HomeMy WebLinkAboutRoad Study Results
MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: GEORGE KOLB, INTERIM ROAD DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ROAD STUDY COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
DATE: 12/27/2011
CC: ERIK KROPP, INTERIM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ROAD STUDY COMMITTEE
On June 22, 2011, a work session was held by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) to discuss the funding
shortfall facing the Road Department. The biggest issue for the Road Department is the loss of the Secure Rural
Schools funding (Forest Receipts) along with the declining amount of motor vehicle revenue coming to the counties
from the State. Current estimates show the County would need approximately $5.1 million dollars for overlays to
keep all roads at a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of not less than 70. This is considered the line between roads
in “good” condition versus “fair” condition. To date, the overall average PCI for all roads in the County is 78.67.
The current amount budgeted for overlays in FY 2012 is $2.8 million dollars; without the funding provided by the
Secure Rural Schools Act that amount could be cut by more than 50%. The BOCC decided that a Road Study
Committee would be formed to look at not only new sources of revenue for the Road Department but also review
how the Road Department conducts its business and find possible ways to lower cost and become more efficient.
The committee consisted of the following members:
Name Organization
Name Organization
Voting Members:
Non-Voting Members:
Andy High COBA
Bill Robie COAR
Peter Russell Deschutes Co. Planning
Chris Doty City of Redmond
George Kolb Deschutes Co. Road Dept.
Jack Holt
Roger Olson Deschutes Co. Road Dept.
Clayton Higuchi
Gordon Dukes retired county employee
Tyler Deke City of Bend
Mike Williams Hooker Creek
Todd Taylor, Chair Taylor Northwest
Steve Runner, Vice Chair Sunriver
Conrad Ruel
Steve Hultberg Ball Janik LLP
Ben Gordon 1000 friends of Oregon
Hardy Hanson City of Bend
The Committee was tasked to come up with five recommendations to be presented to the BOCC in January, 2012 to
alleviate the funding issues facing the Road Department. Four separate meetings were held from August to
November, and the Committee came up with the five points shown on the attached document.
Road Study Committee's Five Recommendations
to the Board of County Commissioners
January 4, 2012
1. Develop a Road Maintenance plan using the Pavement Condition Index (pCl),
ADT, and roadway classification.
a. Switch to a Pavement Management System (PMS) system from Capital
Asset and Pavement Services. This is the same system used by the cities
of Bend and Redmond, and Crook County.
1. Startup costs would be approximately $30,000, with a $1,500
annuallicensinglsoftware fee which would be less than 0.5% of
maintenance budget ($6,400,000 for FY 2011112).
ii. The cost per year to have the Consultant do inspections would be
approximately $11,000, which is less than 0.2% of maintenance
budget. The County could save this cost/year using an FTE that is
trained in the program (cost of FTE this year for entire system
inspection was $11,451).
lll. Determine the lowest PCI value that is acceptable to the Road
Department, and fund maintenance accordingly.
2. Identify different methods of construction/maintenance and how they tie back into
the PCI rating:
a. Currently the following methods are used by the County for road
maintenance and the cost per mile:
1. Full Depth Reclamation ($320,000/mile)
11. Overlay ($21 O,OOO/mile)
iii. Chip Seal ($23,650/mile)
iv. Fog Seal ($4,400/mile)
v. Sand Seal ($20,000/mile)
vi. Slurry Seal ($23,650/mile, not a lot of cost history on this so needs
more research)
V11. Thin Asphalt Overlay ($1 OO,OOO/mile)
Vlll. Possible return of some roads to gravel surfacing ($13 ,OOO/mile)
3. Prioritize services based on funding:
a. The Road Department will need to manage the current assets with less
income. This could include:
i. Reduced staffing levels and/or a reduced work week.
1. Not filling a road maintenance worker position saves
approximately $80,000/year
2. Evaluate going to a 36 hr. work week, which would save
approximately $385,8611year
11. Look at privatization of some services that are now done by
County forces, and determine an acceptable level of service for all
activities (costs shown are an annual average based on a 6-year
period):
1. Snow/ice removal $819,261
2. Sign installation and maintenance $485,197
3. Road striping $414,950
4. Sweeping $26,581
5. Bridge maintenance $5,681
6. Shoulder maintenance/building $527,272
7. Culvert replacement $96,353
8. Ditch cleaning $36,885
9. Roadside tree trimming and removal $164,068
10. Mowing $16,793
11. Roadside weed control $236,741
12. Roadside features, mail boxes, fences $145,658
13. Cattle guard repairs and installations $12,461
14. Guard rails $25,837
15. Emergency maintenance $38,880
16. Roadside trash pick-up and disposal (Adopt-a-Road)
$19,206
17. Dead animal pick up and disposal $32,876
4. Consolidate services with other agencies:
a. Start dialog with the cities of Bend, Redmond and Sisters to determine
what services can be shared over and above what is already being done.
5. Revenue options for the Road Department:
a. Sustainable/Long Term funding:
i. Build a campaign model and present information to the voters of
Deschutes County in 2014 on why a local gas tax is a sensible
option for funding.
1. $0.01 per gallon gas tax = $800,000 per year (the County's
share would depend upon revenue sharing agreements with
the cities)
2. Index the tax to the CPI
3. A current moratorium does not allow a new gas tax until
after January 1, 2014
11. Transient Lodging Tax: consider presentation to voters at the end
of2012:
1. Current rate of7% generates $2,626,000 ('11-'12 estimate).
An increase of 2% to a rate of 9% total would generate
additional revenue of$750,000 per year (current law may
prevent these funds from being used for road purposes).