Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-06-16 Business Meeting Minutes Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 1 of 12 For Recording Stamp Only Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, JUNE 16, 2014 _____________________________ Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend __________________________ Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Dave Doyle, County Counsel; Nick Lelack and Peter Gutowsky, Community Development; and about a dozen other citizens. Chair Baney opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m. __________________________ 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT William Kuhn of Sizemore Road said his property is about four miles from the recent wildfire, and he wanted to talk about wildfires, weeds and other things. Several neighbors have been working with BLM to help the wildlife habitat, Tumalo Wildlife Corridor, with some authority to put up signs, close roads and put up kiosks to help educate the public. On April 26 they were clearing fire fuels from BLM land and putting some of the vegetation across trails used by motorcycles. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 2 of 12 Just before the wildfires, he was with people from the Department of Agriculture and some students seeking some rare vegetation. They found some of it. He was out pulling cheat grass the day of the fires. He has collected a lot of it. They don’t have a joint ownership agreement in his subdivision. He has been trying to get this into place for 17 years. He sent certified letters to the other party with no result. He has appealed but can’t sell his property until there is an agreement. “You guys” have let this go on for years. While the fire was raging, he realized he can’t get permits to fix certain things on his property because ‘you guys’ won’t do your job. He did not cause this situation and it is not his fault. The others can’t get permits either, but they don’t even live there. If his house had burned down, at least he would have gotten some money out of it. Chair Baney observed they are aware that there is a long history on this issue. Dave Doyle agreed to review the information and meet with Mr. Kuhn. 3. Before the Board was Consideration of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-332, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Household and Conditionally Exempt Generator Hazardous Waste Management Program. Timm Schimke gave an overview of the item. The scope of work also includes holding two satellite collection events – one is Sisters and one in La Pine. There was an event in Redmond last year. The cost went up but is within the normal range for past years, with the extra events. DEBONE Move Chair signature of Document No. 2014-332. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 4. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of Approval of the Adoption of Document No. 2014-333, the Community Development Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2014-15. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 3 of 12 Chair Baney opened the hearing at this time. There was no opening statement necessary since it is not a land use decision. Nick Lelack gave an overview of the Plan. LCDC has to be able to work with the County on some amendments, in particular Haner Park and similar developments, but LCDC has to take the lead. Some of this also has to do with managing river flows, which is overseen by the State Water Resources Department. This project is being addressed by various groups handling river issues that are actively pursuing change at the State level. William Kuhn testified that he proposed a text amendment in 2003 regarding unfulfilled obligations of a prior issue of a conditional use. That specific text amendment is at the bottom of page 3 on the 73-page document. He is grateful it is on the agenda for this coming year, but wanted to encourage the Board to raise the level of this. It was supposed to be done this past year but wasn’t. He wants more commitment on the County’s part. He also has a comment regarding enforcement of County Ordinances, in particular the decision to not use enforcement on someone in Sisters who wants to host weddings. He has been doing this inside but wants to build a building for this. He knowingly entered into contracts to do something that he knew was not legal or not acceptable, and the Board was not willing to tell him he should not be doing this. He either has the right or he doesn’t. If it was him, he’d get signatures on a petition from neighbors and bring the community in. Chair Baney stated that this was mis-reported in the media. They will not sit outside his property and wait for an infraction, but will respond to complaints. No individual is on abeyance if they are subject to Code enforcement. Paul Lipscomb lives in Cloverdale and wants to support the Code enforcement conditions of the work plan, and in particular the inclusion of the text amendment regarding pending Code violations. The rule of law is important to maintain public confidence in equal application. He was pleased that they are using volunteers to do some surveying on violations, in particular around mobile home parks. Apparently there are many mobile home spaces developed without planning or septic approval. He suggested something should be done about this. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 4 of 12 It seems to be not too onerous to survey other jurisdictions to see if they have provisions or processes in place if someone wants to expand a current use, and certify they are in compliance with requirements. It would not be up to the County to police this, but it needs to be shown they are in compliance. If there is opposition, it will be easier to determine the level of the problem. If there are going to be Code provisions, they need to follow them and be in compliance. It should be a simple matter and a certification should be adequate. It is interesting to note that a mobile home park has asked to be allowed to expand, but it would be good to know if that operator is in compliance at this time. The same kind of analysis would be appropriate in other situations. He said thanks for the important work and he is proud of the work the Planning Division is doing. Andy Hyde asked for removal of this requirement. It will penalize homeowners. This is another layer of bureaucracy if there is a clear violation of a Code. Most get resolved voluntarily and the homeowner should not have to get a permit, for example, a water heater. He feels this wording should be removed and to continue with the enforcement in place. The County would be checking for compliance already. He supports the rest of the recommendations. Paul Dewey for Central Oregon Landwatch said that this is a good record of what is being done by the County, which is huge. On the Bend UGB, he would like to encourage staff to work with the City, and the County previously gave the City great advice that was not followed. They have new leadership now and he thinks staff would be heard this time around. The City needs the help. Regarding the Goal 11 exception for South County, it belongs with DEQ to initiate, rather than the County, and let DEQ take the lead. At the bottom of page 3, pending code violations, he urged them to do so. Other counties have. It is not redundant. He knows Code enforcement resources are stretched and it is not a burden for people to show they are compliant with the law before getting other approvals. A number of times important Code violations have occurred and the neighbors and County don’t have resources to pursue it. Other counties have done this for a long time. It is a basic rule. The tracking system on the top of Page 4 is important since land use regulations are becoming more complex. He would like this applied to agricultural lands events as well, with the cumulative effect of these to stay informed. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 5 of 12 On page 5, exploring storm water management practices, this is vitally important. The City of Bend decided against treatment of stormwater and started an injection system instead. It is better not in the river, but originally the City was to treat stormwater, but now will inject it. This may not be an appropriate remedy. It is important to know what is being injected into the groundwater. Regarding review of surface mining codes and updating inventory, especially Latham, these really need updating. As development has grown around them or the sites have evolved, more information on dealing with them is needed. Item #22, firewise standards for destination resorts, might need to be moved up. The County went through an extensive planning process for Community Fire Plans. They were adopted into the Comp Plan by reference. These are refreshed regularly. Mr. Dewey said they need to be in the Plan and not reference material. They need to be enforced. A lot of effort went into these plans and they belong in the Comp Plan. Bill Robie, representing the Central Oregon Association of Realtors, supports the work plan with one exception. They have a good working relationship with County staff. There are a lot of big, important projects. In that vein, the text amendment that really should be minor or removed is a solution is search of a problem. Staff talked about Code enforcement and about 1% of problems result in a fine. The inclusion of this should not be a priority. It might be used to exacerbate issues between neighbors. Often Code violations happen because someone is not aware of it. Tony Aceti said staff is doing a great job. He is involved and attends a lot of meetings, and there is a lot of expertise at all levels. He is concerned about the non-resource type land zoning timeline. There has been community input. He asked if this will take years to implement. If there is a big influx of people wanting to be involved, he wants to be part of the stakeholder input on this. The Deschutes Junction master plan needs to stay on top, since it has been in the works for more than four years. He is a stakeholder and wants to share input. There are changes of circumstances in that area, commercial and industrial uses already in place so an expansion of those is appropriate, and no real farming is happening there. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 6 of 12 He noted that in his situation, 80% of the soils he has is class 7 or 8. He has water rights that have not been used for 15 years. Transportation changes affected the land as well. If this becomes part of a master plan, there are lands around there that have a higher and better use than agriculture. This property does not fit the overall classifications. He asked if there will be a frontage road. Chair Baney said that ODOT would take the lead on this. He wants to be part of a stakeholder and community for input. It comes down to how they look at open space. When LCDC was doing the “Big Look’, they indicated there is a lot of open space in Deschutes County. Mr. Aceti was told that someone can designate their land as open space, but mostly this has to do with public lands. Hindering someone from doing more than having open space is not appropriate. He does not think someone should be convicted of a violation before the process is done. He wants to be an active part of the resource lands conversation, and the Deschutes Junction master plan discussion. Commissioner Unger is comfortable with the plan as presented. The Planning Commission is supportive. He understands the destination resort part is applicant driven. Regarding Code enforcement, there are good discussions and they are on the right track. Concerning Haner Park, they are being asked to created conditions that the County can’t institute. They can work with the Water Resources people and others, but can’t make direct changes. Commissioner DeBone stated that a Goal 11 exception was mentioned, and the County will be a partner. The DEQ steering committee suggested the County be involved in coordination with the DEQ. The text amendment regarding permits was interesting. It may or may not be a big issue requiring a lot of staff time. He is not interested in changing the proposed plan at this point. He thanked all for the work on this. It is a big, rolling project with a lot of input. Chair Baney feels this will clarify what they are going to invest in. The economic downturn helped them get more focused on this. She asked about the Bend UGB issue. The County is assisting the City as needed and when requested. Mr. Lelack said they are committed to helping the City, and they have a good consultant team now. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 7 of 12 Chair Baney said the County needs to know what they can take the lead on; the Goal 11 exception in particular. Mr. Lelack said this is a partnership and the DEQ has to do the heavy lifting on this. The County is assembling the application but DEQ will be on it, and DLCD is also involved in justifying the Goal 11 exception. DEQ and the County will be co-applicants. Firewise communities, #22, is not what is being done today, but this is added in perpetuity. All need to be firewise communities going forward. She asked if this should be added into Code. Peter Gutowsky stated that rural residential subdivisions don’t require firewise standards. They have done some retroactively, the historic resorts, but subdivision code does not include this. Chair Baney stated that Ed Keith does work with communities on this. Developers want to do it right but need to know it is available to them. Mr. Gutowsky stated that Brooks Resources has expressed an interest in a development west of Bend, and were recommended to contact Ed Keith. Through Project Wildfire, they have a few tools to make these developments resilient. His understanding of the CWPP is that this County is one of the few that has this in place throughout. It deals predominately with defensible space, sweat equity programs and other processes. It allows the Forest Service and BLM to expedite this process on public lands. Regarding land use, this is pu t together by other agencies as well and there are no specific standards for new developments. It is important that it is referenced. Chair Baney said that the Code is the law, and it would be very hard to marry this up if there are no specific well-defined rules for all. Mr. Gutowsky said the CWPPs get updated on a regular basis as some get treated and others rise to the top. Commissioner Unger stated that the changes are best being referenced so they don’t have to revise the Comp Plan for every change that comes along. Chair Baney supports this being a reference document. Chair Baney is concerned about the item on page 3, prohibiting issuance of a permit if there is an existing violation. She wondered how many would be affected, and sees Code as dealing with the many rather than the few. She proposed this being removed for a more robust discussion. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 8 of 12 Mr. Anderson clarified that this item would initiate a discussion and presupposed that it would be adopted. If the County initiates an amendment, there could be changes. Chair Baney feels that a text amendment uses a lot of resources. They have to balance the few and the many, and she does not understand how large this issue is. Other issues perhaps need more attention. Mr. Lelack said it would be a significant issue for a very few properties. Commissioner DeBone said this is a wide-open discussion and does not want to lock this down to use it against someone unless it is clear. He would consider removing it for more discussion. Chair Baney stated she does not know how many permits are issued if someone is already in Code enforcement. Perhaps there is another option than a text amendment. Commissioner Unger feels they need to put this to bed so they won’t have to grapple with it forever. Mr. Lelack said that regarding destination resort mapping amendments and this amendment, they could slide this to table 2. They will hit the 30-month mark for destination resort mapping soon. An applicant can then apply to initiate changes for this. Chair Baney said she would like more discussion regarding the permit issue. It could be added at another time if appropriate. She wants data on how many properties it might involve and how other counties handle this. Commissioner Unger said they can’t take it off the work plan and expect work to be done on it. Mr. Lelack said this will be a part of the Code Enforcement Policy update in August as well. Chair Baney says it states ‘initiate text amendment’ and she feels it should be worded differently. Mr. Gutowsky asked about the destination resort mapping changes. They can remove or hear from someone who wants to add. Any amendment would be borne by the applicant. The Board agreed. The hearing was closed. UNGER: Move approval of the 2014-15 work plan with the minor changes, as discussed. DEBONE:: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. __________________________ Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 9 of 12 DEBONE: Move approval with the exception of the minutes, which have not yet been reviewed. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Consent Agenda Items 5. Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-354, Amending an Intergovernmental Agreement, extending Measure 57 Funding for Adult Parole & Probation 6. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-242, a Lease to Oregon State University for Office Space in the South County Services Building 7. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-059, Transferring Appropriations in the Sheriff’s Office Fund 8. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-081, Transferring Appropriations within the Risk Management Fund 9. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-082, Transferring Appropriations within the Transient Room Tax Funds 10. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-083, Transferring Appropriations within the Solid Waste Fund 11. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-084, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Grant Projects Department 12. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-085, Transferring Appropriations within the Community Development Fund 13. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-086, Transferring Appropriations within the RV Park Fund 14. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-087, Transferring Appropriations within the Annual County Fair Fund 15. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-088, Transferring Appropriations within the Board of County Commissioners Fund 16. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-089, Transferring Appropriations within the Victims Assistance Fund Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 10 of 12 17. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-090, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Property Management 18. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-091, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Non-Departmental 19. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-093, Transferring Appropriations within the Natural Resources Fund 20. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-094, Transferring Appropriations within the Adult Parole & Probation Fund 21. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-095, Transferring Appropriations within the Administration Fund 22. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-096, Transferring Appropriations within the Legal Counsel Fund 23. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-097, Transferring Appropriations within the Law Library Fund 24. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-098, Transferring Appropriations within the Fair and Expo Center Fund 25. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-099, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Tax Office 26. Approval of Minutes:  Business Meeting of May 19 and June 4, 2014  Work Sessions of May 19, June 2 and 4, 2014  Budget Meetings of May 27, 28, 29 and 30, 2014 CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE BLACK BUTTE RANCH COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 27. Before the Board was Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-080, Transferring Appropriations within the Black Butte Ranch County Service District Fund. DEBONE: Move approval. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 11 of 12 CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 28. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District in the Amount of $17,899.99 (two weeks). DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 29. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District in the Amount of $7,177.78 (two weeks). DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. RECONVENED AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 30. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County in the Amount of $2,468,853.55 (two weeks). DEBONE: Move approval, subject to review. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 31. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA None were offered. Being no other items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 11:25 a.m. DATED this tt ~ ~Day of -~,-------,jF--------2014 for the Deschutes County Board of Commission~ Anthony DeBone, Vice Chair ATTEST: Alan Unger, Commissioner ~~ Recording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, June 16,2014 Page 12 of 12 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REOUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest ___2__________ Date &/1 L.. Address Phone#s E-mail address D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes D No -------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agendaltemoflnterest ____Lf________ Date 20*616. ( Name tJ( ({ (cJ <N-o Kv ~ ~ Address Phone#s E-mail address D In Favor D NeutralfUndecided D Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes D No Name BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK --~=-~~~--~~~~------------------------ Phone#s ~U -"­2­ KrnFavor NeutrallUndecided D Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? 0 Yes ~o ------------------------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda!of Interest --..!:....1t-l-l-_L-+I_________ Date ~/110 Name ~A Hr~i Address -------:r+J1O~S'__.L-l__/\___L/__=_r_-_1,_lt_h________ &~}t 9/')°1 Phone#s _______________________________________________ E-mail address ~InFaVOr D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed _ Submitting written documents as part of testimony? D Yes ~o BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest ___V~:j:::!...:Qc:....::k:::......-...:....Y...!.,.1=..:4d...l.....-_________ Date ~I,l., Address ________~s~o__~s~w__~G~9~1v~/~~~__~~~~_~~______________ 08 11..:1 4~ '9.770')" Phone#s _____~8~L~I~l-~~~~~a_-~~~q~S~6~__________________________ E-mail address ____p~<L~.d:....::..vJ:......;6~y~c---=1a-=.tJ....::.rzd:::.....::...-=-G0=....:...::l6:....:.....C::::.!4~r11.~________________ D In Favor o NeutrallUndecided D Opposed / Submitting written documents as part of testimony? D Yes ~o /­ ------------------------ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest -,----.:.W~()L.l.(-:.k....:.......J?L....i\c..::Jg.!....h~-------Date ~ Name i>ll~ \Zoh' ~ Address 7'15 Nt.J outlook V~~ \X l W(l ~ Q~ VOlo 1 Phone #s SLf ~ 5lJt .. q)t.f I E-mail address ~\ J1@.. (0 q c " (OM In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposedif' Submitting written documents as part of testimony? 0 Yes )R1 No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REOUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest ----~--Y-l,,-'c________ Date I-If")1 Name '/0)])1' Ae eil P Address 2(2. 3) Z~y" If ~?770 I E-mail address D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes D No Community Development Department Planning Division Building Safety Division Environmental Health Division 117 NW Lafayette Avenue Bend Oregon 97701-1925 (541)388-6575 FAX (541)385-1764 http://www.co.deschutes.or.us/cdd/ MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Nick Lelack, AICP, Director DATE: June 10, 2013 SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of the Community Development Department Annual Report & Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2014-15 The purposes of this public hearing item are to present, gain public input, discuss, and approve the Community Development Department (COD) Annual Report and Work Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-15 (July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015). BACKGROUND Each spring, COD prepares an Annual Report and Work Plan describing annual accomplishments and a proposed work plan for the coming fiscal year. The work plan describes the most important objectives and proposed projects in each COD division. It is intended that a review of the draft work plan will provide the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), Planning Commission, Historic Landmarks Commission, County Administration and COD's customers and partner agencies the opportunity to provide input, including additions, modifications and possible re-prioritization. The work plan also serves as the context within which new projects that arise during the course of the year are prioritized and undertaken. WORK PLAN & MATRICES COD's primary objective in FY 2014-15 will be to maintain high customer service levels with increasing development activity in the rural county, cities of La Pine, Sisters, and Redmond, and Lake and Klamath counties, while sustaining appropriate staffing levels across all divisions. Two additional high priority objectives will be to complete the installation of the State's ePermitting software, Accela, and to create a 5-year strategic plan for the department. The Planning Division Draft Work Plan consistently generates public interest. It proposes to carry over projects from the current fiscal year into FY 2014-15 and to utilize available resources to establish, maintain and/or improve several internal tracking systems for: • Comprehensive Plan and Community/Area Plan implementation activities, updates, revisions, and the development of new regional plans. Quality Services Performed with Pride • Requirements and obligations for destination resorts and other major developments. • Potential future text amendments or code sections to be reviewed and/or updated. Each of these tracking systems will be included in subsequent annual reports. Below, Table 1 lists the Planning Division's proposed long range planning projects for FY 14-15. Table 2 summarizes Comprehensive Plan policies and citizen recommended work tasks. Table 2 projects are not currently proposed to be initiated in FY 14-15 due to limited resources . On June 4, BOCC directed staff to indicate the general resources and timeframes required to complete each project. Staff uses a "minor" and "significant" rating to gauge a project's required resources and timeframe . • A minor rating equates to 2-4 months to complete and 0 .25-0.75 full time equivalent (FTE) of long range planning staff. • A moderate rating equates to 4-8 months to complete and 0.5-1.0 FTE. • A Significant rating spans 6-12 months or longer and requires 1.0-2 .0 FTE with possible consultants . Some projects identified as "minor" can evolve and extend the amount of resources and projected timeframe significantly as demonstrated by the Centra I Oregon Irrigation District text amendment to allow as an outright permitted use, piping the Pilot Butte CanaL l The resources required for several projects therefore may change depending on different factors. Table 1-Proposed Long Range Planning Projects (FY 2014-2015) Projects Brief Description Resources/Timeframe • I Agricultural Lands Amend County's Agricultural Lands Program based BOCC and Planning Commission direction None to Significant (depending on BOCC/PC direction on June 26, 2014) Bend Airport Master Plan (BAMP) Coordinate with the City of Bend to adopt the Bend Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan and zoning code amendments into County Code Moderate to Significant Bend Transportation Growth Management (TGM) Participate on various committees for Bend's TGM refinement plan for the west side of Bend Minor I Bend Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Coordination I Coordinate with Bend to complete their UGB Remand Order Moderate to Significant Bicycle Guide Update Complete Deschutes County Bicycle Guide Update and interactive web page Minor lOne narrow change to Deschutes County Code, Title 19 has generated significant community interest, requiring three Planning Commission hearings and generating a voluminous record. -2­ Table 1-Proposed long Range Planning Projects (FY 2014-2015) Projects Brief Description Resources/Timeframe * Bro w nfield Coo r dination Coordinate with Property an d Fac ilities Dep artment to pl an for redevelopment of th e Demolition land Fill Site M inor Brownfield Grant Certified Local Ga vernment Grant (CLG) Destination Resort Remapping Administer a three year U.S. EPA Community-wide Brownfield Assessment Grant Apply fo r an d adm inis ter a ClG grant t o i m plement a h istor ic preservation strat egic pla n (see be low ) Amend Deschutes County's Destination Resort Maps Significant Significant Moderate Federal Emergency Management Coordination Monitor an d parti cipate in state-l ed process t o ad dress the effects of a lawsuit related t o the f ederal End angered Species Act (ESA) ahd floodp lain development M inor t o Moderate Goal 11 Exception Initiate a Goal 11 exception for southern Deschutes Co . Significant Harper Bridge Participate in the process to develop sol utions f or safe access to Deschutes River Minor to Significant Historic Preservation Strotegic PIon Develop a strategic plan to inform County and City of Sisters preservation programs Minor to Moderate Large Lot Industrial Project Coordinate with Redmond to initiate a UGB amendment for a large-lot industrial campus Minor to Moderate La Pine Events Grounds Coordinate with La Pine Park and Recreation District and City of La Pine on land use issues relating to the rodeo grounds Minor to Moderate Transferable Development Credit (TOC) Committee Reconvene the TDC Committee to determine whether amendments are necessary Minor to Significant Sage Grouse Conservation Coo r dinate with the Bureau of Land Management and Governor's Office to coordinate on issues relating to sage grouse conservation to preempt a listing on the federal ESA Minor to Significant 1 Spotted Frog Text Amendment ­ Pending Code Violation Monitor the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's process to protect the Oregon spotted frog, currently a candidate speCies for the federal ESA 1 Initiate text amendment to prohibit the issuance of land and bu i lding permits if a property has a pending code violation Minor Minor to Significant -3­ Table 1 -Proposed Long Range Planning Projects (FY 2014-2015) Projects Brief Description Resources/Timeframe • Tracking System Develop an d maintain tracking systems of Comprehensiv e Plan, Co m munity/Area Plan Implementation activ it ies and upd ates, te xt am end ments, and des t ination resorts Minor Capacity for projects from Table 2 to move up to Table 1 will largely depend on: • Forthcoming BOCC/Planning Commission direction to amend the County's Agricultural Lands Program; • Status and decisions regarding the potential federal ESA listings of sage grouse and/or Oregon spotted frog; • Timing of applications to adopt and implement the BAMP. and to amend the Redmond UGB for a regional large-lot industrial campus; and. • Sunriver Owners Association Task Force recommendation on safe public access to the Deschutes River at Harper Bridge . Table 2 -Comprehensive Plan Policies and Citizen Requested Project Comprehensive Plan Policies Resources/Timeframe 1. Implement, as appropriate, recommendations in the Final Report f rom the Oregon Task Force on Land Use Planning dated Jan u ary 2009 (Po li cy 1.3.8) Significant 2. Support implementation of the Bend 2030 Plan and incorporate, as appropriate, elements from the Bend 2030 Plan into this Plan (Policy 1.3 .13) Significant 3. Develop comprehensive policy criteria and cod e t o provide clarity on when and how EFU parcels can be converted to other d es ignations (Policy 2.2 .3) Moderate to Significant 4 . Review County Code and revise as needed to permit alternative and supplemental farm activities that are compatible wi th farm ing, such as agri-tourism or commercial renewable energy projects (Policy 2.2 .12) Moderate I 5. Explore new methods of identifying and classifying agricultural lands (Policy 2.2.13) Significant 6 . Address land use challenges in the Horse Ridge subzone (Policy 2.2.15) Significant 7. Initiate a review of all Goal 5 inventories and protection programs (Policy 2.4.1) I Significant 8. Explore adopting new ordinances, such as a wellhead protection ordinance for public water systems, in accordance with applicable Federal and/or State requirements (Policy 2.5.21) Significant ·4­ I Table 2 -Comprehensive Plan Policies and Citizen Requested Project Comprehensive Plan Policies Resources/Timeframe 9. Explore an in t ergov ernmental agreement with the i rrigat ion districts f or ensuring irriga t ed land partitions and lot line adjustments are not appr oved w ithout notice to an d co mment by t he affected district (Policy 2.5.26) Sign ificant 10. Explore incorporating appropriate stormwater management practices into Deschutes County Code (Policy 2.5.27) Significant 1 1. Con sid er ado pting r eg ul ations for dock cons t r ucti on based on recommendations of th e Orego n Departm en t of Fish and W ildlife an d t he Desc hutes Ri ver Mitigation and Enhancement Pro gram (Policy 2.5.30) Moder ate 12 . Review County Code and revise as needed to protect open space and scenic views (Policy 2 .7 .6) Significant 13. Revie w Co unty Cod e and re vise as neede d t o ens ure effecti ve energy conse rv ation reg ul ations, such as revising County Code on solar energy t o create flexibility an d permit exce ptions fo r sm all properties and si tes with specific anomalies (Policy 2.8.5) Signi fican t 14. Review County Code and revise as needed to permit alternative energy systems for homes and businesses and mitigate impacts on neighboring properties and the natural environment. (Policy 2 .8.6) Significant 15. Review Coun ty Cod e and rev ise as need ed to dev elop an efficient permitting process an d ef fecti ve siting st andards for commerci al renewable energy projects that addr ess all proj ec t co mpo nents as well as environmental and social impacts (Policy 2.8.8) Significant 16. Review Co u nty Code and revise as needed to promote the use of resource- efficient building and landscaping techniques, materials and technologies for new const r uction and renovation projects (Policy 2 .9.5) Significant 17. Review surface mining codes and revise as needed to consider especially mitigation factors, imported mat er ial and r eclamation (Policy 2 .10.4) Significant 18. Review surface mining site inventories as descr i bed in Section 2.4, including the associated Economic, Social, Environmental and Energy (ESEE) analyses (Policy 2.10.5) Moderate 19. Update the policies for lands designated Rural Commercial as needed (Policy 3.4.8) Minor to Moderate - 20. Update the policies for lands designated Rural Industrial as needed . (Policy 3.4 .22) Minor to Moderate 21. Make the Floodplain Zone a combining zone and explore ways to minimize and mitigate floodplain impacts (Policy 3.5.11c) Significant 22. Require new subdivisions and destination resorts to achieve FireWise Standards from the beginning of the projects and maintain those standards in perpetuity (3.5.11(g))2 Minor to Significant 23. Support the creation of a landfill overlay zone (Policy 3 .6 .13) Minor 2 Destination Resorts are required by Deschutes County Code to develop and implement wildfire prevention, control and evacuation plans (DCC 18.113.0S0(B)(14); 18.113070(H)). Cald era Spring is currently the only Goal8 resort recognized as a Fir ewise Community. -5 ­ Table 2 -Comprehensive Plan Policies and Citizen Requested Project Comprehensive Pl an Policies Resou r ces/Tlm eframe 24 . Update County Code as needed to define rural recreational uses such as private Moderateparks (Policy 3.8.10) 25. Support an overlay zone f or property owned and/or utili zed by t h e Oregon Military Department t o protect tile military site and neighboring properties from noi se and Minor to Significa nt land use conflicts (Policy 3 .10.3 ) 26 . Initiate Deschutes Junction Master Plan (Policies 3 .10.5-3 .10.8) Significant 27 . Develop a master plan to address the infrastruc tu r e challenges facin g rura l, Sig nifi cant un d eveloped lot s in southern Deschutes Co unty (Newb erry Co u ntry; Polic y 3.4) 28. Develop a work plan with affected stakeholders to determine the future development and conservation potential of approximately 1,500 high groundwater Significant lots (Newberry Country; Policy 5.1) 29 . Dev el o p a work plan , in coordin atio n wi t h property owners, to update the Co mprehens ive Plan and Zoning designati on s t o re fle ct th e la nd use an d de vel op ment p atterns in Section 36, Han er Pa rk an d o t her app licabl e areas w ith Si gnifica nt long-s tand ing issu es, while prot ect ing ecologicall y significant natu ra l areas or resou r ce s (N ewberry Coun try; Poli cy 5.1) 30 . Adopt zoning for small destination resorts, as defined in DRS 197.445 (Newberry Minor to SignificantCountry; Policy 7.1) 31. Create a re gional t rail pl an In coordination with the City of La Pine, Sunriver, Deschutes County Bicy cl e an d Pe destrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), La Pine Park Significantand Recreation District, U.S. Forest Service, speCial road districts, and homeowner associations (Newberry Country; Policy 10.3) 32. Prohibit livestock from be i ng permanently stabled in the commercial districts M inor to Significant(Tumalo Community Plan; Policy 14) Citizen Request ed Projects Level of Complexity 1. Pursue a rural community -uni ncorporated community deSignation for the SignificantDeschutes River Recreatio n al Homesites (Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, and 9) 2. Amend the zoning code to regulate RV camping on private property by requiring an electric drop to be installed if a utility services the lot, thereby eliminating the Significant use of electric generators 3. Develop a work program addreSSing drone opportunities and challenges in SignificantDeschutes County. HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION REVIEW Each year, the Historic Landmarks Commission (HLC) reviews the few elements in the Planning Division's Work Plan related to historic preservation. On May 5, the HLC reviewed and supported the draft Work Plan as proposed. -6­ I PlANNING COMMISSION REVIEW Each year, the Planning Commission reviews the Work Plan and conducts a work session and public hearing prior to making a recommendation to the BOCC. On April 24, the Planning Commission conducted a work session and on May 8 conducted a public hearing on the draft Planning Division Work Plan. Public input to the Planning Commission included the following: 1. Property owners requested to be unmapped from the County's destination resort maps, and in support of the Planning Division's draft economic development action item: "Announce in August 2014 that the opportunity for remapping lands to the County's Destination Resort Map is available, and process any applications.',3 Staff coordinated with County legal counsel because all of the property owners live in The Rim at Aspen lakes, a subdivision affiliated with the Aspen lakes Cluster Development. The BOCC, through Ordinances Nos. 2010-024 and 2010-025 adopted a process and eligibility criteria for amending Deschutes County's destination resort maps. One comprehensive plan policy in particular applies to these unmapping requests: Section 3.9 -Destination Resorts Policy 3.9.3 -Mapping for destination resort siting. d. For those lands not located in any of the areas designated in Policy 3.9.3(a) though (c), destination resorts may, pursuant to Goal 8, Oregon Revised Statute and Deschutes County zoning code, be sited in the following areas: 5. All property within a subdivision for which cluster development approval was obtained prior to 1990, for which the original cluster development approval designated at least 50 percent of the development as open space and which was within the destination resort zone prior to the effective date of Ordinance 2010-024 shall remain on the eligibility map [emphasis addedl: According to the underlined wording above, CDD, assuming the BOCC directs staff to initiate a process to amend the County's destination resort maps, could not recommend approving these unmapping request because the lots are located in a subdivision meeting the criteria of Policy 3.93(d)(5). The Comp Plan criterion states "shall remain." To change this policy, one would need to initiate a comprehensive plan text amendment. 2. KJ. Phillips, Jerry Hubbard, and Commissioner Powell submitted written proposals for projects to be initiated. These projects are listed on the attached matrix under "Citizen Initiated Requests." After conSidering public comments provided at the hearing and in writing, the Commission recommended the draft Annual Report and Work Plan to the BOCC as proposed. Since the Planning Commission's reView, the Haner Park Homeowners Association submitted written comments regarding the CDD Work Plan for the BOCC's consideration (see Attachment 2). 3 Specifically, these residents stated their properties are mapped as eligible for destination resorts and they wish to have their properties removed from the eligibility maps. -7­ REQUESTED BOCC ACTION 1. Conduct a public hearing on the CDD Annual Report and Work Plan. 2. Continue or close the public hearing. 3. If the hearing is closed: a. Discuss the CDD Annual Report and Work Plan FY 14-15 and: i. Approve the document as proposed or as modified by the BOCC at this meeting; or ii. Continue the discussion on the document to June 30, 2014. b. Discuss the annual report and work plan on June 30, 2014, and approve the document as proposed or as modified by the BOCC on that date. 4. Continue the hearing to June 30, 2014. Attachments: 1. Draft CDD Annual Report and Work Plan FY 2014-15 2. Public Comments -8­     Community Development DepartmentCommunity Development Department Annual Report & Work PlanAnnual Report & Work Plan 117 NW Lafayette Avenue Bend, Oregon Main Line: 541-388-6575 Fax: 541-385-1764 Website: www.deschutes.org/cdd Draft April 24, 2014     Tammy Baney, Chair Tony DeBone, Vice Chair Alan Unger, Commissioner Tom Anderson, County Administrator Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator Dave Pedersen, Building Official Dale Brieske, Electrical Inspector Scott Farm, Building Inspector III Chris Gracia, Building Inspector III Steve Jensen, Building Inspector III Randy Scheid, Assistant Building Official Dan Swarthout, Building Inspector III Jim Williams, Building Inspector II Richard Wright, Building Inspector III Building Safety Nick Lelack, AICP, Director Lori Furlong, Administrative Manager Tracy Griffin, Permit Technician Judy Hackett, Permit Technician Jennifer Lawrence, Permit Technician Marti Mello, Permit Technician Lisa Petersen, Permit Technician Martha Shields, Permit Technician John Griley, Code Enforcement Technician Tim Grundeman, Code Enforcement Technician Coordinated Services Todd Cleveland, Environmental Health Specialist III Environmental Soils AAADMINISTRATIONDMINISTRATIONDMINISTRATION Kevin Harrison, Principal Planner Peter Gutowsky, AICP, Principal Planner Paul Blikstad, Senior Planner Will Groves, Senior Planner Matt Martin, Associate Planner Peter Russell, Senior Transportation Planner Cynthia Smidt, Associate Planner Sher Buckner, Administrative Secretary Tim Berg, GIS Analyst Programmer Planning BBBOARDOARDOARD OFOFOF CCCOUNTYOUNTYOUNTY CCCOMMISSIONERSOMMISSIONERSOMMISSIONERS CCCOMMUNITYOMMUNITYOMMUNITY DDDEVELOPMENTEVELOPMENTEVELOPMENT DDDEPARTMENTEPARTMENTEPARTMENT SSSTAFFTAFFTAFF Kathleen Stockton, Administrative Assistant Operations 2 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES & HEARINGS OFFICERS CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 3 Cheryl Howard ♦ Chairperson Kevin Tanski ♦ Secretary Mary Barron Bill Braly Pam Hardy Phyllis Lewis Matt Martin Rick Root Jim Stone DDDESCHUTESESCHUTESESCHUTES CCCOUNTYOUNTYOUNTY PPPLANNINGLANNINGLANNING CCCOMMISSIONERSOMMISSIONERSOMMISSIONERS DDDESCHUTESESCHUTESESCHUTES CCCOUNTYOUNTYOUNTY HHHISTORICISTORICISTORIC LLLANDMARKSANDMARKSANDMARKS CCCOMMISSIONERSOMMISSIONERSOMMISSIONERS Broc Stenman ♦ Unincorporated Bill Olsen ♦ Pioneer Association Chris Horting-Jones ♦ Unincorporated Sharon Leighty ♦ Unincorporated Dennis Schmidling ♦ City of Sisters Kelly Madden ♦ Ex-Officio Ray Solley ♦ Ex-Officio Rachel Stemach ♦ Ex-Officio Christen Brown ♦ At Large (Chair) Hugh Palcic ♦ At Large (Vice Chair) Ed Criss ♦ South County Matt Lisignoli ♦ Redmond James Powell ♦ Bend Steve Swisher ♦ Sisters Todd Turner ♦ Bend DDDESCHUTESESCHUTESESCHUTES CCCOUNTYOUNTYOUNTY HHHEARINGSEARINGSEARINGS OOOFFICERSFFICERSFFICERS Karen Green Ken Helm DDDESCHUTESESCHUTESESCHUTES CCCOUNTYOUNTYOUNTY BBBICYCLEICYCLEICYCLE & P& P& PEDESTRIANEDESTRIANEDESTRIAN AAADVISORYDVISORYDVISORY CCCOMMITTEEOMMITTEEOMMITTEE     Deschutes County Mission Statement & Policies ............ 7 CDD Introduction/Overview .......................................... 8 Department Goals ......................................................... 9 Accomplishments ...................................................... 12 Work Plan ................................................................... 13 Accomplishments ...................................................... 14 Work Plan .................................................................. 15 Accomplishments ...................................................... 16 Work Plan .................................................................. 18 Accomplishments ...................................................... 20 Work Plan .................................................................. 20 Accomplishments ...................................................... 22 Work Plan .................................................................. 23 Accomplishments ...................................................... 26 Work Plan .................................................................. 31 2013 Annual Community Involvement Report ............. 35 .................................................................................. 38 CCCOMMUNITYOMMUNITYOMMUNITY DDDEVELOPMENTEVELOPMENTEVELOPMENT DDDEPARTMENTEPARTMENTEPARTMENT CCCOORDINATEDOORDINATEDOORDINATED SSSERVICESERVICESERVICES CCCODEODEODE EEENFORCEMENTNFORCEMENTNFORCEMENT GGGEOGRAPHICEOGRAPHICEOGRAPHIC IIINFORMATIONNFORMATIONNFORMATION SSSYSTEMSYSTEMSYSTEMS BBBUILDINGUILDINGUILDING SSSAFETYAFETYAFETY EEENVIRONMENTALNVIRONMENTALNVIRONMENTAL SSSOILSOILSOILS PPPLANNINGLANNINGLANNING SSSTAFFTAFFTAFF DDDIRECTORYIRECTORYIRECTORY 4 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS    CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 5 Safe Communities Protect the community through planning, preparedness and coordinated public safety services Facilitate collaborative planning among County and community partners to enhance emergency preparedness. Facilitate collaborative planning on County-wide communications and infrastructure. Healthy People Enhance and protect the health and well being of the community through advocacy, education and services Consider population health, wellness, safety and multi-modal connectivity in the design and implementation of infrastructure. Assess, preserve, promote and protect the basic health and wellness of residents. Robust Economy Promote policies and actions that simulate economic vitality Partner with organizations that stimulate economic vitality. Provide cost-efficient and innovative infrastructure that supports local economic opportunities and livable communities. Support land use policies that promote beneficial utilization of othe land for economic growth. Support beneficial management and access policies of publicly owned natural resources to promote tourism and recreational activities. Pursue interjurisdictional and interdepartmental cooperation to enhance service delivery and the cost effectiveness of public services. Management of Natural Resources Promote environmental stewardship through assessment, advocacy and collaboration Partner with community members and appropriate agencies to preserve and protect South County’s water resources. Support healthy and sustainable forest and public land management practices and oversight. Enhance and protect air, land and water resources. DESCHUTES COUNTY MISSION STATEMENT Enhancing the lives of citizens by delivering quality services in a cost-effective manner EXCERPT FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2014-2015 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:     Effective Service Delivery Maintain confidence in Deschutes County through sound fiscal management and responsiveness to the public Continue to provide opportunities for public engagement with Deschutes County government. Provide support to County operations to ensure cost effective and efficient delivery of services to the public. Support employee development, productivity and job satisfaction. Support and promote Deschutes County Customer Service “Every Time” standards. DESCHUTES COUNTY MISSION STATEMENT, CONTINUED 6 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014       Main Office 117 NW Lafayette Ave. Bend, OR 97701 Mon., Tues., Thurs., Fri. 8-5, Wed. 9-5 South County Services Center 51340 Highway 97 S. La Pine, OR 97739 Tuesday 8-4 (Moving to La Pine City Hall) Deschutes County Fair & Expo 3800 SW Airport Way Redmond, OR 97756 Thursday 8:00-4:30 CDD MCDD MCDD MISSIONISSIONISSION SSSTATEMENTTATEMENTTATEMENT The Community Development Department facilitates orderly growth and development in Deschutes County through coordinated programs of Planning, Environmental Soils, Building Safety, Code Enforcement, education and services to the public. This Annual Report highlights the Community Development Department’s 2013 accomplishments, the work plan for Fiscal Year 2014-15, and implements the Board’s goals and objectives. CDD provides satellite office coverage in Redmond, La Pine and Sisters, as well as services at the main office in Bend. The Department consists of divisions and programs as listed below which provide coordinated planning and development services. INTRODUCTION Coordinated ServicesCoordinated ServicesCoordinated Services Building SafetyBuilding SafetyBuilding Safety Environmental SoilsEnvironmental SoilsEnvironmental Soils Planning DivisionPlanning DivisionPlanning Division Code EnforcementCode EnforcementCode Enforcement Geographic Information SystemsGeographic Information SystemsGeographic Information Systems *Building Services are provided at Sisters City Hall. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 7     Full Time Equivalents FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2015 Community Development 32.50 28.60 28.60 32.00 FY 2014 29.00 OVERVIEW N®‘» L›½ƒ‘» CDD Director LÊÙ® FçÙ½ÊĦ AdministraƟve Manager B箽—®Ä¦ Sƒ¥›ãù D®ò®Ý®ÊÄ P½ƒÄĮĦ D®ò®Ý®ÊÄ EÄò®ÙÊÄÛÄヽ SÊ®½Ý D®ò®Ý®ÊÄ CÊÊٗ®Äƒã›— S›Ùò®‘›Ý D®ò®Ý®ÊÄ Commercial/ResidenƟal  Plan Review  and InspecƟons  Current Planning  Long Range Planning  Geographic InformaƟon  Systems  Onsite  Program  Permit Technicians  Code Enforcement  Dƒò› P›—›ÙÝ›Ä Building Official Tʗ— C½›ò›½ƒÄ— Environmental Health Specialist Bʃٗ Ê¥ CÊçÄãù CÊÃîÝÝ®ÊěÙÝ B®‘ù‘½› ƒÄ— P›—›ÝãÙ®ƒÄ A—ò®ÝÊÙù CÊÃîã㛛 H›ƒÙ®Ä¦Ý O¥¥®‘›ÙÝ H®ÝãÊÙ®‘ LƒÄ—ÃƒÙ»Ý CÊÃîÝÝ®ÊÄ P½ƒÄĮĦ CÊÃîÝÝ®ÊÄ D›Ý‘«çã›Ý R®ò›Ù M®ã®¦ƒã®ÊÄ ƒÄ— EÄ«ƒÄ‘›Ã›Äã CÊÃîã㛛 Budget Summary FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2015 (Proposed) Resources 4,292,013 4,476,213 4,457,366 6,230,219 Requirements 4,160,237 4,476,213 4,457,366 6,230,219 FY 2014 4,914,977 4,914,977 K›ò®Ä HƒÙÙ®ÝÊÄ P›ã›Ù GçãÊóÝ»ù Principal Planners 8 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOALS SSSUMMARYUMMARYUMMARY This section applies to all Community Development Department (CDD) Divisions and programs. This plan was developed through Planning Commission, Historic Landmarks Commission and Board of County Commissioner (BOCC) work sessions and public hearings, stakeholder meetings, and input from the general public. It includes action items carried over from prior years, ongoing responsibilities and requirements, new projects, compliance measures, and more. CDD’s Work Plan Objectives for FY 14-15 aim to: 1. Implement the BOCC’s FY 14-15 Goals and Objectives. 2. Employ the County’s Customer Service Standards: “Every Time Standards” Goals: We respond in a timely and courteous manner, identifying customer needs and striving for solutions (response). We set honest and realistic expectations to achieve optimum results (expectations). We provide knowledgeable, timely, professional, respectful service (professionalism). We take ownership of our customer’s needs and follow through (follow through). We value our customers and approach them with an open mind (service). 3. Carry out CDD’s mission statement. 4. Partner, coordinate and cooperate with our partner organizations in the public, private and non-profit sectors and citizens to implement this Work Plan. 5. Maintain updated intergovernmental agreements and contracts with cities, vendors, Hearings Officers, and others. 6. Promote robust public engagement that informs, involves, and empowers people and communities, including maintaining and enhancing cooperative relationships and open dialogue with stakeholder organizations. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 9 Add photo     FFFIVEIVEIVE---YYYEAREAREAR SSSTRATEGICTRATEGICTRATEGIC PPPLANLANLAN SSSIGNIFICANTIGNIFICANTIGNIFICANT IIISSUESSSUESSSUES INININ THETHETHE YYYEAREAREAR AAAHEADHEADHEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOALS, CONTINUED 1. Maintain high customer service levels with increasing development activity in the rural county and in the cities of La Pine, Sisters, Redmond, and Lake and Klamath counties while: (1) sustaining appropriate staffing levels across all divisions and programs; (2) completing the replacement of aging vehicles and technology; and (3) providing training for existing and new staff on regular updates to Accela and related technologies and equipment. 2. Develop and Adopt a 5-Year Strategic Plan CDD will develop its first 5-Year Strategic Plan in FY 14-15. This process started in FY 13-14 with staff creating a Draft Strategic Plan Framework (below). The CDD Strategic Plan will carry out the department’s Work Plan Objectives (above) and guide decisions over the next five years. The Strategic Plan will be updated on a regular basis. As such, we are committed to revisiting the Strategic Plan annually to refine the alignment of the priorities of the plan with the BOCC’s goals and objectives, fiscal realities, and our customers’ priorities. We intend to learn what works and what needs to be improved, so that the plan will remain relevant and continue to provide direction over time. We continue to welcome everyone’s input on the delivery of this plan and the services our department provides. 1. Financial Plan. Develop 5-year financial and permit projections with experts, stakeholders, and the BOCC as the basis for creating a financial plan to make sound financial management decisions and build CDD’s long-term fiscal strength. 2. Human Resources/Succession Plan/Organizational Culture. The Human Resources element will also address how to empower our department’s most valuable asset, our employees. Develop and implement a succession plan to sustain high levels of customer service and efficient operations during transitional periods caused by several senior level retirements. Establish strategies to support and foster an outstanding organizational culture. 3. Facilities Plan. Coordinate with the Property and Facilities Department, stakeholders, the BOCC and others to conduct a high level evaluation of CDD’s existing and potential facilities, including locations and hours of operation where one-stop shared development services shops are provided such as the Sisters and La Pine City Halls, and identify whether improvements may be necessary over the planning period. DDDRAFTRAFTRAFT SSSTRATEGICTRATEGICTRATEGIC PPPLANLANLAN FFFRAMEWORKRAMEWORKRAMEWORK 10 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 Add photo     COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOALS, CONTINUED   4. Shared Services, Contracts, and Partnerships. Inventory and evaluate, if necessary, all existing shared services (i.e., Intergovernmental Agreements, Joint Management Agreements), contracts (i.e., Hearings Officers, on-call staff), and partnerships (i.e., one-stop shop at the City of La Pine); and explore additional opportunities to provide services that benefit our customers in a cost-effective, efficient manner. 5. Operations Plan. Create a plan for CDD’s operations with appropriate policies where applicable to address the following: a. Technology b. Vehicles c. Communications d. Procedures, protocols, and manuals 6. Environmental Sustainability Plan. Evaluate and identify opportunities to exercise cost-effective environmental sustainability in our facilities and operations. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 11 Add photo     COORDINATED SERVICES AAACCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTS OOOVERVIEWVERVIEWVERVIEW The Coordinated Services Division provides service to customers at the main office in Bend, as well as at satellite offices in Redmond and La Pine. The Division consists of six permit technicians and two code enforcement technicians. The goals of the Division are to ensure minimal wait times, provide accurate information to the public, and ensure the efficient operation of the front counter. Staff also perform basic building plan reviews and addressing in the rural county and City of Redmond under contract. Developed, coordinated and facilitated the adoption of intergovernmental agreements and contracts with the state, software vendor, cities, and the County’s IT and Legal Departments to install the State of Oregon’s ePermitting software program, Accela Automation. Coordinated and installed Accela Automation for the Building, Environmental Soils, Planning, and Coordinated Services/Code Enforcement Divisions, and for the cities of Redmond (Planning and Building Divisions) and Sisters (Building Division). Organized and trained all County CDD staff, Redmond and Sisters staff, and customers to implement and efficiently use Accela. Provided training courses for licensed professionals in conjunction with Central Oregon Builders Association and the State of Oregon on Accela and ePermitting. Much of this training will be ongoing. Converted credit card machines to virtual merchant devices for credit card transactions. Trained and coordinated with City of Sister’s staff on processing building permit applications, estimating and calculating fees, and ensuring the appropriate permits are issued. Completed the database cleanup project (carried over from prior years). In coordination with GIS and IT, Coordinated Services continued to assess equipment used by all CDD staff to ensure that operational needs were met. The team developed project list that will enhance service, staff efficiency and communications. Projects included: (1) providing tablets to building and environmental health inspectors and code enforcement technicians in the field to provide real-time inspection results; making data available to inspectors in the field; and improving communication and 12 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     COORDINATED SERVICES, CONTINUED WWWORKORKORK PPPLANLANLAN photography tools; (2) providing linkages to historical documents where parcel numbers have changed; (3) creating new types of online permit applications; and (4) reviewing business processes and procedures and making several adjustments to accommodate and fully utilize Accela. Train staff in Administration and Crystal Reports as part of the contract with the Accela vendor. This training will allow staff to create custom reports and perform changes in the system to fees, workflows and create new record types saving CDD money by not contracting for these services. Continue to lead, facilitate and/or participate in training all County, Sisters, and Redmond staff and user groups on Accela. Continue to coordinate public outreach and education on Accela and all related elements to increase customer use of epermitting, and encourage submittal of applications for all participating jurisdictions at any participating Community Development Department. Serve on Statewide epermitting committee, participate in national Accela conference, and pursue other actions to ensure Accela meets Deschutes County’s needs. Perform addressing duties in rural Deschutes County and for the City of Redmond. Create a one-stop development services shop for Southern Deschutes County with the City of La Pine at City Hall, and explore opportunities with the City of Redmond. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 13     OOOVERVIEWVERVIEWVERVIEW The Code Enforcement program consists of two Code Enforcement technicians (2 FTE in 2013- 2014) plus volunteers, supported by a law enforcement technician from the Sheriff’s Department, management and the operating divisions. Code Enforcement is responsible for investigating code violation complaints associated with building, land use, onsite wastewater disposal and solid waste codes, with the overriding goal of achieving voluntary compliance. If necessary, Code Enforcement may issue citations for prosecution in circuit court or before a Code Enforcement hearings officer. AAACCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTS Code Enforcement staff successfully resolved 264 cases in 2013. The number of new Code Enforcement cases increased 8% in Year 2013. Accommodating this increase, staff maintained consistency in case turnaround times and achieved an 86% voluntary compliance rate. Utilization of volunteers in the proactive code enforcement program was very successful. Work performed by volunteers directly enhanced productivity and efficiency. Coordinating with the County Weeds Program Specialist, staff extended proactive enforcement program focus to include identification of noxious weed-infested property. CODE ENFORCEMENT Case Initiation Summary Compliance Case Turnaround 14 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     CODE ENFORCEMENT, CONTINUED The Code Enforcement Volunteers conducted site visits to all manufactured dwelling and recreational vehicle parks in the rural County. The purpose was to ascertain the level of compliance with the approved number of spaces and types of units. Over the years, many parks have added spaces without planning, building or septic approval and this survey was intended to document the current numbers. Staff will then determine if proactive enforcement might be applicable. Developed draft Code Enforcement Procedures Manual Update in coordination with County Legal Counsel; conducted BOCC work session on the draft Manual Update; and prepared for BOCC public hearings on the Manual Update in Summer 2014. WWWORKORKORK PPPLANLANLAN Ongoing Projects: Complete the update of the Code Enforcement procedures manual, including revising sections to reflect current practices, deleting those sections which are no longer appropriate, and adding provisions for updated objectives. One discussion item will be a review of the policy on accepting anonymous complaints. The BOCC will consider adoption of the updated manual after conducting public hearings. Continue proactive efforts in investigation of illegal second dwellings, review temporary use permits, and follow up on replacement dwellings. Continue to establish a relationship between CDD Code Enforcement and rural subdivision homeowners associations. Code Enforcement technicians make themselves available to speak at stakeholder meetings to share Deschutes County Code Enforcement information and operating procedures. Participate in land use text amendment process by providing information and insight to ensure code enforceability. Survey other code enforcement jurisdictions and incorporate innovative practices where appropriate. This effort includes direct involvement with the Oregon Code Enforcement Association (OCEA) conference participation and networking. Administer the Code Enforcement Volunteer Program, focusing on proactive, non-threatening case review. Potential Projects (listed in priority order, to be accomplished as time allows): In cooperation with the Building Safety Division, participate in the development of a text amendment on the County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. The amendment will update tables to include compact florescent lighting options. Explore the feasibility of conducting proactive enforcement of certain types of land use permits which have conditions of approval associated with them. Determine the types of conditions that would be applicable for follow up, and whether it would be possible to view from a public vantage point. Landscaping, lighting and signage are examples of possible conditions. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 15       Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is staffed by one Analyst/ Programmer and supports CDD divisions as well as providing direct service to the public via electronic and web-based mapping. GIS will assist Coordinated Services with the ePermitting (Accela) transition and adding the City of La Pine’s Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning districts into the County’s database. Assisted Coordinated Services Division, Information Technology Department (IT) and other CDD staff to convert to e-permitting software (Accela), including setting up and training staff on mobile devices (tablets) to post real-time inspection results in the field. Coordinated with the City of La Pine to integrate their comprehensive plan and zoning designations into the County’s Geographic Information System (GIS) as they exercise their local authority for implementing land use planning as an autonomous jurisdiction on January 6, 2014. Coordinated with the City of La Pine to map and extract/ analyze data for the proposed La Pine Urban Renewal Area. Coordinated with the La Pine Park and Recreation District to map and analyze data for the proposed park district expansion. Coordinated with IT as new computers replaced outdated computers or those incompatible with Accela for most of the department. Served as lead CDD staff CDD to develop and implement DIAL 2. Coordinated and implemented the installation of the ORCATS Account Manager software to accommodate the migration of CDD’s addressing program from AccuTerm to ORCATS/ Accela. Assisted CDD staff with work station configurations, computer software and spatial analysis questions and concerns. Contributed to and improved electronic building plan reviews. Assisted Code Enforcement Officers, Environmental Health staff with maps, exhibits, assessor data and land use records. Coordinated with CDD and IT staff to create new monthly development statistics reports in Accela. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS OOOVERVIEWVERVIEWVERVIEW AAACCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTS 16 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 Add photo       GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, CONTINUED Assisted the Planning Division to analyze: Long Range Planning Demographic data from U.S. Census and develop maps for Newberry County: A Plan for Southern Deschutes County. Land use zoning data and produce maps for the Deschutes County Sage Grouse Land Use Assessment and Risk Analysis. Areas affected by the proposed listing of the Oregon spotted frog by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). This assignment also required coordinating with USFWS to share assessor data ofaffected tax lots in the rural county and city of Bend. Middle Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek drainages within the Bend Urban Area Reserve. County Transportation System Plan for the purpose of developing a web-based bicycle and pedestrian map. Transportation System Plan maps and update scriveners’ errors. Exclusive Farm Use Lands potentially affected by a Non- Resource Lands designation. Historic landmarks in the rural County for the purpose of providing maps for volunteer photographers and the eventual development of an interactive web-based historic landmark map. Current Planning Maps for quasi-judicial land use applications, including Urban Growth Boundary amendments affecting the cities of Bend and Sisters. Maps for Hearing Officer’s hearings. Land use histories and Assessor data. Provided data and GIS mapping for the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Steering Committee. Provided data and GIS mapping to the general public. Updated and maintained the CDD/Planning Division website. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 17     GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, CONTINUED    WWWORKORKORK PPPLANLANLAN 18 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 Continue to educate CDD staff on the use of GIS data and products in their work objectives, and identify areas where they may assist Develop recommendations for technology expenditures in the annual CDD budget Seek out training opportunities as appropriate, including at least one county sponsored class and technical off-site training and/or conferences Create Bicycle Route interactive web-based “Story Map,” displaying official bicycle routes within Deschutes County Create Historic Landmarks interactive web-based “Story Map,” depicting information on Deschutes County’s Goal 5 inventory Provide monthly technology updates as necessary for the CDD Update Complete the automation of the CDD monthly statistics, provide training on how to run the reports, and revise/update the reports as necessary Support the CDD Technology Team in various general projects, including: Implementing Accela, Providing DIAL 2 information and training as necessary and Monitoring and assessing CDD’s computer and technology inventory Propose creative and innovative concepts and designs in CDD’s new annual report format and any/all other departmental publications, manuals, forms, etc. that are attractive and user friendly Support continued improvements in Electronic Document Review for Building Division. Coordinate with the City of La Pine to update Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designations. Support mapping needs for the Southern Deschutes County Goal 11 Exception application. Support mapping needs for the Agricultural Lands programs. Create and inventory databases and maps for all surface mines in Deschutes County. Determine which surface mines no longer require Surface Mining Impact Area reviews; update Accela, GIS and DIAL 2.     GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, CONTINUED    WWWORKORKORK PPPLANLANLAN Assist with the coordination of CDD software programs, computer systems, and mobile devices, including maintaining training in all areas. Continue to assist in implementing and updating Accela, and training staff and customers on existing and new/updated features. Provide technical support, including mapping and analysis to the cities of Bend, La Pine, Sisters and Redmond for future Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)/Urban Reserve Area (URA) expansions. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 19       OOOVERVIEWVERVIEWVERVIEW The Building Safety Division consists of a Building Official, Assistant Building Official and seven field inspectors and plans reviewers, plus additional on-call staff. The Division provides construction plan reviews, consultations and inspections to assure compliance with the State Building Code. All inspectors are required to be certified by the State of Oregon for the specialty code they enforce. The Building Safety Division also maintains active agreements with neighboring jurisdictions and the State of Oregon for the application of State Codes. AAACCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTS Issued 297 Single Family Dwelling permits in 2013, an 89% increase over 2012. Implemented Accela for inspection scheduling and recording. The use of IPad tablets has greatly improved and streamlined many of the inspection functions. Sent four inspectors through a State provided class for electrical inspector certification. Completion of the class and successful testing will allow these inspectors to perform electrical inspections and will eliminate the need for two inspectors to visit the same site. Provided first full year of contract Building Official services to the City of Sisters. Continued to provide building services to the City of Redmond, and Lake and Klamath Counties. Continued to meet the State mandated turnaround time on plan reviews during a notable increase in permit activity. Promoted and provided pre-construction/pre-design meetings to facilitate a smoother plan review process. Participated in the offering of State mandated classes for the continuing education of certified inspectors and local design professionals. WWWORKORKORK PPPLANLANLAN The Division will continue to provide full service to all of its customers through the Plan Review and Inspection process. Staff will continue to work with City of Sisters, emphasizing educational opportunities for owners and builders and developing a streamlined and efficient permitting system. Contacts and communication channels that have been developed with Sisters’ divisions will continue to be strengthened and engaged as the County provides building permit services. Continue regular monthly meetings with Central Oregon Builders Association. These meetings benefit both the builders and our staff - feedback from the builders is valuable to us as we fine tune the inspection process and implement State codes as they are developed. BUILDING SAFETY 20 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014       Staff will participate in the development of training opportunities for the inspectors and plan reviewers. These functions typically also involve local design professionals and contractors. One FTE has been approved for the addition of a building inspector as needed. BUILDING SAFETY CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 21     The Environmental Soils Division is staffed by one Environmental Health Specialist III and one on-call inspector who provide site evaluations, design review, permitting, inspection, education and coordination with DEQ for onsite wastewater treatment and dispersal systems. Staff also inspects sewage pumper trucks, reports on the condition of existing wastewater systems, maintains an operations and maintenance tracking system, provides the public with information on wastewater treatment systems and regulations, and investigates sewage hazards. Staff is also engaged in the proactive pursuit of protecting the groundwater in Deschutes County. In 2013, the Division: Assessed 117 sites for onsite wastewater treatment and dispersal systems, up more than 50% from 2012, and issued 810 permits and authorizations for new and existing onsite treatment and dispersal systems, up 11.5% from 2012. Regularly coordinated with Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), including the hydrologist in the Western Region office, to determine the circumstances in South County requiring protective onsite wastewater systems. Staff continued to support and work with DEQ staff on South Deschutes/Northern Klamath Groundwater Protection Steering Committee recommendations. Replaced approximately 43 antiquated, leaky steel septic tanks within the groundwater protection area of South County. Permitted and inspected 13 new nitrogen reducing alternative treatment technology (ATT) systems in South County, bringing the total to 164 homes which are reducing nitrogen loading from their wastewater to standards necessary to ensure safe drinking water in South County. In coordination with the Deschutes County/NeighborImpact Loan Partnership program, assisted a South County property owner, when a nitrogen-reducing ATT system was required to repair a failing onsite system. Provided five property owners in South County with rebates of $3,750 per property for upgrading conventional onsite systems to nitrogen reducing pollution reduction systems. Coordinated with the City of Bend to assess sites eligible for onsite wastewater treatment and dispersal systems due to their distances from a sewer collection facility.   ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS AAACCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTS OOOVERVIEWVERVIEWVERVIEW 22 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS, CONTINUED WWWORKORKORK PPPLANLANLAN Participated in the DEQ Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) work group for the upper Deschutes Basin and City of Bend Stormwater Quality Public Advisory Group. Reported to the Deschutes County Public Health Advisory Board regarding Groundwater Protection efforts in South County, including steering committee recommendations. Participated in the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Onsite Program 2013 Legislative Session Budget Note Workgroup (also referred to as the State and Local Government Efficiency Task Force), which developed a Final Report on November 29, 2013. The State and Local Government Efficiency Task Force was created by House Bill 2855 in 2011 to "review opportunities to provide services in the most effective and cost-efficient manner through reorganization of the way services are delivered by state and local government entities and through specific process improvements; and consider the ability of intergovernmental agreements, existing or new service districts and technology to achieve cost savings.” The Final Report contained two goals: (1) Increase flexibility and efficiencies to meet the needs of rural Oregon; and (2) Administrative Improvements. Each goal contained a series of implementation strategies. Staff participation resulted in Deschutes County retaining local control of the onsite program and the potential for significantly greater flexibility in administering the onsite program in the future. The Environmental Soils Division will continue to maintain or exceed service level goals and permit application processing time for site evaluations, design review and inspection of onsite wastewater treatment and dispersal systems. Staff will coordinate with the DEQ and the planning division on groundwater protection efforts, including implementing the South Deschutes/North Klamath Groundwater Steering Committee recommendations, including participating in discussions regarding Statewide Planning Goal 11 (Public Facilities and Services). Staff will prioritize addressing sewage health hazards and protecting public health and the environment. Staff will continue working with the DEQ on permitting protective onsite wastewater systems in South Deschutes County. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 23     ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS, CONTINUED Given the current workloads and permit activities, a new staff position may be necessary to sustain permit and inspection service level goals. Provide financial assistance opportunities where needed and appropriate to assist South Deschutes County property owners who do not qualify for conventional loans to upgrade conventional onsite systems to nitrogen reducing pollution reduction systems (Nitrogen Reducing System Rebates and the NeighborImpact Non-conforming Loan partnership). P a r t i c i p a t e o n t h e C i t y o f B e n d s t o r m w a t e r p u b l i c a d v i s o r y technical committee. Participate in the Upper Deschutes Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan review and update. Monitor and participate as applicable in the 2015 Legislative Session regarding onsite wastewater legislative and/or rule amendments and water quality issues. Support the TDC Advisory Committee to review and update, if directed, the TDC/PRC program. Maintain and update the South Deschutes County Groundwater Protection Annual Report. Assess staffing needs to maintain service levels. Update Operation and Maintenance reporting, tracking, and electronic invoicing system as required by DEQ. Develop an electronic mail list for installers and distributors to improve information transfer and distribution. As opportunities become available, work with stakeholders to assist in future sewer feasibility studies or logistical research. Update job descriptions for Environmental Soils staff to meet current responsibilities and requirements. Long-Term Projects Update County Code Chapter 13.08 to be consistent with contemporary rules and requirements. Update the DEQ contract for the Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Program to be more consistent with current rules and requirements (current contract dates from 1981).   24 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     PLANNING   OOOVERVIEWVERVIEWVERVIEW CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING The Planning Division is divided into two operational areas: Current Planning and Long Range Planning. The Division consists of ten employees: a Community Development/Planning Director, two Principal Planners, two Senior Planners, one Senior Transportation Planner, a GIS Analyst, two Associate Planners and an Administrative Secretary. Current Planning is responsible for reviewing land use applications for compliance with Deschutes County Code (DCC) and state law, including zoning, subdivision and development regulations, and facilitating public hearings with hearings officers and the BOCC. Staff is also responsible for verifying compliance with land use rules for building permit applications and septic permits; coordinating with Code Enforcement to respond to complaints and monitor conditions of approval for land use permits; performing road naming duties and assisting with addressing; and providing assistance at the public counter, over the telephone and via email. Long Range Planning is responsible for planning for the future of Deschutes County, including developing and implementing land use policy with the BOCC, Planning Commission, community and partner organizations. It is in charge of updating the County Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations, coordinating with cities and agencies on various planning projects taking place in the region, and coordinating population forecasts with Portland State University and cities. Staff also monitors and participates in annual legislative sessions, and serves on numerous local, regional and statewide committees primarily focusing on transportation, natural resources, growth management and economic development. Three specific disciplines support both current and long range planning, including transportation, wetlands/floodplains, and GIS. GIS is covered separately in this Work Plan. Transportation Planning is responsible for providing comments and expertise on land use applications, and calculating System Development Charges (SDC’s) as part of land use application review process or upon request; providing comments to the County’s Risk Management Department regarding traffic issues for permitted events; participating in the annual County Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process with the Road Department; applying for grants for enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities in coordination with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC); participating in Oregon Department of Add photo CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 25     FY 2013FY 2013FY 2013---201420142014 AAACCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNING, CONTINUED Transportation (ODOT) funded refinement planning; coordinating road issues with Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the United States Forest Service (USFS) for urban interface plans; and serving on several local and regional transportation committees, most notably BPAC, the Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Advisory Committee, and Central Oregon Area Commission on Transportation (COACT) Technical Advisory Committee. Floodplain and Wetlands Planning is responsible for providing comments and expertise on land use applications, code enforcement, and general property inquiries that require development, fill, or removal in mapped floodplain and wetlands. Staff maintains certification as an Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Certified Floodplain Manager to provide customers with up-to-date and accurate information regarding FEMA regulations, surveying requirements, and construction requirements. Coordination is frequently required with external agencies including FEMA, US Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of State Lands, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the US Forest Service. Met with 1,920 customers in 2013, compared to 1,614 in 2012. Received 459 land use applications in 2013, compared with 403 applications for 2012. Twelve applications were reviewed by hearings officers in 2013. Two appeals were filed with the Land Use Board of Appeals in 2013. This compares with four appeals in 2012. A new Deschutes County-City of La Pine Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) was adopted that transferred land use permitting responsibilities within La Pine to the City in January 2014. Coordinated with City staff to seamlessly transfer jurisdiction of land use permitting responsibilities from the County to the City. Central Oregon Large-Lot Industrial Lands Project Staff continues to coordinate with the City of Redmond regarding a site owned by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) adjoining its UGB as a plausible location for a regional large-lot industrial campus. Redmond and DSL are currently coordinating with Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) for an official endorsement. Following their COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS AND AGENCIES 26 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     PLANNING, CONTINUED approval, DSL will initiate a City/County UGB plan amendment. City of Bend Airport Master Plan Staff continues to coordinate with the City of Bend to adopt a Federal Aviation Administration approved Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Staff prepared a draft scope of work and an Intergovernmental Agreement on behalf of the City of Bend to outline the process and roles and responsibilities. City of La Pine/La Pine Park and Recreation District Land Transfer Staff issued two lot of record decisions for the Properties and Facilities Department. Both decisions pertain to Bureau of Land Management (BLM) property located on the east and west side of Highway 97 in or close proximity to La Pine. A subsequent lot line adjustment application for the west side property was approved for the purpose of creating a legal lot of the property conveyed under the La Pine Land Conveyance Act. This property is in the process of being transferred to the La Pine Park and Recreation District. In December, the Planning Division issued its findings and decision for a partition application initiated by the Property and Facilities Department for the east side property. Similar to the lot line adjustment, the partition creates a legal lot of the property conveyed under the La Pine Land Conveyance Act. This property is also in the process of being transferred to the City of La Pine. In addition, County staff coordinated with City and Park and Recreation District staff to develop options to conduct rodeos and other events on the Park and Recreation District property west of Highway 97 and south of 6th Street. La Pine Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) Transferred land use permitting responsibilities to the City of La Pine in January, updated comprehensive plan and zoning map designations in the County/City GIS database, and developed an IGA for the County to provide solid waste code enforcement services to the City in exchange for office space at City Hall. CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 27     PLANNING, CONTINUED Metolius Transfer of Development Opportunities/Appeal Fee Caps/UGB Expansions Staff participated in State work groups to explore legislative concepts to amend State Laws to site the Metolius Transfer of Development Opportunities in Deschutes County, cap appeal fees, and streamline and expedite the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) expansion process. Oregon Spotted Frog Staff coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to convene two public meetings in South County relating to a federal proposal to list the Oregon spotted frog as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). Staff also collaborated with the Road Department and BOCC to provide formal comments into the record during the 75-day public comment period. Sage-Grouse As a cooperating agency, staff continues to participate with BLM, who recently released a draft programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for federal land use and resource management plan (RMP) amendments to incorporate sage-grouse conservation measures in Central and Eastern Oregon. Staff is also participating with the Governor’s Office, Sage-Grouse Conservation Partnership. This involves interagency and interstakeholder coordination on issues related to sagebrush and sage grouse habitat conservation on non-federal lands. Staff completed a baseline assessment and impact analysis to characterize the level of disturbance associated with development in sage-grouse designated habitat subject to the County’s permitting authority. The report served as a template to assist Central and Eastern Oregon counties to perform a similar analysis and compliment actions being undertaken by BLM on federal lands. The state’s goal is to demonstrate that listing the sage-grouse as a threatened or endangered species under the federal ESA is unnecessary. The Final EIS and Record of Decision (ROD) are scheduled for September 30, 2014. Add photo 28 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     PLANNING, CONTINUED Statewide Planning Goal 11 Exception Staff continues to support the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) South Deschutes/ Northern Klamath County Groundwater Protection Project. DEQ is finalizing the burden of proof to justify a Goal 11 exception for southern Deschutes County with DLCD support. County staff prepared a template for findings and provided draft findings for consistency with the County’s Comprehensive and Newberry Country plans. Work sessions and public hearings on the Goal 11 exception application with the Planning Commission and BOCC are expected in early FY 14-15. Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Expansions The BOCC adopted ordinances changing the City of Sisters UGB to include the Sisters Eagle Airport and Bend UGB for a new Bend-La Pine School District Middle School and a church. Certified Local Government Grant Administered $13,000 Certified Local Government (CLG) Grant from the State Historic Preservation Office. Noteworthy projects stemming from this grant include a Reconnaissance Level Survey of local, state, and federal landmarks containing tourism and recreational features and photographing and incorporating 53 historic landmarks located in the rural county and city of Sisters into an interactive web page. U.S. EPA Brownfield Community-Wide Assessment Grant The Planning Division is administering a 3-year $400,000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Community-Wide Brownfield Assessment Grant. The project’s first phase (to conduct an inventory) started in December. The consultant team is also under contract to evaluate remediation options for the Demolition Landfill and Redmond Shooting Range. Agricultural Lands Program The Planning Division initiated a public outreach strategy in Spring 2014 to understand community, stakeholder, and landowner opinions about Deschutes County farm designations and land use regulations. By relying upon a series of meetings, public forums, and conversations with Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) zoned property owners, this program can help determine if the County needs to change its agricultural zoning at the local and/or state level. GRANTS PROJECTS CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 29     PLANNING, CONTINUED Destination Resort Text Amendments The BOCC adopted text amendments to Deschutes County Code Title 18 (County Zoning) and Title 19 (Bend Urban Growth Boundary Ordinance), to change the required ratio of residential lots to overnight rental units in destination resorts from 2:1 to 2.5:1. Domestic Livestock Keeping domestic livestock on small acreage has been identified as a use that can have detrimental impacts on livability and groundwater quality. Following a Planning Commission recommendation, the BOCC directed staff to make available to property owners a package of existing state and local education and enforcement programs to address livestock management on small rural residential properties in lieu of a regulatory approach. Harper Bridge Staff continues to coordinate with the Sunriver Owners Association (SROA) and Oregon Marine Board (OMB) on a solution to conflicts between traffic on Spring River Road and those seeking to launch boats or float on the Deschutes River from Harper Bridge. Housekeeping and Legislative Amendments The BOCC adopted a package of text amendments to incorporate changes in state law into the county zoning ordinance. In addition, “housekeeping” amendments were also adopted to correct scrivener errors and provide additional clarification to existing regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. Newberry Country Plan The BOCC amended the Comprehensive Plan last spring by adopting an ordinance to formally recognize an area specific plan titled, Newberry Country: A Plan for Southern Deschutes County. The ordinance was subsequently appealed to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). In October, LUBA dismissed it. Staff is implementing the Plan through other actions in this Work Plan. 30 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     FY 2014FY 2014FY 2014---201520152015 WWWORKORKORK PPPLANLANLAN PLANNING, CONTINUED Traffic Study Code Amendment The BOCC adopted a text amendment to Deschutes County Code (DCC) 17.16, Subdivisions, 18.116, Supplemental Provisions, and 18.16.124, Site Plan to develop stand-alone traffic impact analysis requirements. Expand the Deschutes County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee The BOCC approved increasing the BPAC committee from 9 to 13 members to accommodate the rising demands for BPAC to staff various project committees and to specifically include a member for the City of La Pine area. Continue to improve pre-application conferences to provide the best available information (e.g., applicable standards, fees, processes) to customers at the start of their projects. Continue cost accounting system for current planning section and analyze data from that system. Information will be used to review fees and to quantify work tasks not directly tied to land use permits. Continue to issue all administrative decisions for land use- actions requiring prior notice within 45 days of determination of complete application and for those that do not require prior notice, within 21 days of determination of complete application. Assist the City of La Pine in performing development review services (previously performed by the County under contract), including sharing case files and property information. Maintain tracking systems on destination resort reporting requirements and obligations, such as improvement agreements and residential-to-overnight accommodation ratios. This tracking may also include other major existing, approved, or potential developments. Include tracking systems in the appendix to this Work Plan beginning in FY 15-16. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 31     PLANNING, CONTINUED Assist GIS staff regarding the Local Update of Census Addressing and annual annexation updates. Maintain tracking system of Comprehensive Plan and Community/Area Plan implementation activities, updates, necessary revisions, and potential regions/communities for new plans. Include this tracking system in this Work Plan in FY 15-16. Amend the County’s Agricultural Lands Program based on BOCC/Planning Commission direction. Administer the $400,000 U.S. EPA Community-Wide Brownfield Assessment Grant in partnership with the cities of Bend and Redmond. Announce in August 2014 that the opportunity for remapping lands to the County’s Destination Resort Map is available, and process any applications. Maintain and update the Deschutes County Economic Development Initiatives Report. Provide staff support to the County’s Property and Facilities Department to plan for the redevelopment of the Demolition Landfill site on Simpson Avenue. Coordinate with the City of Redmond to initiate a UGB amendment for a regional large-lot industrial campus to implement the Central Oregon Large-Lot Industrial Lands Program. Initiate with DEQ and process a DLCD-supported Statewide Planning Goal 11 Exception for Southern Deschutes County. Reconvene the Transferable Development Credit (TDC) Advisory Committee to determine whether amendments are necessary to implement the Southern Deschutes County groundwater protection program in the New Neighborhood under the City of La Pine’s new zoning and development ordinances. Participate with the Governor’s Office, Sage Grouse Conservation Partnership, involving interagency and inter-stakeholder coordination on issues related to sagebrush and sage grouse habitat conservation on non-federal lands. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURAL LANDS COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING NATURAL RESOURCES/ GROUNDWATER PROTECTION 32 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     PLANNING, CONTINUED Monitor and participate in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service process considering listing the Oregon spotted frog as a threatened species under the federal ESA. Monitor and participate in state-led process to address the effects of the U.S. District Court decisions related to the ESA and floodplain development. Coordinate with the City of Bend to adopt: 1) the Bend Airport Master Plan (BAMP) Update into the Comprehensive Plan; 2) zoning map amendments to implement the BAMP Update; and 3) text amendment(s) for Deschutes County Code (DCC) 18.76, Airport Development Zone. Participate in various committees for City of Bend’s Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) refinement plan for the West Side of Bend. Complete the Deschutes County Bicycle Guide Update and interactive web page. Develop a Historic Preservation Strategic Plan to provide a framework for shaping the County and City of Sisters’ preservation programs and services over the next five years and create a blueprint for allocating Certified Local Government (CLG) grant funding. Apply for and administer a CLG Grant from the State Historic Preservation Office for spanning 2015 and 2016 to implement the Historic Preservation Strategic Plan. Local Government Coordinate with the City of Bend to complete its UGB amendment, and explore a joint planning services agreement. Coordinate with the La Pine Park and Recreation District and City of La Pine on land use issues to provide for events facilities on the former BLM land west of the City limits. Special Projects Participate in the process to develop solutions for safe access to the Deschutes River at or near Harper Bridge. Text Amendments Initiate a text amendment to prohibit the issuance of land use and building permits if a property has a pending code TRANSPORTATION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COORDINATION CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 33     PLANNING, CONTINUED violation or is in violation with conditions of approval from a prior land use decision. Develop a list of potential text amendments and/or areas of Deschutes County Code for review. Include this list in this Work Plan in FY 15-16. 34 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014       2013 DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT REPORT BACKGROUND 201320132013 CCCOMMUNITYOMMUNITYOMMUNITY IIINVOLVEMENTNVOLVEMENTNVOLVEMENT AAACCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTSCCOMPLISHMENTS CCCURRENTURRENTURRENT PPPLANNINGLANNINGLANNING Statewide Planning Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, requires cities and counties to create a citizen involvement program that provides opportunities for community participation in land use planning processes and decisions. Land use legislation, policies and implementation measures made by Oregonians 40 years ago helped shape Oregon’s urban and rural environments. Likewise, choices made today will ultimately shape these areas in the future. Successful land use planning occurs through an open and public process that provides room for information gathering, analysis and vigorous debate. Deschutes County’s Community Involvement program is defined in Section 1.2 of the Comprehensive Plan. This chapter identifies the County Planning Commission as the committee for citizen involvement (Deschutes County Code 2.52.020D requires membership on the Commission to be representative of the various geographic areas of the County.) It also contains the County’s Community Involvement goal and corresponding five policies that comply with Goal 1 (http://www.deschutes.org/Community-Development/Planning/ Title-23-Comprehensive-Plan/3_Chapter-1.aspx. Pages 9-12). This report briefly discusses the noteworthy community involve- ment actions undertaken by the Planning Division in 2013. The report is intended to provide County residents and stakeholders with a tool to assess its effectiveness and offer additional suggestions the County can utilize to ensure that its diverse communities remain actively involved in land use planning discussions. As noted in the Community Development Department’s (CDD) 2014 Annual Report, administering the zoning code requires the Current Planning Division to processes individual land use applications, zoning review and signoff for building and septic permits. Current planners maintain legally prescribed turnaround times on land use applications (150-days) and provide customer service through assistance at the front counter, telephone conversations, and appointments. Telephone messages are returned within 24 hours. A number of prominent quasi-judicial land use applications, which required public hearings with a hearings officer and, depending on the underlying zoning, the Board of County Commissioners, occurred in 2014. Add photo CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 35     In 2013, the Deschutes County Community Development/Planning Director distributed a departmental update newsletter every other month containing current and long-range planning projects; Histor- ic Landmarks Commission, Planning Commission, and Board of County Commissioners calendars; noteworthy land use issues and decisions; and legislative subcommittee discussions. This update is emailed to residents, stakeholders, partner organizations and agencies which have requested copies. It is also posted on the CDD website and the County’s Facebook page. In 2013, CDD utilized the County’s website as a primary tool of public communication and information for public meetings; pending land use applications; long-range planning projects; posting the CDD Update; and providing links to current and past BOCC and Planning Commission meetings. In addition, CDD coordinated with the County’s Communications Director to publish press releases and announce new documents, etc. on the County’s Facebook page. Finally, CDD coordinated with the Information Technology D e p a r t m e n t t o c r e a t e o n e - s t o p s h o p i n D I A L 2 f o r a l l C o u n t y property, development/permits, assessor records, and interactive mapping. DIAL 2 is intended to increase access, simplify, and consolidate information in one place for the benefit of the general public. Deschutes County amended its Comprehensive Plan to formally recognize an area-specific plan, titled Newberry Country: A Plan for Southern Deschutes County. The Plan encompasses the rural areas south of Lava Butte with two exceptions: Sunriver and La Pine are governed separately. It addresses the area’s unique assets, local values and preferences for growth and development, the environment, natural hazards, transportation and more. The Plan represents a legal framework for implementing a vision for building stronger, more resilient rural communities by managing growth in this region to 2032. This is a Plan that recognizes the realities facing rural Deschutes County, while acknowledging what governments can and cannot influence. It demonstrates leadership for improving the ways in which collaboration can occur among all sectors: government, businesses, non-profits, and residents to achieve a shared vision. This Plan presents the results of the planning process that led to the development of its goals and policies. Following extensive public outreach in 2012, which included Planning Commission hearings, deliberations and 2013 DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT REPORT, CONTINUED NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY WEBSITE, FACEBOOK AND DIAL 2 MONTHLY UPDATE 36 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014     a recommendation of adoption, the Board of County Commis- sioners held two hearings in 2013 and adopted the Plan last May. The Deschutes County Planning Commission held 13 meetings in 2013 discussing an assortment of issues, including: Transportation System Development Charges Destination Resort Amendments to change the required ratio of overnight rental units and residential lots in destination re- sorts in the Bend Urban Area Reserve Destination Resort Amendments to change the required ratio of overnight rental units and residential lots in destination resorts in Deschutes County Code Title 18 Central Oregon Large Lot Industrial Lands Program Bend Airport Master Plan Joint Meeting with BOCC, DEQ and Klamath County Commissioners—Southern Deschutes/North Klamath County Groundwater Protection Steering Committee Rural Residential Domestic Livestock Issues Agricultural Lands/State Panel Discussion Legislative and Housekeeping Amendments Traffic Study Text Amendment North County Farm and Winery Tour and Annual Retreat Legislative Session Updates Metolius Transfer of Development Opportunities 2013 DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT REPORT, CONTINUED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 37     STAFF DIRECTORY NƒÃ›NƒÃ›NƒÃ› T®ã½›T®ã½›T®ã½› P«ÊěP«ÊěP«Êě Eî½Eî½Eî½ Nick Lelack Director (541) 385-1708 Nick.Lelack@deschutes.org Tim Berg GIS Analyst/Programmer (541) 330-4648 Tim.Berg@deschutes.org Paul Blikstad Senior Planner (541) 388-6554 Paul.Blikstad@deschutes.org Dale Brieske Building Inspector III—Electrical (541) 388-6614 Dale.Brieske@deschutes.org Sher Buckner Administrative Secretary (541) 617-4736 Sher.Buckner@deschutes.org Todd Cleveland Environmental Health Spec. III (541) 617-4714 Todd.Cleveland@deschutes.org Scott Farm Building Inspector III (541) 385-1402 Scott.Farm@deschutes.org Lori Furlong Administrative Manager (541) 317-3122 Lori.Furlong@deschutes.org Chris Gracia Building Inspector III (541) 388-6578 Chris.Gracia@deschutes.org Tracy Griffin Permit Technician (541) 388-6573 Tracy.Griffin@deschutes.org John Griley Code Enforcement Technician (541) 617-4708 John.Griley@deschutes.org William Groves Senior Planner (541) 388-6518 William.Groves@deschutes.org Tim Grundeman Code Enforcement Technician (541) 385-1707 Tim.Grundeman@deschutes.org Peter Gutowsky Principal Planner (541) 385-1709 Peter.Gutowsky@deschutes.org Judy Hackett Permit Technician (541) 317-1713 Judy.Hackett@deschutes.org Kevin Harrison Principal Planner (541) 385-1401 Kevin.Harrison@deschutes.org Steven Jensen Building Inspector III—Plumbing (541) 385-1700 Steven.Jensen@deschutes.org Jennifer Lawrence Permit Technician (541) 385-1405 Jennifer.Lawrence@deschutes.org Matt Martin Associate Planner (541) 330-4620 Matt.Martin@deschutes.org Marti Mello Permit Technician (541) 317-3148 Marti.Mello@deschutes.org Dave Pedersen Building Official (541) 385-3200 Dave.Pedersen@deschutes.org Lisa Petersen Permit Technician (541) 317-3188 Lisa.Petersen@deschutes.org Peter Russell Senior Transportation Planner (541) 383-6718 Peter.Russell@deschutes.org Randy Scheid Assistant Building Official (541) 317-3137 Randy.Scheid@deschutes.org Martha Shields Permit Technician (541) 385-1706 Martha.Shields@deschutes.org Cynthia Smidt Associate Planner (541) 317-3150 Cynthia.Smidt@deschutes.org Kathleen Stockton Administrative Assistant (541) 317-3193 Kathleen.Stockton@deschutes.org Dan Swarthout Building Inspector III (541) 385-1745 Dan.Swarthout@deschutes.org Richard Wright Building Inspector III (541) 617-4746 Richard.Wright@deschutes.org Jim Williams Building Inspector II (541) 323-5221 Jim.Williams@deschutes.org W i l l  b e  r e p l a c e d  w i t h  n e w  p h o t o .  38 CDD ANNUAL REPORT AND WORK PLAN 2014 Nick Lelack From: Haner Park HOA Board <hanerparkhoa@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 8:19 AM To: Peter Gutowsky; Nick Lelack; Tom Anderson Subject: Newberry Country (South County) Plan The Haner Park Homeowners Association took an active role in the development of the Newberry Country (South County) Plan. Members ofthe HOA board attended public information sessions, provided input on the draft plan and engaged County planning staff with our membership at the annual summer meeting. Overall, we were very pleased with the collaborative approach taken by the County and we were happy to support the plan. While the overall plan is a promising vision for the south county area, there are a number of items that are of higher importance to our membership. We would like to see these items added to the County's work plan. Policy 1.4 -Sharing information .... Our membership can only engage with the county on issues we know are occurring. We encourage the county to follow through on actively engaging our homeowners board on land use and planning issues that effect Haner Park and the Upper Deschutes River area. We request that you keep us informed at hanerparkhoa@gmail.com. Policy 5.2 -Develop a work plan, in coordination with property owners, to update the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to reflect the land use and development patterns in Section 36, Haner Park and other applicable areas with long-standing issues, while protecting ecologically significant natural areas or resources. This is a significant issue for our residents. The current forest zoning regulations are impractical in a rural residential community. Most properties cannot even legally build a wood shed without obtaining a variance 1 from the County. This is an expensive and unnecessary burden on both the property owners and county staff. Updating the zoning to reflect the actual rural residential conditions that the county has approved is a necessary and urgent need. We request the county to add this to your work plan and provide partial or full reduction in the land use fees associated with the zoning conflicts until the ioning issues have been resolved. Policy 12.4 -Work with the U.S. Forest Service to address maintenance of Forest Service roads that provide access to rural subdivisions, such as USFS # 44. USFS #44 is a primary access route to Wickiup Reservoir and all of the surrounding areas. It is heavily used for recreation and is a primary safety and emergency access route for the Haner Park residents. Currently, the Haner Park residents fund all of the winter access on that road. It needs more regular grading and gravel for the amount of travel it receives, the majority of which are not Haner Park property owners. Policy 16.11 -Participate with all partners in the upper Deschutes Basin on a comprehensive water management plan that restores and manages flows in the upper Deschutes River while meeting the needs of users and property owners. The management of the water flow in the upper Deschutes is unacceptable. Not only is it not wild and scenic, but our property is also being significantly impacted by the extreme high and low flows of the river. Last fall, the widely publicized fish kills near Bend were significant. The upper section just below Wickiup Dam, Haner Park and below also experienced fish kills. We request that the County actively work to stabilize the flows in the river. This can be accomplished by raising the winter flows to the legal, in stream rights of 300 cfs and working to lower the summer flows through conservation and sharing of rights between the irrigation districts. We understand that the County has a number of competing priorities and thank you for working with the Haner Park HOA to accomplish these shared priority items. Sincerely, 2 I Sarah Medary Haner Park Homeowners Association Board 3 Nick Lelack From: K.J.Phillips <rrconstdev@comcastnet> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 4:51 PM To: Nick Lelack; Board; Matt Martin Subject: 5-8-2014_Planning Camm. Mtg-SUBMITTAL Attachments: Robert Parker_UofO Community Planning Workshop.htm Rural Development Development in rural areas --be it residential, commercial or industrial- is permitted by the Statewide Planning Program in order to allow for a variety of lifestyles and community needs. TO: Deschutes County Planning Commission c/o Deschutes County Planning-COD/Nick Lelack [printing of Attachment for inclusion will be needed] Please enter this submittal into today's record for­ Planning Commission- Public Hearing on Work Plan FY 2014-2015 RE: Citizen Project Item-1. Unincorporated Community-Spring River/inclusion of DRRH and related *Plan Items-14,16, 19,20,21,24,27,28, 30,31, & Citizen Project-2. This is a request you fund review of Citizen Project Item-l, as a collaborative task, to also review all related *Plan Items, of significant Planning Value to all the DRRH Community, utilizing Community Planning Workshops, under the guidance of Robert 'Bob' Parker AICP, University of Oregon-PPPM Teaching Faculty Program Director CSC Co-Managing Director, rgp@uoregon.edu Mr. Parker is Executive Director, Community Service Center at the University, and, has past experience of exploring solutions to Deschutes County rural land use issues. His experience, the student resources and collaborative funding assistance from absentee-owners (tbd), can help address many Planning Tasks, and, address all citizens concerns, through coordination of Deschutes Planning Department. The County expense will be small, and, the well-guided, collaborative effort will benefit an entire rural community in the Spring River area. Respectfully submitted, K. J. Phillips Deschutes County taxpayer/landowner of Spring River/DRRH Community lafovastr This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. ~ htru. j 1 I I 2 April 28, 2014 Dear Planning Director Lelack: Once again, we are writing to request that our two parcels, located at 69225 and 69245 Hawksflight Dr., Sisters, OR 97759, be removed from the destination resort overlay map. Our properties, which consists of two single-family home lots of approximately two acres each, in an area zoned RR-10, in a completed housing subdivision, are impractical! implausible for siting a brand new resort. They do not meet the county or state destination resort eligibility criteria, such as the 160-acre minimum lot size. A resort cannot be sited on our housing lots. Deschutes County has freely allowed those who were included on the 1992 original resort map to "opt in" and stay on the map. We expect to enjoy the same control over our property, by opting out of the resort map. Remove our property, which is now and has always been in good standing for payment of all property taxes, from the resort overlay map. If there are fees and forms required, please advise us on what we must submit and when. If this request is denied, please provide a written response with the legal and statutory rationale. Merry Ann Moore & Rob Corrigan 69225 Hawksflight Dr. Sisters, OR 97759 merryann moore@gmail.com, rob@bendcable.com cc: Board of County CommiSSioners, Deschutes County Planning Commission, Principal Planner Peter Gutowsky Peter Gutowsky From: Rob Kuntz <longboards1@gmail.com> Sent Monday, April 28. 2014 3:03 PM To: Nick Lelack Cc: Peter Gutowsky; Planning Commission; Tammy Baney; Alan Unger; Tony DeBone Subject: Opting Out of Destination Resort Map 70020 Camp Polk Road Sisters, OR 97759 April 28, 2014 Nick Lelack. AICP Planning Director Deschutes County Community Development Department Deschutes Services Building 1300 NW Wall Street Bend. OR 97701 Dear Planning Director Lelack: We are writing to request that our land parcel. located at 70020 Camp Polk Road, Sisters, OR 97759, be removed from the Deschutes County destination resort overlay map. Our property. a single-family home on 1.74 acres, is in an area zoned RR-10. It is one of 19 parcels in a completed housing subdivision known as The Rim at Aspen Lakes. As such, it is impractical for inclusion in the siting of a new destination resort. This property does not meet the county or state destination resort eligibility criteria, including the 160-acre minimum lot size. A resort cannot be sited on our parcel. Deschutes County has freely allowed those who were included on the 1992 original resort map to "opt in" and stay on the map. We expect to enjoy the same control over our property, by opting out ofthe resort map. . 1 Please remove our property from the destination resort overlay map. If there are fees and forms required, please advise us on what we must submit and when. If this request is denied, please provide a written response with the legal and statutory rationale. Sincerely, Robert R. Kuntz and Marrie Y. Schaefer 70020 Camp Polk Road Sisters, OR 97759 longboards1@qmail.com cc: Board of County Commissioners, Deschutes County Planning Commission, Principal Planner Peter Gutowsky 2 RECtllV"hD 69295 HawksfJight Drive Sisters, OR 97759 April 29, 2014 MAY 0 12014 To: Deschutes County enD Nick Lelack, AICP Deschutes County Community Development Department Deschutes Services Building 1300 NW Wall Street, Bend, OR 97701 Dear Planning Director Lelack, I tried to send you this letter by email to Nick.LeJack@deschutes.org (per the address given on the Deschutes Co. website), but it didn't go through (twice) so I'm fol1owing up with this letter. My wife and 1want to have our property at 69295 Hawksflight Drive, Sisters, OR97759 permanently removed from the county's destination resort map. Our property consists of a single-family home on 2.3 acres that is zoned RR-10 and is within a completed subdivision. The property does not meet the eligibility requirements for a destination resort property; for example, it does not meet the minimum 160-acre land area. Deschutes County has allowed those who were included on the original 1992 resort map to stay on the map. We expect to be allowed the same freedom to II opt out" of the resort map. Please remove our property from the resort overlay map. If there are forms or fees involved, please so advise us and provide the date at which this information has to reach the county. If this request is denied, please provide us with a response in writing along with the legal and statutory rationale. Sincerely, G.R.Cornforth Email: dhcgrc@comcastnet l I ~ Peter Gutowsky I From: DEREK CORNFORTH <dhcomforth@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday. April 29. 2014 7:34 PM To: Nick@mailscan.deschutes.org; "Lelack <Nick.Lelack"@deschutes.org Cc: Peter Gutowsky; Tammy Baney; Alan Unger; Tony De Bone Subject: Request for removal of our property from the Destination Resort Map Dear Planning Director Lelack, I J We are writing to request that our residential parcel, located at 69295 Hawksflight Drive, Sisters, OR 97759 be removed from the destination resort overlay map. Our property consists of a single family residence located on approx. 2.3 acres, zoned RR-10, in a completed housing subdivision. It is impractical for inclusion in a destination resort. It does not meet the county or state destination resort eligibility criteria of needing at least 160 acres. Deschutes County has allowed those who were included on the original 1992 resort map to stay on the map. We expect to enjoy the same control over our property by being allowed to "opt out" of the map. Please remove our property from the resort overlay map and advise us of any forms and/or fees that are required. If this request is denied, please provide us with a written response that provides us with the legal and statutory rationale. Sincerely, Derek H. Cornforth G.R.Cornforth April 29, 2014. Email address:dhcgrc@comcast.net April 30, 2014 Nick lelack, AICP Planning Director ~ Deschutes County Community Development Department Deschutes Services Building 1300 NW Wall Street Bend, OR 97701 Dear Planning Director lelack: -We are writing to request that our residential parcel, located at 69335 Hawksfiight, Sisters, OR 97759, be removed from the destination resort overlay map. Our property, which consists of a single-family home of approximately 2.32 acres, in an area zoned RR-10, in a completed housing subdivision, is impractical for inclusion in a destination resort area. It does not meet the county or state destination resort eligibility criteria, such as the 160-acre minimum lot size. Deschutes County has freely allowed those who were included on the 1992 original resort map to "opt in" and stay on the map. We expect to enjoy the same control over our property, by opting out of the resort map. Please remove our property from the resort overlay map. If there are fees and forms required, please advise us on what we must submit and when. If this request is denied, please provide a written response with the legal and statutory rationale. Sincerely, Kevin and Ana Blair Email address:akblair@comcast.net cc: Board of County Commissioners, Deschutes County Planning Commission, Principal Planner Peter Gutowsky April 30, 2014 Nick Lelack, AICP Planning Director Deschutes County Community Development Department Deschutes Services Building 1300 NW Wall Street Bend, OR 97701 Dear Planning Director Lelack: We are writing to request that our residential parcel, located at 69335 Hawksflight, Sisters, OR 97759, be removed from the destination resort overlay map. Our property, which consists of a single-family home of approximately 2.32 acres, in an area zoned RR-10, in a completed housing subdivision, is impractical for inclusion in a destination resort area. It does not meet the county or state destination resort eligibility criteria, such as the 160-acre minimum lot size. Deschutes County has freely allowed those who were included on the 1992 original resort map to "opt in" and stay on the map. We expect to enjoy the same control over our property, by opting out of the resort map. Please remove our property from the resort overlay map. If there are fees and forms required, please advise us on what we must submit and when. If this request is denied, please provide a written response with the legal and statutory rationale. Sincerely. Kevin and Ana Blair Email address:akblair@comcast.net cc: Board of County Commissioners, Deschutes County Planning Commission, PrinCipal Planner Peter Gutowsky I I 1 Peter Gutowsky From: Frank Baldwin <sklbum@bendcable.com> Sent: Monday. April 28. 201410:53 AM To: Nick Lelack Cc: Peter Gutowsky; Tammy Baney; Alan Unger; Tony DeB one Subject: Removal from the Destination Resort Overlay Map Frank R. Baldwin 69265 Hawksflight Drive Sisters, OR 97759 541-549-2015 skibum@bendcable.com April 28, 2014 Dear Director Lelack, It is my understanding that it is currently possible that there could be an effort to convert our property and our subdivision and open space to a resort -which would be an erroneous application of existing laws. Therefore we urgently request that our property (69265 Hawksflight Drive) be removed from the destination resort overlay map. For one thing, such a resort cannot be sited on our 19 housing lots. This area is zoned RR-I0, and does not meet either county or state criteria for a destination resort (eg. not be a platted subdivision which we are, nor the 160 acre minimum lot size requirement). I believe both the county and DLCD (in 2008) have confirmed that housing subdivisions cannot become resort locations. It is imperative, and our right, to request exclusion from the destination resort overlay map. Please advise us of any need to formalize this in writing and of any costs which may be involved. Thank you. Sincerely, Frank R. Baldwin cc: Peter Gutowsky Tammy Baney Alan Unger Tony DeBone Nick Lelack From: Jerry Hubbard <jhubbard@Chamberscable.com> Sent: Friday, March 28,201411:17 AM To: Nick Lelack Cc: 'Ogden Construction'; 'Jerry Hubbard' Subject: FW: March 28 Commissioners meeting on camping permits -public input Attachments: Discretionary and Citizen Requested Table.pdf; Code Camping 3 2813 001.jpg; Code Camping 3 28 13 002.jpg; Code Camping 3 28 13 003.jpg; Code Camping 3 28 13 004.jpg; Code Camping 3 28 13 OOS.jpg; Code Camping 3 28 13 006.Jpg; Code Camping 3 28 13 007.jpg; Code Camping 32813 008.jpg Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged We request the County review the ordinance for camping and bar the use of generators if electrical service is available. The following form March 2013 is still valid. Gerald Hubbard 17065 Azusa Road, Sunriver, OR 97707 From: Jerry Hubbard [mailto:jhubbard@chamberscable.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:06 PM To: 'Tom Anderson'; 'Nick Lelack'; 'Alan Unger'; 'Tammy Baney'; OesCo BoCC OeBone Tony Cc: 'Jerry Hubbard'; 'Ogden construction' Subject: RE: March 28 Commissioners meeting on camping permits -public input The following is our issues and position on allowing people to campout on vacant lots in a residential neighborhood. Current policy: Issues: The existing policy harms the livability of our neighborhood and has a negative impact on our right to live in peace and quiet. Full time residents who have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in their homes and property have a right to enjoy their neighborhood and not be required by county ordinance to live with campers and the intolerable life style they bring to our neighborhood. • Families are living full time with children registered and attended local school. o Is the intent of the ordinance to allow full time living with children attending school. o The current family on Bakersfield at the end of June 2013 will have lived on Bakersfield for two continuous years. • Families do not have on-site potable water • Families do not have on-site disposal of gray and black water sewage o Portable toilets are permitted but who knows if they are being serviced. o Where is the human waste being dumped? o Where is the gray water being dumped? • Families are not connected to MidState Electric Service • Families run gas powered generators from early morning (getting the kids ready for school) until late at night, well past the 10 pm cut off of generators. o Once the neighborhood was quiet and with a generator operating all day the quietness has gone and has been replaced with the constant hum of the generator. j • Families bring in horses and Ass's onto a!1 acre lot and do not remove the animal solid waste. Urine goes into the ground. Adjacent lots are high ground water lots and in the Spring you cannot walk across the lots without 1 1 getting your shoes wet. I J 1 • Families living in smalltraiJers spend most of their time outdoors around a warming fire, yelling back and forth between family members. • Junk accumulates on the property. • There is no wording in the ordinance requiring the owners to remove their junk and cleanup their property at the end of the six months permit. o Can they leave the site as is until they get a new 6 moth permit. • While the area is zones RR-10 allowing camping for six months harms the full time residents who pay thousands of dollars in property tax vs. a vacant lot taxed at $90 a year. o There is no benefit to permanent residents by allowing camping in the neighborhood. "Don't Tread On Me" applies to permanent residents. o Our property values and property values diminish and the County has the potential of loosing tax revenue when a neighborhood is degraded by campers. New Policy: • Should address the above issues and permanent residents concerns. • Major restrictions should be placed on temporary use of property in a residential neighborhood. Attached are photo's of homes in our neighborhood and one of an open field and several with the camping family who has lived on Bakersfield Road for 1.9 years ( can you hear the hum of the generator? We have for almost two years! Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Hubbard, 17065 Azusa Road, Sunriver 97709 541 3909798 Mrs. and Mrs. David Ogden, 17090 Azusa Road, Sunriver, 97709 541593 2227 2 Draft Planning Division Work Program FY 201312014 Carry-over and Citizen Requested Land Use Projects ,OOD ~tl:#a ~W.p ~ff~~~5~1fiJ;~q~oj~ . ·~";·P·~I.-I~:,/~:~.)~.;-~ ~;ti;,.;t.;,.~.r~~~: -..~(~ "V''''-~~'''R''''~-~~~~,;fJ:~M~-'~-R-il~ ~pr()p':ctmJ~g'd:rrib ~?:ri~;J~:Ctft&~~r6·~l9 :~~Ini~~JJig~~tlttU®.t~~ ~ 1 . 2 . 3. one if directed by the·SOCC. Develop a master plan tor the apprQ)d~ateh' 10· ";," Amend the ioning code to r~gtllate RVcamping on services the lot. thereby eliminating thetlse of ' . ,pri .Jale -2­ Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 1 of 8 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., MONDAY, JUNE 16, 2014 _____________________________ Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend __________________________ 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up card (provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject of a public hearing will NOT be included in the official record of that hearing. 3. CONSIDERATION of Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-332, a Notice of Intent to Award Contract Letter for the Household and Conditionally Exempt Generator Hazardous Waste Management Program – Timm Schimke, Solid Waste Department Suggested Action: Move Chair signature of Document No. 2014-332. 4. PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of Approval of the Adoption of Document No. 2014-333, the Community Development Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2014-15 – Nick Lelack, Community Development Suggested Actions: Open hearing, take testimony, move adoption of the 2014- 15 Community Development Work Plan. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 2 of 8 CONSENT AGENDA 5. Chair Signature of Document No. 2014-354, Amending an Intergovernmental Agreement, extending Measure 57 Funding for Adult Parole & Probation 6. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-242, a Lease to Oregon State University for Office Space in the South County Services Building 7. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-059, Transferring Appropriations in the Sheriff’s Office Fund 8. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-081, Transferring Appropriations within the Risk Management Fund 9. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-082, Transferring Appropriations within the Transient Room Tax Funds 10. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-083, Transferring Appropriations within the Solid Waste Fund 11. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-084, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Grant Projects Department 12. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-085, Transferring Appropriations within the Community Development Fund 13. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-086, Transferring Appropriations within the RV Park Fund 14. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-087, Transferring Appropriations within the Annual County Fair Fund 15. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-088, Transferring Appropriations within the Board of County Commissioners Fund 16. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-089, Transferring Appropriations within the Victims Assistance Fund 17. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-090, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Property Management 18. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-091, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Non-Departmental 19. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-093, Transferring Appropriations within the Natural Resources Fund Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 3 of 8 20. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-094, Transferring Appropriations within the Adult Parole & Probation Fund 21. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-095, Transferring Appropriations within the Administration Fund 22. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-096, Transferring Appropriations within the Legal Counsel Fund 23. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-097, Transferring Appropriations within the Law Library Fund 24. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-098, Transferring Appropriations within the Fair and Expo Center Fund 25. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-099, Transferring Appropriations within the General Fund/Tax Office 26. Approval of Minutes:  Business Meeting of May 19 and June 4, 2014  Work Sessions of May 19, June 2 and 4, 2014  Budget Meetings of May 27, 28, 29 and 30, 2014 CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE BLACK BUTTE RANCH COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 27. CONSIDERATION of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-080, Transferring Appropriations within the Black Butte Ranch County Service District Fund Suggested Action: Move Board signature of Resolution No. 2014-080. CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 28. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 4 of 8 CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION/4-H COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT 29. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District RECONVENE AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 30. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County 31. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA _________ ______________________________________ Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker@deschutes.org. _________ ______________________________________ PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items. ______________________________________ FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners’ meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.) Monday, June 16 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) 4:00 p.m. Mobilization Ceremony, at Bend Elks Ball Field Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 5 of 8 Wednesday, June 18 11:00 a.m. Oregon Youth Challenge Graduation – Fair/Expo, Redmond Monday, June 23 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting – includes public hearings and adoption of budgets for fiscal year 2014-15 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Tuesday, June 24 11:00 a.m. Annual Luncheon Meeting of Board of Commissioners with the Black Butte Ranch County Service District Board – Black Butte Ranch 1:00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, June 25 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 26 8:00 a.m. 9-1-1 Director Candidate Interviews – at 9-1-1 5:30 p.m. Joint Meeting of the Board of Commissioners and Planning Commission Friday, June 27 8:00 a.m. 9-1-1 Director Candidate Interviews – at 9-1-1 Monday, June 30 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Tuesday, July 1 8:00 a.m. Sisters Chamber of Commerce Event – State of the City – Sisters 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 6 of 8 Wednesday, July 2 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) 5:30 p.m. Public Hearing on Central Oregon Irrigation District Text Amendment Thursday, July 3 8:00 a.m. Joint Meeting of Board of Commissioners with Sisters City Council, City Hall 11:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update – Legal Counsel Monday, July 4 Most County offices will be closed to observe Independence Day Monday, July 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Wednesday, July 9 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Monday, July 21 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Tuesday, July 22 1:00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, July 23 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 7 of 8 Thursday, July 24 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update – Natural Resources Management – at Road Monday, July 28 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Monday, August 4 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Tuesday, August 5 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting Wednesday, August 6 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Thursday, August 7 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update – 9-1-1 County Service District Wednesday, August 13 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Monday, August 18 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Agenda Monday, June 16, 2014 Page 8 of 8 Wednesday, August 20 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Monday, August 25 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Wednesday, August 27 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Thursday, August 28 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update – Sheriff’s Office, Part I Tuesday, September 2 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting 5:00 p.m. County College Presentation Wednesday, September 3 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session – could include executive session(s) Thursday, September 4 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update – Sheriff’s Office, Part II _________ ______________________________________ Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker@deschutes.org. _________ ______________________________________