2026-7-Minutes for Meeting December 17,2025 Recorded 1/12/2026�wIES C-0
�{ I BOARD OF
•,,,- COMMISSIONERS
1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon
(541) 388-6570
Recorded in Deschutes County
Steve Dennison, County Clerk
Corninssioners' Journal
OJ2026-7
01 /12/2026 2:24:09 PM
r� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
9:00 AM WEDNESDAY December 17, 2025
Barnes Sawyer Rooms
Live Streamed Video
Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Patti Adair and Phil Chang. Also present were
County Administrator Nick Lelack; Senior Assistant Legal Counsel Kim Riley; and
BOCC Executive Assistant Brenda Fritsvold.
This meeting was audio and video recorded and can be accessed at the Deschutes County
Meeting Portal website www.deschutes.org/meetings.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair DeBone called the meeting to order at 9:00 am.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN INPUT:
Lynne Connelley said the process used to draft a BOCC district map was extremely
partisan, starting with the makeup of the District Map Advisory Committee. On
another subject, she said since 2020, the position of Chair of the Board of County
Commissioners has been passed back and forth between Commissioner DeBone
and Commissioner Adair and advocated for Commissioner Chang to be designated
as Chair for 2026.
Pete Shepherd relayed the history of Lane County's multi -year misadventure with
redistricting amid claims of rigged maps and unlawful conflicts of interest. He said
when a recent redistricting measure was put to the voters of Lane County, it not
only failed by 73.6%, but it failed in every precinct of the county.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 1 OF 19
Jim Barnett urged the Board to discard proposed district Map C and not forward it
to the voters. Saying that district map. -making is controversial and that no map
should be proposed until after the Board is expanded to five Commissioners, he
encouraged embarking on a different initiative that would focus on ensuring civility
and collaboration and gather input from residents before any possible maps are
drafted.
COMMISSIONER ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Commissioner Adair reported that she met with Dr. Greg Pereira, the new president of
COCC, who shared that the college is expanding its welding and machinery programs.
She added that COCC also runs the welding program at Deer Ridge which offers
inmates the opportunity to gain workforce training and improve job readiness upon
release.
Commissioner Chang announced that he will resume offering "Coffee with a
Commissioner" meet -ups in 2026.
CONSENT AGENDA: Before the Board was consideration of the Consent Agenda
Authorization to accept a Quality Incentive Measures payment from Central
Oregon Health Council for Public Health
2. Approval of Resolution No. 2025-039 adopting a supplemental budget, increasing
t_..:..-- +4. + Fi 1 e r 7lYl _ (FY 7(17 _) Deschutes
Or tr al lslerrit �� appr vpr iatioiis 'vVi�i ni i she riscai � Cai w�ry �r i w�rv� vCJ�i uses
County budget
Convening as the Governing Body for the Countywide Law Enforcement District (District 1)
3. Approval of Resolution 2025-047 adopting a supplemental budget increasing
Fiscal Year 2026 Beginning Working Capital and appropriations within the
Countywide Law Enforcement District (District 1) Fund
Convening as the Governing Body for the Rural LawEnforcement District (District 2)
4. Approval of Resolution 2025-048 adopting a supplemental budget which
increases FY 2026 Beginning Working Capital, and appropriations within the Rural
Law Enforcement District (District 2) Fund
Convening as the Governing Body for the OSU Extension and ¢H Service District
Approval of Resolution 2025-050 adopting a supplemental budget which
recognizes additional Fiscal Year 2026 Beginning Working Capital and increases
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 2 OF 19
appropriations within the Deschutes County Extension and 4-H Service District
Reconvening as the Governing Body of Deschutes County
6. Approval of third amendment to the lease with Telecare Mental Health Services
of Oregon for the Recovery Center at 20370 Poe Shoes Drive in Bend
7. Consideration of Board Signature on letters of appointment, reappointment and
thanks for various Special Road Districts
8. Consideration of Board Signature on letter thanking Judy Trego for service on the
Deschutes County Budget Committees
9. Consideration of Board Signature on letter appointing Jennifer Hobson-Hinsley
for service on the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Board
10. Approval of the BOCC meeting minutes of November 24 and December 1, 2025
CHANG: Move Board approval of the Consent Agenda as presented
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR:
CHANG:
DEBONE:
ACTION ITEMS:
Yes
Yes
Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
11. Proclamation: 250th Anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of
Independence
The Commissioners suggested changes to a draft proclamation celebrating the
250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which will
happen in 2026. The Board was in consensus to take no action at this time and
bring this back in January.
Commissioner Adair reported that students from Mountain View High School will
travel to Washington DC to march on Constitution Avenue at the end of May.
12. Consideration of first reading of Ordinance No. 2025-020: Sunriver
Community Limited District Text Amendment
Caroline House, Senior Planner, reminded that on December 3rd, the Board had
accepted the recommendation of the Hearings Examiner to approve the
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 3 OF 19
requested applicant -initiated text amendment to the Sunriver Community
Limited District.
CHANG: Move approval of first reading of Ordinance No. 2025-020 by title only
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Chair DeBone read the title of the ordinance into the record.
13. Consideration of Document 2025-1096, a Grant Agreement Between
Deschutes County and Craig and Lori Gales Living Trust
Commissioner Chang said processing of the rezone application submitted by
Craig and Lori Gales for property they own and desire to use to shelter homeless
persons is now estimated to cost $32,520, which is $7,520 more than expected.
Craig Gales, property owner, explained that after he and his wife purchased
property at 62150 Hamby Road as an investment, they began working with
homeless people and others in need. He said over time, many in the community
have come to support the Gales's idea of offering safe parking on their property
and, perhaps in the future, sustainable housing as well. He noted that many
people cannot afford the cost of rent in this area.
Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator, added that the Coordinated Houseless
Response Office (CHRO) recommended granting up to $25,000 towards the cost
of the rezone needed to allow a homeless shelter on the Gales property. Per the
terms of the proposed grant agreement, up to $25,000 would be transferred to
the County's Community Development Department upon submittal of a rezone
application to offset the cost of processing that. If the rezone is successful, a
restrictive covenant would be recorded to restrict the use of the property to
ensure that public funds spent on a rezone application for private property
would result in the public good.
Commissioner Chang said it will be important to be able to offer shelter at the
Gales property to homeless persons who are displaced from other areas. He
envisioned a planned, managed space with indoor/outdoor areas that could
accommodate between 75 and 100 people.
Referring to the big picture of the State land use system, Commissioner DeBone
did not support this proposal to spend public money for the government to
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 4 OF 19
review a proposed land use on private property.
Commissioner Adair said the Gales plan is thoughtful, and the Gales have been
working on it for a long time.
In response to discussion on the increased cost of the rezone application, Gales
asked that the County approve the proposed $25,000 grant, with the applicant
determining the source(s) of the other needed $7,520.
Will Groves, Planning Manager, explained that the added cost for the rezone
application is due to a decision by the Gales to pursue an exception to Goal 3,
which will increase the cost of processing the application. Stressing that he
cannot advise the property owner whether or not to seek a goal exception,
Groves noted advantages and disadvantages to this more robust process that
had not been discussed at the time the rezone was estimated to cost $25,000.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Community Development Director Peter
Gutowsky explained why CDD's fee waiver policy does not apply in this case.
Commissioner Chang asked that County Legal review CDD's fee waiver policy and
determine if a non-profit organization could partner with the Gales on this
rezone in a manner that could possibly qualify this application for the fee waiver.
CHANG: Move approval of County Administrator signature on Document 2025-1096, a
Grant Agreement Between Deschutes County and Craig and Lori Gales Living
Trust
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes no. Motion Carried 2 - 1
Commissioner Adair stated her appreciation for the vision and commitment of
the Gales to this project.
14. Consideration of Document 2025-1097, an Agreement Creating a Land Use
Restrictive Covenant involving property at 62150 Hamby Road, Bend
Deputy County Administrator Erik Kropp said in exchange for the grant funds
provided by CHRO, the Gales have agreed that, upon a successful application to
rezone the property at 62150 Hamby Road from Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) to
Multiple Use Agricultural - 10 or Rural Residential - 10, a restrictive covenant
shall be recorded limiting the use of the property to provide services to the
County's homeless population which include indoor/outdoor shelter, related
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 5 OF 19
services, and/or safe parking. If so recorded, the restrictive covenant would be
effective through December 31, 2040.
ADAIR: Move approval of County Administrator signature on Document 2025-1097,
an Agreement Creating a Land Use Restrictive Covenant (Gales' Project),
which, if effected, would be in place until 2040
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes no. Motion Carried 2 - 1
Commissioner Chang asked to know how many non -resource rezone applications
were pursued in the last three to five years as well as the total cost incurred in
terms of staff/BOCC/Hearings Officer time when such applications are contested.
15. Public Hearing: Consideration of Order No 2025-059 transferring jurisdiction
of portions of Northwest Way, SW Helmholtz Way, and NW Pershall Way to
the City of Redmond
Cody Smith, County Engineer/Assistant Road Director, shared that the City of
Redmond has requested jurisdiction of portions of Northwest Way, SW Helmholtz
Way, and NW Pershall Way in conjunction with the annexation of certain
properties into its Urban Growth Boundary. Smith shared maps detailing the
locations of the requested road segments, which together total approximately
0.69 mile of road.
Commissioner DeBone said in the case of a jurisdictional transfer of roadway, the
assuming jurisdiction takes over pavement maintenance, snow plowing, the
processing of utility locates in rights -of -way, etc.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Smith said these transfers will not result in
any appreciable savings to the County given their very limited total area.
The public hearing was opened at 9.54 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 9.54 am.
CHANG: Move approval of Board Order No. 2025-059 transferring jurisdiction of
portions of Northwest Way, SW Helmholtz Way, and NW Pershall Way to the
City of Redmond
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 6 OF 19
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
16. Public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-044 adopting a
supplemental budget in the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY 2026) Deschutes County
Budget
Dan Kieffer, Senior Budget & Financial Planning Analyst, reminded of a previous
Board action to establish a new PERS side account using funds from the PERS
Reserve Fund in the amount of $5 million and accepting a 25% match of $1.25
million from the State. He further described a proposed adjustment to the Fair &
Expo Center budget to reduce revenues and expenses byjust over $1,000,000 as
formerly planned self -produced events will not go forward.
The public hearing was opened at 9.57 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 9.57 am.
In response to discussion, Kieffer said Geoff Hinds, the former Fair & Expo
Director, had envisioned that the considered self -produced events would break
even but not be profitable.
ADAIR: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-044 increasing some appropriations
and decreasing others within the fiscal year 2026 Deschutes County Budget
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
17. Public hearing and consideration of Resolution 2025-046 adopting a
supplemental budget and increasing or reducing Fiscal Year 2026 (FY 2026)
beginning working capital
Cam Sparks, Budget & Financial Planning Manager, explained the need to adjust
all funds to replace the previous estimates of beginning working capital numbers
with actual figures, now that actuals are known. She explained that making these
adjustments ensures that no fund appropriates more resources than are
available. At the same time, these adjustments also allow for using available
resources that were not expended in prior years.
Sparks said because the supplemental budget for the following funds will change
budgeted appropriations by more than 10%, a public hearing is required:
• Fund 020 Code Abatement
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 7 OF 19
- Fund 1 55"Taylor Grazing
Fund 240 Court Facilities
- Fund 327 Federal Forest Title III
She added that the resolution would also appropriate $500,000 from the General
Fund to the County's emergency reserve fund.
Commissioner Adair acknowledged the excellent news that the Health Benefits
Fund currently has a balance of over $12 million.
Responding to Commissioner Adair regarding revisions to the Courthouse
expansion project budget, Sparks said those changes reflect the difference
between what the project team anticipated spending by the end of the fiscal year
and what was actually spent by that time.
Commissioner DeBone commented that at last Friday's Audit Committee
meeting, the Annual Consolidated Financial Report was published.
The public hearing was opened at 90,06 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10.-06 am.
CHANG: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-046 increasing or reducing Beginning
Working Capital and appropriations within the FY 2026 Deschutes County
Budget
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Convening as the Governing Body for the Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District
18. Public hearing and consideration of Resolution 2025-049 adopting a
supplemental budget which recognizes additional Fiscal Year 2026
Beginning Working Capital and increased appropriations within the
Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District
Budget & Financial Planning Manager Cam Sparks explained that because the
ending fund balance in the Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District Fund was
greater than estimated, this resolution would adjust the Fund's budget to
increase beginning working capital by $2,235,495, increase contingency
appropriations by $1,574,533, and increase reserves by $660,962 within the
Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District Fund.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 8 OF 19
The public hearing was opened at 10.• 10 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10.10 am.
ADAI R: Move approval of Resolution 2025-049 recognizing additional Beginning
Working Capital and increasing appropriations within the FY 2026 Deschutes
County 9-1-1 Service District Budget
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
19. Sales Agreement with Russ Bassett Corp. for 9-1-1 dispatch console
replacements
Sara Crosswhite, 9-1-1 Director, presented the proposed agreement to purchase
new dispatch consoles from Russ Bassett Corp. Crosswhite said after the District
budgeted $700,000 for console replacements, the vendor submitted a proposal
with a total cost of $538,255.35. She added that Deschutes County will donate
four of its removed consoles to Jefferson County.
Commissioner Adair commended Crosswhite on the fact that the District had
used its current consoles for 15 years.
Responding to Commissioner DeBone, Crosswhite said the District will soon start
training dispatchers at its back-up facility. In addition, all dispatchers will work out
of the back-up facility when the consoles are being removed and replaced.
CHANG: Move approval of Document No. 2025-1128, a sales agreement with Russ
Bassett Corp. for replacement of the 9-1-1 Service District dispatch consoles
at a total price of $538,355.35
ADAI R: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Convening as the Governing Body for the Sunriver Service District
20. Public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-056 adopting a
supplemental budget increasing and transferring appropriations in the
Sunriver Service District Public Safety Building Fund
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 9 OF 19
Mindy Holliday, Administrator of the Sunriver Service District (SSD), explained the
District's requested adjustments to its Fund 717 Budget to account for funds
which were not expended in the previous fiscal year and allow the District to
move forward with several deferred projects now that sufficient reserve funds
are available.
The public hearing was opened at 10: 17 am. There ,being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10.- 17 am.
ADAIR: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-056 increasing and transferring
appropriations within the Public Safety Building Fund within the Fiscal Year
2026 Sunriver Service District Budget
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Reconvening as the Governing Body for Deschutes County
21. Public Hearing regarding the proposed temporary conveyance of real
property commonly known as the Rease Cemetery located at 17799 Paulina
Lake Road in La Pine to Deschutes Land Trust, and further authorize
accepting said real property from Deschutes Land Trust
Kristie Bollinger, Property Manager, explained the request from the Deschutes
Land Trust that the County assist in the Trust's quest to perfect the title
associated with the Rease Cemetery at 17799 Paulina Lake Road in La Pine, which
was acquired by the County in 1993 through the property tax foreclosure
process. Because the location of physical survey monuments on the ground
differs from the legal description of the property, it has been difficult for the
Trust to acquire title insurance on property it owns to the north, west and south.
The public hearing was opened at 10.21 am. There being no one who wished to speak,
the public hearing was closed at 10.21 am.
CHANG: Move approval of Board Order No. 2025-058
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR:
CHANG:
DEBONE
Yes
Yes
Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 10 OF 19
22. Consideration of Resolution 2025-053 adopting a supplemental budget for
the Community Justice department and eliminating or reducing FTEs
Deevy Holcomb, Community Justice Director, spoke to the process undertaken by
staff to thoroughly and methodically assess constraints in the Community Justice
budget as well as possible reductions.
Trevor Stephens, Community Justice Business Manager, said in addition to
reducing the materials and services budget of the Adult Parole & Probation
division by $200,000, Community Justice also proposes to reduce its staff by
11.10 FTE which is about a 13% reduction.
Commissioner Adair expressed concern about the unintended consequences of
having fewer staff in Community Justice. Commissioner Chang said the County's
General Fund cannot sustain these positions in the face of inadequate State
funding.
Stephens added that the department is also requesting authorization to accept
a grant that would allow adding one limited duration family functional therapist
position.
ADAIR: Move approval of Resolution 2025-053 which decreases appropriations and
FTE within the Juvenile Community Justice Fund and the Adult Parole &
Probation Fund and adds one 1.00 grant -funded Limited Duration position
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Agenda item #24 was taken before item #23.
24. Consideration of Resolution 2025-052 eliminating 10.35 unfilled Full Time
Equivalent (FTE) positions in the Health Services Department and adopting
a supplemental budget
Health Services Director Holly Harris and Health Services Business Officer Cheryl
Smallman presented an overview of significant fiscal pressures being
experienced by Health Services as well as strategies developed to maintain core
services by evaluating ways to reduce costs through position vacancies and other
savings and by maximizing partnerships.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 11 OF 19
Specifically, Health Services has proposed eliminating select positions to reduce
indirect charges and align to actual staffing at an estimated FY 2026 savings of
approximately $1.5 million, consisting of nearly $1.3 million in direct personnel
costs and about $213,0004215,000 in indirect/contingency savings. All 10.35 FTE
proposed for elimination are currently vacant positions. In addition, the
department will reappropriate $2 million previously anticipated for a possible
facility purchase and instead conduct a comprehensive review of space needs.
Continuing, Harris described financial challenges relating to Medicaid enrollees,
noting that some persons who fall off of Medicaid may yet have substantial
healthcare needs and still require services for which the County would no longer
be reimbursed.
Commissioner Adair spoke to the need to reduce the administrative burden
placed on Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs) by the Oregon Health
Authority (OHA) and announced that OHA Director Sejal Hathi would like to meet
with her and Harris on this issue.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Harris confirmed that Health Services will
retain other vacant positions which the department envisions filling.
Responding to Commissioner Adair, Smallman said 39.83 vacancies remain.
Discussion ensued of the impacts on the Behavioral Health and Public Health
divisions expected to result from the position reductions.
Responding to Commissioner Chang, Public Health Director Heather Kaisner
recounted the decision to close the County's Reproductive Health clinic and the
ensuing reliance on community partners to provide reproductive health services.
Harris said in the same way, the County will lean on partners to continue harm
reduction services.
Noting that some babies are born addicted to drugs, Commissioner Adair asked
what Public Health is doing to instruct pregnant women not to use drugs. Kaisner
explained the County's home visit nurse program and other programs which
offer outreach and services to pregnant women.
Commissioner DeBone said legislative engagement will be important in the
upcoming short session in terms of funding needed for health services.
CHANG: Move approval of Resolution 2025-052 to eliminate 10.35 unfilled full-time
equivalent positions in the Health Services Department and adjust
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 12 OF 19
appropriations in Funds 270 and 274
ADAIR: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
23. Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-054, reducing 11.00 approved FTEs
within the Sheriff's Office
Regarding the proposal of the Sheriffs Office to reduce FTEs by 11.00, DCSO
Business Manager Jeff Price said as of today, DCSO has 271 FTE positions, of
which 237.5 are filled.
Sheriff Ty Rupert stated a sustainable funding ceiling near 254 FTE and described
operational challenges including shifts when six deputies are on countywide
patrol. He reviewed cost -containment measures such as discounts from vendors
for paying invoices within ten days and the purchase of single -band instead of
dual -band radios for the jail at a significant cost savings of $30,000.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Sheriff Rupert said while he knew of no
prescribed or advised ratio of FTE per capita, DCSO's staffing levels must
accommodate absences due to vacation, illness, training, or the need to testify at
a criminal trial. He spoke to efforts to reduce overtime costs and pledged that
service to the community will not be reduced.
ADAIR: Move approval of Resolution No. 2025-054 reducing 11.00 approved FTEs
within the Sheriffs Office budget
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
Nick Lelack, County Administrator, praised County leadership for making the
difficult decisions to eliminate 27.95 positions. Noting that such decisions can
place additional burdens on existing staff and require finding efficiencies, he said
although difficult, these kinds of good decisions benefit the organization and
community.
A break was announced at 11.27 am, The meeting resumed at 11.35 am.
Agenda items #29 and #30 were taken before the lunch recess.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 13 OF 19
29. Treasury Report for November 2025
Bill Kuhn, County Treasurer, presented the Treasury Report for November 2025.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Kuhn said the County's portfolio is set up
very well for an economic slowdown, particularly due to a strong three-year
investment ladder and the limited exposure to callable investments.
30. Finance Report for November 2025
Robert Tintle, Chief Financial Officer, presented the Finance Report for November
2025.
Responding to Commissioner DeBone, Tintle confirmed that the County's
accounts payable system recognizes payment arrangements which offer a
discount for paying invoices within ten days of those being issued. Tintle added
that paying within ten days can be challenging depending on how the invoice is
sent and processed. In cases where a discount is offered, desired and expected,
staff must be mindful of the timing and process approvals as termed.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Tintle said the federal Secure Rural Schools
(SRS) program has been re -authorized by Congress. It is not yet known whether
the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program will be re -authorized.
A lunch recess was announced at 12:14 pm. The meeting reconvened at 1.00 pm.
25. Presentation by Limitless Solutions & NorthRenew Energy for a potential
solar project on County -owned property north of Ft. Thompson Lane, Bend
Property Manager Kristie Bollinger introduced Joseph Mazone of Limitless
Solutions and Mark Green of NorthRenew Energy who presented a concept for a
utility -scale solar project of approximately 115 MW on roughly 529 acres of
County -owned property north of Fort Thompson Lane outside of Bend's Urban
Growth Boundary.
Mazone and Green outlined environmental due diligence, viewshed analysis,
screening options, proximity to existing transmission lines, and a prospective
project timeline with construction targeted for 2029, subject to permitting and
community input.
Mazone listed anticipated benefits of the project, including local production of
energy to meet new demand.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 14 OF 19
Discussion ensued of possible requests for naturally -landscaped setbacks from
adjacent properties and whether those would be practical or accommodated,
especially larger setbacks having no discernible impact on the visibility of the
project from other areas. Discussion also ensued of the property's rare, close
proximity to transmission lines and how this renders the proposal far more
economically viable than others.
In response to Commissioner Chang, Planning Manager Will Groves described
the process for applying for a conditional use permit and spoke to the
requirement that projects so permitted be compatible with the surrounding area.
Commissioner Adair supported proceeding with gathering public feedback
before any decisions are made. Referring to a solar farm along Highway 126, she
objected that some solar farm operators do not take initiative to screen their
projects.
Referring to prior community pushback on the proposal to use this property as a
campground, Commissioner Chang advised that the community outreach make
clear that this property will not remain open space in perpetuity. Commissioner
Adair said conducting public outreach door-to-door enables sharing information
in a more personal way.
The Board directed staff to proceed with community engagement via a listening
session and to prepare a Memorandum of understanding for Board
consideration with the understanding that no lease will be entered into or
negotiated before community outreach is conducted.
26. FY 2027 Budget Development - Limited Growth Strategies
Budget Manager Cam Sparks and Chief Financial Officer Robert Tintle requested
Board direction on General Fund expenditure growth, possible departmental
special budget requests, and Internal Service Fund charges. Staff presented 4%,
5%, and 6% General Fund expenditure growth alternatives and an option to grant
up to $350,000 in departmental special requests, noting that updated modeling
for Phase II of the Wage Equity Project reduces forecasted General Fund
sustainability under a 5% limited growth scenario to seven years.
ADAIR: Move to direct that General Fund expenditure growth be limited to 4% in
FY 2027
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 15 OF 19
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
With regard to whether to allow departments to submit special requests,
Commissioner Chang noted the possibility that the State may allocate funding to
community justice programs, public health modernization efforts, or other
needs.
County Administrator Nick Lelack said any special requests would be submitted
after the legislative session concludes.
ADAIR: Move to allow consideration of Special Requests for General Fund
departments and departments receiving General Fund transfers for a
combined total of up to $350,000
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
DEBONE: Move to cap Internal Service Fund charges at 8% with exceptions authorized
by the Budget Officer
ADAI R: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
27. Wage Equity Project Update: Phase II (Market Study for AFSCME and Non -
Represented Positions)
Whitney Hale, Deputy County Administrator, introduced the results of the study
undertaken for Phase II of the County's Wage Equity Project, the goal of which is
to ensure that compensation for AFSCME and non -represented positions is
aligned with the County's compensation philosophy.
Susan DeJoode, Human Resources Director, said most of these positions were
last analyzed in 2017. The recent survey of 254 classifications was completed
using six comparables, with the result that 784 positions (519 AFSCME and 265
non -represented) are recommended for compensation adjustments. The
Steering Committee recommended that the Board approve the identified
adjustments for impacted classifications effective June 22, 2026.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 16 OF 19
Budget & Financial Planning Manager Cam Sparks said the total annual impact of
nearly $7.1 million has been included in the long-term forecast model of the
General Fund.
Health Services Director Holly Harris and Community Development Director Peter
Gutowsky shared their support for the adjustments. Commissioner Adair hoped
that these adjustments would help the County retain excellent staff.
CHANG: Move approval of an implementation plan for Phase II of the County's Wage
Equity Project as recommended by the project steering committee, with
identified adjustments for impacted classifications having an effective date of
June 22, 2026
ADAI R: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
28. Proposed Policy Updates: HR-5: Non -Wage and Salary Compensation and
HR-17: Payroll Deductions for Health Club Membership Dues
Deputy County Administrator Whitney Hale explained proposed updates to HR-5,
which were driven by a recent opinion from the Oregon Ethics Commission, as
well as the recommendation to sunset Policy HR-17 which is no longer relevant.
ADAI R: Move approval of County Administrator signature on proposed updates to
HR-5 and move to sunset policy HR-17: Payroll Deductions for Health Club
Membership Dues
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAI R: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
31. Board selection of Chair and Vice Chair for 2026
Commissioner Chang said that Commissioners DeBone and Adair have denied
him his rotation as Board Chair in several previous years.
Commissioner Adair observed that the world is very divided and said that every
day, she hopes that people will reach across divides and in doing so end
divisions.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 17 OF 19
ADAIR: Move that Commissioner Chang serve as Chair of the Board in 2026
CHANG: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
ADAIR: Move that Commissioner DeBone serve as Vice Chair of the Board in 2026
DEBONE: Second
VOTE: ADAIR: Yes
CHANG: Yes
DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Motion Carried 3 - 0
OTHER ITEMS:
• Commissioner DeBone reported on last Tuesday's meeting of the Sunriver-La Pine
Economic Development Board.
• Commissioners DeBone and Chang met with leaders of Oregon's Military
Department, including Brigadier General Alan Gronewold. Commissioner Chang
noted that one item discussed was the possible consolidation of National Guard
armories in the future.
• Commissioner DeBone attended last Thursday's Oregon Living With Fire meeting.
• Commissioner DeBone said at last week's Fair Board meeting was David Bishop's
final meeting as a Board member after having served in that capacity for 25 years.
• Commissioner DeBone noted the annual Central Oregon Legislative Summit was
this past Monday.
• Commissioner Chang reported on Monday's Regional Housing Council meeting,
sharing that the group is working to identify its legislative advocacy agenda for the
upcoming short session and saying he can advocate for those as authorized by the
BOCC on its behalf or on his own.
• Commissioner Adair said the Festival of Trees event was very well -attended.
• Commissioner Adair said when she met with Dr. Greg Pereira, the new president of
COCC, he relayed efforts to change the institution's name to "Central Oregon
College."
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
At 3:12 pm, the Board convenedasthe GoverningBodyforthe Deschutes County9-1-1 Service
Districtand entered Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2) (d) Labor Negotiations.
The Board exited Executive Session at 3:28 pm and directed staff to proceed as discussed.
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 18 OF 19
At 3:28 pm, the Board reconvened as- the Governing Body for Deschutes Countyand entered
Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property Negotiations.
The Board exited Executive Session at 3:41 pm and directed staff to proceed as discussed.
ADJOURN:
Being no further items to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 3:41 pm.
�p24'
DATED this I day of VUi 2for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners.
ATTEST:
RECORDING SECRETARY
PA TI ADAIR, VICE CHAIR
PHIL CHANG, COMMISSIONER
BOCC MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2025 PAGE 19 OF 19
wU `Za BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
a {
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input or Testimony
SubJ 'ect:' SI rt C l Date:
r
Name e-+
Address -Ij
Phone #s7
O (�v
E-mail address J
In Favor Neutral/Undecided Opposed
Submitting writtendocuments as part of testimony? ❑ Yes `I �No
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
SUBMIT COMPLETED REQUEST TO
RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
o BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Citizen Input or Testimony
Z.
Y
Subject: D��; �-� �" Date:
; _.
Name
Address
Phone #s 5D
t
E-mail address
❑ in Favor ❑ Neutral/Undecided Opposed
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes ❑ No
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
{'y Pei
SUBMIT COMPLETED REQUEST TO
RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE MEETING BEGINS
J ES c
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
o {
REQUEST TO 'SPEAK
Citizen Input; or Testimony
Subject:
Date: .d 7-Z
i/144'L
Name
Address L
<47
`7
Phone #s V
E-mail address 11
u
in Favor NeutraU7ndecided apposed
Submitting
ubmittin written documents as part of testimony? Yes No
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
SUBMIT COMPLETED REQUEST TO
RECORDING SECRETARY BEFORE MEETINGBEGINS
For Recording Stamp Only
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREG
PROCLAMATION
Whereas, on July 4, 2026, America will commemorate the 250th 'nniversary of the
signing of the Declaration of Independence; and
Whereas, this historic milestone is an opportunity to celebrate our nation's
principles of liberty, equality, and government by copsent of the governed; and
Whereas, the United States Constitution stand as the world's longest -running
constitution, and our Bill of Rights bestows p 'vileges elemental to being American,
including the right to freedom of religion a d the right to trial by a jury of one's
peers; and
Whereas, since our nation's foundi94, Americans have courageously and
successfully risen up against socie I wrongs such as slavery and taxation without
representation; and
Whereas, America's civil rig s movement in the 20th century inspired other civil
rights movements around e globe; and
Whereas, Americans vicemen and women have gone to battle against tyranny on
the world stage at gr at personal sacrifice; and
Whereas, AmeV
established the world's first national park and further built the
Panama Canal the mankind's collective benefit; and
Whereas, by believing in progress and scientific and cultural advancements,
American innovation has spurred inventions such as polio vaccines, MRIs,
anesthesia, blood banks, electricity, airplanes, the internet, the satellite GPS system,
air conditioners and cell phones in addition to enduring artistic pursuits and
athletic pastimes such as jazz, blues, rock n' roll, country music, baseball, basketball,
and football;
Page 1 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners encourages
members of the community to reflect on our country's past and honor the
contributions of all who have taken part in the shaping of our nation as we move
forward to continue making history over the next 250 years.
Dated this day of 2025 by the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners.
Anthony DeBone, Chair
Patti Adair, Vice Chair
ATTEST:
Phil Chang, Commissioner
Recording Secretary
Page 2 of 2
T ES COG�-A
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Board Signature on letters of appointment, reappointment and
thanks for various Special Road Districts
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move Approval of Board Signature on the following letters:
• Thanking Jerry Meilink for service on the Ponderosa Pines East Special Road District
Board
• Thanking Russ Reed for service on the River Bend Estates Special Road District
Board
• Appointing Jim Chambers for service on the River Bend Estates Special Road District
Board
• Reappointing Donald Olsen for service on the Cascade View Estates Special Road
District
• Thanking Karen Stone and Mark Dietz for service on the Newberry Estates Special
Road District
• Appointing Joseph DelDonno and Danielle Pokorny for service on the Newberry
Estates Special Road District
• Thanking Kate Reed for service on the River Forest Acres Special Road District
• Appointing Christopher Bond for service on the River Forest Acres Special Road
District
• Thanking Bill Shurte for service on the Pinewood Country Estates Special Road
District
• Thanking Billie Jo Ameika and Ben Ives for service on the Deschutes River Recreation
Homesites Special Road District #6
• Appointing James Arneson and Isaac O'Casey for service on the Deschutes River
Recreation Homesites Special Road District #6
• Reappointing Deanna Jolly for service on the Panoramic Access Special Road District
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
N/A
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
None
BOARD 1
Lux• • •
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of first reading of Ordinance No. 2025-020: Sunriver Community
Limited District Text Amendment
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move approval of first reading of Ordinance No. 2025-020 by title only.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
On December 17, 2025, staff will present Ordinance No. 2025-020 to the Board of County
Commissioners ("Board") for consideration of First Reading. On December 3, 2025, the
Board voted 3-0 to adopt the Hearings Officer's Recommendation. The ordinance attached
hereto will formally adopt the Text Amendment.
The attached memorandum provides additional background.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Caroline House, Senior Planner
MEMORANDUM
TO: Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
FROM: Caroline House, Senior Planner
DATE: December 10, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of First Reading: Sunriver Community Limited District Text Amendment
On December 17, 2025, staff will present Ordinance No. 2025-020 to the Board of County Commissioners
("Board") for consideration of First Reading. On December 5, 2025, the Board voted 3-0 to adopt the
Hearings Officer's Recommendation. The ordinance attached hereto will formally adopt the Text
Amendment.
I. OVERVIEW OF TEXT AMENDMENT
Sunriver Resort ("Applicant") requested a Text Amendment to Deschutes County Code ("DCC") Section
18.108.140. The requested amendment only affects properties with existing structures that are partially
located in both the Sunriver Community Limited ("CL") and Resort Equestrian ("RE") Districts. There is one
property with these conditions, which is identified on County Assessor's Maps i 9-1 1-31 as tax lot 300.
The Applicant narrowly tailored the requested text amendment to address a split zoning issue for the
existing Sunriver Boarding Stable structure, which is split zoned CL District and RE District. This text
amendment will expand the allowed uses of the existing Sunriver Boarding Stable structure located in
the CL District to include the uses allowed outright in the RE District.
11. NEXT STEPS
Staff will return on Wednesday, January 7, 2026, for Second Reading of Ordinance 2025-020.
III. RECORD
The record for this matter is as presented at the following Deschutes County Community Development
Department website:
https://www deschutes org/cd/page/247-25-000035-ta-sunriver-community-limited-district-text-
amendment
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 2025-020 and Corresponding Exhibits
REVIEWED
LEGAL COUNSEL
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
An Ordinance Amending Deschutes County
Code Title 18, Zoning Ordinance, Relating to Uses * ORDINANCE NO. 2025-020
Allowed in the Sunriver Community Limited District.
WHEREAS, Sunriver Resort Limited Partnership applied for a text amendment to Deschutes County
Code ("DCC") Section 18.108.140 (Planning Division File No. 247-25-000035-TA); and
WHEREAS, after notice was given in accordance with applicable law, a public hearing was held on
October 23, 2025, before the Deschutes County Hearings Officer; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the Hearings Officer forwarded a recommendation of approval of
the proposed text amendment to the Board of County Commissioners ("Board"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to DCC 22.28.030(B), the Board shall, in the absence of an appeal, adopt the
Hearings Officer's recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Board voted 3-0 on December 3, 2025, to accept the Hearings Officer's
Recommendation; now, therefore,
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDAINS
as follows:
Section 1. AMENDMENT. DCC Section 18.108.140, Sunriver Community Limited (CL District), is
amended to read as described in Exhibit "A", attached and incorporated by reference herein, with new language
underlined and deleted language set forth in st -i'�_.
Section 2. FINDINGS. The Board adopts as its decision the Hearings Officer's Recommendation,
Exhibit "B", attached and incorporated by reference herein.
PAGE 1 OF 2 - ORDINANCE NO.2025-020
Dated this of , 2026 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
Date of 1" Reading
Date of 2" d Reading:
Commissioner
Anthony DeBone
Patti Adair
Philip Chang
Effective date
ANTHONY DeBONE, Chair
PATTI ADAIR, Vice Chair
PHILIP CHANG, Commissioner
day of , 2025.
day of , 2026.
Record of Adoption Vote:
Yes No Abstained Excused
day of , 2026.
PAGE 2 OF 2 - ORDINANCE NO.2025-020
Exhibit Ato Ordinance 2025-020
CHAPTER 18.108 URBAN UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITY ZONE; SUNRIVER
18.108.140 Community Limited; CL District
A. Uses Permitted Outright. The following uses are permitted outright, subject to the
applicable provisions of DCC 18.116 and DCC 18.124:
1. Picnic and barbecue areas, including picnic tables and benches.
2. Recreational path.
3. For anv structure existing as of April 7, 2026 that is located partially in the CL District
and partiallin the RE District, amuse permitted in the RE District is also permitted
in the portion of the structure in the CL District.
HISTORY
Repealed & Reenacted by Ord. 97-078 §2 on 1213111997
Amended by Ord. 2025-002 §26 on 312812025
Amended by Ord. 2025-020 §1 on x/xx/xxxx
Exhibit Ato Ordinance 2025-020
Mailing Date:
Exhibit B to Ordinance uesday, November 4, 2025
2025-20
HEARINGS OFFICER RECOMMENDATION
SUNRIVER COMMUNITY LIMITED DISTRICT TEXT AMENDMENT
FILE NUMBER:
SUBJECT PROPERTIES/
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
247-25-000035-TA
Mailing Name: SUNRIVER RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Map and Taxlots: 1911310000300 /2011060000500
Accounts: 136299 / 259336
Situs Address: 17400 DESCHUTES RD, SUNRIVER, OR 97707
Radler White Parks & Alexander, LLP ("Applicant")
REQUEST: The Applicant requests approval of a text amendment of the
Deschutes County Code (DCC) Section 18.108.140, Sunriver
Community Limited (CL) District, to add the following new use as a
use permitted outright:
"3. For any structure existing as of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF
ORDINANCE] that is located partially in the CL District and
partially in the [Resort Equestrian] RE District, any use
permitted in the RE District is also permitted in the portion of
the structure in the CL District."
The applicability of the proposed amendment is limited to the
subject properties listed at the top of this recommendation.
HEARINGS OFFICER: Gregory J. Frank
STAFF CONTACT: Caroline House, Senior Planner
Phone: 541-388-6667
Email: Caroline.House@deschutes.org
RECORD: Record items can be viewed and downloaded from:
https•//www.deschutes.org/cd/page/247-25-000035-ta-sunriver-
community-limited-district-text-amendment
1
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
1. GENERAL FINDINGS:
Applicant filed an application (Applicant's Proposal") for a text amendment as summarized
above (Request Section). A Notice of Public Hearing was published consistent with the
Deschutes County Code ("DCC") setting a hearing date for 1:00 p.m. on October 23, 2025 (the
"Hearing"). The Hearing was held virtually and in -person (in the Deschutes Services Building —
First Floor — Barnes & Sawyer Rooms, 1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, OR 97703). Present at the
Hearing were Deschutes County staff, Gregory J Frank ("Hearings Officer") and representatives
of the Applicant. No person testified at the Hearing, either virtually or in person, in opposition
or neutral to the Applicant's Proposal.
Deschutes County Staff Planner Caroline House ("House") provided a presentation/overview of
Applicant's Proposal and Staff's analysis of Applicant's Proposal. Attorney Steven Hultberg
("Hultberg") appeared at the Hearing and provided a brief summary of Applicant's Proposal.
Hultberg requested the Hearings Officer adopt the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Staff
Report, Sunriver Community Limited District Text Amendment (Staff Report").
The Staff Report, in the Conclusion and Recommendation section, stated the following:
"Based on the findings above, staff believes the proposed text amendment complies with
the applicable criteria of DCC Title 18, DCC Title 22, DCC Title 23 and the applicable
sections of OAR. Staff requests the Hearings Officer determine if the Applicant has met
the burden of proof necessary to justify the proposed text amendment."
The Hearings Officer reviewed the Staff Report and other documents contained in the public
record. The Hearings Officer finds the Staff Report correctly identified relevant approval criteria.
The Hearings Officer finds Staff's analysis of the relevant approval criteria and evidence in the
record is factually and legally supportable. The Hearings Officer concurs with the first sentence
of the Staff's above quoted conclusion and therefore finds that Applicant's Proposal has met the
legally mandated burden of proof to merit approval.
The Hearings Officer incorporates the Staff Report (attached to this Hearings Officer
Recommendation) as additional findings and conclusions.
11. RECOMMENTATION:
The Hearings Officer recommends approval of Applicant's Proposal.
Y144e_ P::::47_a*4a
4r�r
Gregory J. Frank
Deschutes County Hearings Officer
Attached: Staff Report for 247-25-000035-TA
2
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
STAFF REPORT
SUNRIVER COMMUNITY LIMITED DISTRICT TEXT AMENDMENT
FILE NUMBER: 247-25-000035-TA
SUBJECT PROPERTIES/
OWNER: Mailing Name: SUNRIVER RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Map and Taxlot: 1911310000300 /2011060000500
Account: 136299 / 259336
Situs Address: 17400 DESCHUTES RD, SUNRIVER, OR 97707
APPLICANT: Radler White Parks & Alexander, LLP ("Applicant")
REQUEST: The Applicant requests approval of a text amendment of the Deschutes
County Code (DCC) Section 18.108.140, Sunriver Community Limited
(CL) District, to add the following new use as a use permitted outright:
"3. For any structure existing as of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF
ORDINANCE] that is located partially in the CL District and
partially in the [Resort Equestrian] RE District, any use permitted
in the RE District is also permitted in the portion of the structure
in the CL District."
The applicability of the proposed amendment is limited to the subject
properties listed at the top of this staff report.
STAFF CONTACT: Caroline House, Senior Planner
Phone: 541-388-6667
Email: Caroline House@deschutes.org
RECORD: Record items can be viewed and downloaded from:
https://www.deschutes.org/cd/Daee/247-25-000035-ta-sunriver-
com m u n ity-li mited-d istrict-text-a mend ment
1 1 7 NW Lafayette Avenue, Bend, Oregon 97703 1 P.O. Box 6005, Bend, OR 97708-6005
A� (541) 388-6575 �@d@deschutes .org wwodeschutes.org/cd
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
I. APPLICABLE CRITERIA:
Deschutes County Code (DCC)
Title 18, Deschutes County Zoning Ordinance:
Chapter 18.108, Urban Unincorporated Community Zone - Sunriver
Chapter 18.136, Amendments
Title 22, Deschutes County Development Procedures Ordinance
Title 23, Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 1, Comprehensive Planning
Chapter 4, Urban Growth Management
Oregon Administrative Rules (OARS)
OAR 660-012, Transportation Planning
OAR 660-015, Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines
OAR 660-022, Unincorporated Communities
II. BASIC FINDINGS:
SITE DESCRIPTION: The Applicant's proposed text amendment will only affect properties with existing
structures that are partially located in both the CL and RE Districts within the Urban Unincorporated
Community of Sunriver. In total, there are onlytwo properties in Deschutes County with the RE District
zoning designation and both properties also contain CL zoned land or abut the CL District. These
properties are identified on Deschutes County Assessor's Maps 19-11-31, as tax lot 300 and 20-11-06,
as tax lot 500 (see Figure 1 below). Sunriver Resort Limited Partnership (L.P.) owns both tax lots and
below staff provides a more detailed site description for each tax lot.
Tax Lot 300
This +/-104-59-acre irregularly shaped property is split zoned RE District, CL District, and Resort Marina
(RA) District in the Urban Unincorporated Community of Sunriver. In addition, the Airport Safety (AS)
and Landscape Management (LM) Combining Zones and Sunriver Flood Plain District (SUFP) apply to
this tax lot. The southeast lot line abuts River Road, a private local road, and Deschutes Road, also a
private local road, bisects the northern third of the tax lot. Paved recreational paths are established
along the east lot line and southern areas of the tax lot. The north lot line and portions of the west lot
line abut the Deschutes River. The Sunriver Resort Marina is established on the northern third and
the Sunriver Stables are established on the south-central area of the property. Most of the Sunriver
Stables structures are located entirely in RE District. However, there is one existing equestrian stable
structure located partially in the CL District and partially in the RE District (see Figure 2 below).
According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Deschutes County and the Local Wetlands
Inventory, respectively, this property is partially located in the 100-year flood plain and contains
significant areas of jurisdictional wetlands.
Tax Lot 500
This +/- 26.40-acre irregularly shaped property is entirely zoned RE District. The AS and LM Combining
Zones and the SUFP also apply. The east lot lines abut River Road and the west lot lines abut the
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 2 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Deschutes River. Paved recreational paths are established along the west lot lines abutting the
Deschutes River. The remaining areas of the property appear to be undeveloped and there do not
appear to be any structures on this tax lot. According to the FEMA FIRM and the Local Wetlands
Inventory, respectively, this property is partially located in the 100-year flood plain and contains
significant areas of jurisdictional wetlands.
Figure 1 - Subiect Properties & Base Zone Designations
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 3 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Figure 2 - Existing Structure on Tax Lot 300 Partially in the CL and RE Districts
(Reference Blue Bubbled Structure)
PROPOSAL: The Applicant's Burden of Proof includes the following background on why this text
amendment has been requested:
The applicant represents Sunriver Resort Limited Partnership, the owner of the Sunriver
Stables, located at 57215 River Rd, Sunriver, OR 97707. The minor text amendment proposed
in this application is intended to address an existing boarding stable building (the "Boarding
Stable") that appears to straddle the line between the SU-CL (Sunriver - Community Limited)
and SU-RE (Sunriver - Resort Equestrian) zones.
The proposed text amendment is narrowly tailored to address the split zoning issue of the
Boarding Stable that staff recently brought to our attention. The Boarding Stable itself was
approved in 2007 in County Land Use Case File No. SP-07-43 (the "2007 Approval"). However,
the 2007 Approval is ambiguous about the approved location of the new building and, as far
as we and staff can tell, the Boarding Stable today straddles the zoning boundary line. The
erroneous location was not identified by the County in its inspections at the time of
construction nor by the owner in the 18 years since the 2007 approval of the Boarding Stable.
Although we have not been able to identify the precise cause of this issue, the applicant hopes
that this text amendment can bring resolution to the issue staff have brought to our attention.
The Applicant's Burden of Proof includes the following information on the proposed language of the
text amendment:
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 4 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
The applicant proposes the following amendment to the text of Deschutes County Code
("DCC") Title 18, Chapter 18.108, Sunriver - Community Limited zone (" CL" ). The proposed
change would permit existing structures that straddle the zoning boundary between the CL
zone and an abutting Sunriver - Resort Equestrian zoned area ("RE') to conduct the use
permitted in the RE zone in the portion of the structure in the CL zone.
To the applicant's knowledge, the only existing structure that straddles those two zoning
boundaries in the county is the Boarding Stable approved in the 2007 Approval.
The amendments would not remove text from the code, and would add the following text,
indicated in blue underline:
18.108.140 Community Limited: CL District
A. Uses Permitted Outright. The following uses are permitted outright:
1. Picnic and barbecue areas, including picnic tables and benches.
2. Recreational path
3. For any structure existing as of rEFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE that is
located partially in the CL District and partially in the RE District, any use
permitted in the RE District is also permitted in the portion of the structure in
the CL District.
As the relevant text only applies to an existing structure "partially in the CL District and
partially in the RE District", the proposed amendment is limited in applicability to locations
where the CL and RE districts are abutting. To the applicant's knowledge, and consistent with
the zone's special purpose for the Sunriver community, the RE district is only applied to lands
in the area to the west of the Sunriver Airport, where it abuts the CL district to the north and
south, as shown on the following page.
Staff finds the proposed text amendment will expand the uses permitted outright, for the portion
of the existing structure in the CL District, to also include:
• An equestrian facility;
• A park;
• A playground; and
• A building or buildings each not exceeding 8,000 square feet of floor area which include any
combination of:
o Retail sales, rental, and repair services commonly associated with equestrian
facilities.
Lastly, staff notes all uses permitted outright under DCC 18.108.140(A) are subject to the applicable
provisions of DCC 18.116 and DCC 18.124. Based on the Applicant's response above, the Applicant
is not proposing to "remove text from the code" and these provisions would continue to apply.
PUBLIC AGENCY COMMENTS: The Planning Division mailed notice on February 5, 2025, to several
public agencies and received the following comments:
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 5 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Deschutes County Building Division, Randy Scheid
NOTICE: The Deschutes County Building Safety Divisions code mandates that Access,
Egress, Setbacks, Fire & Life Safety, Fire Fighting Water Supplies, etc. must be specifically
addressed during the appropriate plan review process with regard to any proposed
structures and occupancies.
Accordingly, all Building Code required items will be addressed, when a specific structure,
occupancy, and type of construction is proposed and submitted for plan review.
Deschutes County Transportation Planner Tarik Rawlings (August 6 2025, Revised Comments)
I have reviewed the transmittal materials for 247-25-000035-TA for a text amendment
request to DCC 18.108.140 (Sunriver Community Limited (CL) District) to add the following
as a use permitted outright:
"3. For any structure existing as of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE] that is located partially
in the CL District and partially in the RE District, any use permitted in the RE District is also
permitted in the portion of the structure in the CL District."
The proposed text amendment is limited to the following properties, totaling 130.99 acres
within the Sunriver Resort Equestrian District (SURE), Sunriver Flood Plain District (SUFP),
Sunriver Community Limited District (CL), Sunriver Resort Marina District (SURA), Flood Plain
(FP) Zone, and the Airport Safety (AS) and Landscape Management (LM) Combining Zones:
Mailing Name: SUNRIVER RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Map and Taxlot: 1911310000300 /2011060000500
Account: 136299 / 259336
Situs Address: 17400 DESCHUTES RD, SUNRIVER, OR 97707
I have reviewed the application materials for potential Transportation Planning Rule (TPR)
effects. While the proposal would effectively allow some form of structural development
where there is currently no allowance, the location of the subject zoning districts (SURE,
SUCL) within the larger Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community (UUC) demonstrates
compliance with the allowable uses for UUCs as defined in OAR 660-022-0010 and further
described in OAR 660-022-0040. Overall, the proposed amendments appear to comply with
TPR provisions. Staff has also reviewed the proposed amendments against the Sunriver UUC
goals and policies outlined in the draft Deschutes County 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Chapter
11), and the current 2010-2030 Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan and finds that the
proposal appears to comply with the various initiatives outlined therein and produces no
foreseeable adverse effects.
Any subsequent development on the subject properties may require transportation analysis
pursuant to DCC 18.116.310, produced by an Oregon -certified Transportation engineer, if
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 6 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
and when such development is proposed. As the property's adjacent roadways are private
roadways, staff finds the access permit requirements of DCC 12.28.050 do not apply.
Board Resolution 2024-038 sets a transportation system development charge (SDC) rate of
$5,856 per p.m. peak hour trip. As the proposal is a legislative amendment and no
development is included, no SDCs apply to the subject proposal.
Oregon Department of Aviation. Brandon Pike
Thank you for providing the opportunity for the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODAV) to
comment on file number(s): 247-25-000035-TA
ODAV has reviewed the proposal and prepared the following comment(s):
1. In accordance with FAR Part 77.9 and OAR 738-070-0060, future development
at this site may be required to undergo aeronautical evaluations by the FAA
and ODAV. The applicant can use the FAA's Notice Criteria Tool to determine
which proposed structures (including any cranes or other tall construction
equipment) warrant a notice of construction. If so, they are required to provide
separate notices of construction to both the FAA and ODAV. The applicant
should receive the resulting aeronautical determination letters from the FAA
and ODAV prior to approval of any building permits.
2. The height of any new structures, trees, and other planted vegetation shall not
penetrate FAR Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces, as determined by the FAA and
ODAV.
3. The subject property appears to be located partially under the transitional
surface of Sun river Airport. Pursuant to the State of Oregon's Airport Land Use
Compatibility Guidebook, some forms of development are not considered
compatible land uses when located near a public -use airport. Per Table 3-4:
Compatible Land Uses per FAR Part 77 Surfaces and FAA Safety Areas, the
following land uses are identified as incompatible developments when located
under the transitional surface of public -use airports: residential uses, places
of public assembly, most recreational uses, and resource production and
extraction uses.
ODAV does not recommend approval of development which is found to be in conflict with
the Airport Land Use Compatibility Guidebook. The applicant is advised to contact Brandon
Pike, Aviation Planner with ODAV (see contact information below) to discuss potential
aviation -related concerns or limitations with the property.
Please reach out if you have questions or concerns. I'm available if the applicant has any
questions or wants our input at this stage.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 7 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
The Applicant contacted ODAV and, in response to that communication, ODAV provided the
following additional comments on February 25, 2025:
Thank you for providing this clarifying information. It's helpful to know the background and
purpose of the application.
These comments are partially intended to alert the property owner and/or applicant about
the potential considerations that may need to be taken into account when owning and
developing property near a public -use airport. So, while there is no new development
proposed with this application, we include this information (specifically calling out future
development) to ensure it enters the record and alerts the owner and future developers of
these potential implications.
ODAV does not oppose the text amendment as proposed, so long as the considerations
we've identified are recognized for future development.
The following agencies did not respond to the notice: Deschutes County Assessor, Deschutes
County Code Enforcement, Deschutes County Onsite Wastewater Division, Deschutes National
Forest, Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife, Oregon Parks & Recreation, Sunriver Airport Manager,
Sunriver Fire Department, Sunriver Owners' Association, Sunriver Utilities, and US Fish & Wildlife.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The Planning Division mailed notice of the application to all property owners
within 250 feet of the subject properties on February 5, 2025. The Applicant also complied with the
posted notice requirements of Section 22.24.030(B) of Title 22. The Applicant submitted a Land Use
Action Sign Affidavit indicating the Applicant posted notice of the land use action on February 10,
2025. No public comments were received.
NOTICE REQUIREMENT: On September 3, 2025, the Planning Division mailed a Notice of Public
Hearing to all property owners within 250 feet of the subject property and public agencies. A Notice
of Public Hearing was published in the Bend Bulletin on Sunday, September 7, 2025. Notice of the
first evidentiary hearing was submitted to the Department of Land Conservation and Development
on September 9, 2025.
REVIEW PERIOD: According to DCC 22.20.040(D), the review of the proposed quasi-judicial text
amendment application is not subject to the 150-day review clock.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 8 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
III. FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS:
Deschutes County Code
Title 18, Deschutes Zoning Ordinance
Chapter 18.136, Amendments
Section 18 136.010, Amendments
DCC Title 18 may be amended as set forth in DCC 18.136. The procedures for text or
legislative map changes shall be as set forth in DCC 22.12. A request by a property owner
for a quasi-judicial map amendment shall be accomplished by filing an application on
forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be subject to, applicable procedures
of DCC Title 22.
FINDING: The Applicant, as a representative of the property owner, has requested a quasi-judicial
text amendment and filed the corresponding application. The Applicant has filed the required land
use application forms for the proposal. The application will be reviewed utilizing the applicable
procedures contained in DCC Title 22. Considering the nature of the proposed text amendment,
staff believes the County's review requires a two-step process following both quasi-judicial and
legislative procedures contained in DCC Title 22.
During a Hearings Officer's review of a recent applicant -initiated Text Amendment to the Airport
Development (AD) zoning code', the Hearings Officer addressed this threshold question as follows:
By its express terms, [DCC 18.136.0101 states that the process for a text amendment is as
set forth in DCC 22.12. But DCC 22.12 broadly governs "legislative" procedures. DCC
22.04.020 defines legislative changes as follows:
Legislative changes generally involve broad public policy decisions that apply to other
than an individual property owner. These include, without limitation, amendments to
the text of the comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, or the subdivision or
partition ordinance and changes in zoning maps not directed at a small number of
property owners.
As Staff points out in the Staff Report (attached to this decision as Exhibit B), the Text
Amendments do not fit squarely within this definition. Further, the Code does not expressly
define "text amendment" in the context of legislative changes or in the context of a quasi-
judicial land use application, even though DCC 22.12.030 allows an individual to seek
legislative changes through an application process. The Staff Report suggests that the Text
Amendments should be processed in the same manner as a quasi-judicial plan amendment,
which is governed by DCC 22.28.030.
1 Reference Deschutes County File No. 247-23-000470-TA.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 9 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
In support of its conclusion, Staff provides a detailed analysis under Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers
v. Benton Co. Bd. of Comm., 287 Or 591, 601 132d 769 (1979) ("Strawberry Hill Wheelers"). In
that case, the Oregon Supreme Court set out a multi -factor test to determine what process
applies to a land use application:
Generally, to characterize a process as adjudication presupposes that the process is
bound to result in a decision and that the decision is bound to apply preexisting
criteria to concrete facts. The latter test alone [applying preexisting criteria to
concrete facts] proves too much; there are many laws that authorize the pursuit of
one or more objectives stated in general terms without turning the choice of action
into an adjudication. Thus a further consideration has been whether the action, even
when the governing criteria leave much room for policy discretion, is directed at a
closely circumscribed factual situation or a relatively small number of persons. The
coincidence both of this factor and of preexisting criteria of judgment has led the
court to conclude that some land use laws and similar laws imply quasi [-]judicial
procedures for certain local government decisions. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers at 602-
03.
As Staff correctly notes, the Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers decision sets out three factors which
must be considered:
1. Is the inquiry bound to result in a decision?
2. Are there preexisting criteria that are applied to concrete facts?
3. Is the inquiry directed at a closely circumscribed factual situation or a relatively
small number of persons?
Although it is a close call, the Hearings Officer agrees with Staff that the three factors listed
above, in this case, warrant following a quasi-judicial process for the City's Application, at
least initially.
At the same time, the Text Amendments carry the qualities of a legislative act. The language
in DCC 22.04.020 provides that legislative changes "generally involve broad public policy
decisions that apply to other than an individual property owner" (emphasis added), and that
definition does not state that decisions applicable to only one individual property owner
cannot be legislative. Indeed, that Code provision goes on to list examples of legislative
decisions, including amendments to the text of zoning ordinances.
An important component of DCC 22.12 is DCC 22.12.050, addressing final decisions. That
Code provision states that la]II legislative changes shall be adopted by ordinance." That
language does not distinguish between purely legislative changes and those legislative
changes that may be processed using a quasi-judicial process. This makes sense because the
DCC is adopted by ordinance, and any changes to the text of the Code would be an
amendment to that adopted ordinance. It also makes sense because ORS 215.503(2)
requires that "falll legislative acts relating to comprehensive plans, land use planning or
zoning adopted by the governing body of a county shall be by ordinance" (emphasis added).
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 10 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Based on the foregoing, I find that, in this case, the adoption of text amendments proposed
by an applicant is a two-step process. In the first step of the process, the Applicant has a right
under the Code to submit and to have considered an application to amend the Code's text.
This phase of the process is quasi-judicial in nature and it is appropriate to have a hearing
and to build a record following the principles of a quasi-judicial process. As part of that
process, the Hearings Officer is addressing the application only of the County's exi[s]ting
laws. The second step of the process is for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
("County Board') to adopt an ordinance to incorporate any text amendments to the Code.
Amendments to the text of a zoning ordinance are a change in the County's law, and only
the County Board can make such a change. In other words, the Hearings Officer is without
authority to amend the County's Code. The Hearings Officer, however, can make a
recommendation to the County Board based on what develops in the quasi-judicial phase of
the process. The County Board is free to accept or to reject the Hearings Officer's
recommendation.
As noted above, the Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers test requires a case -specific analysis of all three
factors in combination. For the purposes of this review, staff addresses each component of the
Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers test below:
1. Results in a Decision
The Applicant has submitted an application for a text amendment. The request will result in either
an approval or a denial, and a decision will be issued by the Board of County Commissioners
("Board") pursuant to DCC Title 22. As opposed to a policy change initiated by staff or decision -
makers, which has a wide discretionary choice between action and inaction, the subject request was
submitted as a land use application by the property owner and the County must take final action
on it. Staff finds the subject amendment clearly meets this component of the Strawberry Hill 4
Wheelers test.
2 Preexisting Criteria Applied to Concrete Facts
The subject application is being reviewed based on the preexisting criteria listed in Section I and the
Applicant's submittal includes a clear and concise statement of facts necessitating the subject
application. Therefore, staff finds preexisting criteria are being applied to concrete facts and the
application meets this component of the Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers test.
3. Directed at a Small Number of Persons
The Applicant's proposed text amendment will only affect properties with existing structures that
are partially located in both the CL District and RE District within the Urban Unincorporated
Community of Sunriver. As detailed in the Basic findings section, there is only one property with
these zoning conditions (ref. Deschutes County Assessor's Map 19-11-31, tax lot 300) and the
Applicant owns this property. Therefore, staff finds the proposed text amendment is directed at a
small number of persons and meets this component of the Strawberry Hill Wheelers test.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 11 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
When the factors above are considered in combination, staff finds the Strawberry Hill Wheelers test
is met and the subject text amendment can initially be reviewed as part of quasi-judicial process. As
noted in Hood River Valley v. Board of Cty. Commissioners, the differentiation between a legislative
and quasi-judicial process is important in orderto ensure all affected parties are given a fair process.
In this case, a quasi-judicial process will provide for a public hearing before a Hearings Officer and,
subsequently, requires final action by the Board as part of a legislative process.
Title 22, Deschutes County Development Procedures Ordinance
Chapter 22.12, Legislative Procedures
Section 22 12.010 Hearing Required.
No legislative change shall be adopted without review by the Planning Commission and a
public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. Public hearings before the
Planning Commission shall be set at the discretion of the Planning Director, unless
otherwise required by state law.
FINDING: As described above, staff finds the subject application is being reviewed as part of a quasi-
judicial and legislative process. The Hearings Officer is being asked to make a recommendation to
the Board. The Board will ultimately approve or deny the application and, if approved, adopt an
ordinance as part of a legislative process. The Planning Director has exercised their discretion not
to set a hearing before the Planning Commission.
Section 22.12.020, Notice.
A. Published Notice
1. Notice of a legislative change shall be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the county at least 10 days prior to each public hearing.
2. The notice shall state the time and place of the hearing and contain a
statement describing the general subject matter of the ordinance under
consideration.
FINDING: This criterion will be met as notice will be published in The Bulletin newspaper at least 10
days prior to each public hearing.
B. Posted Notice. Notice shall be posted at the discretion of the Planning Director and
where necessary to comply with ORS 203.045.
C. Individual Notice. Individual notice to property owners, as defined in DCC
22.08.010(A), shall be provided at the discretion of the Planning Director, except as
required by ORS 215.503.
FINDING: As noted in the Basic Findings section, the Applicant complied with the posted notice
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 12 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
requirement and individual notice was mailed to property owners within 250 feet of the subject
properties.
D. Media notice. Copies of the notice of hearing shall be transmitted to other
newspapers published in Deschutes County.
FINDING: Copies of the notice of hearing will be provided to the County public information official
for wider media distribution. This criterion has been met.
Section 22 12 030 Initiation Of Legislative Changes.
A legislative change may be initiated by application of individuals upon payment of
required fees as well as by the Board of Commissioners or the Planning Commission.
FINDING: The Applicant has submitted the required fees and requested a text amendment. Staff
finds the Applicant is granted permission under this criterion to initiate a legislative change and has
submitted the necessary fee and materials.
Section 22.12.040 Hearings Body.
A. The following shall serve as hearings or review body for legislative changes in this
order.
1. The Planning Commission.
2. The Board of County Commissioners.
FINDING: As described above; the subject application is initially being processed as part of a quasi-
judicial process. For this reason, this application has been referred to a Hearings Officer rather than
the Planning Commission for a recommendation. The adoption of the proposed text amendment
will follow a legislative process because it must be approved by the Board. For the purpose of this
criterion, staff notes the application has properties of both a quasi-judicial and legislative
amendment.
B. Any legislative change initiated by the Board of County Commissioners shall be
reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to action being taken by the Board of
Commissioners.
FINDING: The subject application was not initiated by the Board. Staff finds this criterion does not
apply.
Section 22.12.05, Final Decision.
All legislative changes shall be adopted by ordinance.
FINDING: Following issuance of the Hearings Officer's recommendation, the Board will ultimately
decide on whether to approve or deny the proposed text amendment. If the Board approves the
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 13 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
proposed text amendment, it will be implemented by the Board adopting an ordinance.
Chapter 22.28, Land Use Action Decisions
Section 22 28 030 Decision On Plan Amendments And Zone Changes.
A. Except as set forth herein, the Hearings Officer or the Planning Commission when
acting as the Hearings Body shall have authority to make decisions on all quasi-
judicial zone changes and plan amendments. Prior to becoming effective, all quasi-
judicial plan amendments and zone changes shall be adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners.
B. in considering all quasi-judicial zone changes and those quasi-judicial plan
amendments on which the Hearings Officer has authority to make a decision, the
Board of County Commissioners shall, in the absence of an appeal or review
initiated by the Board, adopt the Hearings Officer's decision. No argument or further
testimony will be taken by the Board.
FINDING: As detailed above, staff finds the proposal should be viewed as a quasi-judicial plan
amendment. For this reason, staff finds these criteria apply. This application is being referred to a
Hearings Officer for a recommendation. If an appeal is not filed and the Board does not initiate
review, the Board shall adopt the Hearings Officer's recommendation as the decision of the county.
C. Plan amendments and zone changes requiring an exception to the goals or
concerning lands designated for forest or agricultural use shall be heard de novo
before the Board of County Commissioners without the necessity of filing an appeal,
regardless of the determination of the Hearings Officer or Planning Commission.
Such hearing before the Board shall otherwise be subject to the same procedures as
an appeal to the Board under DCC Title 22.
FINDING: The subject text amendment does not require a goal exception and does not concern
lands designated for forest or agricultural use. For this reason, a de novo hearing before the Board
is not required.
D. Notwithstanding DCC 22.28.030(C), when a plan amendment subject to a DCC
22.28.030(C) hearing before the Board of County Commissioners has been
consolidated for hearing before the hearings Officer with a zone change or other
permit application not requiring a hearing before the board under DCC 22.28.030(C),
any party wishing to obtain review of the Hearings Officer's decision on any of those
other applications shall file an appeal. The plan amendment shall be heard by the
Board consolidated with the appeal of those other applications.
FINDING: No other application is being consolidated with the subject text amendment. Staff finds
this criterion does not apply.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 14 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Title 23, Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 1, Comprehensive Planning
Section 1 2 Community Involvement Policies
Goals and Policies
Goal 1: Maintain an active and open community involvement program that is accessible to
all members of the community and engages the community during development and
implementation of land use policies and codes.
Policy 1.2.3 Encourage community participation in planning through a variety of tools
and techniques, including:
b. Provide staff reports for comprehensive plan and zoning text
amendments to the public in a timely manner,
FINDING: The staff report for the subject zoning text amendment will be available at least 35 days
prior to the initial hearing. Additionally, any subsequent staff reports will be available at least seven
days prior to any public hearings. Therefore, staff finds the requirements of this policy are met.
Section 1 3 Land Use Planning Policies.
Goals and Policies
Goal 1: Maintain an open and public land use process in which decisions are
based on the objective evaluation of facts.
Policy 1.3.3 Involve the public when amending County Code.
FINDING: As discussed above, there will be at least one public hearing for this review, and the
County has mailed and published public notices in conjunction with this review. These efforts
encourage public participation as part of the review of the applicant requested County Code
amendment.
Chapter 4, Urban Grown Management
Section 4.5 Sunriver Policies.
Goals and Policies
No goals have been defined for the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community.
Policy4.5.1 Land use regulations shall conform to the requirements of OAR 660 Division
22 or any successor:
FINDING: Compliance with the requirements of OAR 660 Division 22 is addressed below.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 15 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Policy 4.5.2 County comprehensive plan policies and land use regulations shall ensure
that new uses authorized within the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated
Community do not adversely affect forest uses in the surrounding Forest Use
Zones.
FINDING: No new uses within the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community are requested as
part of the proposed text amendment.
Resort District Policies
Policy 4.5.15 Areas designated resort on the comprehensive plan map shall be designated
resort, resort marina, resort golf course, resort equestrian or resort nature
center district on the zoning map to reflect a development pattern which is
consistent with resort uses and activities.
FINDING: The subject properties include areas designated resort on the comprehensive plan map
and designated resort equestrian on the zoning map. Staff finds the proposed text amendment to
expand the uses allowed in the CL District to match the RE District will ensure the development
pattern on the subject properties is consistent with the existing resort equestrian uses and activities.
The proposed text amendment does not allow a new development pattern because the proposed
text amendment is expressly limited to existing structures as of the effective date of the ordinance.
Community District Policies
Policy 4.5.19 Areas designated community on the comprehensive plan map shall be
designated communitygeneral, community recreation, community limited or
community neighborhood district on the zoning map to reflect a
development pattern which is consistent community uses and activities.
FINDING: The subject tax lot 300 includes areas designated community on the comprehensive plan
map and community limited district on the zoning map. The proposed text amendment to expand
the uses allowed in the CL District to match the RE District will ensure the development pattern on
the subject properties is consistent with the existing resort equestrian uses and activities. The
proposed text amendment does not allow a new development pattern because the proposed text
amendment is expressly limited to existing structures as of the effective date of the ordinance.
Policy 4.5.20 Lands designated community shall be developed with uses which support all
facets of community needs, be they those of year-round residents or part-
time residents and tourists.
FINDING: The subject tax lot 300 includes lands designated community. The proposed text
amendment is requested to ensure the Sunriver Boarding Stable can continue to be used by the
community, including year-round or part-time residents and tourists.
Policy 4.5.21 Development shall take into consideration the unique physical features of
the community and be sensitive to the residential development within which
the community areas are interspersed.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 16 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
FINDING: The proposed text amendment allows for a limited expansion of uses allowed in existing
structures to align with the current development in the Urban Unincorporated Community of
Sunriver. No changes to the unique physical features of the community are proposed. Additionally,
the County provided notice to all neighbors within 250 feet of the subject property, and the
Applicant posted a proposed land use sign on the subject properties. No comments or concerns
were raised related to the development associated with the proposed text amendment and the
residential development in the Urban Unincorporated Community of Sunriver. Staff also notes the
closest residential district is +/-3,000 feet from the existing structure on the subject tax lot 300.
Therefore, staff finds development associated with the proposed text amendment will comply with
this policy.
OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
Chapter 660, Division 12, Transportation Planning
OAR 660-012-0060 Plan and Land use Regulation Amendments.
(1) if an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a
land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing
or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place
measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed
under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment
significantly affects a transportation facility if it would.
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan);
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system, or
(c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this
subsection based on projected conditions measured at the end of the
planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected
conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area
of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an
enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic
generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand
management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the
significant effect of the amendment.
(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the
functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility,
(B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation
facility such that it would not meet the performance standards
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan, or
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 17 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
(C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation
facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance
standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
FINDING: Deschutes County's Senior Transportation Planner reviewed the proposed text
amendment and did not identify any significant effects on existing or planned transportation
facilities (ref. Agency Comments in the Basic Findings section). Additionally, no new structures are
authorized as part of the proposed text amendment, as the proposed code changes only apply to
existing structures, and, it would be reasonable to assume there will be limited to no additional
transportation impacts. For these reasons, staff finds the proposed amendment will not significantly
affect an existing or planned transportation facility and compliance with the Transportation
Planning Rule has been effectively demonstrated.
Chapter 660, Division 15, Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines
FINDING: The Statewide Planning Goals and the Applicant's findings are quoted below:
Goal 1: Citizen Involvement
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be
involved in all phases of the planning process.
RESPONSE: The amendments do not propose to change the structure of the County's citizen
involvement program. Notice of the proposed amendments will be provided through notice
of public hearings in the "Bend Bulletin" newspaper and other notice will be provided, as
discussed above. The two public hearings on this application will provide the opportunity for
any resident to participate in the land use process. Goal 1 is met.
Goal 2• Land Use Planning
Part I - Planning. To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis
for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base
for such decisions and actions.
RESPONSE: Goals, policies, and processes related to this application are included in the
Quasi-judicial and Legislative Modified Procedure, Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan,
Title 23, and Deschutes County Code, Title 18 and Title 22. Compliance with these processes,
policies, and regulations are documented within the subject application. Goal 2 is met.
Goal 3: Agricultural Lands
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands.
RESPONSE: No lands will be rezoned as part of this application, furthering the purpose of
Goal 3. Neither RE or CL are exclusive farm use zones nor does either zone allow agricultural
uses. DCC 18.108.090 (RE zone does not allow agricultural uses); DCC 18.108.140 (CL zone
does not allow agricultural uses).
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 18 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Goal 3 is not applicable.
Goal 4: Forest Lands
To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to protect the state's forest
economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure the
continuous growing and harvesting of forest tree species as the leading use on forest land
consistent with sound management of soil, air, water, and fish and wildlife resources and to
provide for recreational opportunities and agriculture.
RESPONSE: No lands will be rezoned as part of this application, furthering the purpose of
Goal 4. Neither RE or CL are forest zones nor does either zone allow forest practice uses.
DCC 18.108.090 (RE zone does not allow forest practice uses); DCC 18.108.140 (CL zone does
not allow forest practice uses).
Goal 4 is not applicable.
Goal 5: Open Spaces Scenic and Historic Areas and Natural Resources
To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces.
RESPONSE: The amendments do not propose to change open spaces, scenic or historic
areas, or natural resources. Both zones involved in this proposed amendment are located in
the Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community only. Moreover, the proposed amendment
only applies to existing structures as of the date of the ordinance, and therefore does not
impact any existing open spaces or undisturbed natural resources.
Goal 5 is met.
Goal 6: Air Water and Land Resources Quality
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state.
RESPONSE: The proposed text amendment will not impact the quality of the air, water, or
land resources.
Goal 6 is inapplicable or is met.
Goal 7: Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards
To protect people and property from natural hazards.
RESPONSE: The proposed amendment will not affect the County's regulation of areas subject
to natural disasters or hazards.
Goal 7 is not applicable.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 19 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Goal 8: Recreational Needs
To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where
appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination
resorts.
RESPONSE: To the extent that Goal 8 is applicable to the subject application, the amendment
will allow the recreational equestrian zone to apply to the limited circumstance of existing
buildings that cross from the equestrian zone into the CL zone. This will allow Deschutes
County citizens and visitors to continue to access equestrian recreational opportunities in
those existing buildings.
Goal 8 is met.
Goal 9: Economic Development
To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities
vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens.
RESPONSE: The proposed text amendment complies with Goal 9 because it will permit the
existing resort equestrian area's economic activities to continue in existing buildings that
were built into the CL zone.
Goal 9 is met.
Goal 10: Housing
To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state.
RESPONSE: The subject application does not propose to change any regulations related to
housing, as housing is not allowed in either the CL or RE zones.
Goal 10 is not applicable.
Goal 11: Public Facilities and Services
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and
services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development.
RESPONSE: The proposed text amendment will have no effect on the provision of public
facilities and services.
Goal 11 is not applicable.
Goal 12: Transportation
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system.
RESPONSE: The proposed amendment will not impact transportation facilities within the
County.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 20 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
Goal 12 is not applicable.
Goal 13: Energy Conservation
To conserve energy.
RESPONSE: As the proposed amendment only applies to existing structures, it will not have
any impact on the conservation of energy.
Goal 13 is not applicable.
Goal 14: Urbanization
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to
accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries,
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities.
RESPONSE: Goal 14 concerns the provision of urban and rural land uses to ensure efficient
use of land and livable communities. The proposed amendment does not amend an urban
growth boundary and the uses that would be allowed in the portion of a structure in a CL
district are already allowed in the RE district. The uses in the RE district are related to the
equestrian zoning, and are not "urban" uses under Goal 14.
Goal 14 is met.
Goals 15-19
RESPONSE: Goals 15 through 19 are not applicable as they all related to waterbodies outside
the County (Goal 15 Willamette River Greenway; Goal 16 Estuarine Resources; Goal 17
Coastal Shorelands; Goal 18 Beaches and Dunes; and Goal 19 Ocean Resources).
Staff generally accepts the Applicant's responses and finds compliance with the applicable
Statewide Planning Goals has been effectively demonstrated.
Chapter 660, Division 22, Unincorporated Communities
OAR 660-022-0030 Planning and Zoning of Unincorporated Communities.
(6) County plans and land use regulations shall ensure that new or expanded uses
authorized within unincorporated communities do not adversely affect agricultural
or forestry uses.
FINDING: The proposed text amendment does not create new uses in the Urban Unincorporated
Community of Sunriver. However, it does allow for an expansion of uses authorized in the RE District
for existing structures located in both the RE and CL Districts. Based on the submitted application
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 21 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
materials and staffs review of County records, there is only one existing structure that meets these
criteria - a horse boarding stable constructed in 2007 (see Figure 2).
The Deschutes National Forest abuts the subject properties, and staff find this tract is likely engaged
in forestry uses. The Planning Division mailed notice of the proposed text amendment to Deschutes
National Forest, and no comments/concerns were raised. The existing structure on the subject tax
lot 300 is setback more than 300 feet from the closest boundary of the Deschutes National Forest.
Staff finds this separation ensures there are no adverse effects on forestry uses. Besides the
agricultural uses occurring on the subject property, there do not appear to be any nearby
agricultural uses. Nevertheless, staff finds two out of the three expanded uses (i.e. an equestrian
facility or building used for retail sales, rental, and repair services commonly associated with
equestrian facilities) are agricultural uses. Therefore, staff finds these two expanded uses are
compatible. Moreover, the proposed text amendment is specific to the allowed uses of existing
structures, which significantly reduces any potential impacts on surrounding agricultural or forestry
uses. Considering all these factors, staff finds the expanded uses authorized requested as part of
this text amendment will not adversely affect agricultural or forestry uses.
(8) Zoning applied to lands within unincorporated communities shall ensure that the
cumulative development.
(A) Will not result in public health hazards or adverse environmental impacts
that violate state or federal water quality regulations; and
(B) Will not exceed the carrying capacity of the soil or of existing water supply
resources and sewer services.
FINDING: The proposed text amendment only applies to existing structures. As noted in this staff
report, there is only one existing structure that qualifies for the expanded uses allowed under
proposed text amendment. This existing structure has been permitted by Deschutes County and is
connected to the community water and sewer system in Sunriver. Therefore, staff finds the
proposed text amendment ensures the cumulative development will not result in public health
hazards or adverse environmental impacts that violate state or federal water quality regulations,
and it will not exceed the carrying capacity of the soil or of existing water supply resources and
sewer services.
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 22 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
IV. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the findings above, staff believes the proposed text amendment complies with the
applicable criteria of DCC Title 18, DCC Title 22, DCC Tile 23, and the applicable sections of OAR. Staff
requests the Hearings Officer determine if the Applicant has met the burden of proof necessary to
justify the proposed text amendment.
DESCHUTES COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION
OQ-19�+-
Written by: Caroline House, Senior Planner
1 `P ^---
Reviewed by: Anthony Raguine, Principal Planner
247-25-000035-TA Staff Report Page 23 of 23
Exhibit B to Ordinance 2025-020
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Presentation by Limitless Solutions & NorthRenew Energy for a potential solar
project on County -owned property north of Ft. Thompson Lane, Bend
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Options for Board consideration:
1) Limitless Solutions and NorthRenew Energy to proceed with community
engagement through an advertised public forum or other method of outreach
2) Staff to proceed with drafting a memorandum of understanding (or like agreement)
in coordination with Limitless Solutions and NorthRenew Energy for continued site
due diligence
3) Staff to negotiate lease terms with Limitless Solutions and NorthRenew Energy to
present to the Board at a later date
4) A combination of options 1-3
5) Not to proceed with next steps at this time
6) Other?
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Earlier this year, Limitless Solutions and its partner, NorthRenew Energy (LS/NRE),
approached the County about a potential solar project on County -owned property north of
Ft. Thompson Lane, Bend (Ft. Thompson Site).
At the direction of the Board of County Commissioner, LS/NRE scheduled a pre-app
meeting with Deschutes County Community Development to gain a better understanding
of zoning, overlays and general land use associated with the Ft. Thompson Site; noting this
step was completed. The Board further directed staff to complete reference checks for
LS/NRE associated with other solar projects. Emily Pyle with County Property Management
completed extensive reference checks, which resulted in zero unfavorable findings.
At the conclusion of recent individual commissioner meetings with LS/NRE, staff
recommended proceeding with scheduling a presentation at a regular Board meeting and
the commissioners supported this as a next step. Representatives from LS/NRE will present
a high-level draft project scope, rough timeline, estimated financial benefits, and other
information, and will be available to answer questions.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Kristie Bollinger - Deschutes County Property Management
Joseph Mazone - Limitless Solutions
Mark Green - NorthRenew Energy
^L
W
LU
W
ryNNW
d-J
L
O
Z
0
U)
c
O
a-J
O
E
J
a)
CD
E
O
0
HP
^n
W
O
(^n'
W
^-'
W
•c
4-j
c
L
°Q
a
E
3
O
0
C
U)
O
O
O
ccn
N
d
d
•�
m
y
3
c
N
c
a
m
'U
•�
�
=
O
d
Q
E
�
Or
0
m
0)
>
•
O
N
O
y
�
v
a)V
C
U
O
0
Lu
Lu
U
N
,d
,d,
W
a
Z
Or
a
w O
Z 4-J
w N cn
O a)
O
zw � a)0 O
C '() C3 M V U
'E ^
rn c S:1 0
VV' � -a Q
O a U
a)= +� c
i a
O N N .0 41
O
N O U
O
O N C N O c
O w cn �'_' '0 U N
�
a � Q
.° a) + .�
N N
L- c
CO N 4-a a
O
O O N
,� O U �c O +
E
> 'L- w _O
a)N y- N a)U
0 O 0 0
0
y U 'L
.. = O O � � a. >, a) o
° �' ° -° a' x
a 'W LO
� 0 .� N W a) a) -
H oU 3 0 ° c > o
= d H .O w d-0 z
,O E U o = x
*+ Q •- w U 4+ a)w
i
v
a O O CD� OD; � O Z �.
Z
wo 0
E~ 0
J
J o N
N
®O
fN
O
J
O
a-+
C
E
C)
fN
O
O
0
.a)
Q
E
0
W
Z
.
p1w
S
L�
0
0
0
0
70
O
E
CD
a
U
•i
a)
a-.+
E
vi
0
C
O
cz
co
in
O
U
O
cn
E
O
a)
Zn
O
0
0-
F
O
.w
cn
.E
m
U
O
U
U
00..
E
a)
U)
O
70
N
7
U)
U)
75
+J
U
O
O N
N
E N
C
O
•� O
C: -se
(1) U)
.C: .�
>1
U �
0
E
Z 0-
4)
Ow
C E
N U C
U a � > a a •c � Q.
c— o as c C o
O � ° m
_° `n E a c L o a c0� m
a co o U3 2 E � u'
•- vs
U 'L w ° Q +�+ ti G o
O -Se 6 O E
0 p O z 0 — O O i = O G>
N z a �3 O U o
® o
Q
co
M
N
co
n
U
co
LO
N
�-7
w
w
ow
zw
N
O
N
�
O
0
N
N
a
waftN
N
a
a
�
1
�
Ln
�
C
N
�
N
N
N
O
a
i
a
O
+�
O
a
1
�
O
=
N
•N
O
O
N
.-
C3
.�
i
N
a
40
O
�
U
0
.�.+
N
i
=
L
4-+
a
•�
O
i
O
O
O
d!
0
�
O
.�
d
Q
—°
=
In
i
a
40
>
as
.o
IL
Q
N O
a N
I
N 4-J
V N
i �O
E
:-J
s �
O O
c
E
E O
E
O
v �
E
O �
L
.c
d U
C �
O C:
V O
� U
d
C
fJ
0
a
0
O
a)
a
0
Lo
L
U
co
O
U
O
.c
a
'0
E
M,
N
U)
U
NCO
C
N
N
O
M
N
M
a.4-J
�'
a
a
a
E
�
N
.�
4-1
C
N
C
C
N
NC4
ccnn
O
O
a
U)
a
a
a
a
E
o
Q
o
U
N
1
1
1
_
C:
o
1
1
N
a
0
cn
0
C:
+�
a
O
L
1
N
N
E
N
U)
1
C
+-+co
N
L
cn
C
d
t�
O
.C_
4w
=
1
t
.i1
O
cn
cn
E
d
�
i
d
L
-�
o
a
o
o
�
o
°
U
U
=
O
v
cn
a
.�
.
U
J
4-J
a
a
/
cn
•1�
L
p
O
G�
a
v
®
a
a
3
Z
4-0
Q)
C
�
O
�
v
Ma
N�
O
s;-
a
G�
—
N�
=
a
.N o
m
O
M
'M+
Jo
N
v
A\
�Oogo
L
a
m
P2
n
7
d
d
h
00
P
Q)
E
O
O
ZZ
N
N
0
O
O
O
o
o
�
®
O
O
0
O
O
o
(D
o
o
4-
C
aD
p
U
m
.�
.Q
O
+-=
\
Q)
c�
O
a
E
CD
c:
N
Q)
=
=
ILo
O
O
o
o
J
`
>
cn
Q)
>
Q
O
O
O
Q)
w
_
U
•�O
�D
Q)
•OoQ
�
o
N
�
oO
"
a
sa)
m
0a�
E
E
O
m
O
a)
a)
O
a).�
En
O
x
.,�
_
a
x-0
U)
c
+
-0
a)U
Lo
O
—
N
�t
O
QLo
m
°�
C
•0
O
O
m
CL
I---
fl-
41) co
Lq
in
C4
mLr)
CN
Lo
4A 4A (A
4A
ta Na
Lr)
w
L0
-W
CD
Ean
CN
.a
U)
0
04
rq
C14
U)
03-
'o r.14
cty
17.
C-i'
w
E
:24
jL
(D
0
ca
U-
d) d)
U) CL
CD
w
w
m
o m w ri
ca m — a m
0 U-
m
Lo —
= =
—
E
*c�
q
w
Lo I—
C
IV
5,
m
0
a
E
cu i5
2!, 0
:3
:w
-j
E
L) (i
w
>
CL
.2
Q m
-
CL
0
—
as at
ft
>
It$ 9
Z171,
t
W -iz
= m
-C
E 06
d) Ln
c W
04
0
m
2 ww
Lu
g = 0
ch 0
0 0
CL
ALCi
AIM'.
(D
0
CN
4-J
0 I 0
0
70 0 0 4-J
N
4-1 ®
4-J
a) c: 0 C3 w4- L-
a)
CL -0
0 c
U) — a
iL-
C:
0 0
r
C'�
Lo
o E c-0 :2 Cli
> a - -
E o c: bq m
GO LU 4-1 L: C6
a r
o 4) (D
-2 C6 0 5
0 0 CD
CN c 0 >
0 C3
0D j .0 0 0 In 00 0
7C3 3: 0 Cy):L — CY)
C- (1) :2 0 4) 0 C4 — m L6 Ix >
•gyC C3 c () 0 qT tq x 4) >-
0 a) C: D-Z >%
c 4w (.0 M m m �i a m m Im 0
m = 0 LU 0 4-1 la 0 -51 (Y)
0
x 04W
>
w
cn
-
O
w
E
_}
o
ow
N
zw
�
N
N
O
a
N
4-+
7C3
4
N
•�
U
=
N
�
U
p
O
-O
4-1
O
O
i
a
4-J
U)
I I
O
cn
ocn
LU
C®
•�
O
•�
U
:
F-
N
cn
II
O
p
CD
o
N
M
V
N
N
O
>
O
0
a)J
4w
O
a)•�
:
O
N
d
C:
UU
uNi�
a
0
W
n
v
d �
s`
a�
NIN
166
00
.
U-
a)
E
0
Q
E
a
a
Q
Q
0 C i
0
cn
V U •—
c
C '>
=
d O p 0
O O
O
a-U:�c
m
�
(c
O
..
O
i U-0
O ��
d C v
O
i
c
a) �
Q. a�
`�
f+
+.•
c
O
— O
C
O
��0
�
�ac
��N��a
(�
o 0c
a
N
'°N
�o >
O
3
J 4-1�
O
s
° ° °
_:�
�
���
'y
N�
.�
�� a
d—
-0j
+�
N a
cn C ,,.�
_
�
0- C
•i
OL
0 p
�
4- a
-0 O
�� N
�_
4w
_
a
5
CL
_ E
G
-Jo
�
0
U �n
0 w E
a
O
O
CO
C.
1
wr
CL
0
y
x
4)
Z
9
cQ) a
N
U C O C U C
C: N 4W ®
U C:
Q)o °
-� cn
cLC: Z o
o �Q) o c
DOG
0 Q d C N
a o c a
u �
O }' •O C � 4-J � .Q
U N 0-V N
a a
4-1
U �
O CO C)
O O N
L fn �
O d 4-J +�
Q) o o - O = 2
cLrz
G O
O
Z
® O
u
A
C
N
O
c
O
I -
r
Le
ES C0G2�
I BOAR® OF
COMMISSIONERS
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: FY 2027 Budget Development - Limited Growth Strategies
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS:
1) Move approval to limit General Fund expenditure growth to X% (4%, 5% or 6%).
2) Move approval to allow consideration of Special Requests for General Fund
Departments and departments receiving General Fund transfers for a combined
total of up to $350,000.
3) Cap Internal Service Fund charges at 8% with exceptions authorized by the Budget
Officer.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
On December 3, 2025, staff presented three limited growth options for Board
consideration to maintain financial stability within the General Fund:
1. 4% growth in FY 2027; 5% in FY 2028 and beyond, achieves financial sustainability
through FY 2035 (nine years).
2. 5% growth in FY 2027 and beyond, achieves financial sustainability through FY 2034
(eight years).
3. 6% in FY 2027; 5% in FY 2028 and beyond, achieves financial sustainability through
FY 2032 (six years).
Additionally, Finance and Administration also recommend maintaining an 8% cap on ISF
charges for FY 2027, though some exceptions may be authorized by the Budget Officer.
Since meeting with the Board on December 3rd, the Budget Office has calculated the
financial impact of Phase II of the Wage Equity Project. The General Fund ongoing costs
would increase $170,000 per year over the initial placeholder figures already included in
the financial model. Therefore, staff is now recommending the 4% limited growth option
which still maintains financial sustainability for 9 years. A 5% increase with these new
expenditures reduces financial sustainability by one year from 8 to 7 years.
During FY 2026 budget development, departments impacted by General Fund limited
growth were asked to not submit special requests. Limiting growth to 4% in FY 2027 would
allow the Budget Committee to approve special requests that exceed General Fund
supported departments' baseline budgets or transfers for up to $350,000 in ongoing costs
for all requests combined, while maintaining 8 years of financial sustainability, if this option
was approved by the Board. The Board may consider additional criteria for special requests
(one-time funding, efficiency, modernization, process improvement, service impacts, etc.).
Staff seeks the Board's feedback on the proposed limited growth strategies. The Board's
guidance on these items will assist staff in preparing the FY 2027 budget.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
Following the Board's decision on December 17th, General Fund and ISF departments will
receive baseline budget allocations reflecting the approved level of expenditure growth,
enabling departments to begin developing their budgets.
ATTENDANCE:
Cam Sparks, Budget & Financial Planning Manager
Robert Tintle, Chief Financial Officer
Nick Lelack, County Administrator
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Wage Equity Project Update: Phase II (Market Study for AFSCME and Non -
Represented Positions)
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move Board approval of implementation as recommended by
the project steering committee.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Human Resources has completed its compensation study for Deschutes County AFSCME
represented and non -represented (not represented by a union) positions.
Non -represented positions include managers, supervisors, and employees who work in
"confidential" positions. In this context, "confidential" refers to positions with job duties that
would create a conflict of interest if the position was represented by a union (such as
positions in the Human Resources Department).
The purpose of the study (Phase II of the County's Wage Equity Project) is to ensure that a
market analysis is conducted to ensure that compensation for classifications is aligned with
the County's compensation philosophy and to adjust any compression that may exist in the
County's compensation structure.
Staff will present implementation recommendations from the County's Wage Equity
Steering Committee to the Board and answer questions.
BUDGET IMPACTS: Budget impacts are dependent on implementation decisions.
ATTENDANCE:
Susan Dejoode, Human Resources Director
Whitney Hale, Deputy County Administrator
E S COG�a
0
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Treasury Report for November 2025
ATTENDANCE:
Bill Kuhn, County Treasurer
DATE: December 17, 2025
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Bill Kuhn, Treasurer
Sl1RJFCT: Treasury Report for November 2025
Following is the unaudited monthly treasury report for fiscal year to date (YTD) as of November 30, 2025.
Treasury and Investments
• The portfolio balance at the end of November was $386.5 million, an increase of $17.1 million from October and
an increase of $12.9 million from last year (November 2024).
• Net investment income for November was $1,379.3K, approximately $367.9k higher than last month and $70.2K
greater than November 2024. YTD earnings of $5,449.8K are $852.5K more than the YTD earnings last year.
• All portfolio category balances are within policy limits.
• The LGIP interest rate reduced to 4.25% during the month of November. The FIB rate was 3.85%. Benchmark
returns for 24-month treasuries were down 6 basis points and 36-month treasuries were down 6 basis points from
the prior month.
• The average portfolio yield dipped slightly to 4.10%, which was down 10 bps from last month's average %.
• The portfolio weighted average time to maturity was 1.12 years.
��vT E5 c�G
Deschutes •
G <
1 1
Portfolio Breakdown: Par value by Investment Type
Municipal Debt
18,575,000
4.8%
Corporate Notes
33,000.000
8.5%
_
0.0 %
U.S. Treasuries
186,100,000
48.1%
Federal Agencies
50,000,000
12.9 %
LGIP
72,308,660
18.7%
First Interstate (Book Balance)
26,541,221
6.90%
Total Investments $
386,524,882
100.0 %
Total Portfolio: By Investment Type
First Interstate Municipal Debt
Bank 4.8°rate Notes
6.9 % 8.5 %
Time Certificates
LGIP \� 0.0%
18.7%
Federal Agencies
12.9 % U. S. Treasuries
48.1 %
Portfolio by Broker
$100
N
$84.5
o $80
$62.5
.2
$55.2
$0
2 $40
$34.1 $37.7
$20
12
$1.3 $.5
$
Moreton Robert W DA Stifel
Piper
Great Castle Oak
Capital Baird 8 Co Davidson Capital
Sandler
Pacific
Markets
Securities
Total Investment Income
Less Fee: $12,000 per month
Investment Income - Net
I Prior Year Comparison
(12,000) (60.000
$ 1,379,284 $ 5,449,804
Nov-24 1,309,052 4,597,328
category Maximums:
Yield Percentages
U.S. Treasuries 100 %
Current Month
Prior Month
LGIP($63,387,000) 100%
LGIP
4.25%
4.50%
Federal Agencies 100 %
Investments
4.09%
4.12%
Banker's Acceptances 25%
Average
4.10%
4.18%
Time Certificates 50%
Municipal Debt 25%
Benchmarks
Corporate Debt 25 %
24 Month Treasury 3.54 %
3.60%
LGIP Rate
4.25%
4.50%
Maturity (Years)
36 Month Treasury 3.55 %
3.61 %
Max Weighted Average
3.45 1.12
I
Term
Minimum'
III
0 to 30 Days
10%
28.2%
Under 1 Year
25%
52.8 %
Under 5 Years
100 %
100.0%
Other " Policy ;
Actual
Corp Issuer 5%
2.8%
Callable 25%
10.1 %
Weighted Ave. AA2
AA1
Investment Activity
Purchases in Month $
55600006
SaleslRedem lions in Month $
5:000:000
24 Month Historic Investment Returns
6.00%
5,50%
5.00%
4.50 %
4.00%
3.50%
3.00%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0,50%
0.00%
Dec Feb Apr June August Oct Dec Feb Apr June Aug Oct
County Rate ® 2 Year Treasury Rate Corporate Bond Rate LGIP Rate
400,000,000
350,000,000
300,000,000
250,000,000
200,000,000
150,000,000
100,000,000
50,000,000
ie,M,0oo
14,—,00o
u,aao,o0o
ro,000,ao0
a,a0o,oaa
6,000,000
000,000
},000,OOD
Three Year Portfolio Balance
Oct-22 Dec-22 Feb-23 Apr-23 Jun-23 Aug-23 Oct-23 Dec-23 Feb-24 Apr-24 Jun-24 Aug-24 Oct-24 Dec-24 Feb-25 Apr-25 Jun-25 Aug-25 Oct-25
Five Year Maturity Distribution Schedule
natu,iny ln�aslmeitis ®Courthouse Funtllrg
TES C
o <
BOARD OF
•
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Finance Report for November 2025
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
None --discussion item only.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The Finance Department will present the monthly financial report. The report is
informational only and is intended to provide the Board of County Commissioners with
current financial information. The report will provide budget to actual comparisons and
highlight any potential issues or changes that may impact the current or future budgets.
There are no direct policy implications.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ATTENDANCE:
Robert Tintle, Chief Financial Officer
DATE:
December 17, 2025
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Robert Tintle, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT:
Finance Report for November 2025
Following is the unaudited monthly finance report for fiscal year to date (YTD) as of November 30, 2025.
Budget to Actuals Report
General Fund
• Revenue YTD in the General Fund is $43.11VI or 88.0% of budget. By comparison, last year revenue YTD was
$42.01VI or 87.4% of budget.
• Expenses YTD are $14.9M and 29.8% of budget. By comparison, last year expenses YTD were $14.9M and
30.3% of budget.
• Beginning Fund Balance is $23.2M or 110.3% of the budgeted $21.11VI beginning fund balance.
'- County Wide Financial Dashboard 001 - General Fund
Fund C
select all
i3Sar.V}
CU1-i;eneral F.rn:i
010 - is-nt-C:efk...
020 - Lode Abate,..
GiC - Ccnvnun;ty ...
-c:urt Tech,,
050 - Econcnv¢ Cr.
oso - Cr�"e_r3: Cou...
NO Genera, I-
I ol
010 - r ,;Bet De.,..
.3'-+ L�br3iY
o F ;rr
1�2 F3._
Monthly GL Period
0
5
$19.6M
$500.OK
All Maeor Funds
41.7%
S Year Complete
Budget to Actuals
Requirements Resources Beginning Working Capital Budget to Actuals by Category
i
$14.91A f$43.1 M $23.2M
29.8% 88.0% 1 10.3%
Monthly Expenditures
AMA S
Monthly Revenues
30.4%
% of last vear budqet
87.8%
% of last vear budqet
Projected Ending Working Capital Approved FTE
121.36
520.IM V C ANT
f 7 e9.,,
�✓ -rya:,
.. _. PILLED
92"I •i
On the attached pages you will find the Budget to Actuals Report for the County's major funds with actual revenue
and expense data compared to budget through November 30, 2025.
Position Control Summary FY26
July -June
Percent
Org
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec Jan
Feb Mar April May Unfilled
Assessor
Filled
32.00
32.00
31.00
31.00
31.00
10.95%
Unfilled
3.26
3.26
4.26
4.26
4.26
Clerk
Filled
9.48
9.48
9.48
9.48
9.48
9.54%
Unfilled
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
80PTA
Filled
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.00%
Unfilled
-
-
DA
Filled
58.85
57.05
57.05
57.85
56.65
5.88/0
Unfilled
2.45
4.25
4.05
3.25
3,95
Tax
Filled
6.50
5.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
3.08%
Unfilled
-
1.00
-
-
-
Veterans'
Filled
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
0.00
Unfilled
-
-
-
"
Property Mgmt
Filled
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
Unfilled
-
-
Total General Fund
Filled
115.35
112.55
112.55
113.35
112.15
7.10%
Unfilled
6.71
9.51
9.31
8.51
9.21
Justice Court
Filled
4.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
17.39%
Unfilled
-
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Community Justice
Filled
40.60
41.20
42.20
41.80
40.80
13.19%
Unfilled
6.40
5.80
5.80
6.20
7.20
Sheriff
Filled
235.50
236.50
236.50
234.50
237.50
12 88%
Unfilled
35.50
34.50
34.50
36.50
33.50
Health Srvcs
Filled
376.43
371.58
372.50
379.55
378.80
10.24%
Unfilled
42.20
47.05
46.13
39.08
39.83
CDD
Filled
52.00
51.00
51.00
52.00
51.00
4.10%
Unfilled
1.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
3.00
Road
Filled
57.00
56.00
59.00
59.00
58.00
5.25%
Unfilled
4.00
5.00
2.00
2.00
3.00
Adult P&P
Filled
32.63
32.00
31.00
30.00
29.50
12.36%
Unfilled
3.38
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.50
Solid Waste
Filled
45.00
44.00
45.00
44.00
45.00
7 08%
Unfilled
3.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
Victims Assistance
Filled
5.50
5.50
6.50
6.00
6.00
34.44%
Unfilled
4.00
4.00
3.00
2.50
2.00
GIS Dedicated
Filled
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.00%
Unfilled
-
-
-
"
Fair & Expo
Filled
12.50
12.50
11.50
10.50
10.50
34.29%
Unfilled
5.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
7,00
Natural Resource
Filled
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.00%
Unfilled
-
-
-
ISF- Facilities
Filled
25.75
25.75
25.75
25.75
25.75
7.21%
Unfilled
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
ISF-Ad An
Filled
8.75
8.75
8.75
8.75
8.75
5.41%
Unfilled
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
ISF - BOCC
Filled
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.00%
Unfilled
-
-
-
-
-
ISF - Finance
Filled
13.00
13.00
14.00
14.00
14.00
2.86
Unfilled
1.00
1.00
-
-
-
ISF - Legal
Filled
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
0.00
Unfilled
-
-
-
_
-
ISF - HR
Filled
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
9.00
25.45%
Unfilled
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
ISF - IT
Filled
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
20.00
7 69%
Unfilled
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
ISF - Risk
Filled
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
0.00%
Unfilled
-
-
-
-
911
Filled
56.00
56.00
57.00
57.00
56.00
7 54%
Unfilled
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Total:
Filled
1,125.86
1,115.18
1,122.10
1,125.05
1,124.60
Unfilled
123.69
135.36
129.24
125.29
124.74
Total
1,249.54
1,250.54
1,251.34
1,250.34
1,249.34 A
%Unfilled
9.90%
10.82%
10.33%
10.02%
9.98%
10.21%
A 0.50 FTE reduction to the District Attorney's Office due to expiration of limited duration position.
0.50 FTE reduction to Victim's Assistance due to expiration of limited duration position.
L�'I ES Co
y Budget to Actuals -Total Personnel and Overtime Report
` FY26 YTD November 30, 2025
Fund
Number
Fund
001
001 -General Fund
030
030 -Juvenile
160
160/170 - TRT
200
200-ARPA
220
220 -Justice Court
255
255 - Sheriffs Office
274
274 - Health Services
295
295-CDD
325
325-Road
355
355 - Adult P&P
465
465 - Road CIP
610
610-Solid Waste
615
615 - Fair & Expo
616
616 -Annual County Fair
617
617 - Fair & Expo Capital Reserve
618
618 - RV Park
619
619 - RV Park Reserve
670
670 - Risk Management
675
675 - Health Benefits
705
705-911
999 - All Other Funds
Total
overtime
Actual (Over)
/
Budgeted OT OT Under Budget
Total Personnel Costs
Projection
�`�v"(ESCOGZ� Budget to Actuals -Countywide Summary
All Departments
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
001 - General Fund
030 - Juvenile
160/170 - TLT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 - Sheriffs Office
270 - OHP & Capital
Reserves
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 - Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
675 - Health Benefits
705 - 911
999 - Other
Fiscal Year 2025
Budget Actuals %
47,226,179
926,504
12,400,800
9,726,687
506,200
64,030,262
6,016,100
69,034,749
9,401,238
27,585,291
6,323,657
1,357,339
19,769,001
3,206,000
2,350,667
88,000
489,000
45,000
3,398,791
42,854,789
14,733,900
60,974,212
49,169,365
104%
1,091,010
118% '•.
12,638,380
102%
9,722,588
100%
525,739
104%
65,685,433
103%
13,901,753
231%
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget Actuals %
48,948,514
43,127,944
88%
1,012,772
470,673
46%
12,449,000
8,173,100
66%
984,959
519,683
53%
682,597
192,084
28%
67,205,539
56,403,334
84%
11,829,200
615,146
5%
41.7%
Year Complete
Projection %
50,321,059 103% s
1,368,172 135%
13,549,000 109%
984,959 100%
683,697 100% s
67,412,539 100%
12,144,109 103%
67,097,990
97% `:
65,210,754
21,950,886
34%
63,949,939
98%
9,902,984
105%
9,923,169
4,383,889
44%
10,201,669
103%
28,539,189
103% `
27,423,030
12,655,136
46%
27,485,971
100%
6,499,960
103%
6,888,500
1,916,409
28%
6,137,349
89%
1,499,037
110%
1,384,712
295,770
21%
1,493,212
108%
20,286,179
103% ':
22,198,501
9,697,777
44% ':
22,247,806
100%
3,094,772
97%
3,677,500
1,325,065
36%
2,825,997
77%
2,672,649
114%
2,656,367
2,797,082
105%
2,812,862
106% i
229,192
260%
117,000
63,919
55% `:
130,000
111%
550,566 113%
60,431 134%
3,630,416 107%
43,355,886 101
15,112,121 103%
58,869,234 97%
TOTAL RESOURCES ': 402,444,366 414,134,876 103%
493,800 249,138 50%
58,000
29,442
51%
3,401,406
1,616,804
48%
43,475,500
15,763,507
36%
15,281,100
11,932,506
78%
49,160,747
21,487,023
44%
215,666,316
55% s
394,462,667
519,957
105%
59,700
103%
3,431,306
101%
43,669,200
100%
15,341,500
100%
49,157,747
100%
395,927,750
100%
uT E S
°G�� Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary
All Departments
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
REQUIREMENTS
001 - General Fund
030 - Juvenile
160/170 - TLT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 -Sheriff's Office
270 - OHP & Capital
Reserves
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 -Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
675 - Health Benefits
705 - 911
999 - Other
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
33,458,125
27,885,291
83%
': 32,833,562
10,571,155
32%
30,910,469
94%
9,381,846
8,396,293
89%
10,005,365
3,463,683
35%
9,234,807
92%
5,897,854
5,862,939
99%
3,787,748
2,221,100
59%
3,952,748
104%
987,540
983,441
100%
984,959
163,639
17% `:
984,959
100%
863,097
849,040
98%
1,051,837
333,896
32% ':
1,012,490
96%
66,610,275
62,055,934
93%
68,836,488
25,469,723
37%
68,762,136
100% 's
84,148,302
9,991,245
19,655,197
8,371,685
16,323,504
17,321,744
4,838,162
2,671,901
1,260,000
76,486,004
91 %
9,642,090
97%
18,084,696
92%
7,310,310
87%
8,402,847
51
15,347,950
89%
4,267,724
88%
2,735,983
102%
287,354
23%
85,239,096
10,858,928
19,713,342
8,310,376
19,022,701
18,981,700
5,180,328
2,733,905
1,265,000
726,864
581,262
80%
584,318
170,000
-
0%
170,000
5,631,442
4,358,642
77% 1
6,555,370
38,819,094
35,110,004
90%
42,410,545
17,254,619
14,334,091
83%
17,381,915
108,891,467
68,035,264
62%
93,830,811
29,517,498
35%
4,168,234
38%
6,982,464
35% s
2,746,041
33%
2,722,335
14%
5,244,300
28%
1,547,888
30%
2,479,629
91%
104,364
8%
212,202
36%
10,077
6%
2,385,575
36%
10,714,823
25%
5,707,117
33%
29,203,125
31%
-
999%
86,207,299
101%
10,932,877
101%
19,238,145
98%
7,344,018
88%
16,689,133
88%
18,981,700
100%
3,776,811
73%
2,734,578
100%
1,265,000
100%
578,599
99%
170,000
100%
6,551,541
100%
42,410,545
100%
16,659,807
96%
93,496,025
100%
441,893,687 98%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 453,273,963 371,017,159 82% ': 449,738,294 145,968,869 32%
V'(ESCpG�{ Budget to Actuals - Cou-ntywide Summary
All Departments
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
Fiscal Year 2025 I Fiscal Year 2026
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals %
001 - General Fund
030 - Juvenile
160/170 - TLT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 - Sheriffs Office
270 - OHP & Capital
Reserves
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 - Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
705 - 911
999 - Other
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(14,367,610) (13,526,961) 94% (17,064,685)
8,068,153
8,068,153
100%
8,332,617
(8,502,946)
(8,439,250)
99% ?
(8,504,172)
(9,038,089)
(9,038,089)
100% '
-
380,521
323,301
85%
391,417
3,399,187
3,434,772
101%
3,319,909
(4,234,163)
(1,154,341)
27%
(11,130,299)
10,671,364
7,655,897
72%
17,813,229
(123,668)
(125,725)
102%
790,941
(10,720,695)
(10,720,695)
100%
(9,690,281)
626,964
626,964
100% '
583,198
10,631,333
9,015,761
85% 1
9,600,781
(4,564,141)
(4,564,141)
100%
(4,673,934)
1,227,123
1,219,136
99% ':
1,312,508
(121,900)
(121,900)
100%
(235,000)
6-5,396
609,544
99%
448,946
57,858
57,858
100%
(41,600)
122,142
122,142
100%
221,600
(4,500)
(4,500)
100%
(4,800)
15,877,671 16,562,074 104% 8,529,625
3,684,977 43%
(4,299,119)
25%
3,471,924
42%
(3,668,676)
43%
163,090
42%
1,386,254
42%
-
0%
101,212
1%
(15,646)
-2%
(6,081,732)
63%
242,999
42%
4,315,667
45%
(9,973)
0%
546,878
42%
(97,917)
42% [
187,061
42%
(17,333) 42%
92,333 42%t
(2,000) 42%
9,346,705 110%
41.7%
Year Complete
Projection
%
(17,064,685)
100%
8,332,617
100%
(9,396,252)
110%
391,417
100%
3,319,909
100%
(12,463,366)
112%
19,146,296
107% s
790,941
100%
(9,690,281)
100%
583,198
100%
9,600,781
100%
(4,673,934)
100%
1,365,008
104%
(235,000)
100%
471,446
105%
(41,600) 100%
221,600 100%
(4,800) 100%
v(ES C
Budget to Actuals - Countywide Summary
All Departments
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
ENDING FUND BALANCE
001 - General Fund
030 - Juvenile
160/170 - TLT
200 - ARPA
220 - Justice Court
255 - Sheriffs Office
270 - OHP & Capital
Reserves
274 - Health Services
295 - CDD
325 - Road
355 - Adult P&P
465 - Road CIP
610 - Solid Waste
615 - Fair & Expo
616 - Annual County Fair
617 - Fair & Expo Capital
Reserve
618 - RV Park
619 - RV Park Reserve
670 - Risk Management
675 - Health Benefits
705 - 911
999 - Other
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
Fiscal Year 2025
I
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
14,892,974
23,249,642
156%
20,120,267
51,507,312
977,419
2,127,478
218%
1,040,024
2,606,391
1,163,809
1,500,000
129%
1,500,000
3,783,324
_
ggg%
-
356,043
41.7%
Year Complete
Projection %
25,595,547 127%
2,593,460 249%
1,700,000 113%
23,624
-
0%
22,177
21,279
62,624
282%
16,386,036
22,631,133
138% '
20,188,960
54,950,997
24,601,445
122%
27,993,362
38,958,838
139%
36,284,703
39,573,984
38,639,581
106%
8,014,338
10,724,410
134%
7,529,160
3,259,010
7,613,346
101%
38,691
887,535
999% ':.
900,299
1,087,544
947,268
105%
3,206,945
5,731,344
179%
2,440,000
5,322,285
4,288,889
176%
905,760
2,143,438
237%
861,322
1,556,806
1,519,967
176%
11,340,452
17,787,235
157% `
7,349,914
19,676,336
12,192,095
166%
1,921,897
4,412,870
230%
1,984,768
8,856,374
3,005,042
151%
126,731
577,955
456%
212,680
902,010
992,149
466% f
66,317
324,216
489%
58,462
543,752
167,500
287%
2,622,728
3,730,714
142% s
2,914,946
3,877,329
3,067,160
105%
132,760
339,929
256%
66,882
359,532
239,687
358%
1,518,531
1,703,962
112%
1,639,600
1,815,660
1,815,262
111%
5,931,013
7,435,437
125%
5,841,236
6,664,667
4,310,402
74%
7,895,427
12,105,614
153%
8,564,955
17,154,297
13,364,269
156%
11,850,746
15,149,495
128%
10,813,185
21,374,884
13,831,188
128%
70,001,484
109,331,736
156%
70,692,730
105,277,869
72,387,619
102%
187,011,044
280,852,980
150%
201,026,270
350,527,686
232,934,499
116%
Budget to
Actuals
Report
`\�v1ES C0G
o General Fund - Fund 001
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
PVAB
11,000
11,483 104% i
11,000
3,660
33%
11,000
100%
PropertyTaxes- Current
39,604,000
39,978,464 101%'.
41,196,000
38,283,340
93%
42,057,000
102%
861,000?A
Property Taxes - Prior
328,000
448,776 137% ;
338,000
303,939
90% ':
338,000
100%
Other General Revenues
4,059,656
4,683,508 115%
4,111,171
2,897,703
70%
4,500,100
109% E
388,929IB
Assessor
849,000
868,511 102% t
821,000
267,807
33%
821,000
100%
Clerk
1,426,160
1,583,352 111%
1,331,240
636,545
48%
1,331,240
100%
District Attorney
427,077
511,255 120% !
267,027
176,525
66% ':
267,027
100%
Tax Office
146,200
152,257 104%
142,700
65,878
46%
142,700
100%
Veterans
305,086
220,206 72%
194,448
50,362
26%
201,448
104%
7,000 C
Property Management
70,000
75,275 108%
97,000
41,333
43%
97,000
100%
636,279
438,928
400,853
91%
554,544
126%
; 115,616 D
Non -Departmental
TOTAL RESOURCES
47,226,179
49,169,365 104% ;
48,948,514
43,127,944
88% E
50,321,059
103%
; 1,372,545:
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
PVAB
96,193
91,103 95% i
100,980
40,758
40%
100,298
99 %
i 682': E
6,709,361
5,883,228 88%
6,898,967
2,484,301
36%
6,348,457
92%
550,510 F
Assessor
2,719,443
2,407,704 89%
2,416,514
729,614
30 %
2,148,805
89%
267,709: G
Clerk
District Attorney
13,369,290
12,488,557 93%
14,203,623
4,984,540
35%
13,128,488
92%
1,075,135 H
Medical Examiner
466,854
396,143 85%
465,653
100,087
21 %
465,653
100%
Tax Office
1,065,042
1,024,623 96%
1,054,084
486,011
46%
1,051,824
100%
; 2,260 1
1,068,340
985,944 92% ?
1,012,065
372,162
37%
986,697
97%
25,368 J
Veterans
Property Management
596,494
576,461 97 % `.
640,822
248,529
39%
639,393
100%
1,429 K
Non -Departmental
7,367,108
4,031,528 55%
6,040,854
1,125,154
19%
6,040,854 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
33,458,125
27,885,291 83% '
32,833,562
10,571,155
32% i
30,910,469
94%
? 1,923,093
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In
5,519,522
5,476,511 99% ':
61,500
0%
61,500
100%
Transfers Out
(19,887,132)
(19,003,472) 96% ?
(17,126,185)
(4,299,119)
25% ;
(17,126,185) 100%
TOTALTRANSFERS
(14,367,610)
(13,526,961) 94% i
(17,064,685)
(4,299,119)
25%
(17,064,685)
100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
15,492,530
15,492,530 100%
21,070,000
23,249,642 110% `:
23,249,642 110%
; 2,179,642
Resources over Requirements
13,768,054
21,284,074
16,114,952
32,556,789
19,410,590
3,295,638'
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(14,367,610)
(13,526,961)
(17,064,685)
(4,299,119)
(17,064,685)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 14,892,974
$ 23,249,642 156%
$ 20,120,267
$ 51,507,312 256%
$ 25,595,547 127%
$5,475,280i L
A Current Year taxes received primarily in November, February, and May; actual FY 2026 TAV is 4.90% over FY 2025 vs. 4.58% budgeted. Additionally, the
County is expecting higher than usual penalties from late filings.
B PILT funds received were $600K more than budget of $500K; interest earnings projected to be higher than budget.
C Oregon Dept. of Veteran's Affairs grant reimbursed quarterly.
D Expecting new opioid settlement funds.
E Projected personnel savings estimated at 0.9 % based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
F Projected personnel savings estimated at 9.7% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
G Projected personnel savings estimated at 16.1% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
H Projected personnel savings estimated at 8.5% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
I Projected personnel based on overage to date.
J Projected personnel savings estimated at 3.2% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
K Projected personnel savings estimated at 0.3% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
L Out of the total ending fund balance, $13,594,731 are required contingency balances, $663,000 are restricted Opioid Settlement Funds, $616,610 are
recategorized ARPA funds that haven't been allocated and $500K is Emergency Reserves.
Budget to Actuals Report
pp 5Juvenile -Fund 030
. FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
OYA Basic & Diversion
ODE Juvenile Crime Prev
Leases
InmatelPrisoner Housing
Gen Fund-Opioid Settlement
Interest on Investments
Expungements
DOC Unif Crime Fee/HB2712
Miscellaneous
OJD Court Fac/Sec SB 1065
Contract Payments
Food Subsidy
TOTAL RESOURCES
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
1
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
477,421
503,583
105%
480,000
123,627
26%
480,000
100%
112,772
130,796
116%
112,772
31,267
28%
112,772
100%
97,500
97,594
100%
101,000
42,291
42%
101,000
100%
65,000
100,080
154%
75,000
20,160
27% E
75,000
100%
_
74,000
-
0% i
74,000
100% !
49,000
87,043
178%
57,000
46,700
82%
87,400
153% '
30,400
40,000
68,236
171% '
40,000
9,379
23% S
40,000
100%
52,000
53,359
103%
35,000
-
0%
35,000
100%
6,811
26,728
392% i
26,000
190,596
733%
350,000
999%
324,000: A
12,000
17,801
148%
12,000
5,893
49%
12,000
100%
4,000
0%
-
760
1,000
1,000: B
10,000
5,790
58%
-
926,504
1,091,010
118% '
1,012,772
470,673
46%
1,368,172
135%
355,400
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services 7,497,894 6,686,218 89% 7,952,601 2,767,528 35% 7,182,043 90% 770,558 C
Materials and Services 1,863,952 1,690,256 91% 2,052,764 696,155 34% 2,052,764 100%
Capital Outlay 20,000 19,819 99% '
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 9,381,846 8,396,293 89% 10,005,365 3,463,683 35% ! 9,234,807 92% 770,558E
TRANSFERS Budaet Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In- General Funds 8,143,712 8,143,712 100% 8,409,500 3,503,958 42% 8,409,500 100%
Transfers Out (1,324) (552) 42% (1,324) 100%
Transfers Out-Veh Reserve (75,559) (75,559) 100% (75,559) (31,483) 42% (75,559) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS 8,068,153 8,068,153 100% 8,332,617 3,471,924 42% [ 8,332,617 100%
FUND BALANCE
Beginning Fund Balance
Resources over Requirements
Net Transfers - In (Out)
Budget Actuals % Budget
1,364,608
1,364,608 100%
(8,455,342)
(7,305,284)
8,068,153
8,068,153
1,700,000
Actuals
2,127,478
(8,992,593) (2,993,010)
8,332,617 3,471,924
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 977,419 $ 2,127,478 218% $ 1,040,024 $ 2,606,391
A Deferred revenue from FY25 for COHC grant and OHA funding for FFT Treatment,
B Work crew contract for cleanup services.
C Projected personnel savings estimated at 9.9% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
Projection % $ Variance
125% 2,127,478 125% 427,478E
(7,866,635) 1,125,958'
8,332,617
251% $ 2,593,460 249% $1,553,436
����ts C-oG Budget to Actuals Report
21 TLT - Fund 160/170
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited) 41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025 Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Lodging Taxes
12,332,800 12,538,517 102%
12,340,000
8,041,090
65%
12,940,000
105% 600,000 A
Interest on Investments
68,000 98,403 145% •.
108,000
59,084
55%
108,000
100%
Miscellaneous
1,460
1,000
326
33%
1,000
100% i
Certificate of Authority Revenue
-
-
72,600
300,000
300,000 B
TOTAL RESOURCES
12,400,800 12,638,380 102%
12,449,000
8,173,100
66%
13,349,000
107% 900,000
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
VCO
3,376,105
3,355,769
99% i
3,305,854
2,011,018
61%
3,470,854
105% (165,000) C
Administrative
287,388
280,559
98%
325,976
120,809
37% `:
325,976
100% [
Interfund Charges
186,611
186,611
100%
113,168
47,153
42%
113,168
100%
Software
47,750
40,000
84%
42,750
42,120
99% `:
42,750
100% [
Grants & Contributions
2,000,000
2,000,000
100%
'
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
5,897,854
5,862,939
99%
3,787,748
2,221,100
59%
3,952,748
104% (165,000)
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfer Out - CDD
(100,000)
(100,000)
100%
Transfer Out - RV Park
(20,000)
(20,000)
100%
(20,000)
(8,333)
42%
(20,000)
100%
Transfer Out - Annual Fair
(75,000)
(75,000)
100%
(75,000)
(31,250)
42%
(75,000)
100%
Transfer Out - Health
(276,572)
(276,572)
100%
(376,572)
(156,905)
42%
(376,572)
100%
Transfer Out -Justice Court
(380,521)
(323,301)
85% ':
(400,521)
(166,884)
42%
(400,521)
100%
Transfer Out - F&E Reserve
(465,396)
(459,544)
99%
(448,946)
(187,061)
42%
(471,446)
105%
(22,500) D
Transfer Out - F&E
(1,011,000)
(1,003,013)
99% ':
(978,285)
(407,619)
42%
(1,030,785)
105% '
(52,500)
TransferOut- GeneralCounty
(921,670)
(929,033)
101%
(1,049,811)
(437,421)
42%
(1,866,891)
178%
(817,080)
Reserve
Transfer Out - Courthouse Debt
(1,501,000)
(1,501,000)
100%
(1,503,250)
(751,625)
50%
(1,503,250)
100%
Service
Transfer Out - Sheriff
(3,751,787)
(3,751,787)
100%
(3,651,787)
(1,521,578)
42%
(3,651,787)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(8,502,946)
(8,439,250)
99% E
(8,504,172)
(3,668,676)
43% ':
(9,396,252)
110%
(892,080)
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 3,163,809 3,163,809 100% 1,342,920
1,500,000 112% '
1,500,000 112%
157,080
Resources over Requirements 6,502,946 6,775,441 8,661,252
5,952,000
9,396,252
735,000':
Net Transfers - In (Out) (8,502,946) (8,439,250) (8,504,172)
(3,668,676)
(9,396,252)
(892,080)::
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 1,163,809 $ 1,500,000 129% 1 $ 1,500,000
$= E
$ 1,500,000 100%
$ 3,783,324 252% '
A Lodging Tax revenue up 5.2% from FY25, up 6.9% compared to FY26 budget.
B Estimated Certificate of Authority Fee revenue.
C Payments to VCO based on a percent of TLT collections.
D The balance of the 1 % F&E TLT is transferred to F&E reserves.
E Remaining funds will be reserved in the TLT fund to cover one year's worth of debt service of $1.5 million.
-"juTE5 C-0 Budget to Actuals Report
ARPA — Fund 200
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
State & Local Coronavirus Fiscal
Recovery Funds
Local Assistance & Tribal
Consistency
Interest on Investments
TOTALRESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS
Infrastructure
Services to Disproportionately
Impacted Communities
Administrative
Negative Economic Impacts
Public Health
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
1Fiscal
Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
4,921,150
4,917,051
100% '
984,959 519,683 53% 984,959 100%
4,622,145
4,622,145
100% E
'
183,392
183,392
100%
-
9,726,687
9,722,588
100%
984,959 519,683 53% 984,959 100% i
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
-
(149,988)
625,719
7,725
1%
625,719
100%
727,947
839,230
115%
359,240
155,915
43%
359,240
100%
46,860
92,716
198%
212,733
201,482
95%
'
987,540
983,441
100% ':
984,959
163,639
17%
984,959
100% E
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers Out -Campus (4,756,307) (4,756,307) 100%
Transfers Out - General Fund (4,281,782) (4,281,782) 100% 1-
TOTAL TRANSFERS (9,038,089) (9,038,089) 100%
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 298,942 298,942 100% -
Resources over Requirements 8,739,147 8,739,147 356,043
Net Transfers - In (Out) (9,038,089) (9,038,089) -
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 356,043 999% $
\-\VTES CoG� Budget to Actuals Report
Justice Court - Fund 220
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals %
Projection
% $ Variance
Court Fines 8 Fees
504,200 523,360
104%
674,597
187,288 28% ':
674,597
100% -` A
7,300
3,830 52%
7,300
100%
Other
Interest on Investments
2,000 2,380
119%
700
966 138% ':
': 1,800
257% ': 1,100
TOTAL RESOURCES
506,200 525,739
104%
682,597
192,084 28% E
683,697
100% 1,100?
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
Personnel Services
641,713
632,704
99% `:
774,892
249,183
32%
735,545
95% 39,347`: B
Materials and Services
221,384
216,336
98%
276,945
84,713
31% ':
276,945
100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
863,097
849,040
98%
1,051,837
333,896
32% ':
1,012,490
96% E 39,347::
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In - TRT
380,521
323,301
85%
400,521
166,884
42%
400,521
100%
s
Transfers Out
-
-
(9,104)
(3,793)
42%
(9,104)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
380,521
323,301
85%
391,417
163,090
42%
391,417
100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
999%
Beginning Fund Balance
Resources over Requirements
(356,897)
(323,301)
(369,240)
(141,812)
(328,793)
40,447
Net Transfers - In (Out)
380,521
323,301
391,417
163,090
391,417
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 23,624
$ 0
0%
$ 22,177
$ 21,279
96%
$ 62,624
282%
' $40,447
A Reflects increased citation revenue for City of Redmond traffic cameras.
estimated at 5.3% based on YTD actual vacancy rate. Includes 1.00 FTE approved
on
Resolution No. 2025-045 for traffic camera
B Projected personnel savings
citations.
`,�VtES CMG Budget to Actuals Report
Sheriffs Office - Fund 255
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
LED #1 Property Tax Current
LED #2 Property Tax Current
Sheriffs Office Revenues
LED #1 Interest
LED #1 Property Tax Prior
LED #2 Interest
LED #2 Property Tax Prior
LED #1 Foreclosed Properties
LED #2 Foreclosed Properties
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS
Digital Forensics
Concealed Handgun Licenses
Rickard Ranch
Sheriff's Services
Civil/Special Units
Automotive/Communications
Detective
Patrol
Records
Adult Jail
Court Security
Emergency Services
Special Services
Training
Other Law Enforcement
Non - Departmental
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
TRANSFERS
Transfer In - TRT
Transfer In -Video Lottery
Transfers Out
Transfers Out - Debt Service
TOTALTRANSFERS
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
1
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
40,066,974
39,841,015
99% ':
41,530,000
38,093,526
92% i
41,687,000
100%
? 157,000 A
15,958,353
15,923,358
100%
16,573,000
15,161,805
91% ':
16,592,000
100%
': 19,000E A
7,034,935
8,294,428
118%
7,924,539
2,511,900
32%
7,955,539
100%
31,000:
400,000
745,621
186%
504,000
246,375
49% i
504,000
100%
300,000
413,618
138% ?
310,000
212,407
69%
310,000
100%
150,000
296,571
198% 1
239,000
91,212
38% i
239,000
100%
120,000
169,749
141% E
125,000
86,110
69% E
125,000
100%
767
306
64,030,262
65,685,433
103%
67,205,539
56,403,334
84%
67,412,539
100%
207,000
Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
1,419,216
1,441,638
102%
1,518,547
646,771
43% E
1,537,958
101% E
(19,411) B
592,803
511,534
86% `:
681,414
260,696
38% [
679,547
100%
1,867: B
610,205
404,885
66%
489,653
205,537
42%
525,468
107%
(35,815) B
5,230,244
5,518,536
106% ?
5,483,124
2,300,231
42%
5,948,291
108% E
(465,167): B
1,281,834
1,164,741
91%
1,359,767
429,211
32% E
950,022
70% E
409,745 B
4,152,483
3,833,856
92%
3,775,328
1,152,453
31% 1
3,656,600
97%
118,728E B
4,710,801
4,009,608
85%
5,097,713
1,576,864
31%
4,082,354
80%
1,015,3591 B
15,307,105
14,861,899
97%
14,967,896
6,592,575
44%
17,418,525
116%
(2,450,629) B
875,606
855,082
98% E
1,056,150
366,379
35% E
959,213
91%
96,937E B
25,112,557
23,173,027
92%
27,212,459
9,898,429
36% `:1
27,092,237
100%
120,222E B
649,844
549,212
85% E
670,951
263,899
39%
675,458
101%
(4,507): B
888,223
697,226
78% E
863,808
325,102
38%
908,159
105% !
(44,351): B
3,055,000
2,733,323
89% E
2,895,912
861,387
30%
2,324,129
80% ':
571,783E B
1,765,299
1,124,946
64% `:
1,505,100
412,527
27% E
997,929
66% E
507,171`: B
959,055
675,545
70%
$58,666
177,662
21% E
606,246
71%
252,420E B
500,875
999%
400,000
0
0% :
400,000
100%
66,610,275
62,055,934
93%
68,836,488
25,469,723
37%
68,762,136
100%
74,352:
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
3,751,787
3,751,787
100%
3,651,787
1,521,578
42% [
3,651,787
100%
2,500
0% ':
2,500
100% E
(94,100)
(59,668)
63%
(74,878)
(5,574)
7% E
(74,878)
100%
(258,500)
(257,347)
100% E
(259,500)
(129,750)
50%
(259,500)
100%
3,399,187
3,434,772
101%
3,319,909
1,386,254
42%
3,319,909
100% [
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals °%
Beginning Fund Balance
15,566,862
15,566,861 100%
18,500,000
22,631,133 122% E
Resources over Requirements
(2,580,013)
3,629,499
(1,630,949)
30,933,611
Net Transfers - In (Out)
3,399,187
3,434,772
3,319,909
1,386,254
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 16,386,036
$ 22,631,133 138%
$ 20,188,960
$ 54,950,997 272%
Projection % $ Variance
22,631,133 122% 4,131,1
(1,349,597) 281
3,319,909
$ 24,601,445 122% ? $4,412,485
A Current Year taxes received primarily in November, February, and May; actual FY 2026 TAV is 4.90% over FY 2025 vs. 4.58% budgeted.
B Reflects projected personnel savings and potential wage equity impacts.
jEs .Budget to Actuals Report
•Hr & Capital Reserves - Fund 270
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals %
Projection
%
$ Variance
CCBHC Grant
4,750,100
12,095,717
255%
10,922,200
0%
10,608,507
97%
(313,693)'
Interest on Investments
576,000
1,029,885
179% i
907,000
615,146 68%
1,191,900
131%
284,900
OHP Capitation
690,000
776,151
112%
-
343,702
343,702:
TOTAL RESOURCES
6,016,100
13,901,753
231% i
11,829,200
615,146 5%
12,144,109
103%
314,9099
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals %
Projection
%
$ Variance
-
999%
Expenditures
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
-
-
999%
-
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In
32,000
32,000
100%
Transfers Out
(4,266,163)
(1,186,341)
28%
(11,130,299)
0% i
(12,463,366)
112%
(1,333,067)' A
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(4,234,163)
(1,154,341)
27%
(11,130,299)
0% E
(12,463,366)
112%
(1,333,067)
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
26,211,425
26,211,425 100% i
35,585,802 38,958,838 109%
38,958,838 109%
3,373,036:
Resources over Requirements
6,016,100
13,901,753
11,829,200 615,146
12,144,109
314,909':
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(4,234,163)
(1,154,341)
(11,130,299)
(12,463,366)
(1,333,067)'
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 38,639,581 106%
$2,354,878
$ 27,993,362
$ 38,958,838 139%
$ 36,284,703 $ 39,573,984 109%
A Includes estimated costs for additional
space in the Bend area. Purchase
and remodel options will be forthcoming for
Board consideration.
Budget to
Actuals
Report
,�USES .
o`oG2< Health Services - Fund
274
FY26 YTD November
30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$Variance
State Grant
28,477,273
22,424,512
79%
26,868,127
8,331,203
31% [
26,119,706
97%
(748,421)
OHP Capitation
17,529,405
17,070,198
97% `:
17,407,429
7,187,110
41%
17,411,818
100%
4,389
OHP Fee for Service
4,788,744
6,647,545
139%
5,680,220
1,843,119
32%
5,826,248
103%
146,028
State Miscellaneous
7,330,050
10,099,940
138%
4,912,787
1,006,615
20%
4,414,544
90%
(498,243)
Local Grants
2,763,131
2,662,346
96%
2,053,887
839,717
41%
1,703,636
83%
i (350,251)':
Environmental Health Fees
1,637,892
1,727,069
105% ':
1,746,506
629,241
36%
1,746,506
100%
Medicaid
627,276
1,417,080
226%
1,168,850
571,620
49%
1,476,642
126%
307,792
Interfund Contract -Gen Fund
169,000
171,101
101% '
1,094,969
52,917
5% ':
1,094,969
100%
State - Medicaid/Medicare
1,587,117
1,119,629
71%
981,950
322,170
33%
801,975
82%
(179,975)
Other
1,293,235
837,210
65%
847,130
314,925
37%
1,174,294
139%
327,164:
Interest on Investments
317,000
717,053
226% `
752,000
239,818
32% 's
547,700
73%
i (204,300)
Patient Fees
761,626
847,673
111%
740,630
274,553
37%
664,934
90%
'- (75,696)!
State - Medicare
195,057
437,817
224%
380,938
165,393
43%
380,687
100%
(251)
Vital Records
318,000
363,086
114%
325,000
128,812
40% 1
1 355,000
109%
30,000
Liquor Revenue
177,574
157,079
88%
177,799
42,175
24%
177,799
100%
Federal Grants
987,369
369,515
37% '
72,532
1,500
2% `:
53,481
74%
(19,051)
State Shared- Family Planning
75,000
29,140
39%
'
TOTAL RESOURCES
69,034,749
67,097,990
97% E
65,210,754
21,950,886
34% E
63,949,939
98%
': (1,260,815)i
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Administration Allocation
0
999% `
Personnel Services
58,905,375
56,722,488
96% ':
63,600,394
23,316,118
37%
63,381,043
100%
219,351
Materials and Services
23,310,927
19,088,068
82% i
16,461,860
6,148,780
37%
16,398,813
100%
63,047
Capital Outlay
1,932,000
675,448
35% 's
5,176,842
52,172
1%
6,427,014
124%
(1,250,172)
-
429
999%
429
999%
; (429);
Clerk
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
84,148,302
76,486,004
91% `:
85,239,096
29,517,498
35%
86,207,299
101%
(968,203)
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In- OHP Mental Health
4,266,163
1,186,341
28%
11,130,299
0%
12,463,366
112% 1,333,067
Transfers In- General Fund
7,218,715
6,914,116
96%
6,808,300
-
0% ':
6,808,300
100%
Transfers In -TRT
276,572
276,572
100%
376,572
156,905
42% i
376,572
100%
Transfers In - Video Lottery
250,000
250,000
100%
108,770
108,770
100%
108,770
100%
Transfers In- Sheriffs Office
30,000
30,000
100%
Transfers In- Acute Care Service
626,000
621,684
99%
-
Transfers Out
(1,996,086)
(1,622,815)
81%
(610,712)
(164,463)
27%
(610,712)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
10,671,364
7,655,897
72%
17,813,229
101,212
1%
19,146,296
107% 1,333,067
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
12,456,527
12,456,527 100% '
9,744,273
10,724,410 110%
10,724,410 110%
980,137
Resources over Requirements
(15,113,553)
(9,388,014)
(20,028,342)
(7,566,612)
(22,257,360)
(2,229,018)
Net Transfers - In (Out)
10,671,364
7,655,897
17,813,229
101,212
19,146,296
1,333,067
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 8,014,338
$ 10,724,410 134%
$ 7,529,160
$ 3,259,010 43%
$ 7,613,346 101%
$84,186
\1AES C-0& Budget to Actuals Report
Health Services - Admlin - Fund 274
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited) 41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025 Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Interest on Investments
State Miscellaneous
Vital Records
Other
State Grant
Local Grants
OHP Capitation
TOTALRESOURCES
317,000
717,053
226%
752,000
239,818
32%
547,700
73%
(204,300)
_
350,000
-
0%
350,000
100%
-
325,000
128,812
40%
355,000
109% '
30,000::
511,588
320,554
63%
256,035
10,268
4% E
248,967
97% i
(7,068)?
132,289
133,091
101% i
12,380
5,313
43%
12,305
99% i
(75)
_
-
-
53,766
53,766
474,674
461,653
97% •.
1,435,551
1,632,350
114% '
1,695,415
384,211
23%
1,567,738
92%
(127,677)
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
7,890,669
7,654,588
97%
9,660,203
3,558,795
37% [
9,659,269
100% 934€ A
Materials and Services
8,988,940
8,825,581
98%
9,893,148
3,971,754
40%
9,876,018
100% ; 17,130
Capital Outlay
8,651
999%
-
-
Administration Allocation
(15,263,182)
(15,263,182)
100%
(17,606,513)
(4,374,864)
25%
(17,606,513)
100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
1,616,427
1,225,638
76%
1,946,838
3,155,685
162%
1,928,774
99% 18,064(
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In- General Fund
175,000
-
0% :`
175,000
100%
Transfers Out
(377,446)
(377,446)
100%
(394,712)
(164,463)
42%
(394,712)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(377,446)
(377,446)
100%
(219,712)
(164,463)
75%
(219,712)
100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
3,470,762
3,470,762
100%
3,375,000
3,500,029
104% `:
3,500,029
104% 1
125,029
Resources over Requirements
(180,876)
406,713
(251,423)
(2,771,474)
(361,036)
(109,613)
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(377,446)
(377,446)
(219,712)
(164,463)
(219,712)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 2,912,441
$ 3,500,029
120% i
$ 2,903,865
$ 564,092
19%
$ 2,919,281
101%
$15,416
A Personnel projections assume 5% vacancy and include internal estimates
for pay equity adjustments,
which are to be determined in June
2026.
`,�VTtS C-O& Budget to Actuals Deport
2- Health Services - Behavioral Health - Fund 274
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
State Grant
OHP Capitation
OHP Fee for Service
State Miscellaneous
Local Grants
Medicaid
Interfund Contract- Gen Fund
Patient Fees
State - Medicare
Liquor Revenue
Other
Federal Grants
TOTAL RESOURCES
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
21,305,001
14,799,346
69% E
20,697,708
6,738,196
33% `:
20,501,854
99%
(195,854)
16,694,731
16,251,505
97%
17,016,429
7,088,399
42%
17,016,429
100%
4,764,259
6,613,411
139% i
5,645,320
1,819,988
32%
5,767,126
102% `:
121,806E
6,861,414
9,161,437
134% E
3,624,187
983,052
27% i
3,483,881
96%
(140,306)
2,427,949
2,166,426
89%
1,477,702
520,165
35%
976,159
66%
': (501,543)' A
627,276
1,417,080
226%
1,168,850
571,620
49%
1,476,642
126%
` 307,792
127,000
171,101
135% '
830,239
52,917
6%
830,239
100%
575,975
728,616
127%
661,110
242,051
37%
589,187
89%
(71,923)
195,057
437,817
224%
380,938
165,393
43% i
380,687
100%
(251)
177,574
157,079
88%
177,799
42,175
24% i
177,799
100%
6,241
44,050
706%
10
4,960
999% '
5,843
999%
5,833'
824,623
197,998
24%
-
54,587,100
52,145,865
96% E
51,680,292
18,228,915
35% f
51,205,846
99%
(474,446)
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Administration Allocation
11,474,916
11,474,916
100%
13,817,629
3,454,407
25%
13,817,629
100%
Personnel Services
37,998,825
36,558,069
96%
41,398,430
15,360,995
37%
41,895,650
101%
(497,220) B
Materials and Services
11,393,406
7,617,493
67% i
4,773,604
1,768,722
37%
4,966,043
104%
(192,439) C
Capital Outlay
1,932,000
666,797
35%
5,176,842
52,172
1% i
6,427,014
124%
(1,250,172)
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
62,799,147
56,317,275
90%
65,166,505
20,636,295
32% E
67,106,336
103%
(1,939,831)
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In-OHP Mental Health
3,962,859
987,408
25%
10,821,962
0%
12,194,337
113% 1,372,375i D
Transfers In -General Fund
2,088,273
1,783,674
85% 's
1,396,236
0%
1,396,236
100%
Transfers In- Sheriff's Office
30,000
30,000
100%
-
Transfers In -Acute Care Service
626,000
621,684
99%
-
-
Transfers Out
(445,000)
(80,309)
18%
(216,000)
0%
(216,000)
100%
TOTALTRANSFERS
6,262,132
3,342,457
53%
12,002,198
0% E
13,374,573
111% 1,372,375;
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 4,946,976 4,946,976 100% 3,554,722 4,118,022 116% 4,118,022 116% i 563,300:
Resources over Requirements (8,212,047) (4,171,410) (13,486,213) (2,407,380) (15,900,490) (2,414,277)
Net Transfers - In (Out) 6,262,132 3,342,457 12,002,198 13,374,573 1,372,375
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 2,997,062 $ 4,118,022 137% $ 2,070,707 $ 1,710,642 83% $ 1,592,105 77% ($478,602)
A CHOICE FY26 originally budgeted in Grants - Private, transitioned to OHA BH Main Agreement SE 06 via State Grant Funds.
B Personnel projection assumes an average of 7% vacancy and include internal estimates for pay equity adjustments, which are to be determined in June 2026.
C Increase in anticipated expenditures due to reimbursement to Mosiac Medical for early termination of lease agreement at Kingwood. Budget adjustment
forthcoming.
D Includes estimated transfer to cover costs for additional space in the Bend area as well as funds to cover estimated pay equity adjustments to personnel.
Purchase and remodel options will be forthcoming for Board consideration, as will a budget adjustment if supported.
Budget to Actuals
Report
o Health Services - Public Health
- Fund 274
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
State Grant 7,039,983
7,492,075
106%
6,158,039
1,587,693
26%
5,605,547
91%
(552,492)' A
Environmental Health Fees 1,637,892
1,727,069
105%
1,746,506
629,241
36%
1,746,506
100%
State - Medicaid/Medicare 1,587,117
1,119,629
71% ':
981,950
322,170
33%
801,975
82%
(179,975)B
State Miscellaneous 468,636
938,503
200%
938,600
23,563
3% 's
580,663
62%
(357,937) C
Other 775,406
472,606
61%
591,085
299,697
51%
919,484
156%
328,399i D
Local Grants 335,182
495,920
148%
576,185
319,551
55%
673,711
117%
: 97,526: E
OHP Capitation 360,000
357,039
99%
391,000
98,711
25% i
395,389
101%
4,389
Interfund Contract- Gen Fund 42,000
-
0% i
264,730
0%
264,730
100%
Patient Fees 185,651
119,057
64%
79,520
32,503
41% i
75,747
95%
(3,773)
Federal Grants 162,746
171,517
105%
72,532
1,500
2%
53,481
74%
i (19,051)
OHP Fee for Service 24,485
34,134
139%
34,900
23,131
66%
59,122
169%
24,222:
State Shared- Family Planning 75,000
29,140
39%
Vital Records 318,000
363,086
114%
-
TOTAL RESOURCES 13,012,098
13,319,775
102%
11,835,047
3,337,760
28%
11,176,355
94%
(658,692)
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Administration Allocation
3,788,266
3,788,266
100% ':
3,788,884
920,457
24%
3,788,884
100%
Personnel Services
13,015,881
12,509,831
96%
12,541,761
4,396,328
35%
11,826,124
94%
': 715,637 F
Materials and Services
2,928,582
2,644,994
90%
1,795,108
408,733
23%
1,557,181
87%
237,927
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
19,732,729
18,943,092
96%
18,125,753
5,725,518
32%
17,172,189
95%
953,564
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In- General Fund
5,130,442
5,130,442
100%
5,237,064
0%
5,237,064
100%
Transfers In - TRT
276,572
276,572
100%
376,572
156,905
42%
376,572
100%
'•.
Transfers In- OHP Mental Health
303,304
198,933
66% !
308,337
-
0%
269,029
87%
(39,308);
Transfers In -Video Lottery
250,000
250,000
100%
108,770
108,770
100%
108,770
100%
Transfers Out
(1,173,640)
(1,165,061)
99%
-
TOTAL TRANSFERS
4,786,678
4,690,886
98% i
6,030,743
265,675
4% E
5,991,435
99%
i (39,308)
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
4,038,789
4,038,789 100% i
2,814,551
3,106,359 110%
3,106,359 110%
291,808
Resources over Requirements
(6,720,631)
(5,623,316)
(6,290,706)
(2,387,758)
(5,995,834)
294,872
Net Transfers - In (Out)
4,786,678
4,690,886
6,030,743
265,675
5,991,435
(39,308);
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 2,104,836
$ 3,106,359 148%
$ 2,554,588
$ 984,276 39%
$ 3,101,960 121%
$547,372:
A Decrease in projected state grant award due to vacancies. Majority of funds will roll over into FY27 for future use.
B Medicaid tracking lower than budgeted.
C Projected Medicaid Administrative Claim funding less than budgeted.
D Additional revenue includes PacificSource Immunization Quality Improvement Program Grant ($200k), revenue from sale of equipment and van for the clinic
($83K), and rollover of unspent Bend La Pine School funds from Healthy Schools Program.
E Projections include $100k originally budgeted to be received in State Grant for regional modernization work.
F Personnel projection assumes an average of 4% vacancy and pay equity estimates.
,,G Budget to
Actuals
Report
�sts
C,�
o Community Development
- Fund 295
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Admin -Operations
144,238
139,218
97% i
144,500
62,198
43%
156,500
108%
12,000 A
Code Compliance
1,003,933
1,148,109
114%
1,085,878
467,761
43% '•.
1,085,878
100% i
Building Safety
3,414,568
3,293,374
96%
3,243,170
1,465,671
45%
3,339,170
103% ;
96,000': A
Electrical
918,502
882,298
96%
1,039,420
472,433
45% ':
1,042,420
100%
3,000: A
Onsite Wastewater
1,028,065
972,267
95%
1,144,292
432,269
38% ':
1,189,292
104%
45,000 A
Current Planning
1,916,960
2,290,585
119% 1
2,205,985
1,038,241
47% `:
2,340,985
106%
135,000 A
Long Range Planning
974,972
1,177,134
121%
1,059,924
445,318
42% ':
1,047,424
99%
(12,500)
TOTAL RESOURCES
9,401,238
9,902,984
105%
9,923,169
4,383,889
44%
10,201,669
103%
278,500
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Admin- Operations
3,552,093
3,478,840
98%
3,640,125
1,438,235
40%
3,690,204
101%
(50,079)s B
Code Compliance
801,574
759,220
95%
870,608
348,504
40% i
876,824
101%
(6,216)i
Building Safety
2,133,076
1,994,118
93%
2,298,843
1,003,956
44% ':
2,715,479
118%
(416,636)? C
Electrical
612,818
626,628
102% 1
809,673
197,630
24% i
532,290
66%
i 277,383 C
Onsite Wastewater
724,202
707,052
98%
841,118
322,688
38%
914,293
109%
(73,175)
Current Planning
1,410,470
1,289,259
91%
1,556,999
557,972
36%
1,386,045
89%
170,954 D
Long Range Planning
757,012
786,973
104% ':
841,562
299,249
36%
817,742
97%
23,820 D
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
9,991,245
9,642,090
97%
10,858,928
4,168,234
38%
10,932,877
101%
! (73,949)':
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In -CDD Building
622,630
550,874
88%
633,865
0%
828,491
131%
194,626
Reserve
Transfers In - CDD Electrical
222,200
220,025
99% `:
194,626
0%
0%
': (194,626)
Reserve
Transfers In - CDD Operating Fund
131,502
0%
Transfers in - General Fund
100,000
21,876
22%
-
Transfers In - TRT
100,000
100,000
100%
'
Transfers Out - CDD Reserve
(1,300,000)
(1,018,500)
78%
(37,550)
(15,646)
42%
(37,550)
100%
Transfers Out
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(123,668)
(125,725)
102%
790,941
(15,646)
-2% i
790,941
100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
752,366
752,366
100%
1,045,117
887,535
85%
887,535
85%
(157,582):
Resources over Requirements
(590,007)
260,895
(935,759)
215,655
(731,208)
204,551
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(123,668)
(125,725)
790,941
(15,646)
790,941
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 947,268
105%
$46,969
$ 38,691
$ 887,535
999%
$ 900,299
$ 1,087,544
121%
A Revenue collection is anticipated to be higher than budgeted.
B Projection reflects increased cost in retiree health benefits.
C Projections reflect payroll allocation revisions between the Building Safety and Electrical Divisions.
D Projection includes 1.0 FTE Principal Planner transferred from Current Planning to Long Range Planning
Budget to
Budget
Actuals
Report
�`�\)TEs Co
- Road - Fund
325
o
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Motor Vehicle Revenue
21,484,773
22,010,232
102% `;
21,908,000
9,385,457
43%
21,908,000
100%
Federal - PILT Payment
2,741,447
2,401,480
88%
2,401,500
2,401,500
100% '
2,401,500
100%
Other Inter -fund Services
1,473,576
1,924,352
131%
1,642,616
308,139
19%
1,642,616
100%
Sale of Equip & Material
486,300
605,063
124%
431,000
277,197
64%
431,000
100%
-
426,750
-
0%
426,750
100%
Forest Receipts
Interest on Investments
158,000
301,549
191%
299,000
141,191
47%
312,200
104%
13,200€
Cities-Bend/Red/Sis/La Pine
988,063
806,535
82% •.
180,000
65,405
36%
180,000
100% •.
Miscellaneous
61,132
91,058
149%
63,164
26,296
42% 's
63,164
100%
Mineral Lease Royalties
50,000
179,852
360%
50,000
4,067
8%
50,000
100%
Federal Reimbursements
137,000
94,531
69%
21,000
0%
21,000
100%
Assessment Payments (P&I)
5,000
2,571
51%
-
1,322
2,200
2,200'
-
7,657
10,635
10,635
State Miscellaneous
S
IF Capital Projects -Revenue
121,966
-
36,906
36,906
36,906
TOTAL RESOURCES
27,585,291
28,539,189
103% `i
27,423,030
12,655,136
46%
27,485,971
100%
62,941:
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Personnel Services
9,662,228
9,437,147
98% ':
10,434,868
3,830,498
37%
9,956,864
95%
478,004 A
Materials and Services
9,992,969
8,647,549
87%
9,278,474
3,151,965
34%
9,281,281
100%
(2,807)
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
19,655,197
18,084,696
92%
19,713,342
6,982,464
35%
19,238,145
98%
475,197
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers Out
(10,720,695)
(10,720,695)
100%
(9,690,281)
(6,081,732)
63% ':
(9,690,281)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(10,720,695)
(10,720,695)
100%
(9,690,281)
(6,081,732)
63% S
(9,690,281)
100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
5,997,546
5,997,546
100%
4,420,593
5,731,344
130%
5,731,344
130%
1,310,751
Resources over Requirements
7,930,094
10,454,493
7,709,688
5,672,672
8,247,826
538,138':
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(10,720,695)
(10,720,695)
(9,690,281)
(6,081,732)
(9,690,281)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
f $ 4,288,889
176%
$1,848,889
$ 3,206,945
$ 5,731,344
179%
$ 2,440,000
$ 5,322,285
218%
A Projected personnel savings
estimated at 5.4% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
,�JTES.. Budget to Actuals Report
Adult P&P - Fund 355
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025 Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
DOC Grant in Aid SB 1145
CJC Justice Reinvestment
DOC Measure 57
Interest on Investments
Gen Fund-Opioid Settlement
Interfund- Sheriff
State Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
Oregon BOPPPS
TOTAL RESOURCES
4,693,331
4,717,803
101% `
5,400,000
1,167,413
22%
4,562,804
84%
(837,196) A
1,167,810
1,285,830
110%
950,000
626,438
66% '•.
950,000
100%
259,307
253,517
98% E
270,000
55,598
21%
350,545
130%
80,545i B
73,000
125,990
173% i
101,000
39,544
39% E
101,700
101%
700E
50,000
25,883
52%
87,000
0%
87,000
100%
60,000
60,000
100%
60,000
25,000
42%
60,000
100%
19,709
-
0%
20,000
-
0%
20,000
100%
500
18,306
999% ?
500
2,417
483% S i
5,300
999% '
4,800i C
-
12,632
6,323,657
6,499,960
103% ':
6,888,500
1,916,409
28%
6,137,349
89% i
(751,151)i
REQUIREMENTS Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Personnel Services 6,387,456
5,599,770
88% •.
6,363,227
2,206,035
35% ':
5,721,869
90%
641,358i D
Materials and Services 1,984,229
1,710,539
86%
1,947,149
540,006
28%
1,622,149
83%
325,000i E
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 8,371,685
7,310,310
87% `:
8,310,376
2,746,041
33%
7,344,018
88%
966,358E
TRANSFERS Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In -General Funds 703,369
703,369
100% [
673,300
280,542
42%
673,300
100%
(13,297)
(5,540)
42%
(13,297)
100%
Transfers Out
Transfer to Vehicle Maint (76,405)
(76,405)
100% i
(76,805)
(32,002)
42%
(76,805)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS 626,964
626,964
100% ':
583,198
242,999
42% ':
583,198
100%
i
FUND BALANCE Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 2,326,824
2,326,824
100%
1,700,000
2,143,438
126% '
2,143,438
126%
! 443,438i
Resources over Requirements (2,048,028)
(810,350)
(1,421,876)
(829,632)
(1,206,669)
215,207i
Net Transfers - In (Out) 626,964
626,964
583,198
242,999
583,198
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 905,760
$ 2,143,438
237%
$ 861,322
$ 1,556,806
181%
! $ 1,519,967
176%
$658,645
A Final Grant In Aid Allocation based on legislative changes.
B Final M57 Allocation based on legislative changes.
C Entered into lease with Vigilnet at Bend P&P Office (electronic monitoring
provider).
D Projected personnel savings estimated at 9.8% based
on YTD actual vacancy rate.
E Based on reduced funding from the state working on strategy to
reduce materials
and services.
,IES Co Budget to Actuals Report
Road CIP - Fund 465
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals % Projection
% $ Variance
State Miscellaneous
881,339 890,115
101%
884,712
0% 884,712
100%
Interest on Investments
476,000 608,922
128%
500,000
295,770 59% `: 608,500
122% ` 108,500:
Miscellaneous
TOTAL RESOURCES
1,357,339 1,499,037
110% S
1,384,712
295,770 21% E 1,493,212
108% 108,500
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Materials and Services
134,492
134,492
100%
111,704
46,543
42%
111,704
100%
Capital Outlay
16,189,012
8,268,355
51%
18,910,997
2,675,792
14% ':
16,577,429
88%
2,333,568':
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
16,323,504
8,402,847
51% E
19,022,701
2,722,335
14% f
16,689,133
88% [
2,333,568
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In
10,631,333
9,015,761
85%
9,600,781
4,315,667
45% s
9,600,781
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
10,631,333
9,015,761
85% i
9,600,781
4,315,667
45% E
9,600,781
100%
E
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
15,675,284
15,675,284
100% ':
15,387,122
17,787,235
116% [
17,787,235
116%
2,400,113
Resources over Requirements
(14,966,165)
(6,903,810)
(17,637,989)
(2,426,565)
(15,195,921)
2,442,068
Net Transfers - In (Out)
10,631,333
9,015,761
9,600,781
4,315,667
9,600,781
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 11,340,452
$ 17,787,235
157%
$ 7,349,914
$ 19,676,336
268%
$ 12,192,095
166%
E $4,842,181
y`, 31E5 ('oGz Budget to Actuals Report
° Road CIP (Fund 465) - Capital Outlay Summary by Project 41.67%
,10 FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 Year Completed
Fiscal Year 2025 Fiscal Year 2026
Budaet Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % _ $ Variance
Hunnel Rd: Loco Rd to Tumalo Rd
218,471
Powell Butte Hwy/Butler Market RB
1,095,760
845,205
77%
Wilcox Ave Bridge #2171-03 Replacement
160,000
139,480
87
Paving Tumalo Rd/Deschutes Mkt Rd
520,000
471,376
91
Hamehook Rd Bridge #16181 Rehabilitation
1,930,500
1,747,935
91%
NW Lower Bridge Way: 43rd St to Holmes Rd
1,650,000
301,337
18
Northwest Way: NW Coyner Ave to NW Altmeter Wy
85,000
0
Tumalo Reservoir Rd: OB Riley to Sisemore Rd
2,417,752
234,127
10
Local Road Pavement Preservation
Paving Of Horse Butte Rd
630,000
Paving Of Obr Hwy: Tumalo To Helmho
2,520,000
291,406
11,489
Slurry Seal 2024
La Pine Uic Stormwater Improvements
240,000
S Century Dr / Spring River Rd Roun
1,650,000
770,413
Burgess Rd/Day Rd Traffic Signal
50,000
Powell Butte Hwy: McGrath Rd to US20
2,290,000
2,228,991
350,000
381,083
Slurry Seal 2025
Hamby Road School Zone Improvements
111,715
ODOT ARTS Program - Driver Speed Feedback Signs
24,161
24,161
Lazy River Dr Mailbox Improvements
150,000
108,477
200,000
381,916
Asphalt Leveling 2024
Paving of Skyline Ranch Rd: Century or to City limits
774
Tumalo Rd
Buckhorn Rd: Hwy 126 to MP 1.6 (FLAP
Buckhorn Rd: MP 1.6 to Lower Bridge Way
Lower Bridge Way Repair
S Century Dr Bridge # 16181 Rehab
Signage improvements
125,839
Cline Falls Hwy -Coopers Hawk Safety Imp
La Pine School Zone Improvements
Slurry Seal 2026
Indian Ford Rd
Knott Rd/Baker Rd: US 97 Interchange
Guardrail Improvements
Sidewalk Ramp Improvements
100,000
0%
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
$ 16,189,012
$ 8,268,355
51
40,000
810,844
1,085,000
4,846,453
500,000
1,023,000
350,000
4,012,300
90,000
350,000
500,000
1,370,000
1,760,000
83,400
250,000
100,000
300,000
150,000
7,051 18%
0%
0%
47,823 1%
0%
0%
186,389 53%
338,228 8 %
0%
0%
0%
2,096,301
0%
740,000
300,000
150,000 0%
100,000 0%
$ 18,910,997 2,675,792 1,
7,051 18%
516,224 64%
1,085,000 100%
4,846,453 100%
- 0%
1,023,000 100%
350,000 100%
3,070,000 77%
90,000 100%
0%
0%
1,370,000 100%
2,096,301 119%
83,400 100%
250,000 100%
- 0%
300,000 100%
0%
100,000
50,000
500,000
740,000 100%
- 0%
100,000 100
16,577,429 88'
32,949i
294,620
500,000:
(336,301)
1
Budget to Actuals
Report
I'M.-C,
Solid Waste - Fund 6'10
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Franchise Disposal Fees 9,940,000
10,220,274
103%
11,440,000
4,307,228
38%
11,440,000
100% '
-' A
Commercial Disp. Fee 4,450,000
4,430,805
100%
4,710,000
2,681,896
57% `:
4,710,000
100% ':
:A
Private Disposal Fees 3,420,000
3,722,944
109% ':
4,070,000
1,887,931
46% 1
4,070,000
100%
-i A
Franchise 5% Fees 635,000
772,676
122%
750,000
202,481
27% ':
750,000
100%
-`: B
Yard Debris 440,000
499,699
114%
450,000
293,577
65% ':
450,000
100% i
: C
250,000
0% [
250,000
100%
State Grants -
Miscellaneous 170,000
193,390
114%
185,000
95,702
52% i
185,000
100% i
Interest on Investments 62,000
225,339
363% i
168,000
118,091
70%
204,100
121%
36,100 D
Special Waste 645,000
150,613
23%
167,500
94,776
57%
167,500
100%
-
Recyclables 7,000
16,984
243%
8,000
9,889
124%
15,000
188%
7,000; E
1
1
100%
1
0% ':
1
100%
Leases
Local Grants -
13,455
-
6,205
6,205
6,205 F
Other Inter -fund Services
40,000
-
TOTAL RESOURCES 19,769,001
20,286,179
103%
22,198,501
9,697,777
44%
22,247,806
100%
49,305'
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
Personnel Services
5,739,145
5,263,056
92%
6,742,398
2,506,527
37%
6,742,398
100%
Materials and Services
8,994,999
7,689,612
85%
9,460,502
2,661,366
28%
9,460,502
100%
Capital Outlay
282,000
90,226
32% i
477,000
76,407
16%
477,000
100%
Debt Service
2,305,600
2,305,057
100%
2,301,800
-
0%
2,301,800
100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
17,321,744
15,347,950
89% `.
18,981,700
5,244,300
28% [
18,981,700
100%
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
Transfers Out - SW Capital &
(4,564,141)
(4,564,141)
100%
(4,673,934)
(9,973)
0%
(4,673,934)
100%
Equipment Reserve
TOTALTRANSFERS
(4,564,141)
(4,564,141)
100%
(4,673,934)
(9,973)
0%
(4,673,934)
100% i
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
038,781 100% 3,441,901 4,412,870 128% 4,412,870 128% 970,969i G
Beginning Fund Balance 4,038,781 4,
Resources over Requirements 2,447,257 4,938,229 3,216,801 4,453,477 3,266,106 49,305
Net Transfers - In (Out) (4,564,141) (4,564,141) (4,673,934) (9,973) (4,673,934)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 1,921,897 $ 4,412,870 230% i $ 1,984,768 $ 8,856,374 446% $ 3,005,042 151% ; $1,020,274
A Total disposal fee projections reflect management's best estimate of revenues to be collected. Disposal tons are typically higher in the summer with reductions
in winter; fiscal YTD disposal tons are running -5% greater than last year-to-date. Franchise disposal fee payments of $772K were not received from Republic
Services (Bend Garbage, High Country, Wilderness) by closing.
B Annual fees due April 15, 2026; received monthly installments from Republic.
C Yard Debris revenue is seasonal with higher utilization in summer months.
D Investment Income projected to come in higher than budget.
E Recyclables revenue is positively impacted by larger than anticipated battery proceeds.
F Local Grants include remaining funds for the Bend EventCycle Solutions grant.
G Delayed FY25 siting efforts, equipment orders and other project costs positively impacted the Beginning Fund Balance.
�It5 Budget to Actuals Report
Q`� Fair & Expo - Fund 615
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Events Revenue
1,390,000
1,336,756
96%
2,150,000
624,572
29%
1,207,000
56%
(943,000)
Food &Beverage
1,535,000
1,480,399
96%
1,222,500
558,534
46%
1,257,000
103%
34,500
Rights & Signage
110,000
83,900
76%
135,000
43,000
32%
123,000
91%
(12,000):
Other Inter -fund Services
60,000
25,000
42%
60,000
100%
Horse Stall Rental
67,500
104,350
155%
47,500
35,720
75%
91,000
192%
43,500i
Camping Fee
37,500
42,171
112% i
37,500
23,296
62%
54,000
144%
16,500`
Miscellaneous
5,000
23,714
474% '
19,000
3,711
20%
15,000
79%
i (4,000)
Interest on Investments
16,000
23,482
147%
6,000
10,734
179% ;
18,500
308%
12,500':
497
497
497.
Interfund Payment
Storage
45,000
-
0%
'
TOTAL RESOURCES
3,206,000
3,094,772
97%
3,6779500
1,325,065
36%
2,825,997
77%
(851,503)
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
1,851,584
1,633,354
88%
1,843,250
635,056
34%
1,697,582
92%
145,668 A
Personnel Services - F&B
187,439
28,244
15%
175,250
-
0%
102,229
58% `:
73,021: A
Materials and Services
1,917,689
1,646,515
86%
2,337,378
601,510
26%
1,186,000
51%
1,151,378;
Materials and Services - F&B
781,750
860,402
110% ':
741,450
311,321
42% [
708,000
95%
33,450:
Debt Service
99,700
99,208
100%
83,000
0%
83,000
100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
4,838,162
4,267,724
88%
5,180,328
1,547,888
30% E
3,776,811
73%
1,403,517
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers In - Room Tax
1,011,000
1,003,013
99%
978,285
407,619
42%
1,030,785
105%
52,500;
Transfers In - County Fair
196,900
196,900
100%
310,000
129,167
42%
310,000
100%
Transfers In - Park Fund
30,000
30,000
100% `
35,000
14,583
42%
35,000
100% i
Transfers Out
(10,777)
(10,777)
100%
(10,777)
(4,490)
42%
(10,777)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
1,227,123
1,219,136
99%
1,312,508
546,878
42% E
1,365,008
104% E
52,500
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
531,770
531,770
100% ':
403,000
577,955
143%
! 577,955
143%
': 174,955
Resources over Requirements
(1,632,162)
(1,172,951)
(1,502,828)
(222,823)
(950,814)
552,014':
Net Transfers - In (Out)
1,227,123
1,219,136
1,312,508
546,878
1,365,008
52,500::
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 126,731
$ 577,955
456%
$ 212,680
$ 902,010
424%
$ 992,149 466%
i
$779,469i
A Projected personnel savings estimated at 11.2%
based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
TES � Budget to Actuals Deport
Q`� oG2� Annual County Fair - Fund 616
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
Gate Receipts
Concessions and Catering
Carnival
Commercial Exhibitors
Fair Sponsorship
State Grant
Rodeo Sponsorship
RN Camping/Horse Stall Rental
Interest on Investments
Livestock Entry Fees
Merchandise Sales
Miscellaneous
TOTAL RESOURCES
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
780,000
923,260
118%
950,000
1,007,067
106%
1,007,067
106% '
57,067:
797,500
831,939
104% 1
841,500
888,330
106%
888,330
106%
46,830
430,000
468,142
109%
455,000
458,545
101%
458,545
101% '
3,545::
115,000
138,741
121% 1
132,500
130,230
98% :
130,230
98% !
(2,270)
99,000
139,900
141% `.
125,500
135,800
108% S
135,800
108%
[ 10,300:
53,167
53,167
100%
53,167
83,403
157%
83,403
157%
30,236 A
30,000
49,610
165%
45,000
37,150
83% E
37,150
83%
(7,850)
18,500
35,974
194%
30,000
38,319
128% :
38,319
128%
8,319
23,000
25,894
113%
18,000
12,220
68%
28,000
156%
10,000
2,000
3,130
157%
3,450
4,694
136%
4,694
136%
1,244;
2,500
1,608
64%
2,250
500
22%
500
22%
(1,750):
1,284
-
824
824
824
2,350,667
2,672,649
114%
2,656,367
2,797,082
105%
!, 2,812,862
106%
156,495'
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
Personnel Services
229,798
243,949
106% (
284,780
111,557
39%
285,453
100% ': (673) B
Materials and Services
2,442,103
2,492,034
102%
2,449,125
2,368,073
97%
2,449,125
100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
2,671,901
2,735,983
102% ?
2,733,905
2,479,629
91%
2,734,578
100% (673)i
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
Transfer In -TLT 1%
75,000
75,000 100% '
75,000
31,250
42% ':
75,000
100%
Transfer Out - Fair & Expo
(196,900)
(196,900) 100%
(310,000)
(129,167)
42%
(310,000)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(121,900)
(121,900) 100%
(235,000)
(97,917)
42%
(235,000)
100%
FUND BALANCE Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 509,451
509,451 100%
371,000
324,216 87%
324,216 87%
(46,784)
Resources over Requirements (321,234)
(63,335)
(77,538)
317,452
78,284
155,822
Net Transfers - In (Out) (121,900)
(121,900)
(235,000)
(97,917)
(235,000)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 66,317
$ 324,216 489% !
$ 58,462
$ 543,752 930% ':
$ 167,500 287%
' $109,038:
A Additional state grant funds received in November
due to legislative change.
13 Projected personnel based on overage to date.
IES COG2, Budget to Actuals Report
Annual County Fair - Fund 616
CY25 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
Fair 2025
Fair 2024
Actuals to Date
2025 Projection
RESOURCES
Gate Receipts
$ 926,552
$ 1,007,067
$ 1,007,067
Carnival
468,142
458,545
458,545
Commercial Exhibitors
463,575
507,453
507,453
Livestock Entry Fees
3,139
4,685
4,685
RN Camping/Horse Stall Rental
35,788
37,879
37,879
Merchandise Sales
1,608
500
500
Concessions and Catering
506,742
i
512,108
512,108
Fair Sponsorship
147,752
163,892
170,732
TOTAL FAIR REVENUES
$ 2,553,296
$ 2,692,128
$ 2,698,968
OTHER RESOURCES
State Grant
Interest
Miscellaneous
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS
Personnel
Materials & Services
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
TRANSFERS
Transfer In - TRT 1 %
Transfer Out - F&E Reserve
Transfer Out - Fair & Expo
TOTAL TRANSFERS
Net Fair
Beginning Fund Balance on Jan 1
Ending Balance
635
27,388
$ 2,581,319
136,570 136,570
24,188 26,988
824 824
$ 2,853,709 $ 2,863,349
222,365 236,666 256,277
2,524,960 2,522,563 2,569,490
$ 2,747,324 $ 2,759,229 $ 2,825,767
75,000 68,750 75,000
(54,753) F - -
(98,450) (227,617) (253,450)
$ (78,203) ;<a, $ (158,867) $ (178,450)
$ (244,209) f
$ (64,386)
$
(140,868)
$ 1,020,140
$ 775,931
$
775,931
$ 775,931 $ 711,545 $ 635,064
"i�vTES -,Budget to Actuals Report
2{ Fair & Expo capital Reserve - Fund 617
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025 Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Interest on Investments 88,000 135,080 154% ': 117,000 63,919 55% 130,000 111% 13,000
Miscellaneous 94,112 -
TOTAL RESOURCES 88,000 229,192 260% E 117,000 63,919 55% E 130,000 111% 13,0004
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals %
Projection
% $ Variance
Materials and Services
475,000
256,097
54%
475,000
104,364 22%
475,000
100%
Capital Outlay
785,000
31,257
4%
790,000
0%
790,000
100% A
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
1,260,000
287,354
23% i
1,265,000
104,364 8%
1,265,000
100% S
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In -TLT 1%
465,396
459,544
99% 448,946 187,061 42% 471,446 105% 22,500
Transfers In - Fund 165
150,000
150,000
100% i
TOTAL TRANSFERS
615,396
609,544
99% 448,946 187,061 42% E 471,446 105% 22,500
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
3,179,332
3,179,332
100%
3,614,000
3,730,714
103%
3,730,714
103%
116,714
Resources over Requirements (1,172,000) (58,162) (1,148,000) (40,445) (1,135,000) 13,000
Net Transfers - In (Out) 615,396 609,544 448,946 187,061 471,446 22,500:
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 2,622,728 $ 3,730,714 142% $ 2,914,946 $ 3,877,329 133% $ 3,067,160 105% $152,214
A Capital Outlay appropriations are a placeholder should viable projects be recommended and approved for construction.
vTES C Budget to Actuals Report
oG2< RV Park - Fund 618
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
RV Park Fees < 31 Days
Cancellation Fees
RV Park Fees > 30 Days
Interest on Investments
Washer / Dryer
Miscellaneous
Vending Machines
TOTAL RESOURCES
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
450,000
484,640
108%
450,000
215,850
48%
454,850
101%
4,850:
7,000
30,627
438%
17,500
7,729
44%
17,529
100%
29
15,000
12,391
83%
11,000
9,606
87%
21,906
199%
10,906::
8,000
12,072
151%
' 8,000
6,173
77%
12,500
156%
E 4,500
5,000
6,978
140%
5,000
5,623
112%t
': 7,923
158%
2,923
2,500
2,797
112%
i 1,500
3,153
210%
i 4,063
271%
2,563::
1,500
1,060
71%
800
1,004
126% i
1,186
148%
' 386'
489,000
550,566
113%
493,800
249,138
50%
519,957
105%
26,157
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget
Personnel Services
159,210
150,138
94%
172,715
Materials and Services
344,054
207,824
60%
355,503
Debt Service
223,600
223,299
100% 1
56,100
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
726,864
581,262
80%
584,318
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
60,049
35% i
164,309
95%
i 8,406
152,153
43%
358,190
101%
(2,687)
0%
56,100
100%
212,202
36%
578,599
99%
5,719
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In - Park Fund
160,000
160,000
100% [
160,000
66,667
42% i
160,000
100%
Transfers In - TLT Fund
20,000
20,000
100%
20,000
8,333
42%
20,000
100%
Transfer Out - RV Reserve
(122,142)
(122,142)
100%
(221,600)
(92,333)
42%
(221,600)
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
57,858
57,858
100%
(41,600)
(17,333)
42%
(41,600)
100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
312,766
312,766 100% [
199,000
339,929 171% [
[ 339,929 171% `
140,929
Resources over Requirements
(237,864)
(30,695)
(90,518)
36,937
(58,642)
31,876
Net Transfers - In (Out)
57,858
57,858
(41,600)
(17,333)
(41,600)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 132,760
$ 339,929 256%
$ 66,882
$ 359,532 538%
$ 239,687 358%
$172,805
Budget to Actuals Report
.. RV Park Reserve - Fund 619
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025 Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Interest on Investments 45,000 60,431 134% 58,000 29,442 51% 59,700 103% 1,700'
TOTAL RESOURCES 45,000 60,431 134% ' 58,000 29,442 51% 59,700 103% 1,700::
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
Materials and Services
100,000
-
0%
100,000
10,077
10%
100,000
100%
Capital Outlay
70,000
0%
70,000
0%
70,000
100% A
I TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
170,000
-
0%
170,000
10,077
6% `:
170,000
100%
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
Transfer In - RV Park Ops
122,142
122,142
100% ':
221,600
92,333
42% '•.
221,600
100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
122,142
122,142
100%
221,600
92,333
42%
221,600
100% J
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals %
Budget
Actuals %
Projection %
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
1,521,389
1,521,389 100%
1,530,000
1,703,962 111%
1,703,962 111%
173,962
Resources over Requirements
(125,000)
60,431
(112,000)
19,365
(110,300)
1,700:
Net Transfers - In (Out)
122,142
122,142
221,600
92,333
221,600
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 1,518,531
$ 1,703,962 112%
$ 1,639,600
$ 1,815,660 111%
$ 1,815,262 111%
$175,662
A Capital Outlay appropriations are a placeholder.
Budget to Actuals
Report
CIEs
ooG2< Risk Management - Fund 670
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Workers' Compensation
1,116,950
1,172,530
105%
1,111,329
480,798
43%
1,111,329
100%
General Liability
943,414
943,414
100%
941,127
392,136
42%
941,127
100%
- A
Property Damage
419,983
419,983
100%
430,181
179,242
42% ':
430,181
100%
Unemployment
362,214
345,948
96% 's
364,469
322,401
88% ':
364,469
100%
B
Vehicle
250,030
250,030
100%
245,300
102,208
42%
245,300
100%
-
Interest on Investments
254,000
284,190
112%
219,000
118,490
54%
248,900
114%
29,900€
Skid Car Training
30,000
46,926
156% ;
45,000
14,432
32%
45,000
100%
Claims Reimbursement
20,000
77,121
386%
40,000
6,711
17% "s
40,000
100%
Process Fee- Events/ Parades
2,000
1,705
85%
3,000
385
13%
3,000
100%
Miscellaneous
200
88,568
999% '
2,000
0%
2,000
100%
TOTAL RESOURCES
3,398,791
3,630,416
107%
3,401,406
1,616,804
48%
3,431,306
101%
29,900
REQUIREMENTS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Workers' Compensation
2,000,000
2,093,352
105%
2,000,000
1,022,442
51%
2,000,000
100%
General Liability
1,500,000
752,821
50%
1,880,000
379,329
20%
1,880,000
100%
Insurance Administration
831,187
807,561
97%
1,025,110
327,816
32%
1,021,281
100%
3,829
Vehicle
700,000
242,431
35%
800,000
134,905
17%
800,000
100%
Property Damage
400,255
386,590
97% '•.
600,260
467,745
78%
600,260
100%
Unemployment
200,000
75,887
38%
250,000
53,339
21%
250,000
100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
5,631,442
4,358,642
77% E
6,555,370
2,385,575
36% i
6,551,541
100%
3,829
TRANSFERS
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Transfers Out - Vehicle
(4,500)
(4,500)
100%
(4,800)
(2,000)
42%
(4,800)
100%
Replacement
TOTAL TRANSFERS
(4,500)
(4,500)
100%
(4,800)
(2,000)
42% S
(4,800)
100%
FUND BALANCE
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance
8,168,164
8,168,164
100% I
9,000,000
7,435,437
83%
7,435,437
83%
(1,564,563)':
Resources over Requirements
(2,232,651)
(728,226)
(3,153,964)
(768,771)
(3,120,235)
33,729
Net Transfers - In (Out)
(4,500)
(4,500)
(4,800)
(2,000)
(4,800)
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
$ 4,310,402
74%
':, ($1,530,834)
$ 5,931,013
$ 7,435,437
125% `:
$ 5,841,236
$ 6,664,667
114%
A Includes reimbursement from
State for higher general
liability insurance related to aid and assist.
B Unemployment collected on first $25K of employee's salary in fiscal year.
\NV1ES C0 Budget to Actuals Report
Health Benefits - Fund 675
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
RESOURCES
Internal Premium Charges
COIC Premiums
Employee Co -Pay
Retiree 1 COBRA Premiums
Claims Reimbursement & Other
Prescription Rebates
Interest on Investments
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS
Health Benefits
Deschutes On -Site Pharmacy
Deschutes On -Site Clinic
Wellness
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
TOTAL
FUND BALANCE
Beginning Fund Balance
Resources over Requirements
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
% $ Variance
35,507,169
34,073,222
96%
35,820,000
13,595,972
38%
35,820,000
100% ` A
3,091,915
3,218,586
104% `:
3,122,834
1,143,152
37%
3,122,834
100%
1,556,257
1,552,278
100% f
1,556,257
644,502
41%
1,556,257
100%
1,061,802
1,141,704
108% i
1,268,401
144,908
11% I
1,268,401
100% i
800,000
1,881,666
235%
800,000
7,305
1%
800,000
100% B
626,446
1,180,698
188% i
666,008
0% ?
666,008
100% E
211,200
307,732
146%
242,000
227,667
94%
435,700
180% i 193,700
42,854,789
43,355,886
101% '
43,475,500
15,763,507
36%
43,669,200
100% 193,700
Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals
32,172,026
29,641,211
92%
35,790,482
8,926,174
25% i
4,942,177
4,097,283
83%
5,108,296
1,327,971
26%
1,600,661
1,332,311
83%
1,466,802
450,173
31%
104,230
39,199
38%
44,965
10,505
23%
38,819,094
35,110,004
90%
42,410,545
10,714,823
25%
Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals %
3,859,732 3,859,732 100%
4,035,695 8,245,882
7,500,000 12,105,614 161%
1,064,955 5,048,683
Net Transfers - In (Out) -
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 7,895,427 $ 12,105,614 153% 1 $ 8,564,955 $ 17,154,297 200%
A Reflects a 1 % increase to departments.
Projection
% $ Variance
35,790,482
100%
5,108,296
100%
1,466,802
100%
44,965
100%
42,410,545
100%
Projection %
$ Variance
12,105,614 161%
4,605,614
1,258,655
193,700
$4,799,314 C
$ 13,364,269 156%
Budget estimate is based on claims which are difficult to predict.
Deschutes County Administrative Policy No. F-13 sets forth the appropriate level of reserves. The reserve is comprised of two parts: 1) Claims Reserve at 1.5
times the valuation amount, and 2) Contingency Reserve at 150% of the value of the Claims Reserve. The level of reserve is set at $8 million ($3.2 million claim
reserve and $4.8 million contingency reserve requirements). The reserve requirement amount should be compared to the Total Fund Balance amount in this
report.
Budget to Actuals
Report
o 911 - Fund 705 and 710
FY26 YTD November 30, 2025 (unaudited)
41.7%
Year Complete
Fiscal Year 2025
Fiscal Year 2026
RESOURCES Budget
Actuals
%
Budget
Actuals
%
Projection
%
$ Variance
Property Taxes - Current Yr 11,556,000
11,532,626
100%
12,020,000
11,027,923
92% `:
12,068,000
100%
': 48,000 A
Telephone User Tax 1,800,500
1,934,091
107%
1,800,500
486,110
27% '•.
1,800,500
100%
'•. B
Interest on Investments 426,000
601,311
141%
468,000
239,921
51% ':
480,400
103%
12,400;
Police RMS User Fees 255,000
274,257
108%
274,200
-
0%
274,200
100%
-' C
Contract Payments 179,300
184,671
103%
185,600
31,407
17%
185,600
100%
User Fee 148,600
157,106
106%
157,000
6,500
4%
157,000
100%
Data Network Reimbursement 106,500
119,919
113%
122,300
0%
122,300
100%
•.
Property Taxes - Prior Yr 90,000
123,969
138% i
95,000
62,559
66%
95,000
100%
State Reimbursement 93,000
101,948
110%
80,000
33,000
41%
80,000
100%
' D
Property Taxes - Jefferson Co. 42,500
39,803
94%
42,500
36,435
86%
42,500
100%
Miscellaneous 36,500
42,421
116%
36,000
8,652
24%
36,000
100%
TOTAL RESOURCES 14,733,900
15,112,121
103%
15,281,100
11,932,506
78%
15,341,500
100%
60,400
REQUIREMENTS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Personnel Services
10,237,093
9,569,368
93%
11,064,394
3,965,126
36%
10,342,286
93% 722,108 E
Materials and Services
4,267,026
3,221,390
75%
4,437,521
1,502,515
34%
4,437,521
100%
Capital Outlay
2,750,500
1,543,333
56% ':
1,880,000
239,476
13%
1,880,000
100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
17,254,619
14,334,091
83%
17,381,915
5,707,117
33%
16,659,807
96% 722,108';
TRANSFERS Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Transfers In 515,000 515,000 100% 630,000 - 0% 630,000 100%
Transfers Out (515,000) (515,000) 100% (630,000) 0% (630,000) 100%
TOTAL TRANSFERS
FUND BALANCE Budget Actuals % Budget Actuals % Projection % $ Variance
Beginning Fund Balance 14,371,465 14,371,465 100% 12,914,000 15,149,495 117% 15,149,495 117% 2,235,495
Resources over Requirements (2,520,719) 778,030 (2,100,815) 6,225,389 (1,318,307) 782,508
Net Transfers - In (Out) - -
TOTAL FUND BALANCE $ 11,850,746 $ 15,149,495 128% ' $ 10,813,185 $ 21,374,884 198% $ 13,831,188 128% $3,018,003i.
A Current Year taxes received primarily in November, February, and May; actual FY 2026 TAV is 4.90% over FY 2025 vs. 4.58% budgeted.
B Telephone tax payments are received quarterly.
C Invoices are mailed in the Spring.
D State GIS reimbursements are received quarterly.
E Projected personnel savings estimated at 7.3% based on YTD actual vacancy rate.
\\v'(E S coG2�
BOARD OF
--fir COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING
9:00 AM, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2025
Barnes Sawyer Rooms - Deschutes Services Building - 1300 NW Wall Street - Bend
(541) 388-6570 1 www.deschutes.org
REVISED AGENDA
MEETING FORMAT: In accordance with Oregon state law, this meeting is open to the public and
can be accessed and attended in person or remotely, with the exception of any executive session.
Members of the public may view the meeting in real time via YouTube using this link:
http://bit.ly/3mminzy. To attend the meeting virtually via Zoom, see below.
Citizen Input: The public may comment on any topic that is not on the current agenda.
Alternatively, comments may be submitted on any topic at any time by emailing
citizeninput@deschutes.org or leaving a voice message at 541-385-1734.
When in -person comment from the public is allowed at the meeting, public comment will also be
allowed via computer, phone or other virtual means.
Zoom Meeting Information: This meeting may be accessed via Zoom using a phone or computer.
• To join the meeting via Zoom from a computer, use this link: http://bit.ly/3h3ogdD.
• To join by phone, call 253-215-8782 and enter webinar ID # 899 4635 9970 followed by the
passcode 013510.
• If joining by a browser, use the raise hand icon to indicate you would like to provide public
comment, if and when allowed. If using a phone, press *9 to indicate you would like to speak
and *6 to unmute yourself when you are called on.
• When it is your turn to provide testimony, you will be promoted from an attendee to a
panelist. You may experience a brief pause as your meeting status changes. Once you have
joined as a panelist, you will be able to turn on your camera, if you would like to.
Time estimates: The times listed on agenda items are estimates only. Generally, items will be heard in
sequential order and items, including public hearings, may be heard before or after their listed times.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN INPUT
The Board of Commissioners provides time during its public meetings for citizen input. This is an
opportunity for citizens to communicate to the Commissioners on matters that are not otherwise
on the agenda. Time is limited to 3 minutes.
The Citizen Input platform is not available for and may not be utilized to communicate obscene or
defamatory material.
Note: In addition to the option of providing in -person comments at the meeting, citizen input comments
may be emailed to citizeninput@deschutes.org or you may leave a brief voicemail at 541.385.1734.
COMMISSIONER ANNOUNCEMENTS
CONSENT AGENDA
Authorization to accept a Quality Incentive Measures payment from Central Oregon
Health Council for Public Health
2. Approval of Resolution No. 2025-039 adopting a supplemental budget, increasing or
transferring appropriations within the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY 2026) Deschutes County
budget
Convening as the Governing Body for the Countywide Law Enforcement District (District 1)
3. Approval of Resolution 2025-047 adopting a supplemental budget increasing Fiscal Year
2026 Beginning Working Capital and appropriations within the Countywide Law
Enforcement District (District 1) Fund
Convening as the Governing Body for the Rural Law Enforcement District (District 2)
4. Approval of Resolution 2025-048 adopting a supplemental budget which increases FY
2026 Beginning Working Capital, and appropriations within the Rural Law Enforcement
District (District 2) Fund
Convening as the Governing Body for the OSU Extension and 4-H Service District
5. Approval of Resolution 2025-050 adopting a supplemental budget which recognizes
additional Fiscal Year 2026 Beginning Working Capital and increases appropriations
within the Deschutes County Extension and 4-H Service District
December 17, 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 2 of 5
Reconvening as the Governing Body of Deschutes County
6. Approval of third amendment to the lease with Telecare Mental Health Services of
Oregon for the Recovery Center at 20370 Poe Shoes Drive in Bend
7. Consideration of Board Signature on letters of appointment, reappointment and thanks
for various Special Road Districts
8. Consideration of Board Signature on letter thanking Judy Trego for service on the
Deschutes County Budget Committees
9. Consideration of Board Signature on letter appointing Jennifer Hobson-Hinsley for
service on the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Board
10. Approval of the BOCC meeting minutes of November 24 and December 1, 2025
ACTION ITEMS
11, 9:10 AM Proclamation: 250th Anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of
Independence
12. 9:20 AM Consideration of first reading of Ordinance No. 2025-020: Sunriver
Community Limited District Text Amendment
13. 9:25 AM Consideration of Document 2025-1096, a Grant Agreement Between
Deschutes County and Craig and Lori Gales Living Trust
14. 9:40 AM Consideration of Document 2025-1097, an Agreement Creating a Land Use
Restrictive Covenant involving property at 62150 Hamby Road, Bend
15. 9:50 AM Public Hearing: Consideration of Order No 2025-059 transferring jurisdiction
of portions of Northwest Way, SW Helmholtz Way, and NW Pershall Way to
the City of Redmond
16. 10:00 AM Public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-044 adopting a
supplemental budget in the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY 2026) Deschutes County
Budget
17. 10:10 AM Public hearing and consideration of Resolution 2025-046 adopting a
supplemental budget and increasing or reducing Fiscal Year 2026 (FY 2026)
beginning working capital and appropriations '
December 17, 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 3 of 5
Convening as the Governing Body for the Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District
18. 10:20 AM Public hearing and consideration of Resolution 2025-049 adopting a
supplemental budget which recognizes additional Fiscal Year 2026 Beginning
Working Capital and increased appropriations within the Deschutes County
9-1-1 Service District
19. 10:30 AM Sales Agreement with Russ Bassett Corp. for 9-1-1 dispatch console
replacements
Convening as the Governing Body for the Sunriver Service District
20. 10:40 AM Public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2025-056 adopting a
supplemental budget increasing and transferring appropriations in the
Sunriver Service District Public Safety Building Fund
Reconvening as the Governing Body of Deschutes County
21. 10:50 AM Public Hearing regarding the proposed temporary conveyance of real
property commonly known as the Rease Cemetery located at 17799 Paulina
Lake Road in La Pine to Deschutes Land Trust, and further authorize
accepting said real property from Deschutes Land Trust
22. 10:55 AM Consideration of Resolution 2025-053 adopting a supplemental budget for
the Community justice department and eliminating or reducing FTEs
23. 11:10 AM Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-054, reducing 11.00 approved FTEs
within the Sheriffs Office
24. 11:20 AM Consideration of Resolution 2025-052 eliminating 10.35 unfilled Full Time
Equivalent (FTE) positions in the Health Services Department and adopting a
supplemental budget
LUNCH RECESS
25. 1:00 PM Presentation by Limitless Solutions & NorthRenew Energy for a potential
solar project on County -owned property north of Ft. Thompson Lane, Bend
26. 1:30 PM FY 2027 Budget Development - Limited Growth Strategies
27. 1:50 PM Wage Equity Project Update: Phase II (Market Study for AFSCME and Non -
Represented Positions)
28. 2:35 PM Proposed Policy Updates: HR-5: Non -Wage and Salary Compensation and
HR-17: Payroll Deductions for Health Club Membership Dues
December 17, 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 4 of 5
29. 2:45 PM Treasury Report for November 2025
30. 3:00 PM Finance Report for November 2025
31. 3:20 PM Board selection of Chair and Vice Chair for 2026
OTHER ITEMS
These can be any items not included on the agenda that the Commissioners wish to discuss as part of
the meeting, pursuant to ORS 192.640.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At any time during the meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS
192.660(2)(e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor
negotiations; ORS 192.660(2)(b), personnel issues, or other executive session categories. Executive sessions
are closed to the public, and, with few exceptions and under specific guidelines, are open to the media.
Convening as the Governing Body for the Deschutes County 9-1-1 Service District
32. Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2) (d) Labor Negotiations
Reconvening as the Governing Body for Deschutes County
33. Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2) (e) Real Property Negotiations
ADJOURN
Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all
programs and activities. This meeting/event is accessible. Accommodations
including sign and other language interpreter services, assistive listening devices,
materials in alternate formats such as Braille, large print, electronic formats, or
language translations are available upon advance request at no cost. Please make
a request at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting/event by calling Brenda
Fritsvold at (541) 388-6572 or send an email to brenda.fritsvoid@des-lhutes.org.
El condado de Deschutes anima a las personas con discapacidad a participar en
todos los programas y actividades. Esta reuni6n/evento es accesible. Hay
disponibles servicios de int6rprete de lengua de senas y de otros idiomas,
dispositivos de escucha asistida, materiales en formatos alternativos como braille,
letra grande, formatos electr6nicos, traducciones o cualquier otra adaptaci6n, con
solicitud previa y sin ningun costo. Haga su solicitud al menos 24 horas antes de la
reuni6n/el evento Ilamando a Brenda Fritsvold al (541) 388-6572 o envfe un correo
electr6nico a brenda fritsvold2deschutes.org.
December 17, 2025 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Page 5 of 5