The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2014-04-02 Business Meeting Minutes Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 1 of 10 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2, 2014 _____________________________ Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend __________________________ Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; George Kolb, Road Department; Nick Lelack, Kevin Harrison and Matt Martin, Community Development; and nine other citizens. Chair Baney opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m. __________________________ 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT 3. Before the Board was Consideration of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-164, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Overlay of Cook Avenue, Graystone Lane, Deschutes-Pleasant Ridge Road, Tumalo Place, Innes Market Road and NE 33rd Street. George Kolb gave an overview of the item. Commissioner Unger said that sometimes outside bidders come in when there is a large project, but it seems to be very competitive. Mr. Kolb said the price of asphalt was lower than expected. UNGER: Move Chair signature. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 2 of 10 4. Before the Board was Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-041, Initiating the Vacation of a Portion of Lower Bridge Road (aka Lambert Road). Mr. Kolb said an owner approached the County regarding this vacation. There is no reason a road would need to be built at this location. This will return property to the tax rolls and helps the property owner better utilize the property. Commissioner Unger asked if this road from 1909 has any historical significance. Mr. Kolb said there is no indication on the ground that this road was ever used, and Community Development supports the vacation. DEBONE: Move Board signature. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 5. Before the Board was Consideration of Board Signature of Order No. 2014-009, Vacating a Portion of Lower Bridge Road (aka Lambert Road). UNGER: Move Board signature. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 6. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-009, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 18 to Incorporate “Housekeeping” Changes that Correct Errors and Provide Clarification of Existing Regulations, Procedures and Policies. Chair Baney opened the hearing and read the preliminary statement for Ordinances No. 2014-009, -011 and -012. Regarding conflicts of interest, the Commissioners had none to disclose. There were no challenges from the audience. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 3 of 10 Matt Martin conducted a PowerPoint presentation, and gave an overview of the proposed amendments. (A copy of the presentation is attached for reference.) Laurie Craghead said that separate Titles require separate hearings, but the hearings can be simultaneous. Commissioner Unger asked if they could have discussion and take action on each one as it comes up. Chair Baney asked for public comment on this Ordinance. In regard to horse events, Commissioner DeBone asked what are not considered schooling or training events. He realizes this is due to State law. Mr. Martin said they would be events that are sanctioned by a body or require an entrance fee. Those that are for competition are covered under gatherings. This does not prohibit riding events or those that require fees; it is just a different process. The Board is supportive of this Ordinance as explained. 7. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-011, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 22 to Incorporate “Housekeeping” Changes that Correct Errors and Provide Clarification of Existing Regulations, Procedures and Policies. Mr. Martin said there is one change to the destination resort mapping procedure, referencing the Comprehensive Plan. The formatting no longer matches so it needs to be clarified. The Board is supportive of the Ordinance as explained. 8. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-012, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 23 to Incorporate “Housekeeping” Changes that Correct Errors and Provide Clarification of Existing Regulations, Procedures and Policies. Mr. Martin stated that the findings that relate to any of the three Ordinances are attached to this Ordinance. He said this deals primarily with the urban growth boundary of La Pine, as there was one small property excluded and is still under County jurisdiction. This reinstates this clarification. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 4 of 10 Regarding the Sunriver sewage treatment facility, a portion of the property is used for distribution of effluent. It is not to expand or provide additional capacity. There are letters from citizens regarding this Ordinance for the record. Sunriver Resort had added a policy to the Comprehensive Plan that addresses this point. Steve Hultburg of Sunriver Resort and Sunriver Environmental said that his letter stands on its own, and feels this should be rejected. In 2009, Sunriver Environmental conducted a study with the County and DEQ, and this is referenced in the Comprehensive Plan. It talks about the area east of the railroad tracks being utilized to solve this problem. The Comp rehensive Plan has a policy regarding the expansion of a district and that they have to consider the impacts. To add this language back in is not housekeeping, and conflicts with the 2009 and 2010 changes. Chair Baney thanked him for his due diligence and for his input. Commissioner DeBone stated that south County groundwater protection has been an issue for many years. A lot of work has been done in the past few years, and he wants to leave this option open. The Board would like to have this language removed from the Ordinance at this time. The rest of the Ordinance was supported. Mr. Martin said they will come back at a later date to conduct the first readings of the Ordinances as revised. Ms. Craghead said that the hearings can be closed since the changes are known and will be done. Chair Baney closed the hearings at this time. 9. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-010, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 18, to Comply with ORS and OAR, Including a Revised Definition of “Church” Ordinance. Chair Baney opened the hearing and read the preliminary statement at this time. Regarding conflicts of interest, the Commissioners had none to disclose. There were no challenges from the audience. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 5 of 10 Ms. Craghead said they want the church and flood plain provisions to be withdrawn. One is a ‘may’ to mirror State statute; and the other is still being discussed with staff as the intent is to make it easier to establish churches. It is controversial for some, so it is best to remove this at this time. It was a definition used in other areas but it appears there is concern about this. Commissioner DeBone said this involves land use and Code for a building, not a gathering of people for religious purposes. Ms. Craghead stated more discussion is needed if changes are desired. People can speak if they want, but this change is not being considered and if there is a change proposed in the future, there would be a public hearing specifically for this. Citizen Richard Ross asked for whether this is for a building or a gathering. Ms. Craghead said the intent is to broaden the definition of a church, as they are a use permitted outright with site plan review. This would not prohibit someone from conducting church-like activities in their home. Chair Baney said this could be looked at differently if they were going to have weddings or other activities that involve charging fees. Mr. Ross asked if this is about an organization, meeting or a building. Ms. Craghead said a church is established as a church through the IRS, and they do not have a specific definition, just a list of factors. The intent was to broaden the definition since it was thought to be too narrow. This relates to uses of a structure. Chair Baney asked that Mr. Ross meet with Ms. Craghead to discuss this at length. Chuck Hemingway appeared for Shepherd’s House. They thought it was about a limitation and not an expansion. However, if it is going to be withdrawn at this point, he will wait until it comes before the Board again. Chair Baney clarified that this would only apply to areas outside of the cities, not those within the city limits , so would not affect Shepherd’s House. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 6 of 10 Mr. Blikstad discussed the other amendment , which has come into play since the legislature meets every year at this point. The legislature makes changes to the EFU zone that the County has to incorporate. The forest zones are regulated under OAR. The forest zone changes are minor. Chapter 18.36, the only real substantive change is adding in under conditional uses, a section regarding permanent storage and repair of logging equipment. It should be in both the F-1 and F-2 zones to be consistent. The State also changed language regarding bird and big game hunting; a facility can be established for this, but the language now says bird OR big game hunting. The Planning Commission, under fire siting standards, says people are essentially required to clear the ground around trees; it was suggested that the term “limbing” be used instead of “pruning”. There had been a 100-foot setback from streams for private campsites recommended, but the Board asked that this be stricken. Mr. Blikstad said there were a number of changes in EFU at the State level. The replacement standards for lawfully established dwellings are to be incorporated, but it is so lengthy now that they would like to have it as a separate section. Under 18.16.020, uses permitted outright, replacement dwellings are listed, but the requirement of a farm or forest management agreement needs to be included as required by State law. This is already a practice but needs to be included. Regarding churches in the EFU zone, you can’t put new churches on high value farmland. State law had not allowed this within three miles of cities without a Goal exception. The State changed the law on this , but the membership can’t be over 100. Ms. Craghead stated that it is not unique to churches, but any group. This mirrors State law. The County is in compliance now, but this change will make it easier for the public to understand. Mr. Blikstad said there was a 2012 legislative bill regarding dog training classes. Classes and testing trials can be done for no more than six dogs at a time, but allows ten classes a day. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 7 of 10 They are proposing to take out some language not provided by the State. Regarding anything allowed outright for dog boarding and training requires a conditional use permit. Other changes at the State level were incorporated verbatim. The State requi red that if someone proposes a disposal site for composting, they have to have a meeting with the neighbors and a pre-application meeting with the County. This is similar to what is required for new cellular sites. They wanted to add language for replacement dwellings, a prohibition of temporary dwellings would be in place per OAR. New farm dwellings and relative help farm dwellings were addressed and they can’t be more restrictive in this case; they have to strike the minimum lot size language on high -value farmland for this. Wildlife conservation language for dwellings has been removed from State law. Under farm and ranch operations, the County would add language regarding eastern and western Oregon parcels to be consistent with State law. Commissioner DeBone said that the legislature makes the law, the departments adopt it and the County has to comply and incorporate the appropriate language. The Commissioners agreed that it is important for information to be current and matches State law to avoid confusion. Being no testimony offered, Chair Baney closed the hearing. The Ordinance will be drafted with appropriate changes and presented to the Board at a future date. __________________________ Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda. Chair Baney asked that the minutes of the March 12 business meeting be removed. DEBONE: Move approval with this change. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 8 of 10 Consent Agenda Items 10. Board Signature of a Letter Appointing Joshua Peed to the Deschutes River Mitigation and Enhancement Committee, through February 28, 2017 11. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-036, Declaring Certain Personal Property Surplus, and Directing Disposition (Clerk’s Office) 12. Board Signature of a Letter Appointing Chris Doty to the Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization (BMPO) Policy Board as the Deschutes County Alternate 13. Board Signature of a Letter Reappointing Judy Forsythe to the Deschutes County Special Transportation Fund (STF) Advisory Committee, through December 31, 2015 14. Board Signature of a Letter Accepting the Resignation of Steve Johnson from the Deschutes River Mitigation and Enhancement Committee, and Thanking him for his Service 15. Approval of an Economic Development Grant to Bend Area Habitat for Humanity for $1,500. 16. Approval of Minutes:  Business Meeting: March 12, 2014  Work Sessions: March 12 and 17, 2014  Performance Management Update: Adult Parole & Probation, March 18, 2014 CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 17. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District in the Amount of $14,068.83. UNGER: Move approval, subject to review. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of the Board of Commissioner’s’ Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 9 of 10 CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 18. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District in the Amount of $1,734.19. UNGER: Move approval, subject to review. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. RECONVENED AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 19. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County in the Amount of $452,994.77. UNGER: Move approval, subject to review. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 20. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Being no other items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 11:05 a.m. if DATED this Zy; Dayof_-+-_______ ~2014forthe Deschutes County Board of Commissio~ Tam ~ Anthony DeB one, Vice Chair ATTEST: Alan Unger, Commissioner ~~ Recording Secretary Minutes of the Board of Commissioner's' Business Meeting Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 10 of 10 ------------------------------------------ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest #9' RtM')t!) O~I~'1vJ ~ ~~ Date if--l.. -pf Name ~J". l\.G<'\, J "I~ Address a95).Q C"\NI>J~£)r1\LA G·~cL. Phone#s D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided o Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes -0 No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest ~,vITjON OF Date $jb./lyc. c:.t/v/lLII Name ~L 1fAa:/) J2cs $ Address {,C2~J'f: ~;81\Jt:-1fJec: ~~ O~ q770J... Phone#s FCI/ hl7 qJ... ~ E-mail address ~5 f!!-, t/?pJ~UI d::/t?-! I D In Favor ~NeutrallUndecided o Opposed j I Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes ~No 1 I l1.j .... 1 .... I Steven P. Hultberg shultberg@radlerwhite.com 541·585-3697 April 2, 2014 VIA EMAIL AND HAND DELIVERY Board of County Commissioners Deschutes County 1300 NW Wall Street Bend, OR 97701 RE: Ordinance No. 2014-012 TA-14-1 Dear Board Members: I represent Sunriver Resort Limited Partnership ("SRLP"), and its affiliated company Sunriver Environmental, LLC ("SRE") in connection with the above-referenced ordinance. I request that this letter be included in the record. Late on Monday, March 31, 2014 we learned that the Board was considering adoption of Ordinance No. 2014-012. The Ordinance describes the amendments as "housekeeping" amendments to the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan. The amendments now include changes to Section 4.4 (Page 16) adopted by the Planning Commission at the public hearing last month. These changes go far beyond "housekeeping" and adversely affect the interests of SRLP and SRE. We greatly appreciate that the Board directed staff to contact SRLP and SRE regarding this issue. We urge the Board to reject the proposed amendments on Page 16. SRE owns the 375-acre site east of the BNSF railway, commonly referred to as the Lake Penhollow site. The site is used for the storage and disposal of sanitary waste effluent. The property is generally described on Page 16 of the proposed amendments. Without prior public notice, the Planning Commission added the following amendment regarding the Lake Penhollow site: "This area is not intended to provide additional sewer capacity to serve areas outside of the historic community boundaries." This is a significant policy change that is not supported by any evidence in the record. The Board should reject this amendment for a number of reasons. First, the addition of this amendment without sufficient public notice violates ORS 197.610(6). Under ORS 197.610, local governments must notify DLCD of all additions and deletions to local comprehensive plans. Oeschutes County provided the initial notice to OLCO, but we do not believe that this notice included the language proposed by the Planning Commission. If, after submitting the initial notice to OLCO, the proposed amendments are "altered to such an extent that the materials submitted no longer reasonably describe the proposed change" new notice must be sent to OLCO. New notice was required in this instance {OO253698;1} t 1 1,t ~ ~. c. I 1 Z' w «. x·W· ..... I -< III ~ « ~ 0 wi !::i I ::tl ~ Q! W ..... C « IX Board of County Commissioners April 1, 2014 Page 2 because the original notice does not reasonably describe the change proposed by the Planning Commission. To our knowledge, the County has not sent a revised notice to DLCD. Second, the amendment effectively changes the decision from a legislative "housekeeping" measure into a quasi-judicial decision in violation of Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Benton Co. Bd. of Comm., 287 Or 591 (1979). Where an amendment to a comprehensive plan is directed at a closely circumscribed factual situation or a relatively small number of persons (such as the Lake Penhollow site), it tips the scales towards a quasi-judicial decision. Because the County did not provide the notice required under ORS 197.763 (required for quasi-judicial matters), were the Board to adopt the proposed amendment, it would violate ORS 197.763. Third, the proposed amendment conflicts with other provisions of Section 4.4 of the Comprehensive Plan. On Page 19, Section 4.4 of the Comprehensive Plan references a 2009 feasibility study commissioned by SRE, in conjunction with Deschutes County and DEQ. The purpose of the study was to determine whether it was feasible to construct a new treatment plant at the Lake Penhollow site to serve the existing Sunriver community as well as 4,000 potential new customers south of Sunriver experiencing nitrate groundwater issues. Resolution of the ground water issue in South County is ongoing. The proposed new language would conflict with the solution referenced in the feasibility study and the Comprehensive Plan. Finally, in response to the possibility that the SRE service area would be expanded to address South County groundwater issues, Deschutes County adopted the following policy into the Comprehensive Plan to address the concerns of Sunriver area residents: Policy 4.4.30: Expansion of the Sunriver Water LLClSunriver Environmental LLC Water and Sewer District outside of the historic Sunriver boundaries shall adequately address the impacts to services provided to existing property owners. A significant expansion of the district boundary to include the South County properties would likely necessitate a new plant at the Lake Penhollow site and, at a minimum, additional effluent storage at the Lake Penhollow site. It would be inconsistent with this adopted policy to include the language proposed by the Planning Commission. We appreciate your consideration of the above comments and urge the Board to reject the proposed amendment to Page 16. Very truly yours, ~~ Steven P. Hultberg cc: Mr. Steve Runner (00253698; 1) Matt Martin From: Hugh Palck <hughp@srowners.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:19 PM To: Matt Martin Subject: RE: Follow Up-Proposed Text Amendment to Comp Plan (Sunriver) Matt, Thank you for all of the follow up on this item. I appreciate the clarification. The policy added, indeed supports the language change made on page 18 of the 2010 plan (Public Facility Planning), however both the language change and the policy fail to explain the conflict with the previous comp plan language of 2006 which was extremely specific. In particular, how can an area -the same 366 acre area discussed in both comp plans -be defined in the former plan (2006) as " ... not intended to provide additional sewer capacity to serve areas outside the historic community boundaries ... " and " ... necessary to provide adequate sewage disposal services to the existing community at buildout..." and then in 2010 be disregarded or more appropriately, amended to outright conflict with the prior plan? It is as if one owned a car, and without adding wings or a jet engine, decided to declare it now an airplane. Please note, I do not request of you a response to the question here ... I merely needed to articulate my concerns for the record. In the end, the historical context that the 2006 plan provides is essential and could easily be included. Regardless, I will wholeheartedly support the decision of the BOCC relative to this matter moving forward. In addition, I most certainly appreciate your professionalism in making the necessary contacts in this regard and hope that this matter did not impact your workload too much. Thank you again for your time and efforts, Hugh Palcic 17376 Lively lane Bend, OR 97707 -----Original Message---- From: Matt Martin [mailto:Matt.Martin@deschutes.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 9:32 AM To: Hugh Paleic Subject: Follow Up-Proposed Text Amendment to Comp Plan (Sunriver) Good Morning Hugh- I wanted to follow up on our conversation regarding the proposed text amendment pertaining to Sunriver sewer treatment property. After I spoke with you' had a conversation with Steve Runner (Sunriver Resort) followed by a conversation with Steve Hultburg (Sunriver Resort legal Counsel) to diSCUSS the proposed amendment and the hesitation the Board of County Commissioners expressed during the work session yesterday. Mr. Hultburg pOinted out policy 4.4.030 was added with the 2010 Comp Plan Update that may address this issue. The policy states: 1 Policy 4.4.30 Expansion of the Sunriver Water llC/Environmental/llC Water and Sewer District outside of the historic Sunriver boundaries shall adequately address the impacts to services provided to existing property owners. I intend on providing this information during my staff report at tomorrow's hearing. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Matthew Martin, AICP Associate Planner Community Development Department Deschutes County Office: 541.330.4620/ Fax: 541.385.1764 www.deschutes.orglcdd I i i 2 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 -Fax (54l) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2,2014 Commissioners' Hearing Room -Administration Building -1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up card (provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject ofa public hearing will NOT be included in the official record ofthat hearing. 3. CONSIDERATION of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-164, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Overlay of Cook Avenue, Graystone Lane, Deschutes-Pleasant Ridge Road, Tumalo Place, Innes Market Road and NE 33 rd Street -George Kolb, Road Department Suggested Action: Move Chair signature ofDocument No. 2014-164. 4. CONSIDERATION of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-041, Initiating the Vacation of a Portion of Lower Bridge Road (aka Lambert Road) -George Kolb, Road Department Suggested Action: Move Board signature ofResolution No. 2014-041. 5. CONSIDERATION of Board Signature of Order No. 2014-009, Vacating a Portion of Lower Bridge Road (aka Lambert Road) -George Kolb, Road Dept. Suggested Action: Move Board signature ofOrder No. 2014-009. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 1 of6 6. A PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-009, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 18 to Incorporate "Housekeeping" Changes that Correct Errors and Provide Clarification of Existing Regulations, Procedures and Policies -Matt Martin, Community Development Suggested Actions: Open hearing, take testimony; close hearing and conduct first reading ofOrdinance No. 2014-009, by Title Only 7. A PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-011, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 22 to Incorporate "Housekeeping" Changes that Correct Errors and Provide Clarification of Existing Regulations, Procedures and Policies Matt Martin, Community Development Suggested Actions: Open hearing, take testimony; close hearing and conduct first reading ofOrdinance No. 2014-011, by Title Only 8. A PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-012, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 23 to Incorporate "Housekeeping" Changes that Correct Errors and Provide Clarification of Existing Regulations, Procedures and Policies Matt Martin, Community Development Suggested Actions: Open hearing, take testimony; close hearing and conduct first reading ofOrdinance No. 2014-012, by Title Only 9. A PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2014-010, Amending Deschutes County Code Title 18, to Comply with ORS and AOR, Including a Revised Definition of "Church" Ordinance Paul Blikstad, Community Development Suggested Actions: Open hearing, take testimony; close hearing and conduct first reading ofOrdinance No. 2014-010, by Title Only CONSENT AGENDA 10. Board Signature of a Letter Appointing Joshua Peed to the Deschutes River Mitigation and Enhancement Committee, through February 28,2017 Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 2 of6 11. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-036, Declaring Certain Personal Property Surplus, and Directing Disposition (Clerk's Office) 12. Board Signature of a Letter Appointing Chris Doty to the Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization (BMPO) Policy Board as the Deschutes County Alternate 13. Board Signature of a Letter Reappointing Judy Forsythe to the Deschutes County Special Transportation Fund (STF) Advisory Committee, through December 31, 2015 14. Board Signature ofa Letter Accepting the Resignation of Steve Johnson from the Deschutes River Mitigation and Enhancement Committee, and Thanking him for his Service 15. Board Signature ofa Letter Appointing Joshua Peed to the Deschutes River Mitigation and Enhancement Committee, through February 28, 2017 16. Approval of an Economic Development Grant to Bend Area Habitat for Humanity for $1,500. 17. Approval of Minutes: · Business Meeting: March 12, 2014 · Work Sessions: March 12 and 17, 2014 · Performance Management Update: Adult Parole & Probation, March 18, 2014 CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 18. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 19. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the Extensionl4-H County Service District Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 3 of6 RECONVENE AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 20. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County 21. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker@deschutes.org. PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items. FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. Ifyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.) Wednesday, April 2 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 11:00 a.m. EDCO Annual Luncheon Meeting at the Riverhouse 2:00p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) -note later time Thursday, April 3 10:30 a.m. Performance Management Meeting/Update -Assessor's Office Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, Apri12, 2014 Page 4 of6 Monday, April 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 11:00 a.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) -note earlier time Tuesday, April 8 9:00 a.m. Performance Management Meeting/Update -Human Resources I Wednesday, April 9 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 11 :30 a.m. Redmond Chamber of Commerce, State of the City Address Juniper Golf Club 2:00 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) -note later time Wednesday, April 16 2:00 p.m. Career Workgroup Meeting -Redmond Economic Development Office I Monday, April 21 ~ 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Tuesday, April 22 1 :00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, April 23 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Monday, April 28 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 5 of6 Wednesday, April 30 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, May 5 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session{s) Wednesday, May 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session{s) Wednesday, May 14 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session{s) Monday, May 19 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session{s) Wednesday, May 28 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session{s) Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker@deschutes.org. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 2, 2014 Page 6 of6