HomeMy WebLinkAboutDoc 270 - Hazards Mitigation Plan - FEMADeschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.o:rg
AGENDA REQUEST & STAFF REPORT
For Board Business Meeting of April 28, 2010
Please see directions for completing this document on the next page.
DATE: April 19, 2010
FROM: Joe Stutler Forestry 322-7117
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
Consideration and approval of Document No. 2010-276, the 2010 Deschutes County Natural Hazards
Mitigation Plan, Oregon Office of Emergency Services and FEMA.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS DATE? No.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Counties are required to develop and maintain a Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan, and the current plan
for Deschutes County was scheduled to expire January 2010. The first draft was delivered to Oregon
Office of Emergency and FEMA in September 2009 and, after two additional edits and review, we have
a plan conditionally approved by FEMA and OEM. The only requirement left for full approval is
formal adoption by the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners (see attached letter from
FEMA and 16 page checklist). In the Plan we have identified five critical areas of concern: wildland
fire, severe winter storms, flood, volcanic eruption and earthquakes. Mitigation is offered for each
natural hazard. The Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan is a requirement for many reasons; and one of
particular importance to the County is the Plan is required before we can successfully compete for
grants, such as the pre -disaster mitigation grants we have received in the past.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Since there is a current plan, there are no adverse fiscal implications.
RECOMMENDATION & ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval by the Deschutes County BOCC.
ATTENDANCE: Joe Stutler
DISTRIBUTION OF DOCUMENTS:
Joe Stutler should receive a copy; the original is to be recorded. Copies will be distributed to the
Sheriffs Department and appropriate departments and agencies.
April 8, 2010
Mr. Dennis Sigrist
State of Oregon
Office of Homeland Security
Oregon Emergency Management
P.O. Box 14370
Salem. Oregon 97309-5062
Dear Mr. Sigrist:
U.S. Department of Ilomeland Securih
Region X
130 228th Street, SW
Bethell, WA 98021 -9796
A
J FEMA
As requested, the U.S. Department of Ilomeland Security's Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has completed a pre -adoption review of the 2010 Deschutes County Natural
Hazards Mitigation Plan. The plan successfully contains the required criteria, excluding the
adoption. for hazard mitigation plans. as outlined in 44 CFR Part 201. This letter serves as
Region l0's commitment to approve the plan upon receiving documentation of its adoption by
the county.
The plan will not be formally approved by FEMA until it is adopted. Deschutes County is not
eligible for mitigation project grants until the plan is formally approved by FEMA.
Please contact our Regional Mitigation Planning Manager, Kristen Meyers, at (425) 487-4543
with any questions.
Sincerely.
Ryan Ike
Risk Analysis Branch Chief
Mitigation Division
KM:bb
ww w.felna.gov
X
z
0
W
2
w
LL
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
c
0
co
m
0
C
0
0
0
N
L
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
7
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
SCORING SYSTEM
Please check one of the following for each requirement.
O a) 0)3r
O C
L 0 U 0 0> E
U 7 o a) -0 a)
Emm-occ>
c O O-0 0
1)L.
•> 0)0 CC.
a s O N •`
- N E ._ 3 c
O O 0
> �O a) E d
, N N
N O d
F,
C O co
_
O O w 7 O a
cn
a) a) N 0E
E
0 a) co C d
C a) CO E U
E _7
0= c E
L Q O N O a N
C .�. 7 a) a O
a W a •5 E c ._
w D•
w Ew
m
o•
�Z�o
>ma)<0a
O a -p o a) —
da) OwY
N N .0 a) c 0.
a, a E c��
O
o U W
C U LI c
c N 3 c E
0
0) .3).
(0 N . cc E a)
a.�
0.cnc0E
(1)0-.2(0030)0U E 0
E P A y
0
E
E
C_
E -o
a) N
--0
0 0
E a)
• -c)
C 0)
co
O
C
c0 N
aE
O 0
L
f—
U
fn
C ▪ N
E 52co
> o
o
a�
• E
N N
d 7
Z N
z
E
0'
0
E
E
C
E
E
c0
a
L
0
Com)
w
N
(1)
16
u)
w a) >,
O c0 a) .
0-
2
0
c
Q)
c0
7
U
a)
c0
O
c
a)
E
E
0
a)
a)
cc
N
z
Mitigation Strategy
Prerequisite(s) (Check Applicable Box)
x
x
x
13. Local Hazard Mitigation Goals: §201.6(c)(3)(i)
O
U
O
0
N
co)
T
0
O
m
0)
c
1.
c
> IX
0O
ra0
O
J
a)
L.
C
O
0.
0
co
z
Planning Process
N
z
Plan Maintenance Process
x
x
x
c0
0
N
N
N
U
O
0)
c
C
c
0
Q)
O
0
N c0
U O
O N
01
.0
V
a
a)
0)
C 0)
d N
D • a
c0 c
C'Fc"
• N
w
c0 U
7 0
C CO
W co
O N
0) = <4)
•
• O E
0
C U E
o 0 A
C
U
OS cri c1)
co
z
Risk Assessment
20. Continued Public Involvement: §201.6(c)(4)(iii)
N
z
Additional State Requirements*
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN APPROVAL STATUS
PLAN NOT APPROVED
See Reviewer's Comments
C7z
z 0
O ~
Za
W
PLAN APPROVED
0
N
-O
O c
a) cw
cn O
0 N E
O` • 0-
as
• C
co c0 N
a)No
0
0
O
U
0)
a)
w
c c
a)c
N 0-
5 c
0-.0
a)
0
O
0)
Q
FEMA REGION X
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
PREREQUISITE(S)
1. Adoption by the Local Governing Body
0
O
O
.a
O)
O
O
0
4)
-Q
a
O
a
L§-
0 O
O
-10
0
0
c0
-0
O
N
O U
-O U
oN
Ft --
0
o 0
a .2
0
aU
U
•E
Z O
yU
SCORE
1-
w
n
NOT
MET
x
x
x
Revie
°)o`°)
w c6
C O
U C
O
w x
u c c
J a cca
m
0_
0
r -
a
r -
a
0
0.
7
o`
0
a
0
c9
>.
0
O)
C
0
0)
U
O
0
CO CO
2 Q
O
O
N
0
�a
N
N
L
0
cuN
O
0
E
0
0
O)
"-E
0. -00
7
N U
N C
CD
SUMMARY SCORE
2. Multi -Jurisdictional Plan Adoption
1-
W
0 w
z2
SUMMARY SCORE
3. Multi -Jurisdictional Planning Participation
SCORE
MET
0 w
z 2
N
SUMMARY SCORE
r
a -
J
X
z
0
w
w
u-
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
0 O
c,)
a�
0
7
0
U
cn
ID
7
cn
U
a)
0
U
v
to
7
0
o
� O
h
ctr
Zs
O
•r3
O
•
N •
•
0
0
N N
• O
sy •o
w �
N
0 •ti
h
0) p)
h
•.10
0 4-
z
N
z
b O o
•••.1
COD "Izt
h N
ZO
w ` U
d
w
Cl, Z o
� .o
N O U
/The risk assessment shall include a] description of the type ... of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction.
SCORE I
co
x
x
z
x
x
R
CO
en
O 0
6 O 0
N V E
N s 0 .c ca E ECO
a)H o� a E
C u) > -0 Nto
3v v
m
d N `- 0 o N
> L N L 3 L
CD O 3 COC
CO Ii @ c N 0
w Q• 3 — m a) G=
L cn = v
vt ,' 2 a)
COcy > .D) • • c- c
as
• 7 N o O N a
O x
C @ d LL N 03 N
o C4= L
7i c
7 d m
m 0 c0
.- -D
_
a) L
C CO N f6
F--3� ca O� "o
CI.
•E c m n a) LI
c m O m p ] L '
ca U -0-0r w ` R N
co �— a)
p> N m w v 7
CD c)0 C CD ow i c0 73
(Y)0 -.E Q•.V > C
L O m` C a) - y m
H= 5_a) o CCdc
O)
Q
a)
a)
w
N
O
n
a R
ettt
R
7
R
c
Sia
C 0
C
o
O_ U
a) > o
o)
SUMMARY SCORE
SCORE
cn
x
x
x
x
x
z
0
m v
0 '=
m� ac)
z v
y N
m C6 rt/ N
'C m L
m -c L
0 L. L.
mZ a)
0 0
o >^
•
0 C
.
7
Q U
0 CU
Q) O N w
O
C
OO O 0
cc' -2 E 05
EF -
OO O a.
cn c-
o
a. O
a) •—
a� m o
Q) a) s
O -0 re H
O m
O N
4 _c 4k
N co"o .cO 0
C a
The probability of future events for each hazard is addressed.
N
O
a0
M
d
n
a)�
C N
O f6
L
U (a
a) c
C Q
V N
C m
a)a)m
O
L1
O O
CO a) d
a) C
cn
cn co a)
y m c
c).=
.O 0 co
d N
0)0)2
o -o
❑ 0) c
v
h a)
N
C
> CD
a) v
a
m
7 �
4- NN
O m
L
>
U
m
ca
L
O
CL Tic
w 0 c
a)
U 0 w
c O c6
c O Q
CO a)
O 0 O
U a)
c
O a) a)
❑'�.w
❑
SUMMARY SCORE
CO1.0
0
O
N
r
9-
J
X
z
0
w
w
w
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
m
m
m
,c
a)
a
°
a3
a)
m E
U
w
O O
ca
U U
.co
Q.
wa
o co
oc`a
N
-C2 CD
y t O O)
a) U c (6
aas cO
C^a O C U c
O a) N
O ( C C
1:3asca
Jd to
ca °
cd
c L.
m °
E
co C
as
Ca
3 y"
L-z,c
0 L_ y
o
42 'To
C C .h
>c0)�
c C
C cu o
a) (1) C
Q
tor -cu
0
1� a' o W
SCORE
Co
x
x
x
z
Revic
The overall vulnerability of the city to each hazard is described.
0
00
m
n
n
O
fa N
N a)
_
o >
c N
n,_
a)
-o a
_U
C
N
c'c
co
aa)
0) 9-
(0
0. 0
O U
N
C
(1) Z+N
CO
NEE coL
ca
0 v d
0
U
03
n.
E
a)
L
N
N
d
mom•
c
co -0o
n. U
E.
mom_
N
� L
O c
O
c
as
y N
N L
O U
LI N
th
SUMMARY SCORE
8. Assessing Vulnerability: Addressing Repetitive Loss Properties
SCORE
cn
x
x
z
RI
,o
a)
>
0
•y c
0_ N
2 ca
o L u
c > O
N C
co 70
L
w 0 n
= a)
7
a)
O 7 0
Uco c
a) a) c)
5 0 L
caw
0 0 V) i 4660
f0 N C N
.c 0 a)
a)7
C3 a) C L
CO N t' U
U) C N0
rp Na)
O .
c .y a) a) 0
a) a) 'w N ca w
O Z._ o ? N •
cE2,>occo•S12
0. 0) — y N a)
a)NaLa)'>=
L N q)"- a• a) (0 O
F— Z ° 2rta n
a
r
r
d
•c
>
N N 0
s- O (O
111 cu 0 03
L N
0) CO
U ` L
O N
c a):=
mL c
n. E -o
d C N
a 0
O T i0
O O
CD w a)
L-� Of
N
to a)
a)E0-
0a,"2
0
SU
w
cc
0
U
N
z
to
X
z
0
Q
W
W
LL
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
c
0
rn
0
0
U
t
U
0
0
U
y
z"
SUMMARY SCORE
0 U
Q)
0
Q)
z
0
Q)
0
Qs.
O •
a�
E
, Q)
0
Q a)
a) -S.
w a)
O Q7
w Qom)
O
ya
Q)
2"
O
00
E'o
a) .2
c � �
E c o
Q) r c m
.p w c o
N
Q +r X
O V C
Q O c
CD .QQ v J d m
o �a
°c0
ra 1:3
0 ,O
a h o
Q)
QI co 2
c Q
R -C C�
W Ec Q
cNI
U
4.0
co Q
Q3
CO) L.
= Q
<13
N 0) ,c
11)
0) a —
Q -vO 0)
O 01 0
T SCORE
co
t. z
�
Q
„k
Yb •;
er's Comments
lip
SUMMARY SCORE
11. Assessing Vulnerability: Analyzing Development Trends
a
aQi
0
0
a
c
Qs
0
z
a
c
0
,0
U
h
a
0
c
0
c0
0
a
O
•
0 .y
Q U
oa
E z
w
—
z
co�a
Q)
CD -0
Q •ti
U Q
ti
U
CD
Q)
� c
U
h ti
co c.
Q 0
(1)
-0 O
•V
E
� Q7
V 0
ti
to �,
Q
z
co, E
C O
� U
w
a 0
C
W
ce
0
U
0
Z
O 0
r c m
c o o-
o N cu
X
c
m
J N
0
0
W
SUMMARY SCORE
12. Multi -Jurisdictional Risk Assessment
SCORE
co
in
nna
�
z'hl,
's Comment
0)
0
0
CC
°1000
r c m
C 0 0-
c c
o N f4
t0 '— x
C
J 0. N
0
0
U
SUMMARY
N.
sS
0
0
0
r
X
z
0
0
W
2
W
LL
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
O
U
w
U O
O
tl z
fi
,n
0) •
o 0)
r
w
O
0
0
z
-O
0
O
•
tl
0 .1
U
O 0
)y
C3 y
tl
0 O
o 4.
a'
U
tl
CO 1:44
v :
ND
N
O
N
con
L.1
CD
W tl
ar
162
N
Z
1
H
13. Local Hazard Mitigation Goals
Q)
0
cO
.Q)
CO
0
Qn
0
-o
0
co
L.
0
Q)
U
a
O
co
co
0
O
O
4-
0
O
Q
U
CO
-00
C0
a
0
U
c0
t
H
Q)
O
E
a
CO
N
CO
t
LC
N
y
L.
dC
co
E
T SCORE
cn
X
X
Z
X
z
a) o a)
Y c
C O
•c C
O N co
4-'- x
CO
e) C C
CO
0-
4.) w
d
W
CO
L)
O
O
N
a)
f0
as
E
as
t/)
a)
a)
f0
N
f0
a
0
•
O
U
E
a)
a)
(%.
a)
j O
U
.o
c > L
f0 f0
a o a)
w U c
= a)
aa)0)
O s
w O
0) 0 N
m o
a)
O f6
f0a)
0) O a)
o.
o
0 E >
14. Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions
U
a3
G
,D)
E
Q 0
4-_`
O CO
CO
O
cts -o
0 coO
`�
0:0)
Dc `o
0
_Q—c)
U
CII K
c
O
N (o
SCORE
cn
X
X
X
X
z
R
0)
a
i0
0
f0
U
0
0
0)
E
U
U
N
0-
0
CD
CD
CO
O
> o-
( -2
0
N
�
a
E
O f0
U a)
f0'6
O
•N
c
a)
t a)
N
O
ao
ch
O_
c o) c
co co c
'U
N c =_
To )N d -o
C c
as co N f0
C .0 c co
C d 0)
co j -0 co �c
a'' .12) moo) as 1:5
Q E o ��
7 w •5 .= O C
c O O` a ++
d y
d N -0 dC'X
C f0 d
co d C 0 C O
0 0 N O N
Q.0 N • U�
7 V. = (0 0 f0 N co
Nc0 7cc0
OONU
d y. a)t � U2 0 j
Eo_cw.moa)� ,
2--, d N" ,O _c a) N -c O N
C�0' E a ,., 0..2a c a c J
d
. cco W Q m U
SUMMA
CO
X
z
0
w
te
w
LL
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
O
0)
a)
0
a
0
O
y
w
s
U
CD
0
•
0
U
(n
SCORE 1
N
X
X
X
z
R
N Nc
- U)s
,,u,) (0
E > 3 cQ �L 0 m
N C d 7 (0+ C �..
0) 7 LL o v ax a) -o
c
o .ITo
c a
oma.
o 0ZUO)c 7 o m 0.�
nU �(nrn oU � 5-0
a) N «� > N O
,a) .O (0 7 N L (n N O O
7 • _c c\I 0 a. ALL
cs oU >,3 7 c a) Q 0)
(n y a0j 7> U O c
d Q a) D C o co 7 N 0 •N
-,,;•
.= 060000-
.- X
C O N U 10 .m 7 LL
U C (0 (O f0 a) , O U
(�Cau) -3- �••c c-
a ,- C co C C •N C
>, > LL 3
O 7 C_ O ('� LO O N (D > E O�
O O a) ` 0
No.r LL C In .CL Et O CL7
C nj
d N N N N> ER N • C •.. C
OEooa)a)0.°)c • ca(n
C C r a -
y c0aNCUMO CO >*. 0...P UVCvO VzN
O0Na) 0 a0Z
a) 3w c•o¢ (C m co LE t'E • 0-0
Coo• u))�L(nOoo_Z,O(n
•ON
.►CD, C 0-Cti•� 7 N ,Y 3 0. O E 'f9 a)
aa) O >•'-c O E o a. • O > (7n E
0 w
U
C0Eo-0 O,_oatC<�Q
O
O N
o c
o m a
L O LL
E Z
o ca)
3-0-c
73 c
• N a)
O N U
U N C
u) (n
a)s Q
iC E
N - • 8
co Q
It L,
> • Z c
C :r
.°po
:C U
m
U ?r
O d
.cam
ca
_rn 0 0
Ta a)
77 15 lc
o O�� U
LL_9
C ai a)
•-
N E
7 co
c (a c N
c (p 0 C
8-2
CCI
0 0 7 Z N
(n�E�o)
c o 0 >,
.0-0 0.
7 `5 C L
N U 0 7 O
O >'� E m
N a O
C U
` N (n 0 0
o MI
> L d
N f0 C 0
d N ._
0) 7LL '-
OoZ06. :�0
• .0 a) 2 > -0
O OL
•� N _c C a)
> -0 •- N C —
oa)3
C o a) o o
C c N C
c.� 9 O d
E
o.n:= E7
a'a) E „,c v
Ci-o2cca
t
•3
•
0)
U
C
(0
0.
E
0
U
N
N
(0
(0
17
(0
N
a)
o ?
m
` C
EO
m�
7
c • E
N
C,Da
(0 y O LL
0)
0
a)
w
O
co
(D
ai.
0.
M
CO
N
M
0.
0.
O
N
0)
C
U
y
a)
C
(0
0.
a Z
a)
o w
,c
c c
0
a)•ia
.L+ d
(n 'U_
O
0ca
d
SUMMARY SCORE
01
Q
co
0
>-
J
D
FEMA REGION X
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
0
0
N
16. Implementation of Mitigation Actions
E
a
cO
E
L
. C6
� w
U
C G
N
O a
a)C
O
'E"
N
a0
o
UC
o
co co
co
co
0
- N
c),i�
0
- N
N Q
a�
a
Q U
O4C-J 715
N v)
= y O
f9 o a
a o°'
� N •�
CO yO
'`
y c 4)
c.O��
;t:--.)
as
.co
0
co 0
ti
2 O Q
co 0
N
O 0
�.
.0)- oQ
Q
N
Q) .co
�a
•-
acaL.
-0 C
Ca
O U
E o
Ear
L N 0
a
Ct
L..: a
SCORE
cn
x
x
x
x
x
z
R
d O N
+L+ c c0
C O
O N t0
-.--x
CO c
c
J a CCO
0)
E U O
U V
-O O
O w
N '0 CO •
E CO c
CO N — N
N N C
f6 L O `)
L 0) U
rt.{CO
w c0
COa es
0.
c 6 co o
0):r 0) G)
G � C
N O E
_c °L.
O *CZw = U -p
D_ w CO cco
0)
O
N
(.3
a)
0
O
N
a)
CC
a)
v
c
a)
E
E
O
U
a)
CC
E
4-
O
C
7
0
n
con
O
O
a)
E
CL)
O
E
y rn w R
C c0 C
'-
0 c 0) C
C w E p ‘5.
0
.-
CO c no N
N
co c•- c c'E
O 7 L O L
N co c 0
E c 0) a)
U
=m0073.- U O �
co E 4-
O n a) U O
L
0)E O
v N
c6 O �
C
8
O C
0) N_
N nL O
N ll)a)
-o c) Q -cc-
CN mi N
'O a) `) a)
a) w c
iu a)
O- "Es
O
E C 2'0 a) 0
V ca N O L N
o
-a m
Lo'a' N . O) •- . O. N
O O1'3 a) a)
N
O O c6 4) U N
72 y N C S N N
Ow C) 0 -00 a) •
a
�;
m
.OCg Q 0) N �
NoCO OvC
,yU 'C
in N O ki O
n
mm (xmcm?m
f6 C 13 L .2 E C :c
a O d .) O O
='c0 .L. a) m c•co E
0) U
o) a 7 a) • 'i U
a) • N
NE CcS cew
Cr)
0.
M
ci.
r-
0
O
ri.
n
CN
ll)
O
O.
ti
O
O.
n
0 L c a) ` c6 N O ui
O L U N' N
a)a)
a a) 7 X co E . N co
-ca co
7 a o� c .c E m no.0
C N f0 d N •
03 CD c E N 7
as N --p• p�)'E . O U a) � Y N U
m a) N (O E N_O °-2 nEV- N
^m
n7 " a)
C+� L a)
N E N N c E O 0) c c V rn
O X 4? O c a) N N C N a) N CO
m E m w a _c.0'=- cc
CO `U CO -0= w m
0)o co m E C -O
- Lv c c n '- NO N c
�, m a) -p a) n U c N �•.
L O C c6 L
N N N N E Z -p N ..5- O L
c0 U f6 O. •� C CO O N U C a)
O. ` O
p ` n..� c Ca 17 o
ON n ui n C co
7 'C n' 7 a) n N 7 7 .O O (-' N 0
L- n a) L. 10 N` " N «. N N
o _ca) w co N -o 0
3m"=3.3a)O c -a2
CD O a) N a) n F. '_ C iV
C co c c us -c co C O 7 E> f6
.L..' N.L...' c•us
�(�' CN.N-Ea)c6 4--
4-.
rr U co 0 'p C C L 4= C .N-.
d a)ca
0 a) 7 CO 7 N .= a) o- C a) ,.2 'O 'O >'
�oa)N ooo � oEm Omcn
�w��w.�nc0 0a)�0vc67 -,
W Q C U 6
S
0
*7
X
Z
0
C7
w
CC
QC
w
L
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
17. Multi -Jurisdictional Mitigation Actions
SCORE
Cl)
q
�
X
X
Z
SUMMARY SCORE
PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCESS
18. Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan
SCORE
Cl)
X
X
X
X
Z
R
0.
Z
>'
C
0
U
0
a)
7
L
0
h
a)
0
To
L a)
L E
f6
m E
>
0U
c
> o)
d :,
3• 12
a) (o
d N
C2
O
C
0
n
a)
.0
a)
3
a)
a)
E
E
O
U
C
O
co
O)
a) as
n
0a)
O -
• 0)
L c..
U co
0
O0.
(a
O_
M
n
n
co
d
a)
yi
(0
dc
O CO
L `)
d
E .cc
m
c
a)=0
▪ =
o 0
C- -
, -
CO
ccoD-
na)
• O
co c
-0•C
n O
.E
O 0
o
c C
= 5 • E
0 m ru
o co 1:• 3
-0 co
f6 c
L
O
m 3
E o
o)
40 E
U U "g
0) •
c
co n�
n a) :a
12-2 0
co 0 00-
o co a)
7 7 L
(a a)
O >
L 0
• o •�
oE
u) - L
ms 3
vu)
C0
'O )
C .5
C7-1>
-O 0
O L
a
a))
E
0
a) >
a) .c
"-
c c
0
co co
n Q -
m
f6
7 (15
0
O
3 �
C Q
a) a)
O
o
os
O co
SUMMARY SCORE
X
z
0
w
oC
w
LL.
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
0
0)
(1)
0
T
c
7
0
U
N
0
0
U
0
Q)
O
O
a)
0.
O
O
co
C
Q)
z
Cr
Q)
Q)
0
0
U
wa)
N .00
EQ
o
Q
> CO
(o -
U a?
U C
co
� Q
-Q Q)
0) N
U OO
o a
E
„).
C
ca esv
u • 0
a)
c0
C1 y
c c(o .c
C 4
a°'C E
c)I„o
r _ N
c/)
et U
0 CO
CC) E
o
(`0 2 a�U
o. mi
E
o a) )
C
Qi ro
Q
SCORE
u)
X
x
x
x
z
R
o o a)
t C (d
CO
C .0 72
O N f0
(C - N
U C
Q. (co
rn'
Q
Local planning mechanisms are identified.
10
a) .O
C C c
c0) -•••••
N O
Q) 2'c E 2 u
7 Q)
E co oc o N
5 a) a s w 0
O0) EoE E0
O C L
C O O C O O
U C N N O N N C
O p_ -o C a)
Nco
L Q
O C C 4)
L.. L CIO 00 N E (0
0 O a 2 o U -c
0 O L O N C 00 O
L - 0) N O E N
U
C L c
(A C .0 7 co 0 0
f6 N C •-
a cn --= p C 0 O N U C a)
o. p 7 _ N E (6 N
O N 4 o E co ) Ea) D_ U
c v U a 4=
`ii d N o= C E
C ap
O•� C L'�C O N r COCC 'ONQ
yO U L O E .Oas N(0 . . a) O O U O O)
a -cn -o- c (a t c m
N c yj ' m L L
o a) E C4 o@ E •X C X a)
(o o •N 13 L N N a) 0 U N
p_ C i N'�fCOL O ISLL
7 E- 2 .i. 7 L c .(/) c c 7
U U
= U N N N (L6 0 0 0 0 0
1- .E E o: O. E Ce S
0)
(17
O
O
a
0.
O
0.
n
pp. 10-12, 40-107
0)
c
(0
a •@
U
O E
0 a)
L L..
0 0)
C
C @ C
CI) O ca
E2' a
N 0 0
a
N O.0)
N N E
-0.o
3 .ca L
0 > .'
O
N
c E c
_ca) 2 E
L •=
O N o-
oE�'
C C
O ,0
E m a)
EEL
> 0 0
0 c 0
C
o L
O 0 N �.
a)oE°-)
.L.. C N (6
(0 N C
o
a) 0 rnN o
@ D_
c ca
O_ 'C C
c • 3
c
x•O
c6 (4
E
a :
f6
'0 a !:cc(0�+'
7o'cE
o c c
ac/)
Q^ (4
.c U O.
SUMMARY SCORE
20. Continued Public Involvement
SCORE J
u)
x
x
z
Reviewer's Comments
O
O_
C
a)
0)
w
O
O
o.
�•
5
m3 10
c o
c n (0
c E
O y
0 cti C
U x .0 N
0 0
o ' 3
CE
. 2 0 0) c
x a).C'al
m .E o) o
c r E
as 0
aL0 C >
L f0
=
a
3U co
co O C
c c
O U (0
aa)i5.0o
0a�
(02<,E
0 a EU
SUMMARY SCORE
END OF REVIEW
FEMA REGION X
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
0 .0
H a, y
n
CD ocZ
d
c.e)
i
o 0
tel w
.Y O N
v, ?
U
.4 O.
N
cc:r
µi am•'
0 a.
a.
0 N L, U
.°Eben
ami c °'
,,,E
L epi.
0.
ca. bn • 0
cd = v, '"
0 C :a+ ar
3
CCS 'D N a,
0
w0 0 at U
- U N
O •Y
0 v y `r
-to bo
a) bo
O
a)a 0) -i
y 0 .0 C!
-0 > 0
En 0 0
N 0 0. 1-21
E S cd ,n
.0 2N d o,
0)) 0 a)t
a)
0 cd O 1.., 0 O�
0 a 51 _..5 04Q E 0 t",
m w 0 3 a
0 c a) w
a)a) ,> E
= C v) Cj I. 0 a) 0)
•� h
0 Q x t.,...,
o0 4 U C •,,
o •;, y
'
V) c��d 4° au7 U
a) E i.'
— 2 ❑ 0 b
c k. _ 0 00 Q1 •.
s z 0 4
r .0V
C O 0 b•
= O N 0 0
0 -.0 'al) 0 N
C.)
- _0 0 bn Y.
cd c
r• _n 1.• O aa)i •CA i _.
1._ N 0 0 Q Cr O
: d u pQ.
must discuss repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as defined by the National Flood Insurance Program
As part of the Risk Assessment,
.-c..'
U
a)
69
CI
0)
0
E
O
a)
O
O
0
0
Cti
0
n.
3
0)
cd0
0
0
U
a1+
O
0)
c
Ell
z
ct
Tzt
0)
U
Ct
O
O
O
°
0
.(0
0)
C
N
O
0 °°
o
a .9
0) N
4r+ -0
0
0 'C
a 0
a) a
Qi ct
Q >
Severe Repetitive Loss Properties are defined in 44 CFR §79.2(g) as follows:
N
T
CL a) al rd
LL
Z $ o 0
C aJ 0 Q1 ,-1
o 'O 0 > C
3 0 0
LL+
C c 0 0 3
0 0) a) 0
"O a) „ "O
0) n a) as
L..
> v E
$ N -o a=, E
a) Y C -0f0
L C 0 f0 U
ro cu
o O C c
+L•+ O 0) rd
CU •
'Cr) a .0 L a
C
> U O
CU co U
0 U v L L u
a) U T N 0
ro 0) CO - 4_
MI 4-
:11.-
- O
c o . o i
01 101), C 0 j CO
7) a) al E m T
i_ O T rT0 +.+
T E 0. ` _
E ° +�+ OD c 0 L
L Y ov E 3
+0 C al al
a L 0 0O L
E 3 o i c 0
0 o C o c
N "-coyN al v E
to
00 c E al
c ro rTo x
E . a 0) 'ro C•
v, f0 7 al N N U E
17 .0 CO X 'r0 +L•+ U
CN C Ql U U .•-I
_c 0
CU -d C E rr0 0)
p-->' o o (0 c
0) o •E o- c �, °
.4.74 .0 v, N O CO 0
41 0 ti p
'CD
ucu 'ro ro E 0) .Q
O "O r0 U N 0 C -_
tZ CO •C 4 U r0 > H 3
V U > y u rY0 C a)
0 r0 C 4- L i
-) o L = 0 3 0 0
CU 0_ �, p E
>_ 0) ro E C
LLu .0 u
Cv•v 0 1•" (0 0 o
0
a ‘...°3 ;:-T E
a) =-- row 3 vo
CC VI
C
N
O
v O
va .~
0)
(0
0
0
Y
Ci
0
0
caca
0,3 En 0
r
-o a
a)
O °
T
U
C6 ct
4. 0
O v,
N 06
cd
5 E
0 0
a) cd
Y o`" •0
O•
E
tU.. .
U 4
cd �.
O E _,
ti . U
N a)
47.1
.y •O 0 0/ U
1.0
CAW la z
0 0
b td '3
�
to.y c 0
) 0
Ec ai
,_. - c
0)cd •
CL, ( td
II
0 0) d• r. o b
�
0 o,
c ( 4-. 0 °
o
v p O .c
Y ¢ o U
o • =
N
> a) Ut•,
•a+ a) cid Y C
O, CJ 40 a +0, ;
a) O -0 ;) co
0 z
0 o E-- a v
c -0 0
co -O ca)i a) �, rrU-•, 0)) c
O
L a 0' .E a O Q
7 v
�_ EA •id =
o E 0 E
C
EU 0
c •> _
O 0 = • •
0
I.) .oG
b!1
o5 a3 -o
• E a) = )2
0 C
O C
'v E O .70
C° j v
O cd , Q w
o a) n, .- w
Ea;
U N
L1. a va)i U cod C
D o au 0 a) y Q
a.° U•7, o -0
I
*� 0 3 C
C o ° o ;� 4
ca a
.0 pL y 0 U C p
EA -0 C 0 N
fl, c
0 E E cd 0 -0 a) °° 0 •�
�zz - 0 E0 a, ,
0 = c w s
,., Ll a) C
a) a)• a) 1-.o-
.0 0 c _O
E- E- epi
^'1
x
z
0
0
w
cc
2
w
u-
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK
%
""c:3 ^
,) \
\
\
(
H
b a
' $
§ ƒ
\
% \
\ k
5
\ \
0 3
Q•- %
\ o \ (
704 a) cis
\ �� •
\
./ \ )
s = •
$
o \ to
/
0� f
ct
/ 2
. \\ \
\ \ ) 4
a \ m \
\ / (
) / / \
\ '� & ]
0 . § /
\ / f \
2 \
%
/ o «
\) ( E : # . CS /\\ - CS\
P. .e
/ \ �� \%
w \ / 0.
,o �E Q.(
[ )\ §2
2/ \% Q
V �� \/
%
\\ \k 2/
esi
c,00 '"Z :\ �/
§» •-� 2\
, / § § e
§ \ . \ •_ Ell
e 2\
k� \
E Q .e
September 1, 2009