Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFollow-up of Veterans Services - EffectivenessFollow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 FOLLOW-UP REPORT Veterans’ Services - Effectiveness (Internal audit report #12/13-1 issued February 2013) To request this information in an alternate format, please call (541) 330-4674 or send email to David.Givans@Deschutes.org Deschutes County, Oregon David Givans, CPA, CIA, CGMA Deschutes County Internal Auditor 1300 NW Wall St PO Box 6005 Bend, OR 97708-6005 (541) 330-4674 David.Givans@Deschutes.og Audit committee: Jennifer Welander, Chair - Public member Chris Earnest - Public member Gayle McConnell - Public member Jean Pedelty - Public member Michael Shadrach - Public member Anthony DeBone, County Commissioner Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk Dan Despotopulos, Fair & Expo Director Follow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background ………………………………………...………………................................... 1 1.2. Objectives & Scope ……………………………………..………………………….…….… 1 1.3. Methodology ……………………………………………………..…………………….……. 1 2. FOLLOW-UP RESULTS ……………….…...………………………….............................. 2 3. APPENDIX I – Internal Audit Recommendations - Updated Workplan for Report #12/13-1 (Status updated as of December 2013) ….……...…........................ 3-6 Follow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 Page 1 1. Introduction 1.1 BACKGROUND Audit Authority: The Deschutes County Audit Committee has suggested that follow-ups occur from nine months to one year after the original report issuance. The Audit Committee’s would like to make sure departments satisfactorily address recommendations. 1.2 OBJECTIVES and SCOPE Objectives: The objective was to follow-up on the outstanding audit recommendations. Scope: The follow-up included six (6) recommendations from the internal audit report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness (#12/13-1) (issued February 2013). The follow-up reflects the status as of December 2013. The original internal audit report should be referenced for the full text of recommendations and discussion. 1.3 METHODOLOGY The follow-up report was developed from information provided by Keith MacNamara, Veterans’ Service Officer. In cases where recommendations have not been implemented, comments were sought for the reasons why and the timing for addressing these. The follow-up is, by nature, subjective. In determining the status of recommendations that were followed up, we relied on assertions provided by those involved and did not attempt to independently verify those assertions. The Veterans’ Service Office should be acknowledged for their work in addressing these recommendations. Since no substantive audit work was performed, Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States were not followed. DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT Follow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 Page 2 2. Follow-up Results Figure I - How were recommenda- tions implemented? The follow-up included six (6) recommendations. Management agreed with all of the recommendations. Figure I provides an overview of the implementation status of the recommendations. The details of the updated workplan are provided in Appendix I. With this follow-up, 6 of the recommendations (50%) have been sufficiently completed. Expectations have been established for the remainder of the recommendations. Follow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 Page 3 3. Appendix Appendix I –Updated Workplan for Report #12/13-1 (Status as of December 2013) Rec# Recommendation text Agreement STATUS Expected Completion Date Updated Department Comments 1 It is recommended for a policy to be developed by Deschutes County Veterans’ Services Office to address whether and the extent of services provided to non-Deschutes County veterans. This policy should consider moving towards a situation of limiting “out of county” veterans and referring them to ODVA when there is a backlog to see new Deschutes County veterans. Agree Underway Jun-14 At this time, I have not developed a written policy for seeing out of county clients. However, I have been working with the other local CVSO’S and we have set up a referral system. When we have a client come in from other counties we make phone contact with the respective CVSO and notify them of the veterans need to be seen by them. If we are unable to make contact, we will assist the veteran with their needs at that time and make the referral verbally. We also send email notification to the other CVSO with contact information for the veteran for future representation. Follow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 Page 4 Rec# Recommendation text Agreement STATUS Expected Completion Date Updated Department Comments 2 It is recommended for the Veterans’ Services Office to develop a plan to reduce backlog for new client appointments to an acceptable level. Some suggested ideas for reducing the backlog in new client appointments, could include: • Providing more opportunities for new client appointments. This could include: o extending new client appointment options to all work days, o doing away with walk-in appointments and doing fill-in for cancellations or no-shows, and o establishing performance measures that will monitor work towards improving new client visits. • Triaging new clients and making sure new VSO comes on quickly and has opportunities to increase caseload. • Seeking temporary additional assistance from an available ODVA certified VSO to help bring down the backlog faster. {It is not clear whether one may be available} Agree Completed /Ongoing The backlog has been reduced to what I am considering a normal wait time between 2 and 3 weeks. Currently we are seeing new clients within the 2 - 3 week time frame. 1. We have extended new client appointments to all work days. 2. We have a cancelation notebook that we use to fill in appointments either when one is canceled or rescheduled. 3. The new ACVSO has come up to speed and is seeing a standard caseload of clients, which significantly contributed to the depletion of the backlog. 4. We are seeing new clients as soon as possible, even to file an informal claim. This allows the client and the VSO time to gather the required evidence and documentation to file a formal application for benefits to the VBA. Follow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 Page 5 Rec# Recommendation text Agreement STATUS Expected Completion Date Updated Department Comments 3 It is recommended for the Office to consider more fully utilizing the software for communicating and operating with client information. Agree Underway Jun-14 We are continuing to enter as much data as possible into the Vetraspec database. The VA is turning to all electronic claims submission in the near future. At that time, all data and client information will only be available in the database. This will greatly increase our workload due to amount of documentation that will be required to be scanned into the system. 4 It is recommended for the Office to consider additional performance measures that are useful in addressing the level and quality of services being performed. Agree Completed /Ongoing We have continued to utilize the customer survey sheets that were used during the audit to constantly improve our level of service and our commitment to the veterans of Deschutes County. 5 It is recommended for the Office to seek methods for collecting their information for measures from their computerized systems, when possible. Agree Underway Jun-14 When writing my quarterly reports of activities I am now considering all continuing monthly monetary benefits that in the past have not been considered. The Oregon County Veteran Service Office Association and the Oregon Department of Veterans Affairs are attempting to standardize the format and the configuration of the reports. This will also include what categories must be included in the report and what figures must be used. Follow-up report on Veterans’ Services – Effectiveness #13/14-7 December 2013 Page 6 Rec# Recommendation text Agreement STATUS Expected Completion Date Updated Department Comments 6 It is recommended for the County to consider whether the use of the remote locations is still warranted and evaluate whether the additional .25 FTE in staffing could have a greater impact on service levels. Agree Completed The assistant veteran’s service officer has been increased to full time status. The county also authorized the additional funding that was required to maintain the operations of both remote offices in LaPine and Redmond. We have depleted the backlog of clients to a normal wait time and maintained outreach services. {END OF REPORT}