HomeMy WebLinkAbout2223-5 Follow-up Munis Part IV-Analyses (Final 11-8-22)Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
FOLLOW-UP REPORT
County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing
topics: Part IV - Analyses
(Internal audit report #20/21-9 issued November 2021)
To request this information in an alternate format, please call (541) 330-4674 or send email to internal.audit@deschutes.org
Deschutes County,
Oregon
The Office of County Internal Audit
David Givans, CPA, CIA – Internal Auditor
Aaron Kay – Performance Auditor
internal.audit@deschutes.org
Audit committee:
Daryl Parrish, Chair - Public Member
Jodi Burch - Public Member
Joe Healy - Public Member
Scott Reich - Public Member
Summer Sears - Public Member
Stan Turel - Public Member
Patti Adair, County Commissioner
Charles Fadeley, Justice of the Peace
Lee Randall, Facilities Director
Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
TABLE OF
CONTENTS:
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background on Audit …………..………………………………………….……….……..…. 1
1.2. Objectives and Scope …………….………………………………….…………….………… 1
1.3. Methodology …………………………………….…..………………………….…………….… 1
2. FOLLOW-UP RESULTS …………………….……….……………………………………….…… 2
APPENDICES
Appendix I – Updated workplan (status as of November 2022) .….………….…. 3-6
Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
Page 1
1.
Introduction
1.1 BACKGROUND ON AUDIT
Audit Authority:
The Deschutes County Audit Committee has suggested that follow-ups occur within nine months of
the report. The Audit Committee would like to make sure departments satisfactorily address
recommendations.
1.2 OBJECTIVES and SCOPE
“Audit
objectives” define
the goals of the
audit.
Objectives:
The objective was to follow-up on recommendations from the original audit.
Scope:
The follow-up included ten (10) recommendations from the internal audit report for County
Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses (#2021-9), issued in November
2021. The original internal audit report should be referenced for the full text of recommendations
and associated discussion. The follow-up reflects the status as of November 2022.
1.3 METHODOLOGY
The follow-up report was developed from information provided by Robert Tintle, Chief Financial
Officer. Comments were sought for the status of the outstanding recommendations. Follow-ups are,
by nature, subjective. In determining the status of recommendations that were followed up, we
relied on assertions provided by those involved and did not attempt to independently verify those
assertions. The updates received are included in Appendix I.
Since no substantive audit work was performed, Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States were not followed.
Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
Page 2
2. Follow-up Results
Figure I -
How were
recommendations
implemented?
The follow-up included ten (10) outstanding recommendations agreed to by Finance. Figure I
provides an overview of the implementation status of the recommendations.
With this follow-up, twenty-nine percent (40%) of the outstanding recommendations have been
addressed. As indicated in the provided responses, many of the recommendations have not been
fully addressed because of Finance’s need for a dedicated procurement position to ensure
compliance with public purchasing laws.
The details of the follow-up is included at the end of the report in Appendix I. In interpreting the
status, Internal Audit may sometimes raise or lower the status provided by the department based on
the communication(s) received from the department.
Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
Page 3
APPENDIX Appendix I – Updated workplan for recommendations for #20/21-9
(status as of November 2022)
Items that are not completed are greyed out.
Rec # Recommendations Status
Estimated
or Actual
Date of
Completion Updated Follow-up comments
1 It is recommended, for those billed invoices that
only include an account number (no invoice
number), for staff (based on guidance from
Finance) to include additional descriptors to
make a unique invoice number (such as adding
a month and year to the account number).
Completed March 2022 Munis settings updated to require unique
invoice numbers. Instructions sent to all users
on proper invoice number convention to use.
This is also documented in AP procedures
provided with new Munis Helpdesk system.
2 It is recommended that Finance develop
procedures to review for duplicate invoice
payments and, at least annually, perform a
duplicate invoice search/review.
Underway Dec 2022 Finance staff is working on completing for FY22.
3 It is recommended for Finance to provide
additional guidance to those using the Munis
accounting system as to the use of requisitions
(by service or goods) (by quantity or amount),
receiving of goods and services, and how the
system is intended to operate.
Completed May 2022 Munis Helpdesk implemented providing
resources on receipting. Employees can also
reach out to Finance team via helpdesk for help.
To adequately address purchasing
recommendations and to ensure ongoing
compliance with public purchasing law, Finance
needs a dedicated public procurement
professional position familiar with ORS 279A-C
and other related public procurement
standards.
Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
Page 4
Rec # Recommendations Status
Estimated
or Actual
Date of
Completion Updated Follow-up comments
4 It is recommended Finance provide greater
guidance on the importance and impacts of
receiving activities.
Completed May 2022 Munis Helpdesk implemented providing
resources on receipting. Employees can also
reach out to Finance team via helpdesk for help.
To adequately address purchasing
recommendations and to ensure ongoing
compliance with public purchasing law, Finance
needs a dedicated public procurement
professional position familiar with ORS 279A-C
and other related public procurement
standards.
5 It is recommended for Finance to consider
additional training to approvers on batching
approvals. This would include setting
expectations at various levels in the approval
process as well as communicating them in
written procedures.
Underway Dec 2022 Instructions sent out to p-card approvers on
expectations for review.
Finance to develop reminder email to all Munis
users on invoice approval expectations.
6 It is recommended for Finance to assess,
periodically, the usage of bulk approving and the
impacts on the purchasing workflow.
Planned Dec 2022 Finance requested process developed by County
Internal Auditor and to implement quarterly
review. To adequately address purchasing
recommendations and to ensure ongoing
compliance with public purchasing law, Finance
needs a dedicated public procurement
professional position familiar with ORS 279A-C
and other related public procurement
standards.
Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
Page 5
Rec # Recommendations Status
Estimated
or Actual
Date of
Completion Updated Follow-up comments
7 It is recommended for Finance to consider
revisiting workflows periodically to see if they
can be further streamlined.
Completed May 2022 Finance reviews workflows for proper approvals
on monthly basis. If approval issues arise,
Finance does review workflow setup and suggest
ways to streamline.
8 It is recommended, with the incidence of some
invoices not being entered against a purchase
order or contract, that Finance consider whether
it would be beneficial to provide departments a
tool to reference their purchase orders.
Planned TBD Not started. To adequately address purchasing
recommendations and to ensure ongoing
compliance with public purchasing law, Finance
needs a dedicated public procurement
professional position familiar with ORS 279A-C
and other related public procurement
standards.
9 It is recommended for Finance to work with
departments to identify and consider setting up
routine payments with a purchase order or
contract.
Planned TBD Not started. To adequately address purchasing
recommendations and to ensure ongoing
compliance with public purchasing law, Finance
needs a dedicated public procurement
professional position familiar with ORS 279A-C
and other related public procurement
standards.
Follow-up County Accounting System (MUNIS) purchasing topics: Part IV - Analyses report #22/23-5 November 2022
Page 6
Rec # Recommendations Status
Estimated
or Actual
Date of
Completion Updated Follow-up comments
10 It is recommended the County limit usage of its
accountable plan payments to
employees/volunteers and that other
departmental payments should not be paid
through the County’s accountable plan.
Underway Jan 2023 Finance is working on reviewing the activity in
vendor account 999992 for FY22 to confirm its
being used properly. To clarify the
recommendation so it isn't confused with IRS
Publication 15 and 15B regarding 'accountable
plan' reimbursements, the ‘Accountable Plan’
vendor is for nontaxable reimbursement
payments to ‘volunteers’ or ‘employees prior to
being hired’. Once an employee is an active
employee, each employee is set up with a
unique vendor # to process reimbursements.
{End of Report}