Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-08-20 Business Meeting Minutes Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 1 of 5 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2012 _____________________________ Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend __________________________ Commissioner Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger; Commissioner Tammy Baney was out of the office. Also present were Chris Doty, Road Department; Peter Gutowsky, Community Development; County Counsel Laurie Craghead by conference call; and eight other citizens. Chair DeBone opened the meeting at 10:01 a.m. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT Citizen William Kuhn provided a letter from Patricia Gainsforth, a Realtor and friend. He has had issues with his neighbors for twenty-three years relating to deed restrictions; and the restrictions for another development created about the same time. The difference has been enforcement. (He provided copies for the record.) He has attempted numerous times to get the neighbors to comply with what he believes is required. He criticized former Commissioner Luke and County Counsel Laurie Craghead for what he considers them giving inaccurate and false statements. He is now filing a Code violation against the Dowell’s relating to the septic field location. He feels this field goes onto the jointly owned property. He will drop this if they sign an agreement before the end of October. He objected strongly to Ms. Craghead representing the County on any of the issues surrounding this situation. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 2 of 5 3. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Resolution No. 2012- 103, Establishing the Required Elections of National Forest Related Safety Net Payments per Secure Rural Schools and Reauthorization for Federal Fiscal Year 2012. Chris Doty gave an overview of the item, and advised that there will be one more Safety Net payment made this coming year. He explained the allocations and where they must be utilized. The Resolution sets the amounts of the allocations, with 15% of Title II and II combined and 7% for Title III, as has been followed in the past. The federal fiscal year starts in September. UNGER: Move signature. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. 4. Before the Board was Consideration of Second Reading by Title Only, and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2012-005, Amending the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Systems Plan, and Repealing Code Chapters 23.60 and 23.64. Peter Gutowsky came before the Board to answer questions, if any. UNGER: Move second reading by title only. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Chair DeBone conducted the second reading. UNGER: Move adoption of Ordinance No. 2012-005. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. 5. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2012- 011, Repealing Ordinance No. 2010-008 regarding the La Pine Urban Growth Boundary. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 3 of 5 Since this is a legislative issue, Mr. Gutowsky read the opening statement prior to the hearing being opened. In regard to conflicts of interest, the Commissioners claimed none, and no challenges were offered. Mr. Gutowsky entered the case file into the record, and said that there are several people in the audience interested in this issue. He then gave an overview of the Ordinances and the work that has been done the past few years. The City of La Pine has worked well with the LCDC and made a lot of progress. The new Ordinance recognizes an urban growth boundary as proposed in 2010, and provides updates to the urbanization portion of the County Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner DeBone clarified that this is the justification of original boundaries. Mr. Gutowsky said some clarification was needed to make the proper updates, and this justification has been completed. The work done by the City is being referenced in the Ordinances. At this time, Laurie Craghead called in via conference call. Chair DeBone opened the hearing for both Ordinances at this time, and included the testimony of staff into the hearings. Debra McMahon, representing La Pine, and Karen Swirsky of the DLCD explained that this is basically the same as 2010, but the change came about when LCDC got the information and wanted to know why the urban growth boundary was set where it was. The history and desires of the community were discussed. The variety of tasks included the UGB, either to shrink it or apply for exceptions. They chose to go for the exceptions. They believe with the goal exception and historical patterns, and the importance of the relationship of the UUC and UGB, it would work. They look towards complete communities and continuity. They created three neighborhoods within the City of La Pine. The other tasks were to add to Goals 5 and 7, and policies to the urbanization and transportation chapters. The TSP process is underway and should be done within 15 months. The result was that all were completed, DLCD reviewed and it was acceptable. Chair DeBone said he has watched this go on over time and it has been a great process. Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 4 of 5 Ms. Swirsky said that every new city has its own set of unique circumstances. They had to initiate a process to handle this. She feels it has been successful. They will plan to take the package to DLCD in September and she is optimistic about the result. Commissioner Unger said that an urban growth boundary historically represents the twenty-year plan. There should be capital improvement lists to determine how to fund those. He asked how the City will control the project list an d how the SDC’s will fund those projects. Ms. McMahon said the City absorbed operations of the water and sewer treatment systems. The difference between the UUC and UGB line has to do with housing. (She referred to an oversized map of the area.) Chair DeBone asked if two Commissioners could read and adopt by emergency, and Erik Kropp said he believed they could. Mayor Ken Mulenex said they put a great deal of work and effort into this project. It is a long process and they were able to show how the area connects the community. They see a lot of promise and growth within the boundaries. The newly attained BLM land is exactly what they required so they can speak to what the community needs in the future. They are hopeful that LCDC will see this as a good plan that speaks to State requirements. City Manager Steve Hasson said that this was a real challenge, following a rural settlement pattern that has gone on for 100 years. There was no comprehension of having a community until recent years. The challenge for the City was to make sure it has appropriate boundaries. The sewer and water programs are now handled by the City. They now have a basis to pull the city all together. UNGER: Move first and second readings by title only of Ordinance No. 2012-011. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Chair DeBone did the first and second readings of Ordinance No. 2012-011. UNGER: Move adoption of Ordinance No. 2012-011. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. 6. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2012­ 012, Establishing the City of La Pine Urban Growth Boundary. UNGER: Move first and second readings by title only of Ordinance No. 2012-012. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. Chair DeBone did the first and second readings o/Ordinance No. 2012-012. UNGER: Move adoption of Ordinance No. 2012-012. DEBONE: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. DEBONE: Chair votes yes. 7. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA None were offered, so the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m. DATED this J10 Day of A A CA1LJr____2012 for the Deschutes County Board of Commis:~~ Anthony DeBone, Chair ..........:::: Alan Unger, Vice Chair ATTEST: Tammy Baney, Commissioner ~~ Recording Secretary Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 5 of5 ---------------- -------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item OfInterest ____ I _________ Date 2C)I2,0 8 "1.6 0\ Address Phone#s E-mail address o In Favor D NeutraVUndecided D Opposed Submitting written documents as part of testimony? roY es D No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest -....c...-.-t:;..J...-+--....a...:;..~:-------Date ____ Name L­ Ad&ess ____________________4*~-------------------- Phone#s ------~------------------------------------ E·mail address J LA:S 65 &~dAttO ! C c;rrYJ JR:: In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed .' ,/Submitting written documents as part oftestimony? ~Yes 0 No ~r BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK r Agenda Item of Interest jaB he, VC1 i5 Date .f"/t.o/~2­ Narne£a I't! Ir ~wlrfler j"""" /1 C I)Ad&ess l:d L-•. J/ Phone #s ~/I 371: b 1 ) 7 E-mail ad&ess...!-~--:....Cf_t:_e_!t....;..1_.......:...;J:::..<_1.t_1./_F__ B .S_~_j_(._.lc:_f.~__d_J_/,__ /->_.~t......:%;;r...._____ .. t_:'1'_"___ o In Favor o NeutrallUndecided D Opposed / . Submitting written documents as part oftestimony? 0 Yes ~.No I August 10, 2012 To the Board of County Commissioners Deschutes County Service Center 1300 NW Wall Street, 2nd Floor Bend, Oregon 97701 Dear Deschutes County Commission, William and Leigh Kuhn have asked me for my observations on how the county has dealt with the Kuhn's property situation over time from my perspective as a real estate agent and friend. I'm quite familiar with the property they bought in 1987, both before they purchased and afterword. I've hiked and ridden my horse over that entire area since 1970. I know what the original intent was for that land. I was a member of the original group discussing what became the Tumalo Winter Deer Range study area. The Bartons (John Barton sold William and Leigh their parcel) had a vision and worked with ODF&W to reduce the human impact on the wildlife habitat. The Kuhns were aware of this history when they purchased. They honored both the letter and the intent of the Winter Deer Range in all stages of their building and land use process. The difficulties began when Jeff and Pat Dowell purchased into the cluster. I sat through and spoke at several hearings and witnessed the contortions the county made on behalf of the Dowells. What the Kuhns have gone through to preserve and protect their deed restrictions, the county ordinances, the state statutes in Senate Bill 100, and the wildlife use of their land, was demeaning, unbalanced, and overreach ing. The cost to the Kuhns in real dollars, their time, their health and well­ being has been unconscionable. The issue for the county to address is that the enforceability of building lines on plat maps appears to be jeopardized by the ruling of the Board of County Commissioners reversal of the decision of a Hearings Officer's ruling (A-07-9 and A-09-4) on the Dowell building line. The County's decisions appear to be punishing the Kuhns, unreasonable, slanted, and dishonoring of the intent for wildlife corridor preservation. Sincerely, Patricia Gainsforth cc: William & Leigh Kuhn Feb.uary 8, We the underalSned independent ind1vldua~s are ill ai9'eem.ent and do endorse the follow1-ns thoUgh ts co~ernine land preele #~4. iLL, ~ 9, UL7 (loca~ed on the east bou~dary of the Tumalo W~nter-Deer Ra~e), whLch we acqu~ed from the county at the land auction held Febuary 6. 1976 at. the Cour.ty Court House: We shall respec..t as. para.moullt t.he inten.tion for \1h1c.h the \"J1.n.t.er Ra.l1t5e Area. wa.s dasi-t:',ned. and th.e r1gb.ts of the -a.ni.m.ala. there.i.n to re.rna1n u:o.d1sturbed.. f.pec..ti'·l.c a.lly J A.) t.he t'ur.ther acquisition ot. dogs or &1m11a.r i='ets 'by aD3 one ot us wilL not tue place, and tr.oee Wl".1.c.h. are ,presently househo~ pets and. are likely to he introduced on to one or wore o~ the parcels afore­ mentioned will be restra1ned from harass1ng the wild- 1.1f'e 1n the area. 1n a.ny way. We a.re seriously and conscientiously concerned about the welfare of the w1ldl1fe's sanctuary In Jeopardy, and this policy of dog control ~s an example of aelr-~osed re8tr~ct1.ons and personal responsib1lity we are wil11Itt:, to a.ssume. B.) at no t_1.m.B w1.l~ any of' us use tlof'f-tbe-roadl1 or I1recrea:tl.onal vehicles!! such as motl)rcyc~es, :four­ whee~ drives. or snowmobiles in this area.. we shaJ.l abso~utly respect tbe Winter Range road closures. C.) we feel we are located stratislcally in order too 1..n.sur.e the sanctuary of the wUdlUe in th.e Tumalo Deer Range from. barasament by those who disregard 1ts road c~osurss. and. bounda.r1.ea by trespassing 1n vehicles. Oft-en as not, "'hen vi.s1.bn.g one or more of the parcelaln quation we have observed in person blatant trespa-ss1ns on to the Winter Range. It 1s obvious to anyone v.1.shi:n.e; to 1:1a.ze dO"rfl1. the network of back r-oads in. the area that there 1a little chance they wUl be apprehended for breaking the law in this respect due to the dif1"1.cul ty of off1e.i.e.1 polic1ng of the vast Winter Ra.nGe. But, with our presence a great deal of this abuse will be observed and effectively reported: hopefully curtailing this sort of thing. Thus, our presence at the boundary o~ the winter Range might in tact £urtl'ler the welfare ot the \'lild1ife and the purpose of the winter sanct.uary and a.1d the efforts of both government and private conservat1onists. Perhaps we also could a.id in ans monlto.rj,.llg of the ~- 11!e in terms ot numbers, etc., by keep~ caref~ • We ,seek without reserva~1on the advice and council of ecolo61sts and cooserv~tion1st concerning the welfare of the a.nimals on the Tumalo \11nter Ranee and the bearinG our presence might have on them. It 1s ~os8ible, we feel, to so order ooes h.:a.bi td.t in such a. iilann.er that 1 t will harmonize, not further Jeopardize or intensify the 'yresl:ure on the wild­ life in oree;on. ' \1e ha.ve a.bsolutel! no intent10n of tI sub,-dl vld111R:," these varcels. We are, s .Parcel David J. Seelye Greg St:eckler 5h'Jl"on 5t ee1:1 er 1948 N.W. West H1ll Bend, Ore. 97701 .farcel #11 ~.g Cti.7 " -e'" ~ ,-,,,~~ ~d1;t, .iarcel 119 'Ji:: I e. tJ~tiM John E. Barton star Route, Box 41 Cloverdale. Ore. ~71l3 Parcel #17 ?i"J~(J:-15~wt~/lando /./ &?ut-1)I0 Thompson J. BaJ.":t.on Nanette I. Ba.rton IItfS' C. £/In btr /C(fW/ &n~tJrG 91-rol G,9S() Oak.. t!.~tlrk. Or CarV&1//i S> Pt"l... . J.e, Box 623 Cam~ fherman, Ore. 97730 Pa.rcel #18 • SEE MAP II 4 s P€8 )Q7(P .'DescUUTt'S Coo~Tl AlA.c:bOY1eJ 0 F F nJ£s € F<Ht K ~L.)'~ 1400 1400 SEE MAP 16 ~ I .741 I ---\ 4 I ,/I / SEE 21 (),tI..w.J (>.I<C.("'<: t.-'rlI y1J~' SEE MAP 28 .' ·........ ' 6 6 OFFICIAL RECORD OF OESCII.I1'TIOHS OF 2­P -12 REAL PROPERTY Sec. 6 86.40 7 46S.69 8 80.00 16 160.00 17 600.00 18 628.66 19 667.28 20 440.00 29 40.00 30 240.00 44 47 50 54 122 Less T.L. 1401 80.00 ac Less T.L. 1402 46.83 ac Less T.L. 1403 40.00 ac Less T.L. 1404 66.64 ac 7/5/61 Leaa T.1. 1405 40.0 ac 1l~17 ,ac Less 'P.!: dediuaud -f<,rr;:; rd. ~~:~i?~. Deed t, 2-27-76 228 tess T.L. 1'413 -..:. c.: ,.'Z..(,3~. 0 ac -. Co:nt.:-" 3':'1i-76 228 Cess,T.L. 1414 :J~~ ,~' ;:,1+0.1'2 s,c. .Cont. '3-11-76 228 tess T. L. 1415'..:; ,7 '/. '::',...."" 'li.5 ......0 ~c 'Cont. 3-11-76 228 66 203 -3126.~9 • ,:>(, • • r f Less T.L. 1416 :' ;'.. ~~'. t: 39~ 36 ac Cont. "3-11-76 2~8 Less T.L. 1417 39.0 ac ,Con,t. 3-11-76 W·~~_. ...... ,....,... ~____._~, 192 3411.03 3331.03 3284.20 3244.20 3177.56 245 ;'U9.20 7 42 30~8. 39:: 196·3047.~1 802 ' 3002,·61 ~ "'f,-~. ,: ~ 808,'2963.31 814 2924.31 VOL 336PAGE 332 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Gregory L. Steekler and Sharon M. Steckler, hereinafter refered to as declarants. To the Public, Declaration of Restrictions on the following described real .·.property: as described in exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein . .'.I'heRestrictions and Covenants hereinafter set out are to . run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the >,:h~.nefi t of all parties and all persons owning any portion of ,:.tlie,above described real property. lfthe owners of such real property or any of them, or their "he'irs, successors or assigns, shall violate any of the coven­ "., , . 'ants hereinafter set out, it shall be lawful for any other ...•'. party owning property situate within the above described real estate to prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against the person or persons violating any of such covenants, and ,.':, . either to prevent him from so doing or to recover damages for such violation, or both. Invalidation of any of any of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other provisions, which shall remain in full force and affect. 7:';' These Restrictions and Covenants are created simultaneously with the transfer of a portion of the real property described above to Robert H. Turner who has notice of the existence thereof. The following Covenants and Restrictions are hereby DeSCHUTES COUNTY TITLE CO. P. O. BOX 323 Rfl'-IO, OiueON 97701 VOL 336PAGE 333 made relating to the use of the burdened land: See exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this refernece incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Gregory L. Steckler and Sharon M. Steckler -do hereby execute these presents this !(Jti daYOf~' 1981 . G Sharon M. Steckler " EXHIBIT "B", 'YOl336fAGf 335 .~ ! . R!STRICTIONS ON lAND USE TO BE A PART OF lAND SALE CONTRACT . , _':,' *f « M ,., ,,~ 1. Owners of family members ma.y not acquire additional dogs other than ~e dog(s) they _y own when they purchase the property. All dogs :must be '. kept in such a way that they do not run loose in the area. '.' ~.f: '..~ . . .: :: ' :r}. 2. , Owners or guests 'may not operate '"dirt. bikes" on ·the property. 3. .All telephone and electric lines installed existing utiH:ty poles shall be underground. j ..I'. l:.~· . ~ 4;. All fencing shall be of wood. Potesta rray be of wood or stone. No l:arbed wire or straight wire my be used for fencing. 5. OWllers or guests ma.y not take "target practicet with rifle or handgun• on p:roperty. 6 .. This contract carries with it the strongest enoovrageJllent to demonstrate .' )i; sensl.t.ivity to living wi thin the boundarys of the Tuma.10 Winter Deer Range t arid urges the owners to adjust their life style accordingly. Gregory L. and Sharon M. Steckler 16 -11 - 7 Tax lot # 1415 .' VOL 33BpAGE 334EXHIBIT "A" That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter lying East of the County Road right-of-way and the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter both inSect ion 7. Townshi p 16 South, Range 11 East of the Wi 11 amette Meridian! Deschutes County, Oregon. Reserving a 60 foot road right-of­ way to the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 16 Souty, Range 11 East of the Willamette Meridian, Deschutes County, Oregon. --------- VOL 336PAGf 336 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Marion ) __....;F;...;e;;.;;b~r.;;;.;ua;;;.:.r""'y.....;.;lO~__, 19 81 ) ) ) ) ) ss. ARY PUBLIC for Oregon Commission Expires August 23, 1983 _____F_e_br_u_a_r~y_1_0______, 19 81 OTARY PUBLIC for Oregon My Commission Expires August 23, 1983 SSe ____________________, 19____County of ) Personally appeared the above named and acknowledged the foregoing to be hi~7her voluntary act and ·deed. NOTARY PUBLIC for Oregon My Co~ission Expires STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of ------) --------------------, 19 Personally appeared the above named and acknowledged the foregoing to be his/her voluntary act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC for Oregon My Commission Expires i9S:10 1qS ... 179Z. -. ftf8 -.'1'Z B'7-i4178 ~ . ~,,{;> lAND USE RESTRICTIOHS ~~~ ~ JOHN E. BARTON ~~URCHE~n9 the owner's of property more p~rticularly descrjbe~ in Exhibit A attached hereto. hereby declare said property to be subject to the following Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions. 2. Owners or family IDeIIlbets lIIay not acquire additional dogs ot!'1er than the dog(s) they .al own wnen they purchase tne property. All dog$ I!lJst be kept in such a way that they do not run loose In the area. Dogs ~llowed to -tun" will disrupt deer habitat. Z. Owners or family members m!y not operate ~dtrt b1kes-on tne property. 3. All telephone and electric Ilnes must be underground. 4. AI' fencing must be wood. Top rail may not be higher than 42ft; bottom ral I may not be lower than 18". rio barbed wire or straight ~Ire may be used for fencing. 5. Owners or fclnlUy IlIeIlIbers lIay not take "target-practice with rifle or hand gun on property. 6. Thi~ contract carries with it the $l,~ngest encouragement to demon!ltrate sensitivity to living within the boundaries of the Tamalo Winter Deer Range. and ~rges the owners to adjust their life style accordingly. Dated this .;r:;';oayof 9l.¥1987. '~5~&~~JrT:mBarton STATE OF OREGO~I, COUNTY"OF DESCHUTES )ss. the foregOing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~O day .' ~ '~~.~,~' 1981 by JOHtl E. BARTOI~. ..,.. • . 'i\\ 0 1'1 ). ", _, - : • • .. : _ I · '\p U C L \ (.': .. ""'./~...............:... ' ,. SJoAT-t Of OREGON, COUNTY OF DESCHUTES )ss. The foregolntl ins~rlJment :.tas ackno\~Jedged before me this .,:If. ddy or" " l. . 19B7 by HAi!K DUJ<C~'f.TT. -­ \, ...". " /.' ......"f.. ... " t,,:.\\:): . I ,_, :: : .. , • "." I) D L \ - : 't.' ::./......~...<.. . . f"I, . ./ ... / Tt(:::-r:!/;.,:.:'-'U;:::::;,;i-rs't:+.-Til~'-tE~-:::-,....,...- : . :: ~ I .- I I (I J 11q3 n t1'"5 &XlIlBlT A ~varc-,l of lal\d located 1n the Northeast Quarter (Nt I,,. ) of Section Nineteen ( J(l9), TCf.lNSlllP SI'XTEEN (16) SOUTH, RANG! El.EVEN (11), EAST OF THE 'WlI.LAHEUt: \ MtRlDlAN, Deschutes County. Oregon, which 1a descdbe" .. follows: . CO~l\cLI\B lit the N()'Ctbelllt corner of lIaid Section 19; thence So,,!:h 53"26'03" Y~st )29.52 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINC; thence on I 153.80 foot radius. cur.. e righ.t 77.43 feet_ the loni choreS of wh1ch bean Sout~ 29-07':)0" Veat '6.62 feet: thence South 43-33 '17'" lIelt 117.24 feet; thence on a 194.18 foot 'radluB curve rlght l70.S4 feet. the long ~bord of which beara South 6S·42'SS" liest 16).11 feet; thence Korth 86-01'21" Wcat 68.83 feet; thenct' 011 a 138.02 fOQt radiuB curve left 225.84 feet, the long chord of vh1eh beara south 46-59'511" West 201.48 feet. thence South 00·07'23" Vest 58.72 feet: thence North 89·ll'~7" \leat 325.26 Ceet; thenco North 00-48'U" £..pst 210.11 fcet; thence North 61-42'30" tast 411.30 feet; thence South 89-11'47" £ast 4~8.24 feet to the TRUE POINT OF SECIHNING. ~ 1' A p4rc:el of land located 1n the Northe~.t Qulrter (NE 14) of Section 19, TQ\.INSlllP SI)(.TEE~ (16) SOUTH, RANC!:: ELEVEN (11) EAST OF THE WlLUMETTE MERIDIAN, Deschutes County, Oregon which ts deac:rlbe~ ~a follows: j COilalllellclng lit the Northeast corner.,f sa1d S'1ct1on 19; thenc,", South !'l·Z7'37" \lest 91\2~ 37 feet t" the TRUE: POINT OF BECINNINC; tbence Soutb 00·07 '2l" \lest 58.72 feet; thence on a 10)8.31 hot radiu!I curv~ left 394.79 foP-t, the long chord of which b<'lartJ South 10-46' 10" 1':4st 392. . feet: thence South 21-39' 44" East 117.19 feet: thence on a 590.80 foot radlu~ eurve.rlgnt 170.76 feet. the long chord of which bear" South 13·22'S"" East 170.17 feet; thence North 89·10'04" lIest 11.05.83 feeq the-nee NOTth 00-40'19" £ast 1325.f14 feeti t:henctl South R9-U '47" Eallt 779.00 f .. et; thence Soutb 00""3' 13" Iolel't :,/O~OO feet; thence South 89"11'1,7" East 498." feet; theMe SOllth 61-41')0" Weat 1,11.30 feeq tt.enr.e South 00-'8'13" Ilest 210.11 feet: thence South' 89"11'47"" l::ast. )25.2b feet to the TRUe POINT OF SECINNIHC. A pnrcel of land located 1n Sect1~n 19, Tovnship 16 S?utr., Range"11 East of the I,Illlall>ette MeridIan, 'Deschutes County. Oregon, 'which is dC:6cri bed as follows: ' aeginning. at tl,e Northeast corner of said Sec(:ton 19; thenee North 89° 11' 47" ~~st 306.60 feet to the~esterlyriKht of lolly 11ne of Slsemore County Road and the TRUE POINT OF BECINNING; thence along said right of way line South 23· 56' 02" 'tast 66.67 feet; thence along said right of way Une on a 233 88 foot radius curve rIght 114.1.1 ieet. the long chord of which bears South 09" 54' 40" cas i: 11).33 feet; thence along said Tight of way line on a 1·;3.80 foot radius cu{'ve right 28.46 (eet. the long .:hord of which bcnrfil South 09-24' )2" \Jep.!: 4!8.42 filet; thence North 69· II' .4'" lies: 946.35 feoti thence Noeth 00 0 ~8' I)" East 200.00 feet; thence South 89· 11' 47" ~allt 901.• 63 .fcet t., the TRUe POINT OF 2ECINNING. StAn or ORUiO:.l) COUHTr Of D(S(HUTlS) i5. I. MAU Sut ,rNKOUOW. COUNTY CUll AIID II(Dlctl Of COIiynANCIS. IN ~HD '01 tAlD COIIIII1, DO lIilt., tlllln 1H'" Till WitHIN INSTl\lMIHf 'UIIUCOIOID 'illS DAY: 131 Jut'll Mi 9: 37' 87"1:tl17e; m ..q- OISCHUYlS CDUjjn O"iCIAl IICOIIII hltp:llrecordings.deschlites.org/Detail.asp ?INSTRUMENT _ID= 133399 ~------------------ De s chutes County Clerks Office Recording System Web Iluery !'3C O ri'!.' ',\,.11 St., Suite 200 , I e.."d, Cr.go" 9 7 701 .. C I S41 .38S .€5A9 .. F :~4 !. .3a3 .4424 ~. Ooc' ;p 0",..... ~Document Details Rnum co St...,h Rttum co Ruulu DOn"la:~. ": 1989-024952 Doena:~. n'PE: D -DEED DOC Sl=BTYP[: CO); -Conuacc Records R1:CORD~C DATE: 9 1S 1939 2:i2 :00 P:\! ~. VOWeJ{S R£CORD~G rus: BOOK .. PAGE : 19;"'j CO~SlDER"'TIOX : S,J1,OOO C \ C<--llfoU2 d 0 t) k D[SC'Rll'JlO~: D-C I -Contract of Sale L'"'DL'\X.D: Yes \"ERIJ'TED : Yes flrO f4 ~ UCIIJ\"E nUA: \'Le'A" .Y di tionlllnfotmatton WAGE: \'ie".-Document hn..ue H TIF I'" w 00,,,,"<1\1 ••os PDF ~,r r~~ RdllJ"l) To [~~\a:IADDRnS I ·WDR£SS 1 Iem ISTAn Im I ~+r~+-. P.utn'TI-n: UST ~.'-\IE ~:SA\IE l.IlDDLE ~.UfE Slm BI:RC!IETT ~!AR.:"':'DIREC T JEr,DOWELL"''DIRE CT DOWELLC\'DIP.ECT PA TTI lID"~(nllnOll<I­ ~. lSIO:S LOT BL.OCIC DIR.ECTlO~ J PART I PART n 'l'l l rn-:< I "'~G I SIT QQ T.\...XI..Ol ~L LEC..u. D[SCRIPTtO~ I~ II 19 IE II 19 16 11 19 519 T16 RII);I 2 519 T16 RII 0-0 0-0 1 http://recordings.deschutes.org/ArchiveData.asp?INST_ID=133399 Deschutes County Clerks Office Recording System Web Iluery Suite 2 00. • e.•.nd . Oregon 97701 ' P!541.3BS .5549' F:S41.J83 .4-424 O.'" ~Additional Information ~) rf' O....... Rerum 10 S..rd! Rtmm La Rtsulu J ~ATIO~_' __________________-4 ~ ~19~3_. ;~l ___________________________ SEE DOCD!E.'1T fOR CO)'lPLETE LEGAL j SOTES COXTP_-\.CT DEED R£c[pnO~ !'___ £R 9-..:-'-""' 1B _______________J,,;S-'-~-'9 .'~ C:\Doe'\prop65575IDowtllIpdM90928 DosCoClorksRtcoros 193,75 1989-0Z495Z.doe pago 1 1211812006 8:17:47 AM 89-24952 193 -0075Contract -Deed This agreement made and ent~red into this 3rd day of August 1989, by and betw~e~ MA~, BURCHETT, hereinafter "seller" and JEFF DON~LL and PATTI DO'ilELLf hereinafter "purchaser", witnesseth that: {I) "Seller" t',ereby agrees to sell to "p1.'rchaser" and "purchaser" agrees to purchase and pay for ce.!:tain real property lecated .in Deschutes County, Oregon and wore particularly described as follows, to wit: .'\ parcel of l an~ located i'1 the North 1/2 of Section 19, T.16 S., R. 11 E., W.M" Deschcte Q u n" , Ore 0 h'ch 's desc i bed as f ol lows: IS eSCf'1 es a rna or ortlon 0 t e crce " Commencing at the Northeast co:r::ner of said Section 19; thence N 89°11' 41" W 1208.23'; thence S 00°48 1 13" ~oj 200.00 feet. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: t .hence S 89°1.1'47" E 946.35 1 to the Westerl] rlght-Qf-way line of the Sisemore County Road; thence along said right of way line on a 153.80' rad.:i.u8 curve right 77.43', the long chord of which bears S 29°07'55" W 76.621; thence along said right of way line S 43°33'17" 117.24'; thence along said right of way line on a," 194 .1.8' radius curve right 81.01', the long chord of nwhich bears S 55°30'22 ft N 80.42'; thence N 89°11'47 W 826.06'; thence N 00°48'13" E 200.00'; t..'1ence S 89°11' 4 7" E 61.29' to the TIlliE POINT OF BEGINNING containinq 34.5 more o ~: less . , There is no mention of only 1/2 interest in what i suppo . ed to be JOIi' acres (2) A parcel of land located in Section 19, T.16 S., R.l1 E., W.M.,J)eschutes County, Oregon and described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Section 19; thence N 69°11'47" W 306.60 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of Sisemore Coun~y Road and the true point of beginning; thence along said right-of-way line S 23°56 1 02" E, 6~.67 feet; thence along said right-of­ way line OIl a 233. 88 foot ~ad.ius curve r ight 1 14.47 feet, i::he long chord of which bears S 09°54'46" E, 113. 33 feeti theoce along said right-of ·-way line on a 153.80 foot radius curve right 2B.46 feet; the long chord of which bears S 09°24'32" W 28.42 feet; thence N 89°11'47" W, 946. 35 feet; thence N OO°l!8'13" E; 200. 00 feet; then-;e S 89°11'47" E, 90~.63 feet to t he TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, con.taining 4.3 a cres !Z:.ore or less net. Ip 'ic e is fO I" 2 parcels [ (I) 34 .5 acres more or less; AND 2 4 . II. The total purchase price of forty-two thousand dollars ($42;000) is to be paid by "purchaser" to n seller" in a manner more particularly described as follows: (l} uPurchaser" pays twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) upon acceptance of this agreement; (2) "Purchaser" pa.y:.;. remaining balance seventeen thousand dollaxs ($17,000) over 15 years at a fixed interest rate of 9.5% with option to recalculate mortg~ge whenever a lu~p sum payment of five thousand dollars ($5,000) or more is made. There are for pay:!.ng off mortgage e2.rly and early payment is encouraged by both "loch of t he $42 ,000 is for the 4 .3 acres? How muc h for t'l 134.b ~ re-, rTIQ -·t; 1]' , III. Conveyence of the rea1 property by "seller" to the "purchaser" shall .bt::-m&.3e by warranty deed conv eying rr.ark.etable t.it l~ in and to the :3ubject property subject to all easements and incumbrances of record upon final paYl~len t of subject. property. N. "Purchaser" shall be entitled to possession of said property upon acceptance of this agreement. V. All ad valorem real property ta:~es and all goverrunental or other assessrner.ts levi.eci. against said property for the current ta~ year shall be divided equally between "seller" and "purchaser" (JUly 1st was approximate date of verbal agreement). "Purchaser" shall pay recordinc; fees for recording the deed. "Seller" shall pay the recording fees for release of deed of trus't. Thi. (:ontr'Qct W'QS dra wn up by the Dowells and claims owners h ip of a lar'9 . p ·wtio K 1m pi"opprty I as we ll as full ownersh ip of the joint parcel. 1:s0. til Dowells. thro ug h this IContract -Deed l are atte mpting to ,... rna ... _th . J -i;.j j d02ed i'''S"'l'i~-'-ion whic h was recorded for the cluster on 20 July 9B7 . '0 .~ ... "I.:l. j l ~ i .!-s i ,rE~ ~~ J i ;; ¥H -'l§. ~ g {l i '< '< .!!:I f~~ r­~ ,1-. ~, t .. a.. o · j:d iN 'Er. . jj r ~I t E ~ • ~ 1_i r: 1 1 F:j~ .. wf­a.. Deschutes County Ass\;ssor's Offi ce 1'\(1(1 r~w W; lfl ~I" b, ult 'Oil R. I ,d O " 'U"II ~I n()1 J ohn Ca in . I'h l ll l f ' (!l·11) ~\lUl tj!iUfI ar tographe l's O ffi c e Assessor's OfficeRet.< 'iVt ,(j r rrllt l 01 1: S lIl1I 0 1 Se OI Ulnglon, Ass esso r ,1 -00 om 10 S OC,JI'II 1300 NW \V a~ SI. Su.IU :"'00 -Dond . O ,O/J(In !l71 111 (!rl I);J&l.GS06 • I ni J»-;(i?rt wwSru!: www.m '~(:;h J C l l'll;h C II '~I " NUll h' l f ______ ?A r2-C 6-L. (z.) tt ·30 A G f A(2..C 8.L. Cr ) Lt ,30 A C. .. N Ult) OOL L • ~N 8~ = co 1~ ~~ --.-t It) jEO: x.~ ~ .--.-0 ~ ~ 0 .-c:L. 2' t! u ~ t ~ ._ 2 .!!_ a &. '§ .!!E0 I: 1VJ.:9!..~ .. 1IIl ~ ~ ~ ~! ...~~0!8u..__ _0 v Produ c ed b y De s chutes C Oll nt y Ca rt ogr aph y Depa rtm ent - J o hn Cain f rom 3 August '1989 Cont rac t. H! !H III ...... 1 H.!! Hi H~ Hl ~isti IH Hi 111 ~ ~ ; 9 ;U~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ;~H r~-.. I~-~ ~ ~ III Tllis 3 Augus t 19 8 9 Con ti ac t I S null and void ba s e d o n cont ra ct I e co rd ed 1'1 July 1990 Do c umen t :; 199 0 ·0 20037 Book S Page 2 '13-107 4 , .. _11 111 1111 1~3 0076Ole VI. "Purchasern , agrees to laDd use restrictions described as follows: . 1. OWne:r:s.or family members may not operate dirt bikes on the property. 2. All telephone and electric lines must be underground. 3. All felncing must be -woed. TOp rail may not be higher than 42", bbtt,om rail may not be lower that 18". No barbed wire or straight wi~e may be used for fencing. ,4. Owner or family members may not take target practice with rifle or handgun on property. 5. This contrac~ carries with it the strongest encouragement to demonstrate sensitivity to living within the bOQ~daries of the Tumalo Winter Deer Range, and ~~~es the owners to adjust their lifestyle accordi~gly. VII. This agreement is the entire, final and complete agreeme:1t of the parties ,to th~ sale and purC::haseof said ,property, ap..d supersedes ar.d replaces all prior exi.~ting -wI\tti;{ end oral agre~-nents 'between both parties. vTI.I. nPtirch~sern ,accepts ' said property in its present condition, as is, ·i.ncl'l!dt~g latent 'd~~~,ct.~; , 'W-~th9ut, ,~~y ' representat.ions or warranties, exp~essed or imp1ied~ : ~Pw::chas,er':' ·,i(cfoe~'#§ , that ,';;purch~~er" shall ascertain, f:::ortl sources oth~r 1;h5til Jlseli~~", the appli;cable .z,0r.;~,~g,~ "bu1,ldi~g;' "ho=qstng -and 'othe!: reguiatbry oid:Lr)arices ' and,laws and "i:hat npurchks~i',l :'~Cc~pt~5 '~~id ,p::'0pertr: wi thfullawareriess 'of ' these, o.rdinaIic~s and :19,ws :a,s th~y "~Y "B:.if~Gt :the ,p~~ei~t 'J,lse or any inteflded future use of ,s 'aid ·property, and "'5e11e1;."" ha~. 'J;I!(ide ':no ,i,ep l~'s,eAt:at,ipns ,wi t:h respec't ,1;.0 s ;uch laws 'and 'ordinance's. ' This" ins-trUin~ht"'dc,es , ~r.o~ ·~g~a~~:tn-t'.e~ :tha:t, 'any pari:lcula:ro use may be made ' of the' prop'erty describe'a in ' thi 's. ~ :i;,r.'s,t~.el).t ,;'-: "P.1IIchaser" should check with the appropriate county planning ~epa.ttinetit to ,,,e:i:if~ appi"o,,·eduses. ' ' Note the missing number one restriction shown below from the recorded deed restrictions . Covenants and RestrIctions. 1. Ownar~ or family mambcrs mJY not acquire additional dogs othar than the dog(s) they may o~n when they purchnse the property. All dogs must be kept 1n such a Hay that they do not run loose in the area. Dogs allowed to II run " wHl disrupt deer habitat. 2.. O..mers or family member'S may not operate "til rt bikes" on the property. 3. All telephone and electric lines must be underground. 4. All fencing must be wood. Top rai 1 may r:ot be higher tl1an ~2"; bottom ra 11 may not be lower than 18 11 No barbed wi re or stra ,1ght• wire may be used for fencing. 5. Orlr'lers or fami ly members may not take "target II practlce wi th rifle or hand gun on property. 5. T1ii s contract carries wi th 1t ttle strO:1[Jest encouragerr.ent to demonstrate sensitivity to living within the boundaries of the Tumalo l~lnter Deer Range, and urges the owners to adjust their life style accorcingly. ·""", "" ., I ,. r " };.'\ !.I j .c. (., 193 -0071.~ f ....... /1J {1~.JJt~ . ' Mark Burcr~tt ("seller") (Jt..~" ct-~, NifafY-Public for the "seller" Cr:leJ~! SEAL JOYCE A S'rAAN 'STARr P::~( Ie 'Sl~T! or illiNOIS "" CO,.,.. [)(P. AUG. 29,l!i90 ~~·qo/ Patti Dowell .("puIchase:r ") State of N~w York). County of Monroe) SS.: On t~s ..2llLday Of. September ...:...Je ·f f Dowe J J 'and Pat't i Do'We 1] . , dat~ da e \ date , 1989, before me .personally app~ared to ~e knolm and known ,to me.' to be the , . :. . -. ' -".. and ~he/t.hey Jeff Dowell 422 Lakeshore Drive Hilton NY 14468 . cia e 193 ~ 0078 ..u , ... ..... :,,\ . ..' • • ' ..... .... :y • • " 'j .-:: . :. I •. •• , ( .~ .. " ,,'~ . ,' . ',' ••.• :;: •••••. , -~: • "" , ' , __,1 . ;_" . -' ....", ':;.'; •..,! .: ,.': . ~TAniif OREGON ) ' COU~Y Of DOOtUTES)' 55. ­ I, MAR\, ,SUE P£NHOLL-oW, COUt4TY ruo ,iNo RICOItDO OF CONYEJAIIaS, IN' :AND 'rol SAID COUr4ni 00 IlfiEB1 ' WITIn THAT lHEWlTHlN INS!IIUMOO ,WAS -RKOftD£OnilS DAY: ' ­ E~-"'" DE5CItUm C:;OIJilTY Off-!CIAl KKOR~ 1 ' DESCHUTES COUNTY1 I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 117 NW Lafayette Avenue. Bend. OR 97701 Telephone (&41)388-6575. fax (541)386-1764 CODE ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINT FORM Instructions: In order for you complaint to be accepted. you must fill in all questions completely and sian on the back of this loan. It is important that you supply as much detail as possible. If you have any questions, call code enforcement at 541-385-1707. Address of Violation(s)~:,......;::r;......,~~-.:--"'O";;;"~~.....;;......:.....:~--~~---:::~::-T-:-----­ City: _::--_-.:--_---110~~::..,-_ Nearest Cross Street: ~~~:!ucs=:'&"'.J.l,}..u;s!..=.:::::1:!:!:::.._'-":~~W!.l:L...:m......t::!::.~..:.:..____Subdivision: ____--:-______________________ Residents Name: ~!:l4V1Or11J"" Phone: Owner of Property: ~\ Pa..."f l)OIi>1!L Address: ±~ "" * ,~", ; ~\I1A~ ~)4tS ('[we. S'u:. City: State: Zip: ________ Details of Complaint (be specific): '"PMJ. of S&vfl e. illltl Q tJJ4.At lDt. Ift.)! Jj-Qs)~QQ3J6 Wr-f4,M f.erVliu,s,t)Y) ARE THERE ANY KNOWN OR SUSPECTED HAZARDS AT THIS LOCATION? **** Continue on reverse side •••• CE Complain! Form Rev 04/11 Page 11 The top portion of this side is required and must be completed. Complainant: (Your Name) Name: u.\ lllA.lMo KI)~V\­ ~f;~ess: ::ad: $9Q<' State: ,,;;;...(;>(2.______ Zip: Gf7?c::s!,.,fWb Daytime phone #: 'i+1 361 3" 7"­ Can violation be seen from the road? ( ) Yes (X) No If not, what is the best inspection pOint? f't'Owt CHU' Joint-?ropghr Is the Complainant a neighbor? bd Yes ( ) No The complainant gives the Code Enforcement Technician pennlssion to use their property for viewing the violation: (X) Ves ( ) No If not, why: _______________ Will you, the complainant, testify in court, should the need arise? (X') Yes ( ) No (Note: your complaint may not be accepted without your being available to testify.) If you have photos, or other related information, that can be used as evidence of this violation, please submit them with this form. The submitted documentation will not be returned and will become part of the complaint file. By signing below, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that all Information submitted on and with this form ;s true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. COMPLAINAN DATE Thank you for assisting In making Deschutes County a better place to live. Your Co. Enforcement StJtff ******************************************************************************************************************* FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Subdivision: ___________ Lot; _______ Block: ______ C[ Complaint Form Rev. 04/11 Page 12 • Code Violation Complaint against Dowell for septic system on third parcel Filed 20120820 Due to the utterly ridiculous arguments used by Assistant Legal Counsel in her giving such great emphasis and credence to the numerous measuring errors on the Dowell LM map drawing in spite of the letter from Paul Blikstad warning the Dowells of the maximum building line on MP-79-232, the Kuhns feel it is worthwhile and very justified to file a code violation complaint against the Dowells for the high probability that the Dowell septic field is likely partially on tax lot 161119-00­ 00300 without the permission of the Kuhns. It should also be noted that the Assistant Legal Counsel failed to consider the Acreage Overview map prepared by Jeff Dowell and submitted with the supporting documents for the 1992 LM-92-9 in her defending the Dowells illegal placement of their structure in violation of the final partition plat map a clear violation of Goal 5. C:\Docs\prop65575\Dowell\Legals & Decisions Court & County\1992 LM-92-9\support files\ 19920204_Draft-1_LM-Supporting Doc with map Dowell to Cibelli_Page_08 Acreage Overview.pdf Also 19921103_SepticSiteEvaluationApplication.pdf 1 page 19921117_SepticSiteDenied.pdf 2 pages 19930421-19930615_SepticEvaluationPermit.pdf 6 pages 19940318_BuildingApprovesButNotPlanning.pdf 1 page Ariel Photo Septic Field w Property Lines from CDD 200206.pdf Also considered in our concerns are the facts that we now know that the building safety department of CDD under Dennis Perkins never did any measuring or confirming of property lines when issuing permits, and that two test pits were actually dug on BLM property. It is highly likely that the Dowells septic field is indeed partly on the joint parcel. NOTE: Kuhns are more than willing to address any infringement of the Dowell septic field on the joint parcel without prior Kuhn agreement, in the yet unwritten Homeowners' Agreement, but only if the HOA is signed and recorded by 31 October 2012. page 3 8/20/2012 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2012 Commissioners' Hearing Room -Administration Building -1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up card (provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject ofa public hearing will NOT be included in the official record ofthat hearing. 3. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Resolution No. 2012-103, Establishing the Required Elections of National Forest Related Safety Net Payments per Secure Rural Schools and Reauthorization for Federal Fiscal Year 2012 -Chris Doty, Road Department Suggestion Action: Move signature ofResolution No. 2012-103.I I 1 I 4. CONSIDERATION of Second Reading by Title Only, and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2012-005, Amending the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Systems Plan, and Repealing Code Chapters 23.60 and 23.64 -Peter Russell, Community Development I Suggested Actions: Conduct second readings by title only; move adoption of Ordinance No. 2012-005. i 'I ! i Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, August 20, 2012 ~ ~ Page 1 of7i, \ 5. A PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2012-011, Repealing Ordinance No. 2010-008 regarding the La Pine Urban Growth Boundary -Peter Gutowsky, Community Development Suggested Actions: Conduct hearing; first & second readings by title only; move adoption o/Ordinance No. 2012-011. 6. A PUBLIC HEARING and Consideration of First and Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2012-012, Establishing the City of La Pine Urban Growth Boundary -Peter Gutowsky, Community Development Suggested Actions: Conduct hearing,' first & second readings by title only; move adoption o/Ordinance No. 2012-012. 7. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS 192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items. FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. Ifyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572.) Monday, August 20 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 2 of7 Wednesday, August 22 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, August 27 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:00 p.m. Administrative Work Session -executive session under ORS 192.660(2) (a), employment of a public officer or employee NOTE EARLIER TIME Wednesday, August 29 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Thursday, August 30 10:00 a.m. Joint Meeting with City of Bend Council, at the County Monday, September 3 Most County offices will be closed to observe Labor Day Wednesday, September 5 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Thursday, September 6 8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the Sisters City Council, Sisters City Hall Wednesday, September 12 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Thursday, September 13 7:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the Redmond City Council, Redmond Council Chambers Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 3 of7 Monday, September 17 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) . Thursday, September 20 8:30 a.m. (Tentative) Tobacco Survey Results Discussion Friday, September 21 All Day Association of Oregon Counties' District Meeting -Harney County Monday, September 24 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Wednesday, September 26 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, October 1 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting Wednesday, October 3 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Thursday, October 4 8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the Sisters City Council, Sisters City Hall Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, August 20,2012 Page 4 of7 Wednesday, October 10 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, October 15 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, October 22 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Wednesday, October 24 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, October 29 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Wednesday, October 31 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, November 5 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) 3 :30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 5 of7 Wednesday, November 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting I :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, November 12 Most County Offices Closed to Observe Veterans' Day Holiday November 13 through 16 Association of Oregon Counties Conference Monday, November 19 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) November 22 & 23 Most County Offices Closed to Observe Thanksgiving (November 23 Unpaid Furlough) Monday, November 26 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Wednesday, November 228 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) Monday, December 5 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s) 3 :30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting I i Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 6 of7 I I Wednesday, December 7 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Wednesday, December 12 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Monday, December 17 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s) Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7·1·1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388·6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, August 20, 2012 Page 7 of7