HomeMy WebLinkAboutSAL 4fTABLE 4f -- SUMMARY OF URBAN RENEWAL REVENUE FROM SPECIAL LEVIES AND DIVSION OF TAX IN THE COUNTY, BY PLAN AND AGENCY
Tax Year 2020-21
COUNTY: DESCHUTES
October 09, 2020 2:03 PM
Agency Name: CITY OF BEND
At which point were division of tax rates truncated? Each Levy
h
13
16 h 1
16
16 b
1
1 k?evenue from I percentage
1
j otal Amount to be
j otal UR Division
ITotal UR Division j otal Gain/Loss j otal UR Div. of
JUR Revenue k pecial Levies Nal Revenue Schedule
k2evenue from
k?aised from UR
bf Tax Loss due
lof Tax Amount krom Extension of j ax Loss Due to
from Division of kTable 4a, kcolumn 6 plus kOptional, see
(Plan Name
bivision of Tax
�o Truncation
(Extended PR Div. of Tax Compression
(Tax �ine/column 39) Column 7) instructions)
BEND JUNIPER RIDGE URBAN RENEWAL
1 1,389,516.701
8,186.361
1,389,516.981 0.281 -0.27
1,389,516.71 ] 0.001 1,389,516.711 0.003431560
MURPHY CROSSING URBAN RENEWAL
1 556,847.511
6,572.191
556,846.701 -0.811 -0.10
556,846.601 0.001 556,846.601 0.001287610]
Agency Total:
1,946,363.31 i 0.00 1,946,363.31 0.004719170
Agency Name: City of La Pine
At which point were division of tax rates truncated? Each Levy
h
13
16
16 b
1
1
Revenue from I percentage
I
k2evenue from
I
percentage
otal Gain/Loss j otal UR Div. of
Notal Amount to be
�otal UR Division
ITotal UR Division
�otal Gain/Loss
�otal UR Div. of
JUR Revenue k pecial Levies
�otal Revenue
Schedule
kTable 4a, kcolumn 6 plus kOptional, see
kzaised from UR
bf Tax Loss due
lof Tax Amount
jrom Extension of
Sfax Loss Due to
from Division of kTable 4a,
kcolumn 6 plus
kOptional, see
(Plan Name
bivision of Tax
ko Truncation
(Extended
OR Div. of Tax
Compression
(Tax line/column 39)
Column 7)
instructions)
CITY OF LA PINE URBAN RENEWAL
1 135,610.991
78.661
135,611.261
0.271
-1.94
135,609.321 0.001
135,609.327
0.000287650
Agency Total:
135,609.321i 0.00i
135,609.32
0.000287650
Agency Name: CITY OF REDMOND
At which point were division of tax rates truncated? Each Levy
h
13
16
1
1
Revenue from I percentage
I
otal Amount to be
j otal UR Division
ITotal UR Division
otal Gain/Loss j otal UR Div. of
JUR Revenue
Opecial Levies j otal Revenue Schedule
JUR Revenue k pecial Levies
k?aised from UR
bf Tax Loss due
lof Tax Amount
krom Extension of j ax Loss Due to
from Division of
kTable 4a, kcolumn 6 plus kOptional, see
(Plan Name
bivision of Tax
�o Truncation
(Extended
OR Div. of Tax Compression
(Tax
Line/column 39) Column 7) instructions)
REDMOND DWNTWN URBAN RENEWAL
1 3,604,263.181
1,428.711
3,604,263.981
0.801 -8,578.78
3,595,685.20]
0.001 3,595,685.201 0.008386630]
Agency Total:
3,595,685.20
0.00 3,595,685.20 0.008386630
Agency Name: CITY OF SISTERS
At which point were division of tax rates truncated? Each Levy
h
13
16
lRevenue from
I
percentage
j otal Amount to be
j otal UR Division
ITotal UR Division j otal Gain/Loss
j otal UR Div. of
JUR Revenue k pecial Levies
Nal Revenue
Schedule i
k2aised from UR
bf Tax Loss due
lof Tax Amount krom Extension of
Sfax Loss Due to
from Division of kTable 4a,
kcolumn 6 plus
kOptional, see
(Plan Name
bivision of Tax
�o Truncation
(Extended OR Div. of Tax
Compression
(Tax line/column 39)
Column 7)
instructions)
SISTERS DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL
1 417,266.591
330.131
417,266.621 0.031
-0.92
417,265.701 0.001
417,265.701
0.000755240
Agency Total:
417,265.701i 0.00
417,265.70
0.000755240