HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-08-29 Work Session Minutes
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 1 of 8
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 29, 2012
___________________________
Present were Commissioners Anthony DeBone, Alan Unger and Tammy Baney.
Also present were Erik Kropp, Interim County Administrator; and, for a portion of
the meeting, Tom Anderson, Nick Lelack and Terri Payne, Community
Development; Timm Schimke, Solid Waste; Ed Keith, Forester and Katie Lighthall,
Project Wildfire; Laurie Craghead, County Counsel; Marty Wynne, Finance; and
media representative Erik Hidle of The Bulletin.
Chair DeBone opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m.
___________________________
1. FEMA CDC Foundation Grant Request.
Ed Keith asked for approval of a grant request. They were invited to participate
in a Whole Communities program given to existing programs. The deliverable
is to handle the project and show other communities how it is done.
Katie Lighthall said they have a Facebook page meant to educate a portion of
the population on the role of Project Wildfire. Someone from the CDC (Center
for Disease Control) responded and said they wanted to find out more about
Project Wildfire. The grant would be for $50,000 and the application process is
not that challenging. It can be used to expand outreach or provide equipment.
The focus is on natural disasters such as wildfire, but it could be used towards
emergency preparedness in general. No match is required. It is for one year
and no FTE’s would be needed; about 90% of the funds are disbursed up front.
Mr. Keith said that Project Wildfire has traditionally been funded through Title
III money, but that has been diminishing.
UNGER: Move support of this application, to be signed by the Interim
County Administrator.
BANEY: Second.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 2 of 8
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
___________________________
Regarding previous FEMA grants that are under review, Commissioner Baney
wants to keep the heat on to get some resolution. They will send a letter to the
congressional delegation and a letter pointing out what still needs to be done,
and a schedule for doing so.
UNGER: Support Commissioner Baney moving this process forward as
needed.
DEBONE: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
2. Landfill Gas to Energy Update.
Timm Schimke said he has been in contact with the Waste Energy Group,
which has gotten funding and has a project going forward in El Dorado County,
California. He also was in Washington DC for an annual conference where
new technology is often discussed.
The use of landfill gas to power vehicles is something that is taking off. There
is a county in Virginia that made this change, and it has gone well. They put it
in the pipeline of the natural gas company, and use fueling stations. The Sheriff
and Road Department are interested in this since the cost is less than the current
rate for gasoline or diesel.
They heard there are concerns from the school (a couple of parents). Mr.
Schimke has been in touch with their facilities manager as well as the school
board president. They have said they do not have any problem with this process
as long as they are kept informed. Staff and teachers at the school do not seem
concerned but Mr. Schimke will work with them to make sure they are
comfortable with the project.
He said that sometimes a third party review would take place. He does not
know the cost but it would not hurt to have this, regarding whether it is safe and
makes sense, and the end use of the product. He will explore the review
process and the cost.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 3 of 8
Mr. Kropp is looking towards additional hearings and media coverage so th at
when the issue is decided; all aspects would have been addressed.
Commissioner Baney stated they are in this for the long haul and more input
would be better for all concerned. Mr. Schimke will contact the Chamber of
Commerce and other entities.
Chair DeBone said they do not want to miss getting the third party to remain
involved. Mr. Schimke said he thinks they want to get what they can done
before the weather gets cold. Therefore, it would have to be in the spring if this
is delayed by additional public meetings. Nick Lelack said he could work with
Mr. Schimke to work this out.
Mr. Kropp said that it needs to be clear how any revenue is used. He feels it
needs to remain with Solid Waste. Chair DeBone stated that COCC now has a
teacher who works with compressed fuel ideas.
Commissioner Baney asked questions about how the revenue would be shared.
Mr. Schimke stated they like the idea of a fixed amount each month, which
makes budgeting easier. However, it might take advantage of rising markets.
The company may also be hesitant to perhaps make less or to open their books,
and this would be required if the County gets a percentage; 10% of the net is
typical.
Mr. Schimke might want to utilize a facilitator for any public meetings who can
set parameters. Mr. Kropp wants the Board to be able to say they have done all
they could to be fully informed on the project, and obtain as much public
awareness and participation as possible.
Commissioner Unger asked if there is a way to utilize biomass from th e forests
to do the same thing. It is not economical to handle it in other ways at this
point. It has no real value at this time, which makes it hard to clean up the
forests.
Mr. Schimke said the FireFree program generates a lot of material that is often
used for a variety of purposes to enhance soil. He said it can go into the
landfill, but that is not the best use of the landfill. There are other processes but
it is not known what would be done with what is left over. There is a concern
that once you start pulling your landfill gas off and generate money, people stop
composting or recycling. It is a huge savings to keep the landfill available for
things that cannot be reused or processed otherwise.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 4 of 8
3. Executive Session, under ORS 192.660(2)(b), a personnel issue.
After executive session, the Board took action.
UNGER: Move approval of Order No. 2012-034, with the changes as discussed
during executive session.
BANEY: Second.
VOTE: UNGER: Yes.
BANEY: Yes.
DEBONE: Chair votes yes.
4. Other Items.
Regarding the process for selecting a County Administrator, dates were set for
interviews of candidates. Panels need to be decided now. A total of four panels
are preferred, one being the Board in executive session. Normally six or seven
people are put on each panel, but the Board wants more participation. He asked
the Board to decide on the panels and the makeup of each. (See attached draft.)
He recommended 15 spots for County staff and Department Heads. Some of
course will not be able to make it due to scheduling. Commissioner Baney
suggested sending out the dates and times to all, giving a date to let Mr. Kropp
know if they are able to attend. That will eliminate some. Ten seems like a lot
of people since there will not be ten questions, unless some are just going to
observe. The Commissioners suggested eight on each panel.
Commissioner Unger suggested skipping the Chambers, let the cities decide
who should represent them, and the same for the other groups.
Chair DeBone likes the idea of an open invitation to those on the list, and
letting that narrow down naturally, then going from there, with the caveat to all
that they have to do this as space is available.
No ODOT, no Chambers, ask someone from the Courts (probably the
administrator).
___________________________
Commissioner Baney left the meeting at this point.
___________________________
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 5 of 8
5. South County Plan Update.
Terri Payne said the official name now is the “Newberry Country Plan”. It
became available last week to the public. The parties have been through
numerous meetings, with focus groups, interviews, presentations before various
committees and groups, and put it all together into a draft set of goals and
policies. More input was obtained and the document was finalized. The goals
and policies are the heart of the document, and raise awareness on things that
may not be Countywide but are important to the area.
There has been a lively debate on the role of County government and defensible
space policies. It is more of an art than a science. It was a challenge figuring
out which ideas to leave in and which to eliminate. They feel it now reflects
what they have been hearing for the past year.
It will be adopted into the Comprehensive Plan. However, it is not considered
comprehensive because it does not address agriculture, which is not a big issue
in that area. It addresses issues that are only loosely connected with land use.
However, these are included because they are important to the community. It is
guided by themes that came up during the process.
The Planning Commission is to schedule this soon, if the Board is comfortable
with what is before them. Also, she wanted to know if notice should go out
beyond the traditional requirements. Absentee property owners would not
necessarily see a notice in the newspaper. The Department does not have the
funds for this type of extensive mailing, and needs to know how to handle it. A
postcard can go out quickly; including it with the tax bill will delay the process.
Commissioner Unger likes the postcard idea and the Board should find the
funds for this. Outreach to the absentee landowners is important. Chair
DeBone agreed.
Commissioner Unger asked whether it addresses high river water levels as is
being experienced this year. The County has no control over this, the rivers
change their flow and channels, and people have to know they live in a flood
zone. Mr. Lelack stated there is a meeting set with various water entities in a
few weeks, to plan for a public meeting to address this situation. Ms. Payne
said the County can help facilitate the discussion but cannot correct the
problem.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 6 of 8
Mr. Lelack said having a postcard go out enables Planning Commission
meetings to take place in October, and some can be held in La Pine. The
Planning Commission may then be in a position to make recommendations to
the Board by the end of the year.
Chair DeBone stated that the smaller lots in a rural area, and groundwater
issues, are always a problem, and asked how this has been addressed. Mr.
Lelack said it is generally handled through a State program called Regional
Problem Solving. Ms. Payne said the residents do not like the idea that there is
a problem. This will be incorporated into the Plan. Chair DeBone said it is still
an issue; people bought land many years ago and now want to build but there
are a lot of obstacles, including septic approval and groundwater issues. Ms.
Payne stated there are still a lot of things to be addressed, and there will be a
process for this.
6. Tax/Finance Update.
Marty Wynne said they are still closing the fiscal year out. The beginning of
the year is important after you get past July. Investment reports are about the
same. The feds are talking about stimulus programs. Rates cannot be much
lower but may stay the same for up to two years. The 0.6 interest the County
now gets is better than budgeted. The pool might decrease but has stayed up
thus far. The pool can invest differently.
The important part of July’s report is the comparison of the begin ning net and
the Health Benefits Trust fund. When they project to the end of the year, they
use current experience and carry it forward. At this point, it can be distorted. A
six-month average is more accurate. They had a bad July so the costs shown
are extreme. Projections for 2013 show that if this level of expenditures
continue, they would drop down significantly by the end of the year.
They were almost 30% higher this July compared to the last. August may be
bad as well. However, two months do not make a trend, and he does not take it
too seriously until they have six months behind them. An imbalance has been
created to draw down the fund, but at some point, it has to even out.
Minutes of Board of Commissioners’ Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 7 of 8
Regarding PERS, the rate is drawing down and is solid. However, even with
reserves they may have to raise the PERS rate next year. The future of PERS is
unknown but costs could go up. If the stock market improves, this could be
stable. PERS is almost all based on stock investments.
Year-end comparisons show the general fund coming in higher than budgeted
for beginning net working capital. The only one that is off is Health Services.
The financial systems and programs the County has in place are doing what
they are supposed to do. They are accurate and timely.
Commissioner Unger asked about the Court Security numbers. Mr. Wynne said
it seems to be a large percentage, but is just $18,000.
Commissioner Unger said some places are cutting current retirees paychecks.
Assets needed to fund into the future is $70 billion but they only have $60
billion. If all contributions were taken into one pot, it would equal about $1
billion. Earnings are everything in this regard. Commissioner Unger said that
the 8% that some are getting paid is a big hit. Mr. Wynne stated that this has
been discussed by many, but no one is interested in change. It is based on
historical stock market figures over 28 years. About 20% of the amount is not
being considered as they hope the stock market will fill it in eventually.
___________________________
Commissioner Unger mentioned that there was a proposal for the County to
purchase Evergreen School but the State may not be a partner. He told
someone at the City they would have to run the numbers. If it is does not make
sense, they need to talk about next steps.
Mr. Kropp stated that next week’s executive session might need to be used for
executive session to discuss jail project contracting and real property
negotiations (North County Campus). It is time to talk about the different
contracting methods and pros and cons of each for the jail project.
___________________________
Chair DeBone said he attended a meeting regarding the La Pine land
conveyance issue. Teresa Rozic attended with others from the BLM. She is
picking up the direct connection with BLM for the next year. There will be
some staff time involved. Mr. Kropp stated it is appropriate for staff to take the
lead, as the County is a partner, and come back to the Board when appropriate
with ideas of who pays for what.
Commissioner Unger asked about the process. When there are costs involved,
is there the wherewithal of the players to come up with that kind of money.
Chair DeBone said the others might be able to come up with $40,000 total. The
cost is unknown at this point. Commissioner Unger asked if there is an
opportunity for the County to be a banker in this regard, to get the work done
that the BLM is not getting around to, and maybe hire someone who knows
how to write a NEP A and arrange for inspections, and the other particulars.
Mr. Kropp said he would check with Community Development and prepare the
Board with some talking points.
Being no filrther items discussed, the m(?eting adjourned at 4:40 p.m.
DATED this 1zJ; Day of ~~2012 for the
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners.
Anthony DeBone, Chair
Alan Unger, Vice Chair
ATTEST:
~~
Recording Secretary
Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Page 8 of8
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
l300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960
(541) 388-6570 -Fax (541) 385-3202 -www.deschutes.org
WORK SESSION AGENDA
DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 29, 2012
1. TaxlFinance Update -Marty Wynne
2. FEMA CDC Foundation Grant Request -Ed Keith
3. Landfill Gas to Energy Update -Timm Schimke
4. South County Plan Update -Terri Payne
5. Executive Session, under ORS 192.660(2)(a), employment of a public officer or
employee
6. Other Items
PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e). real
property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h). litigation; ORS I 92.66O(2)(d), labor negotiations; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues.
Meeting dates. times and discussion items are subject to change. AU meetings are conducted in the Board o/Commissioners' meeting rooms at
/300 NW WaU St" Bend. unless otherwise indicated. lfyou have questions regarding a meeting. please call 388-6572.
Deschutes COWlty meeting locations are wheelchair accessible.
Deschutes COWlty provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.
For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY.
Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding alternative formats or for further information.
• CDC FOUNDATION
H,:,lr' nq CDC Do N1or.~. Fa:-;ter
Overview & Instructions
BACKGROUND
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Office of Policy and Program Analysis (OPPA) has
requested that the Nationall Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Foundation), in
partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Office of Public Health Preparedness
and Response (OPHPR), contribute to the development and implementation of its Whole Community approach to
emergency management. The Whole Community approach states that preparing for, mitigating, responding to,
and recovering from a disaster requires a method in which the entire community is empowered to work together
as partners within government, non-profit, and the public and private sector (see http://www.fema.gov/whole
community).
Through a contract with F'EMA, the CDC Foundation and COC's OPHPR have identified examples of existing
community efforts that exemplify a Whole Community approach to emergency management. As a result, several
of these communities are invited to apply for subcontracts up to $50,000 to continue existing program efforts
and/or enhance current preparedness initiatives. The CDC Foundation and the CDC will award, publicize, and
evaluate these select community initiatives that retlect and embody key principles of a public engagement strategy
to build emergency preparedness and resilience
Upon completion of the contract, it is expected that not only will promising examples of community engagement
within the context of emergency preparedness and resilience be identified and publicized, but their lessons learned
will be synthesized to provide recommendations for duplication of similar efforts within other communities. It is
expected that all of these activities will build and strengthen partnerships, empower local action, celebrate
community work, and ultimately create a collective body of knowledge among the emergency management team
nationally that supports a Whole Community approach to emergency management.
For more information on the CDC Foundation, please visit: http://www.cdcfoundation.or!V
For more information on the CDC, please visit: hup:llwww.cdc.gov/
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
The period of performance will be six months up to one year (October I, 2012-September 30, 2013).
Expectations of the funded program:
• Utilize the funds to accomplish stated program objectives;
• Communicate regularly with the CDC point of contact;
• Host one or more site visit(s) for CDC Foundation and CDC staff to learn more about the project; and
• Provide a final report.
Expectations of the CDC Foundation aDd the CDC:
• To distribute 90% of the award by October 15,2012 and the final 10% upon receipt of the final report;
• Collect detailed programmatic information to help build a learning community for disaster preparedness
and response with the intention of informing recommended methods for other communities;
• Share information about the program with FEMA; and
• Publicize and celebrate the project on partner websites .
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
1. Complete Part A (Cover Sheet), B (Agency Description), C (Program Proposal), & D (Budget).
2. Submit the completed application with any attachments electronically by August 31, 2012. Please send
applications to Bernice Bronson at bbronson@cdcfoundation.org.
3. Please send a hard copy of the cover page (with signatures) to Bernice Bronson, CDC Foundation, 55
Park Place, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30303, by September 7, 2012.
4. If you have any questions, please contact Bernice Bronson at bbronson @cdcfoundation.org.
August 10, 2012
, CDC FOUNDATION
Hp fJ f'g CDC [)o ~,lore Fas',-'r
Appendix A: FEMA's Whole Community Principles and Strategic Themes
A Whole Community approach attempts to engage the fuU capacity of the private and nonprofit
sectors, including businesses, faith-based and disability organizations, and the general public, in
conjunction with the participation of local, tribal, state, territorial, and Federal government
partners (FEMA, 2011),
Principles
• Understand/meet the actual needs of Whole Community
• Engage/empower aU parts of the community
• Strengthen what works well in communities on a daily basis
Strategic Themes
• Understand community complexity
• Recognize community capabilities/ needs
• Foster relationships with community leaders
• Build/maintain partnerships
• Empower local action
• Leverage/strengthen social infrastructure, networks, assets
Reference: Federal Emergency Management Agency, A Whole Commllnity Approach 10 Emergency Management:
Principles, Themes, and Pathways for Action. Washington, DC: Fed.eral Emergency Management Agency, United
States Department of Homeland Security; 20 II.
Page 1 of 1
I
6 FOU~DATION
CDC
f--1t-'if'll J \~D' nIl ~Jl )'~ ;:ilS;P'
Part A: Cover Page
Program Title: (Please provide a concise title that is descriptive and meaningful to people outside the program.)
Agency Name:
Mailing Address: City: I State: I Zip:
I I
What type of entity is the agency? (501c3. business. government. other)
Website:
Point of Contact Name: Point of Contact Title:
Phone: Email:
i###) ###-####
Check Should be Made Payable To:
Mailing Address: (if different than agency) I City: I State: I Zip:
I I I
By signing below , the signatori es verifY having read th e application and that the information in the
application is correct and supported by the fis cal administrator.
Name of Applicant: Title:
Date Signed: Sh.~nature of Applicant:
Name of Fiscal Administrator: Fiscal Administrator's Title:
Signature of Fiscal Administrator: Date Signed:
Subcontract Application 2012
Page 1 of 4
;, CDC FOUNDATION
Helpwg r:DC Do M1l'e Faster
Part B: Agency Description
1. Agency Purpose: Describe the purpose ofthe af{ency.
2. A2ency Services: Describe the services that the af{ency provides.
Subcontract Application 2012
Page 2 of 4
• FOU~DATION• CDC
'-j~ f': ,l C.DC no ~Jl,~'p ::as';o'
Part C: Program Proposal
1. Program Objectives: Describe objectives that will be accomplished during the period of
performance with this funding. Objectives should relate to the principles and strategic themes of
FEMA 's Whole Community Approach to Emergency Management (See Appendix A and
hUp:llwww.kma.govlwho/e-communiM. Objectives should be specific, measurable, actionable, realistic,
and time-specific (SMART).
2. Approach: Provide an overview ofthe approach that will be used to meet the stated program
objectives. (i.e., identify the sequence ofsteps to be completed.)
3. Partners: Identify the program's community partners and describe their program-related role.
4. Site Visit(s): CDC Foundation and CDC anticipate conducting site visits to achieve a greater
understanding ofthe program. Please list any upcoming dates for events, exercises, trainings.
meetings, etc. that may provide an opportunity for the CDC Foundation and CDC to learn more
about the program and its impact.
5. Evaluation & Measures of Success: Describe how accomplishments ofthe proposed program
objectives will be measured and documented (i .e., outputs and outcomes ofthe use offunding).
Examples may include increases to the number ofparticipants, individuals served. etc.
Subcontract Application 2012
Page 3 of 4
II
•
• CDC FOUNDATION '
Hplplr'g CDC Dn rl.'h'e. FaslP.' '
Part D: Budget
Please outline the program's proposed budget Jor the period ojperJormance in the table below (or attach
an Excel spreadsheet). Examples ojbudget categories could include personnel, equipment,
materials/supplied, space rental Jor an event, marketing, etc.
BUDGET
CATEGORY
DESCRIPTION AND
JUSTIFICATION OF COST
COST
TOTAL
Subcontract Application 2012
Page 4 of 4
Community Development Department
Planning Division Building Safety Division Environmental Soils Division
117 NW lafayette Avenue Bend Oregon 97701-1925
(541)388-6575 FAX (541)385-1764
http://www.co.deschutes.or.us/cdd/
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 21,2012
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Deschutes County Planning Commission
FROM: Terri Hansen Payne, Senior Planner
Peter Gutowsky, Principal Planner
Nick Lelack, Planning Director
MEETING: August 29,2012 (Board of County Commissioners at 1 :30 p.m.)
August 30,2012 (Planning Commission at 5:30 p.m.)
RE: Draft South County Plan
SUMMARY
Deschutes County has prepared a draft plan for the South County area (south of Lava Butte,
excluding Sunriver and La Pine). The draft Plan is structured to be a chapter of the Comprehensive
Plan, consistent with state law. It will address the area's unique land development pattern, abundant
natural resources and community priorities. Since January, residents and stakeholders have utilized
an assortment of public outreach opportunities to identify and prioritize important local issues, and
develop goals and policies.
The draft Plan will be provided to the BOCC and Planning Commission on Thursday, August 23,
and posted online at www.deschutes.org/southcountyplan. The purpose of these meetings is to
present and discuss the draft Plan and seek direction from the BOCC and Planning Commission on
the next steps.
DIRECTION
Planning staff seeks the following direction from the BOCC and Planning Commission:
1. Is the draft Plan ready for public hearings as presented or modified by either body; or
2. Is additional work necessary prior to initiating the public hearing and review process and, if so,
what areas of the draft Plan require additional attention?
Board of County Commissioners' Direction
Staff also seeks direction from the BOCC on the preferred public notices for the forthcoming public
hearings.
Quality Services Performed with Pride
The minimum notice requirements include a 35-day notice to the Department of Land Conservation
and Development and a notice published at least 10 days prior to each public hearing. In addition
to the minimum requirements above, planning staff will:
• Post all notices on the County's website;
• Send emails to all individuals and stakeholders who have participated in the process to date as
well as all partner organizations -public, private and non-profit, encouraging them to forward
the notices to their members; and,
• Issue press releases and work with local media to publicize the public hearing process.
Though not required for legislative plan amendments, staff is seeking direction from the BOCC on
I
I
I whether individual notices should also be sent. Individual notices may be sent in one of the
following ways:
• Mail a postcard to all property owners in South Deschutes County. The estimated cost for
such notices is $3,500, which is not currently included in the CDD budget.
• Provide a fall tax bill insert for all South Deschutes County property owners. The estimated
cost for the tax bill insert is approximately $550, and also not currently included in the CDD
budget.
Planning Commissioners Direction
Staff seeks direction from the Planning Commission regarding how it prefers to conduct this work
session to review and discuss the draft Plan. Specifically, does the Commission prefer to:
1. Allow public comments on any section of the draft Plan prior to or during the Commission's
review and discussion of the document?
2. Conduct the review and discussion by the eight themes identified in the goals and policies or
section by section of the draft Plan?
3. Enable staff to provide an overall presentation and then open the discussion to items identified
by the Commission?
4. Other?
-2
Newberry Country
A Plan for
Southern
Deschutes County
2012-2032
Deschutes County Community Development Department
Planning Division
August 23, 2012
Acknowledgments
Preparation of the South County Plan was made possible through the cooperative efforts of
many public and private residents and stakeholders. Deschutes County extends its
appreciation to all those that participated and contributed to this process, including the
Deschutes County Board of Commissioners, Deschutes County Planning Commission, La Pine
Senior Center, Deschutes Public Library-Sunriver Branch, citizens, property owners, City of
La Pine, state and federal agencies, and other community organizations.
Board of County Commissioners
Anthony DeBone, Chair
Alan Unger, Vice Chair
Tammy Baney
Planning Commission
Bill Raney, Chair (Sisters)
Christen Brown, Vice Chair (At Large)
Ed Criss (South County)
Matt Lisignoli (Redmond)
Hugh Palcic (South County)
James Powell (Bend)
Todd Turner (Bend)
Former Commissioners
Merle Irvine, (Bend, 2008-2012)
Richard Klyce (Redmond, 2008-2012)
Planning Staff
Nick Lelack, AICP, Planning Director
Peter Gutowsky, AICP, Principal Planner
Terri Payne, AICP, Senior Planner
Peter Russell, Senior Transportation Planner
Tim Berg, GIS Analyst Programmer
Jenni Whelan, Planning Intern
i NEWBERRY COUNTRY : A P LAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY – 2012 TO 2032
Newberry Country
Newberry Country: A Plan
for Southern Deschutes
County
2012-2032
Water and Wastewater ................................................................................................................ 28
Emergency Services ....................................................................................................................... 30
Transportation ................................................................................................................................ 30
Community Response .................................................................................................................... 32
Natural Environment ........................................................................................................................ 32
Geology ............................................................................................................................................ 32
Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 33
Surface Water Quality .................................................................................................................. 35
Groundwater Quality ..................................................................................................................... 36
Wetlands ........................................................................................................................................ 36
Fish and Wildlife ............................................................................................................................ 36
Wildland Urban Interface ............................................................................................................. 38
Community Response .................................................................................................................... 40
Recreation ............................................................................................................................................ 40
Figures
Figure 1, Outdoor Amenities Proximate to South County ...................................................... 1
Figure 2, Issue Identification to Policy Formation ........................................................................ 4
Figure 3, Developing and Implementing an Area Plan ................................................................ 7
Figure 4, Partnerships ....................................................................................................................... 19
Figure 5, Survey Question ............................................................................................................. 21
Tables
Table 1, 2010 Census ........................................................................................................................ 23
Table 2, South County Population Estimate at Build Out ....................................................... 23
Table 3, Build Out for South County Occurs in 2027 .............................................................. 23
Table 4, South County Land Use Designations .......................................................................... 24
Table 5, South County Zoning District and Associated Acreages ......................................... 25
Table 6, Public Water Systems in South County ........................................................................ 29
Table 7, Domestic Wastewater Systems ..................................................................................... 30
Table 8, 303(d) Listed Sections of the Upper Deschutes River in South County .............. 35
Table 9, 303(d) Listed Sections of the Little Deschutes River in South County ................. 35
Appendix
Appendix 1 - Issue Identification
Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis
Appendix 3 - Partnering Agencies
Appendix 4 - Policy Formation
Appendix 5 - Maps
5.1 - Vicinity 5.8 - La Pine Rural Fire Protection District
5.2 - Bend-La Pine School Student Boundary 5.9 - Oregon Conservation Strategy
5.3 - Comprehensive Plan Designations 5.10 - Domestic Wastewater Systems
5.4 - Zoning 5.11 - Special Road Districts
5.5 - Wildlife Overlay Zone 5.12 - La Pine Park & Recreation District
5.6 - Destination Resort Eligibility Areas 5.13 - South County Bikeways
5.7 - Public Water Systems
iii NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY – 2012 TO 2032
Introduction
Context
Located south of Lava Butte, south Deschutes County has long been a destination choice for
visitors and full time residents relocating from other parts of the United States. As illustrated
in Figure 1, people settle in this region because of the outdoor amenities and range of
housing options offered in Sunriver, La Pine, and the rural unincorporated area. This area is
renowned for its recreational amenities. It offers a vast array of sights and activities stemming
from Newberry National Monument, Deschutes National Forest, and the Deschutes, Little
Deschutes and Fall rivers. The South County Plan encompasses the rural areas south of Lava
Butte with two exceptions: Sunriver and La Pine are governed separately. Sunriver is
recognized by Deschutes County and the state as an Urban Unincorporated Community.
Section 4.4 of the Comprehensive Plan contains specific land use goals and policies for the
resort. La Pine incorporated in 2006 and as a municipality adopted its own Comprehensive
Plan in 2012.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 1
Figure 1 - Outdoor Amenities Proximate to South County
The 1990 U.S. Census reported 9,854 people living in south Deschutes County. Twenty years
later, the 2010 US Census identified 15,319, a 61% increase. While the South County Plan
only contains goals and polices for the rural unincorporated area, it recognizes the influence of
La Pine and Sunriver. According to the 2010 US Census, La Pine’s population is 1,653. This
municipality is known for its commercial businesses along Highway 97, a 327-acre industrial
park led by the community-based La Pine Industrial Group, and Frontier Days, an annual 4th
of July celebration. Sunriver adjoins the Deschutes River on 3,300 acres. The 2010 US Census
recognized Sunriver as a Census Designated Place, with a population of 1,343. It is considered
by many to be the premier Northwest destination for vacationers, golfers, and outdoor
recreationalists with 63 holes of world-class golf, clubs, pools, spas, lodging, and restaurants.
Sunriver Village, located within the resort, offers retail and commercial stores and an ice rink
in the winter.
Deschutes County in November 2011 updated its
Comprehensive Plan and during that process residents
supported an area-specific plan to replace one, titled
Regional Problem Solving for South Deschutes County, which
had been in existence since the late 1990s. Deschutes
County and the Oregon Department of Land
Conservation and Development recognized in 1996 that
unintended consequences could occur from rural subdivisions platted in the 1960s and 1970s.
As a result they initiated a collaborative project known as Regional Problem Solving (RPS).
The RPS project area encompassed approximately 42 square miles between Sunriver and La
Pine, and included thousands of small-subdivided lots. The RPS project involved all aspects of
the community, including property owners, interest groups, and public agencies at the local,
state and federal levels.
Deschutes County presented a Final RPS report to the Oregon
Land Conservation and Development Commission in 1999.
The report listed policy recommendations, ultimately adopted
into the Comprehensive Plan, that Deschutes County then
utilized to implement the RPS program. The following list
summarizes some of the County’s achievements pertaining to
groundwater protection, transferable development rights,
wildlife protection, and the development of a mixed use
Neighborhood Planning Area located in the La Pine Urban
Unincorporated Community, now the city of La Pine.
Project Background
2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
• Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and Deschutes County receive a $5.5
million dollar grant to test innovative nitrogen reducing onsite systems.
• County adopts a Transferable Development Credit Program to reduce residential density
in rural areas to meet the carrying capacity of onsite sewage disposal systems.
• County identifies areas where existing community sewer systems can be expanded or
relocated (La Pine Sewer District, Oregon Water Wonder Land Unit #2).
• County adopts deer migration priority area map that prohibits the siting of destination
resorts.
• County acquires from the Bureau of Land Management and master plans a 540 acre
Neighborhood Planning Area.
Scope of Work
The Deschutes County Board of
Commissioners approved an eighteen month
scope of work in December 2011 to develop
an area-specific plan for South County that
upon completion, can be adopted into the
Comprehensive Plan. Revising the RPS Chapter
ensures that the South County Plan continues
to address the area’s unique assets, community
-wide issues, and planning efforts being
undertaken by La Pine, Sunriver, La Pine Park
and Recreation District and state and federal
agencies. By reengaging residents and stakeholders, the County’s intent is to create a plan that
reflects local values and preferences for growth and development, the environment, natural
hazards, transportation and more.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 3
Community Engagement Techniques
The following discussion of the public outreach process provides context for the development
of the Plan goals and policies. The key was interacting with as many people as possible.
Spanning eight months, from January to August 2012, the County employed techniques
designed to promote inclusive and meaningful public involvement. The County’s outreach
efforts are summarized below:
• Community Meetings: Conducted nine evening meetings in La Pine and Sunriver, allowing
residents and stakeholders to provide recommendations and suggestions about growth and
development issues.
• Website: Regularly updated a website at www.deschutes.org/southcountyplan
• Survey Monkey: A twenty question land use survey was posted from March 1 to April 30.
4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
• Schools: Staff coordinated with the Bend-La Pine School District and Parent Teacher
Associations (PTA), culminating in meetings with the Three Rivers Elementary School PTA.
• Organizations: Staff met with non-governmental and governmental organizations that have a
regular presence in South County.
• Interviews: Staff conducted fifteen minute telephone interviews with South County
community leaders.
• Homeowner Associations and Road Districts: Staff made presentations at annual homeowner
association and road district meetings.
• Frontier Days Booth: Staff attended La Pine Frontier Days on July 4.
• Focus Groups: Three focus groups consisting of community leaders and interested residents
reviewed initial drafts of the South County Plan goals and policies.
• Planning Commission Work Sessions. Commission held eight work sessions to provide
direction to staff.
• Other: Staff utilized press releases, radio interviews and newspaper articles to encourage
public participation.
Issue Identification and Analysis
Based on the public participatory techniques summarized above,
over 70 issues were raised in south Deschutes County by
residents, property owners, and other stakeholders. These
issues help inform the construction of this Plan’s policies. Figure
2 shows the linear progression from issue identification, analysis,
to policy formation.
Figure 2 - Issue Identification to Policy Formation
South County Issues Analysis Policy Formation
Issues and concerns gathered through these public participation techniques are presented in
Appendix 1, Issue Identification. This appendix organizes land use issues under four general
categories: Land Use/Economic Development, Transportation, Natural Resources/Natural Hazards,
and Recreation/Other. A close examination of the issues reveal several converging themes. As
shown in Appendix 2, fourteen themes emerge. Six of them strike a collaborative theme,
underscoring opportunities for public, private, and community partnerships. The other eight
focus on economic development, wildlife habitat, water quality, wildfire prevention,
Policy Formation
Deschutes County can only address the multitude of issues mentioned earlier through
partnerships with residents, property owners, the private sector, non-profits, and public
agencies. However, as shown in Appendices 1 and 2, there is some sentiment in South County
to minimize the role of government so residents can pursue greater self-sufficiency. Today,
many residents are satisfied with existing service levels. Nonetheless, those perspectives are
not shared universally. While public outreach techniques highlight some reluctance to pay for
expanded services, others involved in community organizations see emerging opportunities to
improve the region’s social, economic, and environmental conditions.
This intersection of competing values are pervasive in the formation of any community
planning process. The balancing act is to ensure that partnering agencies and community
organizations use their scarce resources in the smartest, most effective way possible. Each can
ill-afford to misuse public and private funding because the opportunity costs are so high.
Appendix 3 provides a detailed list of partnering agencies and organizations that have a
presence in South County. This Plan is intended to be practical, measured and strategic in
order to get more from existing budgets by identifying projects that generate multiple
benefits. The key is to improve the alignment and coordination among public, private and
community partners so South County can develop new approaches, harness community
initiative, and build greater capacity on planning and investment. Appendix 4, while not
exhaustive, identifies potential partners as they pertain to formulating policy, culled from the
issues and themes in Appendices 1 and 2. Appendix 5 contains a series of land use maps.
transportation, parks and recreation, public outreach, and minimizing the role of government.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 5
Plan Organization
A South County Plan represents a legal framework for
implementing a vision for building stronger, more resilient
rural communities by managing growth in this region to 2032.
This is a Plan that recognizes the realities facing rural
Deschutes County, while acknowledging what governments
can and cannot influence. It demonstrates leadership for
improving the ways in which collaboration can occur among all sectors: government,
businesses, non-profits, and residents to achieve a shared vision. This Plan presents the
results of the planning process that led to the development of the its goals and policies. It has
a similar format to the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan and other community plans, by
containing the following five sections:
• Introduction: This section describes the project background, Plan organization, and
application.
• Vision, Plan Goals and Policies: This section provides a policy framework to guide rural
growth and development and address other community issues in South County.
• Policy Topics: This section summarizes five topics that galvanized residents. It describes
Deschutes County’s public outreach techniques, including agency and organizational
partners that have an integral role in contributing to South County’s quality of life. It also
discusses land use designations and economic development opportunities, public facilities
transportation, the natural environment and recreation. Plan policies are based in part on
information contained in this section.
• Appendices: Five appendices contain information describing issue identification and analysis,
partnering agencies, policy formation, and maps.
6 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
How to Use the Plan
An area plan is an integral part of the
Comprehensive Plan and upon adoption by the
Board of County Commissioners (Board)
constitutes an official chapter that can only be
changed though a plan amendment. As a
component of the Comprehensive Plan, it has
more geographically specific goals and policies. It
also contains a vision statement conveying the
expectations of a specific community, an
inventory of existing conditions, and the results
of the public involvement process. These three
elements shape the establishment of goals and
policies, which then provide a guide to decision
making for preferred land uses that support
local development objectives and capital
improvements during a twenty year period.
As illustrated in Figure 3, once adopted, an
area plan can be implemented using regulatory
and non-regulatory tools. One set consists of
zoning, subdivision, and related land use
ordinances. Others promote intergovernmental
coordination and public-private partnerships to
collectively achieve the preferred future. It is
Figure 3 - Developing and Implementing an Area Plan
important to note that these types of approaches must be consistent with Oregon’s Land Use
Program and 19 Statewide Planning Goals. The Board establishes an annual work plan every
fiscal year for the Planning Division. Citizens and stakeholders can engage the Board in the
spring during the development of the budget to endorse Planning Division work tasks and
implementation measures that directly relate to south Deschutes County.
Generally, area plans focus solely on land use issues. This Plan however, addresses land use and
a wide array of additional issues raised by the public. The result is a comprehensive area plan
for South County. It is an umbrella document comprised of goals and policies capturing this
area’s desired future over the next twenty years. It should be used to guide decision making
for Deschutes County and other public agencies as well as non-profit and private organizations
actively involved in South County.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 7
Vision Statement, Plan Goals and Policies
Vision Statement
The intent of this vision, developed in cooperation with South County residents and
stakeholders, is to ensure that with vigilance and foresight, the unique rural character can be
maintained and enjoyed by present and future generations.
South Deschutes County will retain and enhance its high quality of life as a collection of diverse,
rural neighborhoods tied together by outstanding natural and recreational amenities. Residents
and land owners will enjoy excellent educational opportunities for all ages, a safe and efficient
transportation system, healthy environment, thriving economy, access to quality health care,
strong community organizations and partnerships, respect for private property rights, and active
involvement in decisions that shape the area.
Plan Goals and Policies
Community Involvement and Partnerships
Goal 1 Involve and engage the South County community in land use planning.
Policy 1.1 Conduct an annual meeting in South County with the Board of Commissioners
and Deschutes County Planning Commission.
Policy 1.2 Reassess through a public process, the South County Plan as needed, but at least
every three to five years, and analyze:
a. Population growth;
b. Effectiveness of plan implementation; and
c. New issues or emerging opportunities.
Policy 1.3 Maximize public participation on locally significant issues by establishing, where
appropriate, technical or citizen advisory committees, and encouraging federal
and state agencies to do the same.
Policy 1.4 Share information and communicate with residents, community organizations and
absentee landowners through:
a. Hosting town hall meetings with all South County partners;
b. Utilizing internet and social media;
c. Distributing, through a variety of avenues, outreach and education materials
that provide information on locally-led efforts promoting social, economic
and environmental programs; and
d. Encouraging government agencies, community organizers and leaders to write
articles for local newspapers.
8 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Goal 2 Support public, private and non-profit partnerships.
Policy 2.1 Foster a sense of shared identity and pride in South County through community
projects, such as a beautification program to enhance the area for tourists,
businesses and residents.
Policy 2.2 Partner with the community to retain and improve South County’s high quality of
life.
Policy 2.3 Support the community on projects that promote self-reliance, such as
community greenhouses or gardens that increase the local food supply.
Policy 2.4 Work with homeowner associations, road districts, community groups,
government agencies, and non-profits to collectively address land use and natural
resource issues, such as code enforcement or responsible animal husbandry.
Policy 2.5 Encourage organizations like La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of Commerce, and
Central Oregon Visitors Association to maintain and enhance webpages
highlighting South County’s regional amenities and community resources.
Policy 2.6 Partner with the real estate community and others to provide education
materials for new residents and/or property owners about rural lifestyles,
including:
a. Non-urban levels of public services (e.g. unpaved roads);
b. Fire prevention;
c. Noxious weeds;
d. River and groundwater management; and
e. Preservation of wildlife habitat.
Policy 2.7 Collaborate with Lake and Klamath counties on regional issues that affect South
County, such as groundwater quality, economic development, adult education,
social services, transportation, and recreation, including trails.
Land Use
Goal 3 Provide County assistance to address existing and emerging land use
issues and opportunities.
Policy 3.1 Collaborate with the South County community and City of La Pine to address:
a. Business expansion and recruitment, including adding another grocery store
and a movie theater;
b. A 24-hour health care facility;
c. Coordination among health care providers and clinics;
d. Community greenhouses;
e. Affordable senior housing and/or aging in place programs;
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 9
f. Trail development suitable for walking, biking and equestrian use;;
g. Farmer’s markets;
h. Public transportation;
i. La Pine Neighborhood Planning Area (the area bounded by Burgess Road, US
97, 1st Street and Huntington Road);
j. Post-high school education, employment retraining, adult learning, and
vocational programs;
k. Meeting locations allowing for remote teleconferencing, such as Skype; and
l. Other projects as identified.
Policy 3.2 Initiate amendments to County Code to address demographic trends or
community concerns, such as the need for accessory housing units, within the
parameters of state law.
Policy 3.3 Where federal or state government lands are surrounded by subdivisions, work
with the affected government agency to retain them in public ownership for
public use.
Goal 4 Manage County-owned lands to meet community objectives.
Policy 4.1 Evaluate and manage County-owned lands as follows:
a. Properties meeting the County criteria for park lands as cited in
Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.3.14, may be designated by the Board of County
Commissioners as such to be retained for public ownership;
b. Properties recognized in a park district master plan may be considered by the
Board of County Commissioners for a park designation to be retained in
public ownership;
c. If a property does not meet the criteria for park lands, consider auctioning
the property to place it in private ownership;
d. If a property does not meet the criteria for park lands, but is within a wildlife
overlay zone, consider maintaining the land as open space; and
e. Use for other community needs, such as social services, centralized sewer, or
low income housing as allowed by ORS 271.330.
Policy 4.2 Coordinate with local park and recreation districts or other qualified
organizations to transfer County designated park lands into their ownership for
park and recreation purposes, as allowed by State Statue, ORS 275.330.
Policy 4.3 Use all the proceeds derived from the La Pine Neighborhood Planning Area to
protect the groundwater in South Deschutes County, such as funding septic
system repairs and upgrades to qualifying low-income homeowners.
10 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Policy 4.4 In conjunction with the City of La Pine, evaluate and revise as needed, the
Transfer of Development Credit and Pollution Reduction Credit programs by
considering, at a minimum, the following:
a. Reconvening the Transfer of Development Credit Advisory Committee;
b. Analyzing the results of the program;
c. Understanding existing market trends and land development constraints in
the rural area and La Pine Neighborhood Planning Area; and
d. Exploring, if necessary, different alternatives for developing the La Pine
Neighborhood Planning Area that maximize revenues from the sale of
property to fund groundwater protection efforts.
Goal 5 Address high groundwater lots and zoning and surveying issues.
Policy 5.1 Develop a work plan with affected stakeholders to determine the future
development and conservation potential of approximately 1,500 high
groundwater lots. The work plan will need to incorporate the potential for an
unknown number of lots to be served by centralized sewer or other methods of
collection in the future, which would make them developable, where that
possibility may not currently exist. The work plan shall, at minimum, analyze:
a. The impact of the newly permitted development on roads, riparian areas,
wildlife habitat, and wetlands; and
b. Acquisition options such as purchasing the lots, land transfers or other ideas.
Policy 5.2 Develop a work plan, in coordination with property owners, to update the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to reflect the land use and
development patterns in Section 36, Haner Park and other applicable areas with
long-standing issues, while protecting ecologically significant natural areas or
resources.
Policy 5.3 Develop economically viable strategies to address surveying errors including
those in the Lechner Estates area.
Economic Development
Goal 6 Foster a healthy economic and employment base in South County,
while retaining the rural character.
Policy 6.1 Promote La Pine as a regional commercial and employment center, through
concepts such as:
a. Maintaining and supporting La Pine’s representation on Economic
Development for Central Oregon’s (EDCO) Board;
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 11
b. Coordinating as needed with EDCO, La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of
Commerce, Sunriver, the City of La Pine, and others to promote economic
development opportunities; and
c. Collaborating with Klamath County, Gilchrest and Crescent.
Policy 6.2 Facilitate South County tourism by:
a. Supporting organizations like Travel Oregon, Central Oregon Visitors
Association, and La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of Commerce’s efforts to
promote the area as a tourist destination;
b. Promoting the Upper Deschutes, Little Deschutes, and Fall rivers for low-
impact activities such as fishing and canoeing; and
c. Marketing the Cascade Lakes Highway as a defining South County asset and
gateway.
Goal 7 Diversify the rural economy.
Policy 7.1 Adopt zoning for small destination resorts, as defined in ORS 197.445.
Policy 7.2 Encourage telecommunications companies to develop high-speed internet access
to support local businesses.
Policy 7.3 Assess the feasibility of rural development initiatives, including potential
amendments to County Code, such as:
a. Forest product businesses;
b. Extractive industries;
c. Energy facilities; and/or
d. Neighborhood oriented commercial development.
Public Facilities
Goal 8 Sustain public facilities and services commensurate with South
County’s unique development pattern.
Policy 8.1 Support local, state, and federal law enforcement and fire protection agencies.
Policy 8.2 Support agencies and organizations like the Deschutes Public Library, Bend-La
Pine School District, Little Deschutes Grange Hall and La Pine Park and
Recreation District’s missions that provide:
a. Services and programs for the community; and
b. Meeting spaces and educational resources.
Goal 9 Partner with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) to protect groundwater and public health.
12 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Policy 9.1 Explore opportunities for Goal 11 exceptions and the full range of advance
wastewater treatment opportunities, including but not limited to, the use of
onsite alternative treatment technology, centralized sewer systems and cluster
systems.
Policy 9.2 Support DEQ’s efforts to evaluate and communicate the costs and benefits of
wastewater alternatives such as centralized wastewater systems and sewer
district formation, by considering pilot projects or potential case studies.
Transportation
Goal 10 Expand transportation options.
Policy 10.1 Support the Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) and community
organizations in their efforts to:
a. Expand regional public transit options for residents living in Sunriver, La Pine
and outlying rural neighborhoods;
b. Expand park and ride lots where there is an identified need;
c. Explore commute options such as private ride share or shuttles;
d. Expand mobility options for persons with disabilities and/or medical needs;
e. Involve user groups such as students, elderly, and disabled residents in public
transit discussions; and
f. Provide information about existing transit opportunities.
Policy 10.2 Explore the long-term potential for passenger rail.
Policy 10.3 Create a regional trail plan in coordination with the City of La Pine, Sunriver,
Deschutes County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), La Pine
Park and Recreation District, U.S. Forest Service, special road districts, and
homeowner associations, considering at minimum:
a. Adequate rights of way;
b. Appropriate locations and designs to provide connectivity;
c. Public safety;
d. Access to schools, parks, employment and other popular destinations; and
e. Funding sources, including bicycle licenses.
Policy 10.4 Support the trails identified in the County Transportation System Plan and, when
requested, evaluate proposed trails such as:
a. U.S. Forest Service efforts to improve non-motorized connections that either
use or parallel USFS # 41 Road from Spring River Road just west of Sunriver
to Cascade Lakes Highway by the Inn of the 7th Mountain.
b. U.S. Forest Service proposal for a paved path from Sunriver to Lava Lands
Visitor Center.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 13
Policy 10.5 Evaluate emerging trail opportunities that include:
a. Partnerships with other public trail planning processes and trail development
groups with technical experience;
b. River corridor or river trails such as those promoted by the Bend Paddle
Trail Alliance; and
c. A regional trail connecting Central Oregon communities such as La Pine,
Sunriver and Bend.
Policy 10.6 Request BPAC to amend their bylaws to require at least one at-large member be
from South County.
Policy 10.7 Support local initiatives to create a South County trail alliance organization.
Policy 10.8 Work with affected jurisdictions to acquire, develop, connect, and maintain a
series of trails along the Deschutes River and surrounding public spaces.
Policy 10.9 Work cooperatively with City and parks and recreation districts to support grant
applications to build or maintain trails in the rural County.
Goal 11 Maintain and improve the public road system.
Policy 11.1 Support the voluntary formation of special road districts.
Policy 11.2 Partner with special road districts, the County Road Department and
neighborhood associations to determine the best ways to maintain roads that
provide primary thoroughfares or emergency egress.
Policy 11.3 Identify potential funding options for road maintenance.
Policy 11.4 Post a clear explanation of which roads are maintained and why on the Road
Department website.
Goal 12 Partner with Oregon Department of Transportation, U.S. Forest
Service, Bureau of Land Management, Sunriver and La Pine to address
regional transportation issues.
Policy 12.1 Coordinate solutions for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles to cross Highway 97.
Policy 12.2 Evaluate a north-south alternative to Highway 97 on the western edge of South
County, extending from Burgess Road to Spring River Road.
Policy 12.3 Coordinate with Oregon Department of Transportation and the City of La Pine
on the La Pine Transportation System Plan.
Policy 12.4 Work with the U.S. Forest Service to address maintenance of Forest Service
roads that provide access to rural subdivisions, such as USFS # 44.
14 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Natural Hazards
Goal 13 Minimize the threat of wildfire in the Wildland Urban Interface.
Policy 13.1 Assist fire districts and community organizations in fire prevention activities, such
as:
a. FireFree spring and fall events;
b. Debris clearing and/or drop off and pick up sites;
c. Ladder fuel reductions; and
d. Updating Community Wildfire Protection Plans.
Policy 13.2 Encourage neighbors and residents to become Firewise, a national recognition for
fire-adapted communities.
Policy 13.3 Amend County Code to require landowners to maintain defensible space.
Policy 13.4 Encourage the formation of an organization within the Greater La Pine
Community Wildfire Protection Plan area with a fire fighting and river corridor
protection focus similar to the Upper Deschutes River Coalition.
Policy 13.5 Support the productive use of materials removed during fuel reduction efforts.
Policy 13.6 Work with homeowners, the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management
and Oregon Department of Forestry to ensure all subdivisions have adequate
evacuation routes and signage.
Goal 14 Prepare for other natural hazards.
Policy 14.1 Evaluate emergency shelters to ensure that alternates are available if primary
shelters are inaccessible.
Policy 14.2 Provide information on noxious weed regulations and effective weed control.
Goal 15 Promote individual self-sufficiency while recognizing community
interdependence.
Policy 15.1 Promote personal responsibility in preparing for natural disasters.
Policy 15.2 Encourage families to become self-sufficient for the first three days after a major
disaster by taking, at minimum, the following steps:
a. Make a plan;
b. Build a three-day emergency supplies kit; and,
c. Get trained in CPR and first aid.
Natural Resources
Goal 16 Support environmental stewardship and natural resource protection.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 15
Policy 16.1 Coordinate with non-profit organizations that have technical expertise and an
active presence in South County such as Deschutes Soil and Water Conservation
District, Deschutes River Conservancy, Upper Deschutes Watershed Council,
and Trout Unlimited.
Policy 16.2 Facilitate or support public processes to enhance community understanding on
issues that may impact the natural environment, such as pesticide/herbicide use
or geothermal energy development.
Policy 16.3 Support an accessible web-based directory or rural handbook describing local
organizations specializing in environmental issues so citizens can easily identify
points of contact.
Policy 16.4 Track the air quality impacts from potential sources of pollution, such as unpaved
dirt roads.
Policy 16.5 Encourage responsible alternative energy initiatives that recognize South
County’s energy potential.
Policy 16.6 Maintain a South County representative on the Deschutes County Weed
Control District Board.
Policy 16.7 Support efforts to expand recycling opportunities, including woody debris and
curbside recycling, if feasible.
Policy 16.8 Assess the feasibility of forming a South County wetlands mitigation bank.
Policy 16.9 Coordinate with homeowner efforts to address stagnant water in side channels
draining to the Deschutes River.
Policy 16.10 Coordinate with state and federal agencies on significant natural resource issues,
including new threatened or endangered species listings.
Policy 16.11 Participate in the Deschutes River Conservancy efforts to work with all partners
in the upper Deschutes Basin on a comprehensive water management plan that
restores flows in the upper Deschutes River while meeting the needs of users.
Policy 16.12 Coordinate with the Oregon Water Resources Department, Bureau of
Reclamation, and Deschutes Basin Board of Control to regularly engage riverside
property owners to discuss peak summer water releases from Wickiup
Reservoir.
Recreation
Goal 17 Encourage a variety of parks, trails and recreation options for South
County residents.
16 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Policy 17.1 Support parks and recreation facilities and services by:
a. Engaging the neighborhoods not served by a park district as of 2012 in a
discussion of park district options.;
b. Supporting the expansion of outdoor amenities, such as public or private
campgrounds; and
c. Supporting agencies, schools and organizations, such as the La Pine Parks and
Recreation District or Bend La Pine School District, that provide a variety of
youth facilities and programs.
Policy 17.2 Collaborate with the La Pine Park and Recreation District, community
organizations, Sunriver and La Pine to provide safe and convenient river access,
including:
a. Improving existing sites including those at or near Harper Bridge and Maxwell
Veterans Memorial Bridge; and
b. Assessing options for new or improved public locations.
Policy 17.3 Work with the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to maintain
and improve access to recreation activities including hunting, fishing, hiking and
off-road opportunities.
Policy 17.4 Ensure that the trails policies under the Transportation section of this Plan
consider also multi-use and specialized recreational trails.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 17
Policy Topics
The South County Plan is adopted as a chapter of the Deschutes County Comprehensive
Plan, which was updated in 2011. Like the overall Comprehensive Plan, this Plan must comply
with Statewide Planning Goals and regulations. The Oregon planning program was initiated in
the 1970s to protect rural lands, including farms, forests and natural resources, by promoting
growth in urban areas. Within those parameters, this Plan is intended to address unique
conditions as well as provide a voice for what matters to the South County community. This
Plan differs from many Oregon land use plans because most plans include data and analysis for
each Statewide Planning Goal. However, since this information is provided in the
Comprehensive Plan update and the 2012 Transportation System Plan, it is not repeated here.
Goals and policies cited in this Plan complement those in the Comprehensive Plan. They are
specifically tailored to address South County’s issues and perspectives, stemming in large part
from the area’s rural development pattern. Together the Comprehensive Plan and South
County Plan can guide future programs and actions for the area. Several goals and policies
indirectly relate to land use, such as the need for adult education and vocation training,
tourism promotion, or development of high-speed internet. For many of these policies,
County government will take a minor role, if any, in implementation. But these policies are
included to provide visibility for issues that received considerable community support. The
following five sections provide context for understanding South County Plan goals and
policies. Many of the policies propose specific projects or actions that will ultimately require a
thorough public process when they are initiated.
Public Involvement and Partnerships
During the three year period culminating in the Comprehensive
Plan update, county residents noted the importance of involving
the community in local decision-making. Policies in the
Comprehensive Plan recognize the need for using a variety of
public outreach methods. The South County Plan process
incorporated several techniques. Starting in January 2012, two kick-off meetings were held
to introduce the project and begin identifying community expectations. In February,
Deschutes County brought together over 20 representatives from local, state and federal
agencies to staff tables and give presentations. To complement their presentations and
resource materials, the County also provided handouts to attendees summarizing the
region’s existing demographic and land use conditions.
SOUTH COUNTY needs
18 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Deschutes County held the partnership meeting at the La Pine High School. The purpose of
the meeting was to introduce residents to agencies and organizations that are actively involved
in the region. These relationships can provide opportunities to share resources that enhance
the region’s overall capacity to implement land use policies within this Plan. They also highlight
challenges facing the area by acknowledging what public agencies can and cannot influence.
Figure 4, while not exhaustive, illustrates the extraordinary level of local knowledge and
expertise that can be leveraged to effectuate positive change in south Deschutes County.
Appendix 3 provides a detailed list of partnering agencies and organizations that have a
presence in south Deschutes County, and a short synopsis of their respective expertise. This
information can serve as a clearinghouse that residents and stakeholders can utilize to
coordinate and implement projects in their neighborhoods and the region as a whole. Again,
this list is not exhaustive.
Figure 4 - Partnerships
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 19
March meetings relied upon a series of table exercises to enable participants to first discuss,
then identify, and later prioritize their respective land use issues under four categories: Land
Use/Economic Development, Transportation, Natural Resources/Natural Hazards, and
Recreation/Other. As a starting point for these discussions, staff summarized land use issues
• A third generation family from La
Pine and current business owner
• La Pine Chamber of Commerce
• Newberry Eagle
• Volunteer
• Klamath County resident who owns
property in south Deschutes County
• La Pine Planning Commissioner
• Rancher
Deschutes County also reached out to a number of organizations, ultimately conducting
meetings with the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council, Deschutes County Citizens Action
Group, Trout Unlimited, Project Wildfire, Upper Deschutes River Coalition, Lions Club, and
Deschutes Soil and Water Conservation District to listen to their specific perspectives.
County staff also contacted the Bend-La Pine School District and its PTAs, leading to
subsequent discussions with the Three Rivers Elementary School PTA and an informational
booth at the school to promote the Plan and receive feedback from parents and students.
Homeowner associations and road districts were also invited to participate. In May, June, July,
and August, the County engaged Deschutes River Recreation Home Sites 6 and 9, Fall River,
Haner Park, Ponderosa Pines, Oregon Water Wonder Land Unit #1, Special Road District 1/
Deschutes River Recreation Home Sites 1-6, River Forest Acres, Spring River, and Wild River
at their annual meetings. Phone interviews were also employed. Seven community members
shared their visions and expectations for the region. They represented:
20 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Stakeholder Groups
Deschutes County regularly updated its website (www.deschutes.org/southcountyplan) to
provide residents and stakeholders with:
• Project schedule and Scope of work
• Contact information
• Maps
• Outreach opportunities, meeting announcements and results
• On-line survey
• Summary sheets describing existing conditions and demographics
• Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioner work session and hearing
materials
Website and Survey
identified in RPS, the High Groundwater Project (2009), and the Comprehensive Plan update.
Meetings in May focused on reviewing a draft vision for South County and examining land use
solutions, potential obstacles, and opportunities to collaborate with the region’s local, state,
and federal agencies. Draft goals and policies were prepared and reviewed at focus groups
and community meetings in July and early August.
Figure 5 - Survey Question
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 21
Released for two months between March and April 2012, the informal survey provided
through the website, represented another tool to capture community input. Fifty-four people
responded to 21 questions. As demonstrated in Figure 5, respondents were asked their
opinions about the quality of life in south Deschutes County, opportunities for growth,
consequences of unplanned rural development, land use priorities, and topics making the most
difference in ones neighborhood.
Community Response
Partnership discussions led to conversations about the role of County
government. Some people expressed a preference for minimal involvement, noting
that they moved to the area in search of personal freedom. Others stated a
preference for the County government to partner with the community to achieve
common goals or facilitate with other government agencies to address wider
issues. It was acknowledged that County government can assist efforts through many avenues.
Facilitating meetings, donating land, supporting grant funding requests or entering private-
public partnerships are just some of the methods that can be used to work together to retain
and improve the rural character that attracts people to the area.
22 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Land Use and Economic Development
The US 2010 Census provides demographic data for Sunriver, La Pine
and rural unincorporated area. Table 1 summarizes South County’s
2010 population, housing units, and occupancy status for these particular
areas. The 2010 population for the rural portion of South County is
12,273. As Table 2 illustrates, a vacant lands inventory performed in 2011 identified the
potential for 2,708 dwelling units. The estimate is based on 2010 Assessor data, potential land
divisions, vacant lots (excluding high groundwater properties), and the number of units per
acre allowed in each zone. It excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs Resort, a portion of
Vandevert Ranch, and a majority of Crosswater Resort, which are recognized as a Census
Designated Place. If all 2,708 lots develop and household unit size remains at 1.9 persons,
South County’s rural population will increase by 5,145 people, bringing its total to 17,418.
Under this scenario, Table 3 shows that full build out would occur in Year 2027. It is
important to note that the population estimate assumes all buildable lots are developed, but
Southern Deschutes County spans more than 125 square miles
and is bounded by federal lands managed by the Deschutes
National Forest and Bureau of Land Management. Approximately
12,000 lots were platted in the 1960s and 1970s, prior to the
enactment of Oregon's land use planning laws. As of 2012, there
are 7,403 housing units in the rural county, excluding Sunriver,
recognized as a Census Designated Place and La Pine.
Approximately 5,125 or 70% of those lots are occupied. Many of
the lots are proximate to floodplains, wetlands, riparian areas, deer migration routes and
lodgepole pine forests. Most lie within tracts that extend roughly 25 miles south of Sunriver,
adjacent to the scenic Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers and contain small 1 to 2 acre
parcels. Only a limited number are serviced by sewer or water districts, or paved roads. Other
distinct areas include rural residential properties in Newberry Estates, near Paulina Creek,
northeast of La Pine, and tracts in Section 36, near Highway 31. The water table in many
places is shallow - less than six feet for most properties and
less than two feet for approximately 1,500 privately owned
lots. These “high groundwater” lots experience groundwater
rising to within 24 inches of natural ground surface. Each lot
must be evaluated to determine if there is 24 inches of
separation. If not, under Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality rules, no septic system can be installed
in these conditions (OAR 340, Division 71), thereby prohibiting residential development.
US Census
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 23
2010 Population
Average Annual
Growth Rate 1
Build Out Population
Estimate
Population Forecast
Year 2
12,273 2.20%17,418 Year 2027
1 Deschutes County Population Forecast (Ordinance 2004-012)
2 Population estimate excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs, and Crosswater, which are recognized as a Census
Designated Place, and City of La Pine
Table 3 - Build Out for South County Occurs in 2027
Population 1,393 1,653 12,273 15,319
Total Housing Units 4,568 942 7,403 12,913
occupied 725 698 5,125 6,548
vacant 3 3,843 244 2,278 6,365
% vacant 84% 26% 31% n/a
2010 Census Total
1 Census Designated Place includes Sunriver, Caldera Springs and Crosswater
2 Includes all areas outside of Sunriver, Crosswater, Caldera Springs and City of La Pine
3 Vacant could include second homes, short-term rental homes, homes for sale, foreclosure, etc.
Table 1 - 2010 Census
Housing Unit / Occupancy Status
Sunriver
CDP 1
City of
La Pine
Rural So.
County 2
12,273 2,708 1.9 5,145 17,418
Table 2 - South County Population Estimate at Build O ut
2010 Census
Population
Estimate 1
Potential Dwelling
Units 2
Coordinated Population
Forecast
(Household Unit size) 3
Future Population
Based on Undeveloped
Lots
Build Out
Population
Estimate
1 Population estimate excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs, and Crosswater, which are recognized as a Census Designated
Place, and City of La Pine
2 Dwelling unit estimate based on 2010 Assessor’s data, land divisions, vacant lots (excluding high groundwater
properties), and the number of units per acre allowed in each zone. Estimate excludes Sunriver, Caldera Springs Resort, a
portion of Vandevert Ranch, and a majority of Crosswater Resort, which are a Census Designated Place
3 Coordinated Forecast uses housing unit size of 1.9, calculated using the total population count for the unincorporated
county in the 2000 Census and dividing it by the total number of housing units in the unincorporated county.
does not account for potential population growth from second homes, which could become
primary residences. It also does not account for the potential development of the
approximately 1,500 high groundwater properties.
For the 2011/2012 academic year, a total of 1,735 students
from South County attend Three Rivers Elementary School,
Rosland Elementary School, La Pine Elementary School,
Three Rivers Middle School, La Pine Middle School, and La
Pine High School. All of these schools are in the Bend-La
Pine School District. The school boundary for Three Rivers K-8 School encompasses Sunriver
and properties south of the resort, bordering South Century Drive as it intersects with
Huntington Road and extends westward towards the Little Deschutes and Upper Deschutes
rivers. Fall Rivers Estates is also in the Three Rivers K-8 School boundary.
Table 4 - South County Area Land Use Designations
Comprehensive Plan Designations Zoning Districts
Agricultural Exclusive Farm Use Zone
Destination Resort Destination Resort Overlay Zone
Floodplain Floodplain Zone
Forest Forest Use 1 & 2 Zone
Open Space and Conservation Open Space and Conservation Zone
Rural Commercial Rural Commercial Zone
Rural Residential Exception Area Rural Residential 10 Zone
Surface Mining Surface Mining Zone, Impact Combining Zone
Unincorporated Community Unincorporated Community - Rural Service Center
Other Relevant Districts
Landscape Management Combining Zone
Wildlife Combining Combing Zone
Land Use is governed by 19 Statewide Planning Goals, but particularly Goal 2, Land Use
Planning. Refer to the Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan Section 1.3 for further details.
Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan designations identify general land uses and provide a
legal framework for establishing zoning districts. Zoning regulates land uses that are allowed in
each respective district with development standards. Table 4 lists the predominant
comprehensive plan designations and corresponding zoning districts for South County. Table
5 shows the acreage associated with the districts.
Bend-La Pine School District Enrollment
Land Use Designations
24 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 25
Described below in greater detail are South Deschutes County’s Comprehensive Plan
designations.
An “Agricultural Lands” designation and EFU zone protects farmlands
in Deschutes County pursuant to Statewide Planning Goal 3
(Agricultural Lands). As discussed in the Agricultural Lands Section
of the Comprehensive Plan, protecting agriculture is one of the
primary goals of the Oregon land use system. A 1992 study
identified seven agricultural subzones. For each subzone, standards
determine minimum parcel sizes for farm divisions to protect the commercial agricultural land
base. The subzone applicable to south Deschutes County is EFU - La Pine (EFULP). Its
specifically noted for riparian meadows, grazing and meadow hay. The minimum acreage for
this subzone is 37 irrigated acres. Refer to Section 2.2 of the Agricultural Lands section of the
Comprehensive Plan for more details.
Statewide Planning Goal 8, the recreation goal, was amended
in 1989 to specify a process for locating destination resorts
on rural land without taking an exception to Goals 3, 4, 11
and 14. This was followed by legislation incorporating Goal 8
into Oregon's land use statutes. By these actions, the State
of Oregon recognized destination resorts as a legitimate rural land use. In order to allow
destination resorts, Goal 8 requires that Deschutes County adopt a “Destination Resort” map
Table 5 - South County Zoning District & Associated Acreages
Zoning Districts 1 Acres 2 Percent 3
Exclusive Farm Use La Pine 5,706 3%
Flood Plain 4,974 3%
Forest 1 135,827 76%
Forest 2 4,392 2%
Open Space and Conservation 8,979 5%
Rural Residential 10 17,596 10%
Other (Unincorporated Community, Surface Mining, Rural Commercial) 149 0%
Total 177,623 100%
Overlay and Combining Zones
Wildlife Combining 99,655 56%
Destination Resort Overlay 2,000 1%
Landscape Management Combining 8,274 5%
1 Zoning districts, combining and overlay zones exclude Sunriver and La Pine
2 Acres include roads, right-of way, lakes, rivers
3 Rounding may not add to 100%
showing which lands are eligible for destination resort development.
Although a property is mapped as eligible for a destination resort, a destination resort may
not be permitted outright in that location. In order to be approved, a proposal for a resort
must be processed as a conditional use and comply with the specific standards and criteria
established by the county. In 2010, the Board of County Commissioners adopted new criteria
and procedures for updating its Destination Resort Maps. One year later the Board officially
updated them. In south Deschutes County, 573 properties, encompassing 2,000 acres are
designated as eligible for siting a destination resort. Refer to Section 3.9 of the
Comprehensive Plan for more details.
A “Floodplain” designation protects public and private property
from hazards associated with floodplains; conserves important
riparian areas along rivers and streams for fish and wildlife
resources; and preserves significant scenic and natural
resources. Floodplains are defined as the lowland and
relatively flat areas adjoining inland waters including at a
minimum, that area subject to a one percent (100-year
recurrence) or greater chance of flooding in any one year. The
areas of special flood hazard are identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a report
titled, Flood Insurance Study for Deschutes County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas. This report
was revised in September 2007, and includes accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
Floodplains in Southern Deschutes County are adjacent to the Deschutes, Little Deschutes
and Fall rivers. The Flood Insurance Study is on file at the Deschutes County Community
Development Department. Refer to Section 2.5 of the Comprehensive Plan for more details.
Maintaining strong protections for forest land is another primary goal
of the Oregon land use planning system. Statewide Planning Goal 4 sets
forest identification and protection standards which must be met by
local governments. The Goal requires forests to be designated on a
comprehensive plan as “Forest Lands” and protected primarily for the
growing and harvesting of trees. The key concept is local governments
must inventory forest lands and protect them through local regulations.
In 1992, as part of State mandated Periodic Review, Deschutes County revised its forest
designations and associated regulations to two (F-1 and F-2). As shown in Table 5, the vast
majority of lands in South County are zoned for forest uses. Refer to the Section 2.3 of the
Comprehensive Plan for more details.
26 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
An “Open Space and Conservation” designation protects
views either through the Landscape Management
Combining Zone or Open Space and Conservation
Zone. Open spaces are generally undeveloped areas
that are being maintained for some other purpose,
such as parks, forests or wildlife habitat. Besides the value that stems from the primary use of
the land, open spaces provide aesthetically pleasing undeveloped landscapes. Because these
areas are undeveloped they also provide additional benefits such as water recharge and safety
zones from natural hazards like flooding. Refer to Section 2.7 of the Comprehensive Plan for
more details.
The majority of private land in South County is designated “Rural Residential Exception Area.”
Rural Residential Exception Areas and corresponding Rural Residential (RR-10) zone are so
named because the County had to follow a process under Statewide Goals 2, 3 or 4 to explain
why these rural lands were excepted from State farm or forest designations. The minimum lot
size for new subdivisions in the RR-10 zoning district is ten acres. Refer to Section 3.3 of the
Comprehensive Plan for more details.
Besides the above designations there are other Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Districts
relevant to south Deschutes County. “Unincorporated Communities” include “Rural Service
Centers,” pre-existing areas of minor commercial and residential development. The “Surface
Mining” designation provides regulations for non-renewable resources, such as pumice,
cinders, building stone, sand, gravel and crushed rock. The “Rural Commercial” designation
refers to areas of pre-existing commercial development that do not meet the standards for
Rural Service Centers. Refer to the Sections 2.10, 3.4, and 4.8, of the Comprehensive Plan for
more details. There are also a number of overlay or combining zones. The “Wildlife Combining
Zone” provides additional regulations to protect deer migration corridors and elk habitat.
Limits are placed on fencing, building location, and new subdivisions. The “Landscape
Management Combining Zone” provides additional regulations to protect viewsheds from
development along rivers and certain roads. Refer to Sections 2.6, 2.7, and 3.9, of the
Comprehensive Plan for more details.
Lastly, Deschutes County also administers a Transferable Development Credit (TDC)
Program. Adopted in 2002 and modified in 2006, it contributes to the goal of reducing
groundwater contamination from septic systems in south Deschutes County by minimizing the
number of new septic systems. A TDC is acquired when the County pays a private property
owner to record a restrictive covenant on their property. The restrictive covenant prevents
the installation of a septic system. The purchased TDCs are necessary to transfer potential
development to the Neighborhood Planning Area, a master planned neighborhood on county
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 27
Community Response
Predominant land use issues raised by the public emphasized the importance of coordinating
with the City of La Pine to support their economic development interests, reforming
Deschutes County’s TDC Program, clarifying the disposition of County-owned lots, and
resolving conflicts associated with high groundwater lots, surveying errors, and zoning. A
complete list of issues and concerns gathered through these public participation techniques
are presented in Appendix 1, Issue Identification.
Public Facilities and Transportation
Water and Wastewater
Economic Development Initiatives
There are many groups working on economic development initiatives in Deschutes County.
Economic Development for Central Oregon (EDCO) is a private non-profit organization with
the mission of diversifying the regional economy in the tri-county region (Deschutes, Crook
and Jefferson counties). The La Pine and Sunriver Chambers of Commerce promote economic
vitality in their respective communities. Travel Oregon and Central Oregon Visitors
Association promote tourism. Please see the Comprehensive Plan Section 3.4 for further
details on Deschutes County’s rural economy.
owned property within La Pine. This property is served by community sewer and water
systems. In 2006, the County modified the program to include Pollution Reduction Credits
(PRCs) that would be created when an existing onsite wastewater treatment system is
upgraded to a nitrogen reducing system. Pollution Reduction Credits, like TDCs would be
accumulated as a requirement of developing in the Neighborhood Planning Area.
There are approximately 12,000 lots, a majority of which are two
acres or less, that were platted in the 1960s and 1970s, prior to
the enactment of Oregon’s land use planning laws. Without an
understanding of the high water table or the aquifer’s water
quality, and with no promise of infrastructure, these lots were
marketed nationally. Most of these areas lie within a tract
adjacent to the Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers that
extends roughly 25 miles south of Sunriver. With a few exceptions noted later, existing homes
now use individual, onsite wastewater (septic) systems for wastewater disposal and shallow
wells for water supply. At least 50 percent of these wells draw groundwater from the upper
50 feet of the aquifer that underlies the area. Deschutes County’s Comprehensive Plan and
28 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Table 6 lists public water systems in South County, excluding
those serving campgrounds, resorts on public lands, and
properties in Sunriver or La Pine. In Oregon, a public water
system is defined as having greater than three hookups or serving
more than 10 people year-round. The Oregon Drinking Water
Program administers and enforces drinking water quality
standards for public water systems in the state through a partnership with Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and Oregon Health Authority. Table 7 lists
domestic wastewater systems in South County, excluding those in Sunriver and La Pine. The
DEQ requires public and private domestic wastewater systems to have their systems under
responsible control and direction of certified operators.
Table 6 - Public Water Systems in South County
Name Connections
Academy Lodge 1
Avion - Wild River 109
Cascade Meadows RV Park 103
Fall River Water Company 7
Glenwood Acres Homeowners Association 24
Hidden Pines RV Park 25
High Lakes Christian Church 1
Ponderosa Pines Water Company 450
Quail Run Golf Course Inc. 6
River Meadows Home Owners Association 141
Riverview Trailer Park 36
Thousand Trails Inc. 320
Troy Mathews Mobile Home Park 9
Water Wonderland Improvement District 1 200
Water Wonderland Improvement District 2 720
zoning regulations restrict parcel size and the type and intensity of allowed uses to those that
can be served by an approved wastewater treatment system. Furthermore, State onsite
wastewater system rules (OAR 340-071-0290) specify a minimum separation distance of 24
inches from natural ground surface to the groundwater table for the absorption area
(drainfields) to ensure that onsite systems do not contaminate the groundwater. Due to this
requirement, approximately 1,500 privately owned lots are not approved for an onsite
wastewater system that can then serve residential development.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 29
Emergency Services
The La Pine Rural Fire Protection District is bordered on the north by the community of
Sunriver and receives mutual aid protection from the Sunriver Fire Department. It is
bordered on the east by federal lands, generally following the TransCanada gas line; the south
by Klamath County with Old Howard Estates and Wagon Trail Ranch of Klamath County
included; and the West by federal lands generally following the lines of demarcation of the
inhabited and uninhabited lands. The Fire District also provides emergency medical services,
including advanced cardiac life support transport. The Fire District covers approximately 115
square miles of area; the ambulance service area in both Deschutes and Klamath counties
covers more than 1,000 square miles.
Transportation
South Deschutes County has a wide variety of roads ranging from
dirt tracks to multilane modern highways. There are multiple public
agencies and organizations that maintain these roads, including the
US Forest Service (USFS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Deschutes
County, and several special road districts. Many of the paved roads
are used by bicyclists. While the Burlington Northern-Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway mainline runs
through South County, the trains do not stop. The closest passenger rail depot is at Chemult
in northern Klamath County. The USFS and BLM roads are primarily to provide aid in the
economic development of natural resources or provide access to recreational sites. These
roads can range from two-lane paved roads such as USFS #42 between Cascade Lakes
Highway and South Century Drive, to well-graveled roads to two-wheel tracks. ODOT
operates and maintains US 97, the major north-south trucking route on the east side of the
Cascades. US 97 also serves as the major link for commuters and shoppers traveling between
La Pine, Sunriver, and Bend. In 2010 on an average day, the highway traffic volumes varied
30 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Table 7 - Domestic Wastewater Systems in South County
Name # of Tax Lots
Oregon Water Wonderland Unit No. 2 996
Stage Stop Meadows 248
River Meadows 251
Caldera Springs * 411
Crosswater * 161
Vandevert Ranch * 7
* Note: Sunriver collects and treats wastewater from Caldera Springs, Crosswater and Vandevert Ranch,
Deschutes County operates and maintains several key roads in
South County. The traffic volumes are lower than on the State
highways. The highest volume County roads in 2008-2010 were
Burgess Road east of Day Road (7,709 vehicles); South Century
Drive south of the Sunriver Business Park (4,881 vehicles); La
Pine State Rec Road (2,776 vehicles); and Huntington Road
(1,773). Most of the roads in South County have fewer than 1,000 vehicles a day and many
are even less than 500.
While the County Road Department maintains approximately 900
miles of roadway, there are roads maintained instead by the
property owners abutting it. Called special road districts, these
public roads are maintained by a separate entity, not Deschutes
County. The roads are typically low volume and are related to
rural subdivisions. Special road districts are governmental bodies
formed by property owners who then tax themselves to maintain their local roads. State law,
ORS 371.305 to 371.385 sets out how to form these districts and what they can do. There
are 14 special road districts within South County. The residents forming the road district
agree to pay property taxes to support it. Road District Commissioners are appointed by the
Board of County Commissioners. The special road district improves and maintains its roads
to a level agreed to by the residents of the district. Roads can be graveled or paved.
Maintenance can include paving, repairs, blading, or snow plowing. Typically, the traffic
volumes are fairly modest, although as these roads are public rights of way, any one can travel
them.
Cascades East Transit (CET), operated through Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council
offers weekday passenger service between La Pine and Bend six times a day. The bus stops
are at the South Deschutes County Services Building, which is on the east side of US 97 just
south of Sixth Street, and the Wickiup Junction Park and Ride Lot, which is at the northwest
corner of US 97/Burgess Road. CET buses operate throughout all of Central Oregon. CET is
public transportation providing local on demand bus service in the Redmond, Prineville,
Madras, La Pine and Sisters communities.
The County is developing a system of designated bikeways in coordination with advice from
area cyclists and the Deschutes County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC).
from 16,100 at the south of Bend, to 9,800 at Vandevert Road, to 9,100 at First Street in La
Pine, to 5,900 at Oregon (OR) 31. The latter highway links South County to Lakeview and
northwest Nevada. At the Deschutes/Klamath county line, OR 31 carried an average of 1,500
vehicles.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 31
Community Response
Predominant public facility and transportation issues raised by participants included improving
public safety, extending wastewater facilities to underserved areas, improving transit options
for seniors and people with disabilities, mitigating dust from unpaved roads, and establishing
trails from Sunriver to La Pine. A complete list of issues and concerns gathered through public
participation techniques are presented in Appendix 1, Issue Identification. The
Comprehensive Plan Sections 3.6 and 3.7 also provide further detail on public facilities and
services and transportation systems in rural Deschutes County.
The intent is to widen roads and/or shoulders during road
improvement projects, provided no right of way or significant cut and
fill operations are required. The bikeways are identified in the
County’s Transportation System Plan, which is a 20-year plan to
improve and manage the County transportation network for all modes.
Natural Environment
Geology
South Deschutes County’s landscape contains a geologic history
that produced sediments of volcanic origin that were deposited
in a basin over past eons. These conditions are the result of lava
flows from the Cascade Mountains and Newberry Crater that
periodically dammed and shifted the course of the Deschutes
River, creating the La Pine Basin, where the deposition of
sediments has occurred, sometimes burying older forests.
Volcanic eruptions such as the one at Mt. Mazama (Crater Lake) approximately 6,800 years
ago have contributed significantly to the volume of sediment deposited in the basin. The Mt.
Mazama eruption is the source of volcanic material that has formed the predominant soil in the
area. Groundwater flows eastward from the Cascade Range through permeable volcanic rocks
out into the basin and then generally northward. Approximately one-half of the groundwater
flowing into the Cascade Range discharges to spring-fed streams along the margins of the
range.
32 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Water Resources
State and federal agencies, including the federal Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ), have a primary role in monitoring and enforcing water quality
standards. The Oregon Water Resources Department (WRD) oversees
the amount of water flowing through, and being diverted from Oregon’s
water bodies. The appropriation and use of water is regulated under
state law. Under Oregon law, all water is publicly owned. With some
exceptions, cities, farms, factory owners, and other water uses must obtain a permit or water
right from the WRD to beneficially use water from any source - whether it is underground, or
from lakes or streams. The water resource management process occurs outside the state land
use planning system. Oregon land use and water management system are therefore not
integrated. There are no overarching administrative rules that consider statewide water
management in conjunction with land use planning.
Stream flows in most of the upper Deschutes River basin are
controlled by the influence of reservoir regulation and irrigation
diversions in Bend. Storage reservoirs were constructed by irrigators
for the purpose of storing water from the river during the non-
irrigation season to serve as a supplement to the natural flow of the
river during the irrigation season. Three reservoirs, Crane Prairie,
Crescent Lake, and Wickiup were constructed by the Bureau of
Reclamation in the 1920s and 1940s, financed by loans secured and
repaid by the irrigation districts. Nearly 90% of the stream flow from the Deschutes River in
Bend is diverted through irrigation canals during the irrigation season which typically runs from
April through October. Irrigation districts divert twice the amount of water they need to
serve their patrons due to porous volcanic soil. These seasonal flow disruptions have
contributed to a decline in the overall health of rivers and streams including degraded fish
habitat and poor water quality.
Flow alterations are a major contributor to water quality problems in the upper Deschutes
River basin, resulting in sections of the river being listed as water quality impaired under the
federal Clean Water Act. In addition, increased water temperatures in Crane Prairie due to its
shallow pool affects water quality in the river. The operations of Wickiup and Crane Prairie
reservoirs for winter storage and summer irrigation have significantly altered flows, and
consequently water quality in the upper Deschutes River. Wickiup Reservoir is located two
miles downstream of Crane Prairie and is the primary supplemental storage facility for North
Unit Irrigation District (NUID). Wickiup holds 200,000 acre-feet (AF) at full capacity, all of
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 33
which is permitted for NUID to use for irrigation. Wickiup receives numerous inputs from
springs in and around the reservoir, with spring in-charge being measured at close to 500
cubic feet per second (cfs). Reclamation holds the title to Wickiup, and NUID is the operator.
In contrast to Crane Prairie, Wickiup is only authorized for irrigation water uses.
Crane Prairie Reservoir is situated a few river miles downstream
from the headwaters of the Deschutes River. Local irrigation districts
built the reservoir originally and Reclamation rehabilitated it in 1940.
Crane Prairie is a relatively shallow lake that holds 55,300 AF at a
maximum and has water rights for the storage of 50,000 AF.
Wickiup operations contribute more to flow alterations than Crane
Prairie because the storage supply, allocation, and demand is significantly greater. Under
natural conditions, summer flows below Wickiup Reservoir averaged 730 cfs and winter flows
averaged 660 cfs. Currently, during the storage season from October through March, the
minimum flow is set at 20 cfs, or 3% of natural low-flow levels. During the irrigation season,
storage releases from the reservoirs, most prominently Wickiup Reservoir, increase the flow
of the Deschutes River to approximately 200% of what would have flowed naturally. Between
the 1940s and 1970s, flows below Wickiup reached 2,000 cfs. More recently, the flow from
Wickiup Reservoir peaks at 1,500 cfs in the middle of July through the middle of August.
Irrigation needs influence flows in the Little Deschutes River to a
lesser extent than they drive flows in the upper Deschutes River.
Releases from Crescent Lake Reservoir in Klamath County and
Paulina Lake regulate discharge in the Little Deschutes River and its
tributaries. Crescent Lake stores water for Tumalo Irrigation
District and modulates flows in Crescent Creek, a major tributary to the Little Deschutes
River. Reservoir operations contribute to high irrigation season flows and low winter flows in
Crescent Creek and the Little Deschutes River. While the releases from Paulina Lake generally
do not affect discharge in the Little Deschutes River, they do in one of its tributaries. Paulina
Lake stores water for multiple purposes and modulates flows in Paulina Creek. The Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife works with WRD to maintain water levels in the lake to
balance storage, irrigation releases, and recreation and fisheries objectives. Its operation does
not actively increase or decrease flows in the Little Deschutes River, since flows in Paulina
Creek below the dam do not always reach the Little Deschutes River. Paulina Creek does not
have enough flow in most years to reach the river as it dissipates into Paulina Prairie.
DEQ regulates water quality permits, administers onsite sewage system programs, implements
(jointly with Department of Health Services) the state-wide drinking water source assessment
and protection program, certifies drinking water protection plans for public water supply
34 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
systems, and administers an underground injection control and an underground storage tank
program. It issues Water Pollution Control Facilities permits that regulate discharge to non-
navigable waters and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that govern
point source discharge to navigable waters. The DEQ is also responsible for carrying out the
State’s obligation under the federal Clean Water Act. Section 303(d) of the federal Clean
Water Act requires states to identify and list water bodies that do not meet water quality
standards. The state will set a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for water bodies that do not
meet the quality standards, and the TMDL will calculate the maximum amount of pollutants
that can be discharged into the water body while still meeting statutory standards. The
Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers are identified on the federal Clean Water Act 303(d)
List for not meeting water quality standards for several parameters.
Surface Water Quality
Tables 8 and 9 cite Oregon’s Clean Water Act, Section 303(d) List of water quality impaired
waters in the Upper Deschutes sub-basins. The 303(d) list is produced periodically by the
DEQ that compares water quality data against federally-approved water quality standards.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 35
Table 8 - 303(d) Listed Sections of the Upper
Deschutes River in South County
River Mile Parameter Season Year
Listed
189.4 to 222.2 Turbidity Spring /
Summer 1998
189.4 to 222.2 Dissolved
Oxygen
September
1-June 30 1998
189.4 to 222.2 Sedimentation None
started 1998
Source: DEQ 2002
Note: River mile 191.7 is Harper’s Bridge
Table 9 - 303 (d) Listed Sections of the Little
Deschutes River in South County
River Mile Parameter Season Year
Listed
0 to 54.1 Dissolved
Oxygen
September 1 -
June 30 2002
0 to 54.1 Dissolved
Oxygen
July 1 - August
31 2002
54.1 to 78 Temperature Summer 1998
54.1 to 78 Temperature September 1 -
June 30 2002
Source: DEQ 2002
Note: River mile 25 is Rosland Park
Groundwater Quality
The DEQ, the US Geological Survey and Deschutes County have determined
that the safety of the groundwater in southern Deschutes and northern Klamath
counties is threatened by nitrate contamination from traditional onsite septic
wastewater treatment systems. The groundwater aquifer provides the drinking
water source for most residents in this area. Most wells tap into an aquifer
within 50 feet of the ground surface. The aquifers have no natural barriers to the
ground surface and are very vulnerable to contamination from the surface.
Groundwater in the southern Deschutes and northern Klamath aquifer is becoming
contaminated with the nitrate at unsafe levels. Infants and pregnant or nursing women are
especially vulnerable to increased nitrate levels. High levels of nitrate may also cause other
health problems. To protect the quality of the drinking water in the aquifer, Deschutes
County passed an ordinance in 2008 requiring upgrades on all septic systems; voters
overturned the ordinance in a special election in March 2009. Deschutes County asked DEQ
to take the lead to resolve the issue. Since 2010, DEQ has assembled a steering committee of
community members to discuss and make recommendations to improve groundwater
protection in southern Deschutes and northern Klamath counties.
Wetlands
The Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) in July 2011
approved a South County Local Wetland Inventory (LWI) and
incorporated it into the Statewide Wetland Inventory. The LWI
replaces a National Wetland Inventory (NWI) developed in the
1980s. State law requires Deschutes County to use the South
County LWI in place of the NWI for notifying DSL of land use
applications affecting mapped wetlands and other waters. A total
of 114 wetlands, a 0.5 acre or larger were recorded within an 18,937 acre study area, south
of Sunriver. In addition, 71 “probable wetlands” less than 0.5 acre and 29 artificial wetlands
were identified. Most of the 114 mapped wetlands in the Upper Deschutes are currently
capable of performing all functions commonly attributed to wetlands except for providing
habitat to anadromous fish and nesting water birds habitat. The wetland functions having the
highest value in the project area are: phosphorus retention, aquatic invertebrate habitat, and
nitrate removal. The Board of County Commissioners adopted the LWI in September 2011.
Fish and Wildlife
South Deschutes County is known for its wildlife diversity. The Oregon Department of Fish
and Wildlife recognize the following keynote species and habitats. The first two are
recognized in Deschutes County’s Wildlife Habitat Combing Zone.
36 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
• Parallel to the Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers, the Bend/La Pine Deer Migration
Corridor is approximately 56 miles long and 3 to 4 miles wide. The corridor is used by
mule deer migrating from summer range in the forest along the east slope of the Cascades
to the North Paulina deer winter range.
• Of the six key elk habitat areas in Deschutes County, one is located near Fall River,
between the Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers. This area is recognized by the
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife as providing critical habitat for calving, winter or
summer range.
• Oregon spotted frogs are currently only known to occur in Deschutes, Klamath, and Lane
counties. In Deschutes County, Oregon spotted frogs occur within bodies of water on
the Deschutes National Forest, Prineville District Bureau of Land Management and private
land. The Oregon spotted frog is considered a Candidate species by the US Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS). The FWS is currently revisiting the status of the Oregon spotted
frog for listing under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Upper Deschutes and
Little Deschutes rivers and associated wetlands are key habitat for the frog. Riverine
oxbows that contain permanent standing water but are no longer connected to the river
provide essential overwintering and breeding habitat. The rivers and associated floodplains
are connectivity corridors allowing populations of frogs to interbreed. Small ponds and
isolated wetlands with emergent or floating aquatic vegetation and perennial water also
provide habitat for the species, particularly those that are devoid of predatory fish and bull
frogs.
• Historically, the upper Deschutes River and its tributaries
supported healthy populations of redband and bull trout. Stream
flows were naturally stable and the river supported resilient
wetlands and verdant riparian areas. Over the past 100 years
however, fish and wildlife have suffered as a result of basin-wide
habitat degradation. Explosive population growth in the region
and associated impacts – municipal and residential development, irrigation of agricultural
lands, logging, and recreation – have all contributed to a decline in habitat quality
throughout the Deschutes Basin. Native fish species of importance in the Upper
Deschutes River Basin are redband trout, bull trout, and mountain whitefish. Introduced
species of importance are brown trout, brook trout, kokanee salmon, coho salmon, and
largemouth bass. In the lower portion of the upper basin, bull trout is listed as threatened
under the federal ESA.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 37
• In 2006 the Oregon Conservation Strategy (OCS) was adopted by
Oregon’s Fish and Wildlife Commission for the state of Oregon.
The OCS celebrates Oregon’s natural heritage by articulating goals
and identifying actions that conserve and restore Oregon’s species,
habitats and ecosystems. It is not a regulatory document but
instead presents issues, opportunities, and recommended voluntary
actions that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
conservation in Oregon. Deschutes County is identified in the East
Cascade Ecoregion. One of the Conservation Opportunity Areas is located in South
County. The Little Deschutes River Basin (EC-07) has experienced rapidly expanding
urban and rural residential development, resulting in development within riparian zones,
the loss of big game winter range, and water diversions to support development. Along
with this development, Highway 97 traffic volume continues to increase, creating a major
barrier to wildlife movement. Habitat fragmentation and increasing recreational use is of
concern in this ecoregion. Its aquatic and riparian habitat support Oregon spotted frog,
Black Swift, Sandhill Crane, Bull Trout, and Redband Trout.
Wildland Urban Interface
Wildland fire is ranked as the #1 priority in the 2010 Deschutes
County National Hazard Mitigation Plan. It is especially acute in
south Deschutes County. Today, with less stand management,
logging activity and highly effective wildland fire suppression, the
forestland is predominantly dense lodgepole pine with some
mixed stands of lodgepole and ponderosa pine. Much of the
understory consists of dense bitterbrush and manzanita with some areas of native
bunchgrasses. Due to the lack of disturbance, these stands continue to become more and
more overcrowded and at increasing risk for extreme fire behavior. Recent state and federal
legislation provide resources and incentives to residents. The Oregon Forestland-Urban
Interface Fire Protection Act, often referred to as Senate Bill 360, enlists the aid of property
owners toward turning fire-vulnerable urban and suburban properties into less-volatile zones
where firefighters may more safely and effectively defend homes from wildfires. Basically, the
law requires property owners in identified forestland-urban interface areas to reduce excess
vegetation which may fuel a fire, around structures and along driveways. In some cases, it is
also necessary to create fuel breaks along property lines and roadsides.
In 2003, Congress passed historical bi-partisan legislation: the Healthy Forests Restoration
Act (HFRA). This legislation directs federal agencies to collaborate with communities in
developing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP), which includes the identification
and prioritization of areas needing hazardous fuels treatment. It also provides guidance to
38 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
authorities for expediting the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) process for fuels reduction projects on federal lands. The
HFRA defines wildland urban interface as an area within or
adjacent to an at-risk community that has been identified in a
CWPP. Communities are at risk due to hazardous vegetation,
wood roofing, insufficient water supply, poor road conditions, and
inadequate access, signage and evacuation routes. Once a CWPP is
in place, community groups can apply for federal funding and other grants to treat hazardous
fuels and address special concerns to reduce the risk of catastrophic loss as a result of
wildland fire. The Healthy Forest Initiative and the HFRA define a “community at risk” as one
that:
is a group of homes and other structures with basic infrastructure and services in or
adjacent to federal land;
has conditions conducive to large-scale wildland fire; and
faces a significant threat to human life or property as a result of wildland fire.
There are two CWPPs for south Deschutes County. The first applies to the Upper Deschutes
River Coalition. The Upper Deschutes River Coalition is a non profit organization whose
membership consists of 26 neighborhoods south of Sunriver and northeast of Wickiup
Reservoir. There are approximately 2,784 homes in the Coalition. According to their CWPP,
7 neighborhoods are considered “at risk” for wildfire:
* Three Rivers * Little Deschutes Corridor * Big River
* Foster Road Corridor * Wild River * Haner Park
* Fall River
The second is covered by the Greater La Pine Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Its
Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) boundary is marked at the southern edge of the Deschutes
County line. The northern edge is the Upper Deschutes River Coalition CWPP. According to
their CWPP, there are approximately 6,900 homes in La Pine and the unincorporated area.
Nine neighborhoods are considered “at-risk” to wildfire:
* Wickiup Acres * Newberry Estates * 6th & Dorrance Meadow
* Ponderosa Pines * Masten Road * Day Road Corridor
* Little Deschutes River * Huntington South * Section 36
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 39
Community Response
Predominant environmental issues raised by participants highlighted the importance of wildlife
habitat, maintaining defensible space for wildfire protection, monitoring geothermal activity on
Newberry Crater, eliminating noxious weeds, and establishing a non-profit organization to
promote the La Pine Community Wildfire Protection Plan similar to the Upper Deschutes
River Coalition (UDRC). The UDRC is an active non-profit organization consisting of over
twenty-five homeowner associations along the Upper Deschutes River focusing on fire
prevention and river health. A complete list of issues and concerns gathered through public
participation techniques are presented in Appendix 1, Issue Identification. The
Comprehensive Plan Sections 2.4 through 2.9 and 3.5 also provide further detail on natural
resources, open space and natural hazards in rural Deschutes County.
Recreation
South Deschutes County offers a vast array of sights and activities for residents and visitors.
The following descriptions, while not exhaustive, describe local amenities, annual events and
regional destinations that are promoted by Central Oregon tourism associations and
chambers of commerce. Each one emphasizes the proximity of forests, lakes, wilderness areas,
trails, streams and rivers seemingly at ones door step.
The La Pine Park and Recreation District (District) was
established in 1990 as a special service district under
ORS – Chapter 198. It was created to provide park and
recreation services to area residents. The District
covers 85 square miles, which includes La Pine, residential development to the north of the
city and large holdings of federal lands owned by Bureau of Land Management and the United
States Forest Service that surround rural residential development. The District owns two
parks, Audia and Leona, the White School Complex, used for community wide, special events,
Rosland Campground, Finley Butte Road Park Complex, and several under developed parcels.
District voters approved a new permanent rate levy of $0.30 (per $1,000 of taxable assessed
value) in May 2009. It generates approximately $180,000 a year in revenues.
La Pine State Park makes the most of its scenic location on trout-filled Upper
Deschutes and Fall rivers. Its 10 miles of trails afford plenty of views for
sightseers and wildlife watchers. And, its campground and cabins are next door
to a fascinating landscape of past volcanic activity and Cascade mountain
wilderness. The park is also home to Oregon's largest ponderosa pine.
Nicknamed "Big Red," the tree is 162' tall, 28.9' around and may be in excess of 500 years old.
40 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
The Deschutes Paddle Trail includes the navigable sections of the
Deschutes and Little Deschutes rivers. The river portion for
South County includes 26 miles of the Little Deschutes River,
from La Pine to the river’s confluence with the Deschutes River
near Sunriver and 26 miles of the Deschutes River, from Wickiup
Reservoir to Sunriver. Portions of the Upper Deschutes River
are recognized as a State Scenic Waterway and National Wild and Scenic River from Wickiup
Dam to Sunriver.
Sunriver, nestled next to the Deschutes River on 3,300 acres of
high desert, meadows and pine forests, is recognized as one of the
premier Northwest destination for vacationers, golfers, and
outdoor enthusiasts. With the Cascade Mountains to the west
and the Newberry Volcanic National Monument to the east,
Sunriver boosts boasts an array of world class amenities such as
golf, tennis, swimming, horseback riding, kayaking, canoeing, white water rafting, fly fishing,
biking, hiking, bird watching, spa and fitness centers, music and art festivals, and a variety of
restaurants from fine dining to casual.
Deschutes National Forest extends for about 100 miles along the east side
of the Cascade Mountains, encompassing more than 1.6 million acres. A
wide variety of recreational and scenic opportunities are available on
national forest land, including:
• Nine resorts, most notably Mt. Bachelor
• 1,400 miles of trails, catering to hiking, mountain biking and off highway vehicles (OHVs)
• Cascade Lakes Scenic Byway
• 157 lakes and reservoirs
• 5 wilderness areas covering approximately 200,000 acres
Newberry National Volcanic Monument, created in 1990, is managed by
the U.S. Forest Service. It provides a unique opportunity to view the
lava lands of Central Oregon consisting of 55,000 acres of lakes, lava
flows and spectacular geologic features. Notable attractions include:
• Newberry Crater, a five-mile wide caldera containing two popular fishing lakes (East Lake
and Paulina Lake), obsidian fields, waterfalls and unique lava formations, east of La Pine.
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY 41
• Lava Lands Visitor Center, between Bend and Sunriver provides interpretive exhibits and a
trail at the summit of Lava Butte, a 500-foot-high cinder cone.
• Lava Cast Forest, the world’s largest formation of its kind.
• Lava River Cave, a one-mile lava tube formed by a lava flow from Mt. Newberry.
The La Pine Frontier Days is La Pine’s largest event, celebrating community
heritage and culture during the 4th of July weekend. During that weekend,
La Pine hosts an annual pro rodeo sanctioned event. The La Pine Rodeo
Association has been in existence for over 30 years. The City of La Pine, in
concert with other community leaders, successfully worked with its
Congressional delegation, to obtain lands for public rodeo grounds and an
equestrian center on a 150- acre parcel of BLM-administered lands adjacent
to the southwest border of the city. The “La Pine Land Conveyance Act,” approved by
Congress and signed by the President in 2012 conveys this land to Deschutes County.
Community Response
Participants noted the proximity of outdoor activities as one of South County’s defining
features. Residents advocated expanding recreational opportunities for underserved areas in
the Three Rivers area as well as establishing new access points for the Little Deschutes and
Deschutes rivers. A complete list of issues and concerns gathered through public participation
techniques are presented in Appendix 1, Issue Identification. The Comprehensive Plan
Section 3.8 also provides further detail on recreation amenities in rural Deschutes County.
42 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Appendix 1 - Issue Identification
Appendix 1 - Issue Identification
Land Use and Economic Development Category
Ensure South County representation at Economic Development for Central Oregon
Establish a South County economic and/or tourism board
Explore opportunities for an intergovernmental agreement with Klamath County for revenue sharing to ad-
dress regional issues
Explore opportunities with Central Oregon Community College for adult learning opportunities in La Pine
Promote economic development opportunities in La Pine, including the industrial park
Promote commercial and industrial development in La Pine and Sunriver
Promote opportunities for neighborhood commercial uses
Invest in programs that promote job creation for adults and teenagers
Establish a 24-hour health care facility in La Pine
Extend and improve internet service throughout the region
Permit small destination resorts
Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots
Reinvest proceeds derived from the Neighborhood Planning Area located in La Pine into future improvements
for the city or South County that include, but are not limited to roads, parks, open space development and
maintenance, public buildings, and on-site and off-site water and wastewater facilities
Revise the Transferable Development Credit program given the current local economics
Ensure zoning codes, including height restrictions are business friendly
Reconcile those areas that experience property line disputes or code enforcement issues such as Section 36
Collaborate with the Ford Foundation which currently provides leadership training with small, rural communi-
ties to assist in implementation
Provide services for an aging population
Provide more opportunities for senior housing
Support La Pine Comprehensive Plan
Balance growth while retaining the rural character of South County
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 1-1
Appendix 1 - Issue Identification (continued)
Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category
Involve the community in developing solutions for improvements to wildlife habitat, water quality and water
quantity
Provide outreach and education materials to raise awareness about natural resource issues
Define and protect channel migration zones
Protect wildlife habitat, including wetlands and floodplains
Retain and increase native fish populations
Explore opportunities for wetland mitigation banking to protect wetlands
Improve and stabilize Upper Deschutes River stream flow
Engage property owners about the benefits of improving stream flow on the Upper Deschutes
Protect surface and groundwater quality
Support the leadership of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality in working with the community
to address groundwater protection issues
Collaborate with the community to expand the range of tools available to protect groundwater quality by
reviewing new technologies
Support amendment to state regulations to permit centralized sewer systems in areas with high levels of
existing or potential development or identified water quality concerns
Expedite actions such as legislative amendments allowing sewers or similar infrastructure if a public hazard is
declared in rural Deschutes County,
Continue evaluating means to reduce nitrate loading from on-site wastewater systems by exploring innovative
on-site sewage treatment and disposal technology, retrofitting of existing substandard or inappropriately
located disposal systems, expansion of sewer systems, or other measures
Control and maintain livestock manure on-site to protect water quality
Reduce the threat of wildfire hazards
Require absentee property owners to maintain defensible space to minimize their risk and their neighbor’s risk
to wildfire hazards
Consider adopting an ordinance that requires absentee landowners to manage their properties with defensible
space so they are not at risk to the threat of wildfire
Inform residents when defensible space projects and Community Wildfire Protection Plans are being
implemented
Expand the Upper Deschutes River Coalition boundary to include the entire South County area
Prevent the proliferation of invasive weeds
Maintain rural neighborhoods with plenty of open space
Appendix 1-2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Appendix 1 - Issue Identification (continued)
Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category
Coordinate with federal and state land management agencies and environmental non-governmental
organizations
Address stagnant water adjoining the Upper Deschutes River near Island Loop Way
Transportation Category
Collaborate with Oregon Department of Transportation and City of La Pine to address pedestrian and vehicle
crossing issues and access along Highway 97
Provide roads with adequate right-of-way for bicycling
Expand public transit opportunities
Explore partnerships that allow for constructing and paving local roads
Establish more park and ride lots near Highway 97, State Recreation Road, and Sunriver
Establish partnerships with road districts to improve and maintain roads that serve as primary thoroughfares
to other neighborhoods or provide egress for emergencies
Increase connectivity in such places as Lazy River South
Maintain and improve egress
Establish bike shoulders on Huntington Road
Pave sections of Foster Road, Huntington Road, and Pine Crest
Improve Forest Service Road 41 from Sunriver to the Inn at 7th Mountain
Discourage biking on Highway 97
Recreation and Other Category
Promote La Pine as a tourist destination separate from Sunriver
Expand the La Pine Park and Recreation District into the Three Rivers area
Explore opportunities for Deschutes County to provide park services for those areas in South County not
served by a park and recreation district
Provide additional parks and trails
Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots for open space, recreational and
economic development purposes
Establish more pathways along river corridors
Establish a trail system that links Sunriver to La Pine
Improve river access along the Little Deschutes and Deschutes rivers
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 1-3
Appendix 1 - Issue Identification (continued)
Recreation and Other Category
Improve river access at Harper Bridge
Expand recreational opportunities for the disabled
Establish community greenhouses
Promote food self-sufficiency
Expand recycling centers in South County
Improve communication with the Board of County Commissioners and their staff by regularly attending or
hosting meetings in South County so residents gain a better understanding of any emerging issues taking place
in the region
Provide internet links to other South County organizations on Deschutes County’s own website
Protect the outdoors and South County’s small town feeling
Engage residents who do not maintain the appearance of their property since it can reduce property values in
a neighborhood
Maintain a network of neighborhood, homeowner associations, community organizations and similar groups
Educate new residents moving into South County about rural lifestyles and lower levels of public services
Protect property rights
Pursue self-sufficiency with minimal government or neighborhood interaction
Recognize the minimal role of government in South County when compared to a municipality
Improve and expand parking at Maxwell Veterans Memorial Bridge, a common access point for the Little
Deschutes River
Appendix 1-4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis
Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis
Themes Land Use and Economic Development Category
Promote Economic
Development
Establish an economic and/or tourism board
Ensure South County representation at Economic Development for Central Oregon
Permit small destination resorts
Support Central Oregon Community College branch in La Pine
Establish a 24-hour health care facility in La Pine
Extend and improve internet service throughout the region
Revise the Transferable Development Credit program given the current local
economics
Ensure zoning codes, including height restrictions are business friendly
Reconcile those areas that experience property line disputes or code enforcement
issues such as Section 36
Collaborate on
Economic
Development Issues
Reinvest proceeds derived from the Neighborhood Planning Area into future
improvements for the city or South County
Explore revenue sharing between Deschutes and Klamath County to address regional
issues
Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots
Support La Pine Comprehensive Plan
Collaborate with the Ford Foundation which currently provides leadership training
with small, rural communities to assist in implementation
Theme Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category
Protect Wildlife
Habitat
Prevent the proliferation of invasive weeds
Protect wildlife habitat, including wetlands and floodplains
Retain and increase native fish populations
Improve and stabilize Upper Deschutes River stream flow
Involve the community in developing solutions for improvements to wildlife habitat
Explore opportunities for wetland mitigation banking to protect wetlands
Collaborate on
Wildlife Habitat
Issues
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 2-1
Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis (continued)
Themes Natural Resources and Natural Hazards Category
Protect Water
Quality
Control and maintain livestock manure on-site to protect water quality
Expedite actions such as legislative amendments allowing sewers or similar
infrastructure if a public hazard is declared in rural Deschutes County
Support amendment to state regulations to permit centralized sewer systems in areas
with high levels of existing or potential development or identified water quality
concerns
Continue evaluating means to reduce nitrate loading from on-site wastewater systems
by exploring innovative on-site sewage treatment and disposal technology, retrofitting
of existing substandard or inappropriately located disposal systems, expansion of sewer
systems, or other measures
Collaborate on
Water Quality
Projects
Support the leadership of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality in working
with the community to address groundwater protection issues
Collaborate with the community to expand the range of tools available to protect
groundwater quality by reviewing new technologies
Involve the community in developing solutions for improvements to water quality and
water quantity
Reduce Risk to
Wildfire
Require absentee property owners to maintain defensible space to minimize their risk
and their neighbor’s risk to wildfire hazards
Inform residents when defensible space projects and Community Wildfire Protection
Plans are being implemented
Collaborate with
Community
Organizations and
Agencies
Expand the Upper Deschutes River Coalition boundary to include the entire South
County area
Coordinate with federal and state land management agencies and environmental non-
governmental organizations
Themes Transportation Category
Provide roads with adequate right-of-way for bicycling
Establish more park and ride lots near Highway 97, State Recreation Road and Sunriver
Improve the
Transportation
System
Increase connectivity in such places as Lazy River South
Maintain and improve egress
Establish bike shoulders on Huntington Road
Pave sections of Foster Road, Huntington Road, and Pine Crest
Appendix 2-2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis (continued)
Themes Transportation Category
Improve the
Transportation
System
Improve Forest Service Road 41 from Sunriver to the Inn at 7th Mountain
Discourage biking on Highway 97
Collaborate on
Transportation
Projects
Collaborate with Oregon Department of Transportation and City of La Pine to address
pedestrian and vehicle crossing issues and access along Highway 97
Expand public transit opportunities
Explore partnerships that allow for constructing and paving local roads
Establish partnerships with road districts to improve and maintain roads that serve as
primary thoroughfares to other neighborhoods or provide egress for emergencies
Themes Recreation and Other Category
Invest in Park and
Recreation
Programs and
Projects
Provide additional parks and trails
Improve river access along the Little Deschutes and Deschutes rivers
Improve and expand parking at Maxwell Veterans Memorial Bridge, a common access
point for the Little Deschutes River
Improve river access at Harper Bridge
Expand recreational opportunities for the disabled
Establish community greenhouses
Expand recycling centers in South County
Establish Park and
Recreation
Partnerships
Promote La Pine as a tourist destination separate from Sunriver
Expand the La Pine Park and Recreation District into the Three Rivers area
Explore opportunities for Deschutes County to provide park services for those areas in
South County not served by a park and recreation district
Explore opportunities to acquire, develop or transfer high groundwater lots for open
space, recreational and economic development purposes
Maximize Public
Outreach
Improve communication with the Board of County Commissioners and their staff by
regularly attending or hosting meetings in South County so residents gain a better
understanding of any emerging issues taking place in the region
Provide internet links to other South County organizations on Deschutes County’s own
website Provide internet links to other South County organizations on Deschutes
County’s own website
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 2-3
Appendix 2 - Issue Analysis (continued)
Themes Recreation and Other Category
Minimize Role of
Government
Protect property rights
Educate new residents moving into South County about rural lifestyles and lower levels
of public services
Recognize the minimal role of government in South County when compared to a
municipality
Pursue self-sufficiency with minimal government or neighborhood interaction
Promote food self-sufficiency
Appendix 2-4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Appendix 3 - Partnering Agencies
Appendix 3 - Partnering Agencies & Organizations in South County
Name Expertise
Bend-La Pine School District 7th largest school district in Oregon
Central Oregon Association of Realtors Real estate organization promoting its industry, values, and ethics
Central Oregon Builders Association Non-profit trade organization promoting & improving the building industry
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Council of government offering training and economic development services
Central Oregon Visitors Association Non-profit tourism destination marketing association
City of La Pine Incorporated in 2006, one of four municipalities in Deschutes County
Deschutes County Created in 1916, offers a number of government services and programs to residents
Deschutes County Citizens Action Group Non-profit organization encouraging active citizen participation in county-wide issues
Deschutes Soil & Water Conservation District Certified to provide natural resource technical assistance & research to property owners
Deschutes River Conservancy Non-profit organization focused on restoring stream flow and improving water quality
La Pine Chamber of Commerce Advocacy organization for La Pine area businesses promoting commerce and tourism
La Pine Community Action Team Non-profit organization with facilitators promoting partnerships through collaboration
La Pine Industrial Group Community organization promoting a 327 acre industrial park in La Pine
La Pine Park & Recreation District Serves an 86 square mile area providing affordable recreation programs & facilities
La Pine Rural Fire Protection District Fire district covers more than 100 miles, offering fire & emergency services to residents
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Regulatory agency whose job it to protect the quality of Oregon’s environment
Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Agency responsible for protecting and enhancing all Oregon fish & wildlife
Oregon Department of Forestry Agency responsible for all matters pertaining to forestry
Oregon Department of Land Conservation &
Development
Agency responsible for the statewide land use planning program, which protects farm &
forest lands, conservation of natural resources, & orderly & efficient development
Oregon Department of State Lands
Administrative agency of State Land Board, which manages land and other resources
dedicated to the common school fund
Oregon Department of Transportation Agency responsible for providing safe, efficient state transportation systems
Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Provides natural, historic, & recreational sites including La Pine State Park
Project Wildfire County effort & organization creating long term wildfire-resistant communities
Sunriver Resort, LLC Planned private residential & resort community encompassing 3,300 acres
Sunriver Homeowners Association Not-for-profit corporation maintaining common areas & local government for Sunriver
Trout Unlimited National organization with a Deschutes chapter focusing on fisheries & watersheds
Trust for Public Land National non-profit with Central OR. office conserving land for parks, & natural places
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Deschutes
National Forest
Manages Deschutes National Forest, one of the most popular recreation forests in the
Pacific Northwest. Forest attracts 8 million people every year
Economic Development for Central Oregon Private non-profit organization dedicated to diversifying the regional economy by
recruiting new companies and helping existing traded sector companies expand
U.S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Land
Management
Manages public lands, including the Deschutes Wild & Scenic River. Riparian
improvement, grazing management, & fisheries habitat are some of their emphases
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 3-1
Appendix 3 - Partnering Agencies & Organizations in South County (continued)
Name Expertise
U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service
Enforces federal wildlife laws, protects endangered species, restores significant fisheries
and conserves wildlife habitat for the continuing benefit of U.S. citizens
Upper Deschutes River Coalition Non-profit organization focusing on healthy fire resistant forests & watersheds
Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Non-profit organization protecting & restoring local rivers through collaboration projects
Appendix 3-2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Appendix 4 - Policy Formation
Appendix 4 - Policy Formation
Economic Development
Issue Policy Formation Partnering Agencies and Organizations
Adult Education Explore establishing a COCC
presence in La Pine
Central Oregon Community College
City of La Pine
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
La Pine Chamber of Commerce
Code Amendments
Modify Transferable Development
Credit program; allow small
destination resorts; rectify property
line and code enforcement disputes;
and establish business friendly zoning
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Oregon Department of Land Conservation and
Development
Economic &
Tourism Board
Representation
Explore establishing separate
economic and tourism organizations
for south Deschutes County
Central Oregon Visitor’s Association
City of La Pine
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Economic Development for Central Oregon
La Pine Chamber of Commerce
La Pine Industrial Group
Health Care
Facility
Explore establishing a 24-hour health
care facility in La Pine
City of La Pine
Deschutes County
Health Care Professionals and Service Providers
La Pine Chamber of Commerce
High Groundwater
Lots
Explore opportunities to acquire,
develop or transfer high groundwater
lots
Community organizations
Deschutes County
La Pine Park and Recreation District
Internet Service
Support efforts to extend and
improve internet service throughout
the region
Community organizations
Deschutes County
Internet service providers
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 4-1
Appendix 4 - Policy Formation (continued)
Wildlife Habitat
Instream Flow
Support efforts that Improve and
stabilize Upper Deschutes River
stream flow
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Deschutes River Conservancy
Irrigation Districts
Invasive Weeds Support efforts that minimize the
spread of invasive vegetation
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Deschutes Soil and Water Conservation District
Native Fish Support efforts that retain and
increase native fish populations
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Trout Unlimited
Upper Deschutes River Coalition
Upper Deschutes Watershed Council
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Wetlands,
Floodplains,
Migratory
Corridors, etc.
Support efforts that protect wildlife
habitat
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Trout Unlimited
Upper Deschutes River Coalition
Upper Deschutes Watershed Council
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Advanced
Wastewater
Treatment Options
Expedite actions such as legislative
amendments allowing sewers or
similar infrastructure if a public hazard
is declared in rural Deschutes County
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Groundwater
Protection
Work with the community to address
groundwater protection issues
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality
Livestock Runoff
Support efforts to control and
maintain livestock manure on-site to
protect water quality
Community organizations
Deschutes County
Deschutes Soil & Water Conservation District
Appendix 4-2 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
Appendix 4 - Policy Formation (continued)
Wildfires
Issue Policy Formation Leading and Supporting Partners
Defensible Space
Projects
Inform residents when defensible
space projects and Community
Wildfire Protection Plans are being
implemented
Bureau of Land Management
Community Organizations
Deschutes National Forest
Oregon Department of Forestry
Project Wildfire
Upper Deschutes River Coalition
Defensible Space
Requirements
Consider requiring absentee property
owners to maintain defensible space
to minimize their risk and their
neighbor’s risk to wildfire hazards
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Oregon Department of Forestry
Project Wildfire
Upper Deschutes
River Coalition
Consider establishing a coalition for
the Greater La Pine Community
Wildfire Protection Plan similar to the
Upper Deschutes River Coalition
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Project Wildfire
Forest Service
Road 41
Improve Forest Service Road 41 from
Sunriver to the Inn at 7th Mountain
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Deschutes National Forest
Park & Ride Lots Consider establishing more park and
ride lots
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Transportation System
Right-of-Way for
Bicycling
Explore opportunities to provide
roads with adequate right-of-way for
bicycling
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Road Districts
Road Districts
Establish partnerships with road
districts to improve and maintain
roads that serve as primary
thoroughfares to other
neighborhoods or provide egress for
emergencies
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Project Wildfire
Road Districts
NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY Appendix 4-3
Appendix 4 - Policy Formation (continued)
Transportation System
Issue Policy Formation Leading and Supporting Partners
Transit Explore expanding public transit
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council
Community Organizations
City of La Pine
Deschutes County
Sunriver
Recreation
Community
Greenhouses
Promote establishment of community
greenhouses
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
La Pine Park and Recreation District
High Groundwater
Lots
Explore opportunities to acquire,
develop or transfer high groundwater
lots for open space, recreational and
economic development purposes
Community organizations
Deschutes County
La Pine Park and Recreation District
Parks, Trails, River
Access and
Recreation
Consider expanding the La Pine Park
and Recreation District into the
Three Rivers area
Community Organizations
La Pine Parks and Recreation District
Deschutes County
Recycling Centers Consider expanding recycling centers
Community organizations
Deschutes County
La Pine Park and Recreation District
Wilderness Garbage
Communication
Improve communication with the
Board of County Commissioners and
their staff by regularly attending or
hosting meetings in South County so
residents gain a better understanding
of any emerging issues taking place in
the region
Community organizations
Deschutes County
Education
Educate new residents moving into
South County about rural lifestyles
and lower levels of public services
Community Organizations
Deschutes County
Public Outreach
Appendix 4-4 NEWBERRY COUNTRY: A PLAN FOR SOUTHERN DESCHUTES COUNTY
La Pine
Sunriver
Inn 7th Mtn
Bend
D e s c h u t e s R i v e r
F a l l R i v e r
D e s c h u t e s R i v e r L i t t l e D e s c h u t e s R i v e r
20 97
20
97
97
97 31
372
T
o
S
i
s
t
e
r
s
To
Red
m
o
n
d
To
Mt. Bachelor
To
Burn
s
Appendix 5.1 - Community Plan Vicinity Map
1" = 3 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
La Pine City Limit
Community Plan Vicinity
Unincorporated Community
August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.2a - Elementary School Attendance Areas
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Elementary School Attendance Area
Jewell Elementary School
La Pine Elementary School
Rosland Elementary School
Three Rivers Elementary School August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.2b - Middle School Attendance Areas
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Middle School Attendance Area
High Desert Middle School
La Pine Middle School
Three Rivers Middle School
August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.2c - High School Attendance Areas
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
High School Attendance Area
Bend High School
Bend / Summit High School Choice Area
La Pine High School
August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.3 - Comprehensive Plan Designations
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
August 22, 2012
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Comprehensive Plan Designations
AG - Agriculture
F - Forest
OS&C - Open Space & Conservation
RREA - Rural Residential Exception Area
SM - Surface Mining
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.4 - Zoning
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
August 22, 2012
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Zoning Designations
SM - Surface Mining
EFU- La Pine Subzone
FP - Flood Plain
F1 - Forest Use 1
F2 - Forest Use 2
OS&C - Open Space & Conservation
RR10 - Rural Residential 10 Acre Minimum
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.5 - Wildlife Overlay Zone
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
August 22, 2012
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Wildlife Overlay Zone
Elk Range
Deer Winter Range
Deer Migration Range
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.6 - Destination Resort Eligibility Areas
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
La Pine City Limit
Unincorporated Community
Destination Resort Eligibility Area
August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.7 - Public Water Systems
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
August 22, 2012
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Public Drinking Water System
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.8 - La Pine Rural Fire Protection District
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
La Pine City Limit
Unincorporated Community
La Pine Rural Fire Protection District
August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.9 - Oregon Conservation Strategy
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
August 22, 2012
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Oregon Conservation Strategy
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.10 - Domestic Wastewater Systems
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
August 22, 2012
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Domestic Wastewater Systems
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.11 - Special Road Districts
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Special Road District
Beaver Road District
DRRH Special Road District Unit #6
DRRH Unit #8 Part 3 Road District
Fall River Estates Road District
Forest View Road District
Lazy River Road District
Newberry Estates Road District
Pinewood Country Estates Special Road District
Ponderosa Pines East Road District
River Forest Road District
Special Road District #1
Special Road District #8
Spring River Road District
Vandevert Acres Road District
August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.12 - La Pine Park & Recreation District
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
Legend
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
La Pine City Limit
Unincorporated Community
La Pine Park & Recreation District
August 22, 2012
La Pine
Sunriver
97
97
97 31
Appendix 5.13 - South County Bikeways
1" = 1.75 mi.
DISCLAIMER:
The information on this map was derived from digital databases on Deschutes County’s G.I.S.
Care was taken in the creation of this map, but it is provided "as is". Deschutes County
cannot accept any responsibility for errors, omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital
data or the underlying records. There are no warranties, express or implied, including the
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this product.
However, notification of any errors will be appreciated.
Klamath County
Des
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
Lit
t
l
e
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
Fall River
Deschutes River
Little
D
e
s
c
h
u
t
e
s
R
.
B
u
r
g
e
s
s
R
d
Finley Butte Rd
Paulina Lake Rd
Sou
t
h
Centur
y
D
r
Spring
River Rd
Cottonwood Rd
La P
i
n
e
State Rec Rd
Hu
n
t
i
n
g
t
o
n
R
d
6th St
Da
y
R
d
Masten Rd
Ri
v
e
r
S
u
m
m
i
t
D
r
T
o
I
n
n
o
f
t
h
e
7
t
h
M
t
n
To Mt. Ba
c
h
e
l
o
r
Vandevert Rd
August 22, 2012
Legend
South County Bikeway
Railroad
State Highway
Rivers & Lakes
Unincorporated Community
La Pine City Limit
Monthly Meeting with Board of Commissioners
Finance Director/Treasurer
AGENDA
August 29,2012
(1) Monthly Investment Report
(2) July 2012 Financials
(3) FY 2011-2012 Preliminary Financial Reports
(4) Year End Working Capital
---- - - --------------------~
i
Investments By County Function
General $ 109,03.9,115
Commercial Paper $ 0.00%
Corporate Notes 12,963,439 11 .•9%
Time Certificates 9,250,175 '.48%
I Total Investments $ 109,039,115
Federal Agencies 7,990,330 7.33%
U. S. Treasuries 0.00%
I Total Investment Income
Bankers' Acceptances 0.00% I. Less Fee: 5% of Invest. Income
LGI P/BOTC/UMPQUA ~
1
Total Portfolio: By Investment Types
Corporate
Notes Time
12% Certificates
9% Federal
Agencies
7%
LGIPI BOTCI
UMPQUA
72%
Investment Income
Fllcal Year 2012-13
Jul-12 LI Y-T-O
$ 61,656 $ 61,656
--
81,656 61,656
(3,083) (3,083)
I Investment Incom.e -Net .$ 58,573 $ 58,573
Category Maximums:
.U.S. Treasuries 100%
'I'LGIP 100%
""lFederal Agencies 75%
Banker's Acceptances 25%
I,Time Certificates 25%
Commercial Paper 20%
CO!Q9rate Notes 10·"
Comparators
3 Month Trcas. • 0.11 %
12 Montll Treas. ~ 0 .16 '1u
3MonthCP • 0.18%
Average Maturity in Days
General ---640
Memorandum
Date: August 22, 2012
To: Board of County Commissioners
Erik Kropp, Interim County Administrator
From: Marty Wynne, Finance Director
RE: Monthly Financial Reports
Attached please find July 2012 financial reports for the following funds: General
(001), Community Justice -Juvenile (230), Sheriff's (255, 701, 702), Public
Health (259)' Behavioral Health (275), Community Development (295), Road (325),
Community Justice -Adult (355), Commission on Children & Families (370-399),
Solid Waste (610), Insurance Fund (670)' 9-1-1 (705)' Health Benefits Trust (675)'
and Fair & Expo Center (618).
The projected information has been reviewed and updated, where appropriate, by
the respective departments.
Cc: All Department Heads
GENERAL FUND
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Vearlo Date
Budget I Actual I Variance IFY % I Coli. %
RESOURCES:
8eg. NetWorking Capital $ 8,700,000 $9,050,168 $ 350,168 100% 104% $ 8,700,000 $ 9,050,168 $ 350,168
Revenues
Current & Prior Taxes 1,739,763 186,431 (1,553,332) 8% 1% a) 20,877,160 20,877,160
Gen. Rev.· excl. Taxes 198,478 739.067 540.589 8% 31% b) 2,381,731 2,381,731
Assessor 62,386 202.220 139,834 8% 27% c) 748,626 748,626
County Clerk 115,002 124,494 9,492 8% 9% 1,380.023 1,380,023
BOPTA 1,033 4,117 3,084 8% 33% c) 12,398 12,398
District Attorney 15.391 1,370 (14,021) 8% 1% 184,694 184,694
FinancelTax 16,575 51,054 34,479 8% 26% c) 198,900 198,900
Veterans 5,700 75 (5,625) 8% 0% 68,400 68,400
Property Management 8,270 7,854 (416) 8% 8% 99,244 99,244
Grant Projects 167 167 8% 8% 2.000 2,000
Total Revenues 2,162,765 1,316,849 (845,916) 8% 5% 25.953.176 25,953,176
FY2013 Year End $
Budget Projection Variance
TOTAL RESOURCES 10,862,765 10,367.017 (495,748) 8% 30% 34.653,176 35,003,344 350.168
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp. %1
Expenditures
Assessor 295,102 263,295 31,807 8% 7% 3,541,227 3,541,227
County Clerk 122,303 87,527 34,776 8% 6% 1,467,638 1,467,638
BOPTA 6,032 3,793 2,239 8% 5% 72,385 72,385
District Attorney 439,556 409.580 29.976 8% 8% 5.274.667 5.274.667
FinancelTax 69,489 48.595 20.894 8% 6% 833,865 833.865
Veterans 21.749 16.957 4.792 8% 6% 260.992 260.992
Property Management 22.669 21.360 1,309 8% 8% 272,027 272,027
Grant Projects 10,196 9,754 442 8% 8% 122,349 122,349
Non-Departmental 132,056 82.257 49.799 8% 5% d) 1,584,671 1.584,671
Contingency 680,559 680.559 8% n/a 8,166.703 81166,703
1,799,711 943,118 856.593 8% 4% 21,596,524 13,429,821 8,166,703
Transfers Out 11088.054 1,087,548 506 8% 8% 13,056,652 13,056,652
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
NET (Resources -Requirements)
2,887,765
7,975,001
2,030,_
8,336,351
857,099
361,351
8% 60/. 34,653,176 26,486,473
8,516,871
81166,703
8,516,871
a) Current year taxes not due until November
b) Includes annual payments: PILT $730.983
c) A & T Grant received quarterly-July. October, January & April.
d) Budget includes $576,736 payment to LED#2. Will not be expended until June 2013.
Page 1
COMM JUSTICE..JUVENILE
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital
Revenues
Federal Grants
SB #1 06S-Court Assess.
Discovery Fee
Food Subsidy
OY A Basic & Diversion
Inmate/Prisoner Housing
Inmate Commissary Fees
Contract Payments
Miscellaneous
Program Fees
MIP Diversion Fees
Interest on Investments
Leases
Grants -Private
CFC Interfund Grant
Interfund Grant -Gen Fund
Year to Date
Budget I Actual I Variance IFY% LColi. %
$1,010,415
500
4,167
1,083
1,750
31,279
5,000
8
10,167
17
4
83
667
100
42
10,472
1,667
$ 995,051 $ (15,364)
(500)
1,343 (2,824)
770 (313)
(1,750)
(31,279)
5,520 520
(8)
(10,167)
(17)
(4)
150 67
581 (86)
100
143 101
(10,472)
p,667~
100% 98%
8% 0%
8% 3%
8% 6%
8% 0%
8% 0% a)
8% 9%
8% 0%
8% 0% b)
8% 0%
8% 0%
8% 15%
8% 7%
8% 8%
8% 29%
8% 0% c)
8% 0% c)
FY 2013 Year End
Budget Projection Variance
$1,010,415 $ 995,051 $ (15,364)
6,000 6,000
50,000 50,000
13,000 13,000
21,000 21,000
375,347 375,347
60,000 60,000
100 100
122,000 122,000
200 200
50 50
1,000 1,000
8,000 8,000
1,200 1,200
500 500
125,661 125,661
20,000 20,000
Total Revenues 67,006 8,607 (58,399) 8% 1% 804,058 804,058
Transfers In-General Fund 445,378 445,377 ~11 8% 8% 5,344,523 5,344,523
TOTAL RESOURCES 1,522,799 1,449,035 (73,764) 8% 20% 7,158,996 7,143,632 (15,364)
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp. %1
Expenditures
Community Justice-Juvenile
Personal Services 422,918 427,565 (4,647) 8% 8% 5,075,017 5,075,017
Materials and Services 99,497 70,604 28,893 8% 6% 1,193,960 1,193,960
Capital Outlay 8 8 8% 0% 100 100
Transfers Out 4,200 4,200 8% 0% 50,400 50,400
Contingency 69,960 69,960 8% n/a 839,519 839,519
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 596,583 498,169 98,414 8% 7% 7,158,996 6,319,477 839,519
NET (Resources -Requirements) 926,216 950,866 24,650 824,155 824,155
a) Payments received quarterly
b) Contract payment reimbursement requests submitted monthly, receive 1-2 months in arrears
c) Grants received quarterly
Page 2
SHERIFF -Fund 255
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
RESOURCES:
Year to Date
Actual Variance
FY 2013 Year End
IBudQet Projection Variance
Beg. Net Working Capital $ $ $ 100% n/a $ $ $
..8% 7% ..8% 8%
Total Revenues 3,083,610 2,706,883 (316,727) 8% 7% 37,003,318 31,432,623 (5,570,695)
TOTAL RESOURCES 3,083,610 2,706,883 (376,727) 8% 7% 37,003,318 31,432,623 (5,570,695)
REQUIREMENTS: Exp. %1
EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS
Sheriff's Division 188,636 222,271 (33,635) 8% 10% 2,263,630 2,263,530 100
Civil 66,582 52,068 14,514 8% 7% 798,989 798,889 100
Automotive/Communications 137,088 398,598 (261,510) 8% 24% 1,645,050 1,800,050 (155,000)
Investigations/Evidence 125,682 134,574 (8,892) 8% 9% 1,508,180 1,508,080 100
Patrol/CivillComm Supp 689,113 653,509 35,604 8% 8% 8,269,358 8,269,358
Records 59,801 47,276 12,525 8% 7% 717,617 717,517 100
Adult Jail 861,839 738,556 123,283 8% 7% 10,342,072 10,342,072
Court Security 25,250 23,545 1,705 8% 8% 303,001 302,901 100
Emergency Services 16,211 16,063 148 8% 8% 194,533 194,433 100
Special Services Division 111,609 141,852 (30,243) 8% 11% 1,339,308 1,339,308
Regional Work Center 221,923 189,016 32,907 8% 7% 2,663,078 2,662,978 100
Training Division 42,079 29,339 12,740 8% 6% 504,950 504,850 100
Other Law Enforcement Svcs 53,625 53,111 514 8% 8% 643,504 643,404 100
Non-Departmental 7,104 7,104 8% 8% 85,253 85,253
Contingency 477,066 477,066 8% n/a 5,724,795 5,724,795
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 3,083,608 2,706,882 376,726 8% 7% 37,003,318 31,432,623 5,570,695
NET (Resources -Requirements)
.. Revenues from LED #1 & LED #2 adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures
Page 3
Fund 701 LED-Countywide
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31,2012
Year to Date
Actual Variance Variance
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $4,507,352 $ 5,863,246 $ 1,355,894 100% 130% $ 4,507,352 $5,863,246 $ 1,355,894
Tax Revenues -Current 1,282 ,145 (1 ,282,145) 8% 0% a) 15,385 ,740 15,385,740
Tax Revenues -Prior 36,667 137,505 100 ,838 8% 31% 440,000 440,000
Federal Grants & Reimb 2,500 (2 ,500) 8% 0% 30,000 30,000
State Grant 6,167 (6 ,1 67) 8% 0% 74 ,000 74 ,000
Transp . of State Wards 4 17 (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000
SB 1145 123 ,333 (123 ,333) 8% 0% 1,479,991 1,479,991
Prisoner Housing 4,167 (4 ,167) 8% 0% 50,000 50,000
Des . Cty Video Lottery Grant 417 (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000
Des Cly Court Security 20 ,083 20 ,009 (74) 8% 8% 241 ,000 24 1,000
Des Cly Juvenile Contract 348 (348) 8% 0% 4 ,180 4,180
Transport 42 (42) 8% 0% 500 500
Other 292 6,500 6 ,208 8% 186% 3,500 6,500 3,000
DC Fair & Expo Center 333 (333) 8% 0% 4 ,000 4 ,000
Inmate Commissary Fees 833 (833) 8% 0% 10 ,000 10,000
Work Center Work Crews 4,167 268 (3,899) 8% 1% 50,000 50,000
Concealed Handgun Classes 292 850 558 8% 24 % 3,500 3 ,500
Inmate Te lephone Fee 6,667 (6,667) 8% 0% 80 ,000 80,000
Soc Sec Incent ive-Fed 417 (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5 ,000
Miscellaneous 417 744 327 8% 15 % 5,000 5,000
Oregon Mentors 83 (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000
Debit Card Fee 8 39 31 8% 39% 100 100
Medical Services Reimb 1,083 (1,083) 8% 0% 13,000 13,000
Restitution 417 (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000
Sheriff Fees 20 ,833 21,587 754 8% 9% 250,000 250,000
Interest 2,361 3 ,183 822 8% 11 % 28,333 28 ,333
Interest on Unsegregated 294 31 (263) 8% 1% 3,533 3,533
Donations -"Shop with a Cop" 4,325 11,288 6,963 8% 22% 51,897 51,897
Sale of Reportab le Assets 417 !417) 8% 0% 5 ,000 5,000
Total Revenues 1,519,525 202,004 p,317,521 l 8% 1% 18,234,274 18,237,274 3,000
TOTAL RESOURCES 6,026,877 6,065,250 38,373 8% 27% 22,741,626 24,100,520 1,358,894
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp . %1
Fund 255 Departments :
Sheriffs Services 176 ,105 207 ,506 (31,401 ) 8% 10% 2 ,113,257 2,113,164 93
Civil 66 ,582 52,068 14 ,514 8% 7% 798,989 798,889 100
AutofComm 50,551 146,983 (96,432) 8% 24% 606,612 663 ,768 (57 ,156)
Adult Jail 861 ,839 738,556 123,283 8% 7% 10 ,342,072 10,342 ,072
Court Security 25 ,250 23,545 1,705 8% 8% 303,001 302 ,901 100
Emergency Services 16,211 16,063 148 8% 8% 194,533 194,433 100
SpeCial Services 77 ,227 98,153 (20 ,926) 8% 11% 926,721 926,721
Work Center 221,923 189,016 32,907 8% 7% 2,663 ,078 2,662,978 100
Training 25 ,723 17,935 7 ,788 8% 6% 308 ,676 308,615 61
Other (CODE, Forensic) 53,625 53,111 514 8% 8% 643 ,504 643,404 100
Non Dept -ISF Charges 3,559 3,559 0 8% 8% 42,712 42,712
Contingency 301,539 301,539 8% nfa 3 ,618,471 3,618,471
Total to Fund 255 1,880,136 1,546,495 333,641 22,561,626 18,999,656 3,561,970
Transfer to Reserve Fund (703) 8,333 8,333 8% 0% 100 ,000 100,000
Non Dept -Comm System Res 6,667 6 ,667 8% 0% 80,000 80,000
Total Requirements 1,895,136 1,546,495 348,640 8% 7% 22 ,741,626 19,179,656 3 ,561 ,970
Net 4,131 ,742 4.518,755 387,013 4,920 ,863 4,920 ,863
a) Current year taxes not due until November
• Payment to Sheriffs Fund adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures attributable to countywide services . Page 4
Fund 702 LED Rural
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31,2012
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $2,859,915 $3,240,358 $ 380,443 100% 113% $2,859,915 $3,240,358 $ 380,443
Revenues
Tax Revenues -Current 629,167 (629,167) 8% 0% a) 7,550,000 7,550,000
Tax Revenues -Prior 19,167 67,555 48,388 8% 29% 230,000 230,000
Federal Grants & Reimb 1,250 (1,250) 8% 0% 15 ,000 15,000
Federal Grants-BlM 2 ,1 67 (2,167) 8% 0% 26,000 26,000
US Forest Service 6 ,250 (6,250) 8% 0% 75,000 75,000
Bureau of Reclamation 2,167 (2,167) 8% 0% 26,000 26,000
State Grant 15,766 (15,766) 8% 0% 189,194 189,194
SB #1065 Court Assessment 4,583 1,343 (3,240) 8% 2% 55 ,000 55,000
Marine Board License Fee 11,841 (11,841) 8% 0% 142,091 142,091
Des Cty General Fund Grant 48,061 (48,061 ) 8% 0% 576,735 576,735
Des Cly Transient Room Tax 172,772 (172,772) 8% 0% 2,073,265 2,073,265
Des Cly Tax Office Contract 42 (42) 8% 0% 500 500
City of Sisters 38,997 38,997 8% 8% 467,960 467,960
Des Cly CDD Contract 4,531 4,531 8% 8% 54,366 54,366
Des Cty Solid Waste Contr 4,531 4,531 8% 8% 54,366 54,366
Des Cly Clerk/Election 83 (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000
School Districts 3,333 (3,333) 8% 0% 40 ,000 40,000
Securily & Traffic Reimb 417 (417) 8% 0% 5,000 5,000
Seat Belt Program 833 280 (553) 8% 3% 10,000 10 ,000
Miscellaneous 500 749 249 8% 12% 6 ,000 6,000
False Alarm Fees 167 (167) 8% 0% 2,000 2,000
Restitution 417 25 (392) 8% 1% 5,000 5,000
Sheriff Fees 833 538 (295) 8% 5% 10,000 10,000
Court Fines & Fees 10,000 10,224 224 8% 9% 120,000 120,000
Impound Fees 333 800 467 8% 20% 4,000 4,000
Restitution -Street Crimes 42 (42) 8% 0% 500 500
Seizure/Forfeiture 83 (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000
Interest 833 1,210 377 8% 12% 10,000 10,000
Interest on Unsegregated 150 16 (134) 8% 1% 1,800 1,800
Donations 2,500 2,500 8% n/a 2,500 2,500
Sale of Equip & Material 833 (833) 8% 0% 10,000 10,000
Sale of Reportable Assets 3,333 (3 ,333) 8% 0% 40,000 40,000
Total Revenues 983,482 133,299 ~850,183l SO-/. 1% 11,801,777 11,804,277 2,500
TOTAL RESOURCES 3,843,397 3,373,657 (469,740) 50% 23% 14,661,692 15,044,635 382,943
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp . %1
Fund 255 Departments:
Sheriffs Services 12,531 14 ,765 (2,234) 8% 10% 150,373 150,366 7
Auto/Comm 86 ,536 251,615 (165,079) 8% 24% 1,038,438 1,136,282 (97,844)
Investigations 125,682 134,574 (8,892) 8% 9% 1,508,180 1,508,080 100
Patrol 689,113 653,509 35,604 8% 8% 8 ,269,358 8,269,358
Records 59,801 47,276 12,525 8% 7% 717,617 717,517 100
Special Services 34,382 43,699 (9,317) 8% 11% 412,587 412,587
Training 16,356 11.404 4,952 8% 6% 196,274 196,235 39
Non Dept -ISF Charges 3,545 3,545 0 8% 8% 42,541 42,541
8% n/a 324
Transfer to Reserve Fund (704)
Non Dept -Comm System Res
Total Requirements
8,333
10,000
1,221,808 1,160,387
8,333
10,000
61,420
8%
8%
8%
0%
0%
8%
100,000
120,000
14,661 ,692
100,000
120,000
12,652,967 2,008,725
Net 2,621,589 2,213,270 (408,319) 2 ,391,669 2,391,669
a) Current year taxes not due until November
Page 5
• Payment to Sheriffs Fund adjusted monthly to equal actual expenditures attributable to rural services.
PUBLIC HEALTH
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Variance
Beg. Net Working Capital $1,336,051 $ $ 100% 99% $1,336,051 $1,327,199 $ (8,852)
Revenues
Medicare Reimbursement 83 (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000
Federal Grant 5,000 8% n/a 5,000 5,000
Federal Grant (ARRA) 16,667 8% 0% 200,000 200,000
State Grant 217,931 (21 8% 0% a) 2,615,168 168
Child Dev & Rehab Center 3,301 (3,301 ) 8% 0% 39,609
State Miscellaneous 8,469 (8,469) 8% 0% 101,630
OMAP 52,299 8% 4% 627,588
Title 19 29 (29) 8% n/a 352 352
Family Planning 45,833 8% 0% 550,000 550,000
Local Grants 14,160 (14,160) 8% 0% 169,920 169,920
Environmental Health-Water 7,683 8% 0% 92,200
Contract 10,000 10,000 8% n/a 10,000 10,000
Miscellaneous 700 700 8% n/a 700
Patient Insurance Fees 16,100 10,088 8% 5%
Health Fees 8,592 6,288 8% 6% 103,100 103,100
Vital Records-Birth 3,417 2,160 8% 5% 41,000 41,000
Vital Records-Death 8,333 11,130 8% 11% 100,000 100,000
Environmental Health-Lie Fae 60,004 29,912 8% 4% 720,050
Interest on Investments 1,000 563 (437) 8% 5% 12,000 12,000
Donations 442 17,160 16,718 8% 324% 22,277
Interfund Contract 13,219 (13,219) 8% 0%
Administrative Fee 8% 8%
Total Revenues 477,629 115,839 (361,790) 8% 2%
Transfers In-General fund 195,780 195,780 8% 8% 2,349,357
Transfers In-PH Res fund 5,011 8% 0% 60,136
Transfers In-Gen. Fund Other 8% 0% 65,100
TOTAL RESOURCES 2,019,896 1,638,818 (381,078) 8"/.. 17% 9,566,015
Personal Services 530,297 502,000 8% 8% 6,363,560 6,363,560
Materials and Services 159,768 90,936 8% 5% 1,917,220 1,917,220
Capital 5,417 5,417 8% 0% b) 65,000 65,000
Transfers Out 13,100 13,100 8% 0% 157,200 157,200
Contingency 8% n/a
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 795,183 592,936 202,247 8% 6% 9,542,190 8,437,980 1,104,210
NET (Resources -Requirements)
for July will be received in August
Outlay expense for the OCHIN System expended in FY 2012
700
6
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Vearto Date
Actual Variance Variance
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $3,320,968 $ 3,113,095 $ (207,873) 100% 94% $3,320,968 $3,113,095 $ (207,873)
Revenues
Marriage licenses 542 900 358 8% 14% 6,500 6,500
Divorce Filing Fees 13,333 10,468 (2,865) 8% 7% 160,000 160,000
Domestic Partnership Fee 4 30 26 8% 67% 45 45
Federal Grants 21,029 (21,029) 8% 0% 252,349 252,349
Federal Grant (ARRA) 5,313 (5,313) 8% 0% 63,750 63,750
State Grants 644,217 168,482 (475,735) 8% 2% 7,730,599 7,730,599
State Miscellaneous 5,155 (5,155) 8% 0% 61,860 61,860
Adult Mental Health Initiative 16,667 (16,667) 8% 0% 200,000 200,000
Title 19 22,454 14,514 (7,940) 8% 5% 269,446 269,446
liquor Revenue 11,792 (11,792) 8% 0% 141,500 141,500
School Districts 5,750 (5,750) 8% 0% 69,000 69,000
Miscellaneous 69 69 8% n/a 5,000 5,000
Patient Insurance Fees 7,294 8,881 1,587 8% 10% 87,532 87,532
Patient Fees 79 204 125 8% 21% 950 950
Interest on Investments 2,083 1,913 (170) 8% 8% 25,000 25,000
Rentals 1,542 375 (1,167) 8% 2% 18,500 18,500
Administrative Fee 441,044 431,044 (10,000) 8% 8% 5,292,527 5,292,527
Interfund Contract-Gen Fund 10,583 PO,583} 8% 0% 127,000 127,000
Total Revenues 1,208,881 636,880 (572,001) 8% 4% 14,506,558 14,511,558 5,000
Transfers In-General Fund
Transfers In-OHP-CDO
Transfers In-Acute Care Svcs
Transfers In-ABHA
108,982
40,375
22,053
43,670
108,982
40,375
22,053
43,670
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
1,307,787
484,494
264,631
524,039
1,307,787
484,494
264,631
524,039
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Contingency
4,744,929
930,426
549,520
8
17,000
203,752
3,965,055
902,559
213,882
(779,874)
27,867
335,638
8
17,000
203,752
8% 19%
I Exp. %1
8% 8%
8% 3%
8% 0%
8% 0%
8% n/a
20,408,477
11,165,114
6,594,235
100
204,000
2,445,028
20,205,604
11,165,114
6,594,235
204,000
(202,873)
100
2,445,028
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,700,706 1,116,441 584,265 8% 5% 20,408,477 17,963,349 2,445,128
NET (Resources -Requirements) 3,044,223 2,848,614 {195,609! 2,242,255 2,242,255
Page 7
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Year to Date
Budget I Actual I Variance I FY% I Coil. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 10,000
Revenues
Admin-Operations 1,841
Admin-GIS 104
Admin-Code Enforcement 13,850
Building Safety 106,131
Electrical 21,333
Contract Services 9,300
Env Health-On Site Prog 26,081
Planning-Current 53,113
Planning-Long Range 18,868
Total Revenues 250,621
Transfers In
General Fund -Gen Ops 71,239
General Fund -UR Planning 41,280
A&T Reserve (DIS assistance) 7,465
Other 8
TOTAL RESOURCES 380,613
REQUIREMENTS:
EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS
Admin-Operations 112,766
Admin-GIS 9,815
Admin-Code Enforcement 19,077
Building Safety 51,757
Electrical 16,936
Contract Services 11,812
Env Health-On Site Pgm 13.303
Planning-Current 53.526
Planning-Long Range 38.617
Transfers Out (DIS Fund) 14,930
Contingency 28,909
FY 2013 Year End
Budget Projection Variance
$ 10,000 $ 192,982 182,982
22,090 22.090
1.250 1,250
166,200 166.200
1,273.575 1,273.575
256,000 256,000
111.600 111,600
312,971 312.971
637,350 637,350
226,421 226,421
3,007,457
854,872
495,360
89.577
100
4,457,366
3,007,457
854,872
495,360
89,577
4,640,248
POOl
182,882
1,353,189
117,778
228.925
621,087
203,231
141,745
159,636
642,315
463,401
179,155
346,904
4,457,366
1,353,189
117,778
228,925
621,087
203,231
141.745
159,636
642,315
463,401
179.155
4,110,462
346,904
346,904
192,982 $
3,894
65
19,985
138,569
41,411
7,264
24,213
52,062
26,438
182,982
2,053
(39)
6,135
32,438
20,078
(2,036)
(1,868)
(1,051)
7,570
100%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
1930%
18%
5%
12%
11%
16%
7%
8%
8%
12%
313,901 63,280 8% 10%
71,239
41,280
619,402
(7,465)
{81
238,789
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
0%
0%
14%
Exp. %1
115,159
9,205
17,520
51,739
15,361
11,411
11.174
46,595
36,393
(2,393)
610
1,557
18
1,575
401
2.129
6,931
2.224
14.930
28,909
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
9%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
7%
7%
8%
0%
nla
b)
a)
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 371,448 314,557 56,891 8% 7%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 9,165 304,845 295,680 529,786 529,786
Revenues
Expenditures
Net from Operations
313,901
314.557
(656}
3,007,457
4,457,366
(1,449,909)
3,007,457
4,110,462
(1,103,005)
346,904
346,904
a) GIS revenue is sporadic based on the frequency of customer requests
b) Expenses are higher than YTD due to a large (budgeted) software license payment in July
Page 8
ROAD
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Year to Date
Budget I Actual J Variance !FY % !Coil. %
FY 2013 YearEnd
Budget Projection Variance
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $4,719,551 $ 4,940,444 $ 220,893 100% 105% $ 4,719,551 $ 4.940,444 $ 220.893
Revenues
Federal Grant (ARRA) 583 (583) 8% 0% 7,000 7,000
Mineral Lease Royalties 3,333 (3,333) 8% 0% 40,000 40,000
Forest Receipts 33,069 (33,069) 8% 0% a) 396,826 396,826
State Miscellaneous 45,191 (45,191) 8% 0% 542,290 542,290
Motor Vehicle Revenue 899,170 880,851 (18,319) 8% 8% 10,790,043 10,790,043
City of Bend 2,083 (2,083) 8% 0% b) 25,000 25,000
City of Redmond 29,167 (29,167) 8% 0% b) 350,000 350,000
City of Sisters 833 (833) 8% 0% b) 10,000 10,000
City of La Pine 833 (833) 8% 0% b) 10,000 10,000
Admin Recovery (SOC) 388 388 8% n/a 1,000 1,000
Miscellaneous 1,667 125 (1,542) 8% 1% 20,000 20,000
Road Vacations 83 (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1,000
Interest on Investments 1,250 2,826 1,576 8% 19% 15,000 15,000
Interfund Contract 57,500 (57,500) 8% 0% c) 690,000 690,000
Equipment Repairs 18,333 (18,333) 8% 0% 220,000 220,000
Vehicle Repairs 7,500 (7,500) 8% 0% c) 90,000 90,000
LID Construction 833 (833) 8% 0% c) 10,000 10,000
Vegetation Management 2,083 (2,083) 8% 0% c) 25,000 25,000
Forester 2,083 (2,083) 8% 0°;'; c) 25,000 25,000
Car Washes 333 (333) 8% 0% 4,000 4,000
Car Rental 83 (83) 8% 0% 1,000 1.000
Sale of Equip & Material 60,300 594 (59,706) 8% 0% 723,600 723,600
Total Revenues 1,166,310 884,784 (281,526) 8% 6% 13,995,759 13,996,759 1,000
Trans In -Solid Waste 23,023 (23,023) 8% 0% 276,272 276,272
Trans In -Transp SOC 20,833 (20,833) 8% 0% 250,000 250,000
Trans In-Road Imp Res 1,000 (1,000) 8% 0% 12,000 12,000
TOTAL RESOURCES 5,930,717 5,825,228 (84,656) 8% 31% 19,253,582 19,475,475 221,893
REQUIREMENTS: !Exp.o/.I
Expenditures
Personal Services 447,100 443,710 3,390 8% 8% 5,365,202 5,365,202
Materials and Services 786,555 489,800 296,755 8% 5% 9,438,662 9.438,662
Capital Outlay 169,775 200 169,575 8% 0% 2,037,300 2,037,300
Transfers Out 22,917 22,917 8% 0% 275,000 275,000
Contingency 178,118 178,118 8% n/a 2,137.418 2,137,418
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,604,465 933,710 670,755 8% 5% 19,253.582 17.116.164 2.137,418
NET (Resources· Requirements) 4.326,252 4,891,518 586,099 2,359,311 2,359,311
a) Payment received annually in January
b) Billed upon completion of work
c) Payments to be received in June 2013 from other Road Department funds
Page 9
ADULT PAROLE & PROBATION
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31.2012
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital
Revenues
DOC Measure 57
State Miscellaneous
Alternate Incarceration
State Subsidy
SB 1145
Probation Work Crew Fees
Miscellaneous
Electronic Monitoring Fee
Probation Superv. Fees
Interest on Investments
Interfund -Sheriff
Crime Prevention Grant
CFC-Domestic Violence
Total Revenues
Transfers In-General Fund
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Capital Outlay
Contingency
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
Year to Date
Budget 1 Actual 1 Variance
$ 570,000 $ 630,226 $ 60,226
18,270
358
1,250
1,152
229,045
1.875
375
10.833
15,833
750
4,167
4.167
6,236
294,311
2.180
342
12.959
14,351
337
4,167
34,336
(18,270)
(358)
(1,250)
(1.152)
(229,045)
305
(33)
2,126
(1,482)
(413)
(4,167)
(6,236)
(259,975)
36,277
900,588
36,277
700,839 (199,749)
257,608
72,891
8
47,584
243,060
46,254
14,548
26,637
8
47,584
lFY % 1 Coli. %
100% 111%
8% 0%
8% 0%
8% 0%
8% 0%
8% 0%
8% 10%
8% 8%
8% 10%
8% 8%
8% 4%
8% 8%
8% 0%
8% 0%
8% 1%
8% 8%
8% 15%
I Exp. %1
8% 8%
8% 5%
8% 0%
8% nJa
378,091 289,314 88,777 8% 6%
a)
b)
c)
a)
a)
FY 2013 YearEnd
Budget Projection Variance
$ 570,000 $ 630,226 $ 60,226
219,240 219,240
4,301 4.301
15,000 15,000
13,826 13.826
2,748,556 2.748,556
22,500 22,500
4,500 4,500
130,000 130,000
190.000 190,000
9,000 9,000
50,000 50,000
50,000 50,000
74,832 74,832
3,531,755 3,531,755
435,328 435,328
4,537,083 4,597,309 60,226
3,091,291 3,091,291
874,687 874.687
100 100
571.005 571,005
4,537,083 3.965,978 571,105
NET (Resources. Requirements) 522,497 411,525 (110,972) 631.331 631,331
a) Contracts recently submitted, expecting payment mid-September
b) Annual allocation normally received by end of calendar year
c) State invoiced quarterly
Page 10
CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSION
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Budget I
Year to Date
Actual I Variance !FY% ! Coil. %
FY 13 Year End
Budget Projection Variance
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 511,994 $ 574,985 $ 62,991 100'10 112.". $ 511,994 $ 574,985 $ 62,991
Revenues
Federal Grants 16.620 (16,620) 8% 0% 199,441 199,441
Title IV -Family Sup/Pres 3,294 (3,294) 8% 0% 39,533 39.533
HealthyStart Medicaid 7,083 (7,083) 8% 0% 85,000 85,000
level 7 Services 16,408 (16,408) 8% 0% 196.898 196,898
State Prevention Funds 4,010 12,031 8,021 8% 25% 48,122 48.122
HealthyStart /R-S-G 18,329 (18,329) 8% 0% 219,951 219,951
OCCF Grant 34,983 (34.983) 8% 0% 419,796 419,796
Charges for Svcs-Misc 667 (667) 8% 0% 8.000 8,000
Court Fines & Fees 6,624 6.281 (343) 8% 8% 79,485 79.485
Interest on Investments 83 397 314 8% 40% 1,000 1,000
Grants. Private 167 (167) 8% nfa 2,000 2,000
Interfund Grants 26,740 ~26,740! 8% 0% 320.874 320.874
Total Revenues 135,008 18,709 (116,299) 8'10 1'10 1,620,100 1,620,100
Trans from General Fund 23,003 23,000 8% 8% 275.984 275,984
~3l
Total Transfers In 23,003 23,000 (3) 8'10 8% 275,984 275,984
TOTAL RESOURCES 670,005 616,694 (53.311) 8% 26'10
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Capital Outlay
Contingency
53,956
123,000
8
23,709
48,506
10,144
5,450
112,856
8
23.709
I Exp. %1
8% 7%
8% 1%
8% 0%
8% nfa
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 200,673 58,650 142,023 8% 2%
2,408,078 2,471,069 62.991
647,474
1,475.997
100
284,507
647,474
1,475,997
100
284,507
2,408,078 2,123,471 284,607
NET (Resources -Requirements) 469,332 558,044 88,712 347,598 347.598
Page 11
SOLID WASTE
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31,2012
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital
Revenues
Miscellaneous
Franchise 3% Fees
Commercial Disp. Fees
Private Disposal Fees
Franchise Disposal Fees
Yard Debris
Special Waste
Interest
Leases
Recyclables
Budget
$ 700,513
1,833
16,667
71,667
109,500
333,333
6,083
2,083
625
900
3,750
Year to Date
I Actual I Variance I FY % I Coli. %
$ 807,470 $ 106,957 100'. 115%
1,683 (150) 8% 8%
2,500 (14,167) 8% 1% a)
81,917 10,250 8% 10%
142,596 33,096 8% 11%
354,960 21,627 8% 9%
12,096 6,013 8% 17% b)
534 (1,549) 8% 2% c)
629 4 8% 8%
1,800 900 8% 17%
6,467 2,717 8% 14%
FY 2013 Year End
Budget Projection Variance
$ 700,513 $ 807,470 $ 106,957
22,000 22,000
200,000 200,000
860,000 860,000
1,314,000 1,314,000
4,000,000 4,000,000
73,000 73,000
25,000 25,000
7,500 7,500
10,801 10,801
45,000 45,000
Total Revenues 546,441 605,182 58,741 8% 9% 6,557,301 6,557,301
TOTAL RESOURCES 1,246,954 1,412,652 165,698 8% 19% 7,257,814 7,364,771 106,957
REQUIREMENTS
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Debt Service
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out-Road
Trans Out-Capital Res
Contingency
144,443
249,109
78,893
6,917
23,023
52,500
49.933
136,332
66,065
8,111
183,044
78,893
6,917
23,023
52,500
49,933
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
Exp. %1
8%
2%
0%
0%
d)
e)
f)
0% g)
0% h)
nla
1,733,321
2,989,313
946,713
83,000
276,272
630,000
599,195
1,733,321
2,989,313
946,713
83,000
276,272
630,000
599,195
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 604,818 202,397 402,421 8% 3% 7,257,814 6,658,619 599,195
NET (Resources -Requirements) 642,136 1,210,255 568,119 706,152 706,152
a) Due April 15, 2013
b) Seasonal item-Fall and Spring
c) Dependent on special clean-ups such as asbestos and contaminated soil
d) Purchasing will pick up as year progresses
e) To be expended in November and May
f) In the process of contacting bidders
g) Semi-annual payments in December and June
h) As needed
Page 12
RISK MANAGEMENT
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Budget I
Year to Date
Actual I Variance I % of FY I % Coil. Budget
Year End
Projection Variance
RESOURCES:
Beginning Net Working Capital
Revenues
Inter-fund Charges:
General Liability
Property Damage
Vehicle
Workers' Compensation
Unemployment
Claims Reimb-Workers' Compensation
Claims Reimb-Gen Liab/Property
Process Fee-Events/Parades
Miscellaneous
Skid Car Training
Interest on Investments
Other Interest
TOTAL REVENUES
$2,000,000
21,861
26,123
14,470
120,015
20,833
42
5,000
167
4
1,333
1,250
4
211,102
$2,240,791
21,861
26,123
14,470
120,015
20,846
105
250
1,116
204,786
$240,791
(0)
(0)
0
0
13
(42)
(5,000)
(62)
(4)
(1,083)
(134)
(4!
i6,316~
100%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
112'¥.
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
0%
0%
5%
0%
2%
7%
0%
8'¥.
$2,000,000 $2,240,791
262,333 262,333
313,480 313,480
173,635 173,635
1,440,176 1,440,176
250,000 250,000
500 500
60,000 60,000
2,000 2,000
50 50
16,000 16,000
15,000 15,000
50 50
2,533,224 2,533,224
$240,791
TOTAL RESOURCES
Appropriations/Expenditures
Direct Insurance Costs:
GENERAL LIABILITY
Settlement / Benefit
Defense
Professional Service
Insurance
Loss Prevention
Repair I Replacement
Total General Liability
2,211,102
25,000
2,445,577
135.600
763
136,363
234,474
(111,363)
8% 54%
1% Ex!!_ I
8% 45%
a)
4,533,224
300,000
4,774,015
300,000
240,791
PROPERTY DAMAGE
Insurance
Repair I Replacement
Total Property Damage 20,833
158,562
158,562 (137,729) 8% 63%
a)
250,000 250,000
VEHICLE
Professional Service
Insurance
Loss Prevention
Repair I Replacement
Total Vehicle 8,333
598
598 7,736 8% 1% 100,000 100,000
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Settlement I Benefit
Professional Service
Insurance
Loss Prevention
Miscellaneous
Total Workers' Compensation 83,333
26.516
69,009
13,125
108,650 (25,316) 8'¥. 11%
a)
1,000,000 1,000,000
UNEMPLOYMENT -SettlementlBenefits 20,833 20,833 8% 0% 250,000 250,000
Total Direct Insurance Costs 158,333 404,172 (245,839) 8% 21% 1,900,000 1,900,000
Insurance Administration:
Personal Services
Materials & Service
Capital Outlay
Total Insurance Administration
25,658
14,083
8
39,749
23,373
10,284
33,657
2,285
3,798
8
6,092
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
6%
0%
7%
307,896
168,990
100
476,986
307,896
168,990
476,886
100
100
Transfers Out 600 600 8% 0% 7,200 7,200
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 198,682 437,829 (239,147) 8'¥. 18% 2,384,186 2,384,086 100
NET 2,012,420 2,007,748 (4,673) • 2,149,038 2,389,929 240,891
a) Annual premium paid in July 2012 Page 13
• Contingency Is $2,149,038.
DESCHUTES COUNTY 911
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Year to Date
Actual Variance Variance
RESOURCES:
8eg. Net Working Capital $8,000,000 $ 8,874,091 $ 874,091 100% 111% $8,000,000 $8,874,091 $ 874,091
Revenues
Property Taxes -Current 545,641 (545,641) 8% 0% a) 6,547,687 6,547,687
Property Taxes· Prior 15,417 53,031 37,614 8% 29% 185,000 185,000
Federal Grants 20,000 (20,000) 8% 0% 240,000 240,000
State Reimbursement 3,000 (3,000) 8% 0% 36,000 36,000
Telephone User Tax 62,500 (62,500) 8% 0% 750,000 750,000
Data Network Reimb. 2,500 (2,500) 8% 0% 30,000 30,000
.Iefferson County 2,500 (2,500) 8% 0% 30,000 30,000
User Fee 3,667 (3,667) 8% 0% 44,000 44,000
Police RMS User Fees 23,246 (23,246) 8% 0% 278,950 278,950
Contract Payments 2,583 (2,583) 8% 0% 31,000 31,000
Miscellaneous 750 565 (185) 8% 6% 9,000 9,000
Interest 3,333 4,467 1,134 8% 11% 40,000 40,000
Interest on Unsegregated Tax 50 13 p7~ 8% 2% 600 600
Total Revenues 685,187 58,076 (627,111) 8% 1% 8,222,237 8,222,237
TOTAL RESOURCES 8,685,187
REQUIREM ENTS:
Expenditures
Personal Services 358,900
Materials and Services 170,850
Capital Outlay 46,833
Transfers Out 41,667
Contingency 733,603
8,932,167
355,924
94,637
23,257
246,980
2,976
76,213
23,576
41,667
733,603
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,351,853 473,818 878,035
NET (Resources -Requirements) 7,333,334 8,458,349 1,125,015
a) Current year taxes not due until November
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
55%
% Exp·1
8%
5%
4%
0%
n/a
30/0
16,222,237 17,096,328 874,091
4,306,797
2,050,202
562,000
500,000
8,803,238
3,800,000
2,050,202
562,000
500,000
506,797
8,803,238
16,222,237 6,912,202 9,310,035
-10,184,126 10,184,126
Page 14
Health Benefits Trust
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31,2012
RESOURCES
Beg. Net Working Capital $13,800,000 $14,518,223 $ 718,223 100% O· $ 13,800,000 $14,518,223 718,223
Rewnues:
Internal Premium Charges 1,066,250 1,065,326 (924) 8% 8% 12.795,000 12,795,000
prr Emp -Add'i Prem 4,167 2,748 (1,418) 8% 5% 50,000 50.000
Employee Prem Contribution 52,500 52,585 85 8% 8% 630,000 630,000
COIC 108,333 115,031 6,698 8% 9% 1,300,000 1,300,000
Retiree I COBRA Co-Pay 62,500 73,290 10,790 8% 10% 750,000 750.000
Medical Services Reimb 323 323 8% nla 323 323
Interest 6,667 7,250 583 8% 9% 80,000 80,000
Total Rewnues 1,300,417 1,318,554 18,138 8% 15,805,000 15,805,323 323
TOTAL RESOURCES 15,100,417 15.834,m 734,380 92% 105% 29,405,000 30,123,548 718,548
REQUIREMENTS
Expenditures:
Penona/ Services (all depts) 16,731 16,064 667 8% 8% 200.772 200,772
Materials & Services
Claims Paid-Medical/Rx 996,150 1,317,889 (321,739) 8% 11% a) 11,953,800 12.165,439 (211,639)
Claims Paid-DentalNision 148,850 142,312 6,538 8% 8% a) 1,786,200 1,480,046 306,154
Refunds (5,534) 5,534 8% nla (5.534) 5,534
Insurance Premiums 29,167 29,911 (744) 8% 9% 350,000 350,000
State Assessments 13,333 13,333 8% 0% 160,000 160,000
Administration Fee 26,667 26,485 181 8% 8% 320,000 320,000
Preferred Provider Fee 4,167 4,107 60 8% 8% 50,000 50,000
Health Impact 4,583 4,318 265 8% 8% 55,000 55,000
Other -Administration 5,446 1,744 3.702 8% 3% 65,353 65,353
Other -Wellness 8,750 1,120 7,630 8% 1% 105,000 105,000
Admin &Wellness 1,237,113 1,522,353 (285,240) 11% 1O'Y. 14,845,353 14,745,304 100,049
Deschutes On-site Clinic
Healthstat 57,000 57,000 8% 0% 684,000 684,000
Medical Supplies 2.500 532 1,968 8% 2% 30,000 30,000
Equipment 83 83 8% 0% 1,000 1.000
Miscellaneous 1,186 1,853 (66) 8% 9% 21,433 21,433
Total DOC 81,369 2,384 58,985 0% 738,433 738,433
Deschutes On-site Pharmacy
Contracted Services 25,691 25,691 8% 0% 308,281 308,287
Medication and Drugs 83,333 83,333 8% 0% 1,000,000 1,000,000
Miscellaneous 1,380 1,380 (0) 8% nla 16,559 16,559
Total Pharmacy 110,404 1,380 109,024 nla 1,324,846 1,324,846
Capital Outlay 8 8 8% nla 100 100
Contingency 1,024,191 1,024,191 8% nla 12,297,496 12,297,496
TOTAL EXPENDIREQUIREMNTS 2,340,013 1,542,181 908,235 S% 29,405,000 17,007,355 12,397,645
NET (Resources -Requirements) 12, 760,404 14,292,595 1,642,595 13,116,191 13,116,191
* Additional FY 2012 Revenues and Expenditures could be recorded. This will result in a change to Beginning Net Working Capital.
a) Projection based on annualizing 5 weeks of claims paid. YTD actual is an average of $290,934 per week
Page 15
Deschutes County· Fair and Expo Center
YTD-Budget Basis Commissioners
Statement of Financial Operating Data
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Vearto Date
Budget (1112 ofl
annual) I Actual I Variance IFY % ICoil. %
Year End
FY2013
Variance IBudget Projection
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 46,373 $ 35,055 $ (11,318) 100% 76% $ 46,373 $ 35,055 $ (11,318)
Receipts:
Special Events Revenues 50,632 15,949 (34,683) 8% 3% 607,578 599,527 (8,051 )
Interest
Storage
125
4,787
33 (92)
(4,787)
8%
8%
2%
0%
1,500
57,441
1,408
57,441
(92)
Camping at F & E
Horse Stall Rental
500
2,500 16,262
(500)
13,762
8%
8%
0%
54%
6,000
30,000
6,000
46,262 16,262
Concession % -Food
Rights (Signage, etc.)
Interfund Contract
15,833
7,917
1,667
2,483
16,000
200
(13,350)
8,083
(1,467)
8%
8%
8%
1%
17%
1%
190,000
95,000
20,000
189,483
95,000
20,000
(517)
Miscellaneous 567 6 {561) 8% n/a 6,800 6,806 6
Total Receipts 84,527 50,932 (33,594) 8% 5% 1,014,319 1,021,926 7,607
Transfers In
General Fund (001) 14,167 14,167 8% 8% 170,000 170,000
Room Tax (160) 2,145 2,145 8% 8% 25,744 25,744
Welcome Center (170) 6,900 6,900 8% 8% 82,800 82,800
Annual County Fair (619) 22,022 ~22,022} 8% 0% 264,259 264,259
Total Transfers In 45,234 23,212 {22,022) 542,803 542,803
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures:
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Debt Service
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Contingency
176,133
69,324
42,185
9,510
1,188
109,199
66,828
26,744
(66,934)
2,496
15,441
9,510
1,188
122,207 93,572 28,635
11,418 11,418
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
7%
I Exp. %1
8%
5%
0%
0%
n/a
1,603,495 1,599,784 (3,711)
831,882 829,392 2,490
506,223 511,882 (5,659)
114,119 114,119
14,259 14,259
1,466,483 1,469,652 (3,169)
137,012 137,012
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 133,625 93,572 40,052 8% 6% 1,603,495 1,469,652 133,843
NET (Resources -Requirements) 42,509 15,627 (26,8821 130,132 130,132
Page 16
00
u ~
~
0
~
~
~
~
<
~
~
~
<
U
r;r,
;:s
0.. a
u ~
~ .......
c ;:s
0 u
..s:=
1::
0 z
•
c c .......
a
(I)
..s:=
..s:=-(I)
.......
(I) co
•
Deschutes County
North County Services Building
Inception through July 31, 2012
RESOURCES:
Beginning Net Working Capital
Loan Proceeds, net of issuance costs
Resources from Fund 140
Resources from Fund 142
Transfer in
Interest Revenue
Total Re.ource.
EXPENDITURES:
Materials &Services
Architecture/Design
Engineering
Planning
Interfund Charges
Fees , Permits & SDCs
Utilities
Travel· Meals/Mileage Reimb
Total Materlall & Services
Capital Outlay
Land and Building
Remodel
Total Capital Outlay
Contingency
Total Expenditures
Net
Project to
Date I
1,402,013
25,000
600,000
4,036
2,031,041
47,092
2,620
534
10,097
3
2,908
60,346 2,908
1,402,013
230
1,402,243
1,462,588 2,908
568,461 (2,908)
1,402,013
25,000
600,000
4,036
2,031,049
a)
b)
50,000 b)
2,620
534
10,097
3
63,254
1,402,013 a)
230
1,402,243
1,465,497
565,552
L Budget· I Projected I I Variance
3,400,000 3,400,000
1,402,013 1,402,013
25,000 25,000
700,000 700,000
13,740 13,740
5,540,753 5,540,753
325 ,000 325,000
75,000 75,000
13,150 13,150
75 ,000 75,000
20,000 20,000
3 {3~
508,150 508,153 ~3~
1,402,013 1,402,013
3,300,000 3,300,000
4,702,013 4,702,013
313,513 313,513
5,523,676 5,210,166 (3)
17,077 330,587 313,510
• The project budget is the consolidation of FY 2012 (actual and unexpended budget) and FY 2013 adopted budget
a) The building was purchased in FY 2011 with resources from Project Development and Debt Reserve· $1,402,013
b) $25,000 was paid to the architect. in FY 2011 with resources from General County Projects Fund (Fund 142)
I
Deschutes County
Bethlehem Inn (Fund 128)
One Month Ended July 31, 2012
Budget Actual Variance IFy%1 Coli. oJ Budget I Projection I Variance
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $(2,710,000) $(2,710,173) $ (173) 100"/0 100% $(2,710,000) $(2,710,173) $ (173)
Revenues
Grants -Private 8,383 (8,383) S% 0% 100,592 100,592
Lease Payments 2,034 4,068 2,034 S% 17% 24,408 24,408
Total Revenues 10,417 4,0. (6,349) 8% 3% 125,000 125,000
Transfers In:
Project Development (140) 137,500 (137,500) S% 0% 1,650,000 1,650,000
Gen Capital Res (143) 88,333 ~88,333~ S% 0% 1,060,000 1,060,000
TOTAL RESOURCES
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Debt Service:
Interest Expense
Interest Payment
(2.473,750)
2,083
8,333
(2,706.105)
1,406
(232,355)
677
8,333
8%
S%
S%
-2165%
Exp·%1
6%
0%
a)
125,000
25,000
100,000
124,827
17,000
100,000
(173)
8,000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 10,417 1,406 9,010 88;' 125,000 117,000
NET (Resources· Requirements) (2,484,167) (2,707,511) (223,345) b)=============7,=~=7======(1=73=)
a) Interest on July 2012 negative cash balance: $1,4063.45..
b) Inception through July 31, 2012
Revenues -Lease Payments $ 52,884
Expenditures:
Land/Building (Amertitle) -July 2007 2,241,313
Hickman Williams 17,578
City of Bend -May 2008 250,000
KN EX CO 5,289
Kleinfelder 3,732
Total expended on facility 2,517,913
Interest on Negative Cash Balance 242,483
Total expended 2,760,395
Net $(2,707,511)
Deschutes County
General Support Services -SOCC
Conference/Seminar, EducationlTraining and Travel Expenditures
and
SOCC -County College Expenditures
FY 2013
____
[1:30ccconterence~&~II"!I'I~7~~-+---"""-YT-D-T-o-ta-l1
!Tammy Baney
r-g~~f/Sem & EduclTr·aTnTr19~ 30 30
Travel Meals
Accommodations
Airfare
Mileage reimbursement
Ground Transport/Parking
....... -.......
------~
30~!~!~I Baney__"_""
Alan Unger ____ ~ ._."~_~
Conf/Sem & EduclTraining . 65 65Travel Meals -----" --~---"-,--~~-~-~-~-
Accommodations
Airfare
-----:--:-
Mileage reimbursemeil~L
Ground Transport/Parking
.................--.----.---~-~~~-
Total Unger 65 65
I======~'===.---~-~-~--~~==.----~
Tony DeBone
Conf/Sem & EduclTraining 30 30
---~-~-~-----
Travel Meals
Accommodations
re
_ge reimburse!!l_~nt
round Transport
Total Other 30
Total-BOCC Department
125
Travel Meals
Accom modations
Airfare
Conf/Sem & Educ!Trainin.9 __
--=--:--:---
Mileage Reimburs~'!l~I1!_
Ground Transport ______~~--.....,...."..",..._\
Total -BOCC Department 125 125
FY 2013 Budget 14,750
-----~~--
.. _Percent of F.Y~~l~-'~ludI!et Expende~_ 0.8%
BOCC Coun!Y_~~lIeg~_
~ _Qf!i~COpie~~lJ_ppli~~_
Meeting Supplies
8/9/2012
GENERAL FUND
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30,2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
Year to Date
Final Budget I Actual I Variance IFY % I Coil. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital
Revenues
Property Taxes
Gen. Rev.-exd.Taxes
Assessor
County Clerk
BOPTA
District Attorney
FinanceIT ax
Veterans
Property Management
Grant Projects
$ 7,300,000 $
20,100,967
2,382,321
790,996
1,468,707
12,398
298,669
193,900
61,341
96.200
2,000
8,245,725
21,506,937
2,439,103
781,874
1,463,090
14,788
325,968
211,650
69,574
96,200
2,000
$ 945,725
1,405,970
56,782
(9,122)
(5.617)
2,390
27,299
17,750
8,233
-
-
100% 113%
100% 107%
100% 102%
100% 99%
100% 100%
100% 119%
100% 109%
100% 109%
100% 113%
100% 100%
100% 100%
Total Revenues 25,407,499 26,911,184 1,503,685 100Of. 106%
TOTAL RESOURCES 32,707,499 35,156,909 2,449,410 100% 107%
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp. %1
Expenditures
Assessor 3,405,300 3,296,722 108,578 100% 97%
County Clerk 1,423,965 1,142,435 281,530 100% 80%
BOPTA 72,402 62,668 9,734 100% 87%
District Attomey 4,879,296 4,663,981 215,315 100% 96%
FinancelTax 813,648 768,469 45.179 100% 94%
Veterans 267,415 255,677 11,738 100% 96%
Property Management 262,214 258,528 3,686 100% 99%
Grant Projects 118,715 118,480 235 100% 100%
Non-Departmental 1,816,962 1,561.172 255,790 100% 86%
Contingency 5,165,880 5,165,880 100% nfa
18,225,797 12,128.131 6,097,666 100% 67%
Transfers Out 13,978,610 13,978,610 -100% 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 32,204,407
NET (Resources -Requirements) 503,093
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget
26, 106,741
9,050,168
8,700,000 I
6,097,666
8,547,076
100% 81%
Page 1
COMM JUSTICE-JUVENILE
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30,2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
Year to Date
Final Budget I Actual I Variance IFY % I Coil. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 1,101,374 $1,099,010 $ (2,364) 100·,4 100·/.
Revenues
Federal Grants 10,000 9,676 (324) 100% 97%
SB #1 065-Court Assess. 50,000 52,957 2,957 100% 106%
Discovery Fee 15,000 13,628 (1,372) 100% 91%
Food Subsidy 25,000 25.157 157 100% 101%
OYA Basic & Diversion 217,498 342,512 125,014 100% 157%
Inmate/Prisoner Housing 88,490 76,320 (12,170) 100% 86%
Inmate Commissary Fees 100 220 120 100% 220%
Contract Payments 70,000 106,017 36,017 100% 151%
Miscellaneous 60 359 299 100% 599%
Program Fees 40 (40) 100% 0%
MIP Diversion Fees 300 1,065 765 100% 355%
Interest on Investments 7,500 7,986 486 100% 106%
leases 2,400 1,200 (1,200) 100% 50%
Grants -Private 500 934 434 100% 187%
Behavioral Health 6,000 2,905 (3,095) 100% 48%
CFC Interfund Grant 154,128 149,852 (4,276) 100% 97%
Gen Fund Grant.crime Prev 20,000 20,000 -100% 100%
Total Revenues 667,016 810,789 143,773 100% 122%
Transfers In-General Fund 5,321,459 5,321,459 -100% 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES 7,089,849 7,231,258 141,409 100'Y. 102'Y.
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Community Justice-Juvenile
I Exp·%1
Personal Services 5,109,069 4,958,175 150,894 100% 97%
Materials and Services 1,219,733 1,204,632 15,101 100% 99%
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Contingency
40,100
50,400
670,547
23,000
50,400
17,100
-
670,547
100%
100%
100%
57%
100%
n/a
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 7,089,849 6,236,206 853,643 100'Y. 88%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 995,051 995,051
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 1,010,4151
Page 2
SHERIFF -Fund 255
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
Year to Date
Final Budget 1 Actual 1 Variance 1 Fy%l Coil. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ $ $ 100% nfa
100% 84%
100% 81%
Total Revenues 36,533,516 30,177,303 (6,356,213) 100% 83%
TOTAL RESOURCES 36,533,516 30,177,303 (6,356,213) 100% 83%
REQUIREMENTS: Exp. %1
EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS
Sheriffs Division 2,583,941 2,473,759 110,182 100% 96%
Civil 824,095 746,004 78,091 100% 91%
Automotive/Com m unications 1,709,925 1,568,717 141,208 100% 92%
Investigations/Evidence 1,734,218 1,527,082 207,136 100% 88%
PatrollCivillComm Supp 8,004,704 7,853,027 151,677 100% 98%
Records 720,710 686,502 34,208 100% 95%
Adult Jail 10,506,527 9,680,930 825,597 100% 92%
Court Security 286,602 275,256 11,346 100% 96%
Emergency Services 192,925 175,658 17,267 100% 91%
Special Services Division 1,335,161 1,153,546 181,615 100% 86%
Regional Work Center 3,018,466 2,887,831 130,635 100% 96%
Training Division 324,265 266,759 57,506 100% 82%
Other Law Enforcement Svcs 632,256 609,000 23,256 100% 96%
Non-Departmental 73,231 73,231 100% 100%
Contingency 4,386,490 4,386,490 100% nfa
Transfers Out -DIS Fund 200,000 200,000 100% 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 36,533,516 30,177,303 6,356,213 100% 83%
NET (Resources -Requirements)
Page 3
Fund 701 LED-Countywide
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30 , 2012
(PR Date
Variance Coli. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 5,108,671 $ 6,090,734 $ 982,063 100% 119%
Tax Revenues ~ Current 14,306,841 15,070,363 763,522 100% 105%
Tax Revenues -Prior 501,000 747,899 246,899 100% 149%
Federal Grants & Reimb 35,200 30 ,784 (4,416) 100% 87%
State Grant 48 ,475 56 ,577 8,102 100% 117%
Transp. of State Wards 5,000 6 ,304 1,304 100% 126%
SB 1145 1,537,663 1,479,991 (57,672) 100% 96%
Prisoner Housing 224,535 224,535 100% n/a
Des. Cty Video Lottery Grant 5,000 5,000 -100% 100%
Des Cty Court Security 91,000 89,739 (1,261 ) 100% 99%
Des Cty Juvenile Contract 4 ,180 12,768 8,588 100% 305%
Title III Reimbursement 150,000 110,084 (39,916) 100% 73%
Transport 1,000 2,183 1,183 100% 218%
Other 4,971 4,971 100% n/a
DC Fair & Expo Center 3,825 1,796 (2,030) 100% 47%
Inmate Commissary Fees 6,600 16,866 10,266 100% 256%
Work Center Work Crews 50,000 55,002 5,002 100% 110%
Concealed Handgun Classes 3,500 3,650 150 100% 104%
Inmate Telephone Fee 48 ,000 105,100 57,100 100% 219%
Soc Sec Incentive-Fed 5,000 9,600 4,600 100% 192%
Miscellaneous 5,000 8,871 3,871 100% 177%
Oregon Mentors 15,000 9,039 (5,961 ) 100% 60%
Debit Card Fee 287 287 100% n/a
Medical Services Reimb 16,000 14,710 (1 ,290) 100% 92%
Restitution 5 ,000 1,747 (3,253) 100% 35%
Sheriff Fees 200,000 228,754 28 ,754 100% 114%
Interest 28 ,333 49,323 20,990 100% 174%
Interest on Unsegregated 3,533 1,525 (2 ,008) 100% 43%
Donations -·Shop with a Cop· 734 734 100% n/a
Donations 250 250 100% n/a
Sale of Reportable Assets 1,000 7,599 6,599 100% n/a
Total Revenues 17,076,150 18,3561050 1,279,900 100"1. 107%
TOTAL RESOURCES 22,184,821 24,446,784 2,261,963 100% 110%
REQUIREMENTS: 1 Exp. %1
Fund 255 Departments:
Sheriffs Services 2,423,711 2,320,362 103,349 100% 96%
Civil 824,095 746,004 78 ,091 100% 91%
Auto/Comm 639,837 586,998 52 ,839 100% 92%
Adult Jail 10 ,506,527 9 ,680 ,930 825 ,597 100% 92%
Court Security 286 ,602 275,256 11,346 100% 96%
Emergency Services 192,925 175,658 17 ,267 100% 91%
Special Services 928,217 801,957 126,261 100% 86%
Work Center 3,018,466 2 ,887,831 130,635 100% 96%
Training 197,961 162,854 35,107 100% 82%
Other (CODE, Forensic) 632,256 609,000 23,256 100% 96%
Non Dept -ISF Charges 36,689 36 ,689 100% 100%
Non Dept -Jamison DIS 200,000 200,000 100% 100%
Contingency 2,197 ,536 2,197 ,536 100% 0%
Total to Fund 255 22,084,821 18,483,539 3,601,282
Transfer to Reserve Fund (703) 100,000 100,000 100% 100%
Total Requirements 22,184,821 18,583.539 3,601 ,,281 100% 84%
Net 5,863,246 5,863,246 Page 4
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 4,507,352 1
Fund 702 LED Rural
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRE
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $2,936,523 $3,004,533 $ 68,010 100% 102%
Revenues
Tax Revenues -Current 7,348,125 7,578,675 230,550 100% 103%
Tax Revenues -Prior 257,000 371,487 114,487 100% 145%
Federal Grants & Reimb 12,000 32,343 20,343 100% 270%
Federal Grants-BLM 25,000 23,510 (1,490) 100% n/a
US Forest Service 78,750 59,063 (19,688) 100% 75%
State Grant 200,972 175,720 (25 ,252) 100% 87%
SB #1065 Court Assessment 60,000 52,957 (7,043) 100% 88%
Marine Board license Fee 142,332 125,136 (17,196) 100% 88%
Bureau of Reclama1ion 28,871 28,871 100% n/a
Des Cly General Fund Grant 576,144 434,144 (142,000) 100% 75%
Des Cty Transient Room Tax 2,073,856 2,215,856 142,000 100% 107%
Des Cly TaxJFin Contract 540 540 100%
City of Sisters 449,961 449,961 100% 100%
Des Cly COD Contract 54,366 54,366 100% 100%
Des Cly Solid Waste Contr 54,366 54,366 100% 100%
Des Cly Clerk/Election 2,000 595 (1,406) 100% 30%
School Districts 80,000 35,545 (44.455) 100% 44%
Claims Reimbursement 24,719 24,719 100% n/a
Security & Traffic Reimb 5,000 7,675 2 ,675 100% 153%
Seat Belt Program 12,000 7,595 (4,405) 100% 63%
Miscellaneous 8,000 4,018 (3,982) 100% 50%
False Alarm Fees 2,000 1,500 (500) 100% 75%
Restitution 2 ,239 2,239 100% nla
Sheriff Fees 10,000 9,895 (105) 100% 99%
Court Fines & Fees 115,000 136,084 21 ,084 100% 118%
Impound Fees 7,000 4,900 (2,100) 100% 70%
Restitution -Street Crimes 500 13,365 12,865 100% 2673%
Seizure/Forfeiture 1,324 1,324 100% n/a
Interest 10,000 22,877 12,877 100% 229%
Interest on Unsegregated 1,800 769 (1,031) 100% 43%
Grants-Private 7,000 7,000 100% n/a
Donations 13,755 13,755 100% n/a
Sale of Equip & Material 6 ,000 12,253 6,253 100% 204%
Sale of Reportable Assets 20 ,000 66,490 46,490 100% 332%
Total Revenues 11,6121172 12,029,590 417,418 50% 104%
TOTAL RESOURCES 14,548,695 15,034,123 485,428 50% 103%
REQUIREMENTS:
Fund 255 Departments:
Sheriffs Services
Auto/Comm
Investigations
Patrol
Records
Special Services
Training
Non Dept -ISF Charges
Conti
160,230
1 ,070,088
1,734,218
8,004,704
720,710
406,944
126,304
36,542
954
153,398
981,719
1,527,082
7,853,027
686,502
351,589
103,905
36,542
6,832
88,369
207,136
151 ,677
34,208
55,354
22,399
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100 %
Exp. %1
96%
92%
88%
98%
95%
86%
82%
100%
0%
Transfer to Reserve Fund (704) 100,000 100,000 100% 100%
Total Requirements 14,548,695 11 ,793,765 2,754,930 100% 81%
Net 3,240 ,358 3 ,240,358 Page 5
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 2,859,9151
PUBLIC HEALTH
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PR
Variance Coli. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital S 1,596,918 S 1,702,129 S 105,211 100% 107%
Revenues
Medicare Reimbursement 600 814 214 100% 136%
State Grant 2.710.144 2,654,460 (55.684) 100% 98%
Child Dev & Rehab Center 24.607 37,401 12.794 100% 152%
State Miscellaneous 224.829 240,288 15,459 100% 107%
OMAP 523,850 602,733 78.883 100% 115%
TitJe 19 352 352 100% nfa
Family Planning Exp Proj 520.000 521,744 1,744 100% 100%
Local Grants 45.000 120.930 75,930 100% 269%
Water Program-Base Fee 42.000 37,544 (4,456) 100% 89%
Contract Payments 65.376 65,376 100% nfa
Water Program-Field Work 55.817 50,555 (5.262) 100% 91%
H20 Sys Insp-Priv Wells 200 (200) 100% 0%
Miscellaneous 4,529 4.529 100% nfa
Patient Insurance Fees 135.380 178,556 43.176 100% 132%
Health Dept/Patient Fees 118,770 101,505 (17.265) 100% 85%
Vital Records-Birth 30,600 36,530 5.930 100% 119%
Vital Records-Death 100,000 101,745 1.745 100% 102%
Environmental Health 704.350 764,027 59.677 100% 108%
NSF Fee 60 60 100% nfa
Interest on Investments 12,000 10,169 (1.831) 100% 85%
Donations 26,030 14,626 (11,404) 100% 56%
Interfund Contract 198.387 182,914 (15,473) 100% 92%
Administrative Fee 15.056 15.056 -100% 100%
Total Revenues 5,487,620 5,741,915 254,295 100% 105%
Transfer.sln~enaraIFund 2.317,765 2,317,765 -100% 100%
Transfers In-PH Res Fund 30,000 30,000 -100% 100%
Transfers In-Gen. Fund Other 65.100 65,100 -100% 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES 9,497,403 9,856,908 359,505 100% 104%
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Capital Outlay
Transfer.s Out
Contingency
6,190,732
2.098.694
131,500
286,000
790,477
6,101,477
2,048,445
93.788
286,000
89,255
50.249
37,712
-
790,477
I EXP.%I
100% 99%
100% 98%
100% 71%
100% 100%
100% nfa
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 9,497.403 8,529,710 967,693 100-/. 90%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 1,327,199 1.327.199 Page 6
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 1,336,051 I
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30,2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
Year to Date
Actual Variance
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 3,268,759 $ 3,108,163 $ (160,596) 100% 95%
Revenues
Marriage Licenses 5,500 5,775 275 100% 105%
Divorce Filing Fees 133,000 144,427 11,427 100% 109%
Domestic Partnership Fee 100 75 (25) 100% 75%
Federal Grants 276,647 268,784 (7,863) 100% 97%
State Grants 6,964,202 7,822,336 858,134 100% 112%
State Miscellaneous 124,173 63,452 (60,721) 100% 51%
ABHA 164,728 164,728 100% nfa
Title 19 282,297 223,654 (58,643) 100% 79%
Liquor Revenue 105,000 137,168 32,168 100% 131%
School Districts 75,600 87,200 11,600 100% 115%
Miscellaneous 14,000 8,571 (5,429) 100% 61%
Patient Insurance Fees 113,700 201,869 88,169 100% 178%
Patient Fees 1,807 1,026 (781) 100% 57%
Interest on Investments 25,000 25,179 179 100% 101%
Rentals 13,100 17,375 4,275 100% 133%
Donations 108 108 100% nfa
Administrative Fee 4,429,689 4,390,059 (39,630) 100% 99%
Sheriff 20,000 (20,000) 100% 0%
Forfeitures 12,825 12,825 100% nfa
Interfund Contract-Gen Fund 127,000 127,000 -100% 100%
Comm. on Children & Fam 1,450 1,450 100% nfa
Total Revenues 12,710,815 13,703,061 992,246 100% 108%
Transfers In-General Fund 1,263,515 1,263,515 -100% 100%
Transfers In-OHP-CDO 271,402 396,077 124,674 100% 146%
Transfers In-Acute Care SVC8 252,515 252,515 -100% 100%
Transfers In-ABHA 300,863 387,473 86,610 100% 129%
TOTAL RESOURCES 18,067,869 19,110,804 1,042,934 100% 106%
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp. %1
Expenditures
Personal Services 10,428,186 9,566,359 861,827 100% 92%
Materials and Services 5,805,749 5,975,457 (169,708) 100% 103%
Capital Outlay 390,000 169,892 220,108 100% 44%
Transfers Out 286,000 286,000 -100% 100%
Contingency 1,157,934 1,157,934 100% nfa
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 18,067,869 15,997,709 2,070,160 100% 89%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 3,113,095 3,113,094
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 3,320.9681 Page 7
I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
RESOURCES:
Beg. Nat Working Capital $ 229,822 131,776 $ (98.046) 100% 57'.
Revenues
Admin-Operations 24,350 27,689 3,339 100% 114%
Admin-GIS 1,000 1,721 721 100% 172%
Admin-Code Enforcement 166,700 180,096 13,396 100% 108%
Building Safety 1,200,880 1,063,788 (137,092) 100% 89%
Electrical 259,150 236,706 (22,444) 100% 91%
Contract Services 160,200 135,053 (25,147) 100% 84%
Env Health-On Site Prog 280,400 312,500 32,100 100% 111%
Planning-Current 674,900 555,131 (119,769) 100% 82%
Planning-Long Range 253,726 251,366 (2,360) 100% 99%
Year to Date
Final Budget I Actual I Variance I FY% I Coli. %
Total Revenues 3,021,306 2,764,051 (257,255) 100% 91%
Trans In-GF 729,625 849,625 120,000 100% 116%
Trans In.oF for Lng Rng Ping 495,360 495,360 -100% 100%
Trans In..other 100 ~100! 100% 0%
TOTAL RESOURCES 4,476,213 4,240,812 (235,401) 100% 95%
REQUIREMENTS: EXP·%I
EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS
Admin-Operations 1,411,818 1,400,848 10,970 100% 99%
Admin-GIS 127.755 122,676 5,079 100% 96%
Admin-Code Enforcement 204,570 210,021 (5,451) 100% 103%
Building Safety 562,032 554,966 7,066 100% 99%
Electrical 261,450 214,298 47,152 100% 82%
Contract Services 165,689 170,523 (4,834) 100% 103%
Env Health-On Site Pgm 143,108 153,457 (10.349) 100% 107%
Planning-Current 619,002 594,812 24,190 100% 96%
Planning-Long Range 478.806 452,343 26,463 100% 94%
Transfers Out (DIS Fund) 173,885 173,885 -100% 100%
Contingency 328,098 328,098 100% n/a
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,476,213 4,047,830 428.383 100% 90·k
NET (Resources· Requirements) 192,982 192,982
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 10,000 I
Page 8
ROAD
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
Vearto Date
Actual Variance Coil. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 3,417,158 $ 3.417,158 $ 0 100% 100%
Revenues
System Development Charge 1,617 1,617 100% nfa
Federal Reimbursements 600,000 600,000 -100% 100%
Federal Grant (ARRA) 20,000 20,000 -100% 100%
Mineral Lease Royalties 40,000 143,712 103,712 100% 359%
Forest Receipts 1,311,162 1,322,661 11,499 100% 101%
State Grant 849,110 849,110 100% n/a
State Miscellaneous 500,041 502,659 2,618 100% 101%
Motor Vehicle Revenue 11,340,000 10,409,094 (930,906) 100% 92%
City of Bend 275,000 30,783 (244,217) 100% 11%
City of Redmond 350,000 322,507 (27,493) 100% 92%
City of Sisters 10,000 1,135 (8,865) 100% 11%
City of La Pine 10,000 (10,000) 100% 0%
Admin Recovery (SOC) 1,000 2,439 1,439 100% 244%
Miscellaneous 20,000 40,841 20,841 100% 204%
Road Vacations 1,000 2,000 1,000 100% 200%
Interest on Investments 20,000 20,488 488 100% 102%
Parking Fees 144 (144) 100% 0%
Interfund Contract 730,000 673,014 (56,986) 100% 92%
Equipment Repairs 200,000 278,684 78,684 100% 139%
Vehicle Repairs 90,000 77,560 (12,440) 100% 86%
LID Construction 10,000 (10,000) 100% 0%
Vegetation Management 71,500 60,667 (10,833) 100% 85%
Forester 25,000 28,991 3,991 100% 116%
Car Washes 3,500 5,162 1,662 100% 147%
Car Rental 1,020 1,020 100% nla
Sale of Equip & Material 633,000 979,884 346,884 100% 155%
Total Revenues 16,261,347 16,374,028 112,681 10004 101-4
Trans In -Solid Waste 285,773 285,773 -100% 100%
Trans In -Transp SOC 250,000 250,000 -100% 100%
Trans In-Road Imp Res 12,000 (12,000) 100% 0%
TOTAL RESOURCES 20,226,278 20,326.959 100,681 100% 100%
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp·%1
Expenditures
Personal Services 5,615,323 5,344,597 270,726 100% 95%
Materials and Services 10,755,112 9,366,630 1,388,482 100% 87%
Capital Outlay 1,236,691 75,288 1,161,403 100% 6%
Transfers Out 600,000 600,000 -100% 100%
Contingency 2,019,152 2,019,152 100% nla
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 20.226,278 15,386,515 4,839,763 100% 76%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 4,940,444 4,940,444 Page 9
Beg NWC per FV 2013 Budget 4,719,551 I
ADULT PAROLE & PROBATION
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
I
j
i
Year to Date
Final Budget I Actual I Variance IFY% I Coli. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 560,000 $ 634,125 $ 74,125 100"0 113°/.
Revenues
I
DOC Measure 57 217,350 219,240 1,890 100% 101%
State Miscellaneous 4,301 4,301 -100% 100%
I
Alternate Incarceration 30,918 (30,918) 100% 0%
State Subsidy 13,000 13,826 826 100% 106%
SB 1145 2,855,659 2,748,556 (107,103) 100% 96%
i Probation Work Crew Fees 24,000 19,120 (4,880) 100% 80%
Miscellaneous 4,100 2,882 (1,218) 100% 70%
I Electronic Monitoring Fee 170,000 133,523 (36,477) 100% 79%
Probation Superv. Fees 200,000 185,864 (14,136) 100% 93%
Interest on Investments 9,000 6,161 (2,839) 100% 68%
1 Interfund -Sheriff 50,000 50,000 -100% 100%
Crime Prevention Grant 50,000 50,000 -100% 100%
CFC-Domestic Violence 74,832 74,834 2 100% 100%
Total Revenues 3,703,160 3,508,307 (194,853) 100·/0 95%
Transfers In·General Fund 338,292 338,292 -100% 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES 4,601,452 4,480,725 (120,727) 100% 97".
REQUIREMENTS: I Exp·%1
Expenditures
Personal Services 3,168,688 3,053,235 115,453 100% 96%
Materials and Services 886,890 768,464 118,426 100% 87%
Capital Outlay 100 100 100% 0%
Transfers Out 28,800 28,800 -100% 100%
Contingency 516,974 516,974 100% n/aI
I
l TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,601,452 3,850,499 750,953 100% 84%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 630,226 630,226i
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 570,000 I
Page 10
I
I
CHILDREN & FAMILIES COMMISSION
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
Year to Date
Budget 1 Actual I Variance JFY% J Coli. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 467,111 $ 556,143 $ 89,032 100% 119%
Revenues
Federal Grants 299,488 290.393 (9.095) 100% 97%
Title IV -Family Sup/Pres 39,329 39,534 205 100% 101%
HealthyStart Medicaid 95,000 64,197 (30,803) 100% 68%
Level 7 Services 257,982 196,898 (61,084) 100% 76%
State Prevention Funds 24,500 92,301 67,801 100% 377%
HealthyStart /R-S-G 311,838 258,203 (53,635) 100% 83%
OCCF Grant 545,203 509,825 (35,378) 100% 94%
Program Fees 5,813 5,813 100% n/a
Charges for Svcs-Misc 8,000 2,887 (5,113) 100% 36%
Court Fines &Fees 78,000 86,656 8,656 100% 111%
Interest on Investments 5,000 4.517 (483) 100% 90%
Donations 71 71 100% n/a
Interfund Grants 120,875 320,874 199,999 100% 265%
Total Revenues 1,785,215 1,872,169 86,954 100% 105%
Trans from General Fund 272,964 272,960 100% 100%
~4~
Total Transfers In 272,964 272,960 (4) 100% 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES 2,525,290 2,701,272 175,982 100% 107%
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Capital Outlay
Contingency
605,119
1,686,979
100
233,088
590.181
1,536,106
14.938
150,873
100
233,088
I EXP·%I
100% 98%
100% 91%
100% 0%
100% n/a
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,525,286 2,126,287 398,999 100% 84%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 4 574,985 574,981
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 511,9941
Page 11
SOLID WASTE
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/2112012)
Year to Date
Final Budget I Actual I Variance I FY% I Coil. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 1,092,508 $ 1,141.691 $ 49,183 100% 105%
Revenues
Miscellaneous 22,000 19,405 (2,595) 100% 88%
Franchise 3% Fees 200,000 209,954 9,954 100% 105%
Commercial Disp. Fees 860,000 871,580 11,580 100% 101%
Private Disposal Fees 1,314,000 1,319,273 5,273 100% 100%
Franchise Disposal Fees 4,000,000 3,881,491 (118,509) 100% 97%
Yard Debris 73,000 92,652 19,652 100% 127%
Special Waste 25,000 5,752 (19,248) 100% 23%
Interest 7,500 10,430 2,930 100% 139%
Leases 1 9,494 9,493 100% n/a
Donations 2,880 2,880 100% n/a
Sale of Reportable Assets 16,494 16,494 100% n/a
Recydables 30,000 78,473 48,473 100% 262%
Bond Issuance 5,034,300 5,044,437 10,137 100% 100%
Premium 158,434 148,507 ~9,927~ 100% 94%
Total Revenues 11,724,235 11,710,820 (13,415) 100% 100·/.
TOTAL RESOURCES 12,816,743 12,852,511 35,768 100·"{' 100%
REQUIREMENTS
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Debt Service
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out-Road
Trans Out.Post Closure
Trans Out-Equip Reserve
Trans Out·Capital Res
Contingency
1,671,598
3,086,472
6,075,547
202,000
285,773
400,000
250,000
424,000
421,353
1,605,396
2,913,661
5,992,804
173,407
285,773
400,000
250,000
424,000
66,202
172,811
82,743
28,593
421,353
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
96%
94%
99%
86%
100%
100%
100%
100%
n/a
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 12,816,743 12,045,041 771,702 100% 94°"
NET (Resources -Requirements) 807,470 807,470
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 700,5131 Page 12
RISK MANAGEMENT
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELlMINA
% Coli.
RESOURCES:
Beginning Net Working Capital $2,100,000 $2,039,937 ($60,063) 100°.4 97°.4
Revenues
Inter-fund Charges:
General Liability 250,855 250,855 100% 100%
Property Damage 311,633 311,633 100% 100%
Vehicle 178,310 178,310 100% 100%
Workers' Compensation 1,473,944 1,477,736 3,792 100% 100%
Unemployment 252,433 254,862 2,429 100% 101%
Claims Reimb-Workers' Compensation 5,000 548 (4,452) 100% 11%
Claims Reimb-Gen LiablProperty 20,000 65,338 45,338 100% 327%
Process Fee-Events/Parades 1,500 2,295 795 100% 153%
Miscellaneous 50 (50) 100% 0%
Skid Car Training 18.000 14,140 (3,860) 100% 79%
Interest on Investments 15,000 13,844 (1,156) 100% 92%
Other Interest 50 (50) 100% 0%
TOTAL REVENUES 2,526,775 2,569,562 42,787 100% 102%
Transfers In-General Fund 200,000 200,000 100% 100%
TOTAL RESOURCES 4,826,775 4,809,498 (17,277) 100% 100%
Appropriations/Expenditures I %Exp. I
Direct Insurance Costs:
GENERAl LIABILITY
5201 Settlement / Benefit 123,280
5202 Defense 218,523
5203 Professional Service 11,750
5204 Insurance 131.691
5205 Loss Prevention 6,506
5207 Repair I Replacement 5.517
Total General Liability 475,000 497,268 (22,268) 100% 105%
PROPERTY DAMAGE
5204 Insurance 116,418
5207 Repair I Replacement 71,292
Total Property Damage 300,000 187,710 112,290 100% 63%
VEHICLE
5203 Professional Service 157
5204 Insurance 376
5205 Loss Prevention 17,252
5207 Repair I Replacement 84,146
Total Vehicle 100,000 101,932 (1,932) 100% 102%
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
5201 Settlement I Benefit 939,522
5203 Professional Service 5,000
5204 Insurance 108,993
5205 Loss Prevention 49,204
5206 Miscellaneous 44,357
Total Workers' Compensation 1,200,000 1,147,075 52,925 100°.4 96"0
5201 UNEMPLOYMENT -SettlementiBenefits 250,000 215,051 34,949 100% 86%
Total Direct Insurance Costs 2,325,000 2.149,035 175,965 100% 92%
Insurance Administration:
Personal Services 294,357 274,762 19,595 100% 93%
Materials & Service 169,425 137,711 31,714 100% 81%
Capital Outlay 100 100 100% 0%
Total Insurance Administration 463,882 412,472 51,410 100% 8g<l1o
Transfers Out 7,200 7,200 100% 100%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,796,082 2,568,708 227,374 100% 92%
NET 2,030,693 2.240,791 210,098 Page 13
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 2,000,000 I
DESCHUTES COUNTY 911
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
RESOURCES:
Year to Date
Actual Variance
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 6,400,000 $ 7,559,639 $ 1,159,639 100% 118%
Revenues
Property Taxes -Current 5,983,773 6,253,780 270,007 100% 105%
Property Taxes -Prior 200,000 288,923 88,923 100% 144%
Federal Grants 184,578 184,578 100% nla
State Reimbursement 54,000 29,717 (24,283) 100% 55%
Telephone User Tax 750,000 774,298 24,298 100% 103%
Grant -Sunriver Serv Dist 22,500 22,500 100% nla
Data Network Reimb. 27,200 34,698 7,498 100% 128%
Jefferson County 35,000 29,809 (5,191 ) 100% 85%
User Fee 52,000 8,625 (43,375) 100% 17%
Police RMS User Fees 199,000 209,196 10,196 100% 105%
Contract Payments 32,000 33,061 1,061 100% 103%
Miscellaneous 9,000 10,712 1,712 100% 119%
Contracted Training 4,943 4,943 100% nla
Interest 35,000 54,780 19,780 100% 157%
Interest on Unsegregated Tax 800 633 (167) 100% 79%
Donations 750 750 100% n/a
Total Revenues 7,377,773 7,941,002 563,229 100% 108%
TOTAl RESOURCES 13,777,773 15,500,641 1,722,868 100% 113%
REQUIREMENTS:
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Services
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Contingency
4,240,834
1,927,356
1,134,620
500,000
5,974.963
3,824,724
1,750,150
551,676
500,000
416,110
177,206
582.944
5.974,963
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
% Exp·1
90%
91%
49%
100%
n/a
TOTAl REQUIREMENTS 13,777,773 6,626,550 7,151,223 100% 48%
NET (Resources Requirements) 8,874,091 8,874,091
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 8,000,000 I
Page 14
Health Benefits Trust
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8121/2012)
Actual
RESOURCES
Beg. Net Working Capital
Revenues:
Internal Premium Charges
prr Emp -Add'i Prem
Employee Prem Contribution
COIC
Retiree 1 COBRA Co-Pay
Fees for Clinic Services
Federal Payment (ERRP)
Prescription Rebates
Claims Reimbursements
Vending Machines (Wellness Rebate)
Interest
S 15.500.000 S
12,015,711
50,000
630,000
1,260,000
500,000
80,000
15.829.888 S
12,070,571
30,821
602,405
1,230,390
835,024
200
150,431
127,342
654,056
111
99,992
329.888
54,860
(19,179)
(27,595)
(29,610)
335,024
200
150,431
127,342
654,056
111
19,992
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
100%
62%
96%
98%
167%
nfa
nJa
nJa
nfa
nfa
125%
Total Revenues 14.535.711 15.801.341 1.265,633 100% 109%
TOTAL RESOURCES 30,035,711 31.631.233 1.595,522 92% 105%
REQUIREMENTS ! EXP.%!
Expenditures:
Personal Services 151,218 142.448 8,770 100% 94%
IIIltterlais &Services
Claims Paid-Medical/Rx 13,518,284 12,954,554 563,730 100% 96%
Claims Paid-DentallVision 2,019,974 1,912,285 107,689 100% 95%
Refunds (149,503) 149,503 100% nla
Insurance Expense 350,000 355,451 (5,451 ) 100% 102%
State Assessments 150,000 155,263 (5,263) 100% 104%
Administration Fee 320,000 318,485 1,515 100% 100%
PPOFee 50,000 48,922 1,078 100% 98%
Health Impact 55,000 51,621 3,380 100% 94%
Other -Administration 62,318 113,432 (51,114) 100% 182%
Other -Wellness 78,844 28,852 49,992 100% 37%
Admin &Wellnes. 16,755.638 15.931,810 823,828 100% 95%
Deschutes On-site Clinic
Healthstat 957,200 736,901 220,299 100% 77%
MedicationsiOrugsIVacc 325,000 141,871 183,129 100% 44%
Medical Supplies 3,000 23,888 (20,888) 100% 796%
Equipment 4,000 150 3.850 100% 4%
Miscellaneous 5,450 10,795 (5,345} 100% 198%
Total DOC 1.2M•• 913,604 381,046 100% 71%
Deschutes On-site Pharmacy
Medications/DrugsIVacc 115.439 (115.439, 100% nJa
Remodeling Costs 152,157 (152,157} 100% nla
Total Pharmacy
Capital Outlay
Contingency
200
11,985,223
267,596 (267.596)
200
11,985,223
100%
100%
100%
nJa
nfa
nla
TOTAL EXPENDtREQUIREMNTS 30,035.711 17,113.010 12,931,471 100% 57%
NET (Resources· Requirements) 14.518.223 14.526.993
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 13,800.000 I
Page 15
Deschutes County -Fair and Expo Center
YTD-Budget Basis Commissioners
Statement of Financial Operating Data
Year Ended June 30, 2012
(PRELIMINARY AS OF 8/21/2012)
Year to Date
Budget I Actual I Variance IFY % IColi. %
RESOURCES:
Beg. Net Working Capital $ 75,000 $ (40,601) S (115,601) 100"1. -54%
Receipts:
Special Events Revenues 605,000 530,870 (74,130) 100% 88%
Interest 1,500 158 (1,342) 100% 11%
Storage 58,000 37,015 (20,985) 100% 64%
Camping at F & E 6,000 19,240 13,240 100% 321%
Horse Stall Rental 30,000 27,116 (2,885) 100% 90%
Concession % -Food 220,000 141,940 (78,060) 100% 65%
Rights (Signage, etc.) 112,000 124,000 12,000 100% 111%
Grants 33,424 33,424 100% nfa
Interfund Contract 47,000 47,000 -100% 100%
Miscellaneous 6,807 10,491 3,684 100% nfa
Total Receipts 1,086,307 971,254 (115,053) 100% 89%
Transfers In
General Fund (001 ) 170,000 370,000 100% 218%
Room Tax (160) 25,744 25,744 100% 100%
Welcome Center (170) 82,800 82,800 100% 100%
Annual County Fair (619) 220,000 220,000 -100% 100%
Reserve Fund (617) 100 100,000 99,900 100%
Total Transfers In 498,644 798,544 99,900
GF Appropriation Transfer 97,295
TOTAL RESOURCES 1,757,246 1,729,197 (28,049) 100% 98%
REQUIREMENTS: 1 Exp. %1
Expenditures:
Personal Services 846,018 819,339 26,679 100% 97%
Materials and Services 786,060 751,109 34,951 100% 102%
Debt Service 115,068 113,695 1,373 100% 99%
Capital Outlay 100 100 100% 0%
Total Expenditures 1,747,246 1,684,142 63,104
Transfers Out -Reserve Fund' 10,000 10,000 -100% 100%
Contingency -100% nfa
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,757,246 1,694,142 63,104 100% 99%
NET (Resources -Requirements) 35,055 35,055
Beg NWC per FY 2013 Budget 46,373 1
Page 16
i Deschutes County and CSDs
Comparison of Actual and Budgeted Beginning Net Working Capital
July 1, 2012
PRELIMINARY, as of 8/10/2012· Additional FY 2012 Revenues and Expenditures WILL BE recorded
Contingency,
Reserve for
Future Exp &
Fund # BUDGETED ACTUAL $ Difference % Difference UnappropriatedFund Name
I,
1 811012012
I
I
Deschutes County and CSDs
Comparison of Actual and Budgeted Beginning Net Working Capital
July 1. 2012
PRELIMINARY, as of 8/10/2012· Additional FY 2012 Revenues and Expenditures WILL BE recorded
Contingency.
Reserve for
Future Exp &
Fund # Fund Name BUDGETED ACTUAL $ Difference % Difference Unappropriated
PROJECT FUNDS
-~142-Genelin5ountYProjects -~-1 ,406.-060----t.770~480__ 370~480--2ifS"%1.605,036
462 North CoSvc-suiiding-300,000-570.090 2io;090 . 90.0% -313.513
... 613 -SOiidWaSte Cap Projects--~---1.279,463 .. -1.469.073--189.610 --. --14~8"10 -223.839
143 General Capital Reserve 1.711.000---1.71 f.395 ~---395--' --0.0% ---222,281
~O--[ocallmpr District -------~.. -169,872 ---_--169.~-'~-.. --(26,-. 0.0% ----:!3J'i.?~_
-457-Jamison7.:Cq & Remodel - -~---590,000-540.764 (49.236) --·8,3%--
4.E>3 __£a_mells imel"()"emE!.ri!--~7.s:6.000 __ -~_-629Z~0 __(I?Q.2~0)~ -·16JJ:~~~=_}!2,7~~
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
-500-Fairgrounds OS ---~ 250.066------:ff3.431 ... --63~431-~-.... 25.4'*,------10-0.-000
560--PUbiiCSafety 05--' -3f3]OO·········~-·-~:371.950 -58.950'_18:~% ~_ 150.000
-731 Bend Library OS-145.000 169,379 24.379 16_8% -58.206
-575PERS DIS ...... J3t1JQ<[=---'-98.83~_ - -11.833 13.6% ---87,000
-524---Li52007 (BOTe) 7.851-7.85f----N/A'48,277
--5:25-LID 2009 (BOTC)---. ---5.955-' ---5.955 --N/A ---------zz.725
-751--sunriveriJbraryOS__ ~i§,()6o_-,~ -17,368 -----2~308 --15.4% ----~ 8,000
-530 COD Bldg OS 13,000 -~15.237-----2.237 --jzj%____=_ 12.60Q
539 Full Faith & Credit 2008 -121.000-----122:s9if--~-f;S9C)· -.--. 1.3%
535 Full Faith & Credit 2003 45.000----46]18-1,318 -·----2.9% ---32,413
... 541--'FliliF8.lih&Credit. 201() -168.000-169.238-T238 ~-----(fio/~--190.868
-536Full Faith & Credit200S---~ 3,600 . --4.146 ----546-~--15.2%-'-3.200
40--HHS/BJCCDS --------. 8,500 . ----8,930-----430--5.1%-8.050
38 Full Faith & Credit 2007 ~~Ooo ---..... ~_-'.273,287-~@~!1.3)__ ---=8!~--=~-~.?§a.oOO ..
-----..... ~~,-,-.-~------.-.. -~--------,,---------------~--.
RESERVE FUNDS
611 La::':'nd~fi'"'II=-=C::-lo-s-ur~e -----~--9H.158 973~73-1-~ 62,5~--6.9%---340,158
614 Solid Waste Equip Res 101.429-~-149,766 48.337 ...... 47.7%:---W3.324
140-'· ~··Development ---......~--~2,953,581······-~·2:996~····· 43.333 ··-T.5%.-~-=~4381687
703 LED County Capital Reserve "'-~-;a54--_321 ,O~_1.177 ....._~ 0.4%_ ....~.
.612' Landfill Postclosure 512,203 512,707 504 0.1%514,203
135 .. PERS Reserve ..-.~,-_....11,390,000 ---11~,390A9'1'---~""""-0.00/0 -9,664.000
721ExtenSion4-HBld9Res---~-277,150--277,593--~-443---0.2% ~,800
-114-A&T ReserVe---~=_~ 535,00() .. 535,351· --~--6:1%· -346.923
-710-Des Co 9~Equip Res 1.800,000 1 ,800.170 -~17O;--------O:O%--2.304,000
335~dlmprovementRes--~-----T2.i84-----12.19O 6 ....... 0.0%--------:ro:284
--261-~bepartment Reserve 427,135 426,754(381)-----::0:1%-·-370.139
-~704 LED Rural CapjuiiReserve-·f,162.351 ·-----T.f6'1.777 ... (574):---0.0% ----.
111---COurt Technology Reserve ____~. __ !ii.107 ~-51,010=----(697f---~-:.~-_~_51. 707
~:countYWide Trans SOC . 455,790 454,125 (1.665). -0.4% , 583.290
-617 Fair&ExpoCenlerReserVe~---650.082-----554.744 -~(95.338r--·14~-578.082
._ 256 -Communication Sy~fR~~.. _~-=_.... ~__... ..--____~___ --NlA.--. ___ ?01.000
Total 7.167,585 ' 75.638,473
811012012
DRAFT -August 28, 2012
County Administrator Interview Panels
4 panels: BOCC as one panel, 3 other panels (8-10 members each).
Elected Department Heads
I. Larry
2. Patrick
3. Marty
4. Scot
5. Nancy
6. Charles
Non-Elected Department Heads
I. Timm
2. Tom
3. Chris
4. Mark
5. Debbie
6. Susan
7. Scott
8. Ken
9. David Givans
10. Joe S.
11. Dan
12. Hillary
13. Ed
14. Keith
Other Key Staff
I. Erik
2. Dave l.
3. Anna
Comm un ity/Other Partners
1. Bend Cham ber and other cham bers?
2. Rep. from Redmond
3. Rep. from La Pine
4. Rep. from Sisters
5. Rep. from Bend
6. COVA
7. EDCO
8. COBA
9. Mike Maier
10. ODOT -Bob Bryant
II. Courts -judge or Jeff Hall
12. Health care representative
Others to consider: Dennis Luke, Brad Bailey, Tim Moore, Bonnie Baker, 911 E board chair (Chief Sale).
l