HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-11-30 Business Meeting MinutesDeschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701 -1960
(541) 388 -6570 - Fax (541) 385 -3202 - www.deschutes.org
MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009
Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend
Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Dennis R. Luke and Alan Unger. Also
present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Laurie Craghead, Legal
Counsel; Tom Anderson, Paul Blikstad, Will Groves, Kristen Maze and Cynthia
Smidt, Community Development; Tom Blust and Dennis Morris, Road Department;
Anna Johnson, Communications; Hillary Borrud of The Bulletin; and
approximately twenty other citizens.
Chair Baney opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m.
1. Before the Board was Citizen Input.
The Board presented a plaque to and recognized the thirty years of service of
Dennis Morris of the Road Department.
2. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval County Administrator's
Signature of Document No. 2009 -666, an Assignment of Lease regarding
Coffee Service in the Justice Building.
Teresa Rozic gave a brief overview of the item.
LUKE: Move approval.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 1 of 9 Pages
3. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2009 -073,
Accepting a Petition for the Formation of Pinewood Estates Special Road
District, and Setting a Hearing Date.
Laurie Craghead said the necessary requirements have been met so far, and the
security deposit has been paid. There will be two hearings as required by law.
She explained that most of the lots are developed and inhabited. The first date
will be January 6, 2010.
LUKE: Move approval.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
4. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2009-
660 and Document No. 2009 -678, Authorizing Partial Release of
Improvement Agreement Bonds — Caldera Springs Resort.
Will Groves explained the reason for the release. Many of the cabins have been
completed and can be removed from the bond. Others are on warranty for the
balance of a full year.
Laurie Craghead said it is a policy issue and not a legal issue as to whether the
bond should be lowered.
UNGER: Move approval.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
5. Before the Board was Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No.
2009 -023, a Text Amendment regarding the Deschutes County Sign
Ordinance.
Cynthia Smidt gave a brief overview of the County- originated text amendment.
There are four options of text changes for the Board to consider.
Staff recommends option 3 or 4, as these present the fewest conflicts.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 2 of 9 Pages
Ms. Smidt said that the second reading would have to take place in January due
to scheduling; or the Board can adopt by first and second reading Laurie
Craghead said the decision would need to be unanimous in this case.
The Board indicated option #3 is their preference. Commissioner Luke
suggested that this be on the agenda next week, with first and second readings
and adoption by emergency at that time.
6. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2009-
669, Findings and Decision on an Appeal by Tumalo Irrigation District of a
Historic Landmarks Commission Denial of a Landscaping Plan at the
Tumalo Creek Diversion Dam.
Kristen Maze explained the item, which was subject to a public hearing on
November 2, finding that the Historic Landmarks Commission decision be
overturned.
LUKE: Move approval.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
7. Before the Board was Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption, by
Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2009 -025, Amending Code to Allow Utility
Facilities in the La Pine Industrial District.
Kristen Maze gave a brief overview of the item. At a joint public hearing of the
La Pine and Deschutes County Planning Commissions, approval was
recommended. A maximum height limitation would be included, not to exceed
Department of Environmental Quality requirements. With this Ordinance, they
could include an extra scrubber, etc. if they wish. A lengthy discussion took
place regarding the height of the stacks.
LUKE: Move second reading by title and including the change to language
as discussed in regard to the second alternative as proposed by staff.
UNGER: Second.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 3 of 9 Pages
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
Chair Baney then conducted the second reading, including the change on page 8
(e), item 3, exhaust stacks are not to exceed 100 feet in height or the DEQ
requirements regarding heights, whichever is less.
LUKE: Move adoption.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
8. Before the Board was a Public Hearing and Consideration of First and
Second Readings and Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2009-
026, Allowing Public Safety Operations in the Surface Mining Zone.
Chair Baney read the opening statement at this time.
In regard to conflicts of interest, bias, prejudgment or personal interest,
Commissioner Luke said he has discussed this with ODOT staff at other
meetings. Commissioners Baney and Unger had nothing to disclose.
Chair Baney opened the hearing at this time.
Paul Blikstad provided a brief overview of the item. The text amendment was
submitted by the Oregon Department of Transportation, so that it can utilize a
highway maintenance location year- round. The initial hearing was held n
October and continued to a later date, at which time the Planning Commissioner
voted unanimously to approve the proposal. ODOT already has approval to do
this service during specific hours, but this would allow ODOT to apply for a
special operating permit. It would be only for public safety operations, such as
those provided by ODOT and the Road Department.
Ms. Craghead said this does not approve the facility, just the hours of operation.
If there is not yet a facility, a process would have to be followed to establish the
facility.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 4 of 9 Pages
Rick Williams, who manages the ODOT maintenance station in Sisters, said
this facility covers specific areas. They are located on U.S. Forest Service land
at this time, but the USFS plans to sell its property in the near future.
ODOT has tried to locate on land owned by the State. There is already
approval to do aggregate removal. The material is used to sand roads and
similar maintenance work, and crash responses.
Commissioner Luke said that he supports the public safety aspects and knows
that there are times when this material needs to be accessed quickly. To be able
to operate by next winter, approval is needed as soon as possible.
Karen Swirsky, a land use planner for the Oregon Department of
Transportation, stated that they still need to go through the special operating
permit process as well.
Chair Baney closed the hearing at this time.
LUKE: Move first and second readings by title only.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
Chair Baney conducted the first and second readings by title only, declaring an
emergency.
LUKE: Move adoption.
UNGER: Second.
VOTE: LUKE: Yes.
UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
9. Before the Board was a Public Hearing on Remand on an Application from
Olaf and Jannis Bolken for a Determination of Whether they are Entitled
to Relief under Ballot Measure 49.
Chair Baney opened the public hearing. None of the Commissioners had any
bias, prejudgment, conflicts of interest or personal interest to disclose.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 5 of 9 Pages
Steve Griffin said the parties are in general agreement that the net increase in
number of homes for this project would be three. The major improvements
would relate to road improvements. Lots 1 and 2 would have direct access to
Highway 97; the other three would have access through a new road on the
northern part of the property. The road construction will be an important issue
to consider.
In terms of cost, three more invoices from a planner were presented to him this
morning All appears to be in order, so the additional $1,000 should be
included. He feels the cost figures are very close.
The deciding factor could be that the road construction and well construction
projects can be include under Measure 49. He feels that three homes are
maximum, and the parcels would have to be clustered.
Even if a particular improvement can be adapted to a use permitted under a new
law, those improvements are not to be included in the vested rights.
Commissioner Luke stated that they do have approval to put in five lots. Mr.
Griffin said that if they are found to have a common law vested right, they can
complete the project. If they did not have this right as of December 6, 2007,
they cannot do so. The approach to the road has been constructed but not the
road.
Mr. Griffin said that the Board can question any expenses, but the issue seems
to be where the applicant and counsel disagree. This would be on the
application fee and the well project.
Chair Baney stated that the good faith piece is the dates. Mr. Griffin said that it
was all done before the December date. He interprets that expenditures
incurred prior to that date are to be included as long as those expenditures were
reasonable and connected to the development. He feels that there is a gap of
about $3,500 between the two figures. The original fees and future expenses
are well documented by the applicants, including $4,400 in engineering costs
and substantial expenses for the road and well, totally about $91,000, prior to
the building of the homes. The pre- existing homes are of similar features as
those that are planned, which are modest. The total project cost would be about
$394,000
Staff recommends that the applicants supplement the record and see if it can be
adapted to the three -lot subdivision.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 6 of 9 Pages
Commissioner Luke reiterated that they are trying to include the approach to the
road of the north, which would service the back to lots. Mr. Griffin stated that
if it is the only permitted accesses and if the third lot needs permitted access to
the Highway, it would be appropriate to include the expenses.
Chair Baney questioned whether ODOT will even allow access onto Highway
97.
Commissioner Luke said he thought that the property owners could decide
whether to go with Measure 49 or Measure 37. Mr. Griffin replied that this
depends on the timing.
He feels that the Bolkens good faith is not an issue There is no indication that
any expenses were inflated or not otherwise not necessary.
The other factors are the types of expenditures. He feels that this relates to hard
costs. That could go either way, but he feels that this factor weighs against the
applicant although the amount is relatively small. In fact, these might be
considered neutral.
Commissioner Luke asked if the capacity of the well would be for three or five
residences.
Lisa Klemp, attorney for the applicant, came before the Board. She explained
the Bolkens acquired the property in 1971. There are two existing dwellings
that take access from Highway 97. An improvement of an apron was
constructed as required by ODOT. In 2005, the Bolkens applied for waivers
and then their land use approval, for six lots.
To allow for farm use, Mr. Bolken did not want to put a road down the middle
of the property, which would make farm use difficult.
A domestic well and cinders on the road were added. The well was put in just
for the new home sites. Mr. Bolken said that the existing well that serves the
two residences could sere one more.
Ms. Klemp said that there was a huge time commitment of four years, as well as
the money commitment. Based on this evidence, she feels that the Bolkens
have acquired vested rights. She agrees that the dwellings would have to be
clustered. Judges Tiktin and Adler feel that these investments prior to
December 6, 2007 are valid.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 7 of 9 Pages
Mr. Bolken also put in a culvert for the other lots so they can be used for
farming purposes. This amount was not included.
These improvements go beyond what is required. In this case, the apron and
well to serve three homesites is excessive and beyond what is necessary for the
existing residences. The Courts has established that this should not be solely
based on the costs.
Based on the figures set forth and the applicants, which ranges around 7 %, she
feels they have satisfied the ratio analysis. The second well was established as
a community well for the three lots, and a third well was not contemplated.
Commissioner Luke stated that Exhibit 1 shows the five lots, with the name of
Cooper, showing fire access was approved and showing that the water flow is
such that it would be needed for fire.
Mr. Bolken said that a road would need to accommodate a heavy truck and a
well for the three homes would be needed. She indicated that a reservoir is
needed for fire use, or a sprinkler system in the homes instead. Commissioner
Luke asked if the additional access would be needed if there was just one
additional home; Mr. Bolken stated that he thought not.
Commissioner Luke pointed out that the drainfield for lot 1 sits in the area of lot
2. Mr. Bolken said this requires an easement. Because of a rock ledge in the
area, this was necessary. The well was placed where it is because of the rock.
Mr. Griffin stated that the testimony offered today by Mr. Bolken helps to fill
some of the missing information, such as the need for the additional well, and
that the approach from Highway 97 is too far north to serve a three lot
subdivision. From Counsel's point of view, these questions have been
satisfactorily answered.
Commissioner Luke asked if a sprinkler system is required in new homes.
Tom Anderson said that he believes this will be required beginning in 2011.
No further testimony was offered.
Commissioner Unger said that he is glad this continues a rural use, and feels
that the vested rights have been established. The applicant has put forth a good
faith effort to comply.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 8 of 9 Pages
Chair Baney feels that he apron and additional well were established to be able
to add the residences, and feels that the other conditions have been met.
Mr. Griffin said that the order on the Hurt ley case will come before them on
Wednesday, December 2, if the Board would like an order presented on that
same date.
Commissioner Luke agreed that the burden of proof has been met. They were
working towards a five -lot subdivision, which is similar to what surrounds the
property already.
LUKE: Move that the Bolkens as of December 6, 2007 obtained a common
law vested right.
LINGER: Second.
VOTE: LLTKE: Yes.
LINGER: Yes.
BANEY: Chair votes yes.
10. Before the Board were Additions to the Agenda.
None were offered.
Being no further items addressed, the meeting adjourned at 12:20 p.m.
DATED this 30th Day of November 2009 for the Deschutes County
Board of Commissioners.
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
Tammy Baney, Chair
's"°
Dennis R. Luke, Vice Chair
alam-
Unger, Commissioner
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Meeting Monday, November 30, 20( 9
Page 9 of 9 Pages
a
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701 -1960
(541) 388 -6570 - Fax (541) 385 -3202 - www.deschutes.org
BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
10:00 A.M., MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009
Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend
1. CITIZEN INPUT
This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's
discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Citizens who wish to speak
should sign up prior to the beginning of the meeting on the sign -up cards provided. Please
use the microphone and also state your name and address at the time the Board calls on you
to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject
of a public hearing will NOT be included in the record of that hearing.
2. CONSIDERATION of Approval County Administrator's Signature of
Document No. 2009 -666, an Assignment of Lease regarding Coffee Service in
the Justice Building — Teresa Rozic, Property & Facilities
3. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Order No. 2009 -073, Accepting a
Petition for the Formation of Pinewood Estates Special Road District, and
Setting a Hearing Date — Laurie Craghead, County Counsel
4. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2009 -660 and Document
No. 2009 -678, Authorizing Partial Release of Improvement Agreement Bonds —
Caldera Springs Resort — Will Groves, Community Development
5. CONSIDERATION of First Reading of Ordinance No. 2009 -023, a Text
Amendment regarding the Deschutes County Sign Ordinance — Cynthia Smidt,
Community Development
6. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2009 -669, Findings and
Decision on an Appeal by Tumalo Irrigation District of a Historic Landmarks
Commission Denial of a Landscaping Plan at the Tumalo Creek Diversion Dam
— Kristen Maze, Community Development
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 1 of 6 Pages
7. CONSIDERATION of Second Reading and Adoption, by Emergency, of
Ordinance No. 2009 -025, Amending Code to Allow Utility Facilities in the La
Pine Industrial District — Kristen Maze, Community Development
8. A PUBLIC HEARING, and Consideration of First and Second Readings and
Adoption, by Emergency, of Ordinance No. 2009 -026, Allowing Public Safety
Operations in the Surface Mining Zone — Paul Blikstad, Community
Development
9. A PUBLIC HEARING on Remand on an Application from Olaf and Jannis
Bolken for a Determination of Whether they are Entitled to Relief under Ballot
Measure 49 — Steve Griffin, County Counsel
10. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7 -1 -1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388 -6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
FUTURE MEETINGS:
(Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of
Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions
regarding a meeting, please call 388- 6572.)
Thursday, November 26
Most County Offices will be closed to observe Thanksgiving
Friday, November 27
Most County Offices will be closed to observe Thanksgiving (unpaid day off)
Monday, November 30
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 2 of 6 Pages
Wednesday, December 2
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, December 3
8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with Road Department
9:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with Solid Waste
10:00 a.m. Regular Update with District Attorney
11:00 a.m. Regular Update with Community Development
12:00 noon Meeting of Full Audit Committee
Monday, December 7
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council)
Wednesday, December 9
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, December 10
11:00 a.m. Regular Update with Health and Human Services
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
1:00 p.m. Official Signing of Greater Sisters Community Wildfire Protection Plan — Sisters
Fire Department Community Hall
Wednesday, December 16
11:00 a.m. Oregon Youth Challenge Graduation Ceremony
2:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) — Please note later time!
Thursday, December 17
9:00 a.m. Regular Update with the Sheriff's Office
11:00 a.m. Regular Update with Community Justice
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 3 of 6 Pages
Thursday, December 24
Most County Offices will be closed to observe Christmas (unpaid day off}
Friday, December 25
Most County Offices will be closed to observe Christmas
Thursday, December 31
Most County Offices will be closed to observe New Years (unpaid day off}
Friday, January 1
Most County Offices will be closed to observe New Years
Monday, January 4
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council)
Tuesday, January 5
1:30 p.m. Meeting of Full Budget Committee — Overview and Update
Wednesday, January 6
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, January 13
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, January 14
7:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Redmond Council, Council Chambers, Redmond
Monday, January 18
Most County Offices will be closed to observe Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda
Page 4 of 6 Pages
Monday, November 30, 2009
Wednesday, January 20
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, January 21
11:00 a.m. Meeting with Commission on Children & Families' Board and Department
Monday, January 25
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, January 27
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Monday, February 1
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council)
Wednesday, February 3
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, February 10
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Monday, February 15
Most County Offices will be closed to observe Presidents' Day
Wednesday, February 17
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 5 of 6 Pages
Monday, February 22
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
12:00 noon Regular Meeting with Department Directors
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, February 24
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Monday, March 1
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council)
Wednesday, March 3
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, March 4
10:00 a.m. Quarterly Update with the District Attorney
11:00 a.m. Quarterly Update with Community Development
1:30 p.m. Quarterly Update with the Road Department
2:30 p.m. Quarterly Update with Solid Waste
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7 -1 -1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388 -6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Monday, November 30, 2009
Page 6 of 6 Pages
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Agenda Item of Interest: e -t Date: 1/ /6
Name 5;?.
Address CIO Cr
co Sr' ,
/3 e C.' , C��+
Phone #s 1 ss' k
E -mail address e.r , 14 ��..� ;1
r/ In Favor
r1
Neutral/Undecided
A 4 1 �� !e C,'r`
Opposed
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes No
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record,'`
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Agenda Item of Interest: 44 Date:
Name
k
Address I I ...y t
Phone #s r
E -mail address J',;
In Favor
Neutral/Undecided
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
Opposed
■
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Agenda Item of Interest: Q N Date:
CV b
Address 74/ / g 7 IV
e114,e 0 • �f 7 7 ''
Name
Phone #s
1
E -mail address d06 /dive 1V) 3 u
Neutral/Undecided
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
Agenda Item of Interest:
Name
Address
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Date:
Opposed
No
Phone #s
Akr,
E -mail address
In Favor
Neutral/Undecided
Submitting written documents as part of testimony? Yes
If so, please give a copy to the Recording Secretary for the record.
Opposed
No
Remand Hearing, DR- 07 -11, Olaf and Janis Bolken, Common Law Vested Right
to Complete TP -07 -1000
Legal Counsel Suggested Order of Presentation
1. Open hearing and state purpose of the hearing.
"The public hearing on DR -07 -11 on remand from the circuit court is now open. The
purpose of this hearing is to consider, on remand from the circuit court, the
application of Olaf and Janis Bolken for a declaration that they have achieved a
common law vested right to complete the land use approved by the county in TP -07-
1000."
2. Declaration of conflicts.
Inquire as to whether any member of the board has any pre- hearing contacts, bias,
prejudice, or personal interest to declare.
3. Official notice of any facts outside the hearing record.
State any facts officially noticed outside the hearing record: None.
4. Challenges.
Inquire as to any challenges to the board's qualifications to hear the matter.
5. State substantive criteria and admonish participants.
"The substantive criteria for this hearing are set forth in the judgment of the circuit
court in the case of Bolken v. Deschutes County, Circuit Court Case Number
08CV0598AB. In summary, testimony and argument should be directed towards
whether or not on December 6, 2007 Mr. & Mrs. Bolken had made sufficient progress
towards completion of the residential subdivision tentatively approved by the county
in TP -07 -1000 to have achieved a common law vested right to complete the project."
6. Order of presentation. Note: the parties will answer questions from the board
at any time during the hearing.
1. Staff report;
2. Proponent's presentation;
NOTE: There is no opponents' presentation because this is a remand hearing
and no opponents appeared in the circuit court;
3. Staff comments;
4. Proponent's final comments; and
5. Final board questions.
7. Conclusion.
"The public hearing on this matter is now closed."
8. Deliberation and render a decision or, alternatively, schedule for a later time to
render a decision, at the board's discretion.
B RYANT
& FITCH, 1.L1>
Atturnevs ai La,�
Sent via e-mail to:
Board @deschutes.or.us
and USPS
Deschutes County
Board of County Commissioners
1300 NW Wall Street
Bend, OR 97701
November 25, 2009
Sent vial email to:
Steven_Griffin a co.deschutes.or.us
and USPS
Steven Griffin
Deschutes County Counsel
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200
Bend, OR 97701
Ronalk l L. Bryant *
Crai ; P. Emerson
Ed yard E Fitch
Ste% m D. Bryant
Michas 1 R. McLane
Lis, D.T. Klemp
Alison M. Emerson
Tony E )e Alicante *
Ph lip Emerson
Re: Remand of Olaf and Jannis Bolken
File No. DR -07 -11
Dear Commissioners:
Submitted herewith is Response to Staff Report with respect to the Remand matte
referenced above.
/pbj
Enclosure
cc: client
Sincerely,
B YANT, EMERSON & FITCH, LLP
LISA D.T. KLEMP
888 S.W. Evergreen Ave. P.O. Box 457 Redmond, OR 97756 -0103
(541) 548 -2151 Fax (541) 548-1895 E -mail bef@redmond- lawyers.com
1
BEFORE THE
DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
4
5 In the Matter of the Vesting
Application (Declaratory Ruling) File No. DR -07 -11
6 for
OLAF BOLKEN and JANNIS
7 BOLKEN, APPLICANTS' RESPONSE
TO STAFF REPORT
8 Applicants.
9
10 Applicants, Olaf and Jannis Bolken, submit the following in response to the Legal Staft
11 Report submitted November 23, 2009.
12 The Bolkens purchased the subject property in June 1971. They commenced obtaining
13 approvals necessary to develop a 5 -lot subdivision in 2005 and obtained a final approval from
14 Deschutes County and the State of Oregon in 2006. Based on those approvals they expended more
15 than $30,000 toward the developing of the subdivision. To deny them a vested right to continue the
16 approved use at this juncture would be akin to pulling the rug out from under them when they have
17 proceeded in good faith in reliance on the law and prior approval, and otherwise satisfied all of the
18 elements necessary to obtain a vested right pursuant to the common law.
19 The Staff Report recommends excluding specific expenditures and places significant
20 emphasis on the ratio analysis. The applicants oppose excluding expenditures that were necessarily
21 incurred in obtaining the required approvals for the development. The Oregon Court of Appeals hay
22 already declared that such expenditures are qualified expenses. Furthermore, the Courts have stated
23 that there are five factors to consider in the vesting analysis - only one being the ratio analysis, and
24 that no single factor controls. Although the applicants believe that the ratio test is satisfied, if the
25
Page 1 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
26 G: \Clients\EPF\Bolken, Olaf\Bolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to Staff Report.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSON, & FITCH, LLP
ATTORNEYS A LAW
888 S.W. EVERGREE V AVENUE
P.O. BOX 7
REDMOND, OREGON 97756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) 548 -2151
FAX (541) 548 1895
Board determines otherwise, the satisfaction of the other four factors must also be given
consideration to determine a vested right. Based on all of the evidence, the applicants have satisfied
the requirements to obtain a vested right as set forth in the common law.
1. Staff Excluded Expenditures:
A. $520 modified application fee
The Staff Report suggests that the expenses incurred to amend the land use application be
excluded from the ratio analysis. The County's planning staff recommended that the application be
amended from a 6 -lot subdivision to a 5 -lot subdivision. The expense incurred to amend was $520
in County fees. Without the amendment, and payment of the applicable fees, the application may not
have been approved. The issue was that prior to 1979 the County had a code requirement that the
center of the lot be at least 360 feet wide. To satisfy this requirement and allow the lots to be
suitable to farm use and irrigation, the application had to be modified to five lots.
B. $1,116 land use consultant fee
The Staff Report also recommends exclusion of the land use consultant fees paid to Heidi
Kennedy in the amount of $1,116. Professional fees are an allowed expenditure as set forth by the
courts. The appellate courts have held that soft costs, such as engineering fees, planning and
consulting fees, application fees, and attorney fees incurred in conjunction with a land use
application prior to a change of law could be considered as part of qualified expenditures. See
Eklund v. Clackamas Co., 36 Or.App. 73, 583 P.2d 567 (1978); Cook v. Clackamas Co., 50 Or.App
75, 622 P.2d 1107 (1980).
It is clear from the record that Ms. Kennedy represented the Bolkens throughout their land
use application which included an amended application and public hearing. The fee for such
consultant services is reasonable in light of the complexity of the Measure 37 legalities, and a
modified application. Therefore, applicants submit that the fee should be included as reasonable,
Page 2 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
G: \Clients \EPF \Bolken, OlaflBolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to Staff Report.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSON & FITCH, us
ATTORNEYS A LAW
888 S.W. EVERGREE V AVENUE
PO. BOX 4 7
REDMOND, OREGON 97756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) 548 -2151
FAX (541) 548 1895
and an expense incurred in obtaining the subject approval.
2. Error to include $8,500 for a second well that is not required or proposed.
The Bolkens have installed a domestic well at the cost of $8,664. This well is to serve the
three additional dwellings allowed by the land use approval. There is no requirement in the land use
approval that a second well also be established. Therefore, the inclusion in the total additional
expenses to complete the subdivision of $8,500 for a second well is in error.
3. Vested Rights analysis requires consideration of five factors, and no one factor controls.
As set forth in Clackamas County v. Holmes, 265 Or 193, 508 P.2d 190 (1973), there are
several factors to review on a case -by -case basis to determine if the Bolkens have obtained a vested
right to complete the use approved by the County. It is important to note that no single factor
controls - but a combination of satisfied factors may be enough to find a vested right. The
importance of all of the factors is illustrated by comparing the different approaches taken in the
decision of the Court of Appeals and the decision of the Supreme Court in Holmes. In Holmes, the
Court of Appeals rendered a decision, 11 Or App 1, 501 P.2d 333 (1972) that was subsequently
reversed by the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeals had affirmed the Circuit Court's denial of
vesting. The Court of Appeals took careful note that the property owner had made no effort to begin
construction of the proposed chicken processing plant at issue. The Court of Appeals further found
that the alleged use was not in actual existence when the law changed. This left one issue for the
Supreme Court to resolve: Did the property owners have a vested right to construct the plant?
The Court of Appeals had taken a very conservative and restrictive stand. It found only
$2,497 of the $33,000 claimed by the property owners to be "eligible expenses," holding that some
of the expenses could be as consistent with an agricultural activity as with construction of the
processing plant. The Supreme Court, on the other hand, allowed the $33,000 holding that the
expenses were not as consistent with agricultural use as they were with the use of a chicken
Page 3 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
G: \Clients \EPF \Bolken, Olaf\Bolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to Staff Report.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSOP & FITCH, LLe
ATTORNEYS A LAW
888 S.W. EVERGREE V AVENUE
P.O. BOX 4 7
REDMOND, OREGOr, 97756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541; 548 -2151
FAX (541) 548 1895
processing plant. The Supreme Court held that $33,000 was a substantial investment in and of itself,
and that it is proper to consider expenditures that were suitable both for other uses as well as the
proposed nonconforming use. Also, the Supreme Court rejected the proposition that a vested right
could only be found where the ratio of actual expenditures as compared with the total cost of the
completed project were substantial. The ratio test was only one of five factors by which the question
of a vested right could be resolved.
As set forth in Exhibit A to the "Applicant's Remand Memorandum" the Polk County v.
Martin, 292 Or 69, 636 P.2d 952 (1981), the court found a vested right to complete a residential
subdivision when only three of the five factors were met. As demonstrated in that Exhibit A, the
Bolkens have satisfied all five factors.
The Staff Report places significant emphasis on only one of the factors set forth in the
common law vesting cases - the ratio analysis. This has been highly emphasized by those
challenging Measure 37 vested rights; however, it is only one of several factors to consider. As the
courts have all held no one factor controls. One possible explanation for such emphasis may be
because it may be the only quantitative factor. However, even it is not a bright line factor. First, the
decision maker must determine what expenses are allowable and what the denominator - or total
cost of the project is in order to calculate the ratio. In the case of Bolken, there is no clear decision
from the court that the cost of the homes to be built must be included in the denominator. Based on
the history and context in which Measure 49 was established, it was not likely that the legislature
intended subdivisions to be built out in order to be vested as set forth in the "Applicants Remand
Memorandum." This is because it would make the entire statutory provision for a vested right a sham
since no one would likely qualify. In addition, under Measure 49, a residential use for purposes of
achieving compensation does not include the construction of homes. It only includes the division
of land. Moreover, Measure 49 requires one to look to the use allowed in the Measure 37 waiver to
Page 4 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
G: \Clients\EPF\Bolken, Olaf\Bolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to Staff Report.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSON & FITCH, LLP
ATTORNEYS A LAW
BBB S.W EVERGREE J AVENUE
P.O. BOX 41 7
REDMOND, OREGON 97756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) 548 -2151
FAX (541) 548 1895
1 determine whether vesting has been achieved. Those waivers and the language of Measure 49 make
2 it clear that it is only the division of land which constitutes the residential use that needs to be vested,
3 not the construction of homes by third parties.
4 In the case of Eklund, supra, the property owner initiated plans for a subdivision of 108
5 residential lots. That subdivision was to be constructed in four phases. The first three phases
6 consisting of 20 homes was completed. The last phase, however, had not yet been completed when
7 the regulations effecting the property were amended by Clackamas County. The Boundary
8 Commission denied a request to extend the water system serving the remaining lots. The court,
9 however, found that the petitioner had a vested right to complete the subdivision based upon the
10 criteria set forth in Holmes. Of the 108 lots in that case, the petition had expended $15,000 for the
11 land, $57,754 in constructing the water system, and $83,000 in attorney fees, surveying and design
12 costs. The court found that even though there was no evidence concerning the ultimate cost of the
13 project, which may have included the homes, the project was nonetheless vested because there had
14 been a substantial investment.
15 Moreover, if the denominator is to include the cost of the homes, what is that cost. In this
16 case, there is no precise cost of the homes, and establishing the cost is inherently speculative because
17 one must look at future market conditions which can be subject to dramatic changes. One could
18 consider the value of the other homes on the property to determine this figure - to wit: $122,630 for
19 the 1934 dwelling, and $101,190 for the 1976 dwelling. Also, whether the cost of the existing
20 homes that make up the subdivision should be included in the ratio as expenses incurred in
21 completing the approved use is another element to be determined. Finally, the acceptable ratio is not
22 a hard and fast rule. In Holmes, the ratio was in the range of 7 %. The court did not state that nothing
23 less is acceptable, but that considering all of the vesting factors, including the 7% incurred to
24 complete the project, that the owner had a vested right to complete his use. In fact, some courts have
25
Page 5 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
26 G: \Clients\EPF \Bolken, Olaf\Bolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to Staff Report.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSON & FITCH, cm,
ATTORNEYS A LAW
888 S.W. EVERGREE J AVENUE
P.O. BOX 4: 7
REDMOND, OREGON 97756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) 548 -2151
FAX (541) 548 1895
found that a specific denominator for a ratio was not necessary to determine whether a substantial
investment has been incurred. Rather, the court looks to whether the investment of money and time
was substantial. See Biggerstaff v. DLCD and Ralph Johnson, et al, Judge Collins, Yamhill County
Circuit Court; DLCD v. Hudspeth, Judge Williams, Crook County Circuit Court. In this case, the
Bolkens have worked toward completion of this project since 2005, and have spent $30,000 of their
retirement money. This is truly a substantial investment of their time and money. In sum, the ratio
factor becomes less important when the other actors are satisfied.
The expenditures are all attributable to a 5 -lot subdivision and would not support a use that
may be permitted under Measure 49. In fact, this position is in line with the Staff Report for vesting
which found this criteria met. Record at 182, page 11 of 12 of DR -07 -11 Staff Report. Pursuant to
the language of Measure 49, because there are already existing dwellings on the property - the
Bolkens may only be allowed one additional dwelling. Moreover, the costs associated with the
Measure 37 waivers, land use application, surveying, planning, legal expenses, a well, a road, and
the approach required by ODOT would not be expenses applicable to a one dwelling approval under
Measure 49.
The issue, as set forth by the courts, is not whether the "improvements" are "adaptable to
another permitted use." The analysis is "whether the expenditures have any relation to the completed
project or could apply to various other uses of the land, the kind of project, the location and ultimate
cost." Legal Staff Report, at 10, quoting Holmes, at 197 -99. Unlike the land owner in Webber v.
Clackamus Co., 41 Or App. 151, 600 P.2d 448 (1979), who was already using the subdivision water
system to supply - for profit - water to surrounding properties where there was a shortage of water,
and therefore there was clearly another profitable use for the water system that enhanced its
adaptability to other uses, the expenditures incurred by the Bolkens are not servicing other needs or
uses and are not necessary for other uses of the property - including a single lot under Measure 49
Page 6 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
G: \Clients \EPF \Bolken, Olaf\Bolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to Staff Report.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSON 1 FITCH, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT L 1W
888 S.W. EVERGREEN AVENUE
P.O. BOX 457
REDMOND, OREGON 9' 756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) 5, 1 -2151
FAX (541) 548-1F 15
or a farm use.
Specifically, the land use decision addresses the requirements for a road when a subdivision
is proposed verses merely a partition. Although the County Engineer recommended less stringent
standards based on the nature of the subdivision, the Hearings Officer rejected approval of those
recommended standards relying on the requirements of DCC 17.48. He states "A subdivision is not
a partition, nor is it necessarily governed by the same standards. * * * DCC 17.48 sets forth the
minimum standards governing construction of roads and other improvements and facilities."
Decision at 15 -16 [underlining included in original for emphasis]. According to the code, he found
that he had no authority to approve the reduced standards recommended by the Engineer. Therefore,
he found that the applicant must satisfy the requirements of DCC Title 17 for road improvements
including dedication, aggregate base, hammerhead turnarounds, and inspection and approval by the
County Road Department. Decision at 16. Therefore, the expenditures for the "road" are clearly
excessive and not necessary for any partition that may be allowed under Measure 49 for a single
dwelling. In addition, the expenditures are not attributable to the farm use allowed under current
zoning. Therefore, this factor is satisfied.
4. Conclusion
In sum, the applicant has incurred expenditures of $30,000 which is nearly the same amount
the Supreme Court held to be a substantial expenditure in Holmes, however, the expense incurred
is only one of several factors to consider. Applicants have satisfied all five factors as set forth in
their Remand Memorandum. Even if the Board determines that the ratio factor is not satisfied, the
/ ///
/ ///
/ ///
/ ///
Page 7 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
G: \Clients\EPF\Bolken, Olaf\Bolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to StaffReport.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSON & FITCH, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT Lf N
888 S.W. EVERGREEN F /ENUE
P.O. BOX 457
REDMOND, OREGON 97 56 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) 54f 2151
FAX (541) 548 -18c
1 applicant is still vested.
2 DATED this 25th day of November 2009.
3 Respectfully submitted,
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 Enclosures:
Deschutes County DIAL Report reflecting Assessment
12 HiLine Homes Flyer - example of cost of home
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 8 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
BRYANT, EMERSON & FITCH, LLP
EDWARD P. FITCH, OSB #782026
LISA DT KLEMP, OSB #040012
Of Attorneys for Applicants
888 SW Evergreen Avenue - P.O. Box 457
Redmond, OR 97756
541.548.2151 - 541.548.1895 (fax)
Email: efitch@redmond- lawyers.com
lisa a,redmond- lawyers.com
26 G: \Clients\EPF \Bolken, Olaf\Bolken,Olaf- -Remand CL\Applicants Response to StaffReport.wpd
BRYANT, EMERSON ! o FITCH, LLe
ATTORNEYS AT I \W
888 S.W. EVERGREEN \VENUE
P.O. BOX 457
REDMOND, OREGON 9 756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) 5. 3 -2151
FAX (541) 548-1f )5
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2 I hereby certify that I served the foregoing APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF
3 REPORT on the following party by email and mailing a true copy thereof, certified by me as such,
4 contained in a sealed envelope with postage paid, addressed to said party as follows:
5
6
7
8 and depositing in the post office at Redmond, Oregon on this 25th day of November 2009.
Steven Griffin
Deschutes County Legal Counsel
1300 NW Wall Street, Suite 205
Bend, OR 97701
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 9 of 9 - APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
26 G: \Clients \EPF\Bolken, Olaf Bolken,Olaf- Remand CL\Applicants Response to Staff Report.wpd
CF
EDWARD P. FITCH, OSB #782026
LISA DT KLEMP, OSB #040012
Of Attorneys for Applicants
Bryant, Emerson & Fitch, LLP
P.O. Box 457
Redmond, OR 97756
Telephone: (541) 548 -2151
Facsimile: (541) 548 -1895
Email: efitch@redmond- lawyers.com
lisanredmond- lawyers.com
BRYANT, EMERSON (c FITCH, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT AW
888 S.W. EVERGREEN AVENUE
PO. BOX 45'
REDMOND, OREGON 7756 -0103
TELEPHONE (541) ; 18 -2151
FAX (541) 548-' 395
TREMENDOUS VALUE!
CUSTOM -BUILT HOMES
Standard Features
Double Pane Low E Windows
• Spacious Vaulted Ceilings (Most
• Horizontal Lap Siding
• 5/12 Roof Pitch
• 24" Foundation
• 2x6 Exterior Walls
• 30 -Year Arch - Roofing
• Wood Cabinets
• Ridge Vent
Built on
Your Site
from
1940 sq.ft. Home ° °'y $87,9
Plans
MORE
THAN 20
PLANS!
Available
BEDROOM 2
3' x 11'5"
PINING RIM
15 x 92'
(1
—I�
VAULT LV£,
�E[RROOM
13 x 11'3
ENTRY
GREAT RIO
22'8' x 21'
HIL NE
(541)647-1600
BUILT ON YOUR SITE
COV{RFD
PORCH
40 2005 Hi kw Wines .
6
t ple sAve
14 Come walk
Through Our
Model Home!
"Hig tarsdiv
Central Oregon
1454 NW Maple Rim Ct, Redmond
Western Oregon (3034 399 -1721
22.'
Call for a
FREE
INFORMATION,
PACKET
or visit our
MODEL HOME
WWW.HiLineHomes.com
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 1 of 15
Enhancing the lives of citizens by delivering
quality services in a cost - effective manner
Deschutes County
hot news! be informed first! I help I site map
location I contact us I En espaiol
LIVING HERE
BUSINESS
VISITING l GOVERNMENT 1
Living in Deschutes County: Comprehensive information for residents of Deschutes Ccunty.
® You are here: Government » Departments » Assessor's Office » DIAL Search Results `hand
DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Information on the Deschutes County Computer is not guaranteed to be
accurate and may contain errors and omissions. Deschutes County provides NO
WARRANTY AS TO THE MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE FOR
ANY INFORMATION. Original records may differ from computer entries. If
reliance upon computer record is intended, verification of information on
source documents is required. User expressly acknowledges and agrees that
the use of any information appearing on the Deschutes County Computer is at
User's sole risk. Deschutes County shall not be liable for any direct,
indirect, incidental, or consequential damages caused by mistakes, omission -3,
deletions, errors, defects, in any information, or any failure or delays in
receiving information. The following property tax assessment data is updated
nightly.
Account: 127875 Map /TL: R 2 -004 141309 00 01400
* * * CURRENT Ownership Information ONLY
BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
9721 HWY 97 N
TERREBONNE OR 97760
Type: BOPTA CHANGE 309.120
THRU: CitiMortgage
AGENT: FAT (P)
Site Address: 9721 N HWY 97 TERREBONNE 97760
Assessor Property Description
Lot: Block:
Prop Cls:551 MA:2 VA:20 NH 000
Asmt Zone:EFU CDD Zone:EFUTE (EXCLUSIVE FARM USE - TERREBONNE SUBZONE)
:LM (LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT COMBINING ZONE)
* ** Land Values * **
Asmt type Acres R.M.V.
FARM SITE 1.00 8,150
FARM SITE 1.00 8,150
D8 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED 3.50 31,410 DEFERRED
W2 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED 2.62 23,510 DEFERRED
L�- � a,���••• +�� ,rR�;,,�Q., oiw,9„>„ Pr.+;. J= 4sF111nA -RDRD- 5701- 91D726DBA942... 11/2x'/2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 2 of 15
W3 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED 8.90 79,830 DEFERRED
W4 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED 8.00 62,940 DEFERRED
D6 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED 0.32 220 DEFERRED
D7 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED 6.06 19,070 DEFERRED
OSD 4,000
OSD 4,000
*Total 31.40 241,280
* ** Improvement Values * **
FB $ R.M.V. BLT %GD
133 122,630 1934
131 101,190 1976
300 110
300 170
300 120
300 760
300 590
300 450
*Total 226,020
Room Grid for 133 Total SqFt: 2616
R O O M S
LR K DR FAM BD BATH OTH FP UTL
Sq Ft: 1860 1st F1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1
756 2nd Fl 1 1
Room Grid for 131 Total SqFt: 1620
R O O M S
LR K DR FAM BD BATH OTH FP UTL
Sq Ft: 1620 1st F1 1 1 1 3 2 1
* **
LND:
IMP:
TOT:
* * * ** Values shown below are as of the Assessment Date, January 1 of each year * * * **
2009 2008 2007------ -
Total Taxable Total Taxable Total Taxibl
RMV A.V. RMV A.V. RMV A.V.
241,280 289,050 289,050
226,020 272,310 272,310
467,300 198,676 561,360 193,231 561,360 187 94
R 2004 141309 -00 -01400 127875 Prop Class 551 Value Area 20
Maint Area 2 Neighborhood 000
Asmt Zone EFU
BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
9721 HWY 97 N 9721 N HWY 97
�i?r+•JJrimmr rlacrhiitac nrrt /inrdav n fm7nhientic1= 65F111 04- RDRD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24/21,09
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 3 o f 15
TERREBONNE, OR 97760
* * *
I N S P E C T I O N S
Insp By: ST.ONGE- TISIOT10 /19/04 Intr Insp
* * *
Card 1 of 8
R O O M S
LR K DR FAM BD BATH OTH FP UTL
Sq Ft: 1860 1st F1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1
756 2nd Fl 1 1
Factor Book: 133 Year Built: 1934
* * *
I N T E R I O R
Description
HEAT PUMP
LAUNDRY TUB
LAVATORY
CARPET
ROOF CVR - CEDAR SHINGLE
WINDOWS - WOOD
WATER HEATER
DISHWASHER
HEAT PUMP
SHOWER W /DOOR, FIBERGLASS
C O M P O N E N T S
Qty/
Area Description
378 WOOD STOVE
1 TOILET
5 KITCHEN SINK
TILE FLOOR
1428 WINDOWS - SINGLE PANE
FOUNDATION - CONCRETE
1 BATHTUB W /FIBRGL SHWR
1 ROOF - GABLE
1860 SOAKING TUB
1 DECK COVER - AVERAGE
Qt y/
Ai ea
1
3
1
2
1
********************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * *i * **
Card 2 of 8
R O O M S
LR K DR FAM BD BATH OTH FP UTL
Sq Ft: 1620 1st F1 1 1 1 3 2 1
Factor Book: 131 Year Built: 1976
* * *
I N T E R I O R
Description
FORCED AIR HEATING
TOILET
DISHWASHER
VINYL FLOOR
ROOF - GABLE
SIDING - T1 -11 /PLYWOOD
WINDOWS - METAL
KITCHEN SINK
C O M P O N E N T S * * *
Qty/
Area Description
1620 FOUNDATION - CONCRETE
2 WATER HEATER
1 DRYWALL
CARPET
WINDOWS - DOUBLE /THERMAL PANE
LAVATORY
BATHTUB W /FIBRGL SHWR
1 ROOF CVR - SHAKE MED.
Qty/
Area
1
2
1
1E20
,.fi„9„a„P.. +;,1 =111 nA -RfRf- 5701 -91 T)726T)RA942... 1 1 /24/2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 4 of 15
SHOWER W /DOOR, FIBERGLASS 1
* * *
O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S
Factor Book: 131 Year Built: 1976
Description
PUMP HOUSE
* * *
Qty/ Qty/
Area Description Area
1620 DECK - AVERAGE 84
48
************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * *f * **
Card 3 of 8
* * *
O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S
Factor Book: 300
* * *
Qty/ Qt y/
Description Area Description A'ea
GP SHED 120
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * *•, * **
Card 4 of 8
* * *
O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S
Factor Book: 300
* * *
Qty/ Q'!.y/
Description Area Description A:'ea
GP SHED 190
************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * *r * **
Card 5 of 8
* * *
O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S
Factor Book: 300
* * *
Qty/ Q :y/
Description Area Description A :ea
LEAN -TO 280
************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * *k * **
Card 6 of 8
* * *
O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S
Factor Book: 300
* * *
t,++„•ii. =. =._, rip crlhntpc nra /inripv r•.fm9nhiertic1 =6SF1 1 10A- RDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24/ ?009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 5 of 15
Qty/ Qty/
Description Area Description Area
GP BUILDING 1080
************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * **
Card 7 of 8
* * *
O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S
Factor Book: 300
* * *
Qty/ Qty/
Description Area Description Area
GP BUILDING 840
************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * **
Card 8 of 8
* * *
O T H E R I M P R O V E M E N T C O M P O N E N T S
Factor Book: 300
Description
GP BUILDING
* * *
Qty/ Qty/
Area Description Area
540
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * *.*
AT /Class Desc Adj Factor #1 Adj Factor #2 Adj Factcr#3
FARM SITE A 1.00
FARM SITE A 1.00
D8 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED A 3.50
W2 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED A 2.62
W3 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED A 8.90
W4 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED A 8.00
D6 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED A 0.32
D7 EXCLUSIVE FARM USE ZONED A 6.06
OSD
OSD
* * *
T A X P A Y M E N T S
* * *
For current balance due information on this account select the following button (Please note that this link
will provide current balance information, including interest & fees, EXCEPT FOR ACCOUNTS IN
FORECLOSURE, please call the tax office @ 388 -6540 for payoff information on foreclosure accounts)
mjgIINNNWNINI ENIN I11 i,
���rPIIII�III @IIIItmIIIIIOtIq�All
V
IMl
rn m
{VIII
II
COM
lama m(I �NIIIIUINNNNIIIImNWllll1111 '
1,++,,. // 1A1T�1T l�PC!`1,77fPC me /inr-1Pv rfrn9nhientitl =65F1 110A -11DRD-57C1-91D726DBA942... 11/24/21)09
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 6 o r 15
This web site uses the FREE Adobe® Acrobat® Reader plug -In, r4TGet AaVin
Aa
If you do not have this plug -ln, click the icon to get it. abe :: aea
For balance due information on this account for a future date, specify a future date and select the following
button (Please note that this link will provide current balance information, including interest & fees,
EXCEPT FOR ACCOUNTS IN FORECLOSURE, please call the tax office @ 388 -6540 for payoff
information on foreclosure accounts)
Enter a value future Date (mm /dd /yyyy):
11/24/2009
INmImIIMmmN1ImInInnlNmNi� 11lAl n^inN
SWAM
002134
ditnll iii 3al
ifilm
mn�
N�INIIINIIIIIIHHIVVNNIVVIgIIIIIIININ " " "'
woomimmmommium r"
This web site uses the FREE Adobe® Acrobat® ReaderTm plug -In. raja `
If you do not have this plug -in, click the icon to get it. Adobb Reader
2009 Balance Due. Adval Tax
0.00 3,078.77
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -12 -09 0952 - 2,986.41 -92.36 905346 C90699511
2008 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 2,706.05
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -12 -08 0852 - 2,624.87 -81.18 743231
2007 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 2,583.36
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -14 -07 0752 - 2,505.86 -77.50 612481
2006 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 2,445.78
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -14 -06 0652 - 2,372.41 -73.37 440647
2005 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 2,440.51
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -14 -05 5852 - 2,367.29 -73.22 302656
2004 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,622.22
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -15 -04 0452 - 1,573.55 -48.67 179874
2003 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,517.84
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -20 -03 9039 - 1,472.30 -45.54 69524
httn. / /www riecrh„tec nr r /index.cfm ?ohiectid =65F111OA - BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24 2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 7 o'15
2002 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,518.05
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -15 -02 7479 - 1,472.51 -45.54 C 90 1309622
2001 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,457.11
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -15 -01 6805 - 1,413.40 -43.71 C 90 1202404
2000 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,433.35
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -15 -00 6163 - 1,390.35 -43.00 C 90 1093503
1999 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,409.82
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -15 -99 5604 - 1,367.53 -42.29 C 90 1000222
1998 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,359.31
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -15 -98 5122 - 1,318.53 -40.78 C 90 888767
1997 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,361.26
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
12 -15 -97 4572 - 1,320.42 -40.84 C 90 800471
1996 Balance Due Adval Tax
0.00 1,296.57
Trn Date Btch Received Int /Disc Jrnl Rcpt# Description
11 -15 -96 4088 - 1,257.67 -38.90 C 90 699511
Building Permit: 11443 on Account number: 127875
OLD BUILDING# B84173
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS EXPIRED
BUILDING CLASS RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS NEW
STRUCTURE TYPE
PERMIT ZONING
BUILDING USE REPLACING ROOF
STRUCTURE TYPE WOOD FRAME
ON SEWER? NOT LISTED
SOLAR APPROVED? UNKNOWN
PERMIT NAME • BOLKEN,HAROLD
CONTRACTOR NAME • UNKNOWN
SITE ADDRESS • 9721 HWY 97 N, TERREBONNE
STORIES
SQ FEET
ktfrrnAxruro.7 ripinhiitpc nry /index r.fm2nhiectid= 65F111 OA- BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24/ 2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 8 oi° 15
BEDROOMS • 2
PERMIT VALUATION • 3,000
APPLICATION DATE • 03/29/84
PERMIT ISSUE DATE • 03/29/84
EXPIRED DATE 04/23/93
Inspection Initial
04/23/93 SYS
Comments
Mass deleted per DH IF OLDER THAN 01/01/1990 AND NO
RECENT COMMENTS
Building Permit: 16873 on Account number: 127875
OLD BUILDING# • 76 -1154
Map /TL 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS EXPIRED
BUILDING CLASS RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS • NEW
STRUCTURE TYPE
PERMIT ZONING EFUTE9LM
BUILDING USE RES
STRUCTURE TYPE N/A
ON SEWER? NOT LISTED
SEPTIC PERMIT NUMBER 19649
SOLAR APPROVED? UNKNOWN
PERMIT NAME BOLKEN OLAF ETUX
CONTRACTOR NAME OREGON MODULAR HOMES
SITE ADDRESS 9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
STORIES
SQ FEET
PERMIT VALUATION
APPLICATION DATE 09/29/76
PERMIT ISSUE DATE 09/29/76
EXPIRED DATE 03/16/81
Inspection Initial
03/16/81 OLD
10/19/76 OLD
Comments
JOB CHECK - EVERY THING HAS BEEN DONE AND THE HOUSE
LOOKS GOOD.
FOOTINGS OK.
Building Permit: 54754 on Account number: 127875
Map /TL
ACCOUNT
STATUS
BUILDING CLASS.
PERMIT CLASS
STRUCTURE TYPE
PERMIT ZONING
BUILDING USE
STRUCTURE TYPE
ON SEWER?
SEPTIC PERMIT NUMBER
FRONT SETBACK IN FEET...:
141309 00 01400
127875
FINAL
RESIDENTIAL
REMODEL
BUILDING
LM9EFUTE
3 BED /BATH
WOOD FRAME
NO
52078
EF
htt„• / /www dPCrhntec nry /index_cfm ?ohiectid= 65F1110A- BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24/2( 09
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 9 01'15
RIGHT SETBACK IN FEET...: 639
LEFT SETBACK IN FEET • 1665
REAR SETBACK IN FEET ER
SOLAR APPROVED? YES
PERMIT NAME BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
CONTRACTOR NAME OWNER
ARCHITECT • OWNER
SITE ADDRESS • 9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
STORIES • 2
SQ FEET 1512
BEDROOMS 3
PERMIT VALUATION 110,376
APPLICATION DATE 04/13/04
PERMIT ISSUE DATE • 05/21/04
FINAL DATE 10/07/04
Inspection Initial
10/07/04 SEF
07/23/04 SEF
07/14/04 SEF
06/11/04 SEF
06/04/04 SEF
04/13/04 MGR
Comments
*FINAL APPROVED*
INSULATION APPROVED
FRAMING APPROVED
U/F FRAMING APPROVED
FTG /STEMWALL APPROVED
R3 1512 SQ FT X $ 73 = $ 110,376
Electrical Permit: 34200 on Account number: 127875
Map /TL
ACCOUNT
STATUS
BUILDING CLASS
PERMIT CLASS
BUILDING USE
SERVICE DESCRIPTION
• 141309 00 01400
127875 -
FINAL
• RESIDENTIAL
• NEW SERVICE
PUMP
200 AMPS OR LESS(1)
: FEEDER(1)
: FEEDER(1)
• BOLKEN OLAF ETUX
Chets Electric Inc
9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
07/14/95
07/14/95
• 01/19/96
PERMIT NAME
CONTRACTOR NAME
SITE ADDRESS
APPLICATION DATE
PERMIT ISSUE DATE
FINAL DATE
Inspection Initial
01/19/96 JJD
07/17/95 RED
Comments
*FINAL APPROVED
SERVICE OK CANT FINAL AS PUMP AND WHATEVER IS BEING 'ED
FROM 200 AMP CIRCUIT NOT WIRED
Electrical Permit: 73348 on Account number: 127875
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS FINAL
BUILDING CLASS RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS • REM
httn• / /www rieschntes_nrr/ index_ cfm? obiectid= 65F111 OA- BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24/2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 10 of 15
BUILDING USE • BED /BATH ADD
SERVICE DESCRIPTION 200 AMPS OR LESS /SERVICES /FEEDERS: INSTALLATION,
: ALTERATION OR RELOCATION
: FEEDER
: FEEDER
LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: 54754
PERMIT NAME • BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
CONTRACTOR NAME DELTA ELECTRIC SERVICE LLC
SITE ADDRESS 9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
APPLICATION DATE • 04/13/04
PERMIT ISSUE DATE 05/21/04
FINAL DATE 10/11/04
Inspection Initial Comments
10/11/04 RED *FINAL APPROVED*
07/20/04 RED CCN: ROUGH & SERVICE APPROVED
07/14/04 GTJ CN: 1. CIRCUIT #1 AT FURNACE REQUIRES 44 AMP MINIMUP
CIRCUIT AMPACITY. #8 AWG NMB AMPACITY MAY NOT EXCEEI
40 AMPS. 2. UPDATE PERMIT WITH ONE #4 TO REFLECT
FEEDER TO SUB- PANEL.
Electrical Permit: 73349 on Account number: 127875
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS • FINAL
BUILDING CLASS • RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS NEW SERVICE
BUILDING USE LIMITED REMODEL
SERVICE DESCRIPTION LIMITED ELECTRICAL ENERGY - 1 & 2 FAMILY DWELLING
: CONDITIONING SYSTEMS
LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: 54754
PERMIT NAME • BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
CONTRACTOR NAME OWNER
SITE ADDRESS 9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
APPLICATION DATE • 04/13/04
PERMIT ISSUE DATE 05/21/04
FINAL DATE 10/11/04
Inspection Initial Comments
10/11/04 RED *FINAL APPROVED*
07/14/04 GTJ ROUGH APPROVED
Mechanical Permit: 28763 on Account number: 127875
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS • FINAL
BUILDING CLASS • RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS • NEW
SERVICE DESCRIPTION ISSUANCE FEE
httri.//www decri- mtes.nrQ/ index_ cfm? obiectid= 65F111OA- BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/2, /2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 11 o'15
LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..:
PERMIT NAME
CONTRACTOR NAME
SITE ADDRESS
APPLICATION DATE
PERMIT ISSUE DATE
FINAL DATE
•
•
•
•
Inspection Initial
10/07/04 SEF
07/14/04 SEF
06/11/04 SEF
54754
BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
QUALITY HEATING
9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
04/13/04
05/21/04
10/07/04
Comments
*FINAL APPROVED*
ROUGH APPROVED
U/F APPROVED
Plumbing Permit: 24624 on Account number: 127875
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS • FINAL
BUILDING CLASS • RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS NEW
SERVICE DESCRIPTION REMODEL /U1 ISSUANCE FEE
LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: 54754
PERMIT NAME • BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
CONTRACTOR NAME POWELL BUTTE PLUMBING LLC
SITE ADDRESS 9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
APPLICATION DATE 04/13/04
PERMIT ISSUE DATE • 05/21/04
FINAL DATE • 10/07/04
Inspection Initial
10/07/04 SEF
08/26/04 DJS
07/23/04 SEF
07/14/04 SEF
06/18/04
06/11/04
SEF
SEF
Comments
*FINAL APPROVED*
APPROVED SHOWER PAN /TILE
TOP OUT APPROVED
TOP OUT DENIED. RAT -PROOF TUB AND PROVIDE NAIL PLATES
AT 3" WASTE
SEWER LINE APPROVED
U/F APPROVED
Septic Permit: 19649 on Account number: 127875
OLD SEPTIC# • 761920
Map /TL 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS EXPIRED
BUILDING CLASS UNKNOWN
PERMIT CLASS • NEW
PERMIT ZONING
httn• / /www.deschutes_nrg/ index. cfm? obiectid= 65F111OA- BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24 2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 12 of 15
BUILDING USE
WATER SOURCE
SEPTIC PERMIT TYPE
FEASIBILITY NUMBER
LINKED BUILDING PERMIT
MIN SEPTIC GAL CAPACITY
SEPTIC TRENCH LENGTH •
TRENCH DEPTH INCHES
FIELD WORK DONE'?
PERMIT NAME
CONTRACTOR NAME
SITE ADDRESS
APPLICATION DATE
EXPIRED DATE
: 16873
Inspection Initial
06/03/04 SYS
BOLKEN,OLAF
• UNKNOWN
• 9721 HWY 97 N, TERREBONNE
• 08/30/76
08/30/77
Comments
EXPIRED BY THE SYSTEM
Septic Permit: 52078 on Account number: 127875
OLD SEPTIC#
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT • 127875
STATUS • FINAL
BUILDING CLASS RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS ALTERATION
PERMIT ZONING LMyEFUTE
BUILDING USE • RESIDENCE
WATER SOURCE • WELL
SEPTIC PERMIT TYPE ALTERATION PERMIT - MAJOR System Type: S
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOW PLOT PLANS AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA
: APPROVED BY SANITARIAN GARTH D. COOK AS INITIALED
: GDC AND DATED 052004 FOR SEPTIC PURPOSES ONLY.
: FOLLOW DEQ AND DESCHUTES COUNTY PRESSURE
: DISTRIBTUION AND CAPPING FILL INSTALLATION RULES kND
: INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. CALL ALL INSPECTIONS TC
: 317 -3181. AN INITIAL 16" UNSETTLED, NON - COMPACTED
: CAP IS REQUIRED.
FEASIBILITY NUMBER
LINKED BUILDING PERMIT..: 54754
MIN SEPTIC GAL CAPACITY.: 1500
SERVICE DESCRIPTION • ALTERATION PERMIT - MAJOR
SEPTIC TRENCH LENGTH 400
TRENCH DEPTH INCHES • 14
FIELD WORK DONE'?
BEDROOMS • 4
PERMIT NAME • BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
CONTRACTOR NAME OWNER
SITE ADDRESS • 9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
APPLICATION DATE 04/13/04
PERMIT ISSUE DATE 05/20/04
FINAL DATE • 09/01/04
Inspection Initial
09/01/04 GDC
Comments
*FINAL SEPTIC INSP APPROVED
httn•// www_ deschutes .nre /index.cfm ?obiectid =65F 1110A- BDBD- 57C1 -91 D726DBA942... 11/24 '2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 13 of 15
08/11/04
08/09/04
08/04/04
05/20/04
05/19/04
05/10/04
04/26/04
04/13/04
GDC
GDC
JKH
LJP
JKH
JKH
GDC
JKH
DF PRECOVER INSP APPROVED
SEPTIC TANK WATER TEST, H -VALVE SWITCHING, SQUIRT TEST,
ORIFICE SPACING & FLOW - THROUGH, CAP SAMPLE- -ALL
APPROVED. NEEDS PRECOVER, PUMP TESTS, FINAL CAP INSPS.
AS BUILT SUBMITTED /SCHEDULED FOR INSPECTION
REVISED PLOT PLAN & PUMP CURVE SUBMITTED /CDDR /GDC
OWNER UPGRADED TO ALTERATION PERMIT FEE PAID, EXCAVATOR
WILL BRING IN ADDENDUM TO THE PLOT PLAN
EXCAVATOR HAS THE CURTAIN DRAIN INSTALLED AND WILL BE
READY TO HAVE YOU LOOK AT IT ON THURSDAY
SEPTIC APP TROUBLE LETTER TO BE SENT. FWD.
EXISTING HOME WILL BE ADDING 3 BEDROOMS AND ONLY ONE
BEDROOM WILL BE REMAINING FROM THE ORIGINAL HOME.
COMPLETED HOME WILL BE A 4 BEDROM HOME. NEW TEST PI]S
HAVE BEEN DUG TO INSTALL A NEW SYSTEM FOR THIS ADDIT :0N.
Septic Permit: 56230 on Account number: 127875
OLD SEPTIC#
Map /TL 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
STATUS • FINAL
BUILDING CLASS RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT CLASS REPAIR
PERMIT ZONING LM"EFUTE
BUILDING USE RES
WATER SOURCE • W
SEPTIC PERMIT TYPE • REPAIR PERMIT MINOR
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS • LEGALLY PUMP AND ABANDON EXISTING STEEL TANK AND
: INSTALL NEW TANK WITH APPROVABLE RISER. MAINTAIN
: REQUIRED FALL FROM TANK OUTLET TO TOP OF DRAIN
: MEDIA. SUBMIT COMPELTED AS -BUILT FORM TO REQUEST
: TANK PRECOVER INSPECTION.
FEASIBILITY NUMBER
MIN SEPTIC GAL CAPACITY.:
SERVICE DESCRIPTION
SEPTIC TRENCH LENGTH
TRENCH DEPTH INCHES
FIELD WORK DONE'?
BEDROOMS
PERMIT NAME
CONTRACTOR NAME
SITE ADDRESS
APPLICATION DATE
PERMIT ISSUE DATE
FINAL DATE
1000
• REPAIR PERMIT MINOR
Inspection Initial
06/12/06 GDC
06/09/06 LJP
06/08/06 LJP
•
•
•
•
3
BOLKEN,OLAF ETUX
LARIAT CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT
9721 N HWY 97, TERREBONNE 60
06/08/06
06/09/06
06/12/06
Comments
*FINAL SEPTIC INSP APPROVED
AS BUILT SUBMITTED /CDDR GDC
THIS IS FOR A TANK REPLACEMENT PER DOUG MUCK /LARIAT
CONST 420 -2500
** *Land use application: E0955 on Account number: 127875 * **
httnr// www. deschutes. org /index.cfm ?obiectid= 65F111OA- BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/24 2009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 14 of 15
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
REQUEST • EXTENSION OF TP- 07- 1000 /MA -07 -13
DATE SUBMITTED • 10/16/09
DATE ACCEPTED • 10/19/09
STATUS • FINAL
STATUS DATE 10/20/09
APPLICANT - OLAF BOLKEN
SITE ADDRESS • 9721 N HWY 97,TE
** *Land use application: A0810 on Account number: 127875 * **
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT • 127875
REQUEST • APPEAL OF HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION - DR- 07 -11.
DATE SUBMITTED 06/10/08
DATE ACCEPTED • 06/16/08
STATUS VOIDED
STATUS DATE 07/18/08
APPLICANT • OLAF & JANNIS BOLKEN
SITE ADDRESS • 9721 N HWY 97,TE
** *Land use application: DR0711 on Account number: 127875 * **
Map /TL •
ACCOUNT •
REQUEST •
DATE SUBMITTED •
DATE ACCEPTED
STATUS
STATUS DATE
HEARING OFFICER DECISION:
HEARING DATE •
BOARD OF COMM DECISION..:
APPLICANT •
SITE ADDRESS
141309 00 01400
127875
DECLARATORY RULING FOR VESTED RIGHT DETERMINATION FOP
12/18/07
12/21/07
FINAL
06/12/08
DENIED
05/30/08
DENIED
OLAF BOLKEN
9721 N HWY 97,TE
** *Land use application: MA0713 on Account number: 127875 * **
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
REQUEST MODIFY TP -07 -1000 FOR NEW LOT CONFIGURATION
DATE SUBMITTED • 08/28/07
DATE ACCEPTED • 09/04/07
STATUS • FINAL
STATUS DATE 11/26/07
HEARING OFFICER DECISION: APPROVED
HEARING DATE • 11/14/07
APPLICANT • OLAF BOLKEN
SITE ADDRESS • 9721 N HWY 97,TE
** *Land use application: TP071000 on Account number: 127875 * **
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
httn:// www.deschutes.org /index.cfm ?obj ectid =65F 1110A- BDBD -57C 1 -91 D726DBA942... 11/24/ Z009
Deschutes County Government, Oregon - DIAL Search Results Standard Page 15 of 15
REQUEST • 6 -LOT MEASURE 37 SUBDIVISION
DATE SUBMITTED 06/26/07
DATE ACCEPTED 07/03/07
STATUS - FINAL
STATUS DATE • 11/27/07
HEARING OFFICER DECISION: APPROVED
HEARING DATE • 11/14/07
APPLICANT OLAF BOLKEN
SITE ADDRESS 9721 N HWY 97,TE
** *Land use application: LM0449 on Account number: 127875 * **
Map /TL • 141309 00 01400
ACCOUNT 127875
REQUEST • LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT SITE PLAN FOR REMODEL.
DATE SUBMITTED • 03/10/04
DATE ACCEPTED 03/22/04
STATUS FINAL
STATUS DATE 04/13/04
APPLICANT OLAF BOLKEN
SITE ADDRESS 9721 N HWY 97,TE
*********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * *v * **
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Real Property Tax Lot Record * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *, * **
************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * *t * **
IInpINININNHIMNNHINNNINNNNIjt� TWIN NIII.uV(IINGj"n
�9P�Ipill@II�IIIINIM�II III IA I ml
II
m�rtl�niMT�,h
4
It an
mr
II'
ItIINWNIgINIHNII"''
1111 tml �puuonnlll'" "w
This web site uses the FREE Adobe Acrobat® Reader'"' plug -in. AC
If you do not have this plug -in, click the icon to get it. � ' Adobe CO Redder
Tax Lot Record prior to July 2003
For Tax Lot Records prior to 1995 please call our office at (541)388 -6508.
14 13 09 0 0 01400 Code 2 -004
Current Acres 31.40
This description is for tax purposes ONLY and can not be
attached to any legal document.
http: / /www.deschutes.orsJ /index.c $ n ?obiectid =65F111OA - BDBD- 57C1- 91D726DBA942... 11/2, /2009