HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-002VOL 3 t PAGE 548
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESiCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. )
PL -'20, Deschutes County Year 2000 )
Comprehensive Plan; Redesignating )
Certain Property From Agriculture ) I L E
to Rural Residential; and Declaring )
an Emergency. MAR 18 1981
ORDINANCE NO. 81-002 R-OSEMARY PATTERSON
DESCHMfS COUNTY CLERK
WHEREAS, Tumalo Irrigation District proposed the re-
designation of certain property from Agriculture to Rural Residential;
and
WHEREAS, a notice of hearing was given in accordance with
law; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a hearing
on the proposed Comprehensive Plan change on January 8, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the Board of. County Commissioners approved the
proposed redesignation of the property from Agriculture to Rural
Residential; now, therefore,
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES COUNTY,
OREGON, ORDAINS as follows:
Section 1. To amend Ordinance No. PL -20, Deschutes County
Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan, to change the designation from
Agriculture to Rural Residential for the parcel of real property
described as:
Tax Lot 800, Section 29B, Township 16 South,
Range 12 East of the Willamette Meridian,
Deschutes County, Oregon,
and depicted on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this
reference incorporated herein.
Section 2. To adopt as the Board of County Commissioners'
findings and cone usions, the findings submitted by the applicant
dated March 25, 1980, relating to Plan Amendment 80-4, marked
Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. This Ordinance being necessary for the
immediate preservation of public peace, health and safety, an
emergency is declared to exist, and this Ordinance takes effect
on its passage.
ORDINANCE NO. 81-002, PAGE 1
VOL 3 IKE 549
DATED this ' day of 1981.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON
(/Jo)
ROBERT C. P)141 -130N, JR. , Chairman
ATTEST:
Recording Secretary
ORDINANCE NO. 81-002, PAGE 2
prdjeno,nce. No. $ l -00�-
TuvyN000 Ter; CL+'ion
i
3�J i 29
i
i
I
11
su6;ecA
Proper+�
,r
s
a
VOL EAS°' 56
I to - 12 - aci B TL SOO
60' ro 04'E. (..2,96
900 800 701
IS
�N
Q
e} 4 5 0
702
Vlit /
\ 1003
� X92
\� 1.''
Qoo �4.55
n �' ! 5 BB`S°° ✓ �i\ '
i-
szoe"'W S IN 5.80°.52cv":✓'.__
0
0
ILL, N 704
Oi
cr— lt
703
m
1602 e 100
�:. '4�b
------ f 1,T. r 1000 V '
Exh�b� 4 B
TWALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT e�
_ (34697 cook. AVE� VOL 3%PAnE
BEND, OREGON 97701
Phony; 38',_-3053
March 25, 1980
Criteria for Requested: Minor Partition
Zone Change
Amendment Change to Plan
Legal Description: Township 16 South, Ran, e 12 El. -IM, Section 29, N.. 14 NtJ4
Tax Lot 800
1. Goals set forth in Deschutes County Comprehensive Plan
Rural Development (page 49)
a) To preserve and enhance the open space , rural character, scenic values
and natural resources of the County
The scenic value and the rural character of the property will be main-
tained, tPregardless of the requested changes, as it is protected by
natural juniper screening.
The natural resources are limited on this property. It is not economically
feasible for agriculture -due to the limited size, the terrain of the land,
and the lack of irrigation water. The only tre-es on the parcel are un-
marketable as a resource, but necessary to pr -serve the privacy and
rural character of the parcel.
b) To ouide the location and design of rural development so as to minimize
the public costs of facilities and services, to avoid unnecessary
expansion of service boundaries, and to preserve and enhance the
safety and viability of rural land uses.
The use of the land as two residential parcels will allow for additional
development close to already established services.
This ;parcel is less than one mile from the Tumalo Rural Service Center
and therefore facilities are easily accessible.
The property is dissected by Cline Falls Highway and is in close
proximity to Highway 20. Edge Hill Drive on the south and east side
of the property afford access to Cline Falls Highway. No further
public road services are required.
The Tumalo El%mentary School is one-half mile from the property.
The Tumalo Fire Hall is approximately the same distance.
Utilities are available and established on three sides of the property.
Underground facilities can be expanded from the subdivision on the east
and south boundaries.
c) To provide for the possible long-term expansion of urban areas while
protecting the distinction between urban lands and rural lands.
There is no conflict with this goal.
2. Goals set forth by the State Plan
There are no conflicts to Statewide goals, based on criteria as outlined
in that plan.
Goal 5 and 6 apply the same manner as in goal ( W the County Plan as de-
tailed above. VOL 377E 552
Goal 10 is spoken to in goal,(6) of the County Plan as indicated. The public
need (items 3 & 4 'following) also details goal 10. Coal 11, 12, 13 and 14 are
also covered in information provided by items 3 and 4.
3. There is a pub=lic need for the proposal.
To the best of our knowledge, there is only one 5 acre parcel available for sale
within one mile of the Tumalo Rural Service Center. There are very few additional
5 acre parcels sold and undeveloped in th-is area.
There is considerable demand in the area ir.i,i;^diately adjacent to the service
center for parcels of this size. In addition to being accessible to the service
center, it is 6 miles from Bend and readily available to the workplace. In
general, as the plan documents will bear out, the majority of lots available
are in the.LaPine area, whereas the demand for rural residential lots is in
the outlying areas of the City of Bend.
As the accompanying letters from real estate personnel will attest, market demand
has increased for rural parcels of 5 acres or less. This is especially true of
small rural parcels close to a rural service center such as Tunialo. Current real
estate demand and 1979 sales experience indicate that: 20-25'' of market activity
is directly related to rural residential acreage.
There is not a very important need for a 13 acre parcel close to the service
center that is not economically feasible for agricultural purposes. The property
is More of an asset to the community as residential use. The parcel will be for
residential use, whether it remains one or two lots. By remaining one lot it
will be available to a limited number of people vaho can afford to pay in excess
of $50,000 for a building site.
There are considerable 5 acre parcels in this area already developed that will
testify to the need of such lots in this geographic location. A uniformity
has been established for such parcels in this area. As the accompanying riap
locating these 5 acre parcels will attest, this particular lot is more the
exception, as there are a greater majority of 5 acre parcels in the adjoining
area.
4. The need will be best served by changing the classification of the property.
As this is one of the few sites in the Tumalo area in the vicinity of the
rural service center that could be further developed without any burden to
the public or to the surrounding property owners and without changing the
rural characteristics, we feel this is where development should be encouraged.
The use outlined in the plan (agricultural) is not feasible, as detailed
previously. Further, it is not the best use for the property due to its
location.
The boundary line for 5 acre residential parcels is just 1300' south of the
property in question. Referring to the map of 5 acre parcels established
in the area, this parcel of 12.83 appears to be the exception to a uniform
pattern of 5 acre parcels.
VOL 37PAGE 553
Y
'.Y Mutual facilities couid be, developed for the two lots,'i.e., well and septic
tank, to serve the parcels jointly. Underground facilities can be extended
from services existing surrounding the property.
We have letters from property owners adjacent consenting to our requests.
The specific locational advantages of the property in relation -to services and
facilities in the Tumalo Rural Service Center are outlined in (1)...
Our req.: -t for the zone change and partition is also in keeping with the goals
outlined for Tumalo as a rural community. Open space in excess of 65Y -would
exist on each lot created, even after the building of a home.
In reviewing goals and policies set forth in PL -15 4.150 and 4-160, we feel
that our requests are also in keeping with that criteria.
In addition, this acreage would be returned to the tax roles of the County by
becoming privately owned as result of a sale.