Loading...
2020-231-Minutes for Meeting May 18,2020 Recorded 7/10/2020c-o BCC OF COMMISSIONERS 1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon (541) 388-6570 10:00 AM Recorded in Deschutes County Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk CJ2020-231 Commissioners' Journal 07/10/2020 10:17:23 AM 2020-231 FOR RECORDING STAMP ONLY ��. `�•,az` � xs `�.� °s. {*', ,�3n � � Y i"w�. 5 � % 're i .'NHS 'er.� 4tr,.� BARNES & SAWYER ROOMS Virtual Meeting Platform Present were Commissioners Patti Adair, Anthony DeBone, and Phil Henderson. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator (present via Zoom conference call at 1 1:59 a.m,); David Doyle, County Counsel (present via Zoom conference call at 11:42 a.m.) Amy Heverly, Assistant County Counsel (present via Zoom conference call); and Sharon Keith, BOCC Executive Assistant. No identified representatives of the media were in attendance. Attendance was limited in response to Governor's orders. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Adair called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ACTION ITEMS: 1. Continued Discussion of COVID-19 Relief Grant Program County Administrator Anderson gave a brief report of the grant program. Internal Auditor David Givans and Scott Aycock, Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) were present via conference call and presented the proposed grant agreement which is available to provide emergency grants to small businesses and non -profits. BOCC MEETING MAY 18, 2020 PAGE 1 OF 5 The Board is supportive if there is a designated funding source from the County. County Administrator Anderson suggested the general fund or unallocated transient room tax could be the source for these emergency funds. The Board supported unallocated transient room tax reserves to be used as the funding source. The County has been requested to match $100,000 with COIC. The Board made recommendations for language changes to the request for proposals document. DEBONE: Move approval of designating $100,000 from the unallocated transient room tax as funding source for the COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance Match Fund HENDERSON: Second Discussion held on forming a review committee. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes HENDERSON: Yes ADAIR: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY 911 SERVICE DISTRICT 2. 911 Capital Alternatives Discussion 911 Operations Director Sara Crosswhite presented the Trott Report that has been received outlining an enhancement plan for long term radio system. Critical Impact Solutions Consultant, Will Mullins presented the executive summary and his recommendations to proceed. County Administrator Anderson explained there is an available capital budget that could be utilized to enhance radio coverage. This is an anticipated expense beginning in fiscal year 2022. This report will be presented at the 911 User Board meeting that is scheduled May 19. RECONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY BOCC MEETING MAY 18, 2020 PAGE 2 OF 5 3. Treasurer and Finance Report Chief Financial Officer Greg Munn was present via conference call and reported on Deschutes County treasury and investments. Countywide department summaries were reviewed for fiscal year to April 30, 2020. LUNCH RECESS: At the time of 12:07 p.m. the Board went into recess and reconvened the meeting at 1:02 p.m. OTHER ITEMS: Commissioner Henderson commented on his concerns with the terms of the agreement with Neighborlmpact for the Budget Inn shelter agreement for homeless individuals with COVID-19. Commissioner Henderson noted his concerns with language of the agreement. Deputy County Administrator Erik Kropp reported on the cost of liability insurance to cover property damage. County Counsel Doyle reported Neighborlmpact was reviewing the most current draft; Doyle will route the contract to the Commissioners for review additional review. • Commissioner Henderson commented on the COVID19 Executive Leadership Board meeting Friday afternoon. Commissioner Henderson asked the Board if they would consider a letter to the Governor regarding the use of personal protective equipment. Commissioner DeBone supports our legislative process and does not support a letter at this time until further data is compiled. Commissioner Adair supports a letter at this time to take a proactive stand for funding. Commissioner Henderson will draft a letter. • Commissioner Henderson commented on the Stillwater Crossing resolution for property tax exemption. The City of Bend has approved the development's requested tax deferral. The property is adjacent to Highway 97 on the south end of Bend. Commissioner DeBone would like information on traffic and transportation analysis relative to the development. BOCC MEETING MAY 18, 2020 PAGE 3 OF 5 COMMISSIONER UPDATES: • Commissioner DeBone attended the Association of Oregon Counties finance quarterly meeting on line last week. Leadership Bend had a Zoom meeting last week. He has an annual meeting for East Cascades Works on June 5. Commissioner DeBone is participating in the interview process for the OSU Extension Forester position. Commissioner DeBone is participating in an air quality monitoring program. • Commissioner Adair commented on the phase 1 reopening and the amount of citizens venturing out and encourages people to be mindful. judge in Baker County declared the Governor's emergency public health orders (including those regarding church attendance) as null and void due to procedural errors. Commissioner Adair feels that churches should be open if restaurants are open. Commissioner Henderson expressed the same concern. Commissioner Adair spoke of a letter received from the Catholic Diocese Bishop. Commissioner DeBone acknowledged that the Governor now allows Phase 1 counties have gatherings of 25 people; Phase 2 will allow even larger gatherings so our goal needs to be to proceed to Phase 2 as soon as possible. • Commissioner Adair is now the new chair of Central Oregon Area Commission on Transportation. She had a meeting with Nick Lelack regarding the Sisters Visioning plan. She met with Dr. Les Hudson and Nick Lelack regarding Planning Commission membership. She attended the Sisters EDCO meeting. Commissioner Henderson attended the airport commission meeting. He attended the Deschutes Collaborative Forest Project meeting last week and expressed concern of the forest projects, policy, and funding. Commissioner DeBone suggested a letter asking for the goals as the world is different since the formation. Commissioner DeBone recommended a discussion at a BOCC meeting to discuss the history and process of the projects. Commissioner Adair attended the conference call with the St. Charles Hospital Authority meeting. BOCC MEETING MAY 18, 2020 PAGE 4 OF 5 EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the time of 2:09 p.m. the Board went into Executive Session ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property Negotiations. The Board came out of Executive Session 2:23 p.m. to direct staff to proceed as discussed. At the time of 2:23 p.m. the Board went into Executive Session ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property Negotiations. The Board came out of Executive Session 2:48 p.m. At the time of 2:51 p.m. the Board went into Executive Session ORS 192.660 (2) (d) Labor Negotiations. The Board came out of Executive Session 3:56 p.m. At the time of 4:00 p.m. the Board went into Executive Session ORS 192.660 (2) (i) Employee Evaluation. The Board came out of Executive Session 5:05 p.m. Being no further items to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 5:05 p.m. DATED this Days _ 2020 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. TTI ADAIR, CHAIR 1 Atli • I U BOCC MEETING MAY 18, 2020 PAGE 5 OF 5 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703 (541) 388-6570 — www.deschutes.org BOCC MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 AM, MONDAY, MAY 18, 2020 Live Streamed Video - 1300 NW Wall Street - - Bend This meeting is open to the public, usually streamed live online and video recorded. To watch it online, visit www. deschutes. org/meetins. Pursuant to ORS 192.640, this agenda includes a list of the main topics that are anticipated to be considered or discussed. This notice does not limit the Board's ability to address other topics. Item start times are estimated and subject to change without notice. CALL TO ORDER MEETING FORMAT In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, Oregon Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order 20-16 directing government entities to utilize virtual meetings whenever possible and to take necessary measures to facilitate public participation in these virtual meetings. Beginning on May 4, 2020, meetings and hearings of the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners will be conducted in a virtual format. Attendance/Participation options include: Live Stream Video: Members of the public may still view the BOCC meetings/hearings in real time via the Public Meeting Portal at www.deschutes.org/meetings. Citizen Input: Citizen Input is invited in order to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on any meeting topic that is not on the current agenda. Citizen Input is provided by submitting an email to: citizen inputPdeschutes.org or by leaving a voice message at 541-385-1734. Citizen input received before the start of the meeting will be included in the meeting record. Zoom Meeting Information: Staff and citizens that are presenting agenda items to the Board for consideration or who are planning to testify in a scheduled public hearing may participate via Zoom meeting. The Zoom meeting id and password will be included in either the public hearing materials or through a meeting invite once your agenda item has been included on the agenda. Upon entering the Zoom meeting, you will automatically be placed on hold and in the waiting room. Once you are ready to Board of Commissioners BOCC Meeting Agenda Monday, May 18, 2020 Page 1 of 3 present your agenda item, you will be unmuted and placed in the spotlight for your presentation. If you are providing testimony during a hearing, you will be placed in the waiting room until the time of testimony, staff will announce your name and unmute your connection to be invited for testimony. Detailed instructions will be included in the public hearing materials and will be announced at the outset of the public hearing. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ACTION ITEMS 10:00 AM Continued Discussion of COVID-19 Relief Grant Program -Tom Anderson, County Administrator CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY 911 SERVICE DISTRICT 2. 10:30 AM 911 Capital Alternatives Discussion - Sara Crosswhite, 9-1-1 Operations Director RECONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY 3. 11:00 AM Treasurer and Finance Report -Greg Munn, Chief Financial Officer OTHER ITEMS These can be any items not included on the agenda that the Commissioners wish to discuss as part of the meeting, pursuant to ORS 192.640. COMMISSIONER UPDATES EXECUTIVE SESSION At any time during the meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(h), litigation, ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations, ORS 192.660(2)(b), personnel issues, or other executive session categories. Executive sessions are closed to the public, however, with few exceptions and under specific guidelines, are open to the media. Board of Commissioners BOCC Meeting Agenda Monday, May 18, 2020 Page 2 of 3 Executive Sessions under ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property, ORS 192.660 (2) (d) Labor Negotiations, and ORS 192.660 (2) (i) Employee Evaluation ADJOURN Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 617-474Z FUTURE MEETINGS: Additional meeting dates available at www.deschutes.or /g meetingcalendor Meeting dates and times are subject to change. If you have questions, please call (541) 388-6572. Board of Commissioners BOCC Meeting Agenda Monday, May 18, 2020 Page 3 of 3 UT ES c�G Y= Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/ AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT For Board of Commissioners BOCC Monday Meeting of May 18, 2020 DATE: May 15, 2020 FROM: Tom Anderson, Administrative Services, 541-388-6565 TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: Continued Discussion of COVID-19 Relief Grant Program 4'� t ��' � �.�[: y4 is�� ��'t2 t..i �.j .�r�tir ��� •�C E�tF 1 ea v't �... ..��{ Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) Response to: �1; �r`�?� F>► Business Oregon: State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP On behalf of community partners within Crook, Deschutes, and Jefferson counties, Oregon May 18, 2020 1. Amount of Award Requested and Source of Local Funds COIC is working with a group of partners across Central Oregon (Crook, Deschutes, and Jefferson Counties and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs) to combine existing and new small business grant funding to leverage additional state funds through this RFP. Eligible businesses within Crook, Deschutes, and Jefferson counties and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, excluding Bend, will be eligible to apply. COIC requests [$] to be matched 1:1 with [$] in secured local funding for a Central Oregon Small Business Assistance Grant Program. The sources of local match are as follows: Source of local match $ Amount of Geography covered Notes local match Deschutes County [$ TBD] La Pine, Redmond, Sisters, The City of Bend is submitting a and unincorporated areas separate application for that community. City of Madras $25,000 Inside Madras city limits Jefferson County $18,250 Jefferson County outside This is the amount of previously - Madras awarded funding that is consistent with this RFP. Warm Springs Community [$ TBD] Businesses within the Action Team Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Crook County $10,000 All of Crook County Unfortunately, the previous program is fully allocated and there is no way to gather the needed information. Subtotal Local Match: $53,250 + All of Crook, Deschutes Deschutes Co. and Jefferson counties contribution + with the exception of WSCATl Bend. Requested Business OR $53,250 + All of Crook, Deschutes, contribution Deschutes Co. and Jefferson counties contribution + with the exception of WSCAT Bend. The match funds described in the table above are only those which conform to this nrr. 1 Note: COIC has already helped start up small business grant programs across Central Oregon, including $25,000 each in La Pine and Sisters, $25,000 for clientele of the Latino Community Association, and $35,000 for businesses in Jefferson County outside the city of Madras. Prineville/Crook County and Madras/Madras Urban Renewal have also established and administered larger grant programs in those communities--$300,000 in the Madras area and—$200,000 in Prineville/Crook County. All of these efforts have established local task forces and COIC serves on each of them. Unfortunately, much of that local funding has already been allocated and there is no way to ensure that existing recipients will conform to the guidelines for this RFP, with the exception of the Jefferson County program, $18,250 of which can be made to conform to this program, and the Warm Springs Community Action Team, XX of which can be made to conform to this program. COIC Response to State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP 2. Description of Small Business Support Program Program Values The program values mirror those in the RFP: o Ensure that historically disadvantaged individuals that own businesses have access to these funds. o Ensure these funds are supporting the small businesses unable to access or apply for federal funds. o Ensure that these funds are reaching every corner of Oregon. o Ensure that these funds are keeping businesses operational Program Administration COIC will serve as the overall project manager and fiscal administrator for this program. COIC has been coordinating a regional team since late March focused on the development of small business grant and loan programs. This work has led a wide and deep network of regional organizations that will participate in this program. COIL will leverage existing relationships and task forces to develop the application, conduct outreach, and score and select successful applications. For funds awarded in Deschutes County, county staff will also serve on the existing task forces. In some cases COIC will provide lump sum payments via existing MOUs (with the La Pine, Madras, and Sisters Chambers of Commerce) for those partners to cut individual checks to successful business applicants, and in others COIC will cut the checks to businesses directly. Fllndinn PrinritiOc This program will make a one -time -only award to businesses that meet all of the following criteria: • Businesses that have been adversely affected economically in one of the following two categories: o Those for -profit and non-profit (limited to 501(c)(3) corporations) businesses that were prohibited from operation as directed by Executive Order 20-12. o Those eligible for -profit businesses that can demonstrate a one month decline in revenue greater than 50% in the month of March 2020 or April 2020 as compared against sales in the month ofJanuary2020 or February 2020. Those non-profit businesses (limited to 501tc1, 1 rornnrntlnnO that Pan r141mr%n Ctr=tn n rj v linn greater than 50% across the months of March 2020 and April 2020 as compared against `2v 7. "T C. Other communities have focused on for -profit the Sarre period of time in businesses to this point — what does the County want to do? a Businesses with 20 or fewer employees. ® Businesses that have been unable to access federal CARES Act funds including: o Small Business Administration's Paycheck Protection Program (PPP); o Economic Injury Disaster Loan Emergency Advance program (EIDL); or o Other federal programs to date for emergency pandemic funding. Under this program, COIC and our partners will not make grants to: Passive real estate holding companies and others holding passive investments. 2 COI: Response to State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP • Non-profit entities that do not have federal 501(c)(3) status. • Businesses that are delinquent on federal, state, or local taxes that were due before April 1, 2020. • Businesses that do not comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Businesses not headquartered and with principal operations in Oregon. • Business not registered to do business in Oregon (SOS Business Registry verification) if such registration is required. Program Design Successful businesses will be awarded an amount not greater than the following thresholds, based on documentation provided by the applicants: 0-10 employees o $2,500, or 0 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $5,000 11-20 employees o $5,000, or 0 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $10,000 [NOTE: THESE ARE SOMEWHAT LOWER THAN THE THRESHOLDS IN THE RFP. ALSO, WE ARE PROPOSING TO CAP AT 20 EMPLOYEES RATHER THAN 25. It will be very hard to hit the 50% sole proprietorship number if we go above this size limit - plus the larger the awards, the less businesses we can support.] COIC and our partners have established a firm limit of no less than 50% of the funds being deployed to sole proprietor businesses. 100% of the funds will be deployed to businesses located in rural communities as defined in the RFP. As already noted, this application rests on the deployment of a variety of existing and new local funding. ALL of the funding will conform to the above program guidelines. 3. Marketing Approach — Historically Disadvantaged Populations and Other Business Owners Historically -disadvantaged Populations: Initial Marketing Reflecting the values of this program, COIC will work with our network of existing partners to ensure that historically disadvantaged populations have full and equitable access. Our partners have already been working with the local business community to define needs and direct businesses to resources. Three business days before the formal grant announcement is made, we will work with our current partners to deliver a targeted email announcement and follow-up phone calls to businesses owned by women and racial and ethnic minorities as well as sole proprietor business owners. The initial outreach will include materials in both English and Spanish, and will include an offer of assistance in preparing applications. (We would prefer to conduct this outreach for a longer period of time than 3 business COIC Response to State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP days, but the requirement that the program be fully deployed by May 30 seemingly makes that impossible.) Our current partners include: • La Pine, Sunriver, Sisters, Redmond, Prineville -Crook County, and Madras Area Chambers of Commerce • Latino Community Association • Central Oregon Small Business Development Center • All Central Oregon cities and counties • Warm Springs Community Action Team • Additional members of the La Pine, Sisters, Prineville/Crook County, Redmond, and Madras/Jefferson County task forces. • EDCO local offices in Sisters, Redmond, and Prineville. We have noted that the FAQ for this RFP process states that Business Oregon will provide the names of additional organizations through which COIL and our partners may communicate the small grant program, and we look forward to working with these organizations. 4. Grant Announcement and Application Process Upon execution of the phase 1 targeted outreach, a second more global announcement will be made via Press Releases in each community as well as through the regular email lists of all project partners. This announcement will be made at least 2 business clays rnri-r to opening applications for the grant p ograr►l. All announcements wiii inciude the basic eligibility criteria as well as statements regarding geographic eligibility and target businesses. The application will be developed in Google Forms, in English and Spanish, and will include a minimum of the following basic information: • Name of company • Employer Identification Number (EIN) • Oregon Business Identification Number (BIN) • Business Owner(s) Social Security Number ® Aridrprs of rmmnnny • Industry/NAICS (if unknown, we can assign an industry code) m Legal business structure • # of employees as of February 29, 2020 Further, the application will request the following information: • Amount requested • A statement of how the business has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (general statement) 2 Note: the LCA has expressed concerns about some of the information required to be provided by businesses for this grant program. We will discuss this concern with LCA and see if there is a way to conduct outreach to members of their clientele that are less concerned about privacy issues. 4 r-nir Dec-v��v.ri. +.. C+..+....F ....-., .- r ...�. 1.coNvilac tu notc vi v1rgull a %JV iD-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP A brief statement on whether or not the business is currently planning to reopen, what the reopen plan is, and how the grant funds will be used to support reopening. And the following self -certifications and other information: • A self -certification that they have not received CARES Act PPP or SBA EIDL assistance • A self -certification that they were either: o Prohibited from operation as directed by Executive Order 20-12 (with a link to said Order); or o That they had a sales or revenue decrease of 50% or more in the month of March or April as compared to sales revenues of January or February 2020, or as compared against the same period in 2019. If a business uses this justification, we will either request financial statements demonstrating such, or will work with Business Oregon to determine the proper means of demonstrating this impact. Self -certification they are not subject to any of the ineligibility criteria. Self -certification that the business and its operations are, and will, remain compliant with all local, state and federal laws. Necessary business, financial and ownership information necessary to determine and verify eligibility. Individual local task forces may elect to ask additional information. 5. Grant Review and Award Process Grant applications will be reviewed and awarded by local teams, as per the table below. In all cases, COIC staff will also serve on the teams. COIC will work with each team to devise a scoring matrix that a) includes the guidelines of this program and b) any additional desired local review criteria. Applications from Businesses in: Will be reviewed by: Notes La Pine La Pine Task Force + Deschutes Already developed. COIC will County representative provide one check to the La Pine Chamber of Commerce for disbursement to successful La Pine -area businesses Sisters Sisters Task Force + Deschutes Already developed. COIC will County representative provide one check to the Sisters Chamber of Commerce for disbursement to successful Sisters -area businesses Redmond Redmond Task Force + Already developed. Check Deschutes County representative administration is TBD. Unincorporated Deschutes COIC staff+ Deschutes County Task force is to be developed. County representative COIC will cut individual checks to successful applicants. Crook County Prineville/Crook County Task Already developed. COIC will Force provide one check to the Prineville Chamber of Commerce for disbursement to successful COIC Response to State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP Prineville and Crook County businesses. Jefferson County, including Madras/Jefferson County Task Already developed. COIC will Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Force + Warm Springs provide one check each to the Community Action Team [Viarirac Chamber of Commerce representative and the WS CAT (tribal businesses) for disbursement to successful business applicants. Proposed Timeline - Pre -award: reach out to all partners — secure interest and match amounts (DONE) - Begin developing base application — under way - Date of award (TBD by Business Oregon) - Hold orientation conference call with all partners — award + 2 business days or less - Finalize application form on Google Forms in English and Spanish — award + 3 business days - Finalize scoring matrix for each local team. - Begin targeted outreach to historically disadvantaged populations and sole proprietor businesses — award + 3 business days for a period of 3 business days (award + 6 business days) - Global announcement of program (award + 7 business days) - Applications open — award + 9 business days or by May 30, whichever is sooner. If the Business OR announcement is too late to meet this May 30 target, COIC will shrink the other periods to nrhlol/o tho A,4/n/ 2n finr/vo4 - Applications close— application opening + 5 business days - Applications scored by local teams — application closing + 3 business days - Successful applicants announced; checks cut — application closing + 10 business days - Outcomes/evaluation data gathering and evaluation — ongoing and final report by July 15, 2020, 6. Allocations: As noted above, 100% of the funds used in this program will be provided to businesses in rural areas, as rural communities are defined by this RFP. Further, we will ensure that a minimum of 50% of the funds are provided t^, SOIe ,^,r/JP.rietor bUsiisesseS. 7. Admini$trativa Ta=M Overv:e:A - • Scott Aycock, Janel Ruehl, Michelle Williams - COIC • Note all the other local Task Force Members. • Audit/oversight measures (?- Scott Aycock, COIC Community and Economic Development Manager, will serve as the lead contact for this proposal: Scott Aycock, CED Manager scotta@coic.ort; 6 Response to State of Oregon CO iD-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP 541-390-4653 (cell) 334 NE Hawthorne Ave., Bend, OR 97701 8. Final Report to Business Oregon — by July 15, 2020 - Incomplete • Contents (see RFP 7 COIC Response to State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund RFP Notes - COIC Grant group Date: 5/12/20 Oregon is releasing an RFP for public entities (cities, counties, economic development districts, council of governments) that have or will develop a community business assistance program (grants) in response to the COVID-19 crisis and are able to meet the parameters of this program. Initial phase is $2.5M and have total funds of $10M in grant matching. • Grant funds for profit / non-profit businesses >50% decline in business o Profit: Those eligible for -profit businesses that can demonstrate a one month decline in revenue greater than 50% in the month of March 2020 or April 2020 as compared against sales in the month of January 2020 or February 2020. o Non-profit businesses: (limited to 501(c)(3) corporations) that can demonstrate a decline in revenue greater than 50% across the months of March 2020 and April 2020 as compared against the same period of time in 2019. <25 employees Unable to access monies from CARES, PPP, and EIDL. • Principal operations in Oregon Grants no loans. Amounts • 0-5 employees o $2,500, or • 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $5,000. • 6-10 employees o $5,000, or • 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $10,000. • 11-15 employees o $7,500, or 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $15,000. 16-20 employees o $10,000, or 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $20,000. • 20-25 employees o $12,500, or • 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $25,000. Proposals for this round of funding are due May 18, 2020 by 5:00 PM business ore • • State of Oregon COVED-19 Emergency Business Assistance Matching Fund Request for Proposals ANNOUNCEMENT The Oregon Legislature, in partnership with the Governor, allocated $5 million from the State General Fund, which will be combined with $5 million redirected from existing programs at the Oregon Business Development Department (Business Oregon), for the purpose of providing financial assistance to small businesses adversely affected by economic conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic that have not received federal emergency assistance under the federal CARES Act or other federal program for emergency pandemic funding. Many small businesses in Oregon face cash flow shortfalls due to the economic conditions arising from efforts to reduce the number and severity of COVID-19 infections. Some businesses have been closed by executive emergency orders, while others have voluntarily closed or reduced operations to address health and economic concerns. Many communities throughout Oregon are providing local assistance to small businesses, and this announcement provides up to a 1:1 match to augment these community -level assistance programs. To fill gaps not reached by other programs, these state funds are directed to adversely affected businesses with 25 or fewer employees, and only those that have been unable to receive federal CARES Act funding, including the Small Business Administration's Paycheck Protection Program, Economic Injury Disaster Loan Emergency Advance program, or other federal programs for emergency pandemic funding to date. Businesses may use the proceeds for any business related operating expenses, particularly to support businesses that were closed as they move into the first phase of statewide reopening. This announcement is for the first of three rounds of funding tied to this program, this round consists of $2,500,000, available up to a 1:1 match to funds in community programs to provide emergency economic assistance to local small businesses. Awards will be made to public entities (cities, counties, economic development districts, council of governments) that have or will develop a community business assistance program in response to the COVID-19 crisis and are able to meet the parameters of this program. Program awards made to public entities will be structured as forgivable loans. Forgiveness will be based upon a recipient's ability to meet the program values and priorities outlined below and in contract. Public entities will be required to make sub -awards from this program to eligible individual businesses as grants. Awards for this round of funds will be based on a community program's ability to achieve the parameters, values, and goals of the program. If you have such a program that meets the State's program parameters, please submit a funding proposal. Proposals for this round of funding are due Monday, May 18, 2020 by 5:00 PM. Program Values ■ Ensure that historically disadvantaged individuals that own businesses have access to these funds. ■ Ensure these funds are supporting the small businesses unable to access or apply for federal funds. • Ensure that these funds are reaching every corner of Oregon. ■ Ensure that these funds are keeping businesses operational. Eligible Applicants Public entities (cities, counties, economic development districts, council of governments) that have or will develop a local business assistance loan or grant fund and are able to meet the parameters of this program as described below. Priority will be given to those public entities that were not allocated direct funding through the CARES Act. Local Program Funding Priorities Local assistance programs are expected to make one -time -only awards to businesses as follows: ■ Businesses that have been adversely affected economically in one of the following two categories: o Those for -profit and non-profit (limited to 501(c)(3) corporations) businesses that were prohibited from operation as directed by Executive Order 20-12. o Those eligible for -profit businesses that can demonstrate a one month decline in revenue greater than 50% in the month of March 2020 or April 2020 as compared against sales in the month of January 2020 or February 2020. Those non-profit businesses (limited to 501(c)(3) corporations) that can demonstrate a decline in revenue greater than 50% across the months of March 2020 and April 2020 as compared against the same period of time in 2019. ■ Businesses with 25 or fewer employees. ■ Businesses that have been unable to access federal CARES Act funds including: o Small Business Administration's Paycheck Protection Program (PPP); o Economic Injury Disaster Loan Emergency Advance program (EIDL); or o Other federal programs to date for emergency pandemic funding. Ineligibility Factors • Passive real estate holding companies and others holding passive investments. ■ Non-profit entities that do not have federal 501(c)(3) status. ■ Businesses that are delinquent on federal, state or local taxes that were due before April 1, 2020. ■ Businesses that do not comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations. Businesses not headquartered and with principal operations in Oregon. ■ Businesses not registered to do business in Oregon (Secretary of State Business Registry verification) if such registration is required. Program Design Awards to eligible businesses will be made as a grant. The amount of the grant will be the greater of two figures based on an applicant's ability and desire to submit support documentation: the first based on the number of employees before the COVID-19 crisis (as of February 29, 2020); or the second based on the documented amount of fixed operating expenses for the 60 day period of January 1 through February 29, 2020: ■ 0-5 employees o $2,500, or 0 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $5,000. ■ 6-10 employees o $5,000, or 0 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $10,000. ■ 11-15 employees o $7,500, or 0 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $15,000. ■ 16-20 employees o $10,000, or 0 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $20,000. ■ 20-25 employees o $12,500, or 0 60-day fixed expenses up to a maximum of $25,000. Program Award Targets The State will make awards to various local assistance programs designed to achieve geographical delivery across the state, with a target of at least 60% of awards reaching those in rural areas outside of the largest urban growth areas (see Award Process below). The State has set a target of 50% of these funds to be awarded to sole proprietors, where possible, by the local assistance program. The State will encourage outreach to historically disadvantaged population groups. The funds must be rapidly deployed to meet immediate business needs and applicants will be required to fully deploy the proceeds within 45 days of receipt. Business Applications and Support Documentation ■ Businesses must: ■ Self -certify they have not received CARES Act PPP or SBA EIDL assistance as of the date of application. ■ Demonstrate: o That they were prohibited from operation as directed by Executive Order 20-12; or o That they had a sales or revenue decrease of 50% or more in the month of March or April 2020, as compared against the sales or revenues of January or February 2020, or as compared against the same period in 2019. ■ Demonstrate they are headquartered and with principal operations in Oregon. ■ Self -certify they are not subject to any of the ineligibility criteria. ■ Self -certify that the business and its operations are, and will, remain compliant with all local, state and federal laws. ■ Provide business, financial and ownership information necessary to determine and verify eligibility. Other program details and next steps Local entities administering COVID-19 business assistance programs (loan or grant programs, new or existing) may apply to receive an award under this announcement. If approved, the applicant will enter into a contract with Business Oregon in short order. During the contract process, Business Oregon will consult on the detailed operational steps proposed by the local assistance programs, and the basic reporting needed by the State. Program Access It is intended that these state funds are equally accessible to all Oreqonians, so a robust marketinq program that reaches out locally to businesses owned by members of historically disadvantaged population groups (Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and Women Owned Businesses) is a requirement of this program. Only those applicants that can demonstrate such a marketing program and fair access procedures will be considered for funding. Local community program awardees will be required to: ■ Have program marketing materials available in languages that are representative of the local population. ■ Develop a stepped marketing program that reaches out and markets to members of historically disadvantaged population groups in advance of marketing to the general public. ■ Deploy the awarded funds to eligible businesses within 45 days of the receipt of funds. ■ Demonstrate, for loan forgiveness, that all agreed Program Access activities as described in the application and agreed upon in contract have been fulfilled. Application Process Local assistance programs should submit a written Proposal that describes the following: ■ Amount of award requested to match new or existing local funds (state funds up to, but will not exceed, local funds). ■ Description of your established or proposed small business support program responding to the COVID-19 crisis. o For matching funds being requested for a new program, describe how the program will be operational no later than May 30, 2020, and how the local assistance program eligibility requirements comply with the requirements in this State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance announcement. o For matching funds for an established program, describe when the program was formed and how the local assistance program eligibility requirements comply with the requirements of the State of Oregon COVID-19 Emergency Business Assistance. o For either, describe amount and source(s) of capitalization, the eligible applicants, the type(s) of awards made, award ranges, number of awards, amount deployed to date, and the amount remaining to be deployed. ■ Describe marketing activities and outreach to encourage participation of businesses owned by members of historically disadvantaged populations groups in the applicant's jurisdiction(s). Describe any procedures to ensure equitable awards are made to those businesses owned by members of historically disadvantaged populations groups. (See Program Access above.) • Describe the plans to market the grant program, including partnerships and marketing strategies with chambers, business associations, Small Business Development Centers, etc. ■ Description of your grant/loan announcement and application process. ■ Description of your grant/loan review and award process. ■ Estimate geographic distribution of awards (list all municipalities and/or counties served): o The percent of allocation awarded to urban (cities with populations greater than 30,000) businesses, and o The percent of allocation awarded to rural (cities with populations of 30,000 or less, or unincorporated areas) businesses. ■ Estimate the percent of allocation awarded to sole proprietors. ■ Briefly describe the background of the executive in charge of the program, and description of any other key team members if desired, and description of any audit or oversight measures if desired. Provide contact information for a designated lead contact. There is no minimum or maximum page limit for Proposals or other format requirements, except that the Proposal must be delivered electronically in a Microsoft Office compatible file type, less than 20 megabytes. Proposals for this round of funding are due May 18, 2020 by 5:00 PM. Please deliver your Proposal by email to: Melisa Drugge, Regional Development Manager melisa.druage0oregon.gov (503) 508-3147 for any questions A GoToMeeting teleconference for questions and answers regarding this announcement will be held Monday, May 11 from 3:00-4:30 PM. From your computer, tablet or smartphone: httDs://alobal.gotomeeting.com/join/`­441110725 From dialing in with your phone:: +l (872)2240-3412 Access Code: 441-110-725 New to GoToMeeting? Get the app now and be ready when your first meeting starts: https:/J lg obal.gotomeeting.com/install/441110725 Award Process Business Oregon will coordinate an expeditious review process and may contact any proposer for further clarification or negotiation. Decisions will be made in the State's sole discretion, endeavoring to meet the objectives and targets described above and below: ■ No less than 50% of the awards to be made to Sole Proprietors. ■ No less than 60% of awards to be deployed in rural communities with population fewer than 30,000 per the last decennial census (2010) data including all areas outside of the following urban growth boundaries: o Albany • Bend o Corvallis Eugene/Springfield o Grants Pass o McMinnville o Medford o Portland Metro (City of Portland, Multnomah and Washington County and communities in Clackamas County with populations of 30,000 or more) o Salem/Keizer To the extent possible, evenly balanced allocations to the following regions: o Central Region • Crook, Deschutes, Hood, Jefferson, Sherman and Wasco County o Coastal Region • Clatsop, Coos, Curry, Lincoln and Tillamook County, Lane and Douglas County west of Coastal Range o Eastern Oregon Region • Baker, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Malheur, Morrow, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, and Wheeler County o Metro Region • Multnomah, Clackamas, and Washington County o Southern Oregon Region • Jackson, Josephine, Klamath and Lake County and Douglas County east of Coastal Range o Valley Region • Benton, Clackamas, Columbia, Linn, Marion, Polk and Yamhill County and Lane County east of the Coastal Range Grant fund deployment deadlines and reporting requirements A final report is due the sooner of: ■ 30 days from when the capital is deployed by the local assistance program to eligible businesses, or ■ July 15, 2020. Any proceeds not deployed by June 30, 2020 are to be repaid to Business Oregon on or before July 1, 2020, unless waived in writing by the department. In the final report, the local assistance program will be required to report program and recipient information on a form prescribed by Business Oregon, including but not limited to: ■ Number of applications received ■ Number of awards made o Awards as #, $ and % of allocation by voluntary reported demographic information o Award as #, $, and % of allocation by region o Award as #, $, and % of allocation by company size o Award as #, $ and % of allocation to sole proprietors ■ Sub recipient data o Name of company o Employer Identification Number (EIN) o Oregon Business Identification Number (BIN) o Business Owner(s) Social Security Number o Address of company o Industry/NAICS o Amount of award o Legal business structure o # of employees as of February 29, 2020 AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT For Board of Commissioners BOCC Monday Meeting of May 18, 2020 DATE: May 14, 2020 FROM: Sara Crosswhite, 9-1-1 Operations, 541-322-6111 TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: 911 Capital Alternatives Discussion %C0 R ITI CALTM PACT SOLUTIONS Long-term Coverage Enhancement Effort �-� E S May 01, 2020 CRITICAL(�IMPACT Deschutes County 911 Long-term LMR Coverage Enhancement Plan Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Coverage Evaluation Process 3. Enhancement Options 4. Recommended Priorities APPENDIX: Trott Coverage Evaluation Report I CRITICAL )MPACT 1.0 Executive Summary To establish a strategic long-term radio improvement initiative, DC911 conducted an audit of DAQ (Delivered Audio Quality) and BER (Bit Error Rate) testing data, as well as radio tickets captured over the past year. With that data, DC911 was able to identify areas of strong portable in -building coverage and areas that need enhancement. Through this evaluation, the need for potential enhancement options were identified. On November 25th 2019, DC911 entered into an agreement with Trott Communications to conduct an evaluation of the coverage provided by the existing DC911 sites in conjunction with a list of candidate sites. Trott evaluated 39 sites within the Deschutes County Jurisdictional area for coverage enhancement feasibility. The following were the key goals of engaging Trott to evaluate the County coverage options: • Feasibility of simulcasting more population dense areas of the County o Maximizing the simulcast area within the County improves the spectrum efficiency of the system as well as improves roaming issues between various subscriber manufacturers as was identified within the audit of the previous year's user tickets. • Identifying in -building coverage improvements within key population densities o This focus was in the cities of Bend and Redmond • Identifying improvement options for portable radios within the rural areas o This includes NW County and South County • Identifying complementary coverage to provide redundancy o DC911 recognizes that a loss of stand-alone sites, not part of the simulcast, could significantly impact operations. The radio propagation analysis provided by Trott, outlines the coverage evaluation methodology used as well as the baseline provided by the existing DC911 site infrastructure and the delta enhancement generated by select site additions. The Trott analysis is designed to be an additional data point for DC911 to utilize in cultivating a coverage enhancement plan. It does not include the complementary coverage provided through DC911's partnership with the State, nor does it account for the availability or access to the sites evaluated. The analysis was focused on DC911 sites only so that we would understand where our coverage baseline is without reliance on any partnerships. It is understood that we will achieve complementary coverage from the State sites which will produce actual coverage greater than the percentages represented here. CRITICAL (�)MPACT The following sections of this report will walk through the methodology used for the analysis as well as the coverage enhancement options and the recommended priorities as identified by Critical Impact Solutions. 2.0 Coverage Evaluation Process The Statement of Work (SoW) provided to Trott identified 3 primary goals for them to work toward: Increase reliable coverage to in -building portable radios within the City of Bend. Increase reliable coverage to in -building portable radios within the City of Redmond. Increase reliable coverage to outdoor portable radios within the entire geographic area of Deschutes County. To establish a baseline to design from, Trott took the data gathered through the BER testing conducted in 2019 to tune their propagation model for the existing coverage environment. With this information, Trott was able to produce a projected coverage percentage across geographic boundaries within the County, as provided by the existing DC911 sites only. This information is presented in Table 1. Existing Outbound Coverage Level Bend 15Db In -Building 85.3% Redmond 15Db In -Building 78.0% Portable Radio Outdoors 24.5% Mobile Radio 34.1 % TABLE 1 After evaluating multiple simulcast site clusters, Trott identified an optimal Simulcast Cell to maximize the bounded coverage across the County. This cluster is comprised of 13 sites, of which 5 are existing sites and the remaining 8 are potential candidates. The information is captured in Table 2 below: Awbrey Butte, Overturf Butte, St. Charles -Bend, Hoodoo Mountain, Cline Butte, Mount Bachelor Pine Marten, Henkle, Glacier Road, Bearwallow, Scale House, Lookout Mountain, Pine Mountain West, Hampton Outbound Coverage Level Bend 15Db In -Building 92.9% Redmond 15Db In -Building 93.7% CRITICAL(TMPACT Portable Radio Outdoors 78.7% Mobile Radio 89.0% TABLE 2 Each site added into the Simulcast Cell was analyzed based on the increase of coverage provided as well as the simulcast delay spread (SDS) that was created. The SDS was minimized to areas of minimal population density. The increase in coverage identified does not account for the impact of SDS in the percentages. Further design use of directional antennas and timing offset will minimize SDS impact. The increase in coverage over the existing sites was detailed in the Trott report and can be seen here in Table 3. Outdoor Portable Radio Coverage Increase Lookout Mountain +19.2% Pine Mountain West +19.2% Hampton Butte +14.4% Bearwal low +2.2% Henkle +4.2% Scale House Microwave Cell Site +0.3% Glacier Road +0.2% TABLE 3 3.0 Enhancement Options The Trott analysis laid out a recommended site cluster to maximize coverage percentages. This is a data point to be added into the overall consideration for setting an evolution plan for the agencies comprising DC911. Maximizing the user's effectiveness is the intent and coverage percentages only play a small factor in that effort. We must first take into consideration the level of effort associated with the location of coverage increase as well as the amount of coverage increase. Note that 4 of the sites proposed in Table 3, above, only provide approximately 7% land mass coverage over the County Boundary. We must also consider the complementary coverage gained through our partnership with the State. Evaluating the Candidate Sites proposed in the Trott analysis for site readiness or accessibility, DC911 conducted a preliminary review. Table 4 shows the findings. Candidate Site Readiness Lookout Mountain DC911 does not have any existing relationship with the site and would need to conduct a full site survey to determine feasibility. Pine Mountain Day Wireless owned site with good power, HVAC, and Tower. Discussion with Day Wireless will be required to identify feasibility CRITICAL(MPACT and cost for adding the P25 equipment to DC911's existing lease. Hampton Butte BLM owned land with existing communications site used by the power company. DC911 will need to add a tower and shelter to this space, assuming approved access lease. Bearwallow Day Wireless owned site with only solar power and 110' Rohn 45 tower. The site would need to be enhanced with commercial power to support the P25 Phase 2 radio equipment. Discussion with Day Wireless will be required to identify feasibility and cost for access. Henkle Fire Lookout site with no existing environmental systems. 60' Rohn 25 tower is present. A site survey to determine feasibility of environmental systems addition and status of the tower will be required. Scale House American Tower owned site with a 100' Microwave Cell Site monopole tower. The site has commercial power available. Discussion with ATC will be required to determine feasibility and cost for access. Glacier Road US Cellular owned site. DC911 will be required to provide a shelter at the site as well as a site inspection and engineering study. Discussion with US Cellular will be required to determine feasibility and cost for access. USFS Redmond Site USFS owned site with 99' tower and in - building communications room. Discussion with COIDC and USFS will be required to determine feasibility and cost for access. TABLE 4 The sites evaluated, range in ownership from partner owned sites to privately owned sites, some with tower and shelter availability to some with full greenfield build requirements. This makes estimating a cost difficult. An expectation of cost to add the required equipment and licensing for a partner site with availability on existing infrastructure will be around $450,000.00 unless existing equipment is able to be reused. For a full greenfield build, the cost could be in excess of $750,000.00. 4.0 Recommended Priorities CRITICALMPACT In identifying the recommended priorities for the Radio System enhancements, we must refer to the primary goals that DC911 wants to accomplish: • Feasibility of simulcasting larger areas of the County • Identifying in -building coverage improvements within key population densities • Identifying improvement options for portable radios within the rural areas • Identifying complementary coverage to provide redundancy Considering these goals and weighing the operational benefits with the potential costs, Critical Impact Solution provides the following recommendations with rough order of magnitude pricing for each option: Incorporate Cline Butte into the existing Bend Simulcast Cell. ($100,000.00) • This will minimize site roaming with portable radios as user's transverse between Bend and Redmond and areas toward Sisters where coverage converges between the Bend Simulcast Cell and Cline Butte. • This incorporation of a single simulcast cell will also create an increase of constructive interference which will improve in -building penetration. • This will also improve the spectral efficiency of the DC911 system. 2. Deploy a second site in Redmond. The USFS site at COIDC is a partner site with existing infrastructure which will minimize the cost of addition. ($250,000.00) • This will minimize the impact of a potential loss of Cline Butte. • The secondary northern site being added into the simulcast cell will provide increased in -building penetration for the City of Redmond. • The addition of this site will add coverage within the Airport terminal which is currently experiencing low reception. 3. Identify a multicast candidate site in NW County ($450,000.00) • The Trott analysis provided simulcasting options for NW County. Because of the SDS introduced in the area of converged signals on Hwy 20 between Sisters and Bend, the use of a multicast site is recommended. • The spectral efficiency gained by simulcast the Redmond sites will allow for frequency reuse in the NW County where coverage is required but densification is not. 4. Deploy Simulcast sites in South County ($1,000,000.00) • This will increase coverage in South County where La Pine is experiencing population growth • This will improve on -street coverage along cascade lakes HWY where seasonal traffic drives an increase of usage. As Deschutes County continues to expand the geographic footprint for additional residents migrating in, the long-term plan will need to remain fluid to account for changes in demand and focus. This plan should be used as a baseline to budget and CRITICAL )MPACT target improvements to maximize the effectiveness of the DC911 radio system and offering to the DC911 partners. 0 04TROTT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP 1303 West Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 300 Irving, TX 75038 Radio Propagation Analysis Deschutes County, Oregon March 20, 2020 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction......................................................... 2.0 Coverage Analysis Methodology ................... 3.0 Current System Coverage ................................ 4.0 Coverage Analysis Results .............................. 5.0 Summary.............................................................. APPENDIX - Coverage Maps n ........................................... 1 ........................................... 1 ........................................... 1 ........................................... 3 ........................................... 5 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION March 20, 2020 Trott Communications Group, Inc. ("Trott") was retained by Deschutes County, Oregon ("County") to assess the County's current coverage performance of its 800 MHz P25 trunked public safety radio communications system. The County currently employs a combination of six communication sites; Hoodoo Mountain, Cline Butte, Awbrey Butte, St. Charles Hospital — Bend, Overturf Butte, and Mt. Bachelor — Pine Marten. Three of these sites, Awbrey Butte, Overturf Butte, and St. Charles Hospital — Bend, are simulcast on the same frequencies to provide composite coverage to the City of Bend. The remaining three sites are multicast on differing frequencies to provide coverage to the City of Redmond and the remaining areas within the County. Finally, Trott was tasked to analyze the effects of simulcasting all sites within the County and implementing additional communication sites to achieve 95% In -Building portable radio coverage within the Cities of Bend and Redmond and to achieve 95% outdoor portable radio coverage county -wide. 2.0 COVERAGE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The following is a summary of the coverage analysis methodology. The resulting coverage maps are provided in the Appendix. SignalProTM propagation software package from EDX Wireless, Inc. was used by Trott to perform propagation studies and to generate the propagation (i.e. coverage) maps of the existing radio system and various potential site configurations for a system upgrade. SignalProTM provides a comprehensive suite of terrain -based propagation models and design tools. United States Geological Survey (USGS) I arc -second terrain data was acquired for the area and utilized in the modeling process to increase accuracy. Equipment and configuration data for the existing sites was provided by the County. Relevant modeling data for candidate site locations was also provided by the County. Trott Communications Group, Inc. 1 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report March 20, 2020 To further improve the accuracy of the coverage model, the County had collected coverage data from the existing City of Bend simulcast cell and from an additional non -County site. This actual signal propagation data provided by the County was then used for model validation and parameter calibration. Once calibrated and fine-tuned, the EDX propagation software was used to model the performance of both the existing systems and various hypothetical system configurations for the additional coverage options. All coverage presented herein is based upon the outbound (base -to -mobile) signal path. Outbound is typically the limiting path in the 800 MHz band due to available gain and signal-to-noise performance of the receiver antenna systems. Therefore, it is assumed that the outbound and inbound performance is generally balanced. Performance thresholds displayed on the coverage maps represent reliable radio coverage and were developed utilizing performance standards and methods published in TIA/EIA TSB-88. All thresholds are based upon the recommended public safety performance of DAQ 3.4 audio quality and 95% signal level reliability. All coverage maps include thresholds for mobile radios, outdoor portable radios, and portable radios inside of high -density buildings. On each map, DAQ 3.4 and 95% signal level reliability coverage for in -building portable radios is represented by areas shaded in yellow, outdoor portable radio coverage is represented by areas shaded in red and yellow, and mobile radio coverage is represented by areas shaded in red, yellow, and blue. The indoor coverage is modeled using a building attenuation margin of 15 dB to represent high -density buildings. This margin is presented globally and does not identify where buildings actually exist. Locations with light or medium density buildings, such as residential structures, will perform better than indicated. Likewise, higher density buildings with greater than 15 dB attenuation may perform worse than indicated. Site noise and interference vary considerably from site -to -site. For coverage mapping purposes, typical site noise was assumed. As noted in §3, simulcast interference (i.e. SDS) was also analyzed and provided with the coverage maps, see Appendix Exhibits 7-9. Trott Communications Group, Inc. 2 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report 3.0 CURRENT SYSTEM COVERAGE March 20, 2020 As noted in §1, the County currently employs a combination of six communication sites; Hoodoo Mountain, Cline Butte, Awbrey Butte, St. Charles Hospital — Bend, Overturf Butte, and Mt. Bachelor — Pine Marten. Three of these sites, Awbrey Butte, Overturf Butte, and St. Charles Hospital — Bend, are simulcast on the same frequencies to provide composite coverage to the City of Bend. The remaining three sites are multicast on differing frequencies to provide coverage to the City of Redmond and the remaining areas within the County. Appendix Exhibits 1 - 3 show the current coverage provided by these six sites. Exhibit 1 is a county -wide map, Exhibit 2 is a zoomed -in map showing coverage within the City of Bend, and Exhibit 3 is a zoomed -in map showing coverage to the Cities of Redmond and Sisters. The geographic percentage of the County and City coverages are presented in Table 1. Existing Outbound Coverage Level Bend 15dB In -Building 85.3% Redmond 15dB In -Building 78.0% Portable Radio Outdoors 24.5% Mobile Radio 34.1 % Table 1 As described in §1, the County has three primary coverage goals. These goals are to increase reliable coverage to in -building portable radios within the geographic areas of the Cities of Bend and Redmond and to increase reliable coverage to outdoor portable radios within the entire geographic area of Deschutes County. This updated County system would also be fully simulcast. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the effects of Simulcast Delay Spread (SDS) interference. The parameters for the existence of SDS are locations where two or more signals received at a point with 60 microsecond delay or greater and signal strengths within 12dB of each other. If the best server is 12dB or greater than any other site, the mobile (or portable) radio receiver will fully capture that signal, and other signals (from other sites) will not degrade audio performance or cause interfere. Trott Communications Group, Inc. I Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report March 20, 2020 While SDS was observed in the various simulcast configurations, Trott believes that it can be ignored due to its non -impact on the County's coverage goals. The predictions show SDS to mainly occur in areas of mobile only coverage, where the signal received from a distant high elevation site has significant delay. SDS was predicted to occur over 0.5% of the geographic area of the County, 0.02% of the geographic area of the City of Bend, and 0% of the geographic area of the City of Redmond. SDS cannot be eliminated but it can be moved by introducing transmission timing alterations to the various sites to adjust SDS to an area of low concern. Since the coverage goals of this study all involved portable radio coverage and the SDS only impacted mobile coverage, the presence of SDS while not ideal is of minimal impact. The County provided a list of candidate sites to be analyzed in this study along with available antenna heights. The list of existing and candidate sites is shown in Table 2. For each candidate site, Trott utilized a nominal 9 dB omnidirectional antenna with 3° of electrical downtilt. The electrical downtilt was employed to help reduce signal from traveling outside of the intended coverage area of a site and thus minimize the chances of SDS occurring. The transmitter output was set at 100 Watts; 5 dB of filter / combiner losses was added, and cable lengths were set at the antenna height plus 50 feet. Radio Site Name Tower Type Latitude Longitude Awbrey Butte USFS Tower Steel / 3 Leg 44-04-38.06 N 121-19-55.1 W St. Charles Hosp Bend Top of Penthouse - Parapet Antenna. 44-04-04.56 N 121-16-09.6 W Cline Butte Steel Guyed 44-15-30 N 121-17-51 W Mt. Bachelor Pine Marten Parapet wall- Above Roofline 43-59-26.4 N 121-41-12 W Hoodoo Steel / 4 Leg 44-24-07 N 121-52-56 W Overturf Butte Wood Telephone Pole 44-03-13 N 121-20-31 W 911 Center Self Supported Lattice 44-05-51.0 N 121-18-22.0 W Backup 911 Center/Bend Fire E Self Supported 44-04-03 N 121-14-33.5 W Black Butte Lookout Tower 44-23-59.6 N 121-38-05.7 W Wampus Butte Steel/ 4 Leg Self Supported 43-41-59.04 N 121-37-18.96 W Sugar Pine Butte Steel/ 4 Leg Self Supported 43-49-43.8 N 121-21-07.11 W Antelope Butte East Self Supported 43-48-42.0 N 120-52-27.6 W Five Mile Butte Verizon Bldg Steel / 4 Leg 44-21-04.26 N 121-41-28.68 W Gray Butte Steel / 3 Leg 44-25-00.66 N 121-06-04.02 W Henkle Rohn 25 non -guyed 44-20-08.0 N 121-29-09.0 W Pine Mountain West Steel / 3 Leg 43-47-28.63 N 120-56-52.12 W Powell But Steel Tower - Loaded. 44-11-51.3 N 120-58-40.7 W Hampton Butte Power Pole 43-46-25.5 N 120-16-54.1 W Trott Communications Group, Inc. 2 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report March 20, 2020 Five Mile Butte Bldg 2 Guyed Tower 44-21-04.26 N 121-41-28.68 W Mt. Bachelor NW Express Pole attached to roof of Ski Lift Shack. 43-59-03.7 N 1214141.4 W Long Butte Steel Tower 44-10-25.95 N 121-16-36.77 W Awbrey Butte SO Tower Steel / 3 Leg 44-04-38.70 N 121-19-55.02 W Bearwallow Rohn 25 Guyed 44-04-42.7 N 121-33-07.2 W Central Oregon Training and Education Facility (COTEF) Steel 44-01-27 N 121-07-43 W DCSO Jail None 44-06-02.15 N 121-18-21.3 W DCSO Lapine Substation Steel / 3 Leg 43-39-54.58 N 121-30-24.48 W DCS Old OSP Radio Tower 3 Legged Steel Tower. 44-05-57.4 N 121-18-21.9 W Finley Butte ?? 44-39-00 N 121-25-46 W Jackpine Ridge Steel Guyed 44-02-48.75 N 121-31-54.39 W Lookout Mountain Guyed Rohn Tower 43-48-07.8 N 121-41-46.7 W River Woods Water Tank Water Tank 43-58-44 N 121-21-53 W Scale House Microwave Cell Site (2) Steel Monopole with Cell Equip. 43-58-53 N 121-20-05 W Skyliners Water Tower Site Concrete / Steel Water Tower 44-03-11 N 121-23-37 W Springriver Butte Steel / 3 Leg 43-52-25.92 N 121-30-16.80 W St. Charles Hosp Redmond Top of Penthouse - Parapet Antenna. 44-17-20 N 121-10-10.35 W Deschutes County Fair & Expo Wooden Building 44-14-06.78 N 121-11-18.93 W Cinder Butte Wood Telephone Pole 44-19.1-90 N 121-10.26-71 W Glacier Road Steel tower - Self Supported 44-16-06.77 N 121-10-02.12 W Cinder Butte Site 2 Steel Mono -pole 44-19-19 N 1 121-10-24 W TABLE 2 4.0 COVERAGE ANALYSIS RESULTS The most improved coverage to the southern areas of the County required the addition of Lookout Mountain in the southwest, the addition of either Antelope Butte East or Pine Mountain West in the south-central area, and the addition of Hampton Butte in the southeast. This combination of three additional sites provides the best coverage to the southern parts of the County. Antelope Butte East provides better coverage than Pine Mountain West to the northeast of the two sites along Highway 20 and to the community of Brothers while Pine Mountain West to the southwest of both sites. See Appendix Exhibit 4. The most improved in -building portable radio coverage to the City of Bend required the additions of Bearwallow and Scale House Microwave Cell Site to the existing trio of Awbrey Butte, Overturf Butte, and St. Charles Hospital - Bend. If the County is limited to adding only one site to improve Trott Communications Group, Inc. 3 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report March 20, 2020 in -building portable radio coverage to the City of Bend, then the addition of Bearwallow or Jackpine Ridge best improve Bend's coverage while also increasing overall outdoor portable radio coverage County -wide. See Appendix Exhibit 5. The most improved in -building portable radio coverage to the City of Redmond required an additional site added immediately within the Redmond area as very little signal from any of the sites exterior to the City improved coverage within the City of Redmond. The Glacier Road site provided the most improvement and was selected for this exercise though St. Charles Hospital — Redmond or Deschutes County Fairgrounds would also work in this instance. See Appendix Exhibit 6. The most improved coverage to the northwest areas of the County and the City of Sisters was provided by the Henkle site. The Black Butte site provided more geographic coverage to the County but a majority of that coverage is to the west and southwest of the Black Butte site which is low population density and towards Hoodoo Mountain. See Appendix Exhibit 6. Appendix Exhibits 4 - 6 show the theoretically improved coverage provided by the candidate sites discussed above. Exhibit 4 is a county -wide map, Exhibit 5 is a zoomed -in map showing coverage within the City of Bend, and Exhibit 6 is a zoomed -in map showing coverage to the Cities of Redmond and Sisters. The geographic percentage of the County and City coverages are presented in Table 3. Awbrey Butte, Overturf Butte, St. Charles -Bend, Hoodoo Mountain, Cline Butte, Mount Bachelor Pine Marten, Henkle, Glacier Road, Bearwallow, Scale House, Lookout Mountain, Pine Mountain West, Hampton Outbound Coverage Level Bend 15dB In -Building 92.9% Redmond 15dB In -Building 93.7% Portable Radio Outdoors 78.7% Mobile Radio 89.0% 1II\.1QDWI Trott Communications Group, Inc. 4 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report 5.0 SUMMARY March 20, 2020 Terrain and the County's asymmetrical geographic shape provide challenges to maximizing coverage while minimizing communication site counts. The predicted coverage maps in Appendix Exhibits 4-6 provide the County a visual guide of the coverage provided by each of the candidate sites and can assign priorities to the additions of each candidate site if a phased approach of site additions is required. Trott also analyzed the incremental County -wide geographic coverage increase provided to outdoor portable radios by each of the candidate sites. Table 4 shows these increases. Outdoor Portable Radio Coverage Increase Lookout Mountain +19.2% Pine Mountain West +19.2% Hampton Butte +14.4% Bearwallow +2.2% Henkle +4.2% Scale House Microwave Cell Site +0.3% Glacier Road +0.2% TABLE 4 As can be seen from the propagation maps and from Table 4, Lookout Mountain and Pine Mountain West best boost outdoor portable radio coverage county -wide. Lookout Mountain has the added benefit of providing coverage to the Cities of Sunriver and La Pine. Henkle's benefit, while not significant, does fill in the coverage gaps to the north-northwest of the County and to the City of Sisters. Bearwallow, Glacier Road, and Scale House are included to boost in -building coverage to their respective cities but are included in Table 4 for comparison purposes. One final observation noted by Trott during this study was the seemingly minimal coverage to the County by the existing sites of Hoodoo Mountain and Mount Bachelor Pine Marten. Trott ran coverage of all the sites included in Table 3 but removed these two sites. The resultant coverage percentages provided by this configuration are presented in Table 5 for informational purposes. Trott Communications Group, Inc. 5 Deschutes County, Oregon Coverage Predictions Report March 20, 2020 Removal of Mount Bachelor Pine Marten and Hoodoo Mountain Outbound Coverage Level Bend 15dB In -Building 92.9% Redmond 15dB In -Building 93.7% Portable Radio Outdoors 76.1% Mobile Radio 86.5% TABLE 5 It should be noted that the results and implied recommendations presented herein are based solely upon the propagation analysis performed. There may be other factors or considerations including site availability, priority coverage areas, etc. Additional analysis may be required to incorporate these factors. Trott Communications Group, Inc. APPENDIX Exhibit 1 — Existing 800 MHz Deschutes County Coverage Exhibit 2 — Existing 800 MHz City of Bend Coverage Exhibit 3 — Existing 800 MHz Cities of Redmond and Sisters Coverage Exhibit 4 — Supplemented 800 MHz Deschutes County Coverage Exhibit 5 — Supplemented 800 MHz City of Bend Coverage Exhibit 6 — Supplemented 800 MHz Cities of Redmond and Sisters Coverage Exhibit 7 — Supplemented 800 MHz Deschutes County SDS Exhibit 8 — Supplemented 800 MHz City of Bend SDS Exhibit 9 — Supplemented 800 MHz Cities of Redmond and Sisters SDS H m pia n doU m o � gay 3 v 3 � muV mm w U o N rn 'O, o Doa N0 d y mm 'Nm 3w,3dd� L W a` t c«Ec m coi �co in o aPrnoo ' �«coi w c n v nXQX o, pKS c a d U _ O n • E S N N L O m C b Ia 4 `'rt`• Pv'we✓y pOp � lit {! !2f /! Eat fE Ewa 2 |, \ \ OKI ;$ 2 ! kaak�/d k § ■�� ! m RI o 8M EOM q E .6 0 89 L) E CIL 4. 41 m v3 aka ra' a�O C oEdE C chi 0 w a E 5 as 606 Oo 2 N m y M m 0.6 t No �e E E 12 3 �a o� 000O O moo �co ri Q oo v XX •y r Y z W v h a�•7. y f r f ' � pad ;a •, i { p i i fS l; A Y ,L'f z� 6 � r 4 ..f n I� 4 I � m N N.r.N N L aC e r a m goy 3 c 0 w � a 9ua p U mm oo �Fc j$ E E 2 o moon 22 N a — o�'Q 03 0000 ��a O �rno� �cn yxa m mg2 r Ll a 5 m o- g E E S 0 m � T y C w` to 6 R 0 a. O 7 N oHQ Cc) N N V 66 EM X ri v o.Qa r C U N A m 6 X W E e v ow >> g~4 N o oo �co E ri v Sx¢x�' N pK= UoUo N N a 0 N l y w o' = 3 � m � c' � m m O e � m COTES CO o Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/ AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT For Board of Commissioners BOCC Monday Meeting of May 18, 2020 DATE: May 14, 2020 FROM: Greg Munn, Finance, 541-388-6559 TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: Treasurer and Finance Report MEMORANDUM DATE: May 20, 2020 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Greg Munn, Acting County Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Treasury and Finance Report Following is the unaudited monthly finance report for fiscal year to date April 30, 2020. Treasury and Investments • The portfolio balance at the end of April was $229M, an increase of $3.5 million from last month but an increase of $28M (14%) from a year ago. • Net investment income for the month is $332,533, $23,384 less than last month and $70,342 less than April 2019. While the year to date net interest income is 6% more than the prior year, this difference is expected to narrow as the average portfolio return continues to decline (9% last month and 13% and 17% the prior months). • All portfolio category balances are within limits with the exception of corporate notes and LGIP. Corporates are at 25.6% of the portfolio (on a 25% policy) but down from 26.6% last month and the LGIP balance is $52.7M on $50.4M limit. The PERS deposit and tax payments in May will reduce the LGIP under the limit but will cause the ratio of corporates to increase to approximately 27% of the portfolio. We will work on walking back the corporate percentage to within policy limits as new investments are purchased. • Average portfolio yield continues to decline. Yield average for the month is 2.01% which is down from last month's 2.06% reflecting lower return opportunities in the securities market. • The Local Government Investment Pool rate was reduced from 2.00%to 1.75% on April 2. The rate was further reduced to 1.3% on May 14. • The weighted average time to maturity is at 0.7 years which reflects continued investments in short term options due to the lack of longer term yield opportunities. Portfollo Breakdown: Par Value by Investment Type Invesbittient Income ' Municipal Debt $ 14,730,0D0 6.4% Apr-20 Y-T-D Corporate Notes 58,590,000 26.6% Total Investment Income 350,035 3,892,541 Time Certificates - 0.0% Less Fee: 5% of Invest. Income (17,502) 194,627 U. S. Treasuries 14,000,000 6.1% Investment Income - Net 332,633 3,697,914 Federal Agencies 78,465,000 34.3% LGIP 52,742,697 23.0% Prior Year Comparison Apr-19 402,876 3,479,727 First Interstate Bands 10,505,486 4.6% Total Investments $ 229,033,183 100.0% Category Maximums: Yield Pementa es Total Portfolio: By Investment T s U.S. Treasuries 100% Current Month Prfor Month First Interstate LGIP ($50,400,000) 100% FIB/ LGIP 1.75% Banc Municipal Debt Federal Agencies 100% Investments 2.17% 4.6% 6.4% I Banker's Acceptances 26% Average 2.01% Time Certificates 60% Municipal Debt 26% Benchmarks=1.7 Corporate Notes 25.6%LGIP Co orate Debt 26% 24 Month Trees. Rato Wel hted Ave Matu 36 Month Treasu Max 3.64 Years 0.88 Term Mlnknum Actual Time 0 to 30 Days 10% 31.6% Certificates Under 1 Year 26% $2.1% 0.0 % Under 5 Years 100% 100.0% Other Policy Actual Federal u. s. T easu es Corp Issuer 6% 4.4% Agencies 6.1% 34.3% Callable 25% 17.0% Credit W/A AA2 AA1 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 300, 000, 000 250, 000, 000 200,000,000 150, 000, 000 100, 000, 000 50,000,000 24 Month Historic Investment Returns May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr -County Rate 2 Year Treasury Rate Corporate Bond Rate =-- LGIP Rate m own a o O m r�o r`c o. G a�i m aai o v v m a d ,n O z p d d ✓i p d d in O z p d Deschutes County Investments Purchases made in April 2019 Portfolio Management Purchases made in April 2020 Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2020 Purchase Maturity Days To Ratings Coupon Par Market Book Inv #. " Inv Typ ` CUSIP !. ' Security ' • Broke ' Date - ` Date "i Maturi_'_Mood SBPIFit ` Raq.-, YTM 3I ` Value Value -;.'.. Value " 10688 MCI 037833BE9 Apple Inc CASTLE 1/15/2019 5/6/2020 5 Aal AA+ 2.2046 2.40792 2,000,000 1,999,980 2,000,048 10746 TRC 912833KZ2 U.S. Treasury CASTLE 1/24/2020 5/15/2020 14 Aaa AA+ 1.5643 1.57183 4,000,000 3,999,880 3,997,600 10597 FAC 3134GBNK4 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp CASTLE 7/13/2017 5/29/2020 28 Aaa AA+ 1.625 1.67124 3,000,000 3,003,330 3,000,000 10664 MUN 736688LD2 Portland Community College Pi 11/27/2018 6/1/2020 31 Aal AA+ 3.126 3.126 515,000 615,834 515,000 10690 MCI 740189AL9 Precision Castparts Corp CASTLE 2/19/2019 6/15/2020 45 A2 AA- 2.25 2.80011 1,000,000 1,000,470 999,343 10479 MUN 686053DH9 Oregon School Boards Assoc DA DAV 11/2/2015 6/30/2020 60 Aa2 AA 5.373 2.05005 875,000 880,661 879,522 10523 MUN 686053DH9 Oregon School Boards Assoc CASTLE 6/24/2016 6/30/2020 60 Aa2 AA 5.373 1.57009 500,000 503,235 503,009 10580 ACB 686053CK3 Oregon School Boards Assoc CASTLE 3/15/2017 6/30/2020 60 Aa2 A+ 2.0626 2.14874 1,000,000 998,020 996,609 10599 MUN 569203MA7 Salem-Keizer School District CASTLE 7/26/2017 6/30/2020 60 Aa2 2.107 1.77835 2,310,000 2,313,881 2,311,200 10715 AFD 76116FAD9 RFSCP STRIP PRIN MORETN 10/3/2019 7/15/2020 75 Aaa 1.8011 1.85283 3,000,000 2,997,720 2,957,075 10572 MCI 94974BGM6 Wells Fargo Corporate Note Pi 1/19/2017 7/22/2020 82 A2 A- 2.6 2.35002 1,000,000 1,003,480 1,000,537 10691 MCI 94974BGM6 Wells Fargo Corporate Note CASTLE 2/22/2019 7/22/2020 82 A2 A- 2.6 2.9402 1,000,000 1,003,480 999,254 10676 MCI 90331 HNW9 U S Bank - Corp Note CASTLE 12/18/2018 7/24/2020 84 Al AA- 2.0509 2.6509 1,500,000 1,498,965 1,499,487 10680 FAC 3130A5Z77 Federal Home Loan Bank MORETN 12/21/2018 7/29/2020 89 Aaa AA+ 1.83 2.69091 2,000,000 2,006,680 1,995,905 10717 TRC 912803AU7 U.S. Treasury CASTLE 10/18/2019 8/15/2020 106 Aaa - AA+ 1.6379 1.68377 4,000,000 3,999,000 3,945,040 10742 MCI 89236TFK6 Toyota Mtr Cred - Corp N CASTLE 12/17/2019 8/21/2020 112 Aa3 AA- 2.0446 1.92219 3,000,000 2,992,440 3,001,109 10656 TRC 9128284Y3 U.S. Treasury MORETN 9/28/2018 8/31/2020 122 Aaa AA+ 2.625 2.81769 2,000,000 2,016,720 1,998,753 10633 MCI 053015AD5 AUTOMATIC DATA CASTLE 2/26/2018 9/16/2020 137 Aa3 AA 2.25 2.57022 2,710,000 2,722,358 2,706,890 10653 TRC 9128281-65 U.S. Treasury CASTLE 9/17/2018 9/30/2020 152 Aaa AA+ 1.375 2.76127 2,000,000 2,010,780 1,988,947 10573 MUN 940093R25 Washington Univ Higher Ed Pi 1/19/2017 10/1/2020 153 Aa3 A+ 5.93 1.97016 400,000 407,488 406,333 10629 MCI 45905U7J7 International Bonds for Recons CASTLE 2/9/2018 10/5/2020 157 Aaa AAA 2 2.47077 2,000,000 2,016,240 1,994,716 10659 MCI 45905U7J7 International Bonds for Recons CASTLE 10/26/2018 10/5/2020 157 Aaa AAA 2 3.07153 820,000 826,248 816,089 10703 MCI 45905U7J7 International Bonds for Recons CASTLE 6/26/2019 10/5/2020 157 Aaa AAA 2 1.99991 750,000 755,716 750,000 10657 AFD 76116FAE7 RFSCP STRIP PRIN CASTLE 10/4/2018 10/15/2020 167 Aaa 2.764 2.95083 2,445,000 2,441,406 2,413,650 10714 MCI 46625HHU7 JPMorgan Chase - Corporate N CASTLE 9/20/2019 10/15/2020 167 A2 A- 4.25 2.05949 3,000,000 3,043,380 3,029,443 10747 AFD 76116FAE7 RFSCP STRIP PRIN CASTLE 1/29/2020 10/15/2020 167 Aaa 1.6269 1.68812 5,000,000 4,992,650 4,962,264 10548 MUN 492244DV7 Kern Community College CASTLE 11/15/2016 11/1/2020 184 AA- 2.893 1,80006 500,000 503,990 502,626 10689 MUN 544587C30 LOS ANGELES MUNI IMP CASTLE 2/11/2019 11/1/2020 184 AA- 3.146 2.87227 2,310,000 2,325,154 2,313,045 10617 FAC 3134GBX56 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp CASTLE 12/13/2017 11/24/2020 207 Aaa AA+ 2.25 2.17233 3,000,000 3,033,390 3,000,000 10719 MCI 06051GEE5 Bank of America Corp CASTLE 10/22/2019 1/5/2021 249 A2 A- 5.875 1.8832 2,000,000 2,062,960 2,053,218 10758 MCI 89233P4S2 Toyota Mir Cred - Corp N Pi 3/25/2020 1/11/2021 255 Aa AA 4.25 2.79599 2,000,000 2,039,020 2,019,773 10745 MCI 94988J5M5 Wells Fargo Corporate Note CASTLE 1/9/2020 1/15/2021 259 Aa2 A+ 2.1413 1.9249 3,000,000 2,994,030 3,005,222 10725 MUN 73209MAC1 POMONA CALIF REDEV AGY Pi 11/22/2019 2/1/2021 276 A+ 3.406 1.80021 1,300,000 1,309,971 1,315,406 10735 MCI 90331 HPA5 US Bancorp Pi 12/6/2019 2/4/2021 279 Al AA- 3 1.85045 2,000,000 2,025,600 2,017,151 10722 FAC 880591 EL2 Tennessee Valley Authority CASTLE 11/5/2019 2/15/2021 290 Aaa AA+ 3.875 1.64993 2,000,000 2,053,840 2,034,674 10739 TRC 912833LC2 U.S. Treasury CASTLE 12/11/2019 2/15/2021 290 Aaa AA+ 1.6476 1.69748 3,000,000 2,994,780 2,940,690 10740 TRC 912833LC2 U.S. Treasury CASTLE 12/13/2019 2/15/2021 290 Aaa AA+ 1.6476 1.69757 2,000,000 1,996,520 1,960,640 10687 VR2 89236TEV3 Toyota MtrCred- Corp N CASTLE 1/9/2019 4/13/2021 347 Aa3 AA- 1.5914 2.51526 2,000,000 1,989,320 1,994,816 10702 VR2 06051GFV6 Bank of America Corp CASTLE 5/31/2019 4/19/2021 353 Aaa A- 4.0115 3.53654 1,050,000 1,055,576 1,061,259 10706 MUN 801577NR4 SANTA CLARA CNTY CALIF FING .CASTLE 7/2/2019 5/1/2021 365 AA+ 2.05 2.26338 1,095,000 1,101,482 1,094,821 10700 MCI 06051GEH8 Bank of America Corp CASTLE 5/9/2019 5/13/2021 377 A2 A- 5 2.70027 1,560,000 1,622,431 1,595,845 10757 MCI 09247XAF14 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp CASTLE 3/25/2020 5/24/2021 388 Aa3 AA- 4.25 2.65767 2,000,000 2,075,940 2,033,090 10741 TRC 9128286V7 U.S. Treasury CASTLE 12/13/2019 5/31/2021 395 Aaa AA+ 2.125 1.70172 5,000,000 5,106,250 5,022,496 10728 MCI 46625HRT9 JPMorgan Chase - Corporate N CASTLE 11/29/2019 6/7/2021 402 A2 A- 2.400 1.920 3,000,000 3,034,800 3,014,698 10738 MCI 46625HRT9 JPMorgan Chase - Corporate N DA DAV 12/10/2019 6/7/2021 402 A2 A- 2.4 1.95567 2,000,000 2,023,200 2,009,687 10667 MCI 695114CM8 Pacific Corp CASTLE 11/29/2018 6/15/2021 410 Al A+ 3.85 3.35022 1,170,000 1,199,952 1,176,234 10672 MCI 695114CM8 Pacific Corp CASTLE 12/6/2018 6/15/2021 410 Al A+ 3.85 3.35091 830,000 851,248 834,419 10692 MCI 695114CM8 Pacific Corp CASTLE 2/22/2019 6/15/2021 410 Al A+ 3.85 2.85033 2,000,000 2,051,200 2,019,303 10708 FAC 3133EKVC7 Federal Farm Credit Bank CASTLE 7/29/2019 7/19/2021 444 Aaa AA+ 1.875 1.87488 3,000,000 3,056,700 3,000,000 10721 TRC 91282871`1 U.S. Treasury CASTLE 10/31/2019 7/31/2021 456 Aaa AA+ 1.75 1.63127 6,000,000 5,098,850 5,007,248 10705 MUN 797398DK7 SAN DIEGO CN Y CALIF PENSIOICASTLE 7/1/2019 8/15/2021 471 AA2 AAA 5.835 2.00045 2,000,000 2,113,920 2,096,274 10737 FAC 3130A94N8 Federal Home Loan Bank CASTLE 12/9/2019 8/25/2021 481 Aaa AA+ 1.7 1.71436 5,000,000 5,004,100 4,999,038 10696 ' AFD 88059E4M3'Tennessee Valley Authority CASTLE 4/18/2019 ` 9/15/2021 502 Aaa AA+ 2.3733 2.53553 1,020,000 1,004,731 ` 986,243 10648 MCI 45905UC36 International Bonds for Recons CASTLE 7/16/2018 9/28/2021 515 Aaa AAA 2 2.96688 2,000,000 1,941,400 1,974,210 10731 MCI 94988J5TO Wells Fargo Corporate Note CASTLE 12/5/2019 10/22/2021 539 Aa2 A+ 3.625 1.94977 2,000,000 2,066,760 2,048,268 10724 FAC 3130AFUYO Federal Home Loan Bank CASTLE 11/8/2019 11/19/2021 567 Aaa AA+ 1.625 1.71093 3,000,000 3,062,730 2,996,084 10744 FAC 3130AHSR5 Federal Home Loan Bank CASTLE 12/20/2019 12/20/2021 598 Aaa AA+ 1.625 1.68014 3,000,000 3,066,870 2,997,350 10732 MCI 46625WD3 JPMorgan Chase - Corporate N PJ 12/6/2019 44585 633 A2 A- 4.5 2.01005 2,000,000 2.111,400 2,083.910 10654 MCI 695114CPI Pacific Corp CASTLE 9/25/2018 2/1/2022 641 Al A+ 2.95 3.32016 700,000 722,568 695,733 10726 FAC 3133EKCYO Federal Farm Credit Bank CASTLE 11/21/2019 3/14/2022 682 Aaa AA+ 1.95 1.84902 5,000,000 5,005,660 5,007,979 10730 FAC 3133EKCYO Federal Farm Credit Bank CASTLE 11/29/2019 3/14/2022 682 Aaa AA+ 1.95 1.83828 5,000,000 5,005,650 5,008,833 10720 MCI 90520EAH4 MUFG Union Bank CASTLE 10/25/2019 4/1/2022 700 Aaa A 3.15 2.03755 2,000,000 2,058,780 2,041,384 10750 MCI 90520EAH4 MUFG Union Bank CASTLE 2/5/2020 4/1/2022 700 Aaa A 3.15 1.81145 1,000,000 1,029,390 1,025,037 10749 FAC 3133ELLW2 Federal Farm Credit Bank DA DAV 2/5/2020 5/5/2022 734 Aaa AA- 1.61 1.62173 1,000,000 1,000,020 999,777 10759 MCI 037833CP3 Apple Inc CASTLE 3/27/2020 5/11/2022 740 Aal AA+ 2.0809 3.16241 1,000,000 995,760 978,864 10733 MCI 084664BT7 Berkshire Hathaway Inc MORETN 12/6/2019 5/15/2022 744 Aa2 AA 3 1.74 2,000,000 2,099,960 2,050,080 10736 FAC 3133ELCH5 Federal Farm Credit Bank Pi 12/5/2019 6/2/2022 762 Aaa AA+ 1.7 1.71644 2,000,000 2,001,660 1,999,330 10652 MUN 686053BOl Oregon School Boards Assoc MORETN 9/14/2018 6/30/2022 790 Aa2 AA 5.48 3.12 925,000 1,005,808 969,195 10748 FAC 3133EKJ56 Federal Farm Credit Bank CASTLE 1/31/2020 8/30/2022 851 Aaa AA+ 1.9 1.30349 3,000,000 3,009,900 3,011,735 10727 MCI 06051GEU9 Bank of America Corp CASTLE 11/25/2019 1/11/2023 985 A2 A-1 3.3 2.12008 2,000,000 2,096,180 2,061,181 10751 FAC 3130AJ5Q8 Federal Home Loan Bank DA DAV 2/18/2020 2/14/2023 1019 Aaa AA+ 1.75 1.74997 2,000,000 2,000,600 2,000,000 10753 FAC 3135GOX99 Federal National Mtg Assn CASTLE 2/24/2020 2/14/2023 1019 Aaa AA+ 1.7 1.69993 4,000,000 4,013,480 4,000,000 10709 MUN 29270CNU5 Bonneville Power Administratio CASTLE 7/30/2019 7/1/2023 1166 Aal AA- 5.803 2.12492 1,000,000 1,124,100 1,111,172 10713 MCI 361582AD1 Berkshire Hathaway Inc CASTLE 9/9/2019 7/15/2023 1170 Aa3 AA 7.35 2.03065 500,000 589,005 581,596 10754 FAC 3134GVEG9 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp R W B 2/28/2020 2/28/2024 1398 Aaa AA+ 1.626 1.625 4,000,000 4,007,960 4,000,000 10755 FAC 3133ELQV9 Federal Farm Credit Bank Pi 3/3/2020 9/3/2024 1586 Aaa AA+ 1.7 1.7 2,000,000 2,001,280 2,000,000 10752 FAC 3135GOY23 Federal National Mtg Assn CASTLE 2/18/2020 2/18/2025 1754 Aaa AA+ 1.9 1.9 2,000,000 2,006,000 2,000,000 10078 RRP SYS10078 Local Govt Investment Pool 7/1/2006 - - 1 1.75 1.76 52,742,697 52,742,697 52,742,697 10084 RR2 SYS10084 First Interstate 7/1/2006 - - 1 2.75 2.75 10,505 486 10 505,486 10,505,486 229,033 183 230,949,090 229,665,436 Budget to Actuals Report Revenue YTD in the General Fund is 97.9% of budget (up from 95.9% last month) at $35.3 million, an increase of $2.5 million (8%) from last year which was at 95.9% of budget for the same time period. Expenses YTD are 78.9% of budget at $29.7 million compared to $28.2 million and 78.6% of budget last year. Expenses YTD are $1.5 million (5%) more than the same time period last year. cour Fund All nC:_.cnerd 070 DIQ t D"". M-th!,v 6l Period 0 to $9.6M (Blank) Monthly Expenditmes 78.61 'M of last vear budaet Monthly Revenuer. [& of last Veat budoet FY20 Projected Ending Working Capital Approved FIT 109.66 Si `- f f On the attached pages you will find the Budget to Actuals Report for the County's major funds with actual revenue and expense data compared to budget through April 30, 2020. Position Control Summary July - June Percent Org Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April Unfilled Assessor Filled 34.26 34.26 34.26 34.26 34.26 33.26 33.26 33.26 Unfilled 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.69% Clerk Filled 8.48 8.48 8.48 8.48 8.48 8.48 8.48 8.48 Unfilled - - - - - 1.00 1.17% BOPTA Filled 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 Unfilled - - - - - - 0.00% DA Filled 49.95 51.95 50.95 51.75 51.75 50.60 51.60 51.60 Unfilled 2.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.45 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.85% Tax Filled 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Unfilled - - - - - - 0•00% Veterans' Filled 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Unfilled - - - - - 0.00% Property Mngt Filled 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 0.80 1.80 1.80 Unfilled - - - - - 1.00 - - 5.561/. Total General Fund Filled 103.51 105.51 104.51 105.31 105.31 102.16 104.16 104.16 Unfilled 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.45 5.50 3.50 4.50 2.79% Justice Court Filled 4.60 4.60 3.60 3.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 Unfilled - - 1.00 1.00 - - 4.35% Community Justice Filled 47.20 47.90 47.90 47.90 47.90 47.90 46.90 47.90 Unfilled 0.70 - - - - 1.00 - 0.71% Sheriff Filled 224.75 220.75 223.75 224.75 223.75 218.75 226.75 225.75 Unfilled 15.75 19.75 16.75 15.75 16.75 21.75 13.75 14.75 7.17% Health Srvcs Filled 291.20 293.95 291.95 293.30 294.10 293.35 293.35 294.45 Unfilled 18.70 16.95 18.75 17.40 17.05 17.80 17.80 16.70 5.80% CDO Filled 54.00 56.00 55.00 55.00 56.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 Unfilled 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.53% Road Filled 56.00 55.00 54.00 55.00 55.00 54.00 55.00 55.00 Unfilled - 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96% Adult P&P Filled 39.55 38.85 38.85 39.85 39.85 39.60 39.60 39.60 Unfilled 0.30 1.00 1.00 - - 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.59% Solid Waste Filled 24.00 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00 Unfilled 0.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 4.90% 9.1-1 Filled 56.53 56.53 56.53 55.53 53.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 Unfilled 3.48 3.48 3.48 4.48 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 8.98% Victims Assistance Filled 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Unfilled 1.00 - - 3.75% GIS Dedicated Filled 1.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 Unfilled 1.00 - - - - - 13.04% Fair & Expo Filled 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 11.00 11.00 Unfilled 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 6.67% Natural Resource Filled 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Unfilled - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - 17.65% ISF - Facilities Filled 19.00 19.00 19.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 Unfilled 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 22.00% ISF - Adman Filled 5.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Unfilled 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - 9.27% ISF - SOCC Filled 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Unfilled - - - - - 0•00% ISF - Finance Filled 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 9.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 Unfilled - - - - 1.00 - 1.00% ISF - Legal Filled 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Unfilled - - - - - 2.86% ISF - HR Filled 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Unfilled - - - - - - 0.00% ISF - IT Filled 14.70 14.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 15.70 Unfilled 1.00 1.00 - - - - 2.55% ISF - Risk Filled 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Unfilled - - - - - - - - 8.16% Total. Filled 991.34 995.09 993.09 998.24 998.51 989.36 998.36 999.46 Unfilled 56.43 56.68 58.48 54.13 54.75 63.80 54.80 54.70 % Unfilled 5.39% 5.39% 5.56% 5.14% 5.20% 6.06% 5.20% 5.19% 5.57% �-�Es`0 Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary All Departments 83.3% FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % 001 - General Fund 33,938,668 34,900,450 103% ; 35,797,833 35,113,788 98% 37,192,306 104% ; 030 - Juvenile 786,286 842,485 107% ; 856,930 520,306 61% 808,339 94% ; 160/170 - TRT 7,282,600 7,682,623 105% ; 7,732,000 7,348,812 95% 7,465,178 97% ; 220 - Justice Court 552,000 608,275 110% ; 578,000 475,571 82% ; 556,132 96% ; 255 - Sheriffs Office 39,225,869 40,517,859 103% ; 41,581,807 41,166,585 99% ; 42,593,805 102% ; 274 - Health Services 35,444,454 37,595,739 106% ; 36,132,298 27,891,281 77% 35,174,148 97% ; 295 - CDD 8,153,746 7,755,886 95% `, 8,468,820 6,601,057 78% ; 7,943,281 94% ; 325 - Road 22,876,423 23,035,209 101% ; 22,785,827 18,690,205 82% 21,709,757 95% ; 355 - Adult P&P 6,360,818 6,463,769 102% ; 5,775,278 6,529,578 113% ; 6,572,505 114% ; 465 - Road CIP 959,104 261,131 27% 2,142,893 1,483,442 69% ; 2,248,612 105% ; 610 - Solid Waste 11,868,613 11,504,244 97% ; 11,724,869 9,794,442 84% 11,922,020 102%: 615 - Fair & Expo 1,499,100 1,589,820 106% ; 1,561,500 865,050 55% 1,000,788 64% ; 618 - RV Park 358,600 488,620 136% ; 437,700 352,558 81% 393,648 90% ; 670 - Risk Management 3,569,944 3,477,056 97% ; 3,495,039 33396,359 97% ; 3,893,739 111% ; 675 - Health Benefits 21,411,563 22,699,675 106% ; 22,318,433 18,110,313 81% 21,786,085 98% ; 705 - 911 10,260,013 10,514,313 102% ; 10,563,350 9,894,508 94% 10,835,506 103%: 999 - Other 36,330,641 38,687,048 106% ; 31,222,790 30,871,373 99% 31,421,450 101% ; TOTAL RESOURCES ; 240,878,442 248,624,202 103% ; 243,175,367 219,105,226 90% ; 243,517,299 100% ; Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection 001 - General Fund 17,486,029 16,406,076 94% 18,300,987 14,260,637 78% 17,955,853 98% ; 030 - Juvenile 7,040,903 6,638,892 94% 7,127,337 5,770,647 81% ; 6,984,707 98% ; 160/170 - TRT 2,335,678 2,233,953 96% ; 2,212,140 2,065,423 93% 2,139,803 97% ; 220 - Justice Court 658,081 652,039 99% ; 678,141 563,845 83% ; 665,059 98% ; 255 - Sheriffs Office 42,853,022 41,553,897 97% ; 44,685,809 37,037,656 83% ; 45,044,429 101% ; 274 - Health Services 44,974,364 42,441,390 94% ; 473589,309 34,448,396 72% 44,817,067 94% ; 295 - CDD 7,726,157 7,331,793 95% ; 7,905,639 6,220,005 79% 7,438,705 94% ; 325 - Road 14,689,753 12,158,904 83% 14,573,336 9,685,273 66% 13,829,094 95% ; 355 - Adult P&P 6,505,128 6,208,673 95% 6,589,491 5,285,371 80% 6,535,198 99% ; 465 - Road CIP 8,309,501 5,484,366 66% 13,835,913 4,579,097 33% ; 7,246,847 52% ; ES`��� 0 C� Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary o� All Departments 83 3% FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) Year Complete 610 - Solid Waste 8,310,720 7,643,635 92% ; 8,384,039 5,275,076 63% 8,105,837 97% ; 615 - Fair & Expo 2,688,885 2,789,095 104% ; 2,464,787 2,025,379 82% ; 2,338,769 95% ; 618 - RV Park 521,971 499,108 96% ; 540,373 384,191 71% 494,976 92% ; 670 - Risk Management 3,858,097 2,862,764 74% ; 4,132,295 2,068,819 50% ; 3,271,598 79% ; 675 - Health Benefits 23,144,255 21,211,086 92% 22,115,011 17,770,306 80% 23,679,826 107% ; 705 - 911 13,379,064 10,570,113 79% 12,250,336 8,798,170 72% ; 11,734,860 96% ; 999 - Other 46,792,062 35,262,851 75% 60,808,382 30,567,029 50% 60,568,085 100% ; TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 251,273,671 221,948,635 88% 274,193,325 186,805,320 68% ; ; 262,850,714 96% ; Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % 001 - General Fund (18,077,559) (18,091,539) 100% ; (19,023,310) (15,215,688) 80% (19,023,310) 100% ; 030 - Juvenile 5,744,015 5,744,015 100% ; 5,874,465 4,902,630 83% ; 5,874,465 100% ; 160/170 - TRT (4,649,866) (4,449,866) 96% ; (4,133,128) (3,364,624) 81% ; (4,070,557) 98% ; 220 - Justice Court 30,000 30,000 100%- 255 - Sheriffs Office 2,981,253 2,981,254 100% ; 3,119,936 2,752,447 88% 3,119,936 100% ; 274 - Health Services 6,177,535 6,179,204 100% ; 6,102,365 4,644,231 76% ; 6,285,920 103% ; 295 - CDD ; (1,152,624) (1,170,172) 102% ; (1,448,081) (1,063,667) 73% ; (1,089,146) 75% ; 325 - Road (14,464,308) (14,464,308) 100% ; (11,910,575) (6,612,088) 56% ; (11,910,575) 100%: 355 - Adult P&P 165,189 165,189 100% ; 223,189 191,150 86% 223,189 100%: 465 - Road CIP 13,811,725 13,393,963 97% ; 12,014,914 5,298,487 44% 11,893,453 99% ; 610 - Solid Waste (4,688,023) (5,000,029) 107% ; (3,296,192) (1,624,273) 49% ; (3,296,192) 100% ; 615 - Fair & Expo 1,220,994 1,164,996 95% 1,022,863 739,700 72% 826,348 81% ; 618 - RV Park 160,000 160,000 100% ; (307,000) (64,750) 21% (307,000) 100% ; 670 - Risk Management (3,168) (3,168) 100%: (6,918) (5,187) 75% ; ; (6,918) 100% ; 705 - 911 - - - - 999% ; - 999 - Other 12,744,837 13,360,461 105% ; 11,767,472 9,421,632 80% 11,480,387 98% ; TOTALTRANSFERS E `0 Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary All Departments 83 3% FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 ENDING FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals Projection % 001 - General Fund 9,265,080 12,349,379 133% ; 9,563,536 17,986,843 ; 12,562,522 131% ; 030 - Juvenile 689,399 1,296,490 188% ; 694,058 948,779 994,587 143% ; 160/170 - TRT 2,261,401 2,565,255 113% ; 3,686,732 4,484,020 3,820,073 104% ; 220 - Justice Court 67,919 144,227 212% ; 64,859 55,952 35,300 54% ; 255 - Sheriffs Office 13,191,907 16,818,660 127% ; 14,732,933 23,700,035 17,487,972 119% ; 274 - Health Services 3,850,339 10,638,105 276% ; 4,766,157 8,725,221 7,281,106 153% ; 295 - CDD 1,478,676 1,783,536 121% ; 1,097,104 1,100,921 ; ; 1,198,965 109% ; 325 - Road 2,416,014 6,726,840 278% ; 2,303,905 9,119,684 2,696,928 117% ; 355 - Adult P&P 2,220,879 2,754,005 124% ; 1,998,976 4,189,362 3,014,501 151% ; 465 - Road CIP 14,148,365 17,759,555 126% ; 15,938,430 19,962,387 24,654,773 155% ; 610 - Solid Waste 600,000 799,570 133% ; 644,638 3,694,663 1,319,561 205% ; 615 - Fair & Expo 31,209 (94,564) -303% ; 199,576 (515,194) (606,197) -304% ; 618 - RV Park 315,629 592,992 188% ; 150,327 496,610 184,664 123% ; 670 - Risk Management 5,308,679 7,193,407 136% ; 5,455,826 8,515,761 7,808,630 143% ; 675 - Health Benefits 14,318,894 16,563,905 116% ; 16,309,716 16,903,912 14,670,164 90% ; 705 - 911 5,505,949 8,604,816 156% ; 6,066,720 9,701,153 7,705,462 127% ; 999 - Other 58,869,933 75,223,189 128% ; 55,033,130 84,949,165 57,556,940 105% ; TOTAL FUND BALANCE 134,540,271 181,719,367 135% ; 138,706,623 214,019,274 162,385,952 117% ; �-�ES Budget to Actuals Report General Fund - Fund 001 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Property Taxes - Current 27,318,385 27,774,133 102% 29,046,840 28,378,976 98% 29,256,769 101% 209,929� A Property Taxes - Prior 389,000 433,798 112%, 391,000 902,899 231% 950,000 243% 559,000, B Other General Revenues 2,685,500 3,272,354 122% 3,020,400 2,505,828 83% 3,161,400 105% , 141,000, C Assessor 870,658 823,127 95% 837,283 916,061 109% 920,000 110% 82,71T D Clerk 1,787,270 1,702,762 95% 1,615,280 1,801,184 112% 1,911,780 118% 296,500; E BOPTA 12,700 12,119 95% 12,220 13,659 112% 15,000 123% 2,78& D District Attorney 389,782 386,919 99% 383,806 240,124 63% 421,743 110% 37,93T F Tax Office 198,950 206,292 104% 195,390 246,778 126% 260,000 133% 64,610; D Veterans 166,423 168,945 102% 175,614 89,307 51% 175,614 100%! -� G Property Management 120,000 120,000 100% 120,000 18,972 16% t 120,000 100% - H TOTAL RESOURCES 33,938,668 34,900,450 103% ; 35,797,833 35,113,788 98% 37,192,306 104% ; 1,394,473: REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Assessor 4,802,452 4,530,558 94% 4,993,290 3,920,058 79% 4,824,863 97% 168,427,1 Clerk 1,854,397 1,598,764 86% 2,049,501 1,290,902 63% 1,948,790 95% 100,711! 1 BOPTA 73,125 69,565 95% 77,950 61,580 79% 77,007 99% 943! District Attorney 7,372,932 6,993,244 95% 7,873,159 6,308,657 80% 7,700,653 98% 172,506! 1 Medical Examiner 173,129 160,296 93% 235,542 167,516 71% 235,542 100%! - Tax Office 872,020 779,330 89% 846,307 727,005 86% 855,934 101% (9,627)� Veterans 572,287 539,026 94% 589,551 438,619 74% 587,091 100% 2,460 Property Management 287,858 278,966 97% 281,985 255,020 90% 299,271 106% (17,286); J Non -Departmental 1,477,829 1,456,326 99% 1,353,702 1,091,281 81% f 1,426,702 105% (73,000) TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 17,486,029 16,406,076 94% 18,300,987 14,260,637 78% ; 17,955,853 98% 345,134: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In 326,122 289,065 89% 260,000 195,000 75% 260,000 100% K Transfers Out (18,403,681) (18,380,604) 100% (19,283,310) (15,410,688) 80% (19,283,310) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS (18,077,559) (18,091,539) 100% (19,023,310) (15,215,688) 80% (19,023,310) 100% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 10,890,000 11,946,544 110% 11,090,000 12,349,379 111% 12,349,379 111% 1,259,379� Resources over Requirements 16,452,639 18,494,374 17,496,846 20,853,151 19,236,453 1,739,607; Net Transfers - In (Out) (18,077,559) (18,091,539) (19,023,310) (15,215,688) (19,023,310) TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 9,265,080 $ 12,349,379 133% ; $ 9,563,536 $ 17,986,843 188% ; ; $ 12,562,522 131% ; $2,998,986: A Current year taxes received primarily in November, February and May; actual 19-20 TAV is a 5.36% increase compared to FY 18-19 vs. 5.5% budgeted; however, collection rate is projected to be 95.8% versus 95% budgeted. B TDS Baja deferred billing credits per ORS 305.286 in addition to settlement payment C PILT payment of $500,000 received in July. Includes $112,566 of Marijuana tax YTD; interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances D A & T Grant received quarterly. Q1 - July; Q2 - October; Q3 - January; Q4 - April. E Recording fees are up 44% YTD compared to the prior year F YTD collections are low because Discovery Fees have been delayed due to administrative transitions; revenues expected to be collected in full by the end of the fiscal year G Oregon Dept. of Veteran's Affairs grant reimbursed quarterly. H Interfund land -sale management revenue recorded at year-end. I Savings related to FTE vacancies YTD and forecasted vacancy rates consistent with YTD experience. J Retirement payout not anticipated when the budget was developed K Repayment to General Fund from Finance Reserves for ERP Implementation E S`�� Budget to Actuals Report Juvenile - Fund 030 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance OYA Basic & Diversion 407,113 413,320 102% 442,601 189,167 43% 390,000 88% (52,601); A ODE Juvenile Crime Prev r 91,379 92,492 101% 91,379 42,120 46% 80,000 88% (11,379) A Leases 85,000 87,311 103% 86,400 74,555 86% 95,000 110% ! 8,600; B Inmate/Prisoner Housing 70,000 97,200 139% 80,000 85,200 107% 94,000 118% ! 14,00& C DOC Unif Crime Fee/HB2712 r 35,000 43,681 125% 35,000 49,339 141% 49,339 141% 14,339 D Interest on Investments r 25,000 31,318 125% 31,000 23,473 76% 29,000 94% (2,000); E OJD Court Fac/Sec SB 1065 17,000 27,158 160% t 26,000 18,549 71% 22,000 85% (4,000) Gen Fund -Crime Prevention r 20,000 20,000 100% 20,000 15,000 75% 20,000 100%! -; A Food Subsidy 18,744 12,052 64% 16,000 11,589 72% 14,500 91% (1,500); F Miscellaneous r 2,050 4,603 225% 14,050 3,222 23% 4,000 28% (10,050); G Contract Payments 8,000 7,269 91 % 8,000 4,206 53% _ 5,500 69% (2,500); H Case Supervision Fee r 7,000 6,081 87% 6,500 3,886 60% 5,000 77% (1,500)� 1 TOTALRESOURCES 786,286 842,485 107% ; 856,930 520,306 61% ; 808,339 94% (48,591); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services 5,705,245 5,412,349 95% 5,797,927 4,707,698 81% t t 5,668,211 98% 129,71& J Materials and Services 1,327,658 1,218,976 92% 1,329,410 1,062,949 80% 1,316,496 99% 12,914, K r Capital Outlay r 8,000 7,566 95% - - r TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 7,040,903 6,638,892 94% 7,127,337 5,770,647 81% ; 6,984,707 98% 142,630: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In- General Funds 5,831,015 5,831,015 100% 5,961,465 4,967,880 83% 5,961,465 100% - Transfers Out-Veh Reserve r (87,000) (87,000) 100% (87,000) (65,250) 75% (87,000) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS 5,744,015 5,744,015 100% ; 5,874,465 4,902,630 83% ; 5,874,465 100% FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 1,200,000 1,348,881 112% 1,090,000 1,296,490 119% 1,296,490 119% 206,49& Resources over Requirements (6,254,617) (5,796,407) (6,270,407) (5,250,341) (6,176,368) 94,039; Net Transfers - In (Out) 5,744,015 5,744,015 5,874,465 4,902,630 5,874,465 TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 689,399 $ 1,296,490 188% ; $ 694,058 $ 948,779 137% ; $ 994,587 143% ; $300,529: A Quarterly Reimbursement based on actual expenses; COVID impacted lowered projection B Projection based on YTD actuals. Leased a second office to J Bar J Youth Service. C Out of county juvenile detention housing. Fluctuates in accordance with other county policy/usage. Current YTD trend higher than budgeted. D Annual payment received from State Dept. of Corrections based on new state formula higher than budgeted E Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances F Projection based on YTD actuals. Less than anticipated qualifying juvenile detention meals. G Anticipated grant revenue from youth substance abuse research study lower than budgeted due to project start-up delays. H Payments for community service crew projects. Fluctuates depending on community need/request. Covid impact lowered projection. I Projection based on YTD actuals. COVID impact lowered projection further. J Projected Personnel savings based on YTD average vacancy rate of 0.7% K Projected based on YTD actuals. COVID impact lowered many staff and youth expense projections. Co Budget to Actuals Report h TRT - Fund 160/170 83.3% FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) Year Complete Fiscal Year2019 Fiscal Year2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Room Taxes 7,260,000 7,618,179 105% 7,670,000 7,270,420 95% 7,375,475 96% (294,525); A Interest 22,600 64,444 285% 62,000 78,391 126% 89,703 145% 27,703, B TOTALRESOURCES 7,282,600 7,682,623 105% ; 7,732,000 7,348,812 95% 7,465,178 97% (266,822); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % COVA 1,946,668 2,067,761 106% 2,064,221 1,947,322 94% Interfund Contract 59,121 59,121 100% 79,160 65,967 83% Interfund Charges 39,087 39,087 100% 37,309 31,091 83% ! Auditing Services 12,501 10,800 86% 14,500 4,200 29% Software 60,000 51,533 86% 10,350 5,600 54% Office Supplies 4,000 1,589 40% 3,000 559 19% Printing 2,200 209 9% 2,000 642 32% E Public Notices 3,101 1,834 59% 1,600 1,386 87% Refunds & Adjustments - - - 8,657 999% Sunriver Service Dist 200,000 - 0% Temporary Help 9,000 2,020 22% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,335,678 2,233,953 96% 2,212,140 2,065,423 93% ; TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Transfer Out - RV Park (35,000) (26,250) 75% Transfer Out - Annual Fair (150,000) (150,000) 100% (250,000) (187,500) 75% Transfer Out - F&E Reserve (830,083) (630,083) 76% (286,687) (215,013) 75% Transfer Out - F&E (517,996) (517,996) 100% (409,654) (309,381) 76% Transfer Out - Sheriff (3,151,787) (3,151,787) 100% (3,151,787) (2,626,480) 83% TOTALTRANSFERS (4,649,866) (4,449,866) 96% (4,133,128) (3,364,624) 81% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Beginning Fund Balance 1,964,345 1,566,452 80% 2,300,000 2,565,255 112% Resources over Requirements 4,946,922 5,448,669 5,519,860 5,283,388 Net Transfers - In (Out) (4,649,866) (4,449,866) 4 (4,133,128) (3,364,624) t TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 2,261,401 $ 2,565,255 113% ; $ 3,686,732 $ 4,484,020 122% ; Projection % $ Variance 1,983,227 96% 80,994, C 79,160 100%! D 37,309 100% 14,500 100% � r 10,350 100%: 3,000 100%, 2,000 100% 1,600 100% 8,657 999% t i (8,657); � 72,337: 2,139,803 97% ; Projection % $ Variance (35,000) 100% (250,000) 100%, (275,631) 96% 11,056, (358,139) 87% 51,515! (3,151,787) 100%, (4,070,557) 98% 62,571: Projection % $ Variance 2,565,255 112% I 265,255: ! 3 5,325,375 i (194,485); r i (4,070,557) i i 62,571, e $ 3,820,073 104% ; $133,341: A Prior year collections YTD was 92% of budget, compared to current year collections YTD of 95%; remaining FY20 revenue assumed to be minimal due to COVID. B Includes interest payments from delinquent tax collections. C COVA is estimated to receive less TRT revenue than budgeted due to COVID D Contracted services with the Finance Department for operating TRT program CO >? Budget to Actuals Report Justice Court - Fund 220 83.3% FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Court Fines & Fees 550,000 605,344 110% 575,000 473,968 82% 553,967 E 96% (21,033); A Interest on Investments E 2,000 2,931 147% 3,000 1,603 53% 2,165 72% (835) TOTALRESOURCES 552,000 608,275 110%; 578,000 475,571 82% 556,132 96% (21,868); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services 508,650 508,098 100% 516,868 443,786 86% 523,786 101% (6,918), B Materials and Services ( 149,431 143,941 96% I 161,273 120,059 74% 141,273 88% 20,000 C TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 658,081 652,039 99% ; 678,141 563,845 83% ; 665,059 98% 13,082; TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In- General Fund 30,000 30,000 100% - - I TOTALTRANSFERS 30,000 30,000 100% FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 144,000 157,990 110% 165,000 144,227 87% 144,227 87% (20,774); Resources over Requirements (106,081) (43,764) (100,141) (88,275) E t E I (108,927) (8,786) ( I Net Transfers - In (Out) 30,000 30,000 t - TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 67,919 $ 144,227 212% ; $ 64,859 $ 55,952 86% $ 35,300 54% ($29,560); A Loss of revenue is a result of not accepting small claims filings in March, April & May due to COVID 19 B Projected Personnel overage attributed to payout for terminated employee; however, overage reduced from March's projections because temporary help have been laid off due to COVID 19 C Projection based on actuals to date and estimated spending through June 30, 2020 �IES`� Budget to Actuals Report Sheriffs Office - Fund 255 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) RESOURCES LED #1 Property Tax Current LED #2 Property Tax Current Sheriff's Office Revenues LED #1 Property Tax Prior LED #2 Property Tax Prior LED #1 Interest LED #2 Interest LED #1 Foreclosed Properties LED #2 Foreclosed Properties TOTALRESOURCES REQUIREMENTS Sheriffs Services Civil/Special Units Automotive/Communications Detective Patrol Records Adult Jail Court Security Emergency Services Special Services Training Crisis Stabilization Center Other Law Enforcement Non - Departmental TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year2019 Fiscal Year2020 Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance 24,780,245 25,153,487 102% 26,293,470 25,665,976 98% 26,432,672 101% 139,202, A 10,027,098 10,171,051 101% 10,632,014 10,361,297 97% ! r 10,670,810 100%, 38,796, A 3,675,026 4,153,450 113% 3,922,323 3,738,411 95% 4,007,323 102% 85,000! B 312,000 326,275 105% 312,000 702,534 225% 728,000 233% 416,000! C 166,500 157,143 94% 148,000 305,726 207% 320,000 216% 172,000! C 145,000 288,269 199% 138,000 251,078 182% 274,000 199% 136,000! D t 120,000 193,301 161% 136,000 141,563 104% ! 161,000 118% 25,000! D � r I, I , 53,322 21,561 39,225,869 40,517,859 103% ; 41,581,807 41,166,585 99% 42,593,805 102% ; 1,011,998: Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % 2,997,984 � 3,068,683 102% i 3,105,057 2,516,967 81% I 1,181,695 1,149,677 97% 1,232,158 1,016,458 82% t 2,644,785 2,532,545 96% 2,858,337 2,358,033 82% 2,033,077 2,044,686 101% 2,303,072 1,853,266 80% I 10,003,952 i 10,040,921 100% 10,592,002 9,528,623 t 90% 881,182 892,837 101% 1,004,600 694,652 69% 18,357,098 � 17,364,464 95% 18,379,998 14,914,049 81% 551,494 i 531,409 96% 556,740 375,687 I 67% 328,581 341,586 104% 402,734 409,572 102% t 1,520,623 1,451,124 95% 1,601,871 1,415,063 88% 667,647 874,923 131% t 743,334 761,772 102% I , 559,308 82,308 15% 571,267 70,223 12% t i 1,017,266 i 1,070,404 105% 1,330,214 1,018,112 77% 4 I 108,329 i 108,329 100% 4,425 105,180 999% 42,853,022 41,553,897 97% 44,685,809 37,037,656 83% ; Projection % $ Variance 3,111,072 100%; (6,015); E 1,213,428 98% 18,730, 2,920,488 102% f (62,151)! 1 2,233,037 97% 70,035!, r t , 11,237,773 106% (645,771); F 873,981 87% � 130,113% 18,372,513 100%! ! r 7,485!I G I I 457,438 82% � 99,302 I 471,980 117% I (69,246); ! 1,651,557 103% (49,686) 889,734 120% � (146,400) t I 246,201 43% 325,066, 1,259,310 95% I 70,904; , , 105,917 999% (101,492); 45,044,429 101% ; (358,620); TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfer In - TRT 3,151,787 3,151,787 100% 3,151,787 2,626,480 83% 3,151,787 100% Transfer In - General Fund 103,132 103,132 100% 240,249 200,200 83% 240,249 100% Transfers Out - Debt Service I (273,666) (273,666) 100% _ (272,100) (74,233) 27% (272,100) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS 2,981,253 2,981,254 100% ; 3,119,936 2,752,447 88% 3,119,936 100% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 13,837,807 14,873,445 107% 14,716,999 16,818,660 114% < 16,818,660 114% 2,101,661; Resources over Requirements (3,627,153) t (1,036,039) (3,104,002) i 4,128,929 I I (2,450,624) 653,378; E I Net Transfers - In (Out) 2,981,253 r 2,981,254 3,119,936 p 2,752,447 E t 3,119,936 t E TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 13,191,907 $ 16,818,660 127% , $ 14,732,933 $ 23,700,035 161% ; $ 17,487,972 119% ; $2,755,039: A While 19-20 TAV was 0.14% lower vs budget, the collection rate is estimated at 95.8% vs. 95.0% in the budget B Projected to exceed budget due to additional SB 395 Prisoner Housing funds in Adult Jail C TDS Baja deferred billing credits per ORS 305.286 in addition to settlement payment D Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances E Variances in most Divisions are from projections based on YTD personnel and positions that are unfilled or over -filled; includes projection for an interfund payment to Fair & Expo for 1.00 FTE in May and June. F Variance due to over hiring for open and soon -to -be open positions; up to 18-months of lead time is necessary for background and training. Though temporary, the forecast assumes the trend continues for the remainder of the year. G In addition to variance described in Footnote E, projection includes estimated one-time medical expenses Budget to Actuals Report Health Services -Fund 274 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance State Grant 13,262,344 13,053,849 98% 14,080,644 11,013,772 78% 13,003,372 92% (1,077,272); OHP Capitation 8,652,200 8,142,094 94% 7,242,430 5,852,348 81% 7,887,425 109% = 644,995 Title 19 1,345,100 3,069,162 228% 4,8629726 3,315,801 68% 4,000,821 82% (861,905) Federal Grants 990,189 1,311,567 132% 3,277,616 2,164,433 66% 2,733,525 83% (544,091)l Local Grants 1,208,623 1,025,508 85% 1,567,331 1,416,054 90% 1,849,901 118% 282,570 Environmental Health Fees 1,169,600 1,076,036 92% 1,058,206 1,042,579 99% 1,082,798 102% 24,592 State Miscellaneous 899,734 1,808,299 201% 1,040,153 428,459 41% ! 1,506,501 145% 466,348 State - OMAP 1,147,168 1,108,622 97% 991,900 719,251 73% f 856,902 86% (134,998)! Patient Fees 236,500 637,910 270% 564,750 528,852 94% 614,253 109% 49,503 Other 422,593 477,834 113% 484,712 416,478 86% ! 542,345 112% 57,633! Vital Records 212,000 241,727 114% 220,000 211,837 96% 250,036 114% 30,036 Divorce Filing Fees 157,603 157,603 100% 173,030 173,030 100%! 173,030 100% Interest on Investments 135,000 218,767 162% 171,000 203,169 119% 243,803 143% 72,803 Liquor Revenue 151,000 166,372 110% 150,800 110,392 73% 127,292 84% (23,508) Interfund Contract- Gen Fund 127,000 127,000 100% 127,000 127,000 100% 127,000 100% State Shared- Family Planning - 168,007 120,000 167,826 140% 175,144 146% , 55,144 CCBHC Grant 5,327,800 4,805,382 90% - -` TOTALRESOURCES 35,444,454 37,595,739 106% ; 36,132,298 27,891,281 77% ; 35,174,148 97% ; (958,150) REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Administration Allocation ' Personnel Services 31,702,065 29,780,257 94% 33,186,830 26,584,313 80% 32,343,164 97% 843,666, Materials and Services 13,033,299 12,455,102 96% 13,707,479 7,864,083 57% 11,526,533 84% 2,180,946 Capital Outlay 239,000 206,031 86% 695,000 - 0% t 947,370 136% (252,370) TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ; 44,974,364 42,441,390 94% 47,589,309 34,448,396 72% 44,817,067 94% ; 2,772,242: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In- General Fund 6,366,223 6,367,892 100% 5,747,090 4,789,224 83% 5,747,090 100% - Transfers In- OHP Mental Health 548,601 - 0% 732,156 133% = 183,555 Transfers Out (188,688) (188,688) 100% (193,326) (144,993) 75% (193,326) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS 6,177,535 6,179,204 100%: 6,102,365 4,644,231 76% 6,285,920 103% ; 183,555: FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 7,202,714 9,304,552 129% 10,120,803 10,638,105 105% 10,638,105 105% : 517,302: Resources over Requirements (9,529,910) (4,845,651) (11,457,011) (69557,116) (9,642,919) 1,814,092; Net Transfers - In (Out) t 6,177,535 6,179,204 � 6,102,365 4,644,231 �E 6,285,920 F 183,555� i TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 3,850,339 $ 10,638,105 276% ; $ 4,766,157 $ 8,725,221 183% ; $ 7,281,106 153% ; $2,514,949; o� , ` 31 �E SBudget to Actuals Report LC- Health Services - Admin - Fund 274 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3 % Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Federal Grants 108,940 303,065 278% 726,655 592,762 82% 711,314 98% (15,341); A Interest on Investments 135,000 218,767 162% 171,000 203,169 119% 243,803 143% 72,803, B Other 9,000 16,192 180% 9,000 8,546 95% 10,255 114% 1,255 CCBHC Grant 946,400 876,190 93% - - TOTALRESOURCES 1,199,340 1,414,215 118% ; 906,655 804,477 89% ; 965,372 106% ; 58,717; REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services 5,067,132 4,946,052 98% 5,241,264 4,045,259 77% 4,939,190 94% 302,074, C Materials and Services 4,600,091 4,688,516 102% 4,971,179 3,934,886 79% 4,929,385 99% 41,794 D Capital Outlay 5,000 - 0% 5,000 - 0% 0% 5,000 Administration Allocation (8,327,487) (8,295,196) 100% _ (9,308,295) (7,755,000) 83% (9,317,873) 100%; 91578 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,344,736 1,339,372 100% ; 909,148 225,144 25% ; 550,702 61% ; 358,446; TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In- General Fund 40,000 33,328 83% 40,000 100% Transfers Out (188,688) (188,688) 100% f (193,326) (144,993) 75% (193,326) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS (188,688) (188,688) 100% ; (153,326) (111,665) 73% (153,326) 100% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 2,642,514 2,862,108 108% 2,660,832 2,748,263 103% 2,748,263 103% 87,431 Resources over Requirements (145,396) 74,843 (2,493) 579,333 414,670 417,163 Net Transfers - In (Out) (188,688) (188,688) (153,326) (111,665) (153,326) TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 2,308,430 $ 2,748,263 119% ; $ 2,505,013 $ 3,215,931 128% ; $ 3,009,607 120% ; $504,594: A Federal grants are reimbursed on a quarterly basis B Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances C Projected Personnel savings based on YTD Personnel expenditures D $86K projected to be expended on Crisis Stabilization Center costs over budget as well as $9K for May & June operating costs �IES`v.� Budget to Actuals Report Health Services - Behavioral Health - Fund 274 83.3% FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance State Grant 10,187,361 9,796,391 96% 11,203,914 8,548,195 7U% %728,551 W% (1,4/5,3b3); A OHP Capitation 8,652,200 8,142,094 94% 7,242,430 5,852,348 81% 7,887,425 109% 644,995 B Title 19 1,345,100 3,069,162 228% 4,862,726 3,315,801 68% 4,000,821 82% (861,905); C Federal Grants E 499,249 639,680 128% 2,168,961 1,333,272 61% 1,570,262 72% (598,699); D Local Grants E 412,987 424,012 103% 994,331 419,053 42% 852,687 86% (141,644); G Patient Fees E 236,500 515,196 218% 443,450 410,390 93% 488,666 110% t 45,216 E State Miscellaneous ! 351,200 995,622 283% 437,100 904 0% 774,057 177% 336,957! F Other ! 334,545 346,812 104% 395,352 303,909 77% 416,466 105% 21,114 Divorce Filing Fees 157,603 157,603 100% 173,030 173,030 100% 173,030 100% Liquor Revenue 151,000 166,372 110% 150,800 110,392 73% 127,292 84% (23,508); State - OMAP E 131,900 270,591 205% 131,900 153,629 116% 183,759 139% 51,8% Interfund Contract- Gen Fund ! 127,000 127,000 100% 127,000 127,000 100% 127,000 100% CCBHC Grant 4,381,400 3,929,191 90% - - - TOTALRESOURCES 26,968,045 28,579,727 106% ; 28,330,994 20,747,923 73% 26,330,016 93% ; (2,000,978); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Administration Allocation 6,253,121 6,248,556 100% ; 6,978,412 5,814,100 83% 6,981,611 100% ; (3,199); Personnel Services 19,172,838 17,819,840 93% 20,174,804 16,233,338 80% 19,911,386 99% 263,418, H Materials and Services 6,509,514 5,549,421 85% 6,889,404 2,569,612 37% 4,527,965 66% 2,361,439! 1 Capital Outlay 234,000 199,979 85% 690,000 - 0% 947,370 137% (257,370) J TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 32,169,473 29,817,796 93% ; 34,732,620 24,617,050 71% ; 32,368,332 93% ; 2,364,288: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In- General Fund 2,282,708 2,282,580 100% 1,734,107 1,445,075 83% 1,734,107 100% - Transfers In- OHP Mental Health - 548,601 0% 732,156 133% 183,555! K TOTALTRANSFERS 2,282,708 2,282,580 100% ; 2,282,708 1,445,075 63% ; 2,466,263 108% ; 183,555: FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 3,976,398 5,628,746 142% 6,122,347 6,673,256 109% 6,673,256 109% 550,909: Resources over Requirements (5,201,428) (1,238,069) (6,401,626) (3,869,127) (6,038,316) 363,310! Net Transfers - In (Out) ! 2,282,708 2,282,580 E 2,282,708 1,445,075 ! f l 2,466,263 t 183,555 4 TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 1,057,678 $ 6,673,256 631% ; $ 2,003,429 $ 4,249,205 212% ; $ 3,101,203 155% ; $1,097,774: A Budgeted funds was a pass -through from the Behavioral Health State IGA for residential treatment provides, which will be paid directly during an 18 -month contract. B The calendar year 2020 PacificSource contract went into effect February 1, 2020, and an estimated additional $255,000 is expected to be received during FY20 C There is less in Title 19 fees collected relative to budgeted expectations. D CCBHC Expansion was originally budgeted in the "CCBHC funding line; however, the grant through the US Department of Health and Human Services is a traditional grant and more appropriately placed in the "Federal Grants" line. A revised budget corrects this amount. Any continuation of CCBHC through the state will come through as a "CCBHC Grant' line item. E There is an uptick in patient insurance fees collected relative to budgeted expectations. F Projection increased to be reflective of estimated Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (I/DD) FY20 match amounts; actuals occur at year end G Central Oregon Health Council awarded DCHS $581,431 in one-time funds to expand hours at the Stabilization Center. The Stabilization Center has experienced a delay in opening due to COVID-19, and the funds will be awarded as of July 1, 2020. Funds are budgeted in FY20, yet have been removed from the projections. Local Grants also includes an early release of quality improvement measure funds through COHC. H Projected Personnel savings based on YTD Personnel expenditures I Reduction in Materials and Services primarily related to footnote A i Projected expenditures include DCHS contribution of $500,000 toward a North County Facility K Transfer of Mental Health Reserve funds include transfer to offset service element funds as part of participation in CCBHC Continuation through the State. \31 ES`� Budget to Actuals Report { Health Services - Public Health - Fund 274 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) RESOURCES State Grant Environmental Health Fees State - OMAP State Miscellaneous Local Grants Federal Grants Vital Records Patient Fees State Shared- Family Planning Other TOTALRESOURCES 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance 3,074,983 3,257,457 106% 2,876,730 2,465,577 86% 3,274,821 114%, 398,091 A 1,169,600 1,076,036 92% 1,058,206 1,042,579 99% 1,082,798 102% 24,592! B 1,015,268 838,031 83% 860,000 565,622 66% 673,143 78% (186,857) E 548,534 812,677 148% 603,053 427,555 71% 732,444 121% , 129,391� C 795,636 601,497 76% 573,000 997,000 174% 997,214 174% 424,214 D 382,000 368,821 97% 382,000 238,398 62% 451,949 118% 69,949! 212,000 241,727 114% 220,000 211,837 96% 250,036 114% 30,036! - 122,714 121,300 118,462 98% 125,587 104% 4,287 168,007 120,000 167,826 140% 175,144 146% 55,144! 79,048 114,830 145% 80,360 104,023 129% 115,624 144% ! 35,264! 7,2772069 7,601,797 104% ; 6,894,649 6,338,880 92% ; 7,878,760 114% ; 984,111: REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Administration Allocation 2,074,366 2,046,640 99% 2,329,883 1,940,900 83% 2,336,262 100% (6,379); Personnel Services 7,462,095 7,014,365 94% 7,770,762 6,305,717 81% 7,492,588 96% 278,174 E Materials and Services I i 1,923,694 2,217,165 115% 1,846,896 1,359,585 74% I( 2,069,183 112% t I (222,287)� F t Capital Outlay - 6,051 I 999% - - TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ; 11,460,155 11,284,222 98% ; 11,947,541 9,606,202 80% ; ; 11,898,033 100% ; 49,508; TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In- General Fund 4,083,515 4,085,312 100% 3,972,983 3,3109821 83% 3,972,983 100% TOTALTRANSFERS 4,083,515 4,085,312 100% ; 3,972,983 3,310,821 83% ; 3,972,983 100% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 583,802 813,698 139% 1,337,624 1,216,586 91% 1,216,586 91% (121,038); Resources over Requirements (4,183,086) (3,682,425) i (5,052,892) (3,267,322) f l (4,019,273) t 1,033,619 I 1 Net Transfers - In (Out) 4,083,515 4,085,312 3,972,983 3,310,821 3,972,983 TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 484,231 $ 1,216,586 251% ; $ 257,715 $ 1,260,085 489% ; $ 1,170,296 454% ; $912,581: A Public Health State IGA increased funds for Regional and Local Public Health Modernization, as well as increased funds in Communicable Disease and Emergency Preparedness to assist with COVID-19 community response. B Fees were budgeted at an increase of 3%, but were adopted at an 8.5% rate increase C Payments are reimbursed on a quarterly basis, and include the Medicaid Administrative Claims payment for which is currently outstanding D Funds include the Diabetes Prevention Program, which was awarded for the calendar year 2020 as well as an early release of quality improvement measure funds through COHC. E Projected Personnel savings based on YTD Personnel expenditures F Additional expenditures are related to notes A and D. S Budget to Actuals Report 50- Community Development - Fund 295 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Admin - Operations 114,500 152,827 133% 162,000 110,806 68% 138,000 85% (24,000); A Code Enforcement ! 664,291 635,453 96% 693,960 540,506 78% 656,310 95% (37,650); B Building Safety 3,312,714 3,075,409 93% 3,433,780 2,618,606 76% 3,219,292 94% (214,488), B Electrical ! 804,849 738,580 92% 809,500 639,725 79% 726,401 90% (83,099)1 B Environmental On -Site 782,984 819,608 105% ; 877,400 748,088 85% 891,100 102% 13,700 Current Planning 1,795,453 1,701,840 95% 1,807,176 1,400,106 77% 1,647,796 91% (159,380); C Long Range Planning ! 678,955 632,170 93% 685,004 543,219 79% 664,382 97% (20,622) D TOTALRESOURCES 8,153,746 7,755,886 95% 8,468,820 6,601,057 78% 7,943,281 94% ; (525,539); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Admin - Operations 2,477,738 2,386,276 96% 2,492,316 2,104,102 84% 2,460,143 99% 32,173, E Code Enforcement 456,162 445,254 98% 535,590 385,806 72% ! 463,535 87% 72,055! E Building Safety 1,676,037 1,565,140 93% 1,743,298 1,309,777 75% 1,605,951 92% 137,348! F Electrical 445,433 439,104 99% 462,183 373,477 81% 450,387 97% 11,796 F Environmental On -Site 612,596 547,203 89% 616,279 472,638 77% 558,922 91% 57,357! F Current Planning 1,554,847 1,456,128 94% 1,501,588 1,185,846 79% 1,434,835 96% 66,753! F Long Range Planning 503,344 492,687 98% 554,385 388,357 70% 464,933 84% 89,452, G TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ; 7,726,157 7,331,793 95% ; 7,905,639 6,220,005 79% 7,438,705 94% 466,934: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In - General Fund 300,000 289,193 96% 100,000 75,000 75% 100,000 100% Transfers Out E (79,945) (79,945) 100% (85,695) (64,266) 75% (85,696) 100% (1) Transfers Out - CDD Reserve E (1,372,679) (1,379,420) 100% (1,462,386) (1,074,401) 73% (1,103,450) 75% 358,93& TOTALTRANSFERS ; (1,152,624) (1,170,172) 102% ; (1,448,081) (1,063,667) 73% ; (1,089,146) 75% 358,935: FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuais % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 2,203,711 2,529,615 115% 1,982,004 1,783,536 90% 1,783,536 90% (198,468): Resources over Requirements 427,589 424,093 563,181 381,052 4 504,576 (58,605); Net Transfers - In (Out) ( (1,152,624) (1,170,172) t (1,448,081) (1,063,667) ! k (1,089,146) 1 358,935; E TOTALFUND BALANCE $ 1,478,676 $ 1,783,536 121% ; $ 1,097,104 $ 1,100,921 100% ; ; $ 1,198,965 109% ; $101,861: Note: Requirements projection decreased across divisions to reflect credits from the PERS Reserve Fund A Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances B Projection revised to reflect 10% reduction in permit activity and building valuation April - June 2020 due to COVID C Change in accounting procedure for hearing officer deposits, which are held as a liability instead of recognized as revenue. Projection revised to reflect 30% reduction in application activity April - June 2020 due to COVID. D Projection revised to reflect 10% reduction in building valuation April - June 2020 due to COVID E Projection reflects unfilled FTEs and reduced Materials and Services and increased to include unbudgeted health benefits trust F Projection reflects unfilled FTEs and reduced Materials and Services G Projection increased due to time management leave payout; also reflects unfilled FTEs and reduced Materials and Services w� �I ES Budget to Actuals Report Road - Fund 325 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) RESOURCES Motor Vehicle Revenue Federal - PILT Payment Other Inter -fund Services Forest Receipts Cities-Bend/Red/Sis/La Pine Sale of Equip & Material Interest on Investments Federal Reimbursements Mineral Lease Royalties Miscellaneous State Miscellaneous Assessment Payments (P&I) TOTALRESOURCES 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance 16,234,849 16,726,428 103% 17,609,539 14,335,525 81% 16,046,756 91% (1,562,783): A 1,900,000 2,153,308 113% 1,510,450 2,310,002 153% . 2,310,002 153% , 799,552, B 1,044,353 1,096,023 105% 1,156,581 250,870 22% 1,095,581 95% (61,000): C 963,410 801,125 83% 915,000 768,191 84% 768,191 84% (146,809)1 D 635,000 400,849 63% 660,000 153,780 23% 404,553 61% (255,447); E 365,000 327,920 90% 358,000 217,317 61% 349,835 98% (8,165) 150,000 220,062 147% , 246,000 154,304 63% 187,000 76% (59,000); F 544,000 363,910 67% 181,757 363,514 200% 363,514 200% 181,757, G 175,000 69,422 40% 60,000 51,925 87% 60,000 100%! - 45,000 118,699 264% 57,500 67,401 117% 79,000 137% 21,500! H 739,811 735,114 99% 20,000 9,844 49% 34,325 172% 14,325! 1 80,000 22,350 28% 11,000 7,531 68% 11,000 100% 22,876,423 23,035,209 101% ; 22,785,827 18,690,205 82% 21,709,757 95% ; (1,076,070); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services 6,595,561 6,246,351 95% 6,447,671 5,225,933 81% 6,278,748 97% 168,921 J Materials and Services 8,094,192 5,912,553 73% 8,092,165 4,431,633 55% 7,517,930 93% 574,235! K Capital Outlay - - 33,500 27,706 83% 32,416 97% 1,084: L TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ; 14,689,753 12,158,904 83% 14,573,336 9,685,273 66% ; 13,829,094 95% 744,242: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers Out (14,464,308) (14,464,308) 100% (11,910,575) (6,612,088) 56% (11,910,575) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS ; (14,464,308) (14,464,308) 100% ; (11,910,575) (6,612,088) 56% (11,910,575) 100% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 8,693,653 10,314,842 119% 6,001,989 6,726,840 112% < 6,726,840 112% 724,851 Resources over Requirements 8,186,670 10,876,306 8,212,491 9,004,932 7,880,663 (331,828); Net Transfers - In (Out) (14,464,308) F (14,464,308) t (11,910,575) (6,612,088) F 6 (11,910,575) ! 4 TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 2,416,014 $ 6,726,840 278% ; $ 2,303,905 $ 9,119,684 396% ; ; $ 2,696,928 117% ; $393,023: A Preliminary projections based on COVID B PILT payment received in July. Exceeded amounts as budgeted due to a decrease in Timber revenue. C Decrease in vehicle repair revenue due to new vehicles in the fleet D Revised projection based on federal legislation and projections from AOC E Contracted work for City of Redmond will be completed in FY 21 instead of FY 20 F Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances G A two-year federal project was completed in one year, so full amount of reimbursement was requested in year one. H Restitution receipts are higher than anticipated I Updated based on actual receipts j Projected Personnel savings based on YTD average vacancy rate of 2.0% K Contracted road services and on -call engineering anticipated to be less than budgeted due to lack of snow and emergency work. Aggregate & Asphalt anticipated to be less than budgeted due to City of Redmond work being pushed to FY 21. Includes projection for an interfund payment to Fair & Expo for 5.0 FTE for May and June. L Updated based on revised estimate o TES ` 2� Budget to Actuals Report Adult P&P - Fund 355 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) RESOURCES DOC Grant in Aid SB 1145 CJC Justice Reinvestment DOC Measure 57 Probation Supervision Fees DOC-Family Sentence Alt Interest on Investments Interfund- Sheriff Gen Fund/Crime Prevention State Subsidy Probation Work Crew Fees Electronic Monitoring Fee Miscellaneous Oregon BOPPPS State Miscellaneous TOTALRESOURCES 83.3 % Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance 4,781,604 4,781,604 100%, 4,353,626 4,621,782 106% 4,621,782 106%, 268,156: A t 844,831 853,831 101% 712,530 1,061,670 149% _ 1,061,670 149% , 349,140, B t 233,900 233,900 100% ; 236,142 239,005 101% < 239,005 101% 2,863. A t 210,000 191,536 91% 160,000 152,165 95% 165,000 103% , 5,000� C 114,683 114,683 100% ; 114,682 223,746 195% 223,746 195% 109,064, D t 40,000 77,778 194% 77,500 55,383 71% 67,150 87% (10,350)l E t 50,000 51,034 102% 50,000 45,833 92% E 50,000 100% t 50,000 50,000 100% 50,000 37,500 75% 50,000 100% t 17,000 16,337 96% 16,298 16,703 102% 16,703 102% 405! 4,000 2,800 70% 2,000 1,843 92% 2,000 100% 10,000 84,165 842% ' 2,000 19,500 975% , 21,000 999% ' 19,000, F t 500 6,102 999% 500 13,515 999% E 13,515 999%: 13,016 G - - 40,933 40,934 40,934 H 4,300 - 0% - - 6,360,818 6,463,769 102% ; 5,775,278 6,529,578 113% ; ; 6,572,505 114% ; 797,227: REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services 4,656,363 4,522,266 97% 4,809,644 3,949,544 82% 4,769,078 99% 40,566: 1 Materials and Services 1,828,765 1,686,408 92% 1,764,847 1,325,827 75% 1,756,120 100% - 8,727, J Capital Outlay 20,000 - 0% 15,000 10,000 67% 10,000 67% ' 5,000� K TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,505,128 6,208,673 95% 6,589,491 5,285,371 80% ; ; 6,535,198 99% 54,293: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In- General Funds 285,189 285,189 100% 285,189 237,650 83% 285,189 100% -' Transfer to Vehicle Maint (120,000) (120,000) 100% (62,000) (46,500) 75% ' (62,000) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS 165,189 165,189 100% ; 223,189 191,150 86% ; 223,189 100% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 2,200,000 2,333,720 106% 2,590,000 2,754,005 106% ' 2,754,005 106% ' 164,005' Resources over Requirements (144,310) 255,096 (814,213) 1,244,207 37,307 851,520 Net Transfers - In (Out) 165,189 165,189 223,189 191,150 223,189 t ( E € ! E TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 2,220,879 $ 2,754,005 124% ; $ 1,998,976 $ 4,189,362 210% ; ; $ 3,014,501 151% ; $1,015,525: A State Dept. of Corrections and Criminal Justice Commission received more funding for dispersal than anticipated at time of budgeting B State Criminal Justice Commission received more funding for dispersal than anticipated at time of budgeting incl. supplemental grant funding C Projection based on YTD actuals and anticipated COVID related impact on client ability to pay fees D State Dept. of Corrections under allocated resources at the time of budgeting E Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances F Revenue from prior pretrial EM clients more than anticipated at time of budgeting due to account close-out offer in June -Aug 2019 and Dept. Revenue fees from closed/previous accounts. G Revenue includes miscellaneous refunds, staff uniform overage fees and payment from participants attending a Nov 2019/March 2020 training event hosted by Adult P&P H State makes one payment per biennium to conduct hearings for sanctioned offenders. Received both FY19 and FY21 biennial payments in FY20. I Projected Personnel savings based on YTD average vacancy rate of 1.6% less anticipated retirement vacation payouts J Projection based on YTD actuals. Higher than anticipated pass -through grant contributions (JRI), and emergency and transitional housing costs including COVID related impacts. K Projection based on YTD actuals. DCSO auction vehicle was less expensive than budgeted. TES` 2{ Oe, Budget to Actuals Report Road CIP - Fund 465 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance State Miscellaneous 853,104 0% 1,944,893 1,058,217 54% 1,777,052 91% (167,841); A Interest on Investments 106,000 261,131 246% 198,000 313,665 158% 360,000 182% 162,000, B Interfund Payment - - 111,560 111,560 111,560 C TOTALRESOURCES 959,104 261,131 27% 2,142,893 1,483,442 69% 2,248,612 105% ; 105,719; REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Materials and Services 73,153 73,153 100% 71,748 59,790 83% 71,748 100% Capital Outlay 8,236,348 5,411,213 66% 13,764,165 4,519,307 33% 7,175,099 52% 6,589,066! D TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 8,309,501 5,484,366 66% ; 13,835,913 4,579,097 33% ; 7,246,847 52% 6,589,066: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In 13,811,725 13,393,963 97% 12,014,914 5,298,487 44% 11,893,453 99% (121,461), E TOTALTRANSFERS 13,811,725 13,393,963 97% 12,0142914 5,298,487 44% 11,893,453 99% (121,461), FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 7,687,037 9,588,827 125% 15,616,536 17,759,555 114% 17,759,555 114% 2,143,0% Resources over Requirements (7,350,397) (5,223,236) (11,693,020) (3,095,655) (4,998,235) 6,694,785 Net Transfers - In (Out) 13,811,725 13,393,963 12,014,914 5,298,487 112893,453 (121,461) E TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 14,148,365 $ 17,759,555 126% ; $ 15,938,430 $ 19,962,387 125% ; $ 24,654,773 155% ; $8,716,343: A Updated based on reimbursable projects planned to be completed this fiscal year B Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances C Unbudgeted revenue to offset expenses for Spring River Road Improvements D Variance due to unanticipated project delays projected to advance FY 20 budgeted CIP project costs into FY 21, including $5M for US 97 Bend North Corridor project E Revised estimate based on SDC eligible projects anticipated to be completed in fiscal year Budget to Actuals Report Road CIP (Fund 465) - Capital Outlay Summary by Project 83.3% FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) Year Completed Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Burgess Road Day Road Inter. i 900,106 658,203 73% Deschutes Market Dale Road Inter. 1,500,000 1,285,822 86% Erickson Road Paving 468,544 Old Bend Redmond Highway Phase 11 3rd Street Drainage Extension 300,000 112,655 38% US 20 at Tumalo 300,000 1,100,000 367%4 300,000 0% 0% 300,000 Paving Knott Rd 850,286 495,978 58% S. Canal Helmholtz Way 714,937 141,751 20% 800,000 717,683 90% 642,226 80% 157,774- S. Canal - "Six" Corners 798,699 537,724 67% i 900,000 1,007,258 112%- I 1,007,432 112%: (107,432)' Six Corners Irrigation Tumalo Road / Tumalo Place 406,879 49,123 12% 1 769,521 104,236 14% 389,788 51% 379,733; Quail Road Improvements 100,000 100,000 100%! La Pine Guardrail Repair 40,099 C Avenue: Hwy 97 to 6th St Impry 180,746 35,351 20% 1 300,000 369,705 123% 1 1 369,705 123%1 (69,705) Solar Drive Bridge 1 60,000 70,334 44% Old Bend Rdm/Tumalo Rd Inter i 346,426 50,355 15% 1 625,642 97,163 16% 1 772,150 123% 1 (146,508)- Sisemore Bridge 220,000 100,596 46% i 632,174 106,042 17% 675,503 107% (439329)- Spring River Bridge Parking Imp 163,776 12,122 12,122 (12,122)t NE Negus and 17TH 360,000 221 0% 1 1,025,472 31,176 3% 180,000 18% 1 845,472 Paving Ward Road 339,810 681 0% 598,269 715,504 120%!; 715,504 120%! (117,235) Hunnel Rd: Loco Rd to Tumalo Rd 275,000 33,918 12% 75,000 27% 200,000 Cascade Lakes Hwy Bike Facilities 39,856 11,856 30% 11,856 30% 28,000, Fyrear Rd US 20 to Stevens 300,000 - 0% c ! 300,000 100% Alfalfa Mkt Rd: Powell Butte Hwy 300,000 809,018 270% 1 450,000 150%1 (150,000). Bend District Local Roads 558,459 0% City of LaPine Local Roads 500,000 0% 0% 500,000- US 97 Bend North Corridor 5,000,000 0% 0% 5,000,000_ Tumalo Res Rd: OB Riley to Bailey Rd 247,342 0% 0% 1 Z 247,342 US 20 Ward Rd to Hamby 500,000 500,000 100%1 500,000 100% 1 Transportation System Plan Update 250,000 253 0% 80,000 32% 1 170,000- Gribbling Rd Bridge 60,000 0% 30,000 50% 30,000 Slurry Seal 2020 675 300,000 (300,000) Paving of S. Century Dr 2,265 484,813 (484,813)- Sisemore Rd Canal Piping Terrebonne Wastewater Feasibility St. 217 50,000 (50,000)s Signage Improvements 100,000 0% 60,144 0% 28,000 47% 1 32,1144 Guardrail Improvements 100,000 0% 1 100,000 0% 100,000 100%! ARTS Project 180,746 0% 0% 180,74& - Rickard Rd: Groff Rd to US 20 217 1,000 (1,000)= TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $8,236,348 $ 5,411,213 66%1 $ 13,764,165 4,519,307 33%i 1 $7,175, 99 52%1 $ 6,590,066€ o� Budget to Actuals Report E , o� Solid Waste - Fund 610 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Franchise Disposal Fees 6,497,676 6,356,636 98% 6,437,500 5,099,571 79% 6,437,500 100% A Private Disposal Fees 2,709,370 2,379,061 88% 2,419,046 1,981,604 82% 2,419,046 100% Commercial Disp. Fee 2,042,050 2,060,523 101% 2,252,225 1,962,321 87% 2,252,225 100% Franchise 3% Fees 265,000 291,340 110% 265,000 288,328 109% , 296,328 112% 31,328! B Yard Debris 216,761 268,830 124% 216,761 231,630 107% 271,780 125% , 55,0% C Interest 44,000 58,235 132% 59,000 39,653 67% 47,000 80% (12,000)l D Miscellaneous 49,955 57,067 114% 48,336 157,688 326% 161,140 333% , 112,804 E Special Waste 15,000 21,487 143% 15,000 24,125 161% 25,000 167% , 10,000, F Recyclables 18,000 11,063 61% 12,000 9,522 79% 12,000 100% Leases i 10,801 1 0% 1 - 0% 1 100% TOTALRESOURCES 11,868,613 11,504,244 97% 11,724,869 9,794,442 84% 11,922,020 102% ; 197,151: REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services 2,504,623 2,331,135 93% 2,538,776 1,973,855 78% 2,389,303 94% 149,473, G Materials and Services 4,772,159 4,341,881 91% 4,927,163 2,979,902 60% 4,842,710 98% 84,453, H Capital Outlay 173,000 109,681 63% 56,000 11,724 21% 11,724 21% 44,276! 1 Debt Service 860,938 860,937 100% ; 862,100 309,595 36% 862,100 100% J TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 8,310,720 7,643,635 92% ; 8,384,039 5,275,076 63% 8,105,837 97% 278,202; TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance SW Capital & Equipment (4,688,023) (5,000,029) 107% (3,296,192) (1,624,273) 49% (3,296,192) 100%: K Reserve TOTALTRANSFERS (4,688,023) (5,000,029) 107% ; (3,296,192) (1,624,273) 49% ; (3,296,192) 100% ; FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 1,730,130 1,938,991 112% 600,000 799,570 133% 799,570 133% 199,570: i Resources over Requirements 3,557,893 3,860,608 3,340,830 4,519,366 3,816,183 475,353! Net Transfers - In (Out) (4,688,023) (5,000,029) f (3,296,192) (1,624,273) E (3,296,192) r TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 600,000 $ 799,570 133% ; $ 644,638 $ 3,694,663 573% ; ; $ 1,319,561 205% ; $674,923; A Payment of $325K Republic Services (Bend Garbage & Recycling and High Country Disposal) for the month of April was not received by month -end close B Received the annual fees due April 15, 2020; projecting the remaining Wilderness Garbage in monthly installments C Revenue is seasonal with higher utilization in the summer months; historically high month in April anticipated to be offset by extended Fire Free event in May D Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances E Includes an unbudgeted sale of loader 7-279 for $95K, CEC LED light incentive and Taylor NW royalty payments F Revenue source is unpredictable and dependent on special clean-up projects; April had large contaminated soil and asbestos projects G Projected Personnel savings based on YTD average vacancy rate of 4.9% H Projecting to be slightly less than budget; the waste characterization study and seasonal items such as mulching from the Fire Free events and bird control are anticipated later this fiscal year I FY19 extended the life of an existing vehicle and did not purchase a second pick-up; FY20 purchased the budgeted gas monitoring equipment and moved the fencing project to FY21 j Principal and interest payments due in Nov and May K Quarterly reserve transfer on hold to evaluate potential economic changes o ` �j Budget to Actuals Report o Fair & Expo - Fund 615 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Events Revenue 655,000 615,300 94% 687,000 369,222 54% 370,000 54% (317,000): A Food & Beverage 540,000 629,875 117% 568,000 282,071 50% 283,000 50% (285,000); B Rights & Signage 105,000 115,650 110% 120,000 84,100 70% 87,000 73% (33,000)� Storage 83,100 76,735 92% 71,000 53,938 76% 68,000 96% (3,000); C Horse Stall Rental 57,000 71,855 126% 62,000 37,296 60% 37,296 60% (24,704) Interfund Payment 30,000 54,573 182% 30,000 34,279 114% 149,192 497% , 119,192 D Camping Fee 18,200 19,975 110% 18,000 5,600 31% 6,000 33% (12,000) Miscellaneous k 8,400 6,374 76% 3,500 2,236 64% 4,500 129% 1,000 Interest 2,400 (518) -22% r 2,000 (3,694) -185% (4,200) -210% (6,200) TOTALRESOURCES 1,499,100 1,589,820 106% ; 1,561,500 865,050 55% ; 1,000,788 64% (560,712); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services 1,248,512 1,259,337 101% 1,176,169 946,940 81% 1,123,396 96% � 52,773, E Personnel Services - F&B k 149,296 149,947 100% 157,430 132,774 84% 157,430 100%! F Materials and Services k 967,441 912,724 94% 795,788 673,905 85% 740,143 93% 55,645 G Materials and Services - F&B k 222,500 365,951 164% 234,600 216,471 92% 217,000 92% 17,6W B Debt Service 101,136 101,136 100% 100,800 55,290 55% 100,800 100% e TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ; 2,688,885 2,789,095 104% ; 2,464,787 2,025,379 82% 2,338,769 95% ; 126,018; TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In - Room Tax 517,996 517,996 100% 409,654 309,381 76% 358,139 87% (51,515); H i Transfers In - County Fair 472,998 417,000 88% 395,000 250,000 63% 250,000 63% (145,000); 1 Transfers In - General Fund k 200,000 200,000 100% 200,000 166,660 83% 200,000 100% Transfers In - Park Fund 30,000 30,000 100% 30,000 22,500 75% 30,000 100% Transfers Out - - (11,791) (8,841) 75% (11,791) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS 1,220,994 1,164,996 95% 1,022,863 739,700 72% ; 826,348 81% (196,515); FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance - (60,285) 999% 80,000 (94,564) -118%; (94,564) -118%; (174,564); J Resources over Requirements (1,189,785) (1,199,275) (903,287) (1,160,330) (1,337,981) (434,694) Net Transfers - In (Out) k 1,220,994 1,164,996 k 1,022,863 739,700 I k 826,348 i (196,515) E TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 31,209 ($ 94,564) -303%; $ 199,576 ($ 515,194) -258%; ($ 606,197) -304%; ($805,773); A Current year receipts are 54% of budget YTD; prior year receipts were 73% of budget at this point last year. All March, April and May events cancelled due to COVID. June events impacted. B Net earnings from F&B activities YTD are $(67,175). Monthly fixed costs have a greater impact on earnings during off-season months. All March, April and most May events cancelled due to COVID. June events impacted. c Allowing storage to continue additional months due to event cancellations. D Reimbursement from RV Park for personnel expenditures recorded in F&E. Includes interfund payment for 7.0 FTE whose cost is being absorbed by Roads (5.0 FTE), Sheriffs Office (1.0 FTE) and BOCC (1.00 FTE). E Projected Personnel savings based on YTD average vacancy rate of 6.6% and reduction in some staff hours F Net earnings from F&B activities YTD are $(67,175). Monthly fixed costs have a greater impact on earnings during off-season months. G Projected to be lower than budget based on April -June event cancellations. H Projected to be lower than budget based on COVA's estimates for TRT revenue for the remainder of FY20 I Net proceeds from the County Fair are recorded in a separate fund and transferred in at year-end (Final estimate of $250k) j Prior year losses, relative to budget, are compounded into the beginning working capital to start the fiscal year. p� �'VES� Budget to Actuals Report RV Park - Fund 618 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance RV Park Fees < 31 Days 340,200 458,331 135% 405,200 323,572 80% 358,652 89% (46,548); A Interest on Investments 4,400 12,255 279% 12,000 9,713 81% 13,000 108% 1,000� B Cancellation Fees 4,000 12,497 312% 5,000 4,891 98% 5,781 116% , 781 RV Park Fees > 30 Days 5,000 11,600 232% 5,000 13,050 261% 13,050 261% ! 8,050! Washer/Dryer 3,500 4,650 133% 4,000 4,642 116% 5,447 136% 1,447 Vending Machines 1,500 1,716 114% 3,000 1,653 55% 2,059 69% (941) Miscellaneous 2,231 2,000 1,796 90% 2,417 121% , 417 Good Sam Membership Fee 2,561 1,500 351 23% 351 23% (1,149); C Good Sam Discounts , (17,220) 999% t - (7,109) 999% (7,109) 999% : (7,109); C TOTALRESOURCES 358,600 488,620 136% ; 437,700 352,558 81% 393,648 90% (44,052); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Materials and Services 298,870 276,007 92% 318,273 222,663 70% 272,876 86% 45,397; Debt Service 223,101 223,101 100% 222,100 161,528 73% 222,100 100% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ; 521,971 499,108 96% ; 540,373 384,191 71% ; 494,976 92% 45,397: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers In - Park Fund 160,000 160,000 100% 160,000 160,000 100% 160,000 100% Transfers In - TRT Fund 35,000 26,250 75% 35,000 100% Transfer Out - RV Reserve F (502,000) (251,000) 50% (502,000) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS 160,000 160,000 100% ; (307,000) (64,750) 21% ; (307,000) 100% FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 319,000 443,480 139% 560,000 592,992 106% 592,992 106% 32,992: Resources over Requirements (163,371) (10,488) (102,673) (31,632) (101,328) 1,345, Net Transfers - In (Out) 160,000 160,000 E (307,000) (64,750) (307,000) TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 315,629 $ 592,992 188% ; $ 150,327 $ 496,610 330% ; ; $ 184,664 123% ; $34,337: A 9,618 RV spaces, 29.85% utilization YTD. Prior year comparable was 9,416 RV spaces, 29.22% utilization YTD; projection decreased due to COVID. B Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances C The Good Sam incentive program was discontinued during Fall 2019. usE s` Budget to Actuals Report Risk Management - Fund 670 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3% Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Workers' Compensation 1,247,279 1,273,816 102% 1,255,108 1,092,940 87% 1,255,108 100%, General Liability 1,063,675 1,063,675 100% ; 1,072,326 879,572 82% 1,072,326 100% Property Damage 394,291 394,291 100% ; 392,923 329,934 84% 392,923 100% Unemployment 280,921 297,540 106% 323,572 299,142 92% 323,572 100%! A Vehicle 195,250 195,250 100% ; 195,580 1699171 86% 195,580 100% Interest on Investments 85,000 148,890 175% 137,000 128,895 94% 157,000 115% ! 20,000� B Claims Reimbursement 269,198 57,073 21% 82,000 460,881 562% 461,000 562% , 379,000, C Skid Car Training 32,000 44,910 140% 34,000 34,740 102% 35,000 103% 1,000 Process Fee- Events/ Parades 1,800 1,575 88% 2,000 1,080 54% 1,100 55% (900) Miscellaneous 500 5 1% 500 5 1% 100 20% (400); Loss Prevention 30 30 100%, 30 0% 30 100% - TOTALRESOURCES 3,569,944 3,477,056 97% ; 3,495,039 3,396,359 97% ; 3,893,739 111%; 398,700: REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Workers' Compensation 1,360,000 1,013,256 75% 1,460,000 604,103 41% 900,000 62% 560,00& General Liability 900,000 633,248 70% 1,400,000 242,227 17% 600,000 43% 800,000! D Insurance Administration 599,459 529,833 88% 592,059 394,020 67% 531,598 90% 60,461� E Property Damage 728,638 548,796 75% 400,236 696,261 174% 900,000 225% (499,764)! F Vehicle 120,000 100,150 83% 150,000 106,596 71% 250,000 167% (100,000), Unemployment 1503000 37,481 25% 130,000 25,612 20% 90,000 69% 40,000, G TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ; 3,858,097 2,862,764 74% 4,132,295 2,068,819 50% ; 3,271,598 79% 860,697: TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Transfers Out - Vehicle Replace (3,168) (3,168) 100% (6,918) (5,187) 75% (6,918) 100% TOTALTRANSFERS (3,168) (3,168) 100% ; (6,918) (5,187) 75% ; (6,918) 100%: FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 5,600,000 6,582,283 118% 6,100,000 7,193,407 118% 73193,407 118% 1,093,407, Resources over Requirements (288,153) 614,292 (637,256) 1,327,541 622,141 1,259,39T Net Transfers - In (Out) d (3,168) (3,168) I (6,918) (5,187) k f! (6,918) 6 F TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 5,308,679 $ 7,193,407 136% ; $ 5,455,826 $ 8,515,761 156% ; ; $ 7,808,630 143% ; $2,352,804: A Unemployment collected on first $25K of employee's salary in fiscal year B Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances C Payment associated to repair of the Fair and Expo roof. Payment was expected last fiscal year, but received in this fiscal year. D Claims are difficult to project, but General Liability claims are trending less than budget E Part of projected Personnel savings based on 1.00 vacant FTE in July and August, which has been transferred to Administrative Services F Majority of Fair/Expo roof replacement costs were expected in FY19, but significant portion incurred in FY20. G Fewer unemployment claims than anticipated. ,��lES Budget to Actuals Report (�G Health Benefits - Fund 675 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) 83.3 % Year Complete Fiscal Year2019 Fiscal Year2020 RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Internal Premium Charges 17,054,563 18,051,440 106% 17,411,292 14,816,452 85% 17,816,452 102% 405,160� COIC Premiums 11834,000 1,794,789 98% 1,967,021 1,267,225 64% 1,527,225 78% (439,796)' A Retiree / COBRA Premiums 1,280,000 1,144,088 89% 1,433,000 723,960 51% 868,752 61% (564,248); B Employee Co -Pay 963,000 1,016,748 106% 1,041,120 870,656 84% 1,054,656 101% , 131536 Interest 220,000 366,207 166% 346,000 293,694 85% 364,000 105% 18,000 Prescription Rebates 60,000 148,847 248% 75,000 131,394 175% k 135,000 180% , 60,000 Claims Reimbursement & Other 177,557 45,000 6,932 15% 20,000 44% (25,000) TOTAL RESOURCES 21,411,563 22,699,675 106% ; 22,318,433 18,110,313 81% ; 21,786,085 98% ; (532,348); REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Health Benefits 19,559,777 17,493,075 89% 18,550,836 14,611,130 79% 19,779,403 107% (1,228,567), C Deschutes On -Site Pharmacy 2,284,744 2,514,038 110% 2,242,104 2,168,080 97% ! 2,578,352 115% (336,248), C Deschutes On -Site Clinic 1,114,864 1,045,588 94% 1,141,691 853,264 75% 1,141,691 100% C Wellness 184,870 158,384 86% 180,380 137,832 76% 180,380 100% C TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 23,144,255 21,211,086 92% ; 22,115,011 17,770,306 80% ; 23,679,826 107%; (1,564,815); FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 16,051,586 15,075,316 94% 16,106,294 16,563,905 103% 16,563,905 103% 457,611 Resources over Requirements (1,732,692) 1,488,590 203,422 340,007 (1,893,741) (2,097,163); Net Transfers - In (Out) - d - - TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 14,318,894 $ 16,563,905 116% $ 16,309,716 $ 16,903,912 104% $ 14,670,164 90% : ($1,639,552); A Prior year monthly average was $149K, whereas YTD monthly average is—$130K; COIC rates reduced by 5% at start of fiscal year B Prior year monthly average was $95K, whereas YTD monthly average is $72K C Amounts are paid 1 month in arrears; projection compared to historical costs for reasonableness Budget to Actuals Report 911 - Fund 705 FY20 YTD April 30, 2020 (unaudited) RESOURCES Property Taxes - Current Yr Telephone User Tax Police RMS User Fees Interest State Reimbursement Property Taxes - Prior Yr Data Network Reimbursement Contract Payments User Fee Property Taxes - Jefferson Co. Miscellaneous TOTALRESOURCES 83.3 % Year Complete Fiscal Year 2019 1 Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance 8,311,833 8,426,089 101% 8,809,419 8,598,848 98% 8,856,617 101% 47,19& A 890,000 955,187 ° 107 /o i 900,000 474,581 53% � 900,000 100% , � B � ' 300,680 335,192 111% ' 250,000 167,192 67% 250,000 100% ' -C 200,000 205,570 103% 4 157,000 160,589 102% 193,000 123% ' 36,000! D 125,000 i 162,900 130% ' 125,000 101,881 82% 125,000 100%! -' E 110,000 i 1082419 99% � 100,000 242,627 243% � � 255,000 255% ' 155,000- F 50,000 106,592 213% � 55,000 19,819 36% � 55,000 100%! -t 51,300 175 0% � 51,300 16,083 31% ' 75,000 146%' 23,700,C 180,000 i 141,980 79% 73,680 63,967 87% ' 73,680 100%! ' C 30,000 33,453 112% � 30,000 33,637 112% � � 33,637 112% � 3,637! 11,200 38,757 346% ' 11,951 15,284 128% ' 18,572 155% ' 6,621 10,260,013 10,514,313 102% ; 10,563,350 9,894,508 94% 10,835,506 103% ; 272,157: REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Personnel Services i 7,646,307 6,743,116 88% 7,462,575 5,846,016 78% 6,947,099 93% 515,476: G Materials and Services 3,370,357 3,297,619 98% 3,387,761 2,598,342 77% 3,387,761 100% Capital Outlay 2,362,400 529,377 22% 1,400,000 353,813 25% , 1,400,000 100% ' t TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 13,379,064 10,570,113 79% 12,250,336 8,798,170 72% 11,734,860 96% 515,476: FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance Beginning Fund Balance 8,625,000 8,660,615 100% 7,753,706 8,604,816 111% < 8,604,816 111%' 851,109: i Resources over Requirements (3,119,051) (55,800) (1,686,986) 1,096,338 (899,354) 787,633' Net Transfers - In (Out) - TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 5,505,949 $ 8,604,816 156% ; $ 6,066,720 $ 9,701,153 160% $ 7,705,462 127% ; $1,638,742; A Actual 19-20 TAV is a 5.36% increase compared to FY 18-19 vs. 5.5% budgeted; however collection rate is projected to be 95.8% versus 95% B Telephone maintenance reimbursements are received in a lump sum by early spring C Majority of billings sent at the end of March, revenue expected at the end of May D Interest projection based on current investment rate and anticipated cash balances E State GIS reimbursements are received quarterly F TDS Baja deferred billing credits per ORS 305.286 in addition to settlement payment G Projected Personnel savings based on YTD average vacancy rate of 8.3%