HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-07-11 Business Meeting Minutes
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 1 of 8
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org
MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 2012
_____________________________
Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend
__________________________
Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Alan Unger and Tammy Baney.
Also present were Erik Kropp, Interim County Administrator; Chris Doty and
George Kolb, Road Department; Tom Anderson, Nick Lelack and Peter Russell,
Community Development; Joe Sadony and Bonnie Grace Day, Information
Technology; Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; and ten other citizens.
Chair DeBone opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN INPUT
The Board congratulated Bonnie Grace Day of I.T./CDD for her twenty years
of service, and on her upcoming retirement.
3. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Resolution No. 2012-
085, Declaring an Exemption from Competitive Bidding Requirements for
Animal Shelter Services with the Humane Society of Central Oregon and
the Humane Society of Redmond.
Laurie Craghead said that she has discovered that the Resolution is not needed,
as humane society contracts are exempt from competitive bidding requirements.
She asked that this item be removed from the agenda.
This is different from the dog control laws of the State; it is a County ordinance
only.
4. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Documents No. 2012
412 and No. 2012-413, Contracts for the Provision of Animal Shelter
Services to be Provided by the Humane Society of Central Oregon and the
Humane Society of Redmond.
-~ Ms. Craghead stated that these are the same contracts as in previous years, with
the exception being this would be for just one year. At least one vendor has
asked for a shorter contract to be able to review some financial adjustments in
the agreement and how services are provided.
Commissioner Baney noted the payment amounts, but asked if their overall
policy for their shelters would change. The County is not the only funding
source for the shelters. Ms. Craghead stated she has not had any direct
negotiations with the shelters; this has traditionally gone through the County
Administrator. The County could ask for changes based only on what services
are provided by contract with the County.
Mr. Kropp stated that these groups have their own governing boards and
operate their shelters that way. Commissioner Baney asked if the County no
longer contracted with the shelters, what the options would be other than the
County taking this on. Mr. Kropp said that the County would probably have to
provide more general funds for this purpose. Ms. Craghead stated that in most
counties where the shelter is run by the county, their budgets are usually the
first to be cut and they have to operate on a shoestring.
Citizen Jan Elrod, 65940 19 th S1., Bend, said that she knows the contracts are
being negotiated, and money is limited and needs to be used effectively. Even
with the fairly new shelters and rescue groups and spay/neuter efforts, there is
still a tremendous overpopulation of companion animals. The cats are left out
when there are funds for dogs. When she looks at animals in general, a humane
society needs to have an appreciation for all life forms and all they have done
for humanity.
The cycle of overpopulation and overcrowding continues and the shelters
euthanize healthy animals. Redmond is trying to be low-kill but the animals are
going to the other shelter instead where there is no room for them, either. She
feels that a place to start is for everyone to be open about the problem. There is
not enough communication with the public regarding this problem Some
people still feel that Bend has a no-kill shelter. They are under the illusion that
all animals find an appropriate home.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11,2012
Page 2 of8
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 3 of 8
Everyone’s resources are overwhelmed with abandoned cats and dogs. She
would like to see funding used more proactively to let the public know of the
significant problem, and reward shelter and rescue groups financially to be
proactive. This includes trapping, spay/neuter, and education about the
problem. Even when HSCO talks about adoptions on TV, no one ever says
there is a problem. There needs to be an aggressive campaign.
The cost to society financially and in many other ways is significant; and it is
more effective to intervene ahead of time. The County could use limited funds
to bring together the organizations and campaign to end this cycle. Everyone is
too complacent. They need to move away from having to kill animals. People
created it but all need to put their cards on the table and be forthcoming.
Ms. Elrod asked about cremations and whether the Bend shelter gets funding
for that. Commissioner Unger replied they get $1 a pound.
Ms. Elrod stated that this is not a p ositive way to use money. A more positive
way would be to use it for saving them rather than cremating them. She would
like to see that money moved in a different direction. Spay/neuter is the answer
and informing the public about the problem, and talk about responsibility as pet
owners. Everyone here has benefited from animals, through research, advances
in medicine, and companionship. People need to show their appreciation and
end this cycle of suffering. She knows it is a complicated issue.
Commissioner Unger said that they are trying to create the infrastructure as
required by law. The shelters need to do the services they provide. The County
tries to be supportive. Perhaps there needs to be a bigger discussion with the
other groups.
Ms. Elrod stated that the County can try to bring the groups together. It is not
always about huge amounts of money. Spay/neuter is not that expensive
compared to housing animals. They need to have a common goal and reward
that. Then there would be a lesser financial burden and a lower demand at
shelters. They need to be proactive, aggressive and honest, and in the end it
will cost less and this will be a better community.
Commissioner Baney said that a few weeks ago they discussed a coordinated
effort for education and awareness. She was given the blessing by the other
Commissioners to corral interested parties to see if this can be done with a more
unified voice. However, she has not had a chance to get the groups together.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 4 of 8
Chair DeBone added that it helps to discuss this today in a public meeting.
Nancy Sandstrom, citizen, of 18841 Tuscarora Lane, Bend, said she wanted to
talk about the same issues, but in particular funding to help the public spay and
neuter animals. Five vouchers are provided each month by shelters to help low -
income people have their pets spayed or neutered. This is not enough. Kittens
and puppies are being born constantly and continue to procreate. More help is
needed to get the public to nip this problem in the bud for a long -term solution.
Mr. Kropp said that the County does offer some spay/neuter grants for groups
who do this.
Ms. Craghead stated that there are provisions requiring education and annual
reporting. They are supposed to talk about these issues. There needs to be
more discussion around those provisions.
Erik: some s/n grants, given to groups that do this.
Laurie: provision requires education and annual reporting. Are supposed to talk
about these issues. More discussion around those provisions.
There was a discussion about the length of the contracts. Commissioner Baney
said that she wanted to see a six-month contract to give some time to get
together and work on change and a more coordinated outreach program.
BANEY: Move approval of the agreements, subject to amendment to six
month’s termination and to the insurance certificates.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
5. Before the Board were Deliberations and Consideration of First and
Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2012-
005, Amending the County Comprehensive Plan Transportation System
Plan, and Repealing Code Chapters 23.60 and 23.64.
Peter Russell explained that deliberations can happen today but the Board
would need to sign later when the documentation is completely compiled.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 5 of 8
There have been hearings on the TSP and they have worked out most of the
major issues; Mr. Russell detailed those at this time.
Commissioner Unger said this gives more certainty between ODOT and the
County. Mr. Russell stated that prior to design, ODOT will have a public
meeting in Tumalo regarding improvements to the highway there. There are
things that might be able to be done short of an interchange. There could be
interim improvements if the Board wants to work in that direction.
Commissioner Unger said he likes the general policy but does not want to get
boxed in to ideas that have not been completely vetted. He likes the original
language, recognizing the long-term but discussing interim ideas.
Commissioner Tammy likes the interim ideas and allows for more flexibility.
The only way to get improvements at this time is to use alternate improvements.
Chair DeBone said this is the County’s TSP but ODOT goes through the middle
of it. Mr. Russell stated that the 1998 TSP is the current operating document
and shows an interchange in Tumalo. The 2012 update includes options short
of an interchange. Before ODOT gets into design, there has to be a meeting
with the community to make sure it is acceptable. They would need County
approval to disconnect any county roads from the highway. At some point
things have to be firmed up. The issue is the raised median, which ODOT
insists upon, and most in the community do not like this.
Commissioner Unger understands that raised medians can be good or bad. The
conversation should stay open. There are a lot of ways to modify speed.
Commissioner Baney spoke about Deschutes Junction. Mr. Russell said that
there is a grant application with TGM for funding to do a study. They need to
define the study area. Boundaries need to be drawn at some point. ODOT’s
plan is ½ mile from the terminals. All of the language allows for these options.
Commissioner Unger asked about Redmond’s aspirations regarding
management of the east side. Mr. Russell stated that the City is working on a
rough draft of changes on 19th St. When they get an application that works,
they will come to the County to have 19th Street become a collector.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 6 of 8
Commissioner Baney said that it has been an impressive process with a lot of
public input. Commissioner Unger added that a State level, things are changing
and the County needs to be able to be responsive to this.
Ms. Craghead said that if there are changes, the Ordinance cannot be adopted
until those are incorporated. This could be addressed next week.
Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda.
UNGER: Move approval.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
Consent Agenda Items
6. Signature of Document No. 2012-450, a License to Use County-owned
Property
7. Chair Signature of Document No. 2012-439, an Amendment to an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Oregon regarding Public Health
Services
8. Chair Signature of Document No. 2012-438, an Amendment to an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Oregon regarding Financing of
Addiction and Mental Health Services
9. Approval of Minutes:
Board Meetings of June 27 and July 2, 2012
Work Sessions of June 25 and 27 and July 2, 2012
CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY
SERVICE DISTRICT
10. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts
Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District in the Amount of
$3,984.96.
BANEY: Move approval, subject to review.
UNGER: Second.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 7 of 8
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION AND 4-H
COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
11. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts
Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District in the
Amount of $4,353.73.
BANEY: Move approval, subject to review.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
RECONVENED AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
12. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts
Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County in the Amount of $1,541,985.77.
BANEY: Move approval, subject to review.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
13. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Commissioner Baney recognized student Tammy Lucy who is taking a
government class at COCC through instructor Judy Steigler. They are running
a forum between candidates Tom Greene and Alan Unger later this month.
Commissioner Unger noted that there is a lot of information available on the
County website and links.
Being no further items addressed, the meeting adjourned at 10:45.
2012 for the DATED this 2f:!!;. Dayof ~
Deschutes County Board of Commissioner:
Anthony DeBone, Chair
Alan Unger, Vice Chair
ATTEST: Tamm~Sioner ~~
Recording Secretary
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, July 11,2012
Page 80f8
-------------------------------------------
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Agenda Item of Interest ;;;:l;1£ lUd, {; 0 i {0n fmc -I Date ? -/ / -/2..! ,tV ,'+/u y¥um£tlu 5'C'CI,<",ty
Name \Lanl(6 EIrr:J£
Address lo l/iLI [J If-I'h 5-1'--~~/~~'~--~----~~------------------------
:li..--e!2d, t2r, 17 ZtJI
,-----'
Phone#s _____Q~~_~~)-/--~3~'J~d~'-,-~-~--9--6------------------------__
E-mail address
D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided Iy I Opposed ct +--f h us t-I r??e
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes DNo
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
. Agenda Item of Interest he.lf c; f ,'z. e./l ~ w;fit tv tJ u,c.h el':;Date 1-//-/L
, S~ "e/fd f.j;0.& 0/. }..J e vfe..£(lor::;>1"l'c t:< n ('.-f1 tt /5
Name IsjCf..-,-V~ (L/1 c(. ~ T' crJt1A
Address r a7t if I Iu 5c" co rCA: LJ,.
jj~'\rJ
Phone #s __---l:.:S!-·V:-I-'1-[---.:~:!:...cr...!.-...:7_-_2-_I_7f_=_I___________
E-mail address QQBCf!j S Q.J\d s tv~c2 f' Nt" fl· ~
In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? DYes C8r No
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org
BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, JULY 11,2012
Commissioners' Hearing Room -Administration Building -1300 NW Wall St., Bend
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN INPUT
This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's
discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up
card (provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and
clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak.
PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject ofa public
hearing will NOT be included in the official record ofthat hearing.
3. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Resolution No. 2012-085, Declaring an
Exemption from Competitive Bidding Requirements for Animal Shelter
Services with the Humane Society of Central Oregon and the Humane Society
of Redmond -Laurie Craghead, County Counsel
Suggested Action: Move Signature 0/Resolution No. 2012-085.
4. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Documents No. 2012-412 and No. 2012
413, Contracts for the Provision of Animal Shelter Services to be Provided by
the Humane Society of Central Oregon and the Humane Society of Redmond
Laurie Craghead, County Counsel
Suggested Action: Move Signature o/Documents No. 2012-412 and 2012-413.
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, July 11,2012
Page 1 of6
5. DELIBERATIONS and Consideration of First and Second Readings and
Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2012-005, Amending the County
Comprehensive Plan Transportation System Plan, and Repealing Code Chapters
23.60 and 23.64 -Peter Russell, Community Development
Suggestion Actions: Deliberate; move first and second readings by title only;
adopt by emergency.
CONSENT AGENDA
6. Signature of Document No. 2012-450, a License to Use County-owned
Property
7. Chair Signature of Document No. 2012-439, an Amendment to an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Oregon regarding Public Health
Services
8. Chair Signature of Document No. 2012-438, an Amendment to an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Oregon regarding Financing of
Addiction and Mental Health Services
9. Approval of Minutes:
• Board Meetings of June 27 and July 2, 2012
• Work Sessions of June 25 and 27 and July 2, 2012
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY
SERVICE DISTRICT
10. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for
the 9-1-1 County Service District
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION AND 4-H
COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
11. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for
the Extensionl4-H County Service District
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, July 11,2012
Page 2 of6
RECONVENE AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
12. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for
Deschutes County
13. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues
relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS
192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items.
FUTURE MEETINGS:
(Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of
Commissioners' meeting rooms at J300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. Ifyou have questions
regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.)
Monday, July 9
5:30 p.m. Project Wildfire -FireFree Celebration & Awards Banquet at Sunriver Aquatic Center
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 3 of6
Wednesday, July 11
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Thursday, July 12
4:00p.m. Open House/Joe Stutler Retirement Gathering -Road Department
Monday, July 16
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Thursday, July 17
8:00 a.m. Regular Joint Meeting with City of Sisters Council, in Sisters
Thursday, July 19
7:30 a.m. City Forecast Breakfast -Chamber of Commerce -Bend Country Club
Friday, July 20
7:30 a.m. La Pine Chamber Town Hall & Breakfast -La Pine High School
Monday, July 23
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, July 25
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
5:30p.m. Regular Dinner Meeting with the Judges -Boston's
Monday, July 30
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 4 of6
Wednesday, August 1
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Monday, August 6
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting
Wednesday, August 8
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Thursday, August 9
8:30 a.m. Business Tour -Sisters
Wednesday, August 15
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Monday, August 20
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, August 22
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s)
Monday, August 27
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, July 11,2012
Page 5 of6
Wednesday, August 29
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Monday, September 3
Most County offices will be closed to observe the Labor Day holiday
Wednesday, September 5
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-\-\ to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (54\) 388-657\ regarding alternative formats or for further information.
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Page 6 of6
Bonnie Baker
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
sandy@dogstarsports.com
Tuesday, July 10, 20128:00 AM
Board
HSCO and Redmond HS Contracts up for Renewal
Importance: High
To the Deschutes Commissioners
This letter is regarding contracts scheduled for consideration this Wednesday, July 11, 10 AM.
1. Please address is what happens to owner-surrendered animals. They, too, should benefit from the five-day hold period like a stray.
This would allow for an owner to reclaim the pet if they have second thoughts or find a home for it, or would allow at least a few days for an adoption instead of
being put down.
2. Also, please allow for a professional evaluation of behavior of animals dogs and cats in question.
3. Most importantly, please include language that the shelter be required to contact any and all other local or regional animal groups and ask them to take the
animal before it is euthanized. Many shelters now have this in their contract and some animal groups have formed with just this in mind.
Sincerely,
Sandy Schneider
1
Bonnie Baker
From: Pat M <pickwick@bendcable.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:40 AM
To: Board
Subject: Fw: HSCO and Redmond HS Contracts up for Renewal
Importance: High
Greetings Deschutes County Commissioners
Please consider the below items on your renewal of contracts. They require a bit more effort but that is what our shelters are in place to do: put
forth a best effort on behalf of our local pets AND their owners.
Thank you,
Pat McGuinness
From: sandy@dogstarsports.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:00 AM
To: board@deschutes.org
Subject: HSCO and Redmond HS Contracts up for Renewal
To the Deschutes Commissioners
This letter is regarding contracts scheduled
for consideration this Wednesday, July 11, 10 AM.
1. Please address is what happens to owner-surrendered
animals. They, too, should benefit from the five-day hold period like a
stray.
This would allow for an owner to reclaim the pet if they have second
thoughts or find a home for it, or would allow at least a few days for an
adoption instead of being put down.
2. Also, please allow for a professional evaluation of behavior of
1
¢ PNnG &%4£
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
animals dogs and cats in question.
3. Most importantly, please include language that the shelter be
required to contact any and all other local or regional animal groups and
ask them to take the animal before it is euthanized. Many shelters now have
this in their contract and some animal groups have formed with just this
in mind.
Sincerely,
Sandy Schneider
Email scanned by PC Tools -No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.26, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.20110)
http://www.pctools.com/
Email scanned by PC Tools -No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.26, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.20110)
http://www.pctools.com
2
Bonnie Baker
From: Gail Jett <gjett@bendobgyn.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10. 2012 10:02 AM
To: Board
Subject: Shelter contracts, etc
Dear Commissioners Baney, DeBone, and Unger:
It is my understanding that you will be addressing shelter contract renewals tomorrow. I would appreciate your attention to the following concerns in
this regard.
1. Owner surrendered animals need the benefit of a five day hold just as the strays do. Often, the owners may either find a home for the animal at the
last minute (see the numerous posts on craigslist, etc) or have second thoughts. It is neither sound practice nor good public relations for owner
surrendered animals to be euthanized within hours of their arrival. I would remind you of the article in the Source "licensed to Kill" a few years
ago; I believe it is important not to revisit that practice.
2. Professional behavioral evaluation, not just staff observation, must be allowed for strays with questionable behavior. A frightened, stressed cat or
dog in a crate or cage may understandably hiss, snarl, bite, etc. Tincture of time and a professional evaluation means the difference between life and
death for an animal who is often a frightened pet.
3. Please have the contracts included language that the shelters be required to contact any and all local or regional animal rescue groups. Progressive
shelters in other locations not only have this language in their contracts but have also partnered successfully with animal rescue groups.
I understand that you have much that needs to be addressed but I would really appreciate these items be considered in the contractual discussion and
negotiations. Thank you for your time.
Gail JlZtt. NP
BendOB/CYN
Important Notice: This communication, including any attachment, contains information that may be confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for the entity or individual to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message is
strictly prohibited. Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and
is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or
otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank
you in advance for your cooperation.
1
____~~..-....'...'.'-.-..,..'....--r""':"_.,.._____________________________________........________
Bonnie Baker
From: Arlene Spencer <arlene,spencer@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 201211:50AM
To: Board
Subject: Humane Society of Central OR and Redmond Humane Society Contracts up for Renewal
HSCO and Redmond HS Contracts up for Renewal
Dear Deschutes Commissioners:
In regards to the HSCO and Redmond HS contracts scheduled for consideration this Wednesday, July 11, lOAM please seriously consider the
following:
With the economy as it is, owner-surrendered animals are dropped at these shelters more frequently now than ever. They, too, should benefit from
the five-day hold period like a stray. This would allow for an owner to reclaim the pet if they have second thoughts or find a home for it, or would
allow at least a few days for an
adoption instead of being put down. The less animals put down but rather put into new loving homes is at the crux of the missions of both of these
organizations.
In line with the frequent number of abandoned or even neglected animals, right now, because of the economy, most importantly, please include
language that the shelter be required to contact any and all other local or regional animal groups and ask them to take the animal before it is
euthanized. Many shelters now have
this in their contract and some animal groups have formed with just this in mind. As stated, above, this too is in line with each organization's
mission.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns and requests, herein. Thank you, too, for your service to our community.
Best,
Arlene Spencer
2966 NW Wild Meadow Drive
Bend, Oregon 97701
1
____~~~~~~--~~~~'""~~~~~· ~~·~~~~~MMhW*M____~ ~.. .. __m.__MM~____MM________MN~__nMM*______" ____________________________·__ .. ~~~~~
Bonnie Baker
From: nscott782S@q.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 20124:03 PM
To: Bonnie Baker; Lynch, Gregory; Macdonald, Tom; McKie, Tamara
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Pets Here (Central Oregon)
Think you'll find this interesting!
From: nscott7825@q.com
To: nscott7825@q.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10,20123:49:29 PM
Subject: The Future of Pets Here (Central Oregon)
nscott7825@q.com has forwarded you this craigslist.org posting.
Please see below for more infonnation.
Visit the posting at http://bend.craigslist.org/petl3131 083 704.html to contact the person who posted this.
The Future of Pets Here
Date: 2012-07-10, 2:06PM
Tomorrow, Wed., July 11, lOAM, the County Commissioners will be reviewing and possibly approving new contracts with the two local humane
society shelters. The contracts are available to view on the County website, www.deschutes.org, go to the Board of Commissioners' webpage and
meeting schedule, then go down to the documents.
Many people are concerned about the failure of these contracts to address some very important aspects that affect the animals of this area:
First, there should be a strong emphasis on providing affordable spay/neuter services to all companion animals regardless of ownership, the owners'
finances, stray, feral, etc. Otherwise there will always be too many animals, and half of the ones going to the shelters end up being euthanized due to
a lack of homes. Spay/neuter is the ONLY reallong-tenn answer.
There is an up-front cost of course, but long tenn the benefits are great, both financially and the community can be proud of the change. Also,
foundations such as Maddie's Fund provide huge amounts of grant funds to animal agencies all over the country, but all the groups have to be
working towards a no-kill status to be eligible.
1
Also, at this time, most stray animals are allowed five days for someone to reclaim them before they can be put down. The same is not true of pets
that are surrendered. They can be put down immediately. This does not allow any time for the owner to change hislher mind, or maybe to find an
adopter, or for the animal to get maybe a couple of days of exposure as an adoptable animal.
All animals should be professionally evaluated for behavior issues. The shelters now leave it up to the owner who is dumping the animal, and if for
instance the owner says the animal bit someone (maybe using this as an excuse to get rid of it), that animal is as good as dead even if it is not true.
Also, shelters in some areas are required to contact all regional rescue groups and other agencies before putting down an animal to find out if they
will take it instead. Sounds humane, doesn't it? Of course, this means the shelters have to be honest with the public, and they don't want to jeopardize
their donor base by admitting that a lot of animals go in the doors but never come out again.
If you think the shelters here should work towards no-kill, which means not turning away animals at the door to an uncertain future, or euthanizing
animals because of a lack of space, being too old (5+ years), too scared, black, 'wrong' breed, etc., they will need to be forced in that direction. It has
been done in many places and there are groups that will provide guidance if needed.
The Commissioners should hear from you if you feel change is needed. YOUR tax dollars are funding the shelters. The Commissioners can be
reached bye-mail at board@deschutes.org, or via fax at 541-385-3202.
If you care about the welfare and future of thousands of companion animals in this area, please do not flag this but learn more about it and help make
change happen. Of course, if you are not able to comment by tomorrow, still submit your thoughts because this is probably an issue that is not going
to go away.
• Location: Central Oregon
• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
Original URL: http://bend.craigslist.org/petl3131083704.html
this craigslist posting was forwarded to you by someone using our email-a-friendftature -ifyou want to prevent these, please go to:
http://www.craigslist.org/cgi-binlteIU2FsdGVkXI8yMzE I OTIzMePnKf61 2wCemQ-bUT2sdPguafjoqQ20SnkIGDN214-SSI tEumktF c
2
l~_"."~""""" ,ii,4 48 .!tki.....,.,.il*\; ,,,Gq ;,,-_$itA iJAIG PiE;;" 4!M ;19 Pi. JIJ_iQtk.Ug
Bonnie Baker
From: sandykalister@bendbroadband.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 20124:58 PM
To: Board
Subject: HSCO and HSR Contract Renewal
To: County Commissioners Baney, Unger and Debone,
Subject: Animal Shelter Contract Renewal
Dear Commissioners,
It is my hope that during tomorrow's meeting, the problem of cat overpopulation is addressed. Having volunteered for both HSCO and HSR, I feel that not
enough is being done to provide affordable and/or no-cost spay and neuter of cats, to the public. What both shelters currently offer is extremely limiting and
based on numbers in Deschutes County, the problem is getting worse (too many cats, not enough homes). When each shelter is "out of space", HSCO
euthanizes what they consider to be less-adoptable while HSR simply stops accepting them, both owner-release and strays. In my view, neither are acceptable
solutions and in the end, the animals suffer the consequences.
Although there are many things each shelter could be doing to help increase adoptions, especially of adult cats, , feel that both shelters need to begin with
aggressive and less-restrictive spay/neuter programs, available to the public. Whether surgeries are performed by in-house shelter vets or a partnership with
BSNP or other local veterinarians, no cat should be turned away from sterilization, for any reason.
Currently, the county does not have a contract or compensate CRAFT (Cat Rescue Adoption and Foster Team) for housing, sheltering and general care and
adoptions of cats, even though they handle the highest over-all volume throughout Deschutes County. CRAFT provides much more in the way of outreach to cat
owners and 'colony caregivers', donating cat food, veterinary help, and spay and neuter for those that can't afford it or need help with transport. They are the
only pro-active, no-kill group with volunteers 'in the field' trapping stray and feral cats, especially TNR (trap, neuter, return). To me it only seems fair that CRAFT
also be included, have a contract and compensated monetarily by the county.
Thank you for your consideration,
Sandy Kalister
1
--,,,,,,,,.~,-,,,-,,,,,,,,,,___~~,,,,,, .. .lfilli kM • /ii,4i\,., ; 1,\ H $;4 v(flf!4\ til" t, ,*,+!I!".iiS!(·.(AitW II PM $&=