2018-174-Minutes for Meeting April 16,2018 Recorded 5/22/2018uT E S C0
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS Recorded in Deschutes County CJ2018-174
Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk
1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon Commissioners' .journal 05/22/2018 9:44:36 AM
(541) 388-6570 ,.`:',"•."•��` II'll'llll'lll'II IIIIIIIII II III
2018-174
10:00 AM MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2018 BARNES & SAWYER ROOMS
Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney and Anthony DeBone. Commissioner Henderson was
excused. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County
Administrator; David Doyle, County Counsel; and Sharon Keith, Board Executive Assistant. No
representatives of the media were in attendance.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair DeBone called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m.
The video recording of the meeting was not available for this meeting due to
technical difficulties of the recording system.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN INPUT: None was offered.
CONSENT AGENDA: Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the
Consent Agenda.
BAN EY: Move approval.
DEBONE: Second.
PAGE 1 OF 5
VOTE: BAN EY: Yes.
HENDERSON: Absent, Excused.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried
Consent Apenda Items:
1. Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2018-005, Approving
Contingency in the Finance Fund
2. Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2018-010, Amending the
Authorized Balance of the Change Funds - Solid Waste, Knott Landfill
3. Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2018-011, Transferring
Appropriations Within the 2017-2018 Deschutes County Budget and
Directing Entries
4. Consideration of Board Signature of Document No. 2018-136 a License
Agreement with Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch to Install and Maintain a
Crosswalk with a Pedestrian -Activate Warning System on Innes Market Road
5. Consideration of Board Signature of Document No. 2018-180, License for
Food Cart atJustice Building
6. Consideration of Board Signature of Document No. 2018-205, a Quitclaim
Deed from Deschutes County to Arnold Irrigation District Conveying Water
Rights
7. Consideration of Board Signature of Letter ThankingJosh Hanson for Service
on the Two Rivers Special Road District
8. Consideration of Board Signature of Letter Appointing Megan Tucker for
Service on the Two Rivers Special Road District
9. Consideration of Board Signature of Letter Thanking Barbara Balz for Service
on the Deschutes County Behavioral Health Advisory Board
ACTION ITEMS
10.Burgess Road/Day Road Intersection Improvement - Right of Way
Summary
Cody Smith, County Engineer presented the three final acceptances for the
Burgess Road improvement project.
PAGE 2OF5
11. Consideration of Signature of Purchase Agreement, Document No. 2018-
152, and Acceptance of Dedication Deed, Document No. 2018-153, and
Permanent Slope Easement, Document No. 2018-154 from La Pine Rural
Fire Protection District for Right of Way for the Burgess Road/Day Road
Intersection Project
BAN EY: Move approval.
DEBONE: Second.
VOTE: BAN EY:
HENDERSON:
DEBONE:
Yes.
Absent, Excused.
Chair votes yes. Motion Carried
12. Consideration of Signature of Purchase Agreement, Document No. 2018-
198, and Permanent Slope Easement, Document No. 2018-199 from
Therese LaCross and Gary Lee LaCross Heyndericks for Right of Way for
the Burgess Road/Day Road Intersection Project
BAN EY: Move approval.
DEBONE: Second.
VOTE: BAN EY: Yes.
HENDERSON: Absent, Excused.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried
13. Consideration of Signature of Purchase Agreement, Document No. 2018-
200, and Acceptance of Dedication Deed, Document No. 2018-201, and
Permanent Slope Easement, Document No. 2018-202 from Larry and
Christine Hay for Right of Way for the Burgess Road/Day Road
Intersection Project
BAN EY: Move approval.
DEBONE: Second.
PAGE 3OF5
VOTE: BAN EY: Yes.
HENDERSON: Absent, Excused.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried
14.PUBLIC HEARING: of an Appeal of a Hearings Officer's Decision. File No.
47 -17 -00863 -MC, 864 -MP, 865 -CU (247-18-000123A)
Will Groves, Deschutes County Planning presented the hearing procedures.
Hearing no disclosure or declarations of conflict by the Board or challenges
from the audience, Chair DeBone opened the public hearing. Mr. Groves
provided the staff report regarding the Snow Creek subdivision. The appeal
was filed by the applicants in response to a January 29, 2018 Deschutes
County Hearings Officer's decision that the applicants have not met the
burden of demonstrating the proposed modification of prior approvals and
non-farm partition and dwelling complies with applicable criteria.
Laurie Craghead, attorney representing the applicants Pamalynn and H.
Richard Steinfeld presented. (power point slide presentation attached to the
record). Ms. Craghead stated the recommendation is the County adopt replat
criteria to make it clear which subdivision criteria applies and which do not.
Ed Fitch, attorney presented on behalf of adjacent neighbors and noted that
Hearings Officer Dan Olson did a good job with this application. The Snow
Creek subdivision was originally planned for a low key subdivision without a
lot of dwellings but now is allowing non-farm dwellings. Mr. Fitch stated it
doesn't make sense for the applicant/appellant to blame the County for the
deed restrictions. The neighboring properties do not want this and is not
desirable for the subdivision as a whole. This is in essence a replat of the
subdivision and a modification is not appropriate. This will have substantial
impacts. The hearings officer identified all of these issues and came up with
the right decision. They ask the Board to confirm the Hearings Officer
decision and deny this application.
Kevin Neary adjacent homeowner testified that when they purchased their
property they were told there would not be any additional properties built.
PAGE 4OF5
Ms. Craghead gave rebuttal testimony on behalf of the applicants. The deed
restrictions were not recorded but are ready to be recorded. Only three lots
would be able to take advantage of developing a second dwelling.
Will Groves noted staff would request the record be kept open for the typical
7-7-7 record period. Staff would appreciate additional briefing on deed
restrictions and gave a brief summary. The deed restriction is currently not
in the record. Commissioner DeBone requested this information in writing.
At this point, Commissioner DeBone closed the oral portion of the hearing.
Discussion on the record period was held. The written record is open for 7
days and the applicant's final argument will be May 19tH
OTHER ITEMS: None were offered.
Being no further items to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m.
DATED this _ Day of 2018 for the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners. a7t�
RECORDING SECRE�ARY
PAGE 5OF5
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 — Fax (541) 385-3202 — hftps://www.deschutes.org/
BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
10:00 AM, MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2018
Barnes and Sawyer Rooms - Deschutes Services Center — 1300 NW Wall Street — Bend
Pursuant to ORS 192.640, this agenda includes a list of the principal subjects anticipated to be considered or
discussed at the meeting. This notice does not limit the ability of the Board to address additional subjects.
Meetings are subject to cancellation without notice. This meeting is open to the public and interested citizens are
invited to attend. Business Meetings are usually recorded on video and audio, and can be viewed by the public
live or at a later date; and written minutes are taken for the record.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN INPUT
This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues
that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up card (provided), and give the card to the
Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and clearly state your name when the Board Chair calls on you to
speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject of a public hearing not
being conducted as a part of this meeting will NOT be included in the official record of that hearing.
If you offer or display to the Board any written documents, photographs or other printed matter as part of your
testimony during a public hearing, please be advised that staff is required to retain those documents as part of the
permanent record of that hearing.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2018-005, Approving Contingency
in the Finance Fund
2. Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2018-010, Amending the
Authorized Balance of the Change Funds - Solid Waste, Knott Landfill
3. Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2018-011, Transferring
Appropriations Within the 2017-2018 Deschutes County Budget and Directing Entries
Board of Commissioners Business Meeting Agenda Monday, April 16, 2018 Page 1 of 3
4. Consideration of Document No. 2018-136, a License Agreement with Crystal Peaks
Youth Ranch to Install and Maintain a Crosswalk with a Pedestrian -Activate Warning
System on Innes Market Road
5. Consideration of Board Signature of Document No. 2018-180, License for Food Cart at
Justice Building
6. Consideration of Board Approval and Signature of Document Number 2018-205, a
Quitclaim Deed from Deschutes County to Arnold Irrigation District Conveying Water
Rights.
7. Consideration of Board Signature of Letter Thanking Josh Hanson for Service on the
Two Rivers Special Road District
8. Consideration of Board Signature of Letter Appointing Megan Tucker to the Two Rivers
Special Road District
9. Consideration of Board Signature of Letter Thanking Barbara Balz for Service on the
Deschutes County Behavioral Health Advisory Board
ACTION ITEMS
10. Burgess Rd/Day Rd Intersection Improvement - Right of Way Summary - Cody Smith,
County Engineer
11. Consideration of Signature of Purchase Agreement, Document No. 2018-152, and
Acceptance of Dedication Deed, Document No. 2018-153, and Permanent Slope
Easement, Document No. 2018-154, from La Pine Rural Fire Protection District for
Right of Way for the Burgess Rd/Day Rd Intersection Project - Cody Smith, County
Engineer
12. Consideration of Signature of Purchase Agreement, Document No. 2018-198 and
Permanent Slope Easement, Document No. 2018-199, from Therese LaCross and Gary
Lee LaCross Heynderickx for Right of Way for the Burgess Rd/Day Rd Intersection
Project - Cody Smith, County Engineer
13. Consideration of Signature of Purchase Agreement, Document No. 2018-200, and
Acceptance of Dedication Deed, Document No. 2018-201, and Permanent Slope
Easement, Document No. 2018-202, from Lary and Christine Hay for Right of Way for
the Burgess Rd/Day Rd Intersection Project - Cody Smith, County Engineer
14. Public Hearing of on an Appeal of a Hearings Officer's Decision. File Nos. 247 -17-
000863 -MC, 864 -MP, 865 -CU (247-18-000123A) - William Groves, Senior Planner
OTHER ITEMS
Board of Commissioners Business Meeting Agenda Monday, April 16, 2018 Page 2 of 3
These can be any items not included on the agenda that the Commissioners wish to discuss as part of
the meeting, pursuant to ORS 192.640.
At any time during the meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS
192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor
negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(b), personnel issues; or other executive session categories.
Executive sessions are closed to the public, however, with few exceptions and under specific
guidelines, are open to the media.
ADJOURN
To watch this meeting on line, go to: www.deschutes.org/meetings
Please note that the video will not show up until recording begins. You can also view past
meetings on video by selecting the date shown on the website calendar.
Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and
activities. To request this information in an alternate format please call (541) 617-4747.
FUTURE MEETINGS:
Additional meeting dates available at www.deschutes.org/meetingcalendar
(Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of
Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions
regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.)
Board of Commissioners Business Meeting Agenda Monday, April 16, 2018 Page 3 of 3
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 — Fax (541) 385-3202 — https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners Business Meeting of April 16, 2018
DATE: April 11, 2018
FROM: Cody Smith, Road Department,
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Burgess Rd/Day Rd Intersection Improvement - Right of Way Summary
ATTENDANCE: Cody Smith, County Engineer
SUMMARY: Summary map of right of way acquisitions for the Burgess Rd/Day Rd
Intersection Improvement project.
O
77
z
LLJ
0
-7)
o
o o
9
99
9
O
ai
Iq cq
Iq
1� Iq
O
77
z
0
o
o o
9
99
9
O
ai
Iq cq
Iq
1� Iq
0
0
0
o 1
w
0
errN
o0
WLL
z
<
0
5
LL
0 0
0
0 0
77
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 — Fax (541) 385-3202 — https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners Business Meeting of April 16, 2018
DATE: April 10, 2018
FROM: William Groves, Community Development, 541-388-6518
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Public Hearing of on an Appeal of a Hearings Officer's Decision. File Nos. 247 -17 -000863 -
MC, 864 -MP, 865 -CU (247-18-000123A)
RECOMMENDATION & ACTION REQUESTED:
Conduct the public hearing and consider establishing a post -hearing record period or closing
the record.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Before the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is an appeal filed by applicants Pamalynn and H.
Richard Steinfeld. The appeal is submitted in response to a January 29, 2018 Deschutes County
Hearings Officer's decision that the applicants have not met the burden of demonstrating that the
proposed modification of prior approvals and non-farm partition and dwelling complies with applicable
criteria.
The BOCC agreed to hear this matter de novo on February 28, 2018, under Order No. 2018-016.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None
ATTENDANCE: Will Groves, Legal
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 4, 2018
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Will Groves, Senior Planner
RE: BOCC hearing of the Applicant's appeal of a Hearings Officer's decision. File
Nos. 247 -17 -000863 -MC, 864 -MP, 865 -CU (247-18-000123A)
Before the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is an appeal filed by applicants Pamalynn
and H. Richard Steinfeld. The appeal is submitted in response to a January 29, 2018
Deschutes County Hearings Officer's decision that the applicants have not met the burden of
demonstrating that the proposed modification of prior approvals and non-farm partition and
dwelling complies with applicable criteria.
The BOCC agreed to hear this matter de novo on February 28, 2018, under Order No. 2018-
016. A public hearing is scheduled for April 16, 2018.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is part of Lot 4 of the Snow Creek Ranch subdivision (see attached Snow
Creek Replat 1995 Plat). This lot was divided by a 2001 partition (see attached Steinfeld 2001
Partition, PP -2001-6) to create a nonfarm parcel and dwelling. The applicant seeks to divide
Parcel 2 of PP -2001-6 (see attached proposed Partition Figure) for a new nonfarm parcel and
dwelling.
This subdivision, on farm -zoned land, is unusual in that prior approvals included specific
restrictions preventing the subsequent division of the subdivision lots. It appears that the intent
was to create large lot (39-102 acres) farm parcels with a homesite per lot. Unfortunately, the
standards for the originally contemplated farm dwellings became significantly more onerous,
and MC -97-2 was approved to authorize creation of non-farm parcels to permit non-farm
dwellings. The restrictions on additional land divisions in the subdivision were implemented as
follows:
The 1991 approval (TP -91-760) included the following condition of approval:
5. No further division of this land would be allowed since this appears to be the
minimum size in this area for farm use. Also, any further division would
necessarily split up productive farm land and make it difficult to site residences
on lands that did not encompass productive agricultural lands.
This condition was modified in 1997 (MC -97-2) to read:
5. Further division of the Snow Creek Ranch Subdivision lots shall only be allowed
pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.16.055(8) pertaining to the creation of
one new parcel for a nonfarm dwelling, and then only if the recording of a deed
restriction against any additional dwellings is made a condition of final plat
approval for any nonfarm partition approved for the subdivision lot under Section
18.16.055(B) Such deed restriction shall state that no dwelling shall be allowed
on the remainder farm parcel.
The applicant partitioned a non-farm parcel and constructed a non-farm dwelling (CU -00-74 and
MP -00-18) under this modified condition. The required deed restriction was never recorded.
11. PROPOSAL
The applicant has now requested to amend Condition 5 in MC -97-2, to allow another non-farm
parcel and dwelling, as follows:
5. Further division of the Snow Creek Ranch Subdivision lots shall only be allowed
pursuant to the provisions of Deschutes County Code and state law.
The proposal also includes a new partition of the 69.37 -acre parcel zoned EFU to create a
64.73 -acre farm parcel, and a 4.64 -acre nonfarm parcel with a nonfarm dwelling.
III. HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION
The Hearings Officer denied the proposal under several applicable criteria. Below, relevant
code sections in bold are followed by quotes from the Hearings Officer's decision.
Section 22.36.040. Modification of Approval.
Change of circumstances makes change desirable. This criterion sets a high
bar for the applicants. Perhaps the opponent's' concerns do not rise to a
significant adverse impact, but it is hard to conclude that increased traffic, more
dwellings and other identified concerns benefit them. ....none of those other
owners have expressed support or argued that the change is desirable in this
rather unique farm subdivision.
I find that this provision requires something more than being financially desirable
for the applicant. It must be desirable considering the purpose of the applicable
zoning and other regulations.
The prior modification was desirable in that it furthered the objectives of the
original approval and, apparently, agricultural values by providing a work -around
to get something like the originally envisioned farm dwellings. In contrast, as
discussed previously, the proposed modification is inconsistent with the
objectives of the original and modified approvals and encourages exactly the kind
of rural residential development that those approvals explicitly sought to avoid.
...not substitute for an appeal or constitute a substantially new proposal. I
find, however, that this the application constitutes a substantially new proposal.
' Significant opposition was provided by other owners in the Snow Creek Ranch subdivision, who would
also be subject to the proposed modification, and who did not support additional development in the
subdivision.
-2-
The applicants propose to modify a condition that applies throughout the
subdivision. Further, as discussed above, the provision sought to be modified
goes to the heart of the subdivision approval and subsequent modification. The
applicants propose to remove something that at least some of the other lot
owners assert they relied on in purchasing property. The applicants concede that
at least two other owners could take advantage of this restriction, so it could have
broader impacts on the subdivision. If the Code changes again, perhaps even
more properties could develop.
...not have significant additional impacts on surrounding properties. [The
modification] ... opens the door to a fundamental change in the nature of the
subdivision and removes the protections that formed the central basis for
approving the lots in the first place. It may be that some other type of application
constituting a new proposal could be approved that would meet the applicants'
objective, but a modification of conditions is not the proper course in these
circumstances. The applicants have not met their burden on this issue.
Section 17.22.020. Requirements for Approval.
A proposed partition is not in compliance with the zoning ordinance if it
will conflict with the terms of a previously issued approval for land use on
the property... In short, absent a modification, which I have denied, the
application for a partition conflicts with the requirement that the parcel be subject
to a deed restriction permitting only one partitioning.
3. Section 17.36.260. Fire Hazards.
Whenever possible, a minimum of two points of access to the subdivision
or partition shall be provided to provide assured access for emergency
vehicles and ease resident evacuation. I am not comfortable with a condition
leaving it to the applicant to apply to ODOT outside of the record. This criterion
should have been addressed more fully and, therefore, has not been met based
on this record.
IV. APPEAL
On February 7, 2018 the applicants appealed the decision to the BOCC with eleven
assignments of error. Staff summarizes these as follows:
The HO Finding of a required deed restriction under the prior non-farm dwelling
and parcel is a collateral attack on those decisions.
2. The HO erred in requiring a secondary point of access to the subdivision at
Highway 20. The applicant proposes an alternative access.
3. The HO erred in finding that that the prior deed restriction is still an unmet
requirement at this time.
4. In the alternative, the applicant states that the prior deed restriction could be
recorded now.
-3-
5. The HO erred in interpreting the DCC 22.36.040 requirement that a modification
of prior approvals be "desirable" as too narrowly focused on opponents concerns,
rather than broader policy issues.
6. The HO erred in finding that the modification would (or could) not be contained to
the applicant's property. Neighbors could take advantage of this modification, or
a similar one, at their discretion, which would solve the "desirable" issue.
7. The HO erred in finding the application constitutes a substantially new proposal.
The prior modification allowed for more non-farm parcels and this addition of a
single new parcel is substantially new proposal.
8. The HO erred in finding the modification "open the door to a fundamental change
in the nature of the subdivision and removes the protections that formed the
central basis for approving the lots in the first place." The non-farm dwelling
findings confirm that the new dwelling/parcel would not have significant impacts
on area farm operations.
9. The Hearings Officer erred in requiring a condition of approval stating the
requirements of DCC 17.22.020(A)(7). The applicants submitted with their
application an e-mail from the Watermaster's office that he already reviewed the
proposal and that no water rights would be affected by the nonfarm partition.
10. The Hearings Officer erred in finding that the existing condition of approval
prohibiting additional partitioning "remains in place." Whether or not that
condition remains in place is fact to be determined outside the jurisdiction of the
County.
11. The Hearings Officer erred in finding that compliance with DCC 17.36.260 cannot
be found to be met with a condition of approval. As stated previously, the
applicant already pointed out that alternative for emergency vehicles exists.
V. SECTION 22.20.040 AND THE 150 -DAY CLOCK
The 150th day for the County to take final action on this application is currently July 14, 2018.
(DCC Section 22.20.040), due to a 90 day toll of the 150 -day clock by the applicant.
Attachments:
1. Snow Creek Replat 1995 Plat
2. Steinfeld 2001 Partition
3. Snow Creek Partition Locator Figure
4. Full Record to Date (Will be attached to the Hearing Agenda Packet only)
-4-
IMISO
o -
w
wWcc cc
U W W ge
m is
S'�§
WjW p yj2W 0 Loyd 2p
ADW TWO °���
pie pocYid i O. ~ N
v> N32
Ld
ppw SFW W 2
U)
j a i ggign 9 z a UZ
y=Z Zig O WHO O W Q
Za
W 4d} m� Yd
0-'z, a o o
3
DdUp DWOO lai �� V � .
�i Owj
F aoa F aoa a� a a 2w
o W W
�ap
Z F¢FT Z ti0�� Z O K W �i iii C 2 �
o°gQ o 16 E15
z
z rD� z o j .0
JW. < o O O O
Z cn�oo JJ ° U �Z v_,aDw i c°n d0 -
U FOSW ti O m U ti2ZO m a
Q 21-� V1 U Ut Q a_I- 2 N V V1 Q
Z
O
U) Q
0V) DxKmm pUJa 3p UVIWO iW WaZ}p 'ppWwN `�2�b(WJa�p } �� WpT O
Q W o<���Iwx- D�z°3�w'°_'a¢m wr2-��rc3�a��wvnimo�z==a�2 m m�z Tm j�
r DypW� N a42T�UV~iM W'tv v~i�pWZa2Fh.- Wm ..2 hU KF YpD dS W.
W apZ�a�"m`z cWiTaz�z�_aP`"aa °ozaw�G5v\i�eW�o3o...a v�'2`°z`roMcwiei of,
�WW��2 W3o=o3odazp �JmW` IiocW.�°i¢vf �z
Wjz
3m=3�a4 20 �w 3Nwoo�ap4 ow'3 n�mw �v~a �p ww° p-
Z Z }2 OY O�Zd�-3 �1 DW v~ip�w pro i�n�a0� do30 CSD =mW zs
!(4 0_ �Sa�ln� m0U��2.o��a]3��Tw�ornNF'a`D va~ib z<''` m aw 3 a ¢d g.c' I�
UZ W DTZ 3° ��2�•-�3i3v~ao Co��^ 3wmd2��Na~vn pa W3�
�J 2 in'- _ 3 �n rnwxio D o aoo3 O'c' 1 a a� '- `O m
N�wnto�°za3x`J'a�
~�> =�a�ao NFLo °Ina°o���oaomv,wwa3=dz�cwim�2¢�Ix-o ow F���ai
m
�tooDaw�''b
11 Z Mm'�pW� 2: ca
_����'-a�z5wa� �a �='"oao `"�^_ j
v.j V cr
Z) W =aW^zvgw--�W�o^�'w� o3�'t� Z3 oin�w o zw �zz �Wm �
W {.. a od w x�rn ao o_Fc5 w-� I'aww& (f
m D x Swl't- 3w �- T T w mo Z
� z O o�=P°mw �N�WUMW 2fp in 'o''SS z a �a mm°'mo
li O x 3xzD° I -Z 4 yN¢�do?rhoWaati.1.��3oz 3 ww Y z zox `� �� �1
j.0 3WL O p.4 p0 N3�p YKOQm22 0` U �DOdaW� Q
O O y pw5oaz Wz�mro zo oaowoWo z�- �VopC� w o o
W VIY�
a0 aWO Oia DC'mOwFU• _ 2 2K3g m QU
N O_ D pmWo�UVFfnd U1M��2'nmaWWmW'-WO3W��VIF F-000'4 i ¢m �=aS��� \
\ZZzoiz zwf.wb�,3amm�pof�oe'3�pm5o�odozoopa? w a= ¢ d3c°iD�T2 1v o v WZo m? H
~ zDWOWWDWO WOM aDZOW\pNSOMaOWx-NOpd A p Ie
�WF�Qx� O yxSNMW Qd W -m U^SMI-KM 2 W~fOa WW 2 Q.�i InWW02Z W(n5 u'mh
a^�a�ww�z°�3zoNW=ice �o N ?Zmawpa5 mwn g�ino
�(/1&oh�w 5 ��cwi���\F1"i° o 3 Wm : wgo wpY �0OG 'z
W p oT VE. W a°zZ awx�� �M�roi�oi oasoaw�� foW O ~��zd°�� pd�
WUJa�SWm ti`-�.j�F Nav1- �p ml..p'.20Wd1-w�tiKWO�SMU C ZT-U3
N �Wa'Wi-KK � U ✓,q�o�'t JQa O U U O mWr-In Ft- Z Oo'O Q O -ID iO
? H yKY3DZOV° pF22ppNW� zx zUza� awaw= Wp��WZpN3 ° �� U 2J xkm�
Q UpWW¢~� VIKF\p2 0FZ�03a�OF w m s q� p Wd0 a
°a _U pOia W
RDa
(�
m J W W Q2m- VaaIW aa r l LL �iiU 02� O 'Op VIZ VI I-FVW�M4�Otn�Nf/iryW3p�WQMa00N W aW2 � dNO�OtS I" v
Wwl-
Q W F- O¢S�QWg
US ZZ�'�O �aJ p OD OZIn I��ppQdyWa.-w =O Q 'gyp F i- ¢F -Wm (] w�iWpp�Od (Myam 1 (�� _
W U °�w0°aa ?o00DC1nW���O�mo S'td inn=°mW30W2a O W >OZ'\ Q pQQ w � r�l b
H Cn °~OV�3d W�wWQ�dW"IWf-N.D'-Uu/T. M5��2N�SR3� t_U O z mWam3W �./
O m¢wW°zo < FZDw'�"x�zwin ol°--NZ=aNWF�4°e=�=o�' w
w
yD O �a p �o�aoD Uti
2 0� o w 'W �o3 aw Qac�on3pio w'n c�D¢m^ O cwi '- v' Q
}. WmOvl m�d� F� 2�b Z'-0 V) �" Zrvj U (n W V it W�Wm�~ a'.MB�a .eq
m�cFi� z�zwmx- wUhb dU eio � vSboM z cn Tm� a ='' m
O > z�fls,wx z.
�1wl--aDoh`ao vl v N waw W 039vl3
wz�w�= wb.owm g9a,m wabtn p -w 2zzwoz�iv\ x U) x o zwwg o y
V) (n _xooDv�3 mmm3W�c� 3vloo�. Ta�n�3zNr_��000a^'n v5 w Q _5p ° Ymo�iSvgv� 3
4
m
U
sipziso
a
AMP-- � Jo
_K ep ZwZ 3e �(C
ai�u�PaiWo�¢vZf«���S�o��
�nU���o p tJi �✓�2W<U
WJ¢W� i0adm2 < <nW
O O UWUjdjyO� ��W�t
p�n�n ��!i5F'sa�ni<
<��I ZR��yWP� WZZa�
K ZZ�N Z ZOQW FZZi40_=1�
3Fw u<ic3 �a�o 'r�Z�CLL
✓;I, r 71 am
NOA3AiditS A1Nt100 S31i1N:1930
sem_. ,nwtrin p
JIJIJNd H�PM J 0 � b
a
H
v
W Y'
!7 N N
N 1AI
M
N
to
J
N \�
W
a�
ryNry h��
mV �
N
a
U2
0
rrl
p 3
fn
� W
z ly�l
^I
N
W
FZz
� W
V
Z 2 a
w
IN
uj
p
�ua
ADOci
20
O0 W
N
w
LU U -
F O
�3
Z
Q
Z
Q
N
M
N
4
AMP-- � Jo
_K ep ZwZ 3e �(C
ai�u�PaiWo�¢vZf«���S�o��
�nU���o p tJi �✓�2W<U
WJ¢W� i0adm2 < <nW
O O UWUjdjyO� ��W�t
p�n�n ��!i5F'sa�ni<
<��I ZR��yWP� WZZa�
K ZZ�N Z ZOQW FZZi40_=1�
3Fw u<ic3 �a�o 'r�Z�CLL
✓;I, r 71 am
NOA3AiditS A1Nt100 S31i1N:1930
sem_. ,nwtrin p
JIJIJNd H�PM J 0 � b
a
H
v
bd
xz
U O
W
ww�wo
06 a
� Fz�wo
QQ^oo o
F
1 opww
i o z as
Z PQ
zaW
a f -
Di
� E-
o ,� w
p
�zwFPQ z
wwz
�f
�ZgQoo
Quo�ow
E-1
E,woxx
xFoc,w
w� 914 z
zoo
M F
� U
0
S
:zoo
�"6z
-=
C.i
�
ao�
a
2
g
gaff
�
N V.
/
Mrs
i
woo
S� Sq po
�
Cl)
U
�
¢
�q7.�
`Z-•
z
rr
z
a
J
h
JnC x O�
w¢3
W
ay4°JmT Uma
o
�p F^
m4p
TAW
2�
uv��
Zax
oOp
hvow A=.�q
a
30NmW ¢m>'_�p Z�
2222
mC
o}
34
�qb�
l; c�mr SF h�-Km2
a
2v¢iw��n�a�ohr
x.
26xQ
gbh
¢
T�
�
ak
ro�
aJ
atio
Q
T�°�� q Km
2 xr° TrmrZ n`S
`zea
IQ
NX,
o:�Wm°h°Q.`a
`b��
z°"'.~�7c"'i
�Z>°�nWhTO¢
2v Tpm
88�
w`°zo�
adcKoKmUWVh�tt3��p�rvo
¢
o�wi�°�z°z¢u�
_
F
w@a
H.w
O�
�(�^
V
I���U
2¢C�av�i2O��U2m2 �Y
Wao
UW
�3>-S� O2Sw
¢OW'
Z^_ U
c�
N1¢¢h
MK¢
m�
Ww?°v
�w��mmrc
aQ
o
w��'U��oa Q�qz
1
l.0•
LA 1� •y0�
J
;rmJ�
0
�o
j �0 0
¢q: T 3 j ki
oz+�z6 zuS��n z�mp
£K
T¢
¢2 v`� xCC,,TU 33�UW
oi`�wTU�wti Wwm
T
6
i� ��
T
OU�UO
2¢G�O
-
K3
•
4+TR2m
bd
xz
U O
W
ww�wo
06 a
� Fz�wo
QQ^oo o
F
1 opww
i o z as
Z PQ
zaW
a f -
Di
� E-
o ,� w
p
�zwFPQ z
wwz
�f
�ZgQoo
Quo�ow
E-1
E,woxx
xFoc,w
w� 914 z
zoo
M F
� U
0
S
:zoo
�"6z
U.S. HIGHWAY 20
oho Y
M
�
ao�
a
2
g
gaff
�
N V.
/
ry�n0
woo
S� Sq po
�
Cl)
U
� K Z
s
`Z-•
z
rr
z
a
J
^iia
jy
Wa oK vWin T w
¢a
o
• ti O �.
m
nT
a
IQ
NX,
88�
F
w@a
H.w
O�
�(�^
�amio'
mW�N
� p2oa
iz3zKmo
¢T
Wao
UW
xj <
W22-
¢OW'
Z^_ U
c�
N1¢¢h
MK¢
m�
2yyU>
K
1
2q2 Wc� U �'
O¢p2
�' R''
2.,V
¢22
¢¢ 3
6
i� ��
T
OU�UO
2¢G�O
-
K3
•
4+TR2m
W000F
Qo
z�
myWi
TWKUh
3m�TR�
0
�2
x QUO
.T.
MH
o- 2
¢O�p
U.S. HIGHWAY 20
oho Y
M
�
ao�
a
2
//
gaff
K OU
m¢
/
ry�n0
woo
S� Sq po
�
Cl)
U
� K Z
s
`Z-•
z
z
a
J
^iia
jy
Wa oK vWin T w
¢a
o
• ti O �.
U.S. HIGHWAY 20
oho Y
M
�
ao�
_
//
gaff
m
m¢
/
ry�n0
U.S. HIGHWAY 20
oho Y
�
LLj
m
woo
•�
�
Cl)
U
� K Z
s
`Z-•
z
z
a
J
=a
_
m
nT
MAP TO ACCOMPANY APPLICATION FOR PARTITION
PARCEL 1 OF PARTITION PLAT NO. 2001-06 LOCATED IN THE 5112 OF SECTION 4 AND
THE N1/2 OF SECTION 9, T16S, R11E, W.M., DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
TAX LOTS: 1611040000804 AND 1611090000101 (ONE LOT OF RECORD)
ZONING: EFUTRB & LM
CURVE TABLE
�NUMBER hADlE1. S � DELTA ANILE`
C F 395 00 31 06 t 1
ARC IFNGTH f CNORD BFAR(NG
352 3 P t( N56-39 20 "W
CNORO LENGTH
340 74
C2 335 DO 853542
X00 d6 N4i'5709'"W
45520
LINE TABLE
Nl MBER
-BEAMNC
Df$rAN4>w
5
NNl_ f 1
jPO qt.
�- 12
PARCEL 2 ` n
w
�
t«
Nei�1a s"E
6�rsrrE
187 ,s ,
3 00_
-•.. i5
1 S 1717 �D 1 "14
U Dt+
i1 ry
It
_t
LL. 3 r fSOI
t C t l:S
SCALE I" -= 300'
'1971. 07 6QO FT:
NOTES,
1. FINAL DIMENSIONS AND AREAS MAY VARY SLIGHTLY DEPENDENT UPON
FIELD SURVEY.
2. ACCESS WILL BE 'RA SNOW CREEK LANE. SNOW CREEK [ANE IS
ASPHALT SURFACE ±22 FEET WIDE.
3. ORIGINAL PARCEL CONTAINS 47.7 ACRES OF WATER RIGHTS UNDER
CERTIFICATE NO, 88564.
4. SEWAGE DISPOSAL BY INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEM.
5. DOMESTIC NATER BY INDIVIDUAL WELL.
6. FIRE PROTECTION BY DESCHUTES COUNTY RURAL FIRE DISTRICT.
7. POWER BY CENTRAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE.
LEGEND
a••�•s••--••^ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE.
--^ ---E•- RESULTING NEW PARCEL LINE.
• ••• APPROXIMATE AD,IOINER LINE.
-- �:-ern-- EXISTING CONTOUR LINE.
-- EXISTING EASEMENT. WIDTH AND PURPOSE IS
NOTED HEREON,
L1 LINE DESIGNATION - REFER TO TABLE,
Cl CURVE DESIGNATION - REFER TO TABLE.
v.�
I 1'�.lMNli4i R(1; -----------
RAN c`. SY Ifi4 - 1
18285 PIAWN'EW ROAD
BFNO. OR 97703
IN
c:
d�
PARCEL 2 ` n
w
SUBJECT PROPERTY --
±4,64 AC.
• Fag{{ l � ,
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
TL 16(1080000200
RotCo BROWNEr AL?
3119 NW 29TH VENUE
MA
CAS, WA 98607
t4
e
c :_.413J'05'PR.f- `lt
SO
7�,00
LL. 161-1040000200
so", JEW REY, LMNO FRUSr
r
43
18285 PIAWN'EW ROAD
BFNO. OR 97703
L3
PARCEL 2 ` n
w
±4,64 AC.
• Fag{{ l � ,
nn
0.0 AC. WATER
i1 ry
It
�a
UI
:N _29:43 IV--^-
w
! / +
-
ro
ro
PARCEL 1 t
*64.74 AC.
R4
47.7 AC. WATER 7�
1
' N89'41 9"W r 711.62
Tl�wry
589U4':PB"f �
"TT OF ORErON
775 SUMER SIREEr NE x'100
S41.EM, OR 97301
q
TG wowowgij
LEf,toi k CAFr G Nr`Aff
"N
-. 4X)
NO, .}MIN C(' , PANE
£PNO� OR SYJO.f
,� h
¢G g4.RP
7 d ^yx1r,
t4
e
c :_.413J'05'PR.f- `lt
SO
7�,00
w�
r
43
X
PARCEL 2 ` n
w
±4,64 AC.
• Fag{{ l � ,
0.0 AC. WATER
It
�a
:N _29:43 IV--^-
w
-
ro
ro
PARCEL 1 t
*64.74 AC.
47.7 AC. WATER 7�
1
4 JL cP.SaIE'ra;
fl.,d97 LG "EM
vcn-
w
• Fag{{ l � ,
�a
' N89'41 9"W r 711.62
7.L 1611090000660
"TT OF ORErON
775 SUMER SIREEr NE x'100
S41.EM, OR 97301
4/13/2018
Steinfeld nonfarm partition
Original 1993 subdivision
Conditions of approval
TP91760 (exhibit I, page 13)
CONDITION 1
Prior to the issuance of any building permit, proof would have to
be provided that the irrigation wells on the subject property were
in place and operating, and were sufficient to provide irrigation
water to the parcel for which a building permit has been
requested. In the alternative, the property could acquire
adjudicated irrigation water rights and place such water on the
property through improved irrigation ditches and irrigation
systems.