Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1516-12 Follow-up report on Sheriffs Office Transition (Final 7-13-16)Follow-up report of Sheriff’s Office Transition #15/16-12 July 2016 FOLLOW-UP REPORT Sheriff’s Office Transition (Internal audit report #14/15-9 issued August 2015) To request this information in an alternate format, please call (541) 330-4674 or send email to David.Givans@Deschutes.org Deschutes County, Oregon David Givans, CPA, CIA, CGMA Deschutes County Internal Auditor PO Box 6005 1300 NW Wall St Bend, OR 97708-6005 (541) 330-4674 David.Givans@Deschutes.org Audit committee: Shawn Armstrong, Chair - Public member John Barnett - Public member Lindsey Lombard - Public member Michael Shadrach - Public member Wayne Yeatman - Public member Anthony DeBone, County Commissioner Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk Dan Despotopulos, Fair & Expo Director Follow-up report of Sheriff’s Office Transition #15/16-12 July 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background ………………………………………...………………................................... 1 1.2. Objectives & Scope ……………………………………..………………………….…….… 1 1.3. Methodology ……………………………………………………..…………………….……. 1 2. FOLLOW-UP RESULTS ……………….…...…………………………........................... 2-3 3. APPENDIX 3.1. Appendix I – Updated Workplan for Report #14/15-9 (Status as of July 2016) …............................................................................... 4-5 Follow-up report of Sheriff’s Office Transition #15/16-12 July 2016 Page 1 1. Introduction 1.1 BACKGROUND Audit Authority: The Deschutes County Audit Committee has suggested that follow-ups occur from nine months to one year after the original report issuance. The Audit Committee’s would like to make sure departments satisfactorily address recommendations. 1.2 OBJECTIVES and SCOPE Objectives: The objective was to follow-up on the outstanding audit recommendations. Scope: The follow-up included six (6) recommendations from the internal audit report on Sheriff’s Office Transition for County Administration (#14/15-9 issued August 2015). The follow-up reflects the status as of June 2016. The original internal audit report should be referenced for the full text of recommendations and discussion. 1.3 METHODOLOGY The follow-up report was developed from information provided by Beth Raguine, Sheriff’s Office Business Manager. In cases where recommendations have not been implemented, comments were sought for the reasons why and the timing for addressing these. The follow-up is, by nature, subjective. In determining the status of recommendations that were followed up, we relied on assertions provided by those involved and did not attempt to independently verify those assertions. The updates received from the Sheriff’s Office are included in Appendix I. Since no substantive audit work was performed, Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States were not followed. DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT Follow-up report of Sheriff’s Office Transition #15/16-12 July 2016 Page 2 2. Follow-up Results Figure I - How were recommendations implemented? Internal audit recommendation resulted in identification of fraud The follow-up included six (6) recommendations. Management agreed with all of the recommendations. They are to be recognized for their complete and quick response to the recommendations identified. Figure I provides an overview of the implementation status of the recommendations. The details of the updated workplan are provided in Appendix I. With this follow-up, one-hundred percent (100%) of the recommendations are completed. Fraud discovery highlights: The report highlighted the need for “certain cash is held for investigative purposes in different places and should be logged in a master ledger” and recommended that the Sheriff’s Office “include in program ledgers all investigative cash monies held by location”. This finding and associated recommendation was related to a perceived lack of segregation of duties over this cash. The Sheriff’s Office staff in response to this finding explored these logs and associated cash movements. They identified the potential weakness had in fact been exploited. With limited assistance of the internal Follow-up report of Sheriff’s Office Transition #15/16-12 July 2016 Page 3 auditor, Sheriff’s Office staff and FBI assembled a case against the now former Captain Beard responsible for safeguarding those monies. It was also determined additional monies under the former Captain’s oversight had also been compromised. After the investigation was completed, the case was m ade against the former Captain for stealing approximately $205 thousand dollars. The former Captain has pleaded guilty to two counts each of money laundering and theft from a program receiving federal funds. The Sheriff’s Office is seeking recovery of the stolen funds from PERS retirement accounts and personal assets. He is due to be sentenced August 23, 2016 and faces up to five years in prison. Additional follow-up procedures: Shortly after the above fraud was discovered, the Sheriff’s Office, the County and internal audit worked together at identifying additional procedures, forms and controls to prevent future issues over investigative and evidence cash handling. In coordination with this follow-up, internal audit and the Sheriff’s Office Business Manager completed a surprise cash count of investigative monies located with CODE and with the Sheriff’s Office and found that monies agreed to the associated accounting records. Monies requested for investigative funds (since the fraud) were traced though to those custodian accounting records. Reports and processes were reviewed for evidence and investigative funds. The improved communications and transparency of transactions appears to be working as intended. Some minor observations were made on further improving the stated policies. Follow-up report of Sheriff’s Office Transition #15/16-12 July 2016 Page 4 3. Appendix Appendix I – Updated Workplan for Report #14/15-9 (Status as of July 2016) tart, we have been meeting weekly for the past several months to develop/refine a policy that we intend to use Audit #14/15-9 workplan Implementation Status Rec # Recommendations Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated or Actual Date of Completion Sheriff's Office Comments 1 It is recommended for the Sheriff’s Office to establish a routine schedule for having these financial statements audited by their due date. X A schedule has been established to have the financial statements audited by October 31. This will allow sufficient time for the County's Finance department to process year-end invoices, and allow for scheduling with the external auditor. 2 It is recommended the Sheriff’s Office include with credit card purchases a brief explanation (if it is not apparent) how these purchases fall under an “emergency situation” identified in the policy. It might be necessary for the Sheriff’s Office to seek a more expanded credit card use policy from the County for certain internet purchases. X The Sheriff's Office has established a Credit Card Documentation Form to provide a detailed description of the use of the credit card. Internal policy has also been updated to address the appropriate use of credit cards. 3 It is recommended for staff who have custody and use of County credit cards in the Sheriff’s Office be provided copies of the policy and sign an acknowledgment that they have read the policy and will comply with its terms. {Staff authorized to have credit cards have signed and provided copies of the policy for the current transition.} X Completed Follow-up report of Sheriff’s Office Transition #15/16-12 July 2016 Page 5 Audit #14/15-9 workplan Implementation Status Rec # Recommendations Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated or Actual Date of Completion Sheriff's Office Comments 4 It is recommended that purchase of gift cards be discouraged and practices be established to address potential use of gift cards in accordance with the credit card policy or operationally. X The use of gift cards is strongly discouraged. Procedures for tracking gift cards have been established. 5 It is recommended the Sheriff’s Office to identify and exclude certain transactions that do not meet the reporting requirements. Accordingly, appropriate staff training will need to occur on these reporting standards. X Staff has been trained on the proper reporting of these transactions. 6 It is recommended the Sheriff’s Office • have the business manager receive the bank statements and review prior to providing to the division for reconciliation; • provide the business manager and Finance copies of bank reconciliations performed for review; • establish practices to remit unclaimed property that is older than two years; and • include in program ledgers all investigative cash monies held by location. X Bank statements are reviewed by the Business Manager prior to reconciliation. Once reconciled, the Administrative Analyst sends copies of the reconciled statements to the Business Manager, Corrections Captain and County Finance. Unclaimed property submittals are up to date and have been scheduled for October 2016. The Business Manager has established master logs of cash monies held by location. versation with client departments. We feel it would be better to have something in-hand when we he discupolicy that has been vetted through client departments. I am hopef that we will have good information in time for the FY 18 Budget process.ndfor the delay. For whatever reason I had it in my mind that it was due today. {END OF REPORT}