Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSecure Rural Schools DocsSTATEMENT BY THE Partnership for Rural America Campaign An Initiative of the NATIONAL FOREST COUNTIES AND SCHOOLS COALITION On the NATIONAL FOREST COUNTY REVENUE, SCHOOLS AND JOBS ACT OF 2011 The Partnership for Rural America Campaign supports the key concepts underlying the "discussion draft" of the bill that is the subject of the September 22,2011 hearing scheduled by the House Natural Resources Committee. The discussion draft is a good ftrst step in the process towards an acceptable long-tenn solution to the National Forests management and schools and counties funding conundrum. The Coalition, since its inception, has supported a return to more active management of our National Forests, in part to assure that timber and other resource sales receipts to be shared with schools and counties are adequate, and dependable. It is also critically important for ftre resiliency and overall forest health. The Coalition has also continuously advocated for renewal of the recognition by our Federal government of the central role that resource based industries play in rural communities throughout the Country. The discussion draft bill meets these twin standards for Coalition and Partnership support, by offering both an assured revenue stream to counties and schools, and required timber harvest levels to support local industries. The Partnership is also supportive of the bridge funding provision in the discussion draft. It is imperative that support for rural schools and county services continue until increased forest management provisions are fully implemented. In addition we request that Counties be given total local control in how the county's share of the National Forest County Revenue, Schools and Jobs Act of2011 may be expended. The Partnership is impressed with the work of the House Natural Resources Committee to date and looks forward to the further development of the discussion draft into a ftnal bill which is ready to be addressed by Congress. The Partnership urges the Committee and all interested members of Congress to proceed with all deliberate speed to conclude work on development and adoption of a long tenn solution. Partnership for Rural America Campaign To: Individuals communicating with the House Natural Resources Committee post September 22, 2011 Hearing From: Marc Kelley, Partnership for Rural America Campaign Re: Process for Communicating with the Committee and Members of the Committee Date: September 27, 20 II Following the Hearing on Thursday oflast week, we have ten business days (including the day of the Hearing) to respond in writing to the Discussion Draft that was released at the Hearing. That means we have until close of business Wednesday, October 5th to submit our comments. The format for communication will need to be as follows: I. Use your own letterhead 2. Use word formatting 3. Address correspondence to Chairman Rob Bishop and Ranking Member Raul Grijalva. (The draft letter attached provides a format for addressing the Chair and Ranking Member.) 4. Send letter to the email addresses of staff for the Chair and Ranking Member. In the case of the Chair Bishop the letter should be sent to: Tyler Hamman tyler.hamman@mail.house.gov In the case of Ranking Member Grijalva please address to: David Watkins david.watkins@mail.house.gov 5. Carbon copy to, at a minimum, the member or members of the Committee you know are aware and interested in this issue. For members that are not on the committee please feel free to carbon copy to them as well. We will leave it in your competent hands to determine the staffer to receive those e-mails. 6. Blind carbon copy me: Marc Kelley policy@marckelley.com Also please find attached a copy of the Campaign's position on the Draft Legislation that was presented to the Committee and is now a part of the formal record. If you have questions, do not hesitate to contact me. This is a real chance for the Campaign to provide assistance to the House Natural Resources Committee. Board of Coun Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 200· Bend, OR 97701-1960 [541] 388-6570· Fax [541] 385-3202 www.co.deschutes.or.us board@co.deschutes.or.usOctober 3,2011 Tammy Baney Anthony DeBone Alan Unger The Honorable Rob Bishop, Chair National Parks, Forests and Public Lands Subcommittee 1324 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairman Bishop, We want to express our gratitude to the Committee for holding a second hearing on the critical issue of public forest land management and the relevance of reauthorizing the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act. We strongly believe that there must be adjustments to Forest Service land management practices to ensure much-needed job creation and a sustained revenue stream to counties from all environmentally sound activities on these lands. From our perspective, it is difficult to overstate the value of the draft legislation's current language that documents the importance that resource-based industries play in the employment and viability of rural communities across the country as well as the role they play in the protection of our nation's watersheds and wildlife habitat. The draft legislation also makes it clear that a new approach to forest management is vital for fire resiliency and overall forest health. Thank you! We further appreciate that the legislation recognizes the need for bridge funding so that counties and schools can continue basic and vital services while revised forest management plans are developed and implemented. We encourage you to include a stated number of years and a funding amount for the transition payments the Committee is recommending. We appreciate that the Committee understands that it will take time to engage the US Forest Service in active land management. Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost-Effective Manner Finally, we would offer two suggestions. First, we suggest that the Committee consider modifying the definition of biomass relative to include biomass from public lands so that biomass from slash piles and similar potential resources can count towards renewable energy standards. This will provide the certainty that private investors need to build biomass plants in counties near National Forest lands. Second, we would ask that you consider adding some flexibility language to accommodate the need for counties to use their allocated dollars under Title I for activities beyond the maintenance of county roads. As you are aware, when the Act was originally conceived in the early 1900s, the primary and many times exclusive responsibility of county governments was the maintenance of roads. In today's world, that language is too restrictive since counties are responsible for providing a wide variety of other services. Once again, thank you for your continued efforts on our behalf. We are impressed with the work of the House Natural Resources Committee to date and stand ready to work with you in preparation of a final Bill that can be addressed by the Committee and passed by the full House. Sincerely, The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Tammy Baney, Chair Tony DeB one, Vice Chair Alan Unger, Commissioner October 3, 2011 Board of Coun Commissioners 1300 I'JW Wall St, Suite 200· Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570· Fax (541) 385-3202 www.co.deschutes.or.us board@co.deschutes.or.us Tammy Baney Anthony DeB one Alan Unger The Honorable Raul Grijalva, Ranking Member National Parks, Forests and Public Lands Subcommittee 1324 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Ranking Member Grijalva, We want to express our gratitude to the Committee for holding a second hearing on the critical issue of public forest land management and the relevance of reauthorizing the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act. We strongly believe that there must be adjustments to Forest Service land management practices to ensure much-needed job creation and a sustained revenue stream to counties from all environmentally sound activities on these lands. From our perspective, it is difficult to overstate the value of the draft legislation's current language that documents the importance that resource-based industries play in the employment and viability of rural communities across the country as well as the role they play in the protection of our nation's watersheds and wildlife habitat. The draft legislation also makes it clear that a new approach to forest management is vital for fire resiliency and overall forest health. Thank you! We further appreciate that the legislation recognizes the need for bridge funding so that counties and schools can continue basic and vital services while revised forest management plans are developed and implemented. We encourage you to include a stated number of years and a funding amount for the transition payments the Committee is recommending. We appreciate that the Committee understands that it will take time to engage the US Forest Service in active land management. Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost-Effective Manner Finally, we would offer two suggestions. First, we suggest that the Committee consider modifying the definition of biomass relative to include biomass from public lands so that biomass from slash piles and similar potential resources can count towards renewable energy standards. This will provide the certainty that private investors need to build biomass plants in counties near National Forest lands. Second, we would ask that you consider adding some flexibility language to accommodate the need for counties to use their allocated dollars under Title I for activities beyond the maintenance of county roads. As you are aware, when the Act was originally conceived in the early 1900s, the primary and many times exclusive responsibility of county governments was the maintenance of roads. In today's world, that language is too restrictive since counties are responsible for providing a wide variety of other services. Once again, thank you for your continued efforts on our behalf. We are impressed with the work of the House Natural Resources Committee to date and stand ready to work with you in preparation of a final Bill that can be addressed by the Committee and passed by the full House. Sincerely, The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Tammy Baney, Chair Tony DeBone, Vice Chair Alan Unger, Commissioner