Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-03-12 Business Meeting Minutes Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 1 of 12 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 2014 _____________________________ Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend __________________________ Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; George Kolb and Tom Shamberger, Road Department; Mark Pilliod and Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; and twelve other citizens. Chair Baney opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m. __________________________ 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT None was offered. 3. Before the Board was Consideration of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-043, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Supply and Hauling of Crushed, pre-Coated Rock for 2014 Chip Seal. George Kolb gave an overview of the bid process and the project. They are doing 118 miles this year, some of it within cities. The bids were very close. Chip seal will not be done on shoulders; those will be seal coated. This keeps a smoother surface for bicyclists, and staff has had positive feedback in this regard. UNGER: Move Chair signature of the letter. DEBONE: Second. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 2 of 12 VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 4. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2014- 039, Amending a Rehabilitation Loan Agreement with the Humane Society of Redmond (AKA Brightside Animal Center). Erik Kropp said this is in conjunction with the following agenda item. Representatives of COCC and Brightside are in attendance. He gave a brief history of the relationship with Brightside, the various loan agreements and future plans. Since this was just completed and posted, he apologized for the lateness. Chair Baney said that the Board has discussed this at length previously and are familiar with the proposal. Mr. Kropp said the Humane Society was loaned over $1 million, with part of the property being used for collateral to secure the loan. Since then they changed their name and also talked to COCC about the sale of the event center , which is owned by the County, for a vet tech program. Proceeds of the sale will go towards the County; which is still owed $650,000. The loan agreement amendment splits the proceeds of this sale, with $141,000 going towards the loan balance and $40,000 for the partition, and the balance to Brightside. The amendment has COCC paying $300,000 to the County for the event center, based on market value. Per the loan agreement, Brightside will be subject to a procedures review by a CPA firm, as mutually agreed. Financial reporting, procedures and policies will be reviewed, and $7,000 of the sale proceeds will pay for this review. Under section 5, the agreement allows for proceeds to be disbursed; this should reflect on section 1. This means Brightside will get their proceeds before the CPA’s work is done. The agreement allows for the CPA review to be kept in confidence. This should be amended to refer to the original loan agreement. The amendment states that the proceeds will be divided to pay back part of the loan, the costs of sale, CPA review and the balance to Brightside. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 3 of 12 Commissioner Unger is comfortable with legal review and supports the amendment. Commissioner DeBone agreed. Chair Baney agrees with the changes to section 6(b) but in regard to section 5(a), the distribution of funds, she is concerned. She would like a partial release of funds or a date that this task with be complete, rather than having an open - ended timeline. The review has to be completed after tax season, but there needs to be a deadline. Mr. Kropp said that Brightside is supposed to satisfy its loan by the end of 2015. He does not think this can happen and they will likely want this date extended. That might be a good time to discuss implementation to be done after the financial review. Chair Baney said this would be in over a year and a half, and too far off for her. It should underscore that this particular process needs to happen sooner. Tom Anderson said David Givans, Internal Auditor, helped to prepare the scope of work. Chair Baney said she is not looking to have all recommendations done by then, but wants to see progress. David Givans said that they should be able to finish up within a few months, perhaps December at the latest. Commissioner DeBone said he is supportive of having this addressed this calendar year. Chris Bauersfeld of Brightside Animal Center said Mr. Givans walked her through the process and hopes they will learn from this. They want to do all they can to continue the partnership. She would prefer to get this done as soon as possible and not drag it out too long. She anticipates that a few months should be adequate. She said that October 31 should work. Chair Baney stated that the public needs to know they are serious about this process. Ms. Bauersfeld said they should be able to complete this by then. Mark Pilliod asked if the County wants a hold-back on any funds until this takes place. Otherwise the County would release the funds when the sale is completed. Chair Baney feels that the reasons are such that they should release the funds. When they get to 2015, they will cross that bridge if they need to. The Board agreed. Mr. Kropp spoke about the sale agreement, Exhibit A, which is the sale agreement to COCCo Exhibit B talks about the accounting procedures. The last page details the six major elements of the transaction. Ms. Bauersfeld said she is excited about this project. There is demand for certified vet techs, and COCC will be at the forefront. They will graduate some very capable students from this program. With this partnership, Brightside can give students hands-on experience. The animals will benefit and the veterinary community will benefit as well. They have worked towards this for a while. Some students are already at the shelter working with the animals, under veterinary oversight. Matt McCoy of COCC said the facility is important, but the focus is on being able to train the techs in a mutually-beneficial way. The partnership is already running but this will make it better. This will benefit everyone in the community. He is impressed with the County staying with and working through this partnership. The class is full with a waiting list. Mr. Pilliod said the amendments and corrections can be made quickly so this can move forward. UNGER: Move signature of the document, subject to Legal review. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 5. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2014­ 152, a Purchase and Sale Agreement regarding County-owned Property in Redmond to Central Oregon Community College. UNGER: Move signature of the document, subject to Legal review. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12,2014 Page 4 of12 Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 5 of 12 6. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2014-008, Ordering an Exchange of Real Property with Partners in Care, Inc.; and Signature of Documents to Perform the Exchange. Chair Baney opened the public hearing. Susan Ross said there was a Resolution approved to consider this, and anyone who is opposed to th e exchange needs to speak now. She gave an overview of the issue. The Partners in Care property is slightly more valuable. They will also be paying the costs of the transfer. Commissioner Unger said the long-term plan for the County is not necessarily to develop its current land. The other parcel has more marketability, so he supports the exchange. Commissioner DeBone stated that the face of health care has changed and they need to change with it. UNGER: Move approval of the Order. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. DEBONE: Move approval of the conveyance documents. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. UNGER: Move approval of conveying the property to Partners in Care. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 6 of 12 7. Before the Board was a Hearing (continued from February 5) on an Application for a Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Exclusive Farm Use to Multiple Use Agricultural for Approximately 171 Acres Adjacent to Butler Market Road (Newland). Paul Blikstad referred to an oversized map, and gave a brief review. There has been some additional testimony since the previous hearing date. Chair Baney said they received a fair amount of information to review. She asked about timing and whether all have had a chance to go through it. Laurie Craghead said they could take testimony and deliberate without closing the hearing; then close the hearing and deliberate; close the oral testimony and leave the record open for written testimony; or close all and deliberate now or later. She feels the Board needs some time to review information and for staff to provide a matrix for their consideration. There is no deadline on this. Commissioner DeBone said they are looking at two aspects: soil types and making a living off the land. Ms. Craghead said these were the two primary issues on which the Hearings Officer based the denial. Commissioner DeBone stated he is working within the State framework, but looking at farming in this region. He is interested in the opposition argument as well. It seems like it is hard to make a profit on this type of land. Nunzie Gould testified that this is a de novo hearing, with new issues being allowed. She submitted today an e-mail containing 14 pages. The biggest thing that concerns her is that the County is running with this to consider much broader changes. She thinks this is a bad example to get this off the ground. When Governor Kitzhaber talked to local citizens, he raised a certain component for Oregon that he called the happiness factor. When Deschutes County reviewed agricultural lands and destination resorts, this hit a low point on the happiness factor. Continuing the County’s approach based on a perception that this decision should guide policy will result in a lot of unhappiness. They should consider this case within existing land use law and those laws of Deschutes County, and not derive from this case a broader policy; and not embark on a process until they are sure the happiness factor is being considered. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 7 of 12 Maryann Moore said the developer purchased this land knowing the rules. They can’t get where they want to be as it is. This is a clear-cut case of the rules should be the rules, and they should not get what they want. Other people will follow this precedence and try to do the same. She hopes the decision stands. Jerry Norquist said that there was testimony at the Planning Commission meeting that this land can be farmed profitably. There are potential ways to farm this land that may have not been considered. Commissioner DeBone said there was talk about animals, row crops and other ways to farm. Ten acre parcels might be a good way to do this. He lives on 15 acres and can’t make money on it, but likes the lifestyle. Mr. Norquist understands agricultural needs and you can’t get this kind of land back once it is gone. Tony Aceti asked how many people testifying are farmers trying to work for profit. The County is mostly publicly owned with little privately owned land. He knows you can’t make a profit except a few very large farms in the northern area. The catch-all EFU category was established long ago, and some enjoy the open land because of it. His land is not profitable. Maybe ranchettes will keep the open space intact. Their application is for RR-10 zoning which means it would allow for those small farms, similar to others in the area. Losing farm land is a negative, but they need to keep the land that is farmable and profitable, not the hobby farmers who do it for other reasons. There needs to be a difference stated between hobby farms and farming for profit. This is for the economic viability of the County and State. The decision is whether this case meets State law. There are changes in circumstances and maybe they can look at situations on a case by case basis. He would like to be happy here, too, but the opposition seems to want more open space without considering other factors. The Board should decide what complements and benefits a particular area. Pamela Burry of Sisters commented on the remark of Commissioner DeBone regarding profitability. This is not the only argument. This is about many things. This sets precedence in a lot of ways, the UGB, outside interests and expecting all to follow existing law. Open space is interwoven and everyone must follow this. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 8 of 12 The idea of Oregon being unique includes changeability and ingenuity of the farmers here. There are many examples of this, including hay farmers and others who transformed their farms; organic situations, farmers’ markets, education, food banks and others. This is a large part of the community that maybe did not start out that way. These people have learned how to make things work. There are several examples of this. To narrow the field and address just profitability is an injustice. She stands by letting this go. Chair Baney stated her silence does not show support one way or the other. She wants to listen and go through the decision process. Commissioner DeBone said he wanted more feedback also, since this is a big issue for him to consider. Steve Hultberg recapped some of the issues. He encouraged the Board to ask questions if they wanted. There are a lot of different ways to look at things. Roger Borine said that he spoke about some concerns regarding the soils report. Personally he completed all of the field work and the written report. At the last meeting Mr. Garrett said the accuracy was poor and soil science was an art as well as a science. Mr. Borine follows standards and procedures and the DLCD requires a direct connection of the land classification category, which it has. There was written testimony provided by Ms. Beyard that said that he used a flawed approach in testing the soils. Soils science looks at permanent features of the soil, whether dry or not, any time of the year. She stated that the samples were tested in July 2012, but he did all his work March through May. He is concerned that testimony is not always accurate. The report was sound and concise. When soils surveys are completed, this is done with strict procedures. There is continuity in the process. Mr. Hultberg referred to the burden of proof, which is to demonstrate that the land is not agricultural under state law. They believe they have met this threshold. There are the soils and the feasibility for farm use. There is no denying the soil is mostly class 7 or worse. It does not grow crops the way it should. The question is suitability for farm use, and working outside the home to enjoy the rural lifestyle is not the threshold question. This cannot be considered. Testimony was clear; that everything has failed on this property due to a lack of profitability. They have looked at a lot of options for this property and it cannot be put to use for the pr imary reason of making a profit. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 9 of 12 Regarding the DSL property and the interplay of the UGB, this is not the decision before the Board. It is rezoning to MUA-10. In context, during the previous UGB process the City and County determined the subject land was suitable to be included and suitable for residential when it gets to that point. The DSL land was not included. The Board rezoned the DSL property and effectively put the DSL land to the front of the line. During the proviso process, they were on equal footing for the UGB. The DSL jumped to the front of the line and got a free pass. This application is not a mystery and they want to retain equal footing with the DSL property. They have gone above and beyond what the DSL did to demonstrate the same thing. There was talk about beer waste, and it has been asked if it can be put to the land to improve the land. They looked at this and submitted a letter for the record. This is just another input to the soil, and does not make it complete. It is not a typical type of waste. The notion this is free fertilizer is not correct; it won’t transform it to suitable farm use. Another suggestion was to consider community supported agriculture for this property. It is a fabulous model but does not suit this property. It requires large amounts of donated labor. This is not the question before the Board. Those operations are often on property with very different soils. Lower Bridge has high-value farmland and it is not the same. They have seen allegations that profitability is a minor consideration. Ho wever, it is a key component for consideration. This is a primary purpose of farm land. It is a threshold question that needs to be answered. This land won’t pass that threshold. COID and others say the property is green and therefor e is farmland. Simply putting water on property does not make it farmland, nor profitable. Ms. Dickson and others said this will change land in the county and create a domino effect. COID said 87% of EFU land could end up being converted. There is a two-part test, soils and profitability. The only properties eligible for this are those with class 7 or worse soils. Otherwise, it is de facto agricultural land. There is no evidence that 87% of the soils in the county are class 7 or worse. The domino effect notion is a scare tactic. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 10 of 12 They have heard the property was mismanaged. What they do have is evidence of poor soils. It is not like the property is high value farm land and was let go. The results will be the same. It has lacked profitability for many years. There is a notion that they are changing policy and setting precedence. The County needs to maintain an accurate map of agricultural land. This is nothing new and not the first applicant to come through this process. Some have said they are not playing by the rules. They are following state and local law to address this situation. The burden of proof has been met. The soils test is conclusive. In terms of feasibility and profitability, the proof is there. There are larger policy concerns but this is not a part of that. Commissioner Unger wants to be able to review the file and deliberate later. Mr. Hultberg wants seven days to submit written rebuttal. Ms. Craghead said the right to rebut may only apply to the first hearing. Chair Baney said that they won’t be deliberating much today. This rebuttal can be allowed, but will need to be done by 5:00 p.m. on March 14, at which time the record will be closed and nothing further would be considered. Deliberations will be at least two or three weeks from now. The hearing was then closed. The Board decided Monday, April 7 would be the best date for deliberations. __________________________ Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda. DEBONE: Move approval of the consent agenda. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Consent Agenda Items 8. Signature of Document No. 2014-142, a Letter Extending a Lease with Redmond Rod & Gun Club through December 31, 2014 Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 11 of 12 9. Signature of Order No. 2014-006, Establishing Two Roads: NW 39th Drive and NW Glenn Meadow Loop, Redmond, as County Roads 10. Approval of Minutes:  Business Meeting: March 5, 2014  Work Sessions: February 26, March 3 and March 5, 2014 CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 11. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District in the Amount of $41,135.46. DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 12. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District in the Amount of $9,821.22. DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. RECONVENED AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 13. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County in the Amount of $789,574.98. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12, 2014 Page 12 of 12 DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 14. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Being no other items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m. DATED this _________ Day of _______________________ 2014 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. _____________________________ Tammy Baney, Chair _____________________________ Anthony DeBone, Vice Chair ATTEST: _____________________________ Alan Unger, Commissioner ____________________ Recording Secretary DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 14. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Being no other items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m. t11h ' DATED this l~ Day of ~ 2014 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners: Ta~r Anthony DeB one, Vice Chair ATTEST: Alan Unger, Commissioner ~~ Recording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, March 12,2014 Page 12 of 12 ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest -I-'--1.....:f DateN..:...JN ~_________ Name ==>-tfueAl t\b \~ CY Address Phone#s E-mail address ~InFavor D NeutrallUndecided o Opposed _Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes ~No / BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest -J-~IJ?-Date fA~/iIY~--=~~___________ Name ~~/2.... $.~V'E Address (, Y77t:? ~I../.v'f');d c;:;-­, g £Vv/) cJ£ 17 7al Phone#s ~9/-~/o-z~S7 E-mail address J-.";)PV./~~ed4.v/IY~~./..d/7~( ~ In Favor D NeutrallUndecided o Opposed "Submitting written documents as part of testimony? [2}Yes 0 No ./" /-' /' ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK '*-G:,Agenda Item of Interest ______________ Date ~ N~e ___ ~~~G~~~~___·____~~----------- Address Phone#s E-mail addre-ss D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed -' Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes // BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest ___________________ Date ____ Address Phone #s E-mail address D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed __ Submitting written documents as part of testimony? D Yes ,/ c ---------------------------------- -------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest -,tL-~u-_-----,-/....:::-1 Date ____---t'll ~-________ Name li Jt ~ /fc .eli' ~. Address Ad Phone #s E-mail address D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed / Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes //~. , .' ----------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest Y\..tLv\.Q IJtI\. ./ Date ,) }rV J 'lOILj Name Pa W1el~ bVf M, Address Phone#s E-mail address D In Favor D Neutra1lUndecided D Opposed /Submitting written documents as part of testimony? 0 Yes D No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest __ __ __-=£'=---_________ Date J -/ it. ~ I Y-IL-----!.I e_'n. -Name ____~~~£~~'~7~~~a~~j~U~/f~·r--------------------------- Address jP(j 60 'x: J J 7 --~-----=~=-~~~----------------------- 977)7 Phone#s ___~.~~_O~J~-~~~----J-o-/-~-.------------------------ D In Favor o NeutrallUndecided ,W Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes ,.J£I No Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12,2014 Commissioners' Hearing Room -Administration Building -1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up card (provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject ofa public hearing will NOT be included in the official record ofthat hearing. 3. CONSIDERATION of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-043, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Supply and Hauling of Crushed, pre­ Coated Rock for 2014 Chip Seal -George Kolb and/or tom Shamberger, Road Department Suggested Action: Move Chair signature ofDocument No. 2014-043. 4. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2014-039, Amending a Rehabilitation Loan Agreement with the Humane Society of Redmond (AKA Brightside Animal Center) -Susan Ross, Property & Facilities Suggested Action: Move Board signature ofDocument No. 2014-039. 5. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2014-145, a Purchase and Sale Agreement regarding County-owned Property in Redmond to Central Oregon Community College Susan Ross, Property & Facilities Suggested Action: Move Board signature ofDocument No. 2014-145. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, March 12,2014 Page 1 of4 I 6. A HEARING (continued from February 5) on an Application for a Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Exclusive Farm Use to Multiple Use Agricultural for Approximately 171 Acres Adjacent to Butler Market Road (Newland) Paul Blikstad, Community Development Suggested Actions: Continue hearing and take testimony; begin deliberations if appropriate. CONSENT AGENDA 7. Signature of Order No. 2014-008, Ordering an Exchange of Real Property with Partners in Care, Inc. ; and Signature of Documents to Perform the Exchange 8. Signature of Document No. 2014-142, a Letter Extending a Lease with Redmond Rod & Gun Club through December 31, 2014 9. Signature of Order No. 2014-006, Establishing Two Roads: NW 39th Drive and NW Glenn Meadow Loop, Redmond, as County Roads 10. Approval of Minutes: . Business Meeting: March 5, 2014 . Work Sessions: February 24, February 26, March 3 and March 5, 2014 CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 11. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 12. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for , the Extensionl4-H County Service District RECONVENE AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 13. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, March 12,2014 Page 2 of4 14. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker@deschutes.org. PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items. FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. Ifyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.) Tuesday, March 11 7:30 a.m. Real Estate Forecast Breakfast, at the Riverhouse 10:30 a.m. National Public Health Advisory Board Meeting at the Health Department 5:30 p.m. Joint Meeting with the City of Redmond Council, Redmond City Hall Wednesday, March 12 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, March 17 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Tuesday, March 18 8:00 a.m. Performance Management MeetinglUpdate -Adult Parole & Probation (at P&P) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, March 12,2014 Page 3 of4 Monday, March 24 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting I :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Tuesday, March 25 1:00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting t Wednesday, March 26 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Thursday, March 27 9:00 a.m. Performance Management Meeting/Update Human Resources Monday, March 31 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Tuesday, April 1 3:30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting Wednesday, April 2 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Thursday, April 3 8:00 a.m. Joint Meeting with City of Sisters Council -Sisters City Hall 10:30 a.m. Performance Management Meeting/Update Assessor's Office Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker@deschutes.org. ----_.. _----------­ Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, March 12,2014 Page 4 of4