2020-273-Minutes for Meeting June 17,2020 Recorded 8/4/2020BOARD OF Recorded in Deschutes County CJ2020-273
COMMISSIONERS Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk
Commissioners' Journal 08/04/2020 7:37:04 AM
1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon
(541) 388-6570
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
FOR RECORDING STAMP ONLY
10:00 AM Wed n sday, Jun 17, 2020
BARNES & SAWYER ROOMS
Virtual Meeting Platform
Present were Commissioners Patti Adair, Anthony DeBone, and Phil Henderson. Also present were
Tom Anderson, County Administrator; David Doyle, County Counsel; and Sharon Keith, Board Executive
Assistant. Attendance was limited due to Governor's Virus Orders. Several citizens and no identified
representatives of the media were present.
This meeting was audio and video recorded and can be accessed at the Deschutes County
Meeting Portal website http://deschutescountyor.igm2.com/Citizens/Default.aspx
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Adair called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
CITIZEN INPUT:
CONSENT AGENDA: None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Government Finance Officers Award Presentation
This item has been pulled from today's agenda and will be presented at the
BOCC MEETING
JUNE 17, 2020 PAGE 1 OF 7
July 6, 2020 BOCC meeting.
2. Smith Rock State Park Parking Discussion
Road Department Director Chris Doty presented the concern. Present via
Zoom conference call were: Matt Davey, Oregon State Parks; Steve
Memminger, Oregon State Parks; Sheriff Shane Nelson and Captain Paul
Garrison, Cody Smith, County Engineer; and Peter Russell, Senior
Transportation Planner; and Terry Garrick, Redmond Fire and Rescue. Mr.
Doty presented the background on issues and concerns with the parking at
Smith Rock State Park. (Presentation is attached to the record). Mr. Davey
reported on the parking capacity at the park and the pressure on the
adjoining street including the need to address the safety issues. Mr. Davey
recommends extra signage and the ability to issue citations on NE Wilcox
Avenue. Commissioner DeBone requested a map of the area to highlight the
parking concern areas. Captain Paul Garrison commented on safety
response and hazards due to the parking and traffic concerns at Smith Rock.
The Deschutes County Sheriff's Office recommends providing education
which will create additional shifts and work load for the department. Al
Durtinger, Terrebonne resident commented on traffic concerns. Mr. Doty
recommended adding signage on 5 1/2 miles of Deschutes County roads and
asked for authority from the Board. The Commissioners will drive through
the area to review parking. Mr. Doty will bring this item back to the June 22,
2020 BOCC meeting.
3. Transportation System Plan: Draft Scope Discussion
Road Department Director Chris Doty reviewed the transportation system
plan (presentation attached to the record). Commissioner DeBone
recommends having a meeting of the special road districts regarding road
maintenance. Mr. Doty is proposing a TSP advisory committee. Peter Russell
(via Zoom Conference Call) reported on the history of the TSP. The Board
supports proceeding. Commissioner Henderson acknowledged his
preference for further review.
BOCC MEETING
JUNE 17, 2020 PAGE 2 OF 7
CONVENE AS GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY AND DESCHUTES
COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICTS
4. PRESENTATION: Core Area Proposed Urban Renewal District Tax
Increment Finance Plan & Report
Matt Stuart, Elaine Howard, and Councilor Justin Livingston City of Bend (via
Zoom conference call) presented a financing plan for the core area proposed
urban renewal district / tax increment incrament financing. The deadline for
formal Resolution / comment is July 23, 2020. (Presentation is attached to the
record). Sheriff Shane Nelson (via Zoom conference call) commented on the
impacts to the taxing district and concerns regarding impacts to those
districts especially in light of increased service needs and growth of the
County.
RECONVENE AS GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY
RECESS: At the time of 12:54 p.m. the Board went into recess and reconvened at
1:35 p.m. Commissioner Henderson was present at 1:40 p.m.
5. COVIDI9 Update
Health Services Director Dr. Conway (via Zoom conference call) reported on
COVID19 testing and cases in Deschutes County.
• Report on Use of Childcare Funds: Karen Prow, Neighborlmpact (via
Zoom conference call) gave an update of the services provided to
childcare programs in Deschutes County.
BOCC MEETING
JUNE 17, 2020 PAGE 3 OF 7
• IGA: County Counsel Dave Doyle presented a draft intergovernmental
agreement with Jefferson County relative to providing shelter (as
available at the contracted motel site in Bend) for subject homeless
populations in Jefferson County. Mr. Doyle reported that Crook
County is also interested in such an agreement. The agreement allows
for County Administrator signature.
DEBONE: Move approval of Document No. 2020-427, amended to
include Crook County if requested.
HENDERSON: Second
VOTE: DEBONE: Yes
HENDERSON: Yes
ADAIR: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried
6. Discussion of Video Lottery Funds
Senior Legal Assistant Counsel John Laherty reported regarding the
significant shortfall of video lottery funds that were to be allotted to
Deschutes County. The revenue over the last quarter has plummeted due to
the impacts of COVID19. The approximate shortfall for Deschutes County for
the quarter is $130,000.
7. Storm Damage Briefing: Emergency Services Manager Nathan Garibay (via
Zoom conference call) reported on the agricultural damage from the severe
thunderstorm that occurred on May 30, 2020. A declaration is not required
to respond to the damage impact.
BOCC MEETING
JUNE 17, 2020 PAGE 4 OF 7
8. PUBLIC HEARING: Thornburg Golf Course
Community Development Department Planner Will Groves (via Zoom
conference call) presented the public hearing process. Hearing no conflicts
or challenges of the Commissioners, Chair Adair opened the public hearing.
Mr. Groves provided the staff report. Commissioner Adair opened the
hearing for public testimony.
Kameron DeLashmutt, applicant, presented testimony and written materials
for the record and explained details on the application and commented on
claims that have been noted as opposition to the application.
Carol MacBeth, staff attorney with Central Oregon Landwatch presented
testimony in opposition of the application.
Jeffrey Kleinman, attorney representing Nunzie Gould (via Zoom conference
call) presented testimony in opposition of the application.
Karl Anuta, attorney (via Zoom conference call) presented testimony in
opposition of the application.
Assistant Legal Counsel Adam Smith (via Zoom conference call) commented
on public record submissions.
Nunzie Gould, appellant provided testimony in opposition of the application.
Tom Bishop, presented testimony and written materials for the record in
opposition of the application.
Jim Guild, presented testimony in opposition of the application.
Sage Dorsey, presented testimony and written materials in opposition of the
application.
Ambers Thornburg, presented testimony and written materials in opposition
of the application.
David Arnold, presented testimony in opposition of the application.
BOCC MEETING
JUNE 17, 2020 PAGE 5 OF 7
Paula Latasa, 65180 76th street Bend (via Zoom conference call) and
presented testimony in support of Central Oregon Landwatch and Nunzie
Gould and is opposing the application.
Christine Larson, 20200 Marsh Road, Bend (via Zoom conference call)
presented testimony in opposition of the application.
Debra Medlar, 6986 Thunderbird Court, Redmond (via Zoom conference call)
inquired if Henderson Homes will be building any homes at Thornburgh as it
would be a conflict.
Kameron DeLashmutt, applicant and Jan Neuman, attorney and Liz Fancher,
attorney (via Zoom conference call) presented rebuttal.
Hearing no further testimony, the Chair closed the oral record. The decision
deadline is early December 2020. The written record will remain open for
14/7/7. Written record materials could be received until 5:00 p.m. on July 1.
Rebuttal could be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on July 8. Final arguments could be
received until 5:00 p.m. on July 15.
OTHER ITEMS:
• The Executive Sessions will be postponed and scheduled an Executive
Session meeting for 8:30 a.m. on Friday, June 19.
• Mr. Anderson reminded the Board there is a joint meeting with the City of La
Pine at 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 24 at the La Pine Senior Center. A
draft agenda was presented. Mr. Anderson also reported on an upcoming
joint meeting with the City of Redmond on Tuesday, July 14 via a virtual
meeting platform.
BOCC MEETING
JUNE 17, 2020 PAGE 6 OF 7
ADJOURN
Being no further items to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 5:33 p.m.
DATED this Day of
Commissioners.
ATTEST:
REtORDNG SECRET
2020 for the Deschutes County Board of
PATTI ADAIR, CHAIR
ANTHONY DEBONE, V CE CHAIR
N.
PHILIP G. HENDERSON, CMMISSIONER
BOCC MEETING
JUNE 17, 2020 PAGE 7 OF 7
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 - www.deschutes.org
BOCC MEETING AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
10:00 AM, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 17, 2020
Barnes Sawyer Rooms - Deschutes Services Center - 1300 NW Wall Street - Bend
This meeting is open to the public, usually streamed live online and video recorded. To watch it online, visit
www.deschutes.org/meetings.
Pursuant to ORS 192.640, this agenda includes a list of the main topics that are anticipated to be considered or
discussed. This notice does not limit the Board's ability to address other topics.
Item start times are estimated and subject to change without notice.
CALL TO ORDER
MEETING FORMAT
In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, Oregon Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order
20-16 directing government entities to utilize virtual meetings whenever possible and to take necessary
measures to facilitate public participation in these virtual meetings.
Beginning on May 4, 2020, meetings and hearings of the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners will be
conducted in a virtual format. Attendance/Participation options include:
Live Stream Video: Members of the public may still view the BOCC meetings/hearings in real time via the
Public Meeting Portal at www.deschutes.org/meetings.
Citizen Input: Citizen Input is invited in order to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on any
meeting topic that is not on the current agenda. Citizen Input is provided by submitting an email to:
citizeninputPdeschutes.org or by leaving a voice message at 541-385-1734. Citizen input received before
the start of the meeting will be included in the meeting record.
Zoom Meeting Information: Staff and citizens that are presenting agenda items to the Board for
consideration or who are planning to testify in a scheduled public hearing may participate via Zoom
meeting. The Zoom meeting id and password will be included in either the public hearing materials or
through a meeting invite once your agenda item has been included on the agenda. Upon entering the
Zoom meeting, you will automatically be placed on hold and in the waiting room. Once you are ready to
Board of Commissioners BOCC Meeting Agenda
of 4
Wednesday, June 17, 2020 Page 1
present your agenda item, you will be unmuted and placed in the spotlight for your presentation. If you are
providing testimony during a hearing, you will be placed in the waiting room until the time of testimony,
staff will announce your name and unmute your connection to be invited for testimony. Detailed
instructions will be included in the public hearing materials and will be announced at the outset of the
public hearing.
For public testimony, the Zoom meeting ID and password will also be posted within the agenda packet and
listed on the staff report memo for that specific public hearing.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN INPUT (for items not on this Agenda)
[Note: Because COVID-19 restrictions may limit or preclude in person attendance, citizen input comments
may be emailed to citizeninput@deschutes.org or you may leave a brief voicemail at 541.385.1734. To be
timely, citizen input must be received by 9:OOam on the day of the meeting.]
ACTION ITEMS
1. 10:00 AM
2. 10:10 AM
Government Finance Officers Awards Presentation - Greg Munn, Chief
Financial Officer
Smith Rock State Park Parking Discussion - Chris Doty, Road Department
Director
3. 10:40 AM Transportation System Plan: Draft Scope Discussion - Chris Doty, Road
Department Director
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY'S SERVICE
DISTRICTS
4. 10:55 AM PRESENTATION: Core Area Proposed Urban Renewal District Tax
Increment Finance Plan & Report - Tom Anderson, County Administrator
RECONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY
5. 11:40 AM COVID-19 Update
Report on Use of Childcare Funds
Board of Commissioners BOCC Meeting Agenda
of 4
Wednesday, June 17, 2020 Page 2
LUNCH RECESS
6. 1:00 PM
7. 1:15 PM
8. 1:30 PM
OTHER ITEMS
Discussion of Video Lottery Funds -John Laherty,
Storm Damage Briefing - Nathan Garibay, Emergency Manager
PUBLIC HEARING: Thornburg Golf Course - William Groves, Senior
Planner
These can be any items not included on the agenda that the Commissioners wish to discuss as part of
the meeting, pursuant to ORS 192.640.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At any time during the meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS
192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor
negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(b), personnel issues; or other executive session categories.
Executive sessions are closed to the public; however, with few exceptions and under specific guidelines,
are open to the media.
Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2) (d) Labor Negotiations
ADJOURN
To watch this meeting on line, go to: www.deschutes.org/meetings
Please note that the video will not show up until recording begins. You can also view past
meetings on video by selecting the date shown on the website calendar.
Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs
and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need
accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 617-4747.
%1\
FUTURE MEETINGS:
Board of Commissioners BOCC Meeting Agenda
of 4
Wednesday, June 17, 2020 Page 3
Additional meeting dates available at www.deschutes.org/meetingcalendar
(Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of
Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions
regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.)
Board of Commissioners BOCC Meeting Agenda
of 4
Wednesday, June 17, 2020 Page 4
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners BOCC Wednesday Meeting of June 17, 2020
DATE: June 12, 2020
FROM: Chris Doty, Road Department, 541-322-7105
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Smith Rock State Park Parking Discussion
SCUSSION OF CONTINUED PARK
r
LU
u.
z
z
0
CONGEST
TH ROCK STATE PARK
0
0
N
N
W
z
W
U
0
cn
.N
450,000 annua
c co
a) ,Q
to t6 to a)
O _b.0
tt ,� a) 0
0. (I) ccs 0 �C
0 tti a) N Ny to•
0
'0.0 a)
CD ` 0 :I- 0 tB .
X �0 0 Q. N 0
O V '4, ' A ) 11A Q
N ) 0 c6 as
tU cn as - O O
N d. a) ';,�, O
1_• N0'a+ G 0O O
N tB >1 . •
tU 0 O U 0 to c
aC a) 0 tlo 5- N
w'Oco 0 a) .c
tt3 tL 0 Oa to a) C.)
-as... 0 O V 0 �U
•- 0.}' 4- . c O
C 0 c '00 to () tB t6 CO
O E ° 4—
+r
•
50.00 i 0 Y p O
CI '` ' 0 > c. ' N ,— = v a)
i- 0, O _ C
�; V w N 12
v
03 'OD 0 0 a' C C >.• a' 0
!— ,E m- O . v 0 a p O G,
i
N
00
0 0waa� �Qcnao
O 0,
was
■ ■ • 0 ■ ■ ■
N Q N C N
0
0
o
N
N
Ta
,N E
N t/1
i
O 0
-° (13
i N
O
+_ 0
Q a 0
0'aA c
O .0 ca
a:O<
U)
C o
• o 0
.c v Q.
N
CI)� .°
CD N
tiu0
_ 0.z.
0
C
t0 0
0
•• N 3..0
cv • •
900,000+ annua
0
CV
t
1aMIM
0.
CD
et
0
O
N
v
.;
i
0
T3 i
0 u)
2
O
c
a� +r
O • .-
t3
T
0
_ y —
> 0 -C
0 E
. N
c.
N (7)OD
.
°
N v a-13
▪ c c O
.
•
0
c
C5
N
N 0
tB 0
▪ c
• 0
V
i
O c
cA tB
C N
'OVA 0 N
"
c N N.
O co V
i a • 0
0
N QN
L. 0
X 0 O.
O U o
▪ co 0. _
.,"'"
00
(13
f,
0. ▪ o
▪ _ o. .-
a)
'Ouo cn 7
z •c _
o
▪ ° ° O
C i ▪ Q co
CD O i 0 ++
L . .
a
4.0
i
a)
cu
E
0
O
0
1verflow parking on
4.0
0
CtS
0
0
estrictions on adjacent
ated to Terrebonne
issues re
■ Speed reduction
0112:71.101:
c
0
0
a-
0.
13.0
c
i
a
Ion
s..
co
a
a)
0
w c
c �a
Q.
a?
,� a±CO
CA
�
to 2 0
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners BOCC Wednesday Meeting of June 17, 2020
DATE: June 10, 2020
FROM: Chris Doty, Road Department, 541-322-7105
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Transportation System Plan: Draft Scope Discussion
RECOMMENDATION & ACTION REQUESTED:
Staff will lead a discussion of the key scope items.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Kittelson and Associates has emerged as the preferred consultant in response to the Request
for Proposals (RFP) issuance for the Transportation System Plan update. In response to the
RFP criteria and in consultation with the Road Department, a draft scope has been prepared.
Prior to negotiating the fee for services, staff wishes to review the scope and associated
process to ensure Board understanding and satisfaction with the proposed process prior to
negotiating a fee and contract.
Attached is a draft scope (statement of work) and draft roster of the proposed TSP advisory
committee.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Once an acceptable scope has been reached, the consultant will
prepare a fee estimate and staff will deliver a final contract to the Board for approval.
ATTENDANCE: Chris Doty, Road Department
Task 1: Project Management
Task Objective(s): Maintain regular communication and project coordination.
Task Deliverables:
• Kick-off Meeting: Consultant will organize, develop agenda for, and facilitate a kick-off meeting
the project team to discuss project schedule, scope of work, key objectives, development of a
project advisory committee meeting, and project website.
• Project Management Team (PMT) Check -in Meetings: Meetings will occur bi-weekly throughout
the project. Consultant will develop agendas for each meeting and provide meeting summaries
within two business days.
• Progress Reports: Provide monthly and include update on key project activities completed and
those upcoming.
• Project Schedule & Project Overview Memo: Consultant will develop memorandum that clearly
documents project schedule, milestones, key project objectives, and project protocols. This
document will serve as an overview for advisory committee members and other interested in
the TSP update project.
Task 2: Public Involvement
Task Objective(s): Proactively engage with the community through a representative advisory committee,
meaningful public engagement opportunities, and a clear decision -making structure. Consultant will
work with County to advertise and promote project activities.
Task Deliverables
• Public Involvement Plan: Outline key public engagement strategies, committee structure,
decision -making protocols, and key dates.
• Project Website: Consultant will develop, maintain and populate a project website for the
duration of the TSP update.
Task Meetings
• Public Workshops
o Consultant will plan and facilitate public workshops. County will support outreach
efforts through press releases, social media, and stakeholder database.
o Public workshops will generally utilize the following structure:
Online Tools: Given current COVID-19 social distancing recommendations, the
public workshop elements of this TSP update will, at least in the short term, be
flexible to allow for engagement through virtual tools, including online
workshops, virtual open houses, online commenting maps, and a project
website. Online tools will be focused, as useful, to direct users to geographic
regions of the County (Sisters Area, Redmond/Terrebonne Area, Bend Area,
South County).
■ In -person meetings: As possible and useful, the project will host in -person
meetings within various geographic areas of the County (Sisters Area,
Redmond/Terrebonne Area, Bend Area, South County) to solicit input and
feedback at key input points of the project.
o Public Workshop 1 (Virtual OR In -person; TBD)
• Goals & Objectives
• Existing Conditions and Future Conditions Needs
o Public Workshop 2 (Virtual OR In -person; TBD)
• Alternatives
• Funding Forecast Memorandum
• Advisory Committee
o County will appoint Advisory Committee members. Consultant will coordinate
committee communication and facilitate advisory committee meetings. Meetings will
occur in -person or virtually as prudent given ongoing socially distancing guidelines.
o Up to 4 Advisory Committee Meetings:
• AC Meeting #1
• Meeting will review:
o Project Orientation, schedule, and overview
o Public Involvement Plan
o Goals & Objectives
o Plans & Policy Review
o 2012 Deschutes County TSP Review
• AC Meeting #2
• Meeting will review:
o Existing Conditions and Future Conditions Needs Memorandum
• AC Meeting #3
• Meeting will review:
o Alternatives Analysis Memorandum
o Funding Revenue Forecast Memorandum
• AC Meeting #4
• Meeting will review:
o Draft Findings & Adoption Ordinances
o Draft TSP
• Agency Partner Coordination Committee
o Consultant and County will coordinate on identifying and inviting agency partners to
review and provide feedback on key project materials. The Agency Partner Coordination
committee will be comprised of one representative from ODOT, City of Bend, City of
Redmond, City of Sisters, City of La Pine, Bend MPO, Cascades East Transit, DLCD, and
any other agency partner identified by County staff.
o Up to 4 Agency Partner Coordination Committee Meetings will be held in conjunction
with the schedule advisory committee meetings.
• Planning Commission & Board of Commissioners Workshops
o County will coordinate and Consultant will support regular updates to the Planning
Commission and Board of Commissioners to key points in the project. Consultant and
County will coordinate on up to 4 work sessions (2 planning commission and 2 board of
commissioners) during the TSP development process.
Task 3: Review of Current TSP and Applicable Plans and Policies
Task Objective(s): Outline work completed since 2012 and work to be completed as part of this planning
effort. This will inform the TSP update work plan and form a clear and concise understanding of what
various documents plan for the Deschutes County transportation system and how the TSP should reflect
them.
Task Deliverables:
• Plans & Policy Review:
o Review of existing planning documents and identify applicable policies or projects that
should be considered for incorporation into the Deschutes County TSP. Document to be
reviewed include:
• OAR chapter 734 division 051
• Oregon Highway Plan (with 2012 amendments)
• Oregon Public Transportation Plan
• Oregon Rail Plan
■ Oregon Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan
• Oregon Transportation Safety Action Plan
• Oregon Freight Plan
• Oregon Aviation Plan
• ODOT funding projections
• OAR chapter 660 division 012, known as the Transportation Planning Rule
("TPR") Statewide Transportation Improvement Program ("STIP")
• 2012 ODOT Highway Design Manual
• ODOT Operations Program Plan
■ ODOT TSMP Program Performance Management Plan
• ODOT Traffic Signal Management Plan
■ ODOT Draft 2021-2024 STIP
• ODOT Blueprint for Urban Design
• ODOT Traffic Signal Manual
• Oregon Statewide Transportation Improvement Fund (STIF)
• Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
• Deschutes County Development Code
• Deschutes County Standards and Specifications
• Deschutes County Buildable Lands Inventory
• Deschutes County Housing Needs Analysis Report
• Central Oregon Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan
• Deschutes County ITS Plan
• Deschutes County Transportation Safety Action Plan
• Terrebonne Refinement Plan
• Wickiup Junction Refinement Plan
• Bend Transportation System Plan
• Redmond Transportation System Plan
• Sisters Transportation System Plan
• La Pine Transportation System Plan
■ Bend Airport Master Plan
■ Cascades East Transit Master Plan
■ Redmond Area Transit Master Plan
■ Central Oregon Rail Plan
■ Cascade Lakes Highway Corridor and Bicycle Facilities Plan
■ Deschutes County TSDC Methodology
• 2012 Deschutes County TSP Review:
o Conduct detailed review of existing TSP to identify
■ which projects have been completed,
■ what sections should be updated or added to the TSP (including those from
ongoing or completed planning efforts),
■ and outline a clear workplan to accomplish the TSP update.
o This work will be based on Plans & Policy Review and key findings included. Expected
outcomes of task is clear direction as to what projects from existing plans should be
incorporated into the Deschutes County TSP.
• Goals & Objectives Memorandum:
o Consultant shall lead development of developing goals, objectives, and evaluation
criteria that will serve as the basis for the needs analysis, policy and ordinance
development, and project selection. Goals & Objectives should be informed by existing
Deschutes County TSP Goals & Objectives, but consider and reflect current the current
vision and direction to be reflect in this TSP update.
• Methodology Memorandum:
o Consultant shall prepare a Methodology Memorandum, consistent with ODOT's Analysis
Procedures Manual (APM) Version 2 requirements, that documents analysis approach
and key assumptions for existing conditions, future conditions, and solutions analysis for
both County and state facilities. Forecast methods will be based on historical growth
trends for County and ODOT facilities. Consultant will submit the memorandum to the
County and ODOT for review.
Task 4: Existing Conditions and Future Needs Analysis
Task Objective(s): This task will conduct a targeted review of key segments and intersections along the
County system under existing conditions and, as necessary, locations along the State system to assess
how conditions have changed since the previous TSP update. Future needs will be developed based on
2040 forecasts and evaluated study segments and intersections to identify future operational needs.
Task Deliverables:
• Existing and Future Needs Analysis Memorandum
• Existing Conditions Analysis:
o Work with County GIS staff to inventory existing transportation and geographic
facilities, including:
■ Lands and Population Inventory
• zoning, both current and planned
• natural resources and environmental barriers
• activity centers that are likely destinations for bicyclists and
pedestrians, such as schools, parks, and key recreational
destinations
• location of minority and transportation -disadvantaged populations
• historic and projected population growth patterns based on
statewide coordinated populations forecasts
■ Roadway System Inventory:
• facility functional classifications for state and local roads
• jurisdictional responsibility for state and local roads
• signal locations
• posted speed limits
• park and ride locations
• Intelligent Transportation System facilities
• national, state, regional, and local freight and motor carrier routes
• national highway system facilities
■ Pedestrian & Bicycle Inventory
• bicycle facility presence and/or types by roadway
• pedestrian facility presence and/or types by roadway
• location/trip characteristics of major bicycle/pedestrian generators
■ School Locations
• Identify location of schools within the County and document nearby
gaps in the pedestrian, bicycle, or roadway system.
■ Public Transportation Inventory (Cite or reference existing plans as possible)
• Existing and planned local and regional routes
• Existing and planned Dial -a -Ride services
• Location of transit stops or park-n-ride locations
■ Rail Inventory (Cite or reference existing plans as possible)
• Location and owner/operation of existing rail line and crossing
locations
■ Air Transportation Inventory (Cite or reference existing plans as possible)
• airport locations and use
o Roadway and Intersection Operational Analysis
■ List specific intersections and or facilities here. Suggestion: base on review
of existing TSP and discussions with PMT.
o Documentation of key TSAP needs
• Future Conditions Analysis and Needs
o Forecast 2040 conditions for study facilities based on the Methodology
Memorandum. Forecast methods for County and ODOT facilities will be based on
historical growth trends.
o Evaluate study facilities under 2040 conditions and identify locations that exceed
applicable mobility standards.
Task 5: Alternatives Development and Analysis
Task Objective(s): This task will identify the projects, programs, and policies to address the
transportation needs identified within Task 4. This will include evaluation of the funding implications of
modifying the current Deschutes County Road Moratorium policy. Outcomes of this task will inform the
Deschutes County TSP project and program list and provide guidance for the development of future
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project lists.
Task Deliverables
• Alternatives Development and Analysis Memorandum
o For each need identified in Task 4 (excluding those with identified improvement through
other planning efforts), recommend an improvement alternative that will address the need
by the horizon year of 2040. Alternatives will consider capacity, safety, or connectivity needs
for all users along roadways or at specific intersections. As possible, alternatives will build
upon improvement plans already in place through localized refinement plans, facility plans,
area plans, regional plans, or local jurisdiction TSPs.
o Incorporate projects identified in previous planning studies, as documented in Task 3. This
includes recent refinement plans and the Deschutes County TSAP.
o Planning level cost estimates will be developed for each alternative based on recent
construction costs, as provided by Deschutes County.
o Consultants will recommend an initial priority for each alternative (e.g., near-, mid-, or long-
term). Priorities will be revised based on input from the project team, advisory committee,
public input, and decision -makers.
• Moratorium Analysis
o Consultant work with the County, who will lead the transportation funding analysis, to
identify funds needed to meet capital improvement needs through the 2040 horizon
year and how lifting the existing Moratorium impacts the ability to meet those needs.
The findings of that analysis will be clearly documented in the TSP to help inform future
considerations by decision makers.
Task 6: Financial Analysis
Task Objective(s): This is a County -led task that will document future revenue forecast, possible funding
sources, and the applicability of those sources to specific projects, such as FLAP funding.
Task Deliverables:
• Funding Revenue Forecast Memorandum:
o County will lead and consultant will support analysis and development of future revenue
forecasts, including possible funding sources. Specific funding sources likely for each
projects or program will be identified, as appropriate, including those eligible for specific
grant programs, such as FLAP funding or Safe Routes to School funding. Funding analysis
will include need for ongoing maintenance and operations activities conducted by the
County and incorporate findings for the "Moratorium Analysis" completed in Task 5.
Task 7 Transportation System Development Charge Update
Task Objective(s): This task will update project costs within the existing County TSDC methodology and,
as applicable, adjustments to share of projected growth for each proposed alternative identified within
Task 5.
Task Deliverables:
• TSDC Methodology Update Report
o Consultant will use the updated volume projections, developed in Task 4, to identify the
increased capacity created by projects on the SDC list using updated volume growth
projections. Consultant will rely upon methodologies and state of the practice cost
estimating procedures from the American Association of Cost Engineers (Class 5
estimates, developed in Task 5 as well as review of aerial mapping review to assess the
status of projects on the existing SDC eligible list. This work will help reflect the
difference between previous SDC planning -level cost estimates versus the updated cost
estimates to be more reflective of actual costs of construction.
Task 8: Deschutes County TSP Documentation
Task Objective(s): This task will document the outcomes of tasks 1-7 and incorporate into the Deschutes
County TSP. The existing TSP structure will be retained and updates to specific sections made as
informed by the 2012 Deschutes County TSP Review developed in Task 3.
Task Deliverables:
• Updated Deschutes County Transportation System Plan
o Consultant will lead update individual chapters, project lists, costs, and other elements,
as necessary, to modify the TSP to reflect key outcomes and findings from Tasks.
Specific updates will be guided by the outline developed in Task 3.
• Updated TSP Figures and GIS data sets
o Consultant will lead production of updated TSP figures and support GIS data sets that
included project information developed in Tasks 1-7.
• Draft Findings and Adoption Ordinances
o Consultant will lead development of draft findings and adoption ordinances necessary
to implement key outcome of the TSP. This will include findings related to applicable
state polices, such as the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR).
• Recommended Modifications to Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Criteria
o As supported through the outcomes of the TSP process, consultant will recommend
modifications to the existing Deschutes County CIP criteria to reflect changes to that
would help to implement key elements of the TSP.
Task 9: Adoption
Task Objective(s): Support and participate through the TSP adoption process with the Deschutes County
Planning Commission and County Board of Commissioners.
Task Deliverables:
• Updated TSP
o Consultant will update and revise the Draft TSP based on input from the project team,
advisory committee, project stakeholders, and decision -makers. This draft will be
submitted to the County for adoption.
• Updated Findings and Adoption Ordinances
o Consultant will update and revise the Draft Findings and Adoption Ordinances based on
input from the project team, advisory committee, project stakeholders, and decision -
makers. This draft will be submitted to the County for adoption.
• Deschutes County Planning Commission Hearings
o County will lead and consultant will participate in up to 2 hearings with the Deschutes
County Planning Commission.
• Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Hearings
o County will lead and consultant will participate in up to 2 hearings with the Deschutes
County Board of Commissioners.
TSP Advisory Committee — DRAFT
Purpose: The TSP is a 20-year plan which provides policy and guides decision making and investment in the
County's transportation system. The TSP update will solicit public input to assist with plan development. An
Advisory Committee is helpful to provide focused and diverse input to the process and provide
recommendations to the approval bodies (Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners).
A suggested roster of Advisory Committee membership, by general category, is as follows:
Member Category
#
Title
Name(s)
Deschutes County
1
Board Member
1
Planning Commission Member
Geographical
Sisters/Tumalo
2
Citizen Members
Redmond/Terrebonne
2
Citizen Members
Bend
2
Citizen Members
La Pine/Sunriver
2
Citizen Members
Modal
Deschutes BPAC
1
Board Member or Rep
Total Participants
11
It is recommended that the County recruit and advertise for interest in the Advisory Committee for citizen
members.
Additionally, a group of Agency Stakeholders can also be utilized to provide focused input from partner
agencies in relation to transportation system overlap and connection points.
Agency Stakeholders
Agency
Name
ODOT
USFS
BLM
City of Bend
City of Redmond
City of Sisters
City of La Pine
61 150 SE 27th Street Bend, Oregon 97702
(541) 388-6581 road@deschutes.org www.deschutes.org
Bend MPO
Cascade East Transit
It is recommended that each agency provide the County with a staff member to act as a point of contact. The
Agency Stakeholders will not be considered Advisory Committee members.
61 150 SE 27th Street Bend, Oregon 97702
(541) 388-6581 road@deschutes.org www.deschutes.org
41)
ci
0
0
0
cc
-D
41)
0
61,
+.4
c
E
O..
CNN
cn
0
0
0-
(fa
0
E
E
0
H
PC
ea
E
E
0
0
0
>t
'oP
cf)
N
4.4
0
C.)
0
o
tr)
i
0
ge
cD
ntaiittt*k..
on
P
T
(1)
as
BMW=
61 MOM
0
0-
1)
0
-SD
0
en
EP,
and Future 1"\I e e *s n a
c
E
c
c 0
0
0
e
0
TSAP
k since
0
0
C.)
c
F
e
10
02¢13.9
0
Ca
11124904A,,,x
a
CD
0
0
0
ct
LL
110
CD
a)
COMMITTEE
Board Member
Planning Comr
Citizen Members
Citizen Members
Citizen Members
Citizen Members
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners BOCC Wednesday Meeting of June 17, 2020
DATE: June 9, 2020
FROM: Tom Anderson, Administrative Services, 541-388-6565
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
PRESENTATION: Core Area Proposed Urban Renewal District Tax Increment Finance Plan
& Report
ATTENDANCE: Via Zoom Conference Call: City of Bend: Matt Stuart, Carolyn Eagan,
Justin Livingston, and Elaine Howard
710 NW WALL_ STREET
PO BOX 431
BEND, OR 97709
(541) 388-5505 tel
Relay Users Dial 7-1-1
(541) 385-6676 fax
bendoregon.gov
MAYOR
Sally Russell
MAYOR PRO TEM
Bruce Abernethy
CITY COUNCILORS
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Justin Livingston
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
CITY MANAGER
Eric King
May 22, 2020
To:
From:
Re:
CITY OF BEND
Deschutes County
Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Proposed Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
On May 20, 2020, the Bend Urban Renewal Agency (BURA) adopted a
resolution authorizing the release of the Core Area Tax Increment
Finance Plan (TIF Plan) and the Report Accompanying the Core Area
Tax Increment Finance Plan (TIF Report) for formal public review.1
To adopt a tax increment finance plan, the City of Bend must send the
proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to representatives of the affected
taxing districts. The Bend City Council (Council) is required to respond
directly at a public hearing to any written comments or recommendations
from the affected taxing districts and their representatives. This letter
officially transmits the proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to Deschutes
County for review and comment.
On August 5, 2020, the Council is scheduled to open a public hearing
during the Council meeting and consider a first reading of an ordinance
adopting the proposed TIF Plan. The Council meeting will be held at
7:00 p.m., and will likely convene on-line due to continued restrictions on
large in -person gatherings due to COVID-19. If held in -person, the
meeting will take place at City Hall, 710 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon.
The publicized agenda for the meeting will specify whether the meeting
will be held in -person or online. The second reading and final vote is
currently scheduled to occur on August 19, 2020.
Please find the TIF Plan and TIF Report enclosed with this letter. Should
your representatives wish to convey any formal comments or a
recommendation regarding the enclosed TIF Plan and TIF Report for
1 Tax increment finance or TIF is synonymous with "urban renewal", and is used in
place of the term "urban renewal," to more accurately describe the funding mechanism
implemented by these documents.
Council's consideration, please provide in writing by 5 p.m. on July 23, 2020, to:
rchristie(a�bendoregon.gov.
Council will respond to comments and recommendations from the affected taxing
districts during the Council meeting on August 5, 2020.
TIF PLAN AND TIF REPORT BACKGROUND:
In 2018, Council and BURA adopted a series of Resolutions (Council Resolution No.
3114; BURA Resolution No. 120; BURA Resolution No. 123), that authorized the
creation of an advisory committee (now referred to as the Urban Renewal Advisory
Board or URAB) to evaluate the feasibility, the public's desire, and the development of
an urban renewal plan and report (now referred to as a TIF plan and TIF report) for
some or all of the opportunity areas identified in the Bend Comprehensive Plan: Bend
Central District, East Downtown, Inner Highway 20/Greenwood, and Korpine. URAB
was comprised of interested community members and ex-officio representatives from
other public agencies.
From February 12, 2019, to April 14, 2019, URAB held eight (8) public meetings as part
of the greater Core Area Project to evaluate the financial feasibility of a potential TIF
area; determine a boundary for a potential TIF area; and recommend a TIF Plan and
TIF Report for BURA and Council to consider for adoption.
In addition to the URAB meetings, the Core Area Project included significant community
engagement through a variety of other activities, including two in -person and online
open houses which included an online survey that received nearly 375 responses; six
"pop-up" events throughout the area; community and neighborhood association
presentations; meetings with City advisory boards such as the Planning Commission,
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and the Bend Economic Development
Advisory Board; and direct mailers to individuals, households, and businesses in the
City. In addition, the process included close coordination with affected taxing districts
through participation at URAB meetings and through on -going outreach and district
board presentations.
On April 14, 2020, URAB recommended the TIF Plan and TIF Report be forwarded to
BURA for consideration and Council for adoption.
On May 20, 2020, BURA adopted a resolution authorizing the release of the TIF Plan
and TIF Report for formal public review.
PROPOSAL:
The Core Area TIF Boundary (TIF Area), shown in Figure 1 of the attached TIF Plan,
consists of approximately 637.15 acres of land including rights -of -way.
The proposed maximum indebtedness, the limit on the amount of funds that may be
spent on administration, projects and programs in the TIF Area is $195,000,000. The
maximum indebtedness does not include interest paid on any borrowing by the urban
renewal agency. There is a proposed financing plan in the TIF Report that shows that
the Plan is financially feasible. BURA may make changes to the financing plan as needs
and opportunities arise, typically during the annual budgeting process, and may amend
the Plan as described in the Plan, including additional consultation with the taxing
districts for substantial amendments.
IMPACT ON TAXING JURISDICTIONS:
The impact of tax increment financing on affected taxing districts consists primarily of
the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in
assessed value within the TIF Area. The projections for impacts on the affected taxing
districts are estimated through fiscal year end (FYE) 2051, representing 30 years of tax
increment collections.
IMPACT ON PERMANENT RATE LEVY:
The proposed TIF Plan would result in a decrease in Deschutes County's permanent
rate property tax collections, for the life of the TIF Plan. This is attributable to the length
of time that BURA collects tax increment revenue to pay off the TIF Plan's stated
maximum indebtedness. Permanent rate property tax collections do not have a direct
impact on School District or Education Service District budgets. Under current school
funding law, property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund revenues to
achieve per -student funding targets. Under this system, property taxes that are
foregone because of the use of tax increment financing are substantially replaced (as
determined by a funding formula at the State level) with State School Fund revenues.
Table 1 shows the estimated impact to Deschutes County's permanent rate collections
over the life of the TIF Plan. The total estimated impact to Deschutes County over the
projected 30 years is $22,279,800.
TABLE 1 - IMPACT TO DESCHUTES COUNTY
Fiscal Year End
(FYE)
Deschutes County -
Permanent
2022
$ (52,086)
2023
$ (80,879)
2024
$ (110,712)
2025
$ (142,037)
2026
$ (174,927)
2027
$ (209,462)
2028
$ (245,724)
2029
$ (283,800)
2030
$ (323,778)
2031
$ (365,756)
2032
$ (409,833)
2033
$ (456,113)
2034
$ (504,708)
2035
$ (555,732)
2036
$ (609,308)
2037
$ (665,562)
2038
$ (724,629)
2039
$ (786,649)
2040
$ (851,771)
2041
$ (920,148)
2042
$ (991,944)
2043
$ (1,067,330)
2044
$ (1,146,486)
2045
$ (1,229,599)
2046
$ (1,316,868)
2047
$ (1,408,500)
2048
$ (1,504,714)
2049
$ (1,605,738)
2050
$ (1,711,814)
2051
$ (1,823,194)
Total
$ (22,279,800)
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 17 — Report Accompanying Core Area TIF Plan
REVENUE SHARING:
Revenue sharing was a feature of the 2009 legislative changes in TIF law. Revenue
sharing thresholds are not expected to be met in the period of the TIF Plan. If actual
assessed value growth in the tax increment area exceeds the projections made in TIF
Plan and TIF Report, revenue sharing could occur.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND LOCAL OPTION LEVIES:
The TIF Plan will not impact general obligation (GO) bonds and/or local option levies.
TAX REVENUES AFTER TERMINATION OF TIF AREA:
Upon termination of the TIF Area, all future tax revenue will be distributed to the
affected taxing districts. Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) chapter 457 requires the TIF
Report to identify the projected tax revenues for affected taxing districts in the year after
the termination of the TIF Area. Table 2 shows the projected tax revenues for
Deschutes County below for the year after the termination of the TIF Area. These are
estimates only; changes in the economy may impact the projections.
TABLE 2 - TAX REVENUES AFTER TERMINATION OF TIF AREA
Revenue from
Frozen Base
Revenue from
Excess Value
Total Revenue
$534,900
$2,013,867
$2,548,767
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 18— Report Accompanying Core Area TIF Plan
PROCESS FOR REVIEW:
The process for final review and adoption of the TIF Plan include the following steps
outlined in Table 3.
TIF PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
May 20, 2020
Bend Urban Renewal Agency Review
May 22, 2020
Send Formal Notice to Taxing Jurisdictions
June 8, 2020
Planning Commission Review
June 17, 2020 (tentative)
Presentation to Deschutes County Commission
August 5, 2020
City Council Public Hearing and First Reading
August 19, 2020
City Council Second Reading and Vote
For more information, please contact Matt Stuart, Urban Renewal Manager, at
541.323.5992 or mstuart@bendoregon.00v.
Sincerely,
Justin Livingston
Chair, Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Attachments:
A) Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
B) Report on the Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
710 NW WALL STREET
PO BOX 431
BEND, OR 97709
(541) 388-5505 tel
Relay Users Dial 7-1-1
(541) 385-6676 fax
bendoregon.gov
MAYOR
Sally Russell
MAYOR PRO TEM
Bruce Abernethy
CITY COUNCILORS
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Justin Livingston
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
CITY MANAGER
Eric King
May 22, 2020
To:
From:
Re:
CITY OF BEND
Deschutes County (911)
Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Proposed Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
On May 20, 2020, the Bend Urban Renewal Agency (BURA) adopted a
resolution authorizing the release of the Core Area Tax Increment
Finance Plan (TIF Plan) and the Report Accompanying the Core Area
Tax Increment Finance Plan (TIF Report) for formal public review.'
To adopt a tax increment finance plan, the City of Bend must send the
proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to representatives of the affected
taxing districts. The Bend City Council (Council) is required to respond
directly at a public hearing to any written comments or recommendations
from the affected taxing districts and their representatives. This letter
officially transmits the proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to the 911
Taxing District for review and comment.
On August 5, 2020, the Council is scheduled to open a public hearing
during the Council meeting and consider a first reading of an ordinance
adopting the proposed TIF Plan. The Council meeting will be held at
7:00 p.m., and will likely convene on-line due to continued restrictions on
large in -person gatherings due to COVID-19. If held in -person, the
meeting will take place at City Hall, 710 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon.
The publicized agenda for the meeting will specify whether the meeting
will be held in -person or online. The second reading and final vote is
currently scheduled to occur on August 19, 2020.
Please find the TIF Plan and TIF Report enclosed with this letter. Should
your representatives wish to convey any formal comments or a
recommendation regarding the enclosed TIF Plan and TIF Report for
1 Tax increment finance or TIF is synonymous with "urban renewal", and is used in
place of the term "urban renewal," to more accurately describe the funding mechanism
implemented by these documents.
Council's consideration, please provide in writing by 5 p.m. on July 23, 2020, to:
rchristie(a bendoregon.gov.
Council will respond to comments and recommendations from the affected taxing
districts during the Council meeting on August 5, 2020.
TIF PLAN AND TIF REPORT BACKGROUND:
In 2018, Council and BURA adopted a series of Resolutions (Council Resolution No.
3114; BURA Resolution No. 120; BURA Resolution No. 123), that authorized the
creation of an advisory committee (now referred to as the Urban Renewal Advisory
Board or URAB) to evaluate the feasibility, the public's desire, and the development of
an urban renewal plan and report (now referred to as a TIF plan and TIF report) for
some or all of the opportunity areas identified in the Bend Comprehensive Plan: Bend
Central District, East Downtown, Inner Highway 20/Greenwood, and Korpine. URAB
was comprised of interested community members and ex-officio representatives from
other public agencies.
From February 12, 2019, to April 14, 2019, URAB held eight (8) public meetings as part
of the greater Core Area Project to evaluate the financial feasibility of a potential TIF
area; determine a boundary for a potential TIF area; and recommend a TIF Plan and
TIF Report for BURA and Council to consider for adoption.
In addition to the URAB meetings, the Core Area Project included significant community
engagement through a variety of other activities, including two in -person and online
open houses which included an online survey that received nearly 375 responses; six
"pop-up" events throughout the area; community and neighborhood association
presentations; meetings with City advisory boards such as the Planning Commission,
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and the Bend Economic Development
Advisory Board; and direct mailers to individuals, households, and businesses in the
City. In addition, the process included close coordination with affected taxing districts
through participation at URAB meetings and through on -going outreach and district
board presentations.
On April 14, 2020, URAB recommended the TIF Plan and TIF Report be forwarded to
BURA for consideration and Council for adoption.
On May 20, 2020, BURA adopted a resolution authorizing the release of the TIF Plan
and TIF Report for formal public review.
PROPOSAL:
The Core Area TIF Boundary (TIF Area), shown in Figure 1 of the attached TIF Plan,
consists of approximately 637.15 acres of land including rights -of -way.
The proposed maximum indebtedness, the limit on the amount of funds that may be
spent on administration, projects and programs in the TIF Area is $195,000,000. The
maximum indebtedness does not include interest paid on any borrowing by the urban
renewal agency. There is a proposed financing plan in the TIF Report that shows that
the Plan is financially feasible. BURA may make changes to the financing plan as needs
and opportunities arise, typically during the annual budgeting process, and may amend
the Plan as described in the Plan, including additional consultation with the taxing
districts for substantial amendments.
IMPACT ON TAXING JURISDICTIONS:
The impact of tax increment financing on affected taxing districts consists primarily of
the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in
assessed value within the TIF Area. The projections for impacts on the affected taxing
districts are estimated through fiscal year end (FYE) 2051, representing 30 years of tax
increment collections.
IMPACT ON PERMANENT RATE LEVY:
The proposed TIF Plan would result in a decrease in the 911 Taxing District's
permanent rate property tax collections, for the life of the TIF Plan. This is attributable to
the length of time that BURA collects tax increment revenue to pay off the TIF Plan's
stated maximum indebtedness. Permanent rate property tax collections do not have a
direct impact on School District or Education Service District budgets. Under current
school funding law, property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund
revenues to achieve per -student funding targets. Under this system, property taxes that
are foregone because of the use of tax increment financing are substantially replaced
(as determined by a funding formula at the State level) with State School Fund
revenues. Table 1 shows the estimated impact to the 911 Taxing District's permanent
rate collections over the life of the TIF Plan. The total estimated impact to the 911
Taxing District over the projected 30 years is $6,616,459.
TABLE 1 - IMPACT TO 911 TAXING DISTRICT
Fiscal Year End
(FYE)
911 —
Permanent
2022
$ (15,468)
2023
$ (24,019)
2024
$ (32,878)
2025
$ (42,181)
2026
$ (51,948)
2027
$ (62,204)
2028
$ (72,973)
2029
$ (84,280)
2030
$ (96,153)
2031
$ (108,619)
2032
$ (121,709)
2033
$ (135,453)
2034
$ (149,884)
2035
$ (165,036)
2036
$ (180,947)
2037
$ (197,653)
2038
$ (215,194)
2039
$ (233,612)
2040
$ (252,951)
2041
$ (273,257)
2042
$ (294,579)
2043
$ (316,966)
2044
$ (340,473)
2045
$ (365,155)
2046
$ (391,072)
2047
$ (418,284)
2048
$ (446,857)
2049
$ (476,858)
2050
$ (508,359)
2051
$ (541,436)
Total
$ (6,616,459)
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 17 — Report Accompanying Core Area TIF Plan
REVENUE SHARING:
Revenue sharing was a feature of the 2009 legislative changes in TIF law. Revenue
sharing thresholds are not expected to be met in the period of the TIF Plan. If actual
assessed value growth in the tax increment area exceeds the projections made in TIF
Plan and TIF Report, revenue sharing could occur.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND LOCAL OPTION LEVIES:
The TIF Plan will not impact general obligation (GO) bonds and/or local option levies.
TAX REVENUES AFTER TERMINATION OF TIF AREA:
Upon termination of the TIF Area, all future tax revenue will be distributed to the
affected taxing districts. Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) chapter 457 requires the TIF
Report to identify the projected tax revenues for affected taxing districts in the year after
the termination of the TIF Area. Table 2 shows the projected tax revenues for the 911
Taxing District below for the year after the termination of the TIF Area. These are
estimates only; changes in the economy may impact the projections.
- TAX REVENUES AFTER TERMINATION OF TIF AREA
Revenue from
Frozen Base
Revenue from
Excess Value
Total Revenue
$158,850
$598,061
$756,911
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 18 — Report Accompanying Core Area TIF Plan
PROCESS FOR REVIEW:
The process for final review and adoption of the TIF Plan include the following steps
outlined in Table 3.
TABLE 3 - TIF PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
May 20, 2020
Bend Urban Renewal Agency Review
May 22, 2020
Send Formal Notice to Taxing Jurisdictions
June 8, 2020
Planning Commission Review
June 17, 2020 (tentative)
Presentation to Deschutes County Commission
August 5, 2020
City Council Public Hearing and First Reading
August 19, 2020
City Council Second Reading and Vote
For more information, please contact Matt Stuart, Urban Renewal Manager, at
541.323.5992 or mstuarta@bendoregon.gov.
Sincerely,
Justin Livingston
Chair, Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Attachments:
A) Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
B) Report on the Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
710 NW WALL STREET
PO BOX 431
BEND, OR 97709
(541) 388-5505 tel
Relay Users Dial 7-1-1
(541) 385-6676 fax
ben do regon.gov
MAYOR
Sally Russell
MAYOR PRO TEM
Bruce Abernethy
CITY COUNCILORS
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Justin Livingston
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
CITY MANAGER
Eric King
CITY OF BEND
May 22, 2020
To: Deschutes County (Countywide Law Enforcement)
From: Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Re: Proposed Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
On May 20, 2020, the Bend Urban Renewal Agency (BURA) adopted a
resolution authorizing the release of the Core Area Tax Increment
Finance Plan (TIF Plan) and the Report Accompanying the Core Area
Tax Increment Finance Plan (TIF Report) for formal public review.
To adopt a tax increment finance plan, the City of Bend must send the
proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to representatives of the affected
taxing districts. The Bend City Council (Council) is required to respond
directly at a public hearing to any written comments or recommendations
from the affected taxing districts and their representatives. This letter
officially transmits the proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to the
Deschutes Countywide Law Enforcement District for review and
comment.
On August 5, 2020, the Council is scheduled to open a public hearing
during the Council meeting and consider a first reading of an ordinance
adopting the proposed TIF Plan. The Council meeting will be held at
7:00 p.m., and will likely convene on-line due to continued restrictions on
large in -person gatherings due to COVID-19. If held in -person, the
meeting will take place at City Hall, 710 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon.
The publicized agenda for the meeting will specify whether the meeting
will be held in -person or online. The second reading and final vote is
currently scheduled to occur on August 19, 2020.
Please find the TIF Plan and TIF Report enclosed with this letter. Should
your representatives wish to convey any formal comments or a
1 Tax increment finance or TIF is synonymous with "urban renewal", and is used in
place of the term "urban renewal," to more accurately describe the funding mechanism
implemented by these documents.
recommendation regarding the enclosed TIF Plan and TIF Report for Council's
consideration, please provide in writing by 5 p.m. on July 23, 2020, to:
rchristie(a bendoregon.gov.
Council will respond to comments and recommendations from the affected taxing
districts during the Council meeting on August 5, 2020.
TIF PLAN AND TIF REPORT BACKGROUND:
In 2018, Council and BURA adopted a series of Resolutions (Council Resolution No.
3114; BURA Resolution No. 120; BURA Resolution No. 123), that authorized the
creation of an advisory committee (now referred to as the Urban Renewal Advisory
Board or URAB) to evaluate the feasibility, the public's desire, and the development of
an urban renewal plan and report (now referred to as a TIF plan and TIF report) for
some or all of the opportunity areas identified in the Bend Comprehensive Plan: Bend
Central District, East Downtown, Inner Highway 20/Greenwood, and Korpine. URAB
was comprised of interested community members and ex-officio representatives from
other public agencies.
From February 12, 2019, to April 14, 2019, URAB held eight (8) public meetings as part
of the greater Core Area Project to evaluate the financial feasibility of a potential TIF
area; determine a boundary for a potential TIF area; and recommend a TIF Plan and
TIF Report for BURA and Council to consider for adoption.
In addition to the URAB meetings, the Core Area Project included significant community
engagement through a variety of other activities, including two in -person and online
open houses which included an online survey that received nearly 375 responses; six
"pop-up" events throughout the area; community and neighborhood association
presentations; meetings with City advisory boards such as the Planning Commission,
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and the Bend Economic Development
Advisory Board; and direct mailers to individuals, households, and businesses in the
City. In addition, the process included close coordination with affected taxing districts
through participation at URAB meetings and through on -going outreach and district
board presentations.
On April 14, 2020, URAB recommended the TIF Plan and TIF Report be forwarded to
BURA for consideration and Council for adoption.
On May 20, 2020, BURA adopted a resolution authorizing the release of the TIF Plan
and TIF Report for formal public review.
PROPOSAL:
The Core Area TIF Boundary (TIF Area), shown in Figure 1 of the attached TIF Plan,
consists of approximately 637.15 acres of land including rights -of -way.
The proposed maximum indebtedness, the limit on the amount of funds that may be
spent on administration, projects and programs in the TIF Area is $195,000,000. The
maximum indebtedness does not include interest paid on any borrowing by the urban
renewal agency. There is a proposed financing plan in the TIF Report that shows that
the Plan is financially feasible. BURA may make changes to the financing plan as needs
and opportunities arise, typically during the annual budgeting process, and may amend
the Plan as described in the Plan, including additional consultation with the taxing
districts for substantial amendments.
IMPACT ON TAXING JURISDICTIONS:
The impact of tax increment financing on affected taxing districts consists primarily of
the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in
assessed value within the TIF Area. The projections for impacts on the affected taxing
districts are estimated through fiscal year end (FYE) 2051, representing 30 years of tax
increment collections.
IMPACT ON PERMANENT RATE LEVY:
The proposed TIF Plan would result in a decrease in the Deschutes Countywide Law
Enforcement District's permanent rate property tax collections, for the life of the TIF
Plan. This is attributable to the length of time that BURA collects tax increment revenue
to pay off the TIF Plan's stated maximum indebtedness. Permanent rate property tax
collections do not have a direct impact on School District or Education Service District
budgets. Under current school funding law, property tax revenues are combined with
State School Fund revenues to achieve per -student funding targets. Under this system,
property taxes that are foregone because of the use of tax increment financing are
substantially replaced (as determined by a funding formula at the State level) with State
School Fund revenues. Table 1 shows the estimated impact to the Deschutes
Countywide Law Enforcement District permanent rate collections over the life of the TIF
Plan. The total estimated impact to the Deschutes Countywide Law Enforcement District
over the projected 30 years is $19,750,623.
TABLE 1 - IMPACT TO DESCHUTES COUNTYWIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT
Fiscal Year End
(FYE)
Countywide Law
Enforcement - Permanent
2022
$ (46,173)
2023
$ (71,698)
2024
$ (98,144)
2025
$ (125,913)
2026
$ (155,070)
2027
$ (185,685)
2028
$ (217,830)
2029
$ (251,583)
2030
$ (287,023)
2031
$ (324,236)
2032
$ (363,309)
2033
$ (404,336)
2034
$ (447,414)
2035
$ (492,646)
2036
$ (540,140)
2037
$ (590,008)
2038
$ (642,370)
2039
$ (697,350)
2040
$ (755,079)
2041
$ (815,694)
2042
$ (879,340)
2043
$ (946,168)
2044
$ (1,016,338)
2045
$ (1,090,016)
2046
$ (1,167, 378)
2047
$ (1,248,609)
2048
$ (1,333,900)
2049
$ (1,423,457)
2050
$ (1,517,491)
2051
$ (1,616,227)
Total
$ (19,750,623)
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 17 — Report Accompanying Core Area TIF Plan
REVENUE SHARING:
Revenue sharing was a feature of the 2009 legislative changes in TIF law. Revenue
sharing thresholds are not expected to be met in the period of the TIF Plan. If actual
assessed value growth in the tax increment area exceeds the projections made in TIF
Plan and TIF Report, revenue sharing could occur.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND LOCAL OPTION LEVIES:
The TIF Plan will not impact general obligation (GO) bonds and/or local option levies.
TAX REVENUES AFTER TERMINATION OF TIF AREA:
Upon termination of the TIF Area, all future tax revenue will be distributed to the
affected taxing districts. Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) chapter 457 requires the TIF
Report to identify the projected tax revenues for affected taxing districts in the year after
the termination of the TIF Area. Table 2 shows the projected tax revenues for the
Deschutes Countywide Law Enforcement District below for the year after the
termination of the TIF Area. These are estimates only; changes in the economy may
impact the projections.
NATION OF TIF AREA
Revenue from
Frozen Base
Revenue from
Excess Value
Total Revenue
$474,179
$1,785,255
$2,259,434
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 7 ti - Kepo
PROCESS FOR REVIEW:
The process for final review and adoption of the TIF Plan include the following steps
outlined in Table 3.
May 20, 2020
Bend Urban Renewal Agency Review
May 21, 2020
Send Formal Notice to Taxing Jurisdictions
June 8, 2020
Planning Commission Review
June 17, 2020 (tentative)
Presentation to Deschutes County Commission
August 5, 2020
City Council Public Hearing and First Reading
August 19, 2020
City Council Second Reading and Vote
For more information, please contact Matt Stuart, Urban Renewal Manager, at
541.323.5992 or mstuart(p�bendoregon.aov.
Sincerely,
Justin Livingston
Chair, Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Attachments:
A) Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
B) Report on the Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
710 NW WALL. STREET
PO BOX 431
BEND, OR 97709
(541) 388-5505 tel
Relay Users Dial 7-1-1
(541) 385-.6676 fax
ben do regon.gov
MAYOR
Sally Russell
MAYOR PRO TEM
Bruce Abernethy
CITY COUNCILORS
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Justin Livingston
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
CITY MANAGER
Eric King
May 22, 2020
To:
From:
Re:
CITY OF BEND
Deschutes County (Countywide Extension)
Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Proposed Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
On May 20, 2020, the Bend Urban Renewal Agency (BURA) adopted a
resolution authorizing the release of the Core Area Tax Increment
Finance Plan (TIF Plan) and the Report Accompanying the Core Area
Tax Increment Finance Plan (TIF Report) for formal public review.1
To adopt a tax increment finance plan, the City of Bend must send the
proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to representatives of the affected
taxing districts. The Bend City Council (Council) is required to respond
directly at a public hearing to any written comments or recommendations
from the affected taxing districts and their representatives. This letter
officially transmits the proposed TIF Plan and TIF Report to the
Countywide Extension Taxing District for review and comment.
On August 5, 2020, the Council is scheduled to open a public hearing
during the Council meeting and consider a first reading of an ordinance
adopting the proposed TIF Plan. The Council meeting will be held at
7:00 p.m., and will likely convene on-line due to continued restrictions on
large in -person gatherings due to COVID-19. If held in -person, the
meeting will take place at City Hall, 710 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon.
The publicized agenda for the meeting will specify whether the meeting
will be held in -person or online. The second reading and final vote is
currently scheduled to occur on August 19, 2020.
Please find the TIF Plan and TIF Report enclosed with this letter. Should
your representatives wish to convey any formal comments or a
recommendation regarding the enclosed TIF Plan and TIF Report for
1 Tax increment finance or TIF is synonymous with "urban renewal", and is used in
place of the term "urban renewal," to more accurately describe the funding mechanism
implemented by these documents.
Council's consideration, please provide in writing by 5 p.m. on July 23, 2020, to:
rchristie(a�bendoregon.gov.
Council will respond to comments and recommendations from the affected taxing
districts during the Council meeting on August 5, 2020.
TIF PLAN AND TIF REPORT BACKGROUND:
In 2018, Council and BURA adopted a series of Resolutions (Council Resolution No.
3114; BURA Resolution No. 120; BURA Resolution No. 123), that authorized the
creation of an advisory committee (now referred to as the Urban Renewal Advisory
Board or URAB) to evaluate the feasibility, the public's desire, and the development of
an urban renewal plan and report (now referred to as a TIF plan and TIF report) for
some or all of the opportunity areas identified in the Bend Comprehensive Plan: Bend
Central District, East Downtown, Inner Highway 20/Greenwood, and Korpine. URAB
was comprised of interested community members and ex-officio representatives from
other public agencies.
From February 12, 2019, to April 14, 2019, URAB held eight (8) public meetings as part
of the greater Core Area Project to evaluate the financial feasibility of a potential TIF
area; determine a boundary for a potential TIF area; and recommend a TIF Plan and
TIF Report for BURA and Council to consider for adoption.
In addition to the URAB meetings, the Core Area Project included significant community
engagement through a variety of other activities, including two in -person and online
open houses which included an online survey that received nearly 375 responses; six
"pop-up" events throughout the area; community and neighborhood association
presentations; meetings with City advisory boards such as the Planning Commission,
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and the Bend Economic Development
Advisory Board; and direct mailers to individuals, households, and businesses in the
City. In addition, the process included close coordination with affected taxing districts
through participation at URAB meetings and through on -going outreach and district
board presentations.
On April 14, 2020, URAB recommended the TIF Plan and TIF Report be forwarded to
BURA for consideration and Council for adoption.
On May 20, 2020, BURA adopted a resolution authorizing the release of the TIF Plan
and TIF Report for formal public review.
PROPOSAL:
The Core Area TIF Boundary (TIF Area), shown in Figure 1 of the attached TIF Plan,
consists of approximately 637.15 acres of land including rights -of -way.
The proposed maximum indebtedness, the limit on the amount of funds that may be
spent on administration, projects and programs in the TIF Area is $195,000,000. The
maximum indebtedness does not include interest paid on any borrowing by the urban
renewal agency. There is a proposed financing plan in the TIF Report that shows that
the Plan is financially feasible. BURA may make changes to the financing plan as needs
and opportunities arise, typically during the annual budgeting process, and may amend
the Plan as described in the Plan, including additional consultation with the taxing
districts for substantial amendments.
IMPACT ON TAXING JURISDICTIONS:
The impact of tax increment financing on affected taxing districts consists primarily of
the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in
assessed value within the TIF Area. The projections for impacts on the affected taxing
districts are estimated through fiscal year end (FYE) 2051, representing 30 years of tax
increment collections.
IMPACT ON PERMANENT RATE LEVY:
The proposed TIF Plan would result in a decrease in the Countywide Extension Taxing
District's permanent rate property tax collections, for the life of the TIF Plan. This is
attributable to the length of time that BURA collects tax increment revenue to pay off the
TIF Plan's stated maximum indebtedness. Permanent rate property tax collections do
not have a direct impact on School District or Education Service District budgets. Under
current school funding law, property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund
revenues to achieve per -student funding targets. Under this system, property taxes that
are foregone because of the use of tax increment financing are substantially replaced
(as determined by a funding formula at the State level) with State School Fund
revenues. Table 1 shows the estimated impact to the Countywide Extension Taxing
District's permanent rate collections over the life of the TIF Plan. The total estimated
impact to the Countywide Extension Taxing District over the projected 30 years is
$409,643.
- IMPACT TO COUNTYWIDE EXTENSION TAXING DISTRICT
Fiscal Year End
(FYE)
Countywide Extension —
Permanent
2022
$ (958)
2023
$ (1,487)
2024
$ (2,036)
2025
$ (2,612)
2026
$ (3,216)
2027
$ (3,851)
2028
$ (4,518)
2029
$ (5,218)
2030
$ (5,953)
2031
$ (6,725)
2032
$ (7,535)
2033
$ (8,386)
2034
$ (9,280)
2035
$ (10,218)
2036
$ (11,203)
2037
$ (12,237)
2038
$ (13,323)
2039
$ (14,464)
2040
$ (15,661)
2041
$ (16,918)
2042
$ (18,238)
2043
$ (19,624)
2044
$ (21,080)
2045
$ (22,608)
2046
$ (24,212)
2047
$ (25,897)
2048
$ (27,666)
2049
$ (29,524)
2050
$ (31,474)
2051
$ (33,522)
Total
$ (409,643)
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 17 — Report Accompanying core Nrea
REVENUE SHARING:
Revenue sharing was a feature of the 2009 legislative changes in TIF law. Revenue
sharing thresholds are not expected to be met in the period of the TIF Plan. If actual
assessed value growth in the tax increment area exceeds the projections made in TIF
Plan and TIF Report, revenue sharing could occur.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND LOCAL OPTION LEVIES:
The TIF Plan will not impact general obligation (GO) bonds and/or local option levies.
TAX REVENUES AFTER TERMINATION OF TIF AREA:
Upon termination of the TIF Area, all future tax revenue will be distributed to the
affected taxing districts. Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) chapter 457 requires the TIF
Report to identify the projected tax revenues for affected taxing districts in the year after
the termination of the TIF Area. Table 2 shows the projected tax revenues for the
Countywide Extension Taxing District below for the year after the termination of the TIF
Area. These are estimates only; changes in the economy may impact the projections.
- TAX REVENUES AFTER TERMINATION OF TIF AREA
Revenue from
Frozen Base
Revenue from
Excess Value
Total Revenue
$9,834
$37,027
$46,861
Source: Tiberius Solutions, LLC; Table 18 — Report Accompanying core ,-re
PROCESS FOR REVIEW:
The process for final review and adoption of the TIF Plan include the following steps
outlined in Table 3.
- TIF PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
May 20, 2020
Bend Urban Renewal Agency Review
May 22, 2020
Send Formal Notice to Taxing Jurisdictions
June 8, 2020
Planning Commission Review
June 17, 2020 (tentative)
Presentation to Deschutes County Commission
August 5, 2020
City Council Public Hearing and First Reading
August 19, 2020
City Council Second Reading and Vote
For more information, please contact Matt Stuart, Urban Renewal Manager, at
541.323.5992 or mstuart(&..bendoregon.gov.
Sincerely,
Justin Livingston
Chair, Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Attachments:
A) Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
B) Report on the Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Report Accompanying the Core Area
Tax Increment Finance Plan
Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Adopted by the City of Bend
DATE
Ordinance No.
CITY OF BEND
BUILDING ON OUR PAST
SERVING THE PRESENT
SHAPING BEND'S FUTURE
This page intentionally left blank
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
Mayor
Sally Russell
Mayor Pro tem
Bruce Abernethy
City Council
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Justin Livingston
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
Planning Commission
Jeff Payne Chair
Joan Vinci Vice -Chair
Lindsey Hopper
Suzanne Johannsen
Carlos Salcedo
Whitney Swander
Scott Winters
Sally Russell, Council Liaison
City Manager
Eric King
Chief Financial Officer
Sharon Wojda
City Attorney
Mary Winters
Associate City Attorney
Elizabeth Oshel
Economic Development Director
Carolyn Eagan
Urban Renewal Manager
Matt Stuart
Planning Manager
Brian Rankin
Senior Planner
Allison Platt
Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Justin Livingston Chair
Bruce Abernethy
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
Sally Russell
Urban Renewal Advisory Board
Dale VanValkenburg Chair
Whitney Swander Vice -Chair
Robin Vora
Bart Bowen
Elise Jones
Tim Page
Dennis Pahlisch
Adam Bledsoe
Andrea Breault
Craig Davis
Jim Landin
Sonja Porter
Steve Porter
Ex-Officio appointees from the following
Taxing Districts
Bend Parks and Recreation District
Bend La -Pine School District
Cascade East Transit
Central Oregon Community College
Deschutes Library District
Tax Increment Plan Consulting Team
Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC
Tiberius Solutions LLC
Bend Core Area Project Consulting Team
Angelo Planning Group
Cascadia Partners
ECONorthwest
Walker Macy
This page intentionally left blank.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. DEFINITIONS 1
II. INTRODUCTION 3
III. THE PROJECTS IN THE AREA AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TIF
AREA PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE AREA. 6
IV. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF
MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS 18
V. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN 19
VI. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED
AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED 23
VII. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT 29
VIII. REVENUE SHARING 34
IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 34
X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE
OF URBAN RENEWAL AND TIF AREAS 38
XI. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND
IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES 39
XII. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH TIF AREA IN THE PLAN 566
XIII. RELOCATION REPORT 56
I. DEFINITIONS
"Agency" means the Bend Urban Renewal Agency, also called BURA. The Agency
is responsible for administration of this Core Area TIF Plan and other TIF/ plans
previously adopted in the City of Bend.
"Annual report" is the ORS 457.460 requirement for the production of an annual
report that gets distributed to the taxing districts.
"Area" or "TIF Area" means the tax increment finance area shown in Figure 1
established for this Plan pursuant to ORS 457, and described in Section XIV of the
Plan, including the properties and rights -of -way located therein.
"Blight" is defined in ORS 457.010(1)(a-i) and identified in the ordinance adopting a
TIF plan.
"Board of Commissioners" means the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners.
"BURA" means the Bend Urban Renewal Agency, also called Agency. BURA is
responsible for the administration of this Core Area TIF Plan and other TIF plans
previously adopted in the City of Bend.
"City" means the City of Bend, Oregon.
"City Council" or "Council" means the Bend City Council.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the City of Bend Comprehensive Plan and its
implementing ordinances, policies, and standards.
"Core Area Project" or "CAP" means the planning process undertaken in 2019/2020
by the City of Bend for the Bend Core Area.
"County" means Deschutes County, Oregon.
"Fiscal year" or "FYE" means the year commencing on July 1 and closing on June
30.
"Frozen base" means the total assessed value including all real, personal,
manufactured, and utility values within a TIF area at the time of adoption. The county
assessor certifies the assessed value after the adoption of a TIF area plan.
"Increment" means that part of the assessed value of a taxing district attributable to
any increase in the assessed value of the property located in an urban renewal area,
or portion thereof, over the assessed value specified in the certified statement from
the assessor (frozen base).
"Maximum indebtedness" means the amount of the principal of indebtedness
included in a plan pursuant to ORS 457.190 and does not include indebtedness
incurred to refund or refinance existing indebtedness. The maximum indebtedness
for this Plan is $195,000,000.
"Municipality" means any county or any city in the state of Oregon.
"ORS" means the Oregon Revised Statutes and specifically Chapter 457, which
relates to urban renewal.
1 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
"Plan" or "Core Area TIF Plan" means the official plan for the TIF Area pursuant to
ORS 457.
"Planning Commission" means the Bend Planning Commission.
"Project(s)" or "TIF Project(s)" means any work or undertaking carried out under the
Core Area TIF Plan.
"Report Accompanying Core Area TIF Plan" or "Report" means the official report that
accompanies the Core Area TIF Plan pursuant to ORS 457.085(3).
"Revenue sharing" means sharing tax increment proceeds as defined in ORS
457.470.
"Tax increment finance area" or "TIF area" means a blighted area included in a TIF
plan.
"Tax increment finance area plan" or "TIF plan" means a plan, as it exists or is
changed or modified from time to time, for one or more TIF areas, as provided in
ORS 457.
"Tax increment finance area project(s) or "TIF area projects) or projects) means
any work or undertaking carried out under ORS 457.170 and ORS 457.180 in a TIF
area.
"Tax increment finance area report" or "report" means the official report that
accompanies the TIF plan pursuant to ORS 457.085(3).
"Tax increment finance" or "tax increment financing" or "TIF" means the funds that
are associated with the division of taxes accomplished through the adoption of a TIF
plan.
"Tax increment revenues" means the funds allocated by the assessor to renewal TIF
area due to increases in assessed value over the frozen base within the area.
"UGB" means urban growth boundary.
"URAB" means the Urban Renewal Advisory Board set up to help guide the planning
process for the Core Area Project.
"Urban Renewal" means the statutory authority provided in ORS 457. In this Plan it
is synonymous with TIF.
"Vulnerable" means populations including those who are economically
disadvantaged, elderly, underrepresented racial or ethnic groups, uninsured
individuals, survivors of abuse or trafficking or those experiencing substance abuse,
other addictions, mental health, and homelessness.
2 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
II. INTRODUCTION
This Report contains background information and project details that pertain to the
Core Area TIF Plan for the Area. The Report is not a legal part of the Plan but is
intended to provide public information and support the findings made by the Bend
City Council as part of the approval of the Plan.
The Report provides the analysis required to meet the standards of ORS 457.085(3),
including financial feasibility. The Report contains the information required by ORS
457.085, including:
• A description of the physical, social, and economic conditions in the
area;(ORS 457.085(3)(a))
• Expected impact of the Plan, including fiscal impact in light of increased
services; (ORS 457.085(3)(a))
• Reasons for selection of the Area; (ORS 457.085(3)(b))
• The relationship between each project to be undertaken and the existing
conditions; (ORS 457.085(3)(c))
• The estimated total cost of each project and the source of funds to pay such
costs; (ORS 457.085(3)(d))
• The estimated completion date of each project; (ORS 457.085(3)(e))
• The estimated amount of funds required in the area and the anticipated year
in which the debt will be retired; (ORS 457.085(3)(f))
• A financial analysis of the Plan; (ORS 457.085(3)(g))
• A fiscal impact statement that estimates the impact of tax increment financing
upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the urban renewal or TIF Area;
(ORS 457.085(3)(h)) and
• A relocation report. (ORS 457.085(3)(i))
3 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
The relationship of the sections of the Report and the ORS 457.085(3) requirements
is shown in Table 1. The specific reference in the table below is the section of this
Report that most addresses the statute. There may be other sections of the Report
that also address the statute.
Table 1 - Statutory References
Statutory Requirement
Report
Section
ORS 457.085(3)(a)
XI
ORS 457.085(3)(b)
XII
ORS 457.085(3)(c)
III
ORS 457.085(3)(d)
IV
ORS 457.085(3)(e)
VII
ORS 457.085(3)(f)
V,VI
ORS 457.085(3)(g)
V,VI
ORS 457.085(3)(h)
IX
ORS 457.085(3)(i)
XIII
The Report provides guidance on how the Plan might be implemented. BURA has the
authority to make adjustments to the implementation assumptions in this Report, as it
reviews revenues and potential projects each year. BURA may allocate budgets
differently, adjust the timing of the projects, decide to incur debt at different timeframes
than projected in this Report, and make other adjustments to the financials as
determined by BURA. BURA may also make changes as allowed in the Amendments
section of the Plan. These adjustments must stay within the confines of the overall
maximum indebtedness of the Plan.
Note on language: This Report, wherever applicable and permissible, uses the term
Tax Increment Financing or TIF rather than "urban renewal". The term TIF is used
consistently in other parts of the nation and does not evoke past practices of other
urban renewal agencies throughout the country wherein minorities and vulnerable
populations were displaced to clear the way for redevelopment. This Report aims to
avoid those connotations and has been created with intention to avoid those
outcomes. Utilizing the term TIF does not affect the statutory authority of ORS 457,
as it relates to this Report.
4 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Figure 1 — TIF Area Plan Boundary
OCAK CRtj < ep
Nf Nffr pl
HIGHWAY so
TIF AREA
AREA BOUNDARY MAP
AREA SIZE: 637.15 ACRES
EJ Area Boundary r* Railroad
Parks Major Roads
Taxlots
Source: City of Bend
0
0.25 0.5
Miles
This nap is 1or reference pumases only Care
was taken m the crealion of this map, but it, is
pro.ded "AS IS " please contact the city of Bend
to verily map inlornation or to tepotl any ellol6
CITY OF BEND
Map prepared by M Sloan. Ctty of Bend
Flint Date Jan 22, 2020
Sources Cy of Bend. Deschutes County
5 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
III.THE PROJECTS IN THE AREA AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
TIF AREA PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE
AREA.
The Projects identified and authorized for the Area are described below, including
how they relate to the existing conditions in the Area. The existing conditions were
identified by City staff.
A. Transportation, Streetscape, and Utility Infrastructure
1. Transportation
The following projects are intended to provide a more efficient and
functional transportation system, aimed at enhancing public rights -of -way
and attracting development and redevelopment in the Area by providing
greater safety, increased system capacity and connectivity, and a more
robust pedestrian and bicycle network.
Table 2 - Transportation Projects
Midtown Bicycle and Pedestrian
Crossings
Greenwood Avenue
Undercrossing Sidewalk
Widening
Hawthorne Avenue Overcrossing
Franklin Avenue Undercrossing
Widen US 97 undercrossing to include improved
multimodal facilities.
Close sidewalk gap along Hawthorne and create
a grade -separated footbridge over BNSF RR and
US 97.
Shared use path adjacent to roadway- Widen
sidewalk paths under BNSF RR and US 97 to
modernize design for roadside safety.
Existing Conditions
The BNSF railroad and US-97/Parkway run
north -south through the Area and cut off access
east -to -west across the City. Various roads either
cross under or are made into dead ends by the
railroad and parkway, including Franklin Ave,
Greenwood, and Hawthorne Ave. The City,
BNSF, and ODOT each control various portions
of some of the key bridges and undercrossings.
The existing undercrossings on Franklin and
Greenwood consist of poorly lit, narrow passages
6 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
with limited visibility that pose safety concerns for
pedestrians and bicyclists. In 2016, the City hired
a consulting firm to conduct a feasibility study for
improving pedestrian and bicycle safety across
the railroad and parkway at these two
undercrossing locations as well as the feasibility
of constructing a new overcrossing at or near
Hawthorne Avenue, where connectivity had been
removed with the construction of US 97 in the
early 2000s. The analysis found significant
funding barriers to reconstructing existing
undercrossing or building new crossings -
especially for the Franklin undercrossing which is
identified as a historic structure.
Intersection Improvements
Improve safety, access, and mobility for all users
and implements improvements at key
intersections in the Area.
Existing Conditions
Multiple intersections such as Revere Avenue/
4th Street, Olney Avenue/4th Street, Greenwood
Avenue/2nd Street within the Area have or are
modeled to have future safety and capacity
needs that can be addressed with intersection
improvements including crossing enhancements
as well as full intersection improvements such as
roundabouts or traffic signals.
3rd Street Railroad Undercrossing
widening
Widen 3rd Street to 4-lanes under the BNSF RR,
including complete street design from Emerson
Avenue to Miller Avenue.
Existing Conditions
3rd Street is a primary north -south arterial,
providing parallel access to US 97. Capacity is
constrained at the 3rd Street Railroad
undercrossing, where the roadway reduces from
5 lanes to 2 lanes. 3rd Street is recognized by
ODOT as a critical parallel route in the event of
an interruption to traffic flow on US 97. The
existing undercrossing also has limited
pedestrian and bicycle facilities, limiting north -
south connectivity for those walking and biking
within the Area.
Sidewalk Infill
Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity
throughout the Area by closing sidewalk gaps,
including along key walking and biking routes.
Existing Conditions
There are significant sidewalk gaps throughout
7 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
the Area that impact both safety and connectivity
for those walking within or through the area.
Low Stress Bicycle Network
Implement various bicycle safety and
connectivity projects throughout the Area.
Existing Conditions
Most roads in the Area lack bicycle facilities.
Where bicycle facilities do exist, they are often
high stress or have gaps in connectivity. Barriers,
including the BNSF railroad, and US 97 limit both
east -west and north -south bicycle connectivity in
the Area. A "Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress"
(LTS) analysis was conducted and showed
existing high stress locations, facility gaps, and
physical barriers to safe bicycling near key
bicycle -focused destinations in the Area,
especially along 3rd Street/US 20 and
Greenwood Avenue.
Aune Street Extension from Bond
Street to 3rd Street
Two-lane extension of Aune Street to connect
3rd Street and Bond Street. Includes intersection
improvement at 3rd Street and roundabout (RAB)
at the intersection of Bond Street and Industrial
Way.
Existing Conditions
Aune Street does not currently provide public
through access or multimodal connectivity due to
private road restrictions east to west through the
Area. An extension of Aune Street would provide
additional internal route choices for all users and
address existing capacity needs within the Area,
including along the Wilson Avenue corridor.
Mobility Hubs
Citywide implementation of mobility hubs in
coordination with Cascade East Transit (CET)
and High Capacity Transit (HCT) routes.
Existing Conditions
The current transit system in Bend is based on a
"hub and spoke" model where all transit routes
originate from Hawthorne Station. CET is
working on an update to its Tong -range plan that
considers revised route models that would
include the concepts of mobility hubs focused on
a more robust transit system.
Sisemore Street Extension
Construct street extension from Arizona Avenue
to Bond Street.
Existing Conditions
Sisemore Street is a two lane street with
8 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
sidewalks on one side that presently terminates
at Arizona Avenue. The roadway extension
project meeting complete street design standards
will improve local connectivity for all users within
the Area and address regional transportation
needs by improving access to US 97.
Revere Avenue Interchange
Improvements
ODOT coordination project to construct roadway
upgrades and intersection improvement near the
US 97/Revere Avenue interchange, including at
the ramp terminals and adjacent Wall
Street/Portland Avenue intersection.
Existing Conditions
ODOT conducted a crash analysis from 2011-
2015 as part of its US 97 Parkway Planning
process that identified this interchange as a
priority for safety improvements.
Olney Protected Bicycle Lanes
and US 97 Undercrossing
Provide protected bicycle lanes on Olney Avenue
at US 97 undercrossing.
Existing Conditions
East -west bicycle facilities are limited by major
barriers such as US 97 and the BNSF railroad.
Olney Avenue currently Tacks walking and
bicycling facilities to provide east -west
connectivity.
3rd Street & Miller Avenue
intersection improvements and 3rd
Street modifications
Study and construction of intersection
improvements at 3rd Street/Miller Avenue to
address identified safety needs.
Existing Conditions
Identified as top site for safety improvement in
the 2019 Bend Transportation Safety Action Plan
(TSAP).2 This intersection is used by motorists to
avoid congestion at the nearby 3rd Street/Wilson
Avenue intersection. Vehicles turn on and off 3rd
Street at higher rates than the intersection was
designed for. Safety concerns are heightened by
the presence of multiple driveways and other
access points and 3rd Street narrowing to two -
lanes at this location.
Olney Avenue Railroad Crossing
Improvements
Upgrade the Railroad crossing to include
dedicated sidewalks and low stress bicycle
facilities.
1 City of Bend Area Transportation Safety Action Plan. September 30, 2019, Table 8, pg. 31.
2 City of Bend Area Transportation Safety Action Plan. September 30, 2019, Table 8, pg. 31.
9 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Existing Conditions
East -west bicycle facilities are limited by major
barriers including US 97 and the railroad. Olney
provides important east -west connectivity.
Current bicycle facilities on Olney are not low
stress.
Colorado Avenue/ US 97
Intersection safety and capacity
improvements
ODOT coordination project to construct roadway
upgrades and intersection improvements near
the Colorado/Us-97 interchange; may include
traffic signals or roundabout.
Existing Conditions
The Colorado Avenue/US 97 northbound ramp is
currently stop -controlled and near a curve in the
roadway. The ramp terminal intersection
experiences significant delay and a high volume
to capacity ratio. This location was also identified
as a safety priority in the US 97 Parkway Plan
that evaluated crash data from 2011-2015.
3rd Street at Railroad to connect
KorPine
3rd Street underpass: Near term enhancements
to walking and biking route.
Existing Conditions
The existing 3rd Street underpass of the railroad
has limited pedestrian and bicycle facilities,
including narrow sidewalks and no marked
bicycle lanes. In addition it lacks lighting and the
structure is in visual disrepair.
Safety Improvements
Improve safety, access, and livability at key sites
including the Colorado Avenue/US 97
improvements.
Existing Conditions
The current site at the intersection of Colorado
Avenue and the western off ramp of US 97 lacks
safe walking and bicycling facilities through the
intersection of Colorado Avenue and US 97.
High Capacity Transit (HCT)
Project would improve City infrastructure on HCT
routes in coordination with CET. Project includes
improving access to HCT stops within the Area
and may also include street improvements at
HCT stops.
Existing Conditions
Cascade East Transit (CET), operated by the
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council
(COIC), is the public transportation system
providing fixed -route bus service in the City of
Bend. CET is currently developing a transit
master plan that may modify transit route models
10 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
to provide more frequent transit service along
high capacity routes, which have not yet been
established.
2. Streetscape
Provide funds to support streetscape enhancements identified in the Core
Area Urban Design Framework intended to provide an identity and a safe
and effective multimodal transportation network within the Area. These
enhancements include but are not limited to wide sidewalks, curb bulb outs,
decorative paving, lighting, landscaping, furnishings - planters, seating,
bicycle amenities, curbing, on -street parking.
Examples of rights -of -way eligible for streetscape enhancement projects
include but are not limited to:
• 2nd Street
• 3rd Street
• 4th Street
• Greenwood Avenue
• Franklin Avenue
• Division Street
• Hawthorne Avenue
• Aune Road
• Revere Avenue
• Wall Street
• Olney Avenue
Existing Conditions
The existing streetscape within the Area consists of areas with significant missing
sidewalks and sidewalk gaps. In addition, the area lacks street trees; lighting; and a
safe, connected pedestrian and bicycle network.
11 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
3. Public Utility
The following public utility projects are intended to address sewer,
stormwater, and water system infrastructure deficiencies in the Area.
—Public Utility Projects
Sewer System Improvements
Support projects identified in the 2018 Sewer
Public Facility Plan that are located within
the Area, including the Drake Lift Station and
Force Main and the Drake Downstream
Trunk/2nd Street Trunk.
Existing Conditions
The Drake Lift Station and force main require
additional capacity to accommodate
anticipated growth in the KorPine service
area.3
Stormwater System
Improvements
Support projects identified in the 2014
Stormwater Master Plan that are located
within the Area, including the costs
associated with stormwater improvements
for the Franklin Avenue and Greenwood
Avenue Underpasses.4
Existing Conditions
There are multiple known flooding locations
within the Area. The Franklin undercrossing
is the highest priority flooding location
followed by the Greenwood undercrossing.
The City recently completed a project to
address flooding concerns in the 3rd Street
undercrossing area.5
Water System Improvements
Support projects identified in the 2011 Water
Master Plan that are located within the Area,
including upgrading and replacement
projects for the Norton/Olney Avenue,
Revere Avenue, and Division Street.
Existing Conditions
The primary concern for the Area is the need
to upsize pipes and to replace outdated,
galvanized and cast-iron piping that will not
meet the service level needs as the Area
3 City of Bend 2018 Collection System Public Facility Plan, pg. 42.
4 City of Bend 2014 Stormwater Master Plan, pg. 410.
5 https://www.bendorepon.gov/city-proiects/city-infrastructure-proiects/recently-completed-
p ro i e cts/3 rd -street-underpass - sto r m wa to r-project
12 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
builds out.6
B. Affordable Housing Redevelopment and Development Assistance,
Partnership, and Support
Partner with and offer funds to support housing organizations and
developers to create low income, transitional, and affordable housing
opportunities. Project funds may be used for activities that support the
development, redevelopment, or rehabilitation of transitional, low-income
and affordable housing projects, as well as for other facilities that support
vulnerable populations.
Examples of eligible project activities include:
• Land acquisition/assembly
• Environmental review, mitigation and remediation
• Pre -development assistance including contracting with design
professionals
• Payment of fees
• Frontage improvements including utility undergrounding
• Off -site infrastructure improvements
• Other direct support for programming and projects
Existing Conditions
Affordable rental housing is currently the most common housing problem in Bend,
with "rent burden" playing a significant factor.' Over 35% of renters currently pay
rent that exceeds 30% of the area median income, with almost 18% paying rent
that exceeds 50% of the area median income.8
In addition, median Bend home prices have risen by nearly 50% since 2015, and
approximately 175% since 2011,9 which was the lowest point in the recession for
Bend's real estate market. From February 2016 to February 2020, Bend's median
home price rose from $332,000 to $460,000.10
Affordable housing continues to be a top priority for City Council and the Bend
community." The City has an Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) and
existing policies and programs in place that support affordable housing. These
6 City of Bend 2011 Water Master Plan, pg. 50.
City of Bend Consolidated Plan 2019-2023, pg. 33
8 City of Bend Consolidated Plan 2019-2023, pg. 41
9 City of Bend Consolidated Plan 2019-2023, pg. 26
'0 Beacon Appraisal Group, LLC. The Beacon Report, March 2020, pg. 1
11 Bend City Council 2019-2021 Goals. Revised January 15, 2020. Goal 1, Strategy 2, pg. 2
13 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
include:
1. Affordable Housing program: The City collects one-third of one percent of
the total valuation on all building permits submitted to the City, which
generates about $1 M per year to leverage state and federal funding to
supply affordable housing units in Bend.
2. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding: This funding can be
used for acquisition, infrastructure, rehabilitation, and social services. The
City allocates about $300,000 per year of this funding.
3. Density Bonus: See Bend Development Code, Section 3.6.200
4. Height Bonus: See Bend Development Code, Section 3.6.200
5. Parking reduction: Bend Development Code, Section 3.3.300.D.1.d
6. SDC Exemption: City System Development Charges (SDCs) are fully
exempted for qualified affordable housing. The Bend Park and Recreation
District waives SDCs for up to 400 units of affordable housing until
December 31, 2022.
The City's current affordable housing funding sources are limited and subject to
market conditions as well as Congressional budgets, for CDBG. These funds can be
used for a spectrum of activities to support affordable housing acquisition,
rehabilitation, or construction, and are available for rental, ownership, or shelter
facilities and services. Additional funding sources are necessary to allow for the
development of more affordable housing in the area and to address barriers to
development such as infrastructure needs. As of the date of this Plan in 2020, the
City is not aware of any affordable housing projects within the Area.
C. Business Redevelopment and Development Assistance, Partnership,
and Support
1. Business Development and Redevelopment
Provide funds to partner with and offer funds to support redevelopment
and new development projects that support businesses, including
housing providers and transit operators within the Area.
Examples of eligible project activities include:
• Land acquisition and assembly
• Environmental review, mitigation and remediation
• Pre -development assistance including contracting with design
professionals
• Payment of fees
• Frontage improvements including utility undergrounding
• Off -site infrastructure improvements
• Funding for commercial and residential building rehabilitation and
renovation programs and projects, including energy efficiency and
accessibility upgrades, through public/private partnerships
• Market -rate housing and mixed -use commercial/residential
14 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
development projects
• Contracting with design professionals
• Other direct support for programming and projects
2. Business Support and Enhancement
Provide and administer loans and grant programs to assist start-ups,
existing local business owners and property owners in developing,
redeveloping, or rehabilitating property.
Examples of eligible project activities include:
• Improve older buildings to meet current code standards
• Assist in assessment and permitting
• Environmental review, mitigation and remediation
• Feasibility assessment of development or redevelopment
• Assist in other improvements to allow for intensification of under-
utilized sites
• Building facade improvements
• Building utilization assistance
• Landscaping enhancements and pedestrian amenities
• Professional engineering, architecture, landscaping, and other
building and site design assistance
• Mechanical, electrical, and other building upgrades that will reduce
emissions, support energy efficiency.
• Seismic, fire suppression, and other public safety improvements
• Other direct support for programming and projects
Existing Conditions
There are 723 active businesses within the Area which represent approximately 11 %
of all Bend businesses, as of February 201912. In 2016, there were approximately
8,011 employees in the Area.13 There are many properties within the Area that could
benefit from business assistance activities. There is no present funding source for
these types of activities.
D. Open Space, Facilities, Amenities, and Wayfinding
Projects within this category are intended to support the Area as a vibrant
mixed -use city center where businesses thrive, people live, and there are
12 Information found using Active Business license data — February 2019
13 Data sourced from 2016 Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) data provided by
the Oregon Employment Department
15 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
community gathering spaces for people to enjoy and recreate.
Projects may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Parks, plazas, recreation sites, trails, and/or open space land
acquisition
• Wayfinding and signage to create a clear Area identity
• Private art installation(s) grants and loans
Existing Conditions
Bend Park and Recreation District (BPRD) is the urban service provider of parks
within the Bend City limits, including in the Area. The 2018 BPRD Comprehensive
Plan includes a low priority project to secure park land in the Area to develop an
urban plaza or "parklet" to support redevelopment of the area.14 The only BPRD trail
planed in the Area is a Rails to Trails project in the BNSF railroad right of way, which
is not likely to be completed in the near future since the railroad is still active as a
freight line.15 In addition, BPRD has identified the need for a neighborhood park just
south of the KorPine opportunity area to serve the neighborhoods to the south of
that site.16
Wayfinding signage: There is no distinctive wayfinding or signage for the Area.
Private art installations: There are no funding sources to support private art
installations in the Area.
E. Plan Administration, Implementation, Reporting, and Support
Provide funds for BURA to retain the services of City personnel or other
independent professionals or organizations for activities such as:
• General staffing, and office or overhead expenses
• Management and oversight of an appointed advisory board
• Management and oversight of programs designed to support eligible
projects
• Preparation of studies to inform project decisions such as the Midtown
Crossings
• Preparation of market feasibility, transportation impacts analysis, or
other technical or economic studies
• Preparation of design, architectural, engineering, environmental,
landscape architectural, planning, platting, or other developmental
documents, studies, or plans
• Providing special rehabilitation, restoration or renovation feasibility and
14 Bend Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan. Adopted July 2018, pg. 107
15 Bend Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan. Adopted July 2018, pg. 114
16 Bend Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan. Adopted July 2018, pg. 98
16 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
cost analysis studies
• Providing appraisals for property acquisition and disposition
• Assisting in the preparation of the annual financial report required by
this Plan and ORS 457
• Auditing, insurance, bond counsel, financing fees and other required
administrative costs
• Any other powers granted by ORS 457 in connection with the
implementation of this Plan
Existing Conditions
There is presently not a TIF Area in this location. Therefore, there is no overall
funding for administration in the Area. This project would provide that administrative
support.
17 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
IV.THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE
SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS
The cost estimates for Projects are shown are in Table 4 below. These are all
estimates acknowledging that the Area portions of these project activities must fit
within the maximum indebtedness. These costs are shown in year of expenditure
(YOE) dollars, which assumes inflation of 3.0% annually.
The Plan assumes that BURA/City will use other funds to assist in the completion of
the projects within the Area. These sources include but are not limited to City of
Bend General Funds, SDCs, local, state and federal grants, and other sources as
identified by BURA/City. BURA/City may pursue regional, county, state, and federal
funding, private developer contributions and any other sources of funding that may
assist in the implementation of the programs.
BURA will be able to review and update fund expenditures and allocations on an
annual basis when the annual budget is prepared.
Table 4 - Estimated Cost of Each Project
Project Title
Project Cost
(YOE$)
Percentage of
Total Project
Cost
Affordable Housing Partnership & Support
$36,391,670
18%
Business Re/development Partnership &
Support
$28,573,105
15%
Transportation & Bike/Ped, Streetscape,
Utility Infrastructure
$100,521,813
52%
Open Space, Facilities, Amenities, &
Wayfinding
$18,851,202
10%
Plan Administration, Reporting, Refinement,
& Finance fees
$9,700,688
5%
TOTAL:
$194,038,477
100%
Source: City of Bend and Tiberius Solutions
18 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
V. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN
The estimated tax increment revenues through FYE 2051 are calculated based on
projections of the growth assessed value of existing property and new development
within the Area, and the consolidated tax rate that will apply to the Area.
Figure 2 shows expected TIF revenues over time and the projected tax revenues
after termination of the Area. Table 5 shows the incremental assessed value, tax
rates and tax increment revenues each year, adjusted for discounts, and
delinquencies, truncation loss, and receipt of delinquent taxes from prior years. The
projections assume an annual growth rate of 5.0% for assessed value in the Area.
This assumption is supported by an evaluation of the development potential of
vacant and redevelopable land within the Area. These projections of growth are the
basis for the projections in Table 8, Table 9, Table 10, and Table 11.
The first year of tax increment collections is anticipated to be FYE 2022. Gross TIF"
is calculated by multiplying the tax rate times the assessed value used. The tax rate
is per thousand dollars of assessed value, so the calculation is "tax rate times
assessed value used divided by one thousand." The consolidated tax rate includes
permanent tax rates only, and excludes general obligation bonds and local option
levies, which will not be impacted by this Plan.
Figure 3 — Funding for Projects over Time shows the projected funding for projects
over time.
17 TIF is also used to signify tax increment revenues
19 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
co
0
0
0
c0
C
0
0
is
1-
(n
a)
715
as
1-
0
0
0
(n
(n
0
N
(n
(6
C
0
E
0
L
0
0
0
a)
0
0_
L)
0
0
F"
Total TIF
554,843
861,563
1,179,357
1,513,039
1,863,406
6N)
N
CO
N
N
2,617,572
3,023,165 1
3,449,038 l
3,896,205 1
4,365,731
4,858,732 1
000
M
CO
I-
CO
C()
CO
O
6)
-
CA
CC)
N
CO
O
0)
V'
CO
7,089,876
7,719,085
8,379,754
9,073,457
9,801,845
(N
CO
CO
(0
(n
0
11,369,700 1
O
O
N
N
N
r
13,098,260
14,027,888
15,003,997
N
6)
CO
(NI
O
CO
r-
17,105, 073
18,235,042
19,421,509
N
CO
V'
CD
CO
N-
M
N
H)
Net TIF
(Prior Year)
'
M
N
CO
OO
12,799
CO
CA
V'
I`
—
M
M
V'COO
N
N
LO
A-
I-M
N
LO
(n
co
38,768
44,766
V'
CO
O
in
57,677
64,621 1
N
v-
0)
�6)
N.
I-
CO
LO
N.
87,605
96,045
104,907
114,213
M
00
CAN
C)
NM
rr
N
ct
V'
145,014
CC)
N
MN
(400
LC)
r
r
O
CO
r
180,670
V'
CO
hCC)
MIS
CD
tN
N
".--
CI
221,947
237,104
253,020
269,730
$3,224,380
Net TIF
(Current Year)
M
V•
CON
V'
LC)
(0
r
V•
(.0
(0
CO
1,166,558
1,495,541
1,840,973
2,203,677
2,584,516
2,984,397
3,404,273 1
3,845,141
4,308,054
4,794,112 1
N
I,-
CT
V'
0
M
(O
CC)
M
co-
V'
CO
to
6,403,024
M
CO
(`0
CA
CA
CO
7,614,177
8,265,541
CT
r
V'
CA
V'
CA
CO-
CO
O
(9.1
N.
CO
CO
0)
10,421,638
11, 213, 375
6)
6)
(0
V
V'
0
N
I 12,917,589
V'
N
•-
V'
C')
00
CO-
LO
CO
V'
CO
6)
N.
�
LO
CO
CA
CO
O
CO
CC)
CO
CO
CA
I -
CO
C0
CO
17,982,022
19,151,778
$234,110,444
Adjustments
N
0
N
0)
N
(44,907)
00
6)
CO
CO
(78,713)
M
0)
CO
(0
6)
M
CO
CA
Ln
—
(136,027)
(157,074)
(179,172)
(202,376)
(226,740)
N
N
CO
N
CC)
(279,183) 1
(307,387)
(337,001)
Cfl
O)
O
CO'
CO
(400,746)
(435,028)
(471,025)
N-.t-
N
CO
CO-
0
O
LO
OO
V'
(590,178)
N
M
0)
c+)
M
(679,873)
N
r
(0
N
(778,762)
(831,946)
(887,788)
(946,422)
OD
CO
0)
O
.-
N
O
CO
,-
N
N_
Gross TIF
(Current Year)
584,046
898,148
u
O
Nn
N
CT
N
1,937,867
M"t
CO
rN
CO
N
(n
N
3,141,471
LO
V_
O000
LO
C")
4,047,517
4,534,793
CD
C)
V
CD
O
L
LO
CO
COO
C
4f)
6,147,738
6,740,025
N
CA
(O
M
t-
8,014,923
8,700,570
9,420,499
10,176,424
10, 970,145
11, 803, 553
M
CO
(4
N
13,597,462
M
N
(NON-
CC)
V'
00
N
Cl)
CC)
16,638,910
17,755,756
18,928,444
20,159, 767
$246,432,046
Tax
Rate
0)
t�
F-
0)
N
6)
N.
h
CA
N
12.9779
O)
N.
N.
CA
N
6)
t-
h
CA
N
12.9779
12.9779
O)
t-
t'-
6)
CV
12.9779
6)
t-
6)
N
12.9779
12.9779
6)
I,-
O
N
O
t-
N.
CA
N
0)
N-
CA
N
12.9779
12.9779
0)
t-
h
CA
N
12.9779
12.9779
6)
N.
N-
CA
N
O)
N-
I`
6)
N
12.9779
6)
N-
t-
6)
N
12.9779
12.9779
12.9779
0)
N-
I�
6)
N
12.9779
0)
1
I�
0
N
Increment
(Applied)
45,003,083
Cfl
CD
(n
O
N
6)
O
94,618,984
121,302,655
149,320,512
178,739,262
209,628,950
N_
CM
CO
O
N
N
276,119,000
311,877,673
349,424,280
388,848,217
4C)
CO
M
V'
N
O
V'
473,708,242
519,346,378
—
V'
CO
CO
N
N-
10
CO
V'
N
CO
CC)
n
CO
670,414,310
725,887,748
784,134,858
845,294,325
909,511,764
t`
O
O
V'
6)
C6
0)
1,047,739,802
1,122,079,516
N
(4
M
0
N
1,282,095,749
1,368,153,259
1,458,513,645
1,553,392,051
Frozen Base
Assessed Value
439,054,462
M
C1C)
O
6)
C'0
439,054,462
439,054,462
439,054,462
439,054,462
M
in
O
O)
CO
439,054,462
439,054,462
439,054,462
M
LO
O
6)
M
M
O
6)
M
439,054,462
M
44)
O
6)
CO
439,054,462
439,054,462
439,054,462
439,054,462
M
O
6)
M
439,054,462
439,054,462
M
0
O)
M
439,054,462
439,054,462
439,054,462
439,054,462
CO
LC
0
d)
M
439,054,462
439,054,462
(0
LC)
0
d)
M
Total Assessed
Value
Tr
LO
t'-
LO
O
d'
CO
'Cl-
508,260,423
533,673,446
560,357,11 il
588,374,974
N
r
Cii
CA
t�
(0
648,683,412
OO
'
h
r
T-
CO
CO
CO
V'
co-
t--
e-
L0
I`
M
'
N
M
6)
Ci
CC)
N.
788,478,742
�
co
N
O
0)
I \ --
N
CO
869,297,813
912,762,704
958,400,840
1,006,320,881
1,056,636,925
1,109,468,772
1,164,942,210
1,223,189,320
1,284,348,787
co
N -
CO
CO
Cn
-
CO
V'
CO_
1,415,994,537
1,486,794,264
1,561,133,978
1,639,190,678
1,721,150,211
1,807,207,721
1,897,568,107
1,992,446,513
i
W
>-
Il
N
O
N
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030 1
2031
M
O
N
2033
2034
CO
O
N
2036
N-
O
N
CO
O
N
2039
2040
V'
co
N
VN'
O
N
CO
co
N
2044
LO
V'
O
N
2046
2047
CO
V'
O
N
2049
2050
r
4C)
0
N
TOTAL:
20 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Figure 2 - TIF Projections over Time
N
ER
O
N
EA
EA
(suoiiii j) enuene xei ssoao
EA-
E!9
From Frozen Base
•
EA-
4
zsOc,
os
o4
o.A
44
Oe
z4
Oe
O4
oe
oO
o&
t96O&
2O
O&
CtnO&
Off,
O&
t9e
O&
O�,
Source: Tiberius Solutions
21 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Figure 3 — Funding for Projects over Time
O (0 N
N
69 Eft
CO
•cs-
69
49-
Source: Tiberius Solutions
22 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
VI.THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES
REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH
INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED
Table 6 shows a summary of the financial capacity of the Area, including how the
total TIF revenue translates to the ability to fund projects in constant FYE 2020
dollars in five-year increments. Table 8, Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11 show more
detailed tables on the allocation of tax revenues over time.
The Plan is structured to complete all projects and have sufficient tax increment
finance revenue to terminate the Area in FYE 2051, a 30-year duration for the Plan.
The time frame of the Plan is not absolute; it may vary depending on the actual
ability to meet the maximum indebtedness. If the economy is slower, it may take
longer; if the economy is more robust than the projections, it may take a shorter time
period. These assumptions show one scenario for financing and that this scenario is
financially feasible.
The maximum indebtedness is $195,000,000 (one hundred ninety five million
dollars). The estimated total amount of tax increment revenues required to service
the maximum indebtedness of $195,000,000 is $237,334,824 and is from the
division of taxes from permanent rate levies.
Table 6 - TIF Capacity of the Area
Net TIF (YOE$)
$237,334,824
Maximum Indebtedness (YOE$)
$195,000,000
Capacity (2020$)
$111,876,107
Years 1-5
$10,367,874
Years 6-10
$26,042,897
Years 11-15
$13,044,250
Years 16-20
$19,331,320
Years 21-25
$20,264,766
Years 25-30
$22,825,000
Source: Tiberius Solutions
23 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
This financial analysis projects when borrowings might occur as identified in
Table 7. This is only one scenario for how BURA may decide to implement this Plan,
and this scenario is financially feasible. BURA may decide to complete borrowings at
different times or for different amounts, depending on their analysis at the time. The
timeframes on these borrowings are designed to have all borrowings paid off at the
estimated termination of the Area in FYE 2051. These are the principal amounts of
the borrowings. The total amounts, including interest, are shown in the second
column of Table 8.
- Estimated Borrowings and Amounts
Name
Loan A
Loan B
Loan C
Loan D
Loan E
Loan F
Principal Amount
$8,400,000
$13,300,000
$16,300,000
$13,500,000
$18,100,000
$17,200,000
Interest Rate
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
Loan Term
20
20
20
18
14
10
Loan Year
2023
2027
2031
2034
2038
2042
Annual Payment
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874
(1,828,534)
(2,227,479)
Source: Tiberius Solutions
24 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
0)
(0
fl
0
0
N
N
0
0
4-
u)
C
0
(0
0
0
'73
(0
0
0
0
c0
C
0
X
(0
co
N
(0
H
FYE 2028
2,584,516 I
1
li)
o
M
M
2,617,572
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
i
1
1
i
(1,741,264)-1
(876,307)
(2,617,572)
CO
v
FYE 2027
2,203,677 1
27,615
N
N
N
(674,038) 1
N
(C
O
O
i
(1,741,264)
(490,028)
N
CO
CV
N
v"
FYE 2026
M
f.-
01
V'
00_
M
CO
v'
CV
1,863,406
(674,038)
I
I
1
1
(674,038)
0)
M
0)-
CO
(1,863,406)
M
N
FYE 2025
U7
10
0)
v
17,498
1,513,039
(674,038)
i
it
1
(674,038)
(839,002)
(1,513,039)
N
N
N
FYE 2024
co
10
10
to -
up
12,799
1,179,357
(674,038)
i
i
i
1
i
(674,038)
(505,319)
(1,179,357)
1.73
FYE 2023
853,241
M
N
M
CO-
861,563
(674,038)
i
i,
1,
(674,038)
(187,526)
(861,563)
Ns
CV
FYE 2022
554,843
1
CO
v' co
v
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
M
d.
co
NI:Lo
Lo
v
(554,843)
Total
234,110,444
3,224,380
237,334,824 1
(13,480,755) 1
co
N
1.0
v.
v'
M
N
(26,159,083)
(20,787,732)
(25,599,474)
(22,274,787)
(129,646,359)
L(107,688,465)
(237,334,824)
Resources
TIF: Current Year
TIF: Prior Years
Total Resources
Expenditures
Debt Service
Loan A
Loan B
Loan C
Loan D
Loan E
Loan F
Total Debt Service
Transfer to Area Projects Fund
Total Expenditures
Debt Service Coverage Ratio
Source: Tiberius Solutions
25 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
N
a)
O)
(0
a
U
'a
V/
0
0
O
co
O
U
O
(0
u)
a)
z
a)
a)
4E'
a)
E
a)
L
U
X
(0
0)
a)
(0
H
FYE 2036
N
O
CO-
0
co
87,605
6,490,629
O
CO
v
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
0
O
N
V
L(4,204,092) 1
I (2,286,537)
CNO
ci
0))
V'
CO
•
.-
FYE 2035
5,840,351
if)
d7
5,919,918
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
CD
O
co
CO
—
(4,204,092)
LA204,092)
CO
I--
[ (5,919,918)
1.39
FYE 2034
5,304,472
5,376,384
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
'
(4,204,092)
(4,204,092)
(1,172,292)
M
r,
co
I0
N•
FYE 2033
,
N
CD
[ 64,621
Cs)1
M
CO -
LC)
.
d'
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
1
'
(3,049,218)
(3,049,218)
(1,809,514)
(4,858,732)
1.57
FYE 2032
4,308,054
57,677
4,365,731
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
1
1
,
(3,049,218)
CO
N
0)
O
M_.
(1,316,513)
1-
f..-
co
co
N.
1.41
FYE 2031
(
co-
51,064
3,896,205
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(3,049,218)
c
_
N
O)
v-
O
co
(846,987)
(3,896,205)
co
[ FYE 2030
,
3,404,273
44,766
3,449,038
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
,
,
,
,
(1,741,264)
CO
N
N-o
N
N
(3,449,038)
to
FYE 2029
2,984,397
38,768
3,023,165
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,741,264)
(1,741,264)
(1,281,901)
(,023,165)
N
Resources
Beginning Balance
TIF: Current Year
TIF: Prior Years
Total Resources
Expenditures
Debt Service
Scheduled Payments
Loan A
Loan B
Loan C
Loan D
Loan E
Loan F
Total Debt Service, Scheduled Only
Total Debt Service
Transfer to Area Projects Fund
Total Expenditures
Debt Service Coverage Ratio
Source: Tiberius Solutions
26 ( Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
M
a)
0)
as
a
m
U
a)
a)
0
O
V1
O
U
O
a
0
co
a)
a)
a)
4-
a)
E
0
i
U
co
H
O_
a)
td
H
FYE 2044
12,044,699
168,201
O
O
a)O)
N_
N
'
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
M
O
CO_N
(2,227,479)
(7,586,067)
(4,626,833)
O
N
N
N
La
FYE 2043
11,213,375
156,325
11,369,700
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
(1,828,534)
(2,227,479)
(7,586,067)
M
CO
CO
M
coM
CO-
Or O
O1
M
A-
7
1.48
FYE 2042
10,421,638
145,014
10,566,652
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
CO
10
CO-
N
CO_
(2,227,479)
(8,260,105)
(2,306,547)
tf) ^
CO N
CO-
O
CO
N
A-
FYE 2041
CO
CO
O)
N
N
CO
9,801,845
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
1.0
0))
r
O
CO
(1,154,874)
(1,828,534)
(6,032,626)
(6,032,626)
(3,769,219)
(0
A-
FYE 2040
8,949,474
CO
O
CD
CO-
N
9,073,457
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
(1,828,534)
(6,032,626)
M
CO
o
Nt
O
c)
(9,073,457)
1.48
FYE 2039
L
N
M
_M
N
d'
A
8,379,754
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
V
r)
CNs-
O
M
(1,154, 874)
(1,828,534)
(6,032,626)
(2,347,128)
(8,379,754)
r
coIn
FYE 2038
n
104,907
7,719,085 1
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
rn
N
M
(1,154,874)
M
LO
CO-
0N0
(6,032,626)
'4)
v
CO
(7,719,085)
1.26
FYE 2037 1
6,993,831
96,045
7,089,876
(674,038)
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
Tr
OO
V'
Lo
(4,204,092)
(2,885,784)
(7,089,876)
O
Resources
TIF: Current Year
TIF: Prior Years
Total Resources
Expenditures
Debt Service
Loan A
Loan B
Loan C
Loan D
Loan E
Loan F
Total Debt Service
Transfer to Area Projects Fund
Total Expenditures
Debt Service Coverage Ratio
Source: Tiberius Solutions
27 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
a)
0)
as
0_
U
4)
.a.
O
s-+
O
0
0
(0
co
a)
a)
0
C�
C
0
i
X
N
H
FYE 2051
19,151,778 i
0
CO
0)-
CO
N
19,421,509
'
'
1-
CO
O
(1,828,534)
(2,227,479)
(5,210,886)
(14,210,622)
O
tf)
O
CO (0
M
FYE 2050
N
O
CO
O
O
O
LO
N
18,235,042
'
'
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
CO
CO -
COCN
(2,227,479)
(6,518,841)
(11,716,201)
p
CO
N
O
2.76
FYE 2049
CO
O
O
j�
(O
COO
237,104
CO
N
O
LL )
_O
n
'
'
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
(1,828,534)
(2,227,479)
(6,518,841)
(10,586,232)
(17,105,073)
2.59
FYE 2048
15,806,965
221,947
16,028,912
1
'
LO
O
I`..-
O
CO
N-
co
L)
x-
,
(1,828,534)
(2,227,479)
(6,518,841)
'�
N.
O
O
In
0)
N
O
00
N
O
(o
N
V
N
FYE 2047
to
00
NY
O
O
n
N
207,512
15,003,997
'
'
L(1,307,954L
(1,154,874)
(1,828,534)
_(2,227,479)
(6,518,841)
(8,485,157)
(15,003,997)
P
N
FYE 2046
v
(MCO
C)
193,764
14, 027, 888
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
COCV
N
CO
(2,227,479)
(7,586,067)
(6,441,821)
(14,027,888)
FYE 2045
12,917,589
0
O
O
,..-
13,098,260
(1,067,226)
(1,307,954)
(1,154,874)
CO
In
oD
COCNI
(2,227,479)
(0
O
CO
1.0
(5,512,193)
(13,098,260)
1.70
Resources
TIF: Current Year
TIF: Prior Years
Total Resources
Expenditures
Debt Service
Loan A
Loan B
Loan C
Loan D
Loan E
Loan F
Total Debt Service
Transfer to Area Projects Fund
Total Expenditures
Debt Service Coverage Ratio
Source: Tiberius Solutions
28 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
VI1. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT
The schedule for construction of projects will be based on the availability of funding.
The projects will be ongoing and will be completed as directed by BURA.
The Area is anticipated to complete all projects and have sufficient tax increment
finance revenue to terminate the Area in FYE 2051, a 30-year program.
The amount of money available for projects in FYE 2020 constant dollars for the
Area is $111,876,107.
Table 12, Table 13, Table 14, and Table 15 show the $111,876,107 of project costs
in FYE 2020 dollars inflated over the life of the Area, including administrative
expenses. All costs shown in Table 12, Table 13, Table 14, and Table 15 are in
year -of -expenditure dollars, which are adjusted by 3.0% annually to account for
inflation. Annual expenditures for program administration is also shown. These are
predicated on the fact that the Area activities will start off slowly in the beginning
years and increase in the final years.
The 3.0% inflation rate is the rate to use in the future if any amendment to increase
maximum indebtedness is pursued in accordance with ORS 457.470.
BURA may change the completion dates in their annual budgeting process or as
project decisions are made in administering the Plan.
29 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
a)
f,)
0
U)
(a
0
0
0
a-+
C
a)
Q
X
0
a)
>-
co
0
0
CO
E
(0
L
0)
0
L
0
(NI
a)
0
0
1-
FYE 2028
6,760,990 I
co
CO
OD'
M
876,307
7,671,102
(253,360) I
O
co
N
O
O
O)
(1,900,200)
d'
M
N
co
v
(221,690)
N
0)
1`--
h
0
co
3,313,310
FYE 2027
183,578 1
0)
490,028
13,300,000
tt")
O)
M
er-
(2,480,708)
(614,950)
(1,844,850)
(1,844,850)
(79,944)
M
N
M
�''
(7,213,534)
O
0)
O
CO
FYE 2026
543,821
O —
f•-•
N..
coco
co
CO
N
1,735,908
ZTr
aj
(597,050)
(597,050)
(29,853)
(208,968)
CO
co
CV -
In
183,578
FYE 2025
1-
In
N
N
N
A--Cn
839,002 I
O
CO
O
O
CO
(173,895)
(28,983)
(202,878)
(521,685)
CV
CO
NV
FYE 2024
225,406
f
N
r
505,319
1
731,852 I
1
(112,550)
1
I
(168,825)
GO
CO
OS
N
M
CO
(5)
O(0
0)
to
t-
'
CD
225,377
FYE 2023
342,663
1--
187,526
8,400,000
O)
N--
O
(437,080)
C\f
coM N
(546,350)
(163,905)
(27,318)
N
N
'Cr•LY
O
-
CO
N
N
FYE
2022
1
1
M
C
t(!)
1
554,843 (
i
t
i
1
1
(26,523)
(185,658)
CO
N
N
M
O
(.0
N
M
0
0
I—
N
CO
107,688,465 (
CDmO
OD 0
194,757,744 I
(5,482,810) 1
(35,180,813)_ _I
CO
CO
to
CO
CM
co
CO
(28, 573,105)
(18,851,202)
(9,700,688)
( (194,038,477)
Resources (
Beginning Balance
Interest Earnings
Transfer from TIF Fund
Bond/Loan Proceeds
Total Resources
Expenditures (YOE $)
Utility Infrastructure
Transportation & Bike/Ped
Streetscape
Affordable Housing Partnership and Support
Business Re/Development Partnership and
Support
Open Space, Facilities , Amenities, and
Wayfinding
Plan Administration, Reporting, Refinement,
Financing Fees
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
c
0
0
(n
co
1—
a)
0
Cn
30 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
N
N
O)
0
O
0
-o
a)
a.
x
w
9—
O
cis
W
>-
•ice
u)
O
0
13
ca
E
O)
O
L
0
M
0
-a
N
H
FYE 2036
2,713,460
13,567
2,286,537
5,013,564
(770,256)
(641,880)
(641,880)
(32,094)
CO
N
co
O
co
N
(2,366,933)
2,646,632
FYE 2035 1
3,155,268
O
1.
(0
1,715,826
1
4,886,870
(623,200)
(623,200)
(623,200)
(31,160)
(272,650)
(2,173,410)
2,713,460
FYE 2034
CO
NO)
(00
N
1,172,292
O
O
Q
M
CO
r—
LL)
(605,040)
(6,352,920)
(3,781,500)
(605,040)
(605,040)
N
O
co
(399,705)
(12, 379,497)
3,155,268
FYE 2033
507,290
2,536
1,809,514
2,319,340
(587,400)
(587,400)
O
c)
CO
0)
N
(256,988)
00
11,
N
co
00
co
co
f FYE 2032
606,317
N
CO
O
CO-
CO
LC)
CO -
CO_CD
'
1,925,861
'
'
'
(570,280)
(570,280)
LO
CO'
N
(249,498)
(1,418,572)
CD
0)
N
N
LO
FYE 2031
148,933
10
NN.
846,987 1
16,300,000
17,296,665
e
(138,420)
(12,457,800)
O
O
0)-
CS)
(1,799,460)
(89,973)
(405,235)
(16,690, 348)
606,317
FYE 2030
O
O
CO
co
3,878
1,707,774
e
2,487,319
e
(134,390)
e
(940,730)
(940,730)
(87,354)
M
co
L6
N
G.
co
O
CO
N
148,933
FYE 2029
3,313,310
16,567
1,281,901
4,611,778
CD CD
O)
O
N
(1,957,200) 1
(1,304,800)
00
co
(228,340)
(3,836,112)
CD
CD
CO
(()
Resources
Beginning Balance
Interest Earnings
Transfer from TIF Fund
Bond/Loan Proceeds
I Total Resources
Expenditures (YOE $)
Utility Infrastructure
Transportation & Bike/Ped
Streetscape
Affordable Housing Partnership and Support
Business Re/Development Partnership and
Support
Open Space, Facilities , Amenities, and Wayfinding
Plan Administration, Reporting, Refinement,
Financing Fees
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
v,
c
0
0
N
a)
n
ai
0
31 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Cr)
0
0
R3
0
0
a)
a)
0_
X
w
9—
0
a)
>-
co
0
0
CO
0
E
ca
rn
0
L
a
a)
cv
1-
FYE 2044
I-
O
O
N
•ct
N
12,123
CO'
CO
Co
O
N
O
7,063,612
(203,280)
'
(2,032,800)
(2,032,800)
(355,740)
(4,624,620)
2,438,992
FYE 2043
3,115,387
15,577
CO
CO
CO'
CO
CO'
'
6,914,597
'
O^
COCO CO
0) 6
'
O^
COO
f-
6)
O^
COO
0)
'
(345,380)
(4,489,940)
2,424,657
FYE 2042
O
N
CO
M
COCfl
5,818
2,306,54_1
17,200,000
20,675,995
(574,830) 1
O
(2,874,150) 1
O
O
6)
O
O
CO
6)
(9,580,500)
(507,318)
(17,560,608)
3,115,387
FYE 2041
1,618,500
(0'
0
CO-
3,769,219
CV'
CO
LCi
CD
CO
O
j1,860,300)J
(2,046,330)
'
M
U
in
N
CO
(4,232,183)_
6)
csi
to
to
et —
FYE 2040
157,221
3,040,831
3,198,838
LC1264,270)
(316,068)
COCO
M
0
et—
1.0
w
FYE 2039
COco
M
O
CV
CO
N
13,663
2,347,128
5,093,324
(701,400)
( ,927,840)
1
1
i
(306,863)
(4,936,103)
N
N
1*---
O
FYE 2038
O
�
Nr
NYCO
N
N
1,686,459
18,100,000
to
CO
N
O
N
O
coo,
O
CO
(277,440)
(7,660,800)
(3,404,800)
(478,920)
(17,502,920)
COCO
in
M
h-
CV
FYE 2037
2,646,632
CO
CO
N
CO-
2,885,784
'
OO
V.
CO
10
O
O
(677,648)
(4,132, 000)
1
1
(289,240)
(5,098,888)
446,760
Resources
Beginning Balance
Interest Earnings
Transfer from TIF Fund
Bond/Loan Proceeds
Total Resources
Expenditures (YOE $)
Utility Infrastructure
Transportation & Bike/Ped
Streetscape
Affordable Housing Partnership and Support
Business Re/Development Partnership and
Support
Open Space, Facilities , Amenities, and
Wayfinding
Plan Administration, Reporting, Refinement,
Financing Fees
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
Source: Tiberius Solutions
32 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
a)
(6
CL
L
O
^D
W
4-
C
a)
Q
X
W
45
a)
>-
-�+
0)
0
U
CO
C
(B
L
cm
O
^L
tf)
a)
CO
1-
FYE 2051
co
O
O)
O_
7,055
14,210,622
1
15,628,633
1
1
(10,000,000)
(3,000,000)
(1,500,000)
1
(437,500) J
(14,937,500)
O
co
d)
O
FYE 2050
O
OM)
rn
v
24,505
N
O
n
'
(0
(0_
sr
O
1
0
CS)O
c5
o
(2,912,640)
CO
CO
v
i
(424,760)
(15,230,680)
(0
O)
O
v
FYE 2049
CO
01
O
O
CA
4,835
10,586,232
11,558,043
(235,650) 1
(2,827,800)
(1,413,900)
(1,767,375)
COA-
C.,A-
N
A:t
t!
(0
(0
4,900,930
FYE 2048
207,087
M
O
9,510,071
O
O
01
CD
CO-CO-
LO
N
(2,745,480)
R1,372,740)
(1,715,925)
(400,383)
(8,751,218)
N.
(0
0)
FYE 2047
M
CC
M
`'
N
8,485,157
8,925,689
M
N
N
M
.4.
M
Nr
N
(2,665,560)
(1,332,780)
1-
0)
O
CO
CO
j (388,728)
(8,718,603)
207,087
FYE 2046
3,199,985
O
O
O
CO
.,-
O
'
9,657,805
(215,660)
(4,313,200)
(2,156,600)
O�
C
(p
N
'
(377,405)
(9,219,465)
0
M
co
coLO
V
FYE 2045 _ 1
2,438,992
12,195
5,512,193
7,963,380
(209,380)
(2,093,800)
0
0
00
C6
0)
0
N
1
(366,415)
(4,763,395)
3,199,985
Resources
Beginning Balance
Interest Earnings
Transfer from TIF Fund
Bond/Loan Proceeds
Total Resources
Expenditures (YOE $)
Utility Infrastructure
Transportation & Bike/Ped
Streetscape
Affordable Housing Partnership and Support
Business Re/Development Partnership and Support
Open Space, Facilities , Amenities, and Wayfinding
Plan Administration, Reporting, Refinement, Financing Fees
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
33 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
VIII. REVENUE SHARING
Revenue sharing is defined in ORS 457.470. The statute identifies certain thresholds
where the impacted taxing jurisdictions will receive a share of the incremental growth
in the Area. The first threshold is when annual tax increment finance revenues
exceed 10% of the original maximum indebtedness of the Plan (10% of
$195,000,000 is $19,500,000). In the year after reaching the 10% threshold, BURA
will receive the full 10% of the initial maximum indebtedness plus 25% of the
increment above the 10% threshold, and the taxing jurisdictions will receive 75% of
the increment above the 10% threshold. The threshold is projected to be met in the
final year of the Plan, FYE 2051. If projections are realized, no revenue sharing
would commence because the Area would close. If assessed value increases in the
Area exceed projections, revenue sharing would be a component of the Plan, as
required by statute.
The second threshold is when annual tax increment finance revenues exceed 12.5%
of the maximum indebtedness ($24,375,000). If this threshold is met, revenue for the
Area would be capped at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness, with all additional
tax revenue being shared with affected taxing districts. This threshold is not
projected to be met.
IX.IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
This section describes the impact of tax increment financing of the maximum
indebtedness, both until and after the indebtedness is repaid, upon all entities
levying taxes upon property in the Area.
The impact of tax increment financing on overlapping taxing districts consists
primarily of the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied
to the growth in assessed value in the Area. These projections are for impacts
estimated through FYE 2051 and are shown in Table 16 and Table 17.
The Bend La Pine School District and the High Desert Education Service District are
not directly affected by the tax increment financing, but the amounts of their taxes
divided for the Plan are shown in the following tables. Under current school funding
law, property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund revenues to
achieve per -student funding targets. Under this system, property taxes foregone,
due to the use of tax increment financing, are substantially replaced with State
School Fund revenues, as determined by a funding formula at the state level.
Table 16 and Table 17 show the projected impacts to permanent rate levies of taxing
districts as a result of this Plan. Table 16 shows the general government levies, and
Table 17 shows the education levies.
34 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
a)
a)
0
0
(6
0
0
u)
0
.>
J
0
0
rx
a)
C
0
0_
U
L
0
0)
X
(B
0
U
(0
0
E
a)
U
N
0
n
a)
.Q
1-
Subtotal
(320,519)
N
o
O0)
V'
(681,284) l
(874,044)
(1,076,442)
(1,288,960)
NI -a
0
N
(n
...
(1,746,405)
Nt
ON)
0)
..-
CO
Lc)
N
(2,521,971)
(n
CO
O
CO
.N�
(3,105,799)
(3,419,785)
(3,749,470)
N
(0
N
0
(4,459,117)
(4,840,769)
(5,241,503)
(5,662,274)
(6,104,084)
(6,567,984)
(7,055,079)
(7,566,529)
(8,103,551)
(8,667,424)
(9,259,492)
N
CS)
00
00
6
(10,533,916)
f�
CD
M
6)
N
$(137,102,241)
Bend Metro
Parks & Rec
(62,462)
0)
6)
(0
CD
(132,767) 1
(170,332)
(209,775)
0
0)
<-
N
(294,676)
(340,336)
(388,279)
6)
co
06
V'
(491,476)
r-
0-
o
(0
(
(605,252) 1
.-.
V'
Tr
CO
(0
(730,689)
(798,150)
(868,984)
(943,359)
(1,021,453)
N
�
V'
co-
Oo
a.--
(f)
(n
6
(1,279,955)
(1,374,879)
(1,474,550)
(M
O
No
6
()
0
O)
6
(o0000
.-..-.
I`
V_
V'
N
co
(f)
6N)O
CO
N
co
N
N
(2,186, 396)
$(26,718,204)
City of Bend
(119,858)
(p
CO
`"�
(254,766)
(326,848)
(402,535)
(482,006)
tc)
(653,067)
(745,065)
(841,663)
(943,090)
(1,049,589)
N
vco
'
CO
-
(1,278,827)
(1,402,113)
N
(0
LO
((C
(1,667,485)
(1,810,204)
G.
(
CD
O
0M)
(2,117,405)
(2,282,620)
(2,456,095)
V'
V'
N
CO
CI
(0
N
(2,829,500)
O
N
(0
O
01
O
(M
(3,241,180)
N
CO
(f)
N
V
M
(3,695,056)
(3,939,153)
(4,195,455)
$(51,269,325)
0)
(15,468)
(24,019)
(32,878)
(42,181)
(51,948)
(62,204)
(72,973)
(84,280)
(0
67
CO
00
CD
(121,709)
LC)M
V'
(f)
CO
(149,884)
O
(()
(r
(180,947)
(197,653)
(215,194)
(V
CO
M
N
(252,951)
()
N
M
N
(294,579)
(0
0)
(0
M
(340,473)
(365,155)
(391,072)
(418,284)
)
CO
(O
0-
(476,858)
(508,359)
(541,436)
10
V'
(fl
(0
Countywide
Extension
00
(C)
6)V'o(0
I-
00
.-
.-
(O
M
N
N
N
(0
N00
M
—
(f)
M
(4,518)
00
N6)
1.(0.
M
(f)
(6,725)
(7,535)
(8,386)
(9,280)
(10,218)
(Y)
CD
N
(12,237)
(M
M
M
V'
(0
0'(06)
V'
.-.
CO
(f)
00
(0
(18,238)
(19,624)
(21,080)
(22,608)
N_
N
eY
N
(25,897)
(O
(0(n
h
NN
N
6)
(31,474)
N
(0(O
0505
MO
N
V'
VI
Countywide Law
Enforcement
M
Co
(71,698)
(98,144)1
N
N
(155,070)]
(185,685)
(217,830) 1
M
U)
N
CCO
(324,236)J
(363,309)
(404,336)
(447,414)
(492,646)
O
0
'0
(590,008)
(642,370)
(697,350)
(755,079)
(815,694)
(879,340)
(946,168)
(1,016,338)
Cfl
0))
0
(1,167, 378)
(1,248,609)
L,333,900)
(1,423,457)
(1,517,491)
(1,616,227)
R.
(CC (0
n
County Library
LC)
M
CV
CO
LC)0)
(0
01
�
CO
O)
Nh
(64,122)
(78,971)
(94,562)
CV
MCV
0)0
O
.-N
........-..�....
00
0)00
COS
(0
d'(000
(n
(f)
(205,912)
(227,850)
(250,885)
(275,071)
(300,467)
1 (327,133)
N
M
(r)
v
(384, 531)
(415,400)
Nd'
00
N-
V
(481,845)
(517,579)
(555,101)
(594,498)
(635,865)
CD
M
6)
(0
(724,909)
(772,796)
(823,078)
00
CO
CO -
O
o
ER
Deschutes County
(52,086)
(80,879)
(110,712)
I"-
co O
N
V.
(174,927)
(209,462) 1
cr
0-
((')
N
(283,800)
(323,778)
(365,756)
N
CO co
o
Nt
(456,113)
(504,708)
(555,732)
(609,308)
(665,562)
(724,629)
0
((00
COCO-r
0-
.-.
0-
CO
(920,148)
00)
600))
(1,067,330)
L,146,486)
L,229,59 )
L,316,868)
(1,408,500)
(1,504,714)
(1,605,738)
(1,711,814)
(1,823,194)
0
p
CO
07
N
N
CV
Ea
FYE
N
NNN
O
N
M
O
N
V
O
N
2025
CO
N
0
N
2027 1
CO
O
N
0)
CV
O
N
2030
2031 1
N
M
0
N
2033
V'
MMM
O
N
LC)
0
N
CO
0
N
2037
CO
0101
0
N
0)
0
N
O
V'
0
N
V'
0
N
N
V'
0
N
2043
V
V
0
N
(f)
V'
0
N
CO
V'
0
N
2047
2048
6)
0-
0
N
O
(0
0
N
(n
0
N
TOTAL:
0)
C
0
0
(n
N
0
1-
U
O
co
35 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Table 17 - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies - Education
FYE
Bend La Pine School
District
High Desert
ESD
COCC
Subtotal
Education
Total All
2022
(203,679)
(4,121)
(26,524)
(234,325)
(554,843)
2023
(316,274)
(6,400)
(41,186)
(363,860)
(861,563)
2024
(432,934)
(8,760)
(56,378)
(498,073)
(1,179,357)
2025
(555,427)
(11,239)
(72,330)
(638,995)
(1,513,039)
2026
(684,044)
(13,841)
(89,079)
(786,964)
(1,863,406)
2027
(819,092)
(16,574)
(106,665)
(942,332)
(2,231,292)
2028
(960,893)
(19,443)
(125,131)
(1,105,468)
(2,617,572)
2029
(1,109,784)
(22,456)
(144,520)
(1,276,760)
(3,023,165)
2030
(1,266,119)
(25,620)
(164,879)
(1,456,617)
(3,449,038)
2031
(1,430,271)
(28,941)
(186,256)
(1,645,467)
(3,896,205)
2032
(1,602,630)
(32,429)
(208,701)
(1,843,760)
(4,365,731)
2033
(1,783,608)
(36,091)
(232,269)
(2,051,967)
(4,858,732)
2034
(1,973,635)
(39,936)
(257,015)
(2,270,585)
(5,376,384)
2035
(2,173,162)
(43,973)
(282,998)
(2,500,133)
(5,919,918)
2036
(2,382,666)
(48,212)
(310,280)
(2,741,159)
(6,490,629)
2037
(2,602,646)
(52,664)
(338,927)
(2,994,236)
(7,089,876)
2038
(2,833,624)
(57,337)
(369,006)
(3,259,967)
(7,719,085)
2039
(3,076,151)
(62,245)
(400,589)
(3,538,985)
(8,379,754)
2040
(3,330,805)
(67,398)
(433,751)
(3,831,954)
(9,073,457)
2041
(3,598,191)
(72,808)
(468,571)
(4,139,570)
(9,801,845)
2042
(3,878,947)
(78,489)
(505,132)
(4,462,568)
(10,566,652)
2043
(4,173,740)
(84,454)
(543,521)
(4,801,716)
(11,369,700)
2044
(4,483,274)
(90,718)
(583,830)
(5,157,821)
(12,212,900)
2045
(4,808,283)
(97,294)
(626,154)
(5,531,731)
(13,098,260)
2046
(5,149,543)
(104,199)
(670,594)
(5,924,337)
(14,027,888)
2047
(5,507,867)
(111,450)
(717,256)
(6,336,573)
(15,003,997)
2048
(5,884,106)
(119,063)
(766,252)
(6,769,421)
(16,028,912)
2049
(6,279,157)
(127,057)
(817,697)
(7,223,911)
(17,105,073)
2050
(6,693,961)
(135,450)
(871,714)
(7,701,126)
(18,235,042)
2051
(7,129,506)
(144,263)
(928,432)
(8,202,201)
(19,421,509)
TOTAL:
$(87,124,021)
$(1,762,926)
$(11,345,636)
$(100,232,583)
$(237,334,824)
Source: Tiberius Solutions Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceai
36 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Table 18 shows the projected increased revenue to the taxing jurisdictions after tax
increment proceeds are projected to be terminated. These projections are for FYE
2052.
The Frozen Base is the assessed value of the Area established by the county
assessor at the time the Area is established. Excess Value is the increased
assessed value in the Area above the Frozen Base.
Table 18 - Additional Revenues Obtained after Termination of Tax Increment
Financing, FYE 2052
Taxing District
Type
Tax Rate
From Frozen Base
From
Excess
Value
Total
General Government
Deschutes County
Permanent
1.2183
534,900
2,013,867
2,548,767
County Library
Permanent
0.55
241,480
909,158
1,150,638
Countywide Law Enforcement
Permanent
1.08
474,179
1,785,255
2,259,434
Countywide Extension
Permanent
0.0224
9,834
37,027
46,861
911
Permanent
0.3618
158,850
598,061
756,911
City of Bend
Permanent
2.8035
1,230,889
4,634,226
5,865,115
Bend Metro Parks & Rec
Permanent
1.461
641,459
2,415,054
3,056,513
Subtotal
7.497
3,291,591
12,392,648
15,684,239
Education
Bend La Pine School District
Permanent
4.7641
2,091,699
7,875,126
9,966,825
High Desert ESD
Permanent
0.0964
42,325
159,351
201,676
COCC
Permanent
0.6204
272,390
1,025,530
1,297,920
Subtotal
5.4809
2,406,414
9,060,007
11,466,421
TOTAL:
12.9779
5,698,005
21,452,655
27,150,660
Source: Tiberius Solutions
37 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE
AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AND TIF AREAS
State law limits the percentage of both a municipality's total assessed value and the
total land area that can be contained in a TIF area at the time of its establishment to
15% for municipalities over 50,000 in population. As noted below, the frozen base
(assumed to be FYE 2020 values), including all real, personal, personal,
manufactured, and utility properties in the Area, is projected to be $439,054,462.
The Deschutes County Assessor will set the frozen base once the Plan is adopted.
The total assessed value of the City of Bend in FYE 2020 is $12,362,179,543. The
excess value, or increased assessed value over the frozen base, of the existing TIF
areas is $145,845,139.
The two existing TIF areas in Bend, Juniper Ridge and Murphy Crossing are shown
below in Table 19.
The percentage of assessed value of the three TIF areas in Bend is 4.3%, below the
15% threshold.
The Area contains 637.15 acres, including public rights -of -way, and the City of Bend
contains 21,278 acres. Juniper Ridge is 721.95 acres and Murphy Crossing is
275.15 acres. This puts 7.67% of the City's acreage in TIF areas, which is below the
15% statutory threshold.
Table 19 — TIF Area Conformance with Assessed Value and Acreage Limits
Assessed Value
Frozen Base
Excess Value
City of Bend
$12,362,179,543
Juniper Ridge
$119,538,917
$13,752,568
$105,786,349
Murphy Crossing
$112,743,982
$72,685,192
$40,058,790
Core Area TIF Area
$439,054,462
TOTAL:
$525,492,222
$145,845,139
% in Urban Renewal/TIF Area
4.30%
Acreage
City of Bend
21,315.81E
Juniper Ridge
721.95
Murphy Crossing
275.15
Core Area TIF Plan
637.15
TOTAL:
1,634.25
in Urban Renewal/TIF Area
7.67%
Source: Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC with data from City of Ben
Department of Assessment and Taxation (FYE 2020)
18 Matt Stuart, City of Bend e mail December 5, 2019
38 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
XI.EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES
This section of the Report describes existing conditions within the Area and
documents the occurrence of "blighted areas," as defined by ORS 457.010(1).
A. Physical Conditions
1, Land Use
The Area measures 637.15 total acres in size, which is composed of
916 individual parcels encompassing 387.74 acres, and an additional
249.42 acres in public rights -of -way. An analysis of FYE 2019-2020
property classification data from the Deschutes County Department of
Assessment and Taxation database was used to determine the land
use designation of parcels in the Area. By acreage, Commercial uses
account for the most prevalent land use within the Area (56.10%). This
was followed by Industrial (25.05%). Detailed land use designations in
the Area can be seen in Table 20.
Table 20 - Land Use in the Area
Land Use
Parcels
Acreage
Percent of
Acreage
Commercial
551
217.52
56.10%
Industrial
120
97.13
25.05%
Exempt
72
36.34
9.37%
Residential
138
21.66
5.59%
Miscellaneous
23
13.9
3.59%
Multi -Family
12
1.18
0.30%
TOTAL:
916
387.74
100%
Source: Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC with data from the City of Bend using the
Deschutes County Department of Assessment and Taxation database (FYE 2020)
39 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
2. Comprehensive Plan Designations
The most prevalent comprehensive plan designation by acreage in the
Area is Limited Commercial (44.18%). The second most prevalent
comprehensive plan designation in the Area is Mixed Employment
(17.91%). Detailed comprehensive plan designations in the Area can be
seen in Table 19. If a parcel has more than one comprehensive plan
designation, the most dominant designation is used.
Table 21 — Comprehensive Plan Designations in the Area
Comprehensive Plan Designation
Parcels
Acres
Percent of
Acreage
Limited Commercial
453
171.31
44.18%
Mixed Employment
142
69.44
17.91%
Mixed -Use Urban
92
57.40
14.80%
Light Industrial
31
31.65
8.16%
High Density Residential
46
11.21
2.89%
Mixed -Use Neighborhood
32
11.13
2.87%
Mixed -Use Riverfront
12
9.88
2.55%
General Commercial
56
8.70
2.24%
Central Business
35
7.12
1.84%
Public Facilities
9
4.26
1.10%
General Industrial
3
4.13
1.07%
Standard Density Residential
3
1.05
0.27%
Convenience Commercial
2
0.46
0.12%
TOTAL:
916
387.74
100%
Source: Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC with data from the City of Bend
40 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Figure 4 — TIF Area Comprehensive Plan Designations
TIF AREA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
AREA SIZE: 637.15 ACRES
® Area Boundary ms Railroad
Parks Major Roads
Taxlots
0
aU'i ltft MO PO
NC aEVEHt AVC
Mr OLNEY' AVE
AVt
A
0.25 0.5
Miles
This map is for reference purposes only care
was taken .n the creat3Mr 01 la,s rnap. but 0 ie
prorded 'AS IS "Please contact the Gay of Bond
to verify rule inlorr0Nt,on or to report any eNors
NCYCNNPVE NC haft
20
0fCHWAY 20
DEAN onto, no
Ce.
CG
CL
ile
'JR
Ett
RS
CITY OF BEND
Map prepared by M Stuart. City of Send
print Date Jan 22. 2020
Sources Gay of Bend. Deschutes County
Source: City of Bend; Note: If necessary, figure will be updated during a Substantial Amendment
41 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
3. Zoning Designations
The most prevalent zoning designation by acreage in the Area is
Limited Commercial (44.18%). The second most prevalent zoning
designation in the Area is Mixed Employment (17.91 %). Detailed
zoning designations in the Area can be seen in Table 22 If a parcel has
more than one zoning designation, the most dominant designation is
used.
Table 22 - Zoning Designations in the Area
Zoning Designations
Parcels
Acreage
Percent of
Acreage
Limited Commercial
453
171.31
44.18%
Mixed Employment
142
69.44
17.91%
Mixed -Use Urban
92
57.40
14.80%
Light Industrial
31
31.65
8.16%
High Density Residential
46
11.21
2.89%
Mixed -Use Neighborhood
32
11.13
2.87%
Mixed -Use Riverfront
12
9.88
2.55%
General Commercial
56
8.70
2.24%
Central Business
35
7.12
1.84%
Public Facilities
9
4.26
1.10%
General Industrial
3
4.13
1.07%
Standard Density Residential
3
1.05
0.27%
Convenience Commercial
2
0.46
0.12%
TOTAL:
916
387.74
100%
Source: Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC with data from the City of Bend
42 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Figure 5 — TIF Area Zoning Designations
GA: VCSTON AVF
TIF AREA
ZONING DESIGNATION MAP
AREA SIZE: 637.15 ACRES
®Area Boundary Railroad
Parks Major Roads
Taxlots
pV
NI RCVIRP AVI
AVc
OINEY APE
sF GlPNWOOo UP
0.25 0.5
Miles
This map is for reference purposes only Care
was taken ,n the creation of this map_ 504 0 is
presided "AS IS " Please canted the CID of Hens
to 0erity map inforrndti0n or to report any midis
rvI P[Nry AVF Nt NCI, PC)
0
N/BNwAY 10
e[AR cpGIN pp
® cc
0G
el
UE
•a t0N
r!R
'01 1.4J
AF
}J R1,4
RS
CITY OF BEND
Map prepared by M Stuart Gity o1 Bend
Print Date Jan 22. 2020
Sources Crty of Bend, Deschutes County
Source: City of Bend; Note: If necessary, figure will be updated during a Substantial Amendment
43 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
B. Infrastructure
This section identifies the existing conditions in the Area to assist in establishing
blight in the ordinance adopting the Plan. There are projects listed in several City
of Bend infrastructure master plans that relate to these existing conditions, including
but not limited to the 2018 City of Bend Collection System Public Facility Plan, the
2014 City of Bend Stormwater Master Plan, the 2011 City of Bend Water System
Master Plan — Update, and the 2019 City of Bend Transportation Safety Action Plan.
In addition, much of the information also comes from information compiled by City
staff and included in the 2020 City of Bend Core Area Report, Technical Appendix -
Existing Conditions & Applicable Plans, Projects Programs.
There are also deficiencies in the transportation system that have been identified by
City staff for inclusion. This does not mean that all of these projects are included
in the Plan. The specific projects that are included in the Plan are listed in Sections
II and III of this Report.
1. Transportation
The Area contains 23.7 centerline roadway miles, primarily owned and
maintained by the City. The Oregon Department of Transportation
(ODOT) maintains two highways within the Area: the US 97 parkway
which runs north/south, bisecting the Area; and US 20 which runs
north/south on NE 3rd Street with a southern terminus at the
intersection of NE 3rd Street and NE Greenwood Avenue, where it
proceeds to run east/west along NE Greenwood Avenue to the eastern
City limits and beyond. There are several private roadway sections
within the Area, including SE Aune Street, SW Scalehouse Loop, and
SW Industrial Way.
The existing streetscape within the Area consists of areas with
significant missing sidewalks and sidewalk gaps. In addition, the area
Tacks street trees; lighting; and a safe, connected pedestrian and
bicycle network.
The Area is largely divided by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe
(BNSF) railroad. The key east -west connectivity rights -of -way within
the Area such as the Franklin undercrossing, Greenwood
undercrossing, and the 3rd Street underpass, are owned and
maintained in some capacity by the City, ODOT, and BNSF. There are
three at grade railroad crossings in the Area at Revere Avenue, Olney
Avenue, and SE Scott Street. Wilson Avenue crosses over US 97 only.
BNSF owns most of the railroad bridges in the City including the
Franklin and Greenwood railroad undercrossing bridges. In 2016, the
City hired a consulting firm to conduct a feasibility study for improving
44 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
pedestrian and bicycle safety across the railroad and parkway at three
locations (Franklin, Greenwood, and Hawthorne) which found
significant funding barriers to reconstructing existing underpasses -
especially for the Franklin underpass which is considered a historic
structure.
BNSF does not allow new at grade railroad crossings unless additional
at grade crossings are closed. New railroad crossings and designs
must be reviewed and approved by BNSF and ODOT rail authorities
with a strong preference for overcrossings.19
The 2019 Bend Area Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP)
identifies the following locations for safety improvements within the
Area20:
• Highway 20 & 8th Street
• NE Third Street & NE Olney Avenue
• NE Third Street & NE Franklin Avenue
• SE Wilson Avenue & SE Third Street
• NW Greenwood & NW Hill Street
• Highway 20 & NE 10th Street
• 3rd Street & Division Street/Revere Avenue
• 3rd Street Area (near Miller Avenue and Woodland Boulevard)
The projects listed in Table 23 identify deficiencies in the transportation
system within the Area.21 These specific transportation projects are
identified as projects in the Plan.
Table 23 - Transportation Projects in the Area
Midtown Bicycle and Pedestrian
Crossings
Greenwood Avenue Undercrossing
Sidewalk Widening
Widen US 97 undercrossing to include improved
multimodal facilities.
19 City of Bend Core Area Report — Technical Appendix, Existing Conditions & Applicable Plans,
Projects, Programs. Dated April 2019, Revised February 2020, pg. TA-57.
20 City of Bend Area Transportation Safety Action Plan. September 30, 2019, Table 8, pg. 31.
21 Projects were identified by the Citywide Transportation Advisory Committee, and proposed as part
of the City's 2020 TSP update. The TSP update is scheduled for completion by 2020 year end.
45 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Hawthorne Avenue Overcrossing
Franklin Avenue Undercrossing
Close sidewalk gap along Hawthorne and create a
grade -separated footbridge over BNSF RR and
US 97.
Shared use path adjacent to roadway- Widen
sidewalk paths under BNSF RR and US 97 to
modernize design for roadside safety.
Intersection Improvements
Improve safety, access, and mobility for all users
and implements improvements at key
intersections in the Area.
3rd Street Railroad Undercrossing
widening
Widen 3rd Street to 4-lanes under the BNSF RR,
including complete street design from Emerson
Avenue to Miller Avenue.
Sidewalk Infill
Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity
throughout the Area by closing sidewalk gaps
along key routes and streets.
Low Stress Bicycle Network
Implement various bicycle safety and connectivity
projects throughout the Area.
Aune Street Extension from Bond
Street to 3rd Street
Two-lane extension of Aune Street to connect 3rd
Street and Bond Street. Includes intersection
improvement at 3rd Street and roundabout at the
intersection of Bond Street and Industrial Way.
Mobility Hubs
Citywide implementation of mobility hubs in
coordination with Cascade East Transit (CET) and
High Capacity Transit (HCT) routes.
Sisemore Street Extension
Construct street extension from Arizona Avenue to
Bond Street.
Revere Avenue Interchange
Improvements
ODOT coordination project to construct roadway
upgrades and intersection improvement near the
US 97/Revere Avenue interchange, including at
the ramp terminals and adjacent Wall
Street/Portland Avenue.
Olney Protected Bicycle Lanes and
US 97 Undercrossing
Provide protected bicycle lanes on Olney Avenue
at US 97 undercrossing.
3rd Street/Miller Intersection
Study and construction of intersection
improvements at 3rd Street/Miller Avenue to
address identified safety needs.
Olney Avenue Railroad Crossing
Improvements
Upgrade the Railroad crossing to include
dedicated sidewalks and low stress bicycle
facilities.
46 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Colorado Avenue/ US 97
Intersection
Includes traffic signal or RAB.
3rd Street at Railroad to connect
KorPine
3rd Street underpass: Near term enhancements to
walking and biking route.
Safety Improvements
Improve safety, access, and livability at key sites
including the Colorado Avenue/US 97
improvements.
High Capacity Transit (HCT)
Project would improve City infrastructure is
conjunction with HCT transit service that may be
established by CET. Project would improve transit
connections from Area to HCT stops.
Source: City of Bend
Streetscape: The existing streetscape within the Area consists of areas with
significant missing sidewalks and sidewalk gaps. In addition, the area Tacks street
trees; lighting; and a safe, connected pedestrian and bicycle network.
2. Stormwater
The City's 2014 Stormwater Master Plan identifies stormwater problem
areas and potential solutions. Currently the City has a dispersed
system of handling stormwater and primarily uses Underground
Injection Control (UIC) stormwater treatments. The City works to
minimize the discharge of stormwater run-off into the Deschutes River
and Tumalo Creek and towards treating the remainder. The Area
intersects eight stormwater major basins (MB17, 18A, 18B, 37, 8C,
18C, 20, 14B). The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issues
the City a permit for stormwater piped to the river, and places
limitations on stormwater treatments within Drinking Water Protection
Areas (DWPA) and environmental clean-up sites. This limits the use of
UIC treatments in these areas.
There are 518 public underground injection control (UIC) treatments
within the Area. In addition, the City measures the amount of
impervious surface in commercial, mixed use, and high density
residential zones within the City in order to develop a monthly
stormwater service charge based on impervious surface coverage. The
City of Bend defines impervious surface as a hard surface area that
either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle.
Common impervious surfaces include building roofs, walkways, patios,
driveways, parking lots, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, and
packed earthen materials. The Area currently contains 596.67 acres of
impervious surface, making it 93.6 % impervious. The City's current
design standards requires that stormwater infrastructure be sized to
47 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
address a 25- year storm event with safe passage for a 100-year 24-
hour storm, and water quality for a 6-month 24-hour storm.
There are multiple known flooding locations within the Area. The
Franklin undercrossing is the highest priority flooding location followed
by the Greenwood undercrossing. The City completed a project to
address flooding concerns in the 3rd Street undercrossing area by
adding drainage swales in the 55-acre drainage basin to improve
filtration, replacing drill holes in the spill risk area, and constructing a
vault pump station and pipe to a regional retention basin at the
Colorado interchange.
There are approximately thirty-three (33) DEQ environmental clean-up
sites such as former gas stations or dry cleaning locations within the
Area. A large portion of these sites are clustered along the 1st Street
corridor. Many of these sites do not require any further action by DEQ;
however DEQ recommends conducting site screenings.
There is only one Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
designated environmental clean-up site in the Area.22
3. Sewer
The 2018 Collection System Public Facility Plan (PFP) identifies the
types and levels of urban sewer facilities and services appropriate for
the needs and requirements to ensure future development within the
City of Bend's UGB.
The PFP looked at three project implementation timeframes based on
the system's capacity constraint: Short-term (1-5 years), Mid-term (6-
10 years), and Long-term (11-20 years). The Area is dependent on
several improvement projects being completed in order to meet
capacity requirements of higher intensity development:23
• Drake Lift Station and Force Main — Short-term: Expansion of
the Drake Lift Station and force main capacity will accommodate
growth in the KorPine service area. The City is pursuing a
project that combines elements of this project and Drake
Downstream Trunk project to ensure sewer capacity needed to
serve the KorPine opportunity area.
• Drake Downstream Trunk — Mid to Long-term: The gravity
sewer between Drake Lift Station and the Central Interceptor
requires upsizing to serve buildout densities for the KorPine
22 City of Bend Core Area Report — Technical Appendix, Existing Conditions & Applicable Plans,
Projects, Programs. Dated April 2019, Revised February 2020, pg. TA-44.
23 City of Bend Core Area Report — Technical Appendix, Existing Conditions & Applicable Plans,
Projects, Programs. Dated April 2019, Revised February 2020, pg. TA-41.
48 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
development site. The project is recommended between the
mid- and long-term timeframes to accommodate phased
development of the site in a 5-15 year period. To minimize traffic
disruptions through busy commercial areas, the City is pursuing
an alternate improvement route from the Drake Lift Station to an
improved 2nd Street Trunk line*, which is being developed
through the Drake Lift Station and Force Main project.
*Due to the City's investment in the Drake Lift Station and force
main, this trunk line will only need to be replaced for
rehabilitation and operations/maintenance purposes in the
future.
• Central Interceptor — Mid to Long-term: The Central
Interceptor requires upsizing to accommodate buildout densities
in a combination of the West UGB expansion area, Shevlin UGB
expansion area, Central Business District, KorPine site, OSU
Cascades, and Century Drive area. Similar to the Drake Trunk
the interceptor improvement is recommended between the mid -
and long-term timeframes to accommodate phased
development in a 5-15 year period. This project could be phased
incrementally over time most likely starting from the northeast
portion.
4. Water
The 2011 Water Master Plan (WMP) identifies the types and levels of
urban water facilities and services appropriate for the needs and
requirements to ensure future development within the City of Bend's
UGB
The WMP identifies the following upgrade and/or replacement projects
within the Area.24
• Norton Avenue (L5-7)
• Olney Parallel (L5-8)
• Revere Avenue (L5-10)
• Division Street (L5-11)
5. Utility Providers
The following utility providers have services within the City of Bend:
Bend Broadband, Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, Central Electric
Cooperative, Fatbeam LLC, Lightspeed Networks, TDS Telecom, as
24 City of Bend Water System Master Plan Update Optimization Study, Final Report, February 2011,
Appendix G — Master Plan Improvements — Detail.
49 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
well as Pacific Power.25 Other telecommunications providers may also
be present within the City.
6. Parks and Open Space
BPRD is the urban service provider of parks within the Bend City limits.
Riverview Park, located between the Deschutes River and Division
Street, is the only developed park within the Area. Other parks are
located just outside the Area, including Juniper Swim & Fitness Center
and Juniper Park, Kiwanis Park, and Pioneer Park. The 2018 BPRD
Comprehensive Plan includes a low priority project to secure park land
in Area to develop an urban plaza or "parklet" to support
redevelopment of the Area.26
The only trail plan for the BPRD in the Area is a Rails to Trails project
which is not foreseeable in the near future since the rail line is active
by BNSF.27
In addition, BPRD has identified the need for a neighborhood park just
south of the KorPine opportunity area to serve the neighborhoods to
the south.28
25 City of Bend Core Area Report — Technical Appendix, Existing Conditions & Applicable Plans,
Projects, Programs. Dated April 2019, Revised February 2020, pg. TA-50.
26 Bend Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan. Adopted July 2018, pg. 107
27 Bend Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan. Adopted July 2018, pg. 114
26 Bend Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan. Adopted July 2018, pg. 98
50 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
C. Social Conditions
1. Police, Fire and Safety
Between 2015-2019 police calls within the Area have averaged
approximately 13,000 per year. The most prominent police calls were
traffic related, including traffic stops (proactive policing). Unwanted
persons and suspicious circumstances calls are the highest dispatched
calls in the Area.29
2. Demographics
It is estimated that there are approximately 340 households or housing
units and 546 people residing within the Area.30 The Area is primarily
commercial in character with limited residential uses.
The Area is split into two separate Census Tracts, which do not match
the Area boundaries. The Area south of Franklin Avenue is located in
Census Tract 15 and the northern half of the Area is located in Census
Tract 16.
• The median household income for the Area is $46,284 which is
27% less than the citywide median income.
• The Area is located in Census Tracts that have a higher
percentage of persons living in poverty and persons that identify
as Hispanic or Latino than citywide, particularly the northern half
of the Area.
• The Area has a higher percentage of disabled persons than
citywide.
29 Provided by City of Bend staff
3° City of Bend Building Lands Inventory (BLI) Analysis, 2014; Envision Tomorrow model analysis.
51 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Table 24 — Demographics in the Area
Census Tract 15
(South of NE
Franklin Avenue)
Census Tract 16
(North of NE
Franklin Avenue)
Bend, OR
(Citywide)
$63,468
Median Household Income
$46,284
$46,284
% Persons in Poverty
10%
21.50%
10.30%
% White Alone (not Hispanic or
Latino)
82%
73%
85.60%
% Hispanic or Latino
13%
21%
9.10%
Median age
33
33
38.6
% Population 65 years or older
11.50%
9.50%
16.50%
% Population with disability
13.30%
12.30%
10.40%
Households with no car
7.70%
7.30%
5.20%
Source: City of Bend, American Community Survey (ACS) 2014-2018 5-year estimates
52 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
D. Economic Conditions
It is estimated that there are approximately 723 job sites and 8,011
employees within the Area.31
The Area presents itself as an area with relatively low rents compared to
Downtown and the Old Mill District for businesses. While a large portion of
the Area was re -zoned in 2016, there has been little redevelopment to
date.
1. Taxable Value of Property within the Area
The estimated total assessed value of the Area calculated with data
from the Deschutes County Department of Assessment and Taxation
for FYE 2020, including all real, personal, manufactured, and utility
properties, is estimated to be $439,054,462.
2. Building to Land Value Ratio
An analysis of property values can be used to evaluate the economic
condition of real estate investments in a given area. The relationship of
a property's improvement value (the value of buildings and other
improvements to the property) to its land value is generally an accurate
indicator of the condition of real estate investments. This relationship is
referred to as the "Improvement to Land Value Ratio," or I:L. The
values used are real market values. In TIF Areas, the I:L is often used
to measure the intensity of development or the extent to which an area
has achieved its short- and long-term development objectives.
Table 25 shows the improvement to land ratios (I:L) for properties
within the Area. There are 72 parcels that are "exempt" from taxation
as they are owned by governmental agencies or non -profits. This is
9.37% of the total acreage. There are 617 parcels representing
64.39% of the acreage that have I:L ratios less than 1.0. In other
words, the improvements on these properties are worth less than the
land they sit on. A reasonable I:L ratio for properties in the Area is 2.0,
or an improvement worth twice as much as the land it is on. Only 68 of
the 916 parcels in the Area, totaling less than one percent of the
acreage, have I:L ratios of 2.0 or more in FYE 2020. In summary, the
area is underdeveloped and not contributing significantly to the tax
base in the City.
31 2018 Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) employment data from Organization
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OED).
53 1 Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Table 25 - Improvement to Land Ratios in the Area
I:L Ratio
Parcels
Acreage
Percent of Acreage
Exempt
72
36.34
9.37%
No Improvement Value
87
49.01
12.64%
0.01-0.50
288
109.08
28.13%
0.51-1.00
242
91.57
23.62%
1.01-1.50
103
41.80
10.78%
1.51-2.00
56
28.27
7.29%
2.01-2.50
19
8.01
2.07%
2.51-3.00
16
8.67
2.24%
3.01-4.00
21
7.69
1.98%
> 4.00
12
7.29
1.88%
TOTAL:
916
387.74
100%
Source: Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC wth data fro
Department of Assessment and Taxation (FYE 2018-2019)
54 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
E. Impact on Municipal Services
The fiscal impact of tax increment financing on taxing districts that levy
taxes within the Area is described in Section IX of this Report. This
subsection discusses the fiscal impacts resulting from potential increases
in demand for municipal services.
The projects being considered for future use of tax increment funding are
for transportation, streetscape, and utility infrastructure; affordable housing
redevelopment and development assistance, partnership, and support;
business redevelopment and development assistance, partnership, and
support; open space, facilities, amenities, and wayfinding; and plan
administration, implementation, reporting, planning refinement, and
support. Tax increment financing is a method for funding projects that
would otherwise be funded by the City general fund or SDCs, or delayed
until resources are available.
It is anticipated that these improvements will catalyze development on the
undeveloped and underdeveloped parcels in the Area. This development
will require City services. However, since the property is within the City
limits, and the level of redevelopment has been planned for based on the
Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations, the City has anticipated the
need to provide services to the Area. As the development will be new
construction or rehabilitation, it will be constructed to current building
codes, which will aid in the needs for fire protection and lessen the burden
on fire response.
The financial impacts from tax increment collections will be countered by
future economic development, and, in the future, adding increases in
assessed value to the tax base for all taxing jurisdictions, including the City.
55 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
XII. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH TIF AREA IN THE PLAN
The reason for selecting the Area is to provide the ability to fund projects and
programs necessary to cure blight within the Area.
The City's 2016 Comprehensive Plan identified several opportunity areas in which
more intense development and redevelopment should occur to meet the City's
employment and housing needs associated with the 2016 urban growth boundary
expansion. In 2019 the City embarked on a planning process to address Bend's
Core Area to create a common vision and implementation plan for an area within
and adjacent to several of these identified opportunity areas. The CAP process set
out to explore the use of TIF as a supporting funding mechanism for the planned
development and redevelopment in the Core Area. The opportunity areas identified
include the Bend Central District, East Downtown, KorPine, and Inner Highway
20/Greenwood. Based on the existing conditions in the Core Area and the
Comprehensive Plan policies and designations for the area, URAB identified the
guiding principles for the Plan, TIF area boundary, and projects to be implemented in
the Area, and established TIF as an appropriate and viable funding source to
complete the projects. There is extensive need to improve the transportation system,
streetscape, and utility infrastructure; to provide assistance for affordable housing,
as well as business development and redevelopment; create open space, facilities,
amenities and wayfinding; and provide for plan administration, implementation,
reporting, planning refinement and support in the Area.
XIII. RELOCATION REPORT
When BURA acquires occupied property under the Plan, residential or commercial
occupants of such property shall be offered relocation assistance as required under
applicable state law. Prior to such acquisition, BURA shall adopt rules and
regulations, as necessary, for the administration of relocation assistance. BURA will
comply with all applicable state laws in providing these potential benefits.
There are plans to acquire land for infrastructure in the Area which may trigger
relocation benefits in the future. However, no specific acquisitions that would result
in relocation benefits have been identified in the Plan. All acquisitions will be
reviewed for the potential of applicable relocation benefits.
56 I Report Accompanying the Core Area TIF Plan
Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Adopted by the City of Bend
DATE
Ordinance No.
If Amendments are made to the Plan, the Resolution or Ordinance Number and date will
be listed here. The amendment will be incorporated into the Plan and noted through a
footnote.
CITY OF BEND
BUILDING ON OUR PAST
SERVING THE PRESENT
SHAPING BEND'S FUTURE
This page intentionally left blank
Mayor
Sally Russell
Mayor Pro tem
Bruce Abernethy
City Council
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Justin Livingston
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
Planning Commission
Jeff Payne, Chair
Joan Vinci, Vice -Chair
Lindsey Hopper
Suzanne Johannsen
Carlos Salcedo
Whitney Swander
Scott Winters
Sally Russell, Council Liaison
City Manager
Eric King
Chief Financial Officer
Sharon Wojda
City Attorney
Mary Winters
Associate City Attorney
Elizabeth Oshel
Economic Development Director
Carolyn Eagan
Urban Renewal Manager
Matt Stuart
Planning Manager
Brian Rankin
Senior Planner
Allison Platt
Bend Urban Renewal Agency
Justin Livingston, Chair
Bruce Abernethy
Barb Campbell
Gena Goodman -Campbell
Bill Moseley
Chris Piper
Sally Russell
Urban Renewal Advisory Board
Dale VanValkenburg, Chair
Whitney Swander, Vice -Chair
Robin Vora
Bart Bowen
Elise Jones
Tim Page
Dennis Pahlisch
Adam Bledsoe
Andrea Breault
Craig Davis
Jim Landin
Sonja Porter
Steve Porter
Ex-Officio appointees from the following
Taxing Districts
Bend Park and Recreation District
Bend La -Pine School District
Cascade East Transit
Central Oregon Community College
Deschutes Library District
Tax Increment Plan Consulting Team
Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC
Tiberius Solutions LLC
Bend Core Area Project Consulting Team
Angelo Planning Group
Cascadia Partners
ECONorthwest
Walker Macy
This page intentionally left blank.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. DEFINITIONS 1
II. INTRODUCTION 3
III. MAXIMUM INDEBTEDNESS 7
IV. PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES 8
V. TIF AREA PROJECT CATEGORIES...... 11
VI. TIF AREA PROJECTS 12
Vil. AMENDMENTS TO PLAN 18
VIII. PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION 19
IX. RELOCATION METHODS 20
X. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING OF PLAN.. 20
XI. VALIDITY 21
XII. ANNUAL REPORT 21
XIII. RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL OBJECTIVES 22
XIV. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 38
I. DEFINITIONS
"Agency" means the Bend Urban Renewal Agency, also called BURA. The Agency is
responsible for administration of this Core Area TIF Plan and other TIF/ plans previously
adopted in the City of Bend.
"Annual report" is the ORS 457.460 requirement for the production of an annual report
that gets distributed to the taxing districts.
"Area" or "TIF Area" means the tax increment finance area established for this Plan
pursuant to ORS 457, and described in Section XIV of the Plan, below, including the
properties and rights -of -way located therein.
"Blight" is defined in ORS 457.010(1)(a-i) and identified in the ordinance adopting a TIF
plan.
"Board of Commissioners" means the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners.
"BURA" means the Bend Urban Renewal Agency, also called Agency. BURA is
responsible for the administration of this Core Area TIF Plan and other TIF plans
previously adopted in the City of Bend.
"City" means the City of Bend, Oregon.
"City Council" or "Council" means the Bend City Council.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the City of Bend Comprehensive Plan and its
implementing ordinances, policies, and standards.
"Core Area Project" or "CAP" means the planning process undertaken in 2019/2020 by
the City of Bend for the Bend Core Area.
"County" means Deschutes County, Oregon.
"Fiscal year" or "FYE" means the year commencing on July 1 and closing on June 30.
"Frozen base" means the total assessed value including all real, personal,
manufactured, and utility values within a TIF area at the time of adoption. The county
assessor certifies the assessed value after the adoption of a TIF area plan.
"Increment" means that part of the assessed value of a taxing district attributable to any
increase in the assessed value of the property located in an urban renewal area, or
portion thereof, over the assessed value specified in the certified statement from the
assessor (frozen base).
"Maximum indebtedness" means the amount of the principal of indebtedness included in
a plan pursuant to ORS 457.190 and does not include indebtedness incurred to refund
or refinance existing indebtedness. The maximum indebtedness for this Plan is
$195,000,000.
"Municipality" means any county or any city in the state of Oregon.
"ORS" means the Oregon Revised Statutes and specifically Chapter 457, which relates
to urban renewal.
1 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
"Plan" or "Core Area TIF Plan" means the official plan for the TIF Area pursuant to ORS
457.
"Planning Commission" means the Bend Planning Commission.
"Project(s)" or "TIF Project(s)" means any work or undertaking carried out under the
Core Area TIF Plan.
"Report Accompanying Core Area TIF Plan" or "Report" means the official report that
accompanies the Core Area TIF Plan pursuant to ORS 457.085(3).
"Revenue sharing" means sharing tax increment proceeds as defined in ORS 457.470.
"Tax increment finance area" or "TIF area" means a blighted area included in a TIF plan.
"Tax increment finance area plan" or "TIF plan" means a plan, as it exists or is changed
or modified from time to time, for one or more TIF areas, as provided in ORS 457.
"Tax increment finance area project(s)" or "TIF area project(s)" or "project(s)" means
any work or undertaking carried out under ORS 457.170 and ORS 457.180 in a TIF
area.
"Tax increment finance area report" or "report" means the official report that
accompanies the TIF plan pursuant to ORS 457.085(3).
"Tax increment finance" or "tax increment financing" or "TIF" means the funds that are
associated with the division of taxes accomplished through the adoption of a TIF plan.
"Tax increment revenues" means the funds allocated by the assessor to renewal TIF
area due to increases in assessed value over the frozen base within the area.
"UGB" means urban growth boundary.
"URAB" means the Urban Renewal Advisory Board set up to help guide the planning
process for the Core Area Project.
"Urban Renewal" means the statutory authority provided in ORS 457. In this Plan it is
synonymous with TIF.
"Vulnerable" means populations including those who are economically disadvantaged,
elderly, underrepresented racial or ethnic groups, uninsured individuals, survivors of
abuse or trafficking, or those experiencing substance abuse, other addictions, mental
health, and homelessness.
2 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
II. INTRODUCTION
The Plan for the Area was developed for the Bend City Council with cooperative input
from BURA and the community -based URAB. The Plan also includes input from the
taxing districts through individual meetings with each taxing district, community
engagement at two public open houses, in public meetings, and in hearings before the
Planning Commission, BURA, City Council, and a public briefing with the Deschutes
County Board of Commissioners. A full list of community outreach events and
presentations is shown in Table 1.
Table 1 - Outreach
Community Outreach Events/Presentations
Event
Date
Planning Commission
1/13/2019
Larkspur Neighborhood Association (NA) Annual
Meeting
1/21/2019
Orchard NA Annual Meeting
1/29/2019
Southern Crossing NA Meeting
2/7/2019
Larkspur NA Board Meeting
2/18/2019
Urban Renewal Panel Discussion — Central
Oregon Land Watch
3/21/2019
Old Bend NA Meeting
4/30/2019
Pop -Up: Box Factory
5/4/2019
Pop -Up: Grocery Outlet
5/6/2019
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee
Presentation
5/8/2019
Pop Up: Boneyard Brewery
5/9/2019
Pop Up: Backporch Coffee
5/16/2019
Pop Up: Webskis/Webcyclery
5/20/2019
Pop Up: Humm Kombucha
5/23/2019
Speaker Event: Mary Hanlon
6/13/2019
Online Open House
6/15 to 7/13/2019
Open House - Bend High School
6/15/2019
Coldwell Banker Presentation
7/18/2019
City Club Presentation
8/15/2019
Urban Renewal/TIF & Affordable Housing
Brownbag
9/18/2019
Bend Economic Development Advisory Board
Presentation
10/1/2019
BURA/Council update
10/16/2019
Bend Park and Recreation District Board
11/5/2019
Central Oregon Community College Board
11/18/2019
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
12/9/2019
3 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Deschutes Public Library Board
1/8/2020
Neighborhood Leadership Alliance Meeting
1/14/2020
Neighborhood Leadership Alliance Meeting
2/11/2020
River West NA Meeting
2/17/2020
Historic Landmark Commission
2/18/2020
Central Area Plan (CAP) Open House
2/20/2020
CAP Online Open House
2/20/2020 to
3/12/2020
Council update
4/15/2020
Bend Park and Recreation District Board
4/21/2020
Note on language: This Plan, wherever applicable and permissible, uses the term Tax
Increment Finance or TIF rather than "urban renewal". The term TIF is used consistently
in other parts of the nation and does not evoke past practices of other urban renewal
agencies throughout the country wherein minorities and vulnerable populations were
displaced to clear the way for redevelopment. This Plan aims to avoid those
connotations and has been created with intention to avoid those outcomes. Utilizing the
term TIF does not affect the statutory authority of ORS 457, as it relates to this Plan.
A. Area Context
The CAP study began in 2019 to create a common vision and
implementation plan for a potential TIF area in Bend's Core Area. In 2019 the
City Council directed BURA to establish the URAB to serve as the advisory
committee for the CAP process. The 18-member board, representing a broad
cross-section of stakeholders and community members, met eight times between
February 2019 and March 2020.
The community -driven process had active participation from URAB members,
taxing districts, property and business owners, state agency partners, and City
officials and staff. In addition to URAB meetings, the process included five "pop-
up" outreach events at Bend Core Area businesses, two open houses, an online
survey, and discussions with each of the taxing districts. Project staff also
provided briefings and work sessions with the Planning Commission, BURA, and
City Council. The timeline on this page summarizes the process to -date and
shows the planned steps that will be conducted for adoption of the TIF Plan and
Report.
Bend's Comprehensive Plan describes Bend's Core Area, referred to as the
"central core," as follows:
The central core offers proximity to downtown, the Deschutes River,
Mirror Pond, Juniper Park, many other smaller parks, and a variety of
regional destinations; a walkable street grid; neighborhoods with
historic character; successful small neighborhood centers and
corridors (2nd and 4th Streets, 8th and 9th Streets, Newport Avenue,
4 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Galveston Avenue, SW 14th Street); access to a high concentration
of jobs by a variety of modes; and transit service.'
The CAP study area includes four of the nine citywide "opportunities areas" that
were identified in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan update. These opportunity areas
are locations within the City where growth is encouraged, and include the Bend
Central District, KorPine, East Downtown, and Inner Highway 20/Greenwood.
B. Plan Overview
The Guiding Principles of this Plan are intended to guide investment by BURA in
the Area over the life of the Plan. Substantial Amendments to the Plan must be
approved by City Council as outlined in Section VII. All amendments to the Plan
are to be listed numerically on the front page of the Plan and then incorporated
into the Plan document and noted by footnote with an amendment number and
adoption date.
The relationship between the sections of the Plan and ORS 457.085(2)
requirements is shown in Table 2. The specific reference in the table below is
the section of this Plan that primarily addresses the statutory reference. There
may be other sections of the Plan that also address the statute.
Table 2 - Statutory References
Statutory Requirement
Plan Section
ORS 457.085(2)(a)
V, VI
ORS 457.085(2)(b)
V, VI
ORS 457.085(2)(c)
XIV
ORS 457.085(2)(d)
XIII
ORS 457.085(2)(e)
XIII
ORS 457.085(2)(f)
IX
ORS 457.085(2)(g)
VIII
ORS 457.085(2)(h)
III
ORS 457.085(2)(i)
VII
ORS 457.085(2)(j)
Not applicable
C. TIF Area Overview
ORS 457 allows for the use of tax increment revenues, a financing source that is
unique to TIF areas, to fund projects within an area to improve conditions that
impede development. Tax increment revenues - the amount of property taxes
generated by the increase in total assessed values within a TIF area from the
time an area is first established - are used to repay borrowed funds. The
5 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
borrowed funds are used to pay for projects within an area and cannot exceed
the maximum indebtedness amount set by a TIF plan.
The purpose of a TIF area is to improve specific areas of a municipality that are
poorly developed or underdeveloped, called blighted areas in ORS 457. These
areas can have property that is undeveloped or underdeveloped, old or
deteriorated buildings, streets and utilities in poor condition, a complete lack of
streets and utilities altogether, or other obstacles to development. In general, TIF
area projects can include construction or improvement of streets, utilities, and
other public facilities; assistance for development, rehabilitation or
redevelopment of property; acquisition and re -sale of property (site assembly)
from willing sellers; and improvements to public spaces.
The Area, shown in Figure 1, contains 637.15 acres. The Area meets the
definition of a blighted area due to its infrastructure deficiencies, including
deficiencies in the transportation system, sewer system, stormwater system, and
water system. In addition, there are many underdeveloped properties within the
Area. These blighted conditions are specifically cited in the ordinance adopting
this Plan and described in detail in the Report.
The Report contains the information required by ORS 457.085(3), including:
• A description of the physical, social, and economic conditions in the area;
• The expected impact of the Plan, including fiscal impact in light of
increased services;
• Reasons for selection of the Area;
• The relationship between each Project to be undertaken and the existing
conditions;
• The estimated total cost of each Project and the source(s) of funds to pay
such costs;
• The estimated completion date of each Project;
• The estimated amount of funds required in the Area and the anticipated
year in which the debt will be retired;
• A financial analysis of the Plan;
• A fiscal impact statement that estimates the impact of tax increment
financing upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the Area; and
• A relocation report.
6 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
III. MAXIMUM INDEBTEDNESS
Maximum indebtedness is a legal term for the total amount of money that can be spent
on projects, programs, and administration throughout the life of the Plan. The maximum
amount of indebtedness that may be issued or incurred under the Plan, based upon
good faith estimates of the scope and costs of projects in the Plan and the schedule for
their completion, is $195,000,000 (One Hundred Ninety Five Million Dollars). This
amount is the principal of such indebtedness and does not include interest or
indebtedness incurred to refund or refinance existing indebtedness, or interest earned
on bond proceeds.
7 j Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
IV.PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The Guiding Principles of the Plan represent its basic intents and purposes. The
Projects identified in Sections V and VI of the Plan are the specific means of meeting
the guiding principles. The Guiding Principles were developed by URAB during the CAP
planning process. The Guiding Principles will be pursued as economically as is feasible
and at the discretion of BURA. They are not listed in any order of importance or priority.
A. Create a place where you can live, work and play. This area is transformed
into a vibrant mixed -use city center where businesses thrive, people live, and
there are community gathering spaces for people to enjoy and recreate.
B. This plan leads to direct outcomes, it is implemented. This plan does not sit
on a shelf. It leads to feasible, implementable projects and outcomes both in the
short and long term.
C. This area removes barriers and connects the East and West sides of Bend.
This area breaks down physical and socio-economic barriers between the East
and West sides of Bend such as US 97, US20, 3rd Street, and the railroad. It
also removes north -south barriers such as Greenwood/US20, Franklin, and
Revere. This area is full of attractive amenities that draw residents from all sides
of Bend.
D. Affordability is preserved. This area has a supply and mix of housing types that
are affordable to those of all income levels. Strategies to stabilize and maintain
affordability for businesses and key services is a priority.
E. This is a walkable area with a balanced transportation system. This area is
walkable, destinations and services are within an easy and comfortable walk, and
you do not need a car to get around. The area provides comfortable
transportation options for all users including those that drive in to the area and
need to park, bicyclists, and transit users.
F. Public investments incentivize and catalyze private development. The
appropriate public investments and timing have been identified to attract private
investment and create an environment in which developers can thrive.
G. The planning process is transparent and open to ensure that those affected
by the decisions are involved in the process. Throughout the planning
process, community members have a voice in the process to ensure this plan
maintains Bend's charm. Project outcomes and trade-offs are developed to
spread benefits evenly.
H. This area incorporates sustainable and low impact development principles
and practices. Incentives are provided to encourage and promote sustainable
solutions and low impact designs in order to enhance and protect the
environment.
8 Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Table 3 shows the project categories and the Guiding Principles to which they relate:
Table 3 - Guiding Principle Matrix
Project Category
Guiding Principle
Transportation, Streetscape, and Utility
Infrastructure
A. Create a place where you can live, work
and play.
C. This area removes barriers and connects
the East and West sides of Bend.
E. This is a walkable area with a balanced
transportation system.
F. Public investments incentivize and
catalyze private development.
Affordable Housing Redevelopment and
Development Assistance, Partnership,
and Support
A. Create a place where you can live, work
and play.
D. Affordability is preserved.
F. Public investments incentivize and
catalyze private development.
H. This area incorporates sustainable and
low impact development principles and
practices.
Business Redevelopment and
Development Assistance, Partnership,
and Support
A. Create a place where you can live, work
and play.
F. Public investments incentivize and
catalyze private development.
H. This area incorporates sustainable and
low impact development principles and
practices.
Open Space, Facilities, Amenities, and
Wayfinding
A. Create a place where you can live, work
and play.
E This is a walkable area with a balanced
transportation system.
F. Public investments incentivize and
catalyze private development.
Plan Administration, Implementation,
Reporting, Planning Refinement, and
Support
B. This plan leads to direct outcomes, it is
implemented.
G. The planning process is transparent and
open to ensure that those affected by the
decisions are involved in the process.
9 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Figure 1 - TIF Area Boundary
OUTLFR HRY Rrt
NW noRTLAN D AV(
NW Nrwnoar At,
OOAR <RLrk pp
N/CNWAY 20
TIF AREA
AREA BOUNDARY MAP
AREA SIZE: 637.15 ACRES
® Area Boundary *= Railroad
Parks Major Roads
Taxlots
Source: City of Bend
0
0.25 0.5
Miles
This map is for reference purposes only Care
web taken rn the meanon o' U5 map, but rt 15
presided ' AS IS "Please contact the Crty of Fiend
to verify nap Inforroatron or to report any errors
CITY OF BEND
Map prepared by M Stuart. Cray of Bend
hunt Date Jan 22. 2020
Sources Crty of Bend. Deschutes County
10 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
V. TIF AREA PROJECT CATEGORIES
In relationship to the Guiding Principles described in the previous section, the Projects
within the Area fall into the following categories:
A. Transportation, Streetscape, and Utility Infrastructure
B. Affordable Housing Redevelopment and Development Assistance,
Partnership, and Support
C. Business Redevelopment and Development Assistance, Partnership, and
Support
D. Open Space, Facilities, Amenities, and Wayfinding
E. Plan Administration, Implementation, Reporting, Planning Refinement, and
Support
11 Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
VI.TIF AREA PROJECTS
TIF Area Projects authorized by the Plan are described below. No project currently
includes a public building. If any project considered in the future proposes a public
building, the public building criteria in ORS 457.010 and ORS 457.035 to 457.320 will
need to be addressed at the time the project is considered. If a public building is
proposed, and concurrence is provided by the taxing districts as described in ORS
457.089, then the project and the statutory requirements must be identified in the Plan
through a Minor Amendment, as described in Section VII.
A. Transportation, Streetscape, and Utility Infrastructure
1. Transportation
The following projects are intended to provide a more efficient and functional
transportation system, aimed at enhancing public rights -of -way and attracting
development and redevelopment in the Area by providing greater safety,
increased system capacity and connectivity, and a more robust pedestrian and
bicycle network.
Table 4 - Transportation Projects
Midtown Bicycle and Pedestrian
Crossings
Greenwood Avenue Undercrossing
Sidewalk Widening
Hawthorne Avenue Overcrossing
Franklin Avenue Undercrossing
Widen US 97 undercrossing to include improved
multimodal facilities.
Close sidewalk gap along Hawthorne and create a
grade -separated footbridge over BNSF RR and
US 97.
Shared use path adjacent to roadway- Widen
sidewalk paths under BNSF RR and US 97 to
modernize design for roadside safety.
Intersection Improvements
Improve safety, access, and mobility for all users
and implements improvements at key
intersections in the Area.
3rd Street Railroad Undercrossing
widening
Widen 3rd Street to 4-lanes under the BNSF RR,
including complete street design from Emerson
Avenue to Miller Avenue.
Sidewalk Infill
Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity
throughout the Area by closing sidewalk gaps,
including along key walking and biking routes.
12 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Low Stress Bicycle Network
Implement various bicycle safety and connectivity
projects throughout the Area.
Aune Street Extension from Bond
Street to 3rd Street
Two-lane extension of Aune Street to connect 3rd
Street and Bond Street. Includes intersection
improvement at 3rd Street and roundabout (RAB)
at the intersection of Bond Street and Industrial
Way.
Mobility Hubs
Citywide implementation of mobility hubs in
coordination with Cascade East Transit (CET) and
High Capacity Transit (HCT) routes.
Sisemore Street Extension
Construct street extension from Arizona Avenue to
Bond Street.
Revere Avenue Interchange
Improvements
ODOT coordination project to construct roadway
upgrades and intersection improvement near the
US 97/Revere Avenue interchange, including at
the ramp terminals and adjacent Wall
Street/Portland Avenue intersection.
Olney Protected Bicycle Lanes and
US 97 Undercrossing
Provide protected bicycle lanes on Olney Avenue
at US 97 undercrossing.
3rd Street & Miller Avenue
intersection improvements and 3rd
Street modifications
Study and construction of intersection
improvements at 3rd Street/Miller Avenue to
address identified safety needs.
Olney Avenue Railroad Crossing
Improvements
Upgrade the Railroad crossing to include
dedicated sidewalks and low stress bicycle
facilities.
Colorado Avenue/ US 97
Intersection
ODOT coordination project to construct roadway
upgrades and intersection improvements near the
Colorado/US-97 interchange; May include traffic
signals or roundabout.
3rd Street at Railroad to connect
KorPine
3rd Street underpass: Near term enhancements to
walking and biking route.
Safety Improvements
Improve safety, access, and livability at key sites
including the Colorado Avenue/US 97
improvements.
High Capacity Transit (HCT)
(east -west and north -south)
Project would improve City infrastructure on HCT
routes in coordination with CET. Project includes
improving access to HCT stops within the Area
and may also include street improvements at HCT
stops.
13 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
2. Streetscape
Provide funds to support streetscape enhancements identified in the Core Area
Urban Design Framework intended to provide an identity and a safe and
effective multimodal transportation network within the Core Area TIF Area.
These enhancements include but are not limited to wide sidewalks, curb bulb
outs, decorative paving, lighting, landscaping, furnishings - planters, seating,
bicycle amenities, curbing, on -street parking.
Examples of rights -of -way eligible for streetscape enhancements include but are
not limited to:
• 2nd Street
• 3rd Street
• 4th Street
• Greenwood Avenue
• Franklin Avenue
• Division Street
• Hawthorne Avenue
• Aune Road
• Revere Avenue
• Wall Street
• Olney Avenue
3. Public Utility
The following public utility projects address sewer, stormwater, and water
system infrastructure deficiencies in the Area.
Table 5 - Public Utility Projects
Sewer System Improvements
Support projects identified in the 2018 Sewer
Public Facility Plan that are located within the
Area, including the Drake Lift Station and Force
Main and the Drake Downstream Trunk/2nd
Street Trunk.
Stormwater System Improvements
Support projects identified in the 2014
Stormwater Master Plan that are located within
the Area, including the costs associated with
stormwater improvements for the Franklin
Avenue and Greenwood Avenue Underpasses.
Water System Improvements
Support projects identified in the 2011 Water
Master Plan that are located within the Area,
including upgrading and replacement projects
for the Norton/Olney Avenue, Revere Avenue,
and Division Street.
14 ( Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
B. Affordable Housing Redevelopment and Development Assistance,
Partnership, and Support
Partner with and offer funds to support housing organizations and developers to
create low income, transitional, and affordable housing opportunities. Project
funds may be used for activities that support the development, redevelopment, or
rehabilitation of transitional, low-income, and affordable housing projects, as well
as for other facilities that support vulnerable populations.
Examples of eligible project activities include:
• Land acquisition/assembly
• Environmental review, mitigation and remediation
• Pre -development assistance including contracting with design
professionals
• Payment of fees
• Frontage improvements including utility undergrounding
• Off -site infrastructure improvements
• Other direct support for programming and projects
C. Business Redevelopment and Development Assistance, Partnership, and
Support
1. Business Development and Redeveloment
Provide funds to partner with and offer funds to support redevelopment and
new development projects that support businesses, including housing
providers and transit operators within the Area.
Examples of eligible project activities include:
• Land acquisition and assembly
• Environmental review, mitigation and remediation
• Pre -development assistance including contracting with design
professionals
• Payment of fees
• Frontage improvements including utility undergrounding
• Off -site infrastructure improvements
• Funding for commercial and residential building rehabilitation and
renovation programs and projects, including energy efficiency and
accessibility upgrades, through public/private partnerships
15 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
• Market -rate housing and mixed -use commercial/residential development
projects
• Contracting with design professionals
• Other direct support for programming and projects
2. Business Support and Enhancement
Provide and administer loans and grant programs to assist start-ups, existing
local business owners, and property owners in developing, redeveloping, or
rehabilitating property.
Examples of eligible project activities include:
• Improve older buildings to meet current code standards
• Assist in assessment and permitting
• Environmental review, mitigation, and remediation
• Feasibility assessment of development or redevelopment
• Assist in other improvements to allow for intensification of under-utilized
sites
• Building facade improvements
• Building utilization assistance
• Landscaping enhancements and pedestrian amenities
• Professional engineering, architecture, landscaping, and other building
and site design assistance
• Mechanical, electrical, and other building upgrades that will reduce
emissions, support energy efficiency.
• Seismic, fire suppression, and other public safety improvements
• Other direct support for programming and projects
D. Open Space, Facilities, Amenities, and Wayfinding
Projects within this category are intended to support the Area as a vibrant mixed -
use city center where businesses thrive, people live, and there are community
gathering spaces for people to enjoy and recreate.
Projects may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Parks, plazas, recreation sites, trails, and/or open space land acquisition
• Wayfinding and signage to create a clear Area identity
• Private art installation(s) grants and loans
16 ( Core Area Tax increment Finance Plan
E. Plan Administration, Implementation, Reporting, and Support
Provide funds for BURA to retain the services of City personnel or other
independent professionals or organizations for activities such as:
• General staffing, and office or overhead expenses
• Management and oversight of an appointed advisory board
• Management and oversight of programs designed to support eligible
projects
• Preparation of studies to inform project decisions such as the Midtown
Crossings
• Preparation of market feasibility, transportation impacts analysis, or other
technical or economic studies
• Preparation of design, architectural, engineering, environmental,
landscape architectural, planning, platting, or other developmental
documents, studies, or plans
• Providing special rehabilitation, restoration or renovation feasibility and
cost analysis studies
• Providing appraisals for property acquisition and disposition
• Assisting in the preparation of the annual financial report required by this
Plan and ORS 457
• Auditing, insurance, bond counsel, financing fees and other required
administrative costs
• Any other powers granted by ORS 457 in connection with the
implementation of this Plan
17 j Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
VII. AMENDMENTS TO PLAN
The Plan may be amended as described in this section.
A. Substantial Amendments
Substantial Amendments, in accordance with ORS 457.085(2)(i), shall require
the same notice, hearing, and approval procedure required of the original Plan
under ORS 457.095, including public involvement, consultation with taxing
districts, presentation to BURA, the Planning Commission, and adoption by the
City Council by non -emergency ordinance after a hearing. Notice of such
hearing shall be provided to individuals or households within the City, as
required by ORS 457.120.
Substantial Amendments shall be processed in accordance with ORS 457.095
and 457.115.
Substantial Amendments are amendments that:
1. Add land to the Area, except for an addition of land that totals not more than
1 % of the existing area of the Area;1 or
2. Increase the maximum amount of indebtedness that can be issued or
incurred under the Plan.
B. Minor Amendments
Minor Amendments are amendments that are not Substantial Amendments as
defined in this Plan and in ORS 457. Minor Amendments require approval by
BURA by resolution.
The projects proposed in the Plan and Report are organized by project
categories. If BURA determines that the allocation of funds within a project
category should be adjusted based on needs within the Area, they may do so
through a Minor Amendment.2
1 Unless otherwise permitted by state law, no land equal to more than 20 percent of the total land area of
the original Plan shall be added to the urban renewal area by amendments, and the aggregate amount of
all amendments increasing the maximum indebtedness may not exceed 20 percent of the Plan's initial
maximum indebtedness, as adjusted, as provided by law, with increases beyond that amount requiring
concurrence as stated in ORS 457..
2 Project costs may be impacted by grants, timing, cost savings, inflation, or other external forces
unanticipated at this time but which may occur over the 30 year life of this Area.
18 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
VIII. PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION
The Plan authorizes the acquisition and disposition of property as described in this
section. Property includes any and all interests in property, including fee simple
ownership, lease, easements, licenses, or other rights to use. If property is proposed to
be acquired it will first be identified in the Plan through a Minor Amendment, as
described in Section VII. Identification of property to be acquired and its anticipated
disposition is required by ORS 457.085(2)(g).
A. Property acquisition for public improvements
BURA may acquire property within the Area for the public improvement projects
undertaken pursuant to the Plan by all legal means, including use of eminent
domain. Good faith negotiations for such acquisitions must occur prior to
institution of eminent domain procedures.
B. Property acquisition for private development or redevelopment from willing
sellers
The Plan authorizes BURA acquisition of any interest in property within the Area
that BURA finds is necessary for private redevelopment or development, but only
in those cases where the property owner wishes to convey such interest to
BURA. The Plan does not authorize BURA to use the power of eminent domain
to acquire property from a private party to transfer property to another private
party for private redevelopment or development. Property acquisition from willing
sellers may be required to support development of Projects within the Area.
C. Land disposition
BURA will dispose of property acquired under Subsection A of this Section VIII
for a public improvement project by conveyance to the appropriate public agency
responsible for the construction and/or maintenance of the public improvement.
BURA may retain such property during the construction of the public
improvement.
BURA may dispose of property acquired under Subsection B of this Section VIII
by conveying any interest in property acquired. Property shall be conveyed at its
fair reuse value. Fair reuse value is the value, whether expressed in terms of
rental or capital price, at which BURA, in its discretion, determines such land
should be made available in order that it may be developed, redeveloped,
cleared, conserved, or rehabilitated for the purposes specified in the Plan.
Because fair reuse value reflects limitations on the use of the property to those
purposes specified in the Plan, the value may be lower than the property's fair
market value.
Where land is sold or leased, the purchaser or lessee must agree to use the land
for the purposes designated in the Plan and to begin and complete the building of
its improvements within a period of time that BURA determines is reasonable.
19 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
IX. RELOCATION METHODS
If BURA acquires occupied property under the Plan, residential or commercial
occupants of such property shall be offered relocation assistance, as required under
applicable state law. Prior to such acquisition, BURA shall adopt rules and regulations,
as necessary, for the administration of relocation assistance. No specific acquisitions
that would result in relocation benefits have been identified in the Plan.
X. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING OF PLAN
Tax increment financing consists of using annual tax increment revenues to make
payments on debt, usually in the form of bank loans or revenue bonds. The proceeds of
the bonds are used to finance the Projects authorized in the Plan. Bonds may be either
long-term or short-term.
Tax increment revenues are annual property taxes imposed on the cumulative increase
in assessed value within the Area over the total assessed value at the time the Plan is
adopted, with the exception of property taxes for General Obligation (GO) bonds and
local option levies. (Under current law, the property taxes for General Obligation (GO)
bonds and local option levies approved after October 6, 2001, are not part of the tax
increment revenues.)
A. General description of the proposed financing methods
The Plan will be financed using a combination of revenue sources. These
include:
• Tax increment revenues
• Advances, loans, grants, and any other form of financial assistance from
federal, state, or local governments, or other public bodies
• Loans, grants, dedications, or other contributions from private developers
and property owners, including, but not limited to, Local Improvement
Districts and Reimbursement Districts and
• Any other public or private source
Revenues obtained by BURA will be used to pay or repay the costs, expenses,
advancements, and indebtedness incurred in (1) planning or undertaking project
activities, or (2) otherwise exercising any of the powers granted by ORS Chapter
457 in connection with the implementation of this Plan.
20 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
B. Tax increment financing
The Plan may be financed, in whole or in part, by tax increment revenues
allocated to BURA, as provided in ORS Chapter 457. The ad valorem taxes, if
any, levied by a taxing district in which all or a portion of the Area is located, shall
be divided as provided in Section 1 c, Article IX of the Oregon Constitution, and
ORS 457.440. Amounts collected pursuant to ORS 457.440 shall be deposited
into the unsegregated tax collections account and distributed to BURA based
upon the distribution schedule established under ORS 311.390.
C. Duration
BURA intends that it not collect tax increment revenues for the Area after FYE
2051. BURA shall not initiate any Projects in the Area unless BURA reasonably
projects it will be able to pay for those Projects from the proceeds of
indebtedness issued on or before FYE 2051, and from other funds available to
BURA. Except as provided in the next sentence, all indebtedness that is secured
by the tax increment revenues of the Area shall mature no later than FYE 2051,
and BURA shall structure all its indebtedness so that it can be paid in full from
the tax increment revenues of the Area that BURA reasonably projects it will
receive on or before FYE 2051. BURA may issue refunding indebtedness that
matures after FYE 2051, only if issuing that refunding indebtedness is necessary
to avoid a default on previously -issued indebtedness.
Between the 12th (twelfth) and the 16th (sixteenth) year of the Plan, BURA shall
undertake a financial analysis of the Plan, including updated projections for tax
increment finance revenues and evaluating the ability of the revenues to achieve
or exceed the Plan's maximum indebtedness by the anticipated expiration date in
FYE 2051. BURA shall consult and confer with affected taxing districts regarding
the results of this financial update and will consider revenue sharing or
shortening the time frame of the Plan if revenues are exceeding projections.
D. Under -levy
The Agency may determine to under -levy pursuant to ORS 457.455
notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions.
XI.VALIDITY
Should a court of competent jurisdiction find any work, clause, sentence, section or part
of this Plan to be invalid, the remaining words, clauses, sentences, sections or parts
shall be unaffected by such findings and shall remain in full force and effect for the
duration of this Plan.
XII. ANNUAL REPORT
BURA shall file an Annual Report in compliance with ORS 457.460.
21 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
XIII. RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL OBJECTIVES
ORS 457.085 requires that the Plan describe the relationship of the plan to definite local
objectives. This section provides that analysis. Relevant local planning and
development objectives are contained within the Bend Comprehensive Plan, Bend
Economic Development Advisory Board Strategic Plan, and the Bend Development
Code. The following section describes the purpose and intent of these plans, the main
applicable goals and policies within each plan, and an explanation of how this Plan
conforms to the applicable goals and policies.
The numbering of the goals and policies within this section reflects the numbering that
occurs in the original document. The language from the original document is in italics.
Comprehensive Plan designations for all land in the Area are shown in Figure 2. All
proposed land uses conform to Figure 2. Maximum densities and building requirements
for all land in the Area are contained in the Bend Development Code described in
subsection C of this Section XIII. The zoning designations are shown in Figure 3.
A. Bend Comprehensive Plan
The analysis of how the Plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan covers the
most relevant sections, but may not cover every section of the Comprehensive
Plan that relates to the Plan.
If the Comprehensive Plan policies identified in the Plan are updated in the
future, this document will automatically incorporate those updates without the
Plan having to be formally amended. If a Substantial Amendment is completed
in the future, this section of the Plan should be updated at that point.
Below are applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and statements of the
Plan's conformance to Comprehensive Plan policies.
Chapter 1 Citizen Involvement
Policies
1-4 The City and special districts shall work toward the most efficient and economical
method for providing their services within the UGB.
1-7 The City will encourage compact development and the integration of land uses
within the Urban Growth Boundary to reduce trips, vehicle miles traveled, and
facilitate non -automobile travel.
1-8 The City and county will encourage infill and redevelopment of appropriate areas
within the Bend Central Core, Opportunity Areas and Transit Corridors.
1-15 The City shall continue to use advisory committees in their planning process,
members of which are selected by an open process, and who are widely
representative of the community.
1-16 The City will use other mechanisms, such as, but not limited to, meetings with
neighborhood groups, planning commission hearings, design workshops, and
22 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
public forums, to provide an opportunity for all the citizens of the area to
participate in the planning process.
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 1 Citizen Involvement as there has been
extensive citizen involvement in the preparation of the Plan (see Table 1). BURA
created the URAB for the purpose of providing direct input on the creation of a common
vision and implementation plan for Bend's Core Area. The URAB was comprised of
community members, business owners, developers, and taxing district representatives
In this process, the URAB had direct input on the urban design framework, needed
circulation improvements, programs and projects for the area, location, phasing and
cost for necessary infrastructure, funding strategies, boundaries for a TIF Area and
provided a recommendation to BURA for the adoption of a TIF Plan and Report.
In addition to the URAB, BURA, along with City staff, met with representatives of the
affected taxing districts to review the recommendations of the Plan. There were two (2)
Open Houses to present information about the Plan and to provide opportunity for input
from the general public. The City also met with other groups as identified the
Introduction Section of this Plan (see Table 1).
Chapter 3 Community Connections
Policies
3-7 Sites for small neighborhood parks are not shown on the Land Use Plan Map, but
the city shall encourage private or public parties to develop small neighborhood
parks.
3-8 The City shall refer to the park district, for its review and recommendations, all
development proposals that include or are adjacent to existing or proposed parks
or trails.
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 3 Community Connections as the development
of parks, plazas, recreation sites and/or open space land acquisition within the Area are
eligible for funding, including but not limited to, by Bend Park and Recreation District.
The City will continue to coordinate with the Bend Park and Recreation District on all
development proposals that include or are adjacent to existing or proposed parks or
trails.
Chapter 5 Housing
Policies
5-7 The City will continue to create incentives for and remove barriers to development
of a variety of housing types in all residential zones, consistent with the density
ranges and housing types allowed in the zones. This policy is intended to
implement the City's obligation under the State Housing Goal to "encourage the
availability of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price ranges and
rent levels which are commensurate with the financial capabilities of Oregon
households and allow for flexibility of housing location, type, and density".
23 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
5-9 The City and County will support public and private non-profit and for -profit
entities that provide affordable housing in Central Oregon.
5-18 The City will assist in identifying, obtaining and leveraging funding sources for the
development of new housing for very low, low, and moderate - income residents,
as determined by appropriate percentages of Area Median Family income in the
Housing Needs Assessment.
5-20 When affordable housing development is required by City policy or code or to
meet eligibility criteria for a City incentive program or a policy requirement,
affordable housing means housing with a sales price or rental amount that is
within the means of a household that may occupy moderate- and low-income
housing. Unless otherwise specified, affordable housing must meet one of the
thresholds defined below. Nothing in this policy prevents the city from providing
support for housing at other levels of affordability.
In the case of dwelling units for sale, affordable means housing in which the
mortgage, amortized interest, taxes, insurance, and condominium or association
fees, if any, constitute no more than 30 percent of such gross annual household
income for a for a family at 80% of the area median income, based upon most
recent HUD Income Limits for the Bend Metropolitan Statistical Area (Bend
MSA).
In the case of dwelling units for rent, affordable means housing for which the rent
and utilities constitute no more than 30 percent of such gross annual household
income for a family at 60% of the area median income, based upon most recent
HUD Income Limits for the Bend MSA.
5-31 Residential areas will offer a wide variety of housing types in locations best suited
to a range of housing types, needs and preferences.
5-38 Medium -and high -density residential developments should have good access to
transit, K-12 public schools where possible, commercial services, employment
and public open space to provide the maximum access to the highest
concentrations of population.
5-42 Schools and parks may be distributed throughout the residential sections of the
community, and all types of dwelling units should have safe and convenient
access to schools and parks.
5-45 Per the City's Transportation Systems Plan, the City will complete or connect
priority walkways on routes to schools, parks, or commercial areas.
5-46 Bikeways shall be considered as a transportation element, and adequate facilities
shall be provided as a part of new development.
5-47 Efforts will be made to extend trails, pedestrian ways, and bikeways through
existing residential areas. Existing trails, pedestrian ways, and bikeways will be
extended through new developments to allow further extension and promote
alternative modes of travel.
24 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 5 Housing as there are projects, programs, and
expenditures identified for Affordable Housing Redevelopment and Development
Assistance, Partnership, and Support; and Business Redevelopment and Development
Assistance, Partnership, and Support. In addition to the projects, programs, and
expenditures under the affordable housing section of the Plan, the other Projects in the
Plan that provide open space, facilities, amenities, wayfinding, business redevelopment
and development assistance, and infrastructure improvements, including transportation
connectivity, will help encourage the development and retention of housing in the Area.
Chapter 6 Economy
6-1 Bend's economic lands (commercial, industrial and mixed use) serve Bend
residents and the needs of a larger region.
6-2 Bend is a regional center for health care, art and culture, higher education, retail,
tourism, and employment. The economic land policies recognize Bend's role in
the region, and the need to support uses that bolster the local and regional
economy:
Commercial and Mixed Use -designated lands support retail, tourism, and
arts and culture uses to serve a local and regional role.
6-3 Investment in transportation, water, sewer, fiber, and other utility infrastructure
should be prioritized to serve economic lands.
6-4 Infrastructure will be planned, designed and constructed to support continued
economic growth and orderly development.
6-25 The city will encourage vertical mixed -use development in commercial and mixed
use zones, especially where those occur within the Central Core, Opportunity
Areas and along transit corridors.
6-28 The City will encourage development and redevelopment in commercial corridors
that is transit -supportive and offers safe and convenient access and connections
for all transportation modes.
6-29 New commercially designated areas are encouraged to develop with mixed -use
centers to include housing, open space, commercial development, and other
employment uses.
6-30 The City shall strive to retain and enhance desirable existing commercial areas
and encourage property owners' efforts to rehabilitate or redevelop older
commercial areas.
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 6 Economy as there are projects, programs,
and expenditures identified for Business Redevelopment and Development Assistance,
Partnership, and Support. In addition to the projects, programs, and expenditures under
the business redevelopment and development section of the Plan, the other Projects in
the Plan that provide housing support, open space, facilities, amenities, wayfinding, and
infrastructure improvements, including transportation connectivity, will help encourage
the development and retention of businesses in the Area.
25 ( Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Chapter 7: Transportation Systems
Objectives:
To promote land use patterns that support fewer vehicle trips and shorter trip lengths
To ensure that future development, including re -development, will not interfere with the
completion of Bend's transportation system
7-30 The City shall develop safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian circulation to
major activity centers, including the downtown, schools, shopping areas and
parks. East -west access to the downtown area needs particular emphasis across
major obstacles, such as 3rd Street, the Bend Parkway and the railroad.
7-31 The City shall facilitate easy and safe bicycle and pedestrian crossings of major
collector and arterial streets. Intersections shall be designed to include
pedestrian refuges or islands, curb extensions and other elements where needed
for pedestrian safety. Also, bike lanes shall be extended to meet intersection
crosswalks.
7-32 Bike lanes shall be included on all new and reconstructed arterials and major
collectors, except where bikeways are authorized by the TSP. Bike lanes shall
also be provided when practical on local streets within commercial and industrial
areas. Bike lanes shall be added to existing arterial and major collector streets on
a prioritized schedule. Specific effort shall be made to fill the gaps in the on -street
bikeway system. An appropriate means of pedestrian and bicyclist signal
actuation should be provided at all new or upgraded traffic signal installations.
7-35 The City's top priorities for pedestrian improvements are: identified in the 2015-
2025 Strategic Implementation Plan for Walking and Biking Infrastructure. These
projects will be identified and prioritized in the CIP.
7-36 Bicycle and pedestrian facilities shall be designed and constructed to minimize
conflicts between transportation modes.
Public Transportation System
7-44 With the MPO, the City shall support the Cascades East Transit Service's public
transportation system to accommodate the needs of Bend residents and visitors
in order to reduce reliance on the automobile.
7-45 The City shall coordinate with the MPO and Central Oregon Intergovernmental
Council to evaluate funding alternatives and seek appropriate resources to
support a public transportation system. Effort should be made to evaluate
creative funding techniques that may include the combination of public and
private transportation resources in coordination with other agencies and
transportation providers.
7-46 To accommodate a fixed -route transit system, land use ordinances and other
regulations shall be implemented that establish pedestrian and transit -friendly
design along potential or existing transit routes.
26 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Street System
7-48 Streets shall be located, designed, and constructed to meet their planned function
and provide space for adequate planting strips, sidewalks, motor vehicle travel,
and bike lanes (where appropriate). Specific effort should be made to improve
and enhance east -west circulation patterns for all modes of travel throughout the
community.
7-55 The City Council shall involve the public, where appropriate, in the development
and redevelopment of street designs prior to their construction.
Safety
7-75 The City shall improve transportation safety for all modes through approved
design practice, sound engineering principles and regulation of vehicle speeds.
7-78 As a part of the development process, right-of-way shall be acquired as
necessary for the correction of street intersections, excessively sharp curves, or
as otherwise necessary to improve safety of a road alignment.
Bend Central District Plan
7-83 The City will partner with property owners and developers to make improvements
to transportation facilities within the District Overlay to improve connections for all
modes of travel, including implementing a well-connected system for pedestrians,
bicyclists, and transit users.
7-86 The City will work with local businesses and property owners to develop and
implement a parking strategy for the District that meets local parking needs while
also encouraging us of alternative modes (e.g., bicycling, walking, and transit) to
travel to, from, and within the District.
Transportation Funding and Prioritization
7-93 The Bend City Council should regularly evaluate existing funding sources and
explore the use of new funding opportunities to increase resources for
maintenance operations and capital improvements.
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 7 Transportation as there are specific activities,
identified for transportation infrastructure improvements including transportation
connectivity in the Area. Establishing a TIF Area will provide new funding opportunities
for the transportation projects within the Area. The Plan supports and conforms to the
existing policies adopted and acknowledged by the current Comprehensive Plan
Transportation System Plan (TSP).
Chapter 8: Public Facilities and Services
8-2 The city is the primary provider of sewage collection and treatment services for
the City's service area under Statewide Planning Goal 11.
8-13 The City of Bend is the provider of water service for the City's service area under
Statewide Planning Goal 11
27 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
8-20 The City of Bend is the stormwater utility for the city limits and urban growth
boundary. As the utility, the City shall review its Stormwater Master Plan and
Integrated Stormwater Management Plan as needed for compliance with
changes in state or federal requirements and at least every five years.
8-21 The City will initiate funding options (e.g., SDCs, grants, low-income loans) for
stormwater capital projects in accordance with applicable laws.
8-38 The City shall work to reduce transportation -related sources of water pollution,
particularly in stormwater pollution. Any means and actions that result in a
reduction in vehicle -miles -traveled would benefit congestion and reduce both air
and water pollution.
General Policies
8-47 The City may consider funding mechanisms and agreements to address on -site
and off -site improvements, modernization of existing infrastructure to City's
standards and specifications, and impacts to infrastructure inside the current City
limits.
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 8 Public Facilities and Services as there are
specific activities identified for infrastructure improvements including sewer, stormwater,
and water improvements in the Area.
Chapter 10: Natural Forces
Air Quality
10-1 The city will continue to work towards improving circulation and traffic flow
through the city in order to reduce carbon monoxide levels.
Energy Conservation
10-10 The use of alternative energy sources should be encouraged.
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 10 Natural Forces as there are projects,
programs, and expenditures identified for improving circulation and traffic flow in the
Area. In addition; the mobility hubs could employ the use of alternative energy systems
such as solar, or the inclusion of charging stations.
Chapter 11: Growth Management
Bend's Central Core
11-1 The City will encourage compact development and the integration of land uses
within the Urban Growth Boundary to reduce trips, vehicle miles traveled, and
facilitate non -automobile travel.
11-2: The City will encourage infill and redevelopment of appropriate areas within
Bend's Central Core, Opportunity Areas and transit corridors (shown on Figure
11-1).
28 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
11-4 Streets in the Centers and Corridors, Employment Districts, Neighborhoods, and
Opportunity Sites will have the appropriate types of pedestrian, biking, and transit
scale amenities to ensure safety, access, and mobility.
11-6: The City will encourage vertical mixed use development in commercial and mixed
use zones, especially where those occur within the Central Core, Opportunity
Areas and along transit corridors.
11-9 The City will encourage development and redevelopment in commercial corridors
that is transit -supportive and offers safe and convenient access and connections
for all modes.
Finding: The Plan conforms to Chapter 11 Growth Management as there are projects,
programs, and expenditures identified for encouraging compact development, infill and
redevelopment, constructing streets with appropriate pedestrian, bicycle and transit
amenities, encouraging vertical mixed use development and encouraging development
and redevelopment in commercial corridors that is transit -supportive, and offers safe
and convenient access and connections for all modes in the Area.
29 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Figure 2 - TIF Area Comprehensive Plan Designations
TIF AREA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
AREA SIZE: 637.15 ACRES
ED Area Boundary r *= Railroad
Parks Major Roads
Taxlots
0
A
0.25 0.5
Miles
Th. crap is for reference purposes only Care
was taken in the creation of this map, but lI is
provided "AS IS"Please contact the Cay of Bend
to verily nap information or to report any errors
CITY OF BEND
Map prepared by M. Stuart. City of Bend
Punt Dale Jan 22, 2020
Sources Crty of Bend. Deschutes County
Source: City of Bend; Note: If necessary, figure will be updated during a Substantial Amendment
30 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
B. Bend Economic Development Advisory Board Strategic Plan
City code requires the Bend Economic Development Advisory Board (BEDAB) to
create a three-year strategic plan, identifying projects and guiding the work of the
city's nine -member board as it seeks to:
• Advocate: Provide input into City policy and procedures from a private
sector perspective.
• Facilitate: Broker entrepreneurial support among existing community
resources.
• Market: Brand and guide marketing efforts of Bend as "Open for Business."
• Coordinate: Organize and oversee City resources applied to economic
development.
The following goal and strategy which was developed for the 2019-21 BEDAB Strategic
Plan is directly related to the Plan.
Goal 2: Grow and develop a talented workforce
• Support policy that results in additional housing units
Goal 3: Ensure an adequate supply of land for employment & residential uses
• Support policy that allocates funding for critical infrastructure investment
Finding: The Plan conforms to the Bend Economic Development Strategic Plan as
there are projects, programs, and expenditures for creating additional housing units and
infrastructure investment identified in the Area.
C. Bend Development Code
The land uses in the Area will conform to the zoning designations in the Bend
Development Code, including maximum densities and building requirements, and
those provisions of the Bend Development Code, are incorporated by reference
herein. The following zoning districts are currently present in the Area:
Central Business District (CB)
Convenience Commercial District (CC)
General Commercial District (CG)
Limited Commercial District (CL)
General Industrial (IG)
Light Industrial (IL)
Mixed Employment District (ME)
Mixed -Use Neighborhood (MN)
Mixed Use Riverfront District (MR)
Mixed Use Urban (MU)
Public Facilities (PF)
High Density Residential (RH)
Medium Density Residential (RM)
31 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Standard Density Residential (RS)
As the Bend Development Code is updated, the references to the Bend
Development Code in this document will be deemed to incorporate those
updates without the Plan having to be formally amended. If a Substantial
Amendment to this Plan is completed in the future, this section will be updated to
match the current zoning designations. When any Project is undertaken, the
provisions of the Bend Development Code in effect at the time of the Project will
apply.
Section 2.1— RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
Section 2.1.100 Purpose, Applicability, Location
Purpose. Residential Districts are intended to promote the livability, stability, safety and
improvement of the City of Bend's neighborhoods based on the following principles:
• Make efficient use of land and public services, and implement the
Comprehensive Plan, by providing minimum and maximum density standards
for housing.
• Accommodate a range of housing needs, including owner -occupied and rental
housing.
• Provide for compatible building and site design at an appropriate
neighborhood scale which reflects the neighborhood character.
• Reduce reliance on the automobile for neighborhood travel and provide
options for walking and bicycling.
• Provide direct and convenient access to schools, parks and neighborhood
services.
Standard Density Residential (RS) - The Standard Density Residential District is
intended to provide opportunities for a wide variety of residential housing types at the
most common residential densities in places where community sewer and water
services are available. The residential density range in this district is 4.0 to 7.3 dwelling
units per gross acre.
Medium Density Residential (RM) - The Medium Density Residential District is intended
to provide primarily for the development of multifamily residential in areas where sewer
and water service are available. The residential density range in the district is 7.3 to
21.7 units per gross acre and shall provide a transitional use area between other
Residential Districts and other less restrictive areas.
High Density Residential (RH) - The High Density Residential District is intended to
provide land for primarily high density multifamily residential in locations close to
shopping and services, transportation and public open space. The density range of the
district is 21.7 to 43.0 units per gross acre and shall provide a transitional use area
between other Residential Districts and other less restrictive areas.
Section 2.2. — COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 2.2.100 Purpose and Applicability
32 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
This chapter applies to all development in the Central Business District (CB),
Convenience Commercial District (CC), Limited Commercial District (CL) and the
General Commercial District (CG). Collectively, these districts are the City's Commercial
Zoning Districts. The purpose of these zoning districts is to:
• Allow a mixture of complementary land uses that may include housing, retail,
offices, commercial services, and civic uses, to create economic and social
vitality and to reduce vehicle miles traveled;
• Develop commercial and mixed -use areas that are safe, comfortable and
attractive to pedestrians;
• Provide flexibility in the location and design of new developments and
redevelopment to anticipate changes in the market;
• Reinforce streets as public places that encourage pedestrian and bicycle
travel;
• Provide roadway and pedestrian connections to residential areas;
• Provide transitions between high traffic streets and neighborhoods;
Encourage efficient land use by facilitating compact, high density
development and minimizing the amount of land that is needed for surface
parking;
Facilitate development (land use mix, density and design) that supports public
transit, where applicable;
Provide appropriate locations and design standards for automobile- and truck -
dependent uses;
• Provide both formal and informal community gathering places;
• Maintain a distinct storefront character that identifies the Central Business
District;
• Connect the Convenience Commercial District to neighborhoods and other
employment areas; and
Provide visitor accommodations and tourism amenities.
Section 2.2.200 Zoning District Locations and Characteristics
Central Business District (CB) - The Central Business District encompasses the historic
downtown and central business district that has commercial and/or mixed -use
development with a storefront character.
Convenience Commercial District (CC) - The Convenience Commercial District is
adjacent and connected to the Residential District(s) it is intended to serve.
Convenience Commercial uses are larger in scale and area than neighborhood
commercial uses and provide for frequent shopping and service needs of nearby
residents. The zone is intended to provide locations for a wide range of small and
medium sized businesses and services as a convenience to the neighboring residential
areas. New convenience commercial nodes shall develop as commercial centers rather
than a commercial strip and be limited in size up to 5 acres.
Limited Commercial District (CL) - The Limited Commercial District provides for a wide
range of retail, service, and tourist commercial uses in the community along highways
or in new commercial centers.
33 ) Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
General Commercial District (CG) - The General Commercial District provides a broad
mix of commercial uses that have large site requirements, are oriented to the higher
classification roadways and provide services to the entire City and surrounding area.
Section 2.3 — MIXED -USE ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 2.3.100 Purpose and Applicability
The Mixed -Use Districts are intended to provide a balanced mix of residential and
employment opportunities to create focal points of activity in the form of mixed -use
centers, nodes, or corridors. The Mixed -Use Districts support service commercial,
employment, and housing needs of a growing community. The Mixed -Use District
standards are based on the following principles:
Ensure efficient use of land and public services.
• Create a mix of housing and employment opportunities.
• Provide transportation options for employees and customers and reduce
reliance on the automobile.
• Provide business services close to major employment centers.
• Ensure compatibility of mixed -use developments with the surrounding area
and minimize off -site impacts associated with development.
• Create economically successful mixed -use centers and transit corridors.
The Mixed -Use Districts, Mixed Employment (ME), Mixed -Use Riverfront (MR),
Professional Office (PO), Mixed -Use Urban (MU), and Mixed -Use Neighborhood (MN),
are identified on the City's official Zoning Map. The districts serve distinctly different
purposes as described below.
Mixed Employment District (ME) - The Mixed Employment Zone is intended to provide a
broad mix of uses that offer a variety of employment opportunities. Where Mixed
Employment Districts occur on the edge of the City, their function is more transitional in
nature providing service commercial businesses and supporting residential uses in an
aesthetic mixed environment. In this instance, when residential units are provided, the
units shall be within easy walking distance to the commercial and employment uses.
Mixed -Use Riverfront District (MR) - The Mixed -Use Riverfront District is intended to
implement the Comprehensive Plan policies for the creative redevelopment of mill site
properties adjacent to the Deschutes River. It is intended to allow for a mix of uses that:
• Provide a variety of employment opportunities and housing types;
• Foster pedestrian and other non -motor vehicle activity;
• Ensure functionally coordinated, aesthetically pleasing and cohesive site
planning and design;
• Ensure compatibility of mixed -use development with the surrounding area and
minimize off -site impacts associated with the development; and
• Encourage access to, and enjoyment of, the Deschutes River.
34 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Mixed -Use Urban (MU) - The Mixed -Use Urban Zone is intended to provide
opportunities for vibrant mixed -use centers and districts in areas with high -quality
connectivity to and within the area. It is intended to allow for a denser level of
development of a variety of commercial and residential uses than in surrounding areas
with an emphasis on retail and entertainment uses at the street level. It is intended to
provide for development that is supportive of transit by encouraging a pedestrian -
friendly environment.
Mixed -Use Neighborhood (MN) - The Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zone is intended to
provide neighborhood -scaled, pedestrian -oriented mixed -use centers and corridors with
a range of residential, retail, service, and office uses that are compatible with adjacent
development.
SECTION 2.4 — INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Section 2.4.100 Purpose
The Industrial Districts are intended to accommodate a range of light and heavy
industrial land uses. They are intended to segregate incompatible industrial
developments from other districts, while providing a high -quality environment for
businesses and employees. This chapter guides the orderly development of industrial
areas based on the following principles:
• Provide for efficient use of land and public facilities and services.
• Provide transportation options for employees and customers.
• Locate business services close to major employment centers.
• Ensure compatibility between industrial uses and nearby commercial and
residential areas.
• Provide appropriate design standards to accommodate a range of industrial
users, in conformance with the Bend Comprehensive Plan.
• Conserve industrial zoned lands for industrial uses.
Section 2.4.200 Applicability and Location
General Industrial - This zone is intended to provide for the establishment of light and
heavier industrial uses essential to the development of a balanced economic base in an
industrial environment with a minimum conflict between industrial uses and
nonindustrial uses.
Light Industrial - This zone is intended to provide for heavier commercial and light
industrial uses with easy access to collector and arterial streets.
SECTION 2.6 — PUBLIC FACILITIES
Section 2.6.100 Purpose
The Public Facilities (PF) Zoning District is intended to provide area for buildings and
facilities that are owned and operated by Federal, State, or local governments, public
utilities, special districts, or nonprofit organizations which are used to provide
governmental or public services. This zone also provides for school sites, public park
35 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
and recreational facilities, natural areas, trails, wetlands, and similar types of open
space owned and managed by a local government or special district.
SECTION 2.7.3200 BEND CENTRAL DISTRICT (BCD)
The Bend Central District is intended to implement the goals and objectives for the
creative redevelopment of the central Third Street Corridor and surrounding areas west
to the Parkway and east to and including 4th Street as indicated below:
A. Provide for a wide range of mixed residential, commercial and office uses throughout
the area and, depending on the parcel and its surroundings, vertical mixed use (i.e., a
mix of uses within the same building), with an emphasis on retail and entertainment
uses at the street level.
B. Provide a variety of residential development types and greater density of
development, with a transition area adjacent to the existing residential neighborhood
east of 4th Street.
C. Provide for development that is supportive of transit by encouraging a pedestrian -
friendly environment.
D. Provide development and design standards that support the goals of the Plan.
E. Limit development of low -intensity uses while allowing continuation of existing
industrial and manufacturing uses.
F. Provide reduced parking standards and encourage alternative parking arrangements.
The Bend Central District has distinctly different characteristics within the Bend Central
District boundary. Subdistricts that recognize and support these characteristics are
established as follows:
1. 1 st/2nd Street Subdistrict. Applies to properties in the vicinity of 1st and 2nd
Streets within the BCD and is intended to provide for a mix of office, higher
density residential, live/work and small-scale retail uses while also allowing for
continuation of existing light industrial/manufacturing uses in the area.
2. 3rd Street Subdistrict. Applies to properties in the vicinity of 3rd Street between
Revere and Franklin Streets and is intended to provide a range of mixed uses
including large-scale commercial, retail and limited residential uses.
3. 4th Street Subdistrict. Applies to properties in the vicinity of 4th Street within
the BCD and is intended to provide a transition between the more intense
central area and existing residential neighborhoods to the east.
4. South Subdistrict. Applies to properties south of Franklin Avenue along and
between 2nd and 3rd Streets and is intended to provide a range of mixed uses
including high density multifamily and office space above ground floor
Finding: The Plan conforms to the Bend Development Code as projects, programs, and
expenditures proposed in the Plan conform to the requirements in the Bend
Development Code and support the types of uses allowed in the zoning districts present
in the Area.
36 J Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
Figure 3 - TIF Area Zoning Designations
TIF AREA
ZONING DESIGNATION MAP
AREA SIZE: 637.15 ACRES
En Area Boundary r= Railroad
Parks Major Roads
Taxlots
pU1 A.EH MKT DO
N0R0Vr'R0 AVE Z
Dr Or NET AVE.
UN AVC
sr GLrNWOOtt o
St W USON Avr
RCE0 MNµKE'l RO
0.25 0.5
Miles
7 hrs reap rs for reference purposes only Care
Was taken in the creation of this map but it is
pro:sled "AS IS Please contact the CRy of Bend
to verily map information or to report any errors.
err. PENN As"- NE Ara la
AY 20
HIGIi WAY 20
MAR CassK no
ce
cc
N cc
a
rl.
1.1E
MN
!AR
0,2
lAU
PF
RH
RUT
RS
CITY OF BEND
Map prepared by M Stead Ci[y of Bend
Pont Dale. Jan 22. 2020
Sources Crty of Bend. Deschutes County
Source: City of Bend; Note: If necessary, figure will be updated during a Substantial Amendment
37 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
XIV. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC
12965 SW Herman Road, Suite 100, Tualatin, OR 97062
P: (503) 563-6151 I www.aks-eng.com
AKS Job#8010
ENGINEERING & FORESTRY OFFICES IN: BEND, OR - KEIZER, OR - TUALATIN, OR - VANCOUVER, WA
EXHIBIT A
Core Area TIF Area
Bend, Oregon
A tract of land and road rights -of -way located in the Northwest One -Quarter and the Southwest One -
Quarter of Section 28, the Northeast One -Quarter and the Southeast One -Quarter of Section 29, the
Northeast One -Quarter, the Southwest One -Quarter and the Southeast One -Quarter of Section 32,
and the Northeast One -Quarter, the Northwest One -Quarter and the Southwest One -Quarter of
Section 33, Township 17 South, Range 12 East, the Northwest One -Quarter and the Southwest One -
Quarter of Section 4, and the Northeast One -Quarter, the Northwest One -Quarter and the Southeast
One -Quarter of Section 5, Township 18 South, Range 12 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Bend,
Deschutes County, Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 19, Block 56 of the plat of "First Addition to Riverside",
also being on the westerly right-of-way line of Hill Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.29DC);
1. Thence leaving said westerly right-of-way line, Northeasterly 128 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of Hill Street and the northwesterly right-of-
way of US Highway 97 (Assessor's Map 17.12.29DD);
2. Thence along said northwesterly right-of-way line, Northeasterly 698 feet, more or less, to
the westerly line of a 20.00 foot wide alley per the plat of "Riverside" (Assessor's Map
17.12.29DA);
3. Thence along said westerly line, and continuing along the westerly line of a 20.00 foot
wide alley per the plat of "Orokla", and the northerly extension thereof, Northerly 1,246
feet, more or less, to the northerly right-of-way line of Lakeside Place (Assessor's Map
17.12.29AD);
4. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Westerly 50 feet, more or less, to the
easterly line of Lot 10, Block 7 of said plat, also being the westerly line of Document
Number 2015-49076 (Assessor's Map 17.12.29AD);
5. Thence along said westerly line, Northerly 181 feet, more or less, to the Ordinary High
Water Line of the Deschutes River (Assessor's Map 17.12.29AD);
6. Thence along said Ordinary High Water Line, and continuing along the westerly right-of-
way line of Division Street, Northerly 866 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of the
westerly portion of the remainder of Exhibit B of Document Number 94-31211 (Assessor's
Map 17.1.2.29AD);
7. Thence leaving said westerly right-of-way line, Easterly 113 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of Division Street and the northerly right-of-
way line of Addison Avenue (Assessor's Map 17.12.29AD);
8. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 88 feet, more or less, to the
westerly right-of-way line of Tweet Place (Assessor's Map 17.12.29AD);
9. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Southerly 986 feet, more or Tess, to the
northerly right-of-way line of Xerxes Avenue (Assessor's Map 17.12.29AD);
1.0. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 80 feet, more or less, to the
northerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 3, Block 4 of said plat of "Orokla", also
38 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
being the westerly right-of-way line of US Highway 97 (Dalles-California Highway)
(Assessor's Map 17.12.29AD);
11. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Southerly 762 feet, more or less, to the
northerly right-of-way line of Vail Avenue (Assessor's map 17.12.29DA);
12. Thence leaving said northerly right-of-way line, Southerly 379 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of US Highway 97 (Dalles-California
1lighway) and the northerly right-of-way line of Underwood Avenue (Assessor's Map
17.12.29DA);
13. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 382 feet, more or less, to the
easterly right-of-way line of 2nd Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.28CB);
14. 'Thence along said easterly right-of-way line,. Northerly 75 feet, more or less, to the easterly
right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Assessor's Map 17.12.28CB);
15. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line, Northerly 1,383 feet, more or less, to the
southerly line of Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2019-05 (Assessor's Map 17.12.28BC);
16. Thence along said southerly line, and the easterly extension thereof, Easterly 548 feet, more
or less, to Ole easterly right-of-way line of 4th Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.28BC);
17. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line. Southerly 4,735 feet, more or less, to the
northerly right-of-way line of Kearney Avenue (Assessor's Map 17.12.33BC);
1.8. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 61.0 feet, more or less, to the
northerly extension of easterly line of Lot 3, Block 35 of the plat of "Center Addition to
Bend" (Assessor's Map 17.12.33BD);
19. Thence along said northerly extension and said easterly line, Southerly 200 feet, more or
less, to the northerly line of a 20.00 foot wide alley per said plat of "Center Addition to
Bend" (Assessor's Map 17.12.33BD);
20. Thence along said northerly line, and the easterly extension thereof, Easterly 1,215 feet,
more or less, to the easterly right-of-way line of 8th Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
21. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line, Northerly 95 feet, more or less, to the
northerly line of Lot 9, Block 112 of the plat of "First Addition to Bend Park" (Assessor's
Map 1.7.12.33AC);
22. Thence along said northerly line, and the easterly extension thereof. Easterly 300 feet, more
or less, to the easterly right-of-way line of 9th Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
23. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line, Southerly 50 feet, more or less, to the
northerly line of Lot 10, Block 111 of said plat (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
24. Thence along said northerly line. Easterly 110 feet, more or less, to the easterly line of said
Lot 10 (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
25. Thence along said easterly line, Southerly 50 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of Lot
17 of said Block 111 (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
26. Thence along said southerly line, Easterly 110 feet, more or less, to the westerly right-of-
way line of 10th Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
27. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Southerly 350 feet, more or less, to the
southerly line of Lot 25, Block 114 of said plat (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
28. Thence along said southerly line, and the westerly extension thereof, Westerly 520 feet,
more or less, to the easterly right-of-way line of 8th street (Assessor's Map 17.12.33AC);
29. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line. Southerly 245 feet; more or less, to the
easterly extension of the southerly right -of -of -way line of Irving Avenue (Assessor's Map
17.12.33AC);
30. 'Thence along said easterly extension, and said southerly right-of-way line, Westerly 1,825
feet, more or less, to the easterly right-of-way line of 4th Street (Assessor's Map
17.12.33CB);
39 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
31. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line, Southerly 2,667 feet, more or less, to the
northerly right-of-way line of Alden Avenue, also being on the most southerly line of
Block 12 of the plat of "Keystone Terrace" (Assessor's Map 17.12.33CC);
32. Thence leaving said northerly right-of-way line, Southwesterly 76 feet, more or less, to the
most easterly corner of Document Number 2013-01571., also being on the northerly line of
Deed Volume 224, Page 378 (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BB);
33. Thence along said northerly line. Westerly 38 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of said
Deed (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BB);
34. Thence along said westerly line, Southerly 178 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of
said Deed (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BB);
35. Thence along said southerly line, Easterly 32 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of
Document Number 2017-44939 (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BB);
36. Thence along said westerly line, Southerly 272 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly right-
of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad (Assessor's Map 18.1.2.04BB);
37. Thence leaving said northeasterly right-of-way line, Westerly 105 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the centerline of the Burlington Northern Railroad and the northeasterly
extension of the southeasterly line of Lot 5, Block 186 of the plat of "Third Addition to
13end Park" (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BB);
38. Thence along said northeasterly extension and said southeasterly line. Southwesterly 150
feet, more or less, to the northeasterly right-of-way line of Railroad Street (Assessor's Map
18.12.04BB);
39. Thence leaving said northeasterly right-of-way line. Southwesterly 62 feet, more or less, to
the westerly line of Lot 26, Block 186 of said plat (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BB);
40. Thence along said westerly line, and the southerly extension thereof. Southerly 518 feet,
more or less, to the northerly right-of-way line of Miller Avenue (Assessor's Map
18.12.04BB);
41. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 110 feet, more or less, to the
westerly right-of-way line of Heyburn Street (Assessor's Map 18.12,04BB);
42. Thence leaving said westerly right-of-way line. Southeasterly 67 feet, more or less, to the
easterly line of Lot 5, Block 190 of said plat (Assessor's Map 18.12.04B13);
43. Thence along said easterly line, and the southerly extension thereof, Southerly 221 feet,
more or less, to the northerly right-of-way line of Woodland Boulevard (Assessor's Map
18.12.04BC);
44. "Thence leaving said northerly right-of-way line, Southerly 80 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of Woodland Boulevard, and a line that is
parallel with and 15.00 feet westerly of the easterly line of Lot 2, Block 73 of the plat of
"Bend Park" (Assessor's Map 1.8.12.04BC);
45. "Thence along said parallel line, Southerly 91 feet, more or less, 10 the northerly right-of-
way line of Lee Lane (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
46. Thence leaving said northerly right-of-way line, Southerly 60 feet, more or less, to a point
on the southerly right-of-way line of Lee Lane which bears westerly 43.00 feet, more or
less, from the northeasterly corner of Lot 5, Block 74 of said plat (Assessor's Map
18.12.04BC);
47. Thence leaving said southerly right-of-way line, Southerly 100 feet, more or Tess, to a point
on the southerly line of said Lot 5, also being the northwesterly corner of Document
Number 89-33825 (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
48. Thence along the westerly line of said Deed, Southerly 102 feet, more or less, to the
northerly right-of-way line of Dell Lane (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
3
40 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
49. Thence leaving said northerly right-of-way line, Southerly 69 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of Dell Lane, and a line that is parallel with
and 27.00 feet westerly of the westerly line of Lot 3, Block 79 of said plat (Assessor's Map
18.12.04BC);
50. Thence along said parallel line, Southerly 100 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of Lot
20, of said Block (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
51. Thence along said northerly line, Easterly 1.42 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly right-
of-way line of Yew Lane (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
52. Thence along said northwesterly right-of-way line, Southwesterly 249 feet, more or less, to
the northwesterly extension of a line that is parallel with and 28.00 feet northeasterly of the
southwesterly line of Lot 9, Block 80 of said plat (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
53. Thence along said northwesterly extension and said parallel line, Southeasterly 160 feet,
more or less, to the southeasterly line of said Lot 9 (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
54. Thence along said southeasterly line, and the southwesterly extension thereof,
Southwesterly 78 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly line of Lot27, of said Block 80
(Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
55. Thence along said southwesterly line, Southeasterly 100 feet, more or less, to the westerly
right-of-way line of 4th Street (Assessor's Map 18.12.04BC);
56. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Southerly 169 feet, more or less, to the
easterly southeasterly corner of Lot 24, of said Block 80 (Assessor's Map 18.12,04BC);
57. Thence leaving said easterly southeasterly comer, Southeasterly 89 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of Wilson Avenue and the vacated centerline
of 4th Street (Assessors Map 18.12.04CB);
58. Thence along said vacated centerline, Southerly 570 feet, more or less, to the northerly
right-of-way line of Roosevelt Avenue (Assessor's Map 18.12.04CB);
59. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 30 feet, more or less, to the
northerly extension of the easterly right-of-way line of 4th Street (Assessor's Map
18.12.04CB );
60. Thence along said northerly extension, said easterly right-of-way line and the southerly
extension thereof, Southerly 711 feet, more or less, to the southerly right-of-way line of
Cleveland Avenue (Assessor's Map 18.12.04CC);
61. Thence along said southerly right-of-way line, Westerly 915 feet, more or less, to the
southerly extension of the westerly right-of-way line of 2nd Street (Assessor's Map
18.12.05DD);
62. Thence along said southerly extension and said westerly right-of-way line, Northerly L290
feet, more or less, to the southerly right-of-way line of Truman Avenue (Assessor's Map
18.12.05DA);
63. Thence along said southerly right-of-way line, Westerly 1,100 feet, more or less, to the
southerly extension of the westerly right-of-way line of Hill Street (Assessor's Map
18.1.2.05DA);
64. Thence along said southerly extension, Northerly 49 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly
corner of Lot 12 of the plat of "Upper Terrace Phase II" (Assessor's Map 18.12.05A);
65. Thence along the southerly line of said Lot 12, Westerly 431 feet, more or less, to the
westerly line of said Lot 12 (Assessor's Map 18.12.05A);
66. Thence along said westerly line, Northerly 711 feet, more or less, to the southerly right-of-
way line of Wilson Avenue (Assessor's Map 18.12.05A);
67. Thence leaving said southerly right-of-way line, Northwesterly 210 feet, more or less, to
the easterly southeasterly corner of Lot 13 of said plat, also being on the westerly right-of-
way line of Bond Street (Assessor's Map 18.12.05AC);
4
41 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
68. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, and continuing along the southwesterly right-
of-way line of Bond Street, Northwesterly 2,233 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly
corner of Lot 6 of the plat of "Northside Terrace" (Assessor's Map 18.12.05BA);
69. Thence leaving said northwesterly corner, Northeasterly 136 feet, more or less, to the
easterly line of Lot 3, Block 1. of the plat of "Mill `A' Area of Shevlin Center" (Assessor's
Map 18.12.05BA);
70. Thence along said easterly line, Northerly 363 feet, more or less, southerly right-of-way
line of Arizona Avenue (Assessor's Map 18.12.05BA);
71. Thence leaving said southerly right-of-way line, Northerly 100 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of the northerly tight -of -way line of Arizona Avenue and the easterly right-of-
way line of Lava Road (Assessor's Map 17.12.32CD);
72. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 1,220 feet, more or less, to the
westerly right-of-way line of US Highway 97 (Dalles-California Highway) (Assessor's
Map 17.12.32DC);
73. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Northeasterly 275 feet, more or less, to the
westerly right-of-way line of Hill Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.32DC);
74. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Northerly 742 feet, more or less, to the
southerly right-of-way line of Georgia Avenue (Assessor's Map 17.12.32DC);
75. Thence along said southerly right-of-way line, Westerly 123 feet, more or less, to the
southerly extension of the easterly line of Lot 11, Block 29 of the plat of "Park Addition to
Bend" (Assessor's Map 17.12.32DC);
76. Thence along said southerly extension, said easterly line and the northerly extension
thereof, Northerly 310 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of Lot 15 of said Block 29
(Assessor's Map 17.1.2.32DB);
77. Thence along said northerly line, Westerly 1.02 feet, more or less, to the easterly right-of-
way line of Hardman Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.32DB);
78. Thence leaving said easterly right-of-way line, Westerly 41 feet, more or less, to the
northeasterly corner of Lot 8, Block 29 of said plat, also being on the westerly right -of way
line of Harriman Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.32DB);
79. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Northerly 1,901 feet, more or less, to the
intersection of said westerly right-of-way line and the westerly extension of the southerly
right-of-way line of' Kearney Avenue (Assessor's Iv1ap 17.12.32AC);
80. Thence leaving said intersection. Northeasterly 87 feet, more or less, to the intersection of
the easterly right-of-way line of Haniman Street and the northerly right-of-way line of
Kearney Avenue (Assessor's Map 17.12.32AC);
81.. Thence along said northerly right-of-way line, Easterly 150 feet, more or less, to a line that
is parallel with and 150.00 feet westerly of the easterly line of Block 8 of the plat of "North
Addition to Bend" (Assessor's Map 17.12.32AC);
82. Thence along said parallel line, Northerly 140 feet, more or less, to a line that is parallel
with and 1.40.00 feet northerly of the northerly right-of-way line of Kearney Avenue
(Assessor's Map 17.12.32AC);
83. Thence along said parallel line, Easterly 150 feet, more or less, to the westerly tight -of -way
line of Hill Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.32AC);
84. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Northerly 274 feet, more or less, to the
southerly right-of-way line of Lafayette Avenue (Assessor's Map 17.12.32AC);
85. Thence along said southerly right-of-way line, Westerly 519 feet, more or less, to the
southeasterly right-of-way line of Wall Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.32AC);
42 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
86. Thence leaving said southeasterly right-of-way line, Northwesterly 80 feet, more or less, to
the southeasterly corner of Lot 7, Block 1 of said plat, also being on the northwesterly
right-of-way line of Wall Street (Assessors Map 17.12.32AC):
87. Thence along said northwesterly right-of-way line. Northeasterly 253 feet, more or less, to
the easterly northeasterly corner of Document Number 2009-01315 (Assessors Map
17.12.32AC);
88. Thence along the northerly line of said Deed, Westerly 246 feet, more or less, to the
westerly line of Document Number 2018-14686 (Assessors Map 17.12.32AB);
89. Thence along said westerly line, Northeasterly 208 feet, more or less, to the northerly line
of said Deed (Assessor's Map 17 12.32AB);
90. Thence along said northerly line, Easterly 65 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of
Document Number 2018-14687 (Assessor's Map 17 12.32A13);
91. Thence along said westerly line, Northerly 30 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of
said Deed (Assessor's Map 17.12.32AB):
92. Thence along said northerly line, Easterly 32 feel, more or less, to the westerly line of
Document Number 2019-46106 (Assessor's Map 17.12.32AB);
93. Thence along said westerly line. and continuing along the westerly line of Document
Number 201 1-15782. and the northerly extension thereof. Northeasterly 570 feet, more or
less, to the northerly right-of-way line of Portland Avenue (Assessor's Map 17.12.32A13):
94. Thence along said northerly right-ofway line, Easterly 144 feet, more or less, to the
westerly right-of-way line of Wall Street (Assessor's Map 17.12.32A13 );
95. Thence along said westerly right-of-way line, Northerly 1,672 feet, more or less, to the
True Point of Beginning.
The above described tract of land contains 637 acres, more or Tess.
The Basis of Bearings for this description is per the Central Oregon Coordinates System (COOS).
5 412020
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
OREGON
JANUARY 12, 2016
MICHAEL S. KAUJNA
89558PLS
RENEWS: 6/30/21
6
43 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
THURSTON
.1 AVENUE _
IT
e tdr-df,
jI
COI ORADO AVENU
'
111 I r? 900.1
ARIZONA AVENUE__
W.4 IE
r4 -
14JJI7t TAFT AVENUE
./14,1ItT1-111?OSEVE1...T AVENUE
7 Ji±Li LUlab
pill Fri MrCKr_lETi AVENUE
! if • / -11
// \
/
7 II V." */ADDISON
tAT-I,AVENUE
':
— 8lilIltIll
cfl , Li T - r • , . -
Ell
A;,,N,iHED-p.13
0.- REVERE,AyENU
?!.'"; lira': •
riPlz firlY4YrNa2 w
I u i I
)1 LT:.; _I _
• ---•=t±LL:Lis „.1
r+p,i7nriii1
411
-17 ri 11-11
-I 4t.' 1-71 I 1
; DLL__
KEARNEY AVENU
- —
I ME( 1.1 =A111.112L
H. 1-A _LE
GREELEY AVENJE
11AV/MORNE AVENUE
t 4" n
-
•
5,1_1 ii 9 -TATA= II:: I:1E1J LLr
, -- 14LI,T,,i , . ....
r
rill I _tall). II hi_e 4.LJ I I 11 EV
, 0 rEN,ERSON AV.,E1 — I 1,1 -
HbDE .B A • 'UE
-
r' I i I ,H.1
BURNs DE AVENUE \
I 1,
111 I -AILREPVNPE
1 1. IT
I-1-
,
1\-r
11E11
V/ I
CLEVELAINDAVEN E
UTUli h
:SIPE ti'.11.7
rrr
• x9 ,
0
rg§
MAP OF TIF AREA
COVER SHEET
CITY OF BEND
CORE AREA TIF AREA
BV12. OREGON
PISIVEER.0 - &MM. • 1/Madl. 1.80V.069
1.0.511. Pi..014.1.06CAPE 0.410111101,1
44 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
LAKESIDE PI ACI:
I e t
n
REVERE
- AVENUE
I! s
III I La
j-
SEE SHEET 03
..J L
in,,,,_ AVENUE SEWARD
REVERE AVENUE
Iti / lIII I I; l r� I
• / 1 I IH _life ;
/ I
/ L �yOUIMRY AVENUE L I I I
Ii%1 N _ — I- _ 1
PENNAVENUE
s �I
I
UNDERW00D AVENUE
'1 y�
—L
/— ITHURSTON AVENU
/ !—I
�
i
ADDISON AVENUE / —
OLNEY AVENUE
SEE SHEET 03
L J 'I
I�
o
N
MAP OF TIF AREA
CITY OF BEND
CORE AREA TIF AREA
BEND OREGON
45 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
SEE SHEET 02
r •
a •
2
LAFAYETTE AVENUE
65-VMER, su,
I Lli
>0,
;•at
„:11.a
111
M-HOMM:11My
b.1
I I I-
FLORIDA AVENUE
SEE SHEET 02
— - •
GREENWOOD AVENUE
I I. 1,til
71— PA
AOENUE
Im
•
GREELEY AVENUE
FRANKLIN AVENUE
I
_PARK PLAOE'
114) 1-1-71
n
u
I I
11-111-11J.11.1-
SEE SHEET 04
A',
21
a a ••
F
L
I'
L__I___I I ,•• [---
_ __ _ 1,_
LAFAYETTE AVENUE
I I I I— -I 1 -1 I 1 r
i ,-, 18ti- % 1
.) 1 .1. 6 _t4- —CZ, -
I T 1 1--1 I , 1 5 iri
V ' I -.MOO sm I 1
1.q _ I_LEARNEY AVENUE1 1 ...."2
1,, I '' -1 1 —I r,
.
AtL"' 1 i'li''
...._ r
GREENWOOD AVENUE 2
17
i , !gt _ 2 (-----1
6 —
. C 1
IRVING AVENUE
> 6,1'1
'')-fre-li
HAW200021E AVENUE
I -al
ORE LEYAVENUE
I I--
-1 I
FRANKUN AVENUE
Ilig
— 7
Ft' EMERSONAVENUE
11 I JEII
II
----- - / _1, IT JLJI _1
I -1
—
__JUJILLJ11
SEE SHEET (H
tlis I I '
1,
KEARNEY AVENUE
.
T.
M-EKTMIY L
,• 1pFt
I I
V,
ALLEY
I 1 ir
GREENWOOD AVENUE
=
i
i 9L
IRVING AVENUE Ne,
•--Vt •.3
'..e
1J.al 1.0 3 1.01
M-IESITmY
- I
'4 0
E
o
C4
it
MAP OF TIF AREA
CITY OF BEND
CORE AREA TIF AREA
BEND OREGON
rtrVrITTAK
,100.1,0.`tt
5215028 waren., mita. AMAPA
GMESITIT NAI:NAVIANDSCAFF A.1111FOO.
46 1 Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
'
SEE SHEET 3
.Trr
1—,
LTELAWARKAVENUE kr'
Jj1-kly
COLORADO AVENUE .st
74-EASENT 1.2203
ARIZONA AVENUE ,„„,
rOTHIPIE IP ItILPHT---
INDUSTRIAL WAY (PRIVATE)
s
tT
I IR.
,
HC.1—
".., /1
/ /
t
„
N \ 1i
>
cl
" \ „/
\17I
/ / i
,.../ / i
-, _I , ROOSEVELT AVENU
1--
/ 1
, , i, i ,
MCKINLEY AVENU
/,II
I IA\ E7-.IIII I 71 1--- 1 1 .1 Il I -I 1 i
,IIIL/'.i>I2 't I / r-IIIII--/ I I.• t 'I'II. I '
_, C EVELAND AVENUE
//
LIPTHPIPR
I
-
'"'-',
x
HAHNE 770070
1010198718 NOTE
t!
,..,
, fa
i ! ,1,-...:'
t , (
.f'I I
I .
._,. CLEVELAND AVENUE e...
/I 5. • 'rl III'MIVr':*. 1 It.)Itt
—
/--- f‘I'IIII'VEEE.1-1 I'' (t.,v ,
-,,6.,,
—2'1"4.' ; ! 1
SEE SHEET 03
-,v
.--( .k.>•;;N.,.,,,
k,-,,,4.4„,..,t,
ips,,,,.„,,e,!,-4-..„
*,N
,..', >,,,
. ,
MILLER AVENUE
W--.1 I HOIF:Lt, [
r-,-1,_„•.- ,,,,,,o..... 17,
1 o . 1 L') ' ' -7 "-. I
WOODLAND BOULVARI) T.....I,-;c7 T,
I, ° ' II. N
06 `'
--...
1
6.-rr-p
YEW LANE
LTE
WILSON AVENUE
TAFT AVENUE
-77
, ROOSEVELTAV AVENUE r
) / I
- -Oil
--0-- /)
,-
MCKINLEY AVENUE 0
/3 9 I
0
1-1,1-
0 S-
A
MAP OF TIF AREA
CITY OF BEND
CORE AREA TIF AREA
13,Rj1 OREGON
NJAIAXL,,,A
Vtti
"'K
E805E2150. SUAVE'. N.M.1.1,13011K.
FORESTIVI PJA11.4.010SCAPEARCII-7100.
47 I Core Area Tax Increment Finance Plan
LAN & REPOT
0
0
0
Matt Stuart — Urban Renewal Manager
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
w
cn
Adoption Schedule
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
within Core
0 2
O -
O = in'CT)
o
a0 �13
2�c a)
0_ > -. —s2c, 2
9
w D�° �
7 O COL
4= m -U 0 8
a) a) O -0 >>
o U ca;—
tp c ti co co 5 ca
a' co
N< N N O 42<
•
0I N L
��s^g
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1,
.4(
g
Recommended Core Area Urban
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
637.15 Acres
cn
t6
L
L
O
a
0
0
• •
• East Downtown
Bend Central District
CITY OF BEND 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CL
C
to
a)
CD :Pa
to
o c C
_a a) O
.La � a) 0
c 0 _a a)
DI a) CD�- o
co O �a) >
U CU a) p
cu
CD O .� to tC
. CO :'—
ndebtedness
E
E
ca
2
Amendments
• Minor, Substantial
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
i CO
c
U co a)
c 0_ C
co N
U Ct
C c
Q CO c
•C
a).V1) Co
2 _p
'in'N a) c C
N 0_ >, f
c o p al > O.
> > a)
> -o ce
0 co C
O
"0 E co a)
co ca.
o E c N
eL > E E N
co -t a Q Q
cn a) pa 0 u, E
a) a >
LE. c
cm(t = O
O p t0 v_
+r = Cto v .E
to
p-0 12 ) Q Q V t
D. to a) a) Q p
cn E c C U) c CL
p't "v)-0 a) C 0_
(o Q w
I— < t1 00 co 0 OL V)
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
$195, 000, 000
a)
i
a)
O
C
O
c6
L
-o
co
C
co
cn
t0
L
0)
O
2
cris a)
U "0
O O
c
O E O-
4-
a O N
co c
a) i ,�
_a ca a)
o (1
- I Ei 2 2
E O
CO CU
E O
I° a o
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
(o
a_
(o
i
-L
O
O
c
O
Q
O
(o
(o
cn
O
L
Q
a)
E
cnctl
co
C
CO
rn
U)
Increase in the Maximum Indebtedness
c
0
O
cn
a)
L.
COCt
)
O
L
0
co
1
L
O
_c
• All other amendments
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
z
0
a c0
N 0
W N O
LL > N
O LL t0
c
co _o �O 0)
W O -a L.L.
> c O 1-
O N
N P O N
= (0 — —
tS Q = U
N _ .c
C c (13 0 ,U
> U 0_ O
1 • O U
N _o a)O4EjU ® d- )
co
• Ncf) E
• N N Ce
m O CO
a) • S Lc
O
- (6 L()
ti
O .E • N 10
_ • = d'
O -a ) V)
c i w
c .- vs co
c cn — O 'in
4Ej co -c
c 1... g _J
O L 2
"txj-D
cf) Z CO -D 0- as
o• • • D .
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
o
0
0
eL
a)
TO
a)
cn
a)
L cn
ca
a)
O co
a) "0 2
N N > .0
• 4.3%of AV
• 7.67% of acreage
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
o
0
ROjECT CATEGO
-$100.5 million
-$36.4 million
-$28.6 million
-$18.8 million
g••••)
C \ I 00 L() 0
LC)
0)
ft
LC)
ai
(.)
c
.>, 'ea' cz ceS
a) 't Tan ui 0
-..c.5
D.z."---
E a 1 0 CO
06 0 = < P
c a)
ai TD u) ti a) E
a a) OS a) E 0
O a. a. -a
ci) i'D — o t cri E
a) 5 75 ai ID — .t
f.D. 0.) a) in> a = C'' °
V) 't 0 cn
C- D co a) 06 u_ %... (f)
o 2 r
ci
- ai -E 06 U)
2 -0
0. • .;...- CU CD CD (D < .to
(f) cn 2 rn c c c ii=
c a
(i) n co a CC/ CO a)
I--
*YOE $'s (Year of Expenditure)
CITY OF BEND 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
0
N- LO N I's CO O
CO 00 N M f` O
N d' ,I Ln
M .4. O M N co CO N
O CO M d) O N
N N N
6/9 69 b9 69 69- 69
1-9
L
co
Years 6-10
Years 11-15
Years 16-20
Years 21-25
Years 25-30
*YOE $'s (Year of Expenditure)
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
LLJ
'
SUO I! IAI
'90
0
'90
6'4
Ocs
O• cs
Ocs
• ft
Ocs
FN1)
cQ
I
O (1)
w
Lf
,3
0$—
(5_
4
" ,
)
I.-
0
(• )&
U-
cnOc.s
er,
('Oca
c
c27o
• c'
z
Ocs
Ocs
Ocs
c-c.s
Ocs
L.0 s
c
L/CS
C0c
s
19c,
on s
co
c-'cscs
Ocs
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
O CO CO 0) 00 L() CO CS,
CO0dam' CO M N O dN) CO
O O O COc6 N CNO 'I"N d0' CO N f` b9 ff3 to
Deschutes
rn
Bend Metro Parks & Rec
Government
co
0
0
0
0
r2
Bend/La Pine School District
$100,232,583
0
D)
O
O
0
E E
c
0 0
o U
W 0
F
co 0 ca
0 E2 O
C
0 CO
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Lo
69 ER
0
o)
0
N
69
ER
(suomm) anuene I xel sews
G
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
0
0
w
0 O
2 co
72 a) o
c cD co
Q
fX c o
D as o
CO 73
L 1 co
O
O 0) cn
CD •L- O ai
E 2
06 L- o 0-
2 o N c
Csco .o a) -N
O O Q O
(v 1 U rn
0E N
.L �_c o-a
Q ▪ -0 COcn •>
L o -o
I N o
— a)
N
a)
O O • Z
C U O c
a)
2 . .
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
U
MITD
75
E
L
O
a)
o)
O o
L c
as
O f_
0_ Q
CC U
-o a)
C a)
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
O
a
BURA Public Hearing - Resolution
Planning Commission
Deschutes County Commission Briefing
Taxing District Written Comments Due
City Council First Reading - Ordinance
City Council Second Reading - Ordinance
L
o) a)
-Q
cy ▪ ( a)
O co r. E
> > > Q Q
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
z
0
rJ
0
z
0
0
Questions?
E
L
0
•
• (541) 323-5992
0
t
•
CITY OF BEND I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners BOCC Wednesday Meeting of June 17, 2020
DATE: June 9, 2020
FROM: John Laherty, Legal,
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Overview of States's Count of Video Lottery Funds - Senior Assistant Legal Counsel John
La herty
ATTENDANCE: Senior Assistant Legal Counsel John Laherty via Zoom
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners BOCC Wednesday Meeting of June 17, 2020
DATE: June 12, 2020
FROM: Nathan Garibay, Sheriff's Office,
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Storm Damage Briefing
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St, Bend, OR 97703
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - https://www.deschutes.org/
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board of Commissioners BOCC Wednesday Meeting of June 17, 2020
DATE: June 11, 2020
FROM: William Groves, Community Development, 541-388-6518
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
PUBLIC HEARING: Thornburg Golf Course
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
An administrative approval for a Site Plan Review (247-19-000881-SP) for the Phase A golf course
of the Thornburg Destination Resort was appealed by parties Central Oregon Land Watch and
Gould. The golf course includes artificial lakes approved by the Conceptual and Final Master Plans
for the destination resort.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: none
ATTENDANCE: Will Groves, Legal
c 0MMUN TY DE\
STAFF MEMORANDUM
Date: June 17, 2020
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Will Groves, Senior Planner
Re: Hearing Memorandum: Appeal of Thornburg Golf Course Site Plan - 247-19-000881-SP,
247-20-000279-A, and SP, 247-20-000282-A
The Board of County Commissioners (Board) will hold a public hearing on June 14, 2020, at 10 a.m.,
to hear an Appeal of the Thornburg Golf Course Site Plan.
ZOOM PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION:
• Members of the public may listen, view, and/or participate in this hearing using Zoom. Using
Zoom is free of charge. Using this option may require you to download the Zoom app to your
device. To login to the electronic meeting online using your computer, copy this link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88672813625?pwd=Wk9UY2ZZbUJgRW1 IRVR6dU4wMzIuQT09
Password: 506221
• Members of the public can access the meeting via telephone; dial 1 346 248 7799. When
prompted, enter the following: Webinar ID: 886 7281 3625 and Password: 506221.
• Written comments can also be submitted to the record at planning@deschutes.org by 9:00
a.m. on June 17. They will be entered into the record.
• Members of the public may attend the hearing in person subject to social distancing
requirements. Up to 25 people (including staff) will be permitted in the hearing room if 6-
foot distancing can be maintained.
1. Background
On December 11, 2019, Kameron DeLashmutt on behalf of Central Land and Cattle Company, LLC
submitted a request for a Site Plan Review (SP) for the Phase A golf course of the Thornburgh
Destination Resort. The golf course includes artificial lakes approved by the Conceptual and Final
Master Plans for the destination resort.
117 NW Lafayette Avenue, Bend, Oregon 97703 I P.O. Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708-6005
tti (541) 388-6575 @cdd@deschutes.org www.deschutes.org/cd
The other Phase A -required development, including the Overnight Lodging Units (OLUs) and
restaurant and meeting rooms, will be proposed in separate site plan applications. They will be
developed or financially assured, as required, prior to the closure of sales, rental or lease of any
residential dwellings or Tots.
The resort property is large and comprised of numerous tax lots. The properties subject to this
application are located in the southern region of the destination resort.
The Thornburg Destination Resort has a lengthy and complex history that began in 2005. Each
aspect of the Thornburg Destination Resort project includes decisions by Hearings Officers, the
Board, Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), Oregon Court of Appeals, and Oregon Supreme Court.'
The most recent appeal to LUBA (No. 2019-136) is currently awaiting review. LUBA stayed the appeal
pending the outcome of the Supreme Court decision of case 5067074.
I1. Decision
The Planning Division issued an administrative approval without a public hearing on April 1, 2020,
determining the applicant met the applicable criteria.
III. 150-day Issuance of a Final Local Decision
The 150-day period for issuance of a final local decision is currently September 6, 2020.
Iv. Appeal
The administrative approval was timely appealed by Central Oregon LandWatch ("LandWatch") and
Annunziata Gould. Staff summarizes the issues on appeal below.
LandWatch:
1) By applying for just the golf course and lakes, the Applicant is impermissibly
fragmenting approval of facilities required in the first phase of the development.
Specifically, required parking, paths, lighting and structures/facilities must be
proposed and reviewed as part of this application.
2) The submitted plan does not show how vegetation in adjacent undeveloped areas will
be protected and retained. This must be proposed and reviewed as part of this
application.
1 See the Land Use History summary on pages 3-5 under the Basic Findings section of the administrative
decision for file 247-19-000881-SP.
File Nos. 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP, 247-20-000282-A Page 2 of 5
Gould:
3) The Administrative Decision incorrectly states that adequate water for the resort has
been resolved. As explained in detail by Appellant Gould, that is clearly not the case.
The Applicant does not have the water and the contract that supposedly shows that
it is feasible for the Applicant to obtain the water is being withheld as "private."
1) Tax Lot 8000, one of the subject parcels, has never been owned by the LLC or Mr.
DeLashmutt. The application is thus defective.
2) The golf course and lakes are subject to a showing of compliance with applicable site
plan criteria. The source of the water for the lakes must be proved in this application.
3) The present site plan depends on the Tentative Plan approval, which is before the
Oregon Supreme Court in September 2020. The county's premature decision on
remand from LUBA in the Tentative Plan is currently on appeal to LUBA. At the
applicant's request, LUBA has stayed proceedings in that case until the Supreme
Court decides the matter before it.
4) The administrative approval incorporated parts of the application materials by
reference. If staff intends to rely upon such incorporation of the application as part
of the decision, it does so to the prejudice of appellant's substantial rights.
5) The Final Order for the extension water rights has been sent by OWRD ("Oregon
Water Resources Department") to Contested Case. The fate of the applicant's permit
is in suspense. If the permit is not ultimately extended, then the applicant cannot
legally take more water than it can prove it had already been using at the time the
development period set under the permit expired, which is zero.
6) Final Master Plan (FMP) Condition 10 states:
"10. Applicant shall provide, at the time of tentative plat/site plan review for
each individual phase of the resort development, updated documentation
for the state water right permit and an accounting of the full amount of
mitigation, as required under the water right, for that individual phase."
The facts have changed since prior decisions on this property and updated water right
permit information and a full accounting of the mitigation are required in the present
decision.
7) The posted notice of the application was not in fact adequate because it was posted
in the location where it would be least visible to passing motorists.
8) The Applicant has not met his burden of proof with regard to 18.113.0700, K, and L)
File Nos. 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP, 247-20-000282-A Page 3 of 5
regarding natural drainages, provision of water, and beneficial use of wastewater,
respectively.
9) The Applicant has not met his burden of proof with regard to 18.124.060(F) regarding
surface and subsurface water quality.
10) Parking lot (and bicycle parking) design are improperly deferred to a later decision
with a condition of approval.
11) The addition of a nine -hole short course is substantial change to the approved plan
and will require a new application.
12) The applicant has not secured required water rights from Big Falls Ranch by means
of an enforceable contract. Any water rights and contractual rights to water the
applicant may possess have been pledged as security more than once, for the
fulfillment of the applicant's debt obligations. Hence, they are not freely available to
the applicant for the purpose of fulfilling its obligations under the FMP.
13) The application adds a nine -hole short course to the previously approved golf
courses. This is a substantial change to the open space provided, and will be an
additional drain on the available water supply.
14) The golf course and lakes will require water for mitigation purposes. FMP Condition
38 requires a showing of its availability at this stage. The earlier decisions relied upon
by the applicant cannot give rise to either issue or claim preclusion or estoppel here.
This application must be judged on in its own merit.
III. Hearing
A public hearing in this matter is scheduled before the Board on June 17, 2020. The record was
previously presented to the Board as part of the Staff memoranda for the April 6, 2020
consideration of whether the Board would hear this matter and June 10, 2020 work session. New
record materials since that memorandum are presented to the Board and listed below.
DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION
za,,,
Will Groves, Senior Planner
Attachments: Reference Number
File Nos. 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP, 247-20-000282-A Page 4 of 5
2020-06-10 DeLashmutt Email on 150 Day clock 81
2020-06-10 Staff PowerPoint Thornburg Golf Pre -Hearing 80
2020-06-04 Kleinman Email 79
2020-06-03 Thornburg Golf Work Session Memo 78
File Nos. 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP, 247-20-000282-A Page 5 of 5
®Uuiti2i2i�
m
0 ESN
4888)
8 MIS
m RUM
. 470
0
J
-Ci
1
L
bJ0
..
co
m
•
0
ea
0
cu
4J
E
Master Plan
a
Appealed to LUBA and Remanded To County
ed to LUBA
olf Course and Lakes
ra
MOWN
Associated Lakes
o
• 4-)
cii
LT
*E
b.O
O C
- *uu
V) -0
0
_J
• a.)
CU b- .0
4-) • 0
_
a) 0 U
4-)
("0
Meeting Rooms
Restaurant
inistrative a
•
"Called up" by the Board
Appeals by Gould and Central Oregon LandWatch
0)
Issues on
(i)
co
cL
w
1
c
c
• -
E
-0
(L)
C1)
-0
0
Mitigation Water
Site Plan Criteria
•
•
1,2°
fa
0.1
•
a)
cu
a)
V)
ci
4J
c
E
CU
nz5
c
(I)
4-)
V)
(-0
0
a)
4J
no
Ll
• --,
0 C
4— r-1
E
(-0 (0
0_
G.) Q
if) <
4-)
0
(-0
E
Mitigation water was required for ground/surface water
CU
r0
"0
CU
-1-)
a)
.4-,
c
ci;)
4-,
u
CU
CU
ccs
a)
CI)
0
0
ei
E 0
r0
0S2
a_ CU
<
•
a
-0
cl)
c
rCI
44
w
0)
4-4
0
(OC
4-, v)
CI)
bOW
C
>
`I—
0
0
7:4 rt3
u
CL) (-)
z
Parking and bicycle parking
0
V)
-0
c
rt3
0.13
R3
• (76
-0
>.;
0L.
a)
co
rt3
a) 0
C.417
(a (1)
L._
(I)
V) DO
use of wastewater
William Groves
From: Kameron DeLashmutt <kameron@bendcable.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 1:09 PM
To: William Groves
Cc: Liz Fancher
Subject: Re: Cetral Land and Cattle Appeal, 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP,
247-20-000282-A
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Will,
I agreed to extend to give them time.
Kameron
From: William Groves <William.Groves�a),deschutes.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 at 12:16 PM
To: Liz Fancher <liz(aAizfancher.com>, Kam DeLashmutt <kameron@bendcable.com>
Subject: FW: Cetral Land and Cattle Appeal, 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP, 247-20-000282-A
FYI,
I've added this letter to the record.
Will
Will Groves I Senior Planner I CFM
117 NW Lafayette Ave I Bend, Oregon 97708
Tel: (541) 388-6518 I Mail: PO Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708
Let us know how we're doing: Customer Feedback Survey
Disclaimer: Please note that the information in this email is an informal statement made in accordance with DCC 22.20.005 and shall not be deemed to
constitute final County action effecting a change in the status of a person's property or conferring any rights, including any reliance rights, on any person.
From: Jeffrey L. Kleinman <kleinmanjl@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:22 PM
To: William Groves <William.Groves@deschutes.org>
Cc: David Doyle <David.Doyle@deschutes.org>; Adam Smith <Adam.Smith@deschutes.org>
Subject: Cetral Land and Cattle Appeal, 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP, 247-20-000282-A
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Will,
Following up on my earlier message, I note that Mr. DeLashmutt's email of March 19, 2020 states that "I would be willing
to toll the 150 day clock for 90 days to allow the Board to hear any appeal of the Golf Course site plan decision." Again,
1
"would be willing" does not mean "hereby extends" or "agrees to extend," but suggests a willingness to extend at some
point in the future. The clock runs out on June 8, so we would suggest obtaining an unequivocal waiver before that
happens.
Thank you.
Jeff
Jeffrey L. Kleinman
Attorney at Law
The Ambassador
1207 SW Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Tel (503) 248-0808
Fax (503) 228-4529
2
William Groves
From: Jeffrey L. Kleinman <kleinmanjl@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:22 PM
To: William Groves
Cc: David Doyle; Adam Smith
Subject: Cetral Land and Cattle Appeal, 247-19-000881-SP, 247-20-000279-A, and SP,
247-20-000282-A
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Will,
Following up on my earlier message, I note that Mr. DeLashmutt's email of March 19, 2020 states that "I would be willing
to toll the 150 day clock for 90 days to allow the Board to hear any appeal of the Golf Course site plan decision." Again,
"would be willing" does not mean "hereby extends" or "agrees to extend," but suggests a willingness to extend at some
point in the future. The clock runs out on June 8, so we would suggest obtaining an unequivocal waiver before that
happens.
Thank you.
Jeff
Jeffrey L. Kleinman
Attorney at Law
The Ambassador
1207 SW Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Tel (503) 248-0808
Fax (503) 228-4529
1
ES
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input can be given regarding any topic that is NOT on the agenda
Public Testimony can be given during Public. Hearings only
Topic of Input or Testimony: 'f
Is this topic an item on today's agenda?
(please see description of Citizen Input above)
Name
Address
Date:
Phone#s
E-mail address Pg��
THIS FORM IS TURNED IN TO RECORDING SECRETARY
BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony?
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record
ra
es
BOARD OF, COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
Citizen Input can be given regarding any topic that is NOT on the agenda
Public Testimony can be given during Public Hearings only
Topic of Input or Testimony:
Is this topic an item on today's agenda?
`Yes (please see description of Citizen Input above) 1
V 1 L•j Date:
hone Its
-mail address
THIS FORM IS TURNED IN TO RECORDING SECRETARY
BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony?,
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record
Citizen Input can be givenregarding any topic that is NOT on the agenda
Public Testimony can be given during Public Hearings only
Topic of Input or Testimony: (lh"
Is this topic an item on today's agenda?
Yes {please see description: of Citizen Input above)
-mail address
THIS FORM IS TURNED IN TO RECORDING SECRETARY"
BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
Citizen. Input can be given regarding any topic that is NOT on the agenda
Public Testimony can be given during Public Hearings' only
Topic of Input or Testimony:
Is this topic an item on today's agenda?
Yes (please see description of Citizen Input above]
Name�� Date:
Address
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony?
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSMEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
• Citizen Input can be given regarding any topic that is NOT on the agenda
• Public Testimony can be given during Public Hearings only
Topic of Input or Testimony: i o/'ic. Xc / p_ i t
Is this topic an item on today's agenda?
Yes (please see description of Citizen Input above) No
Name i? s` 70 0 A9'
Address / `15�/ G ,{.,:'
Phone #s -`)/a / 6
E-mail address / g-y l a R% z i.
Date:
THIS FORM IS TURNED IN TO RECORDING SECRETARY
BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony? :Yes
If so; please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
.QUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input can be given regarding any topic that is NOT on the agenda
• Public Testimony can be given during Public Hearings only
Topic of Input or Testimony:
Is this topic an item on today's agenda?
ease see description of Citizen Input above
THIS FORM IS TURNED IN TO RECORDING SECRETARY
BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony?
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary, for the record
Citizen Input can be given regarding any topic that is NOT on the agenda
Public Testimony can be given during Public Hearings only
Topic of Input or Testimony:*
is this topic an item on today's agenda?
Yes (please see description of Citizen Input above) r1No
Name
Address.
Date:
Phone #s.
THIS FORM IS TURNED IN TO RECORDING SECRETARY
BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony?
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record
Topic of Input or Testimony:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
• Citizen Input can be given regarding any topic that is NOT on' . agenda
Yufilic Testimionv can o given urmg a lc earm
re a-12e1;
Is this topic an item on today's agenda? He -A, g
NYes (please see description of Citizen Input above
Name
Address
a mats } t `S C
63304,:2. V). Lel
e4 c? 47 7 'le, 3
Phone #s (q?-) ` -- ' 7--C-
E-mail address
y us`71:
09-c17- ;
(17 - -aa2
�No gq 7- /4) -G)00/-5.'
Date:
THIS FORM IS TURNED IN TO RECORDING SECRETARY
BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
Are you submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the recor