2025-240-Minutes for Meeting June 11,2025 Recorded 7/31/2025O�vT E S CUG
2� r BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon
(541) 388-6570
01111 UALT1
Recorded in Deschutes County CJ2025-240
Steve Dennison, County Clerk
Comrnissioners' Journal 07/31 /2025 10:52:09 AM
2025-240
FUK KEC.UKUIN(:i SIAMP ONLY
BOCC MEETING MINUTES
WEDNESDAY June 11, 2025
Barnes Sawyer Rooms
Live Streamed Video
Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Patti Adair and Phil Chang.
Also present were County Administrator Nick Lelack; Senior Assistant Legal Counsel Kim Riley;
and BOCC Executive Assistant Brenda Fritsvold.
This meeting was audio and video recorded and can be accessed at the Deschutes County
Meeting Portal website www.deschutes.org/meetings.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair DeBone tailed the meeting to order at 9:00 am.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN INPUT: None
Commissioner Adair recognized today as the first day of the 2025 Sisters Rodeo,
encouraged people to attend, and shared that her nieces are competing.
Saying it is the Chair's discretion to allow members of the audience to speak to
something which is on the agenda, Commissioner Chang said some people had
tried to sign up to speak at today's Board meeting about the proposal to have a safe
parking program at the County's Public Safety Campus, but were denied the
opportunity because that matter is listed on the published agenda.
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 1 OF 14
Chair DeBone explained the reason for this rule, noted that a public hearing is not
being held on that matter today, and described other ways in which people can
provide input to the Commissioners.
Commissioner Adair said she had received approximately 15 emails on this subject.
CONSENT AGENDA: Before the Board was Consideration of the Consent Agenda.
Approval of Resolution No. 2025-030, extending 1.50 Limited Duration FTEs in the
District Attorney's Office for three months
2. Authorization to apply for a Criminal Justice Commission Restorative Justice Grant
3. Approval of an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with the
Oregon Department of Transportation for Traffic Signal Maintenance
4. Consideration of Board Signature on letters thanking Jill Adams and appointing
Molly Wells -Darling, for service on the Deschutes County Behavioral Health
Advisory Committee
5. Consideration of Board Signature on letter thanking Donna Harris, for service on
the Wolf Depredation and Financial Assistance Compensation Committee
6. Approval of the minutes of the May 13, 2025 Deschutes County Budget
Committee meeting
7. Approval of the Minutes of the May 30, 2025 BOCC Legislative Update
ADAIR: Move Board approval of the Consent Agenda as presented
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Commissioner DeBone acknowledged the consent agenda includes recognition of
persons who are being thanked for their service on the Behavioral Health Advisory
Committee and the Wolf Depredation and Financial Assistance Compensation
Committee.
Commissioner Chang expressed his appreciation for the volunteer work of Donna
Harris on the Wolf Depredation and Financial Assistance Compensation Committee.
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 2 OF 14
ACTION ITEMS:
8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee 2024-2025 Annual Report and
Safe Sidewalk Awards
Tanya Saltzman, Senior Planner, introduced Jennifer Letz, Chair of the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) and David Green, BPAC Vice Chair.
Letz said this year, BPAC bestowed awards to every person and group nominated in
recognition of their work to maintain public infrastructure for the benefit of those
who use it. She expressed her appreciation for all of the work done by many
individuals and groups to aid in securing, maintaining, and improving pedestrian
safety.
Awards were then presented to those in attendance; those not in attendance will be
mailed their certificates of recognition. The Commissioners expressed their
appreciation for all of the work done by everyone recognized.
Green then presented BPAC's annual report, explaining that BPAC advises the
County and all four cities on how to promote safe walking and bicycling. He shared
information on the annual Central Oregon Bike and Ped Summit and noted that the
County's recently adopted Transportation System Plan includes "community
connections" such as ODOT's planned Lava Butte Trail along Highway 97 between
Bend and La Pine. Green also reviewed the State's regulations on e-bikes, noting
which bicycles are not classified or regulated as e-bikes, and summarizing proposed
legislation regarding the use of e-bikes.
In response to Commissioner Adair, Green said anyone aged 16 or over does not
have to wear a helmet when riding an e-bike.
Letz added that law enforcement is not seeing a large increase in e-bike crashes as
the use of these rises.
Commissioner DeBone shared that CET has expanded the hours of its bus routes
and offers the use of bike racks for riders.
9. Consideration of a Notice of Intent to Award a contract for a Materials
Recovery Facility (MRF), Composting, and C&D Consultant Services
Tim Brownell, Director of the Solid Waste Department, explained the County's
efforts to improve its diversion rate of materials by expanding the recovery and
processing of Construction and Demotion (C&D) materials; developing a new
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 3 OF 14
compost facility to process the full stream of vegetative waste recovered across the
County; and recovering more comingled recyclable materials.
After an RFP was issued in March for consultant services, three proposals deemed
responsive were submitted. Each proposal was reviewed and scored, with JR Miller
& Associates identified as the proposer most likely to meet the needs of the project.
Commissioner Adair expressed appreciation for the information and stated her
strong support for recycling.
Commissioner Chang said if the County is able to increase the diversion rate of
materials from the landfill, Knott can continue to be used for more time. Adding that
half of the fires started so far this year in Oregon escaped from burn piles, he
supported encouraging people to dispose of yard waste rather than burn it.
Commissioner DeBone acknowledged that the proposed contract results from the
2019 Solid Waste Management Plan.
ADAIR: Move approval of the Notice of Intent to Award a contract to JR Miller &
Associates for consultant services as described
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Commissioner Adair suggested that Brownell reach out to JTS in Redmond regarding
the possibility of pelletizing some of the diverted wood debris collected by the
County.
10. Public Hearing -Deschutes County Code Title 12 Text Amendments
Cody Smith, County Engineer / Assistant Road Director, presented draft
amendments to Deschutes County Code Title 12 ("Roads, Sidewalks, and Public
Places"). Smith explained the reasons for the changes and summarized current text
and proposed amendments for each affected subsection.
The public hearing was opened at 9:56 am.
Ken Katzaroff referred to a letter he submitted today on this subject, saying that the
changes being proposed which are not related to the State -mandated clear and
objective standards should not be approved on an emergency basis but rather
people should be given the opportunity to review the changes and comment on
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 4 OF 14
them before they take effect since they could impact the cost of development.
Adding that a case which will go before the Oregon Supreme Court may affect these
changes, he suggested delaying action on them.
Commissioner DeBone asked that Smith confirm that these changes will not modify
policy and will only move language from one area of the Code to another. Smith
verified this, saying that the only new language states that anyone wanting to
develop in a wetland or culturally sensitive area must obtain a permit from the
State —this is indeed required, but was not specifically stated in the Code before.
There being no one else who wished to speak, the public hearing as closed at 10:04 am.
Noting that Katzaroffs letter arrived at 8:59 am this morning, Commissioner Chang
did not see anything in it which was not adequately addressed during the hearing.
Commissioner DeBone was comfortable with proceeding to adopt the ordinance
today, saying that any unintended consequences can be addressed at a later date.
CHANG: Move to close the record and proceed to deliberations
ADAIR: Second
VOTE:
ADAIR:
Yes
CHANG:
Yes
DEBONE:
Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
CHANG:
Move approval of first and second readings of Ordinance No. 2025-012 by
title only
ADAIR:
Second
VOTE:
ADAIR:
Yes
CHANG:
Yes
DEBONE:
Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Chair DeBone read the title of the ordinance into the record two times.
CHANG: Move adoption of Ordinance No. 2205-012 amending Title 12 (Roads,
Sidewalks, and Public Places) of Deschutes County Code by emergency to
take effect June 25, 2025
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 5 OF 14
11. Public Hearing: FY 2026 Deschutes County Fee Schedule and consideration of
Resolution No. 2025-014 adopting the Fee Schedule
Laura Skundrick, Management Analyst, distributed a corrected Fee Schedule which
clarified that the "Low Income Housing Application Fee" listed in the Assessor's
Office is "per account." She reviewed that the Bend Parks & Rec Board has formal►y
approved changes to its fees which are reflected in the County's Fee Schedule and
said the term "Transient Room Tax" is being changed to "Transient Lodging Tax" to
align with State regulations. In addition, new TLT certificate of occupancy fees have
been added to the Fee Schedule as previously directed by the Board.
The public hearing was opened at 10:17 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10:17 am.
ADAIR: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-014 adopting the FY 2026 Deschutes
County Fee Schedule
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
The Board convened as the governing body for the 9-1-1 Service District.
12. Public Hearing: FY 2026 Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District Fee Schedule
and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-015 adopting the Fee Schedule
Management Analyst Laura Skundrick said no changes were proposed to last year's
9-1-1 Service District Fee Schedule.
The public hearing was opened at 10:19 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10:19 am.
CHANG: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-015 adopting the FY 2026 Deschutes
County 9-1-1 Service District Fee Schedule
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
The Board convened as the governing body for the County Extension and 4H Service
District.
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 6 OF 14
13. Public Hearing: FY 2026 Deschutes County Extension and 4H Service District
Fee Schedule and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-016 approving the
Fee Schedule
Management Analyst Laura Skundrick said no changes were proposed to last year's
Deschutes County Extension and 4H Service District Fee Schedule.
The public hearing was opened at 10:20 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10:20 am.
Commissioner Adair said the 4-H horse show was relocated from the Fair & Expo to
to Rimrock in Crook County.
ADAIR: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-016 adopting the FY 2026 Deschutes
County Extension and 4H Service District Fee Schedule
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
The Board convened as the governing body for the Black Butte Ranch Service District.
14. Public Hearing: FY 2026 Black Butte Ranch Service District Fee Schedule and
consideration of Resolution No. 2025-018 adopting the Fee Schedule
Management Analyst Laura Skundrick described the proposed changes to the Black
Butte Ranch Service District Fee Schedule and explained the reasons for those
changes.
The public hearing was opened at 10:22 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10:22 am.
ADAIR: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-018 adopting the FY 2026 Black Butte
Ranch Service District Fee Schedule
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R:
CHANG:
DEBONE
Yes
Yes
Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 7 OF 14
The Board convened as the governing body for the Sunriver Service District.
15. Public Hearing - FY 2026 Sunriver Service District Fee Schedule and
consideration of Resolution No. 2025-017 adopting the Fee Schedule
Management Analyst Laura Skundrick described the proposed changes to the
Sunriver Service District Fee Schedule and explained the reasons for those changes.
The public hearing was opened at 10:23 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10:23 am.
CHANG: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-017 adopting the FY 2026 Sunriver
Service District Fee Schedule
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
The Board reconvened as the governing body for Deschutes County.
16. Consideration of Contract No. 2025-597, a Collective Bargaining Agreement
between Deschutes County and the American Federation of State, County
and Municipal Employees Local 3997 (AFSCME)
Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator, thanked those who served on the
bargaining teams, said AFSCME represents more than 500 employees across seven
departments, and summarized the terms which have been agreed to by both
parties.
CHANG: Move approval of Contract No. 2025-597, a Collective Bargaining Agreement
between Deschutes County and the American Federation of State, County
and Municipal Employees Local 3997 (AFSCME)
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
A break was announced at 10:34 am. The meeting resumed at 10:40 am.
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 202S PAGE 8 OF 14
17. Request from Mountain View Community Development to lease property at
the County's Public Safety Campus for its Safe Parking program
Kristie Bollinger, Property Manager, introduced the request from Mountain View
Community Development (MVCD) to lease property at the County's Public Safety
Campus for its safe parking program.
Rick Russell, MVCD executive director, described MVCD's safe parking program and
the rules agreed to by participants, noting some of these were implemented at the
recommendation of Deschutes County District Attorney Stephen Gunnels. MVCD
currently operates the program in nine locations. More than 200 people have
participated, many of which have moved on to stable housing.
Russell said MVCD is currently proposing to add another safe parking location with
six spaces at the County's Public Safety Campus.
In response to Commissioner Adair, Russell said MVCD is working to make shower
and laundry facilities available for program participants in Bend.
Commissioner Adair credited Ryan Rudnick with the idea to utilize the County's
Public Safety Campus for safe parking.
Continuing, Russell described the oversight and case management services to be
provided as well as the actions taken to notify neighboring businesses and residents
of this proposal.
Responding to Commissioner DeBone, Russell said the feedback received from
nearby business owners was generally favorable, although some did voice concerns
which MVCD attempted to address. No opposition was received from those living in
the immediate neighborhood.
Megan Perkins, Bend Mayor Pro Tem, said the City views this proposal as a valuable
expansion of Bend's safe parking sites. Noting that some program participants are
elderly veterans or families with children, she appreciated the provision of case
management services and that no drugs or alcohol are allowed on -site.
Russell added that MVCD proposes that this site have micro -pods, which would be
paid for by funds received from the State.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Bollinger said the County has received very
few complaints regarding the safe parking program on County -owned property in
Redmond.
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 9 OF 14
Discussion ensued of other safe parking program sites, unexpected benefits of
these, and sources of current and possible future funding for this program.
Commissioner DeBone said micro -shelters are different from the housing offered at
Veteran's Village or living in an RV on someone's private property which is now
allowed.
Commissioner Chang supported offering homeless persons an opportunity to
stabilize their situation using portable, changeable shelters with an eye to moving
into more permanent housing.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Russell said MVCD proposes a 12-month lease
to start operations at the Public Safety Campus property as this term would enable
it to apply for a property tax exemption for the land.
Commissioner DeBone objected to allowing this residential use in a commercial/
Industrial area using public funds.
Saying the County needs to make sure this initiative works for the community,
Commissioner Adair proposed a 90-day lease to start. Explaining that a 12-month
lease is needed to secure the State funding for the pods, Russell was amenable to
having an initial check -in at 90 days and also to including language in the lease
allowing either party to terminate it with 90-days' notice.
Responding to Commissioner Chang, Russell said private property owners in the
vicinity of MVCD's other safe parking sites appreciate that unauthorized camping is
not allowed within 500 feet of the sites. Commissioner DeBone said this stipulation
sounds like a threat to businesses that they might be subject to unauthorized
encampments if they don't go along with the safe parking site. Russell said because
MVCD understands that its safe parking program cannot operate without
community support, it is motivated to secure and maintain that.
Commissioner Chang supported approving a 12-month lease as proposed.
ADAIR: Move to direct staff to draft a 12-month lease allowing MVCD to operate a
safe parking program with six micro -pods at the County's Public Safety
Campus, as discussed
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes no. Motion Carried 2 - 1
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 10 OF 14
18. First reading of Ordinance 2025-010 —Plan Amendment and Zone Change
for property totaling approximately 279 acres southeast of the City of Bend
(60725 Arnold Market Road)
Nataniel Miller, Associate Planner, reminded that following a public hearing, the
Board had conducted deliberations and approved the requested rezone.
ADAIR: Move approval of first reading of Ordinance No. 2025-010 by title only
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Chair DeBone read the title of the ordinance into the record.
Commissioner Chang expressed appreciation to the Bend Parks & Rec District for
being open about their planned use of the property.
Commissioner Adair shared that of the 250,576 acres in the County which are under
private ownership and zoned for Exclusive Farm Use, 174 acres will be rezoned by
this action. Another 448,000 acres zoned EFU are publicly -owned lands.
19. Western Rivers Conservancy request for letter supporting BLM's funding
request to the Department of the Interior (Paulina Meadows / Little
Deschutes River land acquisition)
Jen Patterson, Strategic Initiatives Manager, presented the request from Western
Rivers Conservancy for a letter supporting the Bureau of Land Management's
funding request to the Department of the Interior for the Paulina Meadows / Little
Deschutes River land acquisition. Patterson added that the La Pine Chamber of
Commerce has gone on record as supporting this acquisition.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Lisa Clark, Bureau of Land Management,
explained that the property would be made available for dispersed recreation (day
use only) following an environmental assessment. She further explained how the
property would be managed.
Responding to Commissioner Chang, Nelson Mathews, director of the Conservancy,
explained the availability of the federal funding.
Commissioner DeBone stated that he will abstain from voting on the request due
to the source of the federal revenues and the problems encountered with
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 11 OF 14
unsanctioned camping on public lands, including wildfire starts. He added that this
purchase would remove privately -owned land from the property tax rolls.
Commissioner Chang said if the planned fuels reduction work is done correctly,
this property could serve as a buffer protecting other areas from wildfire spreads.
Commissioner Adair said while the interest paid on the federal debt is $1.2 trillion
per year, the source of the referenced revenues are taxes on oil and gas production.
CHANG: Move to approve the request from the Western Rivers Conservancy for a
letter supporting BLM's funding request to the Department of the Interior for
the Paulina Meadows / Little Deschutes River land acquisition
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair abstains. Motion Carried 2 - 1 - 0
20. Deliberations: Reconsideration of Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive
Plan Update
Nicole Mardell, Senior Planner, reviewed the process undertaken to update the
County's Comprehensive Plan, after which its adoption was appealed by Central
Oregon LanclWatch (COLW) to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on three
bases. Mardell referenced a memo summarizing the appellant's arguments.
Commissioner Adair suggested that Comp Plan include the number of acres of land
zoned for Exclusive Farm Use as differentiated between privately -owned property
and publicly -owned.
Commissioner Chang said the Plan could also state that 3,000 acres in Deschutes
County have been rezoned from resource land over the last 12 years. Mardell noted
that about half of those rezones have not been finalized.
Commissioner DeBone was comfortable with the Comp Plan as developed and
voted on. Adding that he supported preserving options for private property owners,
he said unless the State no longer allows property to be rezoned, that will continue
to happen.
In response to concerns stated by COLW, Mardell advised removing new goals 9.2
and 9.3 from the Plan, saying these are not essential to the document, and reverting
the language of Policies 9.2.1 to 9.3.15 back to the language used in the 2011 Plan.
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 12 OF 14
Commissioner Chang said the updated Plan disregards what the majority of the
County's population wants as far as the rural nature of Deschutes County and
protection for farmland, groundwater resources, and wildlife habitat. He said the
more resources which are directed to the development of luxury residential
housing, the less are available for the development of needed affordable and
middle housing.
Commissioner DeBone said while the County'should be diligent as it considers
proposed rezones of resource land, rezoning property from EFU to rural residential
does not constitute urbanization.
Mardell reviewed the changes discussed by the Board and noted that some
scrivener's errors were corrected as staff was producing the final red -lined version.
ADAIR: Move to approve the changes to the draft 2040 Comp Plan as discussed
DEBONE: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: No
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 2 - 1
Mardell said a draft ordinance will be brought to the Board for first reading on June
25th.
Commissioner Chang spoke to the text changes he had submitted for the Board's
consideration in October, which did not move forward.
OTHER ITEMS:
• Commissioner DeBone announced a Habitat for Humanity groundbreaking on June
27thfor its La Pine Sunriver's Park View Development.
• Commissioner DeBone reported on last week's COIC Board meeting, noting it was
the first one attended by Matt Ertle following his appointment by the BOCC.
• Commissioner DeBone reported on yesterday's SLED meeting.
• Commissioner Adair shared that she was in Salem on Monday advocating for the
passage of HB 3135.
• Commissioner Adair reported that the County is being advised to not sign a certain
contract with OHA as it would subject the County to unfunded mandates. She added
that the State is being fined $500/patient/day for the lack of capacity at the State
hospital.
Commissioner DeBone said a meeting has been scheduled tomorrow on the OHA
contract issue.
• Commissioner Adair toured the Greenlee property yesterday.
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 13 OF 14
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
At 12:28 pm, the Board entered Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property
Negotiations and ORS 192.660 (2) (h) Litigation.
The Executive Session concluded at 12:35 pm.
Being no further items to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 12:35 pm.
4°°��
DATED this ®3 Day of J IA 2025 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners.
ATTEST:
RECORDING SECRETARY
ANTHONY DEBONE, CHAIR
��4a-�11
PATTI ADAIR, VICE CHAIR
PHIL CHANG, COMMISSIONER
BOCC MEETING JUNE 11, 2025 PAGE 14 OF 14
�J-ses o0
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
o {
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input or Testimony
Subject:
c Date: Ohl 6__"
Name
Address L 'QA
Phone #s 5�.� qaY S4(o1
E-mail address , C' ' �� \ +
1121 In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? ❑ Yes �No
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
SUBMIT COMPLETED REQUEST TO
RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input or Testimony
Subject: to s-k- Date: G - 11.2.5,
Name 6i M C-V
Address 66731 Su,, „,� u t�J
7776,2,
Phone #so
E-mail address a 7 G.;
In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? F1 Yes No
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
SUBMIT COMPLETED REQUEST TO
RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
`) {Es C
�Za BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
o; <
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input or Testimony
Un in
1 C C
Subject: Date:
I `
Name d '1 C, , Ck 0 A O
Address 2.
Phone #s q �—j `' Q l WQ
E-mail address G, �t
In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed
Submittingwritten documents as art of testimony? ❑ Yes RNo
p
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
SUBMITCOMPLETED REQUEST TO
RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
�•T sCOL
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
o {
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input or Testimony
Subject: �� t(,�'�iVlt i"� �(�-"c Date:
Name r✓`°�
Address i9
Phone #s _ d
E-mail address
In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed
Submitting written. documents as part of testimony? Yes No
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
SUBMIT COMPLETED REQUEST TO
RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
MEETING DATE: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to apply for a Criminal Justice Commission Restorative Justice
Grant
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS:
Move to authorize the submittal of an application for a Criminal Justice Commission
Restorative Justice Grant.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The District Attorney's Office seeks Board authorization to apply for a Criminal Justice
Commission (CJC) Restorative Justice grant for the purpose of continuing the Emerging
Adult Program (EAP). The EAP is a partnership between the District Attorney's Office, Thrive
Central Oregon (Thrive), and Restorative Justice & Equity (RJ&E) which redirect young adults
out of the criminal justice system into a restorative justice program that ensures
accountability by addressing the harm caused. The program aims to reduce the number of
cases going into our court system, connect young adults and their victims to community
services to improve life stability, and allow participants the opportunity to amend for their
actions while avoiding the unintended consequences of a criminal charge.
The CJC's Restorative Justice Grant program has supported the EAP program since fall 2022,
allowing Deschutes County to grow the initiative from 13 pilot participants to a total of 97
individuals. To date we have an 80% graduation rate and a 12% arrest recidivism rate. We
anticipate enrolling another 60 young adults into EAP over the next biennium.
If granted, the funds would be used to cover personnel expenses for three 0.5 FTEs at the
DA's Office, program evaluation, and meeting expenses, in addition to the service contracts
with Thrive and RJ&E. Thrive will provide a 0.5 FTE case manager/support specialist to work
directly with the young adults and their victims, connecting them to local services and
resources. RJ&E will facilitate the program's restorative circles with two halftime RJ
specialists, coordinate team training, and provide the location for program activities.
The grant cycle would be for 24 months starting July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2027.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
If approved, the application would result in a grant award for over $1 million, with about
half ($500,000) going to support EAP staffing at the DA's Office (0.5 FTEs - deputy district
attorney, program development technician & FTE victim advocate) for two years. The other
half would be divided between Thrive and RJ&E for their services (approximately $250,000
each) for case management and restorative dialogue management.
There is no matching funds requirement.
ATTENDANCE:
Kathleen Meehan Coop, Management Analyst
25-27 RJ Grant Application Questions
1. Describe your program's goals and objectives, including the long-term impact
you are attempting to facilitate. [500 words or less] - 495 words
Traditional criminal prosecution often treats young adults the same as fully mature
adults, ignoring key developmental differences. Neuroscience research shows that the
human brain does not reach full maturity until the mid -twenties, meaning individuals
aged 18 to 25 are more prone to impulsive behavior, less capable of complex decision -
making, and more susceptible to peer influence. Yet they face the same legal
consequences as a 30- or 60-year-old. This mismatch can have lifelong
consequences —reducing access to education, future earnings, and increasing the
likelihood of reoffending.
To address this, the Deschutes County District Attorney's Office, in partnership with
Restorative Justice and Equity (RJ&E) and Thrive Central Oregon (Thrive), is continuing
the Emerging Adult Program (EAP), a pre -charge restorative justice initiative for young
adults aged 18 to 25. The program offers a community -based alternative to prosecution,
providing participants with the opportunity to take accountability and repair harm
through restorative dialogue. Trained RJ practitioners facilitate a process between
Responsible Parties (RPs) and, when willing, Harmed Parties (HPs), to develop a
restorative plan that promotes healing and transformation.
Over 21 months (October 2025 to June 2027), the EAP will advance the following goals:
Goal 1: Divert young adult cases from traditional prosecution.
The program will enroll at least 60 new RPs -- screening all police reports involving 18
to 25 year -olds. At least 25% will be felony cases and 25% person crimes. Will maintain
a 75% or higher completion rate, demonstrating effective support and accountability.
Goal 2: Strengthen restorative practices.
RJ&E will conduct an assessment of the current EAP model. Provide staff monthly
training and hire dedicated RJ Facilitators to facilitate the restorative circles. The
program will improve efficiency by moving all cases to a single track. This goal will be
measured through staff and participant surveys, and a reduction in time from RP
enrollment to initial circle.
Goal 3: Improve participant preparedness.
The EAP orientation will be revamped to improve how restorative justice is explained
and all RPs will participate in at least one preparation session with an RJ specialist prior
to their initial circle. Measured by an average RP post -survey score of 80% on
questions related to understanding the RJ process and feeling prepared.
Goal 4: Increase HP participation.
The program will increase HP participation in circles from 3% to 10%, by increasing HP
touchpoints to at least five and, when appropriate, adding an RJ circle to increase HP
input. In addition, new support tools —including an RJ demonstration video (by April
2026) and monthly HP orientation sessions (by December 2025)—will increase
engagement.
Long -Term Impact
The EAP aims to: 1) Improve community safety by maintaining a participant recidivism
rate below 25%; 2) Build personal agency, with a 10% increase in RP and HP
empowerment and satisfaction from the pre- to post -survey; and 3) Reduce the number
of potential court appearances during this time -period by 100.
2. Does your program design use evidence -based practices, or a program model
that is known to be effective? 99
The EAP has structured its restorative dialogue using evidence -based practices. Our
participants will enter into dialogue with trained RJ Facilitators at RJE outside of the
criminal justice system to foster healing and repair harm. The EAP provides resources
to HPs and RPs to foster long-term stability and success. The EAP engages in
restorative practices in how we collaborate, engage in evaluation and assessment, and
participate in training.
The EAP has been in existence since July 2021. Preliminary data shows that our
program model is effective. As of April 30, 2025, 95 individuals/98 cases enrolled, 80%
graduated, and 12% recidivated.
3. How will your program operate? Include a description of what services will be
available, and how restorative practices, such as restorative dialogues will be
utilized. [500 words or less] — 453 words
In October 2025, the Emerging Adult Program (EAP) will launch its third phase,
continuing its mission to divert young adults from the traditional criminal justice system
through restorative justice. While the core model from Phase 2 remains, key
improvements will be implemented —most notably, transitioning to a new restorative
justice partner, Restorative Justice & Equity (RJE). This shift, requiring a substantial
transition, reflects our commitment to deepening the quality of restorative practice and
aligning program delivery with the core values of accountability, healing, and community
connection.
6
The EAP team is composed of representatives from four collaborating partners. RJE will
lead the restorative justice work, including an RJ Director and two Restorative Justice
Facilitators (RJF) — to be hired. Thrive Central Oregon will provide holistic support and
direct access to services through a dedicated Support Specialist (SS). A public defender
from Deschutes Defenders represents the legal interests of the Responsible Parties
(RPs) and provides legal guidance throughout the process and after should an RP fail to
graduate. The DA's Office provides the cases, the Deputy District Attorney (DDA),
Victim Advocate (VA), Program Coordinator, and grant administration through a program
manager.
The EAP is grounded in restorative dialogue and values -based communication. Staff will
model and use restorative language in internal meetings and client interactions, creating
shared agreements that guide communication and engagement. The team will engage
in ongoing training to strengthen RJ practice —focusing on language, presence, and
inclusive behavior —and will track team goals to measure implementation progress.
Program materials will be updated to reflect lessons learned from earlier phases and
support consistency across all staff and client touchpoints.
The EAP process:
CASE SELECTION - Police reports involving 18- to 25-year-olds are screened by the
EAP DDA and then reviewed by the full team. If a case appears suitable for the EAP, the
RP is contacted through the public defender, and the Harmed Party (HP) is engaged by
the Victim Advocate.
ENROLLMENT to GRADUATION — Eligible RPs are invited to attend an orientation to
learn more and decide with the defense attorney, whether to voluntarily enroll in this 6-
month program. After enrollment, the RP will: 1) Engage in pre -dialogue preparation
with an RJF, 2) Accept responsibility; 3) Participate in facilitated restorative dialogues; 4)
Maintain regular check -ins with a Support Specialist for service and resource
connection; 5) Complete a personalized RJ plan; and 6) Not acquire any new criminal
charges. Successful completion of the program results in a no -file outcome, meaning
the case is never formally charged.
HP INVOLVEMENT - HPs are informed of the program and invited to participate at their
comfort level. HPs may: 1) Attend an HP orientation, 2) Participate in the restorative
dialogue, 3) Receive case updates from the VA, and/or 4) Offer input into the RPs'
restorative plan, either directly or through alternative formats.
Through structured dialogue and holistic support, the EAP builds a restorative path
forward for emerging adults, offering accountability without conviction, and the
opportunity for both healing and reintegration for their harmed parties, and the RP.
3
4. What training will staff and Restorative Justice facilitators receive? [250 words
or less] - 212 words
Between now and the launch of Phase 3 in October 2025, Restorative Justice & Equity
(RJE), our new RJ partner, will observe EAP circles and meet individually with each
team member to identify both personal and group challenges. Insights gathered during
this period will inform the design of a comprehensive training plan, developed in
partnership with Culture of Care. Initial training topics will likely include an introduction
or refresher on restorative practices, circle facilitation (language, structure, and
purpose), formal conferencing, trauma -informed approaches, and meditation and
mindfulness practices tailored to legal system settings.
A full -team kickoff training will be held in October 2025 to establish shared expectations,
common language, and consistent practice standards. Monthly Restorative Dialogue
practice sessions will follow, incorporating real-time feedback from program
implementation. These sessions will offer opportunities for skill refreshers, guided circle
role-play, and rotation through various circle roles so all team members gain confidence
and fluency in the entire process.
In addition to this core training, team members will have access to ongoing professional
development through local workshops, state conferences, and other relevant continuing
education. Topics will be selected to address team development as well as the evolving
needs of Responsible Parties (RPs) and Harmed Parties (HPs). This layered, adaptive
training approach will ensure that all staff and facilitators are continually supported in
delivering high -quality, trauma -informed, and equity -driven restorative justice services.
5. On average, how many staff hours do you anticipate needing for each
participanticase? [250 words or less] - 210 words
Cases selected for the Emerging Adult Program (EAP) typically require between 60 and
100 hours of staff time, with an estimated average of 70-80 hours per case. The range
reflects the diversity of eligible cases and the varying levels of support required by RPs
and HPs. This estimate encompasses the full scope of individualized casework from
selection through graduation.
Staff time includes activities such as case review and screening, outreach, and
communication with RPs and HPs, pre -dialogue preparation, restorative circle
facilitation, post -circle check -ins, support plan monitoring, team case review meetings,
and —when applicable—expungement coordination. Each phase involves multiple staff
roles, including the RJ Facilitators, Support Specialist, Victim Advocate, Public
Defender, and Coordinator — all of whom will be employed as 0.5 FTEs.
0
The estimated time does not include hours dedicated to general program operations,
evaluation, training, materials development, or administrative planning.
Given our target of enrolling at least 60 new EAP cases over 21 months —plus the
continued support and resolution of active cases from Phase 2—we project that more
than half of each team member's weekly hours will be spent directly supporting
individual cases.
These time investments reflect the program's commitment to high -quality, trauma -
informed, and relationship -based restorative justice practices that require meaningful
staff engagement at every step.
6. Provide a timeline of when program milestones and activities are anticipated to
be completed. [250 words or less] — 250 words
2025 01 (Jul —Sep):
Phase 2 activities will use RJ GAP funds - covering Thrive, Community Solutions
(current RJ partner), and the DA's Office enrolling cases through September. Gap funds
will also cover Thrive & DA staff time to refine EAP processes, manuals, materials, and
documents for Phase 3. Phase 3 funds will support a new service contract for RJ&E to
begin planning and transition efforts.
2025 Q2 (Oct —Dec):
Phase 3 formally begins in October. Key milestones include shifting to Restorative
Justice & Equity (RJ&E) as our new RJ partner, transitioning to a single service location
at the Latino Community Association, hiring new RJ Facilitators, refining assessment
tools, conducting a full -team kickoff training, and launching regular monthly circle
practice sessions. The program will continue participant enrollment under our new
structure and will host a semi-annual State of EAP stakeholder meeting.
2026 Q3—Q6 (Jan —Dec):
The program will continue enrolling and serving RPs & HPs. By April, we will produce
and begin disseminating an informational video to help HPs understand the RJ process.
We will conduct semi-annual reviews of participant surveys and host monthly team
training. Half of the EAP team will attend the National Association of Community and
Restorative Justice Conference; the other half will attend the NW Justice Forum. We will
also engage local organizations to raise awareness of the EAP.
2027 Q7—Q8 (Jan —Jun):
We will continue facilitating RJ circles and staff training, assessing program outcomes,
and securing funding to sustain the EAP beyond 2027.
5
B. Engagement and Referrals
1. What is your service area? [50 words or less] - 49 words
Our primary service area is Deschutes County. Since Deschutes is a major
shopping/recreation hub for all of Central Oregon, young adults from Crook and
Jefferson who commit a crime in Deschutes are also eligible to participate in EAP.
Thrive's organizational service area also already covers those counties.
2. Who are your community and system referral partners, and at what stage in the
criminal legal or juvenile system do they occur? [500 words or less] - 265 words
The Emerging Adult Program (EAP) is a pre -charge initiative coordinated by the
Deschutes County District Attorney's Office and implemented in partnership with
community -based organizations. Restorative Justice & Equity (RJE) facilitates
restorative dialogues, Thrive Central Oregon provides wraparound support, and
Deschutes Defenders ensures counsel is available for RPs.
Restorative Justice & Equity Group [RJE] is a grassroots non-profit that has gained a
reputation as a reliable, professionally competent, and thoughtful community service
provider over the last eight years. RJE works with community groups to achieve
common goals around racial justice through restorative practices.
Thrive Central Oregon meets with Central Oregonians to connect them with the help
they are looking for. There are many resources in Central Oregon, but they can be
difficult to access alone. Thrive uses a person -centered approach to services and is
committed to promoting equity in Central Oregon.
The EAP activates at the earliest stage in the criminal legal process. When law
enforcement submits a police report involving a young adult (ages 18-25), the DA's
case management system flags the case and forwards it to the EAP-designated DDA
for review. The DDA screens for basic eligibility (e.g., residence, age, charge type),
guided by DA policy and EAP criteria.
If a young adult has already been cited or booked, the EAP DDA works to intervene
before arraignment; however, post -arraignment referral is still possible. Successful
completion of EAP in those cases results in dismissal and eligibility for expungement.
On average, 20 cases are reviewed monthly. About half are screened out due to charge
type (e.g., domestic violence, Measure 11 offenses, Driving While Suspended),
significant criminal history, eligibility for another program (e.g., Early Disposition
Program), or residence outside the tri-county area. The remaining half undergo deeper
9
analysis, including requests for additional evidence, and assessment of program fit.
Eligible cases are advanced for final review by the full EAP team.
By intervening early and engaging system and community partners in every step of the
referral process, EAP ensures consistent, equitable, and timely access for eligible
emerging adults.
3. Who is eligible for service, how will they be screened, and what onboarding
steps do new participants need to complete? Include type of cases (felony,
misdemeanor, person crimes, non -person crimes), and other eligibility criteria.
[500 words or less] - 313 words
To participate in the EAP, an RP must be between the ages of 18 and 25 and reside in
Deschutes, Jefferson, or Crook County. Eligibility is determined through a collaborative
screening process led by the EAP Deputy District Attorney (DDA) in accordance with the
District Attorney's Office's policies, procedures, and program philosophy.
The DDA ensures that only cases that would otherwise be charged are considered for
EAP and assesses whether restorative justice is appropriate for the circumstances of
each case. Not all technically eligible cases are suitable. For example, charges like
Driving While Suspended typically lack meaningful opportunity for restorative outcomes.
Additionally, cases may be diverted to more appropriate alternatives such as the Early
Disposition Program, Domestic Violence Deferred Sentencing Program, Mental Health
Court, or referred as violations per DA Office policy. The DDA retains discretion in
making these determinations, but our community partners —Deschutes Defenders,
RJ&E, and Thrive —are encouraged to provide input on any factors they believe the
DA's Office should consider during eligibility determination.
Eligible case types include both misdemeanor and felony offenses, with the exception of
Measure 11 crimes (Oregon's most serious felonies), sex offenses, and Driving Under
the Influence of Intoxicants (DUII), all of which are categorically excluded. Prior criminal
history does not automatically disqualify an RP, but significant or serious histories may
be grounds for exclusion.
Victim (Harmed Party or HP) opposition does not automatically exclude a case, but the
HP's concerns are weighed carefully as part of the eligibility review.
If selected, RPs are offered a voluntary opportunity to enroll. They are provided
confidential consultation with a public defender, receive a program orientation, and
complete an intake form and pre -survey before committing to participate. HPs are
similarly offered an orientation and asked to complete an intake and survey. Both RPs
a
and HPs complete post -surveys following program participation to support continuous
program evaluation.
4. How will your program engage harmed parties, and what supports will be
available to them? [250 words or less] - 250words
EAP is committed to empowering HPs by offering meaningful choices in how they wish
to engage. We strive to center their voices and increase participation by creating clear,
respectful, and trauma -informed pathways into the restorative process. Our Victim
Advocate (VA) currently attempts to contact all HPs by phone or email and mails an
information packet detailing the EAP process, options for participation, and restitution
forms. Once the RP is enrolled, the VA continues communication with the HP, unless
they request otherwise to keep them informed and to solicit RJ plan contributions.
Those practices will continue, and the EAP team will attempt to contact each HP at least
three times prior to the RP's enrollment using an enhanced script to explain the
restorative process, gather HP input, and offer THRIVE resources. An informational
video will also be created and shared with the HPs to better demonstrate what RJ is and
what to expect from the process.
In addition, an RJ Facilitator and the Support Specialist will connect with the HPs to
ensure their needs, questions, and expectations are addressed. HPs will also be
provided with additional time to contribute to the development of the RP's Restorative
Justice Plan before it is finalized, allowing both parties to reflect on proposed actions
and outcomes. If costs to participate (time off from work1childcare) would prevent
participation a stipend can be provided.
Finally, more prep, practice opportunities, and structured feedback will be provided to
improve how the team supports HPs throughout this experience.
5. How many clients were referred to you or do you anticipate being referred to
you during the last biennium (2023 — 2025)?
Between July 2023 and April 2025, 93 RPs were referred to the EAP. We anticipate
another 5-8 cases being referred between May and the end of June 2025. Between
July 2025 to June 2027, we anticipate approximately 125 cases being referred to the
EAP.
Of those, how many were served by your program, or do you anticipate serving?
The EAP served 60 RPs between July 2023 and April 2025 and anticipates enrolling an
additional four RPs prior to the end of June. During the next biennium, we anticipate
enrolling at least 60 participants -- between 2 to 3 RPs per month.
b. How many successfully completed the program or do you anticipate
completing?
As of April 30, 2025, the Emerging Adult Program (EAP) has served 95 responsible
parties (RPs), representing a total of 98 individual cases since its inception in 2021. Of
those, 67 RPs successfully completed the program, 16 remain active — 82% graduation
rate. Two RPs voluntarily withdrew, and 13 were revoked-10 for non-compliance and 3
due to a new criminal offense. Among all RPs who either graduated or were revoked, 12
have recidivated to date. We anticipate similar results during the next biennium.
c. How many are still receiving services from the program?
As of April 30, 2025, 16 RPs were actively enrolled and receiving services, and we
anticipate enrolling 10 additional RPs in Phase 2 before the end of September. Program
graduates remain eligible for support, and several have reconnected with our Support
Specialist post -completion. Our partnership with Thrive Central Oregon ensures that
even RPs who do not complete the program —or if EAP-specific funding lapses —can
continue accessing services. Thrive offers ongoing support through its broader
community programs and specializing in helping community members connect with
critical resources, including housing, leveraging the relationships built during their time
in EAP.
6. In the previous biennium, did you encounter any challenges or barriers that
impacted the number of clients you served? For implementation applicants, do
you anticipate any challenges or barriers that may impact your ability to meet
enrollment goals? [500 words or less]
While we did not experience major challenges that limited the number of responsible
parties (RPs) we could serve, our original two -track program design did result in delays
in getting participants into their initial restorative dialogue.
One ongoing challenge has been fully engaging harmed parties (HPs), which is
common in pre -charge programs like EAP. Many cases lack a clear, individual victim,
and participation in the restorative process is voluntary. In addition, we believe that for
some HPs on eligible EAP case there are participation barriers due to taking time off
from work and general uncertainty about the process can limit involvement.
6a. If so, what steps are you taking to address those barriers and meet enrollment
goals? [250 words or less]
E
To address past delays between enrollment and the initial circle, while also ensuring
RPs are better prepared, the EAP will transition from a two -track model to a unified
process and shift from relying on volunteers to hiring permanent Restorative Justice
Facilitators who will prep all participants.
To increase HP involvement, EAP is expanding and personalizing its outreach. For
business victims, our Victim Advocate (VA) will not only reach out by phone and email
but may also conduct in -person visits to encourage engagement —an approach that
proved successful in our other community outreach work. EAP will also test small
stipends to help offset any costs associated with participation, such as time off work,
childcare, or travel.
To strengthen understanding and trust in the process, we are developing a short video
explaining the EAP model and the role HPs can play. Additionally, we are increasing
the number of HP touchpoints throughout the program, not just with the Victim
Advocate, but also with the Support Specialist and RJ Facilitators. These steps aim to
build stronger connections and provide HPs with flexible and meaningful opportunities
to participate.
1. What does successful completion look like for your program? [500 words or
less]
Successful completion of the EAP for an RP, involves the young adult taking
accountability for the incident, participating in an orientation and a circle preparation
meeting, completing a restorative justice (RJ) agreement over a six -month -period,
avoiding new criminal charges, attending all RJ circles in person with one permitted to
be virtual, and maintaining regular monthly contact —by phone, Zoom, or in person —
with the program's Support Specialist.
The EAP program looks at success on two levels — one being the pure numbers (i.e.
success of the cases in the program) - Enrolling at least 30 young adults per year, 2)
Continuing a 75% or higher graduation rate, and 3) Maintaining an arrest recidivism rate
of 25% or less for program participants. The other is measuring the program's impact on
RPs, HPs, and the community. We are striving to see a measurable increase in HP
participation in the program. We also want to begin to see through survey data that the
program is building personal agency among our RPs and HPs in a way that they feel
more personally empowered and more satisfied about the situation from where they
were when they entered the program. Those metrics will help us determine the
program's long-term impact on the community.
To collect and assess this impact, we will be updating and expanding EAP's evaluation
efforts. We will work with an external evaluator to revise our current pre/post survey to
effectively measure these points. We will also have participants complete a short survey
m
after each restorative dialogue. These mini surveys will not only provide additional data
to help us better understand our participant's growth in the program, but they will also
aid us in gathering additional feedback from RPs who discontinue or are revoked from
the program. Currently, we have a zero -survey response rate among RPs who did not
complete the program.
The EAP also collects and evaluates data on our HPs and RPs through an intake form,
which helps us glean basic information about our participants, such as preferred
pronouns, education level, marriage and parental status, veteran status, living situation,
employment, disability, and even if they have a driver's license. This information helps
prepare the team and informs our Support Specialist of what type of resources may be
needed immediately. In addition, through this database, we also track RP progress
through and HP involvement in the program. The team tracks HP & RP touch
points/communications, RP progress, HP feedback, critical program dates (referral,
enrollment, circles, graduation or revocation), restitution payments, and level and type
of support provided. All this information is collected and maintained in a database
outside of the DA's Office and case management system to ensure confidentiality.
The DA's case management system is used to obtain referred cases as it provides the
team with details about the incident and information on the RP and HPs. That system
also enables us to track RP recidivism.
2. Are clients offered support services after they "graduate"? Yes/no
Yes
3. What data will you collect to demonstrate your program's success? Methods
may include participant and staff pre- and post- surveys, service data, recidivism
rates, etc. [500 words or less] - 460 words
The Emerging Adult Program (EAP) collects and analyzes a range of data to assess
program effectiveness, participant experiences, and areas for improvement. Data
collection begins at case screening and continues through program completion, with
strict protocols in place to maintain confidentiality and ensure informed consent.
Participant and case -level information —such as demographics, charge type, and law
enforcement narratives —is entered into a dedicated EAP database to keep records
separate from other systems. RPs and HPs each complete a comprehensive intake
form to support service planning and track baseline needs. We also document the
number and type of restorative justice circles, all participant contacts, restitution
payment and distribution, and the support services, resources, and funding provided
throughout the program.
11
All RPs complete a Release of Information (ROI) form so staff can coordinate care
across agencies. Additionally, we are developing a voluntary release form to allow RPs
and HPs to share their stories and program feedback publicly, helping communicate the
value of restorative justice and deepen community understanding.
Surveys are administered to RPs, HPs, staff, and stakeholders at multiple points
throughout the program. An external evaluator designs these pre- and post -surveys to
assess changes in knowledge, accountability, empowerment, and satisfaction. The
evaluator also conducts periodic interviews with staff, volunteers, and stakeholders to
supplement the quantitative data with qualitative insights.
In addition to formal evaluation tools, the EAP team collects anecdotal evidence from
real-time case observations, team debriefs, and peer -to -peer practice discussions.
Team members take notes during circles and other touchpoints to document insights
into participant growth, interpersonal dynamics, and emerging needs that may not be
fully captured through surveys alone.
Recidivism is tracked through the District Attorney's case management system. We
conduct routine reviews and pull criminal histories to monitor new arrests or charges for
all program participants, regardless of outcome (graduation, withdrawal, or revocation).
Together, these data sources help us assess program quality and impact. We
specifically analyze:
• The effectiveness of RJ Facilitators, Support Staff, and overall program coordination.
• Gaps in service delivery or training that may affect outcomes.
• Emerging needs of participants and the barriers they face.
• Trends in participant engagement, graduation rates, and reoffending.
• Feedback and satisfaction levels from HPs, RPs, and team members.
This information is used continuously to refine and improve the program. For example,
previous analysis led to streamlining the EAP structure into a single track to reduce
delays, hiring dedicated RJ staff, and expanding training for volunteers. Insights from
participants also informed new supports, such as creating an EAP demonstration video
and piloting monthly HP orientation sessions.
By collecting data that reflects both measurable outcomes and authentic human
experiences, the EAP remains responsive, transparent, and committed to growth —
ensuring the program evolves to better meet the needs of HPs, RPs, and the
communities we serve.
4. Explain what data on outcomes you have gathered/achieved in the last
biennium. [250 words or less]
12
With regards to outcomes, the EAP currently has a 12% recidivism rate — compared to
the 18-to-30-year-olds (2023/1st) arrest recidivism rates for Deschutes County (1 Year —
21.8%; 3 Year — 58.2%). Our recidivism rate takes into account pilot program
participants, some enrolled in the EAP in 2021.
Our pre/post-survey results indicated at our midterm point (Fall 2024) with 23 post -
surveys completed that EAP was moving in the right direction to achieve our program
outcomes. Eighty-three percent of our participants felt well prepared for the RJ process
by the post -survey, and 91 % felt very satisfied with the RJ process. In addition,
compared to the pre -survey, we saw a 70% increase in RPs stating they felt very
empowered after going through EAP, and 100% of our RPs responded in the post -
survey that they felt somewhat (8%) to very (92%) respected during the RJ process.
Finally, 87% felt very positive about the experience at the end compared to only 55% in
the pre -survey.
5. Is there anything else you would like to share about the proposed program,
including any information that is important to include that was not addressed
above? [500 words or less]
While the program is administered out of the District Attorney's Office it is a community -
based RJ program, and the entire EAP team is dedicated to the program's success and
the principles and practices of restorative justice.
Team Information - Stephen our EAP Victim Advocate, served as a victim advocate for
the DA's Office for over five years, before switching over to be the dedicated advocate
for EAP a year ago. Stephen helped launch the EAP pilot back in 2021. Sarah our DDA,
has only been in this position for three months, but was a former EAP defense attorney
and has experience working on non-profit grant programs that support legal, education
& advocacy work for immigrants and refugees. Amy, our program coordinator, joined the
team with a Master's in Public Health and has been part of the EAP team for almost two
years. She has extensive experience coordinating community programs across the
country. Kathleen, our program manager, has over two decades of experience
managing specialty programs and grants. Our new Thrive Support Specialist, Joe, who
just joined the team in May is bilingual and asked to be our prior support specialist's
replacement. Leslie, our defense attorney, has been supporting the program and our
RPs consistently for almost two years. Sorahi, RJE Executive Director joins the team
with extensive experience as an RJ practitioner that spans school and community work.
In addition, when recruiting for our new RJ Facilitators we will be looking for individuals
with experience in the RJ field, and ideally individuals with lived experience.
iiRl
The EAP program includes a Life Support Fund to help ensure the basic needs of our
RPs and HPs are being met to increase the likelihood that the RP will be successful in
the program and that the HP is also in a stable situation. Those funds can be used to
provide immediate access to food, transportation, housing stability, and communication.
They can be used to assist an RP or HP to take a class, help with childcare, complete a
certificate, or attend therapy. In addition, the funds can also be used to provide a
stipend when needed to assist an HP in being able to participate in a circle.
The EAP also has a small Restitution Fund. This fund ensures that an HP can still be
made whole if an RP is actively engaging in the program and has attempted to pay any
owed restitution, but full payment would cause instability in the RPs life.
Finally, we anticipate by June 30, 2027, the EPA will have enrolled a total of 152 RPs
due to the RJ grant funds. Assuming we achieve our goal of maintaining at least a 75%
graduation rate, a minimum of 114 young adults will have avoided conviction due to the
EAP RJ grant program.
1. Does your program offer services or intend to offer services that engage in and
serve rural or other historically underserved regions or areas in Oregon? [check
box with text response if yes — If yes, please provide details 150 words or less]
112 words
YES
While Bend and Redmond are considered suburban communities and constitute the
majority of our program participants due to the size of the community's populations, a
number of our participants (HPs & RPs) reside in rural areas of Deschutes County, as
well as in neighboring Crook and Jefferson Counties —both of which are classified as
rural.
To better serve historically underserved communities, we have translated all key
program documents into Spanish and provide interpreter services throughout the entire
EAP process when English is not the primary language. Our Support Specialist is also
bilingual, ensuring more accessible communication and support.
Additionally, a significant number of our participants face socio-economic
disadvantages, and we intentionally design our services to meet the need's of those
experiencing financial instability, housing insecurity, and limited access to traditional
support systems. It is why the EAP program has a restitution and support fund.
14
2. Does your program offer services or intend to offer services that engage and
provide culturally appropriate services to socially disadvantaged individual(s)?
[check box with text response if yes — If yes, please provide details in 150 words
or less] —142 words
Yes.
The majority of EAP participants needing culturally appropriate services community
members whose first language is Spanish. To support them, we've translated all core
program materials into Spanish and hired interpreters to assist with restorative circles.
With our program updates, EAP will be co -located in the Latino Community
Association's building to increase accessibility and cultural connection.
Staff and community facilitators receive ongoing training on inclusive practices,
including working with neurodivergent participants and using affirming language, such
as pronouns.
We also intentionally partner with Thrive Central Oregon for their expertise in supporting
socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and our Support Specialist is
bilingual. Many participants face barriers such as food insecurity, unstable housing, or
lack of access to communication tools. Life Support Funds are critical to helping
participants overcome these challenges —ensuring they are not only able to participate
but can build a stable foundation for long-term success.
3. Does your program currently partner or intend to partner with a researcher or
research entity to track and report on any outcome measures associated with the
applicant's program? [check box with text response if yes — If yes, please provide
details in 150 words or less]
Yes.
Greg Stewart is a researcher through Portland State University, who has worked with
EAP on Phase 2 to develop surveys, analyze program data, and provide outcome
reporting. Greg brings valuable expertise in evaluation design and ensures that
participant data is anonymized and analyzed with rigor. He recently informed us of his
plans to retire in the next two to three years, so we are proactively exploring options to
either continue working with him during this transition or to establish a relationship with
a new research partner. We believe it is essential to work with an experienced evaluator
who can ensure our tools are effective and culturally appropriate, and who can help us
draw meaningful insights from both qualitative and quantitative data to guide program
improvement.
4. Does your program address or intend to address case types as defined in OAR
213-003- 0001(14) and OAR 213-003-001(15) (definitions describing person
15
felonies and person misdemeanors)? [check box with text response if yes — If
yes, please provide details in 150 words or less]
Yes.
Emerging adults (ages 18-25) with person felonies and misdemeanors, as defined in
OAR 213-003-0001(14) and (15), are preliminarily eligible for the Emerging Adult
Program (EAP). As of April 30, 2025, we have enrolled 26 participants with pending
person felony or person misdemeanor charges, accounting for a total of 39 qualifying
charges.
5. Does your program address or intend to address case types that carry a
presumptive sentence of prison pursuant to the criteria in OAR 213-004-0001
through OAR 213-004- 0013 (describing the sentencing guidelines grid)? [check
box with text response if yes — If yes, please provide details in 150 words or less]
— 40 words
Yes.
The only cases automatically excluded from EAP include Measure 11 and sexual
assault. As of the end of April 2025, EAP had enrolled 25 participants with felony cases
to the program, which represents 33 felony counts referred into the program.
6. Does your program prioritize funding for direct services to the party harmed
and the person who committed the harm? [check box with text response if yes
If yes, please provide details in 150 words or less] —128 words
Yes
The EAP prioritizes funding for direct services to both the RP and the HP.
RPs are required to connect with our EAP Support Specialist at least once per month
during the program. Both enrolled participants and successful graduates remain eligible
to receive ongoing support, access program funds, and be referred to additional
services as needed.
All HPs are also eligible for these services. Although uptake has been limited to date,
we are working to increase engagement. Moving forward, both our Support Specialist
and Victim Advocate will conduct personalized outreach to each HP to ensure they are
aware of and can access available supports. Our goal is to ensure that every
participant —whether harmed or responsible —has access to the resources they need to
heal, stabilize, and move forward.
16
7. Does your program disqualify program participants based on prior criminal
history? [check box with text response if no— If no, please provide details in 150
words or less] — 98 words
No.
Prior criminal history is not an automatic disqualifier. Most of our participants have prior
juvenile and/or adult criminal history. We expanded EAP eligibility in Phase 2 after
initially limiting participation to individuals with only juvenile records during the pilot
phase, which restricted referrals too much.
While we do not disqualify participants solely based on their record, individuals with
extensive prior criminal history may be screened out if we determine the program does
not have the necessary resources or wraparound services to support their successful
participation or ensure the safety and well-being of the harmed party.
Data Attestation
Collect and submit to CJC program information, including but not limited to
expenditures, outcome measures, program evaluations, demographic information
pertaining to eligible and enrolled participants, satisfaction metrics for both the
responsible and harmed parties, and data collected in partnership with a
researcher or research entity."
Yes
17
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
MEETING DATE: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee 2024-2025 Annual Report and Safe
Sidewalk Awards
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
N/A
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The mission of Deschutes County Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee (BPAC) is to promote
and encourage safe bicycling and walking as a significant means of transportation in
Deschutes County. This presentation will summarize BPAC's major projects and initiatives
over the past year and will also present the Safe Sidewalk Awards to recognize property
owners and businesses who go above and beyond the legal requirements to remove snow,
ice, and debris from sidewalks.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Tanya Saltzman, Senior Planner
Jennifer Letz, BPAC Chair
David Green, BPAC Vice Chair
2024-2025 ANNUAL REPORT
1. Overview 1
2. Safe Sidewalk Awards 2
3. Central Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Summit 3
4. Events 4
5. Community Connections 4
6. BPAC Representation on Transportation Related Committees 5
7. Agencies and Organizations Involved With BPAC 5
8. E-Bikes and Micro -mobility Situation Update 6
1. Overview
The mission of Deschutes County Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee (BPAC) is to promote and
encourage safe bicycling and walking as a significant means of transportation in Deschutes
County. The committee serves to advise Deschutes County, the cities of Bend, La Pine,
Redmond, and Sisters, as well as the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). BPAC is
comprised of 13 volunteer citizen members with regional representation from across Deschutes
County. The committee holds monthly meetings to discuss current bicycle and pedestrian
projects and programs, provide input, and advise local agencies concerning bicycling and
walking interests and priorities. Each year, one meeting is held in La Pine, Sisters, and
Redmond to make sure all parts of the county have a chance to participate. BPAC meetings are
open to the public and include agency representatives as non -voting participants.
2. Safe Sidewalk Awards
BPAC created the Safe Sidewalks Awards in 2006 to recognize those businesses and property
owners who go beyond the legal requirements to remove snow, ice and debris from sidewalks.
This year we are honored to present Safe Sidewalks Awards to the following individuals and
organizations:
Cliff Stevens
NW Bend
Dennis Crotwell
SE Bend
Bill Colton
NW Bend
Bob Snyder
NE Bend
Chris Hoffner
NE Bend
Bruce Hanlon
SE Bend
Brooke Snavely
SE Bend
Bill Dierdorff
NW Bend
Doug Kaess
NE Bend
Charles W Spresser
NW Bend
Tim Shull
Sisters
Circle of Friends
Sisters
Lyle Speirs
NW Bend
Collier Ehlers
NE Bend
Leon Vannett
NE Bend
Perry Johnson
NE Bend
Ronnie Rasmussen
NE Bend
Sebastian
NE Bend
!Tony Salida
SE Bend
Chuck Boyer
NW Bend
Guy Johnson
NW Bend
South Red Carpet Carwash
SE Bend
2
3. Central Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Summit
The 11th Central Oregon Bicycle & Pedestrian Summit was held in Bend on April 10th, 2025
and was attended by over 80 people. This unique event brings together Central Oregon
residents, transportation planners, city and county officials and experts from around the state to
review what has been accomplished and what still needs to be done to make walking, bicycling,
and using transit safe, comfortable, and accessible for everyone in Central Oregon. Since the
summit started in 2011 it has been held in communities all across Jefferson, Crook, and
Deschutes counties.
Topics at this year's Summit included:
Welcome to Bend
Mayor Kebler
Keynote: Status of Regional
Phil Chang (OTC Commissioner)
Transportation
Panel:
Bob Townsend (CET)
Regional Transportation Efforts
David Amiton (ODOT)
Brennan Morrow (Madras)
Tarik Rawlings (Deschutes County)
Randy Winders (COTA-Prineville)
People Streets: Bend's Interface with the
Susanna Julber (City of Bend) and
Hawthorne Overpass
Kristin Reidelberger (Central
Oregon Landwatch)
Bike and Pedestrian Infrastructure:
Talia Jacobson (Toole Design)
Complete Streets
Infrastructure Tour
Chris Blake (City of Bend)
• Small Scale Street Maintenance
Peter McCaffrey (Old Mill)
Equipment
Brad Tower (City of Bend)
• Deschutes River Trail through the
Old Mill
• Riverfront Street —Connecting the
Deschutes River Trail
Partners providing financial support or other help for the event were:
• Cascades East Transit
• Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization
• Commute Options
• Bend Park and Recreation District
3
4. Events
BPAC organized a Permeable Pavement Workshop for agencies to discuss how permeable
pavement can help with storm drainage and how costs of installation and maintenance compare
with standard pavement. Participants included:
• ODOT Region 4
• Bend Parks and Recreation District
• City of Bend
5. Community Connections
The idea of community connections as described in the county's new Transportation System
Plan is gaining momentum.
Planning for the path from Bend to Lava Butte is complete. ODOT is expecting another appeal
of the project to the State Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). ODOT plans to begin
construction in Fall of 2026. ODOT led the project planning and will be managing the
construction. Deschutes National Forest, and Deschutes County are partners. A BPAC
representative was on the citizen's advisory committee.
The path from Lava Butte to La Pine is in the planning process. ODOT has selected a
preferred alignment but no funding for construction has been awarded. ODOT is the lead
agency and the Deschutes National Forest and Deschutes County are involved. BPAC has a
representative actively engaged in the citizen's advisory committee.
ODOT has begun preliminary work on the Sisters -Redmond -Bend active transportation plan.
The focus is on using the right-of-way for major roads between these cities. They plan to hire a
consultant to help develop the plan. Other agencies will be involved in the planning effort. BPAC
will be engaged in this effort.
0
6. BPAC Representation on Transportation Related
Committees
BPAC provides representation to many committees to ensure that bicycle and pedestrian
interests are considered as transportation issues are discussed or projects are planned. We
have had active representation on the following committees in the past year:
• Deschutes County
o Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) project nomination committee
o Transportation Safety Action Plan; Safety Working Group
• Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Region 4
o Bend to Lava Butte Trail Planning
o Lava Butte to La Pine Trail Planning
o US20/Greenwood Ave Facilities Planning
o Revere Corridor Facilities Planning (in partnership with City of Bend)
• Central Oregon Area Commission on Transportation (COACT) and Central Oregon
Intergovernmental Council (COIC)
o Crash Prevention Committee
• Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization (BMPO)
o Technical Advisory Committee JAC)
• Bend -La Pine School District
o Safe Routes to School Coalition
• Oregon Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (OBPAC)
7. Agencies and Organizations Involved With BPAC
One of the important functions BPAC provides is a forum for agencies and organizations
involved in transportation planning in Deschutes County. These agencies and organizations can
discuss projects, grants and funding, and design and construction techniques. This is one of
the few opportunities for representatives of these agencies and organizations to discuss these
topics in an informal but regularly scheduled setting. The following agencies and organizations
regularly participate with BPAC:
• Deschutes County
• City of Bend
• City of Sisters
• City of Redmond
• City of La Pine
• Sunriver
• Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 4
• Cascades East Transit (CET)
• Commute Options
• Bend Parks and Recreation District (BPRD)
• Bend Metropolitan Planning Agency (BMPO)
5
8. E-Bikes and Micro -mobility Situation Update
E-Bikes and other electric powered micro -mobility devices continue to be both areas of
contention and valuable transportation options for many people. In the 2024 Legislative
session, Oregon adopted the standard three class definition of a -bikes and restricted use of
e-bikes to those 16 years of age and older. Other electric micro -mobility devices such as
e-scooters, e-unicycles, and a host of other devices were not considered. Representative
Emerson Levy of Bend sponsored this legislation.
The three classes of a -bikes are used both by the legislature and agencies developing specific
use rules for a -bikes on their facilities. The three classes of a -bikes are:
• Class 1: Pedal assist only. Do not have a throttle. The maximum pedal -assist speed is
20 mph.
• Class 2: Have a throttle and must have operating pedals. The maximum speed is 20
mph.
• Class 3: Pedal assist only. Do not have a throttle. The maximum pedal -assist speed is
28 mph.
It is important to remember that a -bikes that have been modified to go faster or devices that
may look like e-bikes but designed to go faster are not e-bikes. These devices are considered
to be e-motorcycles and are regulated as such.
In the current session, two a -bike and micro -mobility bills are under consideration.
• HB 2963 would grant rebates of up to $1,200 for the purchase of e-bikes by income
qualified people.
• HB 3626, sponsored by Representative Levy, would
• Define "powered micro -mobility device."
• Allow children aged 14 and 15 to use Class 1 e-bikes.
• Require children under age 16 to wear protective headgear when using a bicycle,
electric assisted bicycle, motor assisted scooter, powered micro -mobility device
and certain non -motorized vehicles.
• Provide education for users of e-bikes and other micro -mobility devices.
Locally, the rules regarding use of a -bikes are still unsettled. Class 1 e-bikes are generally
allowed on Bend Parks and Recreation facilities where bicycles are allowed. The Deschutes
National Forest is still considering a proposal to allow Class 1 e-bikes on selected national
forest trails. E-bikes are allowed on BLM roads and motorized trails but not on non -motorized
trails unless specifically allowed. Smith Rock State Park only allows a -bikes on roads or trails 8
ft or wider which essentially bans e-bikes from all trails in the park except the paved trail
descending a short distance from the visitor center. E-bikes are allowed in bike lanes and travel
lanes on city streets but, unlike pedal -only bikes, are not allowed on sidewalks.
C.
E S COG2a
o <
MEETING DATE: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Request from Mountain View Community Development to lease property at the
County's Public Safety Campus for its Safe Parking program
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to direct staff to return with a draft lease allowing Mountain View Community
Development to utilize +/- 0.25-acres of County -owned property at the Deschutes County
Public Safety Campus for safe parking for the Board's review and consideration.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Mountain View Community Development will share information on its Safe Parking
program which has recently expanded from Redmond to Bend.
The presentation will also include community outreach results associated with potentially
utilizing +/- 0.25-acres of County -owned property at the Deschutes County Public Safety
Campus for the Safe Parking program.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
N/A
ATTENDANCE:
Kristie Bollinger - Deschutes County Property Management
Rick Russell - Mountain View Community Development
U)
a)
E
O
N
=
U
N
i
L
i
O
COO
O-
L
VJ
N
U
.i
�
O
J
CO
Co
L
E
L
f)
�
O
�
CL
ti
O
0
CN
(Ci
c
0
U
LO
U)
-0
C
E
.N
0
Q
—
N
U-)
ti
CO
d'
M
a
O
U
�
i
p
>,
4-0
CL
O
Q
M
4-a
U
o
N
a-
ED
n
W
cn
^E
W
CD
A
rl
^X,
�^
�
Y.L
U
�
X
•�
O
N
O
0
0
a)
CM
O
0)
O
C5
m
�
N
E
(�
E
c6
U
M
O
O
LO
0)
E
m
U
N
N
.L—
O
O
N
cm N
U L
� O
N �
H W
N
�
N
�
U
U
�
(6
CCi
to
O
�
�
U
O
O
U
=
Q
U
Q
ai
I
E o
O
m
U)
U >_
D
U C:
O
Q D
-�
U
U)
a)
U)
a)
►u
0 0 0
LJ
U)
� LLL
L.L >
O
N
O
-f-j
LLJ
O
U
m
O0
U
U
�
U
M
U
>CU
O
U
�
�
O
�
O
m
'
R
O
-0
�
N
O
�
U_
�
U
U)
U
o
Al
.
V—
O
cn
N
:f-j
(�3
LL
.
0
Q
Q
11
N
L
N
O
-�-'
0L
�J
N
Q
(Q
Q
O
O
a�
cCS
L
U)
_�
U
L
>
C:
a�
L
O
o
�
ca
cn
�
ti
oo
cy)
m
-r-
CO
Nui
N
Q
2
N
� E s oaG
2� BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
MEETING DATE: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: First reading of Ordinance 2025-010 — Plan Amendment and Zone Change for
property totaling approximately 279 acres southeast of the City of Bend (60725
Arnold Market Road)
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move approval of first reading of Ordinance No. 2025-010 by title only.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The Board of County Commissioners (Board) will consider a first reading of Ordinance
2025-010 on June 11, 2025, for a request for a Plan Amendment and Zone Change (file nos.
247-24-000404-PA, 405-ZC) for property totaling approximately 279 acres to the southeast
of the City of Bend and addressed at 60725 Arnold Market Road.
The electronic record can be accessed on the property website at:
https•//www deschutes.or /g cd/page/247-24-000404-pa-405-zc-bend-park-and-recreation-
district-bprd-comprehensive-plan-amendment.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None.
ATTENDANCE:
Nathaniel Miller, Associate Planner
DEVELOPMENTCOMMUNITY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Deschutes County Board of Commissioners (Board)
FROM: Nathaniel Miller, Associate Planner
DATE: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance 2025-010 - A Plan Amendment and Zone
Change (file nos. 247-24-000404-PA, 405-ZC).
The Board of County Commissioners (Board) will consider a first reading of Ordinance 2025-010 on
June 11, 2025, for a Plan Amendment and Zone Change (File nos. 247-24-000404-PA, 247-24-000405-
ZC). The subject property is located southeast of the City of Bend and is approximately 279 acres. The
property is addressed at 60725 Arnold Market Road, Bend.
I. BACKGROUND
The applicant and property owners, Bend Park & Recreation District (BPRD), requests approval of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the designation of the subject property (+/- 279 Acres)
from Agricultural (AG) and Surface Mining (SM) to Rural Residential Exception Area (RREA). The
applicant also requests a corresponding Zone Change to rezone the subject property from Exclusive
Farm Use -Tumalo/ Redmond/ Bend subzone (EFU-TRB) and Surface Mining (SM) to Rural Residential
(RR10). The property is comprised of approximately 105 acres of SM Zone and 174 acres of EFU Zone.
The applicant asks that Deschutes County change the zoning and the plan designations because the
subject property does not qualify as "agricultural land" under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) or
Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) definitions, and there are no active mining operations at the
former surface mine site.
A public hearing was conducted by a Hearings Officer on November 12, 2024. On January 8, 2025, the
Hearings Officer issued a recommendation of approval for the proposed Plan Amendment and Zone
Change. On April 2, 2025, the Board held a public hearing to hear additional testimony on the
applications. The Board established an Open Record Period after the hearing which closed at 4:OOpm
on April 23, 2025. On May 28, the Board deliberated to approve the requests, with a unanimous vote
in favor of the subject applications.
II. NEXT STEPS / SECOND READING
The Board is tentatively scheduled to conduct the second reading of Ordinance 2025-010 on June 25,
2025, fourteen (14) days following the first reading.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Ordinance 2025-010 and Exhibits
Exhibit A: Legal Descriptions
Exhibit B: Proposed Plan Amendment Map
Exhibit C: Proposed Zone Change Map
Exhibit D: Comprehensive Plan Section 23.01.010, Introduction
Exhibit E: Comprehensive Plan Section 5.12, Legislative History
Exhibit F: Hearings Officer Recommendation
Page 2 of 2
MEETING DATE: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Western Rivers Conservancy request for letter supporting BLM's funding request
to the Department of the Interior (Paulina Meadows / Little Deschutes River land
acquisition)
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
The Board can choose to approve or deny this request.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The Western Rivers Conservancy seeks a letter from the Board supporting the Bureau of
Land Management's request for $5,000,000 from the Fiscal Year 2026 Land and Water
Conservation Fund (LWCF) to acquire the 674-acre Paulina Meadows property along
Paulina Creek and the Little Deschutes River.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Jen Patterson, Strategic Initiatives Manager
[Letterhead]
(Date)
Lisa Clark - Field Manager
Deschutes Field Office, Bureau of Land Management
3050 N.E. 3rd Street
Prineville, OR 97754
Dear Field Manager Clark:
strongly supports the conservation of the scenic 674-acre Paulina Meadows property
along Paulina Creek and the Little Deschutes River. We support the Bureau of Land Management's
request for $5,000,000 from the Fiscal Year 2026 Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to acquire
this property, which includes two miles of the Little Deschutes River, a popular spot to float and explore.
Conservation of this property will provide additional opportunities close to LaPine to hike, fish and float,
ensuring that Central Oregon will continue to draw visitors to its natural beauty and outdoor adventures.
The property also includes the last unprotected over two-mile seasonal reach of Paulina Creek as it flows
from Newberry National Volcanic Monument to its confluence with the Little Deschutes River. The
property is home to some of the highest density of federally listed Oregon spotted frogs on the Little
Deschutes, whose recovery is a focus of the USFWS and the irrigation districts in Central Oregon as part
of a Habitat Conservation Plan. Restoration efforts on the property, along with preserving existing
pristine wetlands, will lead to additional habitat for the federally threatened Oregon spotted frog, thus
furthering this effort.
The area around the property, especially between La Pine and Sunriver, contains the largest mule deer
migration corridor in Oregon and an important winter range for both elk and deer. Acquisition of Paulina
Meadows will ensure protection of this critical habitat for wildlife.
We also support Western Rivers Conservancy's efforts to mitigate wildfire risk on the property during its
interim ownership. We encourage BLM to continue its efforts to use grazing in the area, eventually
including the property, to further manage for wildfire risks and as a tool for managing habitat.
This project will enhance recreational access to the river for rafters, anglers, hunters, hikers and
birdwatchers while protecting critical habitat for threatened native species. Thank you for your request for
funds from the LWCF to conserve this important property, and for your consideration of this letter of
support.
Sincerely,
A Request for a fetter of Stipport f-roni the
I)ESC_ARJ ITS, C:OIIN I � P)OARD O1 C,<)I\1111ssIOi Ef"s
Fiscal Year 2o2E
LITILE DESCMUTE-)
RivE .,
MEADOWS"
Project Facts
Funding Source:
Land and Water
Conservation Fund (LWCF)
Intended Steward:
BLM, Prineville District
Location:
Deschutes County,
Oregon
Project:
Paulina Meadows
Size:
674 acres
Congressional Dist.:
OR-2 (Rep. Cliff Bentz)
.for more inforitviation, please contav: Adelson Mathews,President 1 303-241-0131 1 nmathewsCa)westeriirivers.org
(_,oti.scrving Cotiflumce Lands for Rccrcation with
Pritn.c Habitat f-or Frog, Mulc _ c r a.n,d L
he Wild and Scenic Deschutes River is one of Oregon's
most beloved treasures. Located in north central Oregon,
the basin drains from the many glaciers along the Cascade
crest east to the Ochoco Mountains. Once the headwater streams
tumble out of the mountains and forests, the remainder of the
river carves a course north through the high desert to meet the
Columbia River just east of The Dalles.
The Little Deschutes, also a Wild and Scenic River in its upper
reaches, is the southernmost of the Deschutes' principal tributar-
ies, flowing from the Mount Thielsen Wilderness in the Deschutes
National Forest. The lower 80 miles of the Little Deschutes' 105-
mile course has beautiful, low -gradient meanders until it meets
the mainstem Deschutes near Sunriver Resort. Here the river val-
ley has gentle topography and depressions with forested wetlands,
marshes, meandering streams and shallow lakes. These features are
the result of nearby volcanic eruptions and depositions of highly
permeable material which created coarse, rapidly draining soils
and high groundwater tables. Paulina Creek, a tributary to the
lower Little Deschutes, flows from Paulina Lake in the Newberry
Crater National Volcanic Monument. The majority of the stream
is inside the monument and national forest, with just a short
reach from the national forest boundary to the Little Deschutes
confluence that is not in federal ownership.
The 674-acre Paulina Meadows property contains the lowest
2.3 miles of the creek as well as nearly 2 miles of the Little
Deschutes centered on their confluence. The BLM owns almost
all the adjacent land except for the property immediately upstream
on the creek that was recently conserved by the Deschutes Land
Trust. The property has a diverse mix of forest, meadow, riparian
and wetland habitats. The meadow habitats are part of the Pauli-
na Prairie, which is a combination of wet and dry meadows. The
upland areas are dominated by lodgepole pine woodlands with
scattered ponderosa pines. The undergrowth includes sagebrush
Project Highlights
• Enhancing access for boating, hiking, fishing, hunting
and bird watching on 2 miles of the Little Deschutes
• Conserving a stronghold for Oregon spotted frog and
migratory habitat for mule deer and Rocky Mountain elk
• Continued grazing management and preserving
heritage on a part of the historic Triangle Outfit ranch
Mitigating risk of fire with thinning on 180 acres north
of Quail Run Golf Course and residential area on Pine
Grove Road
and perennial bunchgrasses. The meadow areas are dominated by
grasses, sedges and rushes with copses of willow. The riparian corri-
dor consists of stands of willow, alder and cottonwood.
The property has a farmstead with a dilapidated house, plus sever-
al sheds and a set of corrals, once a part of the Triangle Outfit, an
expansive and historic ranch worked by generations of the Stearns
family — early pioneers in Central Oregon. The Triangle Outfit
has been broken up and sold over many years, and the Paulina
Meadows Property is one of the last large undeveloped blocks
that remains.
Special V�iluc s
Fish: The Little Deschutes and Paulina Creek are well above the
basin's natural and manmade anadromous fish passage barriers, but
they provide important water quality and habitat for the system.
Currently, the Little Deschutes is home to native rainbow and
introduced brown trout. Bull trout, which are ESA -listed as threat-
ened, once occurred in strong numbers in the Little Deschutes, but
May 2025
decades of habitat degradation caused their extirpation from the
basin. The recent conservation of the property immediately up-
stream on Paulina Creek includes a potential water right in -stream
dedication that could rewater the property's reach, and reconnect
the stream to the Little Deschutes.
Wildlife: The stretch of the Little Deschutes that runs through
the property has some of the densest occurrences of Oregon spot-
ted frog (OSF) in the entire basin. A federally threatened species,
OSF populations have seen a steep decline in recent years due to
predation by non-native bullfrogs, water withdrawals and habitat
alterations. The Paulina Meadows property has highly produc-
tive OSF breeding and rearing habitat, which are critical habitat
targets outlined in the species recovery plan. The project will
preserve these breeding grounds and continue to work towards the
eradication of bull frogs from the property, improving local OSF
population levels. Coupled with the 30-year water management
actions outlined in the Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation
Plan, this project will aid in the recovery of OSF and help to alle-
viate future water use restrictions in the basin.
The area around the property, especially between La Pine and
Sunriver, contains the longest mule deer migration corridor in the
state. The pattern of continued development and the associated
roads and traffic all threaten successful mule deer migration. In
addition to its role in the migration corridor, the property also
offers good mule deer and Rocky Mountain elk habitat. Other
notable wildlife species on the property include river otter, beaver,
Townsend's big -eared bat, Lewis's woodpecker, great -horned owl,
golden eagle, cinnamon teal and wood duck, among others.
Recreation: This extremely scenic property has potential to
become a recreational treasure for the public. It offers recreational
opportunities for a wide range of users with just under 2 miles of
the Little Deschutes River meandering through, as well as an exist-
ing network of interior gravel roads in close proximity to La Pine,
Sunriver, and the Newberry National Volcanic Monument.
The Little Deschutes provides great opportunities to fish for the
river's famous "redside" native rainbow trout and brown trout,
as well as horseback -riding, flat -water boating, hiking, wildlife
viewing and hunting. Paulina Meadows is just upstream from a
public boat launch and, in time, will be open for public access to
all recreational users.
Conservation Opportunity: Conservation of the Paulina Meadows
property will protect nearly 2 miles of the Little Deschutes River and
over 2 miles of Paulina Creek and will improve recreational access for
rafters, fishermen, hunters, hikers and birdwatchers. It will complete
conservation of the entire length of Paulina Creek and comple-
ment significant habitat restoration efforts immediately upstream.
Lastly, the project will safeguard important big game habitat within
the state's longest mule deer migration corridor and conserve critical
habitat for Oregon spotted frog.
Local Support: This project has received letters of support from
local business, non-profit organizations, and state and federal
agencies, including Oregon Hunter's Association, Rocky Moun-
tain Elk Foundation, Mule Deer Foundation, Visit Central Ore-
gon, Confluence Fly Shop, Fly and Field Outfitters, Trout Unlim-
ited, Deschutes River Conservancy, Upper Deschutes Watershed
Council, Deschutes Land Trust, Amphibian and Reptile Con-
servancy, Three Rivers Environmental ODFW, USFWS, BLM.
The La Pine Chamber of Commerce and the Newberry Regional
Partnership are currently considering writing letters of support. .
Status: WRC acquired the Paulina Meadows property in summer
2024 with a loan. We will manage and restore forest and riparian
habitats during our ownership and plan to convey to the BLM with
an FY26 LWCF appropriation.
From:
Alex Barton
To:
Nelson Mathews; Nick Lelack
Cc:
Jen Patterson; Brenda Fritsvold
Subject:
RE: request for letter of support / Paulina Meadows and the Little Deschutes River Project
Date:
Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:59:51 AM
Attachments:
image001.12ng
ima e002.Dng
image003.Dng
Caution: External email to Deschutes County: If unexpected or unfamiliar, be cautious
with links and attachments. Contact your IT Dept if unsure.
Nick,
Nelson asked that I write a summary of the LWCF to provide the BOCC with additional
context for this request. I've also summarized our understanding of BLM's intended
management strategy, and which may also be useful if the BOCC has questions. I hope
this is helpful, and let me know if I can provide any more information.
The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) was established in 1964 by Congress
to safeguard natural areas, water resources, cultural heritage, and outdoor recreation
opportunities to the American people. It is intended as a source of funds for the four
federal land management agencies (BLM, USFWS, NPS, and USFS) to accomplish land
acquisitions that meet these goals as welt as to support municipal, county, and state
governments provide outdoor spaces for their residents (ballparks, traits, open space).
Funds are derived from royalties paid by energy companies drilling for oil and gas on the
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) around the US, not by individual taxpayers. In 2020,
President Trumped signed the Great American Outdoors Act (GAOA), a major and
bipartisan piece of legislation championed by Rep. Mike Simpson -ID which made the
LWCF a permanent, and mandatory spending line item of $900,000,000. The LWCF is a
nationally competitive program within the agencies, and appropriations ultimately
require Congressional oversight and approval.
Local support is a prerequisite of the program. A letter of support from the Board of
County Commissioners is necessary for this project to proceed through Congress as it
works to pass a budget in FY26, including appropriations from the LWCF. We have listed
out the local and state level organizations that have provided letters of support in our 4-
page briefing book for reference.
BLM Management Focus: 1) Recreation (day -use), 2) Grazing, 3) Fire risk 4) limit illegal
camping. BLM will manage this property primarily for public day -use recreation, grazing,
and forest health.
1. Recreation: Day -use designation to begin with. Potential for interpretive site and
kiosk at the old homestead. This property has great access, and is highly visible.
Expectation is it will be popular with the public.
2. Grazing: WRC currently leases the property to a local rancher. Grazing will
continue with us as permittee or with another operation as soon as the BLM is able
to complete the planning process and absorb the property into its grazing program.
3. Forest/Fire Risk: WRC is conducting a major fuels reduction treatment on over
100+ acres of the property this summer to thin lodgepole pine stands adjacent to
residences and the Quail Run Golf Course. The BLM is already assessing the new
lands for wildfire risk and will include these acres in their long-term hazardous
fuels reduction plan. Under the current planning process, BLM will identify areas
that need a first entry fuels reduction (generally thinning and mowing) as well as
areas that might need maintenance treatments (just mowing). This will put these
acres on a cycle that will allow continued maintenance as needed and as
vegetation grows up.
4. Illegal camping: The property has perimeter fencing and gates in good condition.
BLM will maintain the infrastructure in working condition. Good fencing and
continued grazing on the property as well as expected day -use area designation,
are expected to limit transient camping on the property. Additionally, BLM is
coRahorat ingIA/ith the n(,.gni anri r?BP anri the KIPM;herry Pin ddinnal Partnerghirrn,
team, and paying into a fund for patrol and enforcement of illegal camping on BLM
lands. This partnership will continue.
n_�
Dest,
Alex Barton I Project Manager
Western Rivers Conservancy
t: 503-241-0151 x 225 c: 603-748-0838 1 www.westernrivers.org
From: Alex Barton
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:58 AM
To: 'Brenda Fritsvold' <Brenda.Fritsvold@deschutes.org>; Nelson Mathews
<nmath ews@westernrivers.org>
Cc:'Jen Patterson' <Jen.Patterson @deschutes.org>; 'nick.ieiack@deschutes.org'
<I IIII, II.ICiCl 1. it LW UCJI,I IU ICJ.VI g>
E S COG2�
MEETING DATE: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Deliberations: Reconsideration of Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Update
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
At the conclusion of deliberations, the Board may choose one of the following options:
• Move to approve the amended 2040 Plan and conduct first reading of Ordinance
2025-007 by title only
• Move to approve the amended 2040 Plan and direct staff for first reading of
Ordinance 2025-007 at a subsequent meeting
Move to continue deliberations.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners (Board) will deliberate on June 11, 2025, to
reconsider Ordinance 2024-007 - adopting the Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive
Plan (2040 Plan). The associated file number is 247-25-000145-PA. The entire record is
available on the project website: httr)s://bit.ly/Deschutes2040Reconsideration .
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Nicole Mardell, AICP, Senior Planner
Will Groves, Planning Manager
Stephanie Marshall, Senior Assistant Legal Counsel
MEMORANDUM
TO: Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Nicole Mardell, AICP, Senior Planner
Will Groves, Planning Manager
Stephanie Marshall, Senior Assistant Legal Counsel
DATE: June 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Deliberations: Reconsideration of Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive
Plan Update
The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners (Board) will deliberate on June 11, 2025, to
reconsider Ordinance 2024-007 - adopting the Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive
Plan (2040 Plan). The associated file number is 247-25-000145-PA. The entire record is
available on the project website: https://bit.ly/Deschutes204OReconsideration.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 2, 2024, the Board voted 2-1 to adopt Ordinance 2024-007, repealing and
replacing the 2011 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan (2011 Plan) with the 2040 Plan
(file no. 247-23-000644-PA). The decision was subsequently appealed by Central Oregon
Landwatch (COLW) to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). The 2040 Plan is not in effect
until the appeal process is resolved.
On February 20, 2025, the County received the Petitioner's Brief from COLW. Staff determined
that new issues were raised in the Petitioner's Brief that were not previously discussed at the
local level.' ORS and Oregon Administrative Rule allow local governments to reconsider a
legislative decision in response to new issues raised by LUBA appellants by conducting a new
hearing. The Board voted on March 5, 2025, to adopt Order No. 2025-004 initiating
reconsideration of the 2040 Plan. LUBA confirmed this approach through LUBA Order No.
2024-080, on March 12, 2025, enabling the Board to initiate a limited de novo hearing process
1 Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 197.835(3) and 197.797, also known as the "raise it or waive it" doctrine, does
not apply to legislative proceedings, therefore, applicants are not required to raise all arguments during the
local hearings process to preserve those issues for appeal.
to gather additional testimony relating to COLW's Petitioner's Brief. The County is required to
complete the hearing process and file a reconsideration decision by September 8, 2025.
II. TESTIMONY RECAP
The Board held public hearings on April 23, 20252 and May 21, 20253. At the conclusion of
the hearing on May 21, the Board closed the oral portion of the record and kept the written
record open until Wednesday, May 28 at 4:00 p.m. Deschutes County received 95 public
comments emphasizing:4
• New residential and industrial development on rural lands.
• Rezoning of farm and forest land.
• Acknowledged policies from the 2011 Plan.
I11. KEY ISSUES FOR DELIBERATION
The following summarizes the key issues for Board deliberation as raised in COLW's
Petitioner's Brief. The information below was initially presented in an April 23, 2025, staff
memorandum and has been updated to reflect the recent public hearing process.
A. Repeal and Replacement of the 2011 Plan
Ordinance 2024-007 stated that the effect of the 2040 Plan was to "repeal and replace" the
2011 Plan. COLW characterizes the 2040 Plan as "newly adopted," rather than "amended,"
because the ordinance recitals state that it repealed and replaced the 2011 Plan. Based on
this language, COLW challenges proposed goals and revised and acknowledged policies.
COLW believes they must all comply with Oregon Statewide Land Use Goals, including Goal
14, related to urbanization of rural lands.
Staff Response: The County did not intend to renounce acknowledged policies through the
adoption of the 2040 Plan. Instead, the use of the phrase "repeal and replace" was employed
to simplify the adoption of the plan. Staff recommends the Board adopt and updated
ordinance without "repeal and replace" language. Staff has provided a draft ordinance for
the Board's consideration to address this item - Ordinance 2025-007 as shown in Attachment
1. This ordinance clarifies that this Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA)
represents a conventional amendment to Deschutes County's Comprehensive Plan. A
"redlined" and clean copy of the 2040 Plan is included as Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-007
(Attachment 1 B). The redline version of the document identifies introductory statements,
and acknowledged goals and policies from Plan 2011, and those that were removed,
2 https://www deschutes org/bcc/page/board-county-commissioners-meeting-227
3 https•//www deschutes.org/bcc/page/board-county-commissioners-meeting 231
4 No agency comments were received.
Page 2 of 5
amended, or newly added. It also incorporates scrivener and formatting errors, along with
staff recommendations presented below.
B. Goal 14 Compliance - Urbanization of Rural Land
COLW alleges that certain provisions of the 2040 Plan violate Goal 14 because they allow
"unlimited conversion" of resource -zoned properties to residential, industrial, and
commercial uses. COLW challenges the following goals and policies:
1. Policy 3.3.6.a. Allow comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments, including for those
that qualify as non -resource land, for individual EFU parcels as allowed by State Statute,
Oregon Administrative Rule, and this Comprehensive Plan.
2. New Goals 9.2 and 9.3 and revised Policies 9.2.1 to 9.3.15 pertaining to Rural Commercial
and Rural Industrial Lands (see full language in Attachments 1 B2).
COLW believes Goals 9.2 and 9.3, Policy 3.3.6.a, and Policies 9.2.1 to 9.3.15 should specify
that plan amendments require a Goal 14 analysis, including site -specific application of the
Curry County factors .5 COLW asserts that, because the 2040 Plan repealed and replaced the
2011 Plan, the County is obligated to require Goal 14 analysis for nonresource land plan
amendment and zone change applications, regardless of whether the land remains rural.
Additionally, COLW argues that the effect of Policy 3.3.6.a. expands the County's rural
residential exception areas (Multiple Use Agricultural - MUA 10 and Rural Residential - RR10),
and Rural Industrial, and Rural Commercial zones without requiring a new Goal 14 exception.
Staff Response: Policy 3.3.6.a is an existing policy from the 2011 Plan and is acknowledged.
Deschutes County is not subject to periodic review.6 Consistent with state law, the Board,
after considering testimony and evidence in the record, has discretion to choose which
acknowledged policies they want to maintain from the 2011 Plan and which ones they want
to revise.
5 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development Commission and Curry County, 301 Or 447, 456, 724
P2d 268 (1986). The Supreme Court held that the county and the Land Conservation and Development
Commission had to determine whether the plan allowed no "urban uses" outside of urban growth boundaries
unless those "urban uses" were supported by exceptions to land use planning Goal 14 prior to acknowledgement
that the plan complied with the goals.
6 Deschutes County completed periodic review on January 23, 2003. Periodic Review is a term used in Oregon
law to describe the periodic evaluation and revision of a local comprehensive plan. Prior to 2003, state law (ORS
197.628 - 636) called for counties to review their comprehensive plans according to a periodic schedule
established by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). The Oregon Legislature
eliminated periodic review requirements for counties in 2003 (SB 920).
Page 3 of 5
During the May 21 hearing, Commissioner Chang requested the Board amend Policy 3.3.6.a
or add a new policy to address the cumulative impacts on rural lands from nonresource land
amendments.
Staff defers to the Board to discuss this option.
Goals 9.2 and 9.3 were added to the 2040 Plan because acknowledged Rural Industrial and
policies, Policies 9.2.1 to 9.3.15, did not follow a statement of overarching goals. The County
determined that this would be a best practice for the organization of the Comprehensive
Plan. Staff now recommends removing these new goals from the document. This change is
reflected in draft Ordinance 2025-007 for Board consideration to address COLW arguments.
Similarly, revisions to Policies 9.2.1 to 9.3.15 were adopted for simplification. Staff now
recommends the Board revert these policies back to their original acknowledged language
from the 2011 Plan (as noted in Attachment 2). This change is also reflected in draft
Ordinance 2025-007 for Board consideration to address COLW arguments.
C. Comprehensive Plan and Deschutes County Code and Comprehensive Plan
COLW argues that the MUA-10 and RR-10 zones allow for urban levels of density through
cluster and planned developments (PUD)' and that such allowances should be removed.
Each zone, respectively, allows for cluster or PUDs as conditional uses. The standards for
these types of developments either do not include a required minimum lot size (PUDs) or
allow smaller than 10-acre minimum lot sizes (cluster developments), which COLW argues
violate Goal 14 and could lead to urban levels of density if resource -zoned land is rezoned to
MUA-10 or RR-10.
Staff Response: Deschutes County Code (DCC) 18.32.040 and 18.60.060(C) are
acknowledged zoning regulations that have been in effect since 1992.8 As noted above,
Deschutes County is not subject to periodic review. The Board, consistent with state law,
after considering testimony and evidence in the record, has discretion to choose whether
these code provisions should be revised.'
Ill. NEXT STEPS
Following deliberations, staff will return with Ordinance 2025-007 for consideration of first
reading.
7 Deschutes County Code (DCC) 18.32.040(A) and 18.60.060(C).
8 Ordinance 92-055.
9 See Footnote #6.
Page 4 of 5
Attachments:
1. Ordinance 2025-007
A. 23.01 Legislative History
B. Updated Deschutes 2040 Document (redline version and clean versions)
C. 5.12 Legislative History
D. Findings
2. Comparison Table of Contested Policies - 2011 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan Language
Page 5 of 5
wT E S C-0a I
BOARD OF
-`� COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING
9:00 AM, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 2025
Barnes Sawyer Rooms - Deschutes Services Building - 1300 NW Wall Street - Bend
(541) 388-6570 1 www.deschutes.org
AGENDA
MEETING FORMAT: In accordance with Oregon state law, this meeting is open to the public and
can be accessed and attended in person or remotely, with the exception of any executive session.
Members of the public may view the meeting in real time via YouTube using this link:
http://bit.l /y 3mminzy. To attend the meeting virtually via Zoom, see below.
Citizen Input: The public may comment on any topic that is not on the current agenda.
Alternatively, comments may be submitted on any topic at any time by emailing
citizeninput@deschutes.org or leaving a voice message at 541-385-1734.
When in -person comment from the public is allowed at the meeting, public comment will also be
allowed via computer, phone or other virtual means.
Zoom Meeting Information: This meeting may be accessed via Zoom using a phone or computer.
To join the meeting via Zoom from a computer, use this link: http://bit.ly/3h3ogdD.
• To join by phone, call 253-215-8782 and enter webinar ID # 899 4635 9970 followed by the
passcode 013510.
• If joining by a browser, use the raise hand icon to indicate you would like to provide public
comment, if and when allowed. If using a phone, press *9 to indicate you would like to speak and
*6 to unmute yourself when you are called on.
• When it is your turn to provide testimony, you will be promoted from an attendee to a panelist.
You may experience a brief pause as your meeting status changes. Once you have joined as a
panelist, you will be able to turn on your camera, if you would like to.
Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all
programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities.
If you need accommodations to make participation possible, call (541) 388-6572 or
email brenda.fritsvold@deschutes.org.
Time estimates: The times listed on agenda items are estimates only. Generally, items will be heard in
sequential order and items, including public hearings, may be heard before or after their listed times.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN INPUT
The Board of Commissioners provides time during its public meetings for citizen input. This is an
opportunity for citizens to communicate to the Commissioners on matters that are not otherwise
on the agenda. Time is limited to 3 minutes.
The Citizen Input platform is not available for and may not be utilized to communicate obscene or
defamatory material.
Note: In addition to the option of providing in -person comments at the meeting, citizen input comments
may be emailed to citizeninput@deschutes.org or you may leave a brief voicemail at 541.385.1734.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Resolution No. 2025-030, extending 1.50 Limited Duration FTEs in the
District Attorney's Office for three months
2. Authorization to apply for a Criminal Justice Commission Restorative Justice Grant
3. Approval of an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with the Oregon
Department ent of Transportation for Traffic Signal Maintenance
4. Consideration of Board Signature on letters thanking Jill Adams and appointing Molly
Wells -Darling, for service on the Deschutes County Behavioral Health Advisory
Committee
5. Consideration of Board Signature on letter thanking Donna Harris, for service on the
Wolf Depredation and Financial Assistance Compensation Committee
6. Approval of the minutes of the May 13, 2025 Deschutes County Budget Committee
meeting
7. Approval of the Minutes of the May 30, 2025 BOCC Legislative Update
ACTION ITEMS
8. 9:10 AM Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee 2024-2025 Annual Report and
Safe Sidewalk Awards
June l 1, 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 2 of 4
9. 9:35 AM Consideration of a Notice of Intent to Award a contract for a Materials
Recovery Facility (MRF), Composting, and C&D Consultant Services
10. 9:45 AM Public Hearing - Deschutes County Code Title 12 Text Amendments
11. 10:15 AM Public Hearing: FY 2026 Deschutes County Fee Schedule and consideration of
Resolution No. 2025-014 adopting the Fee Schedule
Convening as the Governing Body for the 9-1-1 Service District
12. 10:25 AM Public Hearing: FY 2026 Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District Fee Schedule
and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-015 adopting the fee schedule
Convening as the Governing Body for the OSU Extension and 4H Service District
13. 10:30 AM Public Hearing: FY 2026 Deschutes County Extension and 4H Service District
Fee Schedule and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-016 approving the
Fee Schedule
Convening as the Governing Body for the Black Butte Ranch Service District
14. 10:35 AM Public Hearing: FY 2026 Black Butte Ranch Service District Fee Schedule and
consideration of Resolution No. 2025-18 adopting the Fee Schedule
Convening as the Governing Body for the Sunriver Service District
15. 10:40 AM Public Hearing: FY 2026 Sunriver Service District Fee Schedule and
consideration of Resolution No. 2025-017 adopting the Fee Schedule
Reconvening as the Governing Body for Deschutes County
16. 10:45 AM Consideration of Contract No. 2025-597, a Collective Bargaining Agreement
Between Deschutes County and the American Federation of State, County
and Municipal Employees Local 3997 (AFSCME)
17. 10:55 AM Request from Mountain View Community Development to lease property at
the County's Public Safety Campus for its Safe Parking program
18. 11:10 AM First reading of Ordinance 2025-010 —Plan Amendment and Zone Change
for property totaling approximately 279 acres southeast of the City of Bend
(60725 Arnold Market Road) .
June 11, 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 3 of 4
19. 11:20 AM Western Rivers Conservancy request for letter supporting BLM's funding
request to the Department of the Interior (Paulina Meadows / Little
Deschutes River land acquisition)
20. 11:25 AM Deliberations: Reconsideration of Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive
Plan Update
OTHER ITEMS
These can be any items not included on the agenda that the Commissioners wish to discuss as part of
the meeting, pursuant to ORS 192.640.
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
At any time during the meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS
192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations, ORS 192.660(2)(h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor
negotiations, ORS 192.660(2)(b), personnel issues, or other executive session categories.
Executive sessions are closed to the public, however, with few exceptions and under specific guidelines,
are open to the media.
21. Executive Sessions under ORS 192.660 (2) (h) Litigation and ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real
Property Negotiations
ADJOURN
June 11, 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 4 of 4