HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-12-17 Business Meeting Minutes
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 1 of 15
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org
MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2012
_____________________________
Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend
__________________________
Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Alan Unger and Tammy Baney.
Also present were Tom Anderson, Interim County Administrator; Erik Kropp,
Deputy County Administrator; David Givans, Internal Auditor; Judith Ure and
David Inbody, Administration; Chris Doty and Dan Sherwin, Road Department;
Ronda Connor, Personnel; Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; and approximately
ten other citizens.
Chair DeBone opened the meeting at 10:05 a.m.
__________________________
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN INPUT
The Board recognized Judith Ure’s ten years, and Erik Kropp’s five years of
service to the County.
Chair DeBone said that several citizens wished to speak at this time.
Scott Aycock, transportation planner for COIC, said that the County announced
upcoming ODOT services through a program that takes local dollars and
leverages them by nine federal dollars. Commitments have been offered by
Sisters, Redmond and other regional government entities to purchase services
from Cascades East. They have not been able to generate a local match from
La Pine. In the past, La Pine wasn’t approached, and services there were
subsidized by others in the region.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 2 of 15
They received less funding from partner agencies so need to generate funding
for this purpose, but the La Pine City Council declined to support this funding
request.
Some CAG (Citizen Action Group) members in La Pine who attended the
meeting indicated they might be willing to help at some level. They requested
having a representative on the regional committee, and also that the County be
the applicant instead of the City, even though the City was willing to be t he
applicant in spite of not coming forward with funds. The hope is to generate
$2,500 from the community and another $2,500 from the County. This is a
biennial grant that starts the end of June 2013 and runs through June 2015. An
answer is needed this week.
There is not a specific dedicated tax here for transportation, so they have to seek
funding from a variety of groups and entities. Local funding is key to getting
federal funds.
He said that there is a direct link between economic development and these
services. All local entities know that there must be viable transportation
services in an area for businesses to feel this is a good place to be. They want
to attract labor to work at their businesses as well as customers.
Molly Baker Ray and Judy Forsythe of the Citizens Action Group came before
the Board. Ms. Ray said they are concerned about transportation issues, and it
is clear that a lot of people rely on this for a variety of things. There is also a
large number of people who need transit for medical appointments to remain
self-sufficient. She asked that the County consider helping with this grant since
the City is unwilling or unable to do so. This benefits Deschutes County. They
need to keep moving forward and not step backwards.
Judy Forsythe, requests these grant effort be supported. Their vision is for safe
and efficient transportation of all citizens of the southern part of Deschutes
County. This can help bring about positive change in southern Deschutes
County, and it is important to involve citizens. The greater plan for Newberry
Country acknowleges that County governemt can help with these efforts. This
will help bring about stronger, more resilient communities; but they need
reliable transportation. She hopes to see improved collaboration among all
sectors, and that these resources are used in the smartest and most effective way
possible.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 3 of 15
John Huddle explained that 25% of citizens in south County are seniors. If
there are issues with transportation, they will not go to doctor appointments.
There is high unemployment in the area as well, and the poverty level is about
22%. All of this factors in to what affects people in La Pine as well as outside
the UGB. He would like to see the County apply because so many members of
CAG and most residents live outside the City. It is important to take advantage
of the matching funds.
Ellen Curry, the president of the CAG, said she lives outside of La Pine. They
don’t believe it is the responsibility of the County to provide for public
transportation, but it is important to have these services available for those who
are disabled or senior, and for people who can’t afford a car or gasoline to get to
their jobs. She was pleased to have Mr. Aycock attend the CAG meeting. She
also understands that the bulk of the money would come through the federal
grant.
Oregon is having a hard time funding services, but CAG, as a nonprofit, will
help contribute. It is more important for the County to be the applicant and not
the City. An umbrella agency is more appropriately the County. They have
also asked for a seat on the transportation advisory committee, and a report
regarding the use of these grant funds. They are dedicated to the success of this
area and the County. They feel that the current Board has the best interests of
the people at heart, and this is a piece of that.
Commissioner Baney thanked them for their input and the fact that they drove
through a blizzard to get to the meeting. She spoke with Judith Ure about this
situation, who said the person who is supposed to be representing that area has
not been able to make meetings, so this position might be open to someone else,
through the appropriate application process. About 36,000 people live in that
part of the County. Since this is a short timeframe, perhaps the Board could
consider video lottery dollars for this purpose.
Commissioner Unger stated he is the Chair of COIC, and acknowledged it is a
real effort to handle transit in this area. He sees this as an important role.
Chair DeBone said he supports community connections. The reality is that
transportation is very expensive, and they have started something that will be
hard to support in the future. This will have to be closely monitored.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 4 of 15
BANEY: Move that the County match the funds offered, and be the agency
overseeing the grant.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
__________________________
Tony Aceti, citizen, stated that the school in Newtown, Sandy Hill, where there
was a mass shooting, has school colors of green and white. He feels that
DESCHUTES County can show support of the people in that town in some
way, so is selling ribbons to benefit this cause.
3. Before the Board was a Public Hearing, and Consideration of First
Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2013-004, Amending Code
(Internal Auditor).
Chair DeBone opened the public hearing. David Givans explained this
Ordinance, as recommended by the Audit Committee.
No testimony was offered, so the hearing was closed.
Commissioner Baney said that she feels this offers autonomy for the internal
auditor and clarifies the process. Many counties do not have an internal auditor.
This gives the ability to be more transparent, and a buffer between the auditor
and Administrator is appropriate.
Commissioner Unger feels that this position is different from all others and that
person needs to have the ability to be independent. It is an important position,
and peers and the Audit Committee are supportive.
Chair DeBone said he does not see a value in this since it involves just one
person. External auditors are also utilized. He will not support it at this time.
BANEY: Move first reading, by title only, of Ordinance No. 2013-004.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes no. (split vote)
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 5 of 15
4. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Document No. 2012-
665, the Central Oregon Public Works Partnership Intergovernmental
Agreement.
Chris Doty read a letter from Dan Sherwin, the Weed Control person, indicating
Mr. Sherwin is retiring from the County. Commissioner Baney said she is sorry
to hear this because he has been an inspiration and a delight to work with for
the past ten years. Mr. Sherwin stated he will be in the area and will help out
the County as needed.
Commissioner Unger hopes that there will be someone to help keep this moving
forward, as it is an important issue. Mr. Sherwin has made it work, above and
beyond what most would do. Mr. Sherwin said the restoration of land is as
important as weed control. He has been asked to serve on some State
committees and will remain active.
In regard to the agreement, Mr. Doty said Deschutes County will be the first
entity to sign on to this partnership after a lot of work with others over the past
year. This helps deal with budget issues in his department.
An existing IGA is being used by PMAP in the Valley (Portland Metropolitan
Area Partnership) Here it is to be broad, covering sharing equipment and other
services to reduce expenses for all. They have met collectively and attendance
has been good. There is good energy and a culture of sharing and cooperation.
Mr. Doty explained that the City of Bend has been a good partner and they have
already shared equipment and coordinated joint training; and talk with each
other when they make hiring decisions. Collaboration is an important part of
this. They are working on a joint maintenance project for next year for 27 th
Street and Knott Road; this will save funds by buying in quantity, and will
make the process move more smoothly. They anticipate other agencies will
come on board.
Commissioner Unger is excited about the IGA. The Bulletin newspaper
brought up issues of risk and liability. Mr. Doty stated that it is a simple
agreement without a lot of administrative burden. Insurance is required; there is
language regarding indemnification and liability. Things can be more detailed
if needed for a specific project.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 6 of 15
Commissioner Baney feels this is the way local government needs to move. It
breaks down territory and makes the best use of resources. You can’t do
business the same way just because that is how it has always been done. There
is also an opportunity to do a similar agreement with ODOT.
Mr. Doty said that ODOT can’t sign on to this agreement but there is a process
to develop something similar. They are at the table, but it is a matter of making
sure their requirements are met as well.
UNGER: Move approval.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANET: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
5. Before the Board was Consideration of Board Signature of Document No.
2012-622, a Services Agreement with Medcor, Inc. regarding the Operation
of the Deschutes Onsite Clinic.
David Inbody gave a brief overview of the item. Curtis Smith of Medcor is in
attendance and he wanted to speak as well.
Mr. Smith stated that his team is thrilled to have this opportunity to provide
great health and wellness services. The bar is set high and it will be a
challenge. Commissioner Baney said that it has not been an easy task for the
team. Commissioner Unger stated that the County owns its health care and this
allows them to move forward with new ideas and focusing on keeping people
healthy.
BANEY: Move signature.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: BANEY: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 7 of 15
6. Before the Board was a Public Hearing, and Consideration of First
Reading, by Title Only, of Ordinance No. 2013-005, Adopting Amendments
relating to the Ambulance Service District Code.
This item will be addressed at a later date.
7. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2012-
666, an Amendment to an Agreement with TD Cascade Highlands, LLC,
adding SFI Cascade Highlands, LLC to the Agreement.
Laurie Craghead explained that the County agreed to extend the improvement
agreement for Tetherow to let the previous and new owners work out details of
this subdivision being taken over. There is a new attorney and bond, extending
the improvement agreement for five years since build-out won’t happen
quickly. There has been no request of a new estimate of costs for roads and
utilities; the current request was found to be adequate.
Commissioner Unger stated that the County has to recognize the economic
challenges and is supportive. Commissioner Baney feels this protects the
County and offers some clarity.
UNGER: Move approval subject to the bond process.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANET: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
8. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2012-
671, Amending an Improvement Agreement with Pronghorn Destination
Resort relating to Overnight Lodging.
This item will be addressed at a later date.
9. Before the Board were Deliberations on Approval of Applications for a
Plan Amendment and Zone Change Submitted by the Oregon Department
of State Lands (Limited De Novo: File Nos. PA-11-7/ZC-11-2).
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 8 of 15
Paul Blikstad provided a brief overview of the item. He referred to a decision
matrix (copy attached for reference) on this issue.
Chair DeBone stated that he supports this for the big picture. Commissioner
Unger said that part of this was to create a good record to move forward.
Commissioner Baney asked that they go through the matrix.
Mr. Blikstad said the big issue was the soils classification part. There are three
methods, which he explained. There were inclusions to consider as well. Staff
feels that they should just remove the contrasting inclusions from consideration.
It is impossible to figure out percentages of those.
Commissioner Baney said that maybe they should have a soils study done on
those areas. They need to know what those inclusions are. Mr. Blikstad stated
staff would prefer this. They have done this, but the question is whether the
Department of Lands should have to review this study.
Commissioner Baney feels the State is clear on what they want to do. She is
concerned about the overall ramifications.
Commissioner Unger likes using processes already in place. He asked how the
NRCA treats the inclusions, and can their methodology be adopted. Mr.
Blikstad said it depends on the land forms. Commissioner Unger stated that
looking at the big picture, deciding whether the land is farmable , the inclusions
don’t have much of bearing.
Commissioner Baney stated that the inclusions are identified. Mr. Blikstad
stated they are not clarified through percentages. Ms. Craghead stated that the
OAR allows someone to use the NRCA data and map. This group does not do a
soils survey.
Commissioner Baney feels that it would be difficult to replicate this tract of land,
but thinks the percentage issue is subjective and may affect future decisions.
Nick Lelack asked if all applications need this study, or just those where it is
known that the majority of the land is a certain soils type. Chair DeBone feels
that it depends on whether it is clearly black and white.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 9 of 15
Commissioner Baney asked if anyone feels that the 65% is inaccurate. She
does not want added costs if it is clear, but if it might sway one way or another,
it would be appropriate to have the survey.
Chair DeBone said that water is also important for property to be farmland.
Commissioner Baney asked how the process should be handled. Ms. Craghead
stated that there is a pilot project in another area. Mr. Lelack stated this is
creating new language and definitions. It could be a different track at some
point, to be revisited. The Board will have an opportunity to change policy.
The weighted average was supported. The use of the Borine report was
challenged by opposition; the question is whether to submit it to the DLCD for
review. The NRCS already shows what the Borine report confirms. DLCD
already supports staff recommendations and does not feel that DLCD has to
review this report.
The rural residential exception area comp plan designation was found
appropriate for this change.
The question of which comp plan revision applies to this came up. Mr. Blikstad
said that the plan amendment and zone change came in before the new comp
plan was received.
Commissioner Unger does not want to move the goal posts, and they need to be
the same for all. Mr. Lelack said that most attorneys and staff know how to
move forward.
Regarding the ten acre minimum lot size, the opponents question whether this
would be protective. It could allow for an MUA zone and potential two acre
lots in a cluster development. The Hearings Officer does not feel this applies,
as it is not an exception area if it is not agricultural.
Commissioner Baney felt that the ten-acre lots were to act as a buffer. This is
important to protect the right to farm from higher density. Ms. Craghead said
that a two-acre parcel would require 65% open space. Mr. Blikstad said that it
more be more economically feasible to have ten -acre lots instead anyway.
Commissioner Unger supports the Hearings Officer’s decision.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 10 of 15
Mr. Blikstad stated that consistency with the MUA-10 zone and comprehensive
plan was discussed. The Hearings Officer feels that there was a change in
circumstances since this property was zoned for farm use. In 1979, EFU might
have made sense, but given the property and the area, it doesn’t any longer.
The Commissioners indicated they support the Hearings Officer’s decision.
Ms. Craghead stated that based on this discussion, staff will write the decision
and bring it back for Board consideration and approval.
10. Before the Board was an Update and Discussion regarding the Central
Oregon Large Lot Industrial Project.
Peter Gutowsky gave an overview of the item. He acknowledged the regional
partners, gave a synopsis, and prepared the Board for the upcoming public
hearing.
It is important to note this involves all regional counties and cities, EDCO,
COIC, Business Oregon, DSL, Realtors, 1,000 Friends of Oregon and some
private developers. The DLCD funded this organization through grants and
allowed COIC to become the regional governance authority.
It has been a lengthy process and he is thankful for the support of the Board.
This has spanned three years and involved a lot of work.
In January 2010, the first grant was given to review this issue: could Central
Oregon benefit by providing large industrial sites; and if there was a need, how
to address it. A consultant was hired to work with the regional partners, and the
report was completed in May 2011. Central Oregon can collaborate as a
cohesive region because of a shared workforce, highways and other factors.
This region needs to be able to compete in the large lot industrial development
aspect. The amount of sites needed and how they would be used were
discussed. 1,000 Friends of Oregon sued regarding the twenty-year need.
There were concerns of being vulnerable with land use law. All agreed it was
important to put Oregon back into competition for traded sector business.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 11 of 15
The various entities reached out to the Board of Commissioners to find out if
Deschutes County could pursue a settlement. The settlement recognized the
importance of customizing the work in this area. The emphasis is on short-term
needs. There was a recognition that coordination needed to be in place to
amend urban growth boundaries, and a commitment from DLCD working with
LCDC to initiate rulemaking this summer.
An editorial in May 2012 in the Bulletin recognized this process and the fact
that a settlement was sought instead of resorting to a lawsuit.
A rulemaking committee with various representatives worked over the summer,
after which consensus was reached. DLCD unanimously adopted specific rules
for Central Oregon, and this took away some of the ambiguity that previously
existed. These rules came into effect a week ago.
The work session packet contains information to be discussed at the public
hearing. The Board can deliberate and adopt the Ordinance on the same date.
They have worked with all partners to vet this information, which includes
comments from many. If the Board adopts the Ordinance, it becomes a template
for Jefferson and Crook counties. The three counties need to have an integrated
policy framework. The cities would then be in a position to do the same.
Mr. Lelack said the Planning Commissioner discussed this at length , and all
members present recommended approval of this document. They were aware
of staff’s recommendation for adoption by emergency.
Commissioner Baney thanked all for their patience and the fact they stuck with
it. She is sensitive to the emergency clause, and wants to get through the
hearing first. Commissioner Unger wants to move forward. Economic
development remains an issue and this is a tool that needs to be used. He
appreciates staff remaining focused on this. Chair DeBone is supportive but
wants to be sure all are on board.
There will be a public hearing on this in January.
Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda.
Chair DeBone said there was a small change in the work session minutes of
December 3. December 12 has not yet been reviewed.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 12 of 15
BANEY: Move approval, adjusting the work session minutes of December 3,
and removing the minutes of December 12.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
Consent Agenda Items
11. Chair Signature of Document No. 2012-659, Amending a Lease with the State
of Oregon regarding Computer Server Space
12. Signature of Document No. 2012-613, the Annual Renewal of a Maintenance
and Support Services Agreement with Motorola for the Sheriff’s Office Radio
Communications System
13. Signature of Document No. 2012-657, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (Luciano/Macaulay)
14. Signature of Document No. 2012-656, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (Chelsea Trees, Inc./Cattell)
15. Signature of Document No. 2012-670, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (Chalfant-Morrison)
16. Signature of Document No. 2012-672, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (Mondry)
17. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-131, Refunding General Obligation Bonds
18. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-132, Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Capital Outlay to Materials and Service in the Jail
Project Fund
19. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-133,Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Contingency to Personnel in the Public Health Fund
20. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-134, Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Contingency to Capital Outlay in the Behavioral
Health Fund
21. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-135, Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Contingency to Materials and Service in the Solid
Waste Capital Project Fund
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 13 of 15
22. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-137, Authorizing a New Checking Account
for the Jail
23. Signature of a Letter Reappointing John Morter to the Panoramic Access
Special Road District Board, through December 31, 2015
24. Signature of Letters Reappointing William Davidson, John McLaughlin,
Connie Rodda and Steve Swisher to the Commission on Families and Children
Board, through December 30, 2013
25. Signature of a Letter Correcting the Term of Holly Martin’s Appointment to the
Four Rivers Vector Control District, to June 30, 2016
26. Signature of a Letter Reappointing Colleen Horton to the Sun Mountain Ranches
Special Road District, through December 31, 2015
27. Signature of Letters Appointing Marianne Straumfjord and Kristin Powers to the
Deschutes County Behavioral Health Advisory Board, through December 31, 2015
28. Approval of Economic Development Grant Requests:
OSU Extension – Living on a Few Acres Conference - $1,500
Cat Rescue, Adoption & Foster Team – Trailer Fundraiser - $1,000
Family Access Network - 6th Annual Fundraiser at St. Charles Medical
Center - $1,500
CERF – Center for Economic Research and Forecasting Conference,
January 31, 2013 - $1,500
Healthy Beginnings – Improved access to screenings and early intervention
services - $1,500
Sunriver New Generations School – Towards keeping the school open for
two months while other fundraising efforts take place - $3,000
29. Approval of Minutes:
Board Meeting of December 3, 2012
Work Sessions of December 3, 5 and 12, 2012
CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY
SERVICE DISTRICT
30. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Resolution No. 2012-
136, Transferring Appropriations in the FY 2012-2013 Budget within the
Personnel Category for the 9-1-1 County Service District.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Business Meeting Monday, December 17, 2012
Page 14 of 15
UNGER: Move approval.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANET: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
31. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts
Payable Vouchers for the 9-1-1 County Service District for Two Weeks in
the Amount of $13,842.01.
UNGER: Move approval, subject to review.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION AND 4-H
COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
32. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts
Payable Vouchers for the Extension/4-H County Service District for Two
Weeks in the Amount of $9,056.09.
UNGER: Move approval, subject to review.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
RECONVENED AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
33. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Weekly Accounts
Payable Vouchers for Deschutes County for Two Weeks in the Amount of
$1,656,002.98.
UNGER: Move approval, subject to review.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
34. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
None were offered.
Being no further items discussed, the meeting adjourned at 11 :55 a.m.
~ ~(~
DATED this 1 ..--Dayof ~2612 for the
Deschutes County Board of Commission~
~~
Anthony DeBone, Chair
Alan Unger, Vice Chair
ATTEST: Tam~ner ~~
Recording Secretary
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, December 17,2012
Page 15 of 15
. . BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING 11J1\-/
. REQUEST TO SPEAK fo nS<jJO ~'f1 .
Agenda Item ofInterest ,53/() ~~Jh12 -r 11 Date )d -I j-/J..-./
..~ ~ "l /I
Name V uc4f /-:tJrs ijJl..,iL-
Address /b &JL dd:a~
k /Zg,< cYtV 07~Y'
Phone #s ~L/-/ 6ab --::; /.c; it? 7'
E-mail address ~h0f 7/Pto r: e: J'~.
~In Favor D NeutrallUndecided D Opposed
,
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? JZiYes D No
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REOUEST TO SPEAK
Agenda Item of Interest c:.o \L \ ~)~hetJ!..< Date 12.-1'1 .. Cl.
Name :zh.()l\t~k«:~~ -tJlJ5 '70 AaOO·
-J,VPrr~
Address b... '1:f~ a&. .;' (r!"Oic.tl L
H\I..fl ""/ c.fl-ft tlf '
Phone #s 541 I S3la 5:blo
E-mail address ~IA\& Mol ~G2 I>. 0 t . t..ovn
~ In Favor D NeutrallUndecided
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? D Yes
D Opposed
~No
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Agenda Item of Interest A,u~ 7;..cu J r ..! Date / ~ -/7~/1...
j
Name ~~her ,g 4fh.:
Address 1'12.£ k/";> d.~ J~Z7?c1?
(YJ trraJ 'IV J.. Pv Jl'tD5 4
Phone #s 6'-c/j'--7:2~-3:<() I
E-mail address ~,16I1(3 JIIhn hl&d. /tJ~
WIn Favor D NeutraVUndecided D Opposed
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? D Yes ~No
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
~
Agenda Item of Interest /rflA1:Jl:JAch.n41l. Date 1t-ll?I,Z
Name £i?P.rud ~Lr /)~
Address 5 .3 tft:I'I Bmb k./12 IJ1.y
jJl"tSJOlvvT -,1It1
Phone#s BW--53&,-??9 /
E-mailaddress:3 ra..0.Y\{.a.rur:pIe.'i~ I. COY>1
D In Favor D NeutrallUndecided
... Submitting written documents as part of testimony?
D
12.17.12
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
My name is Judy Forsythe and I am here to speak on behalf of the
request for Deschutes County to 'support the 5310 Grant to
purchase transit services for South Deschutes County and for
Deschutes County to serve as 'applicant' for said grant.
Our vision today is for a safe and efJicient transportation system
{or all residents of Newberry Country in Southern Deschutes
County . We are willing to support efforts to expand regional
public transit options. again, for residents living in Sunriver,
LaPine and outlying rural neighborhoods. We sincerely hope
Deschutes County will support our vision for a safe and efficient
transportation system and assist the citizens by electing to be the
applicant for the 5310 Grant to purchase transit services on our
behalf.
It has been noted that to effectuate/ bring about positive change in
South Deschutes County, it is important to involve the community
and its citizens in local decision making. And, we recognize
County government can also assist local efforts through many
avenues.
I am quoting from our 'Newberry Country: A Plan for Southern
Deschutes County', which will be coming before this Board,
shortly. Page 21 acknowledges that, "County government .£!!!
assist efforts through methods such as ... supporting grant funding
requests ..." Our South County Plan represents a legal
framework for implementing a 'vision fgr building stronger. more
resilient, rural communities' and what could be more important to
a strong, resilient rural community than a reliable transportation
system [or all its residents? This PLAN demonstrates leadership
for improving the ways in which collaboration can occur among
all sectors: government, businesses, non-profits and residents to
achieve a shared vision.
2
_ Help 'harness' Newberry Country's community initiative, today,
And, collectively, let's use the 5310 Grant resources in the
smartest, most effective way possible. Thank you. (302/8/12)
3
DSL PAPA & ZC DELIBERATION ISSUES
Issue Discussion Dominant
Condition
I Weighted
average
1Treatment of 1Staff
I Inclusion i recommendation
Soils
classification
determ inations
Dominant
condition vs
weighted
average (also
Soils in a
single map
unit are
designated
Determines
percentage
of each soil
found in a
1. Remove
constrasting
inclusions
from
We believe
weighted average
is the correct
method and the
most limiting) one soil class map unit consideration; most accurate.
using NRCS
charts and
multiplies the
total number
of acres by
the
percentages
2. ASSign a soil
class to the
contrasting
inclusions
based on
dominant
condition
This shows that
more than 50% of
the property is
non-agricultural
land -thus no
goal exception is
required.
3. Determine
a ratio based
onthe
weighted
average
I
' percentages
i
Other Issues
I Issue "tQUestion to
Use of Sage/Borine
report
be
answered
Does DSL
need DLCD
approval of
Sage/Borine
report?
Arguments IStaff Recommendation
NRCS Soil Survey Staff believes that the Borine report just
already shows more confirms what the NRCS Soils Survey
than 50% class 7 already demonstrates.
and 8 soils.
f------"----r--~----+---~""---_1_-~-------------___j
"Rural Residential Is this the This language Staff agrees with the hearings officer that
Exception area" appropriate requires that an this is a "catch-all" designation for rural
Comp Plan comp plan exception be taken residential zoning, even though this
designation
,
! I
•
Issue Question to
be
answered
Arguments Staff Recommendation
Designation for this
change
or,
It is a catch-all
classification for all
rural residential
zoning
request is not for an "exception area."
Which comp plan -rhe All parties came to The new comp plan applies, and the
version applies (new Setniker the conclusion that requested change is consistent with the
vs old) Court of
Appeals
decision
determined
that the
new one
applied.
the new one
applied. The
hearings officer
found that the
proposal was
consistent with the
new plan.
new comp plan language.
10-acre minimum lot The The 10-acre The Hearings Officer found that because
size under OAR 660opponents minimum applies to the property did not constitute
004-0040 questioned
whether
the MUA
10 zoning
would
protect the
10-acre
minimum
lot size
under the
OAR.
this land and the
MUA-10 zone,
which could allow
2-acre parcels
(cluster or planned
development)
wouldn't meet this
standard.
This isn't an
exception area and
the lO-acre lot size
doesn't apply.
agricultural land, it wasn't an exception
area and the 10-acre lot size doesn't
apply.
Zone change criteria Does the Comp plan requires The Hearings Officer found that the
under DCC application the County to criteria were met, including consistency
18.132.020 comply
with these
complete a plan
designation for
with the new comp plan.
*Consistency with criteria. non-agricultural
the new comp plan. land and a process
I
I Issue Question to
be
answered
Arguments Staff Recommendation
*Consistency with
the purpose of the
MUA-10 zone.
*Change of zone will
serve the public
health, safety and
welfare.
*Change of
circumstances or a
mistake in the
original zoning.
for rezoning land
from EFU to MUA
or other zone.
The comp plan
allows the
proposed changes
based on its current
language
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org
BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
10:00 A.M., MONDAY, DECEMBER 17,2012
Commissioners' Hearing Room -Administration Building -1300 NW Wall St., Bend
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN INPUT
This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's
discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Please complete a sign-up
card (provided), and give the card to the Recording Secretary. Use the microphone and
clearly state your name when the Board calls on you to speak.
PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject ofa public
hearing will NOT be included in the official record ofthat hearing.
3. A PUBLIC HEARING, and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of
Ordinance No. 2013-004, Amending Code (Internal Auditor) -David Givans,
Internal Auditor
Suggested Actions: Open hearing; close hearing; conduct first reading by title
only.
(Consideration ofthe second reading and adoption ofOrdinance No. 2013-004
would take place no sooner than two weeks from today.)
4. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Document No. 2012-665, the Central
Oregon Public Works Partnership Intergovernmental Agreement -Chris Doty,
Road Department
Suggested Action: Approve signature ofDocument No. 2012-665.
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, December 17,2012
Page 1 of7
5. CONSIDERATION of Board Signature of Document No. 2012-622, a
Services Agreement with Medcor, Inc. regarding the Operation of the
Deschutes Onsite Clinic -David Inbody, Administration
Suggested Action: Approve signature ofDocument No. 2012-622.
6. A PUBLIC HEARING, and Consideration of First Reading, by Title Only, of
Ordinance No. 2013-005, Adopting Amendments relating to the Ambulance
Service District Code -Thomas Kuhn, Health Services
Suggested Action: Approve signature ofDocument No. 2012-665.
7. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2012-666, an Amendment
to an Agreement with TD Cascade Highlands, LLC, adding SFI Cascade
Highlands, LLC to the Agreement -Will Groves, Community Development
Suggested Action: Move approval and signature ofDocument No. 2012-666.
8. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2012-671, Amending an
Improvement Agreement with Pronghorn Destination Resort relating to
Overnight Lodging -Mark Pilliod, County Counsel
Suggested Action: Move signature ofDocument No. 2012-671.
9. DELIBERATIONS on Approval of Applications for a Plan Amendment and
Zone Change Submitted by the Oregon Department of State Lands (Limited De
Novo: File Nos. PA-II-7/ZC-11-2) -Nick Lelack and Paul Blikstad,
Community Development
Suggested Action: Deliberate, and make decision ifappropriate.
10. UPDATE and Discussion regarding the Central Oregon Large Lot Industrial
Project Nick Lelack and Peter Gutowsky, Community Development
CONSENT AGENDA
11. Chair Signature of Document No. 2012-659, Amending a Lease with the State
of Oregon regarding Computer Server Space
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, December 17,2012
Page 2 of7
12. Signature of Document No. 2012-613, the Annual Renewal of a Maintenance
and Support SeIVices Agreement with Motorola for the Sheriffs Office Radio
Communications System
13. Signature of Document No. 2012-657, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (LucianolMacaulay)
14. Signature of Document No. 2012-656, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (Chelsea Trees, Inc./Cattell)
15. Signature of Document No. 2012-670, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (Chalfant-Morrison)
16. Signature of Document No. 2012-672, an Acceptance Deed for a Temporary
Construction Easement on Skyliners Road (Mondry)
17. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-131, Refunding General Obligation Bonds
18. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-132, Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Capital Outlay to Materials and SeIVice in the Jail
Project Fund
19. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-133,Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Contingency to Personnel in the Public Health Fund
20. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-134, Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Contingency to Capital Outlay in the Behavioral
Health Fund
21. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-135, Transfer of Appropriations in the FY
2012-2013 Budget from Contingency to Materials and SeIVice in the Solid
Waste Capital Project Fund
22. Signature of Resolution No. 2012-137, Authorizing a New Checking Account
for the Jail
23. Signature ofa Letter Reappointing John Morter to the Panoramic Access
Special Road District Board, through December 31, 2015
24. Signature of Letters Reappointing William Davidson, John McLaughlin,
Connie Rodda and Steve Swisher to the Commission on Families and Children
Board, through December 30, 2013
25. Signature ofa Letter Correcting the Term of Holly Martin's Appointment to
the Four Rivers Vector Control District, to June 30, 2016
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, December 17,2012
Page 3 of7
26. Signature of a Letter Reappointing Colleen Horton to the Sun Mountain Ranches
Special Road District, through December 31, 2015
27. Signature of Letters Appointing Marianne Straumfjord and Kristin Powers to the
Deschutes County Behavioral Health Advisory Board, through December 31, 2015
28. Approval of Economic Development Grant Requests:
• OSU Extension -Living on a Few Acres Conference -$1,500
• Cat Rescue, Adoption & Foster Team -Trailer Fundraiser -$1,000
• Family Access Network - 6th Annual Fundraiser at St. Charles Medical
Center -$1,500
• CERF -Center for Economic Research and Forecasting Conference,
January 31,2013 -$1,500
• Healthy Beginnings -Improved access to screenings and early intervention
services -$1,500
• Sunriver New Generations School-Towards keeping the school open for
two months while other fundraising efforts take place -$3,000
29. Approval of Minutes:
• Board Meeting of December 3,2012
• Work Sessions of December 3,5 and 12,2012
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9-1-1 COUNTY
SERVICE DISTRICT
30. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Resolution No. 2012-136, Transferring
Appropriations in the FY 2012-2013 Budget within the Personnel Category for
the 9-1-1 County Service District
31. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for
the 9-1-1 County Service District
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION AND 4-H
COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
32. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for
the Extension/4-H County Service District
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, December 17,2012
Page 40f7
RECONVENE AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
33. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Weekly Accounts Payable Vouchers for
Deschutes County
34. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues
relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS
192.660(2)(d). labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items.
FUTURE MEETINGS:
(Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of
Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated.lfyou have questions
regarding a meeting. please call 388-6572.)
Monday, December 17
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Tuesday, December 25
Most County offices will be closed to observe Christmas Day.
Tuesday, January 1
Most County offices will be closed to observe New Year's Day
Wednesday, January 2
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session( s)
Thursday, January 3
8:00 a.m. Joint Meeting with Sisters City Council, Sisters City Hall
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, December 17,2012
Page 5 of7
Monday, January 7
8:30 a.m. Swearing In Ceremony -Elected Officials -Courthouse
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting
Wednesday, January 9
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s)
Thursday, January 10
7:00a.m. Joint Meeting with Redmond City Council, Redmond City Hall
Monday, January 21
Most County offices will be closed to observe Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
Wednesday, January 23,2013
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s)
Monday, January 28
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, January 30
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session could include executive session(s)
Monday, February 4
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1 :30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
3 :30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, December 17,2012
Page 6 of7
Wednesday, February 6
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Monday, February 18
Most County offices will be closed to observe Presidents' Day
Wednesday, February 20
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Monday, February 25
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, February 27
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
Monday, March 4
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Public Safety Coordinating Council Meeting
Wednesday, March 6
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting
1:30p.m. Administrative Work Session -could include executive session(s)
PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues
relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), litigation; ORS
192.660(2)(d), labor negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues; or other executive session items.
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, December 17,2012
Page 7 of7