Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDiscussion - Firing Range LocationTO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Teresa Rozic, Property Specialist DATE: October 16, 2008 SUBJECT: October 20, 2008 Work Session Agenda Sheriffs Office Firing Range - Analysis of Alternate Locations The Sheriffs Office and the Redmond Rod and Gun Club use approximately 140 acres for individual firing ranges within 215 acres of county -owned land in Redmond. The County is planning to sell that property. The proximity of the gun club range has benefits to the public and law enforcement. Therefore, the board directed us to try to find land large enough to include the gun club in an arrangement similar to what they have now. Since June 2007 we have tried unsuccessfully to identify a suitable location. We suggest that the project goals be re-examined and request board direction. ✓ We examined all county -owned and some state-owned land with zoning that allows a firing range. None meets our criteria. ✓ BLM will not lease land for a firing range because of the environmental liability. A sale will take at least two years and cost $400,000. A land exchange will take at least five years. ✓ BLM will require a full environmental review and public process to amend the existing training area lease to allow live fire. Oregon Military Department fears this will jeopardize the lease and will not make the request. In June we learned from planning department staff that a recent hearings officer decision may have set a precedent for rezoning EFU land allow a firing range. We think this is our final option for locating a range for the Sheriff in Deschutes County. • Which parcel shall we attempt to rezone? • Must we find a site that will accommodate both the Sheriffs and the gun club ranges? • If the gun club continues to be a partner, the success of the rezone may rely on the establishment of a private range. Law enforcement may have to lease from the club. The following table summarizes the four county -owned parcels that fit the criteria. Positive Aspects _ Negative o County -owned land o Restrictions for wildlife (?) o Access as soon as land use o Proximity to airstrip/highway action approved o Distance from Bend/Redmond o Easy road access o No utilities 1 o Adequate size for 2 ranges o Potential conflict with future development o Potential conflict with existing uses (transfer station, archers) o Proximity to airport safety zone o No road or utilities o Potential conflict with future Fair and/or industrial uses o Proximity to airport safety zone o No road or utilities o Not adequate size for 2 ranges o Proximity to highway o Restrictions for wildlife (?) o No utilities Redmond East ;Kr+ C5, EFU, M2, ` o County -owned land Ii o OSPR, SM, o Access as soon as land use SMIA, AS, action approved RURA, LM o Proximity to Bend/Redmond o Adequate size for 2 ranges o No potential conflict with wildlife o County -owned land o Access as soon as land use action and land exchange approved Horse Ridge 60 EFU, LM, o County -owned land SMIA, WA o Access as soon as land use action approved o Proximity to Bend/Redmond o Easy road access CU C 0 N EFU, FP, LM. SMIA, WA EFU, LM, AS Acres + Q O d- Redmond 200+ South Property c V 4-0 ›, t cp 0. 0 L 0 W =Z = U 0 -j VJ_ to a) to a) Figure 4. Proposed Land Management Concept PROPOSED SOUTH REDMOND TRACT LAND USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN • DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS • OCTOBER 2008 APPENDIX B: Airport Safety Combining Zone PROPOSED SOUTH REDMOND TRACT LAND USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN • DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS • OCTOBER 2008 Chronology • June 2007: State and local zoning laws limited our search to property zoned Forest Use. ✓ Inspected county and state lands in this zone. None fit our criteria. • December 2007: Met with BLM ✓ They do not favor individual ranges. Suggested they had land east of the existing ranges to lease. ✓ Tried unsuccessfully for four months to schedule a follow up meeting with BLM. • June 2008: A recent hearings officer decision may set precedent for rezoning EFU to OSPR to allow a firing range. ✓ Met with CDD staff, Sheriff and gun club reps. ✓ Resume analysis of county -owned EFU parcels. • August 2008: We learn from BLM that the moratorium on Recreation and Public Purpose leases has been lifted. They want to hear about the regional facility concept. ✓ Oregon Military Dept. (OMD) will join us in a regional facility but they need 5,000 - acre safety fan for large caliber weapons. ✓ We suggest they amend their current training area lease to include live fire. • September 2008: We meet with Sheriff, gun club and OMD reps and agree on a regional facility concept for the existing training area lease east of Redmond. • October 2008: All parties meet at BLM offices ✓ They will not lease for a firing range because of the environmental hazard liability ✓ A sale is possible but that process takes two years and costs about $400,000. ✓ A land exchange takes at least five years.