HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrder 034 - Remand Johnson Vested Rights CaseDeschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board Business Meeting of July 24, 2013
DATE: July 18,2013
FROM: Mark Pilliod Legal 388-6624
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Consideration of Board Signature of Order No. 2013-034, Remanding the John Johnson Declaratory
Ruling Application (DR-08-6) to the County Hearing Officer.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS DATE? No.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
In May 2012 based upon a decision by the Oregon Court of Appeals, the Deschutes County Circuit
Court issued a Judgment and remanded John Johnson's declaratory ruling application (vested rights) to
Deschutes County (attached). The County must now issue a new decision. Consistent with Board
policy, specifically Order No. 2008-056, which delegates final decision-making authority on vested
rights cases to county hearing officers, the Board should direct the County Hearing Officer, Karen
Green to conduct further proceedings on DR-08-6.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
RECOMMENDATION & ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider and adopt the proposed order and approve Board signatures
ATTENDANCE: Mark Pilliod
DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS:
Copies to Legal, CDD and Karen Green, DC Hearing Officer
REVIEWED
LEGAL COUNSEL
For Recording Stamp Only
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
An Order Remanding the John Johnson *
Declaratory Ruling Application (DR-08-6) to the * ORDER NO. 2013-034
County Hearing Officer *
RECITALS
John Johnson owned real property in the Redmond area and applied for and received from the County
and the State of Oregon waivers of land use regulations pursuant to Measure 37. In April 2006 Johnson applied
to the County for approval of a 40-lot residential subdivision to be developed in four phases. He received from
the County final plat approval in June 2007 and for Phase I in October, 2007. He applied for but did not receive
final plat approval for Phase II later that month. In December, 2007 Measure 49 became effective and in July,
2008 Johnson submitted an application with the County for a declaratory ruling (DR-08-6) to determine whether
in light of Measure 49 he had obtained a vested right to continue to develop his property consistent with the
approved and pending subdivision applications.
As part of the Declaratory Ruling process, the County Hearing Officer, Karen Green conducted a
hearing on September 23, 2008, received testimony and evidence, as well as legal arguments from the County
and Johnson's attorney, Ed Fitch. After the close of the evidentiary hearing Hearing Officer Green issued a
decision in January, 2009.
Dissatisfied with the County hearing officer's decision, Johnson timely filed with the Deschutes County
Circuit Court a Petition for Writ of Review. The Circuit Court held a hearing on the Petition for Writ of Review
and issued a decision in January 2010 vacating and remanding the County hearing officer's decision.
Deschutes County filed an appeal of the Circuit Court's decision with the Oregon Court of Appeals. The
parties submitted briefs and argued the case in 20 I 0 and in response to a request by the Court of Appeals the
parties submitted additional arguments in February 2011. The Court of Appeals issued a decision in March,
2012. The Court affirmed the Circuit Court's decision vacating the hearing officer's decision, but also vacated
the Circuit Court's decision, finding that the lower court had erred in that it rendered its own extensive findings
and circumscribed the scope of the hearing officer's future reconsideration.
In May, 2012 based upon the decision by the Oregon Court of Appeals, the Deschutes County Circuit
Court issued a Judgment and remanded the case to Deschutes County (attached).
Following the circuit court remand of the case, the County and Johnson's attorney attempted but failed
to reach agreement on how the County would conduct the remand hearing, either by the original hearing officer,
Karen Green or by another County appointed hearing officer. In April, 2013 Johnson's attorney requested and
the County Board approved the attorney's withdrawal from the case. Mr. Johnson's surviving spouse (John
Johnson having passed away) has not advised the County whether she has retained new legal counsel.
Now that the Circuit Court has remanded the case, the County must issue a new decision regarding
Johnson's declaratory ruling application. Consistent with Board policy, specifically Order No. 2008-056, which
delegates final decision making authority on vested rights cases to county hearing officers, the Board believes
that it is in the public interest to direct the County Hearing Officer, Karen Green to conduct further proceedings
on DR-08-6.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, ORDERS
as follows:
PAGE 1 OF I-ORDER NO. 2013-034 j
]
i
I
---------------
Section 1. The Declaratory Ruling Application submitted by John Johnson (DR-08-6), together with the
record of proceedings, as generally described in the recitals is hereby remanded to the County Hearing Officer,
Karen Green for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Dated this of ,2013 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
ALAN UNGER, Chair
TAMMY BANEY, Vice Chair
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary ANTHONY DEBONE, Commissioner
!
I
I
PAGE 2 OF 1 ORDER NO. 2013-034
5
10
15
20
25
•1
2
3
4
6
7
x
9
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
26
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES
JOHN JOHNSON,
Case No. 09CY0114AB
Peti ti oner-Respondent,
GENERAL JUDGMENT
v.
REMAND TO DESCHUTES COUNTY
DESCHUTES COUNTY, a political BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
subdivision of the State of Oregon, acting by
and through its Board of County
Commissioners,
Respondent -Appellant.
This matter came before the Court following a remand from the Oregon Court of Appeals
Case No. A144929.
And the Court finding that a remand from the Circuit Court is required for the Deschutes
County Board of Commissioners to reconsider the vesting matter based upon the decision of the
Court of Appeals.
The Court now hereby enters <:l General Judgment of remand to the Deschutes County
Board of Corr.missioncrs consistent with the Court of Appeal,> deCision in Case No. A 144929.
DATED this -.J~ day o~,2012. ~
THE HON~lCHAEL ADLER
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED BY:
EDW ARD P. FITCH, OSB 782026
LISA D.T. KLEMP, OSB 040012
Of Attorneys for Petitioner-Respondent
Bryant, Emerson & Fitch, LLP
P.O. Box 457. Redmond, OR 97756
Telephone: (541) 548-2151, Facsimile: (541) 548-1895
E fitch@,redmond-Iawyers.com
lisa(ii}rednlOnd-lav.yers.cQm
I Page I -GENERAL JUDGMENT -REMAND TO DESCHUTIZS COUNTY BOARD OF BRYANT E'\tERSOl'; ..Ii. fll CH. LLP
COMMISSIONbRS ATTORNEYS Al LAW
888 SW EVERGREEN "VENUEI G ,CllenMEPF\luhnsol1, John'Johnsen..i01111 REMAND,General Judgment· Rem3n" \Iopd PO BOX 457
REDMOND OK 9'1 :'J6·01C3
1 ELEPHCNf (541 )048-2151
~AJ( (5411 548·";3S
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF DESCHUTES
CIVIUDISSOLUTION STATUSIPRE-TRIAL
Case No: __.__---''''''---..:...:::....L..::,,:..._!.-1...._L.__'--''=--______Status/Pre-trial date: . \") '-,1/: d tIll Y
CaseName:_:J~"I.)} '}J)7U () J JVJ) n V. V(::.>())· (' j [" ((/;) 1y
PRESENT 0 BYPHONE~,.
PRESENT 0 BY PHONE 0
BYPHONE 0
BY PHONE 0
PRESENT 0 BYPHONE 0
3rd Party: ________________
PRESENT 0 BYPHONE 0
Fees: Trialfeedue ____________________________
Answer fee paid __________Dueby: _______________
,
Settlement possibility: Poor Fair Good Excellent
Estimated length of trial: _______Court?____6 or 12 person jury? _________
Readyfortrial?____Trial date: _____-----------------
Status Conference: _____________________________
New pre-trial Conference:-----------------1tl't-l\Jt-AOr..~tu4"·rhHU-t-JfH't'-1dHHCkt.;.+e,;>-')~ct::fl-
Settlement Conference: ____________________________
NOTES: /) Pr() Cll4J/~ I)l{ ck: jYlln') C{)UA1-at c4JpcaJ s .
. , .~·t/n) (Lnd (' c1 tD De -S LAlutCJ Co (D~YY) OJ I sS ley, t'l.:)I
..____=.__J\l.lLLl~JhJ] t Ut1LJ1_itf t:XL.,tcr 5) ,I (( }-I (, ;)7) !lJJ)Un j)Ct) p2JSfl
-.p J,1 (t ttC·\'?, i,l) IJ2L r(nUL nr/ t A to /-tf{U) I) II i, ({f]' ( ct '/"" ____ . _~L__c.k,_ ~_L.~~ . .:-.'"'_~._ -W. 'j <: I r
().' L. t.. Ll )~l j) . 0_/) ) -r~ (\ .... ERNEST J. MAZq~Ol, III'. ./ . / ~ TRIAL Court AdmInistrator c\ i If ( I CitT' f (" {C \1)-ll).5 OJ jl ( (: r
OJ IN_Book h(. I r'i){ll) 'i.'1'::, (n~( c \'0 by: -------...;..;.....'--'---'-~-"'------
5
10
15
20
25
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
n
23
24
26
<'''ll') t. prJ I r PI" I.. 03LU,. J h f\ ,. 0 Il '-I'
J j' .' L .i!
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES
JOHN JOHNSON, )
)
Petitioner,) Case No. 09CV01l4AB
)
and ) MOTION AND ORDER TO
) WITHDRAW
DESCHUTES COUNTY, a political )
subdivision of the State of Oregon, acting )
by and through its Board of County )
Commissioners )
)
Respondent. )
Edward P. Fitch, and the law firm of Bryant, Emerson & Fitch, LLP, hereby move the
court for an order allowing them to withdraw as counsel for the reason that the personal
representative of the Estate of John Johnson, Marcella Johnson, has requested that the case be
closed.
DATED this)L day of April, 2013. <.. 5--··..·
Edward P. Fitch, OSB 782026
Bryant, Emerson & Fitch, LLP
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
P.O. Box 457, Redmond, OR 97756
Phone: 541-548-2151, Fax: 541-548-1895
efitch@redmond-Iawyers.com
ORDER:
~
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Edward P. Fitch and the law firm of Bryarit,Elliison .
..~ :::p'
& Fitch, LLP, shall be and hereby are allowed to withdraw as counsel for Plaintif[~ ~~:
Dated this 1.[day Of~.2013 .", ~.
w o
BRYANT EMERSON & FITCH, LLPPage 1 -MOTION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW A rrORNEYS AT LAW
888 SW EVERGREEN AVENUE
PO BOX 457
REDMOND OR 97756-0103
TELEPHONE (541)548-2151
FAX (541) 54S-1895
G:\Clients\EPF\Johnson, John\Johnson,John Writ\Motion to Withdraw.wpd