2017-57-Minutes for Meeting June 28,1984 Recorded 2/23/2017SEVENTH MOUNTAIN COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
BUDGET ADOPTION: JUNE 28, 1984
Chairman Young reconvened the meeting of the Deschutes County
Board of Commissioners acting as the Board of Directors of the
Seventh Mountain County Service District. The purpose of the
meeting was the adoption of the District Budget for fiscal year
1984/85. All three Commissioners were present.
It was noted that the Final Budget Hearing had been held
previously.
Chairman Young read aloud Resolution 84-022 Adopting the Budget.
MOTION: TUTTLE moved to adopt Resolution 84-022, Adopting the
1984/85 Fiscal Year Budget for the Seventh Mountain
County Service District.
PRANTE: Second.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.
Chairman Young then read aloud Resolution 84-023, Making
Appropriations.
MOTION: TUTTLE moved to adopt Resolution 84-023, Making
Appropriations of the Seventh Mountain County Service
District Budget for the Fiscal Year 1984/85.
PRANTE: Second.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.
Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Albert A. Young, . Chairman
Bristow Prante, Commissioner
Laurence A. Tuttle, Commissioner
/ss
DESCHUTES COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS y 2017 57
NANCY BLANKENSHIP, COUNTY CLERK 1+d i
COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL 02/23/2017 11:56:59 AM
1201137-'J7 IIIl 11111111111 III
JUVENILE DETENTION COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 26, 1983 MEETING MINUTES
The meeting was called to order in the Commissioners' Conference
Room at 12:00 P.M. Those present were: Judge John Copenhaver;
Commissioner Larry Tuttle; Jerry Horn, Children's Services
Division; Mike Maier, County Administrator; Darrell Davidson,
County Undersheriff; Marshall Ricker, AIA; Judy Stiegler, Juvenile
Services Commission; Bill Jones, Deschutes County Juvenile
Department; and Dave McGory, Jefferson County Juvenile Department.
Mr. Jones distributed a compilation of juvenile detention
statistics from Deschutes, Jefferson and Crook Counties for 1982.
The committee reviewed the information presented. Mr. Jones
indicated that the figures were low because they are not detaining
as many juveniles as they normally would due to the distance
involved in transporting them. This should be considered when
determining the capacity of a Central Oregon detention facility as
well as the fact that neighboring counties would utilize the
facility.
After general discussion, it was the concensus that a Deschutes
County facility should have a six -bed capacity designed in such a
way that the amount of female and male beds could fluctuate. It
was suggested that a dorm for four to seven beds and one or two
separate rooms would accomodate such an arrangement.
It was also suggested that the facility serve as a shelter
facility as well as a detention facility. Because of the
continuous need for shelter care the facililty would be used
continually rather than only when a juvenile is being detained.
Staff would be required to have training in both shelter and
detention care and counseling. The ability to transfer shelter
care juveniles to another facility would be necessary in the event
that detained juveniles had filled the facility to capacity. The
State of Oregon provides reimbursement for shelter care, which
would help to offset staffing costs. The option of retaining
on-call staff was also discussed as a means of keeping staffing
costs to a minimum.
Use by neighboring counties was also discussed. At this time
there was no input from Harney County, but it is expected that
they would utilize a facility in Deschutes County. Mr. McGory
from Jefferson County agreed that they should maintain their
contract for detention with The Dalles in the event that the
Deschutes County facility was full. Mr. Maier asked Mr. McGory
about the posssiblity of Jefferson County participating in the
capital outlay involved. Mr. McGory agreed to report back on
this.
It was the concensus to meet again on October 10 at noon. Mr.
Ricker agreed to have ready rough drafts of possible floor plans
for that meeting and Mr. Horn will provide information on shelter
care reimbursement from the State.
Being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:55 p.m.
/ss