The URL can be used to link to this page

2015-436-Minutes for Meeting August 31,2015 Recorded 10/2/2015 DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS CJ 7015,436 NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERK COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 10/03/3015 09:45:35 AM 111111111111111111 21 4 vTsaO _ a ;. NZ 0,f Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 0�' (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, AUGUST 31, 2015 Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Tammy Baney and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; David Doyle, County Counsel; Chris Doty, Road Department; Ken Hales and Sonya Littledeer-Evans, Community Justice; Steve Reinke, 911; Ed Keith, Forester; Scot Langton, Assessor; Judith Ure; Administration; Danielle Fegley and Kathleen Hinman, Personnel; David Inbody, Health Services; and Peter Russell, Community Development. Also present were Roger Lee, Robyn Sharp, Janet Burton, Caprielle Lewis and Jon Stark, EDCO; and two other citizens. There were no representatives of the media in attendance. Chair DeBone opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of Economic Development Fund Recapitalization. Roger Lee and Jon Stark introduced Tannus Quatre, CEO of Vantage Clinical Solutions, who gave an overview of his company's history with EDCO. He learned about the loan fund and, as a small business owner, how he found it very helpful. They needed to grow and make investments in technology. Receiving the loan gave them more confidence as they continued hiring, from eleven to twenty-three employees. It helps to have community support. They have spun off two other companies as subsidiaries since then, tied to the original company's mission. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 1 of 9 Pages Robyn Sharp explained how responsive they have been in providing the information required. Commissioner Baney noted it is good that this funding mattered and the Board would like companies to know that they are wanted here. Mr. Quatre said that this is a symbol of the commitment to help businesses thrive here. Roger Lee went over the current project tracking numbers through a PowerPoint presentation. Ms. Sharp said Geospatial will come back, having merged with another company. They have finalized a repayment plan for the loan. r has been 648 000 in County business loans awarded over five years, as b $ Co y y , with 565 jobs committed and 1,085 jobs created. The companies are diverse, from medical to electronics, transportation/logistics, manufacturing, food products and administrative centers. In the pipeline, they are now helping 144 companies with 1,463 expected jobs. Anticipated payroll is $59.2 million. Other incentives are the enterprise zones; Sisters and Redmond programs such as urban renewal and local development cost reductions; low cost industrial land and business finance. The State has a lot of programs for training, water/wastewater programs, and investment funds. EDCO has about ten projects in the works, for companies to either grow or move here, that could mean over 400 jobs. Jon Stark said there are several projects that would use the remaining funds, but some would go into the next fiscal year. Janet Burton said that La Pine got its first one, and there is a lot of energy in the community to market La Pine. This would mean a big win for La Pine. Caprielle Lewis stated she has been working on a business for Sisters for over a year. It is traded sector and tourism based. The relocation will cost $1.5 million and they are looking at a variety of sources. Mr. Lee said they looked at five areas in five states. Sisters could really use the help. They are going through due diligence at this point. Ms. Sharp said she also worked on this for about six months. It has been a team effort. She is working with four Bend companies, and two of those are considering other places as well. The timeframe would mean two this year and two in the next fiscal year. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 2 of 9 Pages Commissioner Unger said they used to call this opportunity funding. He is sold on the program but wants to know how they match this up to a funding source. The return on investment is important, and he hopes there is eventually payback through property taxes and other sources. Commissioner Baney asked how they present this to the public. Some will say that people cannot find housing, child care and adequate transportation. If the County is asked to invest another $400,000, she needs to know how these issues relate and will be addressed. Mr. Lee stated they can show total payroll amounts by industry. Mr. Stark said there is not an easy way to show the ancillary piece, the companies in related industries locally or who sells or purchases good from the companies that received help. Chair DeBone stated these should be non-seasonal, traded sector, family wage jobs. He struggles with the general fund commitment as well. Commissioner Baney questioned allowing companies to have a second turn at the funding. Mr. Stark said sometimes companies are acquired and there is a new group of decision-makers. This happened with Medline. Some reapply for the enterprise zone. EDCO could set a dollar maximum. However, that may mean some will not come because of this restriction. Tom Anderson knows it is a good program and it is hard to argue with the numbers. However, this is general fund money since lottery funds are committed elsewhere to partners to fill gaps in service. $400,000 is a significant amount when you consider limited tax dollars. The nature of the economy is cyclical and there will be a downturn eventually, and there is also a commitment to building reserves back up. There are other dollars leveraged from Sisters. It would be great if the other cities committed to this through a loan program as well. Details on the other available funding sources would be helpful. Commissioner Baney said there is a blessing and a curse with economic development funds. She asked about unrestricted TRT funds as a way to build the foundation. Commissioner Unger stated that EDCO needs a little certainty to continue. Commissioner Baney asked what they need. Mr. Lee pointed out that the fund was not recapitalized this last fiscal year. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 3 of 9 Pages Mr. Anderson proposed that the Board not make a decision today, but perhaps meet with Finance and see what TRT funding is coming in and hos it is being used. It has been treated like general fund. They also need to know how this is trending. As a government entity, they have a lot of needs and priorities to consider. Mr. Stark said they could approach this showing what funds came from where and the results gained. This item will be addressed again in the near future. 2. 4th Quarter Performance Measurement Report. Judith Ure spoke about the latest report. All of the objectives have been addressed at some level. Some departments did not report this time. Community Justice Ken Hales and Jim LaPorte spoke about the Functional Family Therapy program. Mr. LaPorte said they had a big year in Juvenile, especially with the at-risk kids. These families are challenging to engage. The benchmark was set at 85%. There are several critical risk factors regarding youth that are waiting to be caught. They hope to intervene before it happens. They ended at 88%, with 27 families in care and four on the waiting list. For the most part, they get referrals from school districts, friends of the family, and some from DHS or Behavioral Health. Mr. Hales stated that the monies used for prevention are not general fund, but State funds. Commissioner Baney asked if more referrals are needed. Mr. Hales replied that there seem to be people each year who do not know about it, even after years. However, they need to have the staffing available to help them. Commissioner Baney said that prevention is important. Mr. LaPorte stated they have to wrestle with capacity. Commissioner Unger stated that they need to touch these kids earlier in life before they make bad choices. Commissioner Baney added that the family units need to be equipped for this also. They referred to an article in the newspaper relating to Mr. Hale's department and the community service projects they perform. (A copy is attached for reference.) Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 4 of 9 Pages Road Department Ms. Ure said the Road Department goals were not in the budget document but some of what they have been doing fits in with goals and objectives. Chris Doty said this relates to healthy people, transportation and infrastructure. He referred to a presentation regarding widening bike lanes in some areas. As they chip seal, they minimize traveling lanes as allowed and widen the bike lanes. He showed a slide demonstrating what kind of rock chips are used for the various surfaces. They are trying to do this wherever they are striping, especially if they have higher cyclist volumes. Health Department Dave Inbody talked about how people live and how this affects overall health. This effort overlaps with Road and CDD as the environment comes into play. The broader measurement is the regional health assessment. They can spend months on something while they create individual department strategies. They want the latest efforts to truly be regional, including partners such as St. Charles and other entities. They hope that when it is done, all who provide health care in the region are on the same path. The second relates to the nurse/family partnership, and specifically pregnant women and those with infants. Staff screens for signs of domestic violence with every new person. This is tied directly to State funding. Twenty-seven individuals have been enrolled, but they hope to expand options to touch others. Commissioner Baney said the focus is on community health. The regional health improvement plan in the past allowed the COHC to be different. For instance, some folks live in one area but work in another. 911 CSD Steve Reinke explained that strategic capital programming relates to partnering with the State. The State has been very cooperative and will provide a week's training on the radio system that is replacing existing equipment. They have spoken about infrastructure that can be shared to make this revenue neutral. There will be a master agreement with side agreements for each aspect. The State has money to build infrastructure, but the County will help with some of this, in particular at HooDoo. The hope is to offset future maintenance costs. There will be better coverage in the highly populated areas through 911, and the State will help with the outlying areas. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 5 of 9 Pages The 911 User Board can serve as oversight for operations, allocations and bands to be used. Rather than a big intergovernmental agreement, this group would be tasked with additional responsibilities. Input can come to the board from others. Community Development Peter Russell stated that the City of Bend Airport Master Plan's federal version is done. He hopes for the final from the City this fall. He has been expecting this for three years, but the City may decide to hire a consultant to help with it. The County is coordinating for large lot industrial use with the City of Redmond. They are working with a consultant regarding the military department and Fairgrounds' interests, and another for the large industrial area. They are administering the three-year brownfields plan. They have spent much of the grant, but will use some for other projects. Forester Judith Ure said that these goals tie into many other areas. Ed Keith said the g oal was for 90% compliance regarding noxious weed control, a n d this is the first year they had compliance written in code. They had nine complaints, with only one having to be cited into court. Commissioner Unger asked if there are any volunteers who can help with this. Mr. Keith said general outreach is fine for volunteers, but when it comes to compliance issues, he needs to handle it. Some complaints are a combination of things that CDD might be dealing with as well. Assessor's Office Scot Langton reported that they have been looking at the most cost-efficient ways to get funds to where they need to be. They compare well with other counties, but there are a lot of factors to consider. The biggest factor may be how constituents vote on various measures, such as for school bonds. The public is more supportive of government here than in some places. Personnel Danielle Fegley stated that the work done in Personnel is not always apparent. At this time, she wants staff to be sure of the alignment of contracts and services, especially when contracts are coming due. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 6 of 9 Pages Kathy Hinman spoke about long-term disability and life insurance, as they looked for a new provider through a broker. The provider gained a commission out of the last negotiations, 10%, and she felt the County was not getting this back. They asked for different terms or a different process, a flat fee versus commission. A broker on a health insurance plan might take this on. The vendor did not like the fee for service aspect. This adjustment resulted in a savings to the County and for employees. They will add this service to the RFP. Ms. Fegley wants to maintain quality and service, but they are examining all aspects carefully. Estimated savings are significant. Ms. Hinman added that they are finalizing contract terms with Aetna with a rate guarantee. They lost a couple of providers that they are working with, but will try to make sure they can be included. 3. Forester Update, and Request for a Letter of Support for a RAC Grant Application for Noxious Weed Cost Share. Ed Keith spoke about the next round of funds to offer private landowners to use towards noxious weed control purposes. The property owners get on a program and are reimbursed for about half of their costs. There are usually between 40 to 50 participants in a year. He asked for a letter of support for the application. Commissioner Unger said they have advocated for this before and feels it adds stability. Mr. Keith said they are all working together, with the federal and state agencies, towards the same goal. BANEY: Move support of the grant application and a letter of support. UNGER: Second. VOTE: BANEY: Yes. UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. 4. Discussion regarding Clarifying Language in a Dog Nuisance Ordinance. David Doyle said that the existing ordinance needs some minor changes. He referred to the new language, which would make Code consistent in the type of infraction. It will be a class B violation. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 7 of 9 Pages They would omit language that is redundant as well. It does not change the laws substantively. Commissioner Unger wants to be sure the public can find what they need. Commissioner Baney asked about language used by other counties. Mr. Anderson said that this was through the Sheriff's Office who did not think that language was appropriate, because it limits how the Sheriff's Office can treat a situation. The citizen wants a Deputy to stay at the scene for a period of time to listen for barking dogs. The Sheriff's Office is satisfied with their protocols and process. They also do not feel that the laws should be changed just because one person has been vocal about a situation. Commissioner Baney stated that she wants to be sure anyone whoever sees this on the agenda be aware that they have reviewed the whole issue and considered all aspects. 5. Other Items. In regard to the Freight Advisory Committee, Commissioner Unger said he is not able to meet when they do, as those meetings conflict with Board business meetings. He is trying to come up with a solution. At 3:40 p.m., the Board went into Executive Session, under ORS 192.660(2)(h), pending or threatened litigation, until 4:00 p.m. Commissioners Baney and. Unger are not ready to let the business loan fund be eliminated. Chair DeBone said he looked at this as being a temporary situation, but definitely cannot be at the amount EDCO seems to want, $400,000. Commissioner Unger feels $1 25,000 is appropriate. However, the Sisters project alone would be that much. They don't seem to be able to make it happen there. They need something to get things moving. The community doesn't seem to have confidence it its officials. There is no real long-term experience. Mr. Anderson stated that there is a cap of$50,000 per company. He assumes that this was established by the Board for a good reason. EDCO will spend whatever they get. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 8 of 9 Pages Commissioner Baney would support a $50,000 carve-out for Sisters but use the rest elsewhere, up to a total of$175,000. Mr. Anderson will conduct an analysis on this and get back to the Board with suggestions. This will be discussed further at the September 9 work session. Sally Lybarger, citizen, spoke about the meetings held at the library on the first Friday of each month, involving homeless individuals and issues. The Methodist group is talking about having Tuesdays and Thursdays as a drop in place for the homeless. The City needs to step forward and do something positive, and she said she points this out to them at almost every council meeting. She noted that the problem is not going away. About 40% of the homeless are youth. Also, some City councilors are not supportive of the exclusion zone downtown, as an infringement of individual rights. Commissioner Unger stated they have to figure out some way to keep the peace there, but this may not be the right way. Being no other items discussed, the meeting was adjourned at 4:30 p.m. DATED this . Day of t . ' ■ d 2015 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissionefs. 49)d _.. Anthony DeBone, Chair Alan Unger, Vice Chair ATTEST: A Tammy Baney, Co issioner ecording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, August 31, 2015 Page 9 of 9 Pages �vT\�s eb eG 2� °eery Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1:30 P.M., MONDAY, AUGUST 31, 2015 1. Discussion of Economic Development Fund Recapitalization —Roger Lee, EDCO 2. 4th Quarter Performance Measurement Report —Judith Ure; Department Heads 3. Forester Update, and Request for a Letter of Support for a RAC Grant Application for Noxious Weed Cost Share —Ed Keith 4. Discussion regarding a Dog Nuisance Ordinance —John Laherty 5. Other Items PLEASE NOTE:At any time during this meeting,an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2)(e),real property negotiations;ORS 192.660(2)(h),litigation;ORS I92.660(2)(d),labor negotiations;or ORS 192.660(2)(b),personnel issues;or other issues under ORS 192.660(2),executive session. Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners'meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St.,Bend,unless otherwise indicated. !f you have questions regarding a meeting,please call 388-6572. Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. To request this information in an alternate format please call(541)330-4640, or email anna.iohnsondeschutes.orq. iI s', a t? 3 --24 et_...\_ .-:-\ a '� CO q 4 :], --D .. A g �, cs kr "r 0° C4 rat- °°72 „,.. a a►, ® r� r t 3 II) �' .rya 1 tr- n , QJ ! > c \i) al -- ' z - --; 3 r_ _itt , t . c-CI 3 y V' c.� :t + �,,' S -\ 41. 4 .., ..,_, ,-,-„- ,...„, ._., __ , , ,__,.._Th ,..„ „..., , , zwt 'A V , ., ' -' ) (1.0 (.,) Q s � ,r, ,,:, < 0 IQ 0 1 --:, w w _ ___.* .(_-_-_. • -1-..------r- f' ... , ,,,) . .,,4_ .,.. , k.4 CO CL i ----t _s.: 4 - .‹. ia.)..), i.):,,-,..._, .....,....y..,: _toINt-t 4.74:: ___io,7.7, ., .._,e) a) - - / O, Y iv vi .T ... 1.;-._.-) Z ' c/1 7 4 CK. . .7 ).9'— .;:...±iii 41, Z ..,-, Aii %.---k---1\'-f.... 1 9 j a j ...° . _t. i 1:- b, Vl v • 1 I i I � ! ;. C� o cd c::: 0 -0 M O 0i 0 1 0 3 ° 691I�IIO 0 0 0 cD, ry CD w O Vi c. 0 1 Q d O A ss S c> ,4 (4 7 k , I 0 '� U�I y C71 c� o q 00 O to • 7 !b9 O III DI cdI �! N! N U o ' 4 5 LL V 64 D Q a> m O ) C an a' v o d Z o id at C EA ZC7QUv' C7Z 4Uw > , 0- 0 O 0 O AN M N 0 011 • M— ' VS al Z' cei ett .c,51 k- A Q U U Q Z o Z ,, a! z 88 0 0 0 0 v'' c S O o cn � O N. 1 ur ! 6s N Cd3 6I I -. —._. C l z o c+- y C N I.47 O M U A' iw ", I'� N' 0 N Q, CL, CU 0 a I,a `°O. `� VS GS VS N 0 � A I o o CP, — N N bs u b cW "" b "O 70 �? ^o elk 0 o w v i.0 g Z 0 g'4 0 0 C 0 Co a k chi o CkC) 0 O I p CP 0 hi EA h. VS N .-. cn .. • a> kr) V': Q\ Iv) M id I 6s Cr.) QC 0 C. VSII H ,-, \D tr) V') N 00 1 =▪ v! t c•l N. N bR III FA /3 5 69 69 V 0:1 1 : .-� .N-i M 5'r it ,—,, !. .-I, ..r .--, I 0 Q --, N M 4 I — —, -- e N N N N N a Q N d Q S Q o d o Q -< = te, Z O0S ar z O Z A � E ° - CD o C a N o a) a en Q Z N z d oQ o Q d Q 0 Q en 5 a z S z z z Z O S vz N ce q a b 64 72 E •-. : c ao a �o a ^ L N O N N N C N NO N ¢' O A C '" . z o q o -- O z - (6, -_____, -- UyoQOO 0P" o '" o w ...d V M M M M V r .71- '.0 in O 47 4D 4D N N 00 00 00 0 14 000000000 -, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 N N N N N N N N N N ¢ N N N N N N N N N w N + N O CO C 5 N C vD r" ,, 00 O z 00 1- 1- - in " y ❑ ,-, ,-� ,-� N O M N O -" N M N O CN O Q 00 ,-. 000000,--, M N N O O O ,--, ,-, O O O O [V p N A b -.3 N N ,N--� N M M M 1- 1- N v in tA k!6 4D 4O N N N a a o o a o o o o a f . 5 . 0 o o o a a o o a o N N N 0 � r NU 0N ,- N 0047 - 1- _ _ Cr ,-. ,- _ 00 _ _ N "4 > , A M 0 M ,-, N , , O m z N O --I N M N O O N M W M Ch --■ M N N d' M M 'Cl 41 N N N I,n Yi S- a_ Q 00 -, -- 000000 0 0 ,-, -, 0 0 0 0 al 0 p A r 9 o 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 © 0 0 0 O, o O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 U w Z4. C oaC] 000000C7C] od000000S? o C w Q CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o O O 0 0 0 000 0 M Q S O 0, C? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 0, 0 0 0 0 0 O N CV1 -' 1-'00cv40000a �ro00cvoo'o1--0— 0 W 3 a — v) v) N N v) v) M N v) M kA LA IA N 'rr C, "'� O Q' EA 6R bs cA s4 69 s4 64 ss EA 44 ' 6s 64 s4 64 s4 64 64 47 0 d : , (:0 (1) = 4, = 4,4 . .1 00 N N N M M M M kn 01) 64 0 113 O O O O C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 O C? C? O a 5 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N =, =, 'a VS Ch M M N OO , 1 V7 vD N --N M O N 1- n b M a C V .>. 1) 3.. ❑ ,--, N ,-w N O M O N N N M ,-w ,--. ,-, ,-, O N N W =� > 6 N N Cp vD -+ (V N N O 6, N 00 O. a+ 0 Q --, ,1 O O o , . O 0 4 0 ,--, o O -. O W 41t 8 co ,b C a„ m, O., N 00 00 N ,- 'Cl- M N 00 (-- en O © 00 Ch 00 0 0 6) d- TI -" 00 I M N M M) L Q) a N N ,-. --a M (n Z) M VN N M � ¢., , O O N N N m M M M 1- V) v ›` , v U y 5 z O O O O O N N N N O O O O O N N O O O a to 0 v y a O Q N 0 .4 M „ O � N 47 4D O v) v) N v00« 0NM h N N ,--i V w M N ,-" y N ,-� V'1 N N ,-, N N ILA g ° z W _ . - - . �o y N 4=144 6 0 � C q v +' oil O O z.4 C 7 i "" C 6 O ,y � iC N OA z C- O CO� M G N o - O c = , , ++ j ' , O C-� cos „c �° o o a�i U ' �° ai F azi o U 1. j ,142.y y o Q a m 7 -,t m � ¢ b p p < dgc 0 (..) Qw7z7wwx3 E. (( i taiw F } t , o!';;,J:I4i , 0 r i o u +t �'gi .° s 1 ;..., ,'' oia r'I + tl , i d , ,,:1,,,'',K q„ -ti i , Deschutes County FY 2015 Goals and Objectives Mission Statement y. i i N ,I Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services ,;,;ry a in a Cost-Effective Manner tlig ;ill Safe Communities: Protect the community through planning, preparedness, `, ? and coordinated public safety services. ?±'a' iP L .1 ' "4 late .,.. a tie°p'lanning among county cp .!'i,07 parttte; s.`0”-,, peg t' id t','t..°r Wiese , 2. Promote targeted prevention, diversion, and intervention programs to reduce recidivism and future demands AT on county „,e y ,hreved through the coat u44 A a, C ,ceratrop pt t,on erv? ' t4, e ices. ', ',4;:{;.; ' , 1 M p+.' n,, ,„� ,� ,u, �prosecute al tiat t to Onsure thw;. s a } 4' 81t�� h e,the innocent :,',,i14,('. °wr 'w, . t8 Pf, Cx aspc,a taMr w, 4. Facilitate collaborative planning on county-wide communications and infrastructure, •Y, Health Peo le: Enhance and rotect the health and well-bein of the community through advocacy, education, and services. IV 1. Consider population health,wellness, safety, and multi-modal connectivity in the design and implementation ', �pi� , 0 d r prf' 1 A .t 11 g 6 ® IA a ! �'MA „;.ern ,N '.4,1i, 3. Ensure children,youth,and families are protected, healthy, and successful. 4. Provide timely access to quality and affordable health care for the most vulnerable populations. 5. Assess,preserve,promote, and protect the basic health and wellness of residents. 6, ,.,'Nev le ?'hyeica).a,};l,,d}ehavi9a;al,,,l#ealtl?,treatment and,support,seryicos to atiet,„the,needs of the community. , r{;1 7, Piro AM',. yentive health thr'e'd h p ;i•tnerships,commu*tiity ;ducat o'ut s ';,, t'and achy .cy. ,,,}� Wyk ' Robust Economy: Promote policies and actions that stimulate economic a. vitality. 1. Initiate strategic capital programming,including transportation and communications infrastructure, �f` > construction, and other needs. ' ne t,. 'r° ti ,,t ecouo�rii,c.vit ii, 'n„,,,,4rt�e�nd�lth.o-rg,aprax',tQ. k}�t�e ��,1 , e r allt;Y�. � 3. Provide cost-efficient and innovative infrastructure that supports local economic opportunities and livable 9,4Tm, ,lle . ra«+ ' ;0.0 tae policies that promote beneficial utilizatioz1 of',the land for econg` io grewtll, l ;, 5. Support beneficial management and access policies of publicly owned natural resources to promote tourism and T'r.a, : r�itional t ttl s. N, �1J , A,J m ,,, ,,': .Awl,and interdepartmental cooperation to enhance service delivery and tho` de � ly,�a, 7) ! , w.. ", * Siervices. a d M4, .Management of Natural Resources: Promote environmental stewardship ''' S4 throu A h assessment, advocacy, and collaboration. L i!:i t,l t ', .,:r4.,"' «,N*d*r*,, embers and appropriate, ,prigs to'pteselve', a .,040tIth ettgnty's^water 4,,.,,,. 4K ,P,019,.,1 1 is 4.dr 9pfp G9,pp4jcies reg ,,d ., ,9 ,, Aeed c9pti o1:r P d, xa 4 .i,Q: ,f 3. Support healthy and sustainable forest and public land management practices and oversight. ? ' ! 4. Enhance and protect air,land, and water resources. x° is Effective Service Delivery: Maintain confidence in Deschutes County through c 4.4 sound fiscal management and responsiveness to the public. tit:!. d ': 1. Continue to provide opportunities for public engagement with Deschutes County government. ` ,, 2, Provide support to County operations to ensure cost-effective and efficient delivery of services to the public. 3. Support employee development,productivity, and job satisfaction. } 4. Support and promote Deschutes County Customer Service"Every Time”standards. ;, Deschutes County,OREGON Page 9 J" ` Ol] O up N Ga ra fir" •, to U 7, Q "C3 cEdd U 13l r' = to 4 w y c ++ d +.. U y o el 7 I " 0 r'" i." cd -0 U a) U 4� i N •a) N p cd tai •G"" "^� no CSC "" at � °� � to > ,4 V dam•. CO ,•U o w C "° ` -d �, 4 "ti z 0 'd nA 40 imi CU . .O ; as - U .b G , . . . W O C U p• O .b -g g ) = P. a) 0 cn ? o O p . as 0 >,• � •ccdd ++• U 1+ p U 0 p c , N CU 4 Q) U-0 ) '0 z z, O 5� c Q, a) el a) a' ..4 0 `n 0 IA 4+ U p 'd •5 O, 0 .--, *� a) a a) C, o ' GA aid �r et v a) ccdd cUi - pip v 4� y� a+ O ad c� o �0 b 0 a) 0 4-4 cd..•, �E - -0 -5 '� . -0 )�r/ v � U O D 2 4-• ,O '" 5 a Q v Vi ecz. .) � a) Q av En U a)v 'd a) _, . ) "d • "5 y U >...�' a) m U o ; rn z bA ct 7 Q, ate) i v O ca pL,ea E b N r+, S 5 t4 ct = m .•g V = a) a) U v,•04 to CIJ . U U Q t 4) f1 � CI) � 5 ,y 6 N a) O 4 a. m T3 . U C.) J 4 U g ∎ = a) 4~" d O cz Cet ,ue z Q a) '� E Jo cd 'd O pO a) U .. Gj d ) U a a) ± [] W cd t' o ii C a) a) -a = 0 W • - UO O" y d 0., d rU "rd �G V roll a) O "Rs' p e � at a) O A , 'd.tr ,S + y iii a) A at C.) fly N Q C p • a) V1 �+ [Y) 4 �, � � � 0 ab z ac d w a) 4.4 co ,-, o •- g g o x adi o 0 o o 5 a) 0. , -7 d a) p c a- a a d b a) 'd ° o • � x 0 z -dc.° a) U , o •a) a) a Sal-° i a) +' a) �. rn �. �, vc� „'' : pa) U o a O 4) �� ) o w �: ).■ • o m 0 U E 'd V0 .d up a.) 0 -0 , d O g a) `1' w x a 7, 0 up U Q O N E O ca, sy U a) O '" �' t7 'd 7' d i co U .d •d ti).SU." > N y�y N y 3 g C) W x o E N cu) ,- E Q) ' �r a) U U c,, a) E d ad a) - d .�A bA a) cd +-+ at ap U \° N O a) 0 4) `–, P-1 0, 0 b d] , 'C Q �. .s i E ct 0, w N O 01 .. an w M 0 6. ccd •• p 0 •-tom a) rr Q a) CD 'd r' -,--, V) g a.) �d O 0 d U `n c ate] 0 to 0 E y �. ap g es .b ai 4 r p O cvs crp U i. v� b U cd v' cd n �." p v +' v cd O y '' �" vi N N a) q • ti) bA a) 0 Ki •,U� p UO Q Q . � O .� '. O y A O S". N a) ,-- '� ,d 0 tip cd cd �. '- •U Qi.p CU cd' . 0 >, c. °) `" - — Ex rj ... b ° Cu c) d LE o w lab o• en o a � '" p., , ; � � ao �do �TA N a �•U U U O i-+ m 1 i, .d U 6. to C4 up }L' to'd += •U U O tea) a" - #. N o 'd V a) ,.g _ �d = - o U E y , g 7 .. o ) '4 ad p as icl ) nA ,� g 2 rd = U y - w : t titi.)uea O 'd cd W - O a) a) C_) • O M. p o a) U c a' a) C)• d " p d � E a - cn .+ y C" - 5 + '� U i 4 oi) 4 U + O O d k f O tl=- r p an a) U c�= 4 g 0 cd N H • `� _c "a OU C� a, 4 a) .s a) +' 5 a) a) a) 4 �' any C i a) 0 a) a) oA O 'E °A cd g El 7-1 7,5 E 71 7' Q 0 n a eC a) ca.CC a) 'N' a) x y � +' U Ow.2 Z t cal O O..2 C t. U 0 = s . au A 0 � a 2 cncn . AC 8• — a) ' p v aed azs a) a) ` i t U O CaS +U' O - 'd .r ..� r 0 a�d ¢ R3 �r ' CJ, 1 o C1. a p cd b v .� o tg to O cip Q, ? 0' N o i. a = 11) o 'd N U ' y U 7 a) d a) w .b g as r, 1: wo S y O 'b bA U rI FO U . a4 ,,e Cq P, g a) �,cl,C 01 , d .. d 0 '" U 0 r Dy) 0 w U C p o p O O , N" O p ueU p' 4) ro "d 0 s. .F U V] F '� 01 g - )Q pp d j� , a) a a, 2 v q a O — O cd o a U by ¢ co ed 4, - { O o cd 'S a b • ° 7 cd o U 0, ce 0.1 cu o 0 �U cn b bA a� � ed U p E •Ci U u o 0 Q • • . ]g j a p Q _, y 4 C O m -c O O � i U O i d N P.�, •EA a, a> .0 . o a) p] U tbo A -- 1 72 O 6a) 0 C Q U 0 a) \D a d d " ,. ,- ++ co • r: nj - -0 ) -4 N c•, O . .4 y bA d ti.0 U cn 0 cd u ) d b O ? o ▪ 0 — o 0 a) ; .„ O O N O $, 0 Q 0 e4 O C �; ,- - GJ Q q , N Q M a) ;-24� O O Q O"� O O y P. a) c U QO O U , E Q� � 5 ) a 0a s: .d °cd U w _ 5 4o ▪ o cd v O ° a W o 45 O .n - Q Er a aCn O cd U cd 0 O▪ ct O g U z b U O bA O , c•,)'N to <,) •- cn+- O U It a) a) " O O d ,▪ CA a„i 0 Q aj ;.. Q a '� p a) Inn co et a) cd p., .5+ 4- bA Q 'd cd O y, rQ ' Q Q N . cn 8 . w t---' = O --' V O d � O , r ) _ W V] co O q O i.3 cip . - '7." W -- _ _• o a s. v te, O~ o 0 ° Q 0 Cd a'� Q A ao5 A � � 0 � � SAE Q ;, CO,.. ~ d O N 4)a) ' 0 0 U O T o\ (w N C.) a c ,Q.. 5.p.s. It Q Q v' ~ as d "- ° & as , p U m Q cd o p •—• • y W ^C b.° a to•'. OW xWti-. a -■ o 0 0 aA C cg + U O .z. W a) E "j ¢+ a' a6i .� „ . et O 0 b.0 E O ,„, . +. cc3 +" U O at O 0 &), a) 0 'd W 'd 'C a) 'D e, 6 0) 0 O U q _CL) a) U' ,�+ O U U ect u. co co v� a) O U o O et D d N 04 Cn +� 774 ...C.)" c L'1 •� U O ¢ cad O v p ci ,a E i d O O = • O d vi W 4 4 z is O es• co at +^r O CD • . A � 8 � o 0 cn O.s. U O cn c Cll ~G o U Q Z O p o U Cn7 H m O u cn O. ° O = V y c O F-', u N zi g a) o 'd Om O U v) pvi g b0 1 -11111 Gn 0 U b w O a] O p aa� a as �+) ; p y VD a) o o o 'd G y Q Q O • v " O w• Lo O te + cO �. Q) O . u � ,..,"••w V.014 0 0 co 14 0 O o. O 0 O 0 U . b O � O O O w 'd 0.) U ,-- C U O C florl•"' b 7 O O v R, o al a,c s v,) c. O ' . a) C • , Z •'d N p O N d 0 O 'i MI . � "' � Q Q w _c.1 ct O O N _ r n a " • a)0• a) a) F. > _ • .0 N -3 E O . O " ue �a ,� ¢ i 2 U 2 0 • . s,d 't_ co w U• a) 0 0 U 'd G..-. • + 0 W U U F� A v d a 0 tit) • o cu 7 3 v a a pq �; • p U •�PO . o , ,� o �? ° $ d a.) d e ,qo w > nn a ct ) co U a0 a) Q a) b O d d 1-. O = p c O O 0 "b0 O v) a › E a O 0 y a O O c o H A � t ed ■ O It, U 7) - p p N N N N N N N O r-1 t+• M N L- N 00 O� , ' 4N A OG [� N 4� 7 O 'V . •., 0 0 N N N N N N N . `. '� cti r l N 1 e' N V7 M N 00 r, O, 6" o C0 r." ---I 4i ,--I ,—I ,-I ,-, --i N N Ott U y .U bq — cd d C Q y) Cr) a 6 F, `O \D 00 N C O - N 01 N U 0 a Q, �-•, M CS a a N O■ .j 0 N ,--I ,--1 -• .-• N N (-.1 N C) •bp .o Z 0 O =1 O O p O O O O O O N "D .-w „� 0 �. 0 ri d Ny vO CT 00 00 v) co M cf) n a -- %0 00 CN a M o 7 c gr r--I t .- ,-. - .-a N N tn O 4. " - 'd 0 O V — p p O O O 0 O O O cz r: I- \G N Cr CO Cr) M r` a O a cn C -" ad 00 Q� a o -ti a O - ,.y (...1 -- - - N N tr, " g cz cd U) O 0 O O O O O O O ii �� `p 00 N 00 01 a ,- N M O -- ww ,,-4 ,-- ,-, — N N N M a� .„ - Q • 0 , 0.„.„ O cd S. cd -� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '� 0 41 ^� �' O �C+ Q, N 00 -� N N N M 0 , O , O .s. .-�I ,4 -- N h] hl (Ni M o b eUC ms 4 b U wx O O O O o O O O O G_L C "00 xi IN a, > U 1N-1 N NN rn b N O .�• .4 r r -- -- N N N N M , , ¢ w _ 0 o \ e° NNNo N NNE °' �� p, cr, O� N N 00 a 00 -0 O 0 cy a ,,z) M d a a v) �"" N N ,--i N N N N M a" :z" w O El) W U V U 0 O O O 0 cd H O C...) -C Q 1-1• CID Cd X11 o rn is cn A U a cd Deschutes County Department Performance Measurements FY 2014-15—Third Quarter All. Department Responses 9-1-1 Service District Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #3:Respond to,investigate,and prosecute #1: 95%of all 9-1-1 calls will be answered within criminal activity to ensure the guilty are 5 seconds. held accountable,the innocent protected, #2—99.0%of all 9-1-1 calls will be answered and the rights of all citizens are respected. within 10 seconds. #3—Calls will be referred to dispatch in 3 seconds or less. Q4 Status: 1. 95% of all 9-1-1 calls will be answered within 5 seconds. a. Q1 94.1% b. Q2 92.5% c. Q3 92.1% d. Q4 93.0% 2. 99% of all 9-1-1 calls will be answered within 10 seconds. a. Q1 99.7% b. Q2 99.7% c. Q3 99.7% d. Q4 99.8% 3. Calls referred for dispatch in 12 seconds or less. a. Q1 12 seconds b. Q2 7 seconds c. Q3 11 seconds d. Q4 11 seconds (The time for this standard that has been reported in the budget in past years as 3 seconds is actually the goal for our average ring time, which was met in Q2, Q3, and Q4.) The following additional goals were identified in the District's Q1 update: 1. Determine the District's operational and capital needs through strategic.planning--The District's 2015-2018 Strategic Plan was adopted by the Board in January 2015. 2. Maintain the current positive labor relations climate—The working relationship with the Employee Association remains positive. No grievances have been filed since mid-2014. Regular meetings of the Employee Relations Committee are taking place. 3. Get all vacant positions staffed with fully trained Telecommunicators by the end of 2015 - Five new hires started training in January 2015. Four more new hires started training in April 2015. Two new hires will be added in August and four to six more in November. The recent unexpected attrition of four tenured staff members added to this challenge. 4. Value engineer the proposed county-wide radio system to more closely estimate its cost and service level - The Project Review Team (PRT) and the Executive Board agreed staff and a qualified consulting firm should continue to refine the project's cost with an emphasis on maximizing work with stakeholders to value engineer and cost the radio system project. Meetings have been scheduled with State officials to complete the system design and negotiate agreements to finalize service levels and costs. 5. Concurrently develop local partnerships and a governance agreement for the proposed radio system - In progress. 6. Obtain public approval for permanent funding for the District's operational and capital needs including the construction of a coordinated, countywide radio system - This item became a strategic plan goal. Staff completed its analysis of costs for the District's operational needs, and is now working on estimating long-term capital costs. In progress. On July 1, 2015, the District became responsible for the infrastructure for the area's two law enforcement public-safety radio systems on a user fee basis. Administrative Services Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #6: Pursue inter-jurisdictional and Facilitate intergovernmental agreements with interdepartmental cooperation to enhance other public agencies.. service delivery and the cost effectiveness of public services. Q4 Status: Deschutes County entered into an IGA (Intergovernmental Agreement) with Washington County, Clackamas County, and City/County Insurance Services (CIS) to form the Oregon Public Entity Excess Pool (OPEEP). Through OPEEP, participating agencies have purchased excess general liability insurance as a group. For Deschutes County, purchasing excess general liability insurance through OPEEP has expanded insurance coverage for no additional cost. OPEEP also is a forum for the sharing of best practices and effective risk management among the member organization. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #2: Provide support to County operations to Internal Audit recommendation acceptance rate ensure cost-effective and efficient delivery compared to the national average for local of services to the public. government auditors. Q4 Status: 100% acceptance rate (100% in FY 2015). 90% customer survey satisfaction (93% in FY 2015). Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #2: Partner with organizations that County funds leveraged through contractual stimulate economic vitality. arrangements with organizations specializing in job creation,economic development,and local business support. Q4 Status: Board of Commissioners approved economic development loans with i3D Manufacturing, Inc. in the amount of$24,000 to create 12 new jobs and with Kollective Technology, Inc. in the amount of$50,000 to create 50 new jobs. Assessor's Office Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Accounts managed per FTE compared to other Customer Service"Every Time" standards. Oregon Counties. Q4 Status: FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013. FY FY 2014. 2015 Deschutes County 1,982 2,205 2,262 2,495 2,584 2,569 2,591 2,711 2,709 _ 7 County Average 2,181 2,262 2,328 2,441 2,422 2,545 2,742 2,795 2,784 Lane County 2,668 2,785 2,936 2,988 2,981 3,006 3,850 3,850 3,739 r Jackson County 2,325 2,334 2,288 2,323 2,432 2,723 2,853 2,986 2,988 Clackamas County 2,774 2,631 2,785 2,830 2,785 2,740 2,749 2,758 2,715 Douglas County 2,366 2,602 2,668 2,724 2,626 2,716 2,744 2,815 2,816 Marion County 1,877 1,914 2,053 2,355 2,336 2,474 2,480 2,471 2,499 Linn County 1,658 1,721 1,765 1,959 1,896 2,114 2,359 2,302 2,270 Benton County 1,602 1,843 1,803 I 1,910 I 1,899 I 2,042 I 2,162 2,381 2,463 Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Cost per account managed compared to other Customer Service"Every Time"standards. Oregon counties. Q4 Status: FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20.12 FY 2013 FY FY 2014 2015 Deschutes County $48.65 $46.13 $46.15 $42.41 $43.27 $43.04 $44.46 $42.58 $46.48 7 County Average $43.98 $42.87 $44.00 $42.99 $43.34 $43.91 $42.69 $43.53 $43.11 • Douglas County $33.59 $30.46 $28.76 $28.24 $28.88 $28,94 $28.96 $28.55 $30.20 _ Lane County $42.50 $40.00 $36.91 $39.07 $40.03 $37.96 $29,91 $37.88 $38.08 Jackson County $40.86 $38.60 $42.32 $41.12 $40.03 $39.67 $40.99 $39.96 $39.64 Clackamas County $34.40 $37.80 $39.01 $38.77 $39.29 $41.88 $42.68 $41.62 $45.08 r- Linn County $51.62 $51.08 $52.96 $53.46 $54.10 $53,16 $49.18 $51.21 $52.05 Marion County $49.44 $49.92 $48.33 $46.21 $46.18 $48.01 $50.57 $49.24 $45.82 Benton County $55.43 $52.21 $59.71 $54.09 $54.85 $57,75 $56.57 $56.26 $50.86 Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Administrative expenses as a percentage of taxes Customer Service"Every Time"standards. _ imposed compared to other Oregon Counties. Q4 Status: FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY FY 2014. 2015 Deschutes County 2.19% 2.12% 1.96% 1.68% 1.67% 1.70% 1.76% 1.62% 1.66% 7 County Average 2.13% 1.97% 1.93% 1.83% 2.06% 2.02% 1.96% 1.94% 1.87% - Clackamas County 1.29% 1.22% 1.29% 1.20% 1.12% 1.16% 1.18% 1.12% 1.13% , Lane County 2.07% 1.95% 1.80% 1.83% 1.84% 1.69% 1.32% 1.55% 1.67% Jackson County 2.61% 2.20% 2.17% 1.97% 1.86% 1.88% 1.95% 1.83% 1.67% Marion County 2.37% 2.32% 2.27% 2.08% 1.93% 1.98% 2.00% 1.92% 1.72% Benton County 2.48% 2.18% 2.25% 2.10% 2.03% 2.05% 2.01% 1.98% 1.68% Linn County 3.00% 2.72% 2.77% 2.71% 2.57% 2.38% 2.27% 2.31% 2.21% _ Douglas County 4.08% 3.66% 3.34% 3.30% 3.10% 3.03% 2.99% 2.89% 2.99% ' Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Written approval by the Department of Revenue Customer Service"Every Time"standards. for the Assessor's Certified Ratio Study. Q4 Status: FY FY FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2016 Target Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieve Achieve Achieve Achieve Goal h Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Percentage of tax statements mailed by October Customer Service"Every Time" standards. 25th• Q4 Status: FY FY FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2016 Target 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Written certification from the Department of Customer Service"Every Time"standards. Revenue approving the County Assessment Function Assistance(CAFTA)program. Q4 Status: FY FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 2015 2016 Target Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved W Achieve Clerk's Office Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Percentage of original real property records Customer Service"Every Time"standards. recorded,indexed,and returned within one business day. Q4 Status: 100% Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Percentage of customers who rate the level of Customer Service"Every Time"standards. service as good or excellent. Q4 Status: 96% Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Percentage of voter notification cards mailed Customer Service"Every Time" standards. within 14 days of registration(excluding 20 days before and after a primary election). Q4 Status: 100% Community Development Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #2: Partner with organizations that #1: Coordinate with the City of Bend to adopt stimulate economic vitality. the Bend Airport Master Plan Update into the County's Comprehensive Plan and zoning code to promote economic sustainability and growth at the Airport. Q4 Status: On October 27, the BOCC adopted Ordinance 2014-026. The ordinance approved a City of Bend land use application amending the zoning map for the Airport Development (AD) zone in Deschutes County Code (DCC) 18.76 and its subzoncs of Airfield Operations District (AOD), Aviation- Related Industrial District (ARID), and Aviation Support District (ASD). It also corrected a procedural error from the 2003 adoption of the subdistricts and the 2002 Bend Airport Master Plan Update. This year, the City will initiate a plan amendment to formally update the Airport Master Plan. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #2: Partner with organizations that Coordinate with the City of Redmond to amend stimulate economic vitality. its UGB for a large-lot industrial site and future Fairgrounds expansion. Q4 Status: The Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) Board, on May 7, supported a 200+ acre large lot candidate site in Redmond. Deschutes County will be collaborating with the City of Redmond to prepare a UGB amendment application in FY 2015/2016. The Oregon Department of State Lands is currently preparing a Request for Proposal for consultant to prepare an application. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #2: Partner with organizations that Administer 3-year US EPA Brownfield stimulate economic vitality. Assessment grant with the Cities of Bend,La Pine, Sisters,and Redmond to identify contaminated sites and plan for redevelopment. Q4 Status: The Planning Division is in the second year of administering a three-year, $400,000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA) Community-Wide Brownfield Assessment Grant. Brownfield redevelopment often requires environmental site assessments (ESAs) and regulatory review. Deschutes County is utilizing$264,000 of the federal grant to stimulate the cleanup and re-use of properties that are, or may be, affected by hazardous substances, including petroleum hydrocarbons. To help property owners navigate these processes and access resources, the grant offers resources to eligible property owners throughout the county for Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs). Phase I ESAs involve a review of records, site inspections, and interviews with owners, occupants, neighbors and local government officials. Phase II ESAs include sampling and laboratory analysis to confirm the presence of hazardous materials. With the assistance of a Brownfield Advisory Committee, Deschutes County has provided funding for five Phase I and three Phase 11 ESAs. A fourth Phase II ESA is currently planned for the Bend Parks and Recreation District to address Mirror Pond sedimentation. The grant also dedicates $90,000 for Area Wide Planning(AWP). AWP offers resources to conduct research, technical assistance and training that can result in an area-wide plan and implementation strategy for key brownfield sites. This information can then help inform the assessment, cleanup and reuse of brownfield properties and promote area-wide revitalization. The Mid-Town area of Redmond's downtown is the beneficiary of these resources. The timing and readiness to utilize AWP funding offer extraordinary advantages for the City of Redmond. It dovetails with their existing efforts to revitalize the area, including an urban renewal district, market analysis, and housing study. The final report is expected in August. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #4: Support land use policies that promote Evaluate the County's Agricultural Lands beneficial utilization of the land for Program. economic growth, Q4 Status: On.May 6, the BOCC submitted a letter to Director Rue respectfully requesting rulemaking for HB 2229. Later this summer, staff will initiate three amendments to County code: 1) Text amendment to Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 2, Section 2.2 and Chapter 3, Section 3.3, recognizing non- resource lands process allowed under State law to change EFU zoning; 2) Text amendment to zoning code providing a definition of agricultural-exempt buildings; and, 3) Reducing setbacks in the Forest 2 zone, explicitly for Haner Park Subdivision. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #2: Partner with organizations that Reconvene the Transferable Development Credit stimulate economic vitality. (TDC)Advisory Committee to determine if changes are needed to facilitate economic growth in La Pine's New Neighborhood in conjunction with groundwater protection in rural southern Deschutes County. Q4 Status: The TDC Advisory Committee convened on August 21 and conducted a total of five meetings. On December 18, members reviewed a matrix of options and identified their top two choices: 1) maintain the status quo; and, 2) reconvene the committee in 24 to 36 months. The BOCC supported the recommendation on February 4. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #2: Partner with organizations that Coordinate with the City of Bend to adopt the stimulate economic vitality. Bend Airport Master Plan Update into the County's Comprehensive Plan and zoning code to promote economic sustainability and growth at the Airport. Q4 Status: On October 27, the BOCC adopted Ordinance 2014-026. The ordinance approved a City of Bend land use a pp lication amending the zoning map for the Airport Development(AD) zone in Deschutes County Code (DCC) 18.76 and its subzones of Airfield Operations District (AOD), Aviation- Related Industrial District (ARID), and Aviation Support District (ASD). It also corrected a procedural error from the 2003 adoption of the subdistricts and the 2002 Bend Airport Master Plan Update. This year, the City will initiate a plan amendment to formally update the Airport Master Plan. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #5: Support beneficial management and Support Mt.Bachelor's Master Plan access policies of publicly owned natural implementation through coordination and resources to promote tourism and efficient building permit services for new and recreational activities. improved facilities. Q4 Status: Coordinated with BBT Architecture, Mt. Bachelor's Architectural firm for all construction, including planned repairs and maintenance projects over summer 2015. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #2: Partner with organizations that Coordinate with the Sunriver Owners' stimulate economic vitality. Association(SROA)on a solution to conflicts between traffic on Spring River Road and those seeking to launch boats or float the Deschutes River from Harper Bridge. Q4 Status: Staff coordinated with the SROA to remove the unpermitted fence located in the right-of- way; SROA is installing Bend Paddle Trail Alliance signage for river access; and finally, staff is continuing conversations with SROA General Manager, Hugh Palcic on next steps. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #6: Pursue inter-jurisdictional and inter- Maintain and expand 1-stop building and departmental cooperation to enhance development services shops for city and county service delivery and the cost-effectiveness permits. of public services. Q4 Status: Staff is coordinating with the Bend Park and Recreation District to continue to collect their SDCs at CDD to preserve a 1-stop shop for customers while ensuring full cost recovery for CDD. CDD maintains 1-stop shops at the cities of La Pine and Sisters for building-related activities. Sisters will issue an RFP for Building Official Services in fall 2015. CDD will submit a proposal to continue to provide these services, including provisions and approaches that recognize the mutual benefits to the City and County of two 1-stop shops in Sisters and Bend for all customers. CDD is also actively participating in the design and determination of space needs of the new 1-stop shop with the City of Redmond at Evergreen School set to open in fall 2016. Goal Objective Department Measure Management of Natural #1: Partner with community members and Coordinate with DEQ to(1)issue protective Resources. appropriate agencies to preserve and protect onsite wastewater treatment system permits and South County's water resources. water quality risk and monitoring;(2)initiate a Goal 11 Exception for southern Deschutes County;and(3)provide education and outreach materials online and to community groups on livestock impacts on small residential properties. Q4 Status: The Deschutes County Planning Commission(PC)held a public hearing a proposed Goal 11 Exception for South County on Thursday, July 23. Staff from the County, DEQ, and DLCD initiated a land use application with proposed findings for a Goal 11 Exception (Public Facilities and Services) for South County. The Goal 11 Exception materials include a map of the Goal 11 exception area; relevant state laws, rules, and regulations; and applicable County code. The PC will ultimately make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), which will also hold a public hearing at a date yet to be set. Goal Objective Department Measure Management of Natural #1: Partner with community members and Partner with Neighborlmpact to provide financial Resources, appropriate agencies to preserve and protect assistance to property owners needing to upgrade South County's water resources. their onsite wastewater treatment systems. Q4 Status: Deschutes County's partnership continues with Neighborlmpact. No new loans have been granted recently, however,there has been an increase in inquiries regarding new loans. Approximately $80,000 remains available for loans through this program. Goal Objective Department Measure Management of Natural #1: Partner with community members and Partner with Neighborlmpact to provide financial Resources. appropriate agencies to preserve and protect assistance to property owners needing to upgrade South County's water resources. their onsite wastewater treatment systems. Q4 Status: Goal Objective Department Measure Management of Natural #4: Enhance and protect air,land,and Continue participating with the BLM/Governor's Resources. water resources. Office regarding sage-grouse conservation and USFWS on the Oregon spotted frog. Q4 Status: On August 28, 2014 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced its decision to extend protection to the Oregon spotted frog as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act. The final rule designating critical habitat is expected later this summer. Once it is released, CDD will schedule a work session with the BOCC and use a matrix to discuss options for responding to critical habitat from a land use standpoint. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on May 29 released The Oregon Sub-regional Greater Sage- Grouse (GRSG) Proposed Resource Management Plan Amendment (Proposed RMP A) and Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) to incorporate sage-grouse conservation measures on federal lands in Central and Eastern Oregon. The plans are now undergoing a 60-day Governor's Consistency Review period and concurrent 30-day protest period (June 29), after which Records of Decisions will be signed. The plans address issues identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) in a 2010 determination that found the greater sage-grouse was deserving of protection under the Endangered Species Act due to the inadequacy of regulatory protections to prevent further sagebrush habitat fragmentation, placing the bird in danger of extinction. Federal protection was deferred because of higher priorities; however, the Service is required to revisit the determination by September 30, 2015. The Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) initiated rulemaking to address large scale development and sage grouse habitat on private lands. They appointed a Rules Advisory Committee(RAC) in March to assist in the development of a draft rule. LCDC held a hearing in Burns on July 23 and adopted the rules. CDD will initiate amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan and Code to adopt LCDC's rules in fall 2015. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #1: Continue to provide opportunities for The Building Safety Division will continue to public engagement with Deschutes County engage the local chapter of the Home Builders government. Association for feedback on our processes and interaction with their member as well as sharing training opportunities on a monthly and as- needed basis; and artici P ate with the local P accessibility advocates COCA for "lunch and learn" style meetings to help gain uniform application and consideration of rules and policies developed to assure safe and dependable access to commercial facilities. Q4 Status: Building Safety Division staff regularly attends the monthly COCA and COBA meetings. Central Oregon Association of Realtor meetings have been suspended due to a lack of COAR government affairs staff; some members attend the COBA meeting. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #2: Provide support to County operations to Achieve an average turnaround time on building ensure cost-effective and efficient delivery plan reviews of 4.5 days. of services to the public. Q4 Status: As of July 2015, the Building Safety Division's average turnaround time for all county residential plan reviews is 8.24 days. This time frame exceeds the goal of 4.5 days but is well under the state mandated 10 day time limit. The Division is also recruiting and training a new residential plans examiner in an effort to continue to reduce this turnaround time. CDD may propose a new measurement in the future as it aims to "right size" for efficiencies of staffing levels. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #1: Continue to provide opportunities for Achieve 85% voluntary compliance in Code public engagement with Deschutes County Enforcement cases. government. Q4 Status: ,-- ti Code Enforcement Cases Closed Case Turnaround 7/1/2014 To 6/30/2015 7/21/2015 1033:39 AM TOPA tigNed DaYS 60 Par; "10 , 0400040$ 365 Pan John Orley 176 43 28 33 25 21 Lori Wrbng 1 0 0 0 0 0 Not Assigned 20 17 0 1 0 1 Rex Wolf 15 2 1 3 7 2 iron Grundeman 137 14 7 13 33 41 Total 349 76 36 50 65 65 Closure Rate 21.8% 32.1% 46.4% 65.0% 83.7% Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #1: Continue to provide opportunities for Adopt the Code Enforcement Procedures Manual public engagement with Deschutes County Update with public engagement and public government. hearings. Q4 Status: After public involvement and public hearings, the Code Enforcement Procedures Manual was approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in October, 2014. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #3: Support employee development, The Building Safety Division will continue to productivity,and job satisfaction. provide training seminars and classes for all local municipal inspectors and building and design professionals, and ensure all building inspectors maintain required certification. Q4 Status: Randy Scheid, the County's Building Official, is the Vice-President of COCICC, the local chapter of the organization that promulgates the Division's codes, and the Chair of its Education Committee. COCICC will conduct additional classes in October to address separate codes, code sections, and disciplines. One class that covers the structural provisions of Chapter 16 of the OSSC received more design professionals, architects and engineers than any offering in recent history. These classes allow local professionals to obtain their required continuing education credits at a reasonable price without having to send staff to the valley. Community Justice Goal Objective _ Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention,diversion #1a: Number of adult offender sanctions ordered. and intervention programs. #1b: Number of adult offender revocations processed. #1c: Number of interventions provided to adult offenders. Q4 Status: Dept Measure#1 Target Q4 Annual Comments 1 (a) Number of adult offender 700 289 838 sanctions ordered 1(b) Number of adult offender 25 15 34 revocations processed 1(c) Number of interventions 600 188 506 provided to adult offenders Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention,diversion Percent of juvenile community justice officers and intervention programs. meeting contact and skill building goals with medium and high risk offenders. Q4 Status: Dept Measure#1 Target Q4 Annual Comments (2) Percent of juvenile 80% 34% 57% Due to Juvenile Division re- community justice officers organization implemented June 1, 2015 meeting contact and skill building with a two month pilot period in April goals with medium and high risk and May, the usual method of offenders measuring contacts was not used in Q4. The Q4 measure includes medium and high risk youth who were not eligible for CJO contacts, which pushes the average much lower than actual contacts. We will return to the usual measurement in Q1 of FY 16, which measures the percentage of time CJOs meet contact requirements for those youth eligible for contact. Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention,diversion #3a: Percent of adult felony probationers' and intervention programs. successful case closures. #3b: Percent of successful case closures of adults on felony post-prison supervision. Q4 Status: Dept Measure#1 Target Q4 Annual Comments 3(a) Percent of adult felony Q1 was Jul-Aug only. Sept data not yet probationers successful case 750/0 300/o 480/0 available. closures 3(b) Percent of successful case closures of adults on felony post- 50% 60% 58% prison supervision Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention,diversion Percent at-risk juveniles without a criminal and intervention programs. offense 6 months after completion of Functional Family Therapy treatment. Q4 Status: Dept Measure#1 Target Q4 Annual Comments (4) Percent at-risk juveniles without a criminal offense 6 months after completion of 85% 100% 88% 15 youth were analyzed for the year. Functional Family Therapy treatment District Attorney's Office—No Response Provided Fair & Expo Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #4: Support and promote Deschutes County 90%customer satisfaction with concessions, Delivery Customer Service"Every Time"Standards. catering,facilities,operations,sales staff,and management. Q4 Status: 96% customer satisfaction achieved in the 4th quarter. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #4: Support and promote Deschutes County Number of visitors to the annual Deschutes Delivery Customer Service"Every Time"Standards. County Fair. Q4 Status: Target of 248,000 was surpassed by an actual number of 257,000. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #5: Support beneficial management and $35 million in value of economic impact generated access policies of publicly-owned natural from Fair and Expo events and facilities. resources to promote tourism and recreational activities. Q4 Status: $33,553,940 generated during FY 2015. Two expected major horse events had to cancel and/or change dates due to a virus outbreak, resulting in a slight shortfall. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #5: Support beneficial management and $35 million in value of economic impact generated access policies of publicly-owned natural from Fair and Expo events and facilities. resources to promote tourism and recreational activities. Finance Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #2: Ensure cost effective and efficient 1. Percentage of tax statements issued by October Delivery delivery of services to the public. 21'` 2. Number of tax accounts processed per FTE. 3. Meet with each department head twice annually to discuss service delivery and ensure that finance support needs are being met. 4. Receive GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the FY 2015 budget document. 5. Receive GFOA Certificate of Achievement Award for FY 2014 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR). Q4 Status: • 100 % of 102,869 tax statements were issued by October 21 • 23,111 tax accounts were processed per FTE through December 31, 2014 for a total of 103,000. • Regular monthly meetings are established with the Health Department, Human Resources and the Fair and Expo Center. We will arrange meetings with additional departments in FY 2016. • The 2015 budget document was completed in August and was submitted to the awards program. A letter was received on December 3, 2014 indicating that the County had received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the 2015 Budget document. • The 2014 CAFR was issued in November 2014 and submitted shortly thereafter to the GFOA for review. The County was awarded the CAFR award in the spring of 2015. Health Services Goal Objective Department Measure Healthy People #4: Provide timely access to quality and #1: 90%of individuals discharged from a affordable health care for the most psychiatric hospital receive an outpatient vulnerable populations. behavioral health visit within 7 calendar days of discharge. #2: 90%of children and adolescents referred by DI-IS receive a behavioral health assessment within 45 calendar days of referral. Q4 Status: Financial incentives are provided to coordinated care organizations that meet targets for 17 measures—two of these are behavioral health measures. In June 2015, Oregon Health Authority announced the achievement of CCOs in meetings these measures and receiving these funds. Deschutes County Health Services (DCHS) is proud that it contributed substantially(>80%) to Central Oregon(through PacificSource Community Solutions)receiving financial incentives for meeting these two measures. These funds will be used by PacificSource to provide additional health services to residents. • Individuals discharged from psychiatric hospital receive an outpatient behavioral health visit within 7 calendar days of discharge (State target is 70%): While the state average was 72%, the Central Oregon region surpassed this with an achievement of 80%. • Children and adolescents referred by DHS receive a behavioral health assessment within 60 calendar days of referral (State target is 90%): While the state average was 69%, Central Oregon surpassed it with an achievement of 85%. Only three other CCOs (out of 16) surpassed Central Oregon. Goal Objective Department Measure Healthy People #4: Provide timely access to quality and Behavioral Health Oregon Health Plan clients seen affordable health care for the most within specified State timelines. vulnerable populations. Q4 Status: As reported last quarter and at the DCHS budget meeting, DCHS is undertaking a comprehensive initiative to assess and improve its access points—access points being all of the ways clients, providers, partners and the public access the Department. These include phone systems, front desk services, hours of operation, scheduling and assessment processes, etc. During the third quarter, DCHS reported a concern that our routine access measure was falling and that examination of our access process was a priority. We created an Access Workgroup that used an established quality improvement process to thoroughly examine the process and implement both long- , short-term improvements. The long-term improvements include establishing a new model that will be a hybrid of access appointments and walk-in appointments, a screening process for referrals and an effort to reduce"no shows." The new model will be tailored to our various locations. The screening model change will begin August 10, 2015. Community partners and providers have been informed of the changes and were given time to adjust. Short-term we implemented several strategies to "catch up" and get our timeframe for routine assessments back on track. Clinicians from a variety of teams were asked to find time within their schedules to perform assessments. In addition, in Redmond we had four"assessment days" during which multiple clinicians spent the full day conducting assessments. Those took place on July 21, 22, 28, and 29, 2015. We are pleased that as of July 29, 2015 all three locations (Bend, Redmond, and La Pine) are not only within required access timelines, but have capacity within two to five days for routine access. Same day access is available for emergent/urgent. Measure Numerator Denominator Emergent: Within 24 hours 67 72 93% Urgent: Within 48 hours 85 94 90% Routine: Appointment within 2 weeks 493 753 65% , Goal Objective Department Measure Healthy People #1: Consider population health,wellness, DCHS will provide education and information to safety,and multi-modal connectivity in the the public and key partners about the importance design and implementation of infrastructure. of considering population health,wellness,safety and multi-modal connectivity in the design and implementation of infrastructure(new). Q4 Status: The DCHS is providing leadership in the development of the Central Oregon Regional Health Assessment and Health Improvement Plan. Issues of health, wellness, safety and multi-modal conductivity, as well as the importance of these issues as we plan infrastructure, are being highlighted in these documents. The documents will be used by a wide variety community partners to plan and implement strategies and infrastructure to improve the health of Deschutes County residents. In addition, DCHS collaborated with the Oregon Transportation and Growth Management Program, Oregon Health Authority and Oregon Chapter of the American Planning Association to bring Active Living Research Director James Sallis to present in Bend in October. His presentation entitled, "Working Together for Healthier Communities in Oregon: Evidence for Win-Win-Wins," focused on awareness about the connection between land use and transportation decisions and our health. He discussed effective approaches and programs to change policies to improve health, and identified actions that local governments can take. Dr. Sallis left the audience thinking of ways to incorporate physical activity into their work and daily lives. Nearly 50 health and community planning professionals were in attendance. Goal Objective Department Measure Healthy People #3: Ensure children,youth,and families are 90%of newly enrolled Nurse Family Partnership protected,healthy,and successful. clients are screened for domestic violence within three months of enrollment. Q4 Status: Numerator Denominator 27 27 100% Information Technology Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #1: Continue to provide opportunities for Modify the design and navigation of the County Delivery public engagement with Deschutes County. public website to better support access to the depth of information contained on the website by June 2015. Q4 Status: Though this measure was complete in February, staff continues to find ways to improve the content of the public web site. We are pleased with the most recent update to the site and plan to continue with current design for at least another year. Modifications to the site graphics will be made in 2016. in support of celebrating the county's centennial. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #1: Continue to provide opportunities for Provide technical support to the Finance Delivery public engagement with Deschutes County. Department with the process of replacing the County finance,human resources,and payroll systems by June 2015. Q4 Status: Three vendors have been chosen to conduct demonstrations of their software in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #1: Continue to provide opportunities for Redesign the County intranet website and work Delivery public engagement with Deschutes County. with departments to create new features and develop the skills among the most active users of the site by June 2015. Q4 Status: This project is still under delay until higher priority tasks are completed. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #1: Continue to provide opportunities for Establish stand-by data center resources at the 9-1- Delivery public engagement with Deschutes County. 1 data center as a fail-over to the production data center by June 2015. Q4 Status: This project is still a work in progress. Plans continue to be standing up replicated computing resources in the 9-1-1 data center. Facilities to automatically replicated data backups are currently operational. Personnel resources to work on the project are currently tied up in the email system upgrade. We classify this project a"nice to have" initiative where work is completed on an "as we can" schedule. The slow approach allows us to change the specifications of the project as options for applying new technology materialize. Justice Court Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service #2: Provide support to County operations to Rate of collection on outstanding receivables 74% Delivery ensure cost-effective and efficient delivery or greater. of services to the public. Q4 Status: During the third quarter of 2014-15, $394,053 was assessed in new receivables and $226,763 was collected. This is a collection rate of approximately 57.5%. It should be noted that our current software program does not compute receivables in the same fashion our old software did. Collection rates for FY 2013, 2014 &2015 were computed with different variables than prior years; and therefore appear to be lower than previous standards. Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention,diversion,and Percentage of small claims cases resolved intervention programs to reduce recidivism and (judgment,dismissal,or mediated future demands on County services achieved agreement)prior to trial. through the continuum of incarceration,detention, and supervision services. Q4 Status: 240 small claims cases were filed during the fourth quarter of 2014-15. Answers were filed on 25 of these cases, but only 12 cases will be going to trial. That is a resolution rate of approximately 95% . Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention,diversion,and Success rate for defendants offered intervention programs to reduce recidivism and alternative resolution. future demands on County services achieved through the continuum of incarceration,detention, and supervision services. Q4 Status: Currently maintaining success rate of approximately 67%. Legal Counsel Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #3: Support employee development, Provide timely,coordinated,and streamlined legal productivity,and job satisfaction. services to all County offices and departments: Provide employee trainings on topics of general and specific concerns. Q4 Status: • Legal continues to implement cross training. Case assignments are no longer made just on the basis of subject matter expertise or attorney preference. For example, Christopher was recently assigned the solar panel land use case. This is his first land use case since coming to work for Deschutes County. • Legal encourages outside engagements/networking. In the past month, Christopher taught an employment law class at DPSST and John attended a statewide jail liability training seminar in Portland. Later this month, Laurie will attend a statewide seminar on emergency preparedness. • Training Budget Approved. Tom, the Budget Committee, and the BOCC have approved a robust training budget for the Legal Department. This will allow all staff(Connie and Treana included) to attend at least 2 legal trainings each fiscal year. Natural Resource Protection Goal Objective Department Measure Management of Natural #2: Educate the public and enforce Achieve 90%voluntary compliance with noxious Resources policies regarding noxious weed control weed enforcement cases. and eradication. Q4 Status: 88% voluntary compliance. 9 complaints related to noxious weeds were received in fiscal year 2015. Of those, 8 have been or are being resolved through voluntary compliance. One case has yet to be resolved and enforcement action is proceeding early in fiscal year 2016. Goal Objective Department Measure Management of Natural #2: Support healthy and sustainable Maintain or increase public participation in Fire Resources forest and public land management Free events. practices and oversight. Q4 Status: Fire Free has had a record year as residents continue to prepare their properties for wildfire. Fall brought in 10,608 cubic yards breaking the previous record of 8,878 cubic yards, while the spring event brought in 37959 cubic yards breaking the previous record of 29,185 cubic yards. Goal Objective Department Measure Management of Natural #4: Enhance and protect air, land,and Complete implementation of the Bend Fuels Resources water resources. Community Assistance fuel reduction grant. Q4 Status: The Bend Fuels grant is nearly complete, with a couple of small projects that are planned to be completed after the 2015 fire season. With 90% of the funds expended, 830 acres have been treated with fuels reduction that includes brush mowing, thinning, chipping and homeowners creating defensible space through sweat equity. The acreage goal for this grant was to treat at least 700 acres. Personnel For most of Q4 the Department Director was out on a leave of absence. During this absence, all departmental staff stepped in and up contributing to the noted successes. Goal Objective _ Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #2: Provide support to County operations Re-engineer new hire process including employee to ensure cost-effective and efficient orientation. delivery of services to the public. Q4 Status: • Streamlined the placement process of Fair and Expo agency temps to shorten the processing timeline. • Initiated an online volunteer application through neogov with intentions to expand this service throughout FY 15/1 G. • Created simple, user-friendly recruitment authorization forms. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #2: Provide support to County operations I. Support employee wellness,development, to ensure cost-effective and efficient productivity,and job satisfaction. delivery of services to the public. 2. Utilize best management practices to sustain the quality of County assets and infrastructure. Q4 Status: • Met with County departments providing education and training on Family Medical Leave and employee recognition programs. • Developed and released the Spring Public Sector Catalog covering entities such as the City of Redmond and City of Bend. • Improved and enhanced the interactive process with employees under ADA. • Made substantial progress in organizing personnel following best industry practices and standards (85% complete). • Negotiated the long-term disability, life and ad&d policy renewal saving $30,000. • Established a requirement for the service provider of the onsite clinic to prepare an annual budget to review for fiscal purposes. • Organized a process for labor negotiations and collaborated on the bargaining of contracts. Goal Objective Department Measure Effective Service Delivery #4: Support and promote Deschutes Improve financial and human resources data County Customer Service"Every Time" systems to promote streamlined business standards. processes. Q4 Status: • Reorganized processes between finance and personnel eliminating handoffs and improving transaction times. Property& Facilities Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #1: Initiate strategic capital Complete studies and development/marketing programming,including transportation strategies for Demo Landfill and Redmond and communications infrastructure, properties. construction,and other needs. Q4 Status: A brownfield redevelopment study was completed for the Demo Landfill property that identified three scenarios of development from minimal development to the greatest possible development. The associated cost of remediation, possible development, and market values of property for each scenario were identified. These scenarios are being utilized by the Central Westside Planning Project in its efforts to create a detailed refinement plan for the west side of Bend, addressing interrelated transportation and land use issues. The project is about 50 percent complete, and the results will be used as a basis for future development impacts of our property. Once finished, there will be a strategy for allowing development of the landfill property. Deschutes County also received a $100,000 grant from Department of Environmental Quality to conduct a demonstration project or pilot test of the landfill. The pilot test will actually remove waste in order to evaluate the feasibility, costs, and time for waste processing. Information developed during the pilot test will be used specifically to evaluate (1) whether landfill materials (e.g., clean overburden, construction debris, hazardous materials, other solid waste) can be segregated in a cost-effective manner; (2) what amount of waste reduction is possible as a result of segregation and recycling; (3)the time required to segregate materials; and (4)processes necessary to prevent nuisance conditions such as dust, odors, noise, etc. This pilot test is intended to reduce as much of an "X" factor as possible and refine to the greatest extent feasible the amount and types of waste and the cost for remediation. The Redmond property also underwent a brownfield study that identified areas of contamination caused by various historical uses, but mostly from the firing ranges. After remediation, which can occur as part of development, residual risks are predicted to be acceptable. Contaminated soils and debris can be contained in built-up berms or under a cap,preventing exposure. The level of remediation will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis depending on proposed type of development. There have been a couple tire kickers, but no sales or serious interest yet. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #1: Initiate strategic capital Participate in City of Bend's Transportation programming,including transportation Demand Management Project. and communications infrastructure, construction,and other needs. Q 4 Status: The City of Bend is continuing its work with citizens consultants to prepare the Central Westside Plan. The Plan will provide a long range strategy for the interrelated land use pattern and transportation infrastructure necessary to accommodate the projected growth on Bend's west side— including OSU-Cascades, new Bend Park and Recreation Facilities, and continuing commercial and residential development. By working with an appointed Citizens Advisory Committee over the past 6- months, the project planners developed three initial development scenarios of various intensities for community review. The community review and input process on these initial scenarios will conclude this fall (September/October), with a preferred scenario emerging for final consideration. Once the final scenario is chosen, the process will include additional public input through community meetings and ultimately, formal public hearings. The project timeline anticipates adoption of a final Plan in early 2016. The final plan will include a land use element(zoning and development design), supporting transportation infrastructure (including expansion of multi-modal elements for pedestrians, bikes and transit), and an overall plan for coordination of construction of physical infrastructure as related to adjoining development. Road Goal Objective Department Measure Healthy People #1: Consider population health,wellness, Maximize existing pavement for cycling use safety,and multi-modal connectivity in (new). the design and implementation of infrastructure. Q4 Status: In FY 15 and FY 16 (summer maintenance program), the Road Department made efforts to maximize existing pavement for the cycling by: 1. Using a more cycle friendly chip seal material within existing bike lanes 2. Re-striping select facilities used by cyclists to widen paved shoulders (for cycling use) and reduce vehicle travel lane widths (to minimally acceptable levels). These actions facilitate safety within the road section by providing more room for cycling while having the added benefit of vehicle speed reduction by creating"friction"which has been proven to reduce speeds. In addition to the above, the Skyliners Road Reconstruction Project commenced in FY 15, in which 6- foot bike lanes will be included in the design to accommodate the high use of the facility by the cycling community. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #3: Provide cost-efficient and innovative #1: Report the overall average Pavement infrastructure that supports local Condition Index(PCI)of the county paved road economic opportunities and livable network. The PCI is a measure of the quality of communities. pavement ranging from 0(completely failed)to 100(new surface). A PC1 greater than 70 is considered"good"and optimum maintenance efficiency occurs within the low to mid-80s range. Q4 Status: No change from Q3. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #3: Provide cost-efficient and innovative #2: Reports the percentage of roads with a PCI of infrastructure that supports local 70 or better. This measure,in concert with the economic opportunities and livable overall PCI rating,provides another metric by communities. which to measure the quality of the pavement asset and whether or not improvement,sustainability,or regression is occurring across the entire system. Q4 Status: No change from Q3. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #3: Provide cost-efficient and innovative #3: Reports the percentage of system receiving a infrastructure that supports local pavement maintenance treatment in a fiscal year. economic opportunities and livable This metric assists with comparison of actual communities. maintenance work performed versus ideal maintenance intervals(i.e.,chip seals last 7 years, therefore 117th(or 14%)of the network should be treated annually). Q4 Status: No change from Q3. Goal Objective Department Measure Robust Economy #3: Provide cost-efficient and innovative #4: Reports the ratio of pavement preservation infrastructure that supports local investment divided by the"system needs" economic opportunities and livable investment required to sustain the PC1 at its communities. current level. The FY 14 PMP model estimates an annual average"system needs"of$4.5M investment necessary to sustain the PCI over a 5- year to 10-year period. The FY 14 preservation investment was$4.1 M(91.1%sustained). The PMP model estimates a 0.1 PC1 point degradation (or increase)for every$235,000(+/-)subtracted (or added)to the annual pavement preservation investment(outcome measure). The goal of this PM is 100%,the target is improvement or upward trajectory. Q4 Status: No change from Q3. In addition to the above Performance Measures, the Road Department will provide periodic updates regarding progress and delivery of CIP projects to the Board of County Commissioners relating to the Commission's goal of: Robust Economy—Promote policies and actions that stimulate economic vitality. In FY 15, the Road Department will also update the Board of County Commissioners regarding the Fleet and Equipment Program as it relates to county goals. Q4 Status: The BOCC was provided a CIP update in the fourth quarter of FY 15. Sheriff's Office Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention, #1: Complete expansion of the Adult Jail by diversion,and intervention programs to October 2015. reduce recidivism and future demands on county services achieved through the continuum of incarceration,detention, and supervision services. Q4 Status: Refurbishing of dorms continued in Qtr.4 with one dorm completed in June. In addition, the jail staff was able to shift inmates into unoccupied cells to allow extensive cleaning and re-painting of four more dorms. Parts of the holding cells in booking, along with parts of the housing corridors, were cleaned and re-painted as well. The Medical/Mental Health cells are in full use with an average of four inmates housed in this area per day. Staff has also found safety, security and management use in isolating some behavioral and special needs inmates in one of the south dorms. Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #2: Promote targeted prevention, #2: 85 inmates participating in jail GED program. diversion,and intervention programs to reduce recidivism and future demands on county services achieved through the continuum of incarceration,detention, and supervision services. Q4 Status: During the fourth quarter of 2014-15 a total of 20 inmates participated in Jail GED programs. Year to Date 62 inmates or 72% of the FY2015 Target of 85 inmates have participated in GED programs. Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #3: Respond to, investigate,and #3: 34,488 patrol calls for service. prosecute criminal activity to ensure the guilty are held accountable,the innocent protected,and the rights of all citizens are respected. Q4 Status: During the fourth quarter of 2014-15, the number of Patrol Calls for Service was 8,468. Total actual for the year is 33,196 or 96% of the FY2015 Target of 34,488 calls. Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #3: Respond to,investigate,and #4: 44,718 self-initiated patrol calls for service. prosecute criminal activity to ensure the guilty are held accountable,the innocent protected,and the rights of all citizens are respected. Q4 Status: During the fourth quarter of 2014-15, the number of self-initiated Patrol Calls for Service was 10,594. Total actual for the year is 44,998 or just over 100% of the FY2015 Target of 44,718 calls. Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #4: Facilitate collaborative planning on #5: Provide a recommendation for the next county-wide communications and generation emergency communication network for infrastructure. public safety agencies in Deschutes County. Q4 Status: The Sheriffs office transferred the 800MHz and VHF Radio System Fund 245 FY2016 Budget from the Sheriffs Office to 911 via an Intergovernmental Agreement signed June 29, 2015. DCSO will continue to support value engineering of new system concept. Goal Objective Department Measure Safe Communities #4: Facilitate collaborative planning on #6: Participate in 4 emergency preparedness county-wide communications and exercises. infrastructure. Q4 Status: During the quarter the Sheriffs Office Emergency Management staff participated in the Statewide Emergency Coordination Center exercise. In addition the Sheriff's Office had an actual fire event at Shevlin Park on June 11th. Solid Waste: No Response Provided Community justice reaps benefits in Deschutes County; Jim Smith oversees restorative approach ... Page 1 of 2 Community justice reaps benefits in Deschutes County By Ted Shorack • The Bulletin Published Aug 31, 2015 at 12:09AM For the past nine years, Jim Smith has been overseeing graffiti removal and other community service projects as a supervisor for the Deschutes County Community Justice Department. The department supervises adult criminal offenders on parole or probation as well as a juvenile justice program for youth offenders. Smith said the community service, although court ordered, is also repairing harm and allowing offenders to make amends with the community. "It's an effective tool to hold people accountable," Smith said. "But it's a bigger piece to actually provide meaningful opportunities for those offenders to give back to the community." Smith recalled an instance where juvenile offenders were tasked with building a wheelchair ramp for a man whom they had stolen from, an example of the type of atonement the program can provide. Two days a week, adult crews are sent out into the community to perform the tasks, and two days a week, juvenile crews are sent. The crews are supervised at the work sites by the community justice department. Last year, crews built three wheelchair ramps for seniors and disabled people. Some of the community service projects include reducing fire fuels, roadside litter patrol, weed abatement and barbed wire removal. Forty-six juveniles completed about 1,000 hours of community service last year while working at 20 different sites. Smith began working as a probation officer in Humboldt County, California, after attending Humboldt State College in Arcata. In Deschutes County, Smith started at the juvenile detention center and then became a probation officer. He has been working for the county for 25 years. "One of the most enjoyable aspects of my job is the ability to work with community partners and build those relationships and assist victims," said Smith. For example, one of the first graffiti removal projects involved a small mural that had been defaced. "We went out and helped them repaint it. ... The satisfaction you get by helping people is a really neat part of my job," Smith said. As a caseworker you only deal with offenders, Smith said, but as a supervisor he gets to make connections with the community. "This has allowed me to do all the best aspects of probation work and also work with victims in the community," Smith said. http://www.bendbulletin.com/localstate/3459902-153/community justice-reaps-benefits-in-deschut... 9/1/2015 Community justice reaps benefits in Deschutes County; Jim Smith oversees restorative approach ... Page 2 of 2 Smith said the department's primary goal is to protect the public while helping juveniles avoid getting deeper in the system. Community service is an opportunity to connect youth with resources and involve them in volunteering projects after leaving the program, Smith said. Last year, work crews removed about 2.1 tons of abandoned barbed wire fencing from all over the county, cleaned up 107 graffiti sites and collected nearly 3,000 pounds of litter. They also did fire fuel reduction for 21 homes in Deschutes River Woods. The graffiti removal program began in 1987. Smith said there are common spots that are targeted and the program can address quickly. A graffiti hotline exists for property owners to inquire and seek help with removal, 541-385-1720. — Reporter: 541-617-7820, tshorack @bendbulletin.corn (mailto:tshorack @bendbul/etin.com) AI 9f Ryan Brennecke /The Bulletin Jim Smith stands behind a Bend business on Third Street as an adult work crew paints over several areas of graffiti on Thursday. http://www.bendbulletin.com/loca.lstatc/3459902-153/community-justice-reaps-benefits-in-deschut... 9/1/2015 . d ; 70igh" NA„;,„, X .,.qr f J W co E a �p t f d ii a--i �' "Itr Y ,,,,,,,, ' Q 2 �' 3 f a) .. it MM of a 1 � £w Slut ; 'I.-- 0 CL r7dBa3, y'e L, C6 J "w 0 w " H w .c y w.h, A P4 w trr ry,�,f•"w d',3 t s r• .? „° lwp�+ do arS 1 h t{,..r * p fir "t k t°, 9 a „ r Vii, N ,tN” r w '9°"'wk, gy }K ; `:" i,T� ,� v r w ; r . w4 ° w ^� w a b Y �",I �' w a w N y Z wyv V• , llo (4.4%'-'4•;-..t,3"1 m a 4 5.,1 y i + +J„ wp /"' N tr ,.. ib'&.r f f „.1 � f t � Y k. At A 11 . N :1 „1;� l��i 1� 0 1� ,,4, P I v r r l v d' w ;;;,.11.,1414.;. 7, d L r t� . 4 C''*.* '''....' ' *. e al!'''''' . '''.' ' '4' ' ': '.' . 4 4'4.. ' 4".....4...,4,. .4 .:'' ■**.l....4:. ,:.!t4t.t.,P,',i,*34 40 t . I►w - ,..., { ■r.,:., , , . . , . . . . . . . . .,,,, ,!, .,,:i..0. „... ,, ... . . . . , .i__, ,i, .„ 0 t?M ? ,.,.'1'.,' AM w Kr y � �" �a�, , i a �w, ra :' �--P 73 Li- Q CO h � L , 1 Cl..) N .'lli...'t ' ro 0 J J 0 .4:...:,-j-k. \ ,. „.. , .. , ,. ,.,.,,,,;,,, ,,,....„. ryy,1 , ,. ,. .. _ lrMy,, . , . . ,, .. ,,, ,i ,.. , . i',.4i ,, . , Pd t. P; , t = O 4., u .",'�i Q O /�:1 L a, a.) . bP C 0 J J QJ NP 47 ''q� rµ •fk- d iw t r 4J 4 1'.Y : ur • urn' • CO t Q 0 cC Ln 4--, 7:5 co ▪ LL a) rl v co ,, \ � 1 J ' a--+ V) 0- CL w �M x ri i a+". to^ ,, ,I< ifl,. e add of . , ur Bi � ri+w l+ h.P�.✓ Y"jr � ' L � � l 7 a � • imp p ,d ¢, d a.. 4 ,.. E' ., i , ,, �.,,, . :.,...„,:,,,;,:,,,, v,,,:;;...,,:i..,..1,3..:,;444,1,1vit,..4,......„,.,.....,,,,f,,,.,..:...,.....;,;,,,,,t2i4,4,.,.:.*.z.:,,.1, (z) 73 . i.. . .7*1:Vr. '-,.. ' . - '," 'sr' to �;d ";,-, 8p „' n ' ',',.."",',„,is',,,, sa ry, a Q pp w a ,P a +ak Ciutauwrr 9 *g,,. •r Q ”Y' v7 a y •::;',.;;:'''''''. 7pp�?9 �.. dv � n( %, w ..4,w c Ar g� E'+ G u Y` d' F `�^ pp� 1 lA �' 7 : ar F„k � i � lar 4 ` r MN"�fl 1,flt r+' .":G v� ' `w d'k «'' cru ' '7a flSaA"`w. + t�}d ¢ LL ifit,.'L a , n r' . r ri ,. 1P '.i'j" pn �1' ' r 9,, ka r.:u`a riri x u . x� 'p y a e� a ; C6 ." +,' + [y f it I1„14fIcl'.'41,:, t i d e.. i ,'''' Y'i" ' ea,,,„ 4 ',' _ L.�., t dr !N° iyl'�r} "8h r «l r:a+�,{ ijr,4 t $ t :;.......;,,..,,.,.,,,r,°.,, iii Q� •- , s 7 U pa' ( N^Ni" "• �u ud� d y r6;�,':"'......,......1..;d e kr a i III a r 114ti :7 u+ , M"9«f" 4 t'I.:::d u;, ,r I 1 v� s It tt h. 1P u " "' d i .q° ' dr,fpKt��;�i,� I..', b... r4 ,tp I � "' : s s �i�' • .4 pry tl s r ' m , �r„,. d n ..•• g,} 4 ��aµa:NµPl�'”,d�G+ •''i s ir+Y�r"pp�a°g�M ,..��''�, dins" ^:.,,. “• ,C . 1, ! ' ,�►; w. :r'„ N^� , j .k .,,,,,;.-1,..4. W yy "0,-p @ @ ,n 4 d " , J% f rR^ ^•il OP t,' ”■ '''' 'iiti7 !if , ,;" y Yp ' .♦ , "!`4 . , ,: V 'v N aa 4 *, •t,w , ' 171,..!-- r ,, �wM Y,. [� r T '"l;°° ,r n �ai" @ . • r w, r,, ;^� 7 t P;#1',4 "S 'l � A ,1 d ti h r '• 'y„ R +.e is rm Y 1 F ,� a�� 1 3 '� i . " , ki " "4,.;,-.. °' N ► Y;y < �i * " (A yr Y"w� * � G a .M" q� y` a t Mn° � V � t a .a _, � '" ". 'p ".y. l �� 4.y „y f r ; om« "C w . .'r,-.' '..•„ .., 4„,,i. .. „0 ... ,t" .,., y l P- xt ..:, : a"� ,„+ : 1 ■ x "`^ . ,"'� 1)0 '', i" § "k f a 4't ' tY A i.,'t‘,0!` ▪ b4� gAq, ”,pr r s"rI 9 4 l " J▪b " ', / � A 4yri, r .• ■ a e.1 v �' r�i + r ; �' +NJ Y v t� ^h� ° � � ` �r yf ry,P t r t P 4 °" � "� .. � "@ ". ,• " y ,� a ! 1 ..,,,,-.14,--► .� • .44..7' Rl 1 ,. ,.ix ,. ^ '�. -t)::,1 w, .� :ra 9��%„� • p,,414,1 ,..'4''' " .• Ar ,.. . ttif 4* R• b' ^ .K, r',I ,0 � r r r v, ',x' b: N a P"..Y.. „ r �w 14 ." " � t.. ' . W ;',* ;,,t,.1,,,,,, -,..,,,,, �" y'° r y p r a 7.,�� •'r a. ` k,,-..-..,..„7, a r .eV; ! i " `:' .� t i r '.- r` I' ' M• • !' ry' k 4 : w r M r , p r..•.W • . •S t a�w t 9j Ny�i'„ ggq��y��.p •.�'„,„..;• * >T .. . p° .. , f tl'. ^ . "aµ.Y ^ d ;1.,.d„�y♦ '�," ' ,� 'r . Ah w•. ...., . ALi, _ e y r xr #. "7• " " � 1 ': i 1...."' r i it . ,; „� it C. f" � ti $`-iP a., 4 "y w �✓, , �.d �. ! '*�� ,9 � 7 "* , :\":4 ✓r p L,Np p �, +. :. i Y 1/! r i ti l r ' -Y. � ?• �� v.„ J ; v' • p'i- p r .� r r "V rv...,« 4 - , -, .,7 . ,_ q ..r 4 "Y 1 y._1 " W WF 4 M.. ' "" .. . / „" w.w . ' . "r "f •4 � - .1 �. r iii, yr* .IN:L 1, , 'IV,''' a •� 1 ✓fi t M - - 1. -ta..;4' ."— •,, 1. 'ti" '''' l'il '—' 7: .0' ,4'1..4 il. - . et::- . �r • " / ^y f A rd l, a r• a . � y • .. ,iiit4"-',.....9' q Nc t' Mjj" ry v d IAg„▪ _ • �° W". . n . .yr f. .,® ,., , r "'ilk 11. X •via- " �r ► JT ES G qC. W z� -( Board of Count Commissioners 4%.1%, P.O. Box 6005 •Bend, CIR 97708-6005 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 206 •Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 • Fax (541) 385-3202 www.deschutes.org August 31, 2015 board@deschutes.org Tammy Baney Deschutes—Ochoco Regional Advisory Committee Anthony OeBone Katrina Van Dis Alan Unger 334 NE Hawthorne Ave. Bend, OR 97701 Regional Advisory Committee Members, The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners would like to express our support for the Deschutes County Noxious Weed Cost Share Title II grant application for 2015. As you know, noxious weeds are a problem we all share in central Oregon and something we need all landowners and land managers to be engaged in so we can maintain healthy and productive lands for environmental, social and economic benefits. This proposal offers an effective way for landowners in Deschutes County to treat their noxious weeds and is a proven model to engage landowners in actively managing noxious weeds. This project expands upon ongoing efforts t o treat noxious w eeds includin g treatment of right of ways by State, County and City government,treatment of federal and other public lands by land managers, as well as ongoing efforts undertaken by many private landowners. Cost share projects often engage new or small landowners who are unaware of noxious weeds or the appropriate steps to manage them. Often by participating in a cost share project, landowners can reduce or eliminate their noxious weeds and can establish an appropriate management and maintenance plan moving forward to keep noxious weeds under control. In addition, with landowners covering half of the costs of treatment, and Deschutes County supplying personnel to manage the projects, the investment in Title II dollars can treat many more acres than could be treated without matching funds. This project also compliments Deschutes County's extensive outreach efforts related to noxious weeds which is comprised of presence at local events such as the Let's Pull Together weed pulls and the County Fair, as well as presentations to homeowner associations and other groups, and numerous one on one landowner contacts. Deschutes County supports and encourages the funding of the 2015 Deschutes County Noxious Weed Cost Share project utilizing Title II funds. Sincerely, The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Chair Alan Unger, Commissioner Tammy Baney, Commissioner Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost-Effective Manner DFO Project NO: 15- INSTRUCTIONS: This application is a Word document that is locked; press the tab key to advance through the document, or mouse click to the next response. As you write the document will expand. The application is currently 5 pages, do not exceed 10 pages in total with a minimum font size of I I.This application is for the federal fiscal year 2015-17, projects must begin on or after October I, 2015. Part A: Project Contact, Location and Timeframe A.I. Project Costs Funding Amount Requested:$25,593.75 Total Project Costs:$66,538.50 This matchs total costs from Column A in your budget This matches total costs from Column E in your budget A-2. Project Contact Information: Please list the person who will be able to answer questions about the project as the Contact. Project Name: Deschutes County Noxious Weed Cost Share 2015 Project Contact: Ed Keith Title: County Forester Phone: 541-322-71 17 Email:ed.keith@deschutes.org A-3. Fiscal Organization/Administrator: If different than A-I, please provide the name of the person and entity responsible for compliance activities should grant funds be awarded. g County Contact Person: Ed.. e._ Organization: Deschutes Count - Keith Address: 61 150 SE 27'h St. City: Bend ]ZIP Code: 97702 mm Phone No: 541-3272-7117 Email: ed.keithic7..deschutes.org A-4. Project Location Information: {if more than one location, list all) An 8.5 X I I area map is required; you may include up to 3 digital photos of the project area with your hard copy application. National Forest(s): Township(s):Many Range(s):Many Section(s): Many County(ies): Deschutes Deschutes Detailed Project Location Description (100 characters max):Private lands in Deschutes County with A or 13 rated noxious weeds. Ranger District: Bend Ft. Rock, Sisters, Landowner(s)if project will occur on private land: Crescent Private landowners in Deschutes County(several) Land Status(check all that apply): National Forest, ! l Other Federal, State, UCounty, ®Private,and Other(specify) Page I DFO Project NO: 1 S- A-S. Time Frame Information: Provide an estimate of start and end dates. The start dote must be after 101112015. and the end date should reflect the point at which all project activities including those supported by matching funds, will be completed. Start Date(mm/dd/yy):3/1/2016 Completion Date(mm/dd/yy): 12/31/2018 Is this a continuation of a previously RAC-funded project? r- Yes ® No (If yes,complete section G.) What was the title of the previously funded project? Part B: Title ll Eligibility B-I. How does the proposed project meet the purposes of the Legislation? Improves maintenance of existing infrastructure. n Implements stewardship objectives that enhance forest ecosystems. Restores and improves land health. Restores water quality. B-2. Project Type (check all that apply, must choose at least one) Road Maintenance L Trail Obliteration Road Decommission/Obliteration Forest Health Improvement C Other Infrastructure Maintenance Wildlife Habitat Restoration ❑ Soil Productivity Improvement [T Control of Noxious Weeds El Watershed Restoration& Maintenance C Fuels Management/Fire Prevention ❑ Fish Habitat Restoration Implement CWPP Project C Reestablish Native Species - Community Economic Benefit L Trail Maintenance Other,specify ❑ B-3. What is the primary purpose of the project? (Select only one from 13-2) Conrol of Noxious Weeds B-4. Status of Project Planning: National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)Complete: (Note: If NEPA is not ❑Yes ❑ No ® N/A complete please consult your Forest District Ranger before submission as most projects cannot be funded in the necessary timeframe.For private lands, this is not applicable.) Date completed (dd/mm/yyyy) NEPA Project Name Endangered Specific Act Consultation Complete: I Yes LI No ® N/A Dept.of State Lands/ODFW Permits for In-Stream Work Obtained: ❑Yes [T No ® N/A Dept.of State Lands/Army Corps of Engineers Fill/Removal&404 Permit C Yes I No El N/A Obtained: State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)Concurrence Received: C Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Project Design(s)Completed: ©Yes I I No ! N/A Survey and Manage Completed: ❑Yes n No Z N/A B-4. Will the project generate merchantable timber? If yes,the project may be subject to merchantable contracting pilot program or other contracting Yes ® No I=1 N/A Page 2 DFO Project NO: I 5- procedures. Part C: Narrative C-I. Brief Project Description; (in one sentence)This project will treat private lands in Deschutes County infested with A or B rated noxious weeds by providing funds for half the costs of treatment projects, making lands more productive and preventing spread to other areas including the National Forest. C-2. Detailed Project Description (2000 characters max)Deschutes County will assess potential project sites throughout the county and qualified sites with A and B rated noxious weeds will receive technical and financial assistance for weed treatment and restoration utilizing integrated vegetation management techniques. Landowners will be reimbursed for half of the initial project costs as an incentive to complete the work. Landowners will also be responsible to perform follow up maintenance as needed to maintain the project site. C-3. How will cooperative relationships among people that use federal lands be improved? List known partnerships or collaborative opportunities Identify the entities and individuals that have been contacted about this project(please list). Deschutes County has formed a noxious weed advisory board where people and organizations concerned about weeds can collaborate together to educate the public and form partnerships that work towards reduction of noxious weeds throughout the County and across ownerships. The noxious weed board brings together citizens and representatives from the US Forest Service, Deschutes County, Bend Parks and Recreation,City staff, landscaping companies and other private business,as well as the Oregon Department of Agriculture and other state agencies. The noxious weed advisory board is an opportunity for many organizations to collaborate together toward a common cause. The project will help advance the goals of the noxious weed board by treating properties highly infested with A or B rated noxious weeds and putting owners on a plan to manage their noxious weeds. The weed board and Deschutes County will promote opportunities for private landowners to participate in projects while conducting outreach and education to a broad base of citizens throughout Deschutes County. This will occur through presentations to civic groups, presence at relevant community events as well as one on one contact with interested landowners.Through all these collaborative actions we will provide the education and financial resources the landowners need to effectively treat weeds on their property. This project will also serve to compliment treatment projects on federal lands. C-4. How is this project in the best interest of the community? Identify benefits to the community (2000 characters max) Noxious weeds that reduce wildlife habitat, water quality, land productivity,and increase fire risk will be reduced and eliminated through eradication projects. Desirable plants will be restored that will benefit wildlife, increase land and soil productivity and reduce fire risk,while enhancing usability of the land for a variety of purposes including agriculture, recreation, and scenic quailty. C-5. How does the project benefit federal lands/resources (2000 characters max) Deschutes County has a large and diverse population with a high percentage of citizens that use,enjoy or travel through federal lands on a regular basis. Private lands are intermixed with federal lands in such a way that problems such as noxious weeds located on one property soon become an issue for the larger area. It is easy to see that with the heavy public use of the National Forest by the public,that not treating weeds on private lands will quickly lead to trouble for National Forest lands. Treating weeds on private lands will reduce spread of weeds to and infestations of weeds on federal lands and will therefore provide direct benefit by way of reduced infestations of noxious weeds, and reduced need for treatment on National Forest lands. C-6. What is the proposed method(s) of accomplishment? (Check at least one) Page 3 DFO Project NO: 15- AmeriCorps n Volunteers Conservation Crews Grant t l Contract ® Agreement Job Corps Stewardship Contract Federal Workforce U Merchantable Timber Pilot _ County Workforce ® Other Part D: Project Outcomes Insert the quantitative measurements in the space provided as they pertain to your project. Miles of road maintained Miles of road decommissioned/obliterated Miles of trails maintained Miles of trails obliterated Miles of stream/river restored/improved Miles of fish habit restored/improved Number of structures maintained/improved Acres of soil productivity improved Acres of hazardous fuels treated Acres of forest health improved Acres of wildlife habitat restored/improved Acres of rangeland improved Acres of noxious weeds controlled 750 Acres of native species established Timber volume generated (mbf) _. Jobs generated in full time equivalents(FTE)to the nearest tenth (one FTE is 40 hours/week x 52 weeks) Number of people reached (for environmental project/fire prevention) None of the above Part E: Monitoring Plan E-I. Monitoring Plan A. Describe the method of measurement for whether the project meets or excced the desired ecological condition and community goals outlined above. This plan should include evaluation methods in relation to your project outcomes listed in Part D. (1000 characters max) Acres planned and acres treated are documented prior to and after project implimentation so that total acres of noxious weeds treated can be reported_ Project sites are verified and acres treated are tracked and will be reported at the end of the project. B. List the names of those responsible for monitoring these methods. Ed Keith C. Identify the total funding needed to carry out specific monitoring tasks. $2000 E-2. Employment and Training A. How will the project be evaluated to determine if it created local employment or training opportunities? (1000 characters max) Page 4 CFO Project NO: 15-_ Analysis of contractor receipts will show dollars expended towards local employment. Most landowners choose to hire a licensed applicator for herbicide treatment of weeds which will provide direct local employment. B. List the names of those responsible for monitoring these opportunities. Ed Keith C. Identify the total funding needed to carry out specific monitoring tasks. $ 500 E-3. Improved Use or Value-Add of Removed Products (if applicable) A. How will the project be evaluated to determine if it improved the use of, or added value to, any products removed from the land consistent with the purposes of Title II? (1000 characters max) By treating noxious weeds the use of the land is improved for wildlife habitat, forage production, soil retention, and overall usabililty. By tracking acres treated and restored the project will be able to report how many acres received added value by eliminating noxious weeds. B. List the names of those responsible for monitoring these methods. Ed Keith C. Identify the total funding needed to carry out specific monitoring tasks. $500 E-4. Identify remedies for failure to comply with the term of this agreement Unused funds will be returned to the RAC Other U If"Other" is selected,explain Monitoring Remedies. F: Continuation Project Update SKIP IF THIS IS NOT A CONTINUATION PROJECT F-1. Is this a continuation of a previously funded RAC project?Yes No Z F-2. Please list the deliverables, outcomes and activities stated on the previous RAC application (be specific) 750 characters max. F-3. Did you achieve these results?Yes E No If not, please explain why: (500 characters max) Page 5 (For Administrative Purposes ONLY) DFO Project NO: 14 Identify the activities and the source funding for the 2015 RAC Project Request only. {RAC Funds (Matching Funds: (Matching Funds: Non-Federal) Insert Project Name HERE: Requested:) Federal Funds) Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Activities(list) Requested RAC Federal Agency Other In-Kind Funds Funds Other Cash Funds Funds Total Project Cost PERSONNEL(Position Title,Wages $ - $ - $ 11,200.00 $ - $ 11,200.00 Benefits,etc.)County Forester$56/hr $ - $ $ - $ - $ - x 200 hours $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - _$ - $ - $ - $ CONTRACTED SERVICES(Grant $ 24,375.00 $ - $ 24,375.00 $ - $ 48,750.00 Administration,Labor,Consulant, $ - $ - $ - $ - $ " Management,etc.)Weed treatment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - @$65/acre x 750 acres $ - .. $ - $ - . $ - $ r SUPPLIES/MATERIALS(Fencing, $ - $ - $ $ $ Plants,Film,Office Supplies,etc.) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - DESIGN/ENGINEERING&PERMIT $ - $ - $ $ - $ - COSTS(Design, Permits,Site Surveys, $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - etc.) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TRAVEL 6000 miles x.57/mile $ - $ - $ 3,420.00 $ - $ 3,420.00 NEPA(including clearance and consultation with regulatory agencies e.g. USF&W $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - INDIRECT COST RATE If you have a Federally approved negotiated indirect cost rate you may charge up to 5%indirect costs. * $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - OTHER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - PROJECT SUB-TOTAL $ 24,375.00 $ - $ 38,995.00 $ $ 63,370.00 USFS ADMIN OVERHEAD(5% i$ h r�i ,1f r £Sty `%} ��F i J ' r}{x1{;�l sE`yEiv , ji +rAAM automatically added to your Total '"tv s4 rti>t . c -+' ZiI�V# i s ,fit... tier q,� ��trh,p��,,xFd�;n'1 �,�R j��«1��.f��E,tl`�si��P��:k(�'��, Requested RAC funds and Total ''' 6 r 4�Ztiii ii'�d`i5ii r1M 3af#g "t f s3kt7 t � 9F t d, s�F'1 0,Y N; �fri li a', Y l 'p i.01,4f,41, ,-piro,w,po F,j�plaT,o, :�S" s�a'ral nd iii itf ly Project Costs) t»s�' 'A1+� f W l ; Wjt Project } $ 1,218.75 ,..i--;;, ',-,z, r,(,, ',f e,,. � )1f',:''7U., ..`. gl?'`•' NA` ' .:.,-61AC Si $ 3,168.50 TOTAL COST $ , 25,59375. .$ S§ , q asp, FUNDING TOTAL PROJECT AMOUNT, cbsTS REQUESTED RAC Budget Form v�v-rES o 041,ity ti w -A of U kn DESCHUTES COUNTY LEGAL COUNSEL JOHN E. LAHERTY Assistant Legal Counsel 541-388-6624 CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION—NOT TO BE DISCLOSED TO: Board of County Commissioners Date: August 26, 2015 RE: Work Session Agenda, 8/31/15 File No. 29/1-008E It has come to the Legal Department's attention that Deschutes County Code sections 6.08.050 and 8.08.040 are confusing, and arguably inconsistent with each other, regarding(a) what constitutes a nuisance caused by an animal, and (b) whether such a nuisance is a Class A or Class B violation. Amending these sections to remove inconsistencies will make these Code provisions easier to interpret and enforce. Attached: Proposed Amendments cc: Bonnie Baker, Recording Secretary PROPOSED AMENDMENT 6.08.050.Conditions When Animals Are Nuisances. A.An animal other than livestock is a public nuisance if it: 1.Bites,injures or attacks a person; 2.Chases vehicles or persons; 3.Damages or destroys property of persons other than the owner of the animal; 4.Scatters garbage; 5.Trespasses on private property of persons other than the owner of the animal; 6.Disturbs any person by frequent or prolonged noises; 7.Places a person in reasonable fear of imminent physical injury,when such incident takes place off the premises of the animal's owner or keeper; 8.Injures or kills an animal or fowl belonging to a person other than the owner or keeper of the animal; 9.Is found to be in violation of DCC 6.08.060. B.An animal shall not be considered to be a nuisance under DCC 6.08.050 if the subject animal bites a person or another animal wrongfully assaulting the subject animal or if the subject animal bites a person or other animal trespassing upon premises occupied by the dog's owner or keeper after being provoked by that person. under DCC 0&.090. (Ord. ,2015;Ord.98-008§1,1998;Ord.95-031 §1,1995;Ord.90-019§1,1990;) PROPOSED AMENDMENT 8.08.040.Definitions. For the purposes of DCC 8.08,unless otherwise apparent from the context,certain words and phrases used in DCC 8.08 are defined as set forth in DCC 8.08.040. "Direct transportation"means travel between different locations separated by a distance not substantially different than the length of a trip with a destination where the rider leaves the vehicle before resuming travel."Direct transportation"includes parking places in streets and parking lots,but excludes speed contests,motocross contests,rallies and practice therefore,repair and testing of motors,accelerating the motors of stopped motor vehicles,and vehicular traffic wherein the same vehicle may be heard for more than five minutes from the same location. "Motor vehicle"means every self-propelled vehicle and vehicle designed for self-propulsion,except road rollers,farm tractors,traction engines;provided however,that police vehicles,ambulances,fire engines and other emergency vehicles responding to emergency calls are not subject to DCC 8.08. "Off-road motorcycle"means every motor vehicle having a seat or saddle for the use of the rider and designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground,but excluding a trailer.This includes motorcycles suitable for use off any road or on dirt trails,regardless of whether it may also be used on public streets or highways under state law."Off-road motorcycle"includes motorcycles sold or commonly described as dirt bikes,motocross bikes,trail bikes,enduro bikes and trail bikes which in operation make crackling or explosive noises that would disturb the sleep,comfort or repose of persons 30 or more feet away. "Unreasonably loud or raucous noise"'means: A.Motor vehicle noise which is louder or heard for a longer period than that produced by use in direct transportation by motor vehicles with mufflers supplied by the manufacturer with the vehicle,which disturbs,injures or endangers the comfort,repose,health,peace or safety of persons 30 or more feet away,if such noise is not emitted in order to make the motor vehicle move up to the maximum speed limit on public streets,roads,and/or highways for the purpose of direct transportation;or B.Noise,which violates the standards of the Environmental Quality Commission,adopted pursuant to ORS 467.030 which are not exempt under ORS 467.035 or permitted by a variance issued under ORS 467.060; C.The sounding of any horn or signaling device on any automobile,motorcycle,bus or other vehicle except as a reasonable signal required by the exigencies of vehicular or pedestrian traffic; the creation by means of any such signaling device of any sound which disturbs the sleep,peace, quiet,comfort or repose of other persons;the sounding of any such device for an unnecessary or unreasonable period of time; D.The playing,using or operating of any radio,musical instrument,phonograph,television set, tape recorder or other machine or device for the producing or reproducing of sound in such a manner as to disturb the sleep,peace,quiet,comfort or repose of other persons,or at any time with louder volume than is necessary for convenient hearing by the person or persons who are in the room,vehicle or chamber in which the machine or device is operated and others who are voluntary listeners thereto.The operation of any such machine or device in such a manner so as to be plainly audible to a peace officer at a distance of 50 feet from the building,room,structure or vehicle in which it is located shall be prima fade proof of a violation of DCC 8.08.040; E.Using,operating or permitting to be used or operated any mechanical or electrical loudspeaker or sound amplifier,either stationary or mobile,for producing or reproducing sound which is cast upon the public streets or other public property.DCC 8.08.040 does not prohibit the reasonable use of mechanical loudspeakers or sound amplifiers in the course of noncommercial public addresses or emergency announcements required by public safety;provided however,that repetitive mechanically or electrically amplified political advertising shall not be allowed in zoned residential neighborhoods between 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.if it disturbs the sleep,peace,quiet, comfort or repose of persons more than 30 feet away; F.Yelling,shouting,hooting,whistling or singing on the public streets,between the hours of 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.or at any time or place so as to disturb the sleep,peace,comfort or repose of persons more than 30 feet away.DCC 8.08.040 shall not apply to applause and cheering at public meetings,lectures,sports events and shows held at schools,stadiums, auditoriums,churches,meeting halls,public parks and public playgrounds;•G.The keeping-o . - • -• - - - --- ' HG.The blowing of any steam whistle attached to any stationary boiler,except to give notice of the time to begin or stop work,as a waming of fire or danger,or upon request of proper authorities; WI.The discharge into the open air of the exhaust of any steam engine,stationary internal combustion engine,motor boat or motor vehicle except through a muffler or other device which will effectively prevent loud or explosive noises there from; JI.The use of any automobile,motorcycle or other vehicle so out of repair,so loaded,or in such a manner as to disturb the sleep,peace,quiet,comfort or repose of persons more than 30 feet away; 14J.The loading or unloading of any vehicle or the opening,closing or destruction of bales,boxes, crates and containers,so as to disturb the sleep,peace,quiet,comfort or repose of persons more than 30 feet away; �K.The construction including excavation,demolition,alteration or repair of any building,street, sidewalk,driveway,sewer or utility line between the hours of 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.,except as provided in DCC 8.08.080; ML.The creation of any sound on any street adjacent to any school,institution of learning,church or court,while the same is in use,or adjacent to any hospital,nursing home or other institution for the care of the sick or infirm,which would tend to unreasonably interfere with the operation of the same or disturbs the sleep,peace,quiet,comfort or repose of persons more than 30 feet away. "Adjacent"means within 500 feet of any of such institutional building; NM.The operation between the hours of 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.of any pile driver,earthmoving equipment,pneumatic hammer,derrick,steam or electric hoist or other appliance or machinery, the use of which creates a sound which disturbs the sleep,peace,quiet,comfort or repose of persons more than 30 feet away; ON.The use of any off-road motorcycle or snowmobile where it is heard by the occupant from the premises of an inhabited residence not owned by the user.If the user has a permit issued under DCC 8.08.080(B),such person may operate the motorcycle or snowmobile within the terms of the permit; PO.The operation of any blower,power fan,internal combustion engine,electric motor or compressor,or the compression of air,unless the sound from each machine is sufficiently muffled so as not to disturb the sleep,peace,quiet,comfort or repose of persons more than 30 feet away. (Ord. ,2015;Ord.95-032§1,1995;Ord.203.11 §4,1980;) Chapter 6.08. ANIMAL CONTROL 6.08.010. Definitions. 6.08.015. Definition-At Large. 6.08.020. Definition-Dangerous Dog. 6.08.025. Definition-Keeper. 6.08.030. Definition-Livestock. 6.08.035. Definition-Livestock District. 6.08.040. Definition-Open Range. 6.08.045. Definition-Unconfined. 6.08.050. Conditions When Animals Are Nuisances. 6.08.060. Animals At Large. 6.08.070. Dangerous Dog. 6.08.080. Impermissible Harboring. 6.08.090. Violations. 6.08.100. When Impoundment of Dogs Authorized. 6.08.010. Definitions. As used in DCC 6.08, the words and phrases are defined as set forth in DCC 6.08.015 through DCC 6.08.045. (Ord.95-031 §1, 1995) 6.08.015. Definition-At Large. A. "At large" means a dog or other animal found off the premises of the owner or keeper while the dog or animal is not under the complete control of a capable person. B. A dog shall not be considered to be at large under the following circumstances: (a) a dog in a duly recognized obedience school on field training exercises and under the direct supervision of a handler; (b) a dog within a vehicle; (c) a dog being used to hunt, chase, or tree wildlife while under the supervision of its owner or keeper; (d)use of a dog to control or protect livestock; and(e)use of a dog, in other related agricultural activities. C. Livestock on the open range shall not be considered to be at large. (Ord.90-019 §1, 1990). 6.08.020. Definition-Dangerous Dog. "Dangerous dog"means any dog: A. Whose owner has been convicted or has admitted responsibility,or has in effect admitted responsibility on a charge that the dog without provocation impermissibly placed a person in reasonable fear of imminent physical inj u y; B. Whose owner has been convicted or has admitted responsibility,or has in effect admitted responsibility on a charge that the dog attacked a person or domestic animal without provocation;or C. That is trained for or used in animal fighting. (Ord.90-019 §I, 1990) Chapter 6.08 I (04/2003) 6.08.025. Definition-Keeper. "Keeper" means, in addition to its ordinary meaning, the parents or guardian of an animal owner when the owner is under the age of 18 years and when the owner resides with the parent or guardian on the date of the alleged violation of a provision of DCC 6.08. (Ord.90-019 §1, 1990) 6.08.030. Definition-Livestock. ":Livestock" means any animal that is defined to be livestock by the petition or order establishing the livestock district in which the subject livestock was found. (Ord.90-019§1, 1990). 6.08.035. Definition-Livestock District. "Livestock district" means any geographic area wherein as established pursuant to state law it is unlawful for livestock to be at large. This definition shall apply only to those livestock districts or portions of livestock districts lying within the jurisdiction of Deschutes County. (Ord.90-019 §L 1990). 6.08.040. Definition-Open Range. "Open range" means any area outside the boundaries of a city that is not within the boundaries of a livestock district,as defined in DCC 6.08. (Ord.90-019§1., 1990) 6.08.045. Definition-Unconfined. "Unconfined" means not securely confined indoors or confined in a securely locked pen or structure upon the premises of the owner or keeper of a dangerous dog. Such pen or structure must be constructed in a manner adequate to ensure the confinement of the dangerous dog. (Ord.90-019§1, 1990) 6.08.050. Conditions When Animals Are Nuisances. A. An animal other than livestock is a public nuisance if it: 1. Bites, injures or attacks a person; 2. Chases vehicles or persons; 3. Damages or destroys property of persons other than the owner of the animal; 4. Scatters garbage; 5. Trespasses on private property of persons other than the owner of the animal; 6. Disturbs any person by frequent or prolonged noises; 7. Places a person in reasonable fear of imminent physical injury, when such incident takes place off the premises of the animal's owner or keeper; 8. Injures or kills an animal or fowl belonging to a person other than the owner or keeper of the animal; 9. Is found to be in violation of DCC 6.08.060. B. An animal shall not be considered to be a nuisance under DCC 6.08.050 if the subject animal bites a person or another animal wrongfully assaulting the subject animal or if the subject animal bites a person or other animal trespassing upon premises occupied by the dog's owner or keeper after being provoked. by that person. C. The owner or keeper of an animal that is a public nuisance under DCC 6.08.050(A)(1) shall be liable under DCC 6.08.090. Chapter 6.08 2 (04/2003) (Ord.98-008 §1, 1998;Ord. 95-031 §1, 1995;Ord. 90-019 §1, 1990) Large. 6.08.060. Animals at Lar A. Any dog found at large is a public nuisance. B. Any in a livestock control district found at large is a public nuisance. C. An owner or keeper of a dog or livestock shall be liable for a violation of DCC 6.08.060 only if such public nuisance resulted from the owner or keeper's negligent conduct. (Ord.98-008 §1, 1998;Ord.97-011 §2, 1997;. Ord. 95-031 §1, 1995;Ord.90-01.9§1, 1990) 6.08.070. Dangerous Dog. A. No owner or keeper of a dangerous dog shall suffer or permit such dog to go unconfined on the premises of the owner or keeper. B. No owner or keeper of a dangerous dog shall suffer or permit such animal to go beyond the premises of such person unless such animal is humanely muzzled and securely leashed or otherwise securely restrained. (Ord.98-008§1, 1998;Ord.95-031 §1, 1995;Ord. 90-019§l, 1990) 6.08.080. Impermissible Harboring. No person shall own, harbor, or keep any dog with knowledge that, while off the premises owned or controlled by its owner or keeper and while not acting under the direction of its owner or keeper or employees or agents of such persons,the dog has killed or injured any person. (Ord.98-008 §1, 1998;Ord. 90-019 §1, 1990) 6.08.090. Violations. A. Except as provided herein,violation of any provision of DCC 6.08 is a Class B violation. B. Violation of DCC 6.08.050(A)(1),(7)or(8), DCC 6.08.060,DCC 6.08.070 or.DCC 6.08.080 is a Class A violation. (Ord.2003-021 §13,2003;Ord.98-008 §1, 1998; Ord. 97-011 §2, 1997;Ord. 95-031 §1, 1995;Ord. 90-019 §1, 1990) 6.08.100. When Impoundment of Dogs Authorized. When a dog is a public nuisance under DCC 6.08, any peace officer or animal control officer may, in addition to citing the owner for a violation under DCC 6.08.090,impound the dog. (Ord.95-031 §1, 1995;Ord. 90-019§1, 1990) Chapter 6.08 3 (04/2003)