Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVideo Lottery Fund UpdateTO: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FROM: DAVE INBODY SUBJECT: VIDEO LOTTERY FUND UPDATE DATE: 12/18/2009 CC: DAVE KANNER, ERIK KROPP Background Since the Oregon Lottery began, in 1985, more than $6 billion in profits have been allocated to public education, economic development and natural resource protection. Video lottery revenue, which represents the largest component of Oregon Lottery funds, are distributed to various education, natural resources and economic development programs. This includes 2.5 percent of video lottery proceeds that is distributed to counties on a quarterly basis for economic development. The chart below shows the quarterly payments received by Deschutes County beginning in FY 2004. 1FistitUY } 3Q CFS W. '; b Total FY 2004 $113,174 $85,923 $110,049 $115,120 $424,266 FY 2005 $118,007 $123,985 $126,718 $66,524 $435,234 FY 2006 $130,694 $141,354 $152,138 $175,914 $600,100 FY 2007 $180,994 $189,864 $193,582 $183,560 $748,000 FY 2008 $193,159 $193,316 $183,773 $179,774 $750,022 FY 2009 $188,136 $171,726 $160,508 $97,491 $617,861 FY 2010 $119,116 $116,490 $114000* $1 ; ' $46 ,106* *Values in italics represent projections assuming a 2% decline from the previous quarter payment in 3Q & 4Q. Deschutes County Allocation of Video Lottery Funds Resources for the Video Lottery Fund was originally budgeted to be $581,000 in FY 2010. After receipt of two payments, it is projected to be $464,500 ($461,106 in payments + $3,394 in beginning net working capital). Most of the expenses in the Video Lottery Fund are for grants. There are two exceptions: administration and internal service charges, which are expected to be paid as budgeted a total of $16,662. Grants from this fund are allocated in one of four ways. • Service Partners ($212,773) - These grants go to organizations providing services directly connected to county service requirements or obligations. These payments are made on a monthly or quarterly basis. • Community Grant Program ($200,000) - These funds are distributed to local non-profit organizations for providing emergency food, clothing or shelter, protecting the abused and neglected or providing health care, mental health and addiction treatment. These grants have already been disbursed. • Discretionary Grant Program ($75,000 budgeted, $30,000 projected) - Each county commissioner was originally budgeted for $25,000 to be distributed to local non -profits throughout the fiscal year. This was later reduced to $10,000 per commissioner after initial disbursement projections were received from the state. Thus far a total of $9,950 has been disbursed. • Unallocated Grant Funds ($31,530 budgeted, $5,000 projected) - Additional funds were set aside for grants that did not fit into any of the three established programs. In the past such allocations were referred to as "off -the -top." This was also viewed as a source to adjust expenses if payments came in lower than expected. Thus far $5,000 has been transferred to the Sheriff's Office in support of the Shop -with -a -Cop program. Potential Budget Shortfall due to Lower Revenue Current expense projections can be met based on current revenue projections. However, this is through utilization of nearly all of the contingency funds. With an understanding that revenue my decline in excess of the current projections, the following options can be made to reduce the risk of underfunding commitments from the Video Lottery Fund. 1. Withhold from spend the remained of the unallocated grant funds ($21,530 under budget). 2. Expenses for grants to service partners are based on four quarterly payments within FY 2010. Since payments are not made until the conclusion of each quarter, fourth quarter payments will not be made until FY 2011. For most service partners this is offset by a fourth quarter payment in July 2009 for the final quarter of FY 2009. However, Deschutes County 2-1-1 is a new service partner and therefore, will only receive three of four payments within the fiscal year ($6,250 under budget). 3. Maintain self-imposed cap on discretionary grants at $10,000 per commissioner. In addition, consideration should be given to disbursing any additional grants immediately or after receipt of the third quarter payment in February 2010 ($45,000 to $65,050 under budget). 4. Capital outlay of $100 is a placeholder for the fund and is not expected to be spent ($100 under budget). 5. Contingency funds of $49,935 can also be used to offset any revenue shortfall ($49,935 under budget). Here is a summary of FY 2010 funds as originally allocated, spending through November 2009 and the recommended allocation assuming the inclusion of the options listed above: Cate lug t''111>(1tt Projected" Administration $8,282 $3,412 $8,282 Internal Service Charges $8,380 $3,493 $8,380 Grants to Service Partners $212,773 $97,110 $206,523 Community Grants $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Discretionary Grants $75,000 $9,950 $30,000 Unallocated Grants $26,530 $5,000 $5,000 Contingency & Capital Outlay $50,035 $0 $0 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $581,000 $318,965 $458,185 TOTAL RESOURCES $581,000 $238,613 $464,500 SURPLUS (l'EFICIT) +$0 ($80,352) +$6,315 2