HomeMy WebLinkAboutSummary - Fee Schedule2014 Proposed Fee Schedule
Summary of Changes for:
Assessor
Clerk
Community Development
Dog Licensing
Health Services
Justice Court
And
Sheriff's Department
Assessor's Office
Proposed Fee Schedule increases:
Research Fee / Professional Services (1/2 hour minimum) -$65 up $5.
~ To be inline with the same rate as GIS as some of our requests can overlap.
Computer listings and labels: Base fee $35-65 up $5
~ Our base fee is closely tied to our hourly research/professional services fee.
CD of Assessment Roll $175 up $15
~ To match the same fee charge for the county data set which is the same data in a re d
only format that we rarely sell but have to purchase for an outside vendor.
Proposed New/Increase Fee:
The Assessors office took over processing manufactured homes from the Tax Office several years a 0,
we have continue to charge the same fees they charged although they don't appear to have ever been
on the fee schedule.
Manufactured home processing fee $65 in addition to the current BCD fee of $55 for all transaction
other than movements (trip permits), those would remain at $5 per side. The movement fee would
increase from $10 to $30, which is in addition to the $5 per side. The $65 is in line with our
professional/research fee request. Manufactured home transactions can take anywhere from 20
minutes for the basic transaction to 2 hours depending on if the customer has completed the form nd
has all of the documents needed to complete the transaction.
~ In 2005 the DMV transferred the responsibility for maintaining ownership and site
information for manufactured structures to the Building Codes Division. The new
program called Lois was given to County Tax Collectors, Assessors, Dealers and Titl i
Companies to become agents of BCD and process these transactions. BCD set a fee of
$55 per transaction, $25 goes to BCD and $30 to the county. With the exception o ~
Exemptions and Security Interest holders, BCD does not collect a fee for those services
and the county receives all of the $55. The county also receives 100% of the $5 pe ~ side
trip permit and $10 movement fee.
~ To process the average of 550 transactions each year the county receives approxi ately
$16,500. To process these transactions it takes 1 full time FTE. The current fees the
county retains from these transaction only covers approximately 1/3 of the actual I
average expense.
Current Proposed
Ownership Change Transaction
Fee and or
Taxes·
Person to person chonge of ownership. Involving
both porties, with proof of ownership, including
BCD Ownership Document or DMV Title
$55 Total $120 Total
Involving on obondonment See ORS 90.425 or
90.675
$55 $120.00
When one of the current owners is deceosed,
w/out right of survivorship.
$55 $ 120.00
Adding/Removing Security Interest Holder $55 $120.00
Involving bonk or security interest holder
repossession.
$55 $120.00
For use when the originol ownership document
hos been misploced.
$55 $120.00
Lien Release
To receive ond ownership document showing free
ond cleor ownership.
$55 $120.00
Exempting or Un-exempting your Monufoctured
Structure.
$55 $120.00
Movement (Trip) Permit $5 per side
+
$10 County
movement
fee
$5 per side +
$ 30 County
Movement fee
i
Fee Schedule Narrative -FY 2014
Clerk's Office
Item No: elK 5
HB 2417 proposes to increase the fee collected for Affordable Housing from $15
to $20 and focus on veteran's housing. The bill is anticipated to pass the legislature.
Item No: elK 11
In anticipation of the passage of HB 2417, adding the additional $5 fee in the
example fee chart.
Item No: elK 29
Research fee is calculated using current hourly employee salary and benefits.
The increased fee reflects the increased employee cost.
Item No: elK 30
Annually, the Recording Access Fee is reviewed. Any adjustment to the Fee is
based on the January to January CPI published by the US Bureau of labor Statistics.i
The increased fee reflects the 1.6% change rounded to the next five dollar increment.
Item No: elK 43 .
The amend marriage record fee is based on current hourly employee salary alld
benefits. It also reflects the time to process an amended marriage record and cost to !
submit the amended record to Oregon Vital Records. The increased fee reflects the
increased cost.
Community Development Depaa1ment
Planning Division Building Safety Division EnVironment]. Soils Division
117 NW lafayette Avenue Bend Oregon .7701-1925
(541)388-6575 FAX (54:1.)385-1764
http://www.co.deschuteS.or.us/cdd/
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Nick Lelack, AICP, Director
DATE: May 1, 2013
RE: Community Development Department Proposed Fee Changes
The Community Development Department (COD) is proposing a 3.5% fee increase on most
planning and building permits. No changes are proposed for environmental soils (on-site septip
systems) permit fees. A few planning permit fees are proposed to be reduced to more accurately
reflect the cost of providing services. 1·
COD conducted its annual fee survey of building, electrical and planning fees from 15 counties and
cities throughout the State in order to gather and compare fee schedules proposed in FY 2013.14.
The results of this survey varied from no increase to as high as 15%. Several counties are ,
proposing a 1.6% increase based on the CPI for FY 13-14. Overall, COD's proposed fees are In
the middle range compared to other jurisdictions. The attached fee survey does not include all the
counties, but rather those of similar size or are located in Central Oregon.
Some counties surveyed but not included on the attachment include: Benton County (planning fees
increased 5% on January 1, 2013; building fees increased 25% in 2009); Multnomah County .
(proposing a 10-15% increase to all fees); Clatsop County (no fee increase proposed; fees i
increased in 2012 from 10-25% depending upon permit); Hood River County (proposing a 3%jee
increase); and Yamhill and Klamath Counties (proposing 1.6% increase based on CPI).
COD's business activity and revenues are up approximately 7% over FY 12-13 budget while
expenditures are 9% below budget. COD business volume is projected to grow slightly in FY 3
14, however, expenditures are also expected to increase to cover the following:
• Health care and PERS;
• Cost of living adjustments; and,
• Replacement of COD's permitting software with the State's ePermitting program, Accela.
The proposed fee increase represents a shared investment in COD between the County and qDD
customers to sustain current service levels. Specifically, the proposed General Fund transfer <;>f
$551,014 is 36% less than the amount transferred in FY 12-13, not including the General Fun1
transfer for long range planning ($495,000). The proposed 3.5% fee increase is projected to
generate approximately $73,000 in revenue. .
Quality Services Perfonned 'With Pride
PLANNING DIVISION
FEE SURVEY -FY 2013·14
v',: .''1li''',~J\k;;"~ m:;t;r,'~1 ~ ~"'-~
-------,~,......,--=~...",..,.....,..,...",., AAP 241:k= AS 'itA. z.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
FEE SURVEY -FY 2013-14
BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION
FEE SURVEY -FY 2013-14
Deschutes County Finance De plrtment
Marty Wynne, Finance Director Treasurer
P.o. Box 6005 • Bend. OR 9
1300 NW Wall St. Suite 200 • Bend. OR
(541 J 388-6559 • Fax (541 J
www.co.deschutes.or.us
MEMORANDUM I
i
Date: April 3D, 2013 I
To: Board of County Commissioners
From: Cheryl Circle, Finance DepV/
Copy: Marty Wynne, Finance Dept.
Re: Fee Schedule -Dog Licensing
Recommendation to Increase Dog Licensing Fees
It is being requested that the dog licensing fee for altered dogs be increased from $12 to $16 annually
and the unaltered dogs be increased from $27 to $30 annually. Licensing fees were last increased ih
2003, since that time we have experienced increased costs; particularly postage, shelter fees, persoJnel
costs, and printing costs. Also, the Dog Control Fund receives a transfer from the General Fund whiClh
has increased from $50,211 in FY2003 to $105,512 in FY2013. I
The dog licensing fees were recently compared with ten (10) counties in Oregon and Deschutes Couoty
is one of the lowest. In discussions with the City of Bend, who receives a portion of the licensing I'
revenue, it was recommended that we consider increasing the licensing fees as the previous change in
fees dated back to 2003 and costs have dramatically increased. The City of Bend and the City of
Redmond receive 75% of the dog licensing fees for those animals located within their respective ci~
limits. For dogs licensed in the unincorporated areas of the County the Humane Societies receive $~2 of
each license issued. :
As the result of new contracts with the Humane Societies and a review ofthe fees paid to the cities ~f
Bend and Redmond County Administration recommended we review dog licensing fees. This requeIt
I
and review has resulted in a recommendation to increase the licensing fee to $16 for altered dogs and
$30 for unaltered dogs. 1
-------
--
DOG LICENSING FEE COMPARISON
Fee for Altered Fee for Non-PopulationCounty Dog $ Altered Dog $
Crook 20,85510.00 25.00
-.
::••,,';d<?-"-.• ,00 158,875o.cbutea (Present) ." -:.\-...,'~.~ .. '-~:' ...
21,845Jefferson 12.00 28.00
35.00 353,15515.00Lane
117,340Linn 15.00 25.00
~~L-_ .
IDeschutes (Proposed)
-
16.00 30 .00
,
158,875
.. ---~ ---~
Benton 17.00 25.00 85,995
Marion 318,15017.00 32.00
-
Clackamas 18.00 35.00 378,480
-
Jackson 203,95020.00 30.00
Klamath 20.00 66,58030.00
DESCHUTES COUNTY
DOG LICENSE FEE HISTORY
ALTERED
DOG $
UNALTER ED
DOG $
SE NI OR
RATE
KEN NEL
RATE $
2013 16.00 30.0 0 none 5.00
I
2003 12.00 27.00 none 5.00
I
1998 10.00 24.00 none 5.00
1993 6.00 24.00 none 5.00
1990 6.00 12.00 none 5.00
1981 5.00
--
9.00 3.00
Proposed
Kennel Dog Fees -$5 per dog for up to 10 dogs
and $1 per dog for each additional dog over 10 dogs
4/25/2013
Health Services -Behavioral Health
Behavioral Health fees are set using a "unit cost calculator" developed by Dale Jarvis
with direction from the Greater Oregon Behavioral Health, Inc. (GOHBI) to provide
Oregon community mental health programs with a reliable and standard methodology for
calculating unit costs for the services we provide.
We have a requirement to "establish a fee schedule based upon reasonable and customary
costs of services in accordance with a cost allocation plan ...., but not in excess of the
providers usual and customary charge to the general public", and that "charges should
reflect the cost of services provided."
The formula is a function of budgeted expenditures, direct service staff, number of
clinical FTE, and historical data for clinical hours generating billable or encounterable
services, productivity adjuster, group and documentation adjuster, and a location adjuster.
Our fees for FY 14 increased, by provider type, in a range of20.03% -67.37% from FY
13 rates. Historically, we have always adjusted our rates based on what we believed to be
"reasonable and customary" within our community. This methodology has historically
caused us to charge a rate less than our actual cost of providing services.
Based on our FY 14 analysis and in conjunction with guidance from DeAnn Carr, our
Deputy Behavioral Health Director, it was determined that all provider rates would
increase 15% from our FY 13 rates, with the exception of our Behavioral Health
Specialist II provider rate, which increased 20% from our FY 13 rate. This methodology
brings us closer to the cost of providing services and meets our criteria of "reasonable
and customary" charges.
Health Services -Public Health
Public Health fees are determined based on a Cost Analysis Methodology tool developed
by George Christie and provided by the State. The formula is a function of actual
expenses from the previous completed fiscal year (FY 12), direct and indirect staff, actual
utilization of services, Medicare Relative Value of services, and a cost of living adjuster.
We have historically adjusted our rates based on what we believed to be "reasonable and
customary" within our community.
Procedure fees
Our procedure fees for FY 14 increased in a range of 13.39% and 74.24% from FY 13
fees. Based on our analysis and guidance from our Clinical Program Supervisor and
Medical Director, it was determined that our fees would increase 5% from FY 13 fees for
the majority of procedures that we provide. This methodology brings us closer to the cost
of providing services and meets our criteria of "reasonable and customary" charges.
(L) For taking and certifying for a private party an acknowledgment of proof of any instrument, $3. i
(m) Costs in criminal cases, where there has been a conviction, or upon forfeiture of security, $5. J
(2) Not later than the last day ofthe month immediately following the month in which fees set forth in subsection (I) ofthis section are collected, the j tice of the
peace shall pay aU such fees, other than those for performing marriage ceremonies, over to the county treasurer of the county wherein the justice ofthe peace ~as elected
or appointed, for crediting to the general fund of the county, and shall take the receipt of the treasurer therefor. [Amended by 1965 c.619 §25; 1979 c.447 §2;1987 c.829
§I; 1989 c.583 §IO; 1991 c.458 §2; 1997 c.801 §132; 1999 c.l051 §245; 2003 c.687 §I; 2011 c.595 §52b]
52.410 Trial fee. (I) Parties to judicial proceedings in justice courts are required to contribute toward the expense ofmaintaining justice courts, or a
or proceeding therein, by the payment of a trial fee.
(2) The trial fee in a justice court, for every trial by jury, is $17. [Amended by 1979 c.447 §3; 1997 c.80 1 § 133)
55.075 Time and place of hearing; procedure if right to jury trial asserted; fees. (l) Ifthe defendant demands a hearing in the small claims d
court, the court shall flx a day and time for the hearing and shall mail to the parties a notice ofthe hearing time in the form prescn'bed by the court, instructin
bring witnesses, documents and other evidence pertinent to the controversy.
(2) Ifthe defendant asserts a counterc1aim, the notice of the hearing time shall contain a copy of the counterclaim.
(3) If the defendant claims the right to a jury trial, the court shall notifY the plaintiff to file a formal complaint within 20 days following the mailing of s ch notice.
The notice shall instruct the plaintiff to serve a sununons and copy ofthe complaint by mail on the defendant at the designated address of the defendant. Proo of service
ofthe summons and complaint copy may be made by certiflcate ofthe plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney attached to the complaint prior to its flling. The plainti s claim in
such formal complaint is not limited to the amount stated in the claim flied in the small claims department but it must involve the same controversy. The detl
have 10 days in which to move, plead or otherwise appear following the day on which the summons and copy of the complaint would be delivered to the
course of mail. Thereafter, the cause shall proceed as other causes in the justice court, and costs and disbursements shall be allowed and taxed and fees not
shall be charged and collected as provided in ORS 51.310 and 52.410 for other cases tried in justice court, except that the appearance fee for plaintiff shall
equal to the difference between the fee paid by the plaintiff as required byORS 51.310 (IXc) and the fee requiredofa plaintiff by ORS 51.310 (lXa). [1989 d83 §8]
135.921 Amount and distribution of filing fee; diagnostic assessment fee. (1) The flling fee paid by a defendant at the time of filing a petition for a possession of
marijuana diversion agreement as provided in ORS 135.909 is $335. A fee collected under this section in the circuit court shall be deposited by the clerk of tire court in the
Criminal Fine Account. Ifthe fee is collected in a municipal or justice court, $125 ofthe fee shall be forwarded by the court to the Department of Revenue foli deposit in
the Criminal Fine Account, and the remainder of the fee shall be paid to the city or county treasurer. I
(2) Ifless than the full filing fee is collected under this section in a justice or municipal court, the money received shall be allocated first to the Departm¢Dt of
Revenue for deposit in the Criminal Fine Account !
(3) In addition to the filing fee under subsection (I) of this section, the court shall order the defendant to pay $90 directly to the agency or organization providing the
diagnostic assessment [1989 c.1075 §12; 1991 c.460 §19; 1991 c.818 §4; 1993 c.13 §3; 2003 c.737 §§62,63; 2005 c.702 §§73,74,75; 2007 c.71 §34; 2011 c.595 §165]
The exceptions are the returned check processing fee and the debit/credit card transaction fee which are set by eschutes
County.
April29,2013
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Jodi Stacy, Justice Court Coordinator
RE: Requested modifications to current fee schedule
Most of the modifications to the Deschutes County fee schedule requested by Justice Court are pursuant to legislative chan
Oregon Revised Statutes as listed below:
51.310 Schedule offees; payment of fees to county treasurer. (I) Except as provided in ORS 105.130, the justice of the peace shall collect, in adv
criminal eases, and issue receipts for, the following fees:
(a) For the flrst appearance of the plaintiff, $40.
(b) For the fIrSt appearance of the defendant, $40.
(c) In the small claims department, for a plaintiff flling a claim, $28; and for a defendant requesting a hearing, $28.
(d) For transcript ofjudgment, $6.
(e) For transcript ofjudgment from the small claims department, $6.
(I) For certifled copy ofjudgment, $6.
(g) For issuing writs of execution or writs of garnishment, $6 for each writ
(h) For taking an affidavit of a private party, $1.
(i) For taking depositions, for each folio, 70 cents.
(j) For supplying to private parties copies of records and flies, the same fees as provided or established for the county clerk under ORS 205.320.
(k) For each official certiflcate, $1.
es in
e except in
.
dant shall
amount
Sheriff's Office
Proposed Fee Schedule Increases:
The Sheriffs Office deleted several fees from the Law Enforcement Districts Fee Schedule which
are not being used. In addition, The Sheriffs Office is recommending several Inmate medical
services fees be increased.
The cost of providing inmate medical services in the Adult Jail are increasing due to the
complexity of services provided, additional staff time and provider price increases. The Sheriffs
Office is recommending fee increases for inmate medical visits to the Jail Doctor, Nurse
Practitioner, and Nurse. The Jail Staff determined the time per patient visit is increasing based
on a review of medical records and input from Jail medical staff. In addition provider costs for
Labs, X-Rays, Dentist, Emergency Room/Hospital visits has also increased per review of actual
expenses.
The Jail Captain reviewed each proposed increase with the Sheriff and the proposed Fee
Schedule changes are the result of this review.
Jim Ross
Business Manager
Deschutes County Sheriff's Office
541 322-4819