Loading...
2020-208-Ordinance No. 2020-008 Recorded 6/30/2020Recorded in Deschutes County GJ2020-208 REVIE - LECOUNSEL Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk Commissioners' .journal 06/30/2020 10:29:42 AM �J v Co( 2020-208 For Recording Stamp Only BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON An Ordinance Amending Deschutes County Transportation System Plan to add roundabouts at * ORDINANCE NO.2020-008 U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley and U.S. 20/Old Bend - Redmond Highway intersections and amend Tables 5.3.T1 and 5.3.T2. WHEREAS, applicant Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has applied for a plan amendment via File 247-19-000894-PA; and WHEREAS, the Deschutes County Planning Commission reviewed the proposed changes on February 27 and March 12, 2020, and forwarded to the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners ("Board"), a unanimous recommendation of approval; and WHEREAS, the Board considered this matter after a duly noticed public hearing on May 13, 2020, and concluded that the public will benefit from the proposed changes to the Deschutes County Transportation System Plan; now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDAINS as follows: Section 1. AMENDMENT. The Deschutes County Transportation System Plan map is amended to include the roundabouts U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley and U.S. 20/Old Bend Redmond Highway intersections, attached here as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. Section 2. AMENDMENT. The Deschutes County Transportation System Plan Table 5.371 and Table 5.372 are amended to includes the two U.S. 20 roundabouts, replacing the interchange at U.S. 20/Cook- O.B. Riley and the interchange/overpass at U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway with new language shown as underlined and language to be deleted shown as strike, attached here as Exhibit "B„ and incorporated by reference herein. Section 3. AMENDMENT. The Deschutes County Transportation System Plan text is amended to include references to the ODOT planning process for the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley roundabout on page 150 and the U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway roundabout on page 166 with new language shown in underline attached here as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference herein. PAGE 1 OF 2 - ORDINANCE NO.2020-008 Section 4. AMENDMENT. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5.12, Supplementary Section — Legislative History, is amended to read as described in Exhibit "D", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, with new language underlined. Section 5. AMENDMENT. Deschutes County Code, Title 23, Chapter 23.01, is amended to read as described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, with new language underlined. Section 6. FINDINGS. The incorporated by reference herein. Dated this �� of , 2020 ATTEST: Recording tecretary Board adopts as its findings, Exhibit "F", attached hereto and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON 'i PATTI ADAIR„ Chair ANTHONY DEBQNE, Vice Chair PHILIP G. HENDERSON Date of I" Reading: /O day of , 2020. Date of 2,,d Reading: ;5 tj day of P , 2020. Record of Adoption Vote: Commissioner Yes No Abstained Excused Patti Adair _ — Anthony DeBone ve Philip G. Henderson 7 Effective date: day of , 2020. PAGE 2 OF 2 - ORDINANCE NO.2020-008 R.11 R.11 R 13 F5.3.F2 Ranh zo g Proposed Intersection°neH2,z°zH ary r ,Q k Improvements 8 1 aR'{��dmaad ; 5 1 Overpass/Interchange Lower Bridge Way / US Highway W >^ 2 Overpass Oregon Highway 370 / L6 N gh.., W 3 D�sconnttl Road Nusaracker Dr/Cline Falls Hlghxey OT 9 S�grulv.M Helmhol—Bl,Oregon H�.h.] W Sa 5 Rural Roundabout Ceml Bl..y Rd Helmholtz Way f o, R14 6 Qerpam/lntercM1ange Quay Rd/1&Fhghway 97 Y Rural Roundabout OB RlRy Rd/C—Aae/US Highway 30 8 Rural Roundabout Old Gerd Redmond Hwy / US Hlghx�ay M 1 6" 9 Rural Roundabout Hamehook Rd/Deschutes Marlst Rd NORTH i..-,-! f' ]0 Rural Roundab--B..er M.,-Rd/Poxrll—Hwy i/ -CiM1 u.nmre f 11 Rural Roundabout Neff Rd/ABelra M.—Rd/P—U D—Hx nVdfa 1] Rural Roundabout P-118utle Hwy/LS HighwayV Rural Roundabout Hamby Rd/Ward Rd/IIS Highway 30 i 14 Rural Roundabout Sprjng Rw-Rd/SouN Century Dr 15 Rd Vand—nRd/US Highway 9J / 16. Rd Pine<rest L. / US Htghx ey W 17Turn Lene lmproremen", Then lnter<hange-Oregon Highway 3l/US HigM1wey 9J 20 R-15 R16 Map Sy b k Q o a n '1sP tmaiun lmpn•.am."t ��aemav For More Information Contact Deschutes County Community Development Department Slnle iDB t N 1-,N ,1 717NW Lafayette Bend, OR 97701 'm<tts d ... Axa <_„ Runl RawdaMut 541-388-6575 www%codeRchutesorus/cdd taAe Ri ® Spin U T dC mmu ® Tw•IanelmPro em.nb v i1 f 'U to ..owd, Boondary1ly �v�x Pdn<iPal Arterial - (state Highway) 'U_ne•nnxt Goad ALles =)blilrs 1 tt .._�.. �.,�<'"'��_��_"_� _ ..• p,a`v W Exhibit "A" to Ordinance 2020-008 5' —N , Table 5.3.T 1 County Road and Highway Projects Road Name Location Func. Class. Project Estimated Cost Rank County Intersections Powell Butte Hwy Neff/Alfalfa Market Arterial Roundabout $900,000 High Powell Butte Hwy Butler Market Arterial Roundabout $900,000 High Burgess Road Day Road Art/Coll Turn lanes $281,250 Med. Old Bend -Redmond Hwy Tumalo Road Art/Coll Turn lanes $250,000 Med. Baker Road Cinder Butte Rd Art/Coll Roundabout $900,000 Med. Canal Blvd Helmholtz Art/Coll Roundabout $900,000 Med. Deschutes Mkt Rd Hamehook Art/Coll Roundabout $900,000 Med. South Century Spring River Art/Coll Roundabout $900,000 Med. Huntington Road South Century Collector Roundabout $900,000 Low Northwest Way Coyner Road Collector Turn lanes $250,000 Low Subtotal $7,081,250 County Road Segments, New Road Name From To Functional Class Project Est. Cost Rank Hunnell Road Cooley Rodgers Collector New Road $752,500 High Cooley Road 181St Des Mkt Arterial New Road $653,413 Low Crooked River Dr Wilcox Smith Rock Way Collector New Road $198,000 Low Unnamed Masten 6 th St Collector New Road $1,485,000 Low Britta Extension Britta US 20 Collector New Road $375,000 Low Subtotal $3,463,913 County Road Segments, Existing Deer Run Lane Pinecrest Huntington Local Reconstruct/Pave $314,820 High Foster Road So. Cent. La Pine Rec Collector Reconstruct/Pave $3, 125,000 High Hunnell Road Rogers Tumalo Collector Reconstruct/Pave $2,525,000 High Huntington Riverview Riverview Future Coll Reconstruct/Pave $1,448,575 High Rickard Road Groff US 20 Collector Reconstruct/Pave $772,000 High Canal Blvd 615L/Quarry Helmholtz Arterial Add center turn In $508,875 High Helmholtz Elkhorn Maple Collector Add travel lanes; center turn lane $6,132,500 High Burgess Day Huntington Arterial Add center lane; widen bridge $1,084,594 High 5` Street Amber State Rec Collector Widen/Overlay $256,250 Med. 17` St NE Negus O'Neil Hwy Collector Widen/Overlay $312,500 Med. W. Antler Ave. NW 35` Helmholtz Collector Widen/Overlay $159,375 Med. N. Canal Blvd City Limits US 97 Collector Widen/Overlay $434,375 Med. Gosney Rd US 20 COID bridge Collector Widen/Overlay $321,875 Med. Lower Bridge 43 rd St Holmes Collector Widen/Overlay $2,653,125 Med. Negus Way City Limits NE 17 th St Collector Widen/Overlay $453,125 Med. Buckhorn Lower Br. OR 126 Collector Reconstruct/Pave $1,708,000 Med. NW Way Coyner Maple Collector Add travel lanes; center turn lane $2,923,875 Med. Ordinance 2020-008, Exhibit B 31 S` St Sedgewick Lower Br. Arterial Widen/Overlay $312,500 Low 35` St Hemlock Upas Collector Widen/Overlay $490,625 Low 61 n St S. Canal US 97 Collector Widen/Overlay $665,625 Low Almeter NW Way Sedgewick Arterial Widen/Overlay $165,625 Low Bailey US 20 Tumalo Res. Collector Widen/Overlay $306,250 Low Bear Creek City Limits US 20 Collector Widen/Overlay $868,250 Low China Hat Knott End main. Collector Widen/Overlay $573,438 Low Cinder Butte Baker Minnetonka Collector Widen/Overlay $440,625 Low Cooley Road US 20 OB Riley Collector Widen/Overlay $98,438 Low Helmholtz Antler NW Walnut Collector Widen/Overlay $728,125 Low Helmholtz Antler OR 126 Collector Widen/Overlay $156,250 Low Huntington So Century Burgess Collector Widen/Overlay $2,782,500 Low Obsidian City Limits UGB Collector Widen/Overlay $315,625 Low Smith Rock Wy US 97 BNSF Xing Arterial Widen/Overlay $96,875 Low Stevens Road City Limits Ward Collector Widen/Overlay $325,000 Low Tumalo Res. OB Riley Collins Collector Widen/Overlay $1,440,625 Low Wickiup Helmholtz SW 581 Collector Widen/Overlay $159,375 Low Bozeman Trail Chisolm Tr Rickard Local Reconstruct/Pave $297,000 Low Cline Falls Nutcracker Nutcracker Arterial Disconnect Nutcracker $75,000 Low Subtotal $35,432,1 14 Federal Forest Highways Road Name From To Func. Class Project Est. Cost Rank Skyliners Bend UGB End Co. Maint. Collector Reconstruct/Pave $1 1,250,000 High Burgess Pringle Falls So. Century Collector Reconstruct/Pave $4,125,000 Low Subtotal $15,375,000 County Intersections $7,081,250 County Road Segments, New $3,463,913 County Road Segments, Existing $35,432,1 14 Federal Forest Highways $15,375,000 Total of County Road Projects $61,352,2770 Highway Intersections Highway Location Func. Class. Project Est. Cost Rank US 97 Lower Bridge Principal Arterial — Arterial Grade separation $21,000,000 High US 20 Cook-OB Riley Principal Arterial — Art — Collector Oyer -pass with jug handles Roundabout $15,450,000 High US 97* Wickiup jct Principal Arterial — Arterial Grade separation, phase I $24,000,000 Med. US 97 O'Neill Hwy-Pershall Principal Arterial — Principal Arterial - Collector Overpass $9,600,000 Med. US 20 Old Bend -Redmond Principal Arterial — Arterial Interchange Roundabout $26,500,000 Med. OR 126 Helmholtz Principal Arterial — Collector Traffic Signal $1,250,000 Med. US 97 Quarry Road Principal Arterial — Local Grade separation $15,000,000 Low Ordinance 2020-008, Exhibit B US 97* Wickiup Jct Principal Arterial — Arterial Grade separation, realignment, ph II $80,000,000 Low US 97 Vandevert Principal Arterial — Collector Disconnect Vandevert from 97 $2,300,000 Low US20 Hamby -Ward Principal Arterial — Collector Roundabout $1,000,000 Low US 20 Powell Butte Hwy Principal Arterial — Arterial Roundabout $1,000,000 Low OR 31 US 97 Principal Arterial — Principal Arterial Turn lanes, then grade separation $19,000,000 Low Subtotal $216,100,000 Highway Segments Highway From To Func Class Project Cost Est. Rank US 97 1 I` Ave, S O'Neil Hwy Princp. Art. Add travel lanes $9,00,000 High U 20 Hawk's Beard Rail Way Princp. Art. Add travel lanes $20,000,000 High US 97 Cottonwood Drafter Princp. Art. Add travel lanes $43,800,000 Med. US 20 Couch Market Gerking Mkt Princp. Art. Add travel lanes $9,900,000 Med. US 20 Providence Hamby Princp. Art Add travel lanes $2,00,000 Med. OR 126 Quail Tree 2 mi to E Princp. Art. Add travel lanes $7,900,000 Med. OR 126 Cline Falls Helmholtz Princp. Art. Add travel lanes $9,600,000 Med. OR 126 Sherman Crook Co Princp. Art. Add travel lanes $6,200,000 Med. OR 370 US 97 0.5 mi to W Princp. Art. Overpass of RR $26,100,000 Low Subtotal $134,500,000 Highway Intersections $216,100,000 Highway Segments $134,500,000 Total for Highway Projects $350,600,000 Bike and Pedestrian Projects Road From To Func Class Project Cost Est. Rank ---------- Tumalo State Park Riverview ---------- 10' multi -use trail, aka Tumalo Trail $160,000 High 71 St, Tumalo US 20 Cook Ave Collector 5' sidewalks on both sides $10,625 Med. 4` St, Tumalo Wood Ave Bruce Ave Local 5' sidewalks on both sides $13,125 Med. 5` St, Tumalo Wood Ave Cook Ave Local 5' sidewalks on both sides $26,250 Med. 5` St, Terrebonne B Ave C Ave Local 5' sidewalk on east side only $1 1,250 Med. C Ave, Terrebonne 6th St US 97 Local 5' sidewalks on both sides $45,000 Med. B Ave, Terrebonne 5`h St 6" St Local 5' sidewalk on north side only $5,875 Med. A Ave, Terrebonne I it, St 15th St Local 5' sidewalks on both sides $50,000 Low Smith Rock Way, Terrebonne I Ith St 15`h St Arterial 5' sidewalks on both sides $50,000 Low C Ave, Terrebonne US 97 16`h St Collector 5' sidewalk on south side only $38,750 Low I Ih St S„ Terrebonne Central Ave US 97 Collector 5' sidewalks on both side $81,250 Low Ordinance 2020-008, Exhibit B 8t St, Tumalo Cook Ave Riverview Local 5' sidewalk on both sides $17,500 Low Canal "H," Terrebonne 13`h St 12`h St ------- 10' soft trail $1,875 Low Canal "H," Terrebonne 12th St 400' south of A Ave ------- 10' soft trail $6,875 Low B Ave, Terrebonne East end of B at base of plateau West end of B atop plateau ------ 300' stairway $26,250 Low 4 th St, Terrebonne North end of 4th on ridge I Forster Drive ------ 300" stairway 1 $26,250 1 Low Subtotal $570,875 County Bridge Projects Location Sufficiency Rating Posting Required Project Cost Estimate Rank Tetherow Road @ Deschutes River 32.4 Yes New Bridge $1,582,500 High Cascade Lakes Hwy @ Fall River 46.6 Yes New Bridge $796,250 High Gribbling Road @ Canal 24 Yes New Bridge $225,000 Low Wilcox Ave @ Canal 47.2 Yes New Bridge $150,000 Low Sisemore Road @ Upper Tumalo Rsrvr 49.1 No New Bridge 1 $687,50 1 Low Subtotal $3,441,250 Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Regional TDM program Countywide County share of funding Commute Options @ 8K per year $160,000 High Regional TDM program Countywide Install ride share lots at future locations base on 201 1-12 study $45,000 Medium Subtotal $215,000 Total for County Road projects $61,352,000 Total for Highway projects $350,600,000 Total for Bike/Ped projects $570,875 Total for County Bridge projects $3,441,250 Total for TDM and TSM projects $215,000 GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL PROJECTS $416,179,125 Ordinance 2020-008, Exhibit B Table 5.3.T2 Illustrative List of Unfunded Highway Projects Highway Location Func. Class Project Estimated Cost Rank US 97 1.3 mi south of Vandevert Princ. Art. Grade separation $27,000,000 Low US 97 OR 31 Princ. Art. Grade separation $19,000,000 Low US 20 Old Bend -Redmond Princ. Art. Grade separ-atierf Roundabout $23,000,000 Low Subtotal $69,000,000 Ordinance 2020-008, Exhibit B Exhibit C New language on Page 150 shown as underlined. "Once a long-term preferred alternative is reached, ODOT and the County will pursue funding to construct the improvement. Of the two ODOT final long-term concepts, C-4 takes the County road over US 20 while 1-3 takes the County road under US 20. The County through the TSP public hearing process expressed a preference for 1-3. Additionally, the County recognizes the concerns of Tumalo residents regarding the way the long-term project could affect their community and requires that ODOT have an active dialogue in Tumalo after funding is programmed for this long-term project but well before they are designed or constructed: Prior to design, ODOT will hold a public meeting in Tumalo to explain the purpose, need, and timing of the project and to receive and consider the viewpoints of Tumalo area residents and how they might be best addressed in terms of project design and construction. After several public open houses stakeholder committee meetings, and technical research. ODOT and the County now agree a roundabout is the preferred alternative in Tumalo, replacing 1-3." New language on Page 166 shown as underlined. "In the Bend area, the planned improvements are additional lanes from Providence Drive to Hamby Road and the intersection improvements at Old Bend -Redmond Highway, Hamby - Ward, and Powell Butte Highway. These are related to traffic increases on both US 20 and the connecting arterial or collector. For Old Bend Redmond, ODOT and the County will need to conduct a refinement plan to determine if the solution is a simple overpass or a grade - separated interchange. The crash history at this location is what is driving the improvement as drivers unsuccessfully attempt to cross the highway or turn onto the highway. The County is proposing roundabouts on US 20 at Hamby -Ward and the Powell Butte Highway (see Chapter Four for discussion of the issue). However, instead of a grade -separation at Old Bend -Redmond ODOT and the County have agreed to a design concept of roundabouts on US 20 in Central Oregon based upon safety, cost operational benefits and treating rural highway intersections consistently. ODOT will hold public outreach meetings later in the project development process similar to what was done for the Tumalo roundabout." Ordinance 2020-008, Exhibit C sectjo ww 5.12 Leg'tslatWe History Background This section contains the legislative history of this Comprehensive Plan. Table S.12.1 Comprehensive Plan Ordinance History Ordinance Date Adopted/ Chapter/Section Amendment Effective All, except Transportation, Tumalo and Terrebonne 201 1-003 8-10-1 1/ 1 1-9-1 1 Community Plans, Comprehensive Plan update Deschutes Junction, Destination Resorts and ordinances adopted in 2011 2.5, 2.6, 3.4, 3.10, 3.5, Housekeeping amendments to 201 1-027 10-31-1 1 / 1 1-9-1 1 4.6, 5.3, 5.8, 5.1 1, 23.40A, 23.40B, ensure a smooth transition to 23.40.065, 23.01.010 the updated Plan 23.60, 23.64 (repealed), Updated Transportation 2012-005 8-20-12/ 1 1-19-12 3.7 (revised), Appendix C System Plan (added) 2012-012 8-20-12/8-20-12 4.1, 4.2 La Pine Urban Growth Boundary 2012-016 12-3-12/3-4-13 3.9 Housekeeping amendments to Destination Resort Chapter Central Oregon Regional 2013-002 1-7-13/ 1-7-13 4.2 Large -lot Employment Land Need Analysis Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing designation of certain 2013-009 2-6-13/5-8-13 1.3 property from Agriculture to Rural Residential Exception Area Comprehensive Plan Map 2013-012 5-8-13/8-6-13 23.01.010 Amendment, including certain property within City of Bend Urban Growth Boundary Newberry Country: A Plan 2013-007 5-29-13/8-27-13 3.10, 3.1 1 for Southern Deschutes County DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.12 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY Comprehensive Plan Map 2013-016 10-21-13/ 10-21-13 23.01.010 Amendment, including certain property within City of Sisters Urban Growth Boundary Comprehensive Plan Map 2014-005 2-26-14/2-26-14 23.01.010 Amendment, including certain property within City of Bend Urban Growth Boundary 2014-012 4-2-14/7-1-14 3.10, 3.1 1 Housekeeping amendments to Title 23. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing designation of certain 2014-021 8-27-14/ 1 1-25-14 23.01.010, 5.10 property from Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community Forest to Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community Utility Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing designation of certain 2014-021 8-27-14/ 1 1-25-14 23.01.010, 5.10 property from Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community Forest to Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community Utility Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2014-027 12-15-14/3-31-15 23.01.010, 5.10 designation of certain property from Agriculture to Rural Industrial Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2015-021 1 1-9-15/2-22-16 23.01.010 designation of certain property from Agriculture to Surface Mining. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2015-029 1 1-23-15/ 1 1-30-15 23.01.010 designation of certain property from Tumalo Residential 5-Acre Minimum to Tumalo Industrial 2015-018 12-9-15/3-27-16 23.01.010, 2.2, 4.3 Housekeeping Amendments to Title 23. DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.12 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY Comprehensive Plan Text and 2015-010 12-2-15/ 12-2-15 2.6 Map Amendment recognizing Greater Sage -Grouse Habitat Inventories Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2016-001 12-21-15/04-5-16 23.01.010; 5.10 designation of certain property from, Agriculture to Rural Industrial (exception area) Comprehensive Plan Amendment to add an exception to Statewide 2016-007 2-10-16/5-10-16 23.01.010; 5.10 Planning Goal I I to allow sewers in unincorporated lands in Southern Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Amendment recognizing non- 2016-005 1 1-28-16/2-16-17 23.01.010, 2.2, 3.3 resource lands process allowed under State law to change EFU zoning Comprehensive plan 2016-022 9-28-16/ 1 1-14-16 23.01.010, 1.3, 4.2 Amendment, including certain property within City of Bend Urban Growth Boundary Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2016-029 12-14-16/ 12/28/ 16 23.01.010 designation of certain property from, Agriculture to Rural Industrial Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2017-007 10-30-17/ 10-30-17 23.01.010 designation of certain property from Agriculture to Rural Residential Exception Area Comprehensive Plan 2018-002 1-3-18/ 1-25-18 23.01, 2.6 Amendment permitting churches in the Wildlife Area Combining Zone DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.12 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY Housekeeping Amendments correcting tax lot numbers in Non -Significant Mining Mineral 2018-006 8-22-18/ 1 1-20-18 23.01.010, 5.8, 5.9 and Aggregate Inventory; modifying Goal 5 Inventory of Cultural and Historic Resources Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2018-01 1 9-12-18/ 12-1 1-18 23.01.010 designation of certain property from Agriculture to Rural Residential Exception Area Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, removing Flood 23.01.010, 2.5, Tumalo Plain Comprehensive Plan 2018-005 9-19-18/ 10-10-18 Community Plan, Designation; Comprehensive Newberry Country Plan Plan Amendment adding Flood Plain Combining Zone purpose statement. Comprehensive Plan Amendment allowing for the 2018-008 9-26-18/ 10-26-18 23.01.010, 3.4 potential of new properties to be designated as Rural Commercial or Rural Industrial Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment changing designation of certain property from Surface Mining 2019-002 1-2-19/4-2-19 23.01.010, 5.8 to Rural Residential Exception Area; Modifying Goal 5 Mineral and Aggregate Inventory; Modifying Non - Significant Mining Mineral and Aggregate Inventory Comprehensive Plan and Text 2019-001 1-16-19/4-16-19 1.3, 3.3, 4.2, 5.10, 23.01 Amendment to add a new zone to Title 19: Westside Transect Zone. DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.12 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment changing designation of certain 2019-003 02-12-19/03-12-19 23.01.010, 4.2 property from Agriculture to Redmond Urban Growth Area for the Large Lot Industrial Program Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment changing designation of certain property from Agriculture to 2019-004 02-12-19/03-12-19 23.01.010, 4.2 Redmond Urban Growth Area for the expansion of the Deschutes County Fairgrounds and relocation of Oregon Military Department National Guard Armory. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to adjust the Bend Urban Growth Boundary to accommodate the refinement of the Skyline Ranch Road alignment and the 2019-01 1 05-01-19/05-16/ 19 23.01.010, 4.2 refinement of the West Area Master Plan Area I boundary. The ordinance also amends the Comprehensive Plan designation of Urban Area Reserve for those lands leaving the UGB. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, changing 2019-006 03-13-19/06-1 1-19 23.01.010, designation of certain property from Agriculture to Rural Residential Exception Area Comprehensive Plan and Text amendments to provide procedures related to the 2020-001 12-1 1-19/ 12-1 1-19 23.01.01, 2.5 division of certain split zoned properties containing Flood Plain zoning and involving a former or piped irrigation canal. DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.12 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 2020-008 1 06-10-20/09-08-20 1 23.01.010. Appendix C DESCHUTES COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2011 CHAPTER 5 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONS SECTION 5.12 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY Transportation System Plan Amendment to add roundabouts at US 20/Cook- O.B. Riley and US 20/01d Bend -Redmond HM intersections: amend Tables 5.3.T I and 5.3.T2 and amend TSP text EXHIBIT E Chapter 23.01 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chapter 23.01 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 23.01.010. Introduction. A. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2011-003 and found on the Deschutes County Community Development Department website, is incorporated by reference herein. B. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2011-027, are incorporated by reference herein. C. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2012-005, are incorporated by reference herein. D. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2012-012, are incorporated by reference herein. E. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2012-016, are incorporated by reference herein. F. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2013-002, are incorporated by reference herein. G. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2013-009, are incorporated by reference herein. H. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2013-012, are incorporated by reference herein. I. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2013-007, are incorporated by reference herein. J. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2014-005, are incorporated by reference herein. K. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2014-006, are incorporated by reference herein. L. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2014-012, are incorporated by reference herein. M. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2014-021, are incorporated by reference herein. N. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2014-027, are incorporated by reference herein. O. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2015-021, are incorporated by reference herein. P. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2015-029, are incorporated by reference herein. Q. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2015-018, are incorporated by reference herein. R. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2015-010, are incorporated by reference herein. S. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2016-001, are incorporated by reference herein. T. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2016-022, are incorporated by reference herein. U. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2016-005, are incorporated by reference herein. Chapter 23.01 51 2020) EXHIBIT E TO ORDINANCE 2020-008 EXHIBIT E V. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2016-027, are incorporated by reference herein. W. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2016-029, are incorporated by reference herein. X. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2017-007, are incorporated by reference herein. Y. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2018-002, are incorporated by reference herein. Z. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2018-006, are incorporated by reference herein. AA. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2018-011, are incorporated by reference herein. BB. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2018-005, are incorporated by reference herein. CC. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2018-008, are incorporated by reference herein. DD. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-002, are incorporated by reference herein. EE. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-001, are incorporated by reference herein. FF. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-003, are incorporated by reference herein. GG. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-004, are incorporated by reference herein. HH. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-011, are incorporated by reference herein. II. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-006, are incorporated by reference herein. JJ. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-016, are incorporated by reference herein. KK. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2019-019, are incorporated by reference herein. LL. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2020-001, are incorporated by reference herein. MM. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2020-002, are incorporated by reference herein. NN. The Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2020-003, are incorporated by reference herein. 00 The Deschutes Coun Comprehensive Plan amendments, adopted by the Board in Ordinance 2020-008 are incorporated by reference herein. (Ord. 2020-008 § 1, 2020; Ord. 2020-003 § 1, 2020; Ord. 2020-002 § 1, 2020; Ord. 2020-001 §26, 2020; Ord. 2019-019 §2, 2019; Ord. 2019-016 §3, 2019; Ord. 2019-006 § 1, 2019; Ord. 2019-011 § 1, 2019; Ord. 2019-004 § 1, 2019; Ord. 2019-003 § 1, 2019; Ord. 2019-001 § 1, 2019; Ord. 2019-002 §1, 2019; Ord. 2018-008 §1, 2018; Ord. 2018-005 §2, 2018; Ord. 2018-011 §1, 2018; Ord. 2018-006 § 1, 2018; Ord. 2018-002 § 1, 2018; Ord. 2017-007 § 1, 2017; Ord. 2016-029 § 1, 2016; Ord. 2016-027 § 1, 2016; Ord. 2016-005 § 1, 2016; Ord. 2016-022 § 1, 2016; Ord. 2016-001 § 1, 2016; Ord. 2015-010 §1, 2015; Ord. 2015-018 § 1, 2015; Ord. 2015-029 § 1, 2015; Ord. 2015-021 § 1, 2015; Ord. 2014- Chapter 23.01 5� 2020) EXHIBIT E TO ORDINANCE 2020-008 EXHIBIT E 027 § 1, 2014; Ord. 2014-021 §1, 2014; Ord. 2014-12 §1, 2014; Ord. 2014-006 §2, 2014; Ord. 2014- 005 §2, 2014; Ord. 2013-012 §2, 2013; Ord. 2013-009 §2, 2013; Ord. 2013-007 §1, 2013; Ord. 2013- 002 §1, 2013; Ord. 2013-001 §1, 2013; Ord. 2012-016 §1, 2012; Ord. 2012-013 §1, 2012; Ord. 2012- 005 § 1, 2012; Ord. 2011-027 § 1 through 12, 2011; Ord. 2011-017 repealed; Ord.2011-003 § 3, 2011) Click here to be directed to the Comprehensive Plan (http://www.deschutes.org/compplan) Chapter 23.01 5� 2020) EXHIBIT E TO ORDINANCE 2020-008 FINDINGS TO AMEND DESCHUTES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN TO ADD ROUNDABOUTS AT U.S. 20/COOK-O.B. RILEY IN TUMALO AND U.S. 20/OLD BEND-REDMOND HIGHWAY 1. Background The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) coordinated with Deschutes County for the several years on potential roundabouts on the U.S. corridor between Bend and Sisters. In particular those efforts have focused on the intersection of U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley in Tumalo and to a lesser extent on U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway. ODOT formed a stakeholder committee comprised of representatives from the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners (Board), Deschutes County Planning Commission (PC), and staff from Planning and the Road Department as well as Tumalo business owners, Tumalo residents, and the Tumalo School. ODOT also held open house meetings at various stages of the process which resulted in the proposed U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley roundabout. The agency intends to follow a similar approach to further refine the U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway roundabout. The adopted 2010-2030 Deschutes County Transportation System Plan (TSP) lists a grade - separation at U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley intersection as the long-term solution. This design is referred to as 1-3 in the TSP and has the County roads passing underneath the highway. The project is described as an overpass with jug handles (a type of connection between the two roadways) and is listed as a high priority in Table 5.331 (County Road and Highway Projects) in the TSP. The TSP listed two long-term concepts for U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway. One was a simple overpass with the Old Bend Redmond going over the highway with no connections between the two roadways. The second was a grade -separated interchange. Both appear in Table 5.332 (Illustrative List of Unfunded Highway Projects).' The applicant, ODOT, initiated the proposed plan amendment (File 247-19-000894-PA) to amend the Deschutes County TSP. The TSP is the transportation component of the 1 Concept 1-3 and the two proposed roundabouts are part of the materials, along with ODOT's full application, entered into the record at the Planning Commission's January 23, 2020, work session on this application. Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan. The subject plan amendment proposes the following: • Delete Concept 1-3 from the TSP • Add a roundabout at U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley to the TSP • Amend the description and cost estimate in Table 5.331 to reflect the roundabout • Amend the text on page 150 of the TSP to add the roundabout public process • Delete the U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Hwy grade separation from Table 5.332 • Add the U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Hwy roundabout to Table 5.3.T1 • Amend the text on page 166 relating to future improvements for U.S. 20/Old Bend Redmond Hwy to reflect the change to a roundabout and upcoming public outreach 11. Review Criteria Board Ordinance 2020-008 amends the TSP. Deschutes County lacks specific criteria in DCC Titles 18, 22, or 23 for reviewing a legislative amendment. Nonetheless, ODOT is initiating this text amendment and bears the responsibility for demonstrating the amendment complies with Deschutes County Title 22, Development Procedures Ordinance; Statewide Planning Goals; Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS); Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR); the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan; and Deschutes County TSP. The findings are organized as follows: Section 1 - DCC Title 22, Chapter 22.12, Legislative Procedures Section 2 - Statewide Planning Goals Section 3 - Oregon Revised Statutes Section 4 - Oregon Administrative Rules Section 5 - Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Section 6 - Deschutes County Transportation System Plan Section 1, DCC Title 22, Chapter 22.12, Legislative Procedures 22.12.010. Hearing Required No legislative change shall be adopted without review by the Planning Commission and a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. Public hearings before the Planning Commission shall be set at the Discretion of the Planning Director, unless otherwise required by state law. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 2 of 24 FINDING: Staff held a work session with the PC on January 23 prior to the February 27 public hearing, which was the first evidentiary hearing. The PC unanimously recommended on March 12 that the Board approve the amendment. The Board held a work session on March 30 followed by a public hearing on May 20. The Board deliberated on June 3 and unanimously approved the amendment, adopting Ord. 2020-008 on June 10, 2020. The Board finds this criterion has been met. 22.12.020. Notice A. Published Notice 1. Notice of a legislative change shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county at least 10 days prior to each public hearing. 2. The notice shall state the time and place of the hearing and contain a statement describing the general subject matter of the ordinance under consideration. B. Post Notice. Notice shall be posted at the discretion of the Planning Director and where necessary to comply with ORS 203.045. C. Individual Notice. Individual notice to property owners, as defined in DCC 22.0&010(A), shall be provided at the discretion of the Planning Director, except as required by ORS 215.503. D. Media Notice. Copies of the notice of hearing shall be transmitted to other newspapers published in Deschutes County. FINDING: Staff published notice with the required information in the Bend Bulletin on Sunday, January 26, 2020, which is more than 10 days prior to the February 27, 2020, PC public hearing. Staff also sent notice to all property owners within 250 feet of the right of way of either intersection. The mailed notices included first a notice of application (NOA) and then notice of public hearing (NOPH). Mailed individual notices and posted notices are not required for a legislative amendment under County code, but staff exercised the discretion allowed under DCC 22.12.020(B) and (C) to mail individual notices and to require the applicant to post signs. Staff also sent public notice on April 29 to the same geographic area and to those who testified orally or in writing to the PC regarding the Board's May 20 hearing. Staff also sent notice to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) on January 7, 2020, which is more than 35 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing. This notice is consistent with DCC 22.12.020(C). Staff coordinated with the County public information officer for distribution of a press release to the media. The Board finds this criterion has been met. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 3 of 24 22.12.030. Initiation of Legislative Changes A legislative change may be initiated by application of individuals upon payment of required fees as well as by the Board of Commissioners or the Planning Commission. FINDING: The text amendment was initiated by ODOT on December 19, 2019, after paying the required fees. The Board finds this criterion has been met. 22.12.040. Hearings Body A. The following shall serve as hearings or review body for legislative changes in this order. 1. The Planning Commission. 2. The Board of County Commissioners. B. Any legislative change initiated by the Board of County Commissioners shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to action being taken by the Board of Commissioners. FINDING: The PC Feb. 27 public hearing preceded the Board's May 20 public hearing. The Board finds this criterion has been met. 22.12.050. Final Decision All legislative changes shall be adopted by ordinance. FINDING: These findings will become an exhibit to the implementing ordinance, which is 2020-008. The Board finds this criterion has been met. 22.12.060. Corrections The County's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinances, subdivision ordinance, and development procedures may be corrected by order of the Board of County Commissioners to cure editorial and clerical errors. FINDING: The amendment to add two roundabouts to TSP, an element of the County's Comprehensive Plan, does not pertain to an editorial or clerical error, therefore this section is not applicable. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 4 of 24 Section 2, Statewide Planning Goals Goal 1, Citizen Involvement FINDING: The text amendment included a work session before the PC on January 23, 2020, which the public could attend. The entire ODOT application was entered into the record at that time and was part of the PC's agenda packet. (The packet materials can be found at the link below.)2 The ODOT Project Management Team (PMT) reached out to the public throughout the planning process to help identify problems along the corridor and their root causes, evaluate project alternatives, and identify preferred solutions. Public open house meetings took place in January and May 2019 at the Tumalo School while stakeholder meetings took place in March, April, June and September. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment under Deschutes County Code (DCC) 22.12 (Legislative Procedures) went through noticed public hearings before both the Planning Commission and the Board. The Board finds Goal 1 is met. Goal2, Land Use Planning FINDING: The project development process for the two intersection upgrades did not propose a zone change. This Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment will be processed under DCC 22.12 (Legislative Procedures). The comprehensive plan amendment process ensures consistency with the County's adopted Comprehensive plan. The Board finds Goal 2 is met. Goal 3, Agricultural Lands FINDING: The text amendment is not proposing any changes to land use designations. The locations of the two roundabouts are not within nor adjacent to agriculturally zoned lands. Instead, the lands are either with the Tumalo Rural Unincorporated Community (Tu) zone and its subdistricts for the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley intersection or Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA-10) exception lands for the U.S. 20/01d Bend -Redmond Highway intersection. The Board finds Goal 3 does not apply. Goal4, Forest Lands FINDING: The text amendment is not proposing any changes to land use designations. The locations of the two roundabouts are not adjacent to or within forest lands. Instead, the lands are either with the Tumalo Rural Unincorporated Community (Tu) zone and its subdistricts for the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley intersection or Multiple Use Agriculture (MUA- Z https:Hdeschutescountyor.igm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=2201&Inline=True Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 5 of 24 10) exception lands for the U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway intersection. The Board finds Goal 4 is met. Goal 5, Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces FINDING: The text amendment is neither proposing any changes to land use designations nor proposing any changes to previously designated Goal 5 resources. The two proposed roundabouts will not encroach on open spaces, scenic and historic areas and natural resources. The Board finds Goal 5 is met. Goal 6, Air, Water and Land Resource Quality FINDING: The purpose of the two roundabouts is to meet the performance targets for ODOT. By reducing congestion and lowering delays on the side streets, the roundabouts will reduce time vehicle engines would otherwise spend idling, which is when tailpipe emissions are highest. The locations of the two proposed roundabouts do not occur in any designated floodplain or floodway. The actual construction will deal with any drainage. No development or land use changes are being proposed that impact air, water, or land resource qualities. Other areas of the County's code that deal with protecting air, water, and land remain in full force and effect. The Board finds Goal 6 is met. Goal 7, Natural Hazards i FINDING: The County's Comprehensive Plan identifies the dominant natural hazards as wildfire, winter storms, and flooding. The two intersection upgrades to roundabouts are road improvement projects along an existing highway corridor. The road will be maintained appropriately throughout the year. While Tumalo has a mapped floodplain and a floodway, the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley roundabout lies outside those areas. ODOT and the County have existing drainage swales for US 20. Any reconstruction of the affected roadways or construction of the intersection upgrades would incorporate drainage in the project plans. Finally, both ODOT and Deschutes County routinely perform snowplowing, sanding, and other winter maintenance activities to keep roadways functional. The Board finds Goal 7 is met. Goal 8, Recreational Needs FINDING: The text amendment does not change the uses allowed in the Tumalo Rural Community Zone (DCC 18.67) or the MUA-10 (DCC 18.32) zones, some of which are recreational. The intersection upgrades will potentially ease traffic congestion through Tumalo and make it much easier for those headed to nearby recreation areas such as Tumalo State Park and/or the Deschutes River. The Board finds Goal 8 is met. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 6 of 24 Goal 9, Economic Development FINDING: The text amendment still allows properties to develop as allowed under their zoning. The text amendment to add the roundabouts will help to ensure U.S. 20 remains a key statewide and West Coast freight corridor. This will ensure that the movement of goods along U.S. 20 will continue unimpeded. The Board finds Goal 9 is met. Goal 10, Housing FINDING: This goal pertains to urban or urbanizable lands within an Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The proposed text amendment will not result in any changes or elimination of residentially zoned lands in the County. By contrast the affected area is a Rural Unincorporated Community and recognized as such under OAR 660-022-010(7). Finally, unincorporated areas, unlike municipalities, are not obligated to fulfill Goal 10 housing requirements. The Board finds Goal 10 is met. Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services FINDING: This goal pertains more to water and sewer services. Nevertheless, the proposed two roundabouts are favorable to emergency service providers since they will reduce the risk of crashes and their severity, decrease congestion, and speed up response times. The Tumalo roundabout will likely be used by the Bend Fire Department station in the northwest quadrant of the Cook/Fourth Avenue intersection. The Board finds Goal 11 is met. Goal 12, Transportation FINDING: ODOT has provided extensive documentation in its application, including detailed traffic analysis. A summary of the applicant's transportation assessment, separated by each roundabout location, is as follows: U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley As detailed in Tech Memo #1-US 20 @ Tumalo-Traffic Alternatives Analysis: Existing Conditions Review and Future Intersection Needs, pages 8 and 9, (and summarized in Tech Memo #4-US 20 @ Tumalo-Traffic Alternatives Analysis: Summary Memorandum, pages 12 and 13) per the ODOT Highway Design Manual (HDM), the volume -to -capacity (v/c) performance threshold for the intersection is 0.60 along the highway and 0.75 along the side street approaches. A modified v/c performance threshold of 0.90 was selected by ODOT and Deschutes County and used to evaluate the roundabout. This modified threshold has been used on other roundabout projects within the region (Le, US 20 & Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 7 of 24 Barclay) to determine the number of lanes required for the roundabout. This threshold is based on guidance in NCHRP Report 672, Roundabouts: An Information Guide, Second Edition, which identifies a v/c ratio of 0.90 as the approximate upper threshold for satisfactory operation. A design exception will be prepared to use the modified v/c threshold. As detailed in Tech Memo #1-US 20 @ Tumalo-Traffic Alternatives Analysis: Existing Conditions Review and Future Intersection Needs, page 18 (and summarized in Tech Memo #4-US 20 @ Tumalo-Traffic Alternatives Analysis: Summary Memorandum, pages 24 and 25), to accommodate 2040 weekday PM peak hour volumes, two through lanes are needed along the highway approaches and one through lane is needed along the side street approaches. In addition, the Cook Avenue approach needs a dedicated left -turn lane, the O.B. Riley Road approach needs a dedicated right turn lane, and the northbound approach along the highway needs a right -turn bypass lane. This multilane roundabout configuration results in an overall intersection v/c ratio of 0.81 during the 2040 PM peak hour study period. As documented in Tech Memo #4-US 20 @ Tumalo-Traffic Alternatives Analysis: Summary Memorandum, page 35, during discussions with ODOT on March 21 st, 2019, the project team elected to eliminate the northbound right -turn slip lane for opening year to reduce the number of vehicle lanes at the pedestrian crossing in that quadrant of the intersection, and to reduce the overall footprint of the project. Right-of-way will be acquired and reserved in that quadrant to allow for the northbound right -turn slip lane to be potentially added in the future. As detailed in Tech Memo #4-US 20 @ Tumalo-Traffic Alternatives Analysis: Summary Memorandum, pages 35-41, this opening year roundabout configuration, without the northbound right -turn slip lane, is expected to operate over capacity during the 2040 weekday PM peak hour period with a v/c ratio of 1.08 on the northbound approach. During the 2040 weekday AM peak hour and 2040 Sunday midday peak hour, the opening year roundabout configuration is expected to operate below capacity and below the 0.90 v/c performance threshold, with a v/c ratio of 0.64 on the eastbound approach on O.B. Riley Road, and 0.80 on the northbound approach on the highway, respectively. A supplemental operations analysis has been prepared for the opening year (anticipated in year 2022) roundabout configuration with expected opening year traffic volumes. The opening year 2022 volumes were developed based on growing the 2018 count year volumes at linear rate between the 2018 and 2040 traffic volumes. As shown in Table 1, the analysis shows the opening year roundabout configuration operates below the 0.90 v/c performance threshold in 2022 during all study time periods. Opening year 2022 analysis files are provided in Appendix A. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 8 of 24 Funding is reasonably likely in order to satisfy 660-012-0060(3)(d) given the plan amendment is for roundabouts on U.S. 20. ODOT is the road authority for this intersection. Additionally, Deschutes County has contributed substantial dollars to fund the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley roundabout. U.S. 20/01d Bend -Redmond Highway ODOT did not provide the same level of summary in its burden of proof. The agency refers to this roundabout as part of the U.S. 20: Deschutes River Bridge - Robal Road project. The discrepancy is mainly due to the differences in the stage of the design process for each roundabout. The Tumalo roundabout is at the 30 percent phase, meaning there is general certainty toward the basic location, the physical footprint, the number of lanes and their dimensions, etc. The U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond roundabout is more conceptual, but has had traffic analysis done. The agency reports the U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond intersection will meet 2040 mobility targets. Please see page 28 of the US 20 @ Old Bend -Redmond Highway and Robal Road Tech Memo #4-Traffic Alternatives Analysis Project Summary for further reference. Between the material provided above and the discussion in the section on OAR 660-012, aka the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) below, the Board finds Goal 12 is met. Goal 13, Energy Conservation FINDING: This text amendment does not affect the County's regulation of solar setbacks, siting of small-scale windmills, land use or density, etc. The purpose of the two roundabouts is meet the performance targets for ODOT. By reducing congestion and lowering delays on the side streets, the roundabouts will reduce time vehicle engines would otherwise spend idling, which is when tailpipe emissions are highest. The Board finds Goal 13 is met. Goal 14, Urbanization FINDING: No land use plan designations, zoning designations, or map changes will result from this text amendment. Additionally, none of the proposed roundabouts is within an Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The Board finds Goal 14 is met. Goals 15-19 FINDING: These criteria do not apply as the County lacks these lands (Willamette Greenway, estuaries, coasts, beaches, etc.). Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 9 of 24 Section 3, Oregon Revised Statutes ORS 197.610 establishes rules for submission of post -acknowledgement plan amendments and land use regulations to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). These include the text of the proposed changes, explanatory narrative, staff report, required form, and timelines to get all materials to the agency prior to the first evidentiary hearing. FINDING: Staff submitted the required materials in compliance with the 35-day prior notice timeline. Notice was sent electronically to DLCD on January 7, 2020, which was more than 35 days previous to the first evidentiary on February 27, 2020. The Board finds this criterion has been met. Section 4, Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012 660-012-0060, aka the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments (1) if an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless an amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would. (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan), (b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system, (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 10 of 24 (A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility. (8) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; (C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected not to meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. FINDING: The proposed amendment will not change the functional classification of U.S. 20 or Cook, O.B. Riley, or Old Bend -Redmond Highway. The State and County standards which implement the functional classification systems will remain unchanged. The U.S. 20/Cook- O.B. Riley intersection will not meet the ODOT performance targets in 2040; the U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway will meet the ODOT performance targets in 2040. Thus there is a significant effect for the Tumalo intersection, but not Old Bend -Redmond. As discussed below, the County can still approve the plan amendment. The Board finds this criterion has been met. (2) If a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, then the local government must ensure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards of the facility measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP through one or a combination of the remedies listed in (a) through (e) below, unless the amendment meets the balancing test in subsection (2)(e) of this section or qualifies for partial mitigation in section (11) of this rule. A local government using subsection (2)(e), section (3), section (10) or section (11) to approve an amendment recognizes that additional motor vehicle traffic congestion may result and that other facility providers would not be expected to provide additional capacity for motor vehicles in response to this congestion. (c) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance standards of the transportation facility. FINDING: As discussed in the Goal 12 findings, ODOT and the County have agreed to 0.90 volume/capacity (WC) ratio for the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley roundabout. ODOT has the Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 11 of 24 ability to approve and apply alternate mobility standards. DCC 18.116.310(H)(2) defers to ODOT's performance targets on intersections involving State highways and County roads. The Board finds this criterion has been met. (3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may approve an amendment that would significantly affect an existing transportation facility without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the function, capacity and performance standards of the facility where: (a) In the absence of the amendment, planned transportation facilities, improvements and services as set forth in section (4) of this rule would not be adequate to achieve consistency with the identified function, capacity or performance standard for that facility by the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP, (b) Development resulting from the amendment will, at a minimum, mitigate the impacts of the amendment in a manner that avoids further degradation to the performance of the facility by the time of the development through one or a combination of transportation improvements or measures, (c) The amendment does not involve property located in an interchange area as defined in paragraph (4)(d)(C); and (d) For affected state highways, ODOT provides a written statement that the proposed funding and timing for the identified mitigation improvements or measures are, at a minimum, sufficient to avoid further degradation to the performance of the affected state highway. However, if a local government provides the appropriate ODOT regional office with written notice of a proposed amendment in a manner that provides ODOT reasonable opportunity to submit a written statement into the record of the local government proceeding, and ODOT does not provide a written statement, then the local government may proceed with applying subsections (a) through (c) of this section. FINDING: Funding is reasonably likely in order to satisfy 660-012-0060(3)(d) given the plan amendment is for roundabouts on U.S. 20. ODOT is the road authority for this intersection and anticipates beginning construction in the next few years. ODOT's 2018-2021 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) identifies $2.25 for preliminary engineering Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 12 of 24 and right of way purchases for this project (Key #14892), which clearly indicates an intent to build the Tumalo roundabout. In the submitted burden of proof, ODOT has stated funding is reasonably likely. Additionally, Deschutes County has contributed substantial dollars to fund the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley roundabout. The Board finds this criterion has been met. Section 5, Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Chapter 1, Comprehensive Planning Section 1.3 Land Use Planning Policies Goal 1 Maintain an open public land use process in which decisions are based on the objective valuation of facts. Policy 1.3.3 Involve the public when amending County Code FINDING: The Tumalo roundabout was developed through an extensive public process with multiple open houses and meetings with stakeholders and advisory committee members prior to ODOT submitting the plan amendment. ODOT is on record in its submitted burden of proof as intending to go through a similar public process to further refine the U.S. 20/01d Bend -Redmond Highway roundabout. The plan amendment required work sessions with the PC and the Board, which the public could attend, and public hearings where the public testified in writing and orally to the PC and the Board. The Board finds the plan amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 4, Urban Growth Management Section 4.3 Unincorporated Communities FINDING: The County has four types of unincorporated communities: Urban, Rural, Resort, and Rural Service Center. Table 4.3.1 identifies Tumalo as a Rural Community. The goals and policies specific to Tumalo appear in the Tumalo Community Plan which is discussed below. Tumalo Community Plan 2010 - 2030 Traffic and Circulation As noted earlier, the transportation system in Tumalo is dominated by US 20, a state highway that bisects the community. Traffic is a major issue for Tumalo residents because the highway traffic volume creates unsafe crossings and long delays for Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 13 of 24 motorized and non -motorized users entering US 20 from Sth Street, 7th Street, Cook Avenue, and OB Riley Road. Deschutes County and ODOT are currently working on a long-term plan to address the needs of Tumalo and the state highway. The goal is to maintain safe and convenient uses of US 20. In the summer of 2010, ODOT constructed a raised median at the intersection of 7th- Bailey and US 20. The raised median limited 7th Street to right -in, right -out turns only and limited Bailey to right -in, right -out, and left -in turns. The raised median has a Z- shaped opening to enable bicyclists and pedestrians to cross US 20 one lane at a time while simultaneously providing a refuge. FINDING: The Tumalo roundabout will reduce the number and severity of crashes at the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley intersection. The roundabout will also accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians. The Board finds the proposed roundabout is consistent with this section of the Tumalo Community Plan. Commercial Area Policy Limit Access from US 20 so it is safe and economically viable. FINDING: The Tumalo roundabout maintains the current accesses to/from U.S. 20, but the change from a four -legged intersection to a roundabout accomplishes several safety aspects. The roundabout ensures lower speeds coming into and moving through the roundabout, which means any crashes will be less severe. All turns into and out of a roundabout are right turns, which statistically are safer than left turns to/from the highway. The roundabout dramatically decreases the chance of head-on collisions. The Board finds the U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley roundabout is consistent with this section of the Tumalo Community Plan. Transportation Goal Provide a safe and efficient system for all modes of transportation. US 20 Policies 8. Coordinate with the Tumalo Community and Oregon Department of Transportation to implement both short and long-term improvements to solve transportation problems, including at the Cook Avenue and US 20 intersection. 9. Enhance the roadside environment, through tree planting, signage or other means. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 14 of 24 10. Promote safe access and slower speeds on US 20 through Tumalo. 11. Retain and enhance access across US 20 using above, below, or at grade crossings to support pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian access to recreation and community services. FINDING: The intersection upgrade in Tumalo is the result of a multi -year project development process. It involved a comprehensive review of other guidance documents influencing the planning area, an assessment of existing and projected future conditions along the project corridor, and a review of various alternatives that could resolve the identified issues, guided by an extensive public involvement process. Public open house meetings took place in January and May of this year while stakeholder meetings took place in March, April, June and September of 2019. ODOT and Deschutes County have partnered to develop the project to 30% design in order to establish the project footprint and begin the right of way acquisition process. The roundabout will help slow speeds through Tumalo through its design and by indicating to drivers they are transitioning from a rural segment of highway to one that is more urban. Kittelson and Associates has been retained and will be developing the preliminary design. The Board finds the resulting roundabout preferred alternative is consistent with the above goals and policies from the Tumalo Community Plan. Section 6, Deschutes County Transportation System Plan Goal Achieve an efficient, safe, convenient, and economically viable transportation and communication system. This system includes roads, rail lines, public transit, air, pipeline, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The Deschutes County transportation system shall be designed to serve the existing and projected needs of the unincorporated communities and rural areas within the County. The system shall provide connections between different modes of transportation to reduce reliance on any one mode. Policy 1.2 The lead agency for review of transportation projects in Deschutes County shall be: a. Deschutes County for projects completely outside urban growth boundaries (UGBs); Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 15 of 24 FINDING: ODOT has applied to Deschutes County for land use review to amend the County's TSP and Tumalo Community Plan by adding the roundabout locations to these documents. Tumalo is an Unincorporated Community and is outside of any Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). U.S. 20 is a State facility. Policy 1.2a is met; Policies 1.2.b and c are not applicable as the project does not involve a city and is completely outside of a UGB. The Board finds the proposed roundabouts are consistent with this policy. Goal 2 The Deschutes County TSP shall be continually updated in a timely fashion in order to ensure the transportation system serves the needs of County residents, businesses, and visitors. Policy 2.1 Deschutes County shall. a. Identify local, regional, and state transportation needs, b. Develop a transportation plan that shall address those needs, c. Review and update the plan at least every five years, d. Continue to coordinate transportation planning with local, regional and state plans by reviewing any changes to Deschutes County local transportation plans, regional transportation plans, the Oregon Transportation Plan and ODOT's State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and e. Continue public and interagency involvement in the transportation planning process. FINDING: The intersection upgrades are based on the current and future operational challenges of US 20. Roundabouts address safety and operational needs at these two intersections. The Board finds the roundabouts are consistent with this policy. Policy 2.2 Transportation Projects a. The County shall have a list of transportation projects, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with the policies set forth below. b. The initial Transportation Project List shall beset forth in Table 5.3.T1 of the Transportation System Plan adopted as part of the Resource Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Board shall update the Transportation Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 16 of 24 Project List periodically by resolution adopted by the Board without need of a formal amendment to the TSP. c. New Transportation Projects shall be included on the County's Transportation Project List. A transportation project proposed for addition to the list shall be subject to an individual land use review only if applicable administrative rules or land use regulations require such review. d. Transportation or development projects that require a plan text amendment or a conditional use permit may be required to fulfill conditions or implement mitigation measures before approval is granted. Mitigation and conditions may include, but are not limited to: • Improvement of surrounding roads, • Limits on level of development, • Revision of development placement, • Addition or redesign of access, • Addition of traffic management devices such as traffic signals, medians, turn lanes or signage, and/or • Improvements that reduce transportation impacts. Deschutes County acknowledges that land use designations have a significant impact on the overall transportation system and any alterations shall be completed with consideration to traffic impacts on the County road system and consistency with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). FINDING: ODOT proposed that the intersection upgrades (roundabouts) be included on the County's Highway Intersection portion of Table 5.331 as cost -constrained projects. The US 20 at Old Bend -Redmond Highway - Grade separation project under Table 5.332 was removed and added to Table 5.331. The project development process has covered each of the criteria mentioned above in 2.2d. The Board finds the roundabouts are consistent with this policy. Goal The transportation plan and facilities of Deschutes County shall be coordinated with the plans and facilities of incorporated cities within Deschutes County, adjacent counties, and the State of Oregon. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 17 of 24 Policy 3.2 Deschutes County shall coordinate local plans and land use decisions with state transportation plans, including the Oregon Transportation Plan, the Oregon Highway Plan and other modal plans. These plans provide ODOT policies and performance standards for State Highways within Deschutes County. These ODOT plans also provide the framework for access management on state facilities to protect the capacity and function of the highways. FINDING: The Board finds the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) does not have to be amended to include the intersection upgrades. Goal Establish a transportation system, supportive of a geographically distributed and diversified economic base, while also providing a safe, efficient network for residential mobility and tourism. Policy 4.4 Deschutes County shall consider roadway function, classification, and capacity as criteria for plan map amendments and zone changes. This shall assure that proposed land uses do not exceed the planned capacity of the transportation system. Policy 4.5 Roads in Deschutes County shall be located, designed and constructed to meet their planned function and provide space for motor vehicle travel and bike and pedestrian facilities where required. FINDING: The project development process has covered each of the criteria mentioned above in 4.4 and 4.5. The intersection upgrades meets the design and operational standards of ODOT's Highway Design Manual, Oregon Highway Plan, and Table A of Deschutes County's Road and Specification Standards under Deschutes County Code (DCC) 17.48.050. The Board finds the roundabouts are consistent with these policies. Goal 5 Maintain an access management system adequate to protect the quality and function of the arterial and collector street system. Policy 5.3 Wherever practical, access to state highways shall be provided via frontage roads, alternative local roads or other means, rather than direct access to the highway. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 18 of 24 FINDING: The Board finds intersection upgrades meet the access management requirements of the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) and Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 734 (Division 51). Policy 5.4 A non -traversable median on state highways shall be installed by ODOT when operational or safety issues warrant installation as set forth by Policy 3B. Medians in the OHP. Directional breaks in the median may be allowed as needed, provided traffic operations are still safe. FINDING: The roundabouts have splitter islands on the approaches, which essentially function as raised medians. The Board finds that the proposed splitter islands are consistent with this policy. Goal? Update as needed DCC Chapter 17.48, Design and Construction Specifications, to ensure all aspects of construction related to roads, pedestrian walkways and bike facilities occurring outside designated urban growth boundaries in Deschutes County are adequate to meet the needs of the traveling public. Policy 7.1 Any new or reconstructed rural roads shall be built to the standards set forth in DCC Chapter 17.48, Table A. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities shall be built to the standards set forth in DCC Chapter 17.48, Table B. FINDING: The plan amendment is to add the two roundabouts to the TSP. The project development process has covered each of the criteria mentioned above in 7.1. When construction occurs the bicycle and pedestrian facilities included with the intersection improvements meet the standards set forth in DCC Chapter 17.48, Tables A and B. The Board finds the roundabouts are consistent with this policy. Goal 10 Maintain the current arterial and collector system in the County and prevent degradation of the capacity of the system. Policy 10.2 Deschutes County shall continue to work with ODOT, the Cities of Bend, La Pine, Redmond, and Sisters, and neighboring counties to coordinate solutions to highway and non -highway road issues that cross over jurisdictional boundaries. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 19 of 24 FINDING: The project development process included participation from Deschutes County Board of Commissioners, the PC, and Planning and Road Department staff. Two public open houses were held for US 20 at Tumalo and will eventually be held for US20: Deschutes River Bridge - Robal Road once it is included within the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The proposed roundabouts have been coordinated with ODOT and Deschutes County as the preferred improvements at these intersections. The Board finds the roundabouts are consistent with this policy. Goal 12 Develop a plan of designated truck routes on County arterials Policy 12.1 Deschutes County shall designate that long -haul, through trucks, be limited to operating on Principal Arterial and Rural Arterial roads as designated in the County transportation network, except in emergency situations and when no reasonable alternative arterial road is available for access to commercial or industrial uses. Policy 12.2 Deschutes County shall support economic development by encouraging ODOT to prioritize modernization, preservation, and safety projects on highways designated as Freight Routes over non -Freight Routes. FINDING: U.S. 20 is designated both a Freight Route and an Expressway. The Board finds the roundabouts are consistent with these policies. Goal 15 Policy 15.2 Provide and maintain a safe, convenient and economical bicycle and pedestrian system that is integrated with other transportation systems. Policy 15.4 Coordinate on -road County bikeways with known existing and proposed State and City bikeways. Policy 15.5 County arterials and collectors may use shoulder bikeways or shared roadways. These bikeways shall be upgraded to bike lanes when highway reconstruction occurs and the traffic volumes warrant lanes. Policy 15.6 Deschutes County shall facilitate safe and direct bicycle and pedestrian crossings of arterial roads. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 20 of 24 FINDING: The plan amendment is to add roundabouts to the TSP. The project development process has covered each of the criteria mentioned above in 15.2, 15.4,15.5 and 15.6. When actual intersection upgrades begin they will include adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities along northbound and southbound sides of the intersections and coordination with Oregon State Parks Department regarding the routing of Three Bridges State Scenic Bikeway which passes through Tumalo. The Board finds the roundabouts are consistent with these policies. I US 20 Corridor Topic: US 20 as a Barrier in Tumalo Response: Residents of Tumalo, cyclists, pedestrians, and equestrians, as well as motorists have found the US 20 & Cook-OB Riley intersection to be problematic. ODOT in summer 2010 installed a raised median at US 20 & 7th-Bailey as a short-term improvement. The agency and County are in the late stages of selecting a long-term improvement to have a grade -separated crossing of US 20 at either OB Riley -Cook or 7th- Bailey. The County prefers OB Riley -Cook to preserve route integrity and minimize the turning movements at Fifth/Cook. Not all members of the community are accepting of the ODOT concept and would prefer a traffic signal or roundabout. Due to a lack of potential near, mid, and long-term funding that may be available to construct either the C-4 or 1-3 improvement projects, its is suggested that ODOT, Deschutes County, and Tumalo area stakeholders develop an interim solution which provides the necessary incremental system capacity designed in a safe and practical manner. Suggested improvements could include signalization, speed reduction, bicycle and pedestrian crossing improvements, and other similar treatments designed with consideration to the long term vision for the highway through Tumalo. All interim improvement concepts should consider both the needs of the highway user and the Tumalo community. Once a long-term preferred alternative is reached, ODOT and the County will pursue funding to construct the improvement. Of the two ODOT final long-term concepts, C-4 takes the County road over US 20 while 1-3 takes the County road under US 20. The County through the TSP public hearing process expressed a preference for 1-3. Additionally, the County recognizes the concerns of Tumalo residents regarding the way the long-term project could affect their community and requires that ODOT have an active dialogue in Tumalo after funding is programmed for this long-term project but well before they are designed or constructed. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 21 of 24 Prior to design, ODOT will hold a public meeting in Tumalo to explain the purpose, need, and timing of the project and to receive and consider the viewpoints of Tumalo area residents and how they might be best addressed in terms of project design and construction. FINDING: The text above appears on page 150 of the TSP. The proposed text to be added following the above bullet is shown below and underlined. After several public open houses, stakeholder committee meetings, and technical research, ODOT and the County now agree a roundabout is the preferred alternative in Tumalo, replacing 1-3 should appear underneath the current bulleted text above. "The intersection upgrade in Tumalo is the result of a multi -year project development process It involved a comprehensive review of other guidance documents influencing the planning area, an assessment of existing and projected future conditions along the project corridor, and a review of various alternatives that could resolve the identified issues, guided by an extensive public involvement process Public Open House meetings took place in January and May of this year while Stakeholder meetings took place in March, April, June and September of this year. ODOT and Deschutes County have partnered to develop the project to 30% design in order to establish the project footprint and begin the right of way acquisition process. Kittelson and Associates has been retained and will be developing the preliminary design." The Board approves the underlined additional language above and finds it consistent with the TSP. US 20 US 20 is the principal east -west route through Central Oregon, tying the Mid- and Upper Willamette Valley to the High Desert. The highway sees a fair amount of truck traffic and recreational traffic in both winter and summer. The majority of US 20 is two lanes with the majority of the passing lane sections located between Bend and Sisters, there are a few passing lanes between Sisters and the County Line. East of Bend, there are passing lanes tied to topography where the highway crosses Horse Ridge. The 2030 higher volumes will range from 11,900 by Tollgate to 19,200 in the Tumalo area to 15, 900 at the east edge of Bend. These are substantially higher than the existing (2009) volumes, but less than on US 9Z The 2030 volumes will be below ODOT's threshold for a raised median which under Oregon Highway Plan Policy 38 is 28,000 ADT. However, US 20 at the western edge of the County does have a history of weather -related crashes in Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 22 of 24 winter, so four -phased improvements will be needed for safety reasons. Policy 3B under Action Item 3B.3 calls for raised medians when the crash rate exceeds the statewide average for similar facilities. Planned improvements for US 20 include $31.9 million in additional travel lanes and $43.9 for intersection improvements, including overpasses, grade separated interchanges, and roundabouts. (The County recognizes ODOT has reversed its position while the TSP was being developed, and the agency now has qualms about roundabouts. The County acknowledges ODOT can choose a different form of intersection improvements, but the County will base its financial contribution on a rural roundabout. There are two projects proposed for US 20 that drew unfavorable comments from the public. The first is the passing lanes between Black Butte Ranch and Sisters and the second is the long-term improvement at Cook Avenue-OB Riley in Tumalo (see Chapter for a fuller discussion of the relevant issues). The County, ODOT, City of Sisters, and the public attempted to identify mutually agreeable "triggers' for the passing lanes during the public hearings. In the Bend area, the planned improvements are additional lanes from Providence Drive to Hamby Road and the intersection improvements at Old Bend -Redmond Highway, Hamby -Ward, and Powell Butte Highway. These are related to traffic increases on both US 20 and the connecting arterial or collector. For Old Bend Redmond, ODOT and the County will need to conduct a refinement plan to determine if the solution is a simple overpass or a grade -separated interchange. The crash history at this location is what is driving the improvement as drivers unsuccessfully attempt to cross the highway or turn onto the highway. The County is proposing roundabouts on US 20 at Hamby -Ward and the Powell Butte Highway (see Chapter Four for discussion of the issue). FINDING: The text cited above appears on page 166 of the TSP. The proposed text to be added to at the end of this section is shown below and underlined: "However, instead of a grade -separation at Old Bend -Redmond, ODOT and the County have agreed to a design concept of roundabouts on US 20 in Central Oregon based upon safety, cost, operational benefits, and treating rural highway intersections consistently. ODOT will hold public outreach meetings In The Board approves the underlined language above and finds it consistent with the TSP. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 23 of 24 Conclusion The Deschutes County Transportation System Plan (TSP) identifies policies and improvements that support the County's transportation system through the year 2030. The TSP accomplishes this through specific goals and policies. The proposed plan amendment to add roundabouts to the TSP at U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley in Tumalo and U.S. 20/01d Bend - Redmond Highway and amend the cited TSP tables and amend the proposed language are consistent with the applicable OARS, ORSs, the Comprehensive Plan, the Tumalo Community Plan, and the TSP. The plan amendment was processed in accordance with DCC 22.12, Legislative Changes. The Board finds the roundabouts and associated changes to Tables 5.3.T1 and 5.332 and TSP text are consistent with the relevant County plans, policies, and processes as well as the OHP and administrative rules. Exhibit F, Ord. 2020-008 (U.S. 20 roundabouts) Page 24 of 24 AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT For Board of Commissioners BOCC Wednesday Meeting of June 24, 2020 DATE: June 17, 2020 FROM: Peter Russell, Community Development, 541-383-6718 TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Second Reading: Ordinance No. 2020-008 to Amend the Deschutes County Transportation System Plan to 1) Add Roundabouts at U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley and U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Hwy to the TSP Map; 2) Amend TSP Tables 5.3.T1 and 5.332; and 3) Amend Text on Pages 150 and 166. RECOMMENDATION & ACTION REQUESTED: Hold second reading and sign Ord. 2020-008 BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS: ODOT submitted land use application File 247-19-000894-PA to amend the County's TSP as described above. The Planning Commission held public hearings on May 14 and 28, recommending unanimously at the latter that the Board approve the application as submitted. The Board held a public hearing on May 13, closed the record on May 20, and deliberated on June 3. The Board approved the plan amendment to add roundabouts at the U.S. 20 intersections described above. The Board held a first reading of Ord. 2020-008, which implements the land use approval, on June 10. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. ATTENDANCE: Peter Russell, CDD, Senior Transportation Planner MIMEMEMENESEM ►flit �917_1►11111►Ti DATE: June 17, 2020 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Peter Russell, Senior Transportation Planner RE: June 24 second reading and signature of Ordinance 2020-008 to amend the Deschutes County Transportation System Plan (TSP) to add roundabouts at U.S. 20/Cook-O.B. Riley and U.S. 20/Old Bend -Redmond Highway intersections; amend associated Tables 5.3.T1 and 5.332; and amend text (File 247-19-000894-PA). The Board held a public hearing on May 13, 2020, on an application by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to amend the Deschutes County TSP. The proposed plan amendment (File No. 247-19-000894-PA) would add roundabouts to the TSP map, revise the project list in the TSP, and update the TSP language regarding these two intersections. The Board hearing is footnoted below.' The Board closed the oral record at the end of the hearing, but left the written record open until 5 p.m. on May 20, and deliberated on June 3. The deliberations are footnoted below.z The Board unanimously approved the amendment and on June 10 met for consideration of signature and first reading of Board Ordinance 2020-008, which implements the Board's decision. The June 10 meeting is footnoted below.' On June 24 the Board will hold a second reading of the ordinance and sign. Attachments: Board Ordinance 2020-008 Exhibit A, Deschutes County TSP Map 1 The Board May 13 hearing was conducted by Zoom and the TSP amendment is Item #9 https•//deschutescountyor.igm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&I D=2246&Inline=True 2 The June 3 deliberations are below https•//deschutescountyor.igm2.com/Citizens/SplitView.aspx?Mode=Video&MeetinglD=2520&Format=Agenda 'The June 10 consideration and first reading is below: https•//deschutescountyor.igm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=2257&Inline=True 117 NW Lafayette Avenue, Bend, Oregon 97703 1 P.O. Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708-6005 1 (541) 388-6575 @ cdd@deschutes.org @ www.deschutes.org/cd Exhibit B, TSP Table 5.3.T1 and 5.3.T2 Exhibit C, New TSP text for pages 150 and 166 Exhibit D, Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5.12, Supplementary Section, Legislative History Exhibit E, Deschutes County Code Title 23.01 Exhibit F, Board findings Page 2 of 2 5 �3 Gk' N O 0- O n pm ,--Iu U I�1 W O 4 O � �CL 15, a _ V0) o t. =m a v�� aU V O V C V 0 as to N} o y cy- O � ._ O O} CL p 4- V V= v°'o 0)— Hu- >> a ._ o a�Q o �uu a� E Hy a a ° H'� O `� W'o H O O -0 > H � N O O O 0 0 too)O O 4) E V O y' Q V M r Q L Q Q 4) 4) V 4) Q N Q = Oh 0 a O E y t> i cr >` .0 V N ID 7EI oo L - i N Vr-% •- N i i Q O i U U N= O U.�� N OUP O 4- eo Vim° — 0 -Deea y O et = u y s p Nhee u O _ O O = Z .— .'' .I- ' a 0 Nee 0 a > H O >s o o �� 4) 3�•>= =}aCL0u E oNee v> H->I v > oo� 0s0o �oa�"' uu _Lod c N %- N Qi a a a L a L a y N as —} c 0 a N 0 > �c 0} o-t 4) U"- hem•- y,�ao H O O y O y O tA u Ni o 0K aaO NHi0■ .20 •a�o DE > •CO0 u 3 - Q N N L a= L N u N L s O s U Uul UsN OUsa E O C. CL .H E 4� N 2 .C: O C: C: ® •� O �O � � O O 4- 0 +- L U �- } Ln Ln -- Lo .� •3 �� o o E O v c-� U C- N o CN O � D 7 O O Q "' O L- >- O y- > 0 C: C- � O } '� O U 7C) X wU I O> O N70 I 3 O > I O D a.N I Ln r r R 2 6- 0 W) O N .� E O � } O L N E N C i o c E s _a U CL a Q � O O } O O 3 U vs 'Q H O ^V C O CL O to = U O O N O N 4 O a) U C� O > _ p > U pU ��o�� O V 0c°� ,�.. CL O. H �° i i CLL. a LuW O ® 00E 0 a U� U� •0 O U UL- 00� 0 �c 40 Lu V0a } 5� w 0 0 �v o Mae ®W �LU N o6 o- = 006 du H� �_O 0 �.0 oIf a®a— N� C L "+� •_ i LL9 C 0 0) �m N� •� cc'i � ? �VM •— Oc �— 0 w N} N �N �U 30� 0 o3LU 0�o cc �� �'�- o-LU t1l._ 0 � ~ 0-1 U=O a) 0 �in s _0O �= N O 0 3 N V p O s y ® U0 UJ 0Q0 03 p.`- cep pULUUf0 0pWI— ®Ou OEo�H� per rm i fop �Y £ t{}y v ars 7Hl117 Sp t r \ \TA, O 0 U N V V 7C) O i C O 0 O t0 N 0. N Ca p O •O I— `2 N I— cc/) (a 2 •� (u co ( cu W cu CD b_g 2 M, .J V m 0 L a� a� c 0 L 0 CL i E E 0 V A C6 O NI-Z C f ~ ® U E E CJ bi Wei A F U - O O O O O O 0 V) V) V) LO SJ o O O O L O 0 O 0 CN N .�. V) — v Mv V) Z z G [n Z to � 'g 0~ > ` p N N M co -%T a) N 0 N a) V) a7 U1 a) V) a) V) a) 0 a) V) a) fn a) V) () 0 00 0 .� L i a- '' 0-0-d = L 0-4 = i i Cl LL .0 a) a © O C� C3 0 u 0- 0 0 t': L iI t I zw � I V) O CU O O O O O O O V, 0 V) V5 Q CDC!} LO Cn Z Z z 0 z N CV N Cl) Cl) '7 e1' r (NJ Cl) "It a C fT c C Q5 t/) Q% u) Vr V) QY V) 4J Q1 0 V) 0 a) of C) Q) Vl N O 6i i 0-O `' ul 4 O E (J P, 4 a RS a Z a G a a t6 a ci L a G a R 4 ci a o v m O U d O L Q� O 2 D N Q O L- O D O V) 0 N U N > O 011q- C L L O AL, W O N N 0 V O nL, W 3 N t ^ N M O o L U N — � Q O 04 %wooO N Li obi O < O O O } _ — O N .� U— cn QO N � V d- oo N LO � L > Q r7 70 -1.- L4- -:D U 0 (D > 0 V) (n = a) 0 v u u V) LU -0 0 CL D E .0 0 C- U- 0 go 0 u E a u Z 0 0 70- .0 a) LO D u od -1.- 4— C: 0 U 0 LU %- .-f-- U 0 D a) 0 u 12 0 E 'u 0 :) 0 0 u a) =C)7 0 Co 0 u 6K, 0 o 0 L4- LL- c) b uj Lo cy) U SR c7) SR (OY) ry z Ui I I I m l I I � I I I E V) > Ce"7 —0 N N c p O LO 3 Ln � Qa .� X 0 X�w CT > O > o o 0 o 0 0 06 7C3 N �- p N ~ O U (10. Q N p a a iT a) E 0 O 0 0 D (T 00 -1.- 0 u D 0 C- u (1) 4) 0 u D 0 u 0 CL I-- 0 o1L 4- C: 0 C: D 4) u Q(%. O E U 0 h- 2 .2 rq C7 ro a) C, 7, 0 0 0 0 E E E E LO --A . A Ua to,. .'nU Ln 42 r-4 rf) lry 611 (1I (10 4- 41 V) 00 r� J) t4 1,4') Sri 0 1-1 ro 6 o6 4— m rq u m 41 00 c 0 t E ro 0 vi w V) (D co -C Gi Ol CA, C. "r-R Vf CL -b- 4) .O L CL L •L O U N O E O I O m r.1 ,- 06 O Q-0 O O C� .Q N Q Q N Q — o O E Q O Q O O Q Q H O U 0 N N U 0 N N N U t� Q V) CL QZD Q O �-� � V W •® c' a) ECL Q Q 3 > o o �- O��o Cl N N N O N N 0 = N O i N - -0N N U ULr� g CL _ Q Q W ®� O O O O V 0-0 O h a O O O O O O .O _ _ _ _ .O _ _ O _O _O _O � `� U O O N N to N N= V) c � c 0 1�