2024-279-Minutes for Meeting August 19,2024 Recorded 9/27/2024z Es coG�a
{ BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon
(541) 388-6570
Recorded in Deschutes County C:J2024-279
Steve Dennison; County Clerk
Commissioners' Journal 09/27/2024 9:35:59 AM
�� }`£ �� i l l l III I IIII II I I IIIII li I li I III
2024-279
1:00 PM MONDAY August 19, 2024 Allen Room
Live Streamed Video
Present were Commissioners Patti Adair, Tony DeBone and Phil Chang. Also present
were County Administrator Nick Lelack; County Counsel David Doyle; and
BOCC Executive Assistant Brenda Fritsvold.
This meeting was audio and video recorded and can be accessed at the Deschutes County
Meeting Portal webpage www.deschutes.org/meetings.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Adair called the meeting to order at 1:00 pm.
CITIZEN INPUT: None
AGENDA ITEMS:
1. Application for Oregon Health Authority M110 BHRN grant
Holly Harris, Behavioral Health Director, presented background information on
this grant, which previously was applied for and received in conjunction with
other entities. For the upcoming round of funding, each entity is applying
individually; DCHS is proposing to apply to receive $11.5 million over four years.
Harris explained that, if awarded, the funds would be used to continue recovery
services for adults, youth, and the adult intensive and unhoused populations.
Funding would support continuation of 13.3 existing full-time equivalent (FTE),
barrier removals, harm reduction supplies, and 15% for indirect costs.
BOCC MEETING AUGUST 19, 2024 PAGE 1 OF 6
2.
3.
0
In addition, Behavioral Health would seek approval to add two positions (1.0 FTE
Peer Support Specialist and 1.0 FTE Behavioral health Specialist II) to staff a
mobile treatment team serving unsheltered individuals. This team would offer
assessment services as well as medication management, therapy, case
management, peer supports, and harm reduction interventions. One additional
vehicle would be needed to support the team's outreach efforts in South County.
DEBONE: Move approval of an application for a Measure 110 BHRN grant from
the Oregon Health Authority
CHANG: Second
VOTE: CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Yes
ADAIR: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried
Treasury Report for July 2024
Bill Kuhn, County Treasurer, presented the Treasury Report for July 2024.
Finance Report for July 2024
Robert Tintle, Chief Financial Officer, presented the Finance Report for July 2024.
Mountain View Community Development Safe Parking Program and options
for permanent shelter
Rick Russell, executive director of Mountain View Community Development
(MVCD), presented a proposal for a permanent supportive housing village and
asked for a 65-year lease from the County for 8.77 acres in Redmond adjacent to
Oasis Village. Russell spoke to the need for this kind of shelter, particularly for
persons over the age of 50 who lack housing and have very limited incomes,
sometimes due to disabilities, and are not expected to return to employment.
Michelle Cross added that MVCD has researched communities which have
successful permanent supportive housing developments and has also been
working to establish partnerships with Housing Works and Hayden
Homes/Simplicity Homes on a possible project in Deschutes County. MVCD
believes that funding from Oregon Housing and Community Services' Local
Innovation and Fast Track program could pay for the initial capital costs of a
project.
Referring to broad community support for this project, Russell said the proposal
would result in 60 housing units ranging from 400 to 600 sf in size.
BOCC MEETING AUGUST 19, 2024 PAGE',2 OF 6
In response to Commissioner Chang, Russell anticipated that construction could
begin in the fall of 2025.
Responding to Commissioner Adair, Russell assented to including a reversion
clause in the requested lease.
Commissioner Adair asked if a tenant would pay rent if he or she receives
disability income. Russell said it's proposed that all tenants pay up to 30% of their
income for the housing.
Responding to Commissioner Chang, Cross said in the interest of minimizing
costs, all 60 units would likely be built at once instead of in phases.
Saying that the County has already leased this land to the City of Redmond and
noting that the property is within Redmond's jurisdiction, Commissioner DeBone
believed the City should head up any project such as this.
Russell said the City has expressed its willingness to support the County leasing
property directly to MVCD for this project. He characterized the relationship
between the City and MVCD as mission -oriented and productive, and expected
that to continue.
(See page 5 for Board action following the Executive Session.)
5. Deliberation #5: Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update -
Review of draft document
Nicole Mardell, Senior Planner, reviewed the process undertaken by the Board to
deliberate on changes to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and presented the draft
redlined document as revised according to the Board's deliberations.
Mardell referred to an email seeking the opportunity to present additional
comments to the Board on this matter and asked if the Board wishes to re -open
the record or have it remain closed. If the record remains closed, some
comments already received would not be able to be considered in the Board's
deliberations of this subject.
Discussion ensued regarding received comments and the logistics of allowing or
not allowing comments for a legislative process outside of the record.
Commissioner DeBone said the process to update the Comprehensive Plan has
been lengthy, with many opportunities to provide input. Neither he nor
Commissioner Adair supported re -opening the record at this point.
BOCC MEETING AUGUST 19, 2024 PAGE 3 OF 6
Commissioner Chang did not either see a compelling reason to re -open the
record since comments submitted in the last few days have been stated
previously. He encouraged the Board to carefully consider comments received
before the record was closed.
DEBONE: Move approval of Board Order 2024-031 denying the request to
re -open the record for the submittal of comments on the draft
2040 Comprehensive Plan update
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: CHANG: (abstained)
DEBONE: Yes
ADAIR: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 2 - 1 - 0
The Board proceeded to conduct its deliberations of the draft redlined document.
Commissioner Adair said the photo of a dairy cow should be replaced with a
picture of a Galloway cow. On page 90 of chapter 5, she said poaching should be
added to the list of factors affecting the decline in mule deer populations.
Referring to a previous statement from Commissioner Chang indicating he would
not vote for the update as determined by the Board, Commissioner DeBone
reminded that the Board is the governing body representing the public, the
update has been formulated using a public process, and all sides have been
represented in the process of developing the draft update.
Commissioner Chang responded that the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is
to serve as a vision for the future of the community, and he did not believe that
the input of many community members has been sufficiently considered. Adding
that he has suggested revisions to reflect input from the community with regard
to the protection of farmland, groundwater supplies, and the rural character of
the county, he estimated that about 90% of his suggestions were rejected by his
fellow Commissioners.
Commissioner DeBone said much property zoned as resource land has either
never been farmed or never been farmed for profit. While he understood the
value of vista views and open space, he noted that more than 75% of the land in
Deschutes County is publicly owned.
Commissioner Chang said with certain practices, much land not currently farmed
could be used for agriculture.
BOCC MEETING AUGUST 19, 2024 PAGE 4 OF 6
Commissioner DeBone believed that the latest iteration of the draft update
balances competing interests very well. He asked to see the document formatted
without the redlines.
Commissioner Chang presented his suggested changes to the document and
moved that these be incorporated into the final draft. The motion was not
seconded.
Mardell said staff will return on September 11t" with the draft document in final
form.
OTHER ITEMS:
County Administrator Nick Lelack reported that the latest ten -week session of
County College starts next week.
Kim Katchur, Public Information Officer, added that she provided the
Commissioners with a draft presentation for the Board to use to open the initial
session on August 27tn
• Commissioner Adair reported on last week's Behavioral Health Advisory Board and
Audit Committee meetings.
• Commissioner DeBone reported on a well -attended community clean-up at Jackpine
Loop Road in La Pine. The event, coordinated by the Newberry Regional Partnership
and involving Republic Services and the Public Land Stewards, resulted in
approximately 2.5 acres being cleaned up.
• Commissioner DeBone shared that the Public Land Stewards seek financial support
to remove and dispose of vehicles abandoned in the forest. Discussion ensued
regarding contracting for this work or otherwise extending financial assistance.
• Commissioner Adair attended a ceremony in Sisters acknowledging the loss of 19
veterans this year.
A break was taken at 3:12 pm. The meeting resumed at 3:15 pm.
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
At 3:15 pm, the Board entered executive session under ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property
Negotiations.
At 3:30 pm, the executive session concluded and the public was invited to return to the
room. The Board first directed staff to proceed as discussed during the executive session,
then took the following action:
BOCC MEETING AUGUST 19, 2024 PAGE 5 OF 6
CHANG: Move to direct staff to prepare a 65-year lease with Mountain View
Community Development for 9.27 County -owned acres in Redmond to be
used to develop permanent supportive housing
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: No
ADAIR: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 2 - 1
Commissioner DeBone explained his preference that the City of Redmond take the lead on
this effort.
ORRITIM
Being no further items to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 3:31 pm.
DATED this day of _ 2024 for the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners.
ATTEST:
RECORDING SECRETARY
L)�
PATTI ADAIR, CHAIR
E
ANTHONY DEBONE, VICE CHAIR
PHIL CHANG, OMMISSIONER
BOCC MEETING AUGUST 19, 2024 PAGE 6 OF 6
I ES C0
G2a
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING
1:00 PM, MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 2024
Allen Room - Deschutes Services Building - 1300 NW Wall Street - Bend
(541) 388-6570 1 www.deschutes.org
MEETING FORMAT: In accordance with Oregon state law, this meeting is open to the public and
can be accessed and attended in person or remotely, with the exception of any executive session.
Members of the public may view the meeting in real time via YouTube using this link:
http://bit.ly/3mminzy. To attend the meeting virtually via Zoom, see below.
Citizen Input: The public may comment on any topic that is not on the current agenda.
Alternatively, comments may be submitted on any topic at any time by emailing
citizeninput@deschutes.org or leaving a voice message at 541-385-1734.
When in -person comment from the public is allowed at the meeting, public comment will also be
allowed via computer, phone or other virtual means.
Zoom Meeting Information: This meeting may be accessed via Zoom using a phone or computer.
• To join the meeting via Zoom from a computer, use this link: http://bit.ly/3h3ogdD.
• To join by phone, call 253-215-8782 and enter webinar ID # 899 4635 9970 followed by the
passcode 013510.
• If joining by a browser, use the raise hand icon to indicate you would like to provide public
comment, if and when allowed. If using a phone, press *9 to indicate you would like to speak and
*6 to unmute yourself when you are called on.
• When it is your turn to provide testimony, you will be promoted from an attendee to a panelist.
You may experience a brief pause as your meeting status changes. Once you have joined as a
panelist, you will be able to turn on your camera, if you would like to.
MLl Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all
programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities.
ORIf you need accommodations to make participation possible, call (541) 388-6572 or
email brenda.fritsvold@deschutes.org.
Time estimates: The times listed on agenda items are estimates only. Generally, items will be heard in
sequential order and items, including public hearings, may be heard before or after their listed times.
CALL TO ORDER
CITIZEN INPUT: Citizen Input may be provided as comment on any topic that is not on the
agenda.
Note: In addition to the option of providing in -person comments at the meeting, citizen input comments
may be emailed to citizeninput@deschutes.org oryou may leave a brief voicemail at 541.385.1734..
ACTION ITEMS
1. 1:OOPMApplication for Oregon Health Authority M110 BHRN grant
2. 1:20PMTreasury Report for July 2024
3. 1:40PMFinance Report for July 2024
4. 2:OOPMDiscussion of Mountain View Community Development Safe Parking and Other
Options
5. 2:15PMDeliberation #5: Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update - Review
of Draft Document
OTHER ITEMS
These can be any items not included on the agenda that the Commissioners wish to discuss as part of
the meeting, pursuant to ORS 192.640.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At any time during the meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS
192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations, ORS 192.660(2)(h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor
negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(b), personnel issues, or other executive session categories.
Executive sessions are closed to the public, however, with few exceptions and under specific guidelines,
are open to the media.
6. Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property Negotiations
ADJOURN
August 19, 2024 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 2 of 2
0TES C0�� BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Application for Oregon Health Authority M110 BHRN grant
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to authorization the application for a Measure 110 BHRN grant from the Oregon
Health Authority.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
In August of 2022, the Board approved Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) #177290, which funded Behavioral Health Resource Network (BHRN)
activities through December 31, 2023. In January 2024, the Board approved an amendment
to the grant which increased maximum funding and extended the term through June 30,
2025. OHA has now issued a Request for Grant Applications (RFGA) for Measure 110 BHRN
funding the period July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2029. Deschutes County Health Services
(DCHS) is requesting approval to apply for $11,500,000 of BHRN funding.
In November 2020, Oregon voters passed Measure 110, the Drug Addiction Treatment and
Recovery Act of 2020 (Measure 110), to better serve people actively using substances,
engaging in substance misuse, or having a substance us disorder. Measure 110 was written
in response to the high rate of drug addiction and overdoses in Oregon, and the
disproportionate impact of those outcomes on Oregon's communities of color and tribal
communities. The goal was to establish a more equitable and effective approach to
substance use disorder. The Measure also established the Oversight and Accountability
Council (OAC) for the purpose of overseeing the implementation of the Behavioral Health
Resource Networks and approve funding to implement BHRNs and increase access to
community care.
A BHRN is either an entity or a collection of entities that individually orjointly provide the
following services: Screening Services, Comprehensive Behavioral Health Needs
Assessments, Ongoing Peer Counseling and Support, Harm Reduction Services,
Information and Education, Low Barrier Substance Use Treatment, and Transitional and
Supportive Housing for Individuals with Substance. All services provided through these
networks must be evidence -informed, trauma informed, culturally and linguistically specific
and responsive, person -centered, nonjudgmental, and free of charge to clients.
DCHS seeks approval to apply for $11,500,000 of BHRN funding to continue its recovery
services for adults, youth, and the adult intensive and unhoused populations. Funding will
support continuation of 13.3 existing full-time equivalent (FTE), barrier removals, harm
reduction supplies, and 15% for indirect costs. (We are seeking clarity from OHA on
whether indirect costs will be reimbursed at 10% or 15%.)
In addition, two new positions will be requested: a 1.0 FTE Peer Support Specialist and 1.0
FTE Behavioral health Specialist II. These positions will provide co-occurring, street
treatment to unsheltered individuals leveraging existing DCHS psychiatric provider time,
bringing meaningful care out of brick -and -mortar locations and into houseless
communities. The additional positions would allow for a mobile treatment team to provide
assessment, medication management, therapy, case management, peer supports, and
harm reduction interventions. One additional vehicle would be needed to support outreach
efforts in South County.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
If approved, $11,500,000 revenue for the period July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2029.
ATTENDANCE:
Holly Harris, Deputy Director, Health Services
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Treasury Report for July 2024
ATTENDANCE:
Bill Kuhn, County Treasurer
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 19, 2024
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Bill Kuhn, Treasurer
SUBJECT: Treasury Report for July 2024
Following is the unaudited monthly treasury report for fiscal year to date (YTD) as of July 31, 2024.
Treasury and Investments
• The portfolio balance at the end of July was $286.8 million, a decrease of $12.6 million from June and an increase
of $28.3 million from last year (July 2023).
• Net investment income for July was $824K, approximately $10.9K more than last month and $308K greater than
June 2023. YTD earnings of $824,260 are $307,829 more than the YTD earnings last year.
• All portfolio category balances are within policy limits.
• The LGIP interest rate increased to 5.30% during the month of July. Benchmark returns for 24-month treasuries
were down 61 basis points and 36-month treasuries are down 62 basis points from the prior month.
• The average portfolio yield increased to 3.52%, which was up 5 bps from last month's average %.
• The portfolio weighted average time to maturity is down slightly to .88 years.
Portfolio Breakdown: Par Value by Investment Type
Municipal Debt $
24,010,000
8.4%
Corporate Notes
29,321,000
10.2%
Time Certificates
498,000
0.2%
U.S. Treasuries
99,900,000
34.8%
Federal Agencies
92,900,000
32.4%
LGIP
9,946,935
3.5%
First Interstate (Book Balance)
30,244,622
10.5
Total Investments $
286,820,557
100.0
Total Portfolio: By Investment Type
First Interstate Municipal Debt
Bank 8.4%
10.5 % Corporate Notes
LGIP 10.2%
Illrr � �� �tyV�+'"i,
3.5%27iih�
Time Certificates
0.2 %
Federal Agencies
32.4% i��i U. S. Treasuries
34.8%
Portfolio by Broker
$80
$57.8
g $60
$50.3
:E $40
$32.8
$34.5 $36.5
$20
$16.1
$18.8
Stifel
DA
Piper
Robert W Moreton Great Castle Oak
Capital
Davidson
Sandler
Baird & Co Capital Pacific
Markets Securities
Investment Income
Jul-24
Y-T-D
Total Investment Income
$
836,260
$
836,260
Less Fee: $12,000 per month
(12,000)
12,000
Investment Income - Net
$
824,260
$
824 260
Prior Year Comparison
Jul-23
516,431
$
516,431
Category Maximums:
U.S. Treasuries
100%
LGIP ($59,847,000)
100%
Federal Agencies
100%
Banker's Acceptances
25%
Time Certificates
50%
Municipal Debt
25%
,Corporate Debt
25%
Yield Percentages
Current Month
Prior Month
FIB/ LGIP 5.30 %
5.20 %
Investments 3.23%
3.19%
Average 3.52%
3.47%
Benchmarks
24 Month Treasury 4.16%
4.77%
LGIP Rate 5.30 %
5.20 %
Maturity (Years)
36 Month Treasury 3.96%
4.58%
Max Weighted Average
2.96 0.88
I
_
Term Minimum
Actual
0 to 30 Days 10%
18.2%
Under Year 25%
59.1%
Under 5 Years 100%
100.0 %
Other Policy
Actual
Corp Issuer 5%
1.6%
Callable 25%
14.1%
Weighted Ave. AA2
AA 1
Investment Activity
Purchases in Month $
Sales/Redemptions in Month $
10,762,000
6.00%
5.50%
5.00%
4,50%
4.00 - 3.50%
3.00%
2.50%
2,00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
1 11
400,000,000
350,000,000
300,000,000
250,000,000
200,000,000
150,000,000
100,000,000
50,000,000
24 Month Historic Investment Returns
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July
®County Rate — 2 Year Treasury Rate --Corporate Bond Rate — LGIP Rate
Three Year Portfolio Balance
Aug-21 Oct-21 Dec-21 Feb-22 Apr-22 Jun-22 Aug42 Oct-22 Dec-22 Feb-23 Apr-23 Jun-23 Aug-23 Oct-23 De,23 Feb-24 Apr-24 Jun-24
Five Year Maturity Distribution Schedule
g
N N N N N N. N '.N N N",N N N.N N.
_ d O O O CD00000000
O O. O �..O. ,
ol
N N ''.N N N N N N
O OO OONN O O.00 MWm oO W I� cNOO :fM� MN mMm TO, 9
,O a-IM M MO LLWNM aMW smm OOO m OOO .0
0O .7V-OOO WL� MN 'O0O OO MWm 0
0O OO OOO '.O
f` rO:O W O mW m O MO (Cr" W WSW - N WN W f` O'm mO0O W LM.O C M OmCOOOO Wm MMMV Cfm�.M0W NWMW mWWm N
"t 't NO MC)M O00oWO OO'O�mN (VMV'00 MmNW (m7V(0
D r_�',,. CO
Wmd)'WMO.Om Omm MmM:CNMMV
7VC7 m O
mOfN N m m O O OO m m WmmOm O:W m m C (D co W:Wmm O m O0O0m01d0 m O'm O O'O m O)mmNm '31a 0 m mm'm
>
M M- N- - N'. � �'.,, N- N- .- N N N �- N- .- M � C N N �
(o O (o M : r O M Co n N M M M M W M m m m V: co (D (N W V V' 0) V N M N I` W N O M M M O I, M W W m W m M W W W �' 7
M N,W M 0':N N m L- N V' M M W M.M M W �.t- M m o:V O m LO V I M:N '.m (o N M M 0) m W O N m W W'.N o W W:m',v
W W N I� m'. N m M O M � M .- �- W V (o': m" 0 �'. r M N L. M V m W t` O r- n' M �- I� V N O 7.. M M M (:1 M 7 (D N W m L : W m I� a-'': M M
d W W Y W o m m W (0 W to M N N O O m V N N W W m N ((> 't (C1 O O d' O r M c0 f� m 0 W W W N f� W N m 1� M O W W m
d' V.MN W mm Is m 000N O MO W 0� Itr W M mI� 7 f�Mam O W W M M M mm M O. W W (DM N(D W W W W
R; N N:m O W:W m m m..m W C O,O O m O..W m m O O W_ W.W O m 0)a d' m m C C C m M W m.m m m m.W W m O.m N C m.m m 0 C.m,m
^� N NN •- N',N N� N:N s- N i-,,.� N - - N - -
0 0 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0 0.0 C 0 0 C C C 0 0 0 C c C C C
0 0 '. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 '. 0 0 0 0 '. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 ': 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 '. o 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 '. o 0 o a. o o
ofai..o 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lo 0 0 0 0 o M C)0 0,0 0 0 0:0 0 0 010 0
L C 0C!q O O M o o o o o v o o o o o o o o o:o o o o o o o o O O O':o o 0 0',O o o o,o O o a.O'.o
p, i N,N O O OO O O O'.O I- O O10 O O O:W O O O.O O � O"�.O O O O'.O M O OO 0 0 O:V O OO O O OO O O O'IO M O O'.O O O, OO'.O
N N M:M N N N:N N N.,N N N.� N N N..,.N N N N'.N N N N N N N:N N N N,..- M N:N N N NN - N N.N N N,N N.,,N
M V W! M U) W m N m N m M M W M m N m M M. M N co W M
M M.. W M M M N W V. N O O m m N W O M V O i� 0 7 N'.. V' O W C' W 0' m W m v m'm M N'.O N O M M V W M':M w n V''.. m M N d' M
(p N N �:.6 r m M M O.m f W W W M N 0 O N W W t` �.. m M ,O W W R m N:o m 0 m,,o M M W..M 0 C W.N N m I!. O
M W O m N W N W O m v W m 0 O d' W M M O N N M':m '.0 0 0 m. m M I�',M O V �'..M N M.00'.m
M W O m V: N 0 7 O O W W W M M m M O W a- V O W N :. O O O M W O O M O m'. N m M: 0 W O t`
M v W m (D V' W CDW t` M O O f� M m'O (D O M t� N O M W -M 0 7 M:W m
F p V M N I� M W f�:.W (O M 7:O N �j m m W M, M W (D '.N M N M M M (o M M V L6 C! V O N: N M (o M : M
(�'t V o:O O O O'., O 7 Cl! M "t d' V T .4 V'
M M M co M t� V N M N M M M M M V M M M C M.M i� M M m M CO W M M M M r W M M M M M M M
L M M M M.M M N'.M f� N f� �.� f� C 'IR r i�'.M M M M M'..M N m m N I�.N r: r r.
O d O O N O.O O o.V'.V �- M W W W N M I M V' W O .- W o V 0 0 0 0 M M M M':..o o o',O O O O'.O O W m m (o M O W.
3 R ''. : 7
O
IL . q+ q+ Q. . . . . Q+ Q. . q+ Q+ . . Q. . Q+ Q+ Q+ Q+ q+ . Q+ q+ tQ . . . Q+ Qt . . q+ tQ Q+ . . Qi
m m m m m m m. m m @. m m m m' m m R m m m m, m m m R R m
m m., m m m m, m R m m', m R m m'. m m m m. m m m. m m m m:. m m R m@ m R'. m m m R. R'. m
aisQQa,QaasQaaQ:QaQaaQaQ'QaQQaaa¢aQaQaaaaaQQ'aQQ ',aQaa,Qa000Q
7 W W (D 1.0 M V W t` f` t` f` m V N m W W m R W m M M W m W m N M M M M O M V' (o to m( N..M W (D W W (o
0 N W L� r r V Lo m (o (o m.M m W m'.W M W M M I` M',W W O CO'7 co M.W W W.m W m W',W (o W �.M m M f�':O m N :V' M
N V M N V"'.M i� M M:.m m M �',V V V M':� M M'..M M M m:.V N 0 N N: M.� N.M M':�
W r` n M �'.f M� M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M r a' 7 M M M M M M.M 7
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N,N N N N:N N N N N N N N.N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N.N N N N:N N
- dNN'.N
N W N N M M (D L� O O (") �- �W i� 7 W N M (A M M (O N N M W (O N W M W M \ N• t (O � M O In LOIn N M
m w �- N N m �- M N N N\ N N N NNN N N N N N zz 7-
7 M W O N W O N W 7.,,., C' O In N'. (`� W M M N M W : O O M f� �W W M. V '.O �- V 7 iLl N M (O i� N
d M V 0 0 0 0 N ":N N M. M M M M N N N M M M M M V V O O O o 0 N N N N' O O 0:. O O o O':O O N C M 'ITN N N N N N N N
omR N OO 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N.N N N N N N N N N N N N.N N N N.N N N N:N N N N: N N N' N N N N N N N N N N N N.N
:
t NN N N N':N N N N:N N N N'.N N N N'.N N N N:N N N N:N N N NN N N N'N N N N;N N N'.N N N N.N N N N'.N N N N'.N N N
N m N N (O O (O:O (n 0 f�.N M N m( W O �'r N M -M M'T M:0 O W LO O W O W:W r W M:V N O a,N iz W Ci,M M V
M N.N N Q \.N N 27 z.N M\\ N N 27 N z M.M M\ \'..izz Q` (\ M N 'N N 7 N Iz O':O N
1 NN'..O'.00c- �.I�M.W W W W NN -O.-
Y ~ ~ J J ~ J > ~ 'J J J J J J J LU H f- J.J h JJ J J> H N f- N- - F--
� U U LL, m W � m W F- U U m:Q m W m m m.W L- N:H F- I- O� �- W W p� W co: F m m m m <;w W W W W W'
mQQ� �[n (n �tnQQ 0 LL UU'.m to (n (n��(n-(n�(� (n (n tnOOf 0,�Q��
aao(n�oa(na,�oaan-J) �'a�o�, cnL,) (naaaas ,QooQaoa,n�Q�,�a��:aaoC0(1)0 000
c9t9�a�aU'��U��(9aao0of��xaax,u)a00000CU22iC)C)2 .):aofUofOfU0� Cif Uo2aa:E:F222
Z
ma s o_ a s d.
n O O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y w : UO�U U U U UUU U UU UC C C
. y N. y'. N.. N C L
M m (0-
,. 5 N> T 1=m m m m m m m;m m m m m m m m m md m0.'m0 mdo@.0@ a Q.:Q Q Qm Qm,:Qm Qm Qm Q
m) Q @ C C C C C C C C C L CC C C C m.m mm
U m m mm m m m:g 2 :2 2i �2 2�m
m
QCJJJJJJJJJJZ ��y JJ J OLm mJO
.UU U cccc�>
Z Z).2 S2 E E E'E EE E 0 m 0@ 0@E'E E E E'E EEEEEE E E E E E E E E E EIS E Em OE .2. c0 c0'c0 c0c0 00 0 00:mEoEmCm
Z.
m m m m. m R m m., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o m m m m (0 !6 6 i6 6 16 N. 0 0
Q Z'�,Q Q LL: LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL',S M:S 7..M 2 S S.S 2 M 2'.S S S 7:7 M M ='.Z Z Z:Z Z Z Z:Z Z Z Z:S M: M, R m co m m': m
H Q,. t6'... (6 76 W(6'.. t6 m WR'', t6 E c6 ca'. f6 c6 l6 (6: t6 t6 <6 c6'.. (6 76 t6: 76 m t6 <6 (6 t6 (0 <6 t6 <6
m
N---- N: -- N N N N- N N: --- N
, a a a a a a -0 -0 -o -o -a -0'. -0 -o -o -a.'. -o a -0 -o aa'.-0': (� �', (� ai ai., m' vi
O m;m 0 @ @ 0 0 N.m o @ @.o d 0 m'.o @ @ d'.m o m @'.@ m O o'.m a� @ @'.@ m @ m 0 @ 0 0'.0 @ 0.@ 0 @ @'.m m
H I LL LL LL LL LL LL':LL LL LL LL',LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL'.LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL: LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 7)717 7 D'..7).7
r d LWL m> O a 2 Z a �.cWD (7 ON �.K M> M (ND W 0) Y M M J Q U Z LL.M LL IY N a x 7 r` r ro v(� �. `ryryt � z CJ 7 °�:� 2 �'� N O 7�} Z
L „H, 0Ja.Q=>MMU Ja.(na(�a sU JZMa' m Q> (n Mm Y V' W W W ZJXZ XZN W Mcn.W Z W NN0 W W W 0
m L M O> J J z z z z a a a S a.; Y U) XX J> J J> x� r Q Q v c v v a a v Q o o Q v v Qj= W U U U U U
E N M W S� W W W W W W W W W,W W W W,,Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C7 (7 C7 U` 0 00 U` W W U` U' ( U`'. CD (7 U' 0 0 U` "W W N N N N N N N.N
U M �....0 N M..M M M M.M M M M',M M M M'O O O O:O O O O''.O O C..7 V' V a:� V f� I",W W W W'M W (o M M M M.M M W W:W W m W.00 co
d N �, O'..M V M'.M M M M'..M M M 2I1M M M MIM M M M'.M M M M'�,M M M M",M M MM'.M M M M M M M'.M M M MIM M N N'.N N N N'. N'.N
W mMMMM M MMMMMM MM MMMMMM'.M MM M',,MM M M',...M M MM',.M chMM'.MMMMMM M'...MMMM'.MMmm'. minim m',ml.,m
(D L @
f-
R •-
U A N N soUIQ Q QQQ Q Q Q Q Q Q'.Q Q Q Q a QQQ Q Q Q Q.Q Q Q Q'a Q Q Q Q Q a Q'Q Q Q Q�,Q Q Q'Q Q Q Q.,,LL LL 21 a' a' a' a''.. a', a.
M;; N ZLL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL'.LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LLLL LL LL LL'.Q Q F 'r-'.F- I- F- E-',F-
ad.. O O N ,l-__ LL..._�_ _ -LL
W N 1� f` V N N m M m V M N M f� O N M R M M N W m M
T % 7 M W N W W W N N N M f�', r W W 0.., M M : m m m N O M V' m m M N W O N N N M M M 7
W m.m m m m',m m m o',m m m m m m m o,o o r` �:.r` r` W..m m m M-
r`
o a° a o 0 oi� o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0'0 0 0 ',0 0 0 0,0 0 0- o 0 0 0 o ao 0 0 0'0 0
N N N N N
U
OW N M W:O O M:N r cD Wd' m to M tD W m�N N O OM O W my C' c- O.m W r d'�V tD .--':V N VM CO W .- M O Vm 7 V' (O aO V O .-:O M - ot0
m N M (O'm M N'.V O m.N O M W (O M M W r tO O N':W M tD M.O M W ':M N N �'�tl V' W. W N.(O m'T m.tn W tO m r O u :Io M M 0.(D
d' W 00 W N (O N a M 7 N �. r 7 N to N(CM m M N r M N (O M m m N �'O r fO M M r r �.W M tD M r tD IQ:N O N O O O m N 0.M ci
Y d 0 v r (O W m M W W O W m r v m M V' lO V N W m M to r N C' m V CD N m V M r 7 [F O W 7 W m v v OT tO r 7 W 0 W: W tO 0 M M':
o r r W rlm O O:. W m W W W r W"r W r m:m m N:N (O r': N N N OIa M O
m M m m m m m o m m m m p:m m m m � v m (C m m m 10 m 0 O.m m m m m m m �'.V O m m:W N O O O m W O O O p.r O O O.O m 0 ml0 O N V.O
M N M.M N N..,. �- - N N,N N N N N M N N N N -:1 N N N
N O N'.M M W W'.M M r W:O r N N M M tO':(D N W O'.r M M m W 7 W:. T m N W.m O (D r W W W W r W m N: N M O (D''..O O co OD 0 tO
O m m m W O N:tO M W m 0 N M r [t :N r r N M N CO O m M lD N N V' W'.m M r rtD tD (O CO m (O O'.m W W M:r tO O O M M r r':O M N W W WI.
m r lO lO: Ln CO V W O V W 7 N m'. m r m N M (O: W m V O': N O M 7'. (O (O M V':0 W O'..- N W M O:O to to r- (D m O F-N L41 W W m m W F'
Y 3 0 M N M N 7 7 (D O O d' t 0 m v M Ln : 7 r 0 V' N O m W M M W ttJ a O N O C M m r W W N N O N r N N N': N m m Ln
W W W (D W O W W r 0 r W 0 W V' co 7 7 M m W W m O r m W W W (O W r W W O m m r 0 r v V' r r r m W r m,v N m m m m Lf W m
@ m m m m m O m m m O O m m O m d m (O m m m (o m C O m m m m C m m -,� O m o W W m m m m (O C m c m:W m m m m 0 m m W m N M W O
>� M.-,, `-N N':.�.-NM .-N M':.M� .CNN- -N'.- -N
0 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 a 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0..0 0 0 0":0 0 0 0':0 0 0 0:0 00 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 0.0:0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 c O,O 0 0 010 0 0 0':0 0 0 O10 0 0 O10 0 0 010 0 0 0l0 c 0 O:.O O p c'O. p.o o 0 0 O.O 0 0 a 0 o O'.o 0 0 O'. a
o 0 0 0:0 0 06 0 0 0'':0 0 0 0:.o p o o:o 0 0 0:0 0 0 o':p o 0 0l0 0 0 0':0 0 0 o:p o p a o.M a 0 o a o p CT CT! tri o 6 6 0 0 01.o'I tri
l6 O O O O:.O o 0:6 O O o,p 0 0 O.O 0 0 O'.O O O O:o O O Olo O O o:o O O O':O O O O:0 O O 0.0 tO. 0 0 00 O 0 0.0 M O W:O O N o101(D
M@ O O o 0.0 O O O C C 0 C C 0 O.N t0 0 r:CIO O O:r O O O.O O O O,O p C N:tO - O O.m m 0 0 0 m (C O Cl 0 O:r 0 0 0 0 m o O:0 O N 7tq .:
> N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N M �- M M':M N N N: N N N N N N N N N N- N N �-- �- N N N N �'(V N N M,NNN N - N (V �! NN
to r m O: m
Om tD N NN N M O:O N M r':M fit' O O,m O r V:N 7 vm O O d''d' m O r O.tO N (@'':m O M N'V O M': M M O10'':O
O a2wM m MNM r mop tD a m W W rM V:(DrM Om r r m W W tO.m to r'r (D r Ln N r M:W Ott)O O OtOO O O
m m to m W W W N W M m (D V �:� Ln O to V W a' M tO LD CO W W M.M r r W'7 O W O m M M tf): a' O 7. o N 0 V' tO W a:r W V O.M N (O m 0
N N N W �..W d: W W:W r r m W m W W N (D (D: cf (O V V.N N 7 m M W �- O �- r tO O r (O [C W W:W W W rl, tD (O:U W (D O'.N W r W NIN
Ln V �h I.7 V' 7 V': V V V ":'C V' V M tCi tCi V V V N c, �- O O'.O O p 0,':O 0 0 0 0 u'i: 0 0 0 O
W M M M tO V N to L N V N W M U U N t L- V (O L W W N N r- W V N L N N 7 :O N L N M W V:� 4� N N tO N m' M tD W V tO tO
C ,,r r N r N N N Cj r N N r r r N N N':N r N N r N.N r: O r O: N N tD N
Ode -.W W WMWW W �W.-N W4WIC! (DWW WM ONN, WtO.t().-.- NmO:W (D .- O,.V,.
3 R N MI: M V 7',M 7 N N- M: cr V' c- M 0:� V 00 ':. M �.:.� M M N 04 0 O N':
Oad
IL
LL a + ++ +
a +
QQQQ� aa QQ + QQ QQ QQ QQ Qa QQ QQ
Q Q,Q Q a Q.a_ Q Q QI,Q
0
O
N N
@. @ @ @@: @ @ :
a¢aa:¢a¢:aaaaaa¢a:¢¢a¢,a¢aaa¢¢aa¢a¢':¢a¢a'aa:¢a¢¢¢a:aaa:aa¢¢¢¢a¢':aa a'¢¢a ''la:a
- - -- O M lO t@ W.M':V
F ,✓ m N V 7' M:(D W C' O IO (O m m y N �..:W M O M':W W O M'..W.W
tO.W r, W(D ln,tO �.M 7 N N':N N tD':,M tO W W': (O (D '7 Ln :� tO � �.W W: � r': N. :N.N.�-. : � N
........ ._:.- .__. __
U W tD W tD W to (D W W W (o (D W L N d' 0 W to W (O (O W (D (o W V' W-t 7 tO V r cD 4 '7 W W tD V tt) N Lo (O V V' V tD V tO V V (O W 7 7 tO c0 tO
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N.N N N N N N N N:N N N N:N N N N N N N N:N N N N N N N.N N N N.N N N N':N N N N N N
0 0 0 O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O:O O O OO O O O:O 0 0 OO O O O O O O:O O O O.O O O O O O O O. OO
- d N N N N:N N NIN N N.NN N NN.N N N NIN N N NIN N N N':N N N
to O (n (O': n n tCJ : n to MM 1 to to (O In Ln n M W tn'. M W (O. U M n': M to to N M U In tO tO tD to to N to M Ln �_ N
7 � z z � �- � 7 7 � � � � M `- �- M � N � � N N �
N M r FE W I� �':N tD MI: tD N M:.N I- W M V': to W N �r N O AIM C O N':�
C.V 7 O O-a-
1
N N N:N N N N N NIN N N N N N N N N'.N N N N N N N N N N N (N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N,N N N N :N N N N: N N N N '.N N
R d o O O o :O 0 0 0 0 0 OO O O OO O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O: O O O O:.O O o o O O O:O O O O,o O O O O O O O:O O o O:OO
L NNN NN N N:N N N N:N N NNN N N N:N N N N':N N N NIN N N NN N N N'N N NN.N N N N NIN N N NIN N N
3 W co W O O N (O M r r \:N N N N N N N N.N N N N.N N N N:,.,m m m M'.W M r r r h h M W 7 W\ N c- (M.\ r a :M
.-.-.- .-�- N.N NNN.NN NN�-N N� N:NO ��: N:N
1 m �- N N N.NN.N
Y�- F F- : J W W J W W >>>>> W W W Z W W W W W W W
�W W W W FF U W.UHH000a¢aQaD]U W W W �FFUUU W a W W NFU UUUFJ-UFHIJ-U'. IJ-0 0 0 U m U U m U
cO tY try LLUU ¢w-Q U(naaa����� QLLLL LL(/)(f)(/) LLO0ti Cl) U'.a Q Q a(q Q(q (q (n Q'a� as a'. Q a¢ a
00ocn n ¢¢ nn Po- a¢ a aa¢¢,¢¢¢�'a� ¢¢aLLaa ¢o ¢aLL naa:�¢LL:a¢¢aaMaaLL a�!� n n n:n�
alal(n (.> U a (� U'.. (0 U U (D (D U o �:� o �'.. (9 (q (q (n'.0 U U C9''.0 O U 01� U U UI(7 0- U (D (D U C9!U U U C9 U C9 (9 (D CD: C9,c9IK a LL d':a': 0.
�w z
0�uS j(~j
W
W S W
Z Z S N
m
d : 0 0-- F-U LLI
LL
N : } UU WILLI 3<D Cl) QC) p Of
Z_ O
Z z z Z 2 Z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z'2 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z a a EL- L U U Flo ¢ LL,� 07
z N x
S o o.0 U T T:W O_ Z.W m U': o:Q
(/ N N N N N N': N N to N N 'M N N N@ N N.. . N. f/ . N N y N t/1 y N y y N N N N N to Z) Z) F- m M> O Z o N
m m d M'': E d 2: 2 m m m: 2 N d: d m d ml. 2 d m m d m d 2 2 m m m' 2 d m m 2 m d m': m� c c� F-- c c. m (co 0 0 K o d Z�� 2 Z) U) W F Y.O
F-I-FF-h I-F-F-I-HF.t-h�-F-H�-FF': f-F-HI-.F- F-F-I-IH I-F-F- F- d d.U` p o o.. `o `o Q.:¢� W W:w W O~UOp�IEtz-
(7 0? (n w U (n (n (/) (n Ui (/J': (n (/J (/J (n (n (n (n (n (6 U5 6 (6 C6 (n (n U5 6 6 6 (n 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Un 6 a Cl. W w d N d d}} J O O. J 0 Q U Cl) Q Ci ¢ N J
. . o. a':2i � r = O'O a u! W �: ml�
D � � DID ::):Z) D � � M � � zi D'.D D D 7:D 7 ?:� 7 � �''':� � � � = �'� ¢ ¢IU U U U. F- F-':Q J a.
0_ N p} } W J D] W m m N W r N'', m O N c�
U U } Y 0 2.p� S Q W z v C M> LL J.M W z m w z F- LL O J LL Z U` LL ?� � U U U U> S U Q� In to Y:J a M 0] X X N 0 W W W 2 0 U` M S pIS C7 U` 0 w w W W:.X N O (D S LL» oe ('J LL (D (D 0 0 0 0 0 Y U' 0 o Q Q ME ' Y O U 0 m m,a O J J10 r U' W:w.6.
U:U W U U W U U U'W U U U U U U U r r M M U 0 ct :S = N.N N C7 UI:J W a >'I Ln N M
NNN N,N N N N:N N N'.N N N N:N N N N:N N N N'':N N N N:.N N N N N N N N N N N Nlm m M M:N W W (D'':W tO W':W 7 :m W V:WIN t!) W (OIWIp
U W N N N N W W W W W W".W N W W:W W N W.W W W W'IW N W W:W W N W W W W W:W W W OJ:r r W 00 r rIN N W:.tn � M M:tO M M. t:M .- V. MIINlt
N N N N.N N N NN N N:N N N N:.N N N N:N N N NI,N N N N':N N N N:N N N N:N N N N':N N r r,tD tD (O W:.W W N':N N N'.7 V O O:O W:W
M M...N N W W:.W (O N:(N M O O:W M M:.W tO r. m!co
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmml,mmmm':,mmmmmmmm,,..mmmm...mm0O:�N ,Zr W':W mMM,.,mO I,t()IW
> U U U U U U U U'.0 U U U U U U:0 U U U U U U U U U U U.0 U U U U U U U.0 U U U 0 0- Z Z Z Z Z Z Z'.Z Z
�K ����'I LL'0.'2W2'd'LL''I LL'd'LL'w'2'0.'�LL'w'w'� of a' W Q Fa. flifU FYaofCrjr.F-F-U U U U U U UU U, U UUU: U 700I 0000. 00
-1- F- F-'I F- F- E- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F-. F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F-':. F-. F- F- F- E- F- F- F-'I. a a 2 2 7 :2 :2 � 2 2': 2 :E 2 2 2 2 : 2'I 2 Z> 212E :5 2
M tO tD W m M 11'l W m O M V r W m 0 N M'.W O NW m 0 N'M d' r 7 W 0 N W m W W N O W ,Zr r (D r.M 7 W:O W W O_...•W �-10 O:IO
> 7 t 0 Z W W W.(D r r r r r r:W W W W:W m m MIM m m m''.m m 0 O'.O 0 0 � N N N: � O (O...N M N: N m:.N O 10 W O M.r r W 7Ir N
cmmmm:mmmmmmmmmmm.mmmmmmmmlmmmml,mm0O.0000.0000100WW:WWWW'.WWN,WrWWW":WrWM:, rrWIWIW
o':o p o':o
00
co Odc' O O0
ON'�.f". Ln ':NOI.O.Mc .R
Y N 1� M li to to ( r o N V O'.. �!] O M O''. w O <t
0 to
3 to V w o to N to o� to N'...0 O to � 7 0 V N
16N N-It LO 1`N NNN r-Oto NMM OONo
O)O V
N co O o''. o f` N o 1. W M t() o o w to O N o
,' O M: o':O @'.O W, 1`I,(n 7 O 1`.. M',M O. N'..N
(D O: o to N O N O B O O to'. al 0 (c
d 0)O�N to to d' OO'.r oM- OO .Od"..M
30 MNO'. to .--70(D7 oOO �WM'I.aOO V c0
A A N N q Ln':.r N N N �- r. M 'IT N M M o o N a-
2>� mo). -N
O 0 O'.010 0 0 0!0 0 0.0 O O O.lo O N 1-
O O O OIO O O OIO O O.O O o o. M:O N N
O O O O,O 0 0 O'.O O OO O O O.O O(O to
NL6 OO L6.5O O OI.00LL 000 o'.(OO V.O
(6 to to O O': to co O'.(n to m O o m to * o V N
G. m N N to to 1` N N. N'.N t` N:to N co MIO O c\!
o V'., 7 (O to V (o N m( m 't M M M
tp CO N I� I, O CO CO N d1 . ct N O 7 O', to Ln . to'.
(p M m N r
M O N a0 (O O O d)O O R N
1` O M "t m O (p O O O 47 O O O V
W W to M O (O o O N N:1` O to V
(O M r 7.d1 7 MCO W 7 (OV o o.
O V O O o O O'. V O O o
co W O d) M r o M .� 6 O N M O
p 6 a- O0 Oo �d) :I,.N N r'. Ln S. O). Ln Ln.Ln
o
.R N
a
°o
aaaa,aa,aaaaa,aaaa.
M W M O O M (O O M (p to O to W �- a- .- _
p M O) W M 00 M W. (O (O
H inM (p N: (O W (0 M M M M
N oNN7N N7 (oN to V to to
N N N N.N N NN N N
a 0 0 0 O',O O OO O O.00 O O O'.
d N N N N'N N N:N N N NN N N N'.
.-Om. :z to z z -��n
i6 M Mtn �.,� M 7 w a)� o m
o o o,,
NO O o 'o (O M
W N N N NIN N N'.N N N N',N N N NO O N
A m 0 0 0 O',O o O Cl o o O.O O O O'O O: O
t NNN NIN N NI..N N N N',N N N N'N: N'N
iz
Y w
m U'.m m U m w m U a
U [,01x m U �.Ia 2 K.(9'0 a a'..a'.
0
m (9 O
00 'n N '�q} U U
7Z m LN �v) 5
�0 uj ( iF UZ Z a
Z W w a ol u- U' U w= o
}Oa 0X M dcnaw it:2 0
76 Q.N U Q V'.� v7 0..-
O a w Z W 7 t-LL I— LL m c E m m
2 1�- a J'I,.J � ,'.J � 0 Z.0 0 � of > m m.
Z QCD Q, Cp O O m O.2 2
J 2
W m rTU O,gl— af Z,Z Z a m. m
7 m a' � K O',0 o 0 a s O (� , o
�000000aa2�''.mu)l-?Jwu.l'.,
M O N NON (D (O O to O co
a w O> U w m 7 n ro v n
> ILL: h H.,7 a m.,, co
rO) m W Mrd)N V �.to (p toN _
N Ln o o.M to O N (O m N m N (o N U >- >-
COto(o(o(O(O(D,t` t`nr�I 00 co m'y) u).w
f
> Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z a N N
t7777.777.7777'.77771���.
toOtn'�M ol.� to O�� wi�of w
> V 1 M o': (0 f• N 7 to 1, M
of W m o of of 001 t` N W a.,",. W t` t`
OO',O O O.O'.O O O
• , k ' �: OF
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Finance Report for July 2024
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The Finance Department will present the financial reports for July 2024. The report is
informational only and is intended to provide the Board of County Commissioners with
current financial information. The report will provide budget to actual comparisons and
highlight any potential issues or changes that may impact the current or future budgets.
There are no direct policy implications.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Robert Tintle, Chief Financial Officer
DATE: August 19, 2024
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Robert Tintle, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: Finance Report for July 2024
Following is the unaudited monthly finance report for fiscal year to date (YTD) as of July 31, 2024.
Budget to Actuals Report
• Revenue YTD in the General Fund is $2.OM or 4.2% of budget. By comparison, last year revenue YTD was
$683.5K and 1.5% of budget.
• Expenses YTD are $3.41VI and 6.8% of budget. By comparison, last year expenses YTD were $3.61VI and 7.9% of
budget.
• Beginning Fund Balance is $14.5M or 99.5% of the budgeted $14.6M beginning fund balance.
K County Wide Financial Dashboard 001 - General Fund 8.3%
Year Corn. ciete
scicct a- Budget to Actuals
nK
■ e rc Requirements Resources Beqinning `Norkinq Capital Budget to Actuals by Category
J s e a- ...
^u$o - ECon �:n-iic 0...
°`C�: $3.4M $2.OM $14.5M
o 6 8% 4.2% 99.5% ;
r n NyGL?e:;_ - Monthly Expenditures 7.3% Projected Endinq bVo kinq Capital � Approved ETE
%of last 4ear budoet
B i 121.86
- ;'tear uis •�
Monthly Revenues
$13.3M e: of Iast year budoet I
(Blank)( �.
All Major Funds
On the attached pages you will find the Budget to Actuals Report for the County's major funds with actual revenue
and expense data compared to budget through July 31, 2024.
Position Control Summary
Position Control Summary FY25
July -June
Percent
Org
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May June
Unfilled
Assessor
Filled
28.63
Unfilled
664
18.82%
Clerk
Filled
10.48
Unfilled
0.00%
BOPTA
Filled
0.52
Unfilled
0.00%
DA
Filled
57.70
Unfilled
3.40 -
-5.56%
Tax
filled
6.50 -
Unfilled
0.00%
Veterans'
Filled
4.00
Unfilled
1.00
20.00%
Property Mgmt
Filled
3.00
Unfilled
-
0.00%
Total General Fund
Filled
110.83
Unfilled
11.04 '. - - - - -
9.06%
Justice Court
Filled
4.60
Unfilled
-
0.00%
Community Justice
Filled
43.00
Unfilled
6.00
12.24%
Sheriff
Filled
225.75
Unfilled
45.25
16.70%
Houseless Effort
Filled
-
Unfilled
1.00
100.00%
Health Srvcs
Filled
384.93
Unfilled
35.38
CDD
Filled
46.00
Unfilled
5.00
9.80%'..
Road
Filled
59.00
Unfilled
2.00
3.28%
Adult P&P
Filled
31.63
Unfilled
8.13
20.44%'..
Solid Waste
Filled
39.00
:Unfilled._
5.00
11.36%
Victims Assistance
Filled
7.50
Unfilled
2.00
21.05%'.
GIS Dedicated
Filled
2.00
'..
.Unfilled
-
0.00%'.
Fair & Expo
Filled
13.50
Unfilled
4.00
22.86%
Natural Resource
Filled
2.00
Unfilled
1.00
33.33%'.
ISF - Facilities
Filled
24.75
Unfilled
3.00
10.81%
ISF -Admin
Filled
9.75
Unfilled
0.00%
ISF - BOCC
Filled
3.00
Unfilled
-
0.00%
ISF - Finance
Filled
12.00
Unfilled
2.00
14.29%
ISF - Legal
Filled
7.00
Unfilled
0.00
ISF - HR
Filled
9.80
Unfilled
1.20
10.91%
ISF - IT
Filled
18.00
Unfilled
2.00
10.00%
ISF - Risk
Filled
3.25
Unfilled
0.00%
911
Filled
56.15
Unfilled
4.85
7.95%
Total.,
Filled
1,113.43
Unfilled
138.84
Total
1,252.26
%Unfilled
11.09%
11.09%
`�uT E 5 �-G
Budget to Actuals -Total Personnel and Overtime Report
o < FY25 YTD July 31, 2024
Total Personnel Costs
Budgeted
Actual
Projected
Projection
Personnel
Personnel
Personnel
(Over) / Under
Fund
Costs
Costs
Costs
Budget
uu 1 - L3eneral Tuna
030 - juvenile
160/170 - TRT
200-ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 - Sheriffs Office
274 - Health Services
295-CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 - Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
675 - Health Benefits
705 - 911
999 - All Other Funds
Total
Overtime
Budgeted OT
Actual
OT
(Over)/
Under Budget
$-19,bz%u&) 1,
1,449,bb1 $
l9,bL9,u6b $
- $ b9,1UU $
9,S.i6 $
59,S62
7,517,894
524,578
7,517,894
100,000
12,691
87,309
234,588
19,805
234,588
-
-
-
836,621
66,534
836,621
622,013
51,919
622,013
-
-
-
49,758,736
3,847,131
49,758,736
2,849,000
210,710
2,638,290
58,034,555
4,545,231
58,404,555 ®
(370,000) 107,726
19,268
88,458
7,963,984
599,750
7,915,746
48,238 13,000
3,946
9,054
9,556,843
736,176
9,556,843
- 200,000
13,047
186,953
6,387,456
441,763
6,387,456
10,000
302
9,698
5,739,145
392,597
5,739,145
150,000
10,098
139,902
2,039,023
134,498
2,039,023
40,000
5,309
34,691
229,798
19,649
229,798
-
705 ®
(705:
159,210
14,231
159,210
5,000
590
4,410
496,919
41,054
496,919
10,237,093
766,006
10,237,093
485,000
26,453
458,547
18,606,752
1,372,896
18,606,752
50,600
2,830
47,770
$ 198,049,715 $
15,023,498 $
198,371,477 $
(321,762) $ 4,079,426 $
315,489 $
3,763,937
V(ES C-
°g, Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary 8.3%
All Departments Year Complete
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
001 -General Fund
030 - Juvenile
1601170 - TRT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 -Sheriff's Office
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 -Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
675 - Health Benefits
705 - 911
999 - Other
TOTAL RESOURCES
Fiscal Year 2024 Fiscal Year 2025
Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection %
44,408,216 44,897,990 101% € 46,587,060 1,924,164 4% € 46,594,760 100% €
1,014,168 862,606 85% 926,504 36,617 4% i 926,504 100%
12,751,790
€ 14,458,597
525,540
58,558,288
60,343,687
10,460,840
26,673,711
5,535,606
2,179,426
15,995,411
2,343,500
2,324,117
64,800
530,800
34,300
3,714,303
30,654,045
14,034,323
81,793,214
12,485,782
98%
9,814,729
68%
529,969
101% €
60,501,990
103%
64,998,263
108% €
8,523,648 81%
27,129,596 102%
5,907,709 107%
3,127,563 144%
17,732,741 111%
2,805,249 120%
2,457,294 106%
225,047 347%
534,892
101%
45,518
133%
3,811,697
103%
30,890,105
101
13,912,327
99%
67,211,778
82%
12,168,000
8,644,978
506,200
62,902,748
67,970,442
9,401,238
27,479,906
6,323,657
1,357,339
19,769,001
2,721,000
2,350,667
88,000
1,551,793
13% 's
30,492
0%
53,603
11%
620,585
1%
2,765,827
4% €
818,682
9%
4,434,940
16%
1,457,477
23%
46,285
3% f
1,584,166
8% i
42,961
2%
560,203
24%
9,316 11%
489,000
39,247
8%
45,000
4,336
10%
3,398,791
356,160
10%
36,843,787
2,894,772
8%
14,733,900
68,331
0%
66,998,812
4,862,650
7%
388,398,682 378,406,492 97% 391,706,030 24,162,605 6%
12,168,000
100%
8,644,978
100%
506,200
100%
62,902,748
100%
68,253,881
100%
9,401,238
100% €
27,139,939
99%
6,328,041
100%
1,357,339
100%
19,769,001 100%
2,721,000 100%
2,726,091 116%
88,000 100%
487,092 100%
45,000 100%
3,398,791 100%
36,843,787 100%
14,733,900 100% '•.
66,998,812 100%
392,035,102 100% €
O-V E S C-
%� Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary 8.3%
All Departments Year Complete
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
REQUIREMENTS
001 -General Fund
030 -Juvenile
160/170 - TRT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 - Sheriff's Office
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 - Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618-RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
675 - Health Benefits
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
25,420,807
23,386,239
92%
29,171,427
2,353,103
8%
29,171,427
100%
8,481,279
7,725,945
91% s
9,381,846
628,416
7%
9,381,846
100%
6,902,223
6,825,971
99%
5,736,054
2,035,636
35% €
5,736,054
100%
9,837,656
3,708,061
38%
4,022,833
68,944
2%
4,022,833
100%
828,370
800,371
97%
819,797
73,573
9% i
819,797
100%
€ 65,641,097
58,135,891
89%
65,576,861
4,664,063
7% s
65,576,861
100%
72,307,648
65,196,724
90%
83,194,980
5,420,137
7%
81,729,980
98%
10,269,561
8,719,333
85%
9,946,795
764,757
8%
9,898,557
100%
17,124,761
15,555,463
91%
19,549,812
2,158,738
11%
19,549,812
100%
7,576,032
6,894,889
91%
8,371,685
529,899
6%
8,371,685
100% s
€ 24,142,169
23,124,456
96% s
16,323,504
35,369
0% €
16,323,504
100% s
14,404,534
13,448,708
93%
17,321,744
611,470
4%
17,321,744
100%
3,734,327
3,808,518
102%
4,838,162
186,967
4% €
4,860,145
100%
2,582,856
2,424,279
94%
2,671,901
871,940
33% ':
2,671,901
100% s
1,090,000
465,928
43%
1,260,000
20,237
2%
1,260,000
100%
617,131
525,100
85%
174,000
45,252
26%
4,744,447
4,440,875
94%
35,687,213
33,623,315
94%
705 - 911
15,113,760
13,195,925
87%
999 -Other
93,331,824
61,677,578
66%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
420,011,695
353,728,821
84%
726,864
170,000
5,599,742
33,701,342
17,254,619
107,023,566
21,028 3%
-
0%
1,193,577
21%
524,442
2%
1,228,275
7%
2,890,354
3%
442,663,534 26,280,927 6%
725,986 100%
170,000 100%
5,599,742 100%
s 35,673,341 106% s
17,254,619 100%
107,023,566 100%
443,143,400 100% €
O-VESC-oG< Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary 8.3 /o °
All Departments Year Complete
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
TRANSFERS
001 -General Fund
030 - Juvenile
160/170 - TRT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 - Sheriff's Office
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 -Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 - Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
705 - 911
999 - Other
TOTAL TRANSFERS
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
(20,963,314)
(20,931,563)
100%
(18,665,737)
(905,302)
5%
(18,665,737)
100%
6,678,013
6,678,013
100%
8,068,153
672,346
8%
8,068,153
100%
(8,575,254)
(7,128,829)
83%
(8,431,946)
(569,246)
7%
(8,431,946)
100%
(5,022,145)
(400,000)
8%
(4,622,145)
-
0%
(4,622,145)
100%
364,688
364,688
100%
380,521
31,710
8%
380,521
100%
3,377,587
3,380,929
100%
3,493,287
312,649
9%
3,493,287
100%
8,026,456
6,512,034
81%
12,268,215
148,790
1%
9,908,525
81%
466,530
(195,589)
-42%
461,542
-
0%
560,956
122%
(12,700,000)
(12,700,000)
100%
(10,720,695)
-
0%
(10,720,695)
100%
510,950
525,950
103%
626,964
52,247
8%
626,964
100%
12,500,000
12,500,000
100%
10,631,333
-
0%
10,631,333
100%
(1,703,962)
(2,613,962)
153%
(4,564,141)
(1,178)
0% f
(4,564,141)
100%
875,681
1,028,246
117%
1,179,123
98,260
8%
1,179,123
100% €
(34,503)
(34,503)
100%
(121,900)
(10,158)
8%
(121,900)
100%
824,187
671,622
81%
592,396
186,866
32%
592,396
100%
128,436 128,436 100%
51,564 51,564 100%
(503,459) (493,787) 98%
57,858
4,822
8%
122,142
10,179
8%
(4,500)
(375)
8%
15,698,545 12,656,751 81% 9,249,530 (31,610) 0%
57,858
100%
122,142
100% €
(4,500)
100%
s 11,509,806
124%
Q��viESCpg, Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary °
8.3 /°
All Departments Year Complete
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
ENDING FUND BALANCE
001 -General Fund
030 - Juvenile
160/170 - TRT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 - Sheriff's Office
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 -Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
675 - Health Benefits
705 - 911
999 - Other
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
Projection
%
11,850,095
14,564,517
123% ;
13,308,000
13,157,761
13,315,700
100%
710,902
1,343,362
189%
762,811
1,423,918
956,183
125%
1,801,675
3,058,344
170%
-
2,033,304
-
-
6,107,872
999% s
-
6,069,419
-
61,858
94,285
152%
66,924
11,740
66,924
100%
7,295,992
16,748,242
230%
13,199,149
13,017,335
13,199,149
100%
7,480,011
18,832,687
252%
7,073,282
15,935,986
7,502,937
106%
1,975,730 931,444 47% s
2,370,201 6,225,812 263%
1,470,524 2,549,705 173%
9,549,637 15,851,014 166%
2,303,300 4,413,584 192%
32,617 572,741 999%
228,205 519,959 228%
2,391,825 3,187,970 133%
135,220 304,867 225%
1,284,317 1,521,389 118%
6,466,397 8,200,341 127%
1,074,575 3,374,788 314%
12,122,906 14,110,352 116%
104,968,103 127,076,301 121%
915,985 1,004,905
2,433,105 8,503,546
1,078,936 3,529,530
11,199,218 15,861,930
1,824,861 5,402,023
124,826 526,995
156,866 198,063
2,556,396 3,363,915
67,994
327,907
1,510,555
1,535,904
5,794,549
7,362,559
8,232,761
6,217,101
10,639,355 12, 950,408
85,178, 719 129, 007,155
1,063,637 116%
3,096,776 127%
1,133,025 105%
11,516,182 103%
2,313,621 127%
102,843 82%
452,249 288%
2,608,366 102%
123,831
182%
1,518,531
101%
5,994,900
103%
6,260,762
76%
10,639,355
100% €
87,438,995
103%
TOTAL FUND BALANCE 175,574,090 249,589,576 142% 166,124,292 247,441,405 169,303,967 102%
1�uIES C0G� Budget to Actuals Report
General Fund - Fund 001 8 3%
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Property Taxes - Current
37,400,000
38,160,244
102%
39,604,000
-
0%
39,604,000 100%
= A
Property Taxes - Prior
318,000
386,910
S
122%
328,000
90,398
a s
28%
a
328,000 100%
a
-
Other General Revenues
a
3,480,844
3,605,674
8
104% =
3,745,554
1,432,734
a s
38% =
a
3,745,554 100% •
2
Assessor
0
a
775,350
584,395
75% =
849,000
238,446
28%
�
849,000 100% _
a
-_
Clerk
1,259,595
1,229,503
98%
1,426,160
111,357
8% _
a
1,426,160 100% _
a
_
BOPTA
a
&
10,200
7,543
a
74% =
11,000
3,257
as
30%
c
11,000 100% _
a
-
District Attorney
a
552,048
539,157
98%
212,700
2,610
a 8
1%
a
@
212,700 100%
a
Tax Office
a
136,000
112,485
a
83% =
146,200
38,634
s
26% _ =
a
146,200 100%
-
Veterans
261,179
194,448
a
74% =
194,446
-
s
0%
a
194,446 100%
a
B
Property Management
s
a
215,000
70,000
33%
70,000
5,833
a€
8%
a
70,000 100%
a
Non -Departmental
-
7,630
-
895
o B
7,700
7,700=
TOTAL RESOURCES
44,408,216
44,897,990
101% ;
46,587,060
1,924,164
4%
46,594,760 100%:
7,700:
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Expenditures
-
-
1,154,350
-
0% _ =
1,154,350 100%
Assessor
6,189,597
5,478,094
89%
6,709,361
615,050
9%
6,709,361 100%
Clerk
2,351,515
2,053,705
87% =
2,719,443
164,831
6% a
2,719,443 100%
BOPTA
a
97,522
78,082
80%
93,993
13,187
14% a
93,993 100% ;
District Attorney
11,636,672
10,971,525
94%
13,090,813
923,168
7% _
13,090,813 100%
Medical Examiner
'
461,224
379,995
82%
466,854
1,058
0% _
466,854 100% a
o
Tax Office
a
940,770
854,182
91% @
1,041,642
113,900
11% a
1,041,642 100%
2
Veterans
a
934,283
859,434
92% =
a
987,100
63,413
6% a
987,100 100% s
a
s
Property Management
a
539,558
498,484
92% =
584,094
46,846
as
8% _ =
a
584,094 100% _
-_
Non -Departmental
2,269,666
2,212,737
97%
2,323,777
411,650
18% a
2,323,777 100%
2
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
25,420,807
23,386,239
92%
29,171,427
2,353,103
8%
29,171,427 100% ;
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In 103,790 103,790 100% ° 1,138,642 94,887 8% 1,138,642 100% -
Transfers Out (21,067,104) (21,035,353) 100% (19,804,379) (1,000,189) 5% a (19,804,379) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS o (20,963,314) (20,931,563) 100% ; (18,665,737) (905,302) 5% (18,665,737) 100% ;
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 13,826,000 13,984,330 101% = 14,558,104 14,492,002 100% _ 14,558,104 100% = 01 C
Resources over Requirements g 18,987,409 21,511,751 = 17,415,633 (428,939) _ 17,423,333 7,700!
Net Transfers - In (Out) (20,963,314) (20,931,563) (18,665,737) (905,302) _ (18,665,737)
a as a a
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 11,850,095 $ 14,564,517 123% o $ 13,308,000 $ 13,157,761 99% o o $ 13,315,700 100% ; $7,700e
A Current year taxes received primarily in November, February and May
B Oregon Dept. of Veteran's Affairs grant reimbursed quarterly
C Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
,�VSES C-0 Budget to Actuals Report
Juvenile - Fund 030
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
OYA Basic & Diversion
476,611
334,513 70%
477,421
-
0%
477,421 100%
ODE Juvenile Crime Prev
106,829
73,988 69%
112,772
20,760
18%
112,772 100% -
Leases
90,228
93,840 104%
97,500
8,133
8% _
97,500 100% _ -
InmatelPrisoner Housing ➢
75,000
105,300 140% a
65,000
-
0% s
65,000 100% _
DOC Unif Crime Fee/HB2712
52,000
40,019 77%
52,000
-
0% a ➢
52,000 100% ; s
Interest on Investments
37,500
54,078 144% 9
49,000
5,375
11% =
49,000 100% _ -
Revenues Not Assigned
-
- =
40,000
-
0% _
40,000 100%
OJD Court Fac/Sec SB 1065
15,000
11,384 76%
12,000
976
8% _ §
12,000 100%
Food Subsidy
10,000
11,458 115% =
10,000
1,355
14%
10,000 100% a
Miscellaneous
56,500
44,852 79% a
6,811
18
0% ➢ ➢
6,811 100% _ ➢
Contract Payments a
5,000
3,675 74%
4,000
-
0% ➢
4,000 100% e a
Gen Fund -Crime Prevention '
89,500
89,500 100% _
-
-
_ ➢
-
TOTAL RESOURCES
1,014,168
862,606 85%
926,504
36,617
4%
926,504 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
6,852,966
6,246,083 91%
7,517,894
524,578
7%
7,517,894 100% _ -
c
Materials and Services
1,599,048
1,450,597 91%
1,863,952
103,839
6% ➢
1,863,952 100%
Capital Outlay '
29,265
29,265 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
8,481,279
7,725,945 91% a
9,381,846
628,416
7% o
9,381,846 100% ;
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In -General Funds 6,798,630
6,798,630 100% s 8,143,712 678,643 8% 8,143,712 100%
Transfers Out (45,000)
(45,000) 100% _ _ ➢ _ ' s
Transfers Out-Veh Reserve ➢ (75,617)
(75,617) 100% fr (75,559) (6,297) 8% a (75,559) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS 6,678,013
6,678,013 100% a 8,068,153 672,346 8% 8,068,153 100% ;
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
1,500,000
1,528,688 102% =
1,150,000
1,343,372 117%
1,343,372 117% 193,372; A
_
Resources over Requirements
(7,467,111)
(6,863,340)
(8,455,342)
(591,800) _
(8,455,342) ➢ 0Q
Net Transfers - In (Out)
➢
6,678,013
6,678,013
8
8,068,153
672,346
➢ ➢
8,068,153 s
@ 6
TOTAL FUND BALANCE o
$ 710,902
$ 1,343,362 189% ;
$ 762,811
$ 1,423,918 187% ; o
$ 956,183 125% ; $193,372;
A Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24. Trending to be a bit higher than original projections due to personnel
and materials and services savings from FY24.
o`�vSES COG-' Budget to Actuals Report
TRT - Fund 160/170
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Room Taxes
s 12,630,000
12,372,463
98%
12,100,000
1,547,199 13% 12,100,000 100%
Interest on Investments
121,790
112,678
�
93%
68,000
_ �
_ -
4,594 7% 68,000 100% i
Miscellaneous
-
641
$
-
- a -
TOTAL RESOURCES
12,751,790
12,485,782
98% a
12,168,000
1,551,793 13% ' 12,168,000 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
COVA
3,378,641
3,312,662 98% s
3,236,105
-
0% a °
3,236,105 100% _ = A
Grants & Contributions
3,000,000
3,000,000 100%
2,000,000
2,000,000
100% _
2,000,000 100% = B
Administrative
262,395
254,602 97%
265,588
20,085
8% a
265,588 100% = i
Interfund Charges i
213,587
213,587 100% a
186,611
15,551
8% _ °
186,611 100% _
Software i
47,600
45,120 95%
47,750
-
0% i
47,750 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
6,902,223
6,825,971 99% 0
5,736,054
2,035,636
35% 0
5,736,054 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $
Variance
Transfer Out - RV Park
(20,000)
(20,000)
100% _
(20,000)
(1,667)
8% _ _
(20,000)
100%
Transfer Out - Annual Fair
(75,000)
(75,000)
100% a
(75,000)
(6,250)
8% a
(75,000)
100% 3
Transfer Out - CDD
-
(100,000)
-
0% _
(100,000)
100% _
-a
Transfer Out - Health
(368,417)
(368,417)
100%
(276,572)
(23,048)
8% _
(276,572)
100% f
TransferOut- JusticeCourt
! (364,688)
(364,688)
100%a
(380,521)
(31,710)
8% & 3
(380,521)
100%
Transfer Out - F&E Reserve
(462,119)
(462,119)
100% _
(442,396)
(36,866)
8% _
(442,396)
100% _
C
Transfer Out - General County
i (723,720)
(723,720)
100%
(921,670)
(76,806)
8% _
(921,670)
100%
Reserve
Transfer Out - F&E
(1,009,023)
(1,009,023)
100%
(963,000)
(80,250)
8% s
(963,000)
100%
Transfer Out - Courthouse Debt
(1,900,500)
(454,075)
24% _
(1,501,000)
-
0% _
(1,501,000)
100%
-
Service
Transfer Out - Sheriff
(3,651,787)
(3,651,787)
100% _
(3,751,787)
(312,649)
8% _
(3,751,787)
100%
-
TOTAL TRANSFERS
a (8,575,254)
(7,128,829)
83%
(8,431,946)
(569,246)
7%
(8,431,946)
100% ;
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $
Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
4,527,362
4,527,362
100% =
2,000,000
3,086,392
154% _
2,000,000
100% =
0 D
Resources over Requirements
5,849,567
5,659,811
6,431,946
(483,843)
_
6,431,946
=
0a
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(8,575,254)
(7,128,829)
(8,431,946)
(569,246)
@ I
(8,431,946)
e
c
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
° $ 1,801,675
$ 3,058,344
170% e
-
$ 2,033,304
999% ;
-
W
A Payments to COVA based on a percent of TRT collections
B Includes contributions of $2M to Sunriver Service District
C The balance of the 1 % F&E
TRT is transferred
to F&E reserves
D Final Beginning Fund Balance
will be determined
after the final
close
of FY24
v"(ESC,0 Budget to Actuals Report
ARPA — Fund 200
8 3%
FY25 YTD July 31,
2024 (unaudited)
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Local Assistance & Tribal
4,622,145
- 0%
4,622,145
-
0% _
4,622,145 100%
Consistency
'
State & Local Coronavirus Fiscal:
9,516,992
9,516,992 100% =
3,888,833
0%
3,888,833 100%
Recovery Funds
Interest on Investments
319,460
297,738 93%
134,000
30,492
23%
134,000 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES
14,458,597
9,814,729 68%
8,644,978
30,492
0% '.
8,644,978 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Services to Disproportionately
6,538,263
2,164,420 33%
1,956,342
28,141
1%
1,956,342 100% _
-
Impacted Communities
;
Infrastructure
766,410
862,377 113%
916,000
2,410
0% _
916,000 100%
Administrative
1,719,694
140,743 8%
711,364
5,929
1% $
711,364 100%
Public Health
560,926
390,521 70%
415,127
32,464
8%
415,127 100%
,
Negative Economic Impacts
252,363
150,000 59%
24,000
-
0% a
24,000 100%
,
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
9,837,656
3,708,061 38% 0
4,022,833
68,944
2%
4,022,833 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Transfers Out
(5,022,145)
(400,000) 8%
(4,622,145)
-
0% a
(4,622,145) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(5,022,145)
(400,000) 8% a
(4,622,145)
-
0%
(4,622,145) 100% ;
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
401,204
401,204 100%
-
6,107,872
999% _ _
-
0= A
Resources over Requirements =
4,620,941
6,106,668
4,622,145
(38,453)
@
4,622,145
0�
Net Transfers - In (Out) _
s
(5,022,145)
(400,000)
s
(4,622,145)
_
o�
(4,622,145)
s
s
a
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
_
$ 6,107,872 999% ;
-
$ 6,069,419 999% o
$0;
A Unearned grant revenue will be deferred at FY24 year-end and recorded as Federal
grant revenue
in FY25, not
Beginning Working Capital
o`�3 -�ES C,oG< Budget to Actuals Report
Justice Court - Fund 220
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3 %
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Court Fines & Fees
525,000
528,051 101%
504,200
53,301 11% 504,200 100% e
Interest on Investments
I 540
1,917 355% =
2,000
302 15% s 2,000 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES
525,540
529,969 101% ;
506,200
53,603 11% 506,200 100% a
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
652,767
628,204 96%
622,013
51,919
8%
622,013 100%
Materials and Services
175,603
172,168 98%
197,784
21,654
11%
197,784 100% = A
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
828,370
800,371 97%
819,797
73,573
9%
819,797 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In -TRT
364,688
364,688 100% =
380,521
31,710
8% _
380,521 100% -
TOTAL TRANSFERS
364,688
364,688 100% 0
380,521
31,710
8%
380,521 100% e a
Resources over Requirements (302,830) (270,403) _ (313,597) (19,970) _ _ (313,597) 0=
Net Transfers - In (Out) 364,688 364,688 380,521 31,710 s a 380,521
8 B i S B
TOTAL $ 61,858 $ 94,285 152% ; $ 66,924 $ 11,740 18% e ° $ 66,924 100% ; $0;
A One time yearly software maintenance fee paid in July for entire fiscal year
SES C-0& Budget to Actuals Report
Sheriff's Office -Fund 255
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3 %
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%®
Projection % $ Variance
LED #1 Property Tax Current
38,006,062
38,050,896 100%
40,066,974
-
0% a
s
40,066,974 100% ; = A
6
LED #2 Property Tax Current
o
15,189,654
g
15,207,285 100% =
15,958,353
-
g
0%
g 3
15,958,353 100% _ -= B
Sheriff's Office Revenues
4,583,572
a
6,102,846 133% =
5,907,421
504,587
g a
9% =
a s
5,907,421 100%
LED #1 Interest a
264,000
515,925 195% s
400,000
31,591
8% I a
400,000 100% e
a
LED #1 Property Tax Prior
330,000
a
333,126 101% =
300,000
83,209
an
28% =
a a
300,000 100% a -�
LED #2 Interest
g
65,000
149,987 231% =
150,000
10,720
s
7%
150,000 100% _ -
LED #2 Property Tax Prior
120,000
141,925 118% =
120,000
34,225
29% a
120,000 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES
58,558,288
60,501,990 103% ;
62,902,748
664,333
1% o
62,902,748 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $!Variance
Digital Forensics
1,221,145
1,256,864
103% =
1,419,216
219,009
15%
_
1,419,216 100% _
Rickard Ranch
334,232
303,112
91%
610,205
30,464
5%
a
610,205 100%
Concealed Handgun Licenses
624,277
436,508
70%
592,803
46,608
8%
592,803 100%
Sheriff's Services
5,771,949
5,230,287
91%
5,260,244
398,510
8%
5,260,244 100% = a
Civil/Special Units
1,019,021
1,044,761
103% a
1,281,834
76,162
6%
1,281,834 100%! a
Automotive/Communications
4,574,918
4,034,963
88%
4,152,483
207,594
5%
&
4,152,483 100%
Detective
4,773,538
4,076,555
85% a
4,773,401
348,999
7%
a
4,773,401 100%
Patrol
16,270,641
14,303,953
88%
15,308,605
1,157,886
8%
g
15,308,605 100% _ 2
Records
855,590
688,435
80% a
875,606
60,276
7%
g
875,606 100%
Adult Jail
23,784,474
20,538,498
86%
24,095,043
1,668,972
7%
_
24,095,043 100% o
Court Security
600,590
560,976
93% F
649,844
38,278
6%
_
649,844 100%
Emergency Services
808,931
649,995
80%
888,223
63,538
7%
_
888,223 100% s
Special Services
2,779,458
2,867,528
103%
2,945,000
236,971
8%
u
2,945,000 100% _ a
Training
1,537,498
1,185,980
77% g
1,765,299
80,036
5%
g a
1,765,299 100% = a
Other Law Enforcement
634,835
957,475
151% =
959,055
30,759
3%
_
959,055 100% = a
Non - Departmental
50,000
-
0% s
-
- 999%
_ _
g 2
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
65,641,097
58,135,891
89%
65,576,861
4,664,063
7%
a
65,576,861 100% ;
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfer In -TRT 3,651,787 3,651,787 100% = 3,751,787 312,649 8% 3,751,787 100%
Transfers Out (6,500) (6,500) 100% - _ a a °
Transfers Out - Debt Service a (267,700) (264,358) 99% a (258,500) - 0% 4 (258,500) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS 3,377,587 3,380,929 100% 0 3,493,287 312,649 9% _ 3,493,287 100%
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 11,001,214 11,001,214 100% = 12,379,975
16,748,164 135%
_ 12,379,975 100% =
0= C
Resources over Requirements (7,082,809) 2,366,099 (2,674,113)
(3,999,730)
_ (2,674,113) s
0=
Net Transfers - In (Out) 3,377,587 3,380,929 3,493,287
8 g
312,649
3,493,287 @
g & @
s
9
TOTAL FUND BALANCE _ $ 7,295,992 $ 16,748,242 230% ; $ 13,199,149
$ 13,061,083 99%
e $ 13,199,149 100%
$0;
A Current year taxes received primarily in November, February and May
B Current year taxes received primarily in November, February and May
C Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
Q`�uSESCOG�� Budget to Actuals Report
Health Services - Fund 274
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
State Grant
OHP Capitation
State Miscellaneous
OHP Fee for Service
Local Grants
Environmental Health Fees
State - Medicaid/Medicare
Other
Federal Grants
Patient Fees
Medicaid
Vital Records
Interest on Investments
State - Medicare
Liquor Revenue
Interfund Contract- Gen Fund
State Shared- Family Planning
TOTAL RESOURCES
8.3 %
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
23,757,820
i
26,002,318 109%
3
27,505,398
783,836
3%
27,842,660 101% =
337,26Z
16,494,114
16,652,390 101% =
17,529,405
1,308,462
O 1
7%
B
17,529,405 100% a
d
8
5,793,079
9
5,173,485 89% s
7,330,050
49,147
8 ?
1%
7,330,050 100% _
d
4,947,581
a
5,509,866 111% =
a
4,788,744
202,018
4%
4,788,744 100% _
$
1,567,894
2,322,412 148% =
2,845,832
-
0% _ =
a
2,791,775 98% _
a
(54,057)=
1,478,906
i
1,483,715 100% =
1,637,892
30,195
2% _
1,637,892 100%
1,034,491
a
1,049,170 101% =
1,587,117
100,080
6%
1,587,117 100%
1,061,371
2,326,123 219% =
1,160,102
7,264
1% _
1,160,336 100% =
234=
1,440,560
952,286 66%
987,369
-
0% _
987,369 100% =
p
a 1,087,790
833,110 77% §
761,626
56,027
7% _
761,626 100% _
431,000
1,072,603 249% =
627,276
128,921
21%
627,276 100% _
315,000
i
336,256 107% ;
318,000
11,123
3%
318,000 100%
262,007
737,122 281% s
317,000
63,950
20% _
317,000 100% =
s
209,500
283,441 135% =
195,057
17,072
9% $
195,057 100%
i 177,574
188,547 106% =
177,574
-
0%
177,574 100%
127,000
- 0%
127,000
-
0% _ =
127,000 100%
158,000
75,420 48%
75,000
7,732
10% _
75,000 100%
60,343,687
64,998,263 108% ;
67,970,442
2,765,827
4% a a
68,253,881 100% a
283,439.
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Administration Allocation
4,984
-
0%
Personnel Services
52,118,863
50,006,196
96%
58,034,555
4,545,231 8% _
58,404,555 101% _
(370,000);
Materials and Services
19,836,301
15,009,598
76%
23,275,425
874,907 4% F
23,275,425 100%
Capital Outlay
347,500
180,930
52%
1,885,000
- 0%
50,000 3%
1,835,000-
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
72,307,648
65,196,724
90%
83,194,980
5,420,137 7%
81,729,980 98%
1,465,000:
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In- General Fund
6,780,140
6,780,140 100% =
7,218,715
-
0% _
7,218,715 100% _ -
Transfers In- OHP Mental Health
2,210,573
241,400 11%
5,858,016
-
0% 5
3,498,326 60% (2,359,690)g
Transfers In- Acute Care Service
-
-
626,000
-
0% a s
626,000 100%
Transfers In - TRT
368,417
368,417 100% =
276,572
23,048
8%
276,572 100% _
Transfers In - Video Lottery
-
- =
250,000
250,000
100% _
250,000 100%
Transfers Out
(1,332,674)
(877,923) 66% _
(1,961,088)
(124,257)
6% a
(1,961,088) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS a
8,026,456
6,512,034 81% a
12,268,215
148,790
1%
9,908,525 81% o (2,359,690);
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
11,417,516
12,519,113 110% =
10,029,605
18,441,507 184% ;
11,070,511 110% = 1,040,906:
Resources over Requirements a
(11,963,961)
(198,461)
(15,224,538)
(2,654,311) _
(13,476,099) 1,748,439;
Net Transfers - In (Out)
8,026,456
6,512,034
12,268,215
148,790
9,908,525 (2,359,690);
9
TOTAL FUND BALANCE _
$ 7,480,011
$ 18,832,687 252% ;
$ 7,073,282
$ 15,935,986 225% e
$ 7,502,937 106% : $429,655:
TES CpG� Budget to Actuals Report
Health services - Admin - Fund 274
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
OHP Capitation
Interest on Investments
State Grant
Other
TOTAL RESOURCES
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
435,349
1
435,349 100% =
474,674
38,020
8% _
474,674 100%
262,007
b
737,122 281% =
317,000
63,950
3 9
20% _
8 3
317,000 100%
160,000
337,634 211 % s
132,289
-
0% _
132,289 100%
9,000
167,325 999%
36,378
7,014
19%
36,612 101% = 234,
866,356
1,677,431 194% ;
960,341
108,985
11%
960,575 100% ; 234;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Personnel Services
6,769,513
6,366,884 94%
7,652,400
572,124
7%
Materials and Services
7,671,421
7,665,326 100%
8,806,424
705,632
8%
Capital Outlay a
43,750
- 0% _
-
-
$
Administration Allocation
(12,633,378)
- 0%
(15,192,039)
-
0%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
1,851,306
14,032,210 758% ;
1,266,785
1,277,756
101%
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Transfers In- OHP Mental Health
81,250
- 0%
Transfers Out '
(300,174)
(315,174) 105%
(377,446)
(29,371) 8%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(218,924)
(315,174) 144% ;
(377,446)
(29,371) 8% ;
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Beginning Fund Balance
3,665,544
3,786,843 103% a
3,419,300
(8,879,615) -260%
Resources over Requirements
(984,950)
(12,354,779)
(306,444)
(1,168,772)
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(218,924)
(315,174)
(377,446)
(29,371)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE a
$ 2 461,670
$ 8,883, ( ) -361%= _
110
368%'
$ 2,735,411 ($10,077,757)
A Personnel projections assume
4% vacancy.
g Final Beginning Fund Balance
will be determined
after the final close
of FY24
Projection % $ Variance
7,652,400 100% = A
a � a
8,806,424 100% _ -
e i 9
(15,192,039) 100% _ g
1,266,785 100% o
Projection % $ Variance
(377,446) 100%
(377,446) 100% ;
Projection % $ Variance
3,467,473 101% s 48,171 B
(306,210) 2348
s
(377,446) : a
$ 2,783,818 102% $48,407:
o`��3 '�Es `oG2{ Budget to Actuals Report
Health Services - Behavioral Health - Fund 274 $ 3%
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
State Grant
17,967,689
19,538,470 109% =
20,858,334
746,678
4%
20,858,334 100% _
-
OHP Capitation
16,058,765
16,099,534 100% =
16,694,731
1,270,442
8% $
16,694,731 100% _
State Miscellaneous
4,924,368
4,587,786 93% a
6,861,414
44,164
1% ;
6,861,414 100%
-
OHP Fee for Service
4,927,331
5,479,267 111 %
4,764,259
200,443
4% _
4,764,259 100%
Local Grants
1,348,943
1,670,129 124%
2,457,949
-
0% =
2,403,892 98% _
(54,057)=
Federal Grants
1,285,560
860,103 67%
824,623
-
0%
824,623 100%
Medicaid
431,000
1,072,603 249% =
627,276
128,921
21% _ °
627,276 100%
Patient Fees
448,500
634,729 142%
575,975
43,958
8%
575,975 100%
State - Medicare
209,500
283,441 135% =
195,057
17,072
9% _
195,057 100% =
3
Liquor Revenue
177,574
188,547 106% =
177,574
-
0% _
177,574 100%
Interfund Contract- Gen Fund
127,000
- 0% s
127,000
-
0% a
127,000 100% =
a
Other
a 631,245
688,382 109%
6,241
-
0% = 9
6,241 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES
48,537,475
51,102,991 105% ;
54,170,433
2,451,677
5% ;
54,116,376 100% ;
(54,057);
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Administration Allocation
9,546,200
-
0%
11,455,910
-
0%
11,455,910 100%
Personnel Services a
33,370,785
31,993,025
96%
37,270,225
2,908,256
8%
37,670,225 101% a
(400,000)� A
Materials and Services
9,740,566
5,112,765
52%
11,802,106
71,852
1%
_ 11,802,106 100%
Capital Outlay
160,250
126,659
79%
1,885,000
-
0%
50,000 3%
1,835,000� B
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ;
52,817,801
37,232,449
70% ;
62,413,241
2,980,107
5%
60,978,241 98% ;
1,435,000;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In- OHP Mental Health
1,809,358
- 0%
5,554,712
0%
_ 3,195,022 58% _ (2,359,690).
Transfers In -General Fund
2,231,439
2,231,439 100%
2,088,273 -
0%
_ 2,088,273 100%
Transfers In- Acute Care Service
'
-
-
626,000 -
0%
626,000 100% s
Transfers Out
(481,000)
(562,749) 117%
(445,000) -
0%
_ _ (445,000) 100% s
TOTAL TRANSFERS ;
3,559,797
1,668,690 47%
7,823,985 -
0%
; 5,464,295 70% ; (2,359,690);
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget
Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 3,989,589 4,679,830 117% = 2,943,669
20,130,370 684% a 3,980,914 135% = 1,037,245� C
Resources over Requirements (4,280,326) 13,870,542 (8,242,808)
(528,430) _ (6,861,865) 1,380,943;
Net Transfers - In (Out) 3,559,797 1,668,690 s 7,823,985
- 5,464,295 s (2,359,690);
9 E
@ @ f 3
TOTAL FUND BALANCE o $ 3,269,060 $ 20,219,063 618% ; $ 2,524,847
$ 19,601,940 776% ; ; $ 2,583,345 102% ; $58,498;
A Personnel projections assume 6% vacancy. Includes continuation of paid internship
program, which began in January 2024 and was not originally
budgeted.
B Original budget included tenant improvement costs for expansion at a new site in La Pine. At this point, expenditures are not anticipated in FY25.
C Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
Q'`��zEs �oG� Budget to Actuals Report
Health Services - Public Health - Fund 274
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3 %
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
State Grant
5,630,131
6,126,214 109% =
6,514,775
37,158
1% _
6,852,037 105%
337,262=
Environmental Health Fees
1,478,906
1,483,715 100% =
1,637,892
30,195
2%
1,637,892 100%
State - Medicaid/Medicare m
1,034,491
1,049,170 101% =
1,587,117
100,080
6% F
1,587,117 100%
Other
421,126
1,470,416 349% =
1,117,483
250
0%
1,117,483 100%
State Miscellaneous
868,711
585,700 67%
468,636
4,983
1% _
468,636 100%
Local Grants
218,951
652,283 298% =
387,883
-
0% _
387,883 100%
OHP Capitation
-
117,506
360,000
-
0% A =
360,000 100%
Vital Records
315,000
336,256 107%
318,000
11,123
3%
318,000 100%
Patient Fees
639,290
198,381 31%
185,651
12,069
7% f
185,651 100% =
a
Federal Grants
155,000
92,184 59%
162,746
-
0% _
162,746 100%
State Shared- Family Planning
158,000
75,420 48%
75,000
7,732
10% $
75,000 100%
OHP Fee for Service a
20,250
30,598 151% =
a
24,485
1,575
6% s
24,485 100% _
§
TOTAL RESOURCES
10,939,856
12,217,842 112%
12,839,668
205,165
2% 0
13,176,930 103% ;
337,262
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Administration Allocation
3,092,162
- 0%
3,736,129
-
0%
3,736,129 100%
Personnel Services
11,978,565
11,646,287 97%
13,111,930
1,064,850
8%
13,081,930 100% =
30,000; A
Materials and Services
2,424,314
2,231,508 92%
2,666,896
97,423
4% s
2,666,896 100%
Capital Outlay
143,500
54,271 38%
6
-
�
-
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS '.
17,638,541
13,932,066 79%
19,514,955
1,162,274
6%
19,484,955 100%
30,000;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In- General Fund
4,548,701
4,548,701 100% =
5,130,442
-
0%
5,130,442 100%
Transfers In-OHP Mental Health
319,965
241,400 75%
303,304
0% s
303,304 100%
Transfers In - TRT
368,417
368,417 100% =
276,572
23,048
8% _
276,572 100%
Transfers In - Video Lottery
-
- s
250,000
250,000
100% _
250,000 100%
Transfers Out a
(551,500)
- 0% ff
(1,138,642)
(94,887)
8%
(1,138,642) 100% = s
TOTAL TRANSFERS
4,685,583
5,158,518 110% ;
4,821,676
178,161
4%
4,821,676 100%
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget
Beginning Fund Balance
3,762,383
4,052,440 108%
3,666,636
Resources over Requirements s
(6,698,685)
(1,714,224)
(6,675,287)
Net Transfers - In (Out)
B
4,685,583
5,158,518
p
4,821,676
TOTAL FUND BALANCE a
$ 1,749,281
$ 7,496,734 429% ;
$ 1,813,025
A Personnel projections assume 4% vacancy.
B Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
7,190,752 196% _ 3,622,124 99% _ (44,512)= B
(957,109) (6,308,025) 367,262=
178,161 s 4,821,676 a
a€ s s
$ 6,411,803 354% ; $ 2,135,775 118% o $322,750:
SES C0G� Budget to Actuals Report
Community Development - Fund 295
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
Admin - Operations
Code Compliance
Building Safety
Electrical
Onsite Wastewater
Current Planning
Long Range Planning
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS
Admin - Operations
Code Compliance
Building Safety
Electrical
Onsite Wastewater
Current Planning
Long Range Planning
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
157,300
s
148,681
95%
144,238
9,513
7% _
144,238 100%
1,124,181
840,865
75%
1,003,933
86,578
9% a
1,003,933 100% _
s 3,991,388
a
3,372,838
85%
3,414,568
317,638
9%
3,414,568 100%
902,175
796,598
88%
918,502
84,985
9% _
918,502 100%
923,880
a
909,862
98%
1,028,065
49,321
5% s
1,028,065 100%
2,304,562
1,708,739
74%
1,916,960
160,396
8% _
1,916,960 100% e a
1,057,354
746,065
71%
974,972
110,250
11% m
974,972 100%
10,460,840
8,523,648
81%
9,401,238
818,682
9% z
9,401,238 100%
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
3,241,288
2,912,051
90% T
3,552,093
296,399
8%
743,931
641,455
86%
801,574
54,515
7%
2,088,542
1,818,452
87%
2,133,076
153,259
7%
a 583,718
546,234
94%
612,818
47,731
8% _
865,670
i
717,375
83% =
679,752
51,047
8%
1,857,735
1,386,701
75%
1,410,470
102,204
7%
888,677
697,066
78%
757,012
59,602
8%
10,269,561
8,719,333
85% 0
9,946,795
764,757
8% ;
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals %
Transfers In - CDD Operating
510,105
47,445
9%
131,502
0%
Fund
Transfers in - General Fund
100,000
48,181
48%
100,000
- 0% _
Transfers In - TRT
100,000
- 0%
Transfers In - CDD Building
-
s
68,628
- 0% g
Reserve
;
Transfers In - CDD Electrical
86,721
50,027
58%
61,412
- 0%
Reserve
Transfers Out
(107,544)
(107,544)
100%
Transfers Out - CDD Reserve a
(122,752)
(233,698) 190%
-
-
TOTAL TRANSFERS a
466,530
(195,589)
-42% 0
461,542
0% °
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals %
Beginning Fund Balance
1,317,921
1,322,717 100%
1,000,000 950,979 95% E
Resources over Requirements
191,279
(195,685) a
(545,557) 53,925 =
Net Transfers - In (Out)
�
466,530
(195,589)
@
461,542 - s
8
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 1,975,730
$ 931,444 47% e
$ 915,985 $ 1,004,905 110% ;
A Projections reflect unfilled positions and the addition of one new FTE.
g Transfer from reserves for one new FTE
C Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
Projection %
$ Variance
3,524,893 99% a
27,200a A
791,243 99%
10,331 o A
2,099,510 98%
33,566! A
635,677 104%
(22,859)= A
679,752 100% =
s
a 1,410,470 100%
757,012 100% =
s
9,898,557 100% 0
48,238:
Projection %
$ Variance
131,502 100%
100,000 100% a
-•
+ 3
100,000 100% _
8
-
148,148 216% =
79,520! B
81,306 132% =
19,894: B
99,414:
a 560,956 122% s
Projection % $ Variance
1,000,000 100% = 0, C
� @ 9
(497,319) 48,23&
� 8 560,956 99,4146a
$ 1,063,637 116% o $147,652:
Q`,�vSES C,oG� Budget to Actuals Report
Road - Fund 325
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited) $'3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Motor Vehicle Revenue
20,648,483
21,099,991
102% =
21,484,773
1,934,101
9%
21,484,773 100%
Federal - PILT Payment
2,240,000
2,394,054
107% =
2,741,447
2,401,480
88% _
2,401,480 88% _
(339,967)?
Other Inter -fund Services a
1,450,015
1,574,821
109%
1,368,191
70,571
5% _
1,368,191 100%
Cities-Bend/Red/Sis/La Pine
763,171
961,664
126% =
988,063
-
0%
988,063 100%
_
Sale of Equip & Material
614,500
370,308
60%
486,300
10
0%
486,300 100%
Interest on Investments
138,031
195,226
141% =
158,000
25,190
16% a
158,000 100%
Federal Reimbursements
689,703
342,290
50%
137,000
-
0% _
137,000 100% 4
Miscellaneous
73,808
48,692
66%
61,132
3,434
6% = x
61,132 100%
Mineral Lease Royalties
50,000
131,078
262% =
50,000
-
0%
50,000 100% 6
Assessment Payments (P&I)
6,000
11,471
191% =
5,000
155
3% J
5,000 100%
-
TOTAL RESOURCES
26,673,711
27,129,596 102% ;
27,479,906
4,434,940
16%
27,139,939 99%
(339,967),
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Personnel Services
8,406,468
8,287,378
99%
9,556,843
736,176
8% _
9,556,843 100%
Materials and Services a
8,600,033
7,214,494
84%
9,992,969
1,422,562
14% _
9,992,969 100% s
Capital Outlay §
118,260
53,591
45% _
-
-
s
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
17,124,761
15,555,463
91% 0
19,549,812
2,158,738
11%
19,549,812 100%
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers Out
(12,700,000)
(12,700,000) 100%
(10,720,695)
- 0% _ _
(10,720,695) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(12,700,000)
(12,700,000) 100% ;
(10,720,695)
- 0%
(10,720,695) 100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
5,521,251
7,351,679 133% =
5,223,706
6,227,344 119%
6,227,344 119% =
1,003,638= A
Resources over Requirements
9,548,950
11,574,133
7,930,094
2,276,202
7,590,127
(339,967);
Net Transfers - In (Out) a
(12,700,000)
(12,700,000) 3
(10,720,695)
- _ §
(10,720,695)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 2,370,201
$ 6,225,812 263% ;
$ 2,433,105
$ 8,503,546 349% a
$ 3,096,776 127% ;
$663,671',
A Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
\)jEs coG2< Budget to Actuals Report
Adult P&P - Fund 355 8 3%
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection % $ Variance
DOC Grant in Aid SB 1145
4,116,464
4,143,196 101% =
4,693,331
1,179,451 25% _
4,693,331 100%
CJC Justice Reinvestment
943,172
1,196,648 127%
1,167,810
- 0% _
1,167,810 100%
DOC Measure 57
256,815
259,307 101%
259,307
259,307 100%
259,307 100%
Interest on Investments a
75,230
87,583 116%
73,000
9,335 13% s
73,000 100%
Interfund- Sheriff
50,000
50,000 100% =
60,000
5,000 8% _
60,000 100%
Other Inter -fund Services
-
-
50,000
- 0% i
50,000 100%
State Miscellaneous s
22,607
111,969 495%
19,709
- 0% _
19,709 100% _
Miscellaneous
a
500
1,062 212%
500
4,384 877%
4,884 977% ; 4,384= A
Oregon BOPPPS
20,318
7,686 38% _
-
-
Gen Fund/Crime Prevention 9
50,000
50,000 100%
Electronic Monitoring Fee
500
258 52% _
-
- a
-
TOTAL RESOURCES
5,535,606
5,907,709 107% a
6,323,657
1,457,477 23%
6,328,041 100% ; 4,384:
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
5,757,511
5,107,255
89%
6,387,456
441,763
7%
e 6,387,456 100%
Materials and Services a
1,818,521
1,787,634
98% =
1,984,229
88,135
4%
= 1,984,229 100% _ -
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS a
7,576,032
6,894,889
91%
8,371,685
529,899
6%
8,371,685 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In- General Funds
536,369
601,369
112% =
703,369
58,614
8%
703,369 100%
Transfers In- Health Services g
50,000
-
0%
Transfer to Vehicle Maint a
(75,419)
(75,419)
100% _
(76,405)
(6,367)
8%
_ (76,405) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
510,950
525,950
103% a
626,964
52,247
8%
, 626,964 100% a
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals % Budget Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
3,000,000
3,010,934 100% = 2,500,000 2,549,705 102% _
2,549,705 102%
49,705= B
Resources over Requirements
(2,040,426)
(987,179) _ (2,048,028) 927,578 _
(2,043,644)
4,384!
Net Transfers - In (Out)
a
510,950
525,950 = 626,964 52,247
a a s
626,964
s
a
TOTAL FUND BALANCE _
$ 1,470,524
$ 2,549,705 173% ; $ 1,078,936 $ 3,529,530 327% ; a
$ 1,133,025 105%
$54,089:
A Reimbursement for hosting event for Oregon
Association of Community Corrections Directors.
B Final Beginning Fund Balance
will be determined
after the final close of FY24. Trending to be a bit higher than original projections due
to personnel
savings from FY24.
Q'iv1E5 COG�< Budget to Actuals Report
Road CIP - Fund 465
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection % $ Variance
Revenue Not Assigned
-
-
881,339
- 0% i
881,339 100% ;
Interest on Investments
475,310
580,958 122%
476,000
46,285 10% s
476,000 100% a
State Miscellaneous
1,704,116
2,342,101 137% _
-
-
Miscellaneous
-
204,504
-
-
g
TOTAL RESOURCES
2,179,426
3,127,563 144% ;
1,357,339
46,285 3%
1,357,339 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Materials and Services 132,770 132,770 100% = 134,492 11,208 8% _ 134,492 100%
Capital Outlay 24,009,399 22,991,686 96% 16,189,012 24,161 0% 16,189,012 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 24,142,169 23,124,456 96% 16,323,504 35,369 0% 16,323,504 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In
12,500,000
12,500,000 100% =
10,631,333 -
0%
10,631,333 100% _ -
TOTAL TRANSFERS
12,500,000
12,500,000 100%
10,631,333
0%
10,631,333 100% ;
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
19,012,380
23,347,907 123% 15,534,050
15,851,014 102% : 15,851,014 102% 316,964: A
Resources over Requirements E
(21,962,743)
(19,996,893) _ (14,966,165)
10,916 _ (14,966,165) 0=
Net Transfers - In (Out)
12,500,000
12,500,000 10,631,333
- 10,631,333 =
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 9,549,637
$ 15,851,014 166% o $ 11,199,218
$ 15,861,930 142% ; $ 11,516,182 103% ; $316,964;
A Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
�C.\VTES COG2.-� Budget to Actuals Report
Road CIP (Fund 465) - Capital Outlay Summary by Project 8.33%
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 Year Completed
Fiscal Year 2024 Fiscal Year 2025
Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Terrebonne Refinement Plan
Hunnel Rd: Loco Rd to Tumalo Rd
Transportation System Plan Update
Gribbling Rd Bridge
Smith Rock Way Bridge Replace
Deschutes Mkt Rd/Hamehook Round
Powell Butte Hwy/Butler Market RB
Wilcox Ave Bridge #2171-03 Replacement
Paving Tumalo Rd/Deschutes Mkt Rd
Paving of Rosland Rd: US 20 to Draf
Hamehook Rd Bridge #16181 Rehabilitation
NW Lower Bridge Way: 43rd St to Holmes Rd
Northwest Way: NW Coyner Ave to NW Altmeter Wy
Slurry Seal 2023
Terrebonne Wastewater System Phase 1
Tumalo Reservoir Rd: OB Riley to Sisemore Rd
Local Road Pavement Preservation
US20: Locust St
Paving Butler Market - Hamehook to Powell Butte
Old Bend Rdm Hwy- US 20 to Tumalo
Paving Of Horse Butte Rd
Paving Of Obr Hwy: Tumalo To Helmho
Paving Of Spring River Rd: S Centur
Slurry Seal 2024
La Pine Uic Stormwater Improvements
S Century Dr / Spring River Rd Roun
Radar Speed Sign Replacements
Burgess Rd/Day Rd Traffic Signal
Powell Butte Hwy: McGrath Rd to US20
Slurry Seal 2025
ODOT ARTS Program - Driver Speed Feedback Signs
FY 23 Guardrail Improvements
Signage improvements
Sidewalk Ramp Improvements
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
6,639,405
$
2,359,304
88%
20,450
100% i
542,198
98%
991,531
97%
1,151,371
99% i
1,551,099
80% i
1,095,760
0%
1,095,760
100% i
160,000
0%
160,000
100% i
520,000
0%
520,000
100%
386,480
100
367,224
97%
1,930,500
0%
1,930,500
100%
105,726
66%
1,650,000
0%
1,650,000
100%
85,000
0%
85,000
100%
357,325
100%
1,000,000
100% i
197,240
110 %
2,417,752
0%
2,417,752
100%
200,000
0 i
200,000
100% E
1,000,000
100% i
1,454,940
1,272,506
630,000
0% i
630,000
100% i
2,303,234
2,520,000
0%
2,520,000
100%
849,783
219,129
240,000
0%
240,000
100
244
1,650,000
0% i
1,650,000
100% E
30,907
50,000
50,000
2,290,000
2,290,000
350,000
350,000
24,161
24,161 24,161
150,000
0% 150,000 100%
125,839
125,839
100,000
0% 100,000 100%
$ 22,800,097 95%' $ 16,189,012:
24,161 0%: $ 16,189,012 100%i
Q`��SEs COGS Budget to Actuals Report
Solid Waste -Fund 610
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Franchise Disposal Fees
8,000,000
8,858,989 111% =
9,940,000
716,092
7%
9,940,000 100% 4
= A
Commercial Disp. Fee a
3,310,000
3,984,063 120%
4,450,000
392,596
9% a
4,450,000 100% =
s A
Private Disposal Fees
3,450,000
3,236,962 94%
3,420,000
354,734
10% _
3,420,000 100% _
= A
Special Waste
30,000
103,947 346% =
645,000
3,111
0%
645,000 100%
o
Franchise 5% Fees
565,000
646,761 114%
635,000
45,511
7%
635,000 100%
; B
Yard Debris
400,000
456,528 114% ;
440,000
45,104
10% _ -
440,000 100%
Miscellaneous
173,000
290,694 168% =
170,000
17,633
10% _
170,000 100% _
Interest on Investments
60,410
147,126 244%
62,000
14,414
23% _
62,000 100% _
Recyclables
7,000
7,669 110% =
7,000
(5,029)
-72% _
7,000 100%
A
Leases =
1
1 100% =
1
-
0% _
1 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES
15,995,411
17,732,741 111% ;
19,769,001
1,584,166
8%
19,769,001 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
4,108,983
3,850,309
94%
5,739,145
392,597
7%
_ 5,739,145 100%
Materials and Services
7,683,911
7,030,589
91%
8,994,999
218,873
2%
_ 8,994,999 100%
Capital Outlay
309,000
265,290
86%
282,000
-
0%
@ 282,000 100% _
Debt Service
2,302,640
2,302,520 100%
2,305,600
-
0%
a 2,305,600 100% -_
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
14,404,534
13,448,708
93%
17,321,744
611,470
4%
17,321,744 100% ;
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Transfers In - SW Capital & 910,000 - 0%
Equipment Reserve
;
Transfers Out - SW Capital & _ (2,613,962) (2,613,962) 100% : (4,564,141)
(1,178) 0% _
(4,564,141) 100% _
-
Equipment Reserve
TOTAL TRANSFERS (1,703,962) (2,613,962) 153% ; (4,564,141)
(1,178) 0%
(4,564,141) 100% a
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 2,416,385 2,743,514 114% 3,941,745
4,430,505 112% _
4,430,505 112% =
488,760� C
Resources over Requirements 1,590,877 4,284,033 2,447,257
972,696
2,447,257 s
0=
Net Transfers - In (Out) _ (1,703,962) (2,613,962) (4,564,141)
(1,178) a
(4,564,141)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE a $ 2,303,300 $ 4,413,584 192% ; $ 1,824,861
$ 5,402,023 296% ;
$ 2,313,621 127% ;
$488,760;
A Total disposal fee projections reflect management's best estimate of revenues to be
collected; disposal tons are
typically higher in the summer with
reductions in winter. Pending reclass adjustment between Recyclables and Commercial Disp Fee.
B Annual fees due April 15, 2025; received monthly installment from Republic
C Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
SES C-0 Budget to Actuals Report
Fair & Expo - Fund 615
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Food & Beverage
991,000
1,536,154 155% =
1,535,000
2,209
0%
1,535,000 100%
Events Revenue
1,050,000
985,341 94% i
1,390,000
11,768
1%
1,390,000 100%
Rights & Signage
105,000
92,416 88%
110,000
26,400
24%
110,000 100%
Horse Stall Rental
100,000
74,925 75%
67,500
-
0% a 3
67,500 100% _
Storage =
50,000
51,099 102% =
45,000
0% _
45,000 100%
Camping Fee
22,500
33,694 150% =
37,500
-
0% _
37,500 100%
Interest on Investments a
1
22,000
24,619 112% =
16,000
2,066
13% _
16,000 100% s
Miscellaneous
3,000
7,001 233% =
5,000
519
10%
5,000 100% -
TOTAL RESOURCES
2,343,500
2,805,249 120% ;
3,206,000
42,961
1% ;
3,206,000 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Personnel Services
1,478,441
1,460,765 99%
1,851,584
129,899
7%
= 1,851,584 100%
Personnel Services - F&B
148,510
79,529 54%
187,439
4,599
2%
187,439 100%
Materials and Services
1,492,986
1,330,361 89%
1,917,689
50,777
3%
_ 1,937,989 101% &
(20,300);
Materials and Services - F&B
514,200
837,724 163% =
781,750
1,693
0%
_ } 783,433 100%
(1,683);
Debt Service
100,190
100,139 100% =
99,700
-
0%
I 99,700 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
3,734,327
3,808,518 102% ;
4,838,162
186,967
4%
; 4,860,145 100% ;
(21,983);
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Transfers In - Room Tax ;
1,009,023
1,009,023 100% =
963,000
80,250
8%
_
963,000 100%
Transfers In - County Fair
-
-
196,900
16,408
8%
_
196,900 100% _
Transfers In - Park Fund
30,000
30,000 100%
30,000
2,500
8%
30,000 100%
Transfers Out
(163,342)
(10,777) 7%
(10,777)
(898)
8%
(10,777) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
875,681
1,028,246 117% ;
1,179,123
98,260
8%
1,179,123 100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
547,763
547,764 100% =
577,865
572,741
99%
577,865 100% a
0= A
Resources over Requirements s
(1,390,827)
(1,003,269)
(1,632,162)
(144,006)
_
(1,654,145) @
(21,983)=
Net Transfers - In (Out) =
875,681
1,028,246 s
1,179,123
98,260
s
1,179,123
TOTAL FUND BALANCE _
$ 32,617
$ 572,741 999% ;
$ 124,826
$ 526,995 422%
;
$ 102,843 82% ;
($21,983)a
A Final Beginning Fund Balance
will be determined after the final close
of FY24
SE5COG2< Budget to Actuals Report
Annual County Fair - Fund 616 $ 3%
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited) Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Concessions and Catering
a
790,000
Gate Receipts
775,000
Carnival $
430,000
9
Commercial Exhibitors
118,200
Fair Sponsorship
92,500
State Grant a
a
53,167
Rodeo Sponsorship
30,000
a
Interest on Investments
13,500
RN Camping/Horse Stall Rental
17,250
a
Merchandise Sales
2,500
0
Livestock Entry Fees
2,000
a
Miscellaneous
-
TOTAL RESOURCES
2,324,117
REQUIREMENTS Budget
Personnel Services 226,531
Materials and Services 2,356,325
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,582,856
834,968
106% =
797,500
1,042,896
135% =
780,000
245,809
57%
430,000
114,091
97%
115,000
69,967
a
76%
99,000
53,167
100% =
53,167
35,452
118% a
30,000
25,831
191% a
23,000
31,255
181%
18,500
1,899
0
76%
2,500
1,920
96%
2,000
39
2,457,294
106% ;
2,350,667
Actuals
%
Budget
183,190
2,241,088
81%
95%
229,798
2,442,103
2,424,279
94%
2,671,901
11,500
1% _
797,500
100%
146,943
3 i
19% _
780,000
]
100% _
i
-
86,928
ss
20%
430,000
100%
136,925
7 3
119% _
448,650
@
390% =
9
333,6%
94,440
8 9
95% _
a a
122,080
3
123% =
S
23,080=
-
0% _
53,167
a
100%
a
44,010
147% :
34,010
113% =
4,0%
1,672
7%
23,000
100%
s
34,850
a
188%
32,250
174% =
13,750=s
-
@
0%
2,500
s
100% _
a
-
2,934
147% a
2,934
147% =
934=
560,203
24%
2,726,091
116% ;
375,424;
Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
19,649 9% 229,798 100% _ -
852,291 35% _ 2,442,103 100% = 9
871,940 33% , 2,671,901 100% ;
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfer In -TRT 1% 75,000 75,000 100% 75,000 6,250 8% 75,000 100% -
Transfers Out (109,503) (109,503) 100% - -
Transfer Out - Fair & Expo s _ (196,900) (16,408) 8% _ (196,900) 100% _
TOTAL TRANSFERS (34,503) (34,503) 100% ; (121,900) (10,158) 8% (121,900) 100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
521,447
521,447 100% =
600,000
519,959 87% _
519,959 87% _
(80,041)=A
Resources over Requirements ¢
(258,739)
33,015 @
(321,234)
(311,737) a a
54,190 s
375,4243
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(34,503)
(34,503)
(121,900)
(10,158) s =
(121,900) a
2
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 228,205
$ 519,959 228% ;
$ 156,866
$ 198,063 126°/n ;
$ 452,249 288% ;
$295,383:
A Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
�jEs ` Budget to Actuals Report
oG2t
Annual County Fair - Fund 616
CY24 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
Fair 2024
Actuals to
2024
Fair 2023
Date
Projection
RESOURCES
Gate Receipts
$ 1,042,896;'
$
82,439
$ 780,000
Carnival
245,809
24,283
430,000
Commercial Exhibitors
436,160
145,150
448,650
Livestock Entry Fees
1,940
2,914
2,914
R/V Camping/Horse Stall Rental
31,449
32,019
32,019
Merchandise Sales
1,899
-
2,500
Concessions and Catering
512,899
-
482,500
Fair Sponsorship
117,183
105,932
152,080
TOTAL FAIR REVENUES
$ 2,390,235
$
392,737
$ 2,330,664
OTHER RESOURCES
State Grant 53,167 - 53,167
Interest 19,504 15,134 23,494
Miscellaneous 114 - -
TOTAL RESOURCES $ 2,463,020 $ 407,871 $ 2,407,325
REQUIREMENTS
Personnel 175,531 118626 202,111
Materials & Services 2,124,162 1,321:187 2,473,139
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 2,299,693 ,�,� $ 1,439,813 $ 2,675,251
TRANSFERS
Transfer In - TRT 1 %
75,000
43,750
75,000
Transfer Out - F&E Reserve
(170,608)
(54,753)
(54,753)
Transfer Out - Fair & Expo
-
(16,408)
(98,448)
TOTAL TRANSFERS
$ (95,608)
„
$ (27,411)
$ (78,201)
Net Fair
$ 67,719
',,
$ (1,059,353)
$ (346,127)
Beginning Fund Balance on Jan 1
$ 952,421
$ 1,020,140
$ 1,020,140
Ending Balance
$ 1,020,140
'%
$ (39,213)
$ 674,013
�zES `oG2< Budget to Actuals Report
Fair & Expo Capital Reserve - Fund 617
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1 Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Interest on Investments 64,800 94,239 145% 88,000 9,316 11% _ 88,000 100% -•
8 6 8 5
Miscellaneous - 130,809 - - -
TOTAL RESOURCES 64,800 225,047 347% ; 88,000 9,316 11% '. 88,000 100%
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Materials and Services 343,555 273,830 80% = 475,000 13,174 3% _ 475,000 100%
: a as o a
Capital Outlay 746,445 192,098 26% 785,000 7,063 1% 785,000 100% _ A
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,090,000 465,928 43% 1,260,000 20,237 2% • 1,260,000 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals %
Transfers In -TRT 1%
462,119
462,119 100% 442,396
36,866 8%
Transfers In - Fund 165
100,000
100,000 100% 150,000
150,000 100%
Transfers In -Annual County Fair
109,503
109,503 100% _ -
- e
Transfers In - Fair & Expo a
152,565
- 0% _ -
-
TOTAL TRANSFERS
824,187
671,622 81% 592,396
186,866 32%
Projection % $ Variance
442,396 100% -•
150,000 100% ;
592,396 100% ;
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
2,592,838
2,757,229 106% =
3,136,000
3,187,970 102% ,
3,187,970 102%
51,970? B
Resources over Requirements a
(1,025,200)
(240,881)
(1,172,000)
(10,920) a
(1,172,000)
0=
Net Transfers - In (Out)
H
824,187
671,622
S
592,396
186,866
3 S
592,396
E
-
f
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 2,391,825
$ 3,187,970 133% ;
$ 2,556,396
$ 3,363,915 132% ;
$ 2,608,366 102% E
$51,970:
A Capital Outlay appropriations are a placeholder
should viable projects be recommended
and approved for construction
B Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
o'i�1ES c0G�< Budget to Actuals Report
RV Park - Fund 618
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3 %
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
RV Park Fees < 31 Days
a
500,000
479,680 96%
450,000
27,539
6%
o
440,039 98% _
(9,961);
RV Park Fees > 30 Days
12,500
21,682 173% =
15,000
-
0% =
s
15,000 100%
a
Interest on Investments
2,300
8,447 367% =
8,000
951
8 fi
12% _
S
8,000 100%
3
fi
Cancellation Fees
fi
7,000
3
13,820 197%
7,000
8,640
123%,
i
15,053 215% =
i
8,051
Washer Dryer
5,000
�
5,575 112% =
5,000
1,597
32% _
�
5,000 100%
a
a
a
Miscellaneous
2,500
4,335 173% =
2,500
150
ss
6% _
s
2,500 100%
8
Vending Machines
1,500
fi
1,352 90%
1,500
370
d fi
25% =
H
1,500 100%
s
TOTAL RESOURCES
530,800
534,892 101% ;
489,000
39,247
8%
487,092 100% ;
(1,908);
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
91,328
88,108 96% =
159,210
14,231 9% _
159,210 100% ; -
Materials and Services
s
303,173
214,396 71%
344,054
6,798 2% fi
343,176 100% = 87&
Debt Service
222,630
222,596 100% =
223,600
- 0%
223,600 100% -
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
617,131
525,100 85%
726,864
21,028 3%
725,986 100% ; 878;
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In - Park Fund
160,000
160,000 100% =
160,000
13,333
8%
160,000 100% -
Transfers In -TRT Fund a
20,000
20,000 100% =
20,000
1,667
8% 9
20,000 100%
Transfer Out - RV Reserve a
(51,564)
(51,564) 100% ;
(122,142)
(10,179)
8%
(122,142) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
128,436
128,436 100% ;
57,858
4,822
8%
57,858 100% ;
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
93,115
166,640 179% =
248,000
304,867 123%
304,867 123% =
56,867= A
Resources over Requirements
(86,331)
9,791
(237,864)
18,218
(238,894) _
(1,030 =
)fi
Net Transfers - In (Out)
s
128,436
128,436
a
57,858
4,822
57,858
�
a
TOTAL FUND BALANCE _
$ 135,220
$ 304,867 225% ;
$ 67,994
$ 327,907 482% ;
$ 123,831 182% ;
$55,837;
A Final Beginning Fund Balance
will be determined after the final close of FY24
Q`�VZES C-0 Budget to Actuals Report
RV Park Reserve - Fund 619 8 3%
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Interest on Investments 34,300 45,518 133% = 45,000 4,336 10% _ 45,000 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES 34,300 45,518 133% ; 45,000 4,336 10% 45,000 100% a
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Materials and Services 100,000 18,610 19% 100,000 0% 100,000 100%
a � s a
Capital Outlay 74,000 26,642 36% 70,000 - 0% _ 70,000 100% A
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 174,000 45,252 26% 0 170,000 0% 170,000 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfer In - RV Park Ops
51,564
51,564 100% =
122,142
10,179
8%
_ 122,142 100% _ -
TOTAL TRANSFERS
51,564
51,564 100% 0
122,142
10,179
8%
122,142 100% a
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
1,372,453
1,469,559 107% =
1,513,413
1,521,389 101%
1,521,389 101% =
7,976= B
Resources over Requirements 6
(139,700)
266
(125,000)
4,336
(125,000) E
0
Net Transfers - In (Out)
51,564
51,564
t
122,142
10,179
8 6
122,142
8
-
n
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 1,284,317
$ 1,521,389 118% ;
$ 1,510,555
$ 1,535,904 102% ;
$ 1,518,531 101%-
$7,976;
A Capital Outlay appropriations are a piaceholder
B Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
TES coG�< Budget to Actuals Report
Risk Management - Fund 670
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3 %
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Workers' Compensation
1,111,585
1,158,078 104% =
1,116,950
97,600
9%
1,116,950 100%
E
General Liability
935,832
4
935,832 100% =
943,414
78,618
d H
8% =
8 0
943,414 100%
9
Property Damage
418,028
@
418,028 100% =
419,983
34,999
1 e
8% _ °
8
419,983 100%
Unemployment
�
439,989
348,407 79%
362,214
100,368
28%
362,214 100%, - A
Interest on Investments
a
200,000
274,605 137% =
254,000
23,575
s
9% _
a
254,000 100% -
Vehicle
226,710
s
226,710 100% °
250,030
20,836
8%
p
250,030 100% _ -
4
Skid Car Training
10,000
6
45,839 458% =
30,000
-
8 8
0%
3 9
30,000 100% a -
Claims Reimbursement
369,959
399,903 108% =
20,000
-
0%
20,000 100%
Process Fee- Events/ Parades
2,000
1,595 80%
2,000
165
8% _
2,000 100%
Miscellaneous
200
2,700 999%
200
-
0% 3
200 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES
3,714,303
3,811,697 103% 0
3,398,791
356,160
10%
3,398,791 100% ;
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Workers' Compensation s
1,880,000
1,901,810
101%
2,000,000
688,949
34% b
2,000,000 100% 3 -
General Liability
1,200,000
994,706
83%
1,500,000
89,064
6% 6 6
1,500,000 100% _
Insurance Administration
714,197
659,997
a
92% =
7995487
58,561
7% _ =
799,487 100% _
Vehicle
400,000
299,851
75%
700,000
8,172
1% 9
700,000 100%
Property Damage
300,250
474,866
158% =
400,255
348,832
87% _
400,255 100% 5
Unemployment
250,000
109,645
44%
200,000
-
0% a
200,000 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
4,744,447
4,440,875
94%
5,599,742
1,193,577
21%
5,599,742 100%
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers Out - IT
(32,000)
(22,328)
70%
Transfers Out - IT Reserve
(118,000)
(118,000)
100%
Transfers Out - Claims
' (349,959)
(349,959)
100%
Reimbursement
;
Transfers Out - Vehicle
(3,500)
(3,500)
100% _ (4,500) (375) 8% _ (4,500) 100%
Replacement
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(503,459)
(493,787)
98% a (4,500) (375) 8% (4,500) 100% ;
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals % Budget
Actuals
% Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
8,000,000
9,323,307 117% 8,000,000
8,200,351
103% _ 8,200,351 103% = 200,351= B
Resources over Requirements
(1,030,144)
(629,178) a (2,200,951)
(837,418)
i (2,200,951) 0=
Net Transfers - In (Out) a
(503,459)
(493,787) (4,500)
(375)
(4,500) -�
4
TOTAL FUND BALANCE _
$ 6,466,397
$ 8,200,341 127% e $ 5,794,549
$ 7,362,559
127% ; $ 5,994,900 103% ; $200,351:
A Unemployment collected on first $25K of employee's
salary in fiscal year
B Final Beginning Fund Balance
will be determined after the final close of FY24
o`�vCES COG�< Budget to Actuals Report
Health Benefits -Fund 675
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
Internal Premium Charges
COIC Premiums
Employee Co -Pay
Retiree / COBRA Premiums
Prescription Rebates
Interest on Investments
Claims Reimbursement & Other
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS
Health Benefits
Deschutes On -Site Pharmacy
Deschutes On -Site Clinic
Wellness
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
TOTAL
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024 1
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ variance
25,899,034
25,508,234 98%
30,548,182
2,473,277
8%
30,548,182 100% _ -•
1,963,363
e
2,025,772 103% =
2,747,427
202,793
7% =
2,747,427 100%
1,247,416
s
1,406,479 113% =
1,492,623
129,704
p�
9% _
1,492,623 100% -•
1,019,288
1,041,989 102% =
1,039,555
42,803
4% =
1,039,555 100% -
a
280,000
�
382,550 137% =
550,000
-
0%
550,000 100% _ -= A
120,000
s
z
208,021 173%
366,000
14,631
�
4%
s
a ,
366,000 100% _ -
�
124,944
a
317,060 254% =
100,000
31,563
;
32%
100,000 100% a 2
30,654,045
30,890,105 101% ;
36,843,787
2,894,772
8%
36,843,787 100%
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
29,797,663
26,787,680
90%
26,303,391
517,260
2%
28,275,390 107% (1,971,999)� B
I
4,287,997
o
5,355,286
125% =
5,733,434
3,856
0%
i 9 B i
5,733,434 100%
1,415,279
1,356,819
s
96%
1,490,287
3,320
0%
ea s a
1,490,287 100% _ -= C
I
186,274
123,528
66%
174,230
6
0%
@ d @ 9
174,230 100% _ C
35,687,213
33,623,315
94%
33,701,342
524,442
2%
35,673,341 106% ; (1,971,999)
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
% Projection
% $'variance
Beginning Fund Balance
6,107,743
6,107,998 100% =
5,090,316
3,846,771
76% 5,090,316
100% = 0. D
Resources over Requirements
(5,033,168)
(2,733,210) z
3,142,445
2,370,330
1,170,446
(1,971,999)3
Net Transfers - In (Out)
s
-
-
_
¢ a
a a
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 1,074,575
$ 3,374,788 314% =
$ 8,232,761
$ 6,217,101
o
76 /o = a $ 6,260,762
o = ($1,971,999=
76 /o = 10
A Budget estimate is based on claims which are difficult to predict
g Budget for Dental inadvertently entered as $219K vs. $2.1 M. A mid -year budget adjustment will be forthcoming.
C Amounts are paid 1 month in arrears
D Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
(ES COG�< Budget to Actuals Report
911 - Fund 705 and 710
FY25 YTD July 31, 2024 (unaudited)
8.3%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2024
Fiscal Year 2025
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection %
$ Variance
Property Taxes - Current Yr
10,932,000
11,014,581 101% =
11,556,000
0% _
11,556,000 100% =
a A
Telephone User Tax
1,827,530
1,467,581 80%
1,800,500
-
0% _
1,800,500 100% _
- B
Interest on Investments
312,321
462,829 148%
426,000
39,109
9% _
426,000 100%
Police RMS User Fees
244,435
255,485 105%
255,000
-
0% &
255,000 100% _
2 C
Contract Payments
167,765
172,636 103% =
179,300
-
0% _
179,300 100%
User Fee
148,820
151,203 102% e
148,600
3,125
2% a
148,600 100%
Data Network Reimbursement
145,852
107,080 73%
106,500
-
0% 3
106,500 100%
State Reimbursement
93,000
97,500 105% =
93,000
-
0% _
93,000 100%
D
Property Taxes - Prior Yr
90,000
108,215 120%
90,000
24,668
27%
90,000 100% _
-
Property Taxes -Jefferson Co.
40,500
40,915 101% =
42,500
241
1%
42,500 100% _
Miscellaneous
= 32,100
34,304 107%
36,500
1,188
3% _
36,500 100%
o
TOTAL RESOURCES
14,034,323
13,912,327 99%
14,733,900
68,331
0%
14,733,900 100%
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
9,032,045
8,481,407
94%
10,237,093
766,006
7%
10,237,093 100%
Materials and Services
I
4,250,715
3,352,977
79%
4,267,026
439,112
10% _
4,267,026 100%
Capital Outlay
1,831,000
1,361,542
74%
2,750,500
23,158
1%
2,750,500 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS a
15,113,760
13,195,925
87%
17,254,619
1,228,275
7% a
17,254,619 100% ;
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In
1,950,000
-
0%
515,000
-
0%
515,000 100%
Transfers Out
(1,950,000)
-
0%
(515,000)
-
0% a
(515,000) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
-
-
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 13,202,343 13,393,950 101% = 13,160,074 14,110,352 107% 13,160,074 100% 0= E
Resources over Requirements (1,079,437) 716,402 @ (2,520,719) (1,159,944) (2,520,719) 3 O9
Net Transfers - In (Out)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE a $ 12,122,906 $ 14,110,352 116% ; $ 10,639,355 $ 12,950,408 122% , $ 10,639,355 100% ; $0:
A Current year taxes received primarily in November, February and May
8 Telephone tax payments are received quarterly
C Invoices are mailed in the Spring
D State GIS reimbursements are received quarterly
E Final Beginning Fund Balance will be determined after the final close of FY24
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Discussion of Mountain View Community Development Safe Parking and Other
Options
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
N/A - informational discussion
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Mt. View Community Development, with support from Deschutes County and the City of
Redmond, is proposing a 60-unit permanent supported housing village in Redmond,
Oregon.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
TBD
ATTENDANCE:
Kristie Bollinger, Property Manager
Rick Russell, Mountain View Community Development
® ® o
Mt.
ew Community Village AAN\
Master Planned Permanent Supportive Housing Village in Deschutes County
MOUNTAIN VIEW
C O M M U N I T Y
DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT SUMMARY
Mt. View Community Development, with support from Deschutes County and the City of Redmond, propose a 60-unit permanent supportive housing village in
Redmond, Oregon. The development offers below -market rents for those making less than 30% AMI, with on -site staff providing case management services.
The community features opportunity for public -private partnership, recreational facilities, workforce training opportunities, and community gathering spaces.
Site development and landscape is currently in design with Ten Over Studio, with an anticipated construction start date of Fall 2025.
Subject property (pink) and neighboring sites
Property: 8.77 acres (adjacent to 3.2.3ac
Oasis Village site)
Zoning: M1 within the UGB
Land Owner: Deschutes County - adjacent
45 acres also available with County
approval upon proof of concept.
LJ.,
I � ,
Conceptual site plan by Ten Over Studio
60 site permanent supportive housing development
with below market rents serving up to 30% AN
On -site case management
Photo of permanent housing at Community First!
Village in Austin, Texas
For additional information please contact Rick Russell at rick@mvfredmond.org
Target demographic includes recently
unhoused, working poor, those on fixed
incomes, and those in need of a step from
nearby Oasis Village or Safe Parking
Introduction + Executive Summary
Property
Project Overview
Scope of Services
Summary
Prepared by Mt. View Community Development in
conjunction with and support from Deschutes County
and the City of Redmond, Oregon
Mt. View Community Development -- Proposal for Master Planned Permanent SLApportive Housing Village 2
Understanding Mt. View Community Development (MVCD) and the City of Redmond's preference to maximize the number of unhoused individuals served , MVCD
identified sheltering development concepts yielding 30-65 sites throughout the region. We compared programs within the Pacific Northwest and beyond and
analyzed successes and challenges of each. We consulted with affordable housing property managers, low income housing attorneys, service providers, operators,
contractors, and insurance professionals to determine the most feasible designs for the subject property. In doing so we established a set of overall goals and
strategies for our City and County and the constraints associated with each.
Overall Goals + Strategy
® Establish capacity and ensure the quality of appropriate permanent supportive housing units for housing insecure individuals currently homeless or at risk of
homelessness within the greater Redmond community
® Provide adequate indoor and outdoor space for health and well-being and other supportive activities for targeted user group
® Determine successful operating structure on subject property and associated implications with public/private partnership
Targeted User Group
Currently unhoused individuals or those at risk of homelessness working to maintain housing or desiring to transition out of homelessness
Variety of paid permanent housing units
® Social outdoor spaces with active recreational flex space such as a dog park and community garden
® Education and training classrooms
Case management and counseling services with designated office space
® Workforce training areas and life skill development space
Food preparation and dining areas
® Specific opportunities for greater Redmond community involvement and partnership
Mt. View Community Development -- Proposal for Master Planned Permanent Supportive Housing Village
Development Profile
• Site Size: 8.77 acres (adjacent to 3.23ac
Oasis Village site for 12 acre property in total)
0 Zoning: M1 within the UGB
0 Land Owner: Deschutes County -
Currently leased to the City of
Redmond for sublease and
management of property
Mt. View Community Development — Proposal for Master Planned Permanent Supportive Housing Village 4
Project overview
• 60 site housing village serving up to 30% AMI
• 24/7 on -site staff
® Supportive services
— property management
— case management
• Substantial investment in sitework and
landscape
® Target demographic includes recently unhoused,
working poor, those on fixed incomes, and those
in need of an additional step from nearby
transitional shelters making up to 30% AMI
FUTURE CONNECTION
TO NEXT PHASE
\ /- DESIGNATED SITE, TYP
°pNgod
CONNSFCO i
CNFCK.INR
' �� � �' ►i fie►
EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY TONE
EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY ZONE
Mt. View Community Development — Proposal for Master Planned Permanent Supportive P OUSirlg Village 6
60 paid permanent housing units
• Restroom and paid laundry facilities (1:10 ratio of washer/dryer
units and restrooms per site). Permanent housing units include
restrooms.
® Emphasis on investment in landscape to showcase campus and
provide necessary privacy between guests and public given
proximity to Hwy 126.
® Provides parking for RV or additional transportation vehicle
within each site. Additional overflow parking can be provided in
flex use community site
® Community building to provide indoor/outdoor space for
multiuse activities, case management, and workforce training
® Master planned site plan and landscape currently in design with
Ten Over Studio. Permitting in process with the City of Redmond.
Mt. View Community Development — Proposal for Master Planned Permanent Supportive Housing Village 7
Scope of Services
• Project Estimate: $13.5M includes 60 permanent
housing sites and community spaces operational
• Existing ARPA funds support to be used for site work,
infrastructure investment, community building, and
restroom/laundry outbuildings
• Estimated Project Timeline
• Summer 2024: Design review and completion
• Spring 2025: Predevelopment complete
• Fall 2025: On -site construction begins
Spring 2026: Site operational
Operating budget to be financed via HUD housing
vouchers and Medicaid reimbursement via a contract
with Pacific Source (secured in January 2024).
Mt. View Community Development — Proposal for Master Planned Permanent Supportive Housing Village 9
Summary of Proposal
Summary of Community and Proposal
• Community to be developed through the LIFT Permanent Supportive Housing program
• Geography requires significant investment in landscape infrastructure,
signage, and placemaking
MOUNTAIN VIEW
C O M M U N I T Y
DEVELOPMENT
• Operationally intensive demographic with success dependent upon sufficient case management and initial
investment in infrastructure
• Housing village is a permanent option for the recently unhoused, working poor, those on a fixed income, or
those relocating from nearby transitional shelters
• Public/private partnership emphasized, with MVCDs desire for land ownership in order to fully invest in
infrastructure required for the concept
• Phase 1 site development expense is $5M, case management services space is $2.5M, and construction of
housing units is $6M. Operating budget expected to be financed via HUD housing voucher rental income, 15
year LIFT PSH support, and Pacific Source Medicaid reimbursements.
Mt. View community [.development -- Proposal for Master Planned. Permanent Supportive Housing Village 11
Community First! Village in Austin, Texas
m
FUTURE CONNECTION — — DESIGNATED SITE, TYP
TO NEXT PHASE
n G qbM
OOG ka,'Vets
GARDEN BEDS couftrLoRl
CNECIf'l
- GUMMUNiTV
O
R�•N6ATEI9YF00
0.UNDR
t--
EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY ZONE
EOCRpAT010 EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY ZONE
� l a1.�P
FIRE PITS
Preliminary Site Deign by TenOver StUdiO
Subject Property inRed, Onond,Oregon
16
�VTES CO
C. G
Q2� BOAR® OF
COMMISSIONERS
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Deliberation #5: Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update -
Review of Draft Document
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
The Board will consider a request to reopen the record to collect additional input for the
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update.
The Board will provide direction to staff on recommended edits to an updated draft of the
2040 plan for review in its entirety. The updated draft incorporates revisions shared by the
Board at previous deliberation meetings.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The Board of Commissioners will continue its deliberations process in consideration of the
draft Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The full record is located on the project
website: httDs://www.deschutes.orR/cd/oaRe/247-23-000644-oa-deschutes-countv-2040-
comprehensive-plan-update-hearing-page.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Nicole Mardell, AICP, Senior Long Range Planner
Will Groves, Planning Manager
Peter Gutowsky, Community Development Director
COMMUNITY ' 0 MT
IIT, 14LTA 1:*7:7_1► 11l1►A
TO: Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners ("Board")
FROM: Nicole Mardell, AICP, Senior Planner
Will Groves, Planning Manager
DATE: August 14, 2024
SUBJECT: Deliberation #5: Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update -
Review of Draft Document
On August 19, 2024, the Board will consider two items. First, a request to reopen the record
for the Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update process, and dependent on the
outcome of the first item, potentially deliberate on an updated August 14, 2024 draft of the
2040 Plan (Attachment A). This draft reflects revisions shared by the Board at previous
deliberative meetings focused on Chapter 3 - Farm and Forest Resources, Chapter 5 - Natural
Resources, Chapter 7 - Natural Hazards, and Chapter 11 - Unincorporated Communities and
Destination Resorts, and minor scrivener's or technical edits identified by staff. The Board
will have the opportunity to review the draft in its entirety and offer direction on any
remaining revisions to staff.
I. PROPOSAL
This is a legislative text amendment to repeal and replace the 2030 Comprehensive Plan,
adopted in 2011, with the 2040 Plan. No zoning or comprehensive plan map amendments
are being considered, nor are any changes to the County's adopted Goal 5 inventories
pertaining to significant natural resources, scenic views, open spaces, mineral and aggregate
sites, and historic and cultural resources.
The full record is included on the project hearing page:
https://www.deschutes.org/cd/page/247-23-000644-pa-deschutes-county-2040-
comprehensive-plan-update-hearing=page.
II. REQUEST TO REOPEN THE RECORD
Staff received an email from Mary Fleischmann on August 13, 2024. The email was also sent
to the Board, although staff in consultation with legal counsel, recommended the Board not
read the email as the record for the 2040 plan closed on May 30, 2024. Within the email, the
commentor suggested several edits to the draft document and requested the Board reopen
the record to collect additional community input.
If the Board were to reopen the record deliberations would pause, and staff would return
with an order establishing parameters for the new open record period. If the Board chose
not to reopen the record, the deliberations process would continue as scheduled.
III. DELIBERATION PROCESS
The 2040 Plan provides background information, a summary of community considerations,
and overarching goal and policy guidance pertaining to key issues facing the county. The
Board held public hearings to gather testimony for the 2040 Plan on April 10, 2024, in Bend';
April 23 in Sunriver2; and April 30 in Sisters3; and May 8 in Bend 4. At the conclusion of the
May 8 hearing, the Commission voted to close the oral record, leave the written record open
until May 30, and commence deliberations at a subsequent meeting.
Staff held a work session with the Board on June 10'to discuss the process for deliberating
the 2040 Plan, ultimately determining to perform an extensive review of the following four
chapters:
• July 22: Chapter 3, Farm and Forest Resources
• July 24: Chapter 5, Natural Resources
• July 29: Chapter 7, Natural Hazards
• August 5: Chapter 11, Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts.
On August 5, 2024, the Board scheduled an additional meeting to review an updated draft
of the document in its entirety. The document has been updated to an August 14, 2024,
version which includes the Board's recommended revisions from the previous four meetings,
in addition to scrivener's and technical edits. The draft document is intended to serve as a
redline version for ease in identifying changes. Formatting, graphic design, and replacement
of images will occur prior to formal adoption of the document. Staff will be seeking direction
from the Board on any remaining edits to the document and a vote to initiate the adoption
1 https://www.deschutes.org/bcc/page/board-county-commissioners-meeting-162
2https://www.desch
utes.org/bcc/page/pu
bl ic-hearing-2020-2040-comprehensive-plan-update
3 https://www.deschutes.org/bcc/page/public-hearing-2020-2040-comprehensive-plan-update-0
4 https://www.deschutes.org/bcc/page/2020-2040-comprehensive-plan-update-public-hearing
S https://www.deschutes.org/bcc/page/board-county-commissioners-meeting-175
Page 2 of 3
process. Staff will then work with the consultant to finalize the draft document, including
graphic design and formatting work, for first reading.
Parking Lot
During the June work session, staff introduced the concept of a "parking lot" for items that
may be outside the scope of the 2040 Plan. This includes items that are one-time actions
more fitting for a subsequent action plan or items potentially precluded by state law. They
are listed in Attachment B. Staff recommends the Board table them during deliberations,
and instead include the list as an attachment to the adopted 2040 Plan. The Board can then
discuss them in greater detail through the development of an action plan.
IV. NEXT STEPS
Staff seeks direction from the Board on the request to reopen the record. Dependent on the
initial decision, staff also seeks direction on remaining edits to the August 14, 2024, draft
version of the 2040 Plan. Following the discussion, staff will integrate edits into a final version
for adoption. As this is the last scheduled deliberation meeting, the Board may raise
additional topics for discussion at the meeting, or schedule additional meetings as
necessary.
Attachments:
A. August 14, 2024, Draft - Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan
B. "Parking Lot" Issues
Page 3 of 3
Attachment B
Deschutes County
DESCHUTES
COUNTY
Acknowledgements
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Patti Adair, Chair
Anthony DeBone, Vice Chair
Phil Chang
DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Jessica Kieras, Chair
Nathan Hovekamp, Vice Chair
Matt Cyrus
Susan Altman
Kelsey Kelley
Patrick Trowbridge
Toni Williams
Dale Crawford (throughJune, 2023)
Maggie Kirby (through June 2023)
STAFF
Peter Gutowsky, AICP, Community Development Director
William Groves, Planning Manager
Nicole Marcell, AICP, Senior Planner
CONSULTANT TEAM
MIG
Parametrix
Letz Consulting
Kittelson and Associates
Adopted
i-2 I Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements...............................i-2
Introduction.....................................i-4
1. Community
Engagement ....................... ..............
1-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations...
1-2
Context...... ......................... ..........................................................
1-2
Key Community Issues..........................................................
1-6
Goals and Policies . ................... .........................................
:..... 1-6
2. Land Use and
Regional Coordination ............................2-1
Context..... ............ .................................
2-3
Key Community Considerations.......................................2-7
Goals and Policies....-- ..................
2-9
3. Farm and Forest Resources .............. I .....3-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
3-2
Context..................... ....... ..........._.................................... _........3-3
Key Community Considerations....._ . ...............................
3-6
Goals and Policies ............. .-....................................................
3-7
4. Mineral and Aggregate Resources ..............4-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations ...........
4-2
Context... ........................................ ................................... ...........
4-2
Key Community Considerations ........................
4-4
Goals and Policies ............... .................................................
....4-4
S. Natural Resources ............................5-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations._......-
5-2
Context.........................................................................................
5-3
Key Community Considerations .....................................
-5-9
Goals and Policies...............................................................
.5-10
6. Historic and Cultural Resources ...............6-11
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations.........6-12
Context... ....................... ........... . ..... - .................... _.........
6-13
Key Community Considerations.....................................6-13
Goals and Policies ........... --...................................................6-14
7. Natural Hazards..............................7-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations ...........
7-2
Context... ..................... ............................................. ...........
7-3
Key Community Considerations... ....................................
7-6
Goals and Policies ................................................ ................
....7-7
i-3 I Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
8. Recreation...................................8-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations ...........
.8-2
Context.........................................................................................
8-4
Key Community Considerations ........................................
8-5
Goals and Policies ............................... .......................... .........8-6
9. Economic Development .......................9-1
Context.. ........................................................................... -
9-2
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations ............
9-2
Key Community Considerations........................._......._...9-5
Economic Development Goals and Policies ..................-9-6
10. Housing ... .................................
10-1
Context. ................................ ............ - ............................
—. 10-2
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations . ........
10-2
Key Community Considerations ...... ............ ....................
10-4
Goals and Policies ............................... .................................
10-6
11 Unincorporated Communities and Destination
Resorts . ........................................
11-1
Context......................................................................................1
1-2
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations ..........
11-2
Key Community Considerations ........................ ..............
11-4
Goals and Policies.................................................................11-4
12. Public Facilities..............................12-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations ..........
12-2
Context.. ............................................................. ...................
12-3
Key Community Considerations ..... ......... ..... ...............
..12-6
Goals and Policies... ..................... -- .. ....... . .......................12-7
13, Transportation..............................13-1
14. Energy......................................14-1
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations ..........
14-2
Context... ................ ........... ........ ...............
— 14-3
Key Community Considerations......................................14-5
Goals and Policies. ................... . ...... —--...................14-5
Appendix A - Terrebonne Community Plan .........
A-1
Appendix B-Tumalo Community Plan ..............B-1
Appendix C - Transportation System Plan ...........C-1
Appendix D - Newberry Country Plan ..............
D-1
Appendix E - Goal 5 Supplemental Sections ..........
E-1
Ilatteli[Mi
The purpose of the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan is to provide a blueprint
for land use conservation and development. This is accomplished through goals and
policies that tell a cohesive story of where and how development should occur and what
places should remain undeveloped. The Plan provides a legal framework for establishing
more specific land use actions and regulations such as zoning. The goals and policies are
based on existing conditions and trends, community values and the statewide planning
system. The Plan must provide clear policy direction yet remain flexible.
The County's most recent Comprehensive Plan
was adopted in 2011. Since then, the County
has grown substantially and experienced many
demographic and economic shifts. Between April
2010 and July 2020, the Countys population grew
from 157,730 residents to 198,253 residents.
This growth - 25.7% over ten years - is over twice
the 10.6% increase that the State of Oregon
experienced as a whole. The latest projections
from Portland State Universitys Population
Research Centersuggest strong continued
growth throughout Deschutes County.
'An updated Comprehensive Plan is necessary
to address current needs of the communities in
the County, as well as to guide the anticipated
growth and development of Deschutes County
over the next twentyyears. Although many of
the goals and policies of the 2011 Plan still hold
value, fundamental data, trends, and land use
issues have become outdated. The updated
Comprehensive Plan needsto incorporate
community input to craft new and updated
goals and policies regarding agriculture,
forestry, housing, recreation, natural resources,
natural hazards, economic development, and
transportation.
i-4 I Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
In Oregon, comprehensive plans must comply
with the statewide planning system, which was
adopted in 1973,to ensure consistent land use
policies across the State. While compliance
with the statewide system is required, it is also
important for a comprehensive plan to reflect
local needs and interests. This Plan balances
statewide requirements and local land use
values.
The Comprehensive Plan is the County's long-
range plan for how it will grow and serve its
community members in the future. Oregon state
law requires all counties and cities to adopt and
regularly update Comprehensive Plans that are
consistent with state and regional goals, laws,
administrative rules and other requirements and
guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan addresses
topics such as land use, housing, economic
development, transportation, parks and
recreation, and natural resources, with a strong
emphasis on how land is used, developed, and/
or conserved. Other topics in the plan include
citizen involvement, natural hazards, and public
infrastructure and facilities, and more. The Plan
describes conditions related to each element
of the community and provides overarching
guidance for future County decisions in the form
of a set of goals, objectives, and policies. These
policies will drive future decisions and actions
undertaken by County staff, advisory groups,
and elected decision -makers.
Establishes a consistent, statewide approach to planning and development. Development
encouraged to be concentrated into cities while farm, forest, and natural resource areas
are encouraged to be protected from development.
Provides very specific criteria for development outside of city limits, including permitted
uses and development types on farm and forest lands. Counties are required to abide by
these regulations when reviewing development proposals.
Integrates statewide planning program goals, statute, and rule at the county level. Where
the statewide planning program goals allow local discretion, implements locally developed
plans and regulations.
i-5 I Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Deschutes County Timeline
� 3
r ktSZ f -
DESCHUTES
COUNTY
act 42040
1988to 2003 2010 2023
Periodic Review "Deschutes County "Deschutes 2040"
and updatesto 2030" Comprehensive Comprehensive
Comprehensive Plan Plan Update Plan Update
City of Bend photo courtesy of DowntownBend.org
i-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
NATURX RESOURCE ECONOMIC
t �{ MU)FIRE� AND OPEN SPACE +
DEVELOPMENT
PROTECTION OPPORTUNITIES
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Public engagement is the touchstone of planning in Oregon. As Deschutes County grows
and its population changes over the course of the next 20 years, the County must be
prepared to find innovative ways to keep community members involved in the planning
process and provide ample and accessible ways to find and digest information. Challenges
including funding, resources, and ongoing state appeals might pose barriers to this work.
The County has an opportunity to plan for adequate resources and staffing to support this
work.
Context
Involving the public in planning is a critical part
of Oregon's land use system. Statewide Planning
Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement, is intended to
ensure that the public has the opportunity
to be meaningfully involved in all phases of
the land use planning process. Creating these
opportunities requires time and energy on
the part of County staff, as well as systems to
incorporate that input in a meaningful way.
To participate in planning actions, the public
needs to be notified of the proposal or project,
understand the legal framework for the decision
and understand the implications of the decision.
Local governments need to be aware of changing
technologies and best practices to Involve the
community and share project information.
Community engagement can take many forms,
such as focus groups for a larger planning
project, email notification lists for department
activities, or mailed notices of public hearings.
1-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Community Engagement
Summary of Engagement for the 2023 Update
C0 2*16
fs,
Social'•ia In -Person Attendees
Stories
Impressions at OpenHouses
f0?01!0
a`
zs"
z
,a ?`
Online Open House
Survey Responses
• •
Meetings
1-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Regulatory Framework
Statewide Planning Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement
lays the groundworkfor the County's public
involvement program. Jurisdictions are required
to establish a Citizen Involvement Program that
provides widespread community involvement,
two-way communication with appropriate
feedback mechanisms, opportunities for
engagement in all phases of the planning
process, technical information available in an
intelligible form, and is adequately funded.
Deschutes County's Community
Involvement Program
Statewide Planning Goal 1 is implemented by
Deschutes Countys Community Involvement
Program, as described In the following section
DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Deschutes County Planning Commission
serves as the County's Committee for
Community Involvement (CCI). The Planning
Commission is composed of seven volunteer
1-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Community Engagement
members appointed to four-year terms by the
Board of County Commissioners (Board).
Membership of the commission is representative
of the various geographic areas of the County.
Members are selected through an open process
that aims to balance the diverse views of
Deschutes County residents.
The purpose of the CCI is to create a direct
and transparent connection between County
decision -making and the public by providing
regular updates, speakers, panel discussions,
and handouts on land use law and policy. The
CCI aims to make materials intelligible and
convenient for the public and to provide a venue
for civil discourse on important issues for the
County.
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
The Historic Landmarks Commission serves
as a hearings body for matters concerning
historical districts, structures and sites within
unincorporated Deschutes County as well as the
city of Sisters. The Landmarks Commission is
composed of nine voting and several non -voting
ex-officio members who have demonstrated
expertise In historic preservation related
disciplines. Commissioners serve four-year
terms.
OTHER LAND USE RELATED
ADVISORY GROUPS
Project Wildfire is a committee formed to
coordinate, develop and implement strategies
to mitigate the effects of losses due to natural
disasters that strike Deschutes County. Project
Wildfire is composed of 15 to 27 members who
reside or represent agencies within Deschutes
County. All members are appointed by the Board
and serve four years (see also Chapter 7#,
Natural Hazards).
The Deschutes River Mitigation and
Enhancement Program helps achieve Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) habitat
and management goals and objectives within
the Upper Deschutes River sub -basin, consistent
with an agreement between the Central Oregon
Irrigation District (COID) and ODFW. As part of
that agreement COID provides ODFW with funds
to develop and implement a fish and wildlife
habitat mitigation and enhancement program for
the Upper Deschutes River Basin. The Deschutes
River Mitigation and Enhancement Committee
1-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Community Engagement
has seven voting members appointed to three-
year terms by the Board (see also Section 2.5).
In addition to convening these groups,
Deschutes County engages with the public
through numerous methods, including:
Conducting regular work sessions and
hearings
Providing timely public notice of important
items
Maintaining the County Website, including
the department's"Community Engagement
Center" page.
Advertising events and engaging with
constituents through social media channels
Coordinating with media organizations,
such as local newspapers.
Meeting with individuals and small groups
to get feedback on important issues.
These activities were part of the most recent
update of this Comprehensive Plan.
Key Community Issues
Deschutes County is changing and community
members are seeking new ways to share
their ideas on key issues. To provide ample
opportunities to engage, new tools and
technologies will be needed to involve new
groups. Issues that the policies in this section
address include:
Continuing to simplify materials to use plain
language and be accessible to a variety of
audiences
Continuing to maintain a presence
throughout the County, including holding
meetings and events throughout the
County
Supporting engagement activities that allow
community members to participate virtually
and at the time of their choosing.
With these issues in mind, Deschutes County has
adopted the following goals and policies:
1-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Community Engagement
Goals and Policies
Goal 1 .1: Provide for a robust community
involvement program that includes all members
of the community, Including those who are
commonly under -represented, by ensuring
access to information, encouraging community
collaboration, identifying and addressing barriers
to involvement, and promoting efficient and
transparent planning processes.
Policy 1 .1 .1 . Convene the Deschutes County
Planning Commission as the County's
Committee for Community Involvement in
order to provide a direct and transparent
connection between County decision -making
and the public.
Policy 1.1 .2.Wrlte all County planning
documents to be understandable, intuitive,
and easily available to the general public,
using simplified language where possible,
with acronyms spelled out and technical
language explained.
Policy .1 .3. Hold area -specific
comprehensive plan and zoning text
amendment public hearings in locations and
at times convenient and accessible to area
residents, as appropriate.
Policy 1 .1 .4. Provide property information
to the public in an Intuitive and easy -to -use
manner.
Policy 1 .1 .5. Consult and coordinate with
developers before submitting applications
as required or recommended by the County
Development Code to identify and discuss
project requirements and impacts.
Policy 1 .1 .6. Invest in and support land
use educational resources for community
members including information related to
rural living, agricultural practices, natural
resources, and natural hazards.
Policy 1 .1 .7. Promote opportunities for
community members to have civil dialogue
around key community issues.
Policy 1 .1 .8. Explore new and innovative
ways to reach community members and
promote participation in the planning
process.
1-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Community Engagement
Goal 1 .2: Support the activities of the Committee
for Community Involvement
Policy 1 .2.1 . Maintain adequate funding and
staffing support for the Committee.
Policy 1 .2.2. Provide regular updates,
speakers, panel discussions, and handouts
on land use law and policy.
Policy 1 .2.3. Appoint members through an
open and public process to reflect the diverse
geographic regions, demographics, and
values of Deschutes County residents.
Policy 1 .2.4. Meet with the Board of County
Commissioners at least once a year to
coordinate planning policies and activities.
Policy 1 .2.5. Complete periodic reports on
community -Involvement implementation
for the State Citizen Involvement
Advisory Committee, the Board of County
Commissioners, and the public.
Policy 1 .2.6. Maintain open and civil
discourse among Committee members and
with the public.
[�=,l ljlnlll[<l=lUml!,qL
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Deschutes County has been one of the most rapidly growing parts of Oregon for many
years. This growth can cause tension and highlight trade-offs between community
priorities, such as the need for housing, preservation of natural resources, adequate
infrastructure, and intergovernmental collaboration. To manage this growth, the County
partners with its cities, special districts, and state and federal agencies to ensure a
collaborative approach to development activities. As the County continues to navigate
emerging issues, intergovernmental agreements and new partnerships will be key.
One purpose of the Deschutes County
Comprehensive Plan is to provide a blueprint
for land use throughout the County. This is
accomplished through goals and policies that tell
a cohesive story of where and how development
should occur and what places are expected to
remain undeveloped. The Plan provides a legal
framework for establishing more specific land
use actions and regulations.
Deschutes County regulates and manages the
use of land in the unincorporated parts of the
County. This is accomplished by:
Implementing state policy and laws
and furthering local planning goals by
maintaining, updating and applying County
land use policies, standards and regulations
in its zoning codes and this Comprehensive
Plan.
Reviewing development and land use
proposals and help applicants to navigate
the application process.
Coordinating with other local jurisdictions
on issues of regional growth management,
infrastructure, and public services.
Coordinating land use and transportation
planning efforts in rural areas including
planning for farm and forest lands and
natural resource management and
protection.
Administering land use regulations for
unincorporated communities in the County.
2-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
The policies contained in this chapter, as well as
all chapters in this Plan, establish the legislative
policy basis for the Countys land use planning
program. The program is implemented primarily
through application of the Countys Zoning Code,
regulatory maps, and development permitting
application and approval procedures. In addition,
these policies establish important criteria to
be used when initiating regulatory changes or
reviewing and developing code, map, and policy
amendments.
Note: Official comprehensive plan and zoning
maps, including overlay zone maps, ^ ' .��
are available Deschutes County
Dial Properly Information System.
Land Use and Regional Coordination
Context
Comprehensive Plan Designations
Comprehensive Plan designations provide
a high-level policy basis for more detailed
zoning regulations -each Comprehensive Plan
designation may be implemented by one or
more specific zones.
Comprehensive plan designations in Deschutes
Countyare shown in Map 2-1 and described
in the preceding table. Comprehensive Plan
designations within the Bend, Redmond, Sisters,
and La Pine Urban Growth Boundaries are
excluded - local jurisdictions have responsibility
for comprehensive planning within their Urban
Growth Boundaries.
Comprehensive Plan Purpose S tatement De
County -wide Designations
Agriculture
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands for farm use.
Airport Development
To allow development compatible with airport use while mitigating impacts on sur-
rounding lands.
Forest
To conserve forest lands for multiple forest uses.
Open Space &
To protect natural and scenic open spaces, including areas with fragile, unusual or
Conservation
unique qualities.
Rural Residential
To provide opportunities for rural residential living outside urban growth bound-
Exception Area
aries and unincorporated communities, consistent with efficient planning of public
services.
Surface Mining
To protect surface mining resources from development Impacts while protecting
development from mining impacts.
Resort Community
To define rural areas with existing resort development that are not classified as a
destination resort.
Rural Community
To define rural areas with limited existing urban -style development.
Rural Service Center
To define rural areas with minimal commercial development as well as some resi-
dential uses, based on Oregon Administrative Rule 660-22 or its successor.
Urban- Unincorporated
To define rural areas with existing urban development, based on Oregon Adminis-
Community
trative Rule 660-22 or its successor.
Urban Designations
Deschutes County coordinates with cities to adopt comprehensive plan designations for areas within Urban
Growth Boundaries or as part of Urban Reserves Areas in the City of Redmond area. These designations are
reflected in the Deschutes CountyGIS database.
Area Specific Designations
Parts of Deschutes County (Sun river for example) have area -specific Comprehensive Plan designations. These
are detailed in Chapter 11, Unincorporated Communities.
2-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
LA
K L A M A T H
Transportation
— stateecon"
—+—�— Ranroad
County Lines
Arterial
Collector
Forest Highway
Comprehensive Plan
Designation
Airport
JIM Agriculture
JIM Forest
Flood Plain
Open Space &
Conservation
Rural Commercial
Resort
Rural Industrial
Rural Residential
e ccdloa Area
surface Mining
JIM Terrabone Districts
Tumble Districts
Unincorporated
Community
_ Mixed Use Commercial
Mixed Use / Commercial
Future Expansion Area
Other
Urban Gromh Boundary
_.... Urban Reserve
Urban Unincorporated
Community
LAKE C0UiN Y
C O U f 1 T `( O - Miles
zap Descno:esCoonryCom9renensivePlan 1 � 05 5 10 Prepared by
Revised 7/31/2023
This map is Jar information purposes only. The Caunrys official zoning and comprehensive plan maps can be accessed through the Deschutes County Dial Property Information system. Please note that these maps do not represent all of the Counrys combining and overlay zones.
Land Use and Regional Coordination
Zoning Designations
Zoning designations in Deschutes County are
shown in Map 2-2. Zones within the Bend,
Redmond, Sisters, and La Pine Urban Growth
Boundaries are excluded - local jurisdictions
have responsibility for zoning within Urban
Growth Boundaries.
OVERLAY ZONES
Deschutes County has the following overlay
zones, which apply in addition to the base zone
of a given property.
Airport Safety: The purpose of the AS Zone
is to restrict incompatible land uses and
airspace obstructions around airports in an
effort to maintain an airport's maximum
benefit.
Destination Resort: The purpose of
the Destination Resort Combining Zone
is to identify lands eligible for siting
a Destination Resort and establish
procedures and standards for establishing
this type of development.
Landscape Management: The purposes
of the Landscape Management Combining
Zone are to maintain scenic and natural
resources of the designated areas and
to maintain and enhance scenic vistas
and natural landscapes as seen from
designated roads, rivers, or streams.
Greater Sage -Grouse Combining Zone.
The purpose of the Greater Sage -Grouse
Combining Zone is to fulfill obligations of
OAR 660-23-0115. This state rule requires
seven Oregon counties to mitigate impacts
of large-scale development on sage -grouse
habitat.
Sensitive Bird and Mammal Habitat: The
purpose of the Sensitive Bird and Mammal
Combining Zone is to insure that sensitive
habitat areas identified in the County's Goal
5 sensitive bird and mammal inventory
as critical for the survival of the northern
bald eagle, great blue heron, golden eagle,
prairie falcon, osprey, great grey owl, and
2-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
theTownsend's big -eared bat are protected
from the effects of conflicting uses or
activities which are not subject to the Forest
Practices Act.
Surface Mining Impact Area: The purpose
of the SMIA zone is to protect the surface
mining resources of Deschutes County
from new development which conflicts with
the removal and processing of a mineral
and aggregate resource while allowing
owners of property near a surface mining
site reasonable use of their property.
Wildlife Area: The purpose of the
Wildlife Area Combining Zone is to
conserve important wildlife areas
in Deschutes County; to protect an
important environmental, social and
economic element of the area; and to
permit development compatible with the
protection of the wildlife resource.
CITY COORDINATION
Deschutes County includes the following
jurisdictions, each with their own authority and
needs. The role of the County is largely one of
coordination across these multiple communities.
Land Use and Regional Coordination
Deschutes County contains four incorporated
cities. The County, per statute, is responsible for
coordinating with cities on growth related
issues including urban growth boundary and
urban reserve planning. The County maintains
intergovernmental agreements with each cityto
define land use authority for lands outside of city
limits and within urban growth boundaries.
City of Bend
Bend is the largest incorporated area in
Deschutes County. It is centrally located in
the county, with Highways 20 and 97 crossing
paths through the center of the city. Bend has
experienced rapid growth in the last few
years, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic
and "Zoom Town" remote working trends. The
2022 estimated population of the Bend UGB is
103,976. The Bend UGB accounts for most of the
population share among all UGBs in Deschutes
Countywith a population of 225,619 (57.4% of
the population) by 2072.
City of La Pine
The City of La Pine is located close to the
southern edge of the county along Hwy. 97. The
current (2022) estimated population of the La
Pine UGB is 2,736. The population of the La Pine
UGB is projected to increase by 87%to 5,129 in
2047. By 2072, the population is projected to be
8,336.
City of Redmond
Redmond is located northeast of Bend with
Hwy. 97 running through the center of town.
The current (2022) estimated population of the
Redmond UGB is 37,342. The population of the
Redmond UGB is projected to increase by 121 %
to 82,601 in the next 50 years. By 2047 it is
estimated that the population of the Redmond
UGBwill increaseto 60,060.
City of Sisters
Sisters is located on the eastern edge of the
Willamette National Forest and Cascade
Mountains. The current (2022) estimated
population of the Sisters UGB is 3,437. The
Sisters UGB is projected to increase by 130%, to
7,911 in2047,andto14,881 by2072.
TRIBAL COORDINATION
In the Treaty of 1855 (12 Stat. 963), the
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs cedes
approximately10.2 million acres to the Unit
States Government .^ exchange for cre;t ^
reserved-Gf the Warm Springs Reservation f
its exclusive use. The Treaty further reserve to
rt ^fthis ^^t, the Tribes ;ia
rights to 44r4ttake fish at all usual and
accustomed stations, and to hunt-_74skr, gat[
roots and berries, and gr»o ^^ these coao
laacpasture livestock on unclaimed lands
The map beleuwon page 2 9 Identifies the
location of these ceded areas in Deschutes
County, which primarily intersect with publi
owned lands. Coordination with the
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs on gr(
and development related issues is importan
ensure consistency with these treaty rights.
2-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Land Use and Regional Coordination
Key Community Considerations
The rapid pace of growth in Deschutes County
and its impacts on urban, rural, natural, and
recreational areas has been one of the most
significant - and at times the most controversial
- topics of discussion among tk�-
GeA:lmy 44projectparticipants. Some topics
and comments include:
Strong desire by some for greater densities
in urban areas, in order to accommodate
growth while preserving open space and
resource land in rural areas.
A similarly strong feeling by some that the
cities in Deschutes County are becoming
too urban already.
Concern about the amount and distribution
of benefits and burdens created by
destination resorts and tourism -related
activities in rural areas.
Strong desire for interagency collaboration
to manage growth in a coordinated
manner.
With these ongoing conversations in mind,
Deschutes County drafted and refined the
following goals and policies to guide the growth
of our community for the next 20 years.
I
I
DESCHUTES
�t
� r_F F E f�soiv
I
I
VVHEELER
COUNTY
D.-
+
COUNTY
AIRFIELD OPERATIONS
;FOREST USE 1
COUiNTY
URBAN AREA RESERVE
----
L I N K fI
DISTRICT
FOREST USE 2
a 10 ACRE MIN,URBAN
C 0 _J N I Y®
AVIATION RELATED
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
j FLOOD PLAIN
AREA RESERVE 10
ACRE MINIMUM
A PLAN FOR T FI [ FUTURE
TION
AVIASUPPORT
MULTIPLE USE
WESTSIDE TRANSECT
Water Bodies
DISTRICT
AGRICULTURAL
ZONE
EFU - ALFALFA
OPEN SPACE AND
:; URBAN RESERVE AREA I
�- _ _ tY rY
, County Boundary
I
zaz `-I?` sza I
SUBZONE
SPACE & NSERVATION,OPEN
URBAN GROWTH
EFU -HORSE RIDGE
CONSERVATION
BOUNDARY
Transportation
SUBZONE
PUBLIC
URBAN
;.
State Routes
EFU - LA PINE
r ! FACILITY,PUBLIC
-UNINCORPORATED
COMMUNITY
'
s
SUBZONE
FACILITIES
RURAL SERVICE
Railroad
..
EFU -LOWER BRIDGE
�i
„-„ RURAL COMMERCIAL
CENTER
— —
♦
v}
�f?
SUBZONE
EFU -SISTERS /
RURAL INDUSTRIAL
RURAL COMMUNITY
_ + County Lines
I
CLOVERDALE SUBZONE
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
y SURFACE MINING
- RESORT COMMUNITY
EFU - TERREBONNE
— RURAL COMMERCIAL
LANE C O U N I Y
SUBZONE
RESIDENTIAL
SUBURBAN LOW
EFU - TUMALO /
REDMOND / BEND
DENSITY
,"`♦., .. _<o-RI
SUBZONE
URBANIZABLE AREA
+
I
KLAMAIH
COUNTY
L A K cc C0Ui1\1 Y
--,_,� Miles
/���.�
�
0 5 10
Prepared by
2 a "esd-.uees C cuniprer sve elan I
Revised 7/31/2023
This imp is for information purposes only. The Coun tys oJJicialzoning and romprehensive plan maps can
be accessed through the Deschutes County Dial Property Information System. Please note that these maps do not represent all o/the County's combining
and overlay zones.
Goals and Policies
Goal 2.1: Maintain an open and public land
use process In which decisions are based
on substantial evidence and a balancing of
community needs.
Policy 2.1 .1 .Balance the consideration of
private property rights and the economic
Impacts of land use decisions on property
owners with incentives to preserve
agricultural and forest land, wildlife habitat,
ground and surface water resources,
wetlands, riparian areas, open areas and
other community goals identified In the
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 2.1 .2. Review the Comprehensive
Plan periodically in order to address current
conditions, issues, and opportunities.
2-9 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Land Use and Regional Coordination
Policy 2.1 .3. The Deschutes County
Comprehensive Plan Map will be retained
in official replica form as an electronic
map layer within the County Geographic
Information System and is adopted as part of
this Plan.
Policy 2.1 .4. Implement Comprehensive
Plan policies through the Community
Development Department's annual work plan
and other actions by the Department and the
Board of County Commissioners.
Policy 2.1 .5. Explore methods to integrate
carrying capacity into County land use
decision -making.
Goal2.2: Coordinate and support regional
planning efforts relating to growth, natural
resources, recreation, and major infrastructure
investments.
Policy 2.2.1 . Periodically review and update
intergovernmental and urban management
agreements to coordinate land use review
on land inside urban growth boundaries and
outside city limits.
Policy 2.2.2. Help coordinate regional
planning efforts with other agencies on land
use policies and actions that impact their
jurisdictions.
Policy 2.2.3. Support the use of high value
natural resource and recreational lands
for public purposes, whether through
acquisition, easements, or other means.
Policy 2.2.4. Support the implementation
of long-range plans of Deschutes County
jurisdictions, incorporating elements of those
plans into the Countys Comprehensive Plan
as appropriate.
Policy2.2.5. Encourage cities to conduct, -
in collaboration with Deschutes County,
urban reserve planning to facilitate orderly
and thoughtful management of growth and
infrastructure needs.
Policy 2.2.6. Collaborate with federal
agencies on land management issues,
including homelessness, community wildfire
protection, wildlife habitat restoration, water
quality, road networks, energy projects, the
impacts of recreation and the expansion of
sustainable recreation opportunities.
Policy 2.2.7. Support efforts to reduce
barriers to regional infrastructure projects
with community benefit while mitigating
negative -impacts.
Policy 2.2.8. Support updates to
unincorporated community area plans.
2-10 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Land Use and Regional Coordination
Policy 2.2.9, In accordance with OAR 660-
024-004 a n d 0045, Deschutes County,
fulfilling coordination duties specified in
ORS 195.025, shall approve and update its
comprehensive plan when participating
cities within their jurisdiction legislatively or
through a quasi-judicial process designate
regionally significant sites.
Policy 2.2.10.The County and City shall
periodically review the agreement associated
with the Redmond Urban Reserve Area
(RURA). The following land use policies guide
zoning in the RURA.
a. Plan and zone RURA lands for rural uses,
in a manner that ensures the orderly,
economic and efficient provision of urban
services as these lands are brought into
the urban growth boundary.
b. Parcels shall be a minimum of ten acres.
c. Until lands In the RURA are brought into
the urban growth boundary, zone changes
or plan amendments shall not allow more
intensive uses or uses that generate more
traffic, than were allowed prior to the
establishment of the RURA.
d. For Exclusive Farm Use zones, partitions
shall be allowed based on state law and
the County Zoning Ordinance.
e. New arterial and collector rights -of -way
in the RURA shall meet the right-of-way
standards of Deschutes County or the City
of Redmond, whichever is greater, but
be physically constructed to Deschutes
County standards.
f. Existing and future arterial and collector
rights -of -way, as designated on the
Countys Transportation System Plan, shall
be protected from development.
Land Use and Regional Coordination
g. A single-family dwelling on a legal parcel is
permitted if that use was permitted before
the PURA designation. Additionally, the
County will coordinate planning efforts
and development goals with the City of
Redmond prior to bringing County -owned
property into Redmond's urban growth
boundary.
Goal 2.3: Manage county -owned lands to
balance the needs of the community as
articulated in the goals and policies of this Plan
and othersupporting planning documents.
Policy 2.3.1 . Manage lands with a park
designation consistent with the goals and
policies in Chapter 5 Natural Resources.
Policy2.3.2. Supportthe efforts of park
districts, state and/or federal agencies to
identify additional properties along rivers,
streams, or creeks, or containing significant
wildlife, scenic resources, or open space
resources to designate as park land.
Goal2.4: Minimize onerous barriers to land use
application and development review processes.
Policy2.4.1 . Explore opportunities to build
or obtain specialty planning knowledge and
experience among staff within CDD in related
fields such as wildlife, natural resources, and/
or agricultural practices.
Policy 2.4.2. Explore measures to reduce
development costs for projects related to
agriculture and addressing houselessness,
including fee reductions and expedited land
use applications.
2-11 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Commented [NM2]: Image will be replaced.
Farm and Forest
Resources
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Farm and forestry resources and operations continue to play an important role in
the character and economy of Deschutes County. However, a variety of ongoing and
forecasted trends will impact the viability and vitality of these industries and the people
who contribute to them. A number of these trends and challenges are described below
and more information about some issues is found in the Water Resources section of this
Plan (see Chapter 5: Natural Resources).
PREVALENCE OF SMALL FARMING OPERATIONS
AND HOBBY FARMS
The 2022 Census of Agriculture profiles
Deschutes County as primarily consisting of
small acreage, hobby farms and other relatively
small agricultural operations. As of 2022 there
were approximately 1,572 farms, an increase
of 5% from 2017. Although the average size
of a farm in Deschutes County is 97 acres, the
majority of acreage (about 85%) is in farms of 50
acres or less in size.
MARGINAL OR LOW PRODUCTIVITY SOILS
While a large proportion of the County is zoned
for exclusive farm use, much of the land in these
areas has marginal soils which provide limited
productivity, particularly for higher value crops.
Limited access to water rights and Irrigation
can further hamper productivity in some areas.
Deschutes County attempted to reclassify certain
agricultural lands through a nonresource lands
program. This approach was rejected at the state
level. Since that time, some landowners have
successfully redesignated property, primarily to
residential zones, through an applicant -initiated
process.
3-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
FINANCIAL CHALLENGES
According to the 2022 Agricultural Census,
agricultural producers in Deschutes County
are often operating in the red. The per -farm
average of market value of products sold was
$25,437, a 23% increase from 2017, and average
production expenses of $39,918. This results in
a deficit of approximately $14,481 per farm per
year. Government payments help cover a portion
of this deficit, with the average farm receiving
$17,959 in assistance. The costs of operating
continue to be a major challenge for small family
operations, resulting in approximately48°% of
farms In Deschutes County reporting under
$2,500 in sales.
DECLINING FOREST PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
Approximately 1,032,436 acres of Deschutes
Countyarea are zoned for Forest Use.
Historically, forestry on public and private land
was a primary industry in Central Oregon with
key mill sites along the Deschutes River in Bend.
Overtime, species protections, international
competition, unsustainable harvest levels. and new
technologies have reduced the overall footprint
of the timber industry in Central Oregon.
Recently, land uses are shifting toward
recreation and residential development in these
natural resource areas.
WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION
Much of Deschutes County is served by six
irrigation districts (Map 3-1) - these are special
entities created for the purpose of delivering
water to their patrons. These districts are quasi -
municipal corporations chartered under Oregon
law that operate as political subdivisions of the
State of Oregon. In addition to irrigation, these
districts also supply other services including
municipal, industrial, and pond maintenance. In
most cases, these districts are holders of senior
water rights with shares then distributed to their
patrons. As is the case with all water rights, the
irrigation districts' water rights are managed
by the Oregon Water Resources Department
and subject to "beneficial use" requirements to
prevent the waste of the water resource. The
total water available for irrigation and other
human uses in Deschutes County is fixed under
the current water regime, and there is little
opportunity to expand irrigated farming in the
County. Irrigation districts with more junior
water rights such as Arnold Irrigation District
and North Unit Irrigation District (operating
north of Deschutes County), have recently seen
challenges with water delivery due to limited
availability and drought.
CHANGES IN CLIMATE CONDITIONS
Because the total volume of water available for
agricultural and human use is fixed, strategies
to decrease water usage (capping or piping
irrigation channels, irrigation timing strategies,
Days Above 90 Degrees in Brothers
2023 2070
2 I-E24
water conservation) will become more crucial.
Deschutes County is committed to working with
irrigation districts and holders of water rights to
increase water conservation efforts throughout
the County in a manner consistent with existing
legal frameworks established by State and
Federal law.
Context
Agriculture
Agriculture and ranching operations in
Deschutes County vary widely based on water
availability, soil, and microclimate. The f lowing
Ssubzoneswere created through a commercial
farm study conducted in 1992. This study
concluded that irrigation is a key factor to
viability of operations, which enabled the County
to establish smaller acreages than allowed by
state law to provide additional flexibility.
Additional information about farm and forest
resources is provided in the tables and charts
below.
Forest Lands
Deschutes County classifies forest land in one
of two zones. Forest 1 zoning Is intended for
land that is primarily used for forest
management
br commercial forestry, with a lot size over 160
acres, and not developed with residential or non
forest uses. Forest 2 zoning is intended for land
that does have residential or non -forest uses, is
less than 160 acres, and may contain roads or
other public facilities that serve the property.
State regulations limit residential and non -
forestry related development on forest lands
and the County sees only a few applications for
Commented [NM3]: Third number will be added to
temperature chart for additional context.
amo
a i
9Q H
development in these areas each year. Even
with this limitation on development, forest
managers and service providers continue to
express concern with wildfire risk associated
with residential development in heavily wooded
areas.
Most lands in either of these classifications
within Deschutes County are federally owned
and managed by the US Forest Service_
U( SFS). Historically, forest lands were used for
timber production. As timber harvesting
decreases, other uses for forest lands are
emerging. State regulations permit five
general types of uses, including forest
operations; environmental, agricultural or
recreational uses; two types of
Land in Farms by Use
Cropland
Pastureland
Woodland
Other
Farm and Forest Resources
Farms By Size (acres)
1,000+
12 farms
500 to 999
13 farms
180 to 499
40 farms
50 to 179
151 farms
M
10 to 49
671 farms
1 to 9 597 farms
Farms By Value of Sales
Less than $2,500
$2,500 to $4,999
$5,000 to $9,999
$10,000 to $24,999
$25,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $99,999
$100,000 or more
Subzone Name
Minimum Parcel Size •
form divisions •
Lower Bridge
130
Irrigated field crops, hay pastures
rrigated alfalfa, hay and pastures, wooded grazing
Sisters/Cloverdale
63
and some field crops
Terrebonne
35
Irrigated hay and pasture
Tumalo/Redmond/Bend
23
Irrigated pasture and some hay
Alfalfa
36
Irrigated hayand pasture
La Pine
37
Riparian meadows, grazing and
meadow hay
Horse Ridge East
320
Rangeland grazing
3-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
dwellings and locally dependent uses. Permitted
uses are defined and clarified in OAR 660-006.
The following uses are major forest uses in
Deschutes County:
Secondary forest products (forest
operations): There Is an increasing use of
secondary forest products, such as hog fuel
(chipped wood) or wood slash. This type of
product is generally seen as providing dual
benefit, by providing economic opportunity
while also reducing wildfire risk through
thinning projects.
Alternative Energy: Biomass is an
emerging technology for renewable energy
and can also be integrated with these
products. The first biomass facility in the
County is currently under development
through a partnership with Mt. Bachelor Ski
Resort and the USFS G^ros;t on,^ z.
Recreation (environmental, agricultural
and recreation uses): The proximity of
federal forests for hiking, mountain biking,
skiing, hunting, fishing, wildlife viewing and
other outdoor recreation draws tourists
and residents alike. An emeln challenge hallenge is
the prevalence of houseless encampments
on and adjacent to federal lands. These
encampments can cause conflicts with other
trail users and increase fire risk.cl
Forest a 33009 a-;:_ _ _t-1 - -,�
9120f)@Pt�' In tho Gnroct 1 o has; boon
dent fi'-d as
(.rontlal R t et With SPV@Fal
red n rGfltc elkiRg t9 a
and utilize the nrnnorr" as a nit.,
forest In 29-22 P&;ch toc [-;Ad Tr cr
f;CiI tarorl a CQPAPA6Alt" „lclnnlAg PPOCeSS
to ldeAtlA, nroferPed r R41 c it
lapd were to be p pchased as a pr i,ately
hold r oar"renal accor
3-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Farm and Forest Resources
Key Community Considerations
Given the range of issues and conditions
discussed above and, this plan includes a
variety of policies to support farm and forest
operations in Deschutes County. Additional
related policies also are found in Chapter Z:
Land Use and Regional Coordination, Chapter
5: Natural Resources, ChapterT Natural Hazards
and Chapter 9: Economic
Development. These strategies are underpinned
by the following results of Comprehensive Plan
outreach efforts.
There stron duo ortfnrcnnndU in
educational outreach to encourage water
conservation and on -farm efficiency
mM � Ins -
Community members opposed rezoning
low productivity farmland with poor soil
to allow greater opportunities for housing,
while supporting rezoning of this land to
preserve open space.
Th.. nrt fnr
Community members also strongly support
allowing greater flexibility for income -
producing supplemental activities on farms
such as farm -to -table dinner, farm stands,
weddings, or similar events.
Pnarticipants expressed support
for investment in the agricultural economy
through grants or exploring a farmland
conservation program.
Goals and Policies
Goal 3.1: Preserve and maintain agricultural
lands, operations, and uses to support
Deschutes County's agricultural economy
Policy 3.1 .1 . Retain agricultural lands
through Exclusive Farm Use zoning.
Policy 3.1 .2. Continue to apply Exclusive
Farm Use sub -zones consistent with the
Countys most up-to-date adopted studies of
agricultural land and as implemented
through the County Development Code.
Policy 3.1 .3. Develop comprehensive plan
policy criteria and code to
o;4clart when and how EFU parcels can be
converted to other designations.
Policy 3.1 .4. Regularly review farm
regulations to ensure compliance
with changes to State Statute, Oregon
Administrative Rules and case law.
Goal 3.2: Promote a diverse, sustainable, and
thriving agricultural sector.
Policy 3.2.1 . Encourage farming by
promoting the raising and selling of crops,
livestock and/or poultry.
3-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Farm and Forest Resources
Policy 3.2.2. Support agriculture through
the use of grant funds, research, and
other resources dedicated tom
community members and stakeholders,
including but not limited to farmers,
as=;cugal researchers, farm bureaus,
and other organizations in studying and
promoting economically viable agricultural
opportunities and practices.
Policy3.2.3. Supportand encouragesmall
farming enterprises through a variety of
related strategies and programs, including,
but not limited to, niche markets, organic
farming, food council, buy local, farmers
markets, farm -to -table activities, farm stands
orvalue-added products, or other programs
or strategies.
Policy 3.2.4. Work cooperatively with
irrigation districts, public agencies and
representatives, and landowners to
promote and support agricultural uses and
operations, including through use of rural
reserves, conservation easements, transfer
of development rights programs, land
acquisition, and other preservation strategies
consistent with existing fF-ederal and s-State
[Law.
Policy 3.2.5. Support efforts to control
noxious weeds and invasive species.
IPolicy3.2.6. Contlnuetoreview and revise Commented [NMS]:Replacingwlthphoto ofBelted
county code as needed to be and consistent J Galloway cow.
with state code, rules, and regulations to
permit alternative and supplemental farm
activities that are compatible with farming,
such as agritourism or other small-scale
sustainable activities.
Policy 3.2.7. Work with the State to review
and revise their regulations when a desired
alternative or supplemental use identified
by the County is not permitted by State
regulations.
Policy3.2.8. Use land use policy and
develop mentcode requirements, including
right -to -farm provisions, as well as
coordination with other jurisdictions to
minimize conflicts between residential
uses and agricultural uses and continue to
promote the viable operation of agricultural
uses.
Policy 3.2.9. Provide resources such as
technical assistance and access to grants to
support on -site efficiency upgrades relating
to agriculture.
Policy 3.2.10. Explore program to utilize
compost from Solid Waste Department on
farm lands to improve soils, productivity
water, efficiency, and facilitate disposal of
yard debris and compostable materials.
Goal3.3: Ensure Exclusive Farm Use policies,
classifications, and codes are consistent with
local and emerging agricultural conditions and
markets.
Policy 3.3.1 . Identify and retain accurately
designated agricultural lands.
Policy 3.3.2. Continue to explore new
methods of identifying and classifying
agricultural lands.
a. Apply for grants to review and, if needed,
update farmland designations.
b. Study County agricultural designations
considering elements such as water
availability, farm viability and economics,
climatic conditions, land use patterns,
accepted farm practices, and impacts on
public services.
c. Lobby for changes to s-State s-Statute
regarding agricultural definitions specific
to Deschutes County that would allow
some reclassification of agricultural lands.
Policy 3.3.3. Address land use challenges in
the Horse Ridge subzone, specifically:
a. The large number of platted lots not
3-8 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Farm and Forest Resources
meeting the minimum acreage;
b. The need for non -farm dwellings and
location requirements for farm dwellings;
c. Concerns over the impact on private
property from off -road vehicles,
facilities, and trails located on
adjacent public lands.
Policy 3.3.4. Q t� ^ t^ wWork with
the s-State to review and revise
accessory farm dwelling requirements
to address the needs of local farmers -
including removal of parcel size
restrictions.
Policy 3.3.5. Encourage
coordination between agricultural
interests and fish and wildlife
management organizations,
including public agencies, non-
governmental organizations and
others.
Policy3.3.6. Explore the evaluation
and potential redesignation of lands
with a farm designation and poor
soils and low productivity for
protected open space,
development of needed housing, or
other uses that support community
goals as follows.
a. Allow comprehensive plan and
zoning map amendments, Including
for those that qualify as non -
resource land, for individual EFU
parcels as allowed by State Statute,
Oregon Administrative Rules and this
Comprehensive Plan.
b. Explore creation of a new zoning
classification intended to balance the
value of high desert environments
while allowing for limited housing
opportunities and applying this
designation through coordination
with interested and willing property
owners.
Goal 3.4: Protect and maintain forest lands
for multiple uses and objectives, including
forest products, watershed protection,
3-9 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Farm and Forest Resources
conservation, recreation, wildlife habitat
protection, carbon sequestration, forest health,
and wildfire resilience.
Policy 3.4.1 .Retain forest lands through
Forest 1 and Forest Z zoning.
Farm and Forest Resources
Policy 3.4.2. To conserve and maintain
a. Do not qualify under State Statute for
unimpacted forest lands, retain Forest 1
forestland tax deferral,
zoning for those lands with the following
b. Are not necessary to permit forest
characteristics:
operations or practices on adjoining lands
a. Consist predominantly of ownerships not
and do not constitute forested lands
developed by residences or non -forest
that maintain soil, air, water and fish and
uses;
wildlife resources,
b. Consist predominantly of contiguous
c. Have soils on the property that fall within
ownerships of 160 acres or larger;
the definition of agricultural lands as set
forth in Goal 3,
C. Consist predominantly of ownerships
contiguous to other lands utilized for
d. Are a tract of land 40 acres or less in size,
commercial forest or commercial farm
e. Do not qualify under State Statute and the
uses;
terms of the Forest 2 zone for a dwelling,
d. Are accessed by roads intended primarily
and;
for forest management; and
f. Were purchased by the property owner
e. Are primarily under forest management.
after january 1, 1985 but before November
4,1993.
Policy 3.4.3. To conserve and maintain
impacted forest lands, retain Forest 2
Such changes may be made regardless of
zoning for those lands with the following
the size of the resulting EFU zoning district.
characteristics:
Such changes shall be processed in the
same manner as other quasi-judicial plan or
a. Consist predominantly of ownerships
zoning map changes.
developed for residential or non -forest
uses;
Policy 3.4.5. Ensure that criteria for and
designation of Forest Lands are consistent
b. Consist predominantly of ownerships less
with state administrative rules and statutes.
than 160 acres;
c. Consist of ownerships generally
Policy 3.4.6. Coordinate and cooperate
contiguous to tracts containing less than
with the U.S. Forest Service U( SFS), the
160 acres and residences, or adjacent to
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and
acknowledged exception areas; and
other public agencies to promote
sustainable forest uses, including
d. Provide a level of public facilities and
community wildfire protection proiects
services, including roads, intended
recreation facilities, habitat
primarily for direct services to rural
enhancements and biomass facilities,
residences."
on public forest land, including
Policy3.4.4. Notwithstanding any other
currently adopted Forest and Land
quasi-judicial plan or zone change criteria,
Management Plans prepared bythe�udicial
lands designated as Forest under this Plan
g
>=,,,oar car, � r
�'�'=`(USFS4 and
and zoned Forest 2 may upon application be
Land nnaRaRa..,e.,rrBLM4.
redesignated and rezoned from Forest 2 to
a. Usingthe Deschutes National Forest
Exclusive Farm Use if such lands:
Land and Resource Management Plan,
or its successor, as the basis for mutual
coordination and cooperation with the
3-10 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
_AIMIL_ ®�
Farm and Forest Resources
Perest SePAG---ILSFS
3-11 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
b. Using the Prineville R, irp;, i Qf I ;Ad
^ @*BLMUpperDeschutes
Resource Management Plan, or its
successor, as the basis for mutual
coordination and cooperation with the
R ti d Wa �g o rBLM.
Policy 3.4.7. Notify affected agencies and
tribal governments when reviewing land use
applications and proposals for development
that could impact federal or s-State forest
lands.
Policy 3.4.8. Support economic development
opportunities that promote forest health,
create opportunities for local production
of related forest products, and reduce the
prevalence of invasive plant species that
adversely affect forest health and soil quality.
Policy 3.4.9. Provide input on public forest
plans that impact Deschutes County.
Policy3.4.10. Coordinate with community
stakeholders to support forest management
plans and projects that are consistent with
the policies of this chapter and with local
communityforest management and wildfire
protection plans.
3-10 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Farm and Forest Resources
a. Promote forest health and resilience to
wildfire.
b. Contribute to public safety by treating
wildland hazardous fuels particularly in
the designated Wildland Urban Interface
as Identified in the Community Wildfire
Protection Plans described in Chapter 13,
Natural Hazards, of this Plan.
c. Retain and improve fish and wildlife habitat.
Policy 3.4.11. Continue to review and revise
the County Code as needed to ensure
development in forest zones minimizes and/
or mitigates impacts on fish and wildlife
habitat, forest health, and wildfire resiliency.
Commented [NM6]: Replace with higher quality image.
LM= m
r.-LT:j7fllff=-
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Surface mining provides non-renewable resources, such as pumice, cinders, building
stone, sand, gravel and crushed rock. The extraction of these materials provides
employment as well as products important to local economic development. However,
mining of mineral and aggregate resources creates noise, dust and traffic and potential
pollution that can conflict with neighboring land uses, particularly residential uses.
The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral
Industries (DOGAMI) regulates surface mining
sites in Deschutes County. The last available
published analysis of mineral resources in
Deschutes Countywas completed by DOGAMI
In 1976. No updates have been completed
during that time due to limited staff. A continued
challenge Is monitoring the availability of these
resources. However, it is likely that Deschutes
County has enough mineral resources to meet
demand for the next 20 years.
When a mineral resource is exhausted, the
site is required to submit a reclamation plan
to Deschutes County and DOGAM1. This plan
identifies how the site will be closed for mineral
operations, environmental impacts will be
mitigated, and steps to be taking to return the
site to a new use. As mineral and aggregate
resources are exhausted, property owners
often rezone the site from the "Surface Mine"
designation to a new zone (often a residential
zone), to allow for new development to occur.
Coordination with DOGAMI and property owners
is imperative to ensure this reclamation process
occurs in an efficient and environmentally
focused manner.
4-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Context
Surface mining is protected through Statewide
Planning Goal 5, Natural Resources, Scenic
and Historic Areas and Open Spaces and the
associated Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR)
660-023 (this rule replaced 660-016 in 1996).
Mineral and aggregate resources are included
on the list of Statewide Goal S resources that the
County must inventory and protect.
The County maintains an inventory of surface
mining sites as part of its Goal 5 program, shown
in Map 4-1. There are currently 59 mining sites
identified in the Deschutes County GIS data, and
8 sites that have been reclaimed.
Mining sites are subject to a Surface Mining
Impact Area Combining Zone that applies
within �/2 mile of the mining site boundary. This
combining zone limits new uses and expansion
of existing uses that may be impacted by mining
activities and are not in compliance with the site -
specific Economic, Social, Environmental, and
Energy (ESEE) analysis for nearby mining sites. In
certain cases, a waiver of nonremonstrance may
also be required in this zone.
DESCHUTES
LINN COJNFY%
V�HEELER COUNTY
EFFERSoi!
-I
COU[�!•TY ___ _,2040
%
COUN It,
A PLAN FOR THE FU"IURF
— _ — — _ — `! - — — '
` — — � _ - — ,County Boundary
Urban Growth
+ .-< 310 1
Boundaries
SISTERS
Zoning Surface Mining
REDMOND
Impact Area
•, r% zo
® Surface Mining Impact
t 97 1
Area
Reclaimed - Surface
_.._
C R O O K C. O U H IY Mining Impact Area
A N E C O U! T Y%%
r
Transportation
O BEND
- - 1
State Routes
Railroad
County Lines
I I
KLAMAJ H
C0LJNJY LAKE COUiVTY
- Miles
Prepared by Mom
3 i ohua eSc2s Camay Cam,,tane�s- r'lon I 0 5 10 11
4-3
Revised 8/1/2023
This mop is for information purposes only. The Cou,Vs official zoning and comprehensive plan mops con be accessed through the Deschutes County Dial Property Information System. Please note that these maps do not represent oil efthe County5 combining and overloyzanes.
Key Community Considerations
Transportation agencies expressed concern
regarding the impact of depleting mineral
resources on road operations, including the use
of cinder for winter maintenance and other
resources for use in new road projects. The
topic of mineral and aggregate resources was
not a focus of community discussion as part of
this Comprehensive Plan update, though the
priorities of a diverse economy and protected
natural areas for habitat and open space are
interrelated with this subject. The following
goals and policies represent a balance of these
community interests.
Goals and Policies
Goal 4.1: Protect and utilize mineral and
aggregate resources while minimizing
adverse impacts of extraction, processing and
transportingthe resource.
Policy 4.1 .1 . Implement adopted Goal 5
Surface Mining inventories.
Policy 4.1 .2. Coordinate with the Oregon
Department of Geology and Mineral
Industries (DOGAMI) on mining regulations
and studies.
Policy 4.1 .3. Balance protection of mineral
and aggregate resources with conflicting
resources and uses.
Policy 4.1 .4. Support the required
reclamation of mining sites following mineral
extraction.
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Natural resources in Deschutes County are abundant. Wildlife, scenic views of forests
and peaks, and open spaces to preserve habitat and native vegetation are among the
County's top assets.
Oregon Statewide Planning Goal 5 governs Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas,
and Open Spaces. Through this goal, the County maintains inventories and regulatory
protectionsto preservethese many resources. These regulations are created by
weighing Economic, Social, Environmental, and Energy (ESEE) consequences associated
with protection of a resources.
Topics covered in this chapter include:
Protected Wildlife Resources
Open Space and Scenic Views
Water Resources
PROTECTED WILDLIFE RESOURCES
Deschutes County has some of the broadest
and most robust wildlife protections in the
state, covering a variety of species. The County
has development protections within and
surrounding numerous wildlife habitats. Some
of these habitats have mapped geographic
boundaries such as Deer Winter Range, Deer
Migration Range, Antelope Habitat, Golden Eagle
- Sensitive Bird Habitat, and Elk Habitat.
Otherspecies are commonlyfound in protected
riparian areas, such as wetlands and floodplains.
Deschutes County contains general habitats for
fish, fur -bearing animals, waterfowl, and up and
game birds.
A continued challenge to wildlife resources is
rural development and impacts on habitat. Mule
deer are seeing steady declines, approximately
10% each year per Oregon Department of
5-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Fish and Wildlife biologists. These declines
in population are due to a variety of factors,
including but not limited _o loss of habitat,
vehicle collisions, predation,and
disease.
SCENIC VIEWS AND OPEN SPACE
The 2010 Greenprint=for Deschutes County
listed protection of scenic viewsheds as one of
the
top five community priorities for conservation
in the rural County, and the protection of
open space has been one ofthe key topics of
discussion duringthe most recent update of this
Comprehensive Plan. The County has several
designated scenic corridcrs, including several
scenic Bikeways, highways, and wild and scenic
river sections.
'The Trust for Public Land Oregon's Plaeeround Prepares for the Future. A Green print
for Deschutes County. 2010
With close to 80% of the County under
public ownership, many community
members enjoy access to natural
resources on public lands. A perennial
issue among community members is
preserving scenic views and open spaces
closer to home on undeveloped private
properties.
5-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
WATERRESOURCES
all^ t* Deschutes County contains
groundwater resources, defined as water that
exists underground in saturated zones
beneath the land surface', and surface water
resources. Surface water refers to streams,
lakes, rivers, and reservoirs3.
Groundwater is used for a variety of permitted
and exempt activities. Residential wells in the
rural county make up the largest user group of
groundwater, and are exempt from any permit,
provided that the property owner abides by
specific standards. Water rights and or permits
are required for other major use categories,
such as quasi -municipal or municipal uses
pond maintenance, irrigation and other
commercial and industrial activities. 4
The Deschutes River and its tributaries serve
as the region's surface water resources.
Surface water rights in the Upper Deschutes
Basin are fully allocated, meaning, no new
surface water rights can be issued.
Approximately 86% of basin water rights are
associated with agriculture, 12% associated
with instream uses. and 2% associated with
municipal uses'.
Groundwater and surface water in Deschutes
County are closely tied. Numerous studies
have noted the interconnections between
stream flow and well levels over time in
Deschutes County. Programs, such as the
Deschutes Basin Groundwater Mitigation
Program, seek to monitor these connections.
:�1 �M9 r nrt by the Qpe R rinnortmont of
Z US Geological Survey Definition - Groundwater
a US Geological Survey Definitiion —Surface Water
4 Oregon Water Resources Department. 2021 Review of the Deschutes Basin Groundwater Mitigation Program
https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/W RDReports/5YearDeschutesG W M itigation ProgramReport. pdf
s Bureau of Reclamation and Oregon Water Resources Department. 2019 Upper Deschutes River Basin Study.
https://cdn.prod.websitefiles com/667093eeblbb3l6e69fOe9c6/667093eeblbb3l6e69fOe9d8 Upper%20Desch utes%20River%20Basin%20S
tudy%20Final.pdf
5-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan w
Commented [NM71: Moved to "context" section.
Natural Resources
fin,',//--rnrDnSAar,-ccS fog Rd that grG ��.,�r�n.Jcci--,c-PCTr I�,�,(,Ic
thrn gh n@cch t@c ('n nt, ar@ .J@4n „ h" aS
MI-Ch aS 52 foot oftotal rl@Clin@ !n the Central
ort of the basin This; dedip c;id@r@rJ
_ ,oh, d@CkRed" r,or Stare crarl'to;Rd
;ttrihu tpd toy nrd a Shift inn r;ll GIP PP
nAd to @ rho late 1999S a
t PAd in the basin anrJ A@or@x@rl Sno"„naGk
To;ddP@cc rh@c@ is g@tiGR .JictriCtg -,n.J
�h@r�ntiti@� _._____ed in _.. @f Gqs tG
'�Tng-�'b t^^�rngo^T'� Tb
Pipe
nalc aAd Mgd@Mize PPigatiGA S"ct@rr,S
to 'n @44@ir@#r' , Dye tg 'Alglr@p
tr n IQ @ti@ C@R;'r fPQPR
nto ;)Ad (RIMPGratinn
piped Gonolc t,n'ralh, pe9yipe @Aly half the
nt nf,.,nt@r to be di"@rt@rl frnr., the PiVRP
QP Srro;r.-, to dPli'.nr rhn r3PAR VAIN IMP of,.,,4nr
to rhn PRd l oed to opeR
alS
that Pip Ag G@Pa!S Gon4119t@ to @91 'f@r APS
Deschutes County plays a coordination role
along with the Oregon Department of Water
Resources, Soil and Water Conservation
Districts, irrigation districts, water users, a4GI-
owners of private wells, and other stakeholders
to address these water resource Issues.
Context
Protected Wildlife Resources
Wildlife diversity is a major attraction of
Deschutes County. The key to protecting wildlife
is protecting the habitats each species needs
for food, water, shelter, and reproduction. Also
important is retaining or enhancing connectivity
between habitats to protect migration routes
and avoid isolated populations.
5-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
In considering wildlife habitat, counties rely
on the expertise of the Oregon Department
of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS). Those agencies provide
information for the required wildlife inventory
and recommendations on how to protect wildlife
habitat on private lands.
A summary of Deschutes Countys wildlife
protection programs follows:
MULE DEER
Migration corridors and winter range are
essential habitats needed to support mule
deer in Deschutes County. The Bend/La Pine
migration corridor is approximately 56 miles
long and 3 to 4 miles wide and parallels the
Deschutes and Little Deschutes Rivers. The
corridor is used by deer migrating from summer
range in the forest along the east slope ofthe
Cascades to the North Paulina deer winter
range. Deschutes County adopted a "Deer
Migration Priority Area" based on a 1999 ODFW
map submitted to the South County Regional
Problem Solving Group. This specific sub -area is
precluded from destination resorts.
From 2021-2023, Deschutes County explored
an update to the county's mule deer inventory,
which included extensive community
participation including through the public record.
Ultimately, the decision was made not to update.
A snapshot of Deschutes Countys wildlife
protection program is included below. Extensive
information is included in Appendix E, the
Countys Goal 5 inventory.
SENSITIVE BIRDS
Nest sites for the bald eagle, osprey, golden
eagle, prairie falcon, great grey owl, greater
sage -grouse, and great blue heron rookeries are
inventoried by the County. The area required
for each nest site varies between species. The
minimum area required for protection of nest
sites has been Identified by the ODFW in their
management guidelines for protecting colony
5-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
nesting birds, osprey, eagles, and raptor nests.
The USFW works closelywith ODFW on eagle -
related issues and enforces federal guidelines to
ensure protection of bald and golden eagles.
ELK
The Land and Resource Management Plan for
the Deschutes National Forest identifies 6 key
elk habitat areas in Deschutes County. The
ODFW also recognizes these areas as critical elk
habitat for calving, winter or summer range. The
following areas are mapped on the Big Game
Habitat Area map and in the Deschutes National
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan:
Tumalo Mountain
Kiwa
Rya n
Crane Prairie
Fall River
Clover Meadow
ANTELOPE
The Bend and Ochoco District offices ofthe
ODFW provided maps ofthe antelope range
and winter range. The available information
is adequate to indicate that the resource is
significant. The antelope habitat is mapped on
Deschutes Countys Big Game Habitat -Wildlife
Area Combining Zone Map.
Scenic Views and Open Space
Deschutes County has a rich abundance of open
space. Approximately 79% of land in Deschutes
County is federally owned, providing ample
open space and scenic views adjacent to these
areas. Open spaces are generally undeveloped
areas that are being maintained for some other
purpose, such as farms, parks, forests, or wildlife
habitat. Besides the value that stems from the
primary use of the land, open spaces provide
aesthetically pleasing undeveloped landscapes.
Because these areas are undeveloped, they
also provide additional benefits such as water
recharge, buffers #era -for habitat, and safety
zones from natural hazards such as flooding and
wildfire.
Open spaces and scenic views are an important
draw for visitors and are often mentioned
as Important to the area's quality of life. The
backdrop of the Cascade Mountains, with Its vast
forest and sagebrush landscapes and riparian
and wetland habitats, all provide an inspirational
setting for visitors and residents alike. Statewide
Planning Goal 5 recommends, but does not
require, creating an inventory and protections
for open spaces, scenic views and sites. Oregon
Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-023 defines open
space designations as parks, forests, wildlife
preserves, nature sanctuaries, and golf courses.
Open spaces are protected through an Open
Space and Conservation map designation
and zoning district. Scenic view protection
is implemented through the Landscape
Management Combining Zone regulations.
Water Resources
Deschutes County's Role in Water Management
is described below.
REGULATORY AGENCIES
The primary state regulator of water
availability is the Oregon Water Resources
Department (OWRD). The Oregon Department
of Environmental Quality(DEQ) leads the
monitoring and enforcement of water quality
5-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
standards. The Oregon DEQ is required
to comply with the Federal Environmental Protection
Agency. Numerous sections of the Deschutes River in
Deschutes County hold a special status as a federal
wild and scenic river, as well as a state scenic
waterway. These areas carry additional regulations
through the 1996 Upper Deschutes Wild and Scenic
River and State Scenic Waterway Comprehensive
Plan, requiring additional agency coordination with
the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department and
the US Forest Service on development impacting
these sections.
STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
There are two Statewide Planning Goals
relating to the protection of water resources.
Goal 5 (Natural Resources, Scenic and
Historic Areas, and Open Spaces) requires an
inventory and protection ofthe following
water resources.
In Deschutes County, these inventories have
been completed and acknowledged by the
Land Conservation and Development
Commission (See Appendix A for Goal 5
Inventories). Goal 6 (Air, Land, and Water
Resources Quality) requires comprehensive
plans to be consistent with state and federal
pollution regulations. Accordingly,
It is imperative that local land use policies
align with Federal and State laws governing
the community's water resources.
The policies in this section relating to water
provide the framework for evaluating land
use actions and define the responsibility of
the County to work in partnership with cities,
agencies, non -profits and others to achieve
efficient use of water resources and effective
management of water quality In the Upper
Deschutes Basin.
It is important to underscore that the primary
water resource management process occurs
outside of the state land use planning system.
Oregon land use and water management
are not integrated; there are no overarching
administrative rules that consider statewide
water management In conjunction with land use
planning.
SNOWPACK
Although there is expected to be a slight
increase in winter precipitation by the middle
of the century, snowpack is expected to decline
throughoutthe Cascades. The decline in
snowpack(which has already been observed,
see figure below)' is due largely to increasing
temperatures causing some precipitation to fall
as rain rather than snow. This has the double
effect of decreasing snowfall and melting the
previously fallen snow. At the Mt Bachelor Ski
Resort, April snowpack is expected to decline
between 11 %and 18% by the middle ofthe
5-8 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
centuryand between 18% and 43% by the end of
the century.
LAVA SPONGE
Deschutes County Is fortunate to be underlain
on the Western side by relatively young volcanic
lava sponge. This sponge is highly porous and
Is able to absorb large quantities of water during
the wet season and gradually release It via
abundant springs along the eastern slope. The
great advantage this provides is that the
resulting summer flows into the Deschutes
basin are not as dependent on overground flow
of snowmelt, and therefore are expected to
maintain a relatively stable water supply even as
snowpack decreases into the next century.
GROUNDWATER USE
The groundwater aquifer is roughly 1000 feet thick across
significant parts of the basin and is replenished yearly by
the Cascades' precipitation.
A report from GSI water solutions in 2022 noted the
Upper Deschutes Basin receives over 4,000 cubic feet
per second (cfs) of annual recharge.' This recharge is
primarily from in -basin precipitation, although minor
amounts of recharge are attributed to interbasin flow in
which water travels from the Metolius basin, and canal
leakage. Groundwater pumping is equivalent to
approximately 2 percent of the annual groundwater
recharge. In the Deschutes Basin a small amount of
groundwater is also used by farmers for crop or pasture
irrigation. Groundwater is also used for "exempt"
purposes including_ residential wells, irrigation of non-
commercial lawns under a half -acre, stock watering and
fire control.. Groundwater rights are commonly used by
cities to support housing and development The 2019
Upper Deschutes Basin Study estimates 40,000-acre feet
are diverted each year primarily from groundwater
purposes to serve municipal and quasi -municipal uses.
A 2021 report by the Oregon Department of Water
Resources found that groundwater levels !in! Deschutes Commented [NM8]: Moved from 5-3 and edited to
reflect comments.
61 "GSI Solutions Understandina UDDer Deschutes Basin
Groundwater Levels, September 2022".
https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/Documents/White%20Paper Under
stand ing%20Upper%20Deschutes%20Basin%20GW%20Levels 9 26
2022.pdf
County are declining, by as much as 30 feet of total
decline in the central part of the basin. This decline
has caused wells in densely populated areas of the
County to run dry, requiring extensive well deepening
work. Groundwater levels are directly related to
recharge rates which are directly impacted by rainfall
and recharge from other sources such as flood
irrigation and leaky ditches and canals. Impediments
to recharge include such things as increased
irrigation efficiency, large scale piping projects, and
increased juniperpopulations. This decline is
considered "excessively declined" per state statute
and is attributed to a shift toward overall drier
conditions since the late 1990s, expanding Juniper
forests, increased groundwater pumping, a warming_
trend in the basin, and decreased snowpack.
1 Adapted from Mote, P.W., Li, S., Lettenmaier, D.P. et al.
Dramatic declines in snowpack in the western US. npj Clim Atmos So
1, 2 (2018). https://doi.org/l 0. 1038/s41612-018-0012-1
5-9 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
However, studies show that drought and groundwater
levels are cyclical and may vary over the years. For
example, the 1930s and 1970s were dryer than current
conditions.
Average Snowpack near
KAt-
The State of Oregon is currently exploring
measures to restrict overuse of groundwater
rights through its Groundwater Allocation
rulemaking. The program would limit issuance of
new groundwater rights when groundwater
levels are in a period of excessive decline.
Because the groundwater in the Deschutes Basin
is directly connected to the flow of the Deschutes
River, all additional groundwater use must be
mitigated by decreased use of groundwater o r
surface water- elsewhere through the
Oregon Water Resources Department's
Deschutes Groundwater Mitigation program.
This can include retiring of other water rights, or
the release of water into the waterway. A
mitigation permit must be obtained before a
newgroundwaterright can beaccessed. z
Voluntary and or regulatory conservation
mechanisms are needed from all users to
prevent overuse of the groundwater resource at
the local level and mitigate groundwater level
declines.
Natural Resources
Arnold Irrigation Districts are not able to access
water due to this shortage, negatively impacting
agricultural and other operations that depend on
surface water rights.
Aside from impacting operations, the reduction of
surface flows can also impact wildlife habitat. The
Deschutes Basin is home to the Oregon spotted
frog and bull trout, which are federally listed as
threatened species. To mitigate the impacts from
storage, release, diversion and return of irrigation
water on these species, the Deschutes Basin
Habitat Conservation Plan was finalized and
approved by the US Fish and Wildlife Service in
2020. The plan was developed in partnership with
the Deschutes Basin Board of Control representing
irrigation districts along with tribal governments
agency staff, and other stakeholders and seeks to
provide predictability to water managers of surface
flows for the next 30 years. The plan outlines a
combination of water management practices
funding for conservation projects, funding for
instream leasing programs, and parameters for
seasonal release of irrigation water, among other
efforts.
�GYAtI --' Commented [NM9]: Moved to water quality section.
Irrigation districts and other entities are engaged in
of " ros depts u.,weye Several .,.,,,� �r„o ongoing efforts to pipe canals and modernize
aqyifeps lie ip sh;llr,,.,, oil ,l @dj „pptr that irrigation systems to increase their efficiency.
SURFACE WATER USE
The 2019 Deschutes Basin Study found that
total water inflows to the basin vary from
860,000 acre-feet to 2.3 million acre-feet,
depending on how much precipitation falls in a
given year or several consecutive years.
Approximately 720,000 acre-feet (86%) of
surface water is diverted each year for irrigation
districts. The study noted that declines in flow
associated with precipitation and snowpack
combined with overallocation of water rights in
the basin, continues to lead to shortfalls for
junior water right holders. In low water years
iunior water holders in the North Unit and
5-10 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
to water transmission losses in irrigation canals
from seepage into groundwater and evaporation,
piped canals typically require only half the amount
of water to be diverted from the river or stream to
deliver the same volume of water to the end user
compared to open canals.
Community members have expressed concern that
piping_ canals contribute to local aquifer declines
due to loss of artificial recharge from leaking
infrastructure. Continued education and
monitoring on this topic will be helpful to best
understand the actual impact of canal piping on
groundwater resources.
WATER QUALITY
Generally, groundwater quality in Deschutes
County is classified as being 'good' providing
Natural Resources
high quality drinking water to most of its
residents. However, several productive
aQuifers lie in shall alluvial sediments that are
vulnerable to contamination from human
activities and development.
The Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) Laboratory and Water Quality Divisions'
Groundwater Quality Report for the Deschutes
Basin (March 2006) identifies areas of concern
for groundwater contamination based on
various sources of data and groundwater quality
studies. Based on collected data, development
patterns and the geology of the underlying
aquifer, the report makes recommendations
for a couple of areas in the County. The report
notes the groundwater aquifer in the Redmond
area is vulnerable to contamination from human
activities and recommends further study by the
DEQ. The La Pine aquifer in the southern portion
of the county from the Sunriver area to the
-
Klappatu Q^6 i^ty 14^^into Northern Klamath
County between Newberry Caldera and the
Cascades is an area of particular concern
because of data collected through several studies
and the high level of development in the area.
The report also Identifies underground injection
systems that could contaminate the aquifer with
pollutants from stormwater drywells or sewage
drillholes.
In South Deschutes County, the concern
for groundwater quality arises from nitrate
2 Information from the Oregon Water Resources Board
Mitigation Program.
5-11 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
contamination associated with on -site
wastewater treatment (septic) systems
discharging to the shallow unconfined aquifer.
The issue is small lots with highly permeable
rapidly draining soils and a high groundwater
table with relatively cold water temperatures.
Combined with the fact that the majority of lots
are served by on -site wastewater treatment
systems and Individual wells, concern arose
that nitrates from the septic systems could
contaminate local wells and the river system.
Considerable work has gone into studying the
groundwater in South County. In 1999 Deschutes
County and the Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) identified the need for a better
understanding of the processes that affect
the movement and chemistry of nitrogen in
the aquifer underlying the La Pine area. In
response, the U.S. Geological Service (USGS), in
cooperation with Deschutes County and DEQ,
began a studyto examine the hydrologic and
chemical processes that affect the movement
and chemical transformation of nitrogen within
the aquifer. A primary objective was to provide
tools for evaluating the effects of existing
and future residential development on water
quality and to develop strategies for managing
groundwater quality.
Field research from the USGS study shows
that in a 250-square-mile study area near
La Pine the groundwater underlying the La
Pine sub -basin Is highly vulnerable and being
polluted by continued reliance on traditional
onsite systems. Environmental impacts from
residential development include higher nitrate
concentrations in groundwater that is tapped
for domestic water supply and discharges to
rivers. Nitrates are regulated by the federal
Environmental Protection Agency and DEQ as
a human health concern. Vulnerability of the
shallow aquifer to contamination led to concern
that wastewater from septic systems poses a
threat to the primary drinking water supply and
local river systems. The Upper Deschutes and
Natural Resources
Little Deschutes Sub -basins have abundant,
natural sources of phosphorus from volcanic
soils and rocks so the rivers are naturally
nitrogen limited. Nitrogen -limited rivers are
sensitive to low concentrations of available
nitrogen until some other component becomes
limiting, and that may lead to ecological impacts.
In 2008 the County used the research on nitrates
to adopt a'local rule'that required South County
residents to convert their septic systems over
a period of 14years to alternative sewage
system technology designed to reduce nitrates.
New septic systems were also required to use
alternative technologies. The County created
a process to assist residents in funding the
conversions.
Many South County residents expressed concern
over the costs involved with converting their
septic systems and disputed the science behind
the rule. Placed on the ballet by petition, the
local rule was rescinded byvoters in March 2009.
As of 2010 the DEQ is leading the effort to
address nitrates in South County, with the
full cooperation of the County. One solution
being considered is creating a sewer system or
extending Sunriver's to serve some of the nearby
areas. Sewer systems are tightly restricted
on rural lands by Statewide Planning Goal 11
and OAR 660-11, so the Department of Land
Conservation and Development is also involved
in these efforts. The County and Oregon
Department of Environmental Ouality
attempted to apply for an exception to Goal 11
to allow for a community sewer system in 2016
although the effort was overturned by the
Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
D"F Dior .!//I I D C
Them P4' of rho 'rrnoat'n iP QRS4:h roc
C-ei ,nt., cGAr ec from r c Thece r
are aPr'h, cnr'Rg fnrl frn.r, the
Recen,n r n tl;e rJ nl n PGSe of o nl
b
nrer fnr irr atiG nr! @ASWPiAg S61ffiGieRt
crrnomfln,.,, 'n rho In,�,nr nncrh roc "Pr
R@Sinnnl rdrni lghrc 'n P@Geptyears h;;y@ roc Iron;
n In orer Ipye4; 'n these r
5-12 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
ALGAL BLOOMS
Algal blooms have been a problem for
recreational lakes in the cascade mountains In
recent years. Since 2007, the Wickiup Reservoir,
Crane Prairie Reservoir, and Paulina Lake have
experienced algal or bacteria blooms that
required a health advisory.'
Although not all algal blooms are toxic,
they interfere with recreation and aesthetic
enjoyment. In general, algal blooms are caused
by elevated nutrients, elevated temperature,
and still water. Algal blooms in other parts of
the state have led to drinking water concerns,
but Deschutes County cities are supplied by
groundwater and so the risk in algal blooms is
mainly to recreation, with the exception of
Bridge Creek, which supplies water to the City
of Bend. -
3 https.//vavvw.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYENVIRONMENTS/
RECREATION/HARM FU LALGAESLOOMS/Pages/a rchiveaspx
5-13 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
Natural Resources
Key Community Considerations
Natural resources for recreation, passive
enjoyment, habitat protection, and economic
production are a fundamental part of life in
Deschutes County, and as such were a key
part of the community conversation in this
Comprehensive Plan update. Highlights of this
conversation Include:
Concern about the ability of the County's
water supply to accommodate more
residents, visitors, and water -intensive jobs
in the future
Interest in a re-evaluation of water rights
for urban, agricultural, and "hobby farm"
uses.
A robust discussion around wildlife
inventories, habitat conservation, open
space regulations, and impacts on private
property owners.
The topic of habitat conservation and water
availability came up frequently, with most
participants saying that further protections are
needed. However, there was also recognition of
the burden these protections may put on
property owners. Deschutes County does not
have the authority or expertise to r^*^
evaluate or reallocate water rights as part of its
land use planning efforts, leading the County to
instead work with the Oregon Department of
Water Resources, irrigation districts, the Bureau
of Reclamation. US Department of Agriculture
Conservation Districts, non ;governmental
organizations, and holders of water rights to
increase the efficiency of water distribution
throughout the community.
Goals and Policies
Water Goals and Policies
Goal 5.1: Support regional, comprehensive water
management solutions that balance the diverse
needs of water users and recognize Oregon
water law.
Policy 5.1 .1 . Participate in Statewide and
regional water planning including, but not
limited to:
a. Work cooperatively with appropriate
federal, state, tribal and local agency
resource managers, such as The
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs
Reservation of Oregon, the Oregon Water
Resources Department(OWRD), irrigation
districts, and other stakeholders and
nonprofit water organizations, such as
the Deschutes Basin Water Collaborative,
the County Soil and Water Conservation
District;
b. Supportthe development and
implementation of Upper Deschutes Basin
Study, Habitat Conservation Plan, and
Biological Opinion from National Marine
Fisheries Service for the middle and lower
Deschutes Rivers.
Policy 5.1 .2. Support grants for water system
infrastructure improvements, upgrades, or
expansions.
Policy5.1 .3. Develop better understanding
of The Confederated Tribes of the Warm
Springs Reservation of Oregon's treaty -
protected rights to co -manage the water
resources of the Deschutes Basin.
Policy 5.1 .4. Encourage state agencies to
identify local areas of concern for water
availability and explore additional regulations
or requirements to ensure water capacity is
not negatively impacted by development.
5-10 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
Goal 5.2: Increase water efficiency and conservation
efforts among all users, including homeowners and
businesses.
Policy 5.2.1 . Support efficient water use
through targeted conservation, educational
and, as needed, regulatory or incentive
programs.
a. Encourage new development incorporates
efficient water use practices for all water
uses.
b. E^r@g, Provide education and
resources to community members
regarding the beneficial reuse of grey
water for landscaping.
c. Encourage and educate the community
about the relative impacts of thinning or
reduction of plant species that adversely
impact forest health, water availability, and
soil quality.
d. Encourage and educate the community
about on -farm efficiency measures,
including upgrades to equipment.
e. Encourage and educate the community
about use of voluntary metering of water
use to monitor seasonal Impacts on water
use.
f. Provide access to educational materials
and tools related to water conservation
including publications, information about
grant opportunities, and/or partner with
organizations on educational events.
g. Encourage and educate community
members on stewardship of wetlands and
waterways.
h. Provide access to educational materials
about water -wise gardening and
xeriscaping.
ki. Encourage establishment of water
reuse and recycling programs in
particular for County facilities
Policy 5.2.2. Promote coordinated
regional water conservation efforts and
Natural Resources
implementation by regional, tribal, and
local organizations and agencies,
including increasing public awareness
of and implementing water
conservation tools, incentives, and
best practices.
5-101 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Policy 5.2.3. Support conservation efforts
by irrigation districts, property owners and
other water users, including programs to
provide incentives for water conservation,
such as piping of canals and laterals, water
banking, exchanges of water rights, voluntary
transfers of in -stream flows, onsite efficiency
measures, and other means.
Goal5.3: Maintain and enhance a healthy
ecosystem in the Deschutes River Basin.
Policy 5.3.1 . Notifythe Oregon Department
of State Lands, The Confederated Tribes of
the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon,
and other state and federal agencies as
appropriate -of any development applications
for land within a wetland identified on the
statewide wetland inventory maps.
Policy5.3.2. Workwith The Confederated
Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of
Oregon and other federal, state, and local
agency resource managers to restore,
maintain and/or enhance healthy river and
riparian ecosystems and wetlands, including
the following:
a. Cooperate to improve surface waters,
especiallythose designated water quality
impaired under the federal Clean Water
Act;
b. Support research on methods to restore,
maintain and enhance river and riparian
ecosystems and wetlands;
C. Support restoration efforts for river and
riparian ecosystems and wetlands;
d. Inventory and consider protections for
cold water springs;
e. Evaluate waterways in coordination with
OPRD for possible designation under the
Scenic Waterways program;
5-11 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
f. In collaboration with appropriate federal,
state, tribal and local agency resource
managers stakeholders, map channel
migration zones and identify effective
protections;
g. Develop comprehensive riparian
management or mitigation practices that
enhance ecosystems, such as criteria
for removal of vegetation that adversely
impacts water availability and soil health.
Policy 5.3.3. Support studies of the
Deschutes River ecosystem and incorporate
strategies from current watershed studies
that provide new scientific information and
indigenous knowledge aboutthe Deschutes
River ecosystem.
Policy 5.3.4. Support educational efforts
and Identify areas where the County could
provide information on the Deschutes River
ecosystem, including rivers, riparian areas,
floodplains and wetlands.
a. Support efforts to educate property
owners to understand regulations
pertaining to rivers, riparian areas,
floodplains and wetlands.
Policy 5.3.5. Revisit recommendations
of 1996 Upper Deschutes Wild and
Scenic River and State Scenic Waterway
Comprehensive Plan, or its successor, and
consider implementation of voluntary
recommendations intothe county code
Goal 5.4: Maintain and enhance fish and
riparian -dependent wildlife habitat.
Policy5.4.1 . Coordinate with The
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs
Reservation of Oregon and other federal,
state, and local agency resource managers
and stakeholders to protect and enhance
fish and wildlife habitat in river and riparian
habitats and wetlands.
Policy 5.4.2. Promote healthy fish
populations through incentives and
education.
Policy 5.4.3. Support healthy native salmonid
fish populations through coordination with
stakeholders, including, but not limited to,
The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs
Reservation of Oregon and other federal,
state, and local agency resource managers
who provide fish habitat management and
restoration.
a. Review, and apply where appropriate,
strategies for protecting fish and fish
habitat for native salmonid species.
b. Promote native salmonid species
recovery through voluntary incentives
and encouraging appropriate species
management and associated habitat
conservation and restoration.
Policy 5.4.4. Update and Implement policies
to suers be consistent with federally
approved Habitat Conservation Plans for
species listed under the Endangered Species
Act
a. Spawning and rearing areas for salmonid
species should be considered significant
habitat and should be protected in rivers
and streams.
b. Cooperate with covered parties in
restoring or enhancing spawning and
rearing areas for salmonid species, where
feasible.
c. Support efforts to address riparian
restoration associated with streamflow
management under approved plans.
Policy 5.4.5. Use a combination of incentives
and/or regulations to avoid, minimize, and
mitigate development impacts on river and
riparian ecosystems and wetlands.
5-12 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
Policy5.4.6. Support plans, cooperative
agreements, education, water quality
monitoring and other tools that protect
watersheds, reduce erosion and runoff,
enhance riparian vegetation, and protect
other natural or engineered water systems/
processes that filter and/or clean water and
improve and/or and preserve water quality.
Policy 5.4.7. Coordinate with the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality and
other stakeholders on regional water quality
maintenance and improvement efforts such
as identifying and abating point (single -
source) and non -point (unidentified or
multiple -source) pollution or developing and
implementing Total Maximum Daily Load and
Water Quality Management Plans.
Policy 5.4.8. Coordinate with The
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs
Reservation of Oregon, Oregon Health
Authori and other federal, state, and local
agency resource managers to address water -
related public health issues.
a. Support amendments to State regulations
to permit centralized sewer systems
in areas with high levels of existing or
potential development or identified water
quality concerns.
b. If a public health hazard is declared in
rural Deschutes County, expedite actions
such as legislative amendments allowing
sewers or similar infrastructure.
Policy 5.4.9. Continue to evaluate and/or
implement regulations, such as a wellhead
protection ordinance for public water
systems, in accordance with applicable
Federal and/or State requirements.
Policy 5.4.10. Coordinate and workwith
the Oregon Department of Agriculture,
agricultural uses, and available voluntary
programs to support and implement
proven new technologies and best practices
to maintain and enhance water quality,
such as minimizing nitrate contamination,
maintaining streamsidevegetation, reducing
streambank soil erosion and runoff, reducing
fish passage barriers, managing return flows,
limiting livestock access to riparian areas,
and minimizing weeds and bare patches in
grazing areas.
Policy 5 .4.11 . Support regulations, education
programs, and cleaning procedures at public
and private boat landings.
Goal 5.5: Coordinate land use and water policies
to address management and allocation of water
in Deschutes County.
Policy 5.5.1 . Coordinate with other affected
agencies when a land use or development
application may impact rivers or riparian
ecosystems or wetlands.
Policy 5.5.2. Regulate land use patterns
and promote best practices to preserve the
integrity of the natural hydrologic system,
recognize the relationship between ground
and surface water, recognize basin -wide
impacts, and address water impacts of new
land uses and developments, including
water -intensive uses.
Policy 5.5.3. Support BWRD's efforts
to protect existing surface water and
groundwater users and to maintain
sustainable groundwater resources as
OWRD works to update and modernize
Oregon's groundwater allocation rules
and policies. t^ nrnteGt ^X'Stn^
f r --
;Ad to n-, nt-.'n 9lIrtaiA@hlIQ
groundwater
Policy 5.5.4. Support efforts by the OWRD
in collaboration with Central Oregon Cities
Organization, The Confederated Tribes of the
Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, and
non -governmental organizations to revisit
the Deschutes Basin Groundwater Mitigation
Program.
5-13 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
Policy 5 .5.5. Coordinate with the irrigation
districts to ensure +rrigated land partitions
and lot line adjustments are not approved
without notice to the affected district.
Policy 5.5.6. Utilize Central Oregon
Stormwater Manual to apply appropriate
stormwater management practices land use. -
decisions.
Policy 5.5.7. Allow for development of
wastewater facilities and improvements
where needed or required to address water
quality issues and maintain water quality,
consistent with state and local wastewater
system requirements.
Open Space and Scenic Views Goals &
Policies
Goal 5.6: Coordinate with property owners to
protect open spaces, scenic views, and scenic
areas and corridors through a combination of
incentives and/or educational programs.
Policy 5.6.1 . Work with stakeholders to
create and maintain a system of connected
open spaces while balancing private property
rights with community benefits.
Policy 5.6.2. Work to maintain the visual
character and rural appearance of open
spaces such as the area along Highway 97
that separates the communities of Bend
and Redmond or lands that are visually
prominent.-
Policy5.6.3. Work to maintain and protect
the visual character and rural appearance of
visually prominent open spaces within the
County, particularly those that are identified
in the Goal 5 inventory.
Policy 5.6.4. Seek to protect the cultural
identity of rural communities, such as the
Highway 97 area/corridor between Bend and
Redmond, and others.
Policy 5.6.5. Protect significant open spaces,
scenic views, and scenic sites by encouraging
new development to be sensitive to these
resources.
Policy 5.6.6. Incentivize the placement of
structures in a way that is sensitive of view
corridors to maintain the visual character of
the area.
Wildlife Goals and Policies
Goal 5.7:Maintain and enhance a diversity of
wildlife and habitats.
Policy 5.7.1 . Promote stewardship of wildlife
habitats through incentives, public education,
and development regulations.
Policy5.7.2. Ensure Goal 5wildlife
inventories and habitat protection programs
are up-to-date through public processes,
expert sources, and current or recently
adopted plans and studies.
Policy 5.7.3. Provide incentives for new
development to be compatible with and to
enhance wildlife habitat.
Policy 5.7.4. Require, incentivize, or
encourage clustering of development In
inventoried wildlife areas to reduce impacts
to wildlife populations.
Policy 5.7.5.Develop better understanding
of The Confederated Tribes of the Warm
Springs Reservation of Oregon's treaty -
protected rights to co -manage the wildlife
resources of the Deschutes Basin.
Goal 5.8: Balance protection of wildlife and
habitat with the economic and recreational
benefits of wildlife and habitat.
Policy 5.8.1 . Encourage responsible and
sustainable wildlife related tourism,
huntin and recreation.
5-14 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
Policy 5.8.2. Coordinate with stakeholders
to ensure access to appropriate recreational
opportunities within significant wildlife and
riparian habitat through public or non-profit
ownership.
Policy 5.8.3.Coordinatewith Confederated
Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation
of Oregon and State agencies to develop
strategies to support sound wildlife
management science and principals for the
benefit of the wildlife resource.
Goal 5.9: Comply with federal and state
regulations related to sensitive, threatened, and
endangered species, including the Endangered
Species Act, the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and
others as applicable.
Policy 5.9.1 . Coordinate with Federal and
State agencies to develop strategies to
protect Federal or State Threatened or
Endangered Species, or Species of Concern.
Policy 5.9.2. Mitigate conflicts between large-
scale development and sage grouse habitat.
Policy 5.9.3. Consider adopting
recommendations from Oregon Department
of Fish and Wildlife, the Confederated Tribes
of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon,
and the Deschutes River Mitigation and
Enhancement Program in dock construction.
Environmental Quality Goals and
Policies
Goal 5.10: Maintain and improve upon the
quality of air and land in Deschutes County.
Policy 5.10.1 . Use building techniques,
materials, and technologies in existing
and future County operations and capital
facilities that help maintain and improve
environmental quality.
Policy5.10.2. Implement dark skies
educational and or incentive program and
periodically update the Dark Skies ordinance
to reduce the impacts of light pollution
and reduce lighting impacts on adjacent
properties.
Policy 5.10.3. Coordinate with agency
partners to educate residents about
controlled burning projects and air quality
concerns.
Policy 5.10.4. Use public education,
education for County departments, and
regulations to control noxious weeds and
invasive species.
Goal 5.11: Promote sustainable building
practices that minimize the Impacts of
development on the natural environment.
Policy 5.11 .1 . Use the County Code and
educational materials to promote the use of
resource -efficient building and landscaping
techniques, materials, and technologies that
minimize impacts to environmental quality.
Policy 5.11 .2. Encourage and support
reuse and recycling of consumer goods,
green waste, construction waste, hazardous
waste, and e-waste through education and
enhanced recycling opportunities through
the Recycling Program.
Policy 5.11 .3. Supportthe process for
siting new County solid waste management
facilities in rural Deschutes County,
consistent with facility needs and County
standards for the location and approval of
such facilities.
Policy 5.11 .4. Implement best practices in
solid waste management throughout the
County.
5-15 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Resources
Policy 5.11 .5. Develop and implement a
Climate Action Plan to address the potential
future impacts of climate change on
Deschutes County through incentives and/or
regulations.
Policy 5.11 .6. Promote and incentivize
green infrastructure in new development to
improve stormwater management.
Historic d
Cultural Resourcec-,
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Deschutes County is a certified local government (CLG), as designated by the State
of Oregon Historic Preservation Office. This certification recognizes the County's
commitment to implementing and maintaining a formal historic resources program.
Deschutes County has 13 nationally registered historic and cultural sites and 35 locally
significant historic sites. The County currently administers grant programs and zoning
requirements to preserve and restore these sites. Deschutes County owns the National
Register listed Reid School and invests in supporting the Deschutes County Historical
Society as a research and educational facility through a zero -cost lease and maintenance
support for the purposes of running the museum and research center.
Historic resources are recognized by Statewide
Planning Goal 5, Natural Resources, Scenic
Views and Historic Areas and Open Spaces,
and Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-023.
The Statewide Goal and OAR recommend cities
and counties inventory and protect historic
and cultural sites. Recognizing the value and
importance of having a connection to our past,
Deschutes County chose to implement and
maintain a historic preservation program and
Historic Preservation Strategic Plan (Adopted
2022).
The 2022 Historic Preservation Strategic Plan
identified three overarching goals to guide
historic and cultural resource preservation in
Deschutes County: collaborate, coordinate,
and educate. The plan identifies opportunities
to strengthen relationships between historic
preservation and community partners, and to
involve community members in historical and
cultural preservation efforts. Improving access
to historic resource information and providing
content in an easily accessible format will be
paramount to preservation efforts and increase
6-12 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
community appreciation for resources. Along
with improved educational resources, more
outreach and education opportunities could
be explored. Deschutes County has several
partners involved in drafting and implementing
this strategic plan -those partners include the
Deschutes County Historical Society, High Desert
Museum, Archaeological Society of Central
Oregon, Three Sisters Historical Society, and
Redmond Historical Society.
Context
Deschutes County has several notable historical
and cultural sites. These sites receive special
protections to avoid land use or development
activitythat may disturb the historical and
cultural resources existing on site.
LOCALLY SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC SITES
Deschutes County has 35 locally significant sites
including cemeteries, ranches, dams, bridges,
schools, and granges among numerous historic
homesteads and homesites. The State of Oregon
has initiated a process to identify culturally
significant archaeological sites and sites of
indigenous Importance. This process will likely be
Incorporated into the Countys local inventory by
2029.
NATIONALLY REGISTERED SITES
Deschutes County has 13 sites that have
completed the national register process,
including highways, bridges, lodges, and rock
gardens.
6-13 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Historic and Cultural Resources
Key Community Considerations
As part of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan update,
community members shared their vision for the
protection of historic and cultural resources.
Comments included:
The importance of county -wide
coordination on cultural and historic, as
well as increased representation of the
indigenous history of Central Oregon.
Acknowledging previous landowners and
preserving the County's historical and
cultural resources are both important.
A county -wide historic and cultural resource
signage program was also suggested.
The community shared an interest in
capitalizing on the High Desert Museum to
continue to support indigenous culture and
Central Oregon's history.
Goals and Policies
Goal 6.1: Promote the preservation of
designated historic and cultural resources
through education, incentives, and voluntary
programs.
Policy 6.1 .1 . The Historic Landmarks
Commission shall take the lead In promoting
historic and cultural resource preservation as
defined in DCC 2.28.
a. Support incentives from the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO), The
Confederated Tribes ofthe Warm Springs
Reservation of Oregon Tribal Historic
Preservation Office (THPO), or other
agencies for private landowners to protect
and restore historic resources.
b. Supportthe Historic Landmarks
Commission to promote educational
programs to inform the public of the
values of historic preservation.
c. Support improved training for the Historic
Landmarks Commission.
d. Support the goals, objectives, and actions
of the Historic Preservation Strategic Plan.
6-14 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Historic and Cultural Resources
Policy 6.1 .2. Coordinate cultural and
historic preservation with the Oregon State
Historic Preservation Office9#icp and The
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs
Reservation of Oregon Tribal Historic
Preservation Office.
a. Maintain Deschutes County as a Certified
Local Government, which includes the City
of Sisters.
Policy 6.1.3.Encourage private property
owners to coordinate with the State Historic
Preservation Office and The Confederated
Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation
of Oregon Tribal Historic Preservation
Office. Coordinate with The Confederated
Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of
Oregon, Burns -Paiute Tribe, Klamath Tribes,
Archaeological Society of Central Oregon,
and SHPO to adopt a program to identify and
protect archaeological and cultural resources,
as appropriate, and prevent conflicting uses
from disrupting the value of known sites.
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Central Oregon is a dynamic region formed and shaped by the powerful forces of
nature. Deschutes County residents and visitors rely on the County and its partners to
plan for hazardous events and limit harm to people and property.
Continued rapid population growth, development in wildfire -prone areas, and an
increased frequency of natural hazard events make planning for and mitigating risks
ever more important. As temperatures rise globally, Central Oregon will face challenges
due to drought, wildfire, heat events, and storms. The impacts a major Cascadia
Subduction Zone earthquake would have on Deschutes County would be substantial as
well.
In order to plan for and address natural hazards,
Deschutes County has partnered with local
jurisdictions to create its Natural Hazards
Mitigation Plan (NHMP). Additional opportunities
exist to create greater defensible spaces,
encourage fire hardening, utilize grant programs,
and pursue education measuresto reduce these
impacts over time.
According to the NHMP, the hazards with
greatest risk in Deschutes County are:
Winter Storm. Destructive storms
producing heavy snow, ice and cold
temperatures occurred throughoutthe
County's history. Increases in population
and tourism make potential impacts
to shelter, access to medical services,
transportation, utilities, fuel sources, and
telecommunication systems more acute.
The relative frequency of these events
combined with theirwidespread impacts
make winter storms the highest -ranked
hazard in the NHMP.
7-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Wildfire. Historically, wildland fires have
shaped the forests and wildlands valued by
residents and visitors. These landscapes,
however, are now significantly altered due
to increased rural development, warmer
and drier4 conditions, and forest
management practices, apd a ^epepal lade,
^f!a rge sGale tro;tmontcd ot,,,, tdated
fgp@st PA@P@Ron,o.,t practices, resulting in
increased event ofwildfires that burn more
Windstorm. A windstorm is generally a
short duration event Involving straight-
line winds and/or gusts in excess of SO
mph. Although windstorms can affect the
entirety of Deschutes County, they are
especially dangerous in developed areas
with significant tree stands and major
infrastructure, especially above ground
utility lines.
Drought. Periods of drought can have
significant impacts on public health,
agriculture, and industry. Many counties
in central o��orr Oregon are currently
experiencing more frequent and severe
droughts than is historically the norm,
and many climate predictions see this
trend continuing Into the future.
Earthquake. The Pacific Northwest is
located at a convergent plate boundary,
called the Cascadia Subduction Zone, where
the)uan de Fuca and North American
tectonic plates meet. This fault line is
subject to rare but potentially very large
7-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Hazards
earthquakes. Such an event would impact
Deschutes County communities both
directly through damage to infrastructure
and property, as well as economically and
socially as the broader region recovers
from the disaster.
Context
Informed by an understanding of natural
hazards, Deschutes County can reduce the risks
to property, environmental quality, and human
safety through land use planning and review of
specific development proposals. The Countys
policies provide the framework for the Countys
natural hazards review program. This includes:
identification of areas subject to natural hazards,
regulations for evaluating land use actions for
how they may result in exposure to potential
harm from natural hazards, and programmatic
elements including partnerships and funding
opportunities to support natural hazard risk
reduction.
Deschutes County has taken on a number of
proactive projects, including:
2021 Natural Hazards Mitigation
Plan (NHMP)
2019 Wildfire Mitigation Advisory
Committee
Project Wildfire, a County -led wildfire
education and mitigation program has
been in operation since 2003-1-2-and has
been very successful in changing attitudes
towards wildfire and prevention.
Community Wildfire Protection Plans
(CWPP) for many communities'', including:
» Greater Bend CWPP (2016, expected
revision 2021)
» Greater La Pine CWPP (2020, expected
revision 2025)
» Greater Redmond CWPP (2919,
expected expected revision
2026-)
» Greater Sisters Country CWPP (2019,
expected revision 2024)
» Sunriver CWPP (2020, expected revision
2025)
» East and West Deschutes County CWPP
(2018, expected revision 2023)
» Upper Deschutes River Coalition CWPP
(2018, expected revision 2023)
The County is pursuing a process to consolidate
all CWPPs into one document to simplify the
five-year update process. In addition, dozens of
neighborhoods are pursuing or have received
FireWise certification through the National Fire
Protection Association. The County also
supports the Heart of Oregon and Youth
Conservation Corps crews in fuels reduction
work and other mitigation efforts, with
financial assistance from other entities.
Wildfire
According to the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan,
wildfire is the second most significant hazard
to the county (after winter storms) and was
the most discussed natural hazard discussed
during outreach events. Throughout the 201"
century, the years with warm and dry conditions
corresponded with larger fires that have burned
greater areas. Overall increases In heat will also
lengthen growing seasons - building greater fuel
loads and decreasing soil and fuel moisture,
thereby increasing the likelihood of larger fires.
By mid-century, the annual potential for very
7-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Hazards
large fires is projected to increase by at least
350% over the 20t' century average.'
The annual frequency of very high and extreme
fire danger days is expected to increase by
10-15 additional days per year by mid-century'
(up from 36 currently). These trends are due
to exacerbated conditions with a combination
of high air temperatures and very low fuel
moisture, which Increases the likelihood of fire
starts that can spread. As Deschutes County
communities have experienced, increased fire
activity - even at quite a distance - canw4
impact air quality, increasing public health
risks and impacting aspects of everyday life.
Decc.;rch iridic;tes that iA r —horn
hoc m ,n.J rh EG Ugh the landSG@ne'A4h
soy, o r't�' r n,y.o-h'c sh-,ng'ng thspeGies n
c't'r, nfrhn fnrnsrs ,.,h'ch
likely to hem sil'enr to f r re fires 1-nrhor
GGrAPG6IRdiRg fa rnrc like rl 0 ght @i sect
G tbreakc w 11 ronrip e to build f el Innr-Ic 'n
the forests anti ch@nge the fnrecr'c GQIzAP9S1ziQA.
Dncr_fl re loncicc@nnc'n IlesGh s I'n pt ywill
likely See iRGPeaSeS iRthe PPeVaIeRGR nf' n,r+c\r
.,.; n er tree snes'nc Rd a ed 4 GIF iP f'rn
amble rne�'e Ch ecrern hnmloy-k
_cub @In'ne fr anrd corr,e c e PiPe 'cr�nt
SPeGieS like t D F d r
rrR
Iar h w ill have greater cii r rr„ to fire
h t nerhans not tp Athpr streccnrc Larger fir
es
th;r ohQPter nrenynlc,.,'ll n gntiVely
IPRPaGt seed J S sty and rPdilGPd
FAQic461`P in AGIernc@ fnrect FegiGRS
/II he In ally tp rnfG ;tiAA fail
le@Gl Fig to GGAVeFSiQR rn othn y tam types
IP th i f,@Pests, the I
y area
burped is expected to nearly double by Ppid
ant m ,yhile the > > h rnerl "n the grxc/
chn b nloteo c likely to d@cPexe slightly
by mlal rent r y This is partly due to pxFppdpd
1 Halofsky, J. Peterson, D, Harvey, B. "Changing Wildfire,
changing forests: the effects of climate change on fire regimes and
vegetation in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Fire Ecology, 2020.
2 Sebastian U. Busby, Kevan B. Moffett, Andres Holz. High
severity and short interval wildfires limit forest recovery In the Central
Cascade Range. Ecosphere, 2020: 11 (9) D0110. 1002/ecs2.3247
3 6 Halofsky et al. 2020.
giro nhr decreasipg plantgrre,, h ar;d thPrPfr,rL-
nilnhlo fi col Tho rick Gf 61R S poll , r, flrac
is orted- to Incroxo n c I;rno;wathc of
0
Clronon 1nrl d Ag nocrl-, toc
The Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) is defined as
the area where housing and burnable vegetation
meet or intermingle$. Deschutes County has seen
increased development in the WUI associated
with growth in the four cities and the rural count
in particular on the edge of cities adjacent to
public lands. Public lands in the WUI historically
had frequent low intensity fire which reduced the
density of small trees and brush making the
landscape less likely to produce high severity fire.
Past forest management practices and exclusion
of frequent, natural, low intensity fire from the
landscape result in high fuel loads and high
probability of severe fire. Landscapes in
Deschutes County that have experienced severe
fire often contain dense understory vegetation
and brush, which are more susceptible to ignitions
and fire spread in hot and dry climates.
Following severe wildfire events, forests
experience disruption of natural growth
progression, which can lead to competition among
vegetative species and monoculture species
growth. Significant efforts have gone into removal
of these fuels at the federal, state, and local levels
including notable efforts by neighborhood
associations and communities following fire -wise
guidelines.
Home hardening at the individual household level
will continue to play an important role in reducing
the risk of loss from wildfire events and mitigating
the spread of fire between neighboring
properties. The 2020 Labor Day fires severely
mgacted several areas of the state. During those
events, house to house ignitions amplified the
spread of wildfire, causing severe loss of homes
and businesses. Home hardening techniques
include use of ignition resistant siding and roofing
attic ventilation devices that reduce ember
intrusion, and removal of vegetation in the
8 Community Planning Assistance for Wildfire definition for
Wul
7-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Hazards
defensible space area surrounding structures on a
property. These techniques will be crucial to reduce
loss of life and property from these increasing hazard
events in and adjacent to the WUI.
WILDFIRE AND HEAT
By the middle of this century, increasing
temperatures are expected to drive increasing
wildfire risk, especially in the Cascades. The yearly
percentage of area burned is likely to increase in the
mountains and the interval
of return (years between fires) Is expected to
decrease across the county. Both the highest and
lowest summer temperatures will increase, leading
to more extreme heat days and reducing the
historical nighttime cooling effect of the high desert.
Under all change projections, there will be
an increase in the number of days with a
heat index above both 90' and 100°F by
mid-century.8 By 2100, Deschutes County
canexpectsummer maximum
temperatures to be12°Fhotter than current
highs. Overall, extreme heat is not
considered a human health risk in Deschutes
County because of low night-time
temperatures
Natural Hazards
and tl4e-low humidity in the region. However,
the Redmond airport, which sees the hottest
temperatures in the county, will likely start to see
experience occasional temperatures above 105°
everyfew years by mid-century, and at least once a
year by 2100. In addition, summer night -time -lows
are likely
to increase by up to 5° degrees by mid-century,
reducing the cooling effect of the high desert
climate.
Fire Danger near Mt. Bachelor Village
2023
� T
bb
AAAAAAAAAA
wo
4 Oregon Forest Resources Institute Fact Sheet
7-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Rug
AAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAA
Natural Hazards
Key Community Considerations
Community conversations related to natural
hazards have centered around the following
topics:
Impacts of Climate Change. Throughout
the GGrRPRURity engagement process,
community members spoke to the
importance of recognizing and addressing
the impacts of climate change in Deschutes
County and its relationship with natural
hazard events.
Education and Communication.
Providing information about potential
risks to residents and visitors can help the
community as a whole be more prepared
for natural hazards.
Development Code Regulations and
Incentives. Some community members
expressed a desire for stricter regulations
and additional incentives about "fire -
wise" construction and defensible space
practices.
Limiting Development in hazard -prone
areas. Increased development in remote
areas of the County, where life-saving
services may be scarce and human impacts
may exacerbate risks, was a concern for
some.
7-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Coals and Policies
Goal 7.1: Develop policies, partnerships, and
programs to increase resilience and response
capacity in order to protect people, property,
infrastructure, the economy, natural resources,
and the environment from natural hazards.
Policy 7.1 .1 . Partner with county, state, and
regional partners to regularly update and
implement the Deschutes County Natural
Hazards Mitigation Plan.
Policy 7.1 .2. Collaborate with federal,
state, and local partners to maintain
updated mapping of high wildfire hazard
4&k areas, floodplains, and other natural
hazard areas within the county.
Policy 7.1 .3. Communicate and cooperate
with federal, state, and local entities to clarify
responsibilities regarding wildfire mitigation
and suppression to improve fire protection
services.
Policy 7.1 .4, Use the development code to
provide incentives and regulations to manage
development in areas prone to natural
hazards.
Policy 7.1 .5. Work with agency partners to
mitigate impacts of =dd� a� aAd
P@SPGAd t^ soa episodes of poor air
quality resulting from wildfires and
prescribed burning in the region.
Policy 7.1 .6. Protect wildlife with wildland fire
mitigation measures on private lands.
Policy 7.1 .7. Address wildfire risk, particularly
in the wildland urban interface.
Policy 7.1 .8. Identify all areas not protected
by structural fire protection agencies
and promote discussionstoaddressfire
protection in unprotected lands in the
County.
Policy 7.1 .9. Support forest management
practices that reduce wildfire risk.
7-8 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Hazards
Policy 7.1 .10 . Support local fire protection
districts and departments In providing and
improving fire protection services.
Policy 7.1 .11 . Continue to review and revise
County Code as needed to:
a. Ensure that land use activities do not
aggravate, accelerate or increase the level
ofriskfrom natural hazards.
b. Require development proposals to include
an impact evaluation that reviews
the ability of the affected fire agency to
maintain an appropriate level of service to
existing development and the proposed
development.
c. Minimize erosion from development and
ensure disturbed or exposed areas are
promptly restored to a stable, natural
and/or vegetated condition using natural
materialsor native plants.
d. Ensure drainage from development or
alterations to historic drainage patterns do
not increase erosion on -site or on adjacent
properties.
e. Reduce problems associated with
administration of the Floodplain Zone.
f. Require new subdivisions and destination
resorts to achieve FireWise Standards or
other currently accepted fire mitigation
standards from the beginning of the
projects and maintain those standards in
perpetuity.
Goal 7.2: Ensure the County's built environment
and infrastructure are adequately prepared for
natural disasters.
Policy 7.2.1 . Increase the quality, resiliency,
diversity, and redundancy of utility and
transportation infrastructure to increase
chances of continued service following a
natural disaster.
PoIicy 7.2.2. Prohibit the development of
new essential public facilities and uses that
serve vulnerable populations from being
located within areas at high risk of flooding
and wildfire, and aim to relocate existing uses
intheseareas.
Policy 7.2.3. Support sits of Central Oregon
Ready, Responsive, Resilient (CORE3) regional
coordinated emergency services training
facility.
Policy 7.2.4. Coordinate with emergency
service providers when new development is
proposed to ensure that response capacity
can meet the needs of the new development.
Policy7.2.5. Require new developmentto
follow home hardening, defensible space,
and other resilient design strategies in areas
prone to wildfires and other natural hazards.
Policy 7.2.6. Encourage and incentivize
development that exceeds minimum building
code standards and promote retrofitting
of existing development for better natural
disaster resiliency.
Policy 7.2.7. Require development to be
designed to minimize alteration of the
natural landform in areas subject to slope
instability, drainage issues or erosion.
Policy 7.2.8. Regulate development in
designated floodplains identified on the
Deschutes County Zoning Map based
on Federal Emergency Management Act
regulations.
a. Continue evaluation of participation in and
implementation of the Community Rating
System as part of the National Flood
Insurance Program.
b. Cooperate with other stakeholders to
identify alternatives for acquiring and/
or relocating existing structures prone to
flooding.
7-9 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Natural Hazards
c. Continue to coordinate with stakeholders
and agency staff to correct mapping
errors.
Goal 7.3: Develop programs that inform the
public about the Increased risks from natural
hazards.
Policy 7.3.1 . Identify high risk, high need
populations and ensure equitable access
to emergency preparedness and recovery
services.
Policy 7.3.2. Increase outreach and
education for hazard awareness and natural
disaster preparedness, especially for low-
income, elderly, non-English speaking, and
other vulnerable populations.
Policy 7.3.3. Expand partnerships with
government agencies, utilities, and other
groups that can help Deschutes County
residents prepare for natural disasters.
Policy 7.3.4. Work with regional partners to
establish and maintain adequate support for
a Deschutes County Community Emergency
Response Team (CERT) to aid in responding
to natural hazard events.
Policy 7.3.5. Promote and support business
resilience planning.
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Recreation is an important quality of life issue for Deschutes County and recreational
tourism is a key part of the local economy. Both residents and visitors are drawn by
the Countys extensive public lands, seasonal climate, and wide variety of activities and
settings. Recreational opportunities include places set aside for specific activities such as
campgrounds or sports fields as well as passive spaces such as natural areas.
The primary focus of recreation in rural Deschutes County is outdoor recreation.
Outdoor activities promote healthy communities by encouraging people to enjoy an
active lifestyle and by providing opportunities to reconnect with the natural world.
Deschutes County does not have a parks
department; instead, it coordinates with the
federal and state agencies, local park districts,
and private entities that provide park and
recreational opportunities. Coordination
assures that resources are used efficiently, and
duplication is avoided. With a holistic view of
recreation in Deschutes County, the County can
also provide other agencies and jurisdictions
with guidance for service gaps tofilll
8-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
The health ofthe County's recreational assets
and industry is inexorably tied to the health
of the land, forests, and waterways of Central
Oregon The effects of human activity - from
development pressures and overuse of
recreational facilities to resource extraction and
climate change - will have a significant impact on
recreation in Deschutes County. Some ofthese
impacts include:
Changes in precipitationaffectmgthe
timing and conditions for winter sports
Loss of habitat
Wildfire and risk of wildfire limiting
recreational access
Increased number of dangerouslywarm
days
Future Challenges to Recreation
The health of the Countys recreational assets
and industry is inexorably tied to the health
of the land, forests, and waterways of Central
Oregon. The effects of human activity - from
development pressures and overuse of
recreational facilities to resource extraction and
Commented [NM10]: Text box is duplicative, park
districts mentioned below.
climate change - will have a significant impact on
recreation in Deschutes County.
There are several environmental concerns that
may affect parks and recreation in Deschutes
County in the future. Activities such as hiking,
hunting, fishing, swimming, and foraging are
an Important part of recreation in Deschutes
County - these activities are likely to be impacted
by future changes to the climate.
Fishing may be impacted by drought as water
bodies warm and seasonally drop. Foraging
animals, like deer and elk, may express
changing behavior like earlier -season high
elevation foraging and increased interactions
with agricultural communities due to drought.
Drought also severely reduces the prominence
of fruiting fungi for annual mushroom hunters,
and may increase pressure on the remaining
harvest areas. Fungi are crucial to the health of
the forest ecosystem, adapting and responding
to changing conditions and disease.
These conditions may also lead to greater
frequency and severity of algal and bacterial
blooms in fresh water. Algal blooms In other
parts of the state have led to drinking water
concerns, but Deschutes County cities are
supplied by groundwater and so the risk in
algal blooms is mainly to recreation - boaters,
swimmers, anglers, and campers may be less
motivated to visit.
8-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Recreation
WinterSports
Snow sports are a significant component of
recreation in Deschutes County. Overall decline
In snow pack is expected in the coming decades,
which will heavily impact winter sports that
rely on snowpack in the Cascades. At the Mt.
Bachelor Ski Resort, April Snowpack is expected
to decline between 11 %and 18% by the middle
of the century and between 18% and 43% by the
end of the century. Additionally, inconsistent
snowpack buildup will increase due to more
precipitation falling as rain instead of snow
throughout the season, making winter sports
seasons less predictable.
Summer Recreation
The summer outdoor season has additional risks
from degraded to severely degraded air quality
due to wildfire throughout the west coast. With
degraded air quality, outdoor recreators may
avoid the region, impacting regional income and
generally degrading the perception ofthe county
as a retreatto the natural world. Additionally,
an increase in the frequency of very high
temperature days may impact the safety and
desirability of outdoor recreation.
Context
Deschutes County does not directly provide
parks and recreation services. The only public
parks the County maintains are a section of the
County Fairgrounds and the Worrell Wayside in
downtown Bend. Although there is no County
parks department, there are County -owned
properties which are designated as park lands.
Parks and recreation services are provided by
the following entities.
OREGON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OPRD owns and manages several key parks and
scenic areas in the County. These include state
parks such as line Falls State Scenic Viewpoint,
La Pine State Park, Pilot Butte State Scenic
Viewpoint, Smith Rock State Park, and Tumalo
State Park. In addition, they also manage the
Upper and Middle Deschutes River Scenic
Waterway segments, and Cascade Lakes and
McKenzie Pass-Santiam Pass Scenic Byways.
THE BEND PARKS AND RECREATION SPECIAL
DISTRICT (BPRD)
BPRD owns and maintains approximately 3,035
acres of parkland Including 81 parks and 70
miles of trails. The largest park district in the
County, the taxing district follows the City of
Bend Urban Growth Boundary closely, although
extends past the UGB to the west and east to
include several properties outside of city limits.
8-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Recreation
THE LA PINE PARKS AND RECREATION SPECIAL
DISTRICT
This district operates in 85 square miles and
11 parks and recreation facilities in southern
Deschutes County including the City of La Pine.
THE REDMOND AREA PARKS AND RECREATION
SPECIAL DISTRICT
The District operates five recreational facilities
Including the Cascade Swim Center and extends
beyond city limits to Tetherow Crossing. In 2022,
the district received voter approval for a general
obligation bond to build a new community
center with a variety of recreational, fitness, and
therapeutic activates.
THE SISTERS PARK AND RECREATION SPECIAL
DISTRICT
Operates approximately 15 acres of land within
City of Sisters city limits, including Bike Park 242,
Hyzer Pines Disc Golf Course, a playground, a
skatepark, and Coffield Community Center. The
district boundary extends far past city limits,
serving approximately 14,000 residents through
programming and activities.
THE U.S. FOREST SERVICE, BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT
Approximately 76% of the County's total land
area Is owned by the federal government,
primarily these two agencies. Community
members seek out extensive recreation activities
in these areas, including skiing, mountain biking,
hiking, backpacking, fishing, hunting, kayaking,
and off -road vehicle riding.
COUNTY -OWNED OPEN SPACE
Starting in 1994the County received donation
of several properties along rivers, creeks, or
streams or with wildlife, wetlands, or other
value as park lands. The intent ofthls donation
was not to develop these lands for park use but
rather to preserve lands with valuable resources,
which were protected through deed restrictions.
The park designation means that the lands
would be retained in public ownership unless
there was a public hearing and the Board of
County Commissioners determined that selling
was in the best interest of the public.
ORS 275.330 governs the disposal of these lands,
stating that if they are sold the proceeds must
be dedicated to park or recreation purposes. As
of 2009, there were approximately 70 properties
designated as park lands.
COUNTY FAIRGROUND AND EXPO CENTER
The 132-acre County Fairground and Expo
Center site is located southwest of the Redmond
airport, and it is placed strategically at the hub of
the tri-county area (Deschutes, Jefferson, Crook
Counties). The facility is used for a variety of
public and private events. Each of its lawn areas
can be rented exclusively by groups for different
events, which range from weddings, picnics,
reunions, car shows, RV / motorcycle rallies,
animal shows, and outdoor trade shows, among
others.
8-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Recreation
Key Community Considerations
Recreation and access to nature is a key
component of life in Deschutes County and
a primary attraction for both residents and
visitors. As part of this Comprehensive Plan
update, community members noted concerns
about increasing recreational use or overuse,
conflicts among different users, and the need for
permitting or other strategies to manage use of
federally owned lands, particularly in popular
locations.
Because the county does not have a parks and
recreation department, community members
have identified service gaps and lack of
continuity of trail networks, habitat and
species preservation, and land access policies.
Residents are concerned with private recreation
development and use of natural resources such
as land and water.
The tension between resource use of forest land
and water, recreational use of these areas, and
natural resource protection is evident among
members of the community
Community members also noted that It Is
imperative for all special districts and agencies
providing park services to coordinate on
integrated services. These partnerships will be
key to ensure sustainable recreation and land
stewardship as the County continues to grow.
Goals and Polities
Goal 8.1: Increase affordable, sustainable,
and diverse recreation opportunities through
partnerships with government and private
entities.
Policy 8.1 .1 . Reduce barriers to regional
parks and recreation projects in Deschutes
County, including acknowledgement or
adoption of federal, state and local parks
district trail and facility plans.
Policy 8.1 .2. Collaborate with partners to
develop a regional system of trails and open
spaces, balancing recommendations from
local park districts, County, state, and federal
recreation plans and studies and property
owner considerations, particularly for
projects adjacenttofarmand forest lands.
Policy 8.1 .3. Encourage coordination
between the U.S. Forest Service, the Bureau
of Land Management and recreational use
Interest groups to minimize environmental
degradation, agricultural fragmentation and
userconflicts on publicand private land.
Policy 8.1 .4. Support the creation and
improvement of accessible park and
recreation opportunities in compliance with
the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Policy 8.1 .5. Support efforts to coordinate
recreation planning between the County,
park and recreation districts, school
districts, irrigation districts, unincorporated
communities, and cities.
Policy 8.1 .6. Support the development of
parks and trails identified in locally -adopted
plans.
Policy 8.1 .7. Coordinate with unincorporated
communities to identify opportunities for
parks, trails, open spaces, and community
centers.
8-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Recreation
Policy 8.1.8.Es* I *5Dpporttraildesign
standards and identify specific funding
sources for trails as part of future
transportation system planning efforts to
ensure development of Identified priority
rural trail segments and bicycle routes.
Policy 8.1 .9. Explore creation of a County
Parks and Recreation Department to increase
the County's role in recreation and natural
resource management and implement if
deemed appropriate.
Policy 8.1 .10. Support community efforts
for acquisition and management of Skyline
Forest as a community amenity.
Policy 8.1 .11 . Work with stakeholders
to promote new recreational and tourist
initiatives that maintain the integrity of the
natural environment.
.:conomic
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Statewide Planning Goal 9 provides guidance on economic development for Oregon
jurisdictions. This goal is intended to "provide adequate opportunities throughout the
state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of
Oregon's citizens." For Deschutes County, implementing Goal 9 is focused on ensuring
opportunities for economic development, while protecting rural land uses.
In Deschutes County, several areas are designated for rural industrial and rural
commercial activities to allow for activities such as manufacturing or resource
processing. Additionally, unincorporated communities and rural service centers allow for
limited commercial opportunities, including restaurants, services, and retail stores.
Economic development agencies in Central
Oregon cite the tremendous natural resource
access and amenities to be essential for drawing
in new businesses and workers. As the County
grows, childcare will continue to be challenge for
rural residents along with access to high speed
and reliable internet services.
A continued challenge for Deschutes County will
be to balance adequate economic opportunity
for rural residents, with protection of natural
resource lands. Community members have
expressed interest In providing for new and
emerging economic opportunities through
renewable energy development, including
potential for biomass, solar, geothermal, and
wind projects that may be compatible with rural
uses.
9-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Context
Deschutes County's economy was initially built
around farming and logging. As those sectors
declined in the 201h century, recreation and
tourism increased as people were drawn to the
beauty and opportunities to recreate on public
lands. Deschutes County's high quality of life
became a draw for employers and employees
alike. In the 2000's, the building sector boomed
as new housing was built to meet both increased
housing demand and the real estate speculation
that followed. Housing prices rose so high that
workforce housing became a limiting factor in
economic growth. The period of strong growth
ended with the national recession that began
in late 2007, leading to falling housing prices
and rising unemployment. The 2010's and
early 2020's have proven to be another period
of booming economic growth for Deschutes
County, exacerbated bythe COVID-19 pandemic
and the dramatic increase in remote work.
Deschutes County's economy remains strong
compared to Oregon as a whole, as shown in the
statictics below.
Primary Industries
Economic Development
2022 Central Oregon Largest
Private Employers by Industry
Tourism
21549 loyees
I
350 Healthcare
/ \
s r
• • Service and
Grocery
1,959
� ���� ass
_.ema,
Wood Products
1,030 _ Scientific and
manufacturing
Servicesd 780
1,696
Deschutes County Is known for its abundant
natural resources, though the County continues
to balance its economy through a variety of
industries. The top 10 industries overall in
Deschutes County (including those within urban
areas) are:
1. Trade, transportation, utilities (15,742jobs)
2. Education/Health Services (1 3,479jobs)
3. Goods -producing (13,169 jobs)
4. Leisure and hospitality (12,990jobs)
5. Health care and social assistance (12,541
jobs)
6. Retail trade (11,714jobs)
7. Accommodation and food services(10,718
jobs)
8. Professional/business services (10,067 jobs)
9. Food services/drinking places (8,304jobs)
10. Local government (7,396jobs)
9-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
2022 Central Oregon
Largest Private Employers
Employer
1
4,509 ! St. Charles Health System regional
2
1,030 Bright Wood Corporation regional
3
1,000 Sunriver Resort 1,000 1,000 940
4
916 Les Schwab Headquarters & Tire
Centers regional
5
894 1 Mt Bachelor
6
714SafewayregionaI
7
640 NC Fred Meyer regional
8
628 Summit Medical Group regional
9
605' McDonald'sregional
10
440 Lonza, formerly Bend Research
11
415 Rosendin Electric
12
391 Mosaic Medical regional
13
375 Black Butte Ranch
14
365 ibex
15
350 Meta Platforms, Inc. - Facebook Data
Center
16
340 Basx
17
336' PacificSource
18
296' High Lakes Health Care regional
19
280 BrasadaRanch
20
267'MedlineReNewal
Economic Development
Tourism
Tourism continues to be a major facet of Central
Oregon's economy, with approximately4.5
million visitors entering Central Oregon each
year. The majority of those visitors travel to Bend
and Deschutes County in particular but other
communities in the County also are popular
destinations, including Sisters, Redmond and
Terrebonne, as well as destination resort such as
Sunriver, Eagle Crest, Pronghorn and others. In
addition, recreational opportunities throughout
the County also attract a multitude of visitors,
from skiing on Mt. Bachelor, hiking in the Three
Sisters Wilderness, and rafting the Deschutes
River, to fishing, hunting and camping at
dispersed sites on National Forest and BLM land
throughout the County.
9-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Construction and Development
While much of the County's economic activity
occurs in urban areas, staff notes that
agricultural, forestry, and construction industries
also provide economic growth in Deschutes
County. Construction of rural housing can
support additional workforce in areas outside
of city limits while also utilizing local trade
industries. Construction of rural industrial
or commercial projects provide economic
opportunities that serve rural communities,
without a trip into an adjacent city.
Coordination
A key partner for the County in promoting a
healthy economy is Economic Development for
Central Oregon (EDCO). This private non-profit
organization is dedicated to diversifying the
tri-county regional economy by attracting new
investment and jobs. This organization also
tracks the local economy.
Between 2010 and 2013, Deschutes, Crook, and
Jefferson counties, and their respective cities
established a regional large lot industrial land
need analysis, ultimately leading to changes to
state law, OAR 660-024-0040 and 45. This rule
provides that that the large lot industrial land
need analysis agreed upon by all of the parties,
once adopted by each of the participating
governmental entities, would be sufficient
to demonstrate a need for up to nine large
industrial sites in Central Oregon. Six of the sites
will be made available initially. Three more sites
may be added under the rule as the original sites
are occupied. Intergovernmental agreements
were formed with the regions jurisdictions and
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council in
2013 to provide oversight of this new regional
large lot industrial lands program. Participating
local governments will review the program after
all nine sites have been occupied, or after ten
years, whichever comes first.
9-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Economic Development
Connections to Other Comprehensive
Plan Chapters
Much of the County's economic development
activity is directly related to farmland (Chapter
3), forest land (Chapter 3), mineral and aggregate
resources (Chapter 4), and natural resources
(Chapter 5). Additional information can be found
in these sections.
Key Community Considerations
As part of this comprehensive plan update,
community members expressed the following:
A recognition that tourism is an Important
industry in the County, but some concern
that the interests of tourism -related activity
play an outsized role in the County.
Desire for a strong and diverse economy
that benefits local residents.
Strong interest in expanding access to
childcare for rural residents, especially
those who travel into incorporated cities for
employment.
Interest in exploring new economic
opportunities including renewable energy
development.
Desire for additional educational and job
training opportunities, including expansion
of colleges and universities.
Economic Development Goals and
Policies
Goal 9.1: Maintain a stable, and sustainable, and
thriving rural economy, compatible with rural
lifestyles and a healthy environment.
Policy 9.1 .1 . Promote rural economic
initiatives, including home -based businesses,
that maintain the Integrity of the rural
character and natural environment.
Policy 9.1 .2. Support a regional approach
to economic development In concert with
Economic Development for Central Oregon
or and similar organizations.
Policy 9.1 .3. Support growth and expansion
of colleges and universities, regional
educational facilities, and workforce training
programs.
Policy 9.1 .4. Support renewable energy
generation as an important economic
development initiative, while taking other
community goals and concerns into
consideration.
Policy 9.1 S. Support and participate in
master planning for airports in Deschutes
County, including expansion of noise impact
boundaries and upgrades to facilities as
airports continue to grow.
Policy 9.1.6. Within the parameters of
State land use regulations, permit limited
local -serving commercial uses in higher -
density rural communities. Support limited
and locally -serving commercial uses in
appropriate locations.
Policy 9.1 .7. Support expansion of high-
speed internet in rural areas and Integrate
infrastructure such as fiber-optic cables into
new development and road projects.
9-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Economic Development
Policy 9.1 .8. Support funding and
development of childcare locations across
the County to support families in the
workforce.
Policy 9.1 .9. Explore need for master
planning for rural economic development
lands, including Deschutes junction.
Policy 9.1 .10. Recognize the importance of
maintaining a large -lot industrial land supply
that is readily developable in Central Oregon,
and support a multi -jurisdictional cooperative
effort to designate these sites.
Goal9.2: Support creation and continuation
of rural commercial areas that support rural
communities while not adversely affecting
nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Policy 9.2.1 .Allow for new Rural Commercial
zoning designations if otherwise allowed by
Oregon Revised Statute, Administrative Rule,
and this Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 9.2.2.In Spring River there shall be a
Limited Use Combining Zone.
Policy9.2.3.Ensure new uses permitted on
Rural Commercial lands do not adversely
affect nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Policy9.2.4.Ensure new commercial uses on
Rural Commercial lands are limited to those
intended to serve the surrounding rural area
and/or the needs of the traveling public.
Policy 9.2.5.New commercial uses shall be
limited in size to 2,500 square feet or if for
an agricultural or forest -related use, 3,500
square feet.
Policy 9.2.6.A lawful use existing on or before
November 5, 2002 that is not otherwise
allowed in a Rural Commercial zone, may
continue to exist subject to the county's
nonconforming use regulations.
Policy 9.2.7.An existing lawful use may
expand up to 2S percent ofthe total floor
area existing on November 5, 2002.
Policy9.2.8.The Rural Commercial zoning
regulations shall allow a mixed use of
residential or rural commercial uses.
Policy 9.2.9. Residential and commercial
uses shall be served by DEQ approved on -site
sewage disposal systems.
Policy 9.2.10. Residential and commercial
uses shall be served by on -site wells or public
water systems.
Policy 9.2.11 . (;GM ,, iRit+' SeV4e�
Ma3otels, hotels and Industrial uses shall
not be allowed. Community sewer systems
shall not be allowed without exceptions to
relevant statewide land use goals.
Policy 9.2.12. Recreational vehicle or trailer
parks and other uses catering to travelers
shall be permitted.
Goal9.3: Supportthe creation and continuation
of rural industrial areas that support rural
communities while not adversely affecting
nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Policy 9.3.1 . Update the policies for lands
designated Rural Industrial as needed to
limit and control Industrial uses through the
use of the Rural Industrial designation and
development standards.
Policy 9.3.2.To assure that urban uses are
not permitted on rural industrial lands,
land use regulations in the Rural Industrial
zones shall ensure that the uses allowed
are less intensive than those allowed for
unincorporated communities in OAR 660-22
or any successor.
Policy 9.3.3.Limited Use Combining zones
shall be applied to the Redmond Military (Tax
lot 1513000000116), Deschutes Junction (Tax
lot 161226C000301, Tax lot 161226C000300,
9-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Economic Development
Tax lot 161226C000111 and Tax lot
161226A000203) to ensure permitted uses
are compatible with surrounding farm and
forest lands.
Policy 9.3.4. To ensure that the uses in Rural
Industrial zone on tax lot 16-12-26C-301,
as described in Exhibit "C" and depicted on
Exhibit"Y attached to Ordinance 2009-
007 and incorporated by reference herein,
are limited in nature and scope, the Rural
Industrial zoning on that site shall be subject
to a Limited Use Combining Zone which
will limit the uses to storage, crushing,
processing, sale and distribution of minerals.
Policy 9.3.5. To ensure that the uses In Rural
Industrial zone on tax lot 16-12-26C-301,
as described in Exhibit "C" and depicted on
Exhibit"Y attached to Ordinance 2009-
007 and incorporated by reference herein,
are limited in nature and scope, the Rural
Industrial zoning on that site shall be subject
to a Limited Use Combining Zone which
will limit the uses to storage, crushing,
processing, sale and distribution of minerals
Policy 9.3.6. To ensure that the uses in the
Rural Industrial Zone on Tax Lot 300 on
Assessor's Map 16-12-26C-300 and Tax Lot
203 on Assessor's Map 16-12-26A-300 and
portions of Tax Lot 111 on Assessor's Map
16-1 2-26C-1 11 as described in Exhibit'D' and
depicted in Exhibit'E' attached to Ordinance
2010-030 and incorporated by reference
herein, are limited in nature and scope, the
Rural Industrial zoning on the subject parcel
shall be subject to a Limited Use Combining
Zone, which will limit the uses to storage,
crushing, processing, sale and distribution of
minerals, subject to conditional use and site
plan approval
Policy 9.3.7. Ensure new uses on Rural
Industrial lands do not adversely affect
nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Policy 9.3.8. A lawfully established use that
existed on or before February 2, 2003 not
otherwise allowed in a Rural Industrial zone
may continue to exist subject to the county's
non -conforming use regulations.
Policy 9.3.9. A lawfully established use that
existed on or before February 2, 2003 may be
expanded to occupy a maximum of 10,000
square feet of floor area or an additional 25
percent of the floor area currently occupied
by the existing use, whichever is greater.
Policy 9.3.10. Ensure new uses on Rural
Industrial lands are served by on -site
sewage disposal systems approved by the
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ).
Policy 9.3.11 . Residential and industrial uses
shall be served by on -site wells or public
water systems.
Policy 9.3.12. Community sewer systems
shall not be allowed in Rural Industrial zones_
without exceptions to relevant statewide land
use goals.
Policy 9.3.13. A 2009 exception (Ordinance
2009-007) included an irrevocably committed
exception to Goal 3 and a reasons exception
to Goal 14 to allow rural industrial use with
a Limited Use Combining Zone for storage,
crushing, processing, sale and distribution of
minerals.
PoIicy 9.3.14. A2010 exception (Ordinance
2010-030) took a reasons exception to
Goal 14 with a Limited Use Combing Zone
for storage, crushing, processing, sale and
distribution of minerals.
Policy9.3.15.Propertiesfor which a property
owner has demonstrated that Goals 3 and
4 do not apply may be considered for Rural
Industrial designation as allowed by State
Statute, Oregon Administrative rules and
this Comprehensive Plan. Rural Industrial
zoning shall be applied to a new property
that is approved for the Rural Industrial Plan
designation.
9-8 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Economic Development
Rural Service Center Policies
Goal 9.4: Support the creation and continuation
of rural service centers that support rural
communities while not adversely affecting
nearby agricultural and forest uses.
Policy9.4.1 . Rural Service Centers in Alfalfa,
Brothers, Hampton, Wilstlestop, and
Wildhunt are identified on the
Comprehensive Plan Map and shall have
zoning consistent with Comprehensive Plan
designations.
Policy 9.4.2. In Alfalfa, the remaining 20 acres
of the Rural Service Center will continue to
be zoned Rural Service Center - Residential
District, with a 5-acre minimum lot size. A
zone change to mixed use commercial can be
considered only for a specific use and upon
findings that the existing commercial area is
fully developed.
Policy 9.4.3. Ensure that land uses at
Rural Service Centers do not adversely
affect agricultural and forest uses in the
surrounding areas.
Policy 9.4.4. Zoning in rural service areas
shall promote the maintenance of the
area's rural character. New commercial
uses shall be limited to small-scale, low
impact uses that are intended to serve the
community and surrounding rural area or
the travel needs of people passing through
the area. The commercial/mixed use zoning
regulations shall allow a mixed use of
residential or small-scale commercial uses
such as health and retail services.
Policy 9.4.5. Residential and commercial
uses shall be served by DEQ approved on -site
sewage disposal systems.
Policy 9.4.6. Residential and commercial
uses shall be served by onsite wells or public
water systems.
Economic Development
Policy 9.4.7. Community water systems,
motels, hotels and industrial uses shall not
be allowed.
Policy 9 .4.8. Recreational vehicle or trailer
parks and other uses catering to travelers
shall be permitted.
9-9 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Deschutes County faces a variety of housing demands, issues, and challenges. The
County continues to be a desirable and attractive place to live, with access to jobs,
recreation, beautiful natural landscapes, and a variety of other amenities. The County's
population is projected to continue to grow in the coming decades. At the same time,
there are several challenges to the development of housing in the County. Some of the
key issues the County faces today include increased demand for rural housing; housing
affordability; state planning requirements related to Urban Growth Boundaries, farm
and forest land, destination resorts, and others; water availability; and issues related to
homelessness.
PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH IN
UNINCORPORATED DESCHUTES COUNTY
In 2024, Deschutes County 4 continues to be
one of the fastest growing counties in Oregon,
and that trend Is expected to continue.
Significant growth is expected to occur in
Deschutes County in the coming years (over
90,000 new residents in the next 25 years).
However, the majority of this growth Is
forecasted to happen in urban areas with a
more modest amount occurring in
unincorporated parts of the County (about
5,000 additional people during the same
period). (Source: Portland State University
Population Research Center)
INCREASED DEMAND FOR RURAL HOUSING
Between 2010 and 2022, Deschutes County
processed seven applications to rezone
approximately 1,200 acres of property from a
non-residential zone to a residential zone, with
several more applications recently submitted
and under review. Most of these applicants
requested rezonings offarmland due to poor
soil quality for farming. This trend is likely to
continue.
1 0-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Housing
Historical and Forecasted Population and Average Annual Growth Rate
in Deschutes County and its Sub -Areas
400,000 —
350,000 —
300,000 —
250,000 —
c
200,000 —
a 150,000 —
0
a
100,000 —
50,000 —
0—
2010 2020
H€sto ical
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
The median value of owner -occupied housing
units in Deschutes County (including cities),
is significantly higher than that of the State
of Oregon ($435,600 compared to $362,200
accordingto2017-2021 Censusfigures),and
consistently increasing. In July 2023, Becon
Appraisal Group reported an all-time high
median home value for Bend area homes, in the
amount of $78S,000. The same report estimated
a median home price as $694,000 for Sisters
area homes, $473,000 for Redmond area homes,
and $401,000 for La Pine area homes. Given
that median income is generally on par with the
state as a whole, high housing prices are likely
an indicator of an inadequate supply of housing
affordable to many residents of the Deschutes
County, particularly those with low to moderate
Incomes.
10-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
2022 2047 2072
Forecasted
STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS
Although Deschutes County has numerous
prospects to expand residential development,
some of these opportunities face challenges
with respect to state rules and regulations.
The Oregon land use system is designed to
concentrate most growth within Urban Growth
Boundaries. Avariety of statewide planning
goals, laws, and administrative rules designed
to protect farm and forest land, regulate
destination resorts, and ensure cost-effective
provision of infrastructure limit where and how
housing can be built outside of urban areas.
WATER AVAILABILITY AND CONSUMPTION
A growing demand for water for residential,
business, recreation, and agricultural uses;
changes In water table depth; allocation of water
rights; and potential future changes in water
supply related to climate change all may impact
the availability of water to support new housing.
Water resources are discussed in Chapter 5 in
more detail.
Vacant Lots in Resort Areas
Destination Resorts
Caldera Springs
101
Eagle Crest
139
Pronghorn
285
Tetherow
200
Resort Communities
Black Butte
27
In of the 7th Mountain/Widgi Creek
12
Urban Unincorporated Area
Sunriver
118
Total Vacancies, Resort Areas
887 �®
Vacant Lots in Rural Residential Areas
Rural Residential Zones
Rural Residential
2,139
Multiple use Agriculture
518
Suburban Low Desnsity Rural
32
Residential
Urban Area Reserve
292
Rural Communities
Tumalo(TUR/TURS)
32
Terrebonne (TER/TERS)
134
Total Vacancies, Rural Residential
3
Areas
,447
Housing
HOMELESSNESS
The incidence and impacts of homelessness
have been rising In Deschutes County, as well
as across the state and nation in recent years. A
variety of factors have contributed to this trend,
including rising housing costs, increasing income
disparities, and limited transitional housing and
supportive resources. As a result, impacts on
both urban areas and natural resources have
Increased, with elevated levels of community
concern and support for more action by the
County and its partners to address these issues.
BALANCING DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES WITH
VISITOR ACCOMMODATIONS
Although population growth In unincorporated
Deschutes County is forecasted to be relatively
limited, rural parts of the County, including
several destination resorts, Include significant
capacity for new residential development.
Community members have expressed concern
regarding the use of these homes as primary
residences, second homes, or vacation rentals.
RECENT CHANGES IN COUNTY HOUSING
RULES
The County has recently adopted and/or is
currently considering new rules related to
development and regulation of different types of
housing. These include:
Future Opportunities for Rural Residential Lots
Changes to where accessory dwelling units
are allowed.
Repeal of the County's "Conventional
Thornburgh Destination Resort
950
Housing Combining Zone"which prohibited
CalderaSprings Destination
340
manufactured homes in three large
Resort Phase 2
unincorporated areas east and west of
WestSldeTransect
187
Tumalo and east of Bend.
Tumalo Irrigation District
72
Rezoned Parcel
-
Gopher Gulch (North of Bend)
---- ----- ----------------
10
Total Vacancies, Rural
559
Residential Areas
10-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Key Community Considerations
Given the range of issues and conditions
discussed related to this important topic, the
Comprehensive Plan includes a variety of policies
to guide future development of housing and
address impacts to residents in rural areas.
Additional related policies are found in Chapter
2 (Land Use) and Chapter 13 (Transportation).
These strategies are underpinned by community
sentiment, as described below.
Some community members expressed
support for allowing or encouraging
growth in rural areas, particularly to
alleviate housing pressure and provide
larger -lot options. However, engagement
showed greater opposition to residential
development outside of Urban Growth
Boundaries.
Overall support for allowing a wider range
of types of housing (e.g., accessory dwelling
units, manufactured homes, recreational
vehicles, etc.), but concerns about the
quality of this housing and additional rural
residential development in general.
Concern about homelessness and its
impacts, coupled with strong support for
a proactive approach by the County to
work with partner agencies and groups to
address this issue.
IRelatively strong opposition for rezoning Commented [NMt 1]: Replace with higher quality image.
low productivity farmland with poor soil
to allow greater opportunities for housing,
due to negative impact on open space,
habitat, transportation, and active farm
practices.
10-51 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Goals and Policies
Goal 10.1: Support housing opportunities
and choices for rural County residents in
unincorporated Deschutes County, while
meeting health and safety concerns, minimizing
environmental and resource land impacts.
Policy 10.1 .1 . Incorporate annual farm and
forest housing reports into a wider system
for tracking the cumulative impacts of rural
housing development.
Policy 10.1 .2. Continue to update the County
zoning ordinance and work with partnering
organizations to address health and safety
issues associated with housing.
Policy 10.1 .3. Encourage and/or require,
where consistent with County policies
and requirements, new subdivisions to
incorporate alternative development
patterns, such as cluster development, that
mitigate community and environmental
impacts.
Policy 10.1 .4. Implement legislation allowing
accessory dwelling units in rural areas to
expand housing choices.
Policy 10.1 .5. Create and encourage
opportunities for flexibility in rural housing
including development of manufactured
home parks, safe parking sites, and RV
parking areas.
Policy 10.1 .6. Reduce barriers to housing
development and supporting services (such
as locally serving medical offices or similar
uses) in unincorporated communities.
Policy 10.1 .7. Explore grants and funding
opportunities for ongoing maintenance and
rehabilitation of existing housing stock.
Policy 10.1 .8. Evaluate the impacts of short-
term rentals and consider regulations to
mitigate impacts, as appropriate.
10-61 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Housing
Goal 10.2: Support agencies and non -profits that
provide affordable housing.
Policy 10.2.1 . Support Central Oregon
Regional Housing Authority and other
stakeholders to meet the housing needs of
all Deschutes County residents by assisting,
as needed, in coordinating and implementing
housing assistance programs.
Policy 10.2.2. Utilize blockgrants and other
funding to assist in providing and maintaining
low -and moderate -income housing in
partnership with Housing Works and other
housing agencies and providers in Deschutes
County.
Goal 10.3: Regulate the location and density of
housing in the area located between the Bend
UGB and Shevlln Park through Westside Transect
policies
Policy 10.3.1. Protect the sensitive eco-
systems and interrelationships of the urban/
rural interface on the west side of Bend
between the urban area and Shevlin Park and
the public and forestlands to the west.
Policy 10.3.2. Protect natural resources and
environmentally sensitive areas and provide
special setbacks between development and
Shevlln Park, Tumalo Creek, and forestlands.
Policy 10.3.3. Development patterns
shall reflect the protection of land with
environmental significance and fire -wise and
other fire prevention community design best
practices.
Policy 10.3.4. Limit residential development
to 200 single-family residential lots.
Policy 10.3.5. Manage all areas outside of the
structural building envelopes on residential
lots for wildfire mitigation and wildlife
habitat in accordance with coordinated plans
prepared by professionals, reviewed annually
with reports submitted to the County every
three years. The wildfire mitigation and
wildlife habitat plans shall be funded through
homeowner assessments and administered
and enforced by a homeowners association
established at the time of creation of any
residential lots.
Policy 10.3.6. Reducethe impact of
construction by using best management
practices to minimize site disturbance during
construction and construction impacts (i.e.,
erosion) on Shevlin Park, Tumalo Creek, and
forestlands.
Policy 10.3.7. Coordinate with the City
of Bend for mitigation of impacts to City
infrastructure from development within the
Transect.
Goal 10 A Participate in regional efforts to plan
for housing.
Policy 10.4.1 . Collaborate with cities and
private sector partners on innovative housing
developments to meet the region's housing
needs.
10-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Policy 10.4.2. Partner with cities to
ncentivize development within urban growth
boundaries and reduce infrastructure costs
for workforce and affordable housing.
Policy 10.4.3. Partner with local, state,
and federal agencies to address and limit
nuisance and public health issues related to
homelessness.
Policy 10.4.4. Utilize County owned land
in city limits for affordable and workforce
housing, where appropriate.
Policy 10.4.5. Promote regional housing
planning, including urban reserve planning
for cities, to allow for longer term and multi -
jurisdictional housing strategies.
Policy 10.4.6. Limit parcelization and
development adjacent to cities or in conflict
with planned and/or known road/utility
corridors to preserve land for future urban
development.
7' 4
„c.
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Deschutes County is home to numerous unincorporated communities, which contain
urban levels of development outside of city limits. Many of these communities prcvide
services and amenities to rural residents. As the county continues to grow, many
residents are concerned about increasingly dense development in these unincorporated
areas which may feel out of scale with the surrounding rural uses. However, many
residents also see the need for more opportunities -or small-scale rural services anc
retail opportunities to serve existing and future comrr unity members. Deschutes County
will needtocontinueto refinethevision and guidelines for development intheseareas
while balancing infrastructure needs, protection of natural resources and rural lard
uses, and community desires.
In addition to these unincorporated
communities, Resort Communities and
Destination Resorts are another form of
development outside of urban areas.
Historically, resort -type
development served as a
stabilizing force in Central
Oregon's economy and drew in
new residents and businesses.
In recent years, development of destination
resorts has become increasingly contentious, with
litigation and extensive public participation in land
use hearings. Many residents see value in the
amenities and economic value associated with
destination resorts, although have concerns
regarding their natural resource impacts.
.-. pA � .,mr_c
.,Ih, mohoha"o_ e ___ce__ri
nh, tther eat'n nfn nrtc fnr
@Valsi@t" of reacnnc \Nhile rlectno4G
ResGgs al�e ., rt n't"fer e
de"eb PPRE? ,t and s4G61SiPg iP the r rnl Q At„
c4ei;tc hove expressed G dt'nn tG
R
11-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Unincorporated Communities
Deschutes Countys unincorpora _ed communities
generally pre -date Oregon's statewide land use
system and have more urban -scale uses In outer -
lying rural areas, within a defined geographic
boundary.
In 1994, Oregon Administrative Rules (OARS) were
amended to define unincorporatec communities
and the types of uses that could be allowed in
tf ese areas. The OARS established
four types of unincorporated
communities, all ofwhich were
required to be in existence at the time
of the change - the Rule did not allow
for new rural communities to be
established. These community types
are described below.
URBAN UNINCORPORATED
COMMUNITY
This is a community which
contains at least 150 permanent
dwelling units, a mixture of land
uses, and contains a community
water and sewer system. Sunriver
is an Urban Unincorporated
community.
Al rtSAP of thn f tY of La P Re A'aS
ctakepl , le# c) 4 do 4tho
c t@Gh AIG@11 , wAder thlc
Cl9cclfl G9tln ,oil
RURAL COMMUNITY
This is a community which consists of
permanent residential dwellings and at
least two other types of land uses -
such as commercial, industrial,
or public uses provided to the
community or travelers.
Terrebonne and Tumalo are Rural
Communities and were platted
prior to the establishment of the
Countys subdivision ordinance.
11-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
RESORTCOMMUNITY destination resorts may be sited in EFU
This type of community was established for a zones where they weren't previously
recreation -related use on private land prior to allowed. In 1990, LCDC amended the
1989 when the state adopted its Destination rule for siting destination resorts on
forest lands as well.
Resort rules. Black Butte Ranch and Inn of the 711
Mountain/Widgi Creek are Resort Communities.
It's important to note that there are several
other resort style developments in the County
on private lands called "Destination Resorts" See
the next section for more information.
RURAL SERVICE CENTER DESIGNATION
This is an unincorporated community that has
primarily commercial or industrial uses that
provide goods and services to the surrounding
rural area and travelers. These are the most
common type of unincorporated community in
Deschutes County and include Alfalfa, Brothers,
Hampton, Millican, Whistlestop, and Wildhunt_
and are limited in scale, often with only one or
several parcels in the designation.
Destination Resorts
Destination resorts have been a key economic
developmentstrategyfor Deschutes County.
Many community members and visitors enjoy
the recreational amenities and
accommodations that Destination Resorts
provide.
Since 1979 destination resorts have increased
in importance to the economy of Deschutes
County. Sunriver and Black Butte Ranch, as two of
the countVs original resorts, garnered a national
reputation for their recreation facilities and visitor
accommodations, serving as an touchstone for
Deschutes Count Ls tourism industry. In 1989,
recognizing the importance of tourism to the
economy of the State of Oregon, the state
legislature and the Land Conservation
and Development Commission (LCDC) took steps
to make it easier to establish destination resorts
on rural lands in the state. Statewide Planning
Goal 8, the recreation goal, was amended to
specify a process for locating destination resorts
on rural land without taking an exception to
Goals 3, 4, 11 and 14, which govern development
in rural resource lands. Underthese changes,
11-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Eagle Crest Resort, although it had
existed prior to these changes, applied
for legislative changes to comply with
these new rules and expand onto
adjacent lands.
In 2010, Deschutes County
completed an amendment to
its destination resort
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
mapping process, adding "clear and
objective" requirements for eligible and
ineligible sites, and the process for
amending the destination resort map
based on changes in state law. Since
that time, Pronghorn, Caldera Springs,
and Tetherow resorts have gone
through the siting process.
Resorts existing prior to the legislative
change, such as Black Butte, Sunriver,
and the Inn of the Seventh Mountain
have also expanded and been rezoned
to Urban Unincorporated Community
and Resort Community, respectively.
Thornburgh Resort has received
preliminary approvals, butet
brokep grouRdbeginning in 2006.
Commented [NM12]: Moved to first paragraph.
11-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
Key Community Considerations
Unincorporated Communities are limited in
their development potential due to their specific
geographic footprint. Protecting open space
and natural resources while providing economic
opportunities in these unincorporated areas
continues to be a balancing act.
As additional rural development occurs, so
does the demand for services and goods
that can be reached without having to drive
to an incorporated city. Aging residents have
expressed a desire for additional medical care
and offices in rural areas to support aging in
place. On the other hand, many residents would
prefer limiting development in unincorporated
communities in order to preserve the rural
character of thearea.
Destination Resort development continues to
be a contentious issue. Community members
have expressed concern regarding the water
use of large-scale development -specifically
the effects to groundwater for neighboring
property owners. Other community members
express support for the economic and amenity
benefits of destination resorts, noting that the
current requirements sufficiently address natural
resource concerns. Additional community
conversations will be valuable to understand the
diversity of perspectives on this topic.
11-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Goals and Policies
Goal: To provide guidance for development
of unincorporated communities and
destination resorts.
Resort Community Policies
General Resort Community Policies
Policy 11 .1 .1 . Land use regulations shall
conform to the requirements of OAR 660
Division 22 or any successor.
Policy 11 .1 .2. Designated open space and
common area, unless otherwise zoned for
development, shall remain undeveloped
except for community amenities such as bike
and pedestrian paths, park and picnic areas.
Areas developed as golf courses shall remain
available for that purpose or for open space/
recreation uses.
Policy 11 .1 .3. The provisions of the
Landscape Management Overlay Zone shall
apply in Resort Communities where the zone
exists along Century Drive, Highway 26 and
the Deschutes River.
Policy 11 .1 .4. Residential minimum lot
sizes and densities shall be determined
by the capacity of the water and sewer
facilities to accommodate existing and future
development and growth.
Policy 11 .1 .5. The resort facility and resort
recreation uses permitted In the zoning for
Black Butte Ranch and the Inn of the Seventh
Mountain/Wldgi Creek shall serve the resort
community.
Black Butte Ranch General Policies
Policy 11 .2.1. County comprehensive plan
policies and land use regulations shall
ensure that new uses authorized within
the Black Butte Ranch Resort Community
do not adversely affect forest uses in the
surrounding Forest Use Zones.
Policy 11 .2.2. The County supports the
design review standards administered by the
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
Black Butte Ranch Architectural
Review Committee.
11-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
Policy 11 .2.3. Residential, resort and utility
uses shall continue to be developed in
accordance with the Master Design for Black
Butte Ranch and the respective Section
Declarations.
Policy 11 .2.4.industrial activities, including
surface mining, shall only occur in the area
zoned Black Butte Ranch Surface Mining,
Limited Use Combining District (Black Butte
Ranch SM/LU) located in the northwest
corner of Black Butte Ranch.
Policy 11 .2.5.Employee housing shall be
located in the area zoned Black Butte Ranch-
Utility/Limited Use Combining District (Black
Butte Ranch-U/LU).
Policy 11 .2.6.Any amendment to the
allowable use(s) in either the Resort
Community District or the Limited Use
Combining District shall require an exception
in accordance with applicable statewide
planning goal(s), OAR 660-04-018/022 and
DCC 18.112 or any successor.
Policy 11 .2.7.The westerly 38-acres zoned
Black Butte Ranch Surface Mining, Limited
Use Combining District (Black Butte Ranch
SM/LU) shall be used for the mining and
storage ofaggregate resources. Uses that
do not prevent the future mining of these
resources, such as disposal of reclaimed
effluent and woody debris disposal from
thinning and other forest practices may
be allowed concurrently. Other resort
maintenance, operational and utility uses,
such as a solid waste transfer station,
maintenance facility or equipment storage
may be allowed only after mining and
reclamation have occurred.
Policy 11 .2.8. The 18.5 acres zoned Black
Butte Ranch-Utility/Limited Use Combining
District (Black Butte Ranch-U/LU) may be
used for the disposal of reclaimed sludge.
11-8 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Policy 11 .2.9. The area west of McCallister
Road and east of the area zoned Black Butte
Ranch may be used for large equipment
storage, general storage, maintenance uses,
RV storage, telephone communications,
administration offices, housekeeping facilities
and employee housing.
Policy 11 .2.10. Employee housingshall
be set back at least 250 feet from the
eastern boundary of the area zoned Black
Butte Ranch Surface Mining, Limited Use
Combining District (Black Butte Ranch SM/
LU).
Policy 11 .2.11 . Surface mining within the
Black Butte Ranch community boundary shall
adhere to the following Goal 5 ESEE °Program
to Meet Goal' requirements:
a. Only the western most 38 acres of the site
shall continue to be mined.
b. Setbacks shall be required for potential
conflicting residential and other
development. A minimum 50-foot setback
shall be maintained from the perimeter of
tax lot 202 for all surface mining activity.
c. Noise impact shall be mitigated by
buffering and screening.
d. Hours of operation shall be limited
to between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
weekdays. No operations shall be allowed
on weekends and holidays.
e. Processing shall be limited to 45 days
in any one year, to be negotiated with
Deschutes County in the site plan
process in consultation with the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW).
f. The conditions set forth in the August 10,
1989, letter of ODFW shall be adhered to.
g. Extraction at the site shall be limited to five
acres at a time with on -going incremental
reclamation (subject to DOGAMI review
and approval).
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
h. Mining operations, siting of equipment,
and trucking of product shall be conducted
In such a manner that applicable DEQ
standards are met and minimizes noise
and dust.
i. DOGAMI requirements for a permit
once mining affects more than five acres
outside the 8.6-acre exemption area shall
be met.
A conditional use permit shall be obtained
from Deschutes County, under the
provisions of section 18.128.280. Surface
mining of resources exclusively for on -
site personal, farm or forest use or
maintenance of irrigation canals, before
mining activity affects more than five acres
outside the 8.6-acre exempt area.
Black Butte Ranch Public Facility Policies
Policy 11 .3.1 . Police protection services shall
be provided by the Black Butte Ranch Police
Services District.
Policy 11 .3.2. The Black Butte Ranch Water
Distribution Company and the Black Butte
Ranch Corporation shall confirm the water
and sewer service, respectively, can be
provided for new uses or expansion of
existing usesthatrequire land useapproval
Policy 11 .3.3. The Black Butte Ranch Water
Distribution Company shall provide water
service for the Black Butte Ranch Resort
Community.
Policy 11 .3.4. The Black Butte Ranch
Corporation shall provide sewer service for
Black Butte Ranch.
Policy 11 .3.5. The Black Butte Ranch
Fire Protection District shall provide fire
protection services for Black Butte Ranch.
11-91 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Policy 11 .3.6. The roads and the bicycle/
pedestrian path system within the Black
Butte Ranch Resort Community boundary
shall be maintained by the Black Butte Ranch
Owners Association.
Inn of the 7th Mountain Widgi Creek General
Policies
Policy 11 .4.1 . Any amendment to the
allowable uses in either the Resort
Community District or the Widgi Creek
Residential District shall require an exception
in accordance with applicable statewide
planning goal(s), OAR 660-04-018/022 or any
successor, and DCC 18.112 or any successor.
Policy 11 .4.2.The County shall encourage
and support land exchanges efforts by and
between private property owners, public
agencies, and public trusts for the purpose
of fostering public access to and protection
of natural resources, such as rivers, streams,
caves, areas/features of historical importance
and other natural features.
Inn ofthe7th Mountain/Widgi Creek Public
Facility Policies
Policy 11 .5.1 . Police protection services
shall be provided under contract with the
Deschutes County Sheriff.
Policy 11 .5.2. Water service shall be supplied
by on -site wells for the Inn/Widgi Resort
Community.
Policy 11 .5.3. New uses or expansion of
existing uses that require land use approval
shall be approved only upon confirmation
from the City of Bend that sewer service can
be provided.
Policy 11 .5.4. Fire protection services for
the Inn/Widgi shall be provided through a
contract with the City of Bend until such
time as Inn/Widgi develops another plan to
provide adequate fire protection.
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
Policy 11 .5.5. The Resort Community, not
Deschutes County, shall maintain roads in
the community.
Policy 11 .5.6. The bicycle/pedestrian path
system shall be maintained by the Inn/Widgi
Owners Association.
Policy 1 1 .5.7. Emergency access between
Widgi Creek and the Inn of the Seventh
Mountain shall be provided in accordance
with the approved development plan for the
Elkai Woods town homes. The respective
resort property owners shall maintain
emergency access between the Inn and Widgi
Creek
Destination Resorts Policies
Goal 11 .6: Provide for development of
destination resorts in the County in a manner
that will be compatible with farm and forest
uses, existing rural development, and In a
manner that will maintain important natural
features including habitat of threatened or
endangered species, streams, rivers, and
significant wetlands.
Policy 11 .6.1 . Provide a process forthe siting
of destination resorts facilities that enhance
and diversify the recreational opportunities
and economy of Deschutes County, on lands
that have been mapped by Deschutes County
as eligible for this purpose.
Goal 11 .7: Provide for development of
destination resorts consistent with Statewide
Planning Goal 12 in a manner that will ensure
the resorts are supported by adequate
transportation facilities.
Policy 11 .7.1 . Destination resorts shall
only be allowed within areas shown on
the "Deschutes County Destination Resort
Map" and when the resort complies with
the requirements of Goal 8, ORS 197.435 to
197.467, and Deschutes County Code 18.113.
11 -10 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
Policy 11 .7.2 . Ensure protection of water
quality, recreational resources, and other
County resources and values.
Policy 11 .7.3. Ensure that destination resort
developments support and implement
strategies to provide workers with affordable
housing options within or in close proximity
to the resorts.
Policy 11 .7.4.Mapping for destination resort
siting.
To assure that resort development does
not conflict with the objectives of other
Statewide Planning Goals, destination
resorts shall pursuant to Goal 8 not be
sited in Deschutes County in the following
areas:
1) Within 24air miles of an urban growth
boundary with an existing population of
100,000 or more unless residential uses
are limited to those necessary for the
staff and managementofthe resort;
2) On a site with 50 or more contiguous
acres of unique or prime farm land
identified and mapped by the Soil
Conservation Service or within three
miles of farm land within a High -Value
Crop Area;
3) On predominantly Cubic Foot Site Class
1 or 2 forest lands which are not subject
to an approved Goal exception;
4) On areas protected as Goal 5 resources
in an acknowledged comprehensive
plan where all conflicting uses have
been prohibited to protect the Goal 5
resource;
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
5) Especially sensitive big game habitat,
5) Irrigated lands zoned Exclusive
and as listed below, as generally
Farm Use (EFU) having 40 or greater
mapped by the Oregon Department
contiguous acres in irrigation;
of Fish and Wildlife in July 1984 an as
6) 6. Non-contiguous EFU acres in the
further refined through development
same ownership having 60 or greater
of comprehensive plan provisions
irrigated acres;
implementing this requirement.
1. Tumalo deer winter range;
ii. Portion of the Metolius deer winter
range;
ill. Antelope winter range east of Bend
near Horse Ridge and Millican;
6) Sites less than 160 acres.
b. To assure that resort development does
not conflict with Oregon Revised Statute,
destination resorts shall not be sited in
Deschutes County in Areas of Critical State
Concern.
c. To assure that resort development
does not conflict with the objectives of
Deschutes County, destination resorts
shall also not be located in the following
areas:
1) Sites listed below that are inventoried
Goal 5 resources, shown on the Wildlife
Combining Zone, that the County has
chosen to protect:
i. Antelope Range near Horse Ridge
and Millican;
ii. Elk Habitat Area; and
iii. Deer Winter Range;
2) Wildlife Priority Area, identified on
the 1999 ODFW map submitted to the
South County Regional Problem Solving
Group;
3) Lands zoned Open Space and
Conservation (OS&C);
4) Lands zoned Forest Use 1 (F-1);
11-11 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
7) Farm or forest land within one mile
outside of urban growth boundaries;
8) Lands designated Urban Reserve Area
under ORS 195.145;
9) Platted subdivisions;
d. For those lands not located in any of the
areas designated in Policy 3.9.5(a) though
(c), destination resorts may, pursuant
to Goal 8, Oregon Revised Statute and
Deschutes County zoning code, be sited in
the following areas:
1) Forest Use 2 (F-2), Multiple Use
Agriculture (MUA-10), and Rural
Residential (RR-10) zones;
2) Unirrigated Exclusive Farm Use (EFU)
land;
3) Irrigated lands zoned EFU having less
than 40 contiguous acres in irrigation;
4) Non-contiguous irrigated EFU acres in
the same ownership having less than 60
irrigated acres;
5) All property within a subdivision for
which cluster development approval
was obtained prior to 1990, for which
the original cluster development
approval designated at least 50 percent
of the development as open space
and which was within the destination
resort zone prior to the effective date of
Ordinance 2010-024 shall remain on the
eligibility map;
6) Minimum site of 160 contiguous acres
or greater under one or multiple
ownerships;
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
e. The County shall @a^^* a mapadopted a
map in 2010 showing where destination
resorts can be located in the County. C,�h
droll becop„R map is a part ofthe
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance and shall be the basis for the
a+:; overlay zone designated Destination
Resort (DR).
Policy 11 .7.5. Ordinance Provisions
a. The County shall ensure that destination
resorts are compatible with the site and
adjacent land uses through enactment of
land use regulations that, at a minimum,
provide for the following:
1) Maintenance of important natural
features, including habitat of threatened
or endangered species, streams, rivers,
and significant wetlands; maintenance
of riparian vegetation within 100 feet of
streams, rivers and significant wetlands;
and
2) Location and design of improvements
and activities in a manner that will
avoid or minimize adverse effects of
the resort on uses on surrounding
lands, particularly effects on intensive
farming operations in the area and on
the rural transportation system. In
order to adequately assess the effect on
the transportation system, notice and
the opportunity for comment shall be
provided to the relevant road authority.
3) Such regulations may allow for
alterations to important natural
features, including placement of
structures, provided that the overall
valuesofthefeatureare maintained.
b. Minimum measures to assure that
design and placement of improvements
and activities will avoid or minimize the
adverse effects noted in Policy 3.9.4(a)
shall include:
11-12 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive
1) The establishment and maintenance of
buffers between the resort and adjacent
land uses, including natural vegetation
and where appropriate, fenced, berms,
landscaped areas, and other similar
types of buffers.
2) Setbacks of structures and other
improvements from adjacent land uses.
c. The County may adopt additional land
use restrictions to ensure that proposed
destination resorts are compatible with
the environmental capabilities of the site
and surrounding land uses.
Uses in destination resorts shall be limited
tovisitor- oriented accommodations,
overnight lodgings, developed recreational
facilities, commercial uses limited to types
and levels necessaryto meet the needs of
visitors to the resort, and uses consistent
with preservation and maintenance of
open space.
The zoning ordinance shall include
measures that assure that developed
recreational facilities, visitor -oriented
accommodations and key facilities
intended to serve the entire development
are physically provided or are guaranteed
through surety bonding or substantially
equivalent financial assurances prior to
closure of sale of individual lots or units.
In phased developments, developed
recreational facilities and other key
facilitated intended to serve a particular
phase shall be constructed prior to sales in
that phase or guaranteed through surety
bonding.
SUNRIVER POLICIES
General Sunriver Policies
Policy 11 .8.1 . Land use regulations shall
conform to the requirements of OAR 660
Division 22 or any successor.
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
Policy 11 .8.2. County comprehensive plan
policies and land use regulations shall
ensure that new uses authorized within the
Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community
do not adversely affect forest uses In the
surrounding Forest Use Zones.
Policy 11 .8.3. To protect scenic views and
riparian habitat within the community,
appropriate setbacks shall be required for all
structures built on properties with frontage
along the Deschutes River.
Policy 11 .8.4.Open space and common area,
unless otherwise zoned for development,
shall remain undeveloped except for
community amenities such as bike and
pedestrian paths, and parksand picnicareas.
Policy 11 .8.5. Public access to the Deschutes
River shall be preserved.
Policy 11 .8.6. The County supports the
design review standards administered by the
Sunriver Owners Association.
Sunriver Residential District Policies
Policy 11 .9.1 . Areas designated residential
on the comprehensive plan map shall be
developed with single family or multiple
family residential housing.
Sunriver Commercial District Policies
Policy 11 .10.1 . Small-scale, low -impact
commercial uses shall be developed in
conformance with the requirements of
OAR Chapter 660, Division 22. Larger, more
intense commercial uses shall be permitted
if they are intended to serve the community,
the surrounding rural area and the travel
needs of people passing through the area.
Policy 11 .10.2. No additional land shall
be designated Commercial until the next
periodic review.
11 -10 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Policy 11 .10.3. Multiple -family residences
and residential units in commercial buildings
shall be permitted in the commercial area
for the purpose of providing housing which
is adjacent to places of employment. Single-
family residences shall not be permitted in
commercial areas.
Policy 11 .10.4. Approval standards for
conditional uses in the commercial district
shall take into consideration the impact of
the proposed use on the nearby residential
and commercial uses and the capacity ofthe
transportation system and public facilities
and services to serve the proposed use.
Sunriver Town Center District Policies
Policy 11 .11 .1 . Small-scale, low -impact
commercial uses shall be developed in
conformance with the requirements of
OAR Chapter 660, Division 22. Larger, more
intense commercial uses shall be permitted
if they are intended to serve the community,
the surrounding rural area or the travel
needs of people passing through the area.
Policy 11 .11.2. Development standards in
the town center district should encourage
new development that is compatible with a
town center style of development that serves
as the commercial core of the Sunriver Urban
Unincorporated Community. The following
policies should guide development in the
Town Center District in Sunriver:
a. Combine a mixture of land uses that may
include retail, offices, commercial services,
residential housing and civic uses to create
economic and social vitality and encourage
pedestrian use through mixed use and
stand alone residential buildings.
b. Develop a commercial mixed -use area
that is safe, comfortable and attractive to
pedestrians.
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
c. Encourage efficient land use byfacilitating
Sunriver Business Park District Policies
compact, high -density development that
Policy11.13.1.Avariety ofcommercial uses
minimizes the amount of land that is
which support the needs of the community
needed for development.
and surrounding rural area, and not uses
d. Provide both formal and informal
solely intended to attract resort visitors,
community gathering places.
should be encouraged.
e. Provide visitor accommodations and
tourism amenities appropriate to Sunriver
f. Provide design flexibility to anticipate
changes in the marketplace.
g. Provide access and public places that
encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel.
h. Provide road and pedestrian connections
to residential areas.
i. Facilitate development (land use mix,
density and design) that supports public
transit where applicable.
J. (Develop a distinct character and quality
design appropriate to Sunriver that
will identify the Town Center as the
centerpiece/focal point of the community.
Policy 11 .11 .3. Development within the
Town Center (TC) District will be substantially
more dense than development elsewhere
in Sunriver. This increased density will
require changes to existing topography
and vegetation in the TC District to allow
for screened, underground parking. The
requirements of the Countys site plan
ordinance shall be interpreted to reflect this
fa ct.
Sunriver Resort District Policies
Policy 11 .12.1 . Areas designated resort
on the comprehensive plan map shall be
designated resort, resort marina, resort golf
course, resort equestrian or resort nature
center district on the zoning map to reflect a
development pattern which is consistent with
resort uses and activities.
11-11 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Policy 11 .13.2. Allow small-scale, low -impact
commercial uses in conformance with the
requirements of OAR Chapter 660, Division
22. Larger more intense commercial uses
shall be permitted if they are intended to
serve the community, the surrounding rural
area and the travel needs of people passing
through the area.
Policy 11 .13.3. Small-scale, low -impact
industrial uses should be allowed in
conformance with the requirements of OAR
Chapter 660, Division 22.
Commented [NM13]: Replace with higher quality image.
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
Sunriver Community District Policies
Policy 11 .14.1. Areas designated community
on the comprehensive plan map shall be
designated community general, community
recreation, community limited or community
neighborhood district on the zoning map
to reflect a development pattern which is
consistent community uses and activities.
Policy 11 .14.2.Policy 11 .9.2. Lands
designated community shall be developed
with uses which support all facets of
community needs, be they those of year-
round residents or part-time residents and
tourists.
Policy 11 .14.3.Policy 11 .9.3. Development
shall take into consideration the unique
physical features of the community and be
sensitive to the residential development
within which the community areas are
interspersed.
Sunriver Airport District Policies
Policy 11 .15.1 . Future development shall
not result in structures or uses which, due to
extreme height or attraction of birds, would
pose a hazard to the operation of aircraft.
Policy 11 .15.2. Future development should
not allow uses which would result in large
concentrations or gatherings of people in a
single location.
Sunriver Utility District Policies
Policy 11 .15.3. Lands designated utilityshall
allow for development of administrative
offices, substations, storage/repair yards,
distribution lines and similar amenities
for services such as water, sewer,
telephone, cable television and wireless
telecommunications.
11-12 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Sunriver Forest District Policies
Policy 11 .16.1 . Uses and development on
property designated forest that are within the
Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community
boundary shall be consistent with uses
and development of other lands outside of
the community boundary which are also
designated forest on the Deschutes County
comprehensive plan map.
Policy 1 1 .16.2. Forest district property
shall be used primarily for effluent
storage ponds, spray Irrigation of effluent,
biosolids application and ancillary facilities
necessaryto meet Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality sewage disposal
regulations.
Policy 11 .16.3. The development of resort,
residential or non -forest commercial
activities on Forest district lands shall be
prohibited unless an exception to Goal 14 is
taken.
Sunriver General Public Facility Policies
Policy 11 .17.1. Residential minimum lot
sizes and densities shall be determined
by the capacity of the water and sewer
facilities to accommodate existing and future
development and growth.
Policy 11 .17.2. New uses or expansion of
existing uses within the Sunriver Urban
Unincorporated Communitywhlch require
land use approval shall be approved only
upon confirmation from the Sunriver Utility
Company that water and sewer service for
such uses can be provided.
Policy 11 .17.3. Expansion of the Sunriver
WaterLLC/Environmental/LLC Water and
Sewer District outside of the historic Sunriver
boundaries shall adequately address the
impacts to services provided to existing
property owners.
Unincorporated Communities and Destination Resorts
Sunriver Water Facility Policies
Policy 11 .18.1 . Water service shall continue
to be provided by the Sunriver Utilities
Company.
Sunriver Sewer Facility Policies
Policy 11 .19.1 . Sewer service shall continue
to be provided by the Sunriver Utilities
Company.
SunriverTransportation System Maintenance
Policies
Policy 11 .20.1 . Privately -maintained roads
within the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated
Community boundary shall continue to
be maintained by the Sunriver Owners
Association.
Policy 11 .20.2. The bicycle/pedestrian
path system in Sunriver shall continue to
be maintained by the Sunriver Owners
Association or as otherwise provided by a
maintenance agreement.
Policy 11 .20.3. The County will encourage the
future expansion of bicycle/pedestrian paths
within the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated
Community boundary in an effort to provide
an alternative to vehicular travel.
Policy 11 .20.4. All public roads maintained by
the County shall continue to be maintained
by the County. Improvements to County
maintained public roads shall occur as
described the County Transportation System
Plan.
11-13 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
Public facilities and services provide the basic infrastructure for urban and rural
development. These systems include water and sewer systems, police and fire
protection, health and social services, schools, and libraries. The transportation system
is also a public facility - the County has developed and maintains a Transportation
System Plan that is included as Appendix B.
These public services are provided by a variety of entities, each with their own
jurisdiction, funding sources, and regulatory requirements. Overall, the provision of
facilitiesand services is more efficientand cost-effective in urban areasthan in rural
development, where ratepayers may be few and far between. In some areas of the
County, particularly east County, available services are limited due to lower population
density and distance from urban centers. Many of the people who choose to reside
there consider the limited availability ofservicesand facilitiesasan acceptabletradeoff
for a rural lifestyle.
Statewide Planning Goal 11, Public Facilities and
Services and the associated Oregon
Administrative Rule 660-011 specify that facilities
and services should be appropriate for, but
limited to, the needs and requirements of rural
areas to be served. Public facility plans are not
required (with some exceptions); in fact, Goal 11
and the associated rule set limits to the provision
of sewers and water systems in rural areas, in
order to limit rural growth.
12-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
There are several important issues relating to
the provision of public facilities and services that
this Comprehensive Plan addresses, including:
Meeting the needs of county residents
while supporting the protection of resource
lands;
Maintaining health, safety, and security
throughout the county; and
Cooperation among the various providers
of public services.
Context
Deschutes County plays a role in ensuring that
public facilities and services are planned for,
however the facilities and services are often not
provided by county government directly. The
discussion below highlights who provides the
services listed and how the County will manage
development impacts on existing facilities and
services.
County Facilities and Services
LAW ENFORCEMENT
The Deschutes County Sheriffs Office Is a full
service organization providing patrol, traffic
team, criminal investigations, corrections, civil
and search and rescue. Special operations
Include a Marine Patrol, K-9 units, and Forest
Patrol. The Sheriff is an elected public official
who serves a four-year term. Housed within
the Sheriffs office is the Countys Emergency
Management Unit, which coordinates the
countywide response to natural hazards events.
Public Facilities
SOLID WASTE
The County manages Knott Landfill Recycling
and Transfer Station, which is the only landfill
in Deschutes County. In addition to this,
the department manages four additional
transfer stations throughout the Countywhich
gather waste in convenient locations, before
transferring to the Knott Landfill facility.
Operations at the landfill include recycling,
hazardous waste disposal, and composting.
This landfill site is anticipated to remain open
until 2029 at which time it is projected to reach
maximum capacity.
The Deschutes County Solid Waste Department
is currently undertaking a new landfill
development process, which is anticipated to be
completed in 20294. In the future, the County
will likely need to site addition facilities to
support composting, recycling, and waste
stream diversion facilities.
Deschutes County Solid Waste System, Source: Solid Waste Management Plan, 2019
t•
Cities R
Camrt&ndstd MiSNK
Unincorporated ---->
�e�
$'
_ *d vmtessny
County
ram Wasta
Fnw,= -----I
ecn0 Gamagc G out or C000ty
rt-YMN
CM."NeS MSYi ------
Ma = F € !
C"S1 County)
!
Knott Land=
�
W---
"Ma
and 7nr.Ver FaCMty
County -Owned
� ! r !
Transfer
Mom yen
'
-.
.� "
Stations and
t )
tSeun) ! )
acvm
Recycling
Rr;grcMv
Center
MGduz 3 ! �
-^_4
a
Sdvtnwcst
Knott larmta
(L. PkV)
12-3 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Deschutes County Health Services has a primary
responsibility to help address the basic health
and wellness of Deschutes County residents.
The department offers services at more than 40
locations in Deschutes County including public
schools; health clinics in Bend, La Pine, Redmond
and Sisters; five school -based health clinics;
agencies such as the KIDS Center and the State
of Oregon Department of Human Services; area
hospitals; care facilities and homes.
FAIRGROUNDS
The County maintains the County Fairgrounds
and Expo Center. With panoramic views of the
snow-capped Cascade range, the Deschutes
County Fair and Expo Center is situated on the
outskirts of Redmond just off of Hwy 97 and
adjacent to the Redmond Municipal Airport. Due
to its central location, the fairgrounds also serves
as an emergency center. The fairgrounds hosts
the annual County Fair and numerous other
events throughout the year.
Other Agency Facilities and Services
Where other agencies provide facilities and
services, the County coordinates with numerous
other providers of facilities and services for
the benefit of County residents. Where there
are gaps in the coverage for specific areas, the
County can work with providers to fill them.
A selection of other agencies and entities are
noted below.
CENTRAL OREGON INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COUNCIL (COIC)
COIC began serving the residents and
communities of Central Oregon in 1972 as
a Council of Governments organized under
ORS 190 by Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson
Counties and Bend, Culver, Madras, Metolius,
Prineville, Redmond and Sisters. Following
incorporation in 2007, the City of La Pine
joined these efforts. COIC provides a wide
variety of educational and economic
development services such as workforce training,
alternative high school education, business loans
12-41 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Public Facilities
and public transportation. COIC continues to
evolve to meet the needs of Central Oregon.
COIC is governed by 15-member board made
up of elected officials who are appointed by
each of the member governments as well as
appointed representatives of key economic
sectors - business and industry, tourism and
recreation, agribusiness and agriculture, timber
and wood products, and the unemployed/
underemployed.
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
There are three school districts in Deschutes
County:
Bend -La Pine (SD 1),
Redmond (SD 2J) and
Sisters (SD 6).
Additionally, the Brothers Community School is
owned and operated by Crook County School
District (SD 15). The High Desert Education
Service District (ESD) partners with the districts
to provide support services such as special
education, school improvement, administrative
and legal services.
FIRE DISTRICTS
The following fire districts support rural
residents: Bend Fire Department, Black Butte
Ranch Rural Fire Protection District, Cloverdale
Rural Fire Protection District, Crooked River
Ranch Rural Fire Protection District, Deschutes
County Rural Fire Protection District #1 and #2,
La Pine Rural Fire Protection District, Sisters -
Camp Sherman Rural Fire Protection District,
and Sunriver Service District. Public lands are
protected by federal agencies. There are some
areas in Deschutes County that are not covered
by a fire district. (See Chapter 7 for more on fire
protection.)
IRRIGATION DISTRICTS
Irrigation districts in Oregon are organized as
Special Districts under ORS Chapter 545. Six
irrigation districts operate in Deschutes County:
Arnold, Central Oregon, North Unit, Swalley,
Tumalo, the Three Sisters Irrigation Districts.
They are quasi -municipal corporations under
Oregon Law, with prescribed rules for purpose,
boards, elections, staffing, charges, etc. The
districts operate as political subdivisions of
the State of Oregon created for the purpose of
delivering water to their patrons. In addition
to irrigation uses, these districts also supply a
number of other services, includin delivery fo
water to municipal and, industrial entities
and pond maintenance,
C9QrdiP4iA,'rh PRYRIG alit
LIBRARIES
Deschutes Public Library has branches in Bend,
Redmond, Sisters, La Pine and Sunriver. They
also operate a bookmobile program that focuses
on children and parenting books and a program
for supplying books to homebound residents.
HIGHER EDUCATION
Deschutes County is home to Oregon State
University Cascades Campus (Bend)and
Central Oregon Community College (Bend and
Redmond). These campuses are expected to
grow significantly in the future.
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Soil and Water Conservation Districts are
authorized by the State of Oregon to provide for
the conservation of its soil and water resources.
Working in cooperation with stakeholders, the
districts address Issues such as control and
prevention of soil erosion, conservation and
development of water resources, water quality,
and wildlife preservation. The Deschutes Soil and
Water Conservation District is a legally defined
subdivision of the state government, but, like
all soil and conservation districts, functions as
a local unity led by a locally elected board of
directors who serve without pay.
1 2-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Public Facilities
PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS
Public Water Systems are defined as those that
have more than three connections, supply water
at least 60 days/year and are used by at least
10 persons/day. All water systems are regulated
under the federal 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act
and 1981 Oregon Drinking Water QualltyAct.
Public Water Systems serving over 3,300 people
are overseen by the Oregon Department of
Human Services Drinking Water Program. The
County acts as a contractor for the Department
of Human Services to monitor approximately
180 Public Water Systems. Some privately owned
systems are, for various reasons, regulated by
the Public Utility Commission, which sets rates
and rules for public utilities.
Privately Owned Facilities and Services
UTILITIES
Electric
Electricity is provided by Pacific Power around
Bend and Redmond. Central Electric Cooperative
and Midstate Electric provide service in the
rest of the County. Phone service is provided
by Qwest and numerous cell phone providers.
Cable is provided by R-�TDS and
satellite providers. Internet access is provided
by a variety of entities.
Hospitals
Cascade Healthcare Community manages two
hospitals: St. Charles Bend and St. Charles
Redmond. Additionally there are numerous
health providers and clinics in the County.
Sewer Districts
Creating or expanding existing sewer systems
outside an urban growth boundary or
unincorporated community is governed by
Statewide Goal 11 and OAR 660-011-0060. In
order to protect rural areas from urban -style
development, the rules regulate where and
when rural sewers are appropriate. Some sewer
districts, such as Oregon Water Wonderland Unit
2, have used the Statewide Goal 2 exception
process to create or expand a sewer system.
INDIVIDUAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Private wells
Most rural properties are served by private wells
that are approved and managed bythe Oregon
Water Resources Department. The County
currently does not track the number of wells.
Individual septic systems
Most rural properties are served by septic
systems that are approved by the Onsite
Wastewater Division.
12-6 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Public Facilities
Key Community Considerations
The role that Deschutes County plays in the
provision of public facilities and services was part
of the community discussion during the update
of this Comprehensive Plan. Highlights included:
City governments currently own property
outside of urban growth boundaries
and within County jurisdiction. In some
instances, these lands are used for water
and wastewater treatment facilities. As
the County continues to grow, additional
facilities are likely to be needed, and
coordination amongjurisdictions regarding
placement of these facilities will be key.
Significant population growth will lead
to an increase in solid waste, requiring
at minimum the siting of a new landfill.
Community members expressed a desire
for consideration of livability among other
factors when considering the placement of
key public facilities.
Goals and Policies
Goal 12.1: Support the orderly, efficient, and
cost-effective siting of rural public facilities and
services.
Policy 12.1 .1 . Encourage and support the
formation of special service districts to serve
the need for public facilities in rural areas.
Policy 12.1 .2. Encourage and support
planning for and acquisition of sites needed
for public facilities, such as transportation,
water, and wastewater facilities.
Policy 12.1 .3. Support the siting of
community health clinics, hospitals, and
private medical practices to serve rural
residents throughout the County.
Policy 12.1 .4. Continue to support the
County Fairgrounds as a community
gathering place, event facility and home to
the annual County Fair.
Policy 12.1 .5. Maintain the County
Fairgrounds as an emergency readiness
location and staging area in the event of a
Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake or
other large disaster.
Policy 12.1 .6. Priortodisposing ofCounty-
owned property, consider whether the land is
appropriate for needed public projects such
as schools, health clinics, fire stations, senior
centers, or affordable housing.
Policy 12.1 .7. Coordinate with rural
service districts and providers to review
development proposals.
Policy 12.1 .8. Use the land use entitlement
process to ensure new development
addresses and mitigates Impacts on existing
and planned public facilities.
Policy 12.1 .9. Support education districts,
library districts and recreation districts in
meeting community needs, such as meeting
spaces.
12-7 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Public Facilities
Policy 12.1 .10. Where practicable, locate
utility lines and facilities within or adjacent to
existing rights -of -way to avoid dividing farm
or forest lands.
Policy 12.1 .11 . Use the development code to
mitigate visual and other Impacts of public
facilities and cell towers.
Policy 12.1 .12. Use the Comprehensive
Plan and Development Code to guide rural
development in a manner that supports the
orderly and cost-efficient provision of public
facilities and services.
Policy 12.1 .13. Support siting and
development of city owned water and
wastewater facilities on rural lands, Including
innovative facilities that include additional
community amenities.
Goal 12.2: Pursue sustainable, innovative, and
cost-effective waste management practices.
Policy12.2.1. Allow for siting ofwaste
management facilities on rural lands,
including but not limited to landfill facilities,
transfer stations, organics management
facilities, material recovery facilities, and
recycling modernization facilities, in a
manner that is sensitive to environmental
and community concerns.
Policy 12.2.2. Provide incentives, education,
and resources to promote reuse and
recycling of construction waste.
Policy 12.2.3. Encourage waste reduction
through community education and
partnerships with community groups such as
the Environmental Center
Policy 12.2.4. Support the creation of a
landfill overlay zone.
Goal 12.3: Serve as a conduit for countywide
resources.
Policy 12.3.1 . Provide resources to connect
community members with a variety of
housing and health related issues in
Deschutes County
®®® ®® ® ®® ® ®-Am ami.M ® ® ®®
The Deschutes County transportation system includes roadways, bicycle facilities, pedestrian
facilities, and transit facilities, as well as rail, air, marine, and pipeline systems. In general, the
County only owns, manages, and maintains facilities in the unincorporated portions of the
County. Facilities within the Urban Growth Boundaries of the incorporated cities of Bend,
Redmond, Sisters, and La Pine are managed and maintained by those cities. In addition,
the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) owns and maintains a number of state
highways throughout the County.
Information about existing conditions, planned investments, and policies related to
transportation are contained in the Deschutes County Transportation System Plan (TSP),
which is adopted as Appendix B of this Comprehensive Plan.
13-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
[1 04 1 L4 71,
A
Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations
The amount, source, and distribution of energy used in Deschutes County is a
fundamental component of how we live our lives, and it is influenced by land use and
other decisions made at the County level. The State of Oregon requires land uses to be
managed with an eye to their energy impacts.
In Deschutes County, the key energy issues
include:
Community design in more urban areas to
limit the need for large vehicles (generally
powered with fossil fuel) for everyday tasks.
Generating, transporting, and storing
energy locally from a variety of sources, and
managing the Impacts of these facilities.
Conservation of energythrough building
design and orientation, the use of energy -
efficient technologies, and incentives/
regulations/education to encourage others
to do so.
Deschutes County coordinates with utility
providers that serve the area, including:
Central Electric Cooperative
Midstate Electric Cooperative
Pacific Power (PacifiCorps)
Cascades Natural Gas
14-2 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Context
The role of Deschutes County in planning for
energy is addressed in more detail below.
SOLAR ORIENTATION
The solar orientation of structures can create
significant energy savings and allows for
photovoltaic energy generation. The County has
long promoted energy conservation through a
passive solar code that requires new structures
to be sited so that they do not block the sun
from falling on adjacent properties.
SITING LARGE-SCALE ENERGY FACILITIES
In general, cities and counties have siting
authority over energy projects below a certain
size or generating capacity. This includes
individual projects powering or supplementing
homes and businesses or small commercial
projects which produce energy for sale. Larger
facilities are regulated by the Oregon Energy
Facility Siting Council. The thresholds for Siting
Council jurisdiction are determined bythe
Legislature and are defined in Oregon Revised
Statutes (ORS) 469.300. The Siting Council does
not regulate hydroelectric development. Instead,
the Oregon Water Resources Commission has
the authority to issue licenses for hydroelectric
development.
Deschutes County currently has five developed
large-scale energy facilities, primarily located
on the eastern side of the County, approved
between 2015-2017. In 2018, the Department
of Land Conservation and Development altered
statewide rules related to these types of large-
scale energy facilities on high value farmland,
limiting development opportunities in parts
of the County. Community members have
expressed concern regarding impacts of these
facilities on wildlife habitat and aesthetics.
In addition to solar, several irrigation districts
have developed in conduit hydroelectric facilities
in which existing canals are upgraded with
equipment for power generation. Three of these
facilities currently exist, two of which are owned
14-3 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Energy
and operated by Central Oregon Irrigation
District, and the third owned and operated by
Three Sisters Irrigation District.
SMALL-SCALE RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS, AND
COMMERCIAL ENERGY GENERATION
The State oversees construction and approval
of large commercial energy facilities, as noted
above. However, there Is a role for local
governments to oversee smaller commercial
projects. Commercial energy generation is
considerably more complex than permitting
small projects for homes and businesses. From
a land use perspective, the scale, extended time
frame, investment required and required off -site
components all complicate the approval process.
For example, to move the electricity generated at
an alternative energy facility to market there is
often a need for approval of roads, transmission
lines or substations. The accessory facilities
may or may not be in place at the same site as
the main facility, but are an integral part of the
project and are currently reviewed separately,
based on State regulations.
Wind Energy Generation
As shown in the following figure (add figure
below) wind energy is most abundant in the
eastern portion of Deschutes County.
Potential impacts of this type of facility include
temporary construction Impacts, habitat loss and
animal fatalities due to collision with turbines,
visual impacts from towers and accessory
structures, and noise. Deschutes County
regulates small scale wind energy development
generating less than 100 kilowatts of power. This
allowance was added to the Deschutes County
Code in 2010, although since that time no
applications have been received to establish this
type of facility.
Solar Energy Generation
The following figure (add figure below) gives a
broad sense of wherein the US solar irradiance
is highest, and therefore where solar generation
will be most efficient. Deschutes County is
generally favorable to solargeneration.
Potential impacts of this type of facility include
temporary construction impacts, habitat loss,
animal fatalities due to reflected sunlight (for
some solar facilities), and visual impacts. As
noted previously, the Department of Land
Conservation and Development amended its
rules In 2018 to limit solar development on high
value farmland. Typically, solar developments
require large acreage and relatively flat terrain
for their operations. This requirement is a
limiting factor in Deschutes County, as many of
the properties that would meet large acreage
and terrain requirements are actively used
for farming purposes. The Bureau of Land
Management is exploring an amendment to its
rules to allow for greater opportunity for solar
development in the western United States. The
County anticipates limited solar development on
private land going forward and an increase of
leased BLM land for this type of development. 44-
tho fi ,t
Commercial Biomass
Commercial biomass uses organic material such
as wood, agricultural waste or crop residues to
power boilers to generate heat. According to the
Oregon Forest Resources Institute an estimated
4.25 million acres (about 15% of Oregon's
forestland) have the potential to provide useful
woody biomass through thinning to reduce the
risk of uncharacteristic forest fires.
Potential impacts include temporary
construction impacts, transportation impacts
(as materials need to be transported to a central
location), visual impacts, and air quality and
climate impacts due to combustion of biofuels.
14-4 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Energy
The County's first biomass facility is under
construction through a partnership with the
Deschutes National Forest and Mt. Bachelor Ski
Resort. The project is located on federal land
and outside of the purview of Deschutes County
regulations.
Geothermal Energy Generation
Geothermal energy is a form of renewable
energy derived from heat in the earth. This heat
is transferred to water through various means
and the steam produced is used to produce
electricity. Geothermal energy Is dependent on
the location of geothermal resources, central
Oregon may contain some of the best prospects
for geothermal exploration in the continental
United States.
Potential impacts include construction and visual
impacts of geothermal facilities.
Deschutes County regulates geothermal energy
in accordance with state law, although no
geothermal development projects have been
proposed to date.
Hydroelectric Energy Generation
Currently, Deschutes County has three
approved "in conduit" hydroelectric facilities
that are owned and operated by irrigation
districts within existing irrigation district canals.
Approval of these facilities have previously
been contentious, with community members
expressing concern about wildlife and impacts
to other basin users. Irrigation districts have
noted challenges in utilizing the existing county
code for these projects, which were drafted
to address "in channel" hydroelectric facilities.
To promote renewable energy development
using man-made waterways, irrigation districts
have expressed interest in helping the County
update the Deschutes County Code to more
appropriately address "in conduit" hydroelectric
facilities separate and apart from "in -channel"
hydroelectric facilities".
Key Community Considerations
Community discussions related to energy have
revolved around the following topics:
Interest in planning for and adapting to
climate change, including using more
renewable energy sources.
Concern aboutthe design and location
of energy facilities and their impacts on
environmental resources and scenic views.
Preparation for more use of electric
vehicles in the future, which often require
specialized charging infrastructure.
Goals and Policies
Goal 14.1: Promote Energy Conservation and
Alternative Energy Production
Policy 14.1 .1 . Continue to incorporate
energy conservation into the building and
management of all County operations and
capital projects using regular energy audits to
refine the results.
Policy 14.1 .2. Reduce energy demand by
supporting energy efficiency in all sectors of
the economy.
Policy 14.1 .3. Encourage energy suppliers
to explore innovative alternative energy
conservation technologies and provide
energy audits and incentives to patrons.
Policy 14.1 .4. Provide flexibility and
exemptions for small properties and
anomalous sites in the development
code to promote energy conservation.
Promote affordable, efficient, reliable, and
environmentally sound commercial energy
systems for individual homes, and business
consumers.
Policy 14.1 .5. Promote development of solar,
hydropower, wind, geothermal, biomass
and other alternative energy systems while
mitigating impacts on neighboring properties
and the natural environment.
14-5 1 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Energy
Policy 14.1 .6. Provide incentives for homes
and businesses to install small-scale on -site
alternative energy systems consistent with
adopted County financing programs.
Policy 14.1 .7. Support development of
electric vehicle charging stations and facilities
to help promote use of electric vehicles.
Policy 14.1 .8. Use the development code
to promote commercial renewable energy
projects while addressing and mitigating
impacts on the community and natural
environment.
Policy 14.1 .9. Use Oregon's Rural Renewable
Energy Development Zones to support the
creation of renewable energy projects.
Policy 14.1 .10. Identify, protect, and support
the development of significant renewable
energy sites and resources.
Policy 14.1 .11 . Include evaluation of adverse
impacts to natural resources as part of
renewable energy siting processes.
Attachment A
"Parking Lot"
Issues identified by staff that are:
• Potentially precluded by state law or land use goals; or
• Action items that maybe more fitting for an action plan and subsequent separate project.
r i" ":,,. E: .,'`r.. l
;..
,✓ ..> � ,
s der .,7 %' -'v
5 ,
,.. ci .�. C /� . xi `M _.
1-
p" .� ,✓ J ✓.
-i ":9 ��LM.1, K ..�.. ,d,
�,'a.w �
Y ,J.J
"Tl�"':�a � /
✓' � G, .ice'
°U ,="nz.� � eL� ,✓,.'.c .`�"stti✓u,.,.'`^,.. �... .. � Ur r6% U/:v� ,h;�.Y'�:Sc...& � �U ti., "„8..
� ,s .. ,r; .'N{'
.. ,:..k`..
Retain agricultural lands
zoning for property deemed
commercially viable
Ensure regulations do not
exceed requirements of
ORS or LCDC rule.
Ch. 3 - Farm Land Precluded by
State law
Ch. 3 - Farm Land ! Action Item
Eliminate or revisit EFU Sub- Ch. 3 - Farm Land Action Item
zones
Regulate development
through water availability
Require approval of water
permits prior to processing
applications
Re-evaluate use of water
rights _
Require water budgets and
monitoring for public lands
Require consideration of
water availability during
UGB expansion processes
Ch. 5 - Water
Resources
Ch. 5 - Water
Resources
Ch. 5 - Water
Resources
Ch. 5 - Water
Resources
Ch. 5 - Water
Resources
Action Item
Action Item
DLCD expressed concern regarding this
statement, as there are specific criteria in state
law to define "agricultural land" relating to soil
classification, existing farm uses, and supporting
nearby lands. Integrating this language may put
the County as risk for appeal.
DLCD noted that counties have ability to be
stricter, but not less strict on farm related uses.
This topic could be explored through the action
plan and subsequent text amendment process.
This item is more fitting for an action plan. Statue
sets a minimum lot size, generally at 80 acres,
and allows smaller parcel sizes under a farm
study. Elimination of subzones would likely result
in larger minimum parcel sizes.
This would be more fitting for an action item and
would require extensive coordination with DLCD
and OWRD.
Same comment as above.
Precluded by
! The County does not have jurisdiction to regulate
State Law
water rights.
Precluded by
The County does not have jurisdiction to impose
State Law
additional water regulations on public
landowners.
Pre11 cluded by
The County has limitations in authority as UGB
State Law
expansion processes are regulated by state OAR
and ORS. Additionally, any policies related to
Page 2 of 3
UGBs should include extensive discussions with
the County's four cities. _
Construct infrastructure to
Ch. 5 - Water Action Item
This topic could be explored through an action
manage or limit water waste
Resources
plan and subsequent text amendment process.
Replace all wildlife
Ch. 5 - Wildlife Action Item
This topic could be explored through an action
regulations with incentives
Resources
plan and subsequent text amendment process. j
Remove regulations
Ch. 5 -Wildlife Precluded by
DLCD has noted this item is precluded by state
associated with Goal 5
Resources State Law
law without an extensive Goal 5 review process
wildlife resources
and would put the County at risk for appeal.
Remove Floodplain zoning
Ch. 7 - Natural Action Item
This topic could be explored through an action
from irrigation districts and
Hazards
plan and subsequent text amendment process.
canals
Advocate for legislation to
Ch. 10 -Housing Action Item
This topic could be explored through an action
enable transitional housing
plan and coordination with the County's lobbyist.
outside UGBs
Make the Three Rivers
Ch. 11 - I Precluded by
A county cannot designate new unincorporated
census designated place an
Unincorporated 'State Law
communities, state rule notes that only those
unincorporated community
j Communities j
communities existing as of 1994 can have this
status. This language could put the County at risk j
of appeal.
Restrict development of
Ch. 11 - Action Item
This topic received many public comments, both
k destination resorts
Destination
in favor and against. Staff recommends this topic
Resorts
be further explored through an action plan item
and subsequent text amendment process.
Clarify that no restrictions
Ch. 11 - Precluded by
j DLCD noted in their comment letter that
can be imposed that limit,
Destination j state law
eligibility of a site does not guarantee compliance
make unfeasible or prevent
1 Resorts
with applicable regulations or secure land use
development of destination
approval. This language could put the County at
resorts
risk of appeal.
Page 3 of 3
..."�,DESCHIJTES
C®IJIVTy
County College
Date
Topic
Time
Location
Tuesday,
Aug. 27
BOARD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
ADMINISTRATION & INTERNAL
AUDIT
4 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.
Deschutes Services Building
1300 NW Wall St. Bend
(Barnes & Sawyer Room and
DeArmond Room, 1st Floor)
Tuesday,
Sept. 3
ROAD DEPARTMENT
4 p.m. - 6 p.m.
Road Department
61150 SE 271h Street, Bend
Tuesday,
Sept. 10
JUSTICE COURT & FAIR & EXPO
4 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.
Fair & Expo Center
3800 SEAirport Way, Redmond
Tuesday,
Sept. 17
NATURAL RESOURCES & SOLID
WASTE
.m. .m.
4 p- 5:45 p
Road Department
61150 SE 27t" Street Bend
Tuesday,
Sept. 24
CLERK'S OFFICE, HUMAN
RESOURCES, & VETERANS' SERVICES
4 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.
Deschutes Services Building
1300 NW Wall St. Bend
(Barnes & Sawyer Room and
DeArmond Room, 1st Floor)
Tuesday,
Oct. 1
SHERIFF'S OFFICE
& 9-1-1
4 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.
Deschutes 9-1-1
20355 Poe Sholes Drive, Bend
(Conference Room, 2"d Floor)
Tuesday,
Oct. 8
LEGAL, DA'S OFFICE &
COMMUNITY JUSTICE
4 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.
Adult Parole & Probation
63360 NW Britta Street, Bend
(Building Two, 1ST Floor)
Tuesday,
Oct. 15
FACILITIES, PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT &COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
4 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.
Deschutes Services Building
1300 NW Wall St. Bend
(Barnes & Sa UerRoom and
DeArmond Room, 1st Floor)
Tuesday,
Oct. 22
IT, FINANCE &
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
4 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.
Deschutes Services Building
1300 NW Wall St. Bend
(Barnes & Sawyer Room and
DeArmond Room, 1st Floor)
Tuesday,
Oct. 29
HEALTH SERVICES & GRADUATION
4 p.m. - 6 p.m.
Deschutes Services Building
1300 NW Wall St. Bend
(Barnes & Sawyer Room and
DeArmond Room, 1st Floor)
2024 County College Participants
His church is engaged in several forms of
homeless sheltering, interacts with county staff
298
Redmond
Rick
Russell
3
Pastor
No
No
on a regular basis. Would like to more broadly
understand what services the county provides.
Reitred business
Would like to gain a broad understanding of the
299
Bend
David
Weilmuenster
3
development
county's operations to make informed decisions
No
No
consultant
and possibly volunteer.
306
Redmond
John
Linton
5
38-yr-old military
Would like to understand how government
No
No
veteran
serves the community.
Semi -retired, Real
Heard about it from friends and was amazed
307
Bend
Diane
Seay
15
No
No
estate
what they learned.
Heard about CC from a Toastmaster colleague,
Food Chemist. Owns a
308
Bend
Eileen
McLellan
40
hazelnut farm in
is eager to learn more, and feels it is her
No, but has interest.
No
responsibility to learn about the county where
Junction City, OR
she lives.
Hopes to learn more about the county
310
Bend
Colleen
White
8
Administrative
departments she interacts with and what she
No
Yes, Facilities
Support
canto do to support them.
Wants to increase his understanding of county
Teaches AP History at
govt. to share with his students, also interested
311
Bend
James
Prizzia
8
Ridgeview High,
No
No
in how the county influences public land use
Redmond
policy.
Reitred Lab Tech,
312
Sisters
Barbara
Holm
11
active Fire Corp
Wants a general understanding of what goes on
No
No
Will miss two sessions
behind the scenes.
member
26 year -old active in
Want to learn how county departments function
319
La Pine
Samuel
Facey
24
government and
No
No
and share the information with the community.
politics
Volunteer with The
Wants to underrtand the County, as well as
322
La Pine
Edith
Hanson
7
Little Deschutes
what resources are avialble to help others in the
No
No
Grange
community.
Wants to learn more about how the county
323
Bend
Rob
Imhoff
22
Former Commissioner
operates, jurisdictions and how to integrate
No
No
Will miss two sessions
Candidate
ideas into policy:
0
s
Army Veteran,
Wants to learn more the County's work and how
Communicat ons
it interfaces with and impacts the community.
No
No
I
324
Bend
Jenny
Odom
3
Professional, PTO
Wants to grow her network, give back, and open
volunteer
doors to career opportunities.
Navy Veteran, science
Want to have a better understanding of how
325
Bend
Guy
Reynolds
4
tutor COCC, OR
county governemnt works to deliver services to
No
No
Community Health
worker & volunteer
its citizens.
Wants in depth knowledge of activies affecting
327
Black Butte Ranch
Timothy
Hedemark
40
Vietnma Veteran,
the County, economics & politics within OR
No
No
Retired, Aviation
State framework. Improve his voter decisions.
Wants to better understand how public policy is
74-'96
Marketing, education
kindled and carried in the county, and wants to
328
Bend
Nancy
Prosser
plus the
and small business
be part of mending schism that is developing in
No
No
last?
Oregon.
Adjunct nursing
instructor COCC,
Wants to learn how to better serve her
329
Bend
* Lynne
Poole
21
medicare counselor
No
No
Will rniss first session
SHIBA, volunteer
community.
I
Bethlehem L & Innn I r'A.
Wants to learn the interworkings of the County,
Seasonal wi
how staff, electeds and citizens relate, and to
330
Redmond
Leslie
Nue-Limping
2 months
firefighter, policy
g y
become a more informed advocate for rural
No
No
development for RVCC
communities.
Interested in learning more about the different
Yes, Deschutes County
331
Bend
Steven
Davidson
21
Restaruant owner
county departments.
Rural Dist.#2
No
Yes, Investment Advisory
I
Wants to learn more about county operations,
332
Bend
Craig
Renkert
7
Retirred, financial
the challenges and how rapid growth in
Committee &Project
No
industry
Wildfire Neighborhood
impacting county staff and priorities.
Coalition
Retirarl. hist_C orprofessor,v
Wants to learn how county departments
333
Bend
Adrian
Bennett
9
D
function, plus the issues/concerns the county
No
No
Historical Society
and specific departments face.
board member
Want to learn more about local government and
334
Bend -
Amy
Mulvihill
8
Social Studies Teacher
how decisions are made, as well as improve her
No
No
practice as a social studies teacher.
Page 2 of 2
Welco e to
County Collegz
Tonight's Agenda:
• County College: What to Expect
• Introductions
• What counties do
• County services and structure
Break
• Internal Audit
• County Administration
.1114 tell[, [4 Le
- 4 Lor-Ir
Patti Adair
1114 t9PV14tq Lei m
• How long you have lived in
Deschutes County
• Why you applied for County
College
What do counties do?
40
County Service:
Community Justice, Medical Examiner
���XUtES c0G2` «,
o Prioritization, Goals &
Objectives, Budget
Approval
® Legislative Role
o Modification of County
• Quasi-judicial Role
o Land Use, Events,
Addressing Grievances
s,
QuestionS7