2017-788-Minutes for Meeting May 29,1997 Recorded 11/15/2017Recorded in Deschutes County
Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk
Commissioners' Journal 11/15/2017 12:54:31 PM
CJ2017-788
1111111111111111111111111111111
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
Bend, Oregon
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Audio Cassette Recording Titled: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF THE
TUMALO COMMUNITY PLAN
May 29, 1997; 6:00-8:30 PM.
A meeting of the Board of County Commissioners was held on May 29, 1997.
Commissioners present were Nancy Pope Schlangen, Bob Nipper and Linda
Swearingen. Also in attendance were Rick Isham, County Counsel; County
Administrator Mike Maier; the media, other staff and a large number of
interested citizens.
Commissioner Schlangen opened the meeting, which was to discuss the update to
the Tumalo Rural Community Plan. She then opened the public hearing.
A staff report was presented by Brian Harrington of the Community Development
Department. He said he would go over what has been done so far, and how they
met the Rule.
The County has updated the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations for the
Tumalo community, basically to comply with new State rules governing
unincorporated communities.
Transcription of Audio Recording of a Work Session, May 29, 1997 Page 1 of 6
It is an unincorporated community, defined as a rural community that will no
longer be referred to as a rural service center. The Board will take testimony on
recommended changes to the Plan. The documents discussed this evening were
developed over the past year after considerable citizen participation.
A survey was mailed to all Tumalo property owners, followed by a series of four
community workshops held at the Tumalo Elementary School, a public hearing
was held before the Planning Commission, and there were two subsequent Board
work sessions on this issue.
The amendments being presented were forwarded by the Planning Commission
to the Board, for adoption. They are set forth in Ordinances 97-031 (growth
management chapter); 97-032 (amends the map designations); 97-033 (amends
Title 18, the zoning ordinance); 97-034 (amends Title 18 to adopt a new zoning
map); and 97-035 (amends Title 17 amending text regarding road right of way
standards).
Staff then spoke about the boundary changes and transportation adjustments
recommended.
The main concerns of the community regarding transportation was improving
access from Cook Avenue to and across Highway 20; reducing truck traffic
through the community; providing safe pedestrian walkways in the commercial
core and to the school; providing road standards that are practical and cost-
effective; and providing shoulders on County roads.
The County is to support ODOT's efforts to improve the Highway 20 — Cook
Avenue intersection; and to realign O.B. Riley Road through the Bend Aggregate
site
Staff's report went on for a considerable amount of time, and in detail, with
references to the Ordinances throughout.
Commissioner Schlangen said that they received a letter that mentioned multi-
family dwellings. She asked if this is not a consideration because there is no
sewer or public water systems.
Transcription of Audio Recording of a Work Session, May 29, 1997 Page 2 of 6
Staff confirmed this, and there is a policy to allow residential uses in the
commercial area but they can't predominate the area. Multi -family uses are not
appropriate in the commercial district.
The Chair asked for public testimony at this time.
Bill Storey, an attorney representing Rural Fire Protection District #2, explained
that the inclusion of the new public facilities policy statement to encourage the
presence of a fire station in Tumalo. He is concerned that the County does not
have jurisdiction to include this wording in the comprehensive plan.
The Chair said that they would be happy to revise the wording, and for Mr. Storey
to speak to staff about this. He said they would prefer not to have any language
relating to fire stations in the new document.
Bruce Brothers of the Planning Commission stated that they reached consensus,
with all but one person agreeing, that this is important and is surprised staff
hasn't asked the Planning Commission to speak to this. Their role was to first and
foremost to satisfy the people who live there, within the confines of state law.
People feel that the fire district that they bought and paid for should remain in
the area. Nothing is more important there than fire safety. He went on at length
regarding fire protection, the fire station and keeping the community alive and
vital. It seems that Fire Chief Larry Langston just wants some pressure put on so
he can get new fire stations and new equipment, and put them wherever he
pleases. The Planning Commission did not take these issues lightly.
Steve Henderson then testified. He is a resident of Tumalo and an employer,
owning Breedlove Guitars in Tumalo that employs about twenty people. He is
also vice president on the Laidlaw Water District Board, and a member of the
Rural Fire Protection District.
He said their Board has been involved in a long process for strategic planning.
This controversy about the fire station has been going on for a couple of years.
Some have tried to work within the system and keep a lid on it. He does not think
tonight is a good time to decide whether the station stays there.
Transcription of Audio Recording of a Work Session, May 29, 1997 Page 3 of 6
However, the community would like to see a statement showing what the
Commissioners think about a fire station. There are statements that directly
affect the water district as well. The fire station is a very big concern for
everyone there.
It appears that the City of Bend has taken a very strong position that they want
the fire station moved. The County can also make a statement in this regard. The
Commissioners cannot make that decision, but they can certainly make it known
that keeping the station in Tumalo is the best thing for the community.
The community has supported this fire station for over twenty years. It is a
political decision and a hot potato, but the Commissioners should not just drop it
back into the laps of the citizens without making some kind of statement in
support. (He went on at length about the Commissioners standing up for the
community.)
There was then a lengthy discussion about the installation of sidewalks in the
commercial area.
Jeff Role, who lives in Tumalo, also urged that the Commissioners leave in
language regarding public facilities. The language regarding fire protection is
vague enough, not mentioning this District specifically, that it can safely stay in
the document. The City of Bend owns the fire station, not the District.
Commissioner Swearingen stated that the town contracts with the City of Bend
for the station, and has the right to demand that it stay there. The County cannot
dictate how another entity operates.
Vern Bartley, Vice President of the Rural Fire District, said that the District has not
made a decision to close the Tumalo station. The District drives the District, and
not the City. They want to be clear about jurisdictional responsibilities and the
potential for litigation. They have not always agreed with the City.
A top priority is station siting. They will appoint a citizen committee and an
advisory council to consult with the District on this issue. They have to decide
about all the other stations as well.
Transcription of Audio Recording of a Work Session, May 29, 1997 Page 4 of 6
He would like to see the Commissioners remove the language from the Plan to
avoid potential litigation.
Heather Scott said she lives on 4' Street in Tumalo, and is happy to see a plan
happening for Tumalo. She looks forward to the improvements. Her concern is a
personal one. She is trying to turn her house into a duplex, and now this right is
going to be taken away from her. She hopes to work with the County on this
issue. She was encouraged to talk to staff about her plans.
Sharon Dunlevy said she owns several pieces of property in Tumalo, and
wondered if there are concrete plans to improve the roads. Chair Schlangen said
there is a six-year plan that is updated every year, and this information is
available. It depends on whether the roads she referenced are actually in the
system or are private.
Ms. Dunlevy was also concerned about whether any consideration has been given
to properties that may be in the flood plain, that have no protection.
Commissioner Swearingen said that the County has no jurisdiction over this.
Robert Fish wants to be able to continue the use of the property he has in
Tumalo. The previous recommendation of a minimum lot size of about 1/2 acre
would exclude most of the lots in the Tumalo area from being developed. There
are many lot that are an eyesore and would be better off being developed.
Another concern is policy #48 regarding surface mining. Having to reclaim old
sites and making them suitable for residential purposes is under a 'shall be'
statement, and this sounds like a mandate. If those actually develop into
residential, that will put a lot of demand on all the systems in the town.
He was advised that the zoning is a five -acre minimum, so density would not be
much of an issue. Staff said that the proposed policy about reclaiming and using
for residential is no longer in the document.
Being no further testimony, the Chair closed the hearing.
She said that they will take into consideration all of the statements made tonight,
and appreciates their participation throughout the lengthy process.
Transcription of Audio Recording of a Work Session, May 29, 1997 Page 5 of 6
Staff clarified that the fire policy is merely a recommendation for consideration.
They were trying to lay out what came up during the process and what was most
important to the community. The document also has not had the benefit of full
legal review at this time.
The Chair would like to leave the record open for additional written testimony, as
they did with the situation in Terrebonne. Staff said that they need this to be
completed by the end of June. The record was left open until 5 PM on June 13 for
written comment.
At this time another citizen was allowed to speak about difficulties in getting a
building permit. He did not give his name. Staff said that the property in question
is zoned residential, but will be changed to commercial with the adoption of these
ordinances. There is no way to change the use until then.
Chair Schlangen said that they will make a decision on June 25 at their regular
business meeting.
The oral part of the hearing was adjourned.
I certify that the above is a true and accurate record of a meeting, as reproduced from a
cassette tape identified as Minutes of a Meeting of the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners, held on May 29, 1997. This record was completed subsequent to the presiding
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners' tenure.
Bonnie Baker
For the Board of County Commissioners
Transcription of Audio Recording of a Work Session, May 29, 1997 Page 6 of 6