visitor center in Sunriver, the Sunriver Chamber almost went away. However, their focus should be on primary chamber activities and local business support. They were asked to describe activities they will continue to do relating to tourism, and there is some information on this in their handout. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 6 of 14 Pages Chair DeBone said the Chamber lost some continuity. They are trying to be all things to all people, but their board changed and they don't seem to be focused on anything specific. Commissioner Baney said she thought they had gotten $26,000 in the past. COVA does not want to give them anything. Chair DeBone stated that the Chamber needs to figure out what is of value to their members. They want local businesses to be successful but don't seem to have a plan for this. Commissioner Baney suggested giving them $30,000 total, with $20,000 at first and $10,000 for business development; and let them figure out what to do with it. Commissioner Unger feels they need a little something extra to try to do more, and some should be for board development. Chair DeBone stated that the customers are often visitors so there is a disconnect. COVA is set up for visitors, but both are membership organizations, and a lot of tourist-related businesses will go with COVA. These groups are competing against each other. Mr. Anderson said that COVA does not want the help of the Chamber. Chair DeBone stated that there are a lot of businesses that do not depend on visitors. Those should be the ones that the Chamber targets first. Shop with a Cop has received $3,000 in the past. The Board would like that amount to remain. Public transit gets $5,000 per year. There is no commitment from the City of La Pine yet on any of this cost. Project Connect is more mobile now, so does not need funds for an event. All the service partners are asking for additional funding due to increased demand. (Ms. Ure provided a handout and referred to an on-screen spreadsheet.) Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 7 of 14 Pages Commissioner Unger would use the numbers from last year and see what the bottom line is then. Commissioner Baney stated she is proud of what the Latino Community Association is doing. They are working on a Latino Family Empowerment Center. The County is keeping this program alive. The Board suggested $15,000 for each Commissioner for the discretionary grants. They'd like to commit $20,000 for the fundraising events. The emergency food and shelter category was $65,000. The Board needs about $30,000 additional to stay where they were last year. Ms. Ure said that the community grant process is fairly labor intensive, and perhaps those funds could be used to bolster other areas. It is not a lot of money for any of the participants. There are a lot of groups vying for the same funds and the awards just go to a few. It is a lot of work for the applicants as well, who have a low chance of being granted even a small amount. Commissioner Baney said that some groups could leverage for additional funding if they had more support. Some are service partners. Ms. Ure said that if it is just for service partners, many would not be eligible for anything. Commissioner Unger asked about putting those funds in the discretionary pool. This would require less work, but a little money can expand what they can get otherwise. Ms. Ure said they could beef up the discretionary fund or set different categories for this. Commissioner Baney stated that if they are not going to do the competitive community grants, they could review what they have historically funded. Commissioner Unger spoke about the Sisters trail issue. Oregon Solutions is supposed to help, but the objectors won't participate. He is trying to pinpoint issues and figure out what can be done. Oregon Solution wants $7,000 for their expertise. The Trail Alliance doesn't want this discussion to be open to all. He said he asked for $2,000 from the County, and Oregon Solutions is supposed to get other funds. The City of Sisters doesn't want to invest. Central Oregon Mediation perhaps could do this instead. The NEPA process is an open process already if it is opened up. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 8 of 14 Pages Ms. Ure said she went with a low number for the 4th quarter. There might be funds for this if it comes in higher, but she won't know until the first week of May. Alternatively, the Board could commit and take it out of the 2015-16 funds. Commissioner Baney stated that she wants to be supportive of what the City of Sisters will do. She prefers that they take the lead and the Board can support what they choose to do. They need to be engaged, as it is a community issue overall. This needs their voice but they may not be united. She does not want the Board to get crosswise with the Council. Commissioner Unger stated that two support the trail, one doesn't and another is undecided. He said he would try to discuss this with them. However, it does involve a lot of areas outside the City. The County would have an easier time reaching in than the City could reaching out. Chair DeBone asked if there is a rush to address this issue. Commissioner Unger stated that it is in limbo and he does not want to wait much longer. Commissioner Baney said that with Commissioner Unger taking the lead, everyone is now contacting the Board, and she does not want to be drawn into this. She is hearing from a lot of people who are very vocal. Much of the land involved is federal. Commissioner Unger noted that many are from Black Butte Ranch who don't like visitor traffic in the summer. However, it could draw visitors away from there if they have a way to do it. There will be a big federal NEPA process that should address most issues. 5. Discussion regarding a Notice of Intent to Appeal to LUBA. David Doyle said that the non-decision regarding the text amendment has been appealed to LUBA by COID. The Board has some choices in this regard. • Accept a voluntary remand (as requested by COID); • Approve a motion to dismiss; or • Treat this as a normal LUBA appeal with briefs. A voluntary remand allows the Board to try to reach a decision on the merits of the text amendment. The LUBA appeal would be the traditional route. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 9 of 14 Pages He spoke with COID representatives and the idea was that a voluntary remand. might allow for a broader community involvement in the process, similar to mediation that was attempted previously. Perhaps additional stakeholders such as farmers and the City could be involved. Commissioner Unger supports the remand process. Policy is being made but the process is difficult. The project is in a neighborhood, and it all started with past counsel and management at COID. They wanted to see something more collaborative but this did not work and they could not reach agreement. He wondered how this can move forward. If the Board is entertaining a remand, he would like to have this put in abeyance for nine months until Jan. 2016, to give the District a chance to look at the bigger picture regarding diversions, a systems improvement plan, the value of the projects, and to recognize the needs of all. This is an urban area. If this stays as it is on the table, it will go nowhere and both sides will have ongoing legal expenses. Perhaps project funds could be reprioritized to a project that is more of a demonstration and with more collaboration. It is important to the districts to have certainty in how water is transmitted. There are a lot of issues regarding environmental aspects. The basin plan for Wickiup is meant to create better habitat. This effort takes conservation in a lot of different ways, including the canals, farm management, and city water use. It will take two years for a plan to move forward. If discussions could be redirected towards the positive, from diversion on, they could look at the bigger picture in a collaborative way. Anything having to do with hydro gets into this anyway. They can talk about what is a conditional use or compatibility. He referenced Thornburgh and how it got stopped due to conditional use issues. g g pp They need to see the big picture and help each other in the long run with all the water needs, recognizing some personal values and responsibilities will be involved.. He proposes the remand and to allow for an abeyance to see what can be developed in the long term. Commissioner Baney asked if the pilot project could be used elsewhere. Commissioner Unger stated that the water conservation element was supported. and some also supported the hydro part of it. If the funds can be used for another project for conservation, holding off on the decision keeps the money available. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 10 of 14 Pages Chair DeBone supports a voluntary remand. He wants to see the options and what could be done outside of this gridlocked issue. More community conversation would be helpful. Commissioner Unger would like to push it out, redirect the conservation in a positive way, and perhaps demonstrate a better process elsewhere. The text amendment relates to other areas as well. Commissioner Baney stated that they can hope for something better, but she wonders if it will be different. She worries that during that time the cost to the property owners may not be fair. She wants COID to be successful, and knows water needs to be saved. This is an important issue. She also believes in renewable energy. However, it is still water going into a hydro facility. Code states hydro is a conditional use. She feels they cannot disregard this designation, that it is not an allowed use. The Code is not part of a popularity contest. State land use is specific and LUBA confirms this. She is happy to call this back, but doesn't want to have the property owners stuck in limbo. This is a toxic issue. This project is too closely related to a hydro facility. Commissioner Unger agreed that this is a challenge, but they need to step back from a project in a neighborhood. There needs to be a better solution than they have today. Commissioner Baney wonders about the merits of a delay. Commissioner Unger understands this concern but it is part of the bigger problem. It would be good if all could see the direction it is going, perhaps moving out further. Commissioner Baney said they have a path today, which is a conditional use permit. Commissioner Unger stated that the amendment has value in that it would offer some certainty. There needs to be more discussion on how to approach this issue. It needs to be done in a larger context than just this project. Mr. Doyle said COID would like it in abeyance while they investigate other options and to have funding remain in place. Usually it would be within ninety days, but it is up to the applicant to waive the timeframe. Commissioner Baney feels that this is leading to a 2 to 1 vote. They already afforded a delay. If this helps to get to a decision, she supports it, but not necessarily waiting another nine months. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 11 of 14 Pages Commissioner Unger stated that this needs to be part of a bigger look that has not been examined. Both sides took time out, but could not agree. There needs to be an opportunity to look bigger. Chair DeBone supports a remand and is not worried about the timeframe. The hydro project is the next discussion. Commissioner Baney stated they allowed a delay previously. Chair DeBone stated he had hoped that they could mediate or agree, but there was no common ground. They are not going to agree on everything, but he thinks there are still some facts that can be discussed. Commissioner Unger thinks in nine months they can look at how to use their funding differently. They need to start at the diversions and work their way through the basin plan. He believes there is a loss of water and something needs to be done. They do need to consider the values of the neighbors and perhaps can show a better way to do this. They have not had the ability to talk beyond this in the past. Commissioner Baney said they could look at other ways now and move the funding elsewhere. Commissioner Unger said if this is not in abeyance, they will have to use the funding. It is currently a placeholder for the funds. Commissioner Baney stated if the hope is to save the money and this is a placeholder to do that, she doesn't see this being the vehicle. She asked if the funds can be used elsewhere. Commissioner Unger stated that they can use it to size a project that may include hydro. They want to at least keep the water conservation dollars, and these are competitive in nature. Commissioner Baney is uncomfortable using this remand as a way to hold dollars. Commissioner Unger noted that they have not had the chance to review the bigger picture and the basin plan in general. This decision needs to be raised to a higher level, They need more certainty about the funding to be able to use those dollars somewhere.. It is unfortunate it took years to get this close to a basin plan that is badly needed. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 12 of 14 Pages Commissioner Baney wants to call it up and take a vote in a normal way. She does not want to hold this over people's heads. Commissioner Unger wants to give it more time. He said County Counsel could speak with the District and find out if they can limit this timeframe. He would like to see more discussion with the property owners as well. Commissioner Baney stated that if it was just for water conservation, it would already be decided. However, it includes hydro, which is a conditional use. Commissioner Unger stated that the zone is bigger than this neighborhood. By remanding it and allowing for more discussion, they can come to a better outcome. The focus is too narrow. Commissioner Baney said they could talk about excluding this particular neighborhood. Commissioner Unger stated they could put some conditions on this decision, but he does not want them to lose the funding and there needs to be some decisions. Mr. Doyle stated that the text amendment is to allow hydro as a conditional use. Chair DeBone stated that water policy was hard even twenty years ago. Commissioner Unger said they need to get away from the Hatfields and McCoys scenario. Commissioner Baney said that she is okay will calling it up but it would be a new text amendment if there are significant changes. They can get to a vote one way or another, allowing the applicant to do a broader study outside the existing text amendment. Laurie Craghead noted that they could modify the application with a new notice and a hearing. It does not have to be a totally new application. BANEY: Call it up and use the standard process. UNGER: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 13 of 14 Pages 6. Other items. Chair DeBone said that he and Commissioner Baney read and approved a proclamation over the noon hour declaring April 19-25 as National Crime Victims' Rights Week. The proclamation was signed at this time. Regarding the Redmond City Council joint meeting next week, Mr. Anderson said there is an agenda being developed that includes an update on the Evergreen project, the University of Oregon initiative; and Centennial Plaza. Steve Reinke would talk about a letter of support for the 911 project. The County could provide an update on the Unger building remodel. They could have a joint discussion on medical marijuana dispensaries, a no shooting zone east of town, and road networking issues. The Commissioners said the Neighbor Impact meeting is at the same time, and asked if the Redmond meeting could be rescheduled. Mr. Anderson will ask and let them know. The Board then went into Executive Session under ORS 192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations. Being no other items discussed, the meeting was adjourned at 5:05 p.m. DATED this 1 '1 Day of 1 2015 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. abodd:1012-- Anthony DeBone, Chair Alan Unger, Vice Chair �I ATTEST: Ik/144AA-L: Tammy Baney, Co issioner Recording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, April 20, 2015 Page 14 of 14 Pages 0 lc e ;, Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1.960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1:30 P.M., MONDAY, APRIL 20, 2015 1. Discussion of Grant Application—Ashley Beatty, D.A. 's Office 2. Presentation/Update by Bend Metro Park & Recreation District—Scott Wallace and Don Horton 3. Finance Update — Wayne Lowry 4. Video Lottery Fund Prioritization—Judith Ure 5. Discussion regarding a Notice of Intent to Appeal to LUBA—David Doyle 6. Other Items • Executive Session, under ORS 192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations— James Lewis PLEASE NOTE:At any time during this meeting,an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2)(e),real property negotiations;ORS 192.660(2)(h),litigation;ORS 192.660(2)(d),labor negotiations;or ORS 192.660(2)(b),personnel issues;or other issues under ORS 192.660(2),executive session. Meeting dates,times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners'meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St.,Bend,unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting,please call 388-6572. Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible,please call(541)38S-6571,or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker deschutes.ora. te- l. m ...6 "C3 I 1 1 � 0 `; 1 I I NI 2 ..-E °' ■ � F-,,,::1‘) ,4k., , 4k t., . iv, „, 1 k o Is- M. czza -- NI N, cr c-, 6 0 .481) N _r--, °q 4 , , , _g4 , _, Jr, .... I 1 i, .....z..„, ,4-4 .-r; ,---...-1,t_. -a N',. 1.,",3N:,i < 41 : 0 ,,. , , ....._.3 1 . i a .-' I_ S < U.; \ J CU --...z...--- is„. 0 tact co o ` E Ia 1 \\*; r ,�, 1 a, b0 co 1 1 1 1 i � i i , � 1 I Q r ®� John Hummel District Attorney 1164 NW Bond Street • Bend, Oregon 97701 ``. ., (541) 388-6520 • Fax: (541) 330-4691 Grand Jury Fax: (541) 330-4698 www.dcda.us April 20th, 2015 MEMO: Permission to Apply Honorable Board of County Commissioners, Deschutes County District Attorney's Office and Victim Assistance Program would like to move forward with an application to apply for a Stop Violence against Women Association (VAWA)grant. Below will outline the major aspects of the grant and our proposal we would like to submit at the end of this week. Deschutes County's proposed project is asking to fund a special position entitled Bilingual Domestic Violence Investigator.This project would meet state funding priority#1 and#2 by providing victims of domestic violence, stalking and dating violence prompt access to services and support programs.The specific target population is an underserved group of Spanish speaking only victims.The Bilingual Investigator would be housed at the Deschutes County District Attorney's Office and would be utilized by all Law Enforcement Agencies within Deschutes County.This position would also assist other ictio with follow up contacts as needed. jurisdictions wit 1 P In 2013, Deschutes County was the recipient of the Office of Violence Against Women Grant to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Programs, also known as the Arrest Grant. Over several months in 2013, Deschutes conducted a best practice assessment following the Praxis Int. publication entitled "Planning and Conducting a Best Practice Assessment of Community Response to Domestic Violence."While the results acknowledged some exemplary work by dispatchers, law enforcement and the District Attorney's Office,the "major part of our findings indicated that more police follow up would be very beneficial in the investigation and prosecution of DV crimes. Many times patrol officers that are taking initial calls are not able to do additional follow up needed due to resources and scheduling conflicts. It would likely be more effective and productive to have an investigator specifically tasked to conduct follow up investigations including things like gathering prior history,taking follow up photos,and collecting additional evidence." Deschutes County has come together to ask for a Bilingual DV Investigator to help us meet the gap in our services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence and stalking.This position would meet the need specifically pointed out by our best practice assessment and improve our services to victims.This position would specifically fall under the direct supervision of the District Attorney,John Hummel and be housed at the District Attorney's Office with the Victim Assistance Program.This allows for the position to be equally utilized and spread its need throughout each LEA agency and allow the ability to connect victims' early with either a non-profit or systems based victim's advocate. Once an initial call of domestic violence, partner assault, dating violence, or stalking is initially investigated by each agency's patrol, the report would then be funneled to the DV Investigator for review and follow up (if needed).The investigator would ensure that all points of the investigation were completed, ensuring that nothing was missed, prior to passing the report on the District Attorney's Office for filing decisions. This position, being housed in the DA's office with the Victims' Assistance Program,would also be able to connect the victims with quicker access to services and the necessary safety planning resources they need to ensure their needs and safety are met. Once a report has been accepted by the DA's office and filing decisions have been made,the investigator would be available to the deputy District Attorneys for follow up contact and additional investigations as needed.Specifically,this should address victims who contact the DDA with additional information pertaining to their safety or the threat that the defendant poses to themselves or potentially new victims. MOU Partners in this proposal are the Deschutes County District Attorney's Office, Deschutes County Victim Assistance Program, Bend Police Department, Redmond Police Department, Deschutes County Sherriff's Office, Black Butte Police Department,Sunriver Police Department,Saving Grace, Kids Center, Latino Association, and Department of Human Services Child Welfare. This grant would fund the full time investigator for a period of 2 years.The terms of the grant require a 25% in kind match. We have met these in kind funds through providing an office,supplies,work vehicle, and training for this position.Throughout the 2 year duration of the grant, if awarded,the MOU partners agree to evaluate the effectiveness of the position. If the position is meeting the needs of our best practice assessment, each agency has agreed to look at funding a portion of the position to sustain it once the grant period has concluded. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, (/ if/A Ashley Best Victim Assistance Program Coordinator Revised 1/22/2014 Deschutes County Estimate of Personnel Cost FY 2015 Hourly Pay/Benefits Pay/Benefits Position Name/Number Grade/Step Rate Hours Months (FY 2016) (FY 2017*) Investigator 1.00 FTE(2016) J/1 (2016) $ 28.0806 172.67 12 $ 58,184.13 $ - Investigator 1.00 FTE(2017) J/2(2017) $ 29.9395 172.67 12 - 62,035.75 Bilingual Pay-Full Time $ 100.0000 12 1,200.00 1,200.00 Annual Wages 59,384.13 63,235.75 Disability 184.07 196.01 Life Insurance 115.93 122.63 Health Insurance $1,538.42 per Month (FY 2016 Full Time) 18,461.04 19,199.48 FICA 7.65%of wages 4,460.27 4,754.91 PERS General Svc(PERS 19.91%,OPSRP 14.53%)Police(PERS 23.78%,OPSRF 8,628.51 9,371.91 Unemployment 1.41%of the first$25,000 352.50 352.50 Workers'Compensation 8810-.0187 / 7720-.0433 0.0187 655.19 697.68 Benefits Total 32,857.51 34,695.12 Total Wages and Benefits $ 92,241.64 $ 97,930.87 *FY 2017 includes estimates for COLA(+1.5%),Health Insurance(+4%),and PERS(+2%) Requested by: Ashley Beatty For FY 2016 these are the calculations: Disability Annual Wages(up to$108,000)*.0002583(rate)*12 Months with a max of$334.80 Life Insurance Annual Wages*.000145(rate)* 12 Months plus a flat$1.05 per month Health Insurance $1,538.42(Full Time Rate)* 12 Months FICA Wages(Less any Pretax Health Deducations)*7.65% PERS or OPSRP Wages*Applicable rate(OPSRP=14.53%or 18.64%/PERS=19.91%or 23.78%) Unemployment Wages(up to$25,000)*1.41%(Max of$352.50) Workers'Comp Annual Wages*applicable rate(mostly.0187 for your dept)*.59(discount) 78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2015 Regular Session House Bill 3283 Sponsored by Representative BUEHLER,Senator KNOPP, Representative WHISNANT SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editors brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Authorizes issuance of lottery bonds to finance projects, related to removal of Mirror Pond dam, for purpose of improving habitat for fish and wildlife, restoring and protecting parks and promoting economic development. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to funding for Mirror Pond dam removal. 3 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 4 SECTION 1. (1) In addition to and not in lieu of the budget authorization to issue lottery 5 bonds under ORS 286A.035, for the biennium beginning July 1, 2015, at the request of the 6 Oregon Department of Administrative Services, after the department consults with the Bend 7 Park and Recreation District, the State Treasurer is authorized to issue lottery bonds pur- 8 suant to ORS 286A-560 to 280A.585 in an amount that produces $5 million in net proceeds and 9 interest earnings for the purposes described in subsection (2) of this section, plus an addi- 10 tional amount estimated by the State Treasurer to be necessary to pay bond-related costs. 11 (2) Net proceeds of lottery bonds issued under this section and interest earnings in an 12 amount sufficient to provide $5 million must be transferred to the department to provide a 13 grant to the Bend Park and Recreation District. The district shall use the grant to fund 14 projects related to the removal of the Mirror Pond dam, including: 15 (a) The establishment of fish passage, the removal of sediment and the improvement of 16 stream beds, wetlands and the ecosystem. 17 (b) Construction of one or more parks and recreational infrastructure at Mirror Pond 18 and the former clam property. 19 (c) Promotion of economic development along the east bank of Mirror Pond and the for- 20 mer dam property. 21 (3) The Legislative Assembly finds that the use of lottery bond proceeds pursuant to this 22 section will create jobs, further economic development, finance public education or restore 23 and protect parks, beaches,watersheds and native fish and wildlife, and is authorized based 24 on the following findings: 25 (a) Fish passage and other stream and ecosystem improvements protect watersheds and 26 native fish and wildlife. 27 (b) Development of one or more new parks and recreational infrastructure restores and 28 protects parks. 29 (c) The development of recreational infrastructure creates jobs and provides 30 infrastructure that is essential to support the development of economic opportunities. 31 NOTE: Matter in boldfaced type in an amended section is new;matter[italic and bracketed)is existing law to be omitted. New sections are in boldfaced type. LC 3626 3 Monthly Meeting with Board of Commissioners Finance Director/Treasurer AGENDA April 20, 2015 (1) Monthly Investment Report --- March 2015 (2) March 2015 Financials f co co O M 0 0 ° O 0 o e -8.-= o 0 O a o 0 0 0 ti h � ti ONN to o 4 F; 1$) 0o h to to 03 r � OC7 O � OOO � : N Q. 0 4. C . AAA 2 CD _ N N t0/0 co COO c r� O T- CJ C C I— F-^ C r e lA CD d O o a o V O *, to w 0thaOr` C C j T. g 1_ 000 0 0 co 6, U NJM — ♦ ♦ A 0 0 Q_ N a00 � ri c's �, w 0 tin) u`"-)_ E U 4. C r "' rm CD O > > 1 0 64 6H z m C Q tL 0 0 d C c E e e e e n e o e 0 e- C r - O 0 0 U ) Co CA 1.0 O 1C C 7 o 0) 0 g 0 O 1• N O N N N O r r- 7+ N rn C U) 41 E _ N u) ca H 7 u) ' - u) CU O_ .-, E co in C Q to c o d ro L U .fl- 2 2 13 LC) N O 0) ~ Q) ) -' v a O N N T ~C 7 4 M 'C1 "0 0 ~ V D -I1ia0 - 2O I- o D �. i 117 ° �' 0 e e o e d ° O Q a co eatico - .. r 0 O N • N ' � M M o p \ 1.... M CV N M E cu me 1-en E w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 �ro > 000CCCO COCo_ 1->. N U >' 0N000MN- CC) �° ,,e. �) COOOCP O C) a C.12 si = C) co M N C0 tl7 O Z N O = H U cn U 0 m d O N vm� CCI la 4,U N M :.. }1 O �. 2 ��.� Y q4,Y N co co 0 .., O z N Q ,,C x-',r. CO 04 W v/ d a) -t Q• , I- d M CI CD p 03 O °' 1- UI- E2 m V a ~ Q. 2 O I- Li- J 1- irl i Deschutes County Investments -. _ _ _ - _ _.._-_ -_. Portfolio Management _. _.. ___ __ _.__ Portfolio Details-Investments _.. - - - -- - -- M__.. _. ___ _ _.. Marc_h_31,2015 _ _ __ _ _ _. 0606 - 0606 Purchase Maturity Days To Rahngs Coupon Par Market Book Call __._ __. _.__. 4Br. 0644_ __ CUSIP Security Broker Dale pate Maturity Moodys 58P Rate YTM 365 Value Value Value pate 273-150017-5 South Valley Bank CD 5/20/2013 520!2015 49 0 748 0.758 200,000 200,000 200 000 - - UMP972002570 Umpqua Bank 6/7/2014 6,7/2015 67 0400 0406 240,000 240,000 240000 - - 3692G5F7 General Electric-Corporate N CASTLE 917/2013 6x3012015 90 AA+ Al 2375 0.865 1,400,000 1406678 1405174. - - _ .. ___ 4444- -.. 3696205E7 General Electric-Corporate N CASTLE 1110!2014 6/30!2015 90 AA+_ At 2 375 0.501 545,000 547,600 547613 - _-._- _ __ _. _.. _ 0_.._ __ SY510316 Umpqua Bank 719!2013 T9/2015 99 _ 0 500 0507 2,000,000 2,000,000 2 000 000 4406- __._ - _ 45906KDG76 International Bontls for Recons ___CASTLE 12/19/2014 9!112015 153 AAA Aaa 0 443 0 457 1 220 000 1 217 035 1 2 86459DAB2 _ Morgan Hill Redev-B CASTLE 10/1!2014 9/1/2015 153 AA- 1 120 0.450 750 000 751 568 752 086 064159BA3 Bank of Nova Scotia CASTLE 4/3/2014 10/9/2015 191 A+ Aa2 0 750 0.621 540000 540,902 540 363 - - _._._ .nn4 -___ __.. .0606 __ __ _. -_ .44.44 88059EGU2 Tennessee Valley Authority CASTLE 12/42014 11/112015 214 0434 0447 . 418,000 416,717 416922 - - _ _ _ 12__ 742 71 6 0 5 5 ProcterB Gamble CASTLE 121612013 11/15/2015 228.00- AA3 1800 0.430 1000000 1006,890 1008479 - - - _. N -_ i 4.406. 14 - 0604 __. __._ 532457AN8 Eli LillyB Ca _CASTLE 3/24,'2014 111!2016 275AA A2 6570 0.500 1408.000 1472,120 1471726 - _-__ 0 _.__B_- 4 H06- - - _ 00 _.. -- 084670BG2 Berkshire Hathaway Inc CASTLE 3!312014 2'11!2016 316 AA Aa2 0800 0.500 1,000.000 1,003,120 t 002,567. - - 17275RAC6 Cisco Systems Inc CASTLE 227/2014 2/221'2016 327 AA Al 5500 0.550 1874,000 1956175. 1956148_ __ 0640 _ - __ __.. _- __. 06406HCG20 Bank of New Vork Mellon Corp CASTLE 474,2014 3/4!2016 338'0+ At 0 700 0.681 M1 000,000 M1 001 580 1 000174 21312016 _3. __ _ ___ -. _ 0. __. 651.155 . _ 3133734F6 Fetleral HOme_LOan Bank -CASTLE.-_ 5/2/2014 4,'15!2016 380.00+ Aaa 0 772 0.600 650,000 650449 _. 78008K5V1 Royal Bank of Canada CASTLE 11/19/2014 4/19/2016 384 AA Aa3 2 875 0.650 1,500,000 1 532 595! 1 534,820. _. __ .44_06 _ __ ___ 0606 _.. 478160AY0 Johnson&Johnson CASTLE 1)7/2014 5/1512016 410 AAA Aaa 2 150 0.620 1 529,000 1 558,051 1 555 019 _ 3134G4WC85 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp -DA.DAV 12/10/2014 5/2712016 422 AA+ Aaa 0 500 0.521 2 000,000 1 999,120 2 000 000 5127!2015 __ __ 0644 __ 120022332 __ Lewis&Clark Bank __ 12,'6/2014. 6/812016 434 1 000 1.014 240 000 240 000 240 000 _ 949746QU8 Wells Fargo Corporate Note VINISP 2/20/2014 6/15/2016 _ 441 A+ A2 3676 0.750 1000000 1035450 1034,902 - 949746QU8 Wells Fargo Corporate Note CASTLE 10/22014 6/15!2016 441 A+ A2 3676 0,870 1 000,000 1 035,450 1 033,509 0644. 949746QU8 Wells Fargo Corporate Note CASTLE '12112/2014 6/1512016 _441 A+ A2 3 676 0 860 1 000,000 t 035 450 1 033,657 - 686053CF4 Oregon School Boards Assoc CASTLE 3/712014 6/3012016 456 A+ Aa2 0 000 0,999 3,000000 2 968 020 2 963,100_ _ __ - 064n. __ ___ __ 3134G4SH2 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp _ CASTLE 2/912015- 777/2016 463 A_A+ Aaa 0 600 0.600 3,000,000. 3,000210. 3 000,000- _4,712015 3 1 3 591/61/2 Fetleral National Mlg 0660 CASTLE 10116!2014 7!15/2016 471 _ 0 354 0.365 1 693 000 1,680,099 1 665,770 - ____ _0606 - _ - —__ _.__ 88059EMP6 Tennessee Valle Authont CASTLE 10/29/2014 7!1512016 471 0 490 0.507 _1630,000 1 984500 1 967 174 -. __. �.- Y _- 0644 - 78008TL88 Royal Bank of Canada _ CASTLE 11126!2014 7!20.'2016 476 AA _ .Aa3 2 300_ 0.800 1 630 000 1 662,013 1 661 570 _ _4 _ _- - - - 94974BFL9 _WeIIs Fargo Corporate Note -0A DAV_ 1 2/912 0 1 4 _7!20/2016 476 A+ A2 1 250 0.834 1 000000 1.005,510 1 005,376 - - _ 912828QX1 U.S Treasury _ MBS 6/19/2014 7/31/2016 _ 487 AA Aaa 1500 0.548 1000.000 1014,610 1012,600 - - -_ _. _ _ 4406 084670BB3 Berkshire Hathawaylnc CASTLE 12/912014 8115/2016 502 AA Aa2 __ 2200 0.690 _2,000.000 2044,720 2041,118 - - 313405666 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp MBS 7/7/2014 8/26/2016 513.AA+ Aaa _ D 580 0.629 -2,000.000 7 995,460_ 1 998.621__5/26/2015 - __.__. 06meL __ 3134GSGE9 _ Fetleral Home Loan Mtq Corp _CASTLE 1212 2014 8126,2016 513_00+ Aaa _ _ 0 570 _ OS40 3,000,000 3,000,510 3 000 840 8126/2015 3133EDUM2 Fetleral Farm Cretlit Bank CASTLE 2/23/2015_- 9/9/2016 527 AA+ Aaa 0640 _ 0_640 2,000,000 2,002,560 2000.000- 9/9!2015 _ —_. lNa - 4406 - _ 31359YLS4 Fetleral National Mtg 0560 PJ 315!2014 9/1512016 533'00+ Aaa 0 778 0 812 672,000 6fi0664 664,256 - - 90521APH5 MUFG Union Bank MBS 3/11/2015 9/26/2016 544 A+ A2 1.500 1.113 1,800,000 1,808,334 1,810,215 8/26/2016 90521APH5 MUFG Union Bank CASTLE 3/17/2015 9/26/2016 544 A+ A2 1.500 t 085 775,000 778,588 779,728 8/26/2016 3130A1C08 Federal Home Loan Bank CASTLE 7/17/2014 9/28/2016 546 AA+ Aaa_._ 1.125 0.728. 2,000,000__ 2,006,840 2,007096_ 9/28/2015 4 306 4..406 0644_ _- __ -- 3130A3B45 Federal Home Loan Bank MBS '10!2812014 10!282016 576 Aq+ Aaa 0 700 0 659 750,000 750,413 750,349 10728,2015 - _._rea _0606 4406 _ . 0606 __ -. ___ - - 912826RM4 _ 115.Treasury _ CASTLE 12/27/2073 10!31!2016 579 AA+ Aaa 1 000 0.727 1 000,000 1,008.750 1,004,267 _ 3133EEBU3 Federal Farm Credit Bank PJ 12/10/2014 11/14/2016 593 AA+ Aaa 0 600 0.648 2 000,000 1 999.760 1 998 454 - - O _ _ an __ ._06 06_. __ 3, - - - _. _ - _- 06050TLR1 Bank of America-Corporate CASTLE 51132014 11!14!2016 593 A A2 _ 1 125 1.050 1 900,000 1 901 976 1 902,262 - - -_. 06_06 5_. _A _. __-_- 06050TLR7 Bank of America-Corporate__ CASTLE 2/17/2015 11/14!2016 593 A A2 1 125 1.080 2 000,000 2 002 080 2001,432 -. - -_-- - - _-. 0606 - . 0644. - _ - 3133ECWV2 Fetleral Farm Cretlit Bank CASTLE 12117/2013 12,712016 616 AA+ Aaa 0.875 0.722 2 100,000 2,111.319 2 105 576 - _- _- .06 44 4406._ ._ - - __ 064159001 Bank of NOVA Scotia CASTLE 6/9!2014 12/13/2016 622 A+ Aa2 1 100 0.910 1 800,0.00 1 806,300 1 805 727 _ . 6G1 ._ Fed _0606 3136G1XP9 Fetleral National Mtg Assn PJ 3/6 2014 12ry 9!2016 628 AA+ Aaa___ 0 600 0.788 2 000,000 2 007,560 2 000419 5/19!2015 _._ _0606_. 06406HCA5 Bank of New York Mellon Corp_ _ . CASTLE 4123!2014 1/171_2017 657 0+ Al 2 400 7.067 2,000,0_00 2,051,fi60 2047,00_6_ 12,1872016 _ '�, 9128285C5 U.S.Treasury CASTLE 1/162014 1,3112017 671 AA+ _Aaa . 0875 _0844 2000,000 2013,120 2001,132 4406- 0606 _._. 742651DN9 Private Expt Ftlg PJ 1 1/20/2014 2!1512017 686 1375 0.799 3,000,000 3021,600 3032000 064759026 Bank of NOVa Scotia CASTLE Sry 2014 311 72017 7760+ Aa2 0800 0.906 1,000,000 997,940 997956 311 72016 _._. Home 44.06 . 06. 06 __ - - 3134G4Z76 Federal Home LoanMtg Corp. . __ MBS 12x8 2014 4171207' 737 AA+ Aaa 1 000 1.001 2 000,000 2,000,240 2,000,000 417/2015 912828SS0 U.S.Treasury WF 1/17/2014 4/30/2017 760 AAA Aaa 0875 0.950 2000,000 2011,400 1996929 _ -_ 3135GOID8 Federal National Mtg Assn PJ 10,7 2014 5116/2017 776 AA+ Aaa _ _ 2 000 1.127 3 000 000 3 051 840 3 046,942__ 5,16/2016 3136FPYB7 Federal National Mtg Assn VINISP 2/7/2014 5/23/2017 783 AA+ Aaa 2 050 0.885 1,460,000 1 503,975. 1,495,857 - -_ 31359MEL3 Federal National Mtg Assn CASTLE 12/23/2013 6/1/2017 792_AA+ Asa -1 061 1.115 1 000 000 984,040 976.650 - - - ___-. r0606_ __ 31359MEL37 Fetleral National Mt Assn CASTLE 1/242014 611!2017 792 AA Aaa 1 087 1.136 1 050,000 1 033,242 1,025,025 - - - 471 __ _-_ 0606__ -_ 31771CS9] FICO Strip CASTLE 12!9/2014 616/201, ]97 Aaa 1019 1065 1028.000 7008,828 1004807 _- 0644 _on owes 29270CYZ2 Bonneville Power Atlmmistraho CASTLE 4/24,2014 7/1/2017 822 AA Aa1 1197 1.171 670,000 671,179 670393 - - 84247PH53 Southern CA Public Power Autho CASTLE 6/17,2074 7/1/2017 822 AA- t 145 1180 t 000 000 997,250 999 223 - - 1 _/_ _ _._ 912828TM2 U.S.Treasury CASTLE 9/10,2014 8/31/201] 883 _ 0625 1061 1,000,000 998200 989646 _ _ _83 ___ 0644 912828TM2 U.S.Treasur'�- ,CASTLE 2119/2015 6,31/2017 883 0625 0.920 1,000000 998200 992982' _ _ 313383J68 Fetleral Home Loan Bank "VINISP 12'2612013 9,27/2017 _ 910 AA+ Aaa 1 000 1250 1 000,000 1 002 990 993 938 4406_ - _. - - 3136GOC74 Federal National Mtg Assn VINISP 213/2014 9/27/2017 910_00+ Aaa 1000_ 0943 1,.050,000 1051,701 1051,461. 9/27/2075 3106 0606_ - _. -_ 3130A1ZK7 Fetleral Home Loan Bank .MBS 51282014 11/2812017 972 AA+0606 Aaa 0.750 0.750 1000000 1 000.570 1 000000 _. _ - - 405 -_ '�. 31771 KAD90_0606 FICO Strip - - �DA DAV 12710/2014 11.'30!2017 _ 974 :Aaa _ 1.205 1.267 2,000,000 1048,940 1934780 4064 Z4 - .T064 -._. - _ 88059FAZ4 Tennessee Valley Authority CASTLE 71/21/2074 1211572017 989 AA+ 1205 1.268 1,059,000 1024.371 1,023,932 - - 961214BZ5 Westpac CASTLE 3/5/2015 1/12/2018 1,017 AA- Aa2 1 600 1.490 2,000,000 2010,600 2,005,953 - - 3136G1AU3 Federal National Mtg Assn VINISP 12/23/2013 1/30/2016 1,035 AA+ _ 0700 1.420 1000,000 993,240 990,790 4/30!2015 __. - 4.406 _- - 0606. _ 0606 - _ 31771EAL5 FICO Stn CASTLE 2!24!2015 2/8/2018 1 044 1 252 1.318 1 280,000 1 215,698 1 214,235 - _. . p __. - _ _ __ 31771EAL5 FICO Strip CASTLE 2/25!2015 218.,2018 1044_ 1257 1.323 740,000 713982_ 713,014 _ 3135GOVU4 Federal National Mtg Assn _VINISP 1/24/2014 4/3.x2018 1098 AA+ Aaa__ 1125 1540 1000,000 1000050 987,954 4/3/2015 _ - - 3t30A25R3 Federal Home Loan Bank MBS 6119!2014 6119.'2018 1,175 AA+ Aaa 1 000 1.026 2.000,000 2,001,960 1 998,392 6/1912015 939307HF4 Hillsboro SD Pension Bonds PJ 3/30/2015 6/30/2018 1,186 Aa3 1.732 1.650 965,000 996,229 987,529 3136016E10 Federal National Mtg Assn_ VINISP 1/21/2014.12127/2018 1 366.AA+ Aaa 0.750 - 1_820 1,000,000 999,840 977,855 62712015 ___ _-_c 0606_ 4406_ __ -.__ _ . Local Gov[Investment Pool t 0 500 0.500 42,459,365 42 459,365 42 459 365 _ ,.Bank of the Cascades 1 0.500 0.500 4,158,435 4,158,435. 4.158,435 _ _. -. _ _. 4406. _. . _ -_ 0606-- 0606- 0606- - 149.553,800 149,970450 149,801,450 Memorandum Date: Ap ril 13, 2015 To: Board of County Commissioners Tom Anderson, County Administrator From: Wayne Lowry, Finance Director RE: Monthly Financial Reports Attached please find March 2015 financial reports for the following funds: General (001), Community Justice—Juvenile (230), Sheriffs (255, 701, 702), Public Health (259), Behavioral Health (275), Community Development(295), Road (325), Community Justice—Adult(355), Early Learning Hub (370), Solid Waste (610), Insurance Fund (670), 9-1-1 (705), Health Benefits Trust (675), Fair& Expo Center (618), and Justice Court (123). The projected information has been reviewed and updated, where appropriate, by the respective departments. Cc: All Department Heads GENERAL FUND Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% FY 2014 of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Revenues Property Taxes-Current 21,906,239 22,174,164 98% a) 22,736,401 23,236,401 500,000 Property Taxes- Prior 704,120 525,328 91% 576,500 575,328 (1,172) Other General Revenues 2,116,386 1,798,004 80% b) 2,247,299 2,317,299 70,000 Assessor 875,381 665,762 76% c) 876,137 876,137 - County Clerk 1,276,019 1,087,848 92% 1,181,190 1,481,190 300,000 BOPTA 16,097 10,934 68% c) 16,117 16,117 - District Attorney 226,973 171,912 94% d) 182,612 296,212 113,600 Tax Office 236,278 172,869 78% c) 222,199 222,199 - Veterans 80,787 44,084 43% 101,986 101,986 - Property Management 91,900 18,000 72% 25,000 25,000 - Grant Projects 2,000 - n/a - - - Total Revenues 27,532,179 26,668,906 95% 28,165,441 29,147,869 982,428 Expenditures Assessor 3,559,750 2,741,378 72% 3,793,770 3,793,770 - County Clerk 1,293,531 1,025,665 67% 1,536,210 1,536,210 - BOPTA 59,895 47,730 67% 70,777 70,777 - District Attorney 5,382,874 3,924,828 67% 5,835,377 5,540,377 295,000 Tax Office 796,232 608,151 69% 877,907 877,907 - Veterans 292,672 230,571 65% 354,989 354,989 - Property Management 248,054 195,372 76% 258,569 258,569 - Grant Projects 130,054 - n/a - - - Non-Departmental 1,432,177 775,941 68% e) 1,139,696 1,039,696 100,000 Total Expenditures 13,195,239 9,549,636 69% 13,867,295 13,472,295 395,000 Transfers Out 16,327,584 11,670,753 77% 15,116,394 15,116,394 - Total Exp &Transfers 29,522,823 21,220,389 73% 28,983,689 28,588,689 395,000 Change in Fund Balance (1,990,644) 5,448,517 (818,248) 559,180 1,377,428 Beginning Fund Balance 10,371,843 8,381,199 109% 7,692,433 8,381,199 688,766 Ending Fund Balance $ 8,381,199 $13,829,716 $ 6,874,185 $ 8,940,379 $2,066,194 I Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $ 8,630,800 a)Current year taxes received beginning in October b) PILT received in July-$500,000 c) YTD Actual includes three quarters of A&T Grant d) Federal and State grant and Charges for Services in excess of amounts included in the budget e) Transfer to Personne( Fund 650 )will not be required. Page 1 COMM JUSTICE-JUVENILE Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75%of FY 2014 Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection $Variance Revenues OYA Basic&Diversion 322,574 195,375 54% a) 359,149 359,149 - State Grant - 59,000 65% b) 91,379 121,002 29,623 Inmate/Prisoner Housing 47,550 73,800 185% c) 40,000 85,000 45,000 Jail Funding HB#2712 36,311 27,170 74% a) 36,568 36,568 - Food Subsidy 23,988 11,780 49% d) 24,000 17,800 (6,200) Interfund Grant-Gen Fund 20,000 , 10,000 50% a) 20,000 20,000 - Interest on Investments 7,611 6,994 100% e) 7,000 8,700 1,700 Leases 5,200 6,000 n/a f) - 9,100 9,100 SB#1065-Court Assess. 17,335 17,232 287% g) 6,000 24,000 18,000 Contract Payments 7,415 7,232 161% h) 4,500 8,000 3,500 Discovery Fee 1,870 - 0% i) 3,800 - (3,800) Case Supervision Fee - 5,117 n/a j) - 6,000 6,000 Federal Grants 9,434 1,205 n/a k) - 1,205 1,205 CFC Interfund Grant 125,429 - n/a - - - Miscellaneous 909 697 68% 1,025 1,025 - Total Revenues 625,626 421,603 71% 593,421 697,549 104,128 Expenditures Personnel Services 4,887,572 3,745,453 73% e) 5,146,491 5,018,809 127,682 Materials and Services 1,035,701 757,504 74% e) 1,021,392 1,013,127 8,265 Capital Outlay - - 0% 1,100 - 1,100 Transfers Out 3,660 2,745 75% 3,660 3,660 - Total Expenditures 5,926,933 4,505,702 73% 6,172,643 6,035,596 137,047 Revenues less Expenditures (5,301,306) (4,084,100) (5,579,222) (5,338,047) 241,175 Transfers In-General Fund 5,368,346 4,026,258 75% 5,368,346 5,368,346 - Change in Fund Balance 67,040 (57,842) (210,876) 30,299 241,175 Beginning Fund Balance 1,177,566 1,244,605 100% 1,250,000 1,244,605 (5,395) Ending Fund Balance $ 1,244,605 $ 1,186,764 $1,039,124 $1,274,905 $ 235,781 Beginning Net Working Capital - Requested Budget $1,271,324 J a) Payments received quarterly b) Additional grant awards. Payments received quarterly c) Increase in projection due to out-of-County detention revenue d) Decrease in projection due to detention population numbers e) Projection based on annualizing year to date f) Sub-lease of space to Rimrock not included in FY 2015 budget g) State payment will exceed the amount estimated for FY 2015 budget h) Increased projection due to more than anticipated revenue for community service projects i) Agreement with District Attorney's Office no longer in effect j) Policy, requiring supervision fees, not anticipated at the time the FY 2015 budget was prepared. Projection based on annualizing year to date Page 2 k) Increased projection due to receipt of FY 2014 funds in FY 2015 SHERIFF-Consolidated Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% of FY 2014 Fiscal Year) FY 2015 Actual Actual I %of Budget Budget I 'Projection 1 $Variance Revenues(Funds 701 &702) Law Enf Dist Countywide 20,624,082 19,688,416 97% 20,365,842 21,211,880 846,038 Law Enf Dist Rural 12,526,331 11,648,682 91% 12,751,766 12,956,106 204,340 Total Revenues 33,150,413 31,337,098 95% 33,117,608 34,167,986 1,050,378 Expenditures(Fund 255) Sheriff's Services 2,308,182 1,845,173 75% a) 2,467,673 2,503,766 (36,093) Civil/Special Units 1,132,029 924,538 77% 1,192,980 1,192,880 100 Automotive/Communications 1,701,586 1,153,267 61% 1,886,365 1,866,265 20,100 Investigations/Evidence 1,418,744 1,184,486 73% 1,627,803 1,627,703 100 Patrol 8,247,222 6,335,687 73% b) 8,705,700 8,481,297 224,403 Records 761,260 535,990 67% c) 798,805 769,705 29,100 Adult Jail 14,277,113 11,258,189 74% d) 15,214,157 15,134,111 80,046 Court Security 294,563 228,514 75% 302,867 302,767 100 Emergency Services 194,888 332,089 187% e) 177,852 385,315 (207,463) Special Services 1,352,528 1,101,565 67% 1,655,424 1,655,424 - Training 506,938 353,779 64% 551,318 551,218 100 Other Law Enforcement Svcs 801,895 578,636 72% 806,044 808,120 (2,076) Non-Departmental 81,701 54,603 75% 72,813 72,813 - Total Expenditures 33,078,650 25,886,517 73% 35,459,801 35,351,384 108,417 Revenues less Expenditures 71,763 5,450,582 (2,342,193) (1,183,398) 1,158,795 DC Comm Syst Reserve 200,000 200,000 100% 200,000 200,000 - Transfer to Reserve Funds 200,000 200,000 100% 200,000 200,000 - Change in Fund Balance (328,237) 5,050,582 (2,742,193) (1,583,398) 1,158,795 Beginning Fund Balance 9,553,793 9,225,556 120% 7,658,937 9,225,556 1,566,619 Ending Fund Balance $ 9,225,556 $ 14,276,138 $4,916,744 $7,642,158 $2,725,414 Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $7,153,040 I a) Unplanned repair of Administration Building roof for$66,000 expected to be completed by year end b) Due to unfilled positions, personnel expenditures will be less than budgeted c)Savings from unfilled positions d)Savings from unfilled positions will be partially offset by higher overtime and unplanned jail maintenance expenses e) Homeland Security Grant for Communication equipment was awarded in September. Expenditures for this equipment is offset by grant revenue in Fund 701 Page 3-A SHERIFF - Fund 255 Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75%of FY 2014 Fiscal Year) FY 2015 Actual Actual i Budget Budget I Projection I $Variance Revenues (Fund 255) Law Enf Dist Countywide 20,817,324 16,542,822 65% 25,428,019 22,263,313 (3,164,706) Law Enf Dist Rural 12,278,716 9,343,695 63% 14,948,526 13,088,071 (1,860,455) Total Revenues 33,096,040 25,886,517 64% 40,376,545 35,351,384 (5,025,161) Expenditures (Fund 255) Sheriffs Services 2,308,182 1,845,173 75% a) 2,467,673 2,503,766 (36,093) Civil/Special Units 1,132,029 924,538 77% 1,192,980 1,192,880 100 Automotive/Communications 1,701,586 1,153,267 61% 1,886,365 1,866,265 20,100 Investigations/Evidence 1,418,744 1,184,486 73% 1,627,803 1,627,703 100 Patrol 8,247,222 6,335,687 73% b) 8,705,700 8,481,297 224,403 Records 761,260 535,990 67% c) 798,805 769,705 29,100 Adult Jail 14,277,113 11,258,189 74% d) 15,214,157 15,134,111 80,046 Court Security 294,563 228,514 75% 302,867 302,767 100 Emergency Services 194,888 332,089 187% e) 177,852 385,315 (207,463) Special Services 1,352,528 1,101,565 67% 1,655,424 1,655,424 - Training 506,938 353,779 64% 551,318 551,218 100 Other Law Enforcement Svcs 801,895 578,636 72% 806,044 808,120 (2,076) Non-Departmental 81,701 54,603 75% - 72,813 72,813 - Total Expenditures 33,078,650 25,886,517 73% 35,459,801 35,351,384 108,417 Revenues less Expenditures $ 17,390 - $4,916,744 $ - $(4,916,744) a) Unplanned repair of Administration Building roof for$66,000 expected to be completed by year end b) Due to unfilled positions, personnel expenditures will be less than budgeted c)Savings from unfilled positions d)Savings from unfilled positions will be partially offset by higher overtime and unplanned jail maintenance expenses e) Homeland Security Grant for Communication equipment was awarded in September. Expenditures for this equipment is offset by grant revenue in Fund 701 Page 3-B SHERIFF-Expenditure Detail Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1,2014 through March 31,2015(75%of FY 2014 Fiscal Year) FY 2015 Actual - Actual I%of Budget Budget I Projection I $Variance Expenditures Sheriff's Services Personnel 1,342,795 1,070,394 75% 1,431,828 1,431,828 - Materials&Services 965,387 774,779 76% 1,020,745 1,071,938 (51,193) Capital Outlay - - 0% 15,100 - 15,100 Total Sheriffs Services 2,308,182 1,845,173 75% 2,467,673 2,503,766 (36,093) Civil/Special Units Personnel 1,027,640 813,658 76% 1,073,870 1,073,870 - Materials&Services 104,389 110,880 93% 119,010 119,010 - Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Civil/Special Units 1,132,029 924,538 77% 1,192,980 1,192,880 100 Automotive/Communications Personnel 400,169 298,200 75% 399,334 399,334 - Materials&Services 1,265,667 855,067 58% 1,486,931 1,466,931 20,000 Capital Outlay 35,750 - 0% 100 - 100 Total Automotive/Communications 1,701,586 1,153,267 61% 1,886,365 1,866,265 20,100 Investigations/Evidence Personnel 1,277,983 1,067,322 73% 1,470,106 1,470,106 - Materials&Services 140,761 117,164 74% 157,597 157,597 - Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Investigations/Evidence 1,418,744 1,184,486 73% 1,627,803 1,627,703 100 Patrol Personnel 7,450,178 5,585,023 72% 7,728,332 7,505,332 223,000 Materials&Services 547,770 413,604 65% 636,868 628,665 8,203 Capital Outlay 249,274 337,060 99% 340,500 347,300 (6,800) Total Patrol 8,247,222 6,335,687 73% 8,705,700 8,481,297 224,403 Records Personnel 659,297 506,013 73% 692,244 667,244 25,000 Materials&Services 101,963 29,976 28% 106,461 102,461 4,000 Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Records 761,260 535,990 67% 798,805 769,705 29,100 Adult Jail Personnel 11,899,534 9,386,216 74% 12,675,178 12,524,178 151,000 Materials&Services 2,069,651 1,551,736 76% 2,039,314 2,078,314 (39,000) Capital Outlay 63,176 56,588 271% 20,900 76,588 (55,688) Transfer Out-Jail(D/S&Cap Proj) 244,752 263,649 55% 478,765 455,031 23,734 Total Adult Jail 14,277,113 11,258,189 74% 15,214,157 15,134,111 80,046 Court Security Personnel 284,173 221,073 76% 292,715 292,715 - Materials&Services 10,390 7,441 74% 10,052 10,052 Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Court Security 294,563 228,514 75% 302,867 302,767 100 Emergency Services Personnel 169,170 108,262 73% 147,942 147,942 - Materials&Services 25,718 223,828 751% 29,810 237,373 (207,563) Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Emergency Services 194,888 332,089 187% 177,852 385,315 (207,463) Special Services Personnel 1,152,258 888,842 70% 1,273,721 1,273,721 - Materials&Services 183,769 138,742 62% 223,703 223,703 - Capital Outlay 16,500 73,980 47% 158,000 158,000 - Total Special Services 1,352,528 1,101,565 67% 1,655,424 1,655,424 - Training Personnel 385,634 289,908 70% 416,955 416,955 - Materials&Services 121,303 63,871 48% 134,263 134,263 - Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Training 506,938 353,779 64% 551,318 551,218 100 Other Law Enforcement Services Personnel 731,122 504,311 70% 717,594 714,507 3,087 Materials&Services 70,773 62,022 76% 81,310 81,310 - Capital Outlay - 12,303 172% 7,140 12,303 (5,163) Total Other Law Enforcement Svcs 801,895 578,636 72% 806,044 808,120 (2,076) Non-Departmental Materials&Services 81,701 54,603 75% 72,813 72,813 - Total Non-Departmental 81,701 54,603 75% 72,813 72,813 - Total Expenditures $ 33,078,650 $25,886,517 73% $35,459,801 $35,351,384 $ 108,417 4 LED#1 -Countywide Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% of Fiscal FY 2014 Year) FY 2015 Actual Actual I %of Budget 1 Budget I Projection I $Variance Revenues Tax Revenues -Current 16,698,208 16,900,039 98% a) 17,292,244 17,642,244 350,000 Tax Revenues-Prior 532,040 376,391 104% 360,700 411,391 50,691 SB 1145 1,630,823 1,221,762 75% 1,628,947 1,628,947 - Sheriff Fees 365,577 258,579 123% b) 210,000 315,000 105,000 Concealed Handgun License - 120,231 80% 150,000 150,000 - Jail Funding HB 3194 107,806 107,805 100% 107,806 107,806 - Jail Funding HB 2712 36,311 27,170 59% 46,143 36,143 (10,000) State Grant 85,781 247,375 290% c) 85,370 292,933 207,563 Prisoner Housing 329,918 110,534 138% d) 80,000 220,000 140,000 Inmate Telephone Fee 83,297 29,141 36% e) 80,000 40,000 (40,000) Federal Grants 20,897 10,072 50% f) 20,000 10,072 (9,928) Work Center Work Crews 69,723 26,882 54% 50,000 45,000 (5,000) Contracts with Des County 475,815 67,758 112% g) 60,632 85,286 24,654 Inmate Commissary Fees 32,480 26,302 105% h) 25,000 37,000 12,000 Interest 50,563 43,991 110% 40,000 60,000 20,000 Donations-"Shop with a Cop" 38,361 66,268 102% 65,000 66,058 1,058 Miscellaneous 66,441 48,115 75% 64,000 64,000 - Total Operating Revenues 20,624,082 19,688,416 97% 20,365,842 21,211,880 846,038 EXPENDITURES &TRANSFERS DC Sheriffs Office 20,817,324 16,542,822 66% 25,207,970 22,263,313 2,944,657 DC Comm Systems Reserve 80,000 80,000 100% 80,000 80,000 - Transfer to Reserve Fund 100,000 100,000 100% 100,000 100,000 - Total Expenditures 20,997,283 16,722,822 86% 25,387,970 22,443,313 2,944,657 Change in Fund Balance (373,200) 2,965,594 (5,022,128) (1,231,433) 3,790,695 Beginning Fund Balance 6,507,110 6,133,909 117% 5,242,177 6,133,909 891,732 Ending Fund Balance $ 6,133,909 $ 9,099,503 $ 220,049 $4,902,476 $4,682,427 I Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $4,616,439 I a)Current year taxes received beginning in October b) Fees from distressed property sales and civil papers projected to exceed budget due to continued higher volume c) Homeland Security Grant for communications equipment awarded in September d)SB 395 inmate reimbursement revenue is projected to exceed budget due to number of repeat DUI! inmates e) Inmate telephone fees will be less due to changes in commission fees on interstate calls f) Inmate State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP)grant revenue received in Qtr 1 and was less than planned g)Transfer from Fund 240 for Court Security will be higher than planned h) Higher than anticipated inmate population Page 5 LED#2- Rural 702 Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% of FY 2014 Fiscal Year) FY 2015 Actual Actual %of Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Revenues Tax Revenues -Current 7,988,657 8,056,554 97% a) 8,272,852 8,422,852 150,000 Tax Revenues -Prior 262,227 183,310 108% 169,000 200,310 31,310 Des Cty Transient Room Tax 2,838,797 2,528,477 87% 2,920,654 2,920,654 - City of Sisters 486,678 392,256 75% 523,010 523,010 - Marine Board License Fee 155,221 56,914 34% 169,000 169,000 - State Grant 124,246 58,748 45% b) 130,600 108,600 (22,000) Court Fines &Fees 135,023 97,930 75% 130,000 130,000 - Contracts with Des County 119,984 91,172 75% 121,650 121,650 - US Forest Service 101,375 45,250 59% 76,500 76,500 - School Districts 65,088 22,799 41% c) 55,000 72,000 17,000 Federal Grants 84,285 22,294 53% d) 42,000 42,000 - Bureau of Reclamation 24,023 - 0% e) 27,000 27,000 - Interest 21,715 23,247 111% 21,000 33,000 12,000 SB#1065 Court Assessment 17,435 17,232 115% 15,000 24,000 9,000 Federal Grants-BLM 16,213 - 0% f) 10,000 - (10,000) Donations &Grants- Private 12,030 17,030 n/a - 17,030 17,030 Miscellaneous 73,333 35,468 52% 68,500 68,500 - Total Revenues 12,526,331 11,648,682 91% 12,751,766 12,956,106 204,340 EXPENDITURES &TRANSFERS DC Sheriffs Office 12,278,716 9,343,695 63% 14,948,526 13,088,071 1,860,455 DC Comm Systems Reserve 120,000 120,000 100% 120,000 120,000 - Transfer to Reserve Fund 100,000 100,000 100% 100,000 100,000 - Total Expenditures 12,498,716 9,563,695 63% 15,168,526 13,308,071 1,860,455 Change in Fund Balance 27,614 2,084,988 (2,416,760) (351,965) 2,064,795 Beginning Fund Balance 3,046,683 3,074,297 127% 2,416,760 3,074,297 657,537 Ending Fund Balance $ 3,074,297 $ 5,159,285 _$ - $2,722,333 $2,722,333 I Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $2,536,601 a) Current year taxes received beginning in October b) DUI! overtime grant reimbursements will be less than planned c)Quarterly billing in arrears. Bend/La Pine will exceed budget for the year d)Justice Assistance Grant not yet received e)Quarterly billing in arrears f) BLM notified DCSO that contract would not be renewed after FY 2015 Budget was adopted Page 6 PUBLIC HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% FY 2014 of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Revenues State Grant 2,878,140 2,427,701 76% a) 3,202,798 3,330,846 128,048 Environmental Health-Lic Fac 767,248 721,142 93% b) 779,450 779,450 - OMAP 812,441 740,013 113% 655,250 1,015,358 360,108 Family Planning Exp Proj 400,900 161,574 29% 550,000 230,000 (320,000) Interfund Grants &Contract 95,011 476,779 386% a) 123,618 645,557 521,939 Grants (Intergvt, Pvt, & Local) 139,171 73,096 27% 269,678 97,696 (171,982) Patient Insurance Fees 232,968 99,977 51% 196,400 152,462 (43,938) State Miscellaneous 229,520 34,747 21% a)c) 162,352 150,336 (12,016) Federal Payments 161,576 106,592 71% a) 150,335 171,491 21,156 Vital Records-Death 100,535 97,575 98% 100,000 100,000 - Health Dept/Patient Fees 80,653 35,339 44% 80,216 49,150 (31,066) Contract Payments 92,637 7,538 11% a) 69,291 8,000 (61,291) Vital Records-Birth 36,655 27,705 68% 41,000 41,000 - Child Dev& Rehab Center 52,433 12,916 33% c) 39,609 30,759 (8,850) Interest on Investments 9,077 10,594 177% 6,000 13,000 7,000 Grants & Donations 38,192 54,505 3634% a) 1,500 55,000 53,500 Miscellaneous 10,135 30,720 1097% 2,800 31,000 28,200 Total Revenues 6,137,293 5,118,514 80% 6,430,297 6,901,105 470,808 Expenditures Personnel Services 6,457,193 4,903,126 72% 6,794,032 6,650,491 143,541 Materials and Services 2,043,710 1,489,190 68% d) 2,189,982 2,584,740 (394,758) Capital Outlay - 20,000 99% 20,200 20,000 200 Transfers Out 157,320 123,480 75% 164,640 164,640 - Total Expenditures 8,658,223 6,535,795 71% 9,168,854 9,419,871 (251,017) Revenues less Expenditures (2,520,930) (1,417,282) (2,738,557) (2,518,766) 219,791 Transfers In-General Fund 2,701,475 2,026,107 75% 2,701,475 2,701,475 - Transfers In-PH Res Fund 33,000 - n/a - - - Transfers In-Gen. Fund Other 65,100 48,825 75% 65,100 65,100 - Total Transfers In - 2,799,575 2,074,932 75% 2,766,575 2,766,575 - Change in Fund Balance 278,645 657,650 28,018 247,809 219,791 Beginning Fund Balance 1,273,934 1,552,578 99% 1,570,821 1,552,578 (18,243) Ending Fund Balance $ 1,552,578 $ 2,210,229 $ 1,598,839 $ 1,800,387 $ 201,548 Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $ 1,789,387 a)Grants and contracts projected at amended contract amounts b) Majority of fees are due annually and collected in December&January c) Received quarterly, in arrears d)M & S increased to reflect amended grants and contracts.Appropriation will be increased as necessary Page 7 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 (75% FY 2014 of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Revenues Administrative Fee 8,260,932 8,408,079 75% 11,210,767 11,210,767 - State Grants 7,801,239 5,918,018 60% a) 9,783,430 7,706,176 (2,077,254) OHP Capitation 469,069 220,270 56% b) 390,000 436,046 46,046 Federal Grants 184,980 95,574 47% b) 204,849 201,879 (2,970) Patient Fees 219,846 152,747 76% 201,610 175,472 (26,138) Title 19 246,484 219,799 122% 180,300 270,000 89,700 Liquor Revenue 142,665 73,637 49% 151,000 151,000 - Divorce Filing Fees 129,788 96,358 69% 140,600 140,600 - Interfund Contract-Gen Fund 127,000 74,158 58% b) 127,000 127,000 - School Districts 6,952 - 0% c) 65,000 - (65,000) Federal Grant(ARRA) 63,750 - 0% 34,000 - (34,000) Interest on Investments 21,190 25,987 133% 19,500 31,200 11,700 Rentals 16,000 2,250 12% 18,800 18,800 - Marriage Licenses 6,540 4,785 74% 6,500 7,800 1,300 Local Grants 52,891 739,269 n/a d) - 748,081 748,081 Claims Reimbursement 12,918 - n/a - - - State Miscellaneous 31,820 22,800 n/a - 22,800 22,800 Justice Reinvestment HB3194 120,000 - n/a - - - Miscellaneous 28,157 42,052 791% 5,318 43,000 37,682 Total Revenues 17,942,221 16,095,783 76% 22,538,674 21,290,621 (1,248,053) Expenditures Personnel Services 12,415,866 10,637,927 69% 15,467,644 14,300,000 1,167,644 Materials and Services 6,738,744 4,681,213 51% 9,132,319 7,394,499 1,737,820 Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Transfers Out 204,900 153,675 75% 204,900 216,902 (12,002) Total Expenditures 19,359,510 15,472,815 62% 24,804,963 21,911,401 2,893,562 Revenues less Expenditures (1,417,289) 622,968 (2,266,289) (620,780) 1,645,509 Transfers In-General Fund 1,377,302 1,032,975 75% 1,377,302 1,377,302 - Transfers In-Acute Care Svcs 293,593 140,695 75% _ 187,594 187,594 - Total Transfers In 1,670,895 1,173,670 75% 1,564,896 1,564,896 - Change in Fund Balance 253,606 1,796,639 (701,393) 944,116 1,645,509 Beginning Fund Balance 2,671,137 2,924,742 88% 3,313,248 2,924,742 (388,506) Ending Fund Balance $2,924,742 $4,721,381 $2,611,855 $3,868,858 $ 1,257,003 Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $3,893,237 J a)Oregon Health Authority grant projected at amended contract amount b) Received quarterly, in arrears c)Contract not executed Page 8 d) Grant payments received in FY 2014 will be reported as FY 2015 revenue COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 FY 2014 (75% of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 • %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $Variance Revenues Admin-Operations 40,102 40,086 78% 51,225 51,225 - Admin-GIS 2,944 1,275 51% 2,500 2,500 - Admin-Code Enforcement 261,188 214,364 79% 273,000 320,000 47,000 Building Safety 1,748,911 1,470,348 91% 1,616,713 1,995,500 378,787 Electrical 408,194 312,985 75% 418,506 415,660 (2,846) Contract Services 264,039 236,525 112% 211,500 265,000 53,500 Env Health-On Site Prog 448,367 323,835 74% 437,358 430,300 (7,058) Planning-Current 917,674 857,545 95% 902,876 1,175,050 272,174 Planning-Long Range 440,222 376,537 67% 560,658 621,736 61,078 Total Revenues 4,531,641 3,833,501 86% 4,474,336 5,276,971 802,635 Expenditures Admin-Operations 1,590,779 1,099,194 73% 1,500,181 1,500,181 - Admin-GIS 123,751 94,096 73% 129,011 129,011 - Admin-Code Enforcement 275,521 216,055 73% 297,852 297,852 - Building Safety 688,035 569,404 69% a) 822,664 831,759 (9,095) Electrical 217,271 169,293 72% 234,152 238,883 (4,731) Contract Services 220,779 211,773 75% 281,699 273,435 8,264 Env Health-On Site Pgm 181,831 160,171 58% b) 274,228 250,879 23,349 Planning-Current 666,180 545,039 71% c) 766,687 797,081 (30,394) Planning-Long Range 425,323 327,965 56% 586,061 625,000 (38,939) Transfers Out(D/S Fund) 179,035 170,698 98% 173,673 170,698 2,975 Total Expenditures 4,568,505 3,563,686 70% 5,066,208 5,114,779 (48,571) Revenues less Expenditures (36,864) 269,814 (591,872) 162,192 851,206 Transfers In/Out In: General Fund-L/R Planning 495,360 125,078 75% 166,770 166,770 - Out:A&T Reserve (90,360) 100% (90,360) (90,360) - Out: CDD Reserve Funds - (687,470) 100% (687,470) (687,470) - Net Transfers In/Out 495,360 (652,753) (611,060) (611,060) - Change in Fund Balance 458,496 (382,938) (1,202,932) (448,868) 754,064 Beginning Fund Balance 1,578,705 2,037,201 128% 1,589,113 2,037,201 448,088 Ending Fund Balance $2,037,201 $1,654,263 $ 386,181 $1,588,333 $ 1,202,152 I Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget d) $ 947,292 I a)$22,000 for Building Division portion of Fee Study& Financial Plan and $7,500 for vehicle printers b)$5,000 for Environmental Health portion of Fee Study& Financial Plan c) Payout for retiree, fee study, and filling vacant associate planner position d) FY 2016 Requested Budget was prepared based on projections made in January. The Proposed Budget will include Beginning Net Working Capital at an increased amount Note: Materials&Services appropriations for items a through c will be increased as necessary Page 9 ROAD Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% FY 2014 of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Revenues Motor Vehicle Revenue 11,300,058 8,587,037 77% a) 11,220,000 11,220,000 - Forest Receipts 1,259,367 373,840 33% b) 1,140,950 373,841 (767,109) Federal - PILT Payment 1,064,365 1,250,809 123% c) 1,020,000 1,250,809 230,809 Other Inter-fund Services 850,395 184,642 19% d) 971,700 897,745 (73,955) Cities-Bend/Redmond/Sisters 1,097,444 83,423 10% e) 804,200 940,212 136,012 State Miscellaneous 595,804 602,237 100% 602,629 602,629 - Sale of Equip& Material 275,086 221,573 82% 271,000 422,199 151,199 Assessment Payments (P&I) 15,058 136,896 61% 225,840 210,000 (15,840) Mineral Lease Royalties 206,097 168,955 121% 140,000 206,097 66,097 Interest on Investments 49,562 53,669 168% 32,000 55,000 23,000 Miscellaneous 117,069 36,272 142% 25,500 46,177 20,677 Total Revenues 16,830,304 11,699,354 71% 16,453,819 16,224,709 (229,110) Expenditures Personnel Services 5,313,126 4,129,888 74% f) 5,555,695 5,584,404 (28,709) Materials and Services 8,051,744 4,467,866 42% 10,622,604 9,385,240 1,237,364 Debt Service - 106,554 91% g) 117,000 106,554 10,446 Capital Outlay 121,455 1,563,262 18% h) 8,875,507 2,459,464 6,416,043 Transfers Out 450,000 600,000 100% 600,000 600,000 - Total Expenditures 13,936,325 10,867,571 42% 25,770,806 18,135,662 7,635,144 Revenues less Expenditures 2,893,978 831,783 (9,316,987) (1,910,953) 7,406,034 Trans In-Solid Waste 282,148 223,617 75% i) 298,156 298,156 - Trans In-Transp SDC - - 0%j)k) 2,000,000 1,000,000 (1,000,000) Trans In-Road Imp Res - - 0% I) 1,000 12,405 11,405 Total Transfers In 282,148 223,617 10% 2,299,156 1,310,561 (988,595) Change in Fund Balance 3,176,126 1,055,400 (7,017,831) (600,392) 6,417,439 Beginning Fund Balance 6,846,576 10,022,703 112% 8,954,332 10,022,703 1,068,371 Ending Fund Balance $ 10,022,703 $11,078,103 $ 1,936,501 $9,422,311 $7,485,810 I Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget m) $7,361,969 I a) Per Year-to-date State Highway Fund Revenue Model b) Projection is based on lack of authorization of funding the Federal "Secure Rural Schools"Act payments c)PILT payment received July 2014 d) Inter-fund service billed at year end e) Billed and collected upon completion of work f) Projection includes expenditures for unforeseen/unbudgeted retirements g) Final payments of two LID loans made in July 2014 h) Budget includes reserve funds for 5 year CIP i)Transfers made quarterly j)Transfer In-June 2015 k) Revised cash-flow estimate for CIP Projects extending into FY 16 Page 10 I)Closing out fund 335 m)The Beginning Net Working Capital in the Proposed Budget will be increased to$9,298,470 ADULT PAROLE & PROBATION Statement of Financial Operating Data ' July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% FY 2014 of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Revenues SB 1145 3,028,672 2,268,987 75% 3,025,187 3,025,187 - DOC Measure 57 220,788 217,845 99% a) 220,788 217,845 (2,943) Electronic Monitoring Fee 235,642 159,516 73% 220,000 204,000 (16,000) Probation Superv. Fees 208,461 156,304 82% 190,000 198,000 8,000 Interfund -Sheriff 50,000 37,503 75% 50,000 50,000 - Crime Prevention Grant 50,000 25,000 50% b) 50,000 50,000 - CFC-Domestic Violence 70,242 29,244 61% b) 47,996 47,996 - State Subsidy 14,677 11,220 74% 15,158 15,158 - Alternate Incarceration 17,725 15,509 103% c) 15,000 20,000 5,000 Interest on Investments 7,807 6,849 111% 6,150 8,000 1,850 Probation Work Crew Fees 9,137 7,646 154% d) 4,950 12,000 7,050 State Miscellaneous 4,142 4,142 96% e) 4,301 4,142 (159) Leases 1,323 1,000 67% 1,500 1,500 - Claims Reimbursement 6,997 - n/a - - - Justice Reinvest HB3194 458,143 - n/a - - - Miscellaneous 671 835 167% 500 900 400 Total Revenues 4,384,428 2,941,601 76% 3,851,530 3,854,728 3,198 Expenditures Personnel Services 3,343,789 2,671,822 74% 3,623,526 3,623,526 - Materials and Services 1,107,365 736,399 64% 1,148,766 1,148,766 - Capital Outlay - - 0% 100 - 100 Total Expenditures 4,451,154 3,408,221 71% 4,772,392 4,772,292 100 Revenues less Expenditures (66,726) (466,621) (920,862) (917,564) 3,298 Transfers In-General Fund 451,189 338,391 75% 451,189 451,189 - Change in Fund Balance 384,463 (128,230) (469,673) (466,375) 3,298 Beginning Fund Balance 747,520 1,131,982 110% 1,030,824 1,131,982 101,158 Ending Fund Balance $ 1,131,982 $ 1,003,753 $ 561,151 $ 665,607 $ 104,456 I Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $ 662,516 I I a)Annual payment received in July b) Interfund grants. Received when invoiced. Still waiting for response on Crime Prevention Grant c) Invoiced quarterly. Greater utilization d) One time payment from back-owing offender e)Annual payment received in March Page 11 EARLY LEARNING HUB Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through FY 2014 March 31, 2015 (75% Note 1 of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Budget Projection Variance Actual Actual 9 Budget Projection I $ Revenues Federal Grants 258,463 119,425 51% 232,218 232,125 (93) Title IV- Family Sup/Pres 21,994 - 0% a) 21,994 - (21,994) HealthyStart Medicaid 60,561 41,421 69% 60,000 60,000 - Youth Investment 124,493 - n/a - - - State Grant 55,185 46,812 n/a a) - 105,326 105,326 HealthyStart/R-S-G 249,125 146,035 49% a) 295,190 292,086 (3,104) OCCF Grant 132,326 - 0% a) 39,499 - (39,499) Charges for Svcs-Misc 4,138 - n/a - - - Program Fees 4,710 - n/a - - - Miscellaneous 4,074 204% 2,000 2,000 - Court Fines & Fees 77,873 57,815 75% 77,086 77,086 - Interest on Investments 2,868 1,812 72% 2,500 2,500 - Donations 50 - n/a - - - Private Grant 130 - n/a - - - Sale of Assets 450 - n/a - - - Interfund Grants 329,624 7,260 100% 7,260 7,260 - Total Revenues 1,321,991 424,652 58% 737,747 778,383 40,636 Expenditures Personnel Services 501,770 193,071 75% 258,410 258,410 - Materials and Services 1,402,021 471,939 54% b) 877,110 854,347 22,763 Total Expenditures 1,903,791 665,009 59% 1,135,520 1,112,757 22,763 Revenues less Expenditures (581,800) (240,357) (397,773) (334,374) 63,399 Transfers In General Fund 278,739 189,216 75% 252,288 252,288 - General Fund -Other 89,350 67,013 75% 89,350 89,350 - Total Transfers In 368,089 256,229 75% 341,638 341,638 - Change in Fund Balance (213,711) 15,871 (56,135) 7,264 63,399 Beginning Fund Balance 548,572 334,861 105% 318,121 334,861 16,740 Ending Fund Balance $ 334,861 $ 350,732 $ 261,986 $ 342,125 $ 80,139 I Beginning Net Working Capital - Requested Budget $ 274,299 I Note 1: Through June 30, 2014 activity included Children & Families Commission a)Grants projected at amended contract amount b) M &S increase related to amended grant contracts Page 12 SOLID WASTE Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 FY 2014 (75%of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Operating Revenues Franchise Disposal Fees 4,209,029 3,468,790 79% 4,413,809 4,600,000 186,191 Private Disposal Fees 1,518,056 1,189,250 77% 1,550,430 1,570,000 19,570 Commercial Disp. Fees 1,076,538 961,583 89% 1,082,144 1,200,000 117,856 Franchise 3% Fees 210,053 94,618 45% a) 210,000 220,000 10,000 Yard Debris 98,410 85,521 93% 92,000 104,000 12,000 Recyclables 33,345 24,229 54% b) 45,000 45,000 - Special Waste 40,873 16,250 65% 25,000 25,000 - Interest 11,028 12,601 126% 10,000 15,000 5,000 Leases 10,801 8,101 75% 10,801 10,801 - Miscellaneous 21,508 20,494 102% 20,000 25,000 5,000 Total Operating Revenues 7,229,641 5,881,437 79% c) 7,459,184 7,814,801 355,617 Operating Expenditures Personnel Services 1,777,663 1,387,857 72% 1,936,555 1,887,195 49,360 Materials and Services 3,214,375 2,123,352 62% 3,435,926 3,283,101 152,825 Debt Service 930,157 381,624 41% d) 929,794 929,794 - Capital Outlay 25,895 92,717 41% 227,000 224,523 2,477 Total Operating Expenditures 5,948,091 3,985,550 61% 6,529,275 6,324,613 204,662 Operating Rev less Exp 1,281,550 1,895,887 929,909 1,490,188 560,279 Transfers Out Road 282,148 223,617 75% 298,156 298,156 - SW Capital & Equipment Reserve 545,000 1,250,000 82% e) 1,525,000 2,225,000 (700,000) Total Transfers Out 827,148 1,473,617 81% 1,823,156 2,523,156 (700,000) Change in Fund Balance 454,402 422,270 (893,247) (1,032,968) (139,721) Beginning Fund Balance 1,224,767 1,679,169 118% 1,428,003 1,679,169 251,166 Ending Fund Balance $ 1,679,169 $2,101,440 $ 534,756 $ 646,201 $ 111,445 I Beginning Net Working Capital - Requested Budget $ 646,922 I a) Payments due April 15th b) Recycling market prices are low and unpredictable at this time c) Revenues fluctuate with the weather/seasons d) Payments made November and May e)Transfer made as resources required in reserve funds. Appropriation to increase appropriation is pending Page 13 RISK MANAGEMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% of FY 2014 Fiscal Year) FY 2015 Actual Actual %of Budget Budget Projection I $Variance Revenues Inter-fund Charges: General Liability 272,823 284,841 75% 379,793 379,793 - Property Damage 326,526 294,228 75% 392,304 392,304 - Vehicle 164,150 133,164 75% 177,550 177,550 - Workers'Compensation 1,520,352 1,171,305 75% 1,561,804 1,561,804 - Unemployment 318,566 241,506 76% 317,000 317,000 - Claims Reimb-Gen Liab/Property 139,123 31,665 158% 20,000 40,000 20,000 Process Fee-Events/Parades 1,400 1,070 82% 1,300 1,300 - Miscellaneous 14 - 0% 110 110 - Skid Car Training 27,540 28,260 118% 24,000 30,000 6,000 Interest on Investments 15,567 16,893 112% 15,050 20,000 4,950 TOTAL REVENUES 2,786,061 2,202,932 76% 2,888,911 2,919,861 30,950 Direct Insurance Costs: GENERAL LIABILITY Settlement/Benefit 268,561 153,863 Defense 49,872 11,761 Professional Service 33,139 14,060 Insurance 161,994 165,361 a) Loss Prevention 4,659 12,021 Miscellaneous 5,619 64 Repair/Replacement 4,531 4,974 Total General Liability 528,374 362,104 91% 400,000 600,000 (200,000) PROPERTY DAMAGE Insurance 166,668 178,556 a) Repair/Replacement 211,158 20,371 Total Property Damage 377,826 198,927 80% 250,000 270,000 (20,000) VEHICLE Professional Service 875 236 Insurance 205 21,300 Loss Prevention 22,021 15,448 Repair/Replacement 69,276 38,223 Total Vehicle 92,377 75,206 63% 120,000 110,000 10,000 WORKERS'COMPENSATION Settlement/Benefit 478,204 593,582 Professional Service 5,000 5,000 Insurance 155,474 114,968 a) Loss Prevention 44,261 35,743 Miscellaneous 52,488 26,861 Total Workers'Compensation 735,427 776,154 129% 600,000 975,000 (375,000) UNEMPLOYMENT-Settlement/Benefits 102,324 66,857 33% b) 200,000 125,000 75,000 Total Direct Insurance Costs 1,836,329 1,479,248 94% 1,570,000 2,080,000 (510,000) Insurance Administration: Personnel Services 324,005 226,892 69% 330,406 330,406 - Materials& Srvc, Capital Out. &Tranfs. 146,109 99,902 50% 199,140 199,140 - Total Expenditures 2,306,443 1,806,043 86% c) 2,099,546 2,609,546 (510,000) Change in Fund Balance 479,618 396,889 789,365 310,315 (479,050) Beginning Fund Balance 2,631,057 3,110,676 101% 3,074,957 3,110,676 35,719 Ending Fund Balance $3,110,676 $3,507,565 $ 3,864,322 $ 3,420,991 $ (443,331) I Beginning Net Working Capital -Requested Budget $ 3,200,M0 a)Annual premiums paid in July b)Payments made quarterly c) Appropriation for Materials& Services will be increased when required Page 14 DESCHUTES COUNTY 9-1-1 Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015(75% of FY 2014 Fiscal Year) FY 2015 %of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection I $ Variance Revenues Property Taxes -Current 6,258,760 6,394,761 99% a) 6,482,015 6,682,015 200,000 Property Taxes- Prior 203,163 140,820 102% 138,000 153,820 15,820 Federal Grants 46,514 - 0% b)e) 150,000 50,000 (100,000) State Reimbursement 41,813 35,667 99% 36,000 36,000 - Telephone User Tax 756,775 379,737 51% c) 750,000 750,000 - Data Network Reimb. 43,943 - 0% d) 30,000 30,000 - Jefferson County 29,758 29,065 97% 30,000 30,000 - User Fee 53,229 50,223 112% 45,000 53,000 8,000 Police RMS User Fees 236,717 32,688 11% d) 295,788 295,788 - Contract Payments 39,075 - 0% d) 11,000 11,000 - Miscellaneous 45,553 13,262 147% 9,000 13,262 4,262 Claims Reimbursement 29,857 - n/a - - - Interest 40,303 25,591 84% 30,600 30,600 - Total Revenues 7,825,460 7,101,814 89% 8,007,403 8,135,485 128,082 Expenditures Personnel Services 4,420,333 3,560,646 63% 5,683,538 5,016,373 618,065 Materials and Services 1,996,805 1,417,342 68% 2,077,868 2,077,868 - Capital Outlay 66,498 234,798 67% e) 350,000 250,000 100,000 Total Expenditures 6,483,636 5,212,786 64% 8,111,406 7,344,241 718,065 Revenues less Expenditures 1,341,824 1,889,028 (104,003) 791,244 846,147 Transfers Out- Reserve Fund 7,800,000 - n/a - - - Change in Fund Balance (6,458,176) 1,889,028 (104,003) 791,244 846,147 Beginning Fund Balance 10,398,030 3,939,854 116% 3,410,000 3,939,854 529,854 Ending Fund Balance $ 3,939,854 $ 5,828,882 $ 3,305,997 $4,731,098 $1,376,001 I Beginning Net Working Capital - Requested Budget $4,650,000 I a)Current year taxes received beginning in October b) Reimbursement grant. No eligible expenditures made yet in FY 2015 c)Quarterly payments d)Annual billing in December-awaiting payments e) $100,000 of the budgeted CAD to CAD is a pass through between ODOT and Hood River County. Neither the revenue nor the expenditure will be reported as DC 9-1-1 FY 2015 activity Page 15 Health Benefits Trust Statement of Financial Operating Data FY 2014 FY 2015 July 1,2014 Actual through March, %of FY 2015 FY 2015 $Variance 2015(75%of Budget Budget Projection Fiscal Year) Revenues: Internal Premium Charges $ 14,485,502 $ 12,000,664 77% a) $ 15,517,000 $16,002,146 $ 485,146 Part-Time Employee Premium 16,955 12,573 63% b) 20,000 16,764 (3,236) Employee Monthly Co-Pay 813,125 649,311 80% b) 810,000 865,748 55,748 COIC 1,595,847 1,385,176 83% b) 1,670,000 1,846,901 176,901 Retiree/COBRA Co-Pay 1,061,986 822,859 65% b) 1,260,000 1,097,145 (162,855) Prescription Rebates 154,981 110,814 101% 110,000 110,814 814 Claims Reimbursements&Misc 2,419 306 1% 50,000 306 (49,694) Interest _ 67,057 65,381 91% 72,000 85,500 13,500 Total Revenues 18,197,871 15,047,085 77% 19,509,000 20,025,324 516,324 Expenditures: Personnel Services(all depts) 129,509 91,925 63% 144,917 144,917 - Materials&Services Admin&Wellness Claims Paid-Medical 11,633,134 8,840,114 70% c) 12,552,108 11,811,380 740,727 Claims Paid-Prescription 657,550 1,017,668 143% c) 709,494 1,252,827 (543,333) Claims Paid-DentalNision 1,731,608 1,367,532 73% c) 1,868,398 1,813,669 54,729 Claims Refunds (182,448) (289,615) n/a - (289,615) 289,615 Stop Loss Insurance Premium 275,052 243,045 61% 400,000 350,000 50,000 State Assessments 67,753 227,597 106% 215,000 227,597 (12,597) Administration Fee(EMBS) 333,188 310,744 91% 343,000 410,000 (67,000) Preferred Provider Fee 49,712 29,305 51% 57,200 40,000 17,200 1 Other-Administration 42,969 31,953 72% 44,642 44,642 - Other-Wellness 117,775 118,237 60% 195,970 195,970 - Admin&Wellness 14,726,294 11,896,581 73% 16,385,812 15,856,470 529,342 Deschutes On-site Clinic Contracted Services 850,209 579,328 61% 943,500 943,500 - Medical Supplies 54,806 53,255 152% 35,000 75,000 (40,000) Other 27,016 15,855 59% 26,777 40,000 (13,223) Total DOC 932,031 648,438 65% 1,005,277 1,058,500 (53,223) Deschutes On-site Pharmacy Contracted Services 314,801 194,033 63% 306,000 306,000 - Prescriptions 1,588,726 889,446 52% d) 1,696,000 1,524,764 171,236 Other 13,250 9,944 75% 13,321 13,321 - Total Pharmacy 1,916,777 1,093,422 54% 2,015,321 1,844,085 171,236 Total Expenditures 17,704,610 13,730,366 70% 19,551,327 18,903,972 647,355 Change in Fund Balance 493,261 1,316,719 (42,327) 1,121,352 1,163,679 Beginning Fund Balance - 11,967,822 12,461,082 108% 11,585,710 12,461,082 875,372 Ending Fund Balance $ 12,461,082 $ 13,777,801 $ 11,543,383 $13,582,434 $2,039,051 %of Exp covered by Revenues 102.8% 109.6% 99.8% 105.9% 1 Beginning Net Working Capital-Requested Budget $13,190,000 , a) Projection is amount budgeted as Health/Dental Insurance expenditures in the operating funds b) Year to Date annualized c) Average of YTD annualized and 12 month rolling average Page 16 d) YTD Actual-July through January. Projection is YTD Annualized FAIR AND EXPO CENTER Statement of Financial Operating Data Through March 31, 2015 FY 2015-Year to Date(75% FY 2014 of Year FY 2015 Actual Actual °A)of Budget Budget 1 Projection I $Variance Operating Revenues Events Revenues $ 458,147 $ 358,653 57.4% $ 625,000 $ 532,813 $ (92,188) Storage 35,590 29,708 66.0% 45,000 52,708 7,708 Camping at F& E 22,866 4,340 27.1% 16,000 16,125 125 Horse Stall Rental 52,084 6,158 11.7% 52,769 50,158 (2,612) :t04 Av4 a , .,,,O. W 9904,40 , `,4,* F07 1:,, , ' (f'x616 , Ar$4 Concession % Food 97,917 11,411 100.0% b) 11,411 11,411 - Annual County Fair(net) 205,000 244,000 122.0% c) 200,000 244,000 44,000 Miscellaneous 6,648 9,837 124.5% 7,900 10,436 2,536 Total Operating Revenues 878,251 731,371 71.3% 1,025,911 1,005,265 (20,646) Operating Expenditures: General F & E Activities Personnel Services 895,582 680,664 73.5% 926,183 890,664 35,519 Less: RV Park - d) - (84,370) 84,370 Materials and Services 657,882 407,955 80.2% 508,386 562,582 (54,196) Total Operating Expenditures 1,553,464 1,088,619 75.9% 1,434,569 1,368,876 65,693 I Results of Operations (675,213) (357,247) (408,658) (363,611) 45,047 I Non-Operating Revenues Transfer-General Fund 374,186 273,753 75.0% 365,000 365,000 - Park Acq/Dev(Fund 130) 29,000 e) - 29,000 29,000 Transfer-Room Tax-(Fund 160) 262,900 83,631 77.0% 108,544 110,770 2,226 Transfer-Fair& Expo Reserve 100,000 - n/a - - - Interest 409 394 n/a - 393 393 Grants 176,289 280 n/a - 280 280 Rights& Signage 72,000 94,938 118.7% 80,000 113,938 33,938 Total Non-Operating Revenues 985,784 481,995 87.1% 553,544 619,381 65,837 Non-Operating Expenditures Debt Service 112,974 68,281 60.8% 112,213 112,213 - Capital Outlay 176,289 - 0.0% 100 - 100 Total Non-Operating Expenditures 289,263 68,281 60.8% 112,313 112,213 100 TRT-1%for Marketing Revenues(Fund 170) - 47,592 16.3% 292,333 288,850 (3,483) Less: Expenditures 14,980 47,592 16.5% 288,850 288,850 - Net TRT 1%for Marketing 14,980) - 3,483 - (3,483) Change in Fund Balance 6,328 56,467 36,056 143,557 107,501 Beginning Fund Balance (6,673 345 -0.4% 87,000 (345) (87,345) Ending Fund Balance 345 56,122 $ 123,056 $ 143,212 $ 20,156 I Beginning NWC per FY 2016 Requested Budget $ 100,000 a) See "Food & Beverage Activities Schedule" b) July and August Contract with Premier Services c) Revenues and Expenses for the annual County Fair are recorded in a separate fund and the available net income is transferred to the Fair& Expo Center Fund d) Personnel expenditures recorded in F&E which benefit RV Park e) Budgeted transfer from Fund 130 for Fund 601 transferred to Fund 618 instead for maintenance of Center Circle Park Page 17 I «D O . o00 o w n In 47 r- M a) c c mr - M cco m D O co d 2 CD t 0_ CD Co O CD LU r o CD CO t� 01 ti ctl T O CC) N CO tD 01 Cr) N 0 N 10 CO O O 42 CI) N r 0 01 CD CD CO V et N N 0 SCj co c) N to N d d- u"! ti N K1 • O co r co N- co CO CO eD t/1 e- N r 0 a) b! >' 0 in ✓ CD 47 CO M 47 1• in CO o N CO r in co N CO M O O N 0 C) N 0 47 'Cr r CD CO CO et u7 O O N- r N r CO CD N. O CO.. CO 4 • O 47 W d' � N 0 O d! et N N CD ti 2 CIi 44 to P-, In IL) e• CO 0 N r CD o N t,- �Op1 P. 0 {O 01 n M CM co a0) CO co 0 co O ti 0) CO CO ti CCDD CO Pi Cn CD CD CD co O co co' 01 1 GD .t M 0) u_ col tot to to O 0) 0 CI) O N N o N N 0 '' C0 in CO N U) CO O op 49 0/ 'Cl' 4 4 in CO Kf t-- 47 h O N t� O 0 N ' N CI M CGco.... C>D N-CD CD u7 T co CO O 0i 1► r C — C 47 co O in 0 CR N in C+7 co co O O 4 N M 01 4 o N 4 CO N i CO t± :-. L '63 co N- Cn C) NM0 in N co N- r O M C4O rj CO NMr ONN e9 M N Nrt 0) It) 0 T. co E � T Y CA r r Pi r c6 OD +N.. N C1 • C7 O N -c a) in 0 to E a) 7 .L- Cn O CO M 47 co co N v N N- 01 CO CO N L � 0 OMt+ 0cvo r co el- N- r N01 O r t, AO co In N- co.NCo co M 0 NN 0 N N �.+ 0 -0 a E en �. t:n v N' m CO 0i N f~ CD CCV ON r r r r C] n _ 7 O .--� N 0 W E CO 0 CO C"7 r In N OD et Co Opp CO C(9 CO co ' 0 ' CD 0 CD CD N- N 0) M r 1A• CC) a O n r N et CO OO Op N N.+ O ,-- V O CH W CR i Cp 0 V P47 CND tD N C) It) O N A Ch ' O ' O ' M CO 01 CO 0 co_ CC'1 r 4 E 1.' r ci ri ri CD r O ri Pi CD r r a) !N 1 CR fR U)0 i C) G ] 0 f 0 a) E L C) u 0. 2 cn a w a > 3 m ' o co a) c iv 0 O C� u) H •? 0 Ct 0 od m C O 01 e N O. d ° E '—OO 7 CO CA to 7 co W CO d1 N O O c U a Q1 T� e pjj C y C h 0 C) a c C CG o. .LaI"1. tls1 c N W 0 W U CZ a W m C rr • V c2co NCa off. 0 Q .� W d m ct To cv m c $ E aa0 E aL a cc 6 F- 0 0 w JUSTICE COURT Statement of Financial Operating Data July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 FY 2014 (75% of Fiscal Year) FY 2015 of Actual Actual Budget Budget Projection" $ Variance Revenues Court Fines&Fees 425,632 279,272 62% a) 450,000 441,024 (8,976) State Miscellaneous - - 0% b) 600 - (600) Interest on Investments 653 361 44% 815 481 (334) Total Revenues 426,285 279,633 62% 451,415 441,505 (9,910) Expenditures Personnel Services 407,456 320,210 77% c) 416,045 426,947 (10,902) Materials and Services 183,148 118,026 71% d) 166,093 160,000 6,093 Total Expenditures 590,605 438,236 75% 582,138 586,947 (4,809) Revenues less Expenditures (164,319) (158,603) (130,723) (145,441) (14,718) Transfers In-General Fund 140,819 55,800 75% 74,398 74,398 - Change in Fund Balance (23,500) (102,803) (56,325) (71,043) (14,718) Beginning Fund Balance 153,818 130,317 121% 107,621 130,317 22,696 End Fund Bal (Contingency) $ 130,317 $ 27,514 $ 51,296 1 $ 59,274 l $ 7,978 I Beginning Net Working Capital - Requested Budget $ 93,800 1 a) Projection-YTD plus FY 2014 April-June increased by 4%. b) State phased out this payment in FY 2012 c) Projection based on annualizing year to date d) Assume that Apr-June same as March and that year end accrual same as FY 2014 Page 19 CAPITAL PROJECTS • Campus Improvement • North County Campus Deschutes County Campus Improvement(Fund 463) Inception through March 31, 2015 I Received and Committed or Expended Projected Total RESOURCES: Transfer in (Note A) $ 796,617 $ - $ 796,617 Transfer in-General Fund 150,000 - 150,000 Transfer in -General County Projects (142) (Note B) 700,000 120,000 820,000 Oregon Judicial Dept Payment 20,000 - 20,000 Interest Revenue 10,193 - 10,193 Total Resources 1,676,810 120,000 1,796,810 EXPENDITURES: Basement Jail/Boiler Demolition JB1 168,109 - 168,109 Basement Public File View JB2 141,862 - 141,862 1st Floor Public File View JB3 117,980 - 117,980 1st Floor Restrooms/Haslinger Court JB4 401,231 - 401,231 1st Floor DeHoog/Bagley Court/Jury Room JB5 81,702 - 81,702 Accounting Area Open Workspace JB6 40,257 - 40,257 Courthouse DA Offices JB7 34,348 - 34,348 Hearing Room Justice Bldg 2/Basement Phases 1/2 JB8 420,574 - 420,574 "Stone Building" 720 382,549 383,269 Internal Service Fund Charges 7,477 - 7,477 Total Materials&Services 1,414,261 382,549 1,796,810 Revenues less Expenditures $ 262,549 $ (262,549) - Notes: P of the FF&C borrowing for the OSP/911 Building. A. Remaining proceeds of the OS portion o g 9 B. FY 2016 Requested budget includes a Transfer In from Fund 142. Completed Projects JRF 4/1/2015 f Deschutes County North County Services Building Inception through March 31, 2015 ACTUAL Received and Encumbrances Project to Expended &Commitments Date Projected RESOURCES: Rental 500 - 500 500 Expended from Fund 142 for Design Center 1,427,013 - 1,427,013 a) 1,427,013 Transfers in: Fund 140 for Unger Remodel 202,461 567,432 769,893 b) 769,893 Fund 142( FY 2012) 600,000 - 600,000 600,000 Fund 140 for Antler Building (P& I) 151,736 - 151,736 151,736 Interest Revenue _ 9,374 - 9,374 9,374 Total Resources $ 2,391,084 $ 567,432 $ 2,958,516 $2,958,516 EXPENDITURES: Design Center-Hwy 97 Land&Building 1,402,013 - 1,402,013 1,402,013 Architecture/Design 47,092 - 47,092 47,092 Utilities 25,883 1,000 26,883 26,883 Fees, Permits&SDCs 323 - 323 323 Other 4,185 - 4,185 4,185 Total Design Center 1,479,496 1,000 1,480,496 1,480,496 Antler Building Land&Building 601,200 - 601,200 601,200 Building Improvements 42,364 - 42,364 42,364 Personal Property 27,016 - 27,016 27,016 Interest 2,827 - 2,827 2,827 Other 928 - 928 928 Total Antler Building 674,334 - 674,334 674,334 I Unger Building Remodel Remodel Construction-Griffen Constr. 11,477 572,995 584,472 584,472 Architecture/Design 46,165 19,000 65,165 65,165 Relocation Costs 20,886 9,200 30,086 30,086 Fees&Permits 4,316 15,684 20,000 20,000 Utilities 1,829 1,171 3,000 3,000 Furniture, Fixtures&Equipment 6,404 43,596 50,000 50,000 Other 14,058 - 14,058 14,058 Total Unger Building Remodel 105,135 661,646 766,781 766,781 Other Internal Service Fund Charges 33,102 - 33,102 33,102 Evergreen School 3,803 - 3,803 3,803 Total Expenditures 2,295,870 662,646 2,958,516 2,958,516 Net $ 95,214 $ (95,214) - - a)The property was purchased in FY 2011 with resources from Fund 142-General County Projects. Also, $25,000 was paid to the architect from Fund 142 in FY 2011. b) The resources for the Unger remodel will be providced by Fund 140. c) The costs incurred through June 30, 20015 for alternate facilities for Justice Court and Parole&Probation will paid paid from Fund 462. OTr OOCDU7mt (D Ou7 - �)CCD CD CD C) N 0 00 O L() r- O CY) U1 N CY) ([) CD CD AI O 000000 6 6O 66 6 I.. 0 C II u TA O O' 0 0 0 Q Q O 00 00 00 0 • O A CD O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 N (S 00 CD O CD O O h- CT CO 0) CO 0 LC) Cf) (Ni. Cn CC! (0 O LU (D ((7 O O CO co Ct r- N r r- r- � co) CO N '— c-• r- N N CI `� C C e 7 .a til 6F3 EH Ef} 69 EF} b4 d4 Q EF3 E9 69 EA 693 69 64 Eli. T. Q.— W 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cn 0000 O O O 0 'Q O O O CD CD 0 0 I CD O Lo O CD 0 0 0 y. O ac) O O O O C[) t - up CO O CD O M N d T` d O C7 N C) CD O r- 0 Q .— N r- r- Y N N N- r r- N CO r' = N CO F- V d6+} Ef} tt3to693 *aE93 _ 6% w 69369. 6969 69 to E . 1e CU W ° 2 N z t I� is -o ( O ca • °) m L m W CL V) Q) 2 Q Q ° co U Q H c o C m a) w '' � ❑ Q Cl) < W �, 0) c.) co 0 o o U 0 �, a E o U _c F U v mow = J v a 0 o m ° .0 . o © co N } _ Z c LL O C C E C Q. O Cl. •p Q O CC N Q I u. W ui G ca co Q Cl. a) F- C ? ° w C co O Z ° co N W U U E O a°) 0 � W °° Q 5 cn 0 a) w W OOE >") co E W W ° ca c!1 i2 o -0of0cNC w, � Z c) -5 -. 0 .4t —° cp — tQ ° ro s- a E Q a) a) as ° ca N - - Z 7 E 0 V E +-• m > > 0U- OWO-M L 0 CY 2Z (�..) H Z z ° ccp cn o8 c� L w ° — C) -Q 4) C o W < L C ° co i., CZ U h- i '— Q C a) w ° o .° a) ■ C - Ca C co CO a V r- c0 N o � co U Q 0. a) •C U CV N Z C O C C C — C • C C O O CO C p• aO LN C ►. ) L E C) E o c e e E . . 00Qm -2 ,9 o QO o Q U z aco a - -c E a) c W m W c`o) o c o — .�42 CCU a°) n o mOUu_ 2 -J (... e cti) BUD H Deschutes County Service Partner Grant Program 2014-2015 PROGRAM NAME/INVESTMENT COMMUNf1Y N D , ''vg ri h ,„+. z .."'4 6'r^6 *1h�4` A4C�ir, Bethlehem Inn Requesting a 20% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. Increase staffing from .5TFE to 1 FTE to meet increased Current award: $15,000 demand for our Emergency Meal Program. 2015-16 request: $18,000 =20%increase over 2014-15 Based on YTD outcomes (7/1/14-2/28/15), projections for FY 14/15 are updated to 14-15 Project: reflect the following: • .5 FTE staff to support the emergency meals • 73,375 meals served (11% increase) over original program 66,000 meals • 6,000 volunteer hours to provide 66,000 • 8.176 volunteer hours (20% increase) over original meals to residents and 1,400 food boxes 5,970 • 1,174 food boxes distributed Central Oregon Council on Aging(COCOA) Requesting a 4% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. Higher food costs(from $3.74 to $3.85/meal, a 2.9% Current award: $28,500 increase in cost per meal) 2015-16 request: $29,640 2. Increasing number of unduplicated clients in Meals on = 4%increase over 2014-15 Wheels and congregate dining(based on data recorded through January 31, 2015, COCOA estimates it will provide 14-15 Project: 525 unduplicated Deschutes County seniors with Meals on • 0.5 FTE nutrition coordinator for Meals on Wheels in fiscal year 2015;this represents 70 more seniors, Wheels and congregate dining or 15% more,than served in fiscal year 2014) • More than 10,000 volunteer hours in FY 3. Modest cost-of-living 2014 adjustment for 0.5FTE nutrition coordinator • 54,844 Meals on Wheels 4. Potential increase in mileage reimbursement for Meals on • 26,264 congregate meals Wheels drivers from $0.32/mile to current approved rate of • , 81,108 meals $0.56/mile, a potential 75% increase in reimbursement per mile Central Oregon Veteran's Outreach (COVO) Requesting an 80%% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. Increase of.25 FTE Current Award: $10,000 Returning Veterans experience a higher rate of homelessness 2015-16 Request: $18,000 and unemployment than at any time in the prior twenty years. = 80%increase over 2014-15 Increase number of veterans in need - 2,300 people served in last twelve months in drop in center; 580 people served in 14-15 Project: homeless camps. • .33 FTE to coordinate homeless veteran's 2. COVO distributes over 1000 units of supplies each month outreach,train volunteers and provider wrap including,food,toilet paper, propane,tarps,sleeping bags, around case management. toiletries are down; we are spending more funds to purchase • Train five volunteers to provide a minimum of supplies. 1,250 hours to conduct homeless outreach 3. COVO provides homeless camp cleanup averaging 1000 • Homeless Outreach connects COVO with pounds of trash removal per week. This takes the one staff people we can assist to be safely housed. In person away from Outreach Drop in center. the last twelve months, we moved 270 adults and children into safe transition housing. Page 1of4 r Deschutes County Service Partner Grant Program 2014-2015 PROGRAM NAME/INVESTMENT COMMUNITY NEED Court Appointed Special Advocates Requesting a 50% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. Increase in number of children in foster care. In 2014, 248 Current Award: $20,000 children in Deschutes County were wards of the court and 2015-16 Request: $30,000 under legal custody of the DHS, up from 228 children in = 50% increase over/4-15 2013. Currently 54 children are awaiting a CASA and the delay can be long(in 2013-2014, 193 children waited more 14-15 Project: than 12 months for a CASA). Meanwhile, both state and • .65 FTE to provide a CASA to 200 children in county funded has decreased. foster care (this assumes the .65 FTE carries 2. Meet National CASA standards for caseloads. Current a case load twice the national caseload is 1 FTE: 98 cases/68 volunteers. National standard recommendation and earns $13.00/hr with 1 FTE: 45 cases/30 volunteers. In FY 2015-16, $30,000 no benefits). would cover.78 FTE. Family Access Network Data: 1. During the 2014 Homeless Count over 40% counted were Current Award: $10,000 children 2015-16 Request: 2. Nearly 50% of children are eligible for free/reduced lunch $10,000 3. 23% of children live at or below poverty. (plus any additional funds if possible to support Research: critical needs of two new schools opening). A 2014 Penn Graduate School of Education study shows that children with risk factors including homelessness and poor 14 15 Project nutrition generally do worse in school. The study called for social service agencies to partner with education and health systems to • 5 FTE located at Vern Patrick Elementary in target problem areas for children, and work to try to identify Redmond, connecting 120 children and collaborative programs to support children's well-being family members to basic-need resources. outcomes.This is the crucial work of FAN. Healthy Beginnings Requesting a 50% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. $5,000 increase requested to support response to the Current Award: $10,000 program. 2015-16 Request: $15,000 2. Nearly 4 in 10 Oregon children enter Kindergarten with a = 50 % increase over 14-15 barrier to success. HB data indicates that many children in full time daycare/preschools are unable to attend our community • 5 FTE to coordinate 150 evidence based screenings. In response, HB created 4 b4 5 screenings developmental/vision screening in a targeting these children. preschool setting. 3. In the first 6 months of funding: • 144 children screened • 70% of these children received one or more referrals. • only 6% have had a prior HB screening Based upon these numbers we anticipate that we may screen 200 children at our 4b45 screenings this year—doubling our goal. Page 2 of 4 Deschutes County Service Partner Grant Program 2014-2015 PROGRAM NAME;/ °MENT COMMUN , P`7 , JBarJ Cascade Youth & Family Center(CYFC) Requesting a 15% increase in funding to keep pace with: Current Award: $13,000 1. 7%decrease in federal funding for shelter related to the 2015-16 Request:: $15,000 federal budget sequestration ($21,000 loss) 15 % increase over 14-15 2. Increase in demand for shelter(based on first quarter total shelter nights 2015 compared to 2014) 14-15 Project: Emergency Shelter Nights : • .4 FTE to coordinate 500 nights of o Jan - March 2015: 407 emergency shelter, crisis intervention and/or o Jan - December 2014: 900 family mediation. Transitional Living Nights: • Services to over 366 youth o Jan - March 2015: 477 o Jan - December 2014: 1,300 3. Modest cost-of-living adjustment for .4 FTE Case Manager KIDS Center Requesting a 25% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. Increased numbers of children served with medical Current Award: $20,000 evaluations. KIDS Center experienced a 25% increase in 2015-16 Request: $25,000 child abuse evaluations between 2013 and 2014. 25% increase over 14-15 2. In 2014,child sexual abuse referrals continue to exceed 1/3 of all our cases. 48% of children served are under the age of 14-15 Project: 6 and live in Deschutes County. • .18 FTE to provide medical evaluations on 3. KIDS Center provided 382 child abuse medical evaluations suspected victims of child abuse and/or in 2014.The cost of each evaluation is$1,800 and state neglect. funding and medical reimbursements only cover • 163 medical evaluations; approximately 25%of these expenses. • 16 Karly's Law physical abuse exams; • 26 Karly's Law physical abuse consults • 7 hospital visits for exams and/or consults by Dr. St. Germain. Latino Community Association " Requesting a 20% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. We plan to move to a larger space in the next 12-18 months Current Award: $11,000 to expand services that will increase opportunities, and we need more support to achieve this. 2015-16 Request: $15,000 2. Our Latino community continues to be our fastest growing =36%increase over 14-15 segment with the highest rate of employment,yet also with 14-15 Project: the lowest household income. This is a very industrious • .40 FTE of our staff team served over 900 group of people who face barriers such as language and people minimal formal education that limit opportunities. • Coordinate information & referrals for 167 clients • 92 free and low-cost dental services and 12 free legal consultations; • Enroll 360 clients in health insurance; • Provide citizenship assistance for 17 clients; • Coordinate Mexican Consular services that served 345 people. Page 3 of 4 r • Deschutes County Service Partner Grant Program 2014-2015 PROGRAM NAME/INVESTMENT COMMUNITY NEED Mountainair Family Relief Nursery Requesting a 33% increase in funding to keep pace with: Oregon Relief Nurseries have consistently documented a 70% Current Award: $12,000 reduction in the risk for abuse after 6 months of services in an 2015-16 Request:: $16,000 independent evaluation by Portland State University. =33% increase over 14-15 MountainStar Data: 14-15 Project: • 91% of children enrolled at MountainStar remained free from • BOCC funds aprox. 2% of overall program abuse and neglect despite living in homes with an average of budget 18 family risk factors. • MountainStar provided therapeutic early Deschutes Data: childhood classes, home visiting, parent • 10%annual increase # of children in foster care support and transportation (an average of 300 hours annually of contact)for 72 children ages 6 weeks to 3 years old. • 145 children and their families received Safety Net services (crisis intervention, home visits and basic needs support). Redmond Senior Center Requesting a 4% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. Higher food costs(from $3.74 to $3.85/meal, a 2.9% increase Current Award: $2,000 in cost per meal 2015-16 Request:: $2,080 2.Increasing number of unduplicated clients in Meals on Wheels =4%increase over 2014-15 and congregate dining(based on data recorded through January 31, 2015, estimates it will provide 98 unduplicated Redmond 14-15 Project Senior Center area seniors with Meals on Wheels in fiscal year • Purchase food to provide a minimum of 2,000 2015;this represents 20 more seniors, or 15% more,than meals per month via Meals on Wheels and served in fiscal year 2014) congregate meals Saving Grace/Mary's Place Requesting a 50% increase in funding to keep pace with: 1. Replacement of 1.25 FTE long-term staff, requiring additional Current Award: $10,000 expense of extensive safety-focused training for new hires (180 hrs). 2015-16 Request: $15,000 2.Our program is operating at full-capacity, open and staffed 7 50% increase over 2014-15 days per week. 3. Over 65% of children served at MP are 0-6,the most 14-15 Project vulnerable age for exposure to trauma . • Provide 1,600 supervised visits and safe 4.Since Oct 2013 we have been unable to charge any fees for exchanges for families that have experienced services.The loss of this $10K in revenue continues to impact domestic violence, sexual assault,stalking our services,the demand for which has not diminished. and/or child abuse. 5.Since 2014,the court has been ordering a higher number of • visits than exchanges.Visits take 2.5 hrs per family, as opposed to 15-30 minutes for exchanges,so fewer services can be conducted within our capacity. However, visiting families present greater concerns for safety and more intensive supervision than exchanging families. Page 4 of 4 a "d" O a a U) ' ED 0 U) M 0 CD O W N O CO 0 UA — a C') LU N 01 l!) O O 6 6 0 Cd 6 6 6 6 a a a 6 O O 41 i. 0 C J N 0000000 O 00 00 00 0 a) OetCD 0 CD 0 CO CD as 0 0 0O N a 0 (.000000 0 420 0 0 0 p a t- o" p o p Ca U) U) N 0 L (0 O LU co- 1 O 4 CO t) - N - r r - CD r N) C'7 N r e- N M ±+ C CV CO C .- v 0, 64 64 69 69 69. 69 Ef3 0 E9 • 69 EA 63 69 69 6'3 63 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O O c> 0 0 0 O N O C0 O a c) a O ug O 'a O O O a 0 0 0 00Lo00000 yQ woo 0a Qom-) P C L lC) E0OC' T a0 a ar OO ) N y 0N O d C O `- N 1- N— 1— to . N N N— r .-- N 0) ▪ 7 0) ( I.- C� LL LO 64 64 63 69 63 69 Ef3 .�69 W Ef3 Ef3 Ef3 69 Eft Eft Ef3 .2 c -J , �e o , W 0 0 Z d• N d 0 N O D C V •? N C a >. a) © G <CO E re a) ct u a �` z < cv W c U) a d E O O �_ a H E C) i5 v aW2s y,• = 0_ O C O 7 ` •� C O O CO 0 ca Li_ O d C C a) C � a 0 z W .- Q. 7.i-. ° ° m w cn 0 c LL _ ,O as co O v Q) LL N 1 c ,a) u) v) u) E p , Z O Cu Cl) ++ CO 0 o 0 O a) rn , 2 O 7 0 '1_ ncti �' 5 a W O U E O O co L_ W 0 Q a ' 0 m a) Z a a) 2 9 E A a) W w a — co d' ,� al co w a O c c O Q a2i _c W ., C Q 8 ._ co m ro J m > z c L O E 2 u) -v •1 -' E Z CQ > > OLLO Cd7tiixo2 IY2 iz 0 L- N c v I- Z 92 a a V) o8 0 W 0 o �7�// W C 0 Co L W U I- Q i c a) W o0 .� a) 0 cu_ 0 Q a 2 °- r C U > a) c - u) N u) al Z . o c C O O N c a) a c Z' O O L — 2 N a a) c E .O a1 1 N ai) 0OQm 1 U a" QQc)] = C� Ott c 7 O O Q V Z a7 o a) a) a) ca 0 03 a) co 0 © a) as C n O oO0LL2 -, Q' _1 UY Et (0 O D I- 4-17-2015 To: Deschutes County Commissions From: Sunriver Area Chamber of Commerce Regarding: Request for Funding Response to April 13th email from Judith Ure 1.-Precisley how the County's funds are currently being used by the Chamber, particularly with the recent relocation of the Central Oregon Visitors Association (COVA)to Sunriver. Indentify any aspects of County-funded activities that are directly related to promoting tourism. With regards to tourism, COVA's decision to relocate their office to Sunriver appears to have created a perception that the Sunriver Area Chamber of Commerce (SACC) is no longer relevant or that the Chamber is no longer needed to promote tourism in Sunriver. In reality, COVA's relocation to Sunriver has not changed in any way the activities, functions or missions performed by either organization, nor should it. COVA is a regional marketing organization (RMO)while the SACC is a destination marketing organization (DMO). COVA's mission is to promote tourism equally to all of Central Oregon,while the SACC's mission is to promote tourism specifically in the Sunriver Area. If COVA a RMO, can fulfill the functions of SACC a DMO,then it follows that the State of Oregon with their Travel Oregon promotion can perform the functions of COVA and neither COVA nor SACC are needed. In addition,the majority of visitors that enter a local visitor center want specific information about local activities,events and amenities and are rarely looking for information outside of the area they are visiting. With regards to funding, in 2014 the SACC operated with total annual income of$52,786.00 (for your consideration a copy of our 2014 income and expense statement has been attached). Of that amount Deschutes County provided funding of$21,516.00. Because of the low amount of total income,the Board of Directors of SACC has not earmarked the county funds to support a specific tourism project. Rather,the income has been comingled to help financially support all the everyday expenses of the Chamber. For the enhancement and promotion of tourism,the Chamber performs the following functions: -Production of the annual Sunriver Magazine with over 25,000 copies printed. -Continuous distribution of the magazine throughout the year. -Daily maintenance and operation of the Sunriver Chamber website. -Daily maintenance and operation on Facebook. -Handling visitor information and inquiries through emails and correspondence. -Handling visitor inquires through telephone conversations. -Personal interaction with visitors at our visitor center. -Promotion of events and activities in Sunriver. -Sunriver Magazine and/or other specific visitor information mailed directly to potential visitors. -Creation and maintenance of local area maps. -Distribution of maps to visitors. -Promotion of Sunriver brand or image. Although your request asked us to "indentify any aspects of County-funded activities that are directly related to promoting tourism",the services provided by SACC extend well beyond just promoting tourism.The mission of SACC is to "promote and enhance the economic vitality of the Sunriver area" and tourism is just one component of economic vitality. Other components of economic vitality include economic development, health and human services, education, arts and culture, public safety and communication. Economic vitality must also include the individuals and business that live and work here.The services that the SACC provides in these areas have been detailed in our previous submission that was sent to Deschutes County on March 6, 2015 (a copy of that submission has been attached). In addition we have attached a power point presentation highlighting the services provided by the SACC in all areas of economic vitality. Therefore,the SACC is not only looking for financial support from Deschutes County for the promotion and enhancement of tourism, they are also requesting financial support for the additional services that SACC provides for all areas of economic vitality.The Chamber is requesting that Deschutes County provide the Chamber with other sources of financial support, such as lottery funds,to help the SACC promote and enhance areas such as economic development in the Sunriver area. 2-What an increase in funding would specifically be used for, 1.e,staff,operational expenses, projects, programs,or other initiatives. Provide several options at different dollar amounts and show a direct correlation between the use of the funds and varying levels of support. Indentify those activities that directly encourage tourism. As mentioned earlier,the services provided by SACC are not strictly confined to tourism.The day to day operations of the Chamber and the duties required of the executive director to fulfill all parts of the Chamber's mission, is intertwined. It is impossible to segregate the costs related strictly to promotion of tourism as opposed to the other functions provided by the executive director to promote and enhance the other components of economic vitality. The total amount of money provided to the SACC from Deschutes County has been the same amount each year. However,the operating costs to run the Chamber have increased every year and increases in membership dues alone will not cover these financial deficiencies. The SACC currently operates with one full time executive director. However,the annual salary provided the executive director is grossly inadequate in today's economy. In addition, it is impossible for one executive director to operate a full time visitor center and in additional perform the services that are required outside of the visitor center. A position of"assistant to the executive director" is also needed. Deschutes County Funding needed for the 2015 to 2016 budget: Executive Director Salary Range: $35,000 to $50,000 (Recent survey responses from 366 chamber executive directors indicate that the medium annual salary is$97,000). Job Description: The executive director of the chamber of Commerce is a key representative and advocate for business owners and employers in a community. According to the American Chamber of Commerce Executives, there are about 3,000 independent U. S. chambers with unique goals determined by diverse groups of members. Despite differences, all chamber directors work to promote and strengthen their communities by building prosperity through a healthy economy and a strong business sector. Membership Services Chamber directors plan, organize and oversee a range of services and events for members.They typically maintain a website that features local business news and a membership directory that is available to the public and potential new customers and clients. Most chambers hold regular social events that offer members a chance to network and share information and ideas. Some directors identify common needs among local business owners and arrange lectures,workshops and training seminars on different management issues and opportunities. Advocacy Executive directors take an active part in local government.They advocate for laws and ordinances that benefit business. Community Ties Businesses want attractive and culturally rich communities that attract visitors and customers.They also want safe neighborhoods and good schools for employees and their families. Chamber directors lead the business community's efforts to support and enhance cities and towns.They often spearhead campaigns to raise money for local charities and cultural organizations. Chambers may sponsor their own community events such as holiday parades, heritage festivals and job and health fairs.Some directors may launch partnerships between educators and employers so that local schools can align their curriculum with the skills needed by the local labor market. Assistant to the Director: Salary range: $20,000 to $30,000 Job Description: -Communications manager; web site development and maintenance; office manager; membership manager. -Keep chamber office open daily. -Communication with all members periodically to determine chamber focus and management of monthly functions. -Creates and executes events -Mailing important relocation and visitor information The SACC is not asking for funding to specifically develop a new program or project. Our request for financial support is based on our inability to be able to continue to provide the important services that it is currently providing. Simply looking at the gross salary and employee benefit costs alone, an annual income of$100,000 is needed just to pay this expense. With additional funding in hand, the Chamber can then begin the task of properly staffing their office and prioritize Chamber activities and functions. Thank you for allowing us to make this presentation. We are grateful for the support your have given us in the past and we look forward to working with you in the future. Sincerely, The Board of Directors of the Sunriver Area Chamber of Commerce Jan-Dec 14 Income 410000•Visitor Center Advertising 175.00 445000•Grants&Contracts 21,516.88 450000•Interest Income 2.57 455000•Membership Dues 25,505.18 465000•Miscellaneous Income 5,506.92 49900•Uncategorized Income 80.00 Total Income 52,786.55 Gross Profit 52,786.55 Expense 600000•Advertising Expense 1,115.00 602000•Bank Fees 552.74 604000•Dues and Subscriptions 50.00 610000•Food&Beverage 350.00 614100•Insurance-Dir&Off 744.00 614200•Insurance-General Liability 690.00 616000•Miscellaneous Expense 20.00 618000•Postage&Shipping 1,562.65 622000•Professional Fees 849.00 622100•Professional Fees-Accounting 379.50 622200•Professional Fees-Legal 450.00 626000•Rent 4,240.20 626100•Utilities 835.62 628100•Services-Compu Prog&Maint 295.00 628400•Services-Website Development 72.65 628500•Services-Webslte Hosting 2,420.00 632100•Supplies-Office 104.93 634000•Telephone&Telecommunications 2,436.14 636000•Travel&Entertainment 2,393.25 638000•Payroll Expenses 2,823.93 638200•Payroll Expen-Off&Dir Wages 25,342.01 638300• Payroll Expenses-Payroll Tax 7,503.53 638400•Payroll Expenses-Sal&Wages 1,522.91 Total Expense 56,753.06 Net Income -3,966.51 a fi �gS C J1 Y E 0 {'(�/�/y 5 y� z s fist X,%rp O , CO co U • "'1-) o W tt A--) (f) o (1) ct Q o i 0 • ii W cf) a) C ) 00 ct '0 4 (I) ct E it * w W H 1010 ' • • • I V O 0 U 0 i•Liimil cn VD CZ a) E Ci) PLq ct E ;`21 ..8 0 a o , c, , ,_, u P. cL, ,.. u . 0 .,, , E cd 'P-4 0 t4 U E cn E *-0 u 0 m _1-54 tz.. 3 E .4 0 ,Z1 0 0 0 U a a� � 0 w w x < u H • • • • • • • 0 CU U '-H Q)cn •,. .1 (n O bA 4-1 "CI •;-►p O a S� Cl), at o . . cp +► C) a •u c1 cu 5 i › � at tID Cn Cl) 0 �' n .°� C) Q t i, u °' co D4 � o < Q O o � •,, C w C cu > O o • u a)ct ›-"1 < . . N .+� V -4—) v ,� ,� U CU .,-, Q ,i71, iii CC1 Q ;-1 o O a� Cf) 2.3 - -'' ,75., . . o � cu V 14-I°� �-+ : o ,00 u o ,,� CV Cr) er 1111 .�'� Q oaA ooC) iv , 0 • o a o a � to(r) w (f) • • • • • • a) to a) lit' g .-1 Tid • -i a) -5 i-ci U _ `� a oo co (1) C ,� cn bA 1 bA 4� a) g E ° ° o o zjz Qa bA P-4 et 'ci'l a Q .� � •u 4i C p o ct 0 > x L) o w ct < CD ;. co .4,-.), 4 ca) ;c1 -"S -1—' E .1-4 0-1 CD (.2) > .r, O O U n n U ' � a °n a g.,5 2-1 o a c o au co 0 • 15 i ,c) co 0 o -o to(5', 8 gl, o U �Q .,4., bA . ,, Q .,, ftga)u , c/i i-c$ ..._ , 4-1 ,,,, c..) (1., al ct •. O O O O 4-) ...I, c,c, t +� '-(a) U U �, C) ;..., O� N Ct g 4 ct u u P—, HU Mm 1 r^ ,wf y E o a) a� o CA cra • •o 4 "d o -4-0 u 2 c) MI w to O E q� '-• N cct z o > o .� •? o Cn ° • 0 CU 0 i— "Ci I-C1 4 rt5 ct c� 0 ci) a.) 0 ;.1 -r1 CD u CC1 o o b.!) cn v.4.9.2 c) 0 •� o 6-4 .� :L.4 ,_1c24 cli fai a) •u v7/ c.! C! a ,n can 41-1 • • • • • ' f" c� • 1.0 co as E 0 c� w ct >CD c� 0 E •E CU E 0 o •("ii) a9 E 4 Up Clio) 0 _,W) rid • U cu ci) cn ! .,.., ,� cn ` 8 cu � � ct 0 al Ct w 4 cf) 0 71 0 0 faq U • „.. cu o „, .6..),.... g Ct � � g � U o q4j .� o p E ;-1 4 a 1U P-, � �, cn �l • • • ,'Et .s byL/1 rry�^J• -/�//�C��j{//��,. - ::1) 5• •fy�11N1 •�`ry��• 1 V� o w ›, U e i. ct CU c - CA U v '—' CD 0 cv> ci3. e_i 0 0 l • ' UU cn o 0 � '-t: 'v 4. , CU iis.,-, •c, g ,. U cu a) a> U U 0 W v �, ct - a UbA cn cu ;--4 z ct cu .., U CU Cn ° •F cn cn �Ln 0U q) � � qa O 0 CU 4ga (21 g cu cu • o o° ,„-,t1 RS (3) 0 U F 4.1 w Q < U U .6.; ;..., a) C/) r^ c1 V J —.. .. ›, ct E ,.( 0 a) ct Ct ` - a) • r..1 > 0 0 `f' a) Cn . • E a) N E to I Q a) O 5 > o - 0 cd U Cn � Z T2 O a) a) an) 0 Z Z PO c • • • .. M 0 r CI) 9 � C� . o --4 C.) 0 u 0 0 .0 tt •N �-' •N c •,--' O 0 0 biD al as bio bo u O 0 ct Eo bt o E rn 0 0 czs -,-) 0 ;. 145 ct ct as ._ H ct 5 E (i)+, O .... -rii cn O as p..4 bA 4)ti) V c.) O O Q ct L • • • • • • 7 (1) .' dj. 75 a) .i. �-i cii r9 W k■ 0 4 E CZ 4� a, U • iii can Z N ;_i 0) 0 ;.-4 c..1.1 lf) CI) . ) 111 ^4: !! Ct 0 •� a) tiD . < o 0 a) P-1 cn at ,, o ,. °o as .� cn Emi > a) 0) cn o o 0 Q, - � �, cn a U o as a) . /-1 0 a E o N al ° •o a°A o • c' '�bID tO cri Q) cli ct O O - - Cr) O •�, 17; (I) -�--' v) V `~' ' O a) � .v ( • u ,C u u P—I CU '-' •,� .r+ as 4.) _ as Q QO W ti u Z • • • • • • • • CID «}4 Cla) Cl Tad P°:4 CD rt cn L� a g x-1-1 0 Q . . U o 5 -0 '1)0 � Q 0 • • • • Area Chamber of Commerce SERVING THE NORTHWEST'S YEAR-ROUND PLAYGROUND Two Countr,Mall.Suite B 57195 Beaver rive Sunriver,Or 97707 8541)553-8149 Fax.(541)593-3581 eKec(Asunriverchamber,:c m March 6, 2015 Emailed to: Tom Anderson Deschutes County Administrator To Be Submitted to: Deschutes County Commissioners: Tony DeBone Tammy Baney Allen Unger Submitted By: Kent Elliott Executive Director Sunriver Area Chamber of Commerce Domestic Nonprofit Corporation State of Oregon Registry No.: 051430-86 Subject: Request for Funding The Sunriver Community is truly a unique place in Deschutes County. It is comprised of numerous homeowner and vacation associations (large and small), retail, service, tourism, and manufacturing businesses (large and small), public facilities, permanent residents and part time vacation home owners all with various economic goals and objectives. As an unincorporated community, it is difficult to unite the many diverging interests into one marketing brand or community voice. Yet, Sunriver continues to provide Deschutes County with two thirds of the total Transient Room Taxes collected in the County, making it the largest producer of tourism dollars in the County to the tune of$2.8 million in fiscal year 2013-14. Sunriver has been affectionately coined, "the gateway drug that hooks people on Central Oregon." Since Sunriver began operating in the late 1960s, a large percentage of visitors to Sunriver have become property owners in Deschutes County based on the time they spent vacationing here. The economic value of this fact cannot be precisely measured but its importance cannot be overstated. Therefore,when considering the best ways to enhance economic vitality, it is sound and prudent economics to reinvest in the area that brings the greatest economic return. History The Sunriver Area Chamber of Commerce (SACoC) was formed in 1986 by local business people who were very optimistic about the future of Sunriver. The original mission of the SACoC was to promote the "Economic Vitality of the Sunriver Community." The Chamber's original mission continues to this day with very little change over the years. Recently, Deschutes County Commissioner Tony Debone launched a series of"5 for 5"town hall meetings in South Deschutes County outlining the components of Economic Vitality. The 5 components presented in the meetings are at the core of the SACoC's mission. The Chamber continues to provide valuable services that enhance all 5 components of economic vitality as identified by Commissioner DeBone. Public Safety Although the Chamber cannot actually perform public safety, it does everything possible to promote and educate the citizens and visitors to Sunriver on the value of public safety and the services made available through the Sunriver Service District. The chamber is an advocate for the Sunriver Police and Fire departments. It is important for these departments to connect with the citizens. In spring of each year the Sunriver Fire Department, in conjunction with the Chamber, will hold an open house for citizens and children to tour the fire house and equipment. In fall, the Chamber helps promote a major fundraiser at the Hola restaurant, which raises money for the police Unity Tour and for the families of firefighters that have died in the line of duty. The Chamber works with the Sunriver Owners Association (SROA)to promote safety on the roads and bike paths in Sunriver. The Chamber annually distributes thousands of road and pathway maps that list Sunriver's unique and effective safety rules. In survey after survey, visitors and locals consistently rate Sunriver's 30 plus miles of paved pathways as the most frequently used amenity. In 2012, bikeportland.org described Sunriver as having the "Best Bikeways in North America," recognition the Chamber is proud to promote. The Chamber is very active in the promotion, prevention and reduction of forest fires to the businesses and residents of Sunriver. The Chamber works closely with the Upper Deschutes River Coalition to define and promote defensible space and fuel reduction in all the homeowner association districts in the greater Sunriver area. The US Forest Service and the UDRC are important members of the Chamber and utilize the Chamber's many outreach systems to inform the community of ways to reduce fire danger. The Chamber is actively working to address the issue of safe public access to the upper Deschutes River. The Chamber is helping identify solutions to safety issues presented each summer by the public seeking access to the river at Harper Bridge. Our 2015-2016 Sunriver Magazine contains an updated map of publically accessible put-ins and take-outs. Education As the only school located in the Sunriver Area, Three Rivers Elementary receives significant support from the Sunriver community. The education of our children is extremely important to the future economic vitality of the Sunriver community and the school is a priority member of the SACoC. Knowing the importance a nutritional diet has on students' ability to learn; in December 2014 the SACoC organized and promoted Casino Night. The event, which was held at the Sunriver Homeowners Aquatic & Recreation Center (SHARC), is a major fundraiser for the Care and Share Christmas Basket program. The school as well as local churches identified individuals and families in need of assistance. The Care and Share program, an all-volunteer organization, was able to provide over 100 needy families in South Deschutes County with Christmas baskets of food, clothing and children's presents. This year the SACoC implemented, organized and funded the Junior Achievement Program into Three Rivers School. The program has been enthusiastically received by the principal and teachers. Business leaders and SACoC volunteer members will teach at least 7 classes in 2015. Our goal is to be a complete k-8 curriculum sponsor in 2016. The Sunriver Nature Center and Oregon Observatory, a prominent member of the SACoC, conducts educational nature programs for Sunriver residents and visitors. The SACoC works closely with the nonprofit organization to promote their activities and functions. All events and activities of the organization receive high priority promotional status with the SACoC. Economic Development Recent surveys completed by SROA show the number of homes in Sunriver occupied by full time residents has dropped to less than 20%. The SACoC Board of Directors believes a better balance between residency and vacation use will improve Sunriver's economic vitality. The board is seeking ways to promote Sunriver as a great place to live and work. Efforts are being made to promote Sunriver as a place for permanent residents. Promotional material and information is being produced to support this approach. The board is committed to working closely with organizations such as Economic Development of Central Oregon (EDCO) to finds ways to promote Sunriver as a great place to operate a business. EDCO has an ambassador position for La Pine, but does not have a representative position for Sunriver. The SACoC is a current member of EDCO and has requested appointment of a Sunriver position on EDCO's board of directors. The SACoC is supportive of the Sunriver Resort's expansion of Caldera Springs. It is believed that the expansion will create jobs and growth to the Sunriver area. The SACoC holds ribbon cutting ceremonies welcoming new businesses to the Sunriver community. The new business owner is able to meet and greet fellow businesses owners and establish themselves into the community. The SACoC looks for opportunities to provide educational programs for the Sunriver business community to help them operate successful businesses. The Chamber has identified a need to train service staff at accommodation partners and retail outlets to enhance customer service and maximize the guest experience. The SACoC will be rolling out Q School to assist local businesses with this training. The SACoC would like to provide its members and local businesses with educational classes on social media, web development and other technological support classes, in cooperation with local experts. Business and adult educational classes provided by Central Oregon Community College are promoted and current class information is available to visitors and residents at the Visitor Center and Chamber office. Residential and business development property is readily available in the Sunriver area and South Deschutes County and the SACoC is prepared to help promote and welcome new development. The SACoC would like to become the primary source for property development information and services. Health and Human Services The SACoC has recently sent a letter of support to the La Pine Community Health Center to operate out of the High Desert Family Medical Center. The plan calls for the owner of the High Desert Family Medical Center to turn over their facility every Friday to the La Pine Community Health Center. The La Pine Community Health Center would use the facility each Friday to treat low income families and patients. It is hoped that the support of the SACoC will help expedite the proposed agreement and make the plan for increased and consistent health care a reality. When the Sunriver Post Office was in jeopardy of being closed by the US Postal Service, the SACoC was instrumental in gathering community support to stop the closure. The Chamber helped unite the community into one voice and the post office was taken off the closure list. The SACoC continues to be supportive of our Sunriver Area Library. SACoC communicates all library events and services to the community. Arts& Culture As a recreational community, art and cultural events in Sunriver are significant economic engines that attract hundreds of thousands of visitors to Sunriver each year. Each year in preparation of the annual Sunriver Magazine, the Chamber compiles a complete list of events occurring in the Sunriver area and also lists the major events occurring in Bend and La Pine. It is the most comprehensive list of Sunriver events published by any organization. The Sunriver Music Festival, one of the premier events in all of Central Oregon, brings thousands of vacationers to Sunriver and Bend, and works closely with the Chamber to maximize the event's success. For years the Festival has worked together with the Chamber to organize and run the annual Swings for Strings golf tournament, which is the major fundraiser for the organization. The Festival is showcased in the Sunriver Magazine and is one their primary marketing pieces. The Festival utilizes the Chamber's marketing services to help find local housing for the musicians who travel from across the country and overseas to perform at the festival. The Sunriver Nature Center and the Oregon Observatory is an important member of the SACC. In addition to sponsoring several of their events throughout the year, the organization counts on the Chamber as one of their primary marketing sources. The Sunriver Art Faire, a three day event in Sunriver that is organized and run by the Sunriver g Y Women's Club, brings over 20,000 visitors to Sunriver. Each year the Women's Club uses the Chamber to help launch the Art Faire with a "kick off" event held at the SHARC. The event generates awareness and helps recruit volunteers to run the faire. Sunriver Books & Music holds book club meetings and periodic author appearances at their store in The Village at Sunriver, and major author events at SHARC. Larger venues are needed to accommodate crowds that show up to meet best-selling authors like Craig Johnson of the Walt Longmire mystery series fame. The Sunriver Artists' Gallery, a cooperative of 30 artists, also holds artist events throughout the year. Both organizations use the marketing services of the Chamber to help promote their events. The Sunriver Stars Community Theater, a nonprofit group of thespians, performs several plays and musicals throughout the year at SHARC. The 3-day weekend shows are performed to sold out audiences, primarily based on the marketing provided by the Sunriver Scene and the Chamber e news services. Communication In order to maintain strong economic vitality in a community, it is imperative that the community receive consistent information from reliable sources to keep itself educated and informed. Sunriver has limited local news outlets. The Sunriver Scene, the monthly periodical published by SROA, provides locals and visitors with valuable local news; however, it is basically a homeowner's association newsletter. The other principal news source in Sunriver is the SACoC's weekly e newsletters. Each Monday morning the Chamber emails to more than 1,000 business owners and local residents information regarding upcoming events, local and regional business news and other relevant information that affects the community. Chamber members also use the email services to present their information to the community. The e news is available to anyone to receive and is not restricted to members only. The Chamber is working with the special projects division of the Bend Bulletin to help produce the "Under the Sun" quarterly insert dedicated exclusively to Sunriver. The SACoC is providing the Bulletin with editorial leads and content, promotion and identification of potential advertisers. Sunriver Magazine The premier marketing and information material highlighting the Sunriver area is the Sunriver Magazine. Working with Cascade Publications in Bend, the SACoC prints and distributes more than 20,000 copies of the magazine annually. The magazine is made available at news outlets throughout Sunriver, at SHARC,the Sunriver Chamber visitor center and is mailed free of charge to anyone who requests it. Sunriver Resort places the magazine in all their vacation rentals and most property management companies place it in the vacation properties they manage. Through reciprocity agreements, the magazine is distributed to and displayed in every visitor center in the state of Oregon. This includes the major visitors' centers at the Portland International Airport as well as the visitor center at the end of the Oregon Trail in Oregon City. The magazine is distributed to a targeted audience that is actively seeking Sunriver visitor and relocation information. The Sunriver Magazine is much more than a business-advertising vehicle. Great care is taken ensure the magazine contains information about all the areas surrounding Sunriver. The Newberry Monument, Cascades Lakes Hwy., Pacific Crest Trail and the High Desert Museum are all highlighted in the magazine. Relevant maps, educational information and a complete annual events calendar are part of this comprehensive description of Sunriver. This is a beautiful magazine that truly captures and showcases the qualities that make Sunriver a special and unique place to live, work and visit. The magazine is designed to appeal to visitors as well as local residents. It is a coffee table quality publication with a long shelf life that is referred to repeatedly throughout the year. Tourism Tourism by far has the largest positive financial impact on the Sunriver area. For this reason, it is imperative that Sunriver maintain its local presence, marketing and outreach. It is said that Bend has equaled or surpassed Sunriver as the primary visitor destination location in Central Oregon. If this is true, then a portion of that success can be attributed to the multi millions of dollars that the City of Bend has spent promoting the Bend brand and establishing the local Visit Bend visitor center. Such successes are examples of how local control and commitment can produce a better product at a lower overall cost. In January of 2014, the SACoC and the Central Oregon Visitor's Association (COVA) engaged in discussions to determine ways in which the two organizations could work together to enhance the complimentary services they provide. The SACoC proposed jointly operating the visitor center with the SACoC maintaining office space, sharing operating expenses and handling the local visitor inquiries, allowing COVA to concentrate on their regional marketing. This proposal was rejected by COVA. The SACoC then asked to for space display Chamber member information, and be provided an area where the local businesses and nonprofit organizations located in Sunriver could be marketed and displayed. COVA refused this request as well. In December of 2014, (COVA) relocated their offices to a highly visible, high rent location in the heart of The Village in Sunriver. According to COVA's published news releases, COVA established the new visitor center in order "to serve the presently unmet need to provide visitor information to the estimated 2.5 million annual destination visitors who base camp their Central Oregon vacation in Sunriver..." In the December Bend Bulletin COVA was quoted as saying, "the only community that does not have a full time visitor center is Sunriver..." These kinds of public statements make it difficult to engage with COVA as a marketing partner. Even though the vast majority of COVA's reported $2.2 million operating budget comes from taxpayers, and the fact that COVA's published mission statement is to "promote Central Oregon as a year-round visitor destination to improve the economic vitality of the region," COVA has made it clear that they are a member-driven organization. A business must be a member of COVA before they will receive any promotion from COVA. This means that all local Sunriver businesses and nonprofit organizations must pay a membership fee to COVA simply to have their brochure displayed at COVA's visitor center. COVA annual membership is more than twice that of the SACoC. COVA does carry the Sunriver Magazine in their visitor center (reciprocity), and they do list the SACC as a partner on their web site. COVA periodically sends to SACoC names and addresses of individuals who have requested information about Sunriver. The SACoC, in turn, mails copies of the Sunriver Magazine to these potential visitors. However, this means that a visitor center located in the heart of Sunriver, purporting to provide information about Sunriver, will not mail important information about Sunriver to potential visitors. COVA will, however, mail its visitors guide. COVA's Central Oregon Visitors Guide contains 122 pages, of which 7 pages (less than 6%), is devoted to Sunriver. The SACC's Sunriver Magazine is 114 pages and all of it is devoted to Sunriver. The system designed to advertise and promote Oregon to visitors is clear. Promotion is done on a state level, a regional level and a local level. The system is not designed for a regional visitor center to replace a local visitor center. Each level serves unique and specific roles. The services provided, and the organizations that provide them, should be complimentary. Not competitive. Financial Position The SACoC operates on an annual budget of approximately $50,000. Approximately half this money has been provided by Deschutes County with the balance coming from membership dues and advertising income. This income level has changed very little over the years. It is estimated that over 80%of the businesses that actively operate and market their services in Sunriver are members of the SACoC. However, even though the Sunriver area collects and remits the dominant majority of Transient Room Taxes to Deschutes County, it does so with a limited amount of businesses. Both the La Pine and Sisters Chambers of Commerce have twice the membership of the SACoC, based on the greater number of businesses in their area to draw from. Therefore, the SACoC's low amount of membership income is simply based on the small number of business the Chamber can represent in their area. The SACoC's balance sheet contains no long term debt and carries an adequate cash reserve at this time. Funding The financial viability of the SACoC is in jeopardy. Up to now, the SACoC has remained solvent thanks to tremendous volunteer support that local residents have donated to the Chamber. The SACoC currently operates with one full time executive director. It is not realistic to expect one person to operate the Chamber and visitor center 40 hours a week and, at the same time, represent Sunriver as an ambassador at civic functions, Chamber activities, etc. A minimum of two full time individuals are required in order to provide adequate services. The SACoC must invest in new technology and communications platforms. Individuals who are paid minimum wage cannot provide the level of knowledge and expertise required to properly operate and carry out the mission of the Chamber. An unofficial tally of the other Chambers and visitor centers operating in Deschutes County show that large financial grants have been provided to them from the city they represent. The Chambers of Commerce in Sisters and Redmond both receive well over$100,000 annually from their respective cities. In addition, these Chambers are able to maintain twice the number of members due to the larger amount of businesses in their areas. The La Pine Chamber of Commerce has twice the number of members as the SACoC, and receives over twice the amount of grant money, even though the amount Transient Room Tax collected in La Pine is relatively low. Therefore,the Sunriver Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors requests: 1) The Deschutes County Commissioners continue to provide funding for the important activities and services that the SACoC provides in Deschutes County. 2) An increase in those funds. 3) Any grant money that can be provided by the lottery funds. Thank you for considering our request. Respectfully submitted, The Board of Directors of the Sunriver Area Chamber of Commerce Brooke Snavely, President Sunriver Scene Editor 541-585-2938 brookes @srowners.org Dave Wilkins,Treasurer Starr Productions Entertainment Services 541-419-4090 starrproductiondjs @gmail.com Carl Jansen, Secretary President Upper Deschutes River Coalition 541-593-2777 carli @searchna.com Ginny Kansas-Meszaros, Director Gibson Realty 541-977-2710 ginnv.m.kansas @gmail.com Lisa Scott, Director Asea Wellness Consultant 541-647-7602 cellularasea @gmail.com William Wood, Director William Wood Photography 541-593-5512 wmwood@chamberscable.com Patty Klascius, Director Former SROA board member 503-695-2824 pklascius @gmail.com ED OC) START MovE GROW Deschutes County Economic Development Investment Initiative Revised for 2015-16 Fiscal Year EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following proposal is a revised and updated document that closely mirrors the program funded in the current fiscal year by Deschutes County. Per direction provided by staff and commissioners last year,the matrix and supporting narrative below represents a one year investment for comprehensive economic development services within Deschutes County, including the operation of programs and offices in all incorporated cities within the County's political borders. Community/ Deschutes Deschutes Local City Private Sector Total FY15-16 Program County County and other Members& Program Budget FY2014-15 Funding for FY Public Other Earned (inside Deschutes Investment 2015-16 Funding Revenue County borders)** (current) (proposed) (proposed) (proposed) 1C1' ':=113:511=1: 1111111 Sunriver/La Pine r w $20,000 $20,000 $5,000 $45,000 l Mz m „ w. $20,000 $60,000 $5,000 $85,000 Redmond (REDI) 1;4E11:MN $10,000 $80,000 $62,200 $152,200 Bend $10,000 $90,000 $500 $100,500 cr=tfrro tP> O$30,000 $10,000' * PANICS Venture Catalyst ,+r P; ,° $30,000 $10,000 $70,000 $110,000 Program , '1 EC rxa , EOPM ENT ACiTY x °RI°i„ ;0, a'ri` EDCO Regional ''v* $122,200 $50,000 $362,050 $534,250 Office '.. TOTAL: ledf,E13111 $212,200 $310,000 $504,750 $1,026,950 *Included$15,000 in pass-through to FoundersPad. No EDCO funding for FoundersPad is requested in FY2015-16. **Excludes programs in Crook and Jefferson Counties Funding from Deschutes County leverages(roughly 5:1 or$5 of outside funding for every$1 from the county) substantial investment from cities and other public entities(school districts, college, university) as well as from the private sector. In this way, public dollars are combined to achieve better results and measurably improve the local, county,and regional economy. It is our understanding that through three quarters of the current fiscal year that disbursement of video- poker lottery proceeds to Deschutes County are down 1-2%from forecasts. In an attempt to be consistent with lottery funding dedicated to economic development, EDCO's proposal for the coming fiscal year similarly reflects just over a one percent decrease (-$2,500) as well. Strong Local Economic Development Capacity A strong regional organization with equally capable economic development professional capacity at the local level is a model unique to EDCO in the Pacific Northwest. EDCO contracts to deliver comprehensive local economic development programs that are financially underwritten by the communities and Deschutes County. Local managers are assisted by local economic development advisory boards. In La Pine,that group is LED (La Pine Economic Development), an active, 12-member board comprised of city, county and local business leaders that meets monthly. In Sisters,a seven member advisory board with a similar structure meets bi-monthly to provide feedback on critical issues, projects and program activities. Sisters made a bold move this spring to invest further in their local economic development program by moving the position from a three-quarter time manager to full time for the final quarter of the fiscal year. Most importantly,these local programs are producing results in the form of completed business development projects, new capital investment for the property tax base,and new, well-paying jobs. Supporting Entrepreneurship & Early Stage Companies Fostering entrepreneurship is an important component of the region's economic development strategy. The two critical components for establishing Deschutes County as a premier place to start and grow new companies are 1) a robust mentoring network and 2) access to equity/growth capital. Continued development of these key infrastructure assets will not happen without focused and sustained effort. EDCO's funding priorities for the coming fiscal year are to continue support for important work happening under the Venture Catalyst Program (VCP). Overseeing this program is our Venture Catalyst, Brian Vierra, whose leadership continues to set the bar high for both the quality and variety of assets available to young companies and entrepreneurs. Gathering needed funding for the Venture Catalyst has continued to be a challenge for EDCO. As such, County support of this program is critical until we can raise adequate long-term funding. EDCO has been working closely with the Regional Accelerator& Innovation Network(RAIN) in Corvallis and Eugene,The Oregon Entrepreneur's Network(OEN) based in Portland, Southern Oregon Regional Economic Development, Inc. (SOREDI) in Medford, and Business Oregon on a proposal to provide matching funds for similar Venture Catalyst programs in those areas. With dedicated resources directed by the Oregon Legislature through Business Oregon,this could provide a more sustainable funding source for this important element of the services and results that EDCO delivers within Deschutes County and across the region. This proposal is current being considered in the state capitol, with a hearing scheduled on April 29 that will include testimony from Brian Vierra,former EDCO Venture Catalyst Manager and current RAIN Executive Director Jim Coonan, Linda Weston, Executive Director of OEN,and other leaders. Regional Economic Development Capacity Deschutes County has been a statewide leader in funding economic development using video poker lottery proceeds distributed by the State of Oregon. Over the years,this investment has been a foundation for everything the organization does and everything it accomplishes. Without a strong regional organization at the Bend Office, local offices would enjoy little support for their efforts to measurably improve the economy in their community. The regional office provides support in the areas of media relations and PR, marketing, event production, professional mentoring, professional recruitment, incentive administration, website presence, lead generation and financial management and audit services. Adding oversight and support of programs in La Pine and Sisters is stretching regional staff even further, which is why we have requested a modest increase in the coming fiscal year to help cover this added workload. The last increase for support of regional operations was$2,200 four years ago in the 2011-12 fiscal year. Return on Investment—Key Performance Indicators Funding provided by Deschutes County, other cities and counties, and about 300 private sector members has yielded a solid return on its investment. Results in the past two calendar years compared to region- wide goals (derived from EDCO's 3-year Strategic Plan) include: Calendar Year Results: 2013 & 2014 Companies Jobs Investment Payroll 3-Year Goal 96 2,000 $350M $80M Actual 64 1,379 $260.4 M $55.2M (24 months) In addition to these results, EDCO met one-on-one with more than 500 local traded-sector companies (roughly 80%of which were in Deschutes County)to proactively identify needs and opportunities. We provided assists(help that did not require significant time or resources)to an additional 450 companies, and conducted in excess of 300 consultations with early stage companies and entrepreneurs. By nearly every measure EDCO is achieving record outcomes which are "moving the needle" in a positive direction for the region's economy. Summary EDCO's board and staff applaud the Commission and the Deschutes County management team for your vision to sustain support for economic development services. We believe this proposal,which follows closely last year's proposal, represents a well-planned and cost effective strategy that is broadly supported by the communities within Deschutes County and leverages greater investment in economic development at the local level—both private and public. ES G O� 0 iste441; DESCHUTES COUNTY LEGAL COUNSEL DAVID DOYLE Legal Counsel W388-6625 TO: BOCC Date: April 15, 2015 RE: , COID - LUBA Appeal File No. TA 13-4 Attached please find the Notice of Intent to Appeal submitted to LUBA by legal counsel for COID. Staff seeks direction from the BOCC as to how to proceed. Options include: * voluntary remand * motion to dismiss * preparation of Record/defend BOCC action/inaction Quality Services Performed with Pride 1 BEFORE THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON 2 3 CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, 4 Petitioner, 5 LUBA No. 2015- v. 6 DESCHUTES COUNTY, 7 Respondent, 8 9 NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL 10 co c4 ° -do 2N a 0 12 Notice is hereby given that Petitioner intends to appeal the land use decision made by moo°° � 13 Respondent Deschutes County in file number TA-13-4. The decision became final for J �, ° 14 purposes of appeal on March 25, 2015, The decision, bearing the title Text Amendment W �M ry 15 (TA) 13-4, denied a text amendment proposal submitted by Central Oregon Irrigation 16 District, which would have allowed operation, maintenance, and piping of existing irrigation .E c 17 systems as an outright permitted use in the SR-2.5 zone. This appeal is filed on or before the 18 21st day after the decision became final and is therefore timely. OAR 661-010-0015. 19 Petitioner participated orally and in writing before the Respondent. 20 II. 21 Petitioner is represented by: 22 David E. Filippi Steven W. Abel 23 Stoel Rives LLP 900 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 2600 24 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 294-9599 25 26 Page 1 - NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL 78811727.1 0060710-00007 1 Ill. 2 Respondent, Deschutes County, has as its mailing address and telephone number: 3 Deschutes County, P.O. Box 6005, Attn: BoCC, Bend, Oregon 97708-6005, Telephone 4 Number: (541) 388-6570; Facsimile Number (541) 385-3202 and has, as its legal counsel: 5 David Doyle Deschutes County Legal Counsel 6 1300 NW Wall Street, Suite 205 Bend, OR 97701 7 (541) 388-6625 8 IV. 9 1p 0, Other persons mailed written notices of the land use decision or limited land use Nt- 11 decision by Deschutes County, as indicated by its records in this matter, include: n 12 Central Oregon Irrigation District Tom Hignell c/o Craig Horrell 20965 Country View Lane 13 1055 SW Lake Court Bend, OR 97701 .2 Redmond, OR 97756 � � 14 Pi, 15 Brian R. Sheets Joette Storm Schroeder Law Offices P.C. 63214 Brightwater Drive 16 1915 NE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Bend, OR 97701 Portland, OR 97212 o 17 Sheryl Mondt Thomas Casey 18 63298 Brightwater Drive 21115 Scottsdale Drive 19 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 20 Robert Rector Jeff Perrault 63380 Brightwater Drive 20980 Country View Lane 21 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 22 Aleta Warren Ron and Joy Minnice 23 63535 Overtree Road 63330 Brightwater Drive Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 24 Del Swan Pat Kliewer 25 63575 Overtree Road 60465 Sunridge Drive 26 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97702 Page 2 - NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL 78811727.10060710-00007 1 Trace Tipton Greg and Sue Vernon 21000 County View Lane 63385 Old Deschutes Road 2 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 3 Gary Jones Matt and Suzanne Gadow 4 63370 Brightwater Drive 63425 Overtree Road Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 5 6 Jim and Sherry Curl 63545 Overtree Road 7 Bend, OR 97701 8 NOTICE: 9 Anyone designated in paragraph IV of this Notice who desires to participate as a 10 o d11 party in this case before the Land Use Board of Appeals must File with the Board a Motion to Intervene in this proceeding as required by OAR 661-010-050, 12 a o ciD a DATED: April 15, 2015. 13 STOEL RIVES 1.I,P avid 14 • © N 15 Davis E. Filippi, SB No. 965095 16 Steven W. Abel, OS13 No, 831375 4 17 Attorneys for Petitioner 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 3 - NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL 78811727.10060710-00007 1 CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on April 15, 2015, I filed the original of this Notice of Intent to 3 Appeal,together with two(2) copies, with the Land Use Board of Appeals, DSL Building, 4 775 Summer Street NE Suite 330, Salem, Oregon 97301-1283, by certified mail, return 5 receipt, 6 I further certify that on April 15, 2015, I served a true and correct copy of this Notice 7 of Intent to Appeal by first-class mail on the following persons: 8 David Doyle Deschutes County 9 Deschutes County Legal Counsel Attn: BoCC 1300 NW Wall Street, Suite 205 P.O. Box 6005 � o 10 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, Oregon 97708-6005 C• O o ' 11 Brian R. Sheets __..__. Torn Hignell 5 Schroeder Law Offices P,C. 20965 Country View Lane o 0 12 1915 NE Cesar E. Chavez Blvd. Bend, OR 97701 °" Portland, OR 97212 c.n ° �. 13 Sheryl Mondt Joette Storm 14 • M 63298 Brightwater Drive 63214 Brightwater Drive W � O N 15 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 ado 16 Robert Rector Thomas Casey c. .5 63380 Brightwater Drive 21115 Scottsdale Drive 17 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 18 Aleta Warren Jeff Perrault 19 63535 Overtree Road 20980 Country View Lane Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701. 20 21 Del Swan Ron and Joy Minnice 63575 Overtree Road 63330 Brightwater Drive 22 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 _Trace Tipton Pat Kliewer 23 21000 County View Lane 60465 Sunridge Drive Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97702 24 25 26 Page 1 - CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE 78811727,1 0060710-00007 1 Gary Jones Greg and Sue Vernon 63370 Brightwater Drive 63385 Old Deschutes Road 2 Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 3 Jim and Sherry Curl Matt and Suzanne Gadow 4 63545 Overtree Road 63425 Overtree Road Bend, OR 97701 Bend, OR 97701 5 6 7 STOEL RIVES up 8 9 Da E. Filippi, SB No, 965095 IO Steven W. Abel, OSB No. 831375 ° 11 Attorneys for Petitioner a. �a po 12 13 wWJ � 14 C2 H ; ry 15 Q w E 16 •v 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 2 - CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE 78811727.1 0060710.0007 Sale 1A; 2015-01 Serial: 127496 Ta xio t: 151316AA 006 00 205 SW Black Butte Redmond, OR 97756 Znnt,,g C2 Acreage; .09 TDC Number: Comments; SOLD AS IS. Older one-story home with attic, 1,100 square feet. Minimum Bid: $56,800.00 Legal Description: TOWNSITE OF REDMOND; Lot: PT. 5, 6; Block 2 Sala 1D: 2015.02 Serial: 172130 Taxlnt: 1513200503500 2429 SW Valleyview Dr Redmond, OR 97756 Zoning R2 Acreage: 0.17 TDC Number; Comments, Vacant, platted, residential lot. Paved street—utilities available. City of Redmond. Minimum Bid: $29,200.00 Legal Description: VALLEYVIEW; Lot 8; Block 0 Sale ID: 2015-03 Serial, 130285 Taxlot: 1513308401300 3197 SW 45th St. Redmond, OR 97707 Zoning R2 Acreage: 0.46 TDC Number: Commantx: Vacant platted residential lot. Paved street and utilities available. City of Redmond. Minimum Bid: $40,000.00 Legal Description: HUNT'S THREE SISTERS VIEW TRACTS; Lot 2; Block 2 1 Sale ID: 2015-04 Serial; 150790 Taxlat: 1611250001200 64835 Bill Martin Rd. Bend, OR 97701 Zoning EFU, LM, SMIA Acreage: 19.8 TDC Number: Comments: Vacant rural parcel. Includes Conditional Use Permit for Non-Farm Dwelling (Valid until March, 2016). Minimum Bid: $124,000.00 Legal Description: Partition Plat 2011-11; Parcel 1 Sale ID: 2015-05 Serial: 242392 Taxia t: 1613164 0013 00 23010 Brushline Ct. Bend, OR 97701 Zoning Destination Resort Acreage: 0.47 TDC Number: Comments: Vacant platted lot in Pronghorn. Property is subject to required membership fee and dues, and HOA fees. Minimum Bid: $8,000.00 Legal Description: ESTATES AT PRONGHORN PHASE 2; Lot 124 Sale ID: 2015.06 Serial: 180241 Taxiat: 1811120000300 No address Century Dr. (southwest of Bend) Zoning RS Acreage: 2.09 TDC Number: Comments; Vacant parcel in City of Bend/UGB. City utilities may not be available. Minimum Bid: $30,000.00 Legal Description: (Metes and Bounds-- Review Deed at Deschutes County Clerk 2009-20145) 2 Sale 11); 2015.07 Serial: 109835 Taxl o t: 1811361)005900 59610 Navajo Circle Bend, OR 97702 Zoning RR-10, LM Acreage: 1.08 T,DC Number: Comnte►rtt; SOLD AS IS. Platted lot with older single family dwelling. Minimum Bid: $47,200.00 Legal Description: DESCHUTES RIVER WOODS: Lot 4; Block C Sala 11): 2015-08 Serial: 180752 Taxlat: 1812041)000990 No address SE 9th St., Bend, OR 97739 Zoning IL Acreage: 0.25 TDC Number: Cmmnra►rto: Vacant lot. Will require 10 foot right of way dedication along frontage with SE 9th Street. with site development. Limited building area. City of Bend. Minimum Bid: $4,800.00 Legal Description: (Metes and Bounds--Review Deed at Deschutes County Clerk 2002-15308) Sale 1A; 2015-09 Serial: 115866 Taxiot: 201012C006300 16849 Fontana Rd. Bend, OR 97707 Zoning RR-10, WA Acreage: 0.49 MC Number: Continents: Vacant platted legal lot. No permit history. Area of high ground water and septic denial. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Property may not be developable due to inability to place an on-site sanitary wastewater system. Minimum Bid: $7,200.00 Legal Description: DESCHUTES RIVER RECREATION HOMESITES, INC. UNIT 5; Lot 38; Block 27 3 Sale ID; 2015-10 Serial; 137547 Taxlot; 20102313006600 55467 Jamie Way Bend, OR 97707 Zoning RR-10, LM, WA Acreage; 0.59 TDC N111 ber; Comments; Vacant platted lot. In area of high groundwater and septic denial. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Property may not be developable due to inability to place an on-site sanitary wastewater system. Minimum Bid: $4,000.00 Legal Description: OREGON WATER WONDERLAND UNIT NO. 1; Lot 5; Block 6 Sale ID: 2015-11 Serial; 137566 Taxlot: 20102513006700 55473 Jamie Way Bend, OR 97707 Zoning RR-10, LM, WA Acreage: 0.48 TDC Number: Comments; Vacant platted lot. In area of high groundwater and septic denial. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Property may not be developable due to inability to place an on-site sanitary wastewater system. Minimum Bid: $4,000.00 Legal Description: OREGON WATER WONDERLAND UNIT NO. 1; Lot 6; Block 6 Sale ID; 2015.12 Serial; 137565 Taxlat: 20102513006800 55481 Jamie Way Bend, OR 97707 Zoning RR-10, LM, WA Acreage: 0.58 TDC NUM hen Comments: Vacant platted lot. In area of high groundwater and septic denial. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Property may not be developable due to inability to place an on-site sanitary wastewater system. Minimum Bid: $4,000.00 Legal Description: OREGON WATER WONDERLAND UNIT NO. 1; Lot 7; Block 6 4 Sala ID: 2015-13 Serial; 137564 7 axlnt: 201025006900 55483 Jamie Way Bend, OR 97707 Zoning RR-10, LM, WA Acreage; 0.60 TDC Number: Comments: Vacant platted lot. In area of high groundwater and septic denial. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Property may not be developable due to inability to place an on-site sanitary wastewater system. Minimum Bid: $4,000.00 Legal Description: OREGON WATER WONDERLAND UNIT NO. 1; Lot 8; Block 6 Sale ID: 201 5-14 Serial: 126233 T'a xlat: 2011304 002100 17415 Cedar Ct. Bend, OR 97707 Zoning RR-10, LM, WA Acreage; 2.62 TDC Number: COMMONS: Vacant platted lot. In area of high groundwater and septic denial. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Property may not be developable due to inability to place an on-site sanitary wastewater system. Minimum Bid: $4,000.00 Legal Description: LAZY RIVER WEST; Lot 12; Block 1 Sale ID: 2015-15 Serial; 126233 7axial; 2011304002300 17455 Cedar Ct. Bend, OR 97707 Zoning RR-10, LM, WA Acreage; 2.05 TDC Nun,bar: Comments,: Vacant platted lot. In area of high groundwater and septic denial. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Property may not be developable due to inability to place an on-site sanitary wastewater system. Minimum Bid: $4,000.00 Legal Description: LAZY RIVER WEST; Lot 10; Block 1 5 Sale 11); 2015-16 Serial: 139489 Taxlot; 21101614008700 No address Corner— Park and Yoho, La Pine Zoning RR10, WA Acreage: 1.02 TDC Number; COMMON NI Vacant, platted, residential lot. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Minimum Bid: $11,200.00 Legal Description: DESCHUTES RIVER RECREATION HOMESITES UNIT 8, PART 2; Lot 9; Block 95 Sale III: 2013.17 Serial: 140643 Taxlot: 211029D003000 52856 Sunrise Blvd. La Pine, OR 97739 Zoning RR-10, WA Acreage: 1.2 TDC Number: Comments,: SOLD AS IS. Platted legal lot. Has an older single wide mobile home. Minimum Bid: $19,200.00 Legal Description: FOREST VIEW; Lot 7; Block 7 Sale ID: 2015-18 Serial; 144183 Taufo,: 220901A003100 14717 N. Sugar Pine Way La Pine, OR 97739 Zoning RR-10, WA Acreage: 1.4 TDC Number; Comments: SOLD AS IS. Partially constructed home. Large three-bay shop. History of Code Enforcement due to illegal septic system connected to shop. All permits are expired. Property has a Federal Tax Lien of$190,207.89 that will be settled by the County from the proceeds of the sale. Minimum Bid: $221,600.00 Legal Description: PONDEROSA PINES: Lot 37; Block 0 6 Sala IP; 2015-19 Serial; 141650 Taxlat; 2210054003500 15500 Federal Rd. La Pine, OR 97739 Zoning RR-10, WA Acreage; 0.94 TLC Number: Comments; SOLD AS IS. Platted residential lot with older double wide manufactured home. Home is in disrepair. Minimum Bid: $16,000.00 Legal Description: CONIFER ACRES; Lot 17; Block 5 Sale ID: 2015.20 Serial; 115298 Taxlat1' 2210165000414 15656 6th St. La Pine, OR 97739 zoning RR10, WA Acreage 0.96 TDC Number: Comments; Vacant land. Had septic feasibility for sand filter approved in 2006. Buyer must treat wildfire fuels. Minimum Bid: $20,000.00 Legal Description: (Metes and Bounds-- Review Deed at Deschutes County Clerk 2013-50433) Sale ID: 2015-21 Serial: 152289 Taxlat; 2219000001200 No Address. Frederick Butte Area Zoning EFU, WA Acreage; 80 TDC Number: Comments: Vacant rural land. May not have legal access. Surrounded by USA/BLM. Minimum Bid: $22,272.00 Legal Description: The East Half of the Southeast Quarter(E '/2 SE %)of Section 36, Township 22 South, Range 19 East. W.M. Deschutes County, Oregon. 7 Sala 1D: 2015=22 Serlal: 128104 Taplat: 141319401300 No Address. Almeter Way, Terrebonne Zoning EFU Acrooge: 4.5 TDC Number: Commas; Vacant parcel (4.5 acres). EFU Zone. Legal Lot of Record not determined — however, parcel located between/surrounded by legally dedicated right of way and platted subdivision on the west, and legal lots on the east. Minimum Bid: $20,000.00 Legal Description: That portion of Section 19, Township 14, Range 13, EWM, lying east of N.W. Almeter way. 8