Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-05-28 Budget Meeting Minutes Health Services Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 1 of 8 Deschutes County Board of Commissioners 1300 NW Wall St., Suite 200, Bend, OR 97701-1960 (541) 388-6570 - Fax (541) 385-3202 - www.deschutes.org MINUTES OF BUDGET MEETING DESCHUTES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2014 – Morning Session ___________________________ Allen Room, Deschutes Services Building ___________________________ Present were Commissioners Tammy Baney, Anthony DeBone and Alan Unger. Also present were Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Erik Kropp, Deputy County Administrator; Mike Maier, Clay Higuchi and Bruce Barrett, Budget Committee; and, for a portion of the meeting, Wayne Lowery, County Finance Director/Treasurer; David Givans, County Internal Auditor; Teri Maerki, County Financial/Budget Analyst; and Deschutes County Health Services staff Jane Smilie, Director; Scott Johnson, outgoing Director; David Inbody, Operations Manager; Melissa Rizzo, Developmental Disabilities Program Manager; DeAnn Carr, Behavioral Health Deputy Director; Sherri Pinner, Business Manager; Tom Kuhn, Community Health Program Manager; Hillary Saraceno, Regional Early Learning Hub Manager; and Jodie Barram, Bend City Council Member. Meeting minutes were taken by Kathe Hirschman, Deschutes County Health Services. Mr. Barrett (chair of budget committee) opened the meeting at 2:45 p.m. ___________________________ Jane Smilie introduced Health Services staff present and began the presentation. Fiscal Year 2013-2014 was a year of extraordinary change for the department. Oregon Health Plan (OHP) membership continues to grow; Deschutes County gained over 13,000 new members from 2013 to 2014. The department will keep tracking the numbers to make sure service capacity matches the demand. County general funds are critical to meet safety net services for the uninsured—those in crisis and those released from jail. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 2 of 8 Sherri Pinner distributed FY 2015 budget by programs for Funds 259 and 270, and explained the department’s three-year forecast for Medicaid funding to sustain essential services. The department’s ending fund balance is projected to be $2 million at the end of the three-year forecast. Mr. Maier noted that the forecast shows a trend that the contingency funds will be gone in FY 2017, and the department should not look to County general funds to cover. Ms. Pinner noted that the forecast is specific to OHP revenues and OHP expenditures and is a worst - case scenario based on information currently available. Typically, more up-to-date information about funding adjusts the forecast to be better as we get closer to the dates that are projected here. Mr. Higuchi noted that actual funds from the State of $7.4 million, which goes up to $10 million, is the increased per-member-per-month capitated rate for expanded OHP. Mr. Higuchi’s concern is that the amount coming to us is not keeping up to expenses as we look farther out. This is a rolling target and the forecast is continually updated based on current information as it becomes available. The region is required to update the current Health Assessment and Health Improvement Plan in 2015. This is an opportunity and should guide the department’s and the region’s work in setting priorities and moving together to have an impact. Between 2006 and 2015, the average annual increase in personnel related costs has been 9.2% and the County general fund increase has been 2.1%. This is mostly related to public health programs; OHP covers most of the cost in behavioral health programs. OHP expansion has been huge driver over the past year. The department has received 15 new State grants in public health and behavioral health. There was a reduction in State general funds which has mainly impacted our safety net services—those services we are mandated to provide as the Community Mental Health Provider. The department passed the Triennial Review by the State Public Health Division with flying colors, and 93 of the 98 Public Health Accreditation standards were either substantially or fully met. The department has added 23.1 FTE; expanded services in Redmond and La Pine; and got medical sponsors for all five School Based Health Centers. The department’s core responsibility is to assure the health of our residents. We are becoming more diligent about translating broad County Goals and Objectives into measurable objectives. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 3 of 8 We post quarterly progress reports on how we are performing with our measurable objectives to move the County goals forward. The Program Budget narrative speaks to County general funds received and what services are provided with those funds. Common themes for use of County general funds across all the department’s programs are to fill gaps in funding to assure all citizens receive services they are eligible for, to provide matching funds to maximize federal funding; to provide essential administrative and operational support; to advance the Triple Aim with prevention services; to fulfill our responsibility to protect the health and safety of residents. According to the State Public Health Division, county general fund is the second highest funding stream for public health services across Oregon. Deschutes County’s general fund contribution is 26%, which is comparable to the State average. The departments request for County general funds in 2014-2015 is $156,100 (approximately 3.7% increase over FY 2014 level. The bulk of this is to provide funding for staff positions—$110,200 for psychiatry, a jail diversion case manager, therapy for young children; health assessment update; and an internship within County government for an individual with developmental disabilities. Mr. Maier asked whether this request was included in the proposed budget. Tom Anderson explained that it is currently funded out of contingency funds and the department is requesting it be provided by an increase in County general fund. The total amount in the budget coming from County general fund is $2,766,000 in public health and $1,377,000 in behavioral health—the same level of funding as the prior year. This request is for additional County general fund. Scott Johnson noted that the gaps can be covered this year out of contingency funds, but they cannot be covered long-term out of contingency. Mr. Johnson explained that OHP members lose their coverage when incarcerated. This benefit is lost even if the individual is not adjudicated yet—while the individual is incarcerated pre-trail. The department has the responsibility to serve these individuals when they are released, and before OHP coverage is obtained, and coordinates with the jail to do so. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 4 of 8 Ms. Smilie explained that for each piece of the staffing request the department plans to blend the County general funds with OHP funding so that staff can serve those with OHP and the under- and un-insured. In addition to the staffing outlined above, the department is requesting $13,500 to implement an e-learning system that will help with risk management and compliance, and $32,400 to help the department replace computer equipment as required by the Information Technology department. Funds are needed for the e-learning system and computer replacement for public health staff only as the behavioral health budget has sufficient funds. Mr. Higuchi asked whether the $13,500 and $32,400 are one-time expenses or an ongoing commitment. Ms. Smilie clarified that a portion of the employee development would be ongoing and the technological improvement would be one- time. Mr. Maier asked why there had been a big increase in behavioral training expense. Most of the increase was due to sending staff to a national behavioral health conference and training conferences for behavioral health electronic health records staff. Commissioner Unger asked whether the e-learning system would help reduce disallowed expenses because staff will train online rather than travelling. Mr. Johnson replied that it would reduce travel expenses and would also provide the department a more efficient and effective method of tracking which staff have taken which trainings. The expense of the e-learning system has been included in the proposed budget but there is not an offsetting revenue item. Mr. Anderson asked whether there will be legislative initiative next year to change the OHP rules to maintain coverage of incarcerated individuals. Mr. Johnson explained that this would require change in federal law. Commissioner Baney noted that the Governor does have discretion as to whether or not to suspend coverage and that he did decide to suspend rather than terminate. Now the infrastructure has to catch up and we need a fast-track method of getting their coverage back. This is a big topic at the State level. The County transferred 2.5 FTE prevention staff from the Children & Families Commission to Health Services in FY 2014 to continue prevention services. County general funds in the amount of $26,451 included in FY 2014 for operating and indirect costs related to those 2.5 FTE were not included in Health Services budget in FY 2015. The department is requesting these funds be reinstated into Fund 259 to maintain the current level of service. Children & Families Commission general fund was reduced by that amount but Health Services budget was not increased by that amount. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 5 of 8 Increasing community access remains a priority for the department—bringing services to individuals throughout the County. A sampling of data from just three program areas—behavioral health, family planning and WIC—shows that more than 12,000 individuals have benefitted from these services in Sisters, Redmond, La Pine, Bend and north Klamath County over the past year. The number served in outlying areas is expected to increase as new facilities open. DeAnn Carr gave an overview of behavioral health services and priorities. The department aims to provide timely and effective access at accessible locations and to support whole-person health via integration and by expanding the continuum of care and services that support health. Prevention education and outreach will be increased. Safety net functions will be a critical piece. As more individuals enroll in OHP, we will also have an increasing population that is underinsured and will still have a significant gap that the County will be responsible for as a safety net provider. Hillary Saraceno distributed an Early Learning System handout. The Early Learning Hub is a tri-county effort with Crook and Jefferson Counties targeting children 0-6 years old who are at-risk. The comprehensive budget for children’s services in the region is $18.8 million; the Hub is responsible to make sure these funds are used effectively. Total Early Learning Hub budget is $1.3 million, which includes State, Maternal Child Health, High Desert Education Service District, Medicaid, and County funding. When our regional Hub is certified, there will be additional resources that will offset funding currently provided by the Counties. Commissioner Baney noted that Ms. Saraceno and the team have done incredible work in trying to engage the State in rolling this out and asked what is committed from the State to come into our region when we have been certified as the regional Hub. Approximately $660,000 for programs is expected to come to the region, 14% of which will be designated to cover the administrative costs of all the participating providers. WEBCO will need to decide how that will be allocated. Commissioner Baney reminded the Budget Committee that these funds will go not only to the Counties but also to other providers. We need to decide what is Deschutes County’s contribution to the Hub in future. Because we have wanted to be at the forefront, we have been doing this work, and Commissioner Baney is concerned that there may be an understanding in the other Counties that because we’ve been funding the work, we’ll continue to do so. Ms. Saraceno feels there is an understanding at the State level that it cannot be just the Counties and that discussion about this in the legislature is coming. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 6 of 8 Mr. Johnson described the work done over the past year to g et more help from other communities agencies for the School Based Health Centers (SBHC) in order to reduce reliance on County general funds. Each SBHC will provide primary care provided by the medical sponsors, behavioral health services provided by the department, and public health education for the entire student body provided by department public health nurses. Medical sponsors are either already providing services or coming on line at all seven SBHCs. Our partners are Mosaic Medical, La Pine Community Health Clinic, and St. Charles Medical Group. Advantage Dental is a critical partner as well and will be providing dental services, primarily at the Sisters SBHC. Last year we were using $550, 000 for the SBHCs; with the new medical sponsors, we have that number down to $363,000. The $190,000 in savings went to offset costs in Community Health, Reproductive Health, Maternal Child Health and WIC programs. Mr. Higuchi noted that the $190,000 saved did not reduce the general fund contribution but was used to cover costs in other program area s. The program budget document includes paragraphs describing what the general fund contribution does in each program area. The department has used the funds to offset the increase in cost to provide services. Commissioner Baney asked whether it would be safe to say that the $363,000 is our “fixed cost” now associated with the SBHCs. Mr. Johnson explained that we can’t promise that this will be the case but the worst case scenario would be the $363,000 plus normal increases in indirect and administrative costs. Commissioner Baney cannot get over the hurdle of applying for a grant to stand up the SBHCs and not anticipating that the County general fund was going to be needed to go forward. She understands getting out there, because we can and feel we should do the project, but at the same time recognizes that the day is coming when things we have taken on really should not have been ours. The department is very confident that the SBHCs have incredible value as centers. Commissioner Unger noted that the SBHCs were a successful platform to help provide more County services than anticipated and wondered if the cost did not go down because we expanded services being offered at the SBHCs. Mr. Johnson explained that if the County had not gone forward with the Sisters SBHC we would have no place to provide our services in Sisters. We call it a SBHC but we can do a number of other things out of that location. If we were not constructing the SBHC we would still be looking at a lease commitment for another site in order to provide services in Sisters. Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28, 2014 Page 7 of 8 Commissioner Baney stated that the Board does want to be providing services in Sisters and this is a way to do that effectively. Mr. Higuchi expressed concern about the growth of spending, so some action has to be taken. We just don’t have enough money in the County to cover this growth if, say in three years, it will be $2 million. We don’t know if $363,000 is the number. We will have to wait and see, and then figure if $363,000 is worth it. Ms. Smilie summarized: the department’s request is for $156,100 plus transfer of $26,451 from Children & Families Commission fund. The department is covering personnel related increases of $291,444. OHP behavioral health funds are up while public health funding is down. There has been a 23.1 FTE increase since FY 2014 budget was adopted. Accomplishments: increased access; integration efforts underway; regional EL Hub application submitted; demonstrated increased accountability; staff have navigated multiple and majo r changes successfully. Challenges: sustaining public health programs, services and protections; assuring timely OHP access; continuing attention to program compliance and performance; more changes on the way. Mr. Maier noted that contract payments in public health revenue went down more than 50%. Ms. Pinner explained that some of the change was due to the department using the proper revenue line and some were local grants that ended. Mr. Maier referred to the $1 million reduction in state grants on the behavioral health side and a $3 mi llion increase in administrative fees and asked what type of administrative fees. Ms. Pinner explained that OHP capitation has increased . What used to be indigent clients with no coverage previously paid for with by State general funds are now OHP capitation clients who have covered benefits. Mr. Lowery explained that administrative fees are a percentage of the capitation amount provided by the State to cover the costs of providing the services. Mr. Anderson explained that he would like to see us get to the point where ideally we look at each service area and the Commissioners make policy decisions on the level of commitment to make in that service area. It is awkward without that kind of policy/financial process going on. If we could do that, it would make this process more meaningful with the ability to match up the policy decisions with dollars. Mr. Johnson noted that it would be very helpful to have a clear policy framework in which to operate and it would help with the department’s strategic planning. Being no further discussion, the session ended at 4:23 p.m. DATED this rlf> Day of 2014 for the W Deschutes County Board of Commissioners Tammy Baney, Cha Anthony DeBone, Vice ~r ATTEST: ~~~L~fl : Alan Unger, Commissioner ~~ Recording Secretary Minutes of Budget Meeting Wednesday, May 28,2014 Page 8 of8 BUDGET COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, May 27 th , 2014 9:00 AM 9:00 -9:05 AM 9:05 -9:20 AM 9:20 -9:35 AM • Elect Chair • Approve minutes from the December 2013 meeting Sunriver Library County Service District (Fund 751) (Budget Committee-Commissioners) • Open public meeting and introductions • Budget discussion • Public comment • Motion to approve budget of $102,975 and set amount of levy at $99,974 • Motion to be seconded • Budget Committee votes • Close budget meeting Sunriver Service District (Funds 715 & 716) (Budget Committee-Commissioners, Bob Wrightson, Jim Wilson & Mike Gocke) • Open public meeting and introductions • Budget discussion • Public comment • Motions to: 1) Approve Sunriver Service District operating budget of $6,351,263 and set tax rate at $3.3100 per $1 ,000 of assessed valuation (Fund 715) 2) Approve Sunriver Service District Reserve budget of $1,149,122 (Fund 716) • Motions to be seconded • Budget Committee votes • Close budget meeting Black Butte Ranch Service District (Fund 761) (Budget Committee-Commissioners, Dave Sullivan, Tom Mayberry & Carl Burnham) • Open public meeting and introductions • Budget discussion • Public comment Motions to: • 1) Approve budget of $1,739,110 and set tax rate at $1.0499 per $1,000 of assessed valuation 2) Set local option operating tax rate at $.5500 per $1,000 of assessed valuation Program Budget Tab/Page 13/379 71273 7/265 Page 1 BUDGET COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, May 27 th , 2014 Black Butte Ranch Svc District (Cont'd) 9:35 -9:50 AM 9:50 -10:00 AM 10:00 AM -Noon Noon -1:00 PM 1:00 -2:30 PM 2:30 -2:45 PM 2:45 -4:45 PM • Motion to be seconded • Budget Committee votes • Close budget meeting Deschutes County Extension and 4-H Service District (Funds 720 & 721) (Budget Committee-Commissioners, Joe Cross, Mike Scholeman & Katrina Van Dis) • Open public meeting and introductions • Budget discussion • Public comment • Motions to: 1) Approve Deschutes County Extension & 4-H Service District operating budget of $699,835 and set tax rate at $.0224 per $1,000 of assessed valuation (Fund 720) 2) Approve Deschutes County Extension & 4-H Service District Reserve budget of $432,300 (Fund 721) • Motions to be seconded • Budget Committee votes • Close budget meeting Break Deschutes County • Open public meeting • Deschutes County Budget Proposal Capital Improvement Program (Lunch Discussion) Other Funds Health Benefits Trust (Fund 675) PERS Reserve (Fund 135) Economic Development Fund (Fund 105) Video Lottery (Fund 165) Bethlehem Inn (Fund 128) General Fund (Fund 001-00 and 001-45) Break Health Services • Introductions • Budget discussion Continue the Deschutes County budget m e eting to Wednesday, May 28t h , at 9:00 AM Program Budget Tab/Page 7/268 8/277 6/228 6/237 6/229 6/223 6/230 6/214 5/168 Page 2 EL System: Our Shared Purpose & Common Agenda CHILDREN READY FOR SCHOOL Direct & Indirect Effects Adapted from OSU Family Policy Program Early Prenatal Care Parental Access to Alcohol & Drug Abuse Treatment Access to Developmental Screens/Early Evalu'ation Access to Health, Dental, Vision, & Other Needed Care Reduced Teen Pregnancy Parenting Education Family Access to Basic Resources Resources & Activities for Children & Families Wise Use of Electronic Media DIAGRAM KEY Parent Involvement in Care & Education Setting Family Support & Education Services BOXES: Major domain High Quality Early Childhood Care & Education Services Family Access to Basic Resources with direct affects BRACKETS: Key factors"-----------v-- ~ with indirect affects Child Health : • Health Status at Birth • Balanced Nutrition • Healthful Development • Help with Special Health Needs Educational Environments : (Home and Early Care/Education) • Parents as Child's Primary Teacher • Age-Appropriate Stimulation of Physical, Cogni­ tive, Language & Social Skills • Experiences with Peers • Quality Care and Education Experiences • Early Childhood Special Education Family Functioning : • Nurturing/Responsive Parenting Strategies • Parent as Child's Primary Teacher • Family Marital & Economic Stability • No Child Maltreatment • No Family Violence Communities: • Low Exposure to Violence & Fear • Adequate & Afford­ able Housing • Local Resources: Child Care & Educ, Libraries, Parks, Family Resource Centers • Ready Schools & Kindergartens • Social Climate: Neighborhoods, Shared Supervi­ sion, Civility • Positive Role Mod­ els for Children Ch ild ren Re ady for Kinde rgarten ~ ~----------------------------------~ Parental Access to Alcohol & Drug Abuse Treatment Family Support & Education Family Access to Basic Resources Access to Health & Mental Health Care Reduced Teen Parenting Reduced Parental Work Demands Social Supports for Parents & Extended Families Community Building & Community Support Reduced Crime/ Delinquency Youth Engagement in School & Community Coordinated Access to Needed Family Ser­ vices Primary Prevention Programs for Children & Families Community-School Integration Family Friendly Em­m» r -f ployers ::I:-f c: »c"o o ::I:-31: om . z 9-f 1:--' ~r CJ)" ;;tJ II)-n;:::a.»W:a:: C" ..... ­CUI ~ ..:..:,!" ...... :--' co ..... w~ Early Learning Hub of Central Oregon -rev. 3/24/2014 (Original Document Source : OSU Family Policy Program for the EARLY CHILDHOOD FINANCE COMMIITEE) • • ATIACHIVIENT 7.3 -Part 3a (S.2.7.1b) EL Hub of C.O. -DAS RFA# 201-2183­ n •n Kindergarten readiness means young children have the skills, knowledge, behaviors and attitudes necessary for success in school and in life. It includes aspec ts of six domains : • Physical Health and De velopment • Social and Emotio nal Development • Approaches to Lea r ning • Language and Lit e racy • • Cultural Aware ness Cognition and Ge n eral Kn o~!IlIIIl that enable children to engage In an b e nefit from le arning experiences. In order fo r children to be ready, fa mil ies need the resources to support l ear ning, growth and deve lop ment. Schools and communities need to w ork together to prov i de culturaUy relevant environments and experiences that advanc e child develo p ment from birth to kindergarten entry. Each component plays an essential role in readiness and no one component can stand alone. hil ~ n +R ad Fa mil; +R I rv; + mmun I = hil ~ n u --~ ho I Original document source from All Hands Raised-Multnomah Kindergarten Readiness Collaborative * revised by the Early Learning Hub of Central Oregon community partners to reflect The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework Domains and to emphasize the importance of cultural awareness Requested Changes to Proposed Budget FY 2015 f I ~ A) B) OHP-Mental Health Services (Fund 270) I FV 2015 I Proposed I Adjustment] Approved Transfer Out to Fund 142 200,000 200,000 Contingency 4,729,510 (200,000) 4,529,510 Total Requirement Changes Jail Project (Fund 456) I FV2015 I Proposed I Adjustment I Approved Transfer In from Fund 142 140,000 140,000 i•I Ii I I1 C) Total Resource Changes 140,000 New Construction 2,857,956 140,000 2,997,956 Total Requirement Changes 140,000 ISisters Health Clinic (Fund 464) FV 201S I Proposed I Adjustment I Approved Beginning Net Working Capital 140,000 210,000 Federal Grants 220,000 Interest Revenue 1,000 Total Resource Changes 431,000 350,000 220,000 1,000 Architecture/Design 15,000 Interfund charges 359 Fees, Permits & SDCs 5,000 15,000 359 5,000 Transfer Out to Fund 142 100 100 New Construction 139,641 410,900 550,541 Total Requirement Changes 431,000 j i Ci D) General County Projects (Fund 142) I FY 2015 I Proposed I Adjustment I Approved Beginning Net Working Capital 1,780,000 (150,000) Transfer In from Fund 270 200,000 Transfer In from Fund 464 100 1,630,000 200,000 100 Total Resource Changes 50,100 Transfer Out to Fund 456 140,000 140,000I Building Remodel 250,000 Contingency 2,964,255 (339,900) 250,000 2,624,355 Total Requirement Changes 50,100 I E) ! t 2 ~ j :! 1 1 i ~ ,~ C;! ,j i , I i ~ North County Services Building (Fund 462) Beginning Net Working Capital Interest Revenue Sale of Capital Assets 2,500,000 Total Resource Changes 2,031,000 Architect/Design 40,000 560,000 Interfund charges 1,378 Water & Sewer 1,200 Fees & Permits 5,000 21,500 Electricity 10,000 Debt Service-Prinicipal 150,000 Debt Service-Interest 4,500 Capital Outlay-Unger Building 1,000,000 Capital Outlay-Design Center 5,000 (5,000) Capital Outlay-Antler 300,000 Transfer Out (to Fund 140) 480,422 Total Requirement Changes 2,031,000 1,000 2,500,000 600,000 1,378 1,200 26,500 10,000 150,000 4,500 1,000,000 300,000 480,422 Requested Changes to Proposed Budget FY 2015 F) Fair and Expo Center (Fund 618) I FY2015 I Proposed I Adjustment I Approved Concession Food Concession Alcohol Catering Alcohol Catering outside @ 15% Catering Gratuitv 18% Flatware Rental Kitchen Rental Total Resource Changes Personnel Costs-Food/Bey Manager Materials & Serices-Food Costs Materials & Serices-Food/Bev Temp Help Contingency Total Requirement Changes 218,368 218,368 213,315 213,315 14,419 14,419 10,000 10,000 146,914 146,914 26,445 26,445 8,000 8,000 2,000 2,000 639,461 102,880 102,880 176,767 176,767 161,059 161,059 218,814 198,755 417,569 639,461 J n e fit Fund 259 Public Health Division FY 15 Budget by Programs Womens Reproductive Community Maternal Infants & Business Health Health Child Health Children Services--­ FY 15 Budget Total Program FTE 8.97 FTE 19.13 FTE 21.17 FTE 9.93 FTE 17.65 FTE 76.85 FTE RESOURCES: Beginning Net Working Capital 7,707 160,570 3,836 4,730 1,393,978 1,570,821 Revenues Federal Government Payments 82,085 2,500 17,000 101,585 State Government Payments 1,004,831 756,096 1,802,299 684,528 4,247,754 Local Government Payments 240,000 240,000 Charges for Services 107,500 945,866 74,791 141,000 1,269,157 Non-Operational Revenue 1,500 6,000 7,500 Interfund Charges 97,600 6,018 103,618 Interfund Grants 294,439 294,439 Transfers In -County General Fund 679,153 897,501 756,494 433,429 2,766,577 Total RESOURCES 1,882,776 3,056,972 2,975,020 1,122,687 1,563,996 10,601,449 REQUIREMENTS: Expenditures Salaries Benefits 879,036 485,484 1,556,006 835,431 1,436,169 829,335 577,274 340,284 157,013 70,495 4,605,498 2,561,029 Personnel Services Interfund Charges Internal Service Fund Charges Grants. Loans, & Reimbursements Other Materials & Services Materials & Services Capital Outlay Transfers Out Contingency TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1,364,520 119,190 358,822 478,012 40,226 18 2,391,437 187.586 20,089 403,300 610,975 54,558 2,265,504 180,339 232.300 237.712 650,351 32,951 26,215 917,558 89,794 84,391 174,186 30,942 227,508 7,635 13,484 6,700 86,946 114,764 100 5,962 1,215,661 $ 1,882,776 13,056,t~72 $ ~,9751020 $ 1,122,687 $ 1,563,996 7,166,526 7,635 590,393 259,089 1,171,171 2,028,288 100 164,640 1,241,895 _..,_._­ $ 10,601,449 _____.______ __",t)+Ah"t&\". k4 !II4SJI$i.'/!<i1kli L, X ,H 0'jiQ.¥iIf t~,,~h""'4J;t ',~1!1J.,,",i!!lIr""'j Fund 275 Behavioral Health Department FY 15 Budget by Programs Child and Family Program Access & Crisis Services Adult Treatment Program Developmental Disability Program Business Services • FY 15 Budget Total Program FTE 45.77 FTE 16.57 FTE 66.60 FTE 14.61 FTE 18.70 FTE 162.25 FTE RESOURCES; Beginning Net Working Capital $ -$ -$ 3,000 $ 1,252 $ 3,308,996 3,313,248 Licensing and Fees 147,200 147,200 Federal Government Payments 204,849 34,000 238,849 State Govemment Payments 754,892 725,842 3,333.432 3,406.720 8,220,886 Local Government Payments 65,000 65,000 Charges for Services 123,600 8,010 70,000 201,610 ForefeittJres o Non-Operational Revenue 7.800 11,000 19,500 38,300 Interfund Charges 4.516,773 1,295.657 5.398,337 5,218 11,215.985 Interfund Grants 127.000 127.000 Transfers In -County General Fund 384,826 53.553 637.613 301,311 1.377.303 Transfers In -Acute Care 187.594 187,594 TOTAL RESOURCES $ 6,000,091 $ 2,270,656 $ 9,785,~31 $ 3,709,283 $ 3,367,714 $ 25,132,974 REQUIREMENTS: Salaries $ 3,035,325 $ 1,153,056 $ 4,384,252 $ 832,129 $ 77,196 Benefits 1,695.176 632,167 2,435.678 477.501 40,120 Personnel Services 4,730,501 1,785,223 6,819,930 1,309,630 117,311 14,762,595 Interfund Charges 9.760 0 0 1,813 11,573 Internal Service Fund Charges 407,034 151,389 586,843 117,014 1,558 1,263,837 Grants, Loans & Reimbursements 5,600 2,000 330,139 1.692,592 2,030,331 Other Materials & Services 737,721 303,130 1,836.546 524,523 281.741 3,683.662 Materials & Services 1,160,115 456,519 2,753,528 2,334,129 285,112 6,989,403 Capital Outlay 100 100 Transfers Out 55,893 21,764 106,276 20,752 215 204,900 Contingency 53,580 7 1151 105,499 44,772 2,964,971 __3_,175.973 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 6,000,091 $ 2,270,656 $ 9,785,231 $ 3,709,283 $ 3,367,714 $ 25,132,974 (.,~ '-' Budget Committee May 27, 2014 Our Mission: To promote and protect the health and safety of our community. Better Health Less Cost Better Care Public Health, Behavioral Health and support of the Early Learning Hub Health Reform, Medicaid Expansion and Other Trends Impacting Health Services 2013-2014 A Year of Extraordinary Change County General Fund: Essential Need & Request Community Access, Collaboration & Programming Summary 5/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 Oregon Health Authority and other funding sources Deschutes County Health Services Regional, County and community-based operations in a Coordinated Care Organization environment WEBCO Wellness & Education Board Three Counties Education CO Health Council Pacific Source CCO 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Deschutes Co 10,362 11,616 13,99 20,009 23,168 23,182 36,446 37,175 Jefferson Co 2,107 2,831 3,518 4,149 4,418 3,806 5,321 5,427 Crook Co. 1,844 2,090 2,508 3,217 3,482 3,513 5,227 5,331 Total 14,313 16,537 20,021 27,375 31,068 30,501 46,994 47,993 OHP Membership Continues to Grow 2008 – 2015 - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Crook Co. Jefferson Co. Deschutes Co. 10,362 11,616 13,995 20,009 23,168 23,182 2,107 2,831 3,518 4,149 4,418 3,806 1,844 2,090 2,508 3,217 3,482 3,513 36,446 5,321 5,227 37,175 5,427 5,331 We are increasing access more locations, more services, more providers, more contracted dollars, more staff. We contract “at risk.” We must assure service to any resident on OHP with a medical need for BH services. Federal government: it is “fraud and abuse” to use BH OHP funds for any other purpose. We are also the safety net for residents without insurance or at high risk including those in crisis or leaving the jail. County GF is critical here. FY 13 Actual FY 14 Estimated Actual FY 15 Budget FY 16 Budget FY 17 Budget Resources Beg Net Working Cap $ 6,283,630 $ 7,174,100 $ 8,433,927 $ 6,623,543 $ 4,648,054 OHP Capitation 7,414,146 10,040,529 10,502,582 10,712,634 10,926,886 Other Revenues 46,284 44,598 45,100 45,100 45,100 Total Resources $13,744,060 $17,259,227 $18,981,609 $17,381,277 $15,620,040 Requirements Materials & Services $ 336,551 $ 506,657 $ 1,147,299 $ 1,047,972 $ 1,105,038 Trans to Operations 6,233,411 8,318,643 11,210,767 11,685,251 12,455,751 Contingency 0 0 6,623,543 4,648,054 2,059,251 Total Requirements $ 6,569,962 $ 8,825,300 $18,981,609 $17,381,277 $15,620,040 *Our projections are revised, at a minimum, on a quarterly basis. Our target for an ending fund balance at the end of the 3-year forecast is $2 M. FY 06 thru FY 15 (proposed) Average Annual Increase Personnel-related costs 9.2% County GF support 2.1% Balance of increased costs covered from other revenue Example: FY 15 includes $291,444 increased personnel- related costs not requested in County GF support Central Oregon Health Assessment and Health Improvement Plan •Updates required in 2015 •Deschutes, Jefferson, Crook County •Documents health needs •Plan to address them with evidence-based programs •Identify partner responsibilities •Ensure accountability “ The implementation of Health Care Reform … presents promise and challenges to the County’s efforts … Many more County residents are now covered by … OHP, significantly increasing state revenues based on covered lives in the region … It is not clear how many and when these clients will appear in our facilities for services … Staff positions have been added … more may be needed over the next several years …” Cover Oregon & OHP expansion 15 new State grants - improving services $1.9 M cut in State GF - safety net impacted PH Triennial Review- met all 1,179 standards PH Accreditation Site Visit - 93 of 98 met 23.1 FTE net staff increase since FY 14 adopted budget - grants, Medicaid expansion Expanded Redmond and La Pine service Medical sponsors at all SBHCs Assess, preserve, promote and protect the basic health and wellness of residents. Timely access to quality and affordable health care for the most vulnerable populations. Provide physical and behavioral health treatment and support services to meet community needs. Promote preventive health through partnerships, community education, outreach, advocacy. Promote targeted prevention, diversion and intervention programs to reduce recidivism and future demands on county services … Measures related to Client access Program utilization Satisfaction Health outcomes System performance Fill gaps in funding to ensure all residents that are eligible and in need of services receive them Provide matching funds to maximize Federal funding Provide essential administrative and operational support Advance the triple aim with prevention services Fulfill our governmental responsibility to protect the health and safety of residents LHD Projected Revenues By Source FY 2014 County General Funds State IGA Other State & Federal Funds Fees & Donations Medicaid Other Funds Series1 $72,114,993 $42,021,293 $25,555,539 $35,991,714 $84,506,573 $14,891,174 $0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000 $90,000,000 Staffing $110,200 Psychiatry, jail diversion case manager, therapy for young children - safety net services Health assessment update Internship within County govt. for person with developmental disabilities Employee development $13,500 E-Learning module for public health staff Technological improvements $32,400 Replacement of WBTs – required by IT The County transferred 2.5 CFC staff to Health Services to continue prevention services $26,451 in County GF included in FY 14 for operating and indirect costs was not included in Health Services budget in FY 15 We request the remaining funds be reinstated into Fund 259 to maintain our current level of service “You are leveraging resources and processes and using resources to maximize impact in the community, and for public health, you cannot ask an organization to do much more than that.” March 2014 Sisters Clinic Under Construction 183 served Redmond HS SBHC Lynch SBHC Becky Johnson Center New BH Clinic Courtney Annex Wall St. Services KIDS Center Ensworth SBHC La Pine SBHC La Pine Clinic South County Services Center Community Access Remains a Priority 7,212 served 3,775 served Bend HS SBHC 2015 941 served BH: N. Klamath Sample data residents served in: - Behavioral health - WIC or - Family Planning 2013-14 Contracts Contract Type Estimated Number Estimated Amount Service Contracts 147 $ 6.8 M Business Contracts 6 $ 20 K Total 153 $ 6.8 M+ In addition: •Contracts for OHP services held at Pacific Source: $1.58 M in FY 14 are increasing to $1.93 M in FY 15; an increase of $350 K •$2.5M WIC funds spent in Deschutes County grocery stores and farmers markets. 2014-15 Priorities Provide Access to timely & effective services at accessible locations Support Whole Person Health through integration and expansion of our continuum of care. Support System Health BH Future & County’s role Transformation of business approach: Doing good isn’t enough Health complexity driven service models: Complexity drives location and services Whole person health care Increased prevention, education, & outreach Safety net functions Collaboration with Mosaic to create a complex care clinic Co-location with La Pine Community Health Center More use of South County Building for clinical services Opening a new clinic in Redmond this month Adding more full time staff in Redmond & La Pine More local services in Sisters through creation of a new integrated clinic Target population: 10,243 at risk 0-6 year olds in the region Region’s early childhood resources: $ 18.8M Total ELH budget: $ 1.3M Includes state, MCH, HDESD, Medicaid, Counties Deschutes County investment: $ 252,288 General Operations  ($26,451 not transferred) $ 89,350 Alternatives to Incarceration Early Learning Hub Early Learning Hub Outcomes & Goals Programs – Improving Outcomes 10,243 – At Risk Children & Three Tiered Approach ROI – Every $1 invested in EC foundation yields $7 County Specific Programs, Projects & Initiatives 1.6 Staff FTE FY 14 Goals Partner with the medical community Reduce County GF revenue needs FY 15 Benefits Integrated primary care and behavioral health services at all clinics Ease of access, care coordination, decreased absenteeism, quick return to class Health education provided to entire student body Medical sponsors will be in place at all centers in FY 15 La Pine Community Clinic La Pine, Gilchrist (Klamath) Mosaic Medical Bend High, Ensworth, Lynch St. Charles Medical Group Redmond High, Sisters As requested: 34.4% reduction in need for County GF support FY 14 CGF $554,151 FY 15 CGF $363,499 Reinvested $190,652 -Community Health -Reproductive Health -Maternal Child Health -Women, Infants & Children FY 15 Budget Highlights: Request $156,100 County GF Restore $26,451 from CFC transfer Health Services covering personnel-related increase of $291,444 OHP funds up, PH down, new grants secured 23.1 FTE net increase since adopted FY 14, 241.7 total FTE Accomplishments: Increased access Lives covered Service locations Integration efforts underway Regional Early Learning Hub application submitted Demonstrated increased accountability Navigated multiple and major changes successfully Challenges: Sustaining public health programs, services, protections Assuring timely OHP access Continuing attention to program compliance and performance More changes on the way