Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-06-25 Business Meeting Minutes Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Page 1 of 7 For Recording Stamp Only Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 2014 _____________________________ Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend __________________________ Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Dave Doyle, County Counsel; Ed Keith, County Forester; Joe Stutler, Senior Forestry Advisor; Peter Russell, Community Development; Anna Johnson, Communications; James Lewis, Property & Facilities; Sheriff Larry Blanton, Darryl Nakahira and Capt. Erik Utter, Sheriff’s Office; and eight other citizens. Chair Baney opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m. __________________________ 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT Citizen Jerry Aplin said he has been here before, and had papers to give to the Board for review. It has been provided to the Planning Commission in May, regarding the Simpson property on Lower Bridge Road. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Page 2 of 7 He learned that a permit was applied for a septic system. The Planning Department allowed the Simpson to hook into a septic system that never had permits. Todd Cleveland claims he saw the top of a concrete tank and there are no liquids on the surface. Bob Baggett of the DEQ is not sure that there was an approved system at any time. State rules are to be followed. He provided a letter asking the Board to look into this. The Simpsons did not pay taxes for fifteen years, either. Chair Baney said that the Board would not have this level of detail at this time, but she knows they are working to get the Simpsons into compliance. Mr. Aplin said he has a copy of the voluntary compliance forms and they finally got a driveway permit. Dave Doyle said that he would like a few days to review the file and will meet with Mr. Aplin then. Mr. Aplin stated he holds a license and knows things are not as they should be. __________________________ Steve Stenkamp of the Alfalfa Fire District explained that since January they have completed a strategic plan, unanimous approval of their budget, indicated a site for their station, started basic design of a building, and started the process for acquiring equipment and rolling stock. They have received help from Crook and Deschutes County, and Bend Fire District and local Fire Chiefs and Officers. The short-term loan from the County will be paid back in November. The goal is to be in services by summer 2015. It has been a challenging volunteer project for all involved. __________________________ Ed Keith said that there was an awards event scheduled due to the Two Bulls Fire. They recognized Anna Johnson, County Communications, for keeping the community informed at all times, but especially during this hectic disaster. 3. Before the Board was a Public Hearing, and Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-072, Declaring a State of Emergency regarding Wildland Fire Danger and Public Use Restrictions on Unprotected Lands. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Page 3 of 7 Chair Baney opened the public hearing. Joe Stutler gave an overview of the effects of the Two Bulls Fire, not incl uding long-term economic damages. He has never seen the western eleven states more prone to fire as they are now. The Oregon Department of Forestry has already imposed restrictions, and the BLM and Forest Service are involved. What is important is anyone in the public can look at the interactive map on the website, to see what lands are affected. He feels this needs to be done in a timely basis by Resolution, but eventually there may be an Ordinance that would mirror the rules followed by other agencies. This is historical in many ways. It makes good sense to do this to protect the public and property. He expects there will be voluntary compliance because many people here already know the hazards. Ed Keith clarified this is for unprotected lands, which are those that would not be subject to fire department response. Fires are primarily human-caused. It does align with the restrictions of other agencies. Capt. Erik Utter added that these restrictions are already in line for public lands. The Sheriff’s Office is aware of the dangers and risk, and supports this Resolution. Chair Baney noted that some people may not recognize that there are unprotected lands, and expect someone will show up to take care of it. Alison Green of Project Wildfire said that they are ahead of the curve here in many ways, but there is great risk for unprotected lands. Commissioner DeBone asked about farming practices in these areas. Mr. Stutler referred to the points regarding use of equipment if it is associated with making a livelihood. There are very few certain things in life. He or Mr. Keith would be happy to answer questions or look at the situation. Commissioner DeBone stated this is an educational opportunity. One spark can start a fire that goes for a long ways. Mr. Stutler said that a lot of County lands have been treated, but are adjacent to residential areas. Mr. Stutler explained that this should work well, and they will be looking for feedback and may consider an Ordinance for next year. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Page 4 of 7 Tom Anderson asked if the Rural Fire Protection Districts are considering something similar. A representative of the Rural Fire Protection District #1 stated they have worked with other agencies for a while, and have restrictions in place. As a group, the fire protection districts and Chiefs work together and support this Resolution. Mr. Stutler stated that October 15 is the end date for the Resolution, but it can be changed if appropriate. They should have an Ordinance in place, if that is how it should go, by May 2015. Chair Baney asked about the enforcement aspect. Capt. Utter replied that most citizens do a good job of cooperating. If there is a problem, a person could be removed from County property if not in compliance. This is what they generally do anyway, with voluntary compliance being first. Chair Baney said that Stan Shertzin of Sundance Ranch called her to say that he supports this. Mr. Keith stated that the ODF put similar restrictions in place as of last week. Being no other comments offered, Chair Baney closed the public hearing. DEBONE: Move signature of Resolution No. 2014-072. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 4. Before the Board was Consideration of Second Reading by Title Only, and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2014-017, Amending Title 17, Changes to the County’s Traffic Study Requirements. Peter Russell said there were no changes since the first reading. UNGER: Move second reading of Ordinance No. 2014-017. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Page 5 of 7 Chair Baney conducted the second reading by title only. UNGER: Move adoption of Ordinance No. 2014-017. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 5. Before the Board was Consideration of Second Reading by Title Only, and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2014-001, Amending Title 18, Changes to the County’s Traffic Study Requirements. UNGER: Move second reading of Ordinance No. 2014-001. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Chair Baney conducted the second reading by title only. DEBONE: Move adoption of Ordinance No. 2014-001. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. __________________________ Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda. Chair Baney asked that the minutes be removed as she has not had a chance to review them. Commissioner Unger wanted to speak about item #6. UNGER: Move consent agenda, items 7 through 11. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Page 6 of 7 Commissioner Unger gave an overview of item #6. Workforce development and training has not changed much in Oregon for decades. The Governor would like to see this controlled more locally. Each County is creating a Resolution, and there will be a ten-county board to focus more efforts on getting local individuals trained and employed. DEBONE: Move approval of item #6. UNGER: Second. VOTE: DEBONE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Consent Agenda Items 6. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-102, Authorizing Signature of County Administrator and Commissioner Alan Unger of the Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Request Form 7. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-101, Appointing Wayne Lowry as Deschutes County Treasurer 8. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-337, the Annual Services Agreement for Assessment and Taxation Software, with Helion Software, Inc. 9. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-352, a Space Lease to Family Resource Center of Central Oregon 10. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-347, Amending a Lease Agreement for Space to the State of Oregon, Building Codes Division 11. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-360, Amending a Lease Agreement with the Bethlehem Inn 12. Approval of Minutes:  Business Meeting of May 19 and June 4, 2014  Work Sessions of May 19, June 2 and 4, 2014  Budget Meetings of May 27, 28, 29 and 30, 2014 13. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA None were offered. Being no other items brought before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 10:55 a.m. DATED this 10 Day of_-7fCC-~f--_____0u.4-2014 for the Deschutes County Board of Commission~ Tammy Baney, Chair 0 Anthony DeBone, Vice Chair ATTEST: Alan Unger, Commissioner ~~ Recording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 25,2014 Page 7 of7 -------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK AgendaItemofInterest _____________ Date h/z¥( Name Jowl Mlu J Address Levi~B~o::e bI I , Phone #s 5<{( -;(0(-c3f:? ( I E-mail address _~r--___-=:::::::====-oo _____________ In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? WYes D No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest C ,+i 2e-:Ih.pof Name ~eu0 Ste.v-..kc.mp Address I :Hi£a pw t14--+f.!v.-vl ~ Phone #s !;'-Y/-s38B -fLbs;L/ E-mail address D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes ¢ No ~____.___..______________--+_-----I---_---IIL--_____ -.--.. -----..~---.-------~-..---..---...---..-..----__J._--/---------­ ..._--_.__._-----_._------_._._------_.._­,! , -.-....:...-.----.. --.--.~----'--.~._------_.. _ .._--­- I ---,.------..---.---.~..--.---.--..--.-.-.~---.. "--'.'--­ 1----------------------------------------------­ ·1 j iV:_R_~~_""'.;;;...;·.. _ . ~.-_ MAY 2 1 2014 I t I ._.......,..... _,---_._--­ ---.--~-,-.-.- ----.. --.----~ ------,-' 1/5 Y6ffR.> oR.... M&g6 Lf,d-tJ m~ ~l.D/ ---~----10~n;op&? ~hI 12~; -r&:::J.r~-- -.-,---....------'-'--I--~ F -c.?rrr .::tH'~ e 5. ______ ~~~-=__------c~~~~~: ?}-~~§/P--- _.______~W~JI}<:. lrG7Yl '?bIt!} ~6f;> ~r ~ . IC?o"tlvtt;/~~5 ALL1tri?M,f<; !Ytu<::,! ___ . 1& C£!,TAr;v6-tJ B6-~~ Nftf f~;J ---:----=-~&7 >6-, 5 L:::~ WA ~ -­ p 0;./ Chapter 11.04. PUBLIC USE 11.04.010. Purpose. t 1.04.020. Definitions. 11.04.030. Policies. 11.04.040. Justice Building-Searches. 11.04.050. Road Closures. 11.04.060. Prohibited Activities. 11.04.070. Alienation. 11.04.080. Violation-Penalty. 11.04.010. Purpose. Public use regulations are adopted for the purpose of protecting public property. COrd. 96-013 §I, 1996) 11.04.020. Definitions. For the purposes of DCC 11.04, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in DCC 11.04 are defined and as set forth in DCC 1.04 and DCC 11.04.020. "Industrial land" means any County owned real property zoned for industrial, commercial, manufacturing, research and development or warehousing purposes as authorized. "Park" means any County owned real property designated by resolution of the Board as a County park, pursuant to ORS 275.320. "Parking lot" means an area consisting of one or more parking spaces grouped. "Program Administrator" means the Board, the County Property and Real Estate Manager, Deschutes County department head or designees. "Public service facility" means any real property that is owned or leased by County where public services are provided or conducted and shall include, but not be limited to, buildings, facilities, or real property which is fenced, enclosed or otherwise developed and any associated grounds. "Right of way" means the area between the boundary lines of a street, road or other public easement. "Vacant county land" means all County owned land which does not qualify as a "public service facility," "park" or "right of way." (Ord. 96-013 §I, 1996) t 1.04.030. Policies. A. Real Property. Public use of County owned real property shall be limited to day use (dawn to dusk) except as permitted herein or otherwise permitted by adoption of resolution of the Board. I. Any County owned real property leased by authority of the Board to other public agencies or private parties shall be governed by the terms and provisions of such leases. 2. County real property may be posted closed by the County Property and Real Estate Manager, Director of Road Department, Director of Solid Waste, or Risk Management Coordinator. 3. County shall not accept real property except upon recording ofa written acceptance from the Board. 4. Exclusive or other special use of County owned real property by private entities or other agencies shall only be granted pursuant to a written lease or permit authorized by the Board. Chapter 11.04 (04/2003) B. County Owned/Occupied Buildings. County public service facilities and other buildings housing County employees are open to members of the public who have business with County employees. However, these buildings are also places where County employees do their work. That work often involves sensitive and confidential issues. County employees require work areas that are quiet, free from unnecessary foot traffic and where they may discuss sensitive or confidential matters without being overheard by persons not employed by the County. 1. Each department or other program occupying a building shall establish a waiting area which is, to the extent possible, located near the department or program receptionist and outside the department's or program's work area. Members of the public are to wait in this area until the person they are waiting to see is available. Each waiting area shall be clearly posted as such. 2. Areas other than designated waiting areas are open to visitors by invitation only. County department heads and staff are responsible for their offices, and may request (or order) visitors to leave their offices at their discretion. County department heads and department support staff supervisors are responsible for support staff work areas, and may, in their discretion, ask visitors to leave those areas. C. Public Service Facilities. I. Public service facilities which provide services beyond the hours of dawn to dusk shall operate in a manner deemed appropriate by the Program Administrator. Public access may be restricted by the Program Administrator, on the basis of public safety or administrative efficiency to those areas deemed by the Program Administrator to be necessary for provision of the intended services. 2. County parking lots may be posted with time and use restrictions. Violations may be cited by the County building services manager. The recommended penalty for the citation of violation of DCC 11.04 shall be 10 dollars, which shall double each 24 hours up to four days, and which may be paid as a bail for forfeiture. If not paid at that time, a warrant may be issued by the district court to the violator. (Ord. 96-013 §I, 1996) 11.04.040. Justice Building-Searches. Except for on-duty law enforcement personnel, every person entering through the public entrances of the Deschutes County Justice Building or any Justice Building annex is subject to search of his or her possessions and must pass through metal detectors. (Ord. 97-046 §I, 1997) 11.04.050. Road Closures. Where County property, not generally open for public use, is or has been used by automobiles, motorcycles and other off-road vehicles or bicycles for recreation or for other purposes, and the County has a need to close the property to this use, the County will notifY the general public of the intent to close in a local paper of general circulation. The design of the closure shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, published by the Federal Highway Administration, in terms of signing and barricading. Permanent closures shall consist of appropriate berms, ditches and obliteration of existing roads. The closure design shall be in written form and approved by the County Engineer or County Traffic Engineer. In no case shall ropes or cables be used to close the road or area. (Ord. 96-013 §I, 1996) 11.04.060. Prohibited Activities. A. No person shall construct, install, or encroach upon County owned land. No person shall sever, excavate, damage, vandalize, bum, litter, remove materials from or cause other site disturbing activity Chapter 11.04 2 (04/2003) upon or to County owned land without obtaining a permit authorizing such activity, from the Board, Property and Real Estate Manager, Director of Road Department or Director of Solid Waste. B. No person shall cut or remove wood on or from County owned real property except upon first obtaining a wood cutting permit from the County Property and Real Estate Manager. C. Motor vehicles shall be limited to existing parking lots and roads. Motor vehicles are prohibited on dedicated public pedestrian/bicycle trails. D. Discharge of firearms is prohibited in and on public service facilities except as may be provided by resolution of the Board. E. No person or group shall exclude any other member of the public from County owned land, except as provided by lease, license or resolution by the Board. F. No person shall engage in any conduct in or on property where public services are provided which hinders, interferes with or prevents those employees from performing their duties. G. No person shall smoke or carry any lighted smoking instrument in any Deschutes County owned or occupied building. (Ord. 97-057 §1, 1997; Ord. 96-013 §l, 1996) 11.04.070. Alienation. No County owned real property shall be sold, leased, dedicated, licensed, donated, exchanged, encwnbered or otherwise alienated except upon order of the Board. (Ord. 96-013 §l, 1996) 11.04.080. Violation-Penalty. Any violation or failure to comply with any provision ofDCC 11.04, except DCC 11.04.030(B), is a Class A violation. (Ord.2003-021 §24, 2003; Ord. 96-013 §1, 1996) Chapter 11.04 3 (04/2003) I Cone Fountain Legal Fireworks Retail (1.4g) These produce only smoke, sparks or fire. Examples are base fountains, cone fountains, wheels, and ground bloom flowers. Wheel Base Fountain Sparkler (woocl core) Band-Beld Fountain Unclassified Items (Not Fireworks) ,~ ~A'~ -(II ",~ Ground Bloom Flower Band-Beld California Candle Fountain c~L SmokeBomb . i Y (Not Explosive) Sparkler (wire core) Snakes party Popper Illegal Fireworks Limited (1.4g) These explode, eject balls offire, fly into the air, or travel more than six feet on the ground or 1Z inches into the air. -t. +~ ~9 ~~p 11 '~1 ) Firecracker 0Crazy Jack Jumping Jack Aerial Spinners, Bees Helicopters Mortars Regular Firecracker Small Missile Rocket SkyRocket (With Stick) Bottle Rocket Explosive Devices NOT nREWORKS (Lad.y Finger) Roman Candle (Shoots Balls) Itf"Please, when entering these devices in the OAIRS program put them in the ~~suver ~:~"categoq~~::=@'cJudebmnemad: sh CanDIJ MIOO (Red) M80 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY REGULATED CLOSURE PROCLAMATION Number 01 Effective 6:00 a.m., PDT, July 4, 2013 By virtue of the authority vested in me under the provisions of ORS 477.535 to 477.550, I hereby proclaim a Regulated Closure to be in effect in the following subject area: All lands protected by the Central Oregon Forest Protection District, and all forestland within one-eighth mile thereof. Under this Regulated Closure, except as to the owner's legal right of entry upon their land, entry to all forestland is unlawful unless entrants comply with the following restrictions: • Smoking is prohibited while traveling, except in vehicles on improved roads. • Open fires are prohibited, including campfires, charcoal fires, cooking fires and warming fires, except in designated areas. Portable cooking stoves using liquefied or bottled fuels are allowed. Open fires are allowed if conducted in compliance with a valid Burning Permit issued pursuant to ORS 477.515. • Chainsaw use is prohibited, between the hours of 1 :00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Chainsaw use is permitted at all other hours, if the following firefighting equipment is present with each operating saw: one axe, one shovel, and one 8 ounce or larger fire extinguisher. In addition, a fire watch is required at least one hour following the use of each saw. • Cutting, grinding and welding of metal is prohibited between the hours of 1 :00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. At all other times the area is to be cleared of flammable vegetation and the following fire equipment is required: one axe, one shovel, and one 2 % pound or larger fire extinguisher in good working order. • Use of motor vehicles, including motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles, is prohibited, except on improved roads and except for vehicle use by a landowner and employees of the landowner upon their own land while conducting activities associated with their livelihood. • Possession of the following firefighting equipment is required while traveling in a motorized vehicle, except on federal and state highways, county roads and driveways: one shovel and one gallon of water or one 2% pound or larger fire I I extinguisher, except all-terrain vehicles and motorcycles which must be equipped with an approved spark arrestor in good working condition. I • Mowing of dried grass with power driven equipment is prohibited, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., except for the commercial culture and harvest of agricultural crops. 1 • Use of fireworks is prohibited. • The release of sky lanterns is prohibited. I J • The discharging of exploding targets or tracer ammunition is prohibited. • Blasting is prohibited. • Any electric fence controller in use shall be: 1) Listed be a nationally recognized testing laboratory or be certified by the Department of Consumer and Business Services; and 2) Operated in compliance with manufacturer's instructions. The State Forester or an authorized representative may, in writing, approve a modification or waiver of these requirements. These restrictions shall remain in effect until replaced, suspended, or terminated by an additional proclamation of the State Forester or an authorized representative. Maps of the subject area may be viewed at the State Forester's Office, in Salem, Oregon, and at principal offices of the Forest Protection District. Definitions of words and phrases used in this proclamation may be found in ORS 477.001, OAR 629-041-0005, at: 1I I http://www.oregon.gov/odf/fire/closures/definitions.pdf Tom Fields, Fire Prevention Coordinator ODF Fire Protection Program June 16,2014 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY REGULATED CLOSURE PROCLAMATION Number 05 Effective: 06:00 a.m., PDT, July 9, 2011 By virtue of the authority vested in me under the provisions of ORS 477.535 to 477.550, I hereby proclaim a Regulated Closure to be in effect in the following subject area: All lands protected by the Central Oregon Forest Protection District and all forestland within one-eighth mile thereof. Under this Regulated Closure, except as to the owner's legal right of entry upon their land, entry to all forestland is unlawful unless entrants comply with the following restrictions: 1. Smoking is prohibited while traveling, except in vehicles on improved roads. 2. Open fires are prohibited, including campfires, charcoal fires, cooking fires and warming fires, except in designated areas. Portable cooking stoves using liquefied or bottled fuels are allowed. Open fires are allowed if conducted in compliance with a valid Burning Permit issued pursuant to ORS 477.515. 3. Chain saw use is prohibited, between the hours of 1 :00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Chain saw use is permitted at all other hours, if the following fire fighting equipment is present with each operating saw: one axe, one shovel, and one 8 ounce or larger fire extinguisher. In addition, a fire watch is required at least one hour following the use of each saw. 4. Use of motor vehicles, including motorcycles and all terrain vehicles, is prohibited, except on improved roads and except for vehicle use by a landowner and employees of the landowner upon their own land while conducting activities associated with their livelihood. 5. Possession of the following fire fighting equipment is required while traveling in a motorized vehicle, except on federal and state highways, county roads and driveways: one shovel and one gallon of water or one 2% pound or larger fire extinguisher, except all­ terrain vehicles and motorcycles which must be equipped with an approved spark arrestor in good working condition. 6. Use of fireworks is prohibited. 7. Cutting, grinding and welding of metal is prohibited between the hours of 1 :00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. At all other times the area is to be cleared of flammable vegetation and the following fire equipment is required: one axe, one shovel, and one 2 Y:2 pound or larger fire extinguisher in good working order. 8. Mowing of dried grass with power driven equipment is prohibited, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., except for the commercial culture and harvest of agricultural crops. 9. Blasting is prohibited. 10. Any electric fence controller in use shall be: 1) Listed be a nationally recognized testing laboratory or be certified by the Department of Consumer and Business Services; and 2) Operated in compliance with manufacturer's instructions. The State Forester or an authorized representative may, in writing, approve a modification or waiver of these requirements. These restrictions shall remain in effect until replaced, suspended, or terminated by an additional proclamation of the State Forester or an authorized representative. Maps of the subject area may be viewed at the State Forester's Office, in Salem, Oregon, and at principal offices of the Forest Protection District. Definitions of words and phrases used in this proclamation may be found in ORS 477.001. OAR 629-041-0005. and at: https:/Ioregon.gov/ODFIFIRE/Closures/definitions.pdf Robert Young Workforce Capacity Manager Protection From Fire Program Done in Salem, Oregon, July 7, 2011 RY:TG Climate summary Precipitation observed in May 2014 800 400 200 150 125 1{)O 75 50 25 5 2 Accumulated precipitation percentage of normal ~ ~ 0 N >fa >~ i.. c: fa .­ E -c E cu >:::s i.. cu." ." cu .c ...., 0ra E en cu• i..-U :::s ...., fa ~ OJ a. E ~ 0 N -+ W 00 ....-­ I I I I I ­ra E... 0 c: E 0... l+­ cu... :J....,... ra cu "C cu... :J...., ra... cu Q. E cu...., "C cu >... cu '" .c 0 Climate summary Precipitation since October 1st 2013 Despite wet 113 190 1 110 1<10 110 weather during ,:JfEB-MAY, much of the Pacific Northwest has been dry in 2013-2014. Accumulated precipitation percentage of normal Jun 02,2014 Snow Water Equivalent percent of normal Westwide SNOTEL Cu r rent Current Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) Basin-wide Percent of 1981-201'0 Medi an D unavailabl,e * -<:500/0 50 -69% L--.J -070 -89% 90 - 10 90/0 110 -1290/0 130 -1490/0 >= 150% • Data umJvail8ble ar C1me or posting or measurement is not .fP.JlrP.sp.ntntive at this time of year SNOWPACK May 27,2014 (Released Thursday May 29,2014) Valid 8 a.m. EDT statistics type: . , Traditional (00-04. D1-C4 , etc.) _ Categorical (00,01. etc. ) Drou';Jht Cond ition (Perce nt Area ): •• 00-04 I 01·[04 I D2..04 03-D4 D4 The Droug ht Monitor focuses on broad-scale condi tions. LOC9i condNons m ay vaty. See accompanying leXl summafY for forecast stateme nts. Moderate drought (or worse) continues most spots in the west except western Washington 51 20 /2014 last Week 2125120143 Months A.go Start of I 1213 1/2013 i Calendar Year Start of Water I 10 /1 120 13 i Year One Year A.go I 5128 /20 13 I Intensity: DO -Ab normally Dr l 01 -Moderate Drought 02 - Severe Drought 20 .21 4 .3168.82 60 .38 47 .20 3'.18 68.82 60 .82 47 .50 20 .37 4 .81 22.41 7 7.59 59.61 40.34 15.67 4 .12 22.20 77.80 51 .44 31.11 7.75 0.63 25.25 7 4.75 58.96 3·U8 5.57 0.63 13.91 86.09 71 .11 47 .04 15.04 5 .99 View Nore Statlstics _ 03 -Extr em e Drought _ 04 -Exceptional Drought EI Nino phase: May 28th 2014 Probable EI Nino now forming Avoer<Jge SST AnQm 01 ie$ 4 MAY 2014 -.31 MAY 2014 JDN , . ,_ c 20N 10N EO 8'1. "co . \ ~ ,os 205 305 , " I'" '4 > } .-Ii ,-.' <=> p==e w g 1ZOE " The stripe of warmer water extending westward from South America reveals an EI Nino event forming Probable I Nino by early autumn CFSv2 forecast Nino3.4 SST anomalies (K) (PDF corrected) 3~--------------------------------------------------------------------------, .5 2 L D. o ~ ~ 'tr '--e ' -~5 . -1 -1.:' -2.5 -3 , I i 6 ; i , , , , AJJ JJA JAS ASO SON ONO tmJ OJ F JFM FW., ----Le l ;:;;\ a r ortC~' memDel'i. - - -fOf e e OS l ~rI Sc:I'r',ble meo'! ----Eor llc$l 8 !N~cs l membc:'" ---------NCOC dO ,ly o~o')'&'S Other Cot tl e-os t rrJ cmoo:-r (Model b i<JS correct b ose pl!""i c d: 1999 -20 10; Climo t o fOQ), bo se p e ri od ' 1'3B 2 -201D) A variety of forecast models indicate a likely EI Nino forming by late summer EI Nino's effects on the West: June through August temperatures Change in Risk Rate for Wes1ern United States 5O'N ­ 41!"N ­ 4-B'N ­ 44 'N ­ oI<2'N ­ 40'N ­ 3I!"N ­ 36°N ­ ~'N ­ J2°N ­ .... 'I ,. ; . 4 ... .. ~~ ~. , .1·;:.1,\". .,' ~ ),r.: •. •. t. l.~ . If an EI Nino is in place: Red areas have an elevated risk of enduring unusually hot temps over the summer as a whole. Uncolored areas have no greater risk than typical of becoming persistently hot over the summer. In other words: EI Nino doesn't have a relationship to overall summer temps EI Nino's effects on the West: June through August rainfall "N - O"N - 6"N - ,S ON - ON - "N- Change in Risk Rate for Western United Slates , 'fin " W' 11K. 'Un ' If an EI Nino is in place: Uncolored areas have no greater risk than typical of suffering drought over the summer. In other words: it's not possible to use EI Nino to forecast if the summer will be unusually wet or dry. Blue areas are unlikely to I get unusually dry. Temperature and Precipitation Outlook June 2014 Tern peratu res Precipitation EC Unusually warm temperatures Unusually dry for most of most likely for the far west western part of OR/WA Temperature and Precipitation Outlook July, August, and September 2014 Temperatures I_~ Precipitation Unusually warm temperatures Strong monsoon over the likely for most all the far west Rockies but no trend elsewehere. NWCC Predictive Services outlook: une 2014 Long range outlooks for June suggest June will be warmer and drier than usual. Given the dry conditions over most of Oregon and eastern Washington, much of the Pacific Northwest appears poised for an earlier onset to fire season than usual. This includes increasing risk of fires at higher elevations than usual in Oregon in June because of deficient snowpack. At this point, timbered areas of Washington do not appear on track for an early beginning to fire season in 2014. 1000hr fuel moistures measured June 1st 2014 Heavy fuels as measured by NFDRS on June 1st 2014 are drier than usual in most PSAs for this time of year. 1OOOhr fuel moisture are dropping down to potentially critical values several weeks ahead of schedule in 2014. The graphic to the right illustrates the amount of acceleratred drying. 5 weeks ahead 5 weeks Il4 weeks ahead ahead '> :==rr 4 weeks 14 weeks 1\ I ahead ahead 5 weeks 3 weeks 13 weeks I I ahead ahead ahead NWCC Predictive Services outlook: July through September 2014 If outlooks for a warm and dry summer of 2014 prove correct, much of Oregon and sections of Washington appear to be due for greater potential than usual for large, costly fires due to the contributions of preceding drought and low fuel moisture. Lack of snow cover at higher elevations in Oregon could result in earlier exposure of more fuels to ignitions from lightning as July and August arrive. Lightning activity tends to decrease in September but is not guaranteed. NWCC Predictive Services special note for June: Due to unusually dry conditions, especially in snow deficient areas, fire management units should take note that opportunities for prescribed fire at higher elevations are arriving weeks earlier than usual. The need for fire season staffing is also likely to arrive a few weeks earlier than usual. Note: The risk of escaped prescribed fires is correspondingly greater during dry, windy weather. Check spot forecasts carefully. Significant Wildland Fire Potentia l Outlook ... \ ~~ Hawai i V June 2014 ~ J ~ Above Normal Below Normal Increosing to Above Normol Decreasing to Below Normal Returning to Normal ' C=::;-..:: Puerto Riw ,. ~ .. ~ AbCNe normal significant wildland fire potential indicates a higher than usuallikelil100d t hat wildland fires will occur and~or become significant events . IMldl.an ,d fires are still expected to occur during forecasted Iliormalconditions as, would usually be expected during the outlook period. Signifi,cant wildland fires are still p ossible but less likely than usual durin ,g forecasted below normal periods. Map p roduced by PredictIVe ~ervlces . National Interagency Cnnrriin;:ltinn ~p.ntP.r Boise, Idaho I'ssued Ju ne 1, 2014 N~Jd i~U l:IJ fI(;~ July 1,2014 Sign i ficant Wildland Fire Potential Outlook July 2014 ,,0 ~ .. ~~v Hawaii \) ~~ ... Above Normal Increasing to Above Normal Below No,rmal DecleasillY tu Beluw NUIIlli11 > Rp.tllrn ina to N o rmf'l I .JP.» Above normal significant wildland fire potential indicates a higher than usual likelihood that wildland fires will occur and/or become significant event'S. \MIdland fires are still expe-cted to occur during fore-cast9<CI normal conditions as wOll..lld usually be expecte<l during th& outlook period. Significant wildland fires are still possible Du ,t less likely than usual during forecasted belOow nor mal periods. 'c:=;r..: P uerto Rico Map produced by Pred ictive Services, Natio nallnteragency CoordinatiGn Center Boise, Idaho Issued June 1,2014­ N.ext issuance July 1, 2014 .r:--~:.:: & Se~t ~mber 2014 C) ~v {) ~ Above Normal Increasing to Above Normal B elow Normal Decreasing to Below Normal RetUJrninq to Normal .c::?...:: PU~llu Riw Significant Wildland Firre Potential Outlook ~Q Ilawall ~ ... 'O~{ ~~ ~~ t{'V' ---~--~" ,//¢S Alosko ~~ Above no~mal significant wildland fire potential indicates a higher than usual likelihood that wildland fires will occur and/or become ~iy/lifiO:lIIlllvlllIl~. Wikll'IIIl.lIi~Il~ i::UI:l still tlxl'!:::l;llld lu Ul;l;UI uUli/lg ifUIIll;1:I~ll:ltlIIUlllial uJiluiliu/l~ l:I~ wuulu u~ually iJ!::: Ilxl'l:l{;Lllu du~ing the outlook period. Significant wildland fires aJe still possible b ut less likely than usual during forecasted below Iliormal periods. Map produced by Predidive Services, Nationallmeragency Coordination Center Boise , Idaho 1~~ulltl J U /Ill 1 , 20114 Next issuance July 1. 2014 -a c N ~ > 0 0 ..., ::s 0 ..., )( GJ Z I I ::s ~ • I> l t ta I -C en GJ C -C GJ f I I t S r f ! f t f i I ! I ~ f [ Date: June 18, 2014 To: Board of County Commissioners From: Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator W­ Re: Local Workforce Investment Area Boundaries Commissioner Alan Unger serves on the Oregon Workforce Investment Board (OWl B). OWIB is the overall advisory board to the Governor on workforce matters and is made up of leaders representing private sector businesses, labor, state, local governments, and government agencies. To carry out the work ofOWlB, the State of Oregon is divided up into Local Workforce Investment Areas (L WIA). Commissioner Unger also represents Deschutes County on the Oregon Consortium, the Local Workfoce Investment Area that includes Deschutes County. The Oregon Consortium includes twenty-four counties located throughout Central and Eastern Oregon, as well as parts of Southwest Oregon. Governor Kitzhaber, through Executive Order 13-08, initiated a process to evaluate the L WlA boundaries. In order to reduce fragmentation and align federal and state programs to better serve Oregon's job seekers and businesses, OWlB is considering changing the boundaries for the Local Workfoce Investment Areas. At the Board of County Commissioner's June 23 rd Work Session, Commissioner Unger would like to discuss a proposal for Deschutes County to join a new Local Workforce Investment Board with the following counties: Klamath, Lake, Crook, Jefferson, Wheeler, Wasco, Sherman, Hood River, and Gilliam. At the request of Commissioner Unger, staff has drafted a resolution for Deschutes County to participate in this new Local Workforce Investment Board and file a Local Workforce Investment Areas designation request with the Governor's Office. This resolution will come before the Board of Commissioners for consideration at its June 25 th Business Meeting. I J I c: Tom Anderson, County Administrator Bonnie Baker, Executive Secretary Sharon Ross, BOCC Administrative Assistant REVIEWED OOm LEGAL COUNSEL For Recording Stamp Only BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON A Resolution Supporting the Designation of a New Local Workforce Investment Area, Including Deschutes, Klamath, Lake, Crook, Jefferson, Wheeler, Wasco, Sherman, Hood River, and Gilliam Counties * * * * RESOLUTION NO. 2014-102 WHEREAS, The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) includes the requirement that the Governor must designate local workforce investment areas in order for the State to receive funding under Title I of WIA; and WHEREAS, Governor Kitzhaber through Executive Order 13-08 is initiating a process that will re-charter Oregon's State and Local Workforce Investment Boards to reduce fragmentation and align federal and state programs to better serve Oregon's Job seekers and businesses; and, WHEREAS, by June 30,2015 Local Workforce Investment Boards will be re-chartered to: (a) Better direct public workforce investments at the state and local level for talent development, job creation, income progression, business competitiveness, Integrated service delivery and expanded opportunities for citizen prosperity; (b) Use labor market intelligence to better align economic development, education and training, and workforce development investments and services for job seekers and businesses to efficiently address local labor market needs and statewide priorities; (c) Expand private-public partnerships with an integrated workforce system to better meet the needs of communities and create solutions to address tomorrow's workforce challenges; (d) Partner with the Governor's regional Solutions Committees to identify and leverage opportunities to expand job creation and incent job growth; and (e) Be accountable for workforce system outcomes. WHEREAS, Deschutes County desires to form a Local Workforce Investment Board with Klamath, Lake, Crook, Jefferson, Wheeler, Wasco, Sherman, Hood River, and Gilliam to better meet the local workforce needs and demands. PAGE I OF 2 -RESOLUTION NO. 2014-102 NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1) To support and participate in the new Local Workforce Investment Board: and 2) To file a Local Workforce Investment Area designation request form with the Governor's office no later than July 8, 2014. '7<C~ Dated thi ~_';;>_day of June, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON TAM Q~ ANTHONY DEBONE, Vice Chair ATTEST: ~~ Recording Secretary ALAN UNGER, Commissioner PAGE 2 OF 2 -RESOLUTION NO. 2014-102 WORKSOURCE Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Request Form OREGON Instructions: Use this form to request a new LocalWorkforce Investment Area (LWIA) in Oregon. Please use one form for per new LWIA request, and complete all fields. Please provide the signature of at least one chief local elected official from each of the counties to be included in the new area,or attach a resolution passed the county in support of this action . If no resolution has yet been passed by a county, please indicate the date by which such a resolution is anticipated. A completed physical copy, or a scanned copy that includes the signatures of chief local elected official from each county must be submitted to: Education & Workforce Policy clo GOVERNOR'S OFFICE 900 Court Street NE, Suite 160 Salem, OR 97301 Attn: Workforce Policy Advisor Requested new Local Workforce Investment Area Boundaries: Central Area: Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam, Hood River, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Sherman, Wasco, and Wheeler Counties Please explain how the requested change meets each of the following federal criteria: See answers below. How will the proposed geographic area be served by local educational agencies and intermediate educational agencies? See attachment for breakout of all local educational agencies broken down by county _They all provide education services as required by state and federal requirements. How will the proposed geographic area served by postsecondary educational institutions and area vocational education schools. Central Oregon Community College, Bend Oregon, Oregon State University-Cascades Division, Bend Oregon, Klamath Community College ,Klamath Oregon, Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Oregon, and Columbia Gorge Community College, The Dalles Oregon. These colleges offer a full complement of college transfers credits/degrees, and certificate programs. How is the new area consistent with labor market areas to the extent that is possible? There are many similarities among the counties in the central area from their high desert landscape; traditional dependence on manufacturing, forestry, and farming; and their predominately rural character. U.S. Highway 97 stretches through the proposed area . The highway acts as the main thoroughfare for commuters and travelers between the area's communities in the central and southern C\Users\dshoun\AppData\Locai\Microsofl\Windows\Temporary Internet Fi les \Content.Outlook\UZG26MT8\LWIA Redesi gn at ion Form Central R eg ion .docx Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Request Form WORKSOURCE OREGON portion of the proposed area. Due to its proximity to Portland and geography, the northern counties are more insulated from the rest of the central area with their economic hubs in Hood River and The Dalles . The central counties of Crook, Deschutes, and Jefferson self-identify with one another as they share public transportation, a community college system, and a common labor force. Bend and Redmond are the economic hubs of the central tier of the area . Finally, Klamath and Lake Counties in the south are very closely tied to one another; however the southern tier maintains a strong economic connection with the metropolitan counties of Deschutes County to the north and Jackson County to the west. Deschutes County (Bend MSA) is the lone metropOlitan statistical area east of the Cascades . The county dominates employment for the area accounting for an average annual employment of 64 ,580 jobs in 2013 while the remaining nine counties combined accounted for 57,515 jobs. Labor market areas are defined by the federal Office of Management and Budget and the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. There are three types of labor market areas: metropolitan (Metro), micropolitan (Micro), or small (SMLA). The Central area is consistent with labor market areas to the extent possible. It is a complete combination of one metro area,four micro areas, and five SMLAs : Bend, OR Metropolitan Statistical Area (Deschutes County) Hood River, OR Micropolitan Statistical Area (Hood River County) Klamath Falls , OR Micropolitan Statistical Area (Klamath Falls County) Prineville, OR Micropolitan Statistical Area (Crook County) The Dalles, OR Micropolitan Statistical Area (Wasco County) Gilliam County, OR is a SMLA Jefferson County, OR is a SMLA Lake County, OR is a SIVILA Sherman County, OR is a SMLA Wheeler County, OR is a SMLA How far will individuals need to travel to receive workforce services provided in proposed local area {How far must individuals travel to local WorkSource Sites). Most Workforce service centers are within 100 driving m iles . The attach map shows all OED centers within the regions. How does the proposed area increase alignment with economic development districts and regional solutions areas? The boundaries coincide with the Regional Solution boundaries and are similar to Economic Development. There have been discussions of realigning Regional Solutions and Economic boundaries to link up with the new boundaries being presented to the OWIB Are the proposed boundaries of the local area contiguous? C :\Users\ds houn \AppData \Locai\Micro soft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook\UZG26MT8\LWIA Re desi g nati on Form Ce ntr al R eg ion .do c x WORKSOURCE Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Request Form OREGON For as large as this area is the boundaries are contiguous Please provide a brief description as to why you believe the requested change will be more effective or efficient, or produce better performance results for customers than the existing LWIA structure . There are many similarities among the counties in the central area from their high desert landscape; traditional dependence on manufacturing, forestry, and farming; and their predominately rural character. The formation of this new region will allow an avenue to bring on private business since the LWIB will be in their region instead of having to drive 4 to five hours to attend a 5 hour board meeting . This development will allow for a more align Administration Board to address the needs of the Central Region only, and assist in providing collaborative avenues to address employer needs. At least one chief local elected officials from each county within the proposed area must sign this form or submit a resolution in order to be considered. Signature of Chief Local Elected Official(s) Title: County Date county Commissioner Deschutes 6/25/14 County Commissioner Deschutes 6/25/14 County Administrator Deschutes 6/25/14 C :I Users l dshoun\AppDataI LocaiI Micro softlWi n dowsI Tempora ry Internet F ilesl Content.Outlookl UZG26MT8l LWIA Red es ignati on Form Ce ntral R eg ion.do cx Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Request Form WORKSOURCE OR EGON Please attach resolutions and/or provide dates by counties anticipate introducing resolutions for new boundaries. C :\Users\dshoun\AppData\Locai \Micro softIWindows\Temporary Internet Files\ContenI.Outlook\UZG26MT8\LWIA Red e s ig n ation Form Ce ntral R eg ion .doc x In December 2011, Governor Kitzhaber asked the Oregon Workforce Investment Board (OWIB) to respond to the changing economy by transforming the state's workforce development system from one that organizes work based on programs and federal requirements and funding streams, to one that organizes work based on community, business and worker needs. In response, the OWIB developed a new strategic plan, Oregon atWork. The plan built on recent innovations in the workforce system and identified strategies to take it to a new level. .. .. Successful implementation of the new strategic plan creates new roles, responsibilities, accountability and authority for the state and local workforce investment boards. In recognition of this change, Governor Kitzhaber is developing an Executive Order to re-charter these boards to playa greater role in aligning and innovating Oregon's workforce system. Recognizing that workforce solutions are most effective when they are based on community needs, and that the best way to develop these solutions is to create strong private/public partnerships to respond to local labor markets, Governor Kitzhaber's Executive Order requires: Recognition of the OWIB and Local Workforce Investment Boards as conveners of private/public partnerships that engage more partners and resources, develop a strong understanding of the local labor markets, and implement workforce solutions that communities need. All Local Workforce Investment Boards to transform from direct service providers Into neutral, independent brokers of services, designers of innovation, and evaluators of outcomes . OWIB and state agencies involved in the workforce system to fund the new functions of the boards and increase state level alignment and integration of workforce programs. Publicly funded workforce programs and Regional Solutions Teams to work with the state and local workforce investment boards to avoid unnecessary duplications and help implement locally based workforce solutions. OWIB and the Oregon Education Investment Board to identify how they will work together to achieve common outcomes across the education and workforce systems. .. The Executive Order will be issued in July 2013. OWIB and state agencies are working to finalize strategy to better align systems and resources to support a more integrated workforce system and the re-chartered workforce boards by the 2014 legislative session. At the same time a formal process for the re-chartering of boards will be developed by early December 2014. The four local workforce investment boards that currently deliver services will have to comply with the separation of governance from service delivery structures by June 30, 2015. t~:;);' ~:~~~;.~ \",cW//~1 t!V Agnes Balassa, Workforce Policy Advisor I Office of the Governor I 503-986-6530 I agnes.balassa :.CJ,state.or.us In December 2011, Governor Kitzhaber initiated a transformation of Oregon's workforce system to respond to a changing economy. He called upon the workforce system to expand innovation, eliminate fragmentation and provide more resources and authority for local communities to develop workforce solutions that achieve a common set of goals : • Oregonians with the skills needed to fill current and emerging hlgh-~ge,hIgh -demand Jobs. • BUsinesses with th e skilled workforce to support future growth. • An aligned wor~o rce system that provIdes Integrated services and makes the most effic1ent possIble use of resources. In June 2012, the Oregon Workforce Investment Board, (OWIB) adopted a 1 O-year plan, Oregon at Work, that built on recent innovations in the workforce system to achieve the Governor's goals. The plan Identified strate­ gies to transform Oregon's workforce system to better integrate and align programs, services, budgeting and decision making at the state and local level. . .­ Fundamentally, this change is about delivering better results for more people, more effectively, in a time of diminished resources . We -as state and local leaders -must create the vibrant economic environment that supports growth and vitality in all of our communities, and ensure all Oregonians -especially our most vulnerable and under-served citizens -have the support and access needed to enter a path to economic stability. Governor Kitzhaber has made clear that doing this requires state government to think differently, act differently, and work differently. Changes to the workforce system will allow: The creation of new products, services and strategies for a dynamic client base . State and local workforce boards to better align workforce and education investments with economic development in the service of local communities. Local workforce boards to act as independent, neutral brokers of those services that deliver the best results for job seekers and businesses. The WorkSource service integration model to expand and increase access to innovative programs that result in market-relevant credentials, good jobs and a growing economy. State and local administrative structures to operate as an efficient and effective system that's locally delivered and outcome based. The transition analysis and planning for Oregon's workforce system is based on cor,e guiding principles: • A workforce system designed to meet state and local labor market needs is critical to support the state's job creation, business retention and economic development goals. Workforce services are critical to helping more Oregonians enter into and progress in jobs that provide the wages and benefits necessary to support families. An effective workforce system is built on strong private/public partnerships. Oregon's workforce system will gain prominence by taking a pivotal role within the larger framework of job creation and educational attainment and not solely the jurisdiction or concern of a distinct agency or program. • Greater numbers of Oregonians can be more effectively served if all possible resources flow to local communities, and state government's role is concentrated on setting broad policy, establishing desired outcomes and metrics, and providing efficient functional services at the state and local level. Streamlining and reduction of redundancy will yield better outcomes and more accountability. The resulting system will incorporate new models of decision-making and oversight to strengthen the ties with policy goals across state government. • The research and analysis to develop this future state will be done with integrity without preconceived solutions. The Governor's Office, Department of Administrative Services and Oregon's workforce agencies have engaged an outside team of experts with organizational redesign, and business process experience to analyze and make recommendations on the structural and process changes needed. A project plan to better integrate and align the workforce system is currently being designed. Opportunities for employee and stakeholder input throughout the process will ensure broad perspectives to inform the ultimate recommendations. As insights and recommendations begin to surface, they will be shared clearly and systematically so all stakeholders have the opportunity to give feedback. The project plan consists of two tracks: 1. Developing a process for the re-chartering of the state and local workforce investment boards. 2. Developing a recommendation for the state infrastructure to support implementation at the local level. Recommendations to increase alignment, expand service integration and enhance the ability of the workforce system to respond to local needs will be developed by December 31,2013. Recommendations requiring legislative approval will be presented to the State Legislature in February 2014. if approved, full implementation of the recommendations would likely begin in July 2015. Until such time, staff, partners, businesses, citizens and communities can count on continued operations of the programs and services currently administered by Oregon's workforce system. Executive Workforce Order clarifies Draft plan to Re-chartering community state & local Governor & ofstate & State &local engogement governance Legislature local boards boards begins expectotions for comment begins re-chartered ",,'? ~'? '? ~'? ~'? ".....'? ~\). ~t>. • \). ~'> "",> _______--; 'V --. .~-\~ Agnes Balassa, Workforce Policy Advisor I Office of the Go vernor [503 -986-6530 [ agnes.balassa Ccil state.or.us ').v Rl ,,'\ "Rl "Rl "v Rl Rl~' ~ Co--'V ').v ~/ '~ ____.~c.,~__"'V ___,,,');__ ~'V _~'b ,»~ --,~ --....-s --<-~~ ,",v ,~-l.~V _,,'I)'~. I I r -, v) " ~-Stote ond local ~ ,»~ I "v '" Analysis of programs & structures Scenarios developed & discussed Updated draft plan to Governor & Final plan to Governor & Legislature implementation plans developed Transformed delivery model Implementation with partners Leglslatpre _ for approvol ,{(~~~~ I~:' :\;;f ~ \ .. " ~ ~i!-:.--'!../ I •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• John A. Kitzhaber, MD Governor MEMORANDUM Date: March 3, 2014 To: Local Workforce Investment Board Chairs, Directors and Chief Elected Officials From: Agnes Balassa, Workforce Policy Advisor, Office of Governor John Kitzhaber Re: Local Workforce Investment Area redistricting This memorandum is in follow up to a letter from Governor Kitzhaber on the topic of Local Workforce Investment Area redistricting which you should have received by email earlier today. A hard copy is also in the mail. Some of you are probably wondering why the Governor has initiated a discussion about Oregon's local workforce investment area boundaries. The reason is that our economy is changing, creating the need for new approaches to helping people get, keep and progress in jobs throughout the state. Oregon's approach to economic development is changing from a focus on fixed, place based assets and incentives to a focus on the skills of our workforce. We'd like aU parts of the state to be better positioned to help grow local jobs. At the same time, federal resources for workforce development have declined and are likely to continue to do so into the future . To achieve our goals for a strong economy we need to focus more intentionally on leveraging our resources to meet the needs of local communities. By better aligning our workforce area boundaries with our economic deVelopment strategies, including regional solutions, we can create greater leverage for the growth of a new economy. This is especially true in our more rural parts of the state. Local Workforce Investment Boards are critical to creating this alignment. However, our current boundaries are not well aligned in all parts of the state to achieve these goals. This memorandum and attached materials describe the process for redistricting local workforce investment area boundaries, and include an invitation for a statewide video conference to discuss next steps . The Department of Community Colleges and Workforce Development has provided an analysis of state and federal rules and regulations related to this topic, which is attached . The following process was developed based on their input. It is the intent of the federal law and of the Governor that this process be a collaborative and voluntary one among the state and local workforce investment boards, Local Chief Elected Officials Page 2 of 3 (CEO's), and the Governor. While only the Governor may (re)designate local workforce investment areas, the support of Local CEOs is necessary for boundary changes to take place. CEOs in any local workforce investment area, a state workforce investment board, or a governor may propose a local workforce investment area redesignation. The Governor's letter you received, dated March 3,2014, invites local workforce investment boards (LWIBs) and the CEO's who serve on these boards to enter into a discussion about local workforce investment area boundaries. L WIB members and county elected officials should be included in these discussions. Requests for redesignation should use the following process: • A redesignation request is initiated by filing the attached form with the Governor's Workforce Policy Advisor. Any of the following may submit a redesignation request: CEOs, LWIBs with CEO support, the Governor or the State Workforce Investment Board. Requests will be processed as they are received in order to allow sufficient time for development of new boundary proposals. All requests for redesignation must be filed by April 15, 2014'. • The Governor's Office will notify an L WIB of the receipt of any requests for redesignation of boundaries within 5 days of receipt and initiate a process for discussion of possible new boundaries. • The Governor will host a statewide video conference in early April to discuss both the process and any concerns or questions raised by local areas. More information will be forwarded as soon as it is available . • In compliance with federal and state guidelines, the Governor will consider boundaries that are consistent with local labor markets and the service areas of local educational and other workforce partners and reflect regional and labor market economies of scale. Examples of "regional and labor market economics of scale" include Economic Development Districts and Regional Solutions area boundaries. • Requests consistent with the criteria above will be forwarded to the Oregon Workforce Investment Board (OWIB) by June 1, 2014 for consideration at the Board's June 13,2014 meeting. In recommending approval of new boundaries, OWIB must consider: o Geographic areas served by local education agencies and intermediate educational agencies. o Geographic areas served by post-secondary educational institutions and area vocational education schools. o The extent to which local areas are consistent with labor market areas. o The distance that individuais will need to travel to receive services provided in such local areas. o The resources of such local areas that are available to effectively administer the activities carried out under subtitle IB of the Workforce Investment Act. o Whether there is compelling evidence that a redesignation would: • Better meet any criteria established by OWIB in its strategic plan; • Be more effective or efficient; and • Produce better performance results for customers • If the OWIB determines the request(s) meet(s) the criteria and there is compelling evidence that a local area(s) should be redesignated, the Governor may approve the redesignation request and recognize the Page 3 of 3 resulting new configuration oflocal area(s). It is the Governor's intent to approve any new boundaries by July 1,2014. Federal law allows until October 1 for the identification of new boundaries, however, that would not allow sufficient time for completion of administrative work necessary for boundary changes and to prepare L WlBs to be chartered in time for the July 1, 2015 start of the new fiscal year. • The OWIB and Local Workforce Investment Boards must provide public notice for any regular, special or emergency meeting where (re)designation will be discussed . These meetings may take place concurrently with other steps of the redesignation process. The notice must be specific enough to permit citizens to recognize matters of interest. • A change in local area(s) designation will also require a modification ofthe State Strategic Plan. Such modifications are subject to the same public review and comment requirements that apply to the development of the original State Plan. Any changes to existing local workforce investment areas designations will be forwarded to the Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration for federal approval/recognition in the form of a new State Plan or State Plan Modification. . Attached, please find details of the process as well as the form required to initiate a redistricting request. A comparison of Local Workforce Investment Areas with Regional Solutions Boundaries is also included for those who are unfamiliar with these two sets of boundaries . Details for a statewide video conference meeting with the Governor will be forthcoming. I will be in contact with each local workforce investment board to schedule a time to talk about this process, answer questions and potentially schedule to attend a future local meeting if this would be helpful. I can be reached at 503.986.6530 or agnes.balassa@state.or.us if you have questions in the meanwhile . Thank you for your consideration. COMMUNITY COLLEGES AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WORKSOURCE OREGON Public Service Building 255 Capitol Street NE Salem. Oregon 97310 Phone (503) 947-2401 Fax (503) 378-3365 l/IIV'M .oregon.gov/ccwd January 29,2014 To: The Honorable John A. Kitzhaber, Governor Agnes Balassa, Workforce Policy Advisor, Oregon From: Krissa Caldwell, Deputy Commissioner, CCWD Re : Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Changes In response to the Governor's request for information regarding the federal and state requirements and procedures involved with designating or redesignating Local Workforce Investment Areas (L WIAs), the Department of Communi ty Co 11 eges and Workforce Development has prepared the attached document. State and federal guidance describe several conditions under which L WIAs may be (re)designated; this letter specifically addresses the process of voluntary (re)designation. In Oregon, the state workforce investment board is known as the Oregon Workforce Investment Board (OWIB). In summary: • The Chief Elected Official(s) (CEOs) of any local area, the state workforce investment board, or the governor may propose a local area redesignation by following the attached process. Proposals may be initiated at any time, but specific time lines may affect the request and redesignation process. • Only the Governor may (re)designate local workforce investment areas. • Voluntary redesignation of a workforce investment area is expected to be a collaborative process between the state workforce investment board, the Governor, and local CEOs. The L WlA designation process must include the following steps: • A proposal/request form submitted to the Governor's Workforce Policy Advisor; • Consultation with the state workforce investment board and chief elected officials (CEOs); • A public comment period, including consideration of comments received If approved by the Governor, a change in L WIA designation must: • Be included in the State Strategic Plan (or submitted as a Plan Modification) • Be subinitted to the US Department of Labor (DOL)/Emplo)rment and f'raining Administration (ETA) References: Federal requirements and guidance for the designation and redesignation of L WIAs requirements may be found primarily in • The Workforce Investment Act, Section 116 • 20 CFR, Part 661.250 through 661.280 • Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 37-10, Workforce investment Act (WlA) and Appropriations Act Provisions on the Designation ofLocal Workforce investment Areas Oregon's state-level guidance may be found at: • ORS 660.324, Duties ofstate board; state plan for workforce investment system • OAR 151-010-0040, Designation of Workforce investment Areas (Designation/ Redesignation) • OWIB Policy, Workforce investment Area Designation (Amended: March 26, 2004) A more thorough description of the process and requirements for voluntary (re)designation is included in Attachment A. If/as a proposal to any of Oregon's LWIAs moves forward, CCWD will provide additional information and support, as requested by the Governor, the OWIB, or other stakeholders. Attachment A Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Brief History The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) includes the requirement that the Governor must designate local workforce investment areas in order for the State to receive funding under Title I of WIA . Each time Oregon submits its State Plan to the US Department of Labor/Employment Training Administration (DOL/ETA), it includes a section identifying the local workforce investment areas designated in the state, and the process used for des ignating local areas. According to Oregon's State Plan, local workforce investment areas (LWIAs) were initially designated in accordance with WIA Section 116(a)(4), Designation on Recommendation of State Board (1999-2000) . In brief: • Local Elected Officials brought designation requests before the State Workforce Investment Board • The State Workforce Investment Board recommended the designation of areas to the Governor • The Governor approved the State Workforce Investment Board's recommendations Only one redesignation has taken place in the intervening time. On July 1, 2004, at the request of local elected officials, Tillamook County petitioned to be removed from the LWIA serving the Portland metropolitan area and reinstated with The Oregon Consortium/Oregon Workforce Alliance area, where it had been prior to the implementation of the WIA. Any changes to LWIA designations need to be submitted to DOL/ETA in the State Plan, or as a Plan Modification, according to the guidelines and processes listed below. The (re)designation process can be initiated by any of several entities, for a variety of reasons/purposes. The following summary focuses on (re)designation as a voluntary action. [Note: Involuntary designation may result from instances offraud, abuse, failure to carry out local board functions, or failure to meet performance measures for two consecutive program years. None of these conditions currently exists in Oregon, and the State is not in a position to consider involuntary redesignation of its LWIAs at this time.] What Happens, and How • A local workforce investment area, specifically a local chief elected official(s) can voluntarily agree to redesignation. • The local area, the state workforce investment board (OWIB), or the governor may propose a local area redesignation. o A proposal/redesignation request is initiated by filing an approved form with the Governor's Workforce Policy Advisor. • The Governor will review the request to ensure it meets the following criteria: o Is with local markets service areas of local ed and other workforce partners; and o Reflects regional and labor m economies III If the request meets the above the Governor will forward the request to the OWIB to o Geographic areas served by local education and intermediate educational agencies. o hic areas by institutions area vocational education schools. o The extent to which local areas are areas. o The individuals will need to to receive provided in such local areas. o resources of local areas are available to effectively administer the carried out subtitle IB of the Act. III The OWIB will also whether is compelling evidence a redesignation would: o Better meet criteria established by the state board; o more effective or efficient; and o Produce better performance results for customers III The and Local Workforce Investment Boards must provide public of the time, place and for any regular, special or meeting (re)designation will be discussed. 0 notice must be enough to permit citizens to recognize matters interest. III If the determines the request meets applicable and is compelling evidence a local should be may the redesignation uest and the resulting new configuration of local area{s). III A in local area designation, or the redesignation local areas, is considered a substantial ch requires a modification of Strategic Plan. III State Plan modifications are to the same public review and comment requirements that apply to the development of the I State Plan; the OWlB must provide an opportunity for comment on development modification before submitting it to the Governor. o to the on which the OWIB submits a plan modification, OWIB shall: (1) available of a proposed plan modification to the public through such means as public hearings and local news media; (2) allow members of board and of the public, including representatives of business and representatives of labor organizations, to submit comments on proposed local to the local board, not the end of 30-day period beginning on the date on which the proposed plan modification is made available; and (3) include with the plan modification submitted to the Governor any such comments that represent disagreement with the plan. • Any changes to existing LWIA designations will be forwarded to DOL/ETA for federal approval/recognition in the form of a new State Plan or State Plan Modification, along with: o A description of the process the State used to make the Plan available to the public and the outcome of the State's review of the resulting public comments. Additional notes: • To be timely, requests must be received by the Governor (or Advisor) not later than October 1 of the year previous to the Program Year the redesignation would be in effect. o A Program Year (PY) is from July 1 through June 30 -e.g., PY 2013 is July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014. • An appeal process exists for any unit of local government, or combination of such units, whose request for redesignation was denied. References: Many of the procedural aspects and requirements of redesignation are addressed and cross­ referenced among the sources below. Additionally, Oregon sources may contain Oregon-specific processes. Federal requirements and guidance for the designation and redesignation of Local Workforce Investment Areas (LWIA) may be found primarily in: • The Workforce Investment Act, Section 116 http://www.doleta.gov/usworkforce/wia/wialaw.pdf • 20 CFR, Part 661.250 through 661.280 http://www.doleta.gov/usworkforce/wia/finalrule.pdf • Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 37-10, Workforce Investment Act (WIA) and Appropriations Act Provisions on the Designation of Local Workforce Investment Areas http://wdr.doleta.qov/directives/attach/TEGL/TEGL37-10ACC.pdf Oregon's state-level guidance may be found at: • ORS 660.324, Duties of state board; state plan for workforce investment system https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/billslaws/lawsstatutes/20110rs660.htm I • OAR 151-010-0040, Designation of Workforce Investment Areas (Designation/ Redesignation) http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/pages/rules/oars100/oar151/151010.html • _OWl B Po~icy,,!!orkforce ~nvestm~_n!jj!eCJ De~ignC1!i0n (~J!1ended:_MC1r~~_~6J 2004) http://www.worksourceoregon.org/state-workforce-board/about-oregons-workforce­ i nvestm ent -boa rd/ru Ies-a n d-policies/278-workforce-i nvestm ent-a rea-d esign ation Comparison of Workforce and Regional Solutions Boundaries Background: Governor Kitzhaber has suggested that Oregon's local workforce investment areas consider greater alignment with the state's regional solutions boundaries. These boundaries are based on the state's economic development districts . Oregon is divided into eleven "regions", each with its own regional solutions steering committee led by a local convener as indicated on the map below . • JOHN A. KITZHABER. M.D. GOVER NOR Regional Solutions *Reglonol SolJtl ...c.nIor Each of the three regions in the Valley/North Coast cluster has a Governor's staff assigned to its committees. The remaining four clusters of regions are each served by a Governor's staff person, in effect creating 7 regions as follows: CENTRAL OREGON Crook, Deschutes, Hood River, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Sherman and Wasco Counties EASTERN OREGON Baker, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Malheur, Morrow, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa and Wheeler Counties SOUTHERN OREGON Coos, Curry, Douglas, Jackson and Josephine Counties NORTH COAST Comparison of Workforce and Regional Solutions Boundaries Clatsop, Columbia, Lincoln and Tillamook Counties MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY Marion, Polk and Yamhill Counties SOUTH WILLAMETTE VALLEY Benton, Lane, Lincoln and Linn Counties METRO Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington Counties Oregon's Local Workforce Investment Areas are also divided into seven regions as indicated on the map below: These boundaries were created many years ago based on the federally designated metropolitan statistical areas that existed at the time. There is some alignment with regional solutions boundaries , as well as large areas that are served by multiple regional solutions teams. D Oregon Workforce Alliance/ The Oregon Consortium _ Workforce Investment Board for Multnomah and Washington Counties and the City of Portland/ Worksystems, Inc. Job Growers Incorporated Workforce Investment Council D linn, Benton, lincoln Workforce Investment Board/ Community Services Consortium lane Workforce Partnership Rogue Workforce Partnership/ The Job Council • Non-TOC/OWA MTC -lVIanagement & Training Corporation (MTC Works) -D UT&E -Umpqua Training & Employment r--"I SeBEC -South Coast Business Employment Corporation D MCCOG -Mid-Columbia Council of Governments -eOlc -Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council eAPECO -Community Action Program of East Central Oregon TEC -Training and Employment Consortium Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 2014 Commissioners' Hearing Room -Administration Building -1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up card (provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject ofa public hearing will NOT be included in the official record ofthat hearing. 3. A PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-072, Declaring a State of Emergency regarding Wildland Fire Danger and Public Use Restrictions on Unprotected Lands Joe Stutler, Senior Advisor; County Legal Counsel; Sheriff's Office Suggested Actions: Solicit staffand public comment; move Board signature of Resolution No. 2014-072. 4. CONSIDERATION of Second Reading by Title Only, and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2014-017, Amending Title 17, Changes to the County's Traffic Study Requirements Peter Russell, Community Development Suggested Actions: Move second reading ofOrdinance No. 2014-017, by title only; move adoption. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 25, 2014 I Page 1 of6 1 I 5. CONSIDERATION of Second Reading by Title Only, and Adoption of r Ordinance No. 2014-001, Amending Title 18, Changes to the County's Traffic i Study Requirements -Peter Russell, Community Development ISuggested Actions: Move second reading o/Ordinance No. 2014-001, by title only; move adoption. f I CONSENT AGENDA I6. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-102, Authorizing Signature of County Administrator and Commissioner Alan Unger of the Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Request Form 7. Board Signature of Resolution No. 2014-101, Appointing Wayne Lowry as Deschutes County Treasurer t J 8. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-337, the Annual Services Agreement for Assessment and Taxation Software, with Helion Software, Inc. 9. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-352, a Space Lease to Family Resource Center of Central Oregon 10. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-347, Amending a Lease Agreement I for Space to the State of Oregon, Building Codes Division I 11. Board Signature of Document No. 2014-360, Amending a Lease Agreement t with the Bethlehem Inn 12. Approval of Minutes: · Business Meeting of May 19 and June 4, 2014 · Work Sessions of May 19, June 2 and 4,2014 I · Budget Meetings of May 27,28,29 and 30, 2014 l 13. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 25,2014 Page 2 of6 Deschutes County encourages persons with disabilities to participate in all programs and activities. This event/location is accessible to people with disabilities. If you need accommodations to make participation possible, please call (541) 388-6572, or send an e-mail to bonnie.baker@deschutes.org. PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS ] 92.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS ] 92.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items. FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. Ifyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.) Monday, June 23 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting -includes public hearings and adoption of budgets for fiscal year 2014-15 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Tuesday, June 24 11:00 a.m. Annual Luncheon Meeting of Board of Commissioners with the Black Butte Ranch County Service District Board Black Butte Ranch 1:00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, June 25 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 26 8:00 a.m. 9-1-1 Director Candidate Interviews -at 9-1-1 5:30 p.m. Joint Meeting of the Board of Commissioners and Planning Commission 8:00a.m. 9-1-1 Director Candidate Interviews -at 9-1-1 Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 25,2014 Page 3 of6 I Monday, June 30 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Tuesday, July 1 8:00 a.m. Sisters Chamber of Commerce Event State of the City -Sisters 3:30p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting I Wednesday, July 2 I10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting f t1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) 5:30p.m. Public Hearing on Central Oregon Irrigation District Text Amendment Thursday, July 3 8:00 a.m. Joint Meeting of Board of Commissioners with Sisters City Council, City Hall 11:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update -Legal Counsel Monday, July 4 f I Most County offices will be closed to observe Independence Day I Monday, July 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Wednesday, July 9 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Monday, July 21 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Page 4 of6 l I I Tuesday, July 22 1 :00 p.m. Employee Benefits Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, July 23 I10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) I l Thursday, July 24 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update Natural Resources Management I -atRoad I I tMonday, July 28 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Monday, August 4 [ f !10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting i 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) I I I Tuesday, August 5 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting I Wednesday, August 6 t I10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) t I I { Thursday, August 7 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update -9-1-1 County Service District I J Wednesday, August 13 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting ! 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) I I Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 25,2014 r l Page 5 of6 I t f Monday, August 18 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Wednesday, August 20 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting i I1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) ~ I f Monday, August 25 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Wednesday, August 27 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Thursday, August 28 9:00a.m. Performance Management & Department Update Sheriffs Office, Part I Tuesday, September 2 3:30 p.m. Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting 5:00 p.m. County College Presentation Wednesday, September 3 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Thursday, September 4 9:00 a.m. Performance Management & Department Update Sheriffs Office, Part II Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 25,2014 Page 6 of6