HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-02-23 Business Meeting Minutes-(ES C., Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701 -1960 (541) 388 -6570 - Fax (541) 385 -3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2009 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Dennis R. Luke and Alan Unger. Also present were Nick Lelack, Paul Blikstad, Will Groves, Kevin Harrison and Anthony Raguine, Community Development; Anna Johnson, Communications; Laurie Craghead, Legal Counsel; and approximately twenty other citizens Chair Baney opened the meeting at this time. The Board then recognized Bonnie Baker, Recording Secretary, for ten years of service with the County. 1. Before the Board was Citizen Input. None was offered. 2. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Findings and Decision regarding the City of Sisters' Proposal to Change the County Designation of Property from Forest to Urban Reserve. Will Groves gave a brief overview, and indicated that the City of Sisters has reviewed and approved this document. LUKE: Move approval. UNGER: Second. VOTE: UNGER: Yes. LUKE: Yes. TAMMY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 1 of 9 Pages 3. Before the Board was a Public Hearing on Files No. PA -083 and ZC -083, on an Appeal of the Hearings Officer's Decision regarding a Plan Amendment /Zone Change on Agricultural /EFU to Airport Development (Aviation Support District - Bend). Chair Baney opened the public hearing at this time, and Laurie Craghead read the opening statement. In regard to ex parte contacts, Commissioner Luke pointed out that there was talk about this when the urban renewal district and runway extension issues were addressed. He also said he has known Pat Gisler for a long time. Commissioner Unger said that he recently visited the airport to get an update on activities there. Commissioner Baney agreed with the comments made, and said she has also known Mr. Gisler for years. Anthony Raguine gave an overview of the item. The Hearings Officer recommended denial, as the application relates to Statewide Planning Goal 2, the requirement for a factual basis. This relates to the Airport Master Plan, which now says that sufficient area is available for airport uses, and the Hearings Officer felt there was not a change in circumstances warranting a rezone. Peter Russell said that staff is concerned about applying the TPR if there is no simultaneous site plan (page 13); also Statewide Planning Goal 12, transportation planning and limits. Laurie Craghead noted that when there is a plan amendment, Statewide Planning Goals apply. They have to balance the Master Plan, and the TPR is applicable. Commissioner Luke said that he has the same concerns as the Hearings Officer; the Master Plan has not been updated for a long time, and it needs to be done. Jeff Wilson and Will Van Vactor, attorneys with Miller Nash of Prineville, and Roger Borine, a soils expert were present to support the applicant. They gave an overview, referring to maps. Much of the discussion related to the types of soils surrounding the airport area, the fact that the area if not prime agricultural land, and how the airport runway area and protection zone interfere with uses other than those tied to the airport. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 2 of 9 Pages Mr. Wilson said that the Hearings Officer recommended against approval, but it was not an appeal. He feels it could be approved if the Airport Master Plan was updated and correct. He said this argument is a common one, that a comprehensive plan and master plan are not compatible, but this is only a recommendation of law. He feels that for the most part the Hearings Officer was supportive of the application. He added that there is no evidence of a negative impact on the surrounding farms, and there has been no opposition from adjacent property owners at this point. A consulting soil scientist was contacted to investigate the soils on lots 401 and 403. He found the soils are shallow with low water capacity, and do not meet the definition of agricultural land. The Hearings Officer noted this as well. He added that the Hearings Officer found that this change would assist with eonmic development, and that the property is not suitable for residential development. The Airport Master Plan is an issue with Goal 12, transportation. He feels that the rezone could take place whether or not the property is in the Master Plan overlay; the Master Plan could be amended later. The rezone is compatible with the surrounding properties, as required by OAR. The Board of Commissioners has the authority and probably the duty to regulate surrounding land use in this fashion. The intent of the existing Master Plan and the law seems to be that this land should be eligible for a rezone. He thinks the need can be established. The most recent update did not adequately consider the demand for the airport and airport related services. He said that if there is a conflict between the maps and text, the text controls. This contradicts the map that the Hearings Officer referred to. She also minimized the urban renewal district information. The change requires a substantial change in circumstances. The land was originally zoned EFU, but the development of the airport is a change, as well as the extension of the runway and the purchase by the City of Bend of a portion of the property. He disagrees with the Hearings Officer that these don't matter. He reiterated that there was no opposition to the application. Also, the $10,000 application fee is a lot of money. If the Board agrees with the Hearings Officer, he doesn't think it is right to have to pay an additional $10,000 after the Mater Plan is amended. He thinks the zone change can be supported now. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 3 of 9 Pages Commissioner Luke stated that the airport clear zone is still zoned EFU, and the City has not asked for a zone change on its own property. To take property out of EFU without a stated need sets precedence and triggers appeals. The other question is what would keep property south of this one from coming in and wanting a zone change as well. Mr. Wilson said that practically speaking, and in terms of need, he doesn't think this is the law in Oregon. They have to show it is irrevocably dedicated to another use or show that it is non - agricultural. Commissioner Baney asked if it could be another use or the existing homesites into a conforming use or RR -10. Mr. Wilson replied that if it is not farm use, the question becomes what should it be. Airport uses is the best use of the property. Compatibility is the problem if it were residential. The highest and best use is for airport- related uses, and there isn't a lot of that type of property available. Commissioner Baney suggested that the more the airport is expanded, the more compatibility issues may expand. It is hard to know what triggers the growth, but other lands might become expansion areas. It is important to remember that the purpose of the airport zone is to be consistent with the Airport Master Plan and the Comprehensive Plan. It is a roadmap that is to be used. Government often does the planning later than it should. Mr. Wilson said that he is asking only that it be rezoned to be consistent with the soils. The language talks about development but there is no application before the Board. Those would be addressed at the time of a development application. Patrick Gisler testified that he is part of the LLC but not the owner of the property; he has a managing interest. There are a dozen or so owners involved, most of which are pilots; the property was acquired for the purpose of becoming part of the airport some years ago. An agreement was already in place with the City but the City did not follow through. He believes that the Comprehensive Plan is the overall controlling document, followed by the zoning ordinances and maps, and the master plan and refinement plans. Then come the development and eventually building permits and use of the land. All have to be in compliance, but the order of priority is from the top down, which is the reason for the comprehensive plan. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 4 of 9 Pages This property was included in the master plan at least once over the years. The Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan are not one and the same. This is a refinement of the Master Plan. He understands the decision regarding the urban renewal district, but this is not the same thing. This helps update the Master Plan efficiently. All of the land is inside of the noise contour area, and there are really no other zones that are compatible. Not many other properties would be subject to this type of zone change; there are only two that adjoin the runway, to the north and south. They invited the City to join in this application, but they didn't see the need even though they built airport -type improvements on EFU land, the runway extension that was recently completed and the overrun area. No one has complained about this. The paving extends to the center line of old Nelson Road, and the base extends into EFU about 600 feet, and the extension 1,100 feet into EFU land. This all caused it to be impossible to use the previously existing irrigation system. It is not feasible to build a new irrigation system to serve those lands. David Hice, the General Manager for EPIC Air, said his position is undecided. All of the companies at the Airport have an interest in seeing the airport improve, with attention being given to the existing structures and property lines. They have a lot of land to the northeast that has not yet been addressed. There are water and sewage concerns, and EPIC did a lot of work in this regard. They want to be friendly to the community and not have airport sprawl that is not controlled. The Airport Master Plan is in dire need of updating to address hangar uses and other issues. He knows there is a new runway and they are waiting for additional taxiways to make the airport more practical and safe. He feels the Airport Master Plan is a viable piece of what needs to be done. The focus is on current perimeters as defined, and a lot of expansion and development needs to be addressed with the Master Plan. The overrun area was an addition and proved out to be a good thing. They have been meeting with the City to put together an outline and milestones for the Master Plan, but there is no timeline set. The last update was done in 2002 and it is supposed to be done every five years. The Chair called for a five- minute break at this time. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 5 of 9 Pages Mr. Raguine said that the Headings Officer felt that both the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan are approval criteria. The application talks about the noise contours, and this comes from the Master Plan but references the Comprehensive Plan. If the Board wants to consider it relevant per the Master Plan, they have to show public need. The former Airport Manager said that there was no need for additional land right now. Peter Russell commented that there was testimony why this is not appropriate as farm ground. However, there would be differences in traffic with this change. Ms. Craghead noted that they always use the worst case scenario for a zone change. Also, it is an urban use under Goal 14, but the Master Plan should be amended. Mr. Raguine said that there was one letter submitted from the City of Bend early. They declined to participate in the hearings or make further comments. Commissioner Luke said that without a master plan, the same logic could apply to others. There needs to be a defining document so that the best judgments can be made. The Master Plan has to include this property. He stated that he would like input from staff on the fee issue. Ms. Craghead stated that one option is to continue the hearing to a date certain, to allow for the Master Plan to be revised. The application could be modified at that point. Or the Board could close the hearing and leave the written record open, deliberate and make a decision, but the applicant would have to reapply. Commissioner Baney said that the applicant is not solely responsible for what is at play; the City is involved and this is a unique situation. She does not think it is fair for the applicant to bear the entire burden. Commissioners Luke and Baney agreed that more needs to be done. Commissioner Unger said that there are a lot of desires at the airport, but the Master Plan needs to be clarified. The zone change should wait until more is known. The City of Bend should be at the table and doing the Master Plan update. There is sufficient evidence that this property should be changed to airport development, and the applicant has done a good job of explaining this except perhaps the transportation part. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 6 of 9 Pages Mr. Wilson said that perhaps a resolution of intent to rezone might be considered, with the rezone subject to certain conditions. Commissioner Luke stated that they can't do that, as it would presuppose what the Master Plan might say. If this is continued, they will find out what the Master Plan changes are. Ms. Craghead said that the Board would make a basic finding that it complies now and would defer the decision, but a public hearing would not be held. She sees this as problematic. Commissioner Unger noted that he has some concerns, but there is a runway protection zone already and it is clear that it will be airport development property someday. Ms. Craghead said that she disagrees with Mr. Gisler's analysis, and feels the Master Plan should be held more important. After a lengthy discussion, it was agreed that the hearing would be continued to the regular 10:00 a.m. Board meeting of August 3, 2009. 4. Before the Board were Deliberations on a Decision regarding Files CU -07- 102, SP -07 -46 (MA -08 -3, MA -08 -4, A -08 -14 and A- 08 -20) for Latham Excavation, regarding an Appeal of the Hearings Officer's Decision on an Application to Expand Mining Activities at a Site Located off Johnson Road. Due to time constraints, Laurie Craghead said that the applicant will provide in writing an extension to the end of March 2009 for a decision. Deliberations were then scheduled for the Wednesday, February 25 Board meeting. 5. Before the Board was an Addition to the Agenda. Before the Board was a Discussion of Bond Reductions for Caldera Springs. Will Groves said that this item is for discussion only and relates to the protocols regarding bond reductions. Caldera Springs would like a partial release as permitted by agreement as construction occurs. Future bonds may include this in the standard language. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 7 of 9 Pages Ms. Craghead said that they need to know whether this would be done by staff or the Board. Staff prefers that the Board do the releases due to the large dollar amounts involved. Commissioner Baney asked what impacts this would have on staff and financing. Steve Holfer of Ball Janik, Attorneys, said they want to simplify the process. The bond issues relate to the cabins, not the infrastructure or golf course. Each time they have had to do a new estimate of what it would take to complete the work, and this is lengthy and expensive. Staff can determine that a cabin has been built, the cost of it and reduce the bond accordingly. Bonds are very expensive, and also lower the bonding capacity of the parent company. They could provide one set of construction estimates within any time of the twelve- month period, and would not have to do it every three or four months. The estimate could be increased 8% a year to protect against inflation. Commissioner Luke asked if the cabins vary in cost. Mr. Holfer said they are roughly the same price, with a range of standard amenities. Commissioner Luke said he'd like to see a public hearing on this, as there is a lot of interest in destination resorts. Ms. Craghead clarified that this is not part of Code; it is language in the individual contracts. It was a standard provision from Pronghorn on, as part of the contract, not a Code issue. Mr. Holfer stated that this is not about changing the bonding process, which already allows for releases; it only affects the number of times they have to get estimates done. Commissioner Baney clarified that staff would determine if the work had been done, the releases would occur and they would not have to come to the Board several times a year. Ms. Craghead said that they are asking to never come before the Board on this issue. They would provide construction costs to staff, and staff would decide whether to do the releases. Commissioner Luke said that they already count on staff to do that research. There is also a bond of 110% for a cushion. But he would still like these to come to the Board and to have some public testimony. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 8 of 9 Pages Commissioner Unger stated that he is comfortable with the proposed process, but it should be decided in public. There are economic issues, and the purposes of the bonds are being met. He wants to be sure there is enough for unforeseen circumstances. It seems straightforward to him. Commissioner Baney stated that it may be difficult to get consensus at this time. She would like to see a list of pros and cons for a future date, perhaps at a work session to figure out how they want to proceed. Commissioner Luke said he wants this discussed at a regular business meeting, since there is a lot of public interest in destination resorts. Being no further items to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 12:35 p.m. DATED this 23rd Day of February 2009 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST: Recording Secretary Tammy 'aney, Cha Det'inis R. Luke, Vice Chair Alan Unger, Commissioner Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 9 of 9 Pages ES Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701 -1960 (541) 388 -6570 - Fax (541) 385 -3202 - www.deschutes.org BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10:00 A.M., MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2009 Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend 1. CITIZEN INPUT This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Citizens who wish to speak should sign up prior to the beginning of the meeting on the sign -up cards provided. Please use the microphone and also state your name and address at the time the Board calls on you to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject of a public hearing will NOT be included in the record of that hearing. 2. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Findings and Decision regarding the City of Sisters' Proposal to Change the County Designation of Property from Forest to Urban Reserve — Will Groves, Community Development Department 3. PUBLIC HEARING on Files No. PA -083 and ZC -083, on an Appeal of the Hearings Officer's Decision regarding a Plan Amendment /Zone Change on Agricultural/EFU to Airport Development (Aviation Support District - Bend) — Anthony Raguine, Community Development 4. DELIBERATIONS on a Decision regarding Files CU -07 -102, SP -07 -46 (MA- 08-3, MA -08 -4, A -08 -14 and A- 08 -20) for Latham Excavation, regarding an Appeal of the Hearings Officer's Decision on an Application to Expand Mining Activities at a Site Located off Johnson Road — Paul Blikstad 5. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7 -1 -1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388 -6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 200' Page 1 of 8 Pages FUTURE MEETINGS: (Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388- 6572.) Thursday, February 26, 2009 9:00 a.m. Tri- County Work Session (Deschutes, Jefferson, Crook) — Fairgrounds Board Room, Redmond Monday, March 2, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, March 4, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, March 5, 2009 7:30 a.m. State of the County Forecast Breakfast — Bend Country Club 10:00 a.m. Regular Update with Community Development Department 2:00 p.m. Regular Update with Road Department 3:00 p.m. Regular Update with Solid Waste Department Wednesday, March 11, 2009 7:30 a.m. Conference Call with Public Affairs Council (State Lobbyist) regarding Legislation 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Redmond Council, in Redmond 11:00 a.m. Regular Update with Health & Human Services Department Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 2 of 8 Pages Monday, March 16, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, March 18, 2009 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:00 a.m. Regular Update with the Clerk 10:00 a.m. Regular Update with Community Justice Department Monday, March 23, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, March 25, 2009 7:30 a.m. Conference Call with Public Affairs Council (State Lobbyist) regarding Legislation 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with Fair & Expo Department 10:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the Assessor 11:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with Commission on Children & Families Monday, March 30, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, April 1, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 3 of 8 Pages Thursday, April 2, 2009 8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Sisters Council, Sisters City Hall Monday, April 6, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, April 8, 2009 7:30 a.m. Conference Call with Public Affairs Council (State Lobbyist) regarding Legislation 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Monday, April 20, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:30 a.m. Conference Call with Public Affairs Council (State Lobbyist) regarding Legislation 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Monday, April 27, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 4 of 8 Pages Monday, May 4, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, May 6, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12 noon Regular Commissioners /Department Directors Update Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Redmond Council, in Redmond Monday, May 18, 2009 9:00 a.m. Budget Deliberations Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:00 a.m. Budget Deliberations 1:00 p.m. Departmental Budget Presentations Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:00 a.m. Budget Deliberations Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:00 a.m. Budget Deliberations Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 5 of 8 Pages Monday, May 25, 2009 Most County Offices will be closed to observe Memorial Day. Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Monday, June 1, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) 3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council) Wednesday, June 3, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 4, 2009 10:00 a.m. Regular Update with the District Attorney 11:00 a.m. Regular Update with Community Development Department 1:30 p.m. Regular Update with Road Department 2:30 p.m. Regular Update with Solid Waste Department Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:30 a.m. Conference Call with Public Affairs Council (State Lobbyist) regarding Legislation 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:00 a.m. Regular Update with Health & Human Services Department Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 6 of 8 Pages Monday, June 15, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:00 a.m. Regular Update with Community Justice Department Monday, June 22 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, June 24, 2009 7:30 a.m. Conference Call with Public Affairs Council (State Lobbyist) regarding Legislation 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting — includes public hearings on proposed budgets, and consideration of adoption of the budgets 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Thursday, June 25, 2009 9:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with Fair & Expo Department 11:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with Commission on Children & Families 2:00 p.m. Regular Meeting with the Sheriff Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting 1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 7 of 8 Pages Thursday, July 2 8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Sisters Council, Sisters City Hall Friday, July 3 Most County Offices will be closed to observe Independence Day. Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7 -1 -1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388 -6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information. Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, February 23, 2009 Page 8 of 8 Pages BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest ' , "~'� e-' date ^© Name Address p, ?s1 ,e),_ A, get X04' Phone #s L j' /-� 5/8— E' e" E -mail address In Favor "Neutral/Undecided Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Opposed Yes [No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest Name Address -De - e. Date 216? 3ti(S kV)J (,.VML 57- 0730 Re-1\n D ci‘1-401 Phone #s J? eno E -mail address ctfP1 L 5) 6 col/ UlLin Favor Neutral/Undecided Submitting written documents as part of testimony? es Opposed No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING REQUEST TO SPEAK Agenda Item of Interest 6-/ ,ir,,e7 Ab6744Cie.. Date qZ V4c Name ��lz .J/-7h Address 29772 :,� -Z,'/ t2 '4, 977e/ Phone #s 67 � /U -2 57 7 (,*J) E -mail address /"�c�iire In Favor Neutralechteisiskl Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Opposed Yes [7 No BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING Agenda Item of Interest Name Address REQUEST TO SPEAK Date 2- Zj. oQ fQ- c177S 23v Phone #s ,may/ 997- 5777 E -mail address �i � . eaiSAd Cd /1'f � r1- Co,s,. /1-,In Favor Neutral/Undecided Submitting written documents as part of testimony? es Opposed No ■n ■■■ ■.;- ■1 ■■ MI 11 -IN 01100 'pun NNE —.I aim ■ 111111 IN ■■■■■ - ■mi ■ MEI INN lir ii fii>~II�rO��,���� Ills ■iii �� ■NI E . Iwo nip sirr if if. 1- op in 111111 in Artm IN awl gamma uddif 611111111 Subject Property 15- 10 -09 -00 -01002 1 i Legend Subject Property 15- 10 -09 -00 -01002 QSisters Urban Growth Boundary County Zoning EFU Sisters /Cloverdale Subzone (EFUSC) Flood Plain (FP) Forest Use 1 (F1) Rural Residential (RR10) PROPOSED LOCATION MAP City of Sisters Exhibit IIB" 0 260 500 1,000 MlaGli Feel January 29,2009 D0C1AMFA: The FbOss.on on eY map w. cleric.] *on, epl0I dateSW on D .uor. County. 0.1.9. Cr. was •M.n 0 do aeration of 0NY me. ..4 II hi pron.. '.. U'. ,.suss. Caoty cannot.c1P1 any r..pon.ledty la rmu. onus.... or Poor.... 0099 F the d. sI date or PM 0idarfyM0 record.. Then re no warmness. express al peed. ac0Ar9 w.nardy of m.nrh.nuGPry ar nine.* for a part., P00PO0...6orn 090(9 W. arodn Hmr v.t notification of any anon a W .ppradaMd. NtC0.tem\ Canty1CDD' Pl .mirNOViltlZCPEOZProlcFMVdnc.tb 8.9.00 OREGON LAND USE PLANNING COMPREHENSIVE PLANS • ZONING ORDINANCES f MASTER/REFINEMENT PLANS DEVELOPMENTS • BUILDING PERMITS/USES "GISLER CHART" Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Planning Commission RE: Airport Zoning Expansion PA -08 -3 and ZC -08 -3 Commissioners, Please accept my strong support for the proposed airport zoning expansion. We need more land for expansion of airport uses, including airport facilities, hangars, tie -downs and airport industrial uses. Sincerely, Signatur i Gk 6chrCumeci Print Name 22.5clO. g©r■ Rd . Address Gt770 1 City, State & Zipcode 477 //,,t'` 211Z_ 2_009 Date FEB 2 0 2009 `►-- BOAR OF OF TONERS