HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-07-15 PSCC Meeting Minutes
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 1 of 8
For Recording Stamp Only
DESCHUTES COUNTY
PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL
MINUTES OF MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 2015
______________________________
1. Call to Order & Introductions
Vice Chair Baney called the meeting to order at 3:40 p.m., as Judge Sullivan
indicated he would be joining the meeting late.
Present were Tammy Baney, Commissioner; Judge Michael Sullivan; Judge
Randy Miller; Tom Anderson, County Administrator; Ken Hales, Community
Justice; District Attorney John Hummel; Paul Kansky, for the Bend Police
Department; Shelley Smith, KIDS Center; Jacques DeKalb, defense attorney,
Dave Tarbet, Redmond Police Chief; Capt. Shane Nelson, Sheriff’s Office; and
citizens Roger Olson of NAMI of Central Oregon; Marilyn Burwell, Peace and
Justice Team; and Claire Withycombe of the Bulletin.
2. January Minutes.
Motions to approve and second approval of the January 6, 2015 minutes were
offered, and the minutes were unanimously approved.
3. Public Comment
Citizen Marilyn Burwell of the Peace and Justice Team presented a handout and
discussed several Oregon legislative bills. Commissioner Baney said she would
review them.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 2 of 8
4. Discussion regarding “DeschutesSafe”
John Hummel stated he wants to work with various groups to better improve
coordination around crime prevention. He had planned to start on this after a
few months in office, but began hearing from people right away about the
various specialty courts: Drug Court, Family Court, Veterans’ Court and others.
He was uncertain how to approach this because all of the ideas have some
merit. He thought he might solicit public feedback, but thinks this can be better
with a group. He attended a conference before he took office that focused on
this issue. He chose to put an advisory group together to solicit feedback. He
has to be sure not to just focus on the newest thing, but also to evaluate what is
already in place to determine if it can be done better.
His concept is to map the current crime problem here so that everyone will
know, breaking it down by location, age, and so on. They need to know what
drives crime other than the obvious, and what are they doing now to address
those drivers. There may be some areas that are not being addressed and others
where efforts are being duplicated.
After this is compiled, they can seek out public feedback. He recently reviewed
a grant through the MacArthur Foundation that was due immediately, but has a
focus on pre-trial incarceration. It is for a seven-month planning grant to look
at what is being done in crime prevention, and the pre-trial incarceration issue.
They will expect a plan, and some jurisdictions will be awarded a grant. It
means a significant amount of money if achieved. He obtained letters of
support from all agencies and others in short order. He is fully prepared that the
community may say what is being done is great already. There may not be any
gaps. But the pre-trial jail population is a problem since those individuals
cannot go into treatment or be involved in providing any services to the
community.
He should know the results of the application in about a month. They would
fund it by the end of May.
Judge Sullivan said that the people being held pre-trial are there almost always
at the request of the District Attorney’s Office. Generally the judges will listen
to what the attorneys have to say. Those decisions are made in court so the
review needs to include this.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 3 of 8
Mr. Hummel stated that how it is done now is based on anecdotal information
and experience. There is a prosecutor pre-trial risk assessment tool that many
D.A. offices are now using. He wants to look at this even if they do not get the
grant. However, he does not want to do things piecemeal but in total.
Judge Sullivan said they are using the ankle bracelets in some cases. Mr. Hales
noted there are 150 people with electronic monitoring devices, and a 130 are
pre-trial. The County subsidizes this program. They use GPS and a combo
unit, and alcohol sensors.
Jacques DeKalb said that the release officer uses criteria for recommendations,
and his experience is that the D.A. officials come in well prepared to make an
argument regarding security issues. They take in account the crime and
criminal history, and he does not think it is arbitrary.
Judge Sullivan stated that authority has been given to sergeants at the jail to
release some individuals. Capt. Shane Nelson said the release officer has been
helpful in this regard. The officer on the street can make this decision at times,
and officers at the jail can do so as well. Then it goes to the court. There are
many areas in which people are diverted off, depending on the situation. By the
time the decision gets to the judge, there have been a certain number of
evaluations done.
Frequently after this process, the attorney can speak up and ask for reduced
security. Mr. DeKalb concurred. He asked if someone has pending charges but
is given a parole sanction, if they can then work at the jail. Capt. Nelson said
normally they have to be sanctioned or sentenced. This population can be
70/30 or even 80/20, with the pretrial the higher number.
Commissioner Baney stated that regardless of the grant, she is pleased if things
can be mapped. They are doing this now in the health system with adults and
children. She feels that they have lost the community investment with the loss
of the Commission on Children & Families and what they did relating to early
childhood issues. She would like to know how the current lack of investment is
impacting issues. She knows there is higher youth suicide, and there may be
other major problems. She would like to see a very strategic investment
system-wide rather than focusing on just those that are already in the system.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 4 of 8
Mr. Hummel said that law enforcement people are experts in their field, and
educators are experts in theirs, but the various groups do not talk enough.
There has to be a look far upstream with early education as a base.
Commissioner Baney is sensitive about how those who can help might be able
to come up with time to participate. Better Together is working on graduation
rates and early childhood issues. Perhaps they can include others in this
program, those who are already invested, other than just those in PSCC.
Mr. Hummel stated he would ask for one meeting at which they can talk about
how to handle it. If they get the grant, they will get dedicated staff.
Commissioner Baney said she is committed if he wants to champion this issue.
Mr. Hummel noted that he is committed even if they don’t get the grant.
Marilyn Burwell explained there is a group working on restorative justice,
especially in La Pine, getting the child and parents involved as well as the
educators and others. She feels it needs to start at least at the high school level
but some before then. Mr. Hummel said he has spoken with the person there
who is involved in that program.
Mr. DeKalb said that the specialty courts come in after the fact. Prevention is
the key. Hard data on crime prevention is difficult to come by, and it is also
challenging to show how prevention is working. Commissioner Baney stated
that when the CC&F was going after grants, it was hard for them to be able to
show hard data in a big way. It takes time for those findings.
Capt. Nelsons stated that they have come a long way, and not everyone can be
served the same. The look needs to be more global. They are working on some
already. Crime prevention means something a little bit different to everyone.
They need to know why crime happens, and the best time to start on this is
when people are very young. They know some individuals have chosen this
path regardless of the opportunities, and won’t do anything else. Others come
in once and will never be back. They want to meet the group in the middle and
guide them properly.
Judge Sullivan said that some counties monitor folks before they are
adjudicated. It seems to be successful for some individuals, with someone
making sure they are going to work and staying out of trouble.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 5 of 8
Mr. Hales said they had pre-trial officers when he was in Wichita, who had a
say on who could be released. Mr. Hummel asked if this helps with a
recommendation. Mr. Hales said that some judges put people out purposefully
on pre-trial probation just to see how they do. Mr. Hummel stated that they
have to decide on whether to have a trial, but a recommendation would help.
This would include information on whether the person maintained his or her
job, and so on.
Mr. Hales said that a pre-sentence risk assessment is done in some areas. Judge
Sullivan noted that if they have options, to see if the person attends programs
and keeps their job, they may be able to stay away from open sentencing. This
would save money and perhaps allow for a better outcome.
5. Public Safety Legislation
Mr. Hales said they are watching the reform bills and those related to the justice
reinvestment program. The State added funds to JRP statewide through the
Governor’s Office and the co-chair. This is a maintenance budget at best. Mr.
Hales feels that this needs to be increased to handle the more complicated
things to come.
Capt. Nelson said the Sheriff’s Association takes an active role with legislation,
but he hopes experts are involved before it gets to that point. It is good to have
the OSSA and others overseeing this process. A growing concern from the
Sheriff’s Office is State mandates that may not have funding attached. The
Sheriff’s Office is critical of how the State does business and does not like to
see new laws that probably won’t increase public safety, but are required and
cost taxpayers’ money. The increased gun sales background check law, SB
941, does not provide for increased public safety and may even cause a lot of
people to break the law. There are questions regarding enforcement and they
don’t see the benefit of many of these proposals.
He does not know if the Sheriff’s Office will have increased workload in
administration if it passes, but it may mean other work in the field.
Chief Dave Tarbet is worried about the use of body cams and other unfunded
mandates. The cost is significant because the cameras would be expensive if
they are to be durable enough. Those making proposals do not always tell the
whole story all the time, and the public and media see what they want to see.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 6 of 8
Most of the time officers are working within the law. There are bills in play
that accredited agencies already have in place, including profiling that is not
allowed. His staff is commensurate with the racial makeup of the community,
as are the number of arrests handled by his agency.
Shelley Smith stated that KIDS Center is part of a network, and they want to
keep the funding going for child abuse prevention in various ways. Those
funds come from criminal fines and assessments from the Department of
Justice. There is HB 2234 that was co-sponsored from this district that looks at
the codes for interviewing. It will not adequately fund child abuse prevention
efforts across the state. KIDS Center is a medical model and is able to assess in
that way because of proper funding. The legislation is important but it will not
take care of the funding need.
The justice reinvestment fund comes with a tag about opportunities for
nonprofit agencies in the County, and she’d like to be able to apply for those
funds if appropriate.
Mr. DeKalb stated that they have discussed the expungement rule, a three-year
rules for certain crimes; only twelve states allow this at all. The other issue is
the lifetime suspension for a third DUI. A person can apply for a license after
ten years. He feels this should be reduced to five years since it is a hardship.
There should be adequate funds available for this.
Judge Sullivan said that the public defenders are not adequately funded and this
can cripple the system. Mr. DeKalb’s is a private firm that contracts to handle
indigent persons. They are not a favored entity at the State level, as they prefer
consortiums or public defenders. That is not practical here.
Tom Anderson noted that the recreational marijuana rules coming soon are
being worked out, and there is a land use side of this. The County is dealing
with the medical marijuana piece this month. On the prevention side, some
staff is involved in monitoring flavored tobacco and delivery systems, and how
that will impact marijuana use.
Judge Sullivan stated that the transition to the Odyssey computer system
continues. It will make it easier to transmit information between agencies. It
will be an integral transition. He has been through two of these roll-outs and
some judges will complain more, but in the long term it works well. It will
make a huge difference in processing cases. The learning curve is not easy and
will take a while.
Mr. Hummel said that Linn County has shared some issues they had with this
program, and have been working out the kinks. He contacted various D.A.'s
who have been through this, ten in all, to get feedback.
Judge Randy Miller stated that it will be a time challenge initially, but its effect
on justice will help with the time required in court. Judge Sullivan said that the
criminal docket will initially be put behind, and they may not be able to have
people cited into Court for a couple of weeks.
Commissioner Baney left the meeting at this time.
6. Redmond Community Justice Offices
Mr. Hales referred to the plans for the remodel of the Unger Building in
Redmond. It has been utilized by several County departments and for other
operations over the years. Adult Parole & Probation and Juvenile have used
space there, as well as some employees from Community Development and
Justice Court.
The building will basically be brought to a shell so they can configure how to
use the space. Community Corrections will have the whole building, with two
entrances, one for adults and one for juveniles. Current Parole Officers are
scattered in different locations now, and this will be a great improvement. They
will have space for group work and other programs. Judge Sullivan feels the
separation of Adult from Juvenile groups is important.
7. Other Business
Shelley Smith of KIDS Center spoke about the annual Blue Ribbon Campaign
against Child Abuse. She indicated she has posters and other information
available.
Being no other business discussed, Judge Sullivan adjourned the meeting at
4:55 p.m.
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 7 of8
Respectfully submitted,
Bonnie Baker
Recording Secretary
Attachments
· Agenda
· Sign-in sheets
· Statement from citizen Marilyn Burwell
· Unger Building remodel plans
Minutes of PSCC Meeting Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Page 8 of8
I
] DESCHUTES COUNTY t PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL f
I
i Tuesday April 7, 2015 -3:30 PM
i Allen Room, Deschutes Services Building, 1300 NW Wall, Bend, OR
I Agenda
I I I Call to Order & Introductions
Chair Sullivan
I II August Minutes Attachment 1
Chair Sullivan
Action: Approve January minutes
III Public Comment
I Chair Sullivan
,
IV DeschutesSafe
John Hummel
Brief Council members on proposal
V Public Safety Legislation
Chair Sullivan
Council members to highlight priority legislation
VI Redmond Community Justice Offices
Ken Hales
Brief Council on temporary locations and facility remodel Attachment 2
VII Other Business
Judge Sullivan
z-
z
()VI
UJ
VI
«
UJ -J 0..
I I
I I I
I I
I
I
t
I I
I I
I I
.~ c c 0
CD
E
c...
.2 ~
~
OJ
OJ
0::
z-
Z \J-VI
UJ
VI « UJ
...J a..
Lt"I-o
N .. r-... -';:
0« .. >1}
u u VI a..
t+
I
I I
eli ·c c o co
.8
OJ m OJ 0:::
Statement for Deschutes County PSCC -April 7,2015
In December the U.S. Dept. ofJustice released a guidance for federal law enforcement agencies
in essence prohibiting racial profiling. There are also three important bills before the Oregon
Legislature concerning racial profiling. Those bills are HB 2001, 2002 and 2003. There are
copies of both the guidance and a summary ofthe three bills here for you to take and read.
Recent events nationally and locally, like the death at the jail and the rude demonstrations at
Prineville, mean that local law enforcement needs to improve their relationship with the public.
Working on eliminating racial profiling would help, and so would expanding the composition of
your advisory boards. There should be greater numbers of both women and minorities on those
boards.
Thank you.
Marilyn Burwell, Bend, Oregon
A E
1
3
D
K4
A4
.
0
0
D1 A4.00
CB
2
K1
A4
.
0
0
G1 A4.00
10
7
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J1
10
8
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J2
10
8
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J3
10
8
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J4
45
S
F
AD
U
L
T
U
A
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
10
4
13
8
S
F
SM
A
L
L
CO
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
10
9
21
3
S
F
LA
R
G
E
CO
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
11
0
10
8
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
A1
10
9
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
A2
10
9
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
A3
10
9
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
A4
10
9
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A6
10
9
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A7
15
9
S
F
SU
P
E
R
V
I
S
O
R
OF
F
I
C
E
S1
10
8
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A8
10
7
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A9
46
S
F
ST
O
R
A
G
E
13
10
8
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A11
18
2
S
F
ST
A
F
F
W
O
R
K
RO
O
M
12
5
23
S
F
IT
C
L
O
S
E
T
12
9
44
S
F
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
WO
M
E
N
13
0
312 SFSTAFF BREAK ROOM 136
10
9
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A5
10
8
S
F
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A1
0
20
2
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
WA
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R1
1
20
5
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
HA
L
L
W
A
Y
R1
4
43
S
F
AD
U
L
T
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
R7
43
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
R8
23
S
F
JA
N
I
T
O
R
R1
7
45
S
F
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
M
E
N
R1
6
78
S
F
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
SH
O
W
E
R
R1
5
43
6
S
F
AD
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R1
9
19
8
S
F
AD
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R1
8
11
7
S
F
RE
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
R2
0
20
2
S
F
AD
U
L
T
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
RO
O
M
10
3
44
S
F
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
U
A
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
12
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A9
.
7
A
C3
C4
C6
C2
A9
.
7
A
9
8
11
10
1
DC
D1
A4
.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8 9
A B C D E F G H J K
Drawing Title:Date :
D
r
a
w
n
B
y
:
Revised :
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
Stamp
S
h
e
e
t
N
o
.
of BLRB ARCHITECTS, P.S.
1
8
/
8
/
2
0
1
4
2
:
3
9
:
2
9
P
M
OVERALL FLOOR PLANS 08-08-2014
D
T
L
14.34B A2.01DESCHUTES COUNTY UNGER BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SET DESCHUTES COUNTY 00MATERIALS KEY
0'
2
'
4
'
1'
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
@
F
U
L
L
S
I
Z
E
G1
FL
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
1
0'
2
'
4
'
1'
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
@
F
U
L
L
S
I
Z
E
K1
FL
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
B
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
Q
U
A
R
E
F
O
O
T
A
G
E
1S
T
F
L
O
O
R
= 4,844 SQ FT
BA
S
E
M
E
N
T
= 450 SQ FT
TO
T
A
L
= 5,294 SQ FTROOM LEGEND 13
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
101
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
103
A
D
U
L
T
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
104
A
D
U
L
T
U
A
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
108
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
109
S
M
A
L
L
C
O
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
110
L
A
R
G
E
C
O
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
122
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
R
O
O
M
125
S
T
A
F
F
W
O
R
K
R
O
O
M
126
I
T
C
L
O
S
E
T
127
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
128
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
U
A
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
129
I
T
C
L
O
S
E
T
130
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
W
O
M
E
N
131
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
M
E
N
132
A
D
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
135
S
T
A
F
F
W
O
R
K
R
O
O
M
136
S
T
A
F
F
B
R
E
A
K
R
O
O
M
A0
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
A1
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
A2
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
A3
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
A4
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
A5
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A6
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A7
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A8
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A9
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A10
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
A11
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
ADULT OFFICE #5ADULT OFFICE #5 J0
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
J1
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J2
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J3
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J4
A
D
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
J5
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R1
R
E
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
R2
A
D
U
L
T
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R3
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R4
A
D
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R5
A
D
U
L
T
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R6
R
E
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
R7
A
D
U
L
T
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
R8
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
R9
A
D
U
L
T
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R10
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R11
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R12
A
D
U
L
T
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
R13
A
D
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R14
J
U
V
E
N
I
L
E
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R15
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
S
H
O
W
E
R
R16
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
M
E
N
R17
J
A
N
I
T
O
R
R18
A
D
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R19
A
D
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
R20
R
E
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
S1
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
O
R
O
F
F
I
C
E
A3.00 E1
A3
.
0
0
A3
.
0
0
A3
.
0
0
C1
K1
H1
K4
A4
.
0
0
D1 A4.00
K1
A4
.
0
0
F1 A4.00
D1
A4
.
1
1
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
12
7
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
12
8
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
12
9
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
13
0
AD
U
L
T
U
A
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
11
7
SM
A
L
L
CO
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
11
5
LA
R
G
E
CO
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
11
8
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
10
4
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
10
5
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
10
6
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
OF
F
I
C
E
10
7
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
10
9
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
11
0
SU
P
E
R
V
I
S
O
R
OFFICE 111
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
13
1
ADULT OFFICE 135
ST
A
F
F
W
O
R
K
RO
O
M
11
9
IT
C
L
O
S
E
T
12
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
WO
M
E
N
12
2
STAFF BREAK ROOM 125
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
10
8
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
13
4
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
WA
I
T
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
10
3
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
HA
L
L
W
A
Y
11
2
AD
U
L
T
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
10
1
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
10
2
JA
N
I
T
O
R
12
1
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
M
E
N
12
3
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
SH
O
W
E
R
12
4
A
AD
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
12
6
AD
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
11
3
RE
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
11
4
AD
U
L
T
W
A
I
T
I
N
G
RO
O
M
10
0
JU
V
E
N
I
L
E
U
A
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
11
6
A9
.
1
C1
A9
.
1
E1
A9
.
1
G1
A5
.
1
E1
E5
E3
E2
A5
.
0
B2
B1
B5
B3
A5
.
0
D5
D1
D2
D3
A5
.
1
B1
B4 B2
B3
A5
.
0
F1
F2
F4
F6
A5
.
0
G1
G2
J1
J2
A5
.
0
K1
K2
K4
K6
A5
.
1
C1
C2
C3
C4
A5
.
1
.
A5
.
1
J1
J2
J3
J4
.
A5
.
1
J5
J6
J7
J8
A9.1 K2 K3K4K5A5.2 B1 A5.2 B4 B3B5 A5.2 B2
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
G1
G2
G3
G4
A5.2 D1 D2D3D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5
.
2
D1
D2
D3
D4
A5.2 F1 F2F3F4
10
0 A
E1
0
3
A
11
2 B
125 A
10
1 A10
2 A
11
4 A
11
2 A 12
6 A
11
4 B
11
'
-
1
0
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
5'
-
2
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
5
/
8
"
11' - 6 5/8"
8'
-
0
3
/
4
"
5'
-
5
1
/
4
"
4'
-
1
3
/
8
"
5'
-
1
1
3
/
4
"
1'
-
6
1
/
4
"
1'
-
6
3
/
4
"
4'
-
2
3
/
4
"
12
'
-
4
3
/
4
"
8'
-
6
3
/
4
"
18
'
-
8
3
/
4
"
13
'
-
0
1
/
4
"
7'
-
7
"
8'
-
4
3
/
4
"
8'
-
8
5
/
8
"
7' - 2 1/2"
4
5
/
8
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
1
/
2
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
8'
-
5
1
/
2
"
2'
-
4
"
17
'
-
1
1
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
5 3/4"2' - 4"9' - 1 1/2"
14
'
-
1
0
"
98
'
-
0
"
4' - 10"4' - 0"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5
3
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
5
"
6"
2'
-
4
"
5'
-
7
1
/
2
"
2' - 4"6"5' - 5"3' - 2 1/2"
11
'
-
1
0
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
11
'
-
6
3
/
4
"
16' - 8 3/4"
4
'
-
6
"
1
0
'
-
7
"
1
2
'
-
4
1
/
2
"
1
0
'
-
7
"
4
'
-
6
"
8' - 2 1/4"13' - 1"13' - 1"8' - 2 1/4"42' - 6 1/2"E4WV1E4WS2 E4WS1 4W2
4W
2
6W
2
6W
2
4W
2
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
V
1
E4
W
V
1
E4
W
V
1
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
V
1
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
V
1
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
S
1
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
4W
2
6W
2
6W
2
4W
2
6S1
E4
W
S
2
E4WS1 E4WV1 E4WV1 E4WS1 E4WS1 E4WV1E4WS2E4WV1
E4
W
V
1
4W
2
4W24W2
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
13
2
AD
U
L
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
13
3
A8
.
1
K6
D5
A4
.
1
1
10
4 A
10
5 A
10
6 A
10
8 A
10
9 A
11
0 A
11
1 A
12
2 A
12
0 A
11
8 A
11
6 A
11
5 A
11
5 B
11
7 A
11
8 B
12
3 A
135 A
13
3 A
13
2 A
13
1 A
13
0 A
12
9 A
12
8 A
12
7 A
10
7 A
12
1 A
A8
.
1
K1
A8
.
1
K3
5'
-
0
"
5'
-
7
3
/
4
"
4W
2
6W
2
6W
2
SHELF & ROD
6
'
-
2
1
/
4
"
6
'
-
2
1
/
4
"
DN11
2 C
KN
O
X
B
O
X
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
104413.FXC
10
4
4
1
3
.
F
X
C
A7
.
0
G6
E4WV1E4WV1
4
'
-
8
3
/
8
"
1
2
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
4
'
-
7
1
/
8
"
1
0
'
-
7
1
/
8
"
12
6 B
13
4 A
12
4
A
A12
4 A EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
SH
O
W
E
R
12
4
.
CL
E
A
R
5'
-
0
"
4W2
AD
U
L
T
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
A 12
6
A
A9.1 K5K2K4K3.SIM OPP SIM OPP SIM OPPSIMOPP UCDW REFRIGERATOR BY OWNER 126 C
G1
7
0
°7 0 °
8
"
8
"
9
1
/
2
"
1'
-
2
"
3'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
8 ' - 3 "
1'
-
2
"
3 ' - 5 "
5 "
3
'
-
5
"
8
'
-
3
"
4
3
/
4
"
1'
-
2
"
9
1
/
2
"
4
1
/
2
"
5 ' - 2 1/2 "1 ' - 9 "2 ' - 0 "3 ' - 4 "1 ' - 5 "1 ' - 9 "5 ' - 2 1 /2 "6 ' - 9 "7 3 °7 3 °
4W
3
4W
2
A9.1K1
10
3 A
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
G
Y
P
S
U
M
B
O
A
R
D
09
2
9
0
0
.
I
G
B
EXTERIOR WALL TYPES
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
T
Y
P
E
S
WALL
TY
P
E
S
ASSEMBLY
K
E
Y
N
O
T
E
S
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
WA
L
L
TY
P
E
S
AS
S
E
M
B
L
Y
K
E
Y
N
O
T
E
S
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
AT
1
6
"
O
.
C
.
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
G
Y
P
S
U
M
B
O
A
R
D
09
2
9
0
0
.
I
G
B
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
G
Y
P
S
U
M
B
O
A
R
D
09
2
9
0
0
.
I
G
B
WO
O
D
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
06
1
0
0
0
.
W
F
R
WO
O
D
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
06
1
0
0
0
.
W
F
R
AT
1
6
"
O
.
C
.
FACE BRICK (VENEER)042000.FB PLYWOOD SHEATHING 061600.PWS WOOD FRAMING 061000.WFR
SO
U
N
D
B
A
T
T
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
07
2
1
0
0
.
S
B
SO
U
N
D
B
A
T
T
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
07
2
1
0
0
.
S
B
WOOD FRAMING 061000.WFR?061600.WBM?061500.WD BLANKET INSULATION 072100.BIPLYWOOD SHEATHING 061600.PWS BLANKET INSULATION 072100.BIAT 16" O.C.
4W
1
4W
2
4W
3
E4
W
S
1
E4
W
V
1
INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD 092900.IGB INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD 092900.IGB
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
G
Y
P
S
U
M
B
O
A
R
D
09
2
9
0
0
.
I
G
B
AT
1
6
"
O
.
C
.
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
G
Y
P
S
U
M
B
O
A
R
D
09
2
9
0
0
.
I
G
B
WO
O
D
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
06
1
0
0
0
.
W
F
R
SO
U
N
D
B
A
T
T
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
07
2
1
0
0
.
S
B
6W
1
BU
L
L
E
T
P
R
O
O
F
P
A
N
E
L
13
4
7
1
3
.
B
P
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
G
Y
P
S
U
M
B
O
A
R
D
09
2
9
0
0
.
I
G
B
WO
O
D
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
06
1
0
0
0
.
W
F
R
AT
1
6
"
O
.
C
.
SO
U
N
D
B
A
T
T
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
07
2
1
0
0
.
S
B
BU
L
L
E
T
P
R
O
O
F
P
A
N
E
L
13
4
7
1
3
.
B
P
FU
R
R
I
N
G
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
G
Y
P
S
U
M
B
O
A
R
D
09
2
9
0
0
.
I
G
B
5/
8
"
WALL TYP. LEGEND NEW WALL (E) WALL TO REMAIN
B.
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
B1
0
0
ME
C
H
B1
0
1
WA
S
H
B1
0
2
ST
O
R
A
G
E
B1
0
3
ST
O
R
A
G
E
B1
0
4
(E
)
C
O
N
C
.
W
A
L
L
S
T
O
RE
M
A
I
N
U
N
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
UP
(E
)
(E
)
(E
)
(E
)
B1
0
4
A
B1
0
3
A
B1
0
2
A
B1
0
1
A
Drawing Title:Date :
D
r
a
w
n
B
y
:
Revised :
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
Stamp
S
h
e
e
t
N
o
.
of BLRB ARCHITECTS, P.S.
A B C D E F G H J K
2
3
4
5
6
7 8 9
1
3
/
1
6
/
2
0
1
5
4
:
0
1
:
5
9
P
M
OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 12-15-2014
D
T
L
14.34B A2.1UNGER BUILDING REMODELPERMIT SET 1-22-2015DESCHUTES COUNTY
0'
2
'
4
'
1'
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
@
F
U
L
L
S
I
Z
E
G1
FL
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
1
S
T
L
E
V
E
L
0'
2
'
4
'
1'
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
@
F
U
L
L
S
I
Z
E
K1
FL
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
B
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
L
E
V
E
L
NO
T
E
:
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
T
O
V
E
R
I
F
Y
A
L
L
DI
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
S
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S