HomeMy WebLinkAboutIntegration Demo Project LettersHEALTH SERVICE
2577 NE Courtney Drive, Bend, Oregon 977
Public Health (541) 322-7400, FAX (541) 322-74
Behavioral Health (541) 322-7500, FAX (541) 322-75
www.deschutes.a
To: Deschutes County Board of Commissioners (Board)
Dave Kanner, County Administrator
From: Scott Johnson, Deschutes County Health Services
Date: November 4, 2009 Work Session (update of October 9, 2009 memo to BOC)
Subj: Central Oregon Integration Project
Potential State Demonstration and Regional Health Authority Concept
This memo will provide the most current information about our work with Commissioner Baney
and other jurisdictions about improving the health care system for the people we serve.
Early mortality for clients
There is an emerging body of evidence that suggests changes should be made in the way community
health care is provided to people struggling with mental health and addictions. For example, people
with a serious mental illness die 25 years earlier than the general population'. Eighty-seven percent
of these lost years are directly due to medical illnesses. In addition, the disconnect between primary
care and behavioral health compromises health outcomes and contributes to this problem.
Central Oregon (CO) discussions
Stakeholders in CO have been meeting to explore this topic and consider whether we should be
changing our system. Commissioner Baney has been following this work on behalf of the Board. If
it is possible, local groups are likely to support changes in the system to improve care. These groups
include all three counties, the hospital system, our Oregon Health Plan insurance groups (ABHA,
CDO, COIHS 2), Health Matters (a local health collaborative), Mosaic Medical, LaPine Community
Clinic, Volunteers in Medicine, NAMI and the Cascade Peer and Self -Help Center. Richard Harris,
State Addictions and Mental Health Director, has met with the group here to receive a briefing and
express interest in our work.
1 Measurement of Health Status of People with Serious Mental Illnesses, Parks, Radke, Mazade, National
Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, October 16, 2008.
2 ABHA (Accountable Behavioral Health Alliance), the CDO (Deschutes County Chemical Dependency
Organization) and COIHS (Central Oregon Independent Health Systems / Clear One).
To promote and protect the health and safety of our community
The concept of integration
As outlined in the literature, integration would mean developing multi -disciplinary teams of health
care providers, including mental health and addictions workers, who would work together to
improve health outcomes for people enrolled in services at a community clinic. For example,
County mental health workers could work in a primary care clinic like Mosaic Medical, with a care
coordinator, a physician, a nurse and psychiatric consultation. Also, a specialty clinic like the DCHS
annex program for people with serious mental illnesses could include a primary care component, to
address primary care needs of people receiving intensive behavioral health services.
National and State reform
Numerous national reports are calling for system reform and this integration of behavioral health
and primary care in clinic settings or "medical homes". With better coordination and integration,
there is evidence client health will improve and costs could be contained. In Oregon, the 2009
Legislature passed a budget note calling for two to three demonstration projects. We are currently
evaluating whether it would be beneficial to become a demonstration site. We may be the State's
most likely candidate.
Central Oregon counties meet September 30
The CO County Commissioners on the ABHA Board (Commissioners Fahlgren, Ahern and Baney)
agreed that we should seriously consider a joint project. It may mean changes in the nature and
scope of ABHA; it could also mean forming some sort of new regional health authority, with
significant County leadership in this organization. The scope of work for a regional authority might
include policy development, resource oversight and a regular review of system outcomes. No
decisions were made but we were encouraged to keep working.
October 20 State offer of demonstration site
We received a letter (enclosed) from the State Addictions and Mental Health Division and the
Division of Medical Assistance Programs offering the opportunity for our collaborative to be a
"Demonstration Project site". The letter focuses on four things: 1. creation of a single point of
accountability, 2. financial integration, 3. service integration and 4. agreed upon outcomes. The
letter asks that our local group consider becoming a State sponsored demonstration site and to work
together to develop a Memorandum of Agreement.
Questions emerging for the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
1. As a matter of policy, do you as the local mental health and public health authority endorse
health care service integration (behavioral health, primary care and preventative care) as a
concept and do we want to see service models that can move our system in that direction?
2. In reviewing the letter from the State of Oregon, do we support working with Jefferson and
Crook counties and others to become a State demonstration site?
3. As we learn more about the option of forming a Regional Health Authority, do we want to
seriously consider a more formal regional entity to lead this effort and support our work?
I look forward to the opportunity to meet with you on November 4 to discuss the project and the
State invitation. No decision will be needed but general guidance would be appreciated. Thank you.
Oregon
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor
October 20, 2009
Scott Johnson
Robin Henderson
Central Oregon Integration Project
2577 NE Courtney Drive
Bend, OR 97701
Dear Mr. Johnson and Ms. Henderson;
Department of Human Services
Addictions and Mental Health Division
500 Summer Street NE E86
Salem, OR 97301-1118
Voice 503-945-5763
Fax 503-378-8467
The Legislature directed Department of Human Services (DHS) to establish
demonstration projects with willing local partners to develop an integrated
management and service delivery system that includes physical health, addictions
and mental health services. We know that the task in front of us and our local
partners can seem daunting. The legislative intent includes using all existing
funding to improve services, developing a single point of accountability for the
delivery of services, reducing the use of emergency department, residential and
hospital services and managing and evaluating contracts on outcomes.
We appreciate what the Central Oregon Integration Project (COIP) members have
already accomplished in developing a possible demonstration project. The
discussions between local partners and key members of the Addictions and Mental
Health Division (AMI -I) have been very productive. We especially appreciate the
time COIP members took to brief Richard Harris and Len Ray from AMID.
We are offering COIP the opportunity to be a Demonstration Project site. Upon
acceptance by all COIP members additional details will be negotiated in a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and contract language and as needed.
DHS understands that local communities may not be able to accomplish the full
mandate at the beginning of the project. Local projects may propose
demonstrations that incrementally approach the different components of the
demonstration that meet the legislative intent. This includes the four basic
components of the demonstration projects:
1. Creation of a single point of accountability;
2. Financial integration;
If you need this letter in alternate format, please call 503-945-5763 (Voice) or 800-375-2863 (TTY)
"Assisting People to Become Independent, Healthy and Safe"
An Equal Opportunity Employer
HSS1601 (11/06) 4
Scott Johnson and Robin Henderson
October 20, 2009
Page 2
3. Service integration; and
4. Agreed upon outcome measurements.
DHS supports the essential role of the three counties, as Local Mental Health and
Public Health Authorities in this effort. We understand that local accountability
and ownership, including leadership from the counties, greatly increases the
opportunity for success of this project. The single point of accountability should be
designed by the local demonstration project in close consultation with the Local
Mental Health Authority (LMIIA).
Ultimately, we see a single point of accountability as one entity managing the
financing, governance, provision of services and local planning. It would include
physical health, mental health, and addiction services. We have no preconceived
entity in mind but firmly believe that the entity must have the necessary expertise
in all areas of service delivery and management. This could be an administrative
services organization serving as an umbrella organization, a limited partnership, a
Medicaid managed care entity that will take on broader responsibilities, or some
new concept that we have not developed. Please let us be clear, that we are
interested in seeing your proposal on the concept. Your proposal will help guide
discussions.
We see the demonstrations as collaborative projects with local communities and
look forward to working with local projects to finalize details. This includes
negotiations regarding financial support, use of different financial resources,
timing, outcomes and governance structures. You will have the opportunity to take
on the responsibility for managing long-term care and services for residents of the
demonstration region, even if you are not ready to do so initially.
Proposed demonstration projects should submit business plans including proposed
populations, timelines, and governance structures. The plans should discuss
movement toward consolidation of administration and financing. DHS will provide
additional clarity around the four components and additional guidance to help
proposed demonstration sites complete the business plan.
DHS also knows that developing new systems across funding streams, providers
and populations can appear to be risky. DHS will work closely with local projects
to minimize potential risks, especially related to Medicaid funding and will work
Scott Johnson and Robin Henderson
October 20, 2009
Page 3
internally and with the federal government to remove barriers and reduce potential
negative outcomes. We will actively engage other divisions within the department
and other state agencies to help support access to other social services and
supports.
DHS is not asking local communities to shoulder the entire responsibility for the
demonstration. DHS will work closely with the demonstration sites to:
• Provide $150,000 this biennium to support Demonstration efforts. Future
funding for the project will be negotiated during the budget and contract
development process and of course will be contingent on legislative approval.
• Provide access to a new data system that will allow local systems and providers
access to real time data.
• Contract for an external evaluator similar to the Children's System Change
Initiative evaluation process. The intent is to limit any additional burden on the
demonstration partners but to clearly show key leaders, including the
Legislature, the progress being made.
• Actively partner on federal and foundation grant applications that support the
demonstration's goals and objectives including researching available
opportunities, applying for state -only funding opportunities, and supporting
local grant applications.
• Support local efforts with a DHS team to resolve problems and negotiate
barriers.
• Provide flexibility, where possible, regarding financing and administrative
requirements.
• Provide COIP partners current biennial details regarding state and federal
funding to show a baseline of the resources that are provided to the region for
physical health care, mental health services and addiction services.
• Work with the LMHAs to consolidate all state funding in the state/county
behavioral health Financial Assistance Agreement to each county to increase
flexibility and reduce silo thinking, as long as state and federal mandated and
core services are available to all prioritized citizens.
Scott Johnson and Robin Henderson
October 20, 2009
Page 4
You have requested that DHS provide the COIP team the "Kessler formula using
prospective population estimates for 2009-2011, to determine the relative state
mental health and addiction investment in each county." The Kessler formula is a
methodology to distribute funds with a much broader context then the
demonstration projects. AMH will work with AOCMHP to work on the formula
issue in a stand alone process. We do not see the demonstration projects tied to the
issue of formula allocations and are not making any changes at this time.
However, we will provide COIP both the current contracted amounts and the
impact of the Kessler formula on the region and the state as an example at your
request.
We also understand that state's financial situation may change causing program
and service cuts. Additionally, local budgetary situations may also change. If these
situations do occur, the entire demonstration project agreement would be open for
discussion at that time.
DHS developed specific examples of measurable outcomes for individuals
receiving services in the demonstration projects. However, final measurable
outcomes will be developed between the site and DHS. We will provide
information to the Legislature explaining the agreed upon outcomes. We believe
increasing access is a vital component. One way we believe this will happen is
through savings resulting from reduced utilization of high cost services back to the
local community. However, we also understand that increased access is contingent
on stable funding and may not be realized if funding scenarios change.
We also want to assure local communities that we are committed to the success of
these projects and have no preconceived end -date. We believe that moving in this
direction provides better accountability, higher quality of care and better access to
those in need. DHS will support the Demonstration through 2013-2015 biennium
providing it doesn't conflict with legislative direction and measurable progress is
being made on agreed upon outcomes.
We believe that the demonstration projects will continue to change and adapt to
new information and to the experience in the demonstration as we progress. Also,
DHS and local partners should have the option to terminate the demonstration if
the project is not meeting expectations or if there is irreconcilable differences.
Scott Johnson and Robin Henderson
October 20, 2009
Page 5
We look forward to working with the COIP to finalize a formal agreement
including negotiated outcomes by December 1, 2009. This agreement will describe
the partnership between DHS and local partners and expectations on both sides. If
you have questions, please feel free to call Jane -ellen Weidanz, DHS Integration
Demonstration Project Manager at 503-945-9725 or e-mail her at jane-
ellen.weidanz@state.or.us.
Sincerely,
Richard L. Harris
Assistant Director
Addictions and Mental Health Division
Judy Mohr Peterson
Assistant Director
Division of Medical Assistance Programs