HomeMy WebLinkAboutInfo on Broadcasting MtgsTO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DAVE INBODY SUBJECT: BROADCASTING BOARD MEETINGS DATE: 5/29/2008 CC: DAVE KANNER; ERIK KROPP; SUSAN ROSS; JOE SADONY In response to interest expressed in broadcasting Board of County Commissioners meetings, some initial steps have been taken to better understand the requirements necessary to deliver this request. Thus far the following steps have been taken: • A general inquiry was made of other jurisdictions who have recently established broadcast services. Several Oregon cities and counties had made such additions. The City of Albany provided the quotes they received for service (Attachment A). • Matt Hand from from Pinnacle Media met with Dave Inbody, Susan Ross and Joe Sadony to discuss the county's needs. He also did a walk through of the room. He confirmed that the equipment used by the City of Albany would be simiar to that required for the county's needs. He also provided a general description of the equipment needs. (Attachment B). • Joe Sadony discovered that Redmond is currently charged $344 per meeting, which will go up to $488 in January 2009, to broadcast their meetings on Bend Broadband. • BendBroadband was also solicited on broadcast recommendations. They provided recommendations in a spectrum of price ranges (Attachment C). Their recommendation of a tricaster is consistent with Albany and Matt Hand. • Tony Sprando from Audio Visual Presentation, who originally designed the audio equipment set up for the county did a walk through of the room. He was also asked about other changes to the room, including an additional screen and projector for the commissioners and a control booth. Sprando will be providing a quote for all the room additions and changes. Here are the additions and changes noted during the walk through: • The Albany design would probably be what the county would need, although he also noted that there are some cameras available at a lower cost than those used by Albany. • Three tabletop monitors were proposed as a better option over an additional screen and projector. They could be embedded in the commissioners' table and raised only when needed. It was also thought that this would be a more cost effective option. • The footprint for the additional equipment would mostly reside in the closet, but some of the operations equipment would be required in the room. It was estimated that the space currently used for audio and meeting minutes would be doubled. A booth would not necessarily be required, but security considerations could be an issue without it. • The room is already equipped to provide streaming server. Therefore, the $6,319 spent by Albany for this server would not be required. • A full quote will be provided, but the cost for the equipment and room improvements is currently estimated at $50,000 - $75,000. 2 City Council Video Recording 0 Ln Ln N O ':1- COO o LO O Lri LA c6 c; cri Ln LA CU 0 'O OCO � O O L�f1 QT CO CT ,z) 5 i,-1-1 EA- ,--1 - - - - L CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 IN 0 ,--I ti ry i oo Q1 cr; Lri LO kr, M h o h t.D 0o ,-i O ri CO LO l0 h 'cr Lf1 CO CO C l0 b4 x ,-i - O- -EA- -EA- - -E 'ct W FO- F - 0 n 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Lri 6 0 0 Lri o Lri Ql Lri Q1 o h�Ln�t he b ,i rn� ,-i l0 N h Ln 00 M Q) 0 0 DZ Z CO ,-i -EA-,—i - - d4 � - 'cr 0 0 U x _c M ri 1+ u • M 0 ,--I 0 r0 r0 C 0 mo L/1 • a ozoo oo�r L "3 4.1 Ln l0 M M lD 111 O i 10 ,-i 2 Cn a N 0 -p 110) U W ►� d a d 0 v ft) a) ✓ • Q (01 QQQ QQLwn L a) uu u u u u 0 a) '- z 1- +-) OO ij) r��o> Lnvc RETAIL OFF WEB PRICING CO CO IV a) L a) aaaa ao0 01-> 3 3 CCO CCO COCCCO rn rn 0 0 0 0 ▪ N vi- N COCO c0 4:31M Qui 0 O Ad N h N ,-i cY l0 cr .21. '-i '-i - -EA- Ln Qi Qi Q? CT Qi Q1 0 = Ql M Q1 Q1 Ln O h 7 Qi h 01 N 01 M yr L - '1- cLO CO .1- LO 01CU 0. M (*OM M ---4- Zoom Lens Smart Platforms Streaming Server 5/23/20088:48 AM C:\Documents and Settings\Davidl\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKA\City of Albany Video equipment quotes.xls Deschutes County Chamber Telecast Specifications cN ƒ ® / q .n o ]//0 E f 2 0 0- _1 e - E.7 1 E / E E 2?E): � 0) r -0 / § 0 r 2£666/ -L -6 / 2 a .a-.) 0 ° ,-E- o o 7 2 / / /.z?c 0= Q g J- 0 2 Eo30 0`n Ta) o - ®Ec o 0•\ D •7 0 $ = o._ 0) g c00c e f _ [ o / 2 O 0±0 o -0D 3: \ \5ƒ o/ }\05_E0 3@///2 O /£- 00 /%/2a / / / / / : 0 g ' 7 0 a- o o ° 0 0 0 ƒ f E2.2 / 2 0 0 0.0 EoEe'2 °'E E o 3 2 e 25 / C 0 d 0 'i O 0 (1) 3: 0 E ®O / 9 \ \/00/0/ 2 _ 2 - 2 0 sƒ±\6±2 -\'\£0\\ • C)0=c0. E 2 0- E E > 0 a a / \ E 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 f / 0 f / 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 F_- -0 2 § » Deschutes County Video Production Recommendations The best low budget product we can recommend for in-house production of meetings is called "Tricaster" by Newtek. It is used by small cable companies, churches, etc. for producing in-house video or other productions. It has the ability to add graphics and can handle multi -camera setups as well as live streaming to the web. It is billed as a `studio in a box' and has received rave reviews. htto://www.newtek.com/tricaster/ User profiles: http://www.newtek.com/tricaster/profiles Probably the best price with options would be about $6500. You could purchase some robotic cameras (from $1200 a unit) and then a control box, a high def flat panel and some audio gear and microphones. It then could be operated by one trained person. My best guess on total investment in equipment going this route is approximately $15K. In terms of multi -camera video production, this is reasonable. I believe there are other Tricaster users in the community who could be resources for training. Newtek also offers training. http://www.newtek.com/communitv/atc.php At the other end of the spectrum, the city of Lincoln City, Oregon has its own production facility in the council chambers. They selected Professional Video and Tape in Portland http://www.provideoandtape.com through their RFP process. They have four robotic cameras and a document camera all feeding into a video switcher. One person operates the system. They go live onto a channel with Charter Cable. They replay their meetings via a Leightronix replay unit, consisting of two very large hard drives and scheduling software. They use stationary Omni -directional microphones with noise -gate (off when not speaking, on when speaking). The cost of this unit was in the $100K range. BendBroadband 63090 Sherman Rd. Bend OR 97701 (541) 312-6453 www.bendbroadband.com