HomeMy WebLinkAboutDoc 417 - Amend IGA - Redmond - Bldg InspectionsDeschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board Business Meeting of November 4, 2013
DATE: October 28, 2013
FROM: Nick Lelack, Director Community Development x1708
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Consideration of Board Signature of Document No. 2013-417, Amendment No.1 to Intergovernmental
Agreement No. 2013-026 with the City of Redmond.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS DATE? NO.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The City of Redmond is requesting Deschutes County Building Inspector( s) at the time of final
inspection of single-family and duplex building permits, provide photographs of the site in order for the
City of Redmond to determine if requirements of City Ordinance 2013 -04 have been met. City
Ordinance No. 2013-04 pertains to street trees/architectural requirements.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
An increase of $500 annually to the existing IGA revenue will occur for this service.
RECOMMENDATION & ACTION REQUESTED:
Request approval and signature from the Board of Commissioners of Document No. 2013-417.
ATTENDANCE: Nick Lelack, Community Development Director; Lori Furlong, Admin. Manager
DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS:
Two original Agreements should be returned to Kathleen Stockton, CDD, x3193.
DESCHUTES COUNTY DOCUMENT SUMMARY
(NOTE: This form is required to be submitted with ALL contracts and other agreements, regardless of whether the document is to be
on a Board agenda or can be signed by the County Administrator or Department Director. If the document is to be on a Board
agenda, the Agenda Request Form is also required. If this form is not included with the document, the document will be returned to
the Department. Please submit documents to the Board Secretary for tracking purposes, and not directly to Legal Counsel, the
County Administrator or the Commissioners. In addition to submitting this form with your documents, please submit this form
electronically to the Board Secretary.)
Please complete all sections above the Official Review line.
Date: 110/16/131 Department: ICDDI
I
Contractor/Supplier/Consultant Name: Cit of Redmond
Contractor Contact: Heather Richards, COO Oirecto Contractor
Phone #: 541-923-7756
Type of Document: Document No. 2013-417, Amendment No.1 to IGA No. 2013-026
I
I Goods and/or Services: This amendment would expand current building inspection
services for the City of Redmond.
Background & History: The City of Redmond is requesting that the County Building
t Inspector(s), at the time of final inspection of single-family and duplex building permits,
provide up to 6 photographs of the site in order for the City to determine if requirements 1 of City Ordinance 2013-04 (a copy of this Ordinance has been attached) have been
met. The photos would be provided to the City prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.I
i
Agreement Starting Date: 110/1/13 Ending Date: !AutomatiC renewall
Annual Value or Total Payment: $630. for cost of iPad 10 tablet; as of 7/1/14, $500.
annuall . The annual cost of $500. is in addition to the billable rates contained in IGA
No. 2013-026.
Insurance Certificate Receiv.ed (CleCk box)
Insurance Expiration Date: I AI/A:
"
Check all that apply: o RFP, Solicitation or Bid Process o Informal quotes «$150K)
~ Exempt from RFP, Solicitation or Bid Process (specify -see DCC §2.37)
Funding Source: (Included in current budget? ~ Yes 0 No
If No, has budget amendment been submitted? D Yes No
Is this a Grant Agreement providing revenue to the County? D Yes ~ No
10116/2013
.'
Special conditions attached to this grant:
Deadlines for reporting to the grantor:
If a new FTE will be hired with grant funds, confirm that Personnel has been notified that
it is a grant-funded position so that this will be noted in the offer letter: 0 Yes 0 No
Contact information for the person responsible for grant compliance: Name:
Phone #:
Departmental Contact and Title: Nick Lelack Phone #: x1708
Department Director Approval: ~14
ignature
Distribution of Document: Who gets the original document and/or copies after it has
been signed? Include complete information if the document is to be mailed.
I Dale
Official Review:
County Signature Required (check one)~C 0 Department Director (if <$25K)
o Administrator (if >$25K but <$150K;; if >$1 ~K, SOCC Order
' -"--'-f-"-"""'---
./ l
Legal Revie -C{).AAu-=~id~I
Date --+-'-4
Document Number DC - 2 a13-111 ,
10/16/2013
/" ~VIEWED
2<
LEGAL COUNSEL
For Recording Stamp Only
DOCUMENT NO. 2013-417,
AMENDMENT NO.1 TO
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2013-026
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT, Intergovernmental Agreement by and between the City of
Redmond (CITY) and Deschutes County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon
(COUNTY), effective January 1, 2013, is amended as set forth below. All other provisions of the
Agreement and the consideration remain unchanged .
The above listed Agreement is amended as follows:
4. COUNTY SERVICES.
The COUNTY agrees to :
4.13 The purpose of Section 4 .14 is to aid CITY in determining compliance with CITY
Ordinance No . 2013-04 in order for CITY to determine if conditions required by
CITY's Ordinance No. 2013-04, An Ordinance Amending the Redmond City
Code, Chapter 8, Articles I. Zoning Standards and III, Land Division Standards,
to Revise/Add Standards Related to Architectural Requirements for Single Family
Dwellings and Duplexes, New Fences and the Planting of Street Trees,
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
4.14 At the time a final building permit inspection of a single family dwelling or duplex
is requested and scheduled by the customer, the COUNTY building inspector(s),
upon direction from CITY, shall provide CITY no more than 6 (six) photographs of
the building site.
4 .15 COUNTY will purchase and COUNTY inspectors will use an iPad 10 tablet to
provide the service in Section 4 .14.
4 .16 COUNTY building inspectors will attach photos of the sites to building permit
records via the ACCELA Inspector App.
4 .17 COUNTY building inspectors will use the tablet for tracking and posting the
results of inspections throughout the county, within and outside city limits.
6. PAYMENT .
Page 1 of 2 -DOCUMENT NO. 2013-417 , AMENDMENT NO.1 TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT, DOCUMENT NO. 2013-026
DC -2013 17
---------
~!'. ..
6.11 In lieu of monetary compensation to COUNTY for the service provided in Section
4.14 through 4.16 for the period of October 1,2013 through June 30,2014, CITY
agrees to reimburse COUNTY $630.00 (six hundred and thirty dollars) for the
cost of purchasing an iPad 10 tablet.
6.13 CITY shall provide COUNTY the reimbursement described in 6.11 no later than
October 1, 2013.
6.14 Beginning July 1,2014 and through the term of the Agreement. the CITY agrees
to compensate COUNTY annually the sum of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) for
COUNTY inspectors' time to take photos and upload photos to the record and to
compensate COUNTY for cellular air time for this service.
6.15 Payment per Section 6.14 is due to COUNTY July 5 of each year.
6.16 CITY agrees to pay COUNTY a late payment charge of 1.5% per month if
payment due July 5 of each year is not received by the 25th day of that month.
Dated this __of _______, 2013 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ALAN UNGER, CHAIR
ATTEST: TAMMY BANEY, VICE-CHAIR
Recording Secretary ANTHONY DEBONE, COMMISSIONER
DATEDthis (4~ of O~~ev ,2013
BY: ULtV
KEITH WITCOSK ,
CITY MANAGER
Page 2 of2 -DOCUMENT NO. 2013-417, AMENDMENT NO.1 TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT, DOCUMENT NO. 2013-026
CITY OF REDMOND
ORDINANCE NO. 2013"()4
I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REDMOND CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLES
I, ZONING STANDARDS AND III, LAND DIVISION STANDARDS, TO REVISEIADD
STANDARDS RELATED TO ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE
i FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES, NEW FENCES AND THE PLANTING OF
STREET TREES.
WHEREAS, the City of Redmond has adopted Development Code (zoning and
I planning) regulations in accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 227 that
regulate and control the development of land within the City, and,
i
WHEREAS, the City of Redmond City Council has an adopted set of goals that include:
1.) "Create an image and identity that generates a sense of community pride, ensuring
i
1 the high quality of life and safety of our citizens, attracting new residents and
businesses and facilitating their success and safety as well" which is further
implemented through the policy to "maintain the quality of Redmond neighborhoods";
and, 2.)"Enhance the quality of life in the City through the adoption of programs,
policies and standards that balance growth while maintaining the city's unique
character" which is further implemented through the policy to "promote quality
neighborhoods and development"; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Redmond has adopted Comprehensive Plan policies regarding
new development that are directed to: 1.) Creating new developments in existing areas
that are compatible with surrounding developments, including landscaping, visual
impact, architectural styles and lighting, and that their appearance should enhance the
area; and, 2.) Residential zones should allow for a wide variety of compatible housing
types and densities; and,
WHEREAS, the Urban Area Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 19,
2013 and, after reviewing the record and providing an opportunity for public testimony,
has recommended that the Redmond City Council adopt the amended Development
Code text for Architectural (Single family and Duplex Residential). Fence and Street
Tree Standards as set forth in Exhibits A, Band C; and
WHEREAS, the Redmond City Council held a public hearing on May 14, 2013 to
consider the recommendation of the Urban Area Planning Commission, review the
existing record and gather additional evidence and public testimony; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the Planning Commission's recommendation
and, after receiving additional evidence and testimony, determined that the requested
Development Code amendments would contribute to and further implement the
Redmond Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies for Residential Compatibility and
New Residential Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council concludes that the Findings to support the adoption of the
Development Code amendments regarding the Architectural, fence and Street Tree
Standards have fully addressed the City's Comprehensive Plan, the applicable State
law, the Statewide Planning Goals and the City's standards and criteria for an
amendment to the Redmond Development Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the attached code amendments are necessary to
further these interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF REDM0ND ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION ONE: The City of Redmond hereby amends the Redmond City Code,
Chapter 8, Articles I, Zoning Standards and III, Land Division Standards, to revise the
existing standards and add new standards related to architectural requirements for
single family dwellings and duplexes, new fences and the planting of street trees, in
order to implement The City of Redmond Comprehensive Plan, the State Law and
adopt development standards that allow and encourage desirable design for the City.
The amendments and adopted text are attached hereto as "Exhibits A, B and C."
SECTION TWO: In support of the Development Code text amendments in Section One,
the City of Redmond hereby adopts the Findings which are attached hereto as "Exhibit
0" which were prepared by City staff, reviewed by the Planning Commission and
demonstrate compliance with the Redmond Development Code, Section 8.0760
Criteria for Amendments, the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the applicable Statewide
Planning Goals and Statutes.
SECTION THREE: SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Ordinance are severable.
The invalidity of any section, clause, sentence, or provision of this Ordinance shall not
affect the validity of any other part of this Ordinance which can be given without such
invalid part or parts.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor this 14th day of May, 2013.
lsi George Endicott
George Endicott, Mayor
ArrEST:
lsi Kelly Morse
Kelly Morse, City Recorder
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page2of26
EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE 2013-04
Article I, Zoning Standards -Proposed Development Code
Amendments, Residential Design Standards
Development Code Amendments: Existing code language is in black, proposed new
code language is in red and the proposed deleted language is noted with strikethrough.
8.0140 Table B. Minimum Standards. The following minimum standards apply in each of the
Residential zones as follows:
Zone:
Standard: R-1 R-3 R-4 R-5
Minimum Lot size -Square Feet
Single Family 9,000 _~,OO~_ 7,500 6,000 0
Duplex NA 0 10,000 A10,OOO 7,500 0 -
Duplex Lot 4,250 3,750 0
Townhouse E
Multi-family Dwelling NA NA NA F
Multi-famity Comj)Iex NA NA F
Maximum Density (1 unit per # 3,000 0s.f.) F
Minimum Setback Distance C F
Front 15 15 15 15
Interior Side B 5/10 B 5/10 B 5/10 B 5/10
Street Side 15 15 15 15----Rear 20 20 20 20 ..
Garage 20 20 20 20
Maximum Building Height F 30 30 30 40,E ~
Minimum Street Frontage
Standard Street 50 50 50 50
Cul-de-sac 30 30 30 30
Flag Lot 20 20 20 20
Duplex lot (non flag or cui de N/A N/A 25 25sac)
Townhouse E
A Duplexes permitted only on comer lots
B Interior side yards must provide a minimum of 5 feet on one side and 10 feet on the
other side for single family and duplex residences. Where aUey access is provided, both
interior side yards may be reduced to 5'. Exceptions to this 10' setback are allowed (1)
when the lot was created prior to the adoption of this standard (November 9, 2006); or
(2) on cui de sac lots; or (3) on flag lots, or (4) parcels created by partition.
C Does not include solar setbacks, which are calculated separate!y
D Duplexes only allowed on legally created lots of adequate size 1 created prior to
November 9, 2006, otherwise prohibite<;l.
E Pursuant to the Townhouse Development Standards in Chapter 8, Article IV Site and
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page30f26
Design Review Standards, Section 8.3035.4.f.2, Table A. I
F Does not apply to development standards for Multi-family Dwellings and Multi-family
Complexes which are located in Chapter 8, Article IV, Site and DeSign Review
Standards, Section 8.3035.4.E.2., Table A
I
i
N/A ;;: "not allowed"
All distances shown are measured in feet.
8.0141 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND
DUPLEXES
1. Purpose. The purpose of the Architectural Design Standards for Single Family
Dwellings and Duplexes is to promote and sustain:
A. High quality development throughout a variety of housing choices;
B. A diversity of individual styles that incorporate positive design characteristics
throughout the City; and,
C. Excellence in architectural design that:
1. Enhances the visual environment and character of the community;
2. Preserves and protects property values, as well as public and private
infrastructure investment;
3. Conveys a sense of balance, integrity and character among all
neighborhoods throughout the City; and,
4. Elevates the attractiveness and quality of life in Redmond.
2. Intent. The intent of the Architectural Design Standards for Single Family Dwellings
and Duplexes is to:
A. Maintain flexibility for a variety of architectural style to be developed throughout
the City;
B. Establish a basis for architectural character for each dwelling, regardless of
architectural style;
C. Continue to allow innovations in design that recognize emerging technologies
such as solar and wind power, telecommunications, and environmentally
conscious construction methods;
D. Provide an integral relationship between the quality of the dwelling and the
quality of the public and private infrastructure of the neighborhood; and,
E. Promote quality design characteristics that will enhance the long-term
desirability of the dwelling. neighborhood and community as an attractive place
to live.
3. Procedure. New single family dwellings and duplexes shall be reviewed for
conformance with the requirements listed in this Section, subject to the procedures
outlined below:
A. Track 1. Conformance with Section 8.0141 (5), below. An application
demonstrating conformance with Section 8.0141 (5) shall be submitted to and
reviewed by the Community Development Director or designate. Conformance
with the objective standards included in Section 8.0141(5} shall be shown on
the a~chitectural plans submitted with the building permit application and
administered as part of the plan review process. These applications are
reviewed administratively by City of Redmond Planning Staff.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 4 0/26
B. Track 2. As an alternative to the procedure for Review as a Development
Action as listed in Section 8.0141(3)(A) above (in cases where the proposed
design does not, or the applicant chooses not to comply with the requirements
of Section 8.0141(5», an application may be submitted to the Community
Development Director which demonstrates conformance with the Purpose and
Intent of this Section as listed in Sections 8.0141(1) and (2), above. The
individual prOVisions of subsections (1) and (2) shall serve as discretionary
review criteria, and shall be addressed by the applicant in writing and shown on
the architectural plans submitted with the application. These applications are
reviewed administratively by City of Redmond Planning Staff, unless the
Community Development Director determines that a public hearing is
necessary. in which case the application will be reviewed to the Hearings Body.
4. Application and Approval Process. The applications for either a Track 1 or Track 2
review as specified in Sections 8.0141 (3) (A) and (B) above. shall be submitted prior to
or in conjunction with an application for a building permit. Building permits will not be
issued until the review action is completed and approved by the City. The application
shall be submitted on a form prescribed by the City with an accompanying fee.
5. Architectural Design Standards. Although specific architectural styles (Le. craftsman,
colonial, tudor) are not mandated, single family dwelling and duplex design shall
conform with the following standards:
A. Screening of Mechanical Equipment and Trash Storage Areas. All exterior
ground mounted mechanical equipment areas shaH be entirely screened from
view on all sides at the ground/eye level line of sight by a sight obscuring fence
or wall, with such fences or walls being maintained in perpetuity. Solar power,
wind power, satellite dish or other equipment necessitating placement on walls
or roofs for normal operation are exempt from this prOVision, excluding all
HVAC equipment.
B. Building Design.
1. Architectural Design. In order to discourage the appearance of tract-type
housing, a separation by at least three (3) lots on either side and across
the street by 2 lots in each direction is required for single family dwellings
and duplexes with the same or very similar design when viewed from the
street frontages. The same or very similar designs are those which
consist merely of mirror image floor plans, or exterior elevations of the
same basic design which utilize different colors. materials or
ornamentation.
2. Roof Design. Most architectural styles utilize a related set of roof
elements that compliment and help establish the overall style and
character of a dwelling. Because the roof is a primary feature and key
component of a dwelling that contributes greatly to the overall
architectural style and character of the dwelling. a minimum of three (3)
roof design elements shall be used on all four elevations of the structure.
Roof Design Elements include:
a. Pitched or sloping roof;
b. Variations in roof orientation;
c. Variations in roof pitch, height of roof planes or roof orientation;
d. Dormer, such as hipped, gabled, shed or eyebrow dormer design
e. Eave of at least 12 inches;
f. Overhang of at least 6 inches with bargeboard or vergeboard; and
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 50/26
g. Gable end elements (window, decorative vent door, decorated
verge boards, trusses, false beams, corbels, brackets, or other
decorative elements in gable ends)
3. Wall Design. Most architectural styles utilize a related set of fayade
features. details and finishes that define the overall character of a
dwelling. The most attractive designs work within the established style
and incorporate an appropriate mix of multiple fa9ade elements to
achieve a base degree of style recognition. Because an appropriate
number and mix of wall elements is fundamental to achieving and
establishing style and character, a minimum of four (4) wall design
elements shall be used on the side and rear elevations of the structure,
and five (5) elements on the front elevation. Multiple siding treatments
are highly encouraged. Wall Design Elements include:
a. Recessed entry;
b. Covered porch at least 36 square feet, with a minimum 4 foot
depth
c. Balconies enclosed by railing or parapet;
d. Vertical offsets, at least two, either projecting or recessed at least
6 inches deep and a minimum of 4 feet long;
e. Horizontal offsets. at least two, either projecting or recessed at
least 5 inches deep;
f. Column or pilaster, either complete or engaged;
g. Engaged tower, with the design being square, rectangular, circular
or polygonal in form;
h. Bay window. box window. or box bay that projects at least 6
inches outward from the wall plane;
I. Window trim or surround (casing) at least 3.5 inches wide that
completely surrounds the window;
j. Windows with grids, multi-paned sashes, or that are of elliptical.
round, arched, semi-circular or similar design;
k. Shutters, as a matched pair for windows, either fixed or movable;
I. Variation in wall cladding, wall surface pattern or decorative
materials;
m. Decorative garage doors, with or without windows, including
patterning relief at least 5/8" deep over the door surface;
n. Band course, band molding. belly band, belt course or similar
horizontal element the entire length of the fayade of relatively
slight projection;
o. Exterior chimney of brick. stone, composite, masonry or other
similar materials; and,
4. Front Door. A front door that is visible from the public street frontage
(front yard) and an identifiable pedestrian connection between the front
door and the public sidewalk is required. Front porches, including
covered front porches, are highly encouraged.
5. Driveways and Garages.
a. A garage is required for each newly constructed dwelling unit and
shall be of adequate size to accommodate a minimum of one
vehicle, and shall at a minimum meet the design requirements in
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 60[26
Section 8.0500 through 8.0515 (Off Street Parking and Loading
Requirements) of the City of Redmond Development Code.
b. Driveway access to any street less than 28 feet wide shall be in
conformance with Section 8.2710 (3)(Table 1), of Article 3, the
City of Redmond Land Division Code.
c. Driveways, whether accessed from a public or private street or
alley, shall be of adequate size to accommodate a minimum of
one vehicle, and shall at a minimum meet the design requirements
in Section 8.0515 (Parking Table and Diagram) of the City of
Redmond Development Code.
d. Notwithstanding Section 8.0141 (5)(8)(5)(a, b and c) above, all
garages and driveways accessed directly from public or private
streets or alleys less than 36 feet in width shall be sized to
accommodate a minimum of 2 cars based on the parking space
design standards listed in Section 8.0515 (Parking Table and
Diagram) of the City of Redmond Development Code.
e. If a garage as required by subsection 8.0141 (5)(8)(5)(a) above is
converted to living or other space permissible by this Code, two
off-street parking spaces shall be provided pursuant to Section
8.0500 through 8.0515 (Off Street Parking and Loading
Requirements) of the City of Redmond Development Code.
f. Notwithstanding the applicable provisions of Sections 8.0500
through 8.0515 (Off Street Parking and Loading Requirements) of
the City of Redmond Development Code, all required off street
parking areas and driveways constructed in conjunction with
single family dwellings and duplexes may have alternative
surfaces to concrete or asphalt, and may include permeable
surfaces to the extent they provide an all weather surface
sufficient for vehicular travel. Loose gravel, aggregate and similar
surface treatments are not permitted for required parking spaces.
6. Landscaping. All lots on which new single family dwellings or duplexes
are constructed which abut a public or private street, not including an
alley, shall be landscaped between the corresponding fa~de of the
structure and the edge of the street, for the entire length of the street
frontage.
7. Fences. Fences constructed in conjunction with any single family
dwelling or duplex (including fences constructed by the developer of a
subdivision as perimeter fences) shall be in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Section 8.340 of the City of Redmond
development Code.
I
I
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page7of26
EXHIBIT B TO ORDINANCE 2013-04
Article I, Zoning Standards -Proposed Development Code
Amendments, Fence Standards
Development Code Amendments: Existing code language is in black, proposed new
code language is in red and the proposed deleted language is noted with strikethrough.
8.0340 Fences
1. In any residential zone, a fense, lattiGe 'Nark, SGreen or wall, other than a retaining wall,
not more than six feet in height may be located in any required front yard, and no more
than eight feet in height in any required side or rear yard. Pro'Jided however, in those
areas designated for Glear vision, the restriGtions set forth in Sections 8.0305 8.0310
shall apply. (Revised 6.l98) (Note: the International Building Code indiGates that fenGes
in eXGess of six feet in height require a building permit, and may need to be
professionally engineered).
All fences constructed after the time of the adoption of this ordinance shall comply with the
following standards. For the purpose of these standards fences refers to fences, lattice work,
screens or walls (other than a retaining wall).
The intent of these standards is to ensure that fencing contributes positively to the appearance
of the community, and that the scale, location, and appearance of fencing does not adversely
affect adjacent or nearby properties or public safety.
1. On all properties one (1) acre or less in size, in all Residential Zones and the Urban
Holding Zone, all fences shall be developed to the following standards:
A. Fences abutting a public street shall comply with the following:
1. Fences in front yards, and in that portion of side yards extending from the
front property line to the front fa~ade of the dwelling, shall be a maximum
of 3Yz feet tall and constructed of wood, vinyl or wrought iron only. Chain
link fences are not permitted.
2. Fences in that portion of side yards extending from the front fa~de of the
dwelling to the rear property line, and all rear yards, shall be a maximum
of 6 feet tall and constructed of wood, vinyl or wrought iron only. Chain
link fences are not permitted.
3. Fences located in side and rear yards shall incorporate other architectural
elements such as stone, brick, rock. or similar products every 16' in
length (See: Examples).
4. Other types of fences (allowed to the 6 foot height limit) may be approved
by and at the discretion of the Community Development Director subject
to compliance with the intent statement above.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 8 0/26
5. Fences in side or rear yards which abut an alley shall be allowed to be 8
feet in height. (Note: the Oregon State Building Code -as defined in
State Statute -indicates that fences in excess of 6 feet in height require a
building permit, and may need to be professionally engineered).
6. Fences which encroach into, the public right of way shall be treated as a
nuisance and shall be subject to enforcement pursuant to Section 8.0805
of the City of Redmond Development Code.
B. Fences not abutting a public street shall comply with the following:
1. Fences located in the side or rear yards shall not exceed 8 feet in height.
(Note: the Oregon State Building Code -as defined in State Statute
indicates that fences in excess of 6 feet in· height require a building
permit, and may need to be professionally engineered).
C. No fence in any residential zone, except as exempted by Section 8.0340 (5)
below, shall be constructed with barbed wire, razor wire, or similar apparatus.
2. In a--G4 all Commercial Zones (except for the C-2, Central Business District Zone and
the Mixed Use Zones), aRy the PF-Public Facility Zone, the Park Zone, and in bGtR any
Industrial Zones, all fences shall be developed to the following standards:
A. The maximum height of a fence shall not exceed 8 feet. (Note: the International
Building Code indicates that fences in excess of 6 feet in height require a building
permit, and may need to be professionally engineered). Provided however, in
those areas designated for clear ..tision, the restrictions set forth in Sections
8.0305 8.0310 shall apply. (Re'.(ised 6198)
3. For any development undergoing land use review, any wood or vinyl fence bordering a
street exceeding a span of 25' in length shall incorporate other architectural elements
such as stone, brick, rock, or varied usage of '.wod, similar products every 16' in
length (See: Examples).
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page90f26
4. All fences, regardless of zone or location, shall comply with the following requirements:
A Fences fronting public streets shall provide one gate, opening, or other site
access for emergency services use. For corner lots, only one opening along the
either the front or side yard frontage is required.
B. Fences shall not block the clear vision area and shall comply with the standards
in RDC Section 8.0305.
C. Fences shall be constructed on private property, and shall not be located in
public rights of way.
D. Fences shall be comprised of wood, vinyl, metal or other solid material that is
able to be painted and/or maintained in structurally sound condition. All fences
shall be maintained in a structurally sound condition and be free from exposed
nails, screws, loose members, decaying materials or other similar conditions that
can pose a hazard.
4:-5. The following fences shall be exempt from AeigAt the restrictions standards set forth
herein, except for the requirement to comply with the clear vision standards in RDC
Section 8.0305, as listed in Section 8.0340 (4) (B) above:
A Any security fencing around a public or quasi-public utility or entity including the
Airport perimeter.
B. Fences related to a park or school use including (but not necessarily limited to)
tennis courts, driving ranges and ball fields.
C. Fences necessary for compliance with any documented Federal or State
mandated requirements (i.e. Homeland Security requirements)
G-: D. Any fence exempted under (4) (5) (A and B) herein that is in excess of 20 feet
in height shall require conditional use permit review and approval, and a public
hearing.
5. At no time shall fense heights exceed 4' 'tYhen the fense fronts a publis road or street.
6. Fenses fronting publis streets shall provide one gate, opening, or other site ascess for
emergency services use.
Examples:
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page10of26
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 11 0/26
EXHIBIT C TO ORDINANCE 2013-04
Article I, Zoning Standards and Article III, land Division Standards
Proposed Development Code Amendments
Development Code Amendments: Existing code language is in black, proposed new
code language is in red and the proposed deleted language is noted with strikethrough.
8.0140 Table B, Minimum Standards. The following minimum standards apply in each of the
Residential zones as follows:
Zone:
Standard: R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5
Minimum Lot size -Square Feet _.
Single Family 9,000 9,000 7,500 6,000 6,000
~uplex
Duplex Lot
NA 0 10,000 A10,OOO 7,500 7,500
4,250 3,750 3,750
Townhouse E E
Multi-family Dwelling NA NA NA F F
Multi-family Complex NA NA F F
Maximum Density (1 unit per #
s.t.) F
3,000 2,500
Minimum Setbac~ Distance C F
.-"-,-.---~,.
15
._-_._-
15----
5
Front 15 15 15 .._
Interior Side
Street Side_._-_..._--_..•..
Rear
B 5/10 B 5/10 B 5/10 B 5110
15 15 15 15 15
5
r---.._._
20 20 20 20
...
Garage 20 20 20 20 20
Maximum Building Height F 30 30 30 40,E 40,E
Minimum Street Frontage
Standard Street 50 50 50 50 50
Cul-de-sac 30 30 30 30. 30
Flag Lot 20 20 20 20 20
Duplex lot (non flag or cui de
sac) N/A N/A 25 25 25
Townhouse E E
A Duplexes permitted only on corner lots
B Interior side yards must provide a minimum of 5 feet on one side and 10 feet on the
other side for single family and duplex residences. Where alley access is provided, both
interior side yards may be reduced to 5'. Exceptions to this 10' setback are allowed (1)
when the lot was created prior to the adoption of this standard (November 9, 2006); or
(2) on cui de sac lots; or (3) on flag lots, or (4) parcels created by partition.
C Does not include solar setbacks, which are calculated separately
D Duplexes only allowed on legally created lots of adequate size 1 created prior to
November 9, 2006, otherwise prohibited.
E Pursuant to the Townhouse Development Standards in Chapter 8, Article IV Site and
Design Review Standards, Section 8.3035.4.f.2, Table A.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 12of26
F Does not apply to development standards for Multi-family Dwellings and Multi-family
Complexes which are located in Chapter 8, Article IV, Site and Design Review
Standards. Section 8.3035A.E.2., Table A
G Street trees are required to be provided in accordance with Section 8.3035.5K
N/A ="not allowed"
All distances shown are measured in feet.
Section 8.3035.5K
A. Street trees. A street tree plan is required for all development fronting on public or private
roads. All street trees shall meet the following requirements.
1. Certain trees are prohibited by City Code. Prohibited tFee species include: fir. cedar.
INitiO'!.'. balm. poplar and aspen, nut, locust, all fruit bearing'species and cottonwood.
2. Trees chosen for the public right of way shall be single stem, round, compact crmvn,
deciduous trees, free of fruit, thorns or other harmful appendages. Trees that are
tolerant of extremes in weather, cultivation around the root area, and pest and diseases
are Fecommended.
3. Tap root trees and surface root trees shall be avoided.
4. Trees shall be chosen INith a mature height of no more than 30 feet and a minimum
branching clearance of 8 feet at maturity.
5. The Genter of all trees planted in public right of way shall be a minimum of 18" from the
face of the street curb.
6. Street trees shall be placed at the rate of one tree for ewry 25 feet of street frontage.
Trees may be evenly spaced \f::ith variations to the spacing permitted. Irrigation systems
shall be required for all street trees.
7. VVhen street trees are planted on private property, the trees shall not be planted further
than 25' from the curb. EYergreen species are acceptable street trees on private
property pro'/ided that they are more than 5 feet away from pathways and driveways.
K. Street trees. Street trees are required to be installed on all residential, commercial, and
industrial lots fronting on public or private streets, including on lots already platted at the
time of adoption of this ordinance, but not yet developed. Street trees shall be provided in
accordance with the following requirements:
1. Street Tree Plan. A street tree plan shall be provided showing the location of street
trees, the types and the installation sizes of the trees and the type of irrigation proposed.
2. Timing of Improvements. All street tree(s) shall be installed prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for said construction. An exception to this shall be when it is
not feasible to plant street trees due to cold weather, in which case a posting of a bond
for the value of the tree shall be acceptable to ensure the tree is planted at the earliest
feasible time.
3. Number of Trees Required. The number of street trees planted on each lot is
dependent upon the lot width per the table below:
Lot Width Number of Street Trees Required
50 feet and less 1
51-100 feet 2
101-150 feet 3
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 13 of26
1
I
1151 and more lOne treel40 feet of width fronting street
4. Spacing of Trees. Street trees shall be spaced in accordance with the table below:
Lot Width Tree Spacing Requirement
50 feet and less The street tree shall be planted as close as possible to the
center of the lot frontage, unless there is a conflict with a
driveway, in which case it should be located as close as
possible to the center
50 feet and more Small canopy and columnar shaped trees shall be planted
no further than thirty (30) feet apart
Medium and large canopy trees shall be planted no further
than forty (40) feet apart
Downtown Per Public Works standards
An exception to the tree spacing requirements above include: when planting a tree
would conflict with existing trees, retaining walls, utilities, driveways, views or other
similar physical barriers. In those cases, the Community Development Director or
designee may approve alternative spacing.
5. Location of Trees. Street trees shall be planted within existing and proposed planting
strips or in City approved sidewalk tree wells on streets without planting strips, unless an
alternative street tree location is approved during the planning review process. The
location of trees shall meet the following setback requirements:
Object Tree Must Be Setback
From
Distance Street Tree Must Be Setback From
Object ;
Curb or Sidewalk 3 feet (small and medium stature tree) and 3 -feet
(large stature tree); in no cases, shall the tree be
more than 10 feet from the curb
Curb line of an intersection,
stop/yield signs, and street lights
25 feet
Adjacent Tree 20 feet
Fire hydrants, underground
utilities, utility poles and directional
traffic signs
10 feet
Edge of a driveway 5 feet
Property lines 2 feet
6. Caliper Size. The minimum caliper size at planting shall be 1 % inches for single family
residential and 1 % inches for commercial and industrial. If the required caliper is not
available, the Community Development Director or designee may accept an alternative
proposal that is comparable.
7. Approved Tree List. Types of street trees shall be selected from the City Arborist's
approved list of trees.
8. Maintenance. Maintenance of street trees shall be in accordance with standards listed
in Section 3.600 of the Redmond Code.
9. Utility Easements. All street trees shall be placed outside utility easements unless the
utilities are in a conduit for maintenance. If the existing planter strip contains such
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page14of26
easements and is not wide enough to also accommodate street trees, the street tree
location requirement in Section 4 above may be adjusted by the Community
Development Director or designee during the development review process.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 150f26
l
1
,I
EXHIBIT D TO ORDINANCE 2013-04
FINDINGS OF THE REDMOND CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING TA-12-3, LAND DIVISION CODE
CITY OF REDMOND ORDINANCE #2013-04
AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE REDMOND DEVELOPMENT
CODE TO ADOPT NEW AND REVISED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND DUPLEXES; FENCES; AND. STREET
TREES)
FILENO. TA 12-3
REQUEST: A Legislative Amendment to the Redmond Development Code, Articles I,
Zoning Standards and IV, Site and Design Review Standards, to
revise/add standards related to architectural requirements for single family
dwellings and duplexes, new fences and the planting of street trees.
APPLICANT: City of Redmond
716 SW Evergreen Avenue
POBox 726
Redmond, OR 97756
LOCATION: The proposal applies to all single family and duplex residential uses, all
proposed fences, and requirements for planting street trees within the
incorporated boundary of the City of Redmond.
STAFF: James Lewis, Planning Manager
Heather Richards, Community Development Director
HEARINGS Redmond Planning Commission
BODY: Redmond City Council
DATE& TIME: Planning Commission -March 19,2013 at 6:30 p.m.
LOCATION: City Council-May 14,2013 at 7:00 pm
City Council Chambers, 777 Deschutes Avenue, Redmond, Oregon
I. APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS AND CRITERIA:
Redmond Development Code, Chapter 8:
Article I -Zoning Standards (amending existing and adding new Sections)
-Section 8.0140 Table B, Minimum Standards
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 160/26
I1
i I
1 -Section 8.0141 (new/proposed) Architectural Design Standards for Singlei
Family Residences and Duplexes
-Section 8.0340 Fences
1
i Article II -Land Use Procedures
I -Section 8.1110 through 8.1125; Legislative Procedures
1 Article IV -Site and Design Review Standards1
i -Section 8.3035 (5)(K), Site and Design Review (Street Trees)
The Redmond Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, including:
I
t -Chapter 1, Citizen Involvement
-Cbapter 2, Land Use Planning
-Chapter 10, Housing
I Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) -ORS 197.250, 197.610, 197.763.
i Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR), LCDC, Division 15, Statewide Planning Goals
:1 I and Guidelines -OAR 660-015-0000 (as applicable)
I
.~
Not Applicable
Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR), LCDC, Division 12, Statewide Planning Goals
and Guidelines -OAR 660-012-0000 (specifically OAR 660-012-0060) is not
applicable because the proposal does not include any changes to the allowable uses
that would affect the number of trips or functional classifications of roads/streets in
Redmond. The proposal is merely limited to basic design elements appurtenant to
physical development of vacant residential lots -the uses permitted by zone are not
affected by this action.
II. BACKGROUND & HISTORY: In the early part of the past decade residential
development and growth exploded in Redmond. New subdivisions were developed,
homes were built and the population grew. Over the past few years, as economic decline
has plagued many communities, Redmond was hit especially hard with a large number of
foreclosures, empty homes and undeveloped subdivisions. Many of the empty homes and
undeveloped subdivisions are now in a state of disrepair and are undesirable for new
development or rehabilitation for a variety of reasons - a primary'reason being the lack of
physical amenities and design elements that make neighborhoods attractive and desirable,
and/or amenities were constructed that were not desirable to the community, including
. the homes themselves, many of which lacked enduring architectural interest. The
proposed amendments are intended to ensure that new development results in
neighborhoods where people want to live, where property values are maintained and that
the development becomes an asset to the community for many years to come. These are
in confonnance with the existing adopted goals and policies of the City of Redmond
Comprehensive Plan as discussed herein.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 170/26
The proposed Development Code Text Amendments have been initiated legislatively by
the City of Redmond -thus, the City is the applicant -and include: The Development
Code requirements for Articles I, Zoning Standards and IV, Site and Design Review
Standards, to revise/add standards related to architectural requirements for single family
dwellings and duplexes, new fences and the planting of street trees. The intent of the
amendments is to achieve these primary goals:
• Implement the Redmond City Council Goals to continue to promote quality
neighborhoods and developments through incorporation of great neighborhood
principles.
• Implement existing goals and policies of the City of Redmond Comprehensive
Plan concerning residential compatibility and enhancement
• Address community concerns regarding elements that are desirable in new
neighborhoods
• Ensure that design standards continue to include requirements for complete
neighborhoods
• Ensure that new residential development is aesthetically pleasing and maintains
property value
The rationale for the adoption of the proposed text amendments is also consistent with the
Redmond City Council 2012-13 Goals -the following Goals apply:
Council Goal 4. Create an image and identity that generates a sense of community
pride, ensuring the high quality of life and safety of our citizens, attracting new
residents and businesses and facilitating their success and safety as well.
A. Maintain the quality of Redmond neighborhoods.
1. Pursue a Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy in coordination
with agency partners.
2. Reduce property code violations.
3. Serve as a community resource for neighborhood
organizations.
Council GoalS. Enhance the quality of life in the City through the adoption of
programs, policies and standards that balance growth while maintaining the city's
unique character.
A. Promote quality neighborhoods and development.
1. Continue to incorporate the Great Neighborhood Principles in
both new development and infill development
a.) Amend the Redmond Development Code to ensure
the principles are promoted throughout the code.
2. Review Redmond Development Code, Building Codes,
programs and policies to evaluate creating incentives for new
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 18of26
development and redevelopment that are energy, water and
land efficient and support a multi-modal transportation
system.
III. PROPOSAL: The request is for a Legislative Amendment to the Redmond
Development Code, Articles I, Zoning Standards and IV, Site and Design Review
Standards, to revise/add standards related to architectural requirements for single family
dwellings and duplexes, new fences and the planting of street trees.
IV. AREA DESCRIPTION: As stated above, this proposal (a Text Amendment to
the Redmond Development Code) is applicable to development standards for single
family and duplex residential development, all fences and the planting of street trees
within the incorporated boundary of the City of Redmond. Thus, the proposal does not
include any specific Comprehensive Plan or Zoning map changes, or changes to the text
ofthe Comprehensive Plan.
V. EXHIBITS: The following exhibits make up the record in this matter:
1. Proposed Findings and Conclusions included herein.
2. The existing and proposed text of Article I, Section 8.0140, Table B, Minimum
Standards; Section 8.0141 (new), Architectural Design Standards for Single
Family Residences and Duplexes; and, Section 8.0340, Fences.
3. The existing and proposed text of Article IV Section 8.3035 (5)(K), Site and
Design Review (Street Trees).
4. Agency and departmental comments (on-file) with the Planning Division.
5. Notice to DLCD -mailed January 28,2013.
6. Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing -Redmond Spokesman
published March 6, 2013 (file).
7. Notice of City Council Public Hearing -Redmond Spokesman-May 1,2013
(file).
8. Planning Commission Work SessionlPublic Hearing Staff Reports.
9. City Council Work Session/Public Hearing Staff Reports.
10. Public comment letters received in response to these proposals.
VI. SUMMARY:
1. The request is for a Legislative Amendment to the Redmond Development Code,
Article I, Zoning Standards. and IV, Site and Design Review Standards, to revise/add
standards related to architectural requirements for single family dwellings and duplexes,
new fences and the planting of street trees.
2. The intent of the proposed amendments are to: provide more affinnative action toward
the neighborhood designs which the City of Redmond desires with residential
development; address community concerns regarding design elements that are desirable
in new neighborhoods; ensure that design standards further implement requirements for
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 190f26
complete neighborhoods; ensure that new residential development is aesthetically
pleasing and maintains property value; and, require connectivity between existing and
new neighborhoods.
3. The proposals will be applicable to the entirety of the land area within the
incorporated boundary of the City of Redmond specifically for those zoning designations
specified therein.
4. The findings, the proposed Development Code text, and supporting materials, all
demonstrate that the proposed Development Code amendments are consistent with the
Statewide Planning Goals, the Redmond Comprehensive Plan, the City Council Goals
and other applicable policies adopted by the City.
5. The four criteria set forth in RDC Section 8.0760 (Criteria fOr Amendments) are
addressed hereinlbelow, as well as all applicable state laws and requirements.
VII. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:
A. REDMOND DEVELOPMENT CODE (RDC), Chapter 8, Sections 8.0750 through
8.0775 (Amendments) sets forth the procedure and standards for an amendment to the text
of the Code or to the adopted Comprehensive Plan or Zoning map. Specifically, Section
8.0760 -Criteria for Amendments, sets forth the four (4) criteria that must be met:
1. In conformity with all applicable State statutes;
Finding: The State statutes that directly apply to this application include ORS 197.610, Local
Government Notice of Amendment or New Regulation; ORS 197.250, Compliance with Goals
Required, and ORS 197.763, Conduct of Local Quasi-Judicial Land Use Hearings; Notice
Requirements. The applicable City of Redmond Code standards (sections 8.0750 to 8.0775,
Amendment Procedures and Notice Requirements), and (sections 8.1100 through 8.1125,
Legislative Procedures), were developed in compliance with the applicable State Statutes listed
above regarding noticing and public hearings. Applicability of the Statewide Planning Goals is
addressed in greater detail below -those findings, incorporated by reference herein, show
compliance with the applicable Statutes listed above.
With regard to the Statutory noticing requirements referenced above, notice of the proposed
amendment has been provided to DLCD and advertised in the local newspaper (public notice) as
required by City Code and State Statute.
With regard to the Statutory public hearing requirements referenced above, this proposal is
legislative and not quasi-judicial in nature However, for lack of specific Statutory requirements
governing such legislative actions, Sections 8.1100 through 8.1125 of the Redmond
Development Code which implement the quasi-judicial Statutory requirements in a similar
fashion have been met. Subsequently, the Planning Commission and (ultimately) City Council's
public hearing and review processes meet the Statutory requirements for the purpose of the
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page20of26
reVIew.
Notwithstanding the Statutory requirements addressed herein, the Oregon Administrative Rules
(OAR) also implement the Statutes. The applicable Rules are addressed in the ensuing review.
Conclusion:
Based on the findings addressing Code amendment criterion I, the proposed Development Code
text amendment conforms to applicable State statutes.
2. In conformity with the State-wide planning goals whenever they are determined to be
applicable:
Finding: The proposed amendments do not directly implement a comprehensive planning
requirement of the Statewide Planning Goals, State Statutes or Administrative Rules concerning
the necessary provision of housing they do not include provisions that are directly applicable to
the substantive "land use" elements of the Goals requiring a variety of housing types at urban
densities, but do fall within the "procedural" Statewide Planning Goal requirements applicable to
the development ofland. Thus, the only applicable Statewide Planning Goals are: Goal 1
(Citizen Involvement); 2 (Land Use Planning); and, Goal 10 (Housing). All the listed Goals are
addressed below.
Goal 1-Oregon's Statewide Planning Goals: Citizen Involvement
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be
involved in all phases ofthe planning process.
Finding: The Urban Area Planning Commission serves as the City's formal citizen advisory
committee to fulfill Goal 1, and is made up of Redmond area residents. The City conducted
public meetings (Planning Commission work sessions -5, and public hearing -1) at the end of
2012 and beginning of 2013 regarding the proposal. Public notices and agendas for Planning
Commission meetings where the proposed amendments were discussed were provided. All
documents were available for the public review. Further, public notice advertising the public
hearing was published in the local newspaper, the Redmond Spokesman. Additionally, a work
session and public hearing were held before the City Council, with required notice provided.
The City continually provided public review and involvement opportunities during/via the public
work sessions and public hearings both at the Planning Commission level and City Council level
as deemed necessary by such bodies. Based on these actions, Oregon Planning Goal 1 for
Citizen Involvement has been met.
Goal 2-Oregon's Statewide Planning Goals: Land Use Planning.
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and
actions related to use ofland and to assure an adequate factual basefor such decisions and
actions.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 21 0[26
Finding: The staff, the Redmond Urban Area Planning Commission and the Redmond City
Council, have received input from other City staff and residents of the community. Based on this
input, these revised standards are necessary to enhance residential neighborhood livability by
initiating new and revised standards for single family and duplex residential architectural design,
fences and street trees. The Planning Commission and City Council have determined that
enough factual and policy basis exists to support the proposed Code amendments. The proposed
amendments will better implement policies of the Comprehensive Plan and will provide clearer
regulations for the City staff to administer. Based on these findings, the proposed amendments
are in conformance with Goal 2.
Goal 10-Oregon's Statewide Planning Goals: Housing.
To provide for the housing needs ofcitizens ofthe state.
Finding: The proposed text will implement the City of Redmond Comprehensive Plan by
continuing to allow for the housing needs of the citizens of Redmond, which is consistent with
the densities and development policies prescribed therein. The proposal includes changes to the
design elements for single family and duplex residences, and associated site design elements
all of which implement the Great Neighborhood Principles. The resulting development will
provide more desirable residential designs, and a more viable and livable product for the
community -resulting in greater confonnance with other Statewide Planning Goals. Overall, by
amending the Development Code as proposed, the City will be encouraging residential
development that is desirable and meets the housing needs of its citizens. Based on these
'findings, the proposed amendments are in conformance with Goal 10.
Conclusion:
Based on the findings addressing Code amendment criterion 2, the proposed Development Code
text amendments conform to applicable Statewide planning goals.
3. In conformity with the Redmond Comprehensive Plan, land use requirements and
policies:
Chapter 1 -Redmond Comprehensive Plan: Citizen Involvement.
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be
involved in all phases ofthe planning process.
Finding: The Urban Area Planning Commission serves as the City's formal citizen advisory
committee (as required by State Administrative Rule) and is made up of Redrnond area residents.
The Planning Commission is formally recognized through City Code and was appointed by the
City Council. Thus, the Planning Commission is the appropriate public review and
recommendation body to the City to meet this Comprehensive Plan policy.
The City, through the Planning Commission, has conducted initial public meetings, and public
hearings over the past few months regarding the proposed amendments. Public notices and
agendas for Planning Commission meetings where the proposed amendments were discussed
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page22of26
I
I
j were provided. All documents were available for the public review. Further, a notice of the
initial public hearing was published in the local newspaper, the Redmond Spokesman, as
required. The City has continually provided extensive public review and involvement
I
opportunities during public work sessions and public hearings both at the Planning Commission
and City Council levels as deemed necessary by such bodies.
The proposed amendments serve the following Policies of Chapter I of the Redmond
Comprehensive Plan.
1. The City shall establish a citizen involvement program to provide for widespread citizen
involvement.
2. The citizen involvement program shall involve a cross-section of affected citizens in all
phases of the planning process.
3. The City shall assign the Redmond Urban Area Planning Commission as its officially
recognized committee for citizen involvement (CCI).
4. The City shall establish mechanisms to assure two-way communications between citizens
and elected and appointed officials.
5. The City shall provide the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the
planning process.
6. The City shall assure that technical information is available to citizens in an
understandable form.
7. The City shall assure that recommendations resulting from the citizen involvement
program shall be retained and made available for public assessment. Citizens who have
participated in this program shall receive a response from policy-makers.
8. The City shall allocate adequate human, financial and informational resources for the
citizen involvement program.
Chapter 2 -Redmond Comprehensive Plan: Land Use Planning~
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and
actions related to use ofland and to assure an adequatefactual basefor such decisions and
actions.
Finding: The staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council have provided
opportunities for and have received public input throughout the review process. Based on this
input, the City Council finds that the proposed amendments and new development/design
standards are necessary to implement Chapters I and 2 of the City of Redmond's Comprehensive
Plan, specifically, and other Chapters through the support of good design principles. The City
Council has determined that enough factual and policy basis exists to support the proposed Code
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page230f26
amendments. The proposed amendments will better implement policies of the Comprehensive
Plan and will provide clearer regulations for the City staff to administer.
The proposed amendments serve the following Policies of Chapter 2 of the Redmond
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The plan shall be the basis for specific implementation measures. These measures shall
be consistent with and adequate to carry out the plans. Each plan and related
implementation measure shall be coordinated with the plans of affected governments.
3. All land use plans and implementation ordinances shall be adopted by the governing
body after public hearing and shall be reviewed and, as needed, revised on a periodic
cycle to take into account changing public policies and circumstances, in accord with a
schedule set forth in the plan.
4. Opportunities shall be provided for review and comment by citizens and affected
governmental units during preparation, review and revisions of plans and implementing
ordinances
5. To provide a sound basis for orderly and efficient urbanization by establishing proper
relationships between residential, commercial, industrial, public and open land uses, and
transportation uses.
Chapter 10 -Redmond Comprehensive Plan: Housing.
Finding: The proposed text will not have a direct effect on the type or density of housing
allowed in Redmond. However, the amendments will provide design standards which ensure
that the build out of residential subdivisions with single family homes and duplexes are desirable
to residents of the community and ofthat particular neighborhood. The standards will ensure a
base degree of architectural and neighborhood design integrity, but will not limit architectural
freedom to develop a multitude of architectural styles and home designs. Overall, by amending
the Development Code as proposed, the City will be encouraging residential development that is
desirable and economically viable, which ultimately provides more community vitality.
The proposed amendments facilitate further implementation of the following Goals of Chapter
10 of the Redmond Comprehensive Plan.
2. Allow for a variety of housing options at all income levels in both existing neighborhoods
and new residential areas that match the changing demographics and lifestyles of
Redmond residents.
3. Establish residential neighborhoods that are safe, convenient and attractive places to live,
which are located close to schools, services, parks, shopping and employment centers.
The proposed amendments serve the following Policies of Chapter 10 ofthe Redmond
Comprehensive Plan.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page24of26
Residential Compatibility
I. New developments in existing areas shall be compatible with surrounding developments,
including landscaping, visual impact, architectural styles and lighting, and their
appearance should enhance the area.
New Residential Development
8. All residential development should protect, to the greatest extent possible, the physical
characteristics of the site relating to soils, slope, erosion, drainage, natural features and
vegetation.
12. New residential developments in areas without an established character or quality should
be permitted maximum flexibility in design and housing type consistent with densities
and goals and objectives of this plan, and approved Master Plans.
Density
29. Residential zones should allow for a wide variety of compatible housing types and
densities.
Conclusion:
Based on the findings addressing Code amendment criterion 3, the proposed Development Code
text amendment conforms with the Redmond Comprehensive Plan, and land use requirements
and policies.
4. That there is a change of circumstances or further studies justifying the amendment
or mistake in the original zoning.
Finding: This proposal in and of itself does not include a change of zoning to any particular
property or area within the City. Rather, it involves the amendment of existing standards for
single family and duplex residential design, as well as those for fences and street trees -all of
which contribute to the overall character and livability of a neighborhood. Thus, this criterion is
applicable to the need for addressing the amendments in relation to changes in
circumstances/further study justifying the amendment since the existing standards were adopted
-past development under the previous standards has shown that additional standards are
desirous and necessary to ensure the development of high quality neighborhoods.
In the early part of the past decade residential development and growth exploded in Redmond.
New subdivisions were developed, homes were built and the population grew at an accentuated
rate. Some of that development was completed hastily to respond to market opportunity, without
a great degree of forethought in architectural design and longevity. Over the past few years, as
economic decline has plagued many communities, Redmond was hit especially hard with a large
number of foreclosures, empty homes and undeveloped subdivisions. Many of the empty homes
and undeveloped subdivisions are now in a state of disrepair and are undesirable for new
development or rehabilitation for a variety of reasons - a primary reason being the lack of initial
architectural diversity and integrity, as well as lacking physical amenities and design elements
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page250f26
that make neighborhoods attractive and desirable. Thus, the development pattern that was
established under the previous regulations did not always support or lead to desirable
neighborhoods.
State law does not stipUlate many of the components of new development that concern most
citizens of the community and result in attractive, desirable neighborhoods. These are left up to
the local jurisdiction to develop based on community desires. For example, State law requires
that a variety of housing types be provided within a community but does not specify that such
homes include any degree of architectural integrity to try to ensure that they are long lasting
assets to the community. Additionally, State law does not specify any particular requirements
for fences and the planting of street trees, both of which are routine elements of most
neighborhoods and have the ability to greatly influence neighborhood character. These elements
are some of the primary components that affect the overall livability and character of the City.
The attached Draft Code is being amended to achieve these primary goals:
• Implement the Redmond City Council Goals to continue to promote quality
neighborhoods and developments through incorporation of great neighborhood
principles.
• Implement existing goals and policies of the City of Redmond Comprehensive Plan
concerning residential compatibility and enhancement
• Address community concerns regarding elements that are desirable in new neighborhoods
• Ensure that design standards continue to include requirements for complete
neighborhoods
• Ensure that new residential development is aesthetically pleasing and maintains property
values
The proposed amendments are intended to provide more affirmative action toward the designs
the City of Redmond desires with residential development and the accompanying amenities. The
resulting development pattern will be more desirable for residents, will maintain property values,
and will result in a more viable and livable product for community's residents. Thus, these
findings include such justification as applied to the change in circumstances/further study
justifying the amendment part of this criterion.
Conclusion:
Based on the findings addressing Code amendment criterion 4, the proposed Development Code
text amendment is supported by the change in circumstances described above.
CONCLUSION:
The Redmond City Council concludes that the above findings demonstrate that the proposed
Development Code Text amendments to Articles I, Zoning Standards and IV, Site and Design
Review Standards, to revise/add standards related to architectural requirements for single family
dwellings and duplexes, new fences and the planting of street trees.
Ordinance No. 2013-04
Page 26 0/26