Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-11-30 Work Session MinutesDeschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF WORK SESSION DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009 Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Dennis R. Luke and Alan Unger. Also present were Dave Kanner, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Dave Inbody, Assistant to the Administrator; Joe Studer, County Forester; Judith Ure, Administration/Grant Writer; Marty Wynne, Finance; Hillary Borrud of The Bulletin; and five other citizens. Chair Baney opened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of FEMA/OEM Grant. Joe Stutler asked for Board approval and signatures of various letters and documents for grants for wildfire mitigation efforts. The match amounts have been addressed through work already accomplished. LLTKE: Move Chair signature. UNGER: Second. VOTE: LLTKE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 2. Monthly Finance Update. Marty Wynne said the LGIP is down to .70. The 2% amount previously negotiated expires soon, so it will drop to .95 or lower. The average interest is 1.85 for the past few months, and 1.2 was budgeted, so that amount remains over budget at this point. Tax collections are about the same as last year at this time. The Clerk's numbers are up some, but many of the recordings are a result of foreclosure activity. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, November 30, 2009 Page 1 of 6 Pages Room tax revenue is slightly higher than expected. Community Development's revenue projection has dropped from $390,000 to $290,000. Regarding Health Benefits, the projection is for about 11% expenses. These expenses are not expected for the most part, since there are 2,400 people covered and it is not possible to know what claims will come in. The Fair & Expo fund indicates a negative net due to operating revenues and expenses. In regard to capital projects, the OSP/911 project is coming in under budget due to the economy and lower bids. Regarding the proceeds from the Teater trust as handled through attorney Karnopp, part of it has been disbursed to the two humane societies. The property is being held until 2013, at which time it is hoped that the market will be better. 3. Letter of Support for Sisters Microenterprise Zone Grant. Erik Kropp said that the City of Sisters is seeking a grant to increase staff to handle this outreach. LUKE: Move signature. UNGER: Second. VOTE: LUKE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. 4. Discussion of Request for Letter of Support for HousingWorks — HUD Housing Choice Vouchers. LUKE: Move signature. UNGER: Second. VOTE: LUKE: Yes. UNGER: Yes. BANEY: Chair votes yes. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, November 30, 2009 Page 2 of 6 Pages 5. Application Discussion regarding Leave Policy. Appropriate time for leave without pay; and unscheduled leave. Chair Baney said that she feels the policy is fair, because these kinds of actions affect the other employees in the department. Some minor wording changes were suggested. Commissioner Luke was not yet ready to vote on this policy. 6. Discussion of Lechner Estates Lot Line Issues: The Way Forward. Mr. Kanner gave a brief overview of the issue, per his staff report. Laurie Craghead said that there are limits as to what kind of lot line adjustments can be done. Some parcels could be reduced by 10% or more. It is assumed that all are legal lots of record. A private surveyor would have to be hired by the property owners to draw up deed descriptions. By statute, the County surveyor cannot do this since it would be helping to correct a private contract issue. The County surveyor is required to review the surveys, however. A lot line adjustment is a land use issue and an application is necessary. Everyone in the development has to agree to do this and all lot lines adjusted at the same time. It is problematic as if one property owner will not participate, he or she cannot be forced to comply. It has been said that some owners have not been able to sell their property because of this issue. Everett Turner, a real estate broker, stated that some lenders will loan and some won't, based on their internal policies. Title companies do not seem to be aware of this issue and do not physically inspect properties. Other areas have the same problem, originating prior to the 1970's. Chair Baney asked who is ultimately responsible. Mr. Kanner said it is the property owners. All of the existing deeds would have to be transferred to an entity that will in turn provide the revised deeds. Mr. Turner said that he is not confident they will get compliance from all property owners. He suggested bringing in someone from a State agency that might have run into this problem before. The quoted figures are just estimates. Mr. Kanner stated that this is not the County's problem to solve. A roadmap has been provided and the County can help to a point, but the key issue is money. It is an expensive solution and there is not much flexibility on the costs. The County could contribute the lot that it owns. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, November 30, 200 Page 3 of 6 Pages Commissioner Luke said that the County surveyor should be able to reduce the fee. Mr. Kanner stated that the fee is statutory and cannot be used to benefit private property owners. There are at least 41 lots affected by this issue. George Cook said that the survey was done in the 1950's by a logging engineer, who set the pins. The BLM came in 1960 and set brass caps. He has been surveying in the County since the 1960's and won't work in that area. The only way to resolve this is to hire a surveyor, put it all in a metes and bounds descriptions, and have every owner indicate where they think their property lines area. It will have to be set up by an entity such as the County. Most of the people won't or cannot pay for this kind of thing. Chair Baney asked if this might be something for Neighborlmpact to handle. Mr. Kanner was not sure. Ken Mulenex owns property in the development, and as worked with some property owners. They got within two or there people short of the 41. Money is an issue for most of these people. Some people are getting by without any change. There has to be a way to force everyone to comply. Many live outside of the area. Mr. Mulenex said that he got is title insurance and paid for it when he bought his property. Most people feel that the County should have some ownership of the problem. Ms. Craghead said that the County really doesn't have a way to force the owners to comply. It would be a taking and a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Mr. Mulenex stated that Dave Bancroft, a part of the group, found in California where there was a similar problem. They wrote an ordinance establishing the historical boundaries. Mr. Kanner said that this was examined and Oregon law prohibits this. Elaine Grove said her home foreclosed today. She wanted to get a reverse mortgage and cannot do so because of this problem. There is no recorded ingress or egress. Mr. Turner stated that Neighborlmpact is going to try to help her stay in her home. Commissioner Unger stated that he hopes the County can help solve this problem. Good, visual data is needed to help the property owners understand how this affects them. Commissioner Luke feels the County should provide an up to date aerial and overlay the maps. Mr. Kanner said the photo is only a few years old and shows very well how badly the boundaries are off. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, November 30, 2009 Page 4 of 6 Pages At this time, the group looked at the oversized maps. Mr. Bancroft will contact Mike Berry, the previous County surveyor, about the issue and whether another aerial photography that is clearer would be feasible this time of the year. Chair Baney will contact the Attorney General's Office to see if there is a solution from the State. Chair Baney said that perhaps some kind of ordinance could be developed to address this issue on a County level. Mr. Kanner stated that this kind of issue is not uncommon, and he worries about the precedence of solving lot line issues for everyone. There will be additional expenses and workload for Community Development and County Counsel; the Commissioners indicated that funds would be found for this. Commissioner Luke said that the County supported Sunriver Sewer District's attempts to expand. This would set the standard for any other subdivision that has a similar problem. Ms. Craghead stated that the Sunriver issue was tied to public health. In addition, there is the question about how the cost of the lot line adjustments will be handled. Commissioner Luke said that the aerial is the first step. Chair Baney said that a text amendment will be a roadmap for anyone else who needs to address a similar problem. Commissioner Luke notec that the County cannot pay for this whole thing but can provide some guidance. Mr. Mulenex agreed that it is logical and the County appears to be on board finding a solution. Mr. Mulenex, Mr. Bancroft and Mr. Turner will help draft a letter. 7. Consideration of Discretionary Grant Applications. • Upper Deschutes River Coalition — Environmental Education Program Dave Inbody stated that they submitted an updated application for $2,900. The bulk of this is for educational brochures and a display board. Commissioner Luke granted $1,000 and Commissioner Unger granted $500 • Deschutes County 4-H Leaders Association — Aid to Economically Disadvantaged 4-H Youth This group asked for $23,000, but might be confused about this program and the community grant program. No funds were granted at this time. • St. Vincent de Paul — Community Assistance This request is for increased assistance to the community. Commissioner Luke granted $1,000 and Commissioner Unger granted $500. Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Monday, November 30, 200 ) Page 5 of 6 Pages • California Lutheran University Center for Economic Research & Forecasting — Central Oregon Economic Forecast Project This group has asked for $3,000. Chair Baney said that all of the local economic development groups are supportive of this project. She granted $1,000 and Commissioner Unger granted $500. 8. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules. The Bend MPO requested funding for a survey about household travel behavior, which costs $140,000. The City of Bend already declined it. The Commissioners declined as well. Chair Baney said she got a request from Bob Moore, a loaned employee working on the homeless count project. He is looking for a grant of $500. Commissioner Unger agreed to this grant. Mr. Kanner said that the December schedule is a tight one, and there are no meetings scheduled beyond December 16. He suggested the Board meet on December 21 as usual. Commissioners Unger and Baney agreed to meet on that date as well as on December 28 and 30 if needed. 9. Other Items. Being no further items addressed, the meeting adjourned at 3:35 p.m. DATED this 30th Day of November 2009 for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners. ATTEST: Recording Secretary Tammy Baney, Chair Dennis R. Luke, Vice Chair ctia4.t_ Alan Unger, Commissioner Minutes of Board of Commissioners' Work Session Page 6 of 6 Pages Monday, November 30, 2009 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org WORK SESSION AGENDA DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1:30 P.M., MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009 1. Discussion of FEMA/OEM Grant — Joe Stutler 2. Monthly Finance Update — Marty Wynne 3. Letter of Support for Sisters Microenterprise Zone Grant — Erik Kropp 4. Discussion of Request for Letter of Support for HousingWorks — HUD Housing Choice Vouchers — Erik Kropp 5. Application Discussion regarding Leave Policy — Erik Kropp 6. Discussion of Dustan Road Lot Line Issues: The Way Forward — Dave Kanner 7. Consideration of Discretionary Grant Applications — Dave Inbody • Upper Deschutes River Coalition — Environmental Education Program • Deschutes County 4-H Leaders Association — Aid to Economically Disadvantaged 4-H Youth • St. Vincent de Paul — Community Assistance • California Lutheran University Center for Economic Research & Forecasting — Central Oregon Economic Forecast Project 8. Update of Commissioners' Meetings and Schedules 9. Other Items PLEASE NOTE: At any time during this meeting, an executive session could be called to address issues relating to ORS 192.660(2) (e), real property negotiations; ORS 192.660(2) (h), pending or threatened litigation; or ORS 192.660(2) (b), personnel issues Meeting dates, times and discussion items are subject to change. All meetings are conducted in the Board of Commissioners' meeting rooms a 1300 NW Wall St., Bend, unless otherwise indicated. tfyou have questions regarding a meeting, please call 388-6572. Deschutes County meeting locations are wheelchair accessible. Deschutes County provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. For deaf, hearing impaired or speech disabled, dial 7-1-1 to access the state transfer relay service for TTY. Please call (541) 388-6571 regarding altemative formats or for further information. Monday, Nov. 30, 2009 Work Session ,� is 7.T Z N\ c O'P Monthly Meeting with Board of Commissioners Finance Director/Treasurer AGENDA November 30, 2009 (1) Monthly Investment Report (2) October 2009 Financials Investment Income Fiscal Year 2009-10 J 0 } $ 138,057 $ 643,804 138,057 643,804 (6,903) (32,190) Investment Income - Net I $ 131,154 $ 611,614 I GI 9 U 0 II Investments By County Function General $ 122,653,491 Total Investments $ 122,653,491 a F- auximaitawkidualluluL =In ' eschutes ount4 0/31 201 r • - - i1 - . ' 77! • _lT7ii 0 0 0' ooFEo 6 0 O CO O N O cri 0 CO C3) - C'> CO . CC) . s -- o5 C) (O M . 7. (.0 O L() N 'ct N r 00 05 O 0) U) r- N CO Ef3 a) Q o @ (6 Z U .` Q) t O 2 a) E o 0 E n E O O 0 0 F- U. S. Treasuries O 0 ( CC4 a) n U C O Q (9 'a-) a) Y C CL) LL LGIP/BOTC 122,653,491 69 Total Investments t c 0 2 c 0 L U d Q P CO O O C"7O C[) T N T • o CO Cl T T T N 0 ca 1a1 a E 0 U O O O 1.0 Co Cr)N O O O Average Maturity in Days u, �n 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 LC) o u) CO 0 O O N N N N T T l"' Time Certificates a) Q cn (9 a) CL O RS Z m • � E o E Q - o U 0 Total Portfolio: By Investment Types U 3 k na N 0 z E F Market Value O _O: O O' O O >.. O _U U _U'._UI_U U _U U )U U U _U'. U'',U''._U U U U U U _U U U O i m �' N N I M' In � U: m Z Z.--2:-.21-2 Z'Z Z Z.Z Z'Z ZZ'Z Z Z Z'Z Z Z Z Z Z O X10 C)C' O g. Z N 1 O O OI O N E, E' 0 1 (0 N V' 0 N. ' 00 Le) V C) N. V N' 0 0' 0 00 0 0 (0 ' 0 OV 0 0 0 00 �':0 0 0:0-'0: N' C) V V O U)':1- LO .. O V CO U) C)1, N' O U) I O . co O O OO co O O , O: O O' co O �'. V O U) Ti O (O U) (O'' (l O C) U): c0'',, of O: N. O N N O 00 O U) (O O O O N. 0: O O CD, O U), O' ' CO 0, V N N: 0 N. N. (0 U)! cr 0 CO (O CO CO: (n CO (n N. 0, 0' 0 0' N. CO 0 0 O' 0 ' U)'. U), U) -co N CO N CO CO 1- (O', I N OD 1-'V O'. (0 N co N CO V 0 0 O N. co O' O 0 C) N O N' O'. c U)'', co O O O, 0 d' N'I 1.0 co C) 1Z co:co. O. O O O V U) O. C) co O 01 O. O V' O C) OI N 05 O, U): N': O O V O' C) O: co c'7. V U)'. O 00 c0 0 NI N co OI (O •,-,,-, . O .— O.— O' 0 °I ,— O O'.— .—, O c3..- 0 0 0 O'I 0, O O �' O N N N N V, N V N' V.- 0. 0. 0.,_ N N N N N N N N N N N ' c0 C)' N OI O O 0. 0' V V (`')'. O' CO' C) en O1 O. O 0: 0: 0 O, (O c0 O. O' O, OI O'. O, O CO 0 CIO V O': O . O O I C " U) V . co c., co cv c`') c) O' O c) c, c:, O U) N c) Q I O c) 0 0 0 co O N R 0 0 0 0 O 00 '. O O C) O CO'. (n C) 0', V' O O. O N. O. O N O O', O O' 0, O O (O O I O' co. C) O' O O' VI 00' C) (OI O. en C) .- OI O. 0' N' co en O'. 00 00 (OI O. (0(0(0(0 (0 V V 1 N CO c, co U) �. c, O co O, —' ,t r-. OI N ', O,(O (0 f� , ',- (nc01(n'00 00I N C)'. N O 'fs- 0 C) N O N N O CI' ( Co, (n C) O CO- C) U) 0, U) (n CO (� ' .- O 0 1� U) 0' 0 0) 0 () (0- 0 OI 0 .- N 0''. 00 U)I CO. N O. d'' N' 0' .- U) �- O' N' .- 0 Oil 0: 0 0'.0) O � O'', O. O 0 X 1 0 O O: O. CY O' .- ' C) O O O I O O,- O O. O OI OI O, O O O N N N N ' V Cl' V Cl : d' N'' N N .-- N N N! N' Cl'': NI N ,- N N- N 0 0 0 0 0 0'. 0 0', C) 0 0 0. 0,010 : O O• c0'. O O O" O O O: O O O O I O O O c0 O N co O O O' O O O O' co O O O O O O: O c,'. O O O O O O'. O O O O O O. O O O O 0 0 0' O' O 0'' 0 0, co 0 0 c): 0 0' 0 0' N' O (0 O 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 O. O: 0:N- O' U 0: 0 O' CO CO CO' V 01 V O O C)C)I O 1 0' O O CO ((pp- N O N O' 0, 0 0 0 0: 0 O, O U)- O O O. O N CO CV: c0 0'. (0 O_ O 011 C) O: O O' O' V (")'. 0) (O: c0 OI O' O O O 0' O' O. O V O A 1 0 0' 0 (n, U) (0 O O' O O O OO O1 0 CO N. c0 01 0 0. O O O, O': O' O C)1 C O O! 0''. Tr, V co' V O' N O O O 01 O O 01 O O (OO O O O. O: O O' 01 o 0 V 1 OI W 1� OI O. O' Or 00001. 00!x. O O C.)!0': 00 O' 0� 0 O 0'I O' O 0!. O, N N N TF o4 V N TF �: N N NN N N1 N'. N: N;N1N N0 ,(V'N 9 a) _d A c 0 0. O U w tti O A u re 0 O, 10 O A Z' Il0 ea �z. W ta67: a) .5 3: Q 71. LL'. ro e e l e' e• e' e 0', 8' 0' O • O' CD! CD: 0 O' C) O O OI OI 0 O''.O O U) r - U)': ': O O'. O. O OI cnI Opi O' O': V • U) U)'. 001 U) U) U) U)1 ,t1 U) 0' In O 'C) N: C)IN N NII ���:N N C) O',e e'l 0'o 0 O U) O• U) (0 ' ' N. NI N, U) C) V V • e''ere e e 0 (0 e o:(OI,o:O O O O!(o O (1) N.. V' O. N O', C U) U), CD! cr' N' O O: N 0- U) 0 U) (n O 0 N. co N N co co C) N C) co U) ' C) C) Ti Ti r- e'', e'' e e 1' e e OR eco 0 0110,0o'o1O O'm'O C) O. O OI V'. co coO'. V OI N 1 O', O O CO CO C) co' r-- 0,1 N � N N N:'O O OR o 0 \'.. e. o 0 0. e o o 0 01010 O O 0 0 0 Tr U) O O''.O O O O, CO' CO O U)' � • N N N O.0 (1)I d'. • ' O C) O (0 U) e') : 0 oi U) N c O : O O 0L E x,00 U) �' :L ear N e e e e L1 CD o 0 0 (I ONO t` O N O N of N', J 0 O E1 C �I C c IwI m'. a) 0 1 >' �I I dlo m ' - a c E F I(0• 10, 10 0) ' 01N- 0 N. N co' co. O O' N. 10 0. co V O, co. O O O, O' O' 00I N. N. N. -. O , N 0)> 2 V ((0p co N O'I co V C) (0co: V V V C) 1, 10 co V ON O Tr I in C) C) C): N 1 C) V V' O C) 11 N In 0), C) N. (0': N C) N. C)11 (")I U) U) U) �'. U)', V 01 U) V U) 0-.U) to U) f-' fes' fes: I's! In to to In f. '1111 E C 010)0'' • 0 O OI O O O O O O 01i 0' O O O O O, O_ O 0I> 0 O 111' ,_ 00 (n', (n I �' N N OI O O V O. 41 fY: 0 O. N N C) (n O: m la I C (7 CV! C) 0— 0 — 01 O:— 0 0 N .— N. CI' O O O CO O N O.0 NIO N N'.N V • �' N N N 01 COI r V N. N. N. c0. 00 00))1 O) O 0': O N', NI C) r) i',5'.4 V' - (O ' > 14.. (�.) O I N,—• O. O', O O I O O O O'I O': O O O O I o''., o o C)! O. O, O' C)! O O O' O', Q I,. 0 0 m' 1' O CO1 0 N. O' 0)' O' c0 0) CO OI 01. O 00 0 O OI OI O O O 0) 0) O! O 0) 0) 0) CD O 0) I O' O O o10 O, OI O'Ol0 O O O 01.0'0!0 0 • U) f01V',- 0 O O O C) C' 00 0 0:01 0 O O10O' �l.('7'Vl co N 1�:N O (O 0 N. U)1 0 0. 0' O 0) 1 0,0) �N. .N V, N: (n ', 0) O) N O C) r- N N O N, O N O O CI N. N. N, ,. N N N O C) O N O 01 C) O N N. N (n N N N ....... I V V (`h V V.- O N (O- m V (0 10 . (O 11: 11: N N CO CO 0' 0 0' 0 (0'. 0 x':0'.0 0 01.000 00l0l00 0 0 0 0 1- 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 t C' ❑I'ala1zlz 01,0 0'0 0 0'010'.20 Q Q Z'Q"Q 01.0 ccccQ Q Q cc cc Zla''' F- F- 1 LL LL U U F- F- F- F- F- F- F-' I- LL H LL LL U LL LL H H LL LL LL LL LL: LL LL c) LL CO 0_ 'm a U I 0 a a 0_ UIm Q,m LL LLIZ LL caleaO u- ;I 2! .2 2! 2! 7,?Z Z Z1 J 7 LL' m'3 - ''0_'UIm m m 711 mJ m'0_ 23(n13,LL1LL7 0 u)10 0-v)I ci 0 ci(1) (1), stment Descri 10 N C) O C) N (0 coI U) co C) C)'' V (0 V: O U) F- ❑:' 0_100 Z'. F- o co 31 (n QQ J J CO'. (n LL. of v Y F-''.-, Q1I F- 2 U ;:l Y: ml 'O Q > > N:31 U :DI N O, z oI N, LL - U) O F-' Q: 1 co 2 Q Q O' '. >' 'I O 01 X X V CO X X' X N X LL O O, X. X CV 01 01 1. '' C) 1, C) C) C)- (O c) F— 00. (O O O C )'. ) C). 1 01 01 01 c7,8 co co N. co m' COCD M ) M ) C) M c7, c7, MMM M cc ❑ 0 01 z 0 U1:I 0 1 U 0 0 0 tee: 0 v C -0 U U, 0-0p 0 . i0 0: c10 0 o m o ''U �U ❑I ' m z Ulm N N 0 C) ' 010 0) m .3 3,� ciP v m U te._ >h se 11 c U a) a) c U Y a) f° c LL o a) cl(a CO o $ 15 �Io E E (°a)clE o a) m > a) > cr m m coo m j c: o o Q o 1 m¢ E m m ac`s 0 2 I, n EM <1<l< 1<< 0 0 m c 2 mm m 127,31:2':g (o m QQ 01 (0 v CO O T O {LLrco 1 7 --_t cL 1 E, Y c 1 c l— c ami c —I E J J 0-0 E 22,>: o: o o coco E. co -a co21, 0 2 2 o'LLI2I, E' o21 Z'Z'Z LLI LL12' oil- 11 V) J 7 LL I1 LL.>I F-; U1 m, CO m171 m'J': m LLL 2 LL LL 0 LL LL' 710 LL LL LL LL LL' LL. U O'I LLi O z O w J 1LL03,-mz1>r00.LI <LLZa0 '.. m m'',U:2 JLL'LL' NI n 71:7'3'[0 U U'LL wI rn'. n. _ Q� (0 :;' ml N. "(;'11. ir- d to to < • -.F. co i m (C (C Z I To -- 1 O ,, N c9 a N. 0 0 0 -,0 w1 m (c.0, -la i s E E' c:.,- i2 L' a N e E EL 6 a) F- N x10 0.014m1aa)) 01 E,N U O O E(n {--?_ .773 ]UULL1H7 m m''U 2J'LL N N 0 C • m: 1' Memorandum Date: November 13, 2009 To: Board of County Commissioners Dave Kanner, County Administrator From: Marty Wynne, Finance Director RE: Monthly Financial Reports Attached please find October 2009 financial reports for the following funds: General (001), Community Justice—Juvenile (230), Sheriffs (255, 701, 702), Public Health (259), Behavioral Health (275), Community Development (295), Road (325), Community Justice — Adult (355), Commission on Children & Families (370-399), Solid Waste (610), Insurance Fund (670), 9-1-1 (705) and Health Benefits Trust (675). The projected information has been reviewed and updated, where appropriate, by the respective departments. Cc: All Department Heads GENERAL FUND Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 6,050,000 $ 6,775,995 $ 725,995 100% 112% $ 6,050,000 $ 6,775,995 $ 725,995 Revenues Property Taxes 6,607,616 2,631,068 (3,976,548) 33% 13% a) 19,822,847 19,822,847 Gen. Rev. - excl. Taxes 973,821 1,569,227 595,406 33% 54% b) 2,921,462 2,921,462 Assessor 273,568 423,103 149,535 33% 52% c) 820,704 820,704 County Clerk 347,724 480,640 132,916 33% 46% d) 1,043,171 1,193,171 150,000 BOPTA 4,597 8,208 3,611 33% 60% c) 13,791 13,791 District Attorney 110,933 89,105 (21,828) 33% 27% 332,800 332,800 Finance/Tax 62,350 108,969 46,619 33% 58% c) 187,049 187,049 Veterans 23,397 (23,397) 33% 0% e) 70,192 70,192 Property Management 28,817 28,817 - 33% 33% 86,450 86,450 Grant Projects 667 667 33% 33% 2,000 2,000 Total Revenues 8,433,490 5,339,804 (3,093,686) 33% 21% 25,300,466 25,450,466 150,000 TOTAL RESOURCES 14,483,490 12,115,799 (2,367,691) 33% 39% 31,350,466 32,226,461 875,995 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Assessor County Clerk BOPTA District Attorney Finance/Tax Veterans Property Management Grant Projects Non -Departmental Contingency Exp. 1,096,877 1,021,502 75,375 33% 31% 3,290,631 3,290,631 486,901 415,125 71,776 33% 28% 1,460,704 1,460,704 19,903 17,917 1,986 33% 30% 59,708 59,708 1,529,088 1,453,556 75,532 33% 32% 4,587,263 4,587,263 - 248,824 258,639 (9,815) 33% 35% f) 746,471 746,471 75,234 71,554 3,680 33% 32% 225,701 225,701 79,895 77,126 2,769 33% 32% 239,685 239,685 35,224 33,806 1,418 33% 32% 105,673 105,673 537,669 246,551 291,118 33% 15% 1,613,006 1,493,006 120,000 2,031,571 2,031,571 33% 0% 6,094,713 6,094,713 6,141,186 3,595,776 2,545,410 33% 20% 18,423,555 12,208,842 6,214,713 Transfers Out 4,308,970 4,127,630 181,340 33% 32% 12,926,911 12,926,911 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 10,450,156 7,723,406 2,726,750 33% 25% 31,350,466 25,135,753 6,214,713 NET (Resources - Requirements) 4,033,334 4,392,393 359,059 - 7,090,708 7,090,708 a) Approximately 85% of the property taxes are collected in October and November b) Includes annual PILT payment of $467,230. c) Includes 2 quarters of A & T Grant: Assessor -$415,093, Tax -$97,761 and BOPTA -$8,208. d) Significant foreclosure and refinancing recordings. e) 1st quarter payment ($15,827) received in November. 2nd quarter will be received in Nov or Dec. f) Year to date includes expenditures paid annually. Year End $ Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 6,050,000 $ 6,775,995 $ 725,995 100% 112% $ 6,050,000 $ 6,775,995 $ 725,995 Revenues Property Taxes 6,607,616 2,631,068 (3,976,548) 33% 13% a) 19,822,847 19,822,847 Gen. Rev. - excl. Taxes 973,821 1,569,227 595,406 33% 54% b) 2,921,462 2,921,462 Assessor 273,568 423,103 149,535 33% 52% c) 820,704 820,704 County Clerk 347,724 480,640 132,916 33% 46% d) 1,043,171 1,193,171 150,000 BOPTA 4,597 8,208 3,611 33% 60% c) 13,791 13,791 District Attorney 110,933 89,105 (21,828) 33% 27% 332,800 332,800 Finance/Tax 62,350 108,969 46,619 33% 58% c) 187,049 187,049 Veterans 23,397 (23,397) 33% 0% e) 70,192 70,192 Property Management 28,817 28,817 - 33% 33% 86,450 86,450 Grant Projects 667 667 33% 33% 2,000 2,000 Total Revenues 8,433,490 5,339,804 (3,093,686) 33% 21% 25,300,466 25,450,466 150,000 TOTAL RESOURCES 14,483,490 12,115,799 (2,367,691) 33% 39% 31,350,466 32,226,461 875,995 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Assessor County Clerk BOPTA District Attorney Finance/Tax Veterans Property Management Grant Projects Non -Departmental Contingency Exp. 1,096,877 1,021,502 75,375 33% 31% 3,290,631 3,290,631 486,901 415,125 71,776 33% 28% 1,460,704 1,460,704 19,903 17,917 1,986 33% 30% 59,708 59,708 1,529,088 1,453,556 75,532 33% 32% 4,587,263 4,587,263 - 248,824 258,639 (9,815) 33% 35% f) 746,471 746,471 75,234 71,554 3,680 33% 32% 225,701 225,701 79,895 77,126 2,769 33% 32% 239,685 239,685 35,224 33,806 1,418 33% 32% 105,673 105,673 537,669 246,551 291,118 33% 15% 1,613,006 1,493,006 120,000 2,031,571 2,031,571 33% 0% 6,094,713 6,094,713 6,141,186 3,595,776 2,545,410 33% 20% 18,423,555 12,208,842 6,214,713 Transfers Out 4,308,970 4,127,630 181,340 33% 32% 12,926,911 12,926,911 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 10,450,156 7,723,406 2,726,750 33% 25% 31,350,466 25,135,753 6,214,713 NET (Resources - Requirements) 4,033,334 4,392,393 359,059 - 7,090,708 7,090,708 a) Approximately 85% of the property taxes are collected in October and November b) Includes annual PILT payment of $467,230. c) Includes 2 quarters of A & T Grant: Assessor -$415,093, Tax -$97,761 and BOPTA -$8,208. d) Significant foreclosure and refinancing recordings. e) 1st quarter payment ($15,827) received in November. 2nd quarter will be received in Nov or Dec. f) Year to date includes expenditures paid annually. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Federal Grants SB #1065 -Court Assess. Discovery Fee Food Subsidy OYA Basic & Diversion Inmate/Prisoner Housing Inmate Commissary Fees Contract Payments Miscellaneous MIP Diversion Fees Interest on Investments Leases Grants - Private CCF Interfund Grant Crime Pry Svcs Interfnd Grnt Total Revenues COMM JUSTICE -JUVENILE Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY% - CoII. % $ 1,085,000 10,592 20,000 5,333 10,000 110,817 20,000 267 69,380 100 333 4,333 816 22,667 6,667 $ 1,200,041 $ 115,041 100% 111% $ 1,085,000 $ 1,200,041 $ 115,041 17,002 6,176 5,090 42,450 16,791 20 125 7,371 800 449 (10, 592) (2,998) 843 (4,910) (110,817) 22,450 (267) (52,589) (80) (208) 3,038 (16) 449 (22,667) (6,667) 281,305 Transfers In -General Fund 1,847,729 TOTAL RESOURCES 3,214,034 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Community Justice -Juvenile Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Juvenile Resource Center Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Contingency 96,274 (185,031) 1,847,728 (1) 3,144,043 (69,991) 33% 0% a) 31,775 47,995 16,220 33% 28% 60,000 60,000 39% 16,000 16,000 33% 17% b) 30,000 30,000 33% 0% c) 332,450 340,076 7,626 71% d) 60,000 120,000 60,000 33% 0% 800 800 33% 8% e) 208,141 104,000 (104,141) 33% 7% 300 300 33% 13% 1,000 1,000 13,000 18,000 5,000 33% 33% 2,448 2,448 n/a 449 449 33% n/a f) 68,000 68,000 33% 0% f) 20,000 20,000 33% 11% 843,914 829,068 (14,846) 33% 33% 33% 57% 33% 33% 33% 33% 5,543,186 42% 7,472,100 Exp. % 5,543,186 7,572,295 100,195 943,384 925,734 17,650 33% 33% 2,830,152 2,830,152 440,699 319,791 120,908 33% 24% g) 1,322,097 1,322,097 33 33 33% 0% 100 100 844,051 61,634 33 200,865 764,181 75,112 79,870 33% (13,478) 33% 33 33% 200,865 33% 30% 2,532,154 41% h) 184,903 0% 100 n/a 602,594 2,532,154 184,903 100 602,594 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,490,699 2,084,818 405,881 33% 28% 7,472,100 6,869,406 602,694 NET (Resources - Requirements) 723,335 1,059,225 335,890 - 702,889 702,889 a) Federal Grant projection increased for funds not spent in prior fiscal year. First quarter reimbursement expected in November. b) Food Subsidy receipts are for July and August. September and October payments expected to be received in November. c) OYA Basic and Diversion reimbursement delayed due to unavailability of reimbursement forms. Anticipate payment late November. d) Utilization of housing for juveniles by Crook County projected to exceed original estimates. e) Actual BRS revenue received covers July -September. Projection reduced to reflect actual youth count at half of original estimate. f) First quarter payments received in November. g) Positive variance a result of accruals during July of June expenses for utilities, supplies, and contract payments. h) Negative variance due to an annual subscription payment, one time appliance purchase, and special needs of youth in detention. Year End Budget Projection Variance $ 1,200,041 $ 115,041 100% 111% $ 1,085,000 $ 1,200,041 $ 115,041 17,002 6,176 5,090 42,450 16,791 20 125 7,371 800 449 (10, 592) (2,998) 843 (4,910) (110,817) 22,450 (267) (52,589) (80) (208) 3,038 (16) 449 (22,667) (6,667) 281,305 Transfers In -General Fund 1,847,729 TOTAL RESOURCES 3,214,034 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Community Justice -Juvenile Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Juvenile Resource Center Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Contingency 96,274 (185,031) 1,847,728 (1) 3,144,043 (69,991) 33% 0% a) 31,775 47,995 16,220 33% 28% 60,000 60,000 39% 16,000 16,000 33% 17% b) 30,000 30,000 33% 0% c) 332,450 340,076 7,626 71% d) 60,000 120,000 60,000 33% 0% 800 800 33% 8% e) 208,141 104,000 (104,141) 33% 7% 300 300 33% 13% 1,000 1,000 13,000 18,000 5,000 33% 33% 2,448 2,448 n/a 449 449 33% n/a f) 68,000 68,000 33% 0% f) 20,000 20,000 33% 11% 843,914 829,068 (14,846) 33% 33% 33% 57% 33% 33% 33% 33% 5,543,186 42% 7,472,100 Exp. % 5,543,186 7,572,295 100,195 943,384 925,734 17,650 33% 33% 2,830,152 2,830,152 440,699 319,791 120,908 33% 24% g) 1,322,097 1,322,097 33 33 33% 0% 100 100 844,051 61,634 33 200,865 764,181 75,112 79,870 33% (13,478) 33% 33 33% 200,865 33% 30% 2,532,154 41% h) 184,903 0% 100 n/a 602,594 2,532,154 184,903 100 602,594 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,490,699 2,084,818 405,881 33% 28% 7,472,100 6,869,406 602,694 NET (Resources - Requirements) 723,335 1,059,225 335,890 - 702,889 702,889 a) Federal Grant projection increased for funds not spent in prior fiscal year. First quarter reimbursement expected in November. b) Food Subsidy receipts are for July and August. September and October payments expected to be received in November. c) OYA Basic and Diversion reimbursement delayed due to unavailability of reimbursement forms. Anticipate payment late November. d) Utilization of housing for juveniles by Crook County projected to exceed original estimates. e) Actual BRS revenue received covers July -September. Projection reduced to reflect actual youth count at half of original estimate. f) First quarter payments received in November. g) Positive variance a result of accruals during July of June expenses for utilities, supplies, and contract payments. h) Negative variance due to an annual subscription payment, one time appliance purchase, and special needs of youth in detention. SHERIFF - Fund 255 Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ Revenues Law Enf Dist Countywide Law Enf Dist Rural Interest Total Revenues 6,747,645 4,239,107 $ 183,677 $ 183,677 100% 5,661,953 3,724,972 11,738 (1,085,692) (514,135) 11,738 n/a $ $ 183,677 $ 183,677 33% 28% a) 20,242,936 17,263,761 (2,979,175) 33% 29% a) 12,717,322 11,295,156 1.1,422,166) 33% n/a - 35,000 35,000 10,986,752 TOTAL RESOURCES 10,986,752 REQUIREMENTS: EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Sheriff's Division 653,729 Civil 242,320 Automotive/Communications 465,961 Investigations/Evidence 560,776 Patrol/Civil/Comm Supp 2,524,192 Records 214,121 Adult Jail 3,014,971 Court Security 71,969 Emergency Services 62,690 Special Services Division 369,563 Regional Work Center 912,614 Training Division 100,018 Other Law Enforcement Svcs 175,901 Non -Departmental 154,348 Contingency 1,283,580 Transfers Out 9,398,663 (1,588,089) 33% 29% 32,960,258 28,593,917 (4,366,341) 9,582,340 (1,404,412) 33% 29% 32,960,258 28,777,594 (4,182,664) 679,126 231,647 544,455 504,120 2,370,398 195,220 2,620,533 62,816 54,498 393,584 764,503 93,559 188,390 21,016 (25,397) 33% 10,673 33% (78,494) 33% 56,656 33% 153,794 33% 18,901 33% 394,438 33% 9,153 33% 8,192 33% (24,021) 33% 148,111 33% 6,459 33% (12,489) 33% 133,332 1,283,580 33% 33% Exp. % 35% 32% 39% b) 30% 31% c) 30% 29% c) 29% 29% 35% 28% c) 31% 36% 5% n/a 180,000 122,500 57,500 33% 23% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 10,986,753 NET (Resources - Requirements) 1,961,188 726,961 1,397,884 1,682,327 7,572,575 642,363 9,044,909 215,908 188,071 1,108,690 2,737,842 300,053 527,702 463,044 3,850,741 1,961,088 100 726,961 1,397,884 1,682,327 7,472,575 100,000 642,263 100 8,744,909 300,000 215,808 100 188,071 1,108,690 2,587,742 150,100 299,953 100 527,602 100 463,044 - 3,850,741 540,000 540,000 8,846,365 2,140,388 33% 27% 32,960,258 28,558,917 4,401,341 (1) 735,975 735,976 218,677 218,677 a) Revenue from LED's based on actual expenditure and adjusted quarterly. Projection is based on 1st quarter actual. b) Year to date actual includes annual amount ($260,405) of transfer to Fund 245 Communications System. c) Unfilled open positions resulting in less than planned personnel expenses. Year End Budget Projection Jariance n/a $ $ 183,677 $ 183,677 33% 28% a) 20,242,936 17,263,761 (2,979,175) 33% 29% a) 12,717,322 11,295,156 1.1,422,166) 33% n/a - 35,000 35,000 10,986,752 TOTAL RESOURCES 10,986,752 REQUIREMENTS: EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Sheriff's Division 653,729 Civil 242,320 Automotive/Communications 465,961 Investigations/Evidence 560,776 Patrol/Civil/Comm Supp 2,524,192 Records 214,121 Adult Jail 3,014,971 Court Security 71,969 Emergency Services 62,690 Special Services Division 369,563 Regional Work Center 912,614 Training Division 100,018 Other Law Enforcement Svcs 175,901 Non -Departmental 154,348 Contingency 1,283,580 Transfers Out 9,398,663 (1,588,089) 33% 29% 32,960,258 28,593,917 (4,366,341) 9,582,340 (1,404,412) 33% 29% 32,960,258 28,777,594 (4,182,664) 679,126 231,647 544,455 504,120 2,370,398 195,220 2,620,533 62,816 54,498 393,584 764,503 93,559 188,390 21,016 (25,397) 33% 10,673 33% (78,494) 33% 56,656 33% 153,794 33% 18,901 33% 394,438 33% 9,153 33% 8,192 33% (24,021) 33% 148,111 33% 6,459 33% (12,489) 33% 133,332 1,283,580 33% 33% Exp. % 35% 32% 39% b) 30% 31% c) 30% 29% c) 29% 29% 35% 28% c) 31% 36% 5% n/a 180,000 122,500 57,500 33% 23% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 10,986,753 NET (Resources - Requirements) 1,961,188 726,961 1,397,884 1,682,327 7,572,575 642,363 9,044,909 215,908 188,071 1,108,690 2,737,842 300,053 527,702 463,044 3,850,741 1,961,088 100 726,961 1,397,884 1,682,327 7,472,575 100,000 642,263 100 8,744,909 300,000 215,808 100 188,071 1,108,690 2,587,742 150,100 299,953 100 527,602 100 463,044 - 3,850,741 540,000 540,000 8,846,365 2,140,388 33% 27% 32,960,258 28,558,917 4,401,341 (1) 735,975 735,976 218,677 218,677 a) Revenue from LED's based on actual expenditure and adjusted quarterly. Projection is based on 1st quarter actual. b) Year to date actual includes annual amount ($260,405) of transfer to Fund 245 Communications System. c) Unfilled open positions resulting in less than planned personnel expenses. SHERIFF 701 Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % CoII. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 2,470,519 $ 3,343,461 $ 872,942 33% n/a Revenues Tax Revenues - Current 4,939,901 1,503,048 (3,436,853) 33% 10% a) 14,819,703 14,819,703 Tax Revenues - Prior 166,667 459,153 292,486 33% 92% 500,000 500,000 Federal Grants 11,667 600 (11,067) 33% 2% 35,000 35,000 State Grant 15,052 18,563 3,511 33% 41% 45,156 45,156 Transp. of State Wards 1,667 (1,667) 33% 0% 5,000 5,000 - SB 1145 573,731 987,330 413,599 33% 57% b) 1,721,192 1,935,336 214,144 Des. Cty Video Lottery Grant 1,667 (1,667) 33% n/a 5,000 5,000 Des Cty Court Security 43,000 42,850 (150) 33% 33% 129,000 129,000 Des Cty Juvenile Contract 1,000 (1,000) 33% 0% 3,000 3,000 - Title III Reimbursement 50,000 - (50,000) 33% n/a 150,000 150,000 - Transport 667 2,122 1,455 33% n/a 2,000 4,000 2,000 DC Fair & Expo Center 2,100 2,100 33% n/a 3,000 3,000 Inmate Commissary Fees 20,000 10,391 (9,609) 33% 17% 60,000 60,000 - Work Center Work Crews 14,150 17,970 3,820 33% 42% 42,450 42,450 Concealed Handgun Classes 2,000 2,050 50 33% 34% 6,000 6,000 Soc Sec Incentive -Fed 1,667 3,800 2,133 33% 76% 5,000 5,000 - Miscellaneous 1,333 808 (525) 33% 20% 4,000 4,000 Oregon Mentors 1,667 1,902 235 33% n/a 5,000 5,000 Medical Services Reimb 4,000 2,668 (1,332) 33% 22% 12,000 12,000 Restitution 350 604 254 33% 58% 1,050 1,050 Sheriff Fees 53,333 70,377 17,044 33% 44% 160,000 160,000 - Interest 9,444 4,805 (4,639) 33% 17% 28,333 28,333 - Interest on Unsegregated 1,178 733 (445) 33% 21% 3,533 3,533 - Rentals 9,999 46,839 36,840 33% 156% c) 30,000 51,236 21,236 Donations - 50 50 33% n/a 50 50 Budget Year End Projection Variance 1 $ 2,470,519 $ 3,343,461 $ 872,942 Total Revenues 5,924,140 3,178,763 (2,745,377) 33% 18% 17,772,417 18,012,847 240,430 TOTAL RESOURCES 8,394,659 6,522,224 (1,872,435) 33% 32% 20,242,936 21,356,308 1,113,372 REQUIREMENTS: EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Materials and Services 6,747,646 Exp. 5,661,953 1,085,693 33% 28% d) 20,242,936 17,263,761 2,979,175 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,747,646 5,661,953 1,085,693 33% 28% 20,242,936 17,263,761 2,979,175 NET (Resources - Requirements) 1,647,013 860,271 (786,742) - 4,092,547 4,092,547 a) Approximately 85% of the property taxes are collected in October and November. b) Actual State reimbursement for 1145 inmate housing will exceed amount estimated for the budget. c) FBI relocation from Sheriff's Office has been delayed resulting in 4 months of additional rental revenue. d) Payment to Sheriff's Office based on actual expenditure and adjusted quarterly. Projection is based on 1st quarter actual. SHERIFF 702 Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % CoII. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $1,287,473 $ 1,433,708 $ 146,235 Revenues Tax Revenues - Current 2,413,233 736,367 Tax Revenues - Prior 79,667 233,474 Federal Grants 667 6,712 US Forest Service 25,500 12,750 State Grant 62,544 12,212 SB #1065 Court Assessment 22,333 17,002 Marine Board License Fee 41,489 - Des Cty General Fund Grnt 287,721 10,000 Des Cty Transient Room Tax 595,612 595,612 City of Sisters 140,005 138,672 Des Cty Tax/Fin Contract 333 - Des Cty CDD Contract 9,061 9,061 Des Cty Solid Waste Contr 27,183 27,182 Des Cty Clerk/Election 667 54 School Districts 33,333 Security & Traffic Reimb 4,333 2,871 Seat Belt Program 2,000 2,925 Miscellaneous 3,333 4,745 Sheriff Fees 1,667 4,070 Court Fines & Fees 28,333 38,833 Impound Fees 25,000 6,200 Restitution - Street Crimes 500 Seizure/Forfeiture 1,122 Interest 3,333 (908) Interest on Unsegregated 600 359 Sale of Reportable Assets 6,779 Sale of Equip & Material 2,000 (1,676,866) 153,807 6,045 (12,750) (50,332) (5,331) (41,489) (277,721) (1,333) (333) (1) (613) (33,333) (1,462) 925 1,412 2,403 10,500 (18,800) 500 1,122 (4,241) (241) 6,779 (2,000) Total Revenues 3,809,947 1,866,594 (1,943,353) TOTAL RESOURCES 5,097,420 3,300,302 (1,797,118) REQUIREMENTS: EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Materials and Services 4,239,107 33% n/a 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 10% a) 98% 336% b) 17% 7% 25% 0% 1% 33% 33% 0% 33% 33% 3% n/a 22% 49% 47% 81% 46% 8% n/a n/a -9% 20% n/a 0% 16% c) $ 1,287,473 7,239,702 239,000 2,000 76,500 187,633 67,000 124,468 863,163 1,786,837 420,015 1,000 27,183 81,548 2,000 100,000 13,000 6,000 10,000 5,000 85,000 75,000 10,000 1,800 6,000 $1,433,708 $ 146,235 7,239,702 239,000 10,000 8,000 76,500 187,633 67,000 124,468 863,163 1,786,837 416,016 (3,999) 1,000 27,183 81,548 2,000 100,000 13,000 6,000 10,000 5,000 85,000 75,000 500 500 2,500 2,500 10,000 1,800 10,000 10,000 6,000 11,429,849 11,446,850 17,001 33% 26% 12,717,322 12,880,558 163,236 Exp. 3,724,972 514,135 33% 29% d) 12,717,322 11,295,156 1,422,166 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,239,107 3,724,972 514,135 33% 29% 12,717,322 11,295,156 1,422,166 NET (Resources - Requirements) 858,313 (424,670) (1,282,983) - 1,585,402 1,585,402 a) Approximately 85% of the property taxes are collected in October and November. b) HIDTA grant for drug enforcement overtime reimbursement will exceed plan for the year. c) Actual escalation increase to Sisters law enforcement contract will be less than estimated for the budget. d) Payment to Sheriff's Office based on actual expenditure and adjusted quarterly. Projection is based on 1st quarter actual. Year End Budget Projection Variance $ 1,287,473 7,239,702 239,000 2,000 76,500 187,633 67,000 124,468 863,163 1,786,837 420,015 1,000 27,183 81,548 2,000 100,000 13,000 6,000 10,000 5,000 85,000 75,000 10,000 1,800 6,000 $1,433,708 $ 146,235 7,239,702 239,000 10,000 8,000 76,500 187,633 67,000 124,468 863,163 1,786,837 416,016 (3,999) 1,000 27,183 81,548 2,000 100,000 13,000 6,000 10,000 5,000 85,000 75,000 500 500 2,500 2,500 10,000 1,800 10,000 10,000 6,000 11,429,849 11,446,850 17,001 33% 26% 12,717,322 12,880,558 163,236 Exp. 3,724,972 514,135 33% 29% d) 12,717,322 11,295,156 1,422,166 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,239,107 3,724,972 514,135 33% 29% 12,717,322 11,295,156 1,422,166 NET (Resources - Requirements) 858,313 (424,670) (1,282,983) - 1,585,402 1,585,402 a) Approximately 85% of the property taxes are collected in October and November. b) HIDTA grant for drug enforcement overtime reimbursement will exceed plan for the year. c) Actual escalation increase to Sisters law enforcement contract will be less than estimated for the budget. d) Payment to Sheriff's Office based on actual expenditure and adjusted quarterly. Projection is based on 1st quarter actual. PUBLIC HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 900,000 $ 1,120,355 $ 220,355 100% 124% $ 900,000 $ 1,120,355 $ 220,355 Revenues Medicare Reimbursement 1,333 (1,333) 33% 0% 4,000 4,000 - State Grant 809,976 558,537 (251,439) 33% 23% a) 2,429,928 2,571,114 141,186 Child Dev & Rehab Center 11,579 - (11,579) 33% 0% 34,737 34,737 State Miscellaneous 71,080 77,821 6,741 33% 36% 213,240 213,240 OMAP 101,000 135,938 34,938 33% 45% 303,000 303,000 Family Planning Exp Proj 158,333 141,678 (16,655) 33% 30% b) 475,000 475,000 Grants 22,254 22,254 33% n/a c) 22,254 22,254 Patient Insurance Fees 44,600 43,107 (1,493) 33% 32% 133,800 133,800 - Health Dept/Patient Fees 50,717 45,583 (5,134) 33% 30% 152,150 152,150 - Vital Records -Birth 12,000 10,785 (1,215) 33% 30% 36,000 36,000 Vital Records -Death 32,667 32,975 308 33% 34% 98,000 98,000 Interest on Investments 12,667 6,410 (6,257) 33% 17% 38,000 38,000 Donations 2,933 2,394 (539) 33% 27% 8,800 8,800 Interfund Contract 43,925 (43,925) 33% 0% 131,774 131,774 Administrative Fee 9,000 9,000 - 33% 33% 27,000 27,000 Total Revenues 1,361,810 1,086,482 (275,328) 33% 27% 4,085,429 4,248,869 163,440 Transfers In -Reserve Fund Transfers In -General Fund TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) 8,333 - (8,333) 33% 0% 25,000 25,000 772,588 772,588 - 33% 33% 2,317,765 2,317,765 3,042,731 2,979,425 (54,973) 33% 41% 7,328,194 7,711,989 383,795 Exp. % 1,486,092 1,376,668 109,424 33% 31% a) 4,458,276 4,509,942 (51,666) 588,177 413,277 174,900 33% 23% a) 1,764,531 1,824,915 (60,384) 12,301 12,301 33% 0% 36,902 36,902 50,000 37,500 12,500 33% 25% 150,000 150,000 306,162 306,162 33% nla 918,485 918,485 2,442,732 1,827,445 615,287 33% 25% 7,328,194 6,521,759 806,435 599,999 1,151,980 560,314 - 1,190,230 1,190,230 a) State Grant projection adjusted to actual FY 2010 contract, includes Rev. 1 & 2. Grant appropriation for revisions in process. b) Payments are received one month in arrears. c) Grants for HIV and Chronic Care were not included in FY 2010 budget. Year End Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 900,000 $ 1,120,355 $ 220,355 100% 124% $ 900,000 $ 1,120,355 $ 220,355 Revenues Medicare Reimbursement 1,333 (1,333) 33% 0% 4,000 4,000 - State Grant 809,976 558,537 (251,439) 33% 23% a) 2,429,928 2,571,114 141,186 Child Dev & Rehab Center 11,579 - (11,579) 33% 0% 34,737 34,737 State Miscellaneous 71,080 77,821 6,741 33% 36% 213,240 213,240 OMAP 101,000 135,938 34,938 33% 45% 303,000 303,000 Family Planning Exp Proj 158,333 141,678 (16,655) 33% 30% b) 475,000 475,000 Grants 22,254 22,254 33% n/a c) 22,254 22,254 Patient Insurance Fees 44,600 43,107 (1,493) 33% 32% 133,800 133,800 - Health Dept/Patient Fees 50,717 45,583 (5,134) 33% 30% 152,150 152,150 - Vital Records -Birth 12,000 10,785 (1,215) 33% 30% 36,000 36,000 Vital Records -Death 32,667 32,975 308 33% 34% 98,000 98,000 Interest on Investments 12,667 6,410 (6,257) 33% 17% 38,000 38,000 Donations 2,933 2,394 (539) 33% 27% 8,800 8,800 Interfund Contract 43,925 (43,925) 33% 0% 131,774 131,774 Administrative Fee 9,000 9,000 - 33% 33% 27,000 27,000 Total Revenues 1,361,810 1,086,482 (275,328) 33% 27% 4,085,429 4,248,869 163,440 Transfers In -Reserve Fund Transfers In -General Fund TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) 8,333 - (8,333) 33% 0% 25,000 25,000 772,588 772,588 - 33% 33% 2,317,765 2,317,765 3,042,731 2,979,425 (54,973) 33% 41% 7,328,194 7,711,989 383,795 Exp. % 1,486,092 1,376,668 109,424 33% 31% a) 4,458,276 4,509,942 (51,666) 588,177 413,277 174,900 33% 23% a) 1,764,531 1,824,915 (60,384) 12,301 12,301 33% 0% 36,902 36,902 50,000 37,500 12,500 33% 25% 150,000 150,000 306,162 306,162 33% nla 918,485 918,485 2,442,732 1,827,445 615,287 33% 25% 7,328,194 6,521,759 806,435 599,999 1,151,980 560,314 - 1,190,230 1,190,230 a) State Grant projection adjusted to actual FY 2010 contract, includes Rev. 1 & 2. Grant appropriation for revisions in process. b) Payments are received one month in arrears. c) Grants for HIV and Chronic Care were not included in FY 2010 budget. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Marriage Licenses Divorce Filing Fees Domestic Partnership Fee Federal Grants State Grants State Miscellaneous Title 19 Liquor Revenue School Districts Miscellaneous Patient Insurance Fees Patient Fees Seizure/Forfeiture Interest on Investments Rentals Donations Interfund Contract Administrative Fee Comm. on Children & Fam Crime Prevention Services BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 $ 2,725,000 $ 2,589,996 $ (135,004) 100% 95% $ 2,725,000 $ 2,589,996 $ (135,004) 1,833 41,667 667 33,273 1,759,029 61,572 100,235 35,333 23,333 13,600 82,500 3,833 10,667 5,500 1,000 1,040 1,011,651 7,333 42,333 2,440 43,371 55 25,253 1,779,849 5,326 42,069 26,700 4,486 46,520 1,521 13,129 16,846 2,875 7,000. 981,652 607 1,704 (612) (8,020) 20,820 (56,246) (100,235) 6,736 3,367 (9,114) (35,980) (2,312) 13,129 6,179 (2,625) 6,000 (1,040) (29,999) (7,333) (42,333) Total Revenues 3,236,399 Transfers In -General Fund 438,719 Transfers In -Other 85,212 33% 44% 5,500 5,500 33% 35% 125,000 125,000 33% 3% 2,000 2,000 33% 25% a) 99,819 99,819 b) 5,277,086 5,351,224 74,138 33% 3% 184,716 184,716 0% c) 300,705 300,705 40% 106,000 106,000 33% 38% 70,000 88,800 18,800 11% 40,800 40,800 33% 19% 247,500 247,500 13% 11,500 11,500 - 33% n/a 13,129 13,129 33% 53% 32,000 45,000 13,000 33% 17% 16,500 16,500 - 233% 3,000 7,000 4,000 0% 3,120 3,120 33% 32% 3,034,954 3,031,954 (3,000) 0% 22,000 - (22,000) 0% a) 127,000 127,000 33% 34% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 2,999,092 (237,307) 33% 31% 9,709,200 9,807,267 98,067 432,889 (5,830) 126,875 41,663 TOTAL RESOURCES 6,485,330 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services 2,635,227 Materials and Services 1,351,171 Capital Outlay 26,667 Transfers Out 50,000 Contingency 605,600 33% 33% 50% 33% 1,316,158 255,636 1,316,158 363,129 107,493 6,148,852 (336,478) 33% 44% 14,005,994 14,076,550 70,556 2,355,858 1,037,714 279,369 313,457 26,667 37,500 12,500 605,600 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,668,665 NET (Resources - Requirements) 1,816,665 Exp. % 33% 30% 26% 33% 0% 33% 25% n/a 33% 33% 7,905,680 4,053,514 80,000 150,000 1,816,800 7,890,661 15,019 4,053,514 80,000 150,000 1,816,800 3,431,072 1,237,593 33% 24% 14,005,994 12,174,175 1,831,819 2,717,780 901,115 - 1,902,375 1,902,375 a) Grant billing received quarterly, in arrears. b) Dept of Human Services Grant projected at amended contract amount for FY 2010. c) Delay in payment due to problems with the State MMIS software system. Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % $ 2,725,000 $ 2,589,996 $ (135,004) 100% 95% $ 2,725,000 $ 2,589,996 $ (135,004) 1,833 41,667 667 33,273 1,759,029 61,572 100,235 35,333 23,333 13,600 82,500 3,833 10,667 5,500 1,000 1,040 1,011,651 7,333 42,333 2,440 43,371 55 25,253 1,779,849 5,326 42,069 26,700 4,486 46,520 1,521 13,129 16,846 2,875 7,000. 981,652 607 1,704 (612) (8,020) 20,820 (56,246) (100,235) 6,736 3,367 (9,114) (35,980) (2,312) 13,129 6,179 (2,625) 6,000 (1,040) (29,999) (7,333) (42,333) Total Revenues 3,236,399 Transfers In -General Fund 438,719 Transfers In -Other 85,212 33% 44% 5,500 5,500 33% 35% 125,000 125,000 33% 3% 2,000 2,000 33% 25% a) 99,819 99,819 b) 5,277,086 5,351,224 74,138 33% 3% 184,716 184,716 0% c) 300,705 300,705 40% 106,000 106,000 33% 38% 70,000 88,800 18,800 11% 40,800 40,800 33% 19% 247,500 247,500 13% 11,500 11,500 - 33% n/a 13,129 13,129 33% 53% 32,000 45,000 13,000 33% 17% 16,500 16,500 - 233% 3,000 7,000 4,000 0% 3,120 3,120 33% 32% 3,034,954 3,031,954 (3,000) 0% 22,000 - (22,000) 0% a) 127,000 127,000 33% 34% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 2,999,092 (237,307) 33% 31% 9,709,200 9,807,267 98,067 432,889 (5,830) 126,875 41,663 TOTAL RESOURCES 6,485,330 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services 2,635,227 Materials and Services 1,351,171 Capital Outlay 26,667 Transfers Out 50,000 Contingency 605,600 33% 33% 50% 33% 1,316,158 255,636 1,316,158 363,129 107,493 6,148,852 (336,478) 33% 44% 14,005,994 14,076,550 70,556 2,355,858 1,037,714 279,369 313,457 26,667 37,500 12,500 605,600 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,668,665 NET (Resources - Requirements) 1,816,665 Exp. % 33% 30% 26% 33% 0% 33% 25% n/a 33% 33% 7,905,680 4,053,514 80,000 150,000 1,816,800 7,890,661 15,019 4,053,514 80,000 150,000 1,816,800 3,431,072 1,237,593 33% 24% 14,005,994 12,174,175 1,831,819 2,717,780 901,115 - 1,902,375 1,902,375 a) Grant billing received quarterly, in arrears. b) Dept of Human Services Grant projected at amended contract amount for FY 2010. c) Delay in payment due to problems with the State MMIS software system. Year End Budget Projection Variance $ 2,725,000 $ 2,589,996 $ (135,004) 100% 95% $ 2,725,000 $ 2,589,996 $ (135,004) 1,833 41,667 667 33,273 1,759,029 61,572 100,235 35,333 23,333 13,600 82,500 3,833 10,667 5,500 1,000 1,040 1,011,651 7,333 42,333 2,440 43,371 55 25,253 1,779,849 5,326 42,069 26,700 4,486 46,520 1,521 13,129 16,846 2,875 7,000. 981,652 607 1,704 (612) (8,020) 20,820 (56,246) (100,235) 6,736 3,367 (9,114) (35,980) (2,312) 13,129 6,179 (2,625) 6,000 (1,040) (29,999) (7,333) (42,333) Total Revenues 3,236,399 Transfers In -General Fund 438,719 Transfers In -Other 85,212 33% 44% 5,500 5,500 33% 35% 125,000 125,000 33% 3% 2,000 2,000 33% 25% a) 99,819 99,819 b) 5,277,086 5,351,224 74,138 33% 3% 184,716 184,716 0% c) 300,705 300,705 40% 106,000 106,000 33% 38% 70,000 88,800 18,800 11% 40,800 40,800 33% 19% 247,500 247,500 13% 11,500 11,500 - 33% n/a 13,129 13,129 33% 53% 32,000 45,000 13,000 33% 17% 16,500 16,500 - 233% 3,000 7,000 4,000 0% 3,120 3,120 33% 32% 3,034,954 3,031,954 (3,000) 0% 22,000 - (22,000) 0% a) 127,000 127,000 33% 34% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 2,999,092 (237,307) 33% 31% 9,709,200 9,807,267 98,067 432,889 (5,830) 126,875 41,663 TOTAL RESOURCES 6,485,330 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services 2,635,227 Materials and Services 1,351,171 Capital Outlay 26,667 Transfers Out 50,000 Contingency 605,600 33% 33% 50% 33% 1,316,158 255,636 1,316,158 363,129 107,493 6,148,852 (336,478) 33% 44% 14,005,994 14,076,550 70,556 2,355,858 1,037,714 279,369 313,457 26,667 37,500 12,500 605,600 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,668,665 NET (Resources - Requirements) 1,816,665 Exp. % 33% 30% 26% 33% 0% 33% 25% n/a 33% 33% 7,905,680 4,053,514 80,000 150,000 1,816,800 7,890,661 15,019 4,053,514 80,000 150,000 1,816,800 3,431,072 1,237,593 33% 24% 14,005,994 12,174,175 1,831,819 2,717,780 901,115 - 1,902,375 1,902,375 a) Grant billing received quarterly, in arrears. b) Dept of Human Services Grant projected at amended contract amount for FY 2010. c) Delay in payment due to problems with the State MMIS software system. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % CoII. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 413,471 $ 629,659 $ 216,188 100% 152% $ 413,471 $ 629,659 216,188 Revenues Admin -Operations 1,217 7,250 6,033 33% 199% a) 3,650 17,000 13,350 Admin -GIS 692 4,535 3,843 33% 219% b) 2,075 38,900 36,825 Admin -Code Enforcement 63,150 57,855 (5,295) 33% 31% c) 189,450 175,500 (13,950) Building Safety 324,925 314,879 (10,046) 33% 32% d) 974,775 992,400 17,625 Electrical 93,500 96,912 3,412 33% 35% d) 280,500 297,900 17,400 Contract Services 85,167 26,217 (58,950) 33% 10% e) 255,500 99,600 (155,900) Env Health -On Site Prog 97,617 78,895 (18,722) 33% 27% c) 292,850 241,500 (51,350) Env Health-Lic Facilities 230,158 64,452 (165,706) 33% 9% f) 690,475 690,475 Env Health - Drinking H2O 31,770 29,186 (2,584) 33% 31% g) 95,311 95,311 Planning -Current 328,050 254,766 (73,284) 33% 26% h) 984,150 689,900 (294,250) Planning -Long Range 142,967 158,406 15,439 33% 37% c) 428,900 418,200 (10,700) Total Revenues Trans In -GF Trans In -GF for Lng Rng Ping Trans In -Other TOTAL RESOURCES 1,399,213 1,093,352 (305,862) 33% 26% 4,197,636 3,756,686 (440,950) 405,542 405,543 1 100,000 75,000 (25,000) 33 (33) REQUIREMENTS: EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Admin -Operations Admin -GIS Admin -Code Enforcement Building Safety Electrical Contract Services Env Health -On Site Pgm Env Health-Lic Facilities Env Health - Drinking H2O Planning -Current Planning -Long Range Transfers Out (D/S Fund) Contingency 2,318,259 2,203,553 (114,706) 0°/U n/a 1,216,627 1,216,627 0% n/a 300,000 300,000 0% 0% 100 (100) 36% 6,127,834 5,902,972 (224,862) 33% Exp. % 569,371 556,386 12,985 33% 33% 1,708,112 1,708,112 71,869 67,711 4,158 33% 31% 215,606 215,606 60,323 58,714 1,609 33% 32% 180,969 180,969 - 241,715 233,700 8,015 33% 32% i) 725,145 698,080 27,065 68,906 67,357 1,549 33% 33% i) 206,719 193,187 13,532 88,260 84,524 3,736 33% 32% i) 264,781 260,270 4,511 80,229 76,280 3,949 33% 32% 240,687 240,687 - 165,315 164,630 685 33% 33% 495,946 495,946 26,866 28,949 (2,083) 33% 36% 80,598 80,598 269,928 262,028 7,900 33% 32% 809,783 809,783 - 183,943 139,859 44,084 33% 25% 551,828 551,828 59,220 59,220 - 0% 33% 177,660 177,660 156,667 156,667 33% n/a 470,000 470,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,042,612 1,799,359 243,253 33% 29% 6,127,834 5,612,726 515,108 NET (Resources - Requirements) 275,647 404,195 128,548 290,246 290,246 Revenues 1,093,352 3,756,686 Expenditures 1,799,359 5,612,726 Net from Operations (706,007) (1,856,040) a) Revenues are higher than budgeted due to interest earnings on positive fund balance. b) Custom GIS work revenue sporadic. Includes $37,175 reimbursement from IT -Web Programmer. c) Projections are slightly below budget. On -Site work volume has slowed significantly. d) Business volume and revenue have thus far exceeded expectations. e) Significant drop-off in City of Redmond work. f) Revenue is received primarily in December through February following mailing of license renewal statements. g) Payments from State DHS are received irregularly. h) Significant slowdown in land use applications. i) Reflects the retirement of the Building Safety Director in November. Year End Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 413,471 $ 629,659 $ 216,188 100% 152% $ 413,471 $ 629,659 216,188 Revenues Admin -Operations 1,217 7,250 6,033 33% 199% a) 3,650 17,000 13,350 Admin -GIS 692 4,535 3,843 33% 219% b) 2,075 38,900 36,825 Admin -Code Enforcement 63,150 57,855 (5,295) 33% 31% c) 189,450 175,500 (13,950) Building Safety 324,925 314,879 (10,046) 33% 32% d) 974,775 992,400 17,625 Electrical 93,500 96,912 3,412 33% 35% d) 280,500 297,900 17,400 Contract Services 85,167 26,217 (58,950) 33% 10% e) 255,500 99,600 (155,900) Env Health -On Site Prog 97,617 78,895 (18,722) 33% 27% c) 292,850 241,500 (51,350) Env Health-Lic Facilities 230,158 64,452 (165,706) 33% 9% f) 690,475 690,475 Env Health - Drinking H2O 31,770 29,186 (2,584) 33% 31% g) 95,311 95,311 Planning -Current 328,050 254,766 (73,284) 33% 26% h) 984,150 689,900 (294,250) Planning -Long Range 142,967 158,406 15,439 33% 37% c) 428,900 418,200 (10,700) Total Revenues Trans In -GF Trans In -GF for Lng Rng Ping Trans In -Other TOTAL RESOURCES 1,399,213 1,093,352 (305,862) 33% 26% 4,197,636 3,756,686 (440,950) 405,542 405,543 1 100,000 75,000 (25,000) 33 (33) REQUIREMENTS: EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Admin -Operations Admin -GIS Admin -Code Enforcement Building Safety Electrical Contract Services Env Health -On Site Pgm Env Health-Lic Facilities Env Health - Drinking H2O Planning -Current Planning -Long Range Transfers Out (D/S Fund) Contingency 2,318,259 2,203,553 (114,706) 0°/U n/a 1,216,627 1,216,627 0% n/a 300,000 300,000 0% 0% 100 (100) 36% 6,127,834 5,902,972 (224,862) 33% Exp. % 569,371 556,386 12,985 33% 33% 1,708,112 1,708,112 71,869 67,711 4,158 33% 31% 215,606 215,606 60,323 58,714 1,609 33% 32% 180,969 180,969 - 241,715 233,700 8,015 33% 32% i) 725,145 698,080 27,065 68,906 67,357 1,549 33% 33% i) 206,719 193,187 13,532 88,260 84,524 3,736 33% 32% i) 264,781 260,270 4,511 80,229 76,280 3,949 33% 32% 240,687 240,687 - 165,315 164,630 685 33% 33% 495,946 495,946 26,866 28,949 (2,083) 33% 36% 80,598 80,598 269,928 262,028 7,900 33% 32% 809,783 809,783 - 183,943 139,859 44,084 33% 25% 551,828 551,828 59,220 59,220 - 0% 33% 177,660 177,660 156,667 156,667 33% n/a 470,000 470,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,042,612 1,799,359 243,253 33% 29% 6,127,834 5,612,726 515,108 NET (Resources - Requirements) 275,647 404,195 128,548 290,246 290,246 Revenues 1,093,352 3,756,686 Expenditures 1,799,359 5,612,726 Net from Operations (706,007) (1,856,040) a) Revenues are higher than budgeted due to interest earnings on positive fund balance. b) Custom GIS work revenue sporadic. Includes $37,175 reimbursement from IT -Web Programmer. c) Projections are slightly below budget. On -Site work volume has slowed significantly. d) Business volume and revenue have thus far exceeded expectations. e) Significant drop-off in City of Redmond work. f) Revenue is received primarily in December through February following mailing of license renewal statements. g) Payments from State DHS are received irregularly. h) Significant slowdown in land use applications. i) Reflects the retirement of the Building Safety Director in November. ROAD Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 4,871,665 Revenues Federal Reimbursements 163,333 System Development Chrg Mineral Lease Royalties 3,333 Forest Receipts 827,333 State Grant 138,492 Motor Vehicle Revenue 2,666,667 City of Bend 75,000 City of Redmond 83,333 City of Sisters 3,333 City of La Pine 3,333 Admin Recovery (SDC) 167 Miscellaneous 43,333 Road Vacations 333 Interest on Investments 16,667 Other Bank/LGIP Interest Interfund Contract 233,333 Equipment Repairs 91,667 Vehicle Repairs 30,000 Vegetation Management 11,667 Inter -fund: Forester 7,333 Car Washes 833 Car Rental Sale of Eqp & Material 266,667 $ 4,891,649 $ 19,984 100% (163,333) 231 231 10,478 7,145 (827,333) (138,492) 2,362,827 (303,840) - (75,000) (83,333) (3,333) (3,333) 585 418 7,081 (36,252) (333) 22,581 5,914 642 642 - (233,333) 57,012 (34,655) (30,000) (11,667) (7,333) 1,342 509 356 356 193,216 (73,451) Total Revenues 4,666,157 Trans In - CDD Trans In - Solid Waste Trans In - Transp SDC Trans In -Road Imp Res 6,063 236,189 25,000 3,333 2,656,351 (2,009,806) 177,142 18,750 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 100% $ 4,871,665 $ 4,891,649 $ 19,984 0% n/a 105% 0% 0% 30% 0% 0% 0% n/a 33% n/a 33% 5% 33% 0% 45% 33% n/a 33% 0% c) 21% 0% c) 0% c) 0% c) 54% n/a 24% 19% 33% a) b) b) b) b) 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% (6,063) 33% (59,047) 33% (6,250) 33% (3,333) 33% TOTAL RESOURCES 9,783,407 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services 1,888,458 Materials and Services 3,044,403 Capital Outlay 900,000 Transfers Out 133,333 Contingency 594,439 7,743,892 (2,058,265) 33% 1,751,102 4,297,165 424,963 137,356 (1,252,762) 475,037 133,333 594,439 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,560,633 33% 33% 33% 490,000 490,000 925 25,000 2,482,000 415,477 8,000,000 225,000 250,000 10,000 10,000 1,500 130,000 1,000 50,000 1,500 700,000 700,000 275,000 275,000 90,000 90,000 35,000 35,000 22,000 22,000 2,500 2,500 1,000 800,000 800,000 10,000 2,482,000 415,477 8,000,000 225,000 250,000 10,000 10,000 500 130,000 1,000 50,000 925 15,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 13,998,477 14,017,902 19,425 0% 18,190 18,190 25% d) 708,567 708,567 25% d) 75,000 75,000 0% c) 10,000 10,000 50% 19,681,899 19,721,308 39,409 Exp. % 31% 47% 16% 33% 0% 33% n/a 6,473,230 87,403 33% NET (Resources - Requirements) 3,222,774 1,270,662 (1,970,862) a) Annual payment anticipated to be received in December 09. b) Billed upon completion of work. c) Payment to be received in June 2010 from Funds 326, 328, 329, 340, and 430. d) Payment received quarterly from Solid Waste. 5,665,373 9,133,210 2,700,000 400,000 1,783,316 5,665,373 9,133,210 2,700,000 400,000 1,783,316 33% 19,681,899 17,898,583 1,783,316 1,822,725 1,822,725 Year End Budget Projection Variance 100% $ 4,871,665 $ 4,891,649 $ 19,984 0% n/a 105% 0% 0% 30% 0% 0% 0% n/a 33% n/a 33% 5% 33% 0% 45% 33% n/a 33% 0% c) 21% 0% c) 0% c) 0% c) 54% n/a 24% 19% 33% a) b) b) b) b) 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% (6,063) 33% (59,047) 33% (6,250) 33% (3,333) 33% TOTAL RESOURCES 9,783,407 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services 1,888,458 Materials and Services 3,044,403 Capital Outlay 900,000 Transfers Out 133,333 Contingency 594,439 7,743,892 (2,058,265) 33% 1,751,102 4,297,165 424,963 137,356 (1,252,762) 475,037 133,333 594,439 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,560,633 33% 33% 33% 490,000 490,000 925 25,000 2,482,000 415,477 8,000,000 225,000 250,000 10,000 10,000 1,500 130,000 1,000 50,000 1,500 700,000 700,000 275,000 275,000 90,000 90,000 35,000 35,000 22,000 22,000 2,500 2,500 1,000 800,000 800,000 10,000 2,482,000 415,477 8,000,000 225,000 250,000 10,000 10,000 500 130,000 1,000 50,000 925 15,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 13,998,477 14,017,902 19,425 0% 18,190 18,190 25% d) 708,567 708,567 25% d) 75,000 75,000 0% c) 10,000 10,000 50% 19,681,899 19,721,308 39,409 Exp. % 31% 47% 16% 33% 0% 33% n/a 6,473,230 87,403 33% NET (Resources - Requirements) 3,222,774 1,270,662 (1,970,862) a) Annual payment anticipated to be received in December 09. b) Billed upon completion of work. c) Payment to be received in June 2010 from Funds 326, 328, 329, 340, and 430. d) Payment received quarterly from Solid Waste. 5,665,373 9,133,210 2,700,000 400,000 1,783,316 5,665,373 9,133,210 2,700,000 400,000 1,783,316 33% 19,681,899 17,898,583 1,783,316 1,822,725 1,822,725 ADULT PAROLE & PROBATION Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 467,892 $ 487,674 $ 19,782 100% 104% $ 467,892 $ 487,674 $ 19,782 Revenues State Miscellaneous 2,667 (2,667) 33% 0% a) 8,000 4,301 (3,699) State Subsidy 9,833 6,653 (3,180) 33% 23% b) 29,500 29,500 SB 1145 946,642 1,480,995 534,353 33% 52% c) 2,839,925 2,839,925 Probation Work Crew Fees 13,333 11,837 (1,496) 33% 30% d) 40,000 40,000 Miscellaneous 1,000 1,595 595 33% 53% 3,000 3,000 Electronic Monitoring Fee 53,333 58,535 5,202 33% 37% 160,000 160,000 Probation Superv. Fees 73,333 75,696 2,363 33% 34% 220,000 220,000 Interest on Investments 3,000 4,654 1,654 33% 52% 9,000 9,000 Crime Prevention Services 16,667 (16,667) 33% 0% 50,000 50,000 Total Revenues 1,119,808 1,639,965 520,157 33% 49% 3,359,425 3,355,726 (3,699) Transfers In -General Fund 38,343 38,344 1 33% 33% 115,029 115,029 Transfers In -Sheriff 16,667 - (16,667) 33% 0% 50,000 50,000 TOTAL RESOURCES 1,642,710 2,165,983 523,273 33% 54% 3,992,346 4,008,429 16,083 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Contingency Exp. % 952,909 920,570 32,339 33% 32% 2,858,726 2,858,726 234,707 230,271 4,436 33% 33% 704,121 704,121 33 33 33% 0% 100 143,133 143,133 33% n/a 429,399 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,330,782 1,150,841 179,941 NET (Resources - Requirements) 33% 100 429,399 29% 3,992,346 3,562,847 429,499 311,928 1,015,142 703,214 445,582 445,582 a) 1st quarter hearings officer revenue not yet received. The $8,000 is for the biennium. Actual for FY 2010 will be $4,301. b) Contract is being finalized for AIP funds. c) Received second quarter funds for periods Oct -Dec. d) Courts are diverting some offenders to monitored probation to monitor community service, reduction in clients. Year End Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 467,892 $ 487,674 $ 19,782 100% 104% $ 467,892 $ 487,674 $ 19,782 Revenues State Miscellaneous 2,667 (2,667) 33% 0% a) 8,000 4,301 (3,699) State Subsidy 9,833 6,653 (3,180) 33% 23% b) 29,500 29,500 SB 1145 946,642 1,480,995 534,353 33% 52% c) 2,839,925 2,839,925 Probation Work Crew Fees 13,333 11,837 (1,496) 33% 30% d) 40,000 40,000 Miscellaneous 1,000 1,595 595 33% 53% 3,000 3,000 Electronic Monitoring Fee 53,333 58,535 5,202 33% 37% 160,000 160,000 Probation Superv. Fees 73,333 75,696 2,363 33% 34% 220,000 220,000 Interest on Investments 3,000 4,654 1,654 33% 52% 9,000 9,000 Crime Prevention Services 16,667 (16,667) 33% 0% 50,000 50,000 Total Revenues 1,119,808 1,639,965 520,157 33% 49% 3,359,425 3,355,726 (3,699) Transfers In -General Fund 38,343 38,344 1 33% 33% 115,029 115,029 Transfers In -Sheriff 16,667 - (16,667) 33% 0% 50,000 50,000 TOTAL RESOURCES 1,642,710 2,165,983 523,273 33% 54% 3,992,346 4,008,429 16,083 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Contingency Exp. % 952,909 920,570 32,339 33% 32% 2,858,726 2,858,726 234,707 230,271 4,436 33% 33% 704,121 704,121 33 33 33% 0% 100 143,133 143,133 33% n/a 429,399 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,330,782 1,150,841 179,941 NET (Resources - Requirements) 33% 100 429,399 29% 3,992,346 3,562,847 429,499 311,928 1,015,142 703,214 445,582 445,582 a) 1st quarter hearings officer revenue not yet received. The $8,000 is for the biennium. Actual for FY 2010 will be $4,301. b) Contract is being finalized for AIP funds. c) Received second quarter funds for periods Oct -Dec. d) Courts are diverting some offenders to monitored probation to monitor community service, reduction in clients. RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Federal Grants Title IV - Family Sup/Pres HealthyStart Medicaid Child Care Block Grant Level 7 Services HealthyStart /R -S -G OCCF Grant Miscellaneous Court Fines & Fees Interest on Investments Grants -Private Miscellaneous Crime Prevention Services Total Revenues COMM ON CHILDREN & FAMILIES Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % $ 624,543 75,000 12,551 31,667 27,092 58,398 102,526 204,684 2,667 25,000 10,000 667 62,500 24,783 $ 668,626 $ 44,083 32,304 (42,696) (12,551) (31,667) (27,092) (58,398) (25,706) 48,643 (1,610) 1,023 (6,188) (667) 20,000 (42,500) (24,783) 76,820 253,327 1,057 26,023 3,812 637,535 Trans from General Fund 94,778 413,343 (224,192) 100% 107% $ 624,543 $ 668,626 $ 44,083 33% 14% d) 225,000 33% 0% a) 37,652 33% 0% 95,000 33% 0% a) 81,275 33% 0% a) 175,193 33% 25% a) 307,577 33% 41% a) 614,052 33% 13% 8,000 33% 35% c) 75,000 33% 13% 30,000 33% 0% 2,000 33% 11% 187,500 0% 74,350 33% 367,600 39,328 95,000 257,982 308,924 492,383 8,000 70,000 30,000 2,000 187,500 74,350 142,600 1,676 (81,275) 82,789 1,347 (121,669) (5,000) 33% 22% 1,912,599 1,933,067 20,468 94,777 (1) 33% 33% Total Transfers In 94,778 94,777 (1) 33% TOTAL RESOURCES 1,356,856 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Contingency 179,993 591,681 33 168,785 1,176,746 (180,110) 33% 165,829 377,043 33% 284,333 284,333 284,333 284,333 42% 2,821,475 2,886,026 64,551 Exp. % 14,164 33% 31% b) 214,638 33 33% 0% 168,785 33% n/a 33% 21% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 940,492 542,872 397,620 33% NET (Resources - Requirements) 416,364 633,874 217,510 a) Revenue projections reflect from final legislative allocations. b) Personnel projection reduced due to two positions open in 1st quarter. c) Court fees reduced for FY 2010. d) New federal grant for the Family Access Network received. 539,978 1,775,043 100 506,354 494,522 1,770,461 45,456 4,582 100 506,354 19% 2,821,475 2,264,983 556,492 621,043 621,043 Year End Budget Projection Variance 100% 107% $ 624,543 $ 668,626 $ 44,083 33% 14% d) 225,000 33% 0% a) 37,652 33% 0% 95,000 33% 0% a) 81,275 33% 0% a) 175,193 33% 25% a) 307,577 33% 41% a) 614,052 33% 13% 8,000 33% 35% c) 75,000 33% 13% 30,000 33% 0% 2,000 33% 11% 187,500 0% 74,350 33% 367,600 39,328 95,000 257,982 308,924 492,383 8,000 70,000 30,000 2,000 187,500 74,350 142,600 1,676 (81,275) 82,789 1,347 (121,669) (5,000) 33% 22% 1,912,599 1,933,067 20,468 94,777 (1) 33% 33% Total Transfers In 94,778 94,777 (1) 33% TOTAL RESOURCES 1,356,856 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Contingency 179,993 591,681 33 168,785 1,176,746 (180,110) 33% 165,829 377,043 33% 284,333 284,333 284,333 284,333 42% 2,821,475 2,886,026 64,551 Exp. % 14,164 33% 31% b) 214,638 33 33% 0% 168,785 33% n/a 33% 21% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 940,492 542,872 397,620 33% NET (Resources - Requirements) 416,364 633,874 217,510 a) Revenue projections reflect from final legislative allocations. b) Personnel projection reduced due to two positions open in 1st quarter. c) Court fees reduced for FY 2010. d) New federal grant for the Family Access Network received. 539,978 1,775,043 100 506,354 494,522 1,770,461 45,456 4,582 100 506,354 19% 2,821,475 2,264,983 556,492 621,043 621,043 SOLID WASTE Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 338,611 $ 466,325 $ 127,714 100% 138% $ 338,611 $ 466,325 $ 127,714 Revenues State Grant 37,850 37,850 33% n/a a) 37,850 37,850 Miscellaneous 10,000 8,992 (1,008) 33% 30% 30,000 30,000 Franchise 3% Fees 66,667 11,131 (55,536) 33% 6% b) 200,000 200,000 Commercial Disp. Fees 465,467 338,988 (126,479) 33% 24% 1,396,400 1,396,400 Private Disposal Fees 513,767 542,877 29,110 33% 35% 1,541,300 1,541,300 Franchise Disposal Fees 1,581,167 1,437,346 (143,821) 33% 30% 4,743,500 4,743,500 Yard Debris 25,000 33,027 8,027 33% 44% 75,000 75,000 Special Waste 10,000 12,636 2,636 33% 42% c) 30,000 30,000 Interest 4,667 6,057 1,390 33% 43% 14,000 14,000 Sale of Equip & Material 11,667 12,547 880 33% 36% 35,000 35,000 Total Revenues 2,688,402 2,441,451 (246,951) 33% 30% 8,065,200 8,103,050 37,850 TOTAL RESOURCES 3,027,013 2,907,776 (119,237) 33% 35% 8,403,811 8,569,375 165,564 REQUIREMENTS Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Debt Service Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency Exp. % 587,859 560,948 26,911 33% 32% 1,763,578 1,763,578 1,249,418 992,061 257,357 33% 26% d) 3,748,254 3,748,254 322,922 322,922 33% 0% e) 968,765 968,765 49,667 25,850 23,817 33% 17% f) 149,000 149,000 479,922 177,142 302,780 33% 12% 1,439,767 1,439,767 111,482 - 111,482 33% n/a 334,447 334,447 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,801,270 1,756,001 1,045,269 33% 21% 8,403,811 8,069,364 334,447 NET (Resources - Requirements) 225,743 1,151,775 926,032 500,011 500,011 a) Was due last fiscal year but received in 09-10. b) Due April 15, 2010. c) Contaminated soil and asbestos loads are intermittent. d) Some larger ticketed items are budgeted in M&S but not scheduled for purchase until later in the FY. e) Payments are scheduled for Nov and May. f) Capital item purchases are spread out throughout the fiscal year. Year End Budget Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $ 338,611 $ 466,325 $ 127,714 100% 138% $ 338,611 $ 466,325 $ 127,714 Revenues State Grant 37,850 37,850 33% n/a a) 37,850 37,850 Miscellaneous 10,000 8,992 (1,008) 33% 30% 30,000 30,000 Franchise 3% Fees 66,667 11,131 (55,536) 33% 6% b) 200,000 200,000 Commercial Disp. Fees 465,467 338,988 (126,479) 33% 24% 1,396,400 1,396,400 Private Disposal Fees 513,767 542,877 29,110 33% 35% 1,541,300 1,541,300 Franchise Disposal Fees 1,581,167 1,437,346 (143,821) 33% 30% 4,743,500 4,743,500 Yard Debris 25,000 33,027 8,027 33% 44% 75,000 75,000 Special Waste 10,000 12,636 2,636 33% 42% c) 30,000 30,000 Interest 4,667 6,057 1,390 33% 43% 14,000 14,000 Sale of Equip & Material 11,667 12,547 880 33% 36% 35,000 35,000 Total Revenues 2,688,402 2,441,451 (246,951) 33% 30% 8,065,200 8,103,050 37,850 TOTAL RESOURCES 3,027,013 2,907,776 (119,237) 33% 35% 8,403,811 8,569,375 165,564 REQUIREMENTS Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Debt Service Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency Exp. % 587,859 560,948 26,911 33% 32% 1,763,578 1,763,578 1,249,418 992,061 257,357 33% 26% d) 3,748,254 3,748,254 322,922 322,922 33% 0% e) 968,765 968,765 49,667 25,850 23,817 33% 17% f) 149,000 149,000 479,922 177,142 302,780 33% 12% 1,439,767 1,439,767 111,482 - 111,482 33% n/a 334,447 334,447 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 2,801,270 1,756,001 1,045,269 33% 21% 8,403,811 8,069,364 334,447 NET (Resources - Requirements) 225,743 1,151,775 926,032 500,011 500,011 a) Was due last fiscal year but received in 09-10. b) Due April 15, 2010. c) Contaminated soil and asbestos loads are intermittent. d) Some larger ticketed items are budgeted in M&S but not scheduled for purchase until later in the FY. e) Payments are scheduled for Nov and May. f) Capital item purchases are spread out throughout the fiscal year. RESOURCES: Beginning Net Working Capital Revenues Inter -fund Charges: General Liability Property Damage Vehicle Workers' Compensation Unemployment Claims Reimb-Workers' Compensation Claims Reimb-Gen Liab/Property Process Fee-Events/Parades Miscellaneous Skid Car Training Interest on Investments TOTAL REVENUES Transfers In -PERS Reserve TOTAL RESOURCES Appropriations/Expenditures Direct Insurance Costs: GENERAL LIABILITY Settlement / Benefit Defense Insurance Loss Prevention Repair / Replacement Total General Liability PROPERTY DAMAGE Insurance Repair / Replacement Total Property Damage VEHICLE Professional Service Insurance Loss Prevention Repair / Replacement Total Vehicle WORKERS' COMPENSATION Settlement / Benefit Insurance Loss Prevention Miscellaneous Total Workers' Compensation RISK MANAGEMENT Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance % of FY % CoII. $2,491,977 $2,669,291 $177,314 100% 107% $2,491,977 $2,669,291 $177,314 152,321 95,431 61,398 285,285 53,397 8,333 3,333 300 1,333 7,333 10,000 152,314 95,368 61,398 285,280 53,401 72,483 455 (23) 1,960 15,166 (7) 33% (63) 33% (0) 33% (5) 33% 4 33% (8,333) 33% 69,150 33% 155 33% (1,356) 33% (5,373) 33% 5,166 33% 678,466 737,802 33 59,336 33% (33) 33% 3,170,476 3,407,093 30,193 974 139,418 13 299 121,704 170,896 100,000 236,617 33% 33% 456,964 456,964 33% 286,294 286,294 33% 184,195 184,195 33% 855,854 855,854 33% 160,191 160,191 0% 25,000 25,000 725% 10,000 75,000 6f ,000 51% 900 900 -1% 4,000 4,000 9% 22,000 22,000 51% 30,000 30,000 36% 2,035,398 2,100,398 e,000 0% 100 (100) 75% 4,527,475 4,769,689 242,214 % Exp. (49,192) 33% 47% 135,996 105,984 241,980 (141,980) 33% 883 411 1,801 25,322 40,000 28,417 206,667 UNEMPLOYMENT - Settlement/Benefits 46,667 173,820 72,921 1,445 10,678 258,863 a) 365,112 360,000 '1,112 a) b) 81% 300,000 350,000 (50,000) 11,583 33% 24% 120,000 115,000 5,000 (52,196) 33% 42% 620,000 630,000 (10,000) 46,667 33% 0% c) 140,000 200,000 (60,000) Total Direct Insurance Costs 515,037 Insurance Administration: Personal Services 91,345 Materials & Service 82,164 Capital Outlay 33 700,156 (185,118) 33% 45% 1,545,112 1,655,000 (109,888) 89,962 60,931 Total Insurance Administration 173,542 Contingency 820,579 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,509,158 NET 1,661,318 150,893 851,049 2,556,044 1,383 33% 21,233 33% 33 33% 22,649 33% 820,579 33% 658,109 33% 894,726 a) Annual insurance payment (10/1/09-10/01/10), of $138,000 for Gen b) Expenditures in property damage is offset by claims reimbursement c) Expenditure for the quarter ended 9/30/09, paid in November, is $10 Health Services. 33% 274,034 25% 246,493 0% 100 29% 520,627 n/a 2,461,736 274,034 246,493 100 520,527 100 2,4k 1,736 19% 4,527,475 2,175,527 2,3f 1,948 2,594,162 2,514,162 Liab and $135,996 for Property Damage, expended in October. revenue. 1,687. Unemployment payments required due to layoffs in CDD ani Year End Budget Projection Variance $2,491,977 $2,669,291 $177,314 100% 107% $2,491,977 $2,669,291 $177,314 152,321 95,431 61,398 285,285 53,397 8,333 3,333 300 1,333 7,333 10,000 152,314 95,368 61,398 285,280 53,401 72,483 455 (23) 1,960 15,166 (7) 33% (63) 33% (0) 33% (5) 33% 4 33% (8,333) 33% 69,150 33% 155 33% (1,356) 33% (5,373) 33% 5,166 33% 678,466 737,802 33 59,336 33% (33) 33% 3,170,476 3,407,093 30,193 974 139,418 13 299 121,704 170,896 100,000 236,617 33% 33% 456,964 456,964 33% 286,294 286,294 33% 184,195 184,195 33% 855,854 855,854 33% 160,191 160,191 0% 25,000 25,000 725% 10,000 75,000 6f ,000 51% 900 900 -1% 4,000 4,000 9% 22,000 22,000 51% 30,000 30,000 36% 2,035,398 2,100,398 e,000 0% 100 (100) 75% 4,527,475 4,769,689 242,214 % Exp. (49,192) 33% 47% 135,996 105,984 241,980 (141,980) 33% 883 411 1,801 25,322 40,000 28,417 206,667 UNEMPLOYMENT - Settlement/Benefits 46,667 173,820 72,921 1,445 10,678 258,863 a) 365,112 360,000 '1,112 a) b) 81% 300,000 350,000 (50,000) 11,583 33% 24% 120,000 115,000 5,000 (52,196) 33% 42% 620,000 630,000 (10,000) 46,667 33% 0% c) 140,000 200,000 (60,000) Total Direct Insurance Costs 515,037 Insurance Administration: Personal Services 91,345 Materials & Service 82,164 Capital Outlay 33 700,156 (185,118) 33% 45% 1,545,112 1,655,000 (109,888) 89,962 60,931 Total Insurance Administration 173,542 Contingency 820,579 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,509,158 NET 1,661,318 150,893 851,049 2,556,044 1,383 33% 21,233 33% 33 33% 22,649 33% 820,579 33% 658,109 33% 894,726 a) Annual insurance payment (10/1/09-10/01/10), of $138,000 for Gen b) Expenditures in property damage is offset by claims reimbursement c) Expenditure for the quarter ended 9/30/09, paid in November, is $10 Health Services. 33% 274,034 25% 246,493 0% 100 29% 520,627 n/a 2,461,736 274,034 246,493 100 520,527 100 2,4k 1,736 19% 4,527,475 2,175,527 2,3f 1,948 2,594,162 2,514,162 Liab and $135,996 for Property Damage, expended in October. revenue. 1,687. Unemployment payments required due to layoffs in CDD ani DESCHUTES COUNTY 911 Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance % of FY % Coll. Budget Year End Projection Variance RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital $5,137,000 $ 5,611,168 $ 474,168 100% 109% $5,137,000 $5,611,168 $ 474,168 Revenues Property Taxes - Current 2,043,594 622,913 (1,420,681) 33% 10% a) 6,130,782 6,130,782 Property Taxes - Prior 33,333 167,509 134,176 33% 168% 100,000 167,509 67,509 State Reimbursement 8,167 2,148 (6,019) 33% 9% b) 24,500 6,000 (18,500) Telephone User Tax 178,667 70,569 (108,098) 33% 13% 536,000 536,000 Data Network Reimb. 11,333 22,402 11,069 33% 66% c) 34,000 27,880 (6,120) Jefferson County 9,333 4,744 (4,589) 33% 17% 28,000 28,000 User Fee 20,167 46,605 26,438 33% 77% d) 60,500 60,500 Contract Payments 23,333 23,978 645 33% 34% e) 70,000 26,000 (44,000) Miscellaneous 2,833 3,309 476 33% 39% 8,500 8,500 Interest 12,000 27,944 15,944 33% 78% 36,000 36,000 - Interest on Unsegregated Tax 1,250 303 (947) 33% 8% 3,750 3,750 Total Revenues 2,344,010 992,424 (1,351,586) 33% 14% 7,032,032 7,030,921 (1,111) Transfers In -Other 33 (33) 33% 0% 100 - (100) TOTAL RESOURCES 7,481,010 6,603,592 (877,418) 33% 54% 12,169,132 12,642,089 472,957 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Personal Services Materials and Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency % Exp. 1,272,096 1,141,055 131,041 33% 30% 3,816,287 3,816,287 429,841 280,172 149,669 33% 22% 1,289,522 1,289,522 58,333 13,830 44,503 33% 8% 175,000 175,000 646,313 646,313 33% 0% 1,938,939 1,938,939 1,649,795 1,649,795 33% n!a 4,949,384 4,949,384 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,056,378 1,435,057 2,621,321 33% 12% 12,169,132 7,219,748 4,949,384 NET (Resources - Requirements) 3,424,632 5,168,535 1,743,903 - 5,422,341 5,422,341 a) Approximately 85% of the property taxes are collected in October and November. b) Less activity being performed. c) Annual billings. d) Quarterly billing. e) Less contract activity with law enforcement agencies. Health Benefits Trust Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY % Coll. % RESOURCES Beg. Net Working Capital $17,894,797 $ 17,894,797 $ Revenues: Internal Premium Charges 3,493,333 3,489,762 PIT Emp - Add'I Prem 18,333 15,015 Employee Prem Contribution 110,000 113,190 COIC 333,333 361,354 Retiree / COBRA Co -Pay 166,667 192,222 Prescription Rebates 5,544 Interest 75,000 94,468 (0) 100% 100% (3,571) (3,319) 3,190 28,021 25,555 5,544 19,468 Total Revenues 4,196,667 4,271,555 74,888 TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS Expenditures: Personal Services Materials & Services Conferences and Seminars Claims Paid-Medical/Rx Claims Paid-DentalNision Refunds Insurance Expense State Assessments Administration Fee PPO Fee Health Impact Printing Program Supplies Other Total Materials & Services Capital Outlay Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 22,091,464 22,166,351 36,432 34,582 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% Revised Budget * Year End L Projection If Variance $17,894,797 $ 17,894,797 $ (0) 33% a) 10,480,000 10,440,425 (39,575) 27% 55,000 55,000 34% 330,000 330,000 36% 1,000,000 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 5,544 5,544 225,000 225,000 38% n/a 42% 34% 12,590,000 12,555,969 (34,031) 74,888 92% 73% 30,484,797 30,450,766 Exp. % 1,850 33% 32% 109,297 109,297 1,000 505 495 4,749,192 3,931,084 818,108 607,333 528,610 78,723 - (21,587) 21,587 124,180 123,878 302 3,833 68,989 (65,155) 97,588 96,060 1,528 27,216 12,391 14,825 16,524 16,545 (21) 3,333 393 2,940 33,333 1,239 32,094 9,686 12,528 (2,842) 5,673,220 4,770,636 4,451,914 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 902,584 33% - 33% 4,451,914 10,161,566 4,805,218 33% 17% 28% b) 29% b) n/a 33% n/a c) 33% 15% 33% 4% 1% 43% 28% 0% 0% 3,000 3,000 14,247,576 11,356,466 1,822,000 1,527,097 (21,587) 372,540 372,540 11,500 11,500 292,764 292,764 81,648 81,648 49,572 49,572 10,000 10,000 100,000 100,000 29,059 29,059 (34,031) ;',891,110 294,903 21,587 17,019,659 100 13,355,741 13,812,059 3,207,600 100 13 355,741 5,356,348 33% 16% 30,484,797 13,921,356 16 563,441 NET(Resources- Requirements) ' 11,929,898 17,361,133 5,431,235 - 16,529,410 16 529,410 * Proposed revisions to FY 2010 original budget a) Amount budgeted to be transferred from operating funds for FY 2010. b) Projection based on annualizing 18 weeks of claims paid. YTD actual is $246,562 per week. c) Zurich to reimburse County $57,490 (5/6ths) of the $68,989 payment made in July for the July through December assessment. 0 Ocll CO N 0 Ym LL O 0 0 N 7 0) y O 0) Q0 n 0 7 .0 LL .0 E 0 0) E Z (0 0 2 0) m } ❑ Q 0) .0 O 0 0 0) E d 0) ro'0000-- (D C).C) On0 Ul V - N N 0 N N n N O OI (O 02 U2 . • O (0 V Or MN N M (0 (0 V M O co N (V 0 0 0 0 0 0 CCD 0 0 0 :O (D O O N .O O C) C) 0 M 0 O N n (D • s-NWn V M N ul ,F cn .' N I..r> co 01) N 0 co h co O co O co 0 cocci V Cr) O e- 0 01) CO V O,O 0'e. 0) O N P- CD C) e- (D 000 0 O 00 10 0 0') (0 (O 't() '0 V 7 co N O O O.0 ,0 on O O h n V N,e- 0'1- N M O O O a 6 M O C) CO CD 000 Ul et N N N O (0 ' N co_ 0 r M ONE N M', O O O W 0 (0'0 N'(0 N N N. O N 23 .00 (0 O N '(V O (O CO; O'V O' 0 n O - 1 o O)'0 (O h (D N''(D n N O n_0 00 �O N. 00 0 N 000 1N �'. P:.. yr' O - ' O O 0 (0 (O N N N, O.� M'0 n M (WO V O M N O. M M' 0 0 0 - N •- O O 000 N r' MO M �' (0 O O '' ''.(Dv n M O ' (O 0 (o v r I, N O O O O' O N OM O M N • ' ' O 10'0'0 ' O 0) O n M' O O O 0') V (0 0 V • P- o O' o O n 04 o ' O'' 00 0 coNN V O 0 00 N 0 00 • 0 i O 0 ' (0 M 01 e - NI ('1) 0 MN) CO 0Ul M e (0 n M (O N O M N O W Met - 0 0 O (0 n'M O 1 f' WD V M N o o0 0 O 0 10 O Or O ' ', O 0 cf 0') r M N N 0 M CO ' ' O ' V) O N O M V M O M U1' P. M ' O r O V 0') M O V 03 CO 0 r CO CO V CO 0 0 M 0 N O n CD 0'e - t+), 0 CD 04 0 CO UP 0 1- `- v v 0 00) O N N 0. (D O 0) O 0)n O v n N O (0 (0 n O 0'N CO W 0 0- 3 3 0) 0) ,h OD O O co' N N N W (0 0 10 O O CO COCD N 0) v 01 (D (0 r 3 (0 O.0 CVO) O O' O o'o) O "(0 cri 0 to (0 M 0 N CO N N CO (0 (n 'm O (0 ('1) (D 05 0') 01 r ( 10 oi 00 CO CO N N aD 0 up V M 0 (D O .- 0 CO CO' ' O.,V V W 00 0 CO N N O 0')' O e- O W V n �'.N. 00) n N M OCD 00 0O 0'. V' �0� ' (270' e- P. ' CO O N O N'.' ' V�(DO ' M' O M a0 00'V N' ‘r 04 .- 0 h O O', �^ O (0 a O 0 V, V 00 O (O 00: 00 N 00 0 r on o ▪ ' ' V , ' V. ' V coMO M a (00 0 00. n' ' N ,i V n. (0 V co (0 V a ul V N.' N' N N 0) et I-- N N N (0 M N O .-. to o n O ▪ O )n, O 01 CO N M M cD O 0 ' CD CO 00 N W 0 (0D (N+) 0 0 0 0 0 eD V (D O M W 0) O O' V 00 co n (0 co'', n co 0'n '(D n n, 00 (D O ' ' ' N r N'..�. a (0 O 0'Vr O O. N 0 0) LL u) 0 0Eo _ CD c y' c u> Ill Ce 01 j �y ‘5I _I C 0 C 7i C' C OV NSI C' 0 ii 9 a., 0.. ce 0 e(j co I To N 0 C 0 I a' co C (0 O a' w'S c'n0 0a 01) a) c'�Im.0 c ociro0 �, an d a) g E y c c t N, io Q) _ It m .� o0.wl...I '.(ouzO>CI 2't G a20ill 1— u.0 0 N0P- 0' M 0 CO O. N O co V N M'. 0 M. N N" 0 yr 3 O. M, (▪ 0D 0 O N v O.j N O:LL ; RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Receipts: Security & Traffic Reimb Miscellaneous Vending Machines Telephone Fees - Events Special Events Revenues Interest Storage Camping at F & E Horse Stall Rental Concession % - Food Rights (Signage, etc.) Interfund Contract Total Receipts Transfers In TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures: Personal Services Materials and Services Debt Service Capital Outlay Transfer to Reserve Fund (617) Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS NET (Resources - Requirements) Deschutes County - Fair and Expo Center YTD -Budget Basis Statement of Financial Operating Data Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget _ Actual Variance FY % Co II. % $ 75,000 $ 42,232 $ (32,768) 100% 12,000 1,002 575 300 134,700 666 22,000 2,000 33,000 3,420 3,513 124 83,984 263 8,446 1,170 11,611 11,000 (12,000) 2,511 (451) (300) (50,716) (403) (13,554) (2,000) 1,170 (21,389) 7,580 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% Year End Budget Projection Variance 56% $ 75,000 0% 88% 5% 0% 16% 13% 15% 0% 3% 5% 13% 0% 12,000 4,000 2,300 1,200 540,000 2,000 58,000 7,000 45,000 235,000 86,420 45,000 $ 42,232 $ (32,768) 6,512 1,849 900 488,833 1,597 58,000 5,000 46,170 213,611 99,000 45,000 (12,000) 2,512 (451) (300) (51,167) (403) (2,000) 1,170 (21,389) 12,580 209,663 120,111 (89,552) 33% 12% 1,037,920 135,171 135,171 - 33% 27% a) 498,105 419,834 297,514 (122,320) 33% 18% 1,611,025 274,896 258,158 16,738 177,108 144,715 32,393 452,004 402,873 33% Exp. % 31% 33% 27% b) 0% 0% 33% 0% c) n/a 33% 33% 33% 824,769 531,604 116,188 100 16,412 121,952 966,472 386,876 1,395, 580 (71,448) (111,229) (215,445) 808,002 16,767 525,132 6,472 116,188 100 16,412 121,952 49,131 33% 25% 1,611,025 1,465,734 145,291 (32,170) (105,359) (73,189) a) Transfer from Annual County Fair fund projected to be $111,000 less than budgeted. b) It is possible that M & S will be less than what is currently projected. c) The transfer will be made to the Reserve Fund only if there are sufficient funds. Accrued Revenue (Accounts Receivable): Current Month Events Prior Months Total Accounts Receivable 11,244 565 11,809 - (70,154) (70,154) Deposits Received for Future Events: 2010: November December January February March April May June FY 2011 FY 2012 & Beyond TOTAL 8,723 1,205 100 2,270 490 4,875 3,260 1,000 36,090 5,450 63,463 REVENUES Gate Receipts 400,000 284,806 Carnival 154,000 127,997 Commercial Exhibitors: Outside 70,000 84,395 Inside 38,000 42,700 Food 12,000 13,900 Livestock Entry Fees 4,000 4,951 R/V Camping/Horse Stall Rental 17,000 18,102 Concessions: Food 146,850 112,931 112,931 Fair Sponsorship: Rodeo 23,000 19,350 19,350 84% (3,650) On -ground Stages 13,000 8,000 8,000 62% (5,000) Day 8,000 5,000 5,000 63% (3,000) Golf Carts 2,500 4,125 4,125 165% 1,E,25 Food Court 3,000 3,000 3,000 100% Concert (a) 30,000 10,000 20,000 30,000 100% Presenting Sponsors 12,000 12,000 12,000 100% Barn Sponsors 6,000 3,400 3,400 57% (2,E:00) Parade Sponsors 4,800 4,800 N/A 4,E'00 Transfer In -General Fund 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 100% T -Shirts 3,500 3,725 - 3,725 106% 225 Donations 1,229 - 1,229 N/A 1,229 State Grant (b) 25,000 - 41,963 41,963 168% 16,963 Interest 2,000 655 150 805 40% (1,1 9) Deschutes County Fair - Fund 619 Revenues and Expenses FAIR 2009 - July 29 to August 1, 2009 Fiscal Year 2010 284,806 71% 127,997 83% (115, 194) (26, )03) 84,395 42,700 13,900 4,951 18,102 121% 112% 116% 124% 106% 77% 14,395 4, '00 1,100 !)51 1 02 (33,4)19) TOTAL REVENUES 974,850 770,066 62,113 832,179 85% (142,671) EXPENSES Personnel 178,128 152,715 29,507 182,222 102% (4,094) Materials and Services 623,444 575,942 13,114 589,056 94% 34,388 Contingency 31,157 - - 0% 31,157 TOTAL EXPENSES 832,729 728,657 42,621 771,278 93% 61,451 Net Fair - 2009 142,121 41,409 19,492 60,901 (81,220) Transfer to Fund 618 197,421 - 86,192 86,192 111,229 Retained in Annual Fair Fund (55,300) 41,409 (66,700) (25,291) 30,009 Beg Net Working Capital Ending Balance 55,300 25,291 25,291 .11 66,700 66,700 0.00 0 (a) Combined Communications payment due on or before December 31, 2009. (b) Per Oregon Fairs Association Actual - Through FY 2010 Budget October 31, 2009 Additional Estimated Projected Total % of Budget Varia=ice 284,806 71% 127,997 83% (115, 194) (26, )03) 84,395 42,700 13,900 4,951 18,102 121% 112% 116% 124% 106% 77% 14,395 4, '00 1,100 !)51 1 02 (33,4)19) TOTAL REVENUES 974,850 770,066 62,113 832,179 85% (142,671) EXPENSES Personnel 178,128 152,715 29,507 182,222 102% (4,094) Materials and Services 623,444 575,942 13,114 589,056 94% 34,388 Contingency 31,157 - - 0% 31,157 TOTAL EXPENSES 832,729 728,657 42,621 771,278 93% 61,451 Net Fair - 2009 142,121 41,409 19,492 60,901 (81,220) Transfer to Fund 618 197,421 - 86,192 86,192 111,229 Retained in Annual Fair Fund (55,300) 41,409 (66,700) (25,291) 30,009 Beg Net Working Capital Ending Balance 55,300 25,291 25,291 .11 66,700 66,700 0.00 0 (a) Combined Communications payment due on or before December 31, 2009. (b) Per Oregon Fairs Association PROJECTION 0 O N 0 a) U (0 0 E U W c a) E E E 0 0 Received and a) 0 a) X W RESOURCES: 1 1.0 O 1t) 0) 0 0) 4 O O 1n 0) I ) N M co. 6 cn 0 U CD U C (0 U U O 4) to N d V N2o U • a o o 00 c EXPENDITURES: O 1� LC" 0 CV CO CO ' ' ' N ' ( c) N vO 05 cc) -1- Er) 000 co 1l) 00 O N co O O co) O N ch 0) O d1 I� 1l) O N C( Cl4 CV O O 4 O 00 r Er) r M I� O 03 M (OC) 0 N- 0 0 0 c4) ' O 0) ' O L) ' O t O U) O v- 03 03 1n M O • N I" N N In M O (0) O O CO (S) (.0 CO 0) 0 0) (O N d7 CO I- 0 0 00 d1 N (f) N 4 O— c O O ti N.. N N x O M O 0) OOCOLOCO CO 0) 00)(r) • Imo- 0) co I- CO co) (6tom- to 4 4 O— c0 ✓ N I� � r O ce) M 00 .rte co O C0 O co O O co 0) 00 co d• LC) (l) O ti o co ▪ O 0) O c6 co ▪ N r v N M O 00 r � O N M M O co ti 1n 1n O N ti c`) O d• 0) 1l) M N 0) M M N 0) M O O N W CA a) V U Z (n Oa) v) CA R C 0 0 _- °6 r C ccs • co 0 U a cn d r (0 R. Cr) a) 0 a)co) U (gyp ` ,0 `0. R 05 .� � V) O) -p U Zr) •� 0 2 O U E U co To 0 7 z O U c a) ( a) > c L H o I— - Qwi-a cu_<a`_0 • -.E.:5. co U C a) 0) c 0 0 co 0) N 03 03 M O O w C`5 co 0 0) 0) Total Expenditures d Z co O u) Z C lLl LL 2 rn O 2 N a_ O M c0 N Q 0 U 0) ) WO - 0 -c a Z 3 0 N , H c U a) W 0 Classification Amount Paid 0 0_ (1)0 a) 0 CO O N O ti r CO N O Capital Outlay O O O O '71- (0 r r D7 C" J LO O) CO C") r O N COO 1 0 0) dr 10 N O tea) 0 a) 0(5 X 17) 0 C (/) 0 a.) -4-,e,- Cl) 0 0 0 To v O c a Q 8 to UJ O (o (0 •- 2 N 0 a0) o LCA Architects LCA Architects Total Architect 0 0) 0 7 ``Y^^ V/ 0) Oc ^^^^,, r 0 C (5) Ci) ^) c U V/ LU co a) O 11) co a) 0) 0) N O O O Total Encumbrances & Commitments PROJECTION a) U co O H Encumbrances & Commitments Received and a) c a) 0 W RESOURCES: CD M O I� N CO 0 I � CO 0 M O 00 O t) O N CD N CO M N 0 CO O 0 0 N M 0 O : CO O O O co O to O N CO N CO M N CO O t0 CD N CD N M CD CD co co Tr O CO 00 M O Total Resources EXPENDITURES: Materials & Services 0) LOCO Cr) O CO r' N N- O CO 0) 0 N- O O (V 0 0 O O CO 0 a0 LC) a0 0 1 0 0 0 LC) O'—'— Cr) 0- 0 0 O r- CV O N CV O • LO N I� 0 (0 O d- n - O N 00 00 0 0 0 0 ' O ' 0 0 ' 0 0 N O O '- '- O N to O r- • 0 0 0 CD - O 00 N,— • r M CO O CO CD — N- CO CO 0 0 0 O CC) 01) CO • r ' N c0 N ▪ N- CO N 1.0 I I 1 1 1 1 N 0 0 CO O CO CV 0 0 CO CO O 00 CO r` • O O 0 0 0 O co O r r 00 (NJ U) 2 V) X a) ii U ...=. U C cn o z a) ao ) (n c a •� > c a) V) m a) a)O) O U N U) L.L. L ' a) 3 °c) a) 0 o E CT 0 U tia)C N 0,o O c)'cc▪ CC7CO 'Ec UON c w6a(13 (Da) L C 4HFLS5i¢a_02 ti ti CO 00 LC) 00 CD N d' r N ti c0 co 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 O O O O O N CO It) CD Cn to M M N CD (0 N r— 0 0 0 N- 0 0 0 ▪ ' O O O O CO O Cr) CO N O N CO M c O co 0) O O O O O 10 N O CV- 0 O O CO C co o (0 )n N 0 O Tr. e- 00 0 N N- M O 0) t) N I() 0 LL) r U a) O U RA CO Cr CC CC CO to N M '4) <V Total Expenditures N' PROJECTION O H J 1- 0 0 c o 0 d Encumbrances & Commitments Received and c O Q X W RESOURCES: O ti M CO ti M CO N O CO N- CO O CO I� N O O C N O T LO N CO O 0)) M M O N O N O CO O CO CDNON O N O 1� O N- CO CO N CO 0) M M CO CO d' N. O 03 N. ' CO Lr)N O M M Ch I 1 I M Total Resources EXPENDITURES: Materials & Services 0) CO LO CO CO Lo N O CO O) O N t O O N O O O CO O O O 0 0'- 0 O d O O v- O O d O v- N O (\ N N O N CO O0) OCO CCOO OO O O d ' O .- ' 0 N. r- N O O .- .- CO co N 10 N d O O) O CO d O CO N I- CO c- CO O CO CO c- I- OCOOOO.--a) Od co T N d03 N '1" COCV .1- co' ' ' N O NOOOd• Lt) ON 00-r- 100)-COcocoO) co .1- co co- N N d .-- CO N ti N- 06 O CO O 03 CO N O) CO co N O r -- r -- co M O M co O 03 O dw O N M d• O CO N d• LO CO ti N CO M N O O r T T COLO O CO 0 0) N O O O N CO O N- CO co co co .- c- N N 0 C N N N T O co O N O 0) N_ 03 O) r - ti O d 0) O O M O N O N d U V U —E U c0 U °o 7 . rA co > N ° co 7 2 is ° TtjO 0 V co n d •. .` > > t y c O >s c 0 E m U co m° a c U U�O O U CV • O Tj U E V U d c 75 O •) to coc >Oa U.cONU c(0 O NC c c u) O c Qw1-n c Li.O Q'p aOI- cO I- 0 0O 0 0 N CO N ti 03 M 03 O N M u7 N 03 Total Expenditures N O ti 0 0 03 N a� z Amount Paid C O 0 U N a) ❑ Cf) I� NC) 0 O d) 1- co COCD00 CO Lri (fl O O� LO O C)co d) co N d) CO Nd) ' ' CO CO CO ,- O C) O 0 - . N 1- to 1- CO O O O �- 0) CA O .- .- CO N- C N N. C) CC000 Cf) I� N a) a) N U X N O °) o � C c C OW N 2 .5 CL CC ' - • �- O O CO d) CO CO O d) N. N N OO'— f— co N C) O `zt Total Architect cn E N C (/) (B 0 • N CT • a) U CQ 0 E O Q (/) C Herman Miller 0 U co O 0 Engineered Structures Inc Total Encumbrances & Commitments cD O O c O L >,LLN c • >� M O 43 O.5 a - o d A U = L a) N 0) a Li - 2 - F— Z rn PROJECTION J h a) U c co 1 O 1— Encumbrances & Commitments Received and 0 a) 0 c a) 0. w RESOURCES: O O O t0 1() co N Q) O x- 01 CD O CO 0 01 Q) r ' co a) f� N 1.0 CO f- N CD o O� 00 LLLL Transfer In -911 Transfer In -911 Federal Grants 2 a) c Total Resources O O O O Ln O O O O LCD t` O O O O ti O O O O LCD ti I O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O co ,- O ,- O co co co N N r r X- O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 L6 Lf) O r LCD O Lti O Lf) O co — O — O co N- M co CN N r r x— O OO O O O a) O O O Y_ E a) LL c x V o 0 i. i.". 0 06 m ac) O a) v) 0) • Co E w co °� `�E o 0 > m 7.77 U` y ca o NUO0 N , ct O ° E 1) aN >N ci) oW LL Hv)U la 1p a)cO0• N co C.) otL) E. w 0 a) aU a) Nw p;0; 0 c aco.o .c o c.n,c z a ) a v ff o OW 8 U1- Oc�vOL�Zm L a • c ti a_ wX a3 �2 U0 LL I— 0 Total Ewnenditures RESOURCES: Beg. Net Working Capital Revenues Grants - Private Total Revenues TOTAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Debt Service (Negative Int Rev) Deschutes County Bethlehem Inn (Fund 128) Four Months Ended October 31, 2009 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance FY Coll. % $(2,666,469) $(2,689,172) $ (22,703) 100% 101% a) $(2,666,469) $(2,689,172) $ (22,703) 2,766,469 2,766,469 - (2,766,469) 33% 0% 2,766,469 - (2,766,4,a - (2,766,469) 33% 0% 2,766,469 • (2,766,469) 100,000 (2,689,172) (2,789,172) 33% -2689% 100,000 (2,689,172) (2,789,1 '2) Exp. % 100,000 14,73585,265 33% 15% b) 100,000 45,000 55,0(i0 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 100,000 14,735 85,265 33% 15% 100,000 45,000 55,010 NET (Resources - Requirements) - (2,703,907) (2,703,907) a) The beginning working capital is $22,703 less than estimated for the FY 2010 budget. b) October interest expense was $3,196. - (2,734,172) (2,734,178 Year End Budget Projection Variance $(2,666,469) $(2,689,172) $ (22,703) 100% 101% a) $(2,666,469) $(2,689,172) $ (22,703) 2,766,469 2,766,469 - (2,766,469) 33% 0% 2,766,469 - (2,766,4,a - (2,766,469) 33% 0% 2,766,469 • (2,766,469) 100,000 (2,689,172) (2,789,172) 33% -2689% 100,000 (2,689,172) (2,789,1 '2) Exp. % 100,000 14,73585,265 33% 15% b) 100,000 45,000 55,0(i0 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 100,000 14,735 85,265 33% 15% 100,000 45,000 55,010 NET (Resources - Requirements) - (2,703,907) (2,703,907) a) The beginning working capital is $22,703 less than estimated for the FY 2010 budget. b) October interest expense was $3,196. - (2,734,172) (2,734,178 Deschutes County General Support Services - BOCC Conference/Seminar, Education/Training and Related Travel Expenditures FY 2010 Jul Aug Sep Oct YTD Total Tammy Baney Conf/Sem & Educ/Training - 350 350 Travel Meals 15 15 Accommodations - 595 595 Airfare - - - - Mileage reimbursement 256 86 5.73 915 Ground Transport/Parking 45 45 Total Baney 256 86 1,578 1,920 Dennis Luke Conf/Sem & Educ/Training - 350 350 Travel Meals 25 - 25 50 Accommodations - 77 - 452 529__ Airfare - - Mileage reimbursement 329 85 257 672 Ground Transport/Parking - 34 34 Total Luke - 432 85 1,118 1,635 Alan Unger Conf/Sem & Educ/Training 350 350 Travel Meals Accommodations 624 624 Airfare Mileage reimbursement - Ground Transport/Parking 56 56 Total Unger - 1,031 1,031 Total - BOCC Department Conf/Sem & Educ/Training - 700 1,050 Travel Meals 25 - 40 65 Accommodations 77 - 1,046 1,748 Airfare - - Mileage Reimbursement 585 172 831 1,587 Ground Transport 79 135 Total - BOCC Department 687 172 2,696 4,585 FY 2010 Budget 22,750 Percent Expended 20.2% 11/2/2109 November 20, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security 500 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20472 Board of County Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 200 • Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 • Fax [541) 385- 3202 www.co.deschutes or,us board@co.deschutes or. us Tammy 3aney Dennis R Luke Alan Jnger Subject: 2010 Central Oregon Wildfire Mitigation Project Sub -Application to the FEMA Pre - Disaster Mitigation Grant Program This letter serves to verify that the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners supports the 2010 Central Oregon Wildfire Mitigation Project sub -application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Pre -Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant program. If awarded a PDM grant, Deschutes County, the official applicant and potential fiscal agent for grant funds received, will be responsible for the required local match of 25%. The County's sub - application outlines the matching contribution which relies on mandatory property owner contributions in a percentage of approximately 33% cash, labor, and/or materials and equipment toward 77% in grant funds used to reduce wildfire fuels on private lands. In cases where the property owner is not financially or physically able to contribute the matching share, an equivalent in-kind value of labor, supplies, and equipment will be provided by other groups, such as neighboring Rangeland Fire Protection Associations (RFPAs). The value of these contributions will be fully documented and monitored throughout project implementation using established forms, tracking systems, and accounting methodologies. Thank you for the opportunity to submit an application to the PDM grant program. We look forward to continuing our work with the Oregon Emergency Management Division and FEMA to implement this important project in the future. Sincerely, Tammy Baney, Chair Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost -Effective Manner JUDY STIEGLER STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 54 November 25, 2009 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 900 Court St NE Salem, OR 97301 Ken Murphy, Director Oregon Office of Emergency Management PO Box 14370 Salem, OR 97309 Dear Mr. Murphy: We are writing this letter of support for the pre -disaster mitigation grant Deschutes County is currently applying for to treat hazardous wildland fuels in Crook, Deschutes, and Klamath Counties. Wildland fire is no stranger to Central Oregon. Over the last twenty years, there has been an average of 452 wildland fires on 50,000 acres annually, making our geographic area one of the most volatile in the Pacific Northwest. In 2006, the Black Crater Fire caused the evacuation of over 1,500 people in the community of Sisters. To minimize this potential loss of lives, property, and natural resources, we simply must treat the fuels before the wildland fires occur. During the 2007 and 2008 pre -disaster mitigation grant funding cycles, Deschutes County was successful in receiving approximately $1.6 million to address wildland fuels throughout neighborhoods in both Crook and Deschutes County. Those projects are currently underway and are expected to treat well over 2,200 acres of high risk lands by the end of the two grant periods. Prior to those awards, only one wildland fire pre -disaster mitigation grant application was successful in Oregon and, in 2008, the Deschutes County application was the only wildfire mitigation request funded in the entire country. This seems unfortunate given the fire history of the state, particularly during the past five years. The high probability for devastating wildland fire events presents an ongoing threat to the health and safety of our region and the work to mitigate this threat must be continued. We ask that the Oregon Office of Emergency Management support the application to be submitted by Deschutes County for further funding during the 2010 cycle. Thank you for your consideration. C.- \m't--k. Senator Chris Te1fert Representative Gene Whisnant Represent. ive Judy Stigler Phone: 503-986-1454 rep.judystiegler@state.or.us District Address: 61535 S. Hwy 97 Suite 9-202, Bend, OR 97702 PF Complete Click time c; Upgrade Expanded Features Unlimited Pages„ AI Switzer. Commissioner Position Onc November 27, 2009 KLA MATH COUNTY Home of Crater Lake hlanrrrllr (onrrtr ( nnrrrd.vrmen 305 Main Street, Klamath Falls, Oregon 97601 Phone: 541-883-5100 Fax: 541-883-5163 Email: John Elliott. Commissioner Cheryl 11ukill, Commissioner Position Two Position Thrcc Federal Emergency Management Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security 500 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20472 Subject: 2010 Central Oregon Wildfire Mitigation Project Sub -Application to the FEMA Pre - Disaster Mitigation Grant Program This letter serves to verify that the Klamath County Board of Commissioners supports the 2010 Central Oregon Wildfire Mitigation Project sub -application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Pre -Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant program. If awarded a PDM grant, Klamath County will be responsible for the required local soft match of' 25%. The County's sub -application outlines the matching contribution which relies on mandatory property owner contributions in a percentage of approximately 33% cash, labor, and/or materials and equipment toward 77% in grant funds used to reduce wildfire fuels on private lands. In casts where the property owner is not financially or physically able to contribute the matching share, an equivalent in-kind value of labor, supplies, and equipment will provided by other groups. The value of these contributions will be fully documented and monitored throughout project implementation using established forms, tracking systems. and accounting methodologies. Thank you for the opportunity to submit an application to the PDM grant program. We look forward to continuing our work with the Oregon Emergency Management Division and FEMA to implement this important project in the future of Klamath County and our sister jurisdictions. Si erely, n Elliott. Chairman Cheryl 1tUkill, Commissioner Al S cr.—Commissioner November 25, 2009 Crook County Federal Emergency Management Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security 500 C St.. SW Washington, DC 20472 300 N.E. 3rd Street • Prineville, Oregon 97754 Phone (541) 447-6555 • FAX (541) 4116-3891 Re: 2010 Central Oregon Wildfire Mitigation Project Sub -Application to the FEMA Predisaster Mitigation Grant Program To Whom it May Concern: This letter serves to verify that the Crook County Court supports the 2010 Central Oregon Wildfire Mitigation Project Sub -Application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Pre -Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant program. If awarded a PDM grant, Crook County will work with Deschutes County, the official applicant and potential fiscal agent for grant funds received, and will coordinate for the required local match of 25%. Crook County will support the matching contribution which relies on mandatory property owner contributions in a percentage of approximately 33% (cash, labor andJor materials and equipment) toward 77% in grant funds used to reduce wildfire fuels on private lands. In cases where the property owner is not financially or physically able to contribute the matching share, an equivalent in-kind value of labor, supplies and equipment will be provided by other groups such as neighboring Rangeland Fire Protection Associations (RFPAs). The value of these contributions will be fully documented and monitored throughout project implementation using established forms, tracking systems and accounting methodologies. Thank you for the opportunity to submit an application to the PDM grant program. We look forward to continuing our work with the Oregon Emergency Management Division and FEMA to implement this important project in the future. Sincerely, Mike McCabe Crook County Judge MM/mli Mike McCabe, Judge • Ken Fahlgren, County Commissioner • Lynn Lundquist, County Commission ,t,r 140t,A‘ Board of County Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 200 • Bend, OR 97701-1960 [541) 388-6570 • Fax [541) 385-3202 www.co.deschutes or. us board@co. deschutes or. us Tammy 3aney Dennis R Luke Alan Jnger MEMORANDUM DATE: November 30, 2009 TO: Dennis J. Sigrist, Oregon Emergency Management FROM: Joe Stutter, Deschutes County Forester RE: Maintenance of Fuels Treatment If Deschutes, Crook and Klamath Counties are fortunate to receive the Pre - Disaster Mitigation Grant to treat hazardous wildland fuels on private lands the issue of maintenance will be addressed as follows: • A majority of private lands in each County is protected by the Oregon Department of Forestry and consequently the Oregon Forestland - Urban Interface Fire Protection Act of 1997 (SB 360) requires private land owners to provide and maintain defensible space around structures and on vacant lots. In Deschutes County for the "unprotected private lands," private property owners are also required to follow SB 360 defensible space standards. In Deschutes County we have over 70% voluntary compliance with SB 360. • Each County is currently implementing a variety of "Sweat Equity" programs where private land owner's complete defensible space around their structures and the debris is picked up and utilized for biomass purposes. In Deschutes County alone over 250,000 cubic yards of defensible space yard debris has been collected and ground the last 3 years. • Each County will continue aggressive education and prevention programs which provide ideas, tools and assistance for private land owners to treat fuels and to better "live with wildland fire." Sincerely, osepn E. Stutter Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost -Effective Manner Pre -Disaster Mitigation - FY08 PDM Competitive Grant Program SUBGRANTEE QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FORM Covering the Period: July 1 thru October 1, 2009 Subgrantee Name: Deschutes County Grant: EMS- 2007-PC=0005(3) Sub -Grant Application Reference: PDMC-PJ-10-OR- Project Name: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Deschutes/Crook Counties Project Location: Deschutes Count 2007-004 Grant Type: [ ] Planning Plan Adopted y/n? [ x ] Project WORK SCHEDULE: Work is Proceeding on Schedule: Yes[x] No [ ] %ofWork Completed100% Start date: 9/28/07 Estimated Completion: 5/28/11 COST STATUS: Cost Unchanged [ x] Cost Over -Estimate [ ] Cost Under -Estimate[ ] Oregon Emergency Management P.O. Box 14370 Salem, OR 97309-5062 Documertt3 Comments (Describe problems or circumstances affecting completion dates milestones, scope of work, & cost. Also describe achievements successes, progress and special issues) Since July 1 thru October 1, 2009 the following has been accomplished: 1. Treated 1,997.75 acres this quarter and with total so far of 13,296.75 acres and have exceeded our grant target of 1200 acres. 2. Private land owner contributions for this period are 1904.75 acres from numerous neighborhoods throughout the county which accumulated and ground 7,991 cubic yards of debris brought to disposal sites by citizens. Acres treated by the public are 12,992.5 of the grant total. We have treated an additional 304.25 acres on public lands (county property). 3. Numerous Project Wildfire and Community Fire Planning meetings to identify fuels treatment priorities. SIGNED BY: PRINT SIGNATURE: Joe Stutter DATE: October 8 2009 ADDRESS: 61150 SE 27th Avenue, Bend, OR 97702 PHONE: (541) 322-7117 OEM Pre -Disaster Mitigation Program Deschutes County & Crook Counties Grant Agreement #: EMS -2007 -PC -005 (3) Project Application #: PDMC-PJ-IO-OR-2007-004 In -Kind Match July 1 thru October 1 Property Owners Contribution: Our activity is increased significantly during the summer and early fall and the following list identify our match and public contributions to our overall grant effort of providing defensible space. For this quarter we treated a total of 1997.75 acres of which the public contributed 1949.75 acres. Using the formula in the grant of $333 per acre for public contribution for this quarter alone we accumulated an additional $687,660.75. This amount comes from a cubic yard contribution by the public from the neighborhoods to county owned disposal sites. We accumulated 7,991 cubic yards, using the calculation of each cubic yard of treatment creates % acre of defensible space treatment. Joe Stutler Deschutes County Forester OREGON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PRE -DISASTER MITIGATION PROGRAM DESCHUTES COUNTY & CROOK COUNTY GRANT AGREEMENT No: EMS -2007 -PC -005 (3) PROJECT APPLICATION NO: PDMC-PJ-10-OR-2007-004 OfficeSupport Staff Benefits Deschutes County Crook County GIS & Tech Support Staff Benefits Office Support Staff Wages Deschutes County Crook County Deschutes County Crook County GIS & Tech Support Staff Wages Deschutes County D C Forester Wages/CC Crook County Project Coordinator Deschutes County Crook County' Project Wildfire Coordinator Wages Deschutes County Crook County COST ESTIMATE BUDGET PREVIOUS BILLED D C Forester Benefits Deschutes County Crook County Project Wildfire Coordinator Benefits Staff Supplies Local Staff Travel Office Space Meeting Rooms Deschutes County Crook County Deschutes County Crook County Deschutes County Crook County Deschutes County Crook County 3,494.00 Deschutes County Crook County Veg Removal Cont Labor - Public Land $ 630,000.00 Deschutes County Crook County, Veg Removal Cont Labor - Private Land Deschutes County Crook County DESCHUTES COUNTY TOTAL CROOK COUNTY TOTAL COMBINED TOTAL IN-KIND TRAVEL & LABOR Project Wildfire Committee Involvement Deschutes County Crook Count �$ 100.00 BAL ‘NCE 722.88 501.76 $ 1,444.80 239.52 5,304.75 7,837.50 $ 7,775.50 6,830.00 400.00 $ 4,996.00 164,458.35 17,288.00 29,018.75 Community Wildfire Plan Committee Involv • $ 57,600.00 Deschutes County Property Owners Contribution Crook County Deschutes County Crook County DESCHUTES COUNTY TOTAL CROOK COUNTY TOTAL IN-KIND COMBINED TOTAL COMBINED REQUESTED AND IN-KIND TOTAL 3,564.00 10,800.00 433,128.15 171,943.10 323,051.50 $ 655,487.96 1,917.00 8,883.00 43,002.00 14,598.00 $ (3,239,177.25 2,735,693.43 5,633.07 2,759,174.43 5,633.07 2,764,807.50 (3,194,258.2: 3,087,859.00 ; (2,538,770.21 Prepared by: K Putschler 11/30/2005 11:28 AM DRAFT Letter of Support for Housing Works' Application to HUD The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners strongly supports Housing Works' application for Housing Choice Vouchers. The vouchers will provide an important tool for Housing Works to assist families lacking adequate housing. Through the Family Unification Program, Housing Works promotes family stability by working with families who are living in substandard or dilapidated housing, homeless, displaced by domestic violence, living in an overcrowded unit, or living in housing not accessible to its disabled child. There is a continuing need in our communities for rental assistance to support Family Unification Program -eligible families in their choice of decent, safe and affordable housing units. Housing Choice Vouchers will provide Housing Works another option to address the growing housing needs of families in Central Oregon. Housing Works has formed strong community partnerships with the Family Unification Program and is working closely with the State of Oregon Department of Human Services and District 10 Child Welfare Program (which administers child welfare services for Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson Counties). Deschutes County is proud to have Housing Works as our region's housing authority and supports Housing Works' application to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development for rental assistance vouchers under the Family Unification Program. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Tammy Baney Dennis Luke Alan Unger Chair Commissioner Commissioner Date: To: From: Re: November 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator New Proposed Leave Policy Attached is a new proposed Leave Policy, No. HR -13. The proposed policy includes discussion of scheduled leave, unscheduled leave, and leave without pay. The policy provides guidelines related to leave and will result in more consistent leave management practices across County departments. c: Dave Kanner, County Administrator Debbie Legg, Personnel Services Manager -(ES Deschutes County Administrative Policy No. HR -13 Effective Date: TBD — November 24, 2009 DRAFT LEAVE POLICY STATEMENT OF POLICY It is the policy of Deschutes County to provide paid leave to employees for vacation and sick time and to require that employees responsibly manage their leave. APPLICABILITY This policy applies to all regular County employees that accrue leave. Departments may adopt stricter leave policies that are consistent with this policy. In the event of a conflict between this policy and a collective bargaining agreement, the terms of the collective bargaining agreement shall prevail. POLICY AND PROCEDURE General Time management leave is a combined leave bank for vacation and sick leave. The program is designed to eliminate abuses of sick leave while rewarding employees for faithful attendance. Employees are encouraged to maintain a reasonable leave balance in the event of an illness. Employees who are ill are encouraged to use leave to become well and to prevent spread of the illness to co-workers (if applicable). A supervisor may require that an employee with an illness leave the workplace. A decision to send a sick employee home must be based on observable symptoms and behaviors that lead a reasonable person to conclude that the employee is unable to perform their basic job duties or presents a threat of infection to co-workers or the public. Supervisors should consider the seriousness of the illness (for example, a common cold generally would not be included) and the relative risk to the work group. If the employee disagrees with the supervisor's assessment, the County may require the employee to visit urgent care. If the employee receives documentation from the urgent care physician approving an immediate return to work, the County shall pay for the urgent care visit and the time associated with the urgent care visit shall be counted as time worked. Procedure Scheduled Leave • The County shall make reasonable efforts to grant requests for leave, but shall have no obligation to do so, except for FMLA/OFLA qualifying leave and other protected leaves as defined in Chapter 3.36 of the Personnel Rules. • Scheduled leave includes vacations, personal appointments, and other leave that is requested in advance of the leave. Employees are required to request scheduled time off from their supervisor at least one work day in advance. Department operations may require more notice depending on the amount of leave requested and to maintain minimum staffing levels. Employees must confirm that their time off has been approved prior to taking time off. Policy # HR -13, Leave Policy • Supervisors shall only approve scheduled leave for hours that are currently in the employee's leave bank (leave banks are credited with that month's leave at the beginning of the month, as reflected on the employee's time sheet). Leave accrued in the month is available to be used anytime during the month. However, supervisors shall not approve scheduled leave contingent upon future accumulation/credit to the leave bank. Leave Without Pay • Leave without pay is discouraged and may not be requested or granted until all accrued leave, including compensatory time, has been exhausted. • Leave without pay shall only be used in situations such as the death of an immediate family member (as defined in ORS 659A), a personal or family medical emergency (as defined in County Policy HR -12, Family and Medical Leave), or an extreme hardship (such as an employee that has severe fire damage to their residence). A department head may grant a leave of absence without pay up to 30 calendar days (or up to 90 days when contained in an applicable collective bargaining agreements). Leave without pay for periods in excess of 30 days must be approved by the County Administrator — except for FMLA/OFLA qualifying leave. Factors that will be considered for leave without pay are the nature of the request, the employee's previous leave use history, relevant discipline (if applicable), probationary status, and workload. • Except in cases of FMLA/OFLA qualifying leave, an employee on leave without pay for more than 40 hours in a pay period shall be required to pay a pro -rated portion of their full health insurance premium. Employees on leave without pay status shall only accrue paid leave on a pro -rated basis for actual paid hours during the pay period. Unscheduled Leave • Employees are responsible for regular attendance at their jobs, per Chapter 3.20 of the Personnel Rules. Excessive unscheduled absences create a burden on the other members of the work team and can negatively impact service to our customers. • Unscheduled leave is any non -qualifying FMLA/OFLA leave (as defined in Administrative Policy HR -12, Family and Medical Leave Policy) that is not approved in advance. Unscheduled leave is most often related to an employee or a family member becoming ill, but it also includes unexpected events that result in an absence. If an employee is required to leave work due to an illness, the incident shall be considered unscheduled leave. Supervisors are responsible for closely monitoring unscheduled leave. • Supervisors may require documentation from a health care provider for any unscheduled leave equal to or greater than three consecutive regular work shifts. • Inappropriate or excessive use of unscheduled leave may be cause for disciplinary action. Inappropriate use includes feigning illness, deceitful use of sick leave, or failure to provide requested documentation for an absence. Excessive unscheduled leave is defined as seven occurrences during a rolling twelve month period. FMLA/OFLA qualifying leave shall not be included in calculating excessive unscheduled leave. • An employee who takes excessive unscheduled leave, as defined above, may be required to provide documentation of the reason for any additional unscheduled leave of any length of time within a 12 month rolling period. • For Performance Evaluations, an employee must have no more than six unscheduled leave occurrences, as defined above, to receive a "Meets Standards" on the Attendance factor. Policy # HR -13, Leave Policy • An absence of more than one day for the same reason is considered one occurrence. If the days are not consecutive, a doctor's note may be requested to establish that the absences are linked. • Supervisors have the discretion to waive an incident due to extenuating circumstances. Approved by the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners (((((date)))))). Dave Kanner County Administrator Policy # HR -13, Leave Policy Department of Administrative Services Dave Kanner, County Administrator November 24, 2009 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Dave Kanner RE: Lechner Estates Lot Line Issues 1300 NW Wall St, Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 www.co.deschutes.or.us Last summer, following a discussion of the lot line issues in Lechner Estates, the Board requested that I pull together for property owners in the subdivision a clear, step-by-step "road map" they could use for resolving their problems once and for all. A staff group consisting of me, Dave Inbody, Laurie Craghead, Mike Berry, Kevin Harrison and Teresa Rozic spent a considerable amount of time researching and discussing the various steps involved and came up with our final product in early October. In order to accommodate the schedules of the leaders of the Lechner Estates property owners group (one of whom lives in Arizona), we were not able to present this to them until November 23rd. There is further discussion of that meeting below. Background Lechner Estates was created in the late 1950s by Bert and Pearl Lechner on about 300 acres of land south of Burgess Road, west of what is now the city of La Pine. The Lechners hired a timber company surveyor to mark the subdivision tracts. There was no legal requirement at that time that the subdivision plat be recorded. When the Lechners began selling individual lots within the subdivision, the deed descriptions did not match the tracts laid out on the ground by the private surveyor. As a result, purchasers acquired properties whose boundaries were significantly different than what they thought they were acquiring. Today, roads that were thought to have been contiguous with property lines in the 1950s run through the middle of properties as described, fences run across property lines and there may be additional problems with the placement of wells and septic systems. In addition, when the Lechners finished creating these inaccurate deed descriptions, they were left with an oddly shaped remnant parcel that is today referred to as tax lot 100. The County acquired this parcel from the Lechners via tax foreclosure in 1973. The problems in the area first came to the County's attention in 1989, when a County -owned tract was sold to a private party. The County Commissioners were notified that surveys in the area were inconsistent with deed descriptions and the sale was rescinded. The Enhancing the Lives of Citizens by Delivering Quality Services in a Cost -Effective Manner County surveyor was directed to reset the public land survey corners in the area and this work was completed in 1991. It was also determined at that time that a resolution to the problem was outside of the County's jurisdiction. These lot line problems resurfaced in 2007, when Commissioners were contacted by a property owner who was unable to sell her property because of her inaccurate deed description. Over the course of the next year, the County was contacted by other property owners experiencing similar problems. In 2008, at the Board's request, staff assembled and mailed an FAQ sheet to all property owners in the subdivision providing background information and options for dealing with the problem, as well as an explanation as to why Deschutes County cannot fix the problem. Earlier this year, some property owners asked that the County take a more direct role in laying out the steps that need to be taken to solve the problem, which brings us to where we are today. The Way Forward I must emphasize again that the County cannot solve this problem for the property owners. The deeds and deed conveyances are essentially private contracts in which we cannot legally intervene. It would seem that at a minimum, the owners of the 41 lots bisected by the private roads in the subdivision need to voluntarily agree to participate in a solution. The problem, of course, is that because the solution involves the simultaneous adjustment of a large number of contiguous lot lines, any individual property owner has de facto veto power over the entire process. On November 23r1, staff met with eight property owners from Lechner Estates and provided them with the attached information. As you can see, there are nine steps the property owners need to go through. Some of these steps are process items that need to be taken care of by the County, such as lot of record verification and survey review, but these are items we take care of on a fee-for-service basis at the request of a property owner; these are not things we unilaterally do on our own. Note that the County does not conduct private property surveys. (The County Surveyor's Office maintains the public corner system.) The conversation during this meeting was quite spirited and focused in large measure on the costs involved. I think it is fair to say that to the extent practical, the property owners would like to see a direct financial contribution from the County. This financial contribution would take the form of: • Waiving the fee for the code text amendment (or making it a County -initiated amendment) • Paying the fees for the lot of record verification. (Laurie is researching whether we can legally do this.) • Paying the fees for the lot line adjustments. (Ditto.) • Paying the fee for the survey review. (Ditto again.) If we assume that 41 lots are involved and we agreed to the above, the County's cost would be $41,260. We were also asked if the County would be willing to bid out and pay for the necessary survey work, then bill each of the affected properties for a share of the cost. We told them we would probably not do so. In addition, the County would need to do a survey of tax lot 100, since part of the solution will involve lot line adjustments and transfers of portions of that tax lot to adjoining properties. The cost of such a survey would be $2,000 - $3,000. Policy Questions for the Board: 1. Is the County willing to give up tax lot 100 and deed apportioned pieces of it to adjoining property owners in order to achieve a solution to the private property lot line problems? I would recommend that we do so. TL 100 is completely landlocked and has little market value. 2. Is the Board willing to waive or pay any or all of the fees for those services the County must provide as part of the solution? I would recommend that we do so for the text amendment, which may have a general benefit for similarly situated properties in the County (if there are any), but the rest of the fees are for individual private properties without demonstration of hardship. Given that there are lot line issues all over the County (although few, if any, on this scale) such waivers would set a dangerous precedent. It would also raise issues (that Laurie is researching) regarding the use of public funds for private benefit without benefit to the general public health and welfare. 3. Is the Board willing have staff bid out the survey work and then bill each of the affected properties? I recommend against this. We have no way of compelling repayment other than by a lien on each individual property, and each lien would likely be in second (or third or fourth) position. We look forward to discussing this with you further on November 30th Possible Lot Line Issue Resolution — Steps for Property Owners 1. Deschutes County Code Change — Submit a text amendment changing the Deschutes County Code to allow for the reduction of substandard parcels by more than 10%. 2. Lot of Record Verification — Request verification that each parcel is a legal lot. 3. Survey Property —Hire a private surveyor to conduct a survey and write new deed descriptions and easements (specifics associated with survey process outlined below). 4. Lot Line Adjustment Application — Based on the completed survey, submit application identifying all lot line adjustments. This can be achieved as a "before and after" description of lots in one application. 5. Survey Review — Submit the completed survey to the County Surveyor for review. 6. Preliminary Title Report —Request a preliminary title report for each lot. 7. Check with Lender —Confirm with mortgage lender what is required to change the property description on mortgage. 8. Transfer to Entity — All deeds are turned over using one of the following methods: a. Title Company —Hire a title company to act as transfer entity by holding property in escrow. b. New Entity - Establish a separate entity to which properties will be deeded and properties with adjusted lot lines will be returned (possibly an LLC) c. County —transfer property to Deschutes County that will act as the transfer entity d. Court Settlement —All property owners enter into a suit to quiet title that results in a settlement with lot lines redrawn. e. Recordable Deed — All property owners enter into a recordable deed that is a boundary line adjustment agreement in which all parties will be grantors and grantees. 9. Transfer to Property Owners — All parcels identified with corrected lot lines are transferred back to property owners through one of the five methods identified in step #8. Costs Associated with Steps in Process These estimates do not include costs associated with property owners hiring private legal counsel or other outside expertise during this process. Step Estimated Cost 1. Code Change $5,000 2. Lot of Record Verification $420/Lot 3. Survey Property $2,500/Lot 4. Lot Line Adjustments $420/Adjustment, avg. 6 per lot 5. Survey Review 6. Preliminary Title Report $1,000 + $20/Adjustment $250/Lot 7. Check with Lender 8. Transfer Property to Entity May be fee for change —500 create entity, —$50 submit deed 9. Transfer to Property Owners $50/Lot # Lots Total Cost Property Description 29 Lots $176,490 All properties directly south of County -owned Lot 100 41 Lots $246,810 All owners that signed Mulenex agreement 102 Lots $604,270 All properties in SW corner of Section 4, Township 22 South, Range 10 East 229 Lots $1,348,490 All properties in West half of Section 4, Township 22 South, Range 10 East Property Survey Process The cost for surveying the property can vary dramatically depending upon a variety of factors. If owners put it out to bid, County Surveyor would be willing to discuss history of area, survey issues and logical procedures to fix it with survey companies submitting bids — to ensure more accurate bids. A surveyor would need to work through the following steps: 1. Setting Control Points for Accurate Aerial Ortho-Photo — more accurate than what we currently have. Price to have it flown about $100/acre 4 29 lots (-50 acres) = $5,000. Aerial photo can be used to: a. Roughly map improvements not obscured by trees b. Plan efficient field survey strategy — crew costs $5,000+/week c. Identify potential conflict areas of occupation d. Serve as base map to plot out underground utilities, fences, and proposed boundary lines. 2. Precisely Survey Outer Boundary of Agreement Area — probably occupation vs. deed problems that won't be fixed by this agreement, surveyor will have to identify physical encroachments and deed discrepancies along exterior boundary of final survey 3. Survey All Internal Occupation Lines — roads, driveways, fences, and cleared areas (lawns, pastures). Existing deed boundaries for internal properties won't need to be calculated since agreement extinguishes them. All deeds ever recorded for this area will need to be reviewed to identify, and possibly relinquish and recreated, existing easements. This is usually done by a title company charging by the hour. 4. Identify Unrecorded Iron Pipe Corners - compare them to current occupation lines. They can also provide a basis for establishing a geometric pattern for lots with no pipes, no occupation lines or owners haven't cleared or fenced beyond their homes. 5. Survey Existing Improvements along Proposed Lot Lines (buildings, sheds, aboveground and underground utilities, drain fields and wells) - consider in establishment of new lot lines. 6. Place Stakes along Proposed Lines - especially corners not intervisible 7. Map Conflict Area — the existence of pipes or proposed boundary lines that don't coincide with fences or other improvements will need to be addressed possibly via arbitration. Surveyor will probably need to place stakes in these areas, draft sketches for review by affected parties and make revisions as problem is being resolved. 8. Descriptions for New Parcels (and any easements) — potential problems, such as encroaching drain fields, could be remedied by easements or license agreements. 9. Prepare Survey — for filing at surveyor's office 10. Walk boundary lines with owners — reference in recorded agreement to reduce likelihood of future litigation Page 1 of 1 Bonnie Baker From: Dave Inbody Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:36 AM To: Bonnie Baker Subject: Discretionary Grants - Nov. 30th Attachments: Upper Deschutes River Coalition (Nov).pdf Bonnie, I plan to present the following discretionary grant applications for BOCC review at the Nov. 30th work session: • Upper Deschutes River Coalition - Environmental Education Program • Deschutes County 4-H Leaders Association - Aid to Economically Disadvantaged 4-H Youth • St. Vincent de Paul - Community Assistance (application previously presented, BOCC requested additional information) • California Lutheran University Center for Economic Research and Forecasting - Central Oregon Economic Forecast Project (application previously presented, BOCC requested additional information) Can you please include them on the agenda. I have attached the Upper Deschutes River Coalition application. I requested confirmation on the 4-H application. If I get it today, I will forward it to you. Otherwise, the Board can review it at a future meeting. Thanks, Dave 11/25/2009