HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDD Memo - Affordable Hsg
TO: Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
FROM: Nick Lelack, Planning Director
DATE: February 25, 2009
MEETING: March 4, 2009
SUBJECT: Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) Affordable Housing
Work Group
SUMMARY
I am serving on a State appointed affordable housing work group designed to encourage cities
to provide sites dedicated to affordable housing. Based on the work group’s recommendations,
the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) has introduced HB 2225. Please
find attached the legislative concept for HB 2225.
This legislation would establish a Pilot Program to encourage up to five cities to provide “sites
dedicated to affordable housing” within urban growth boundaries (UGBs). The concept would
direct LCDC – in coordination with the Oregon Department of Housing and Community Services
– to adopt rules for conducting the pilot project and selecting a limited number of local
governments (up to five) to provide sites dedicated to affordable housing under some special
provisions in the legislation and LCDC rules. The legislation would authorize pilot cities to
designate sites dedicated to affordable housing through an expedited process for UGB
expansion, or through other methods as may be specified in agency rules.
The purpose of this work session is to briefly provide an overview of the work group and
legislation, and how it might impact Deschutes County.
OVERVIEW
On March 20, 2008, the LCDC directed the Department of Land Conservation and Development
(DCLD) to initiate an affordable housing administrative rulemaking project.
The project is intended to encourage cities to provide sites dedicated to affordable housing and
manufactured housing parks, as a “pilot project” limited to a few cities. LCDC appointed a work
group to advise the department and the Commission (the list of work group members is
provided at the end of this report). Based on input and recommendations from the workgroup,
LCDC expected to adopt new administrative rules by the end of 2008.
However, DLCD has found that the recommended rules cannot be adopted in a manner
consistent with current State statutes. Therefore HB 2225 was introduced to obtain the
minimum statute change necessary to authorize this pilot project to proceed.
In considering new rules/laws to provide sites dedicated to affordable housing and
manufactured housing parks, LCDC indicated the work group should consider the following:
• If UGB amendments are one of the recommended tools for this concept, allow an added
site to be exchanged for a site already in the UGB better located to serve those in need
of affordable housing;
• Require that new sites designated for this purpose be capable of being served by
transportation facilities, sewer and water service and other public facilities necessary for
affordable housing, in the near-term;
• Define the term “sites dedicated to affordable housing,” taking into consideration regional
factors, ownership and rental housing needs, government assisted housing, and the
need to accommodate those displaced by mobile home park closures;
• Propose safeguards to eliminate or minimize adverse impacts on farm and forest land
protection and other key components of the statewide land use program;
• Consider allowing a mix of affordable housing and market rate housing on a site
dedicated to affordable housing;
The work group continues to meet once or twice per month; our most recent meeting was
Monday, February 23. The legislative concept for HB 2225 largely remains the same, however,
it continues to evolve and several issues have yet to be addressed or defined. Please see the
current version of HB 2225 attached.
IMPACT ON DESCHUTES COUNTY
Deschutes County will likely be home to one or more of the pilot program cities, and County
owned property may be included in a Redmond pilot program.
The cities of Redmond, Sisters and Bend have all indicated their interest to the DLCD work
group regarding their interest in serving as one of the Pilot Program cities.
While working for the City of Redmond, I indicated Redmond’s interest in serving as a pilot
program. Redmond is a good candidate for inclusion in the program for the following reasons:
• There is a need for affordable housing in Central Oregon, and Redmond is centrally located
in the region;
• Redmond adopted its first Affordable Housing Plan in November 2007, which included a
policy to provide land supply for affordable housing;
• Redmond has identified a potential 40-acre parcel owned by Deschutes County in the
Redmond Urban Reserve Area (URA) primarily for the purposes of affordable housing. The
property is located near jobs on the east side of the city;
• The County owned property is identified for a mixed income neighborhood, including
affordable housing, in the Redmond Eastside Framework Plan, adopted in December 2008;
and,
• While some cities may expand their UGBs to include prime farmland for affordable housing,
a concern raised by the Oregon Farm Bureau, Redmond’s property is already included in its
50-year growth boundary (URA) and identified for future urban expansion.
Based on my conversations with former Redmond City Counselor Joe Mansfield in 2008, the
preliminary concept for the Redmond property consisted of the City purchasing the property
from the County at a discounted rate. Then, Redmond would work with an affordable housing
developer and/or provider (e.g., Housing Works) to develop a mixed income neighborhood. For
example, there may be 60% market-rate housing and 40% affordable housing. It is important to
note that HB 2225 would not require 100% of a site to be dedicated to affordable housing.
Given the current economic conditions, Redmond may not be able to purchase the property for
the foreseeable future. However, the County may still be able move forward with the same
concept for the property (depending on the outcome of HB 2225) if Redmond is selected for the
pilot program. The County could work with affordable housing developers/providers or donate a
portion of the land for affordable housing, and then sell the remainder for market-rate housing.
Redmond and its employers would still benefit from the provision of affordable housing in the
community, and Deschutes County may be able to sell a small portion of its eastside Redmond
property for market-rate housing.
The City of Sisters has contacted DLCD about its interest in serving as a pilot program city as
well. Sister’s Community Development Director Eric Porter sent the following email to DLCD on
February 17, 2009:
“The City of Sisters is interested in being considered as a candidate for the pilot
program described in HB 2225 (attached).
Sisters is unique in several key aspects that we believe help to make us an ideal
candidate for this program;
(1) Our City Council is supportive of efforts to stimulate local development,
including affordable housing;
(2) We have an incredibly successful Habitat for Humanity established in Sisters
that is and has been dedicated to providing affordable ‘for purchase’ housing;
(3) We are a ‘Severely Distressed’ community as identified by the State
Department of Economic Development;
(4) We are under 5000 population (presently at 1875);
(5) We have historically had high land costs within the city that make providing
affordable housing challenging, and
(6) We are also in the geographical area served by HousingWorks, a provider of
affordable rental units (they constructed Tamarack Village in Sisters, a low-
income apartment complex).
We have the ability on staff to provide the required findings to expand our UGB,
and have just completed a Housing Needs Analysis to correlate with our Housing
Plan update.
We now need to know what we can do to be put on the radar for consideration
into this program once this becomes a possibility. Any suggestions or feedback
you might have for us would be greatly appreciated.”
In addition, I understand affordable housing developers from Bend have contacted DLCD to
indicate their interest in the program. However, I do not have any correspondence or information
submitted on behalf of the City of Bend.
All three Central Oregon communities may be uniquely qualified to serve as pilot program cities
because of their significant differences in population.
WORK GROUP MEMBERS
John VanLandingham, LCDC (Chair), Lane County Legal Aid & Advocacy Center
Janet Byrd, Housing Alliance/Neighborhood Partnership Fund
Jon Chandler, Oregon Building Industry Association
Shawn Cleave, Oregon Farm Bureau
Bob Gillespie, Oregon Housing and Community Services
Ann Glaze, Oregon Citizen Involvement Advisory Committee
Jana Jarvis, Oregon Association of Realtors
Al Johnson, Johnson & Sherton, P.C.
Nick Lelack, Deschutes County/City of Redmond
Mary Kyle McCurdy, 1000 Friends of Oregon
Martha McLennan, Northwest Housing Alternatives
Larry Medinger, Oregon Housing Council (Ashland-area homebuilder)
John Miller, HOST Development
Don Minor, Oregon Manufactured Housing Association
Greg Mott, City of Springfield
Linda Navarro, Oregon Bankers Association
Jim Tierney, Columbia County Community Action Team
Gregory Winterowd, Winterbrook Planning
Bob Rindy, Gloria Gardiner, Bryan González, Department of Land Conservation and
Development