HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-06-04 Business Meeting MinutesDeschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701 -1960
(541) 388 -6570 - Fax (541) 385 -3202 - www.deschutes.org
MINUTES OF BUSINESS MEETING
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2008
Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend
Present were Commissioners Dennis R. Luke, Michael M Daly and Tammy
Melton. Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Laurie Craghead,
Legal Counsel; Catherine Morrow and Terri Hansen Payne, Community
Development; George Kolb, Road Department; and approximately thirty other
citizens.
Chair Luke opened the meeting at 10:00 a.m.
1. Before the Board was Citizen Input.
None was offered.
2. Before the Board was a Public Hearing (continued) on File #PA -07 -6 and
File #TA -07 -6, County Code Plan and Text Amendments to the Sunriver
Urban Unincorporated Community regarding Redevelopment of the
Sunriver Mall Area.
Terri Payne explained this is a continuation of the issue. It is being continued
because the language has changed. Some very different concepts have been
submitted by the applicant. Staff is still reviewing this information and would
like the hearing to be continued to June 25.
Commissioner Luke asked if it is appropriate to take testimony today. Laurie
Craghead stated that testimony should be only on the changes that have been
made since the last hearing.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 1 of 7 Pages
Commissioner Luke asked if the changes are significant enough to go back to
the Planning Commission. The floor area ratio is quite different, but some may
end up putting a cap on the density which is one of the things the Planning
Commission had wanted. It would delay the process unless the Board met with
the Planning Commission, and notice would have to be sent out again.
Commissioner Daly said he does not see a reason why this should go back to
the Planning Commission. The details still need to be worked out.
Commissioner Luke added that there is an opportunity to invite the Planning
Commission to sit on this, as long as they don't have to vote they can comment
if they wish.
Ms. Craghead stated that if the Planning Commission meets, it would have to be
noticed as a regular meeting. It may need to be continued again after the June
25 meeting. Ms. Payne commented that the Planning Commission usually
cannot meet during the day due to their work schedules.
Commissioner Melton said that she is okay with meeting in the evening or in a
different location if necessary.
Commissioner Luke stated that this has been going on for a while and there are
some disagreements. Ms. Craghead said that the year -long process has been
challenging. Commissioner Luke asked if there is a reason the Sunriver
Owners Association and the applicant have not met with County staff at length.
Ms. Payne said when the SROA land sale failed, it changed what can be done
and new language has been offered to deal with this change. A
recommendation as to the floor area ratio may work better than density
requirements. More changes will be recommended and it is hoped all entities
can review and come to some kind of agreement. The proposed language is
site - specific and would not affect any other areas of the County.
Commissioner Melton asked what the timing is. Ms. Payne stated that she
hopes they have the final language by early next week. Ms. Craghead said that
testimony today could be on the changes done during the last couple of weeks.
Chair Luke asked for anyone wanting to testify to come forward.
Larry Weber, a Sunriver property owner who lives in Damascus, talked about
two supporting documents, including a May 16, 2008 memorandum dealing
with the changes; and written testimony from Harvey Barringer, a resident and
attorney. He then read his statement (copy attached.)
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 2 of 7 Pages
Commissioner Luke said that this hearing is in regard to the text amendment
and not on the project itself. He asked Mr. Weber to stay on point and not on
the specific details of the proposed project. Mr. Weber said that his comments
relate to the text amendment.
Commissioner Luke said that the developer has nothing to do with the text
amendment and asked that Mr. Weber not disparage the developer. The text
amendment would allow any developer to apply for this work.
Mr. Weber continued reading his written statement.
President of Sunriver Owners Association, and speaking for the Board, read a
statement in regard to the floor area ratio.
Doug Seators said he wants to endorse the FAR concept. Concerns have been
raised regarding density, but there is a cap of 22 units per acre. He stated that
FAR is a more complete and logical way to address the issue; this allows the
developer to meet the demands of the marketplace, and the concept has been
used worldwide. He added that he feels there is no downside to going in this
direction.
Craig Carver, a part -time resident of Sunriver, observed that this has been a
long process and changes each time it is examined. This time the newest
feature is the FAR concept. He wanted to address some issues from the last
hearing.
Ms. Payne said that language was added as to where the town center could go,
and does include the lands that failed to be included but doesn't count them
until the rezone is done.
Ms. Payne stated that she is still working on the open space verbiage, and added
that the language added is considerably more site specific than in most cases.
Dave Lewis commented on the hard work of the community. He is impatient
for this to move forward and urged the Commissioners not to send this back to
the Planning Commission. The community voted about 57% in favor of the
original, larger size and the sale of the land. He feels the FAR concept would
create shoulder seasons, with more people in the village on an ongoing basis,
helping retailers. This is what is needed to make the development successful.
The builder should be allowed some flexibility based on market demand.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 3 of 7 Pages
Ms. Payne recommended the hearing be continued to June 25 at 10:00 a.m.
Discussion took place as to whether to hold another hearing, whether to hold a
hearing again in Sunriver, and whether the Planning Commission should be
involved at this point.
Commissioner Melton wanted another hearing held in Sunriver and the
Planning Commission to be involved. Commissioners Luke and Daly felt that
they didn't feel it was necessary to hold a hearing in Sunriver; and that the
Planning Commission members could attend as individuals if they want to, or
can submit written testimony.
DALY: Move this hearing be continued to the Board's June 25, 2008 regular
meeting, with testimony accepted on changes only.
LUKE: Second.
VOTE: MELTON: No. (Split vote.)
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
3. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Resolution No. 2008-
056, Initiating the Vacation of a Portion of Third Street, Terrebonne.
George Kolb explained the item, which is a 100% vacation. There is no reason
for anything to ever be built there.
DALY: Move signature
MELTON: Second.
VOTE: MELTON: Yes.
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
4. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Order No. 2008 -048,
Vacating a Portion of Third Street, Terrebonne.
DALY: Move signature
MELTON: Second.
VOTE: MELTON: Yes.
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 4 of 7 Pages
5. Before the Board was Consideration of Signature of Document No. 2008-
289, Quitclaim Deed in a 1963 Easement near Groff /Rickard Road.
Mr. Kolb said this easement is not needed for any public services.
MELTON: Move signature
DALY: Second.
VOTE: MELTON: Yes.
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of the Consent Agenda.
MELTON: Move signature
DALY: Second.
VOTE: MELTON: Yes.
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
Consent Agenda Items
6. Approval of Minutes:
• Work Session: May 28
• Business Meeting: April 21; May 14 and 28
7. Economic Development Grant Requests:
• Deschutes County Historical Society — Computer Network Upgrades —
Commissioners Luke and Melton granted $500 each; Commissioner Daly
granted $1,614.95.
• Central Oregon Senior Pro Rodeo Association — Promotion — Commissioner
Luke granted $500 and Commissioners Daly and Melton granted $1,000
each
• Redmond Chamber of Commerce — Concert Series — Commissioners Luke
and Melton, $500 each; Commissioner Daly $1,000.
• Meth Action Coalition — Child Neglect Summit — Commissioners Luke and
Melton $750 each; Commissioner Daly $500
• Healthy Beginnings — Health Access Services — Commissioner Luke $750;
Commissioner Melton $1,000.
• Tower Theatre Foundation — "A Christmas Carol" Production — no funds
were granted at this time.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 5 of 7 Pages
• Oregon High School Equestrian Team — State Championship —
Commissioner Daly granted $3,500 and Commissoner Luke granted $500.
CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9 -1 -1 COUNTY
SERVICE DISTRICT
8. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Accounts Payable
Vouchers for the 9 -1 -1 County Service District in the Amount of
$70,330.48.
MELTON: Move approval, subject to review.
DALY: Second.
VOTE: MELTON: Yes.
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
CONVENED AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION /4 -H
COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
9. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Accounts Payable
Vouchers for the Extension /4 -H County Service District in the Amount of
$1,259.02.
MELTON: Move approval, subject to review.
DALY: Second.
VOTE: MELTON: Yes.
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
RECONVENED AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
10. Before the Board was Consideration of Approval of Accounts Payable
Vouchers for Deschutes County in the Amount of $330,287.48.
MELTON: Move approval, subject to review.
DALY: Second.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 6 of 7 Pages
VOTE: MELTON: Yes.
DALY: Yes.
LUKE: Chair votes yes.
11. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
None were offered.
Being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned at 11:20 a.m.
DATED this 4th Day of June 2008 for the Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners.
ATTEST:
f-gLkm
Recording Secretary
De
s R. Luke, Chair
dktd•LIL.A.
aney) A lton, Vice Chair
Mic ael M. Daly, C mmissioner
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 7 of 7 Pages
IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY
Please complete this card & turn
it in to a County staff person.
Name: C
Mailing Address:
l 01--7
Phone #: '('
E -mail Address: c.;1-(\cD
Date:
Subject:
IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY
Please complete this card & turn
it in to a County staff person.
Name: & j) e L s
Mailing Address: test
k.(;7,,/?
Phone #:
E -mail Address: 1.014,
Date: te.°-
Subject: S. J ed>
IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY
Please complete this card & turn
it ' to a Count staff person.
Name:
Mailing Addres
5O\nr OCL
0
c2)
Phone #: 5c
E -mail Address:
Date: - �3
Subject: 5 rito -- f'AC \
Ck\ (kft\k.Ac
L
CI) 4E4
r (Q
4-
°'
716
°
O o
cv
>-
-
LL ci 4
0
Q)
0
4-
AI;
Mailing Arlrir
Ph » E
E -r
o
Da 12-3 izu
Sul I'
O
t--s"
Q,C
a U f.
s. NE O v ° <
� 0o
Mi L1.. Q) C
Ph z
E -r
Date:
Subject:
Community Development Department
Planning Division Building Safety Division Environmental Health Division
117 NW Lafayette Avenue Bend Oregon 97701 -1925
(541)388 -6575 FAX (541)385 -1764
http://www.co.deschutes.orus/cddi
STAFF REPORT # 4
To: Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners
From: Terri Hansen Payne, Senior Planner
Date: May 28, 2008
Hearing Date: June 4, 2008
Subject: Public Hearing on Sunriver Plan & Text Amendments PA- 07- 6JTA -07 -6
PURPOSE
SilverStar Destinations has proposed plan amendment PA -07 -6 and text amendment
TA -07 -6 to revise Deschutes County Code (DCC) to create a Town Center district in the
Sunriver Urban Unincorporated Community. The Town Center would accommodate
mixed -use development including retail, commercial, overnight lodging, live /work and
multi - family residential uses.
PROPOSAL
Background and staff reports on the record to date, can be found at the County website
www.deschutes.orq /cdd under pending code amendments.
This proposal has been continually evolving due to the complexity of creating a new set
of regulations, and due to ongoing negotiations between the applicant, the Sunriver
Owners Association (SROA) Board and County staff. A new version was provided to
staff on May 21 and staff has not yet had time to analyze the new language. No further
revisions are anticipated at this time.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Recently received public comments are attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the public hearing be continued to allow analysis of the revised
language.
Attachment
1. Public input received between April 21, 2008 and May 27, 2008
Quality Services Performed with Pride
Larry D. Weber
Owner #9 Elk Lane Sunriver
13788 SE 180t Ave Damascus, OR 97089
Board of County Commissioners, Deschutes County
Subject: PA -07 -6 and TA -07 -06 Proposed Changes to the Sunriver
Urban Unincorporated Community
Dear Commissioners,
Based upon a review of the FAR language that is now contained within
the text amendments before this body it appears that the applicant's
proposal now allows for more residential units and square footage...this
based upon Silverstar's own previous testimony before the Planning
Commission and this Body...as the average size of each residence.
Silverstar appears to be trying to make it appear that No Change is
occurring by referencing options that are not realistic...and at the very
least are not based upon their own previous statements as being their
intentions.
Based upon the applicant's stated average residence size of 1,100 square
feet...from the November 8, 2007 Planning commission
presentation...the current FAR allowance of 1.0 allows for over 15%
more units and residential square footage and potentially more than
that! This is in complete opposition to the conditions the Planning
commission made and further it goes against the will of the Sunriver
owners in our February 15, 2008 vote to reduce the size and scope of the
Silverstar proposal by retaining our common areas and Beaver Drive
which runs through the Mall.
The current language would allow more residential units and
square footage while allowing for far less commercial. Exactly the
opposite of what the Planning Commission felt was needed in order for
the proposal to be forwarded to YOU!
Silverstar's actions in the current proposal would have us believe that
they had won the owner election of February 15, 2008 in an landslide
vote and that the Planning Commission had approved their application
unanimously on the first vote...And, NOT that they had lost both!
(1)
In the public record on this matter you have 100's of e-mails and letters
from Sunriver property owners who have and continue to raise
questions and concerns about the density of the residential component,
the heights of the buildings which in some instances exceed existing
heights by 40'to 50; and the complete disregard for solar and open
spaces that are in the present 16 Districts of the UUC. Owners such as
me are questioning the need for an additional District...when we have
16 already! And, the applicant has not demonstrated a need or public
interest in the creation of a TC District in our unincorporated
Community. With some negotiated revisions to our existing
Commercial District a mixed -used revitalization of the existing
commercial core of Sunriver can be achieved at far less risk to the 4100
property owners that make up the Sunriver Resort Community.
The risk...In Mark Smuland's memorandum on the Village At Sunriver
directed to the Sunriver Board of Directors on May 16, 2008, Smuland
in his Conclusions writes. "Mixed -Use Town Centers are extremely
complex projects and, according to Dave Leland of Leland Consulting
Group, approximately 60% of these projects either fail or under -
perform financially." End of Quote!
Further evidence of the risk involved in this proposal...and in written
testimony buried in the public record on this matter...Harvey Barragar,
a Sunriver owner and lawyer who practiced law with the Miller Nash
Law Firm in Portland, Oregon...where much of his practice involved
representation of developers, property owners, lenders and investors in
connection with real estate matters...to include a number of projects
here in Deschutes County makes the following observations on the
Town Center text amendments before you:
1) "Silverstar has promoted its proposal on the basis that because of
the purchase price Silverstar paid for the Mall, development of a
profitable residential component is necessary to permit it to
create the vibrant commercial core that Sunriver residents want
to have." Barragar raises an issue that has been glossed over
when he writes, "An issue that seems to have been glossed over in
all of the arguments back and forth about the Silverstar proposal
is whether it is likely to result in a vibrant commercial core for
Sunriver." He believes it will NOT for the following reasons:
00. oV, dg
( z)
1) No Commitment to Retail. Silverstar has skillfully created images
of nice shops and restaurants in the mall. It was suggested that the new
Sunriver Village would be so grand that it would attract business from
South Deschutes County and Bend. However, when Silverstar drafted
zoning language the grand shopping mall concept was gone! They have
`lumped' the shops and restaurants in with offices for real estate agents,
property managers, title insurance companies, doctors, dentists,
mortgage brokers and other nonretail uses. In the promotional phase
commercial +ises were expected to be as much as 120,000 sq. ft.
(somewhat smaller that the existing mall) with a commitment to develop
at least 85,000 sq. ft. The Planning Commission decided that
Silverstar's 85,000 sq. ft. was inadequate and recommended an increase.
Silverstar's response was to reduce the required amount of commercial
development to 150 sq. ft. per `dwelling unit', And, it should be noted
that none of this commercial development is required to be retail! And,
Sunriver already has a grocery store in the mall. So, what about the
shops and restaurants? Why are they not required in the Town Center
zoning? Could it be that Silverstar has no interest in being a landlord
to these type fo businesses?
2) Necessary Ingredients for a Vibrant Commercial Development
are Missing. Think of the vibrant commercial development in
Bend...the Shops at the Old Mill comes to mind. It is being done
by a developer with vision and the experience to carry out the
vision. The developer is focusing on the retail core. National and
regional retail tenant have been attracted. It is an exciting place
to be! Is this sort of vibrant development likely to take place in
the Sunriver Mall? Of course not! Silverstar has no development
experience and has not owned retail property. As has been
pointed out in public testimony by Silverstar's consultant, the
Sunriver Mall has a short selling season. It will never attract
national and regional retail tenants. And, it is not easy being
landlord to local tenants who seasonally may have trouble selling
enough merchandise or meals to pay the rent. And, there is the
high cost of building in restaurant tenants, particularly in multi-
story building is likely to be more than seasonal restaurants can
afford. So, it only goes to reason that Silverstar's energies will be
devoted to its residential development...that's where the money
is! Without a committed and experienced retail developer and
C3)
06. off, d
operator, there is very little likelihood that the promised vibrant
commercial core will ever materialize.
3) The Town Center Development Process is Not Designed to Result
in the Promised Vibrant Commercial Development. The
conceptual site plan procedure proposed by Silverstar gives the
developer virtually absolute discretion as to specific land uses as
long as they do not violate overall use restrictions. It is not
necessary to meet all of the presently existing site plan approved
criteria. The site specific plan review does not adequately cope
with enforcing required amounts of commercial development (to
say nothing of retail) in the way it transfers requirements from
one phase to another of the basis of starting construction of
commercial. It is very difficult to tell in a mixed use building
under construction what space will eventually be commercial.
Only with a requirement for a specific amount of retail space
occupied by tenants open for business in each phase before the
next phase can begin is there any hope for a semblance of a
successful refurbished mixed use mall.
4) Emphasis On Residential Dooms Commercial Component to
Failure. There is little reason to believe that a totally inexperienced
developer like Silverstar can pull this off. Silverstar has no equity in
the property, having borrowed the purchase price. It may be expected
that portions of the property will be sold off to realize some working
capital for the development. Multiple ownerships will further
complicate an already complex development. And, with the focus on
profitable residential, commercial use could be spread out around the
mall on the ground floor of widely separated mixed use building',
Without focus there is no chance for a vibrant commercial core. In
the current conceptual plan the grocery store is removed from the rest
of the development. Other retail, if there is any, may be separated by
a wall of tall residential buildings and will have no opportunity to feed
off the customers of the grocery store. And, of course, how long can
existing tenant survive during a prolonged construction period,
particularly if they are cut off from the grocery store? After the
residential units are built and sold the developer is likely to have little
interest in running a fragmented commercial facility.
L4
06.oY,t '
There is an Alternative...
The Sunriver mall suffers them a large amount of deferred maintenance
and a lack of tenants. However, the main pat+ of the mall includes
buildings that fit in with Sunriver. It was designed by an award
winning architect. From the exterior the buildingsappear to be
structurally sound. When the mall was kept up and had a good tenant
mix, it was a very pleasant place to shop. It should be preserved, much
like the Great Hall, rather than be torn down like the Pilot Butte Inn.
The plaza has been an excellent place for events. On the other hand, the
buildings on the northerly portion of the mall have little to recommend
them. They would not be missed if they were torn down. If this
proposal were really about a vibrant commercial core for Sunriver, the
plan would be to refurbish the main part of the mall and to build
residential on the north portion of the mall property of the size and
density comparable to the rest of Sunriver with its own amenities and
open space...similar to the highly successful Quelah Condominiums.
Silverstar will respond that this proposal is not economically feasible.
To which our response is...this proceeding is supposedly about creating
a vibrant commercial core for Sunriver. It should not be about bailing
nqta real estate speculator who paid too much for property that was not
zoned for the use the speculator hoped for.
o ,
the . s no justification for approving the Silverstar
Id be denied.
Olo o 0
Weber
With text from Harvey C. Barragar's written testimony of April 24,
2008...which is in the public record on this proposal before the
Commissioners.
(5)
SUNRIVER OWNERS ASSOCIATION
MAINTAINING SUNRIVER AS A PREMIER RESIDENTIAL AND RESORT COMMUNITY PROTECTING
AND ENHANCING ITS QUALITY OF LIFE, NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND PROPERTY VALUES.
June 4, 2008
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Board of County Commissioners
for Deschutes County
1300 NW Wall Street
Bend, Oregon 97701
Re: SilverStar Destinations, LLC applications
Town Center District — Sunriver Village Mall
County File Nos. PA -07 -6 and TA -07 -6
Dear Commissioners Luke, Melton and Daly:
I am the president of the Board of Directors for the Sunriver Owners Association ( "SROA "), and
I submit this written testimony into the record for the above - referenced files.
This written testimony is submitted to specifically comment on the request of SilverStar
Destinations, LLC ( "SilverStar ") to utilize the Floor Area Ratio methodology as the means of
regulating population impacts in the proposed Town Center District in Sunriver. The SROA
Board fully endorses the Floor Area Ratio methodology now before you.
In reaching its decision to support the Floor Area Ratio ( "FAR ") methodology, the SROA Board
and its Development Review Team had to become informed and knowledgeable about FAR in
order to analyze potential impacts from this population impact regulation tool. While the SROA
Board and the Development Review Team did not have an abundance of time to get up to speed,
it worked extremely hard and long to do so given the importance of mall revitalization to
Sunriver. The SROA obtained input from development and land use experts and really dove into
the details of the FAR methodology.
At the end of the SROA's learning curve came the conclusion that the FAR methodology was the
appropriate tool to regulate population impacts, particularly when used in conjunction with a
Development Agreement. FAR with a private Development Agreement between the SROA and
SilverStar balances the Community's need for assurances regarding the exterior mass and scale
of the development and a developer's need for flexibility to respond to an always changing
market.
5539.49 \06 04 2008 written testimony Joe.
57455 ABBOT DRIVE • P.O. BOX 3278 • SUNRIVER, OREGON 97707 • (541)593 -2411 • TOLL FREE (888) 284 -6639 • FAX (541) 593-56.9
www.sunriverowners.org
Board of County Commissioner
for Deschutes County
June 4, 2008
Page 2
In SROA's opinion, some of the specific benefits of utilizing the FAR methodology are the
following:
• A mechanism to control the bulk and mass of structures, district -wide
• Allowing for a greater mix in the types of buildings and uses
• The very real potential that the overall development will have more open areas
without buildings because FAR generally results in a decrease in land used for
building footprints
• A tool that offers developer flexibility and the ability to respond to changing
conditions, enhancing the overall likelihood of success of the entire project
The SROA Board of Directors encourages this Board to endorse the FAR methodology and
proceed with approval of SilverStar's plan and text amendments for the creation of the Town
Center District in Sunriver.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these applications.
Respectfully submitted
Cry
DORIS BRANNAN
President of the
Sunriver Owners Association
5539.49 \06 04 2008 written testimony.dc
s iE °i € vft�enast .{ i€ iR: sxs)3 €r- €1.04 �<• i €.€ t: * 'EI. +#{)x e.€1 8 €:a:��<
sa ttfi4£:�E3#£ €k� # {'Few{z83�tt�f #.{33.,°..`R. ttYE »xrrsK3fit - }.t i' t�ta3ix-!£ 3331 C+�D33
mt..t t €i
..........................
............................
549 SW ' #$3£ i.6. W`a k`z Built. ! 3 .
3 t' nd, .97702
f; F
witatlan Route Plan: .fialr Road
` \ It`£3< ?xB Tn. �C$Sk 4 d!- fzno3:tIt d %#rq#f£:.#t
• t.1i<zt #ship }t t 3 � � a€ 4 •
t #a' 33; #tEt'.m l33 lk F�3\o.€ d €�Yi #t i #i iFfG. t 3 i� ?) Eta . ##' I#':#'- 1,i"ks✓ �q i 'S'i Etif €. #:t}i#
Z�F
€Elh €1
?.W. 3.3{.3' 0.
n.N
f.<)9t�Sb,fi83.�
w
0
Deschutes County Board of Commissioner'
1300 NW Wall St., Bend, OR 97701 - 1960
(541) 388 -6570 - Fax (541) 385 -3202 - www.deschutes.or,
BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2008
Commissioners' Hearing Room - Administration Building - 1300 NW Wall St., Bend
1. CITIZEN INPUT
This is the time provided for individuals wishing to address the Board, at the Board's
discretion, regarding issues that are not already on the agenda. Citizens who wish to speak
should sign up prior to the beginning of the meeting on the sign -up cards provided. Please
use the microphone and also state your name and address at the time the Board calls on you
to speak. PLEASE NOTE: Citizen input regarding matters that are or have been the subject
of a public hearing will NOT be included in the record of that hearing.
2. A PUBLIC HEARING (continued) on File #PA -07 -6 and File #TA -07 -6,
County Code Plan and Text Amendments to the Sunriver Urban
Unincorporated Community regarding Redevelopment of the Sunriver Mall
Area — Terri Hansen Payne, Community Development Department
3. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Resolution No. 2008 -056, Initiating the
Vacation of a Portion of Third Street, Terrebonne — George Kolb, Road
Department
4. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Order No. 2008 -048, Vacating a Portion
of Third Street, Terrebonne — George Kolb, Road Department
5. CONSIDERATION of Signature of Document No. 2008 -289, Quitclaim
Deed in a 1963 Easement near Groff /Rickard Road — George Kolb, Road
Department
CONSENT AGENDA
6. Approval of Minutes:
• Work Session: May 28
• Business Meeting: April 21; May 14 and 28
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 1 of 6 Pages
7. Economic Development Grant Request:
• Deschutes County Historical Society — Computer Network Upgrades —
Commissioners Luke and Melton granted $500 each.
Central Oregon Senior Pro Rodeo Association — Promotion — Commissioner
Luke granted $500 and Commissioner Melton granted $1,000
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE 9 -1 -1 COUNTY
SERVICE DISTRICT
8. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Accounts Payable Vouchers for the 9 -1 -1
County Service District
CONVENE AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE EXTENSION /4 -H
COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
9. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Accounts Payable Vouchers for the
Extension/4 -H County Service District
RECONVENE AS THE DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
10. CONSIDERATION of Approval of Accounts Payable Vouchers for
Deschutes County
11. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7 -1 -1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388 -6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 2 of 6 Pages
FUTURE MEETINGS:
(Please note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change. All meetings take place in the Board of
Commissioners' meeting rooms at 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. If you have questions
regarding a meeting, please call 388- 6572.)
Monday, June 2, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council)
5:00 p.m. Joint work session with the City of Bend Council, at the County
Tuesday, June 3 through Friday, June 6
Association of Counties Spring Conference
Monday, June 9, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, June 12, 2008
9:00 a.m. Quarterly Update — Mental Health Department
10:00 a.m. Quarterly Update — Health Department
Monday, June 16, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
10:00 a.m. Regular Meeting of the Employee Benefits Advisory Committee
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 3 of 6 Pages
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
10:30 a.m. Oregon Youth Challenge Graduation Ceremony
2:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s) — please note later time
Thursday, June 19, 2008
7:00 a.m. Bend Chamber of Commerce Legislative Policy Council Meeting
10:00 a.m. Quarterly Update — Juvenile Community Justice
Monday, June 23, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting — Includes Budget & Fee Schedule Public Hearing,
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting — Includes Budget & Fee Schedule Adoption
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, June 26, 2008
9:00 a.m. Quarterly Update — Fair & Expo Center
11:00 a.m. Quarterly Update — Commission on Children & Families
Monday, June 30, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
5:00 p.m. (Tentative) Joint Meeting with the City of La Pine Council, in La Pine
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, July 3, 2008
8:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Sisters Council, in Sisters
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 4 of 6 Pages
Friday, July 4, 2008
Most County offices will be closed to observe the July 4`h Holiday
Monday, July 7, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council)
Wednesday, July 9, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Thursday, July 10, 2008
7:00 a.m. Regular Meeting with the City of Redmond Council, in Redmond
12:00 noon Audit Committee Meeting
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
10:00 a.m. Regular Meeting of the Employee Benefits Advisory Committee
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Monday, July 19, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, July 21, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 5 of 6 Pages
Monday, July 28, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Monday, August 4, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
3:30 p.m. Regular Meeting of LPSCC (Local Public Safety Coordinating Council)
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
10:00 a.m. Board of Commissioners' Meeting
1:30 p.m. Administrative Work Session — could include executive session(s)
Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7 -1 -1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388 -6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
Board of Commissioners' Business Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Page 6 of 6 Pages