Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1617-2 Follow-up report on WEBCO (Final 12-12-16)Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 FOLLOW-UP REPORT Wellness & Education Board of Central Oregon (Internal audit report #15/16-4 issued February 2016) To request this information in an alternate format, please call (541) 330-4674 or send email to David.Givans@Deschutes.org Deschutes County, Oregon David Givans, CPA, CIA, CGMA Deschutes County Internal Auditor PO Box 6005 1300 NW Wall St Bend, OR 97708-6005 (541) 330-4674 David.Givans@Deschutes.org Audit committee: Lindsey Lombard, Chair - Public member John Barnett - Public member Tom Linhares - Public member Daryl Parrish - Public member Michael Shadrach - Public member Wayne Yeatman - Public member Anthony DeBone, County Commissioner Nancy Blankenship, County Clerk Dan Despotopulos, Fair & Expo Director Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background ………………………………………...………………................................... 1 1.2. Objectives & Scope ……………………………………..………………………….…….… 1 1.3. Methodology ……………………………………………………..…………………….……. 1 2. FOLLOW-UP RESULTS ……………….…...…………………………........................... 2-3 3. APPENDIX 3.1. Appendix I – Updated Workplan for Report #15/16-4 (Status as of December 2016) …...................................................................... 4-9 Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 1 1. Introduction 1.1 BACKGROUND Audit Authority: The Deschutes County Audit Committee has suggested that follow-ups occur from nine months to one year after the original report issuance. The Audit Committee’s would like to make sure departments satisfactorily address recommendations. 1.2 OBJECTIVES and SCOPE Objectives: The objective was to follow-up on the outstanding audit recommendations. Scope: The follow-up included eighteen (18) recommendations from the internal audit report on Wellness and Education Board of Central Oregon (WEBCO) (#15/16-4 issued February 2016). The follow-up reflects the status as of December 2016. The original internal audit report should be referenced for the full text of recommendations and discussion. 1.3 METHODOLOGY The follow-up report was developed from information provided by Lionel “Chad” Chadwick, MPH, Ph.D., Director of WEBCO. In cases where recommendations have not been implemented, comments were sought for the reasons why and the timing for addressing these. The follow-up is, by nature, subjective. In determining the status of recommendations that were followed up, we relied on assertions provided by those involved and did not attempt to independently verif y those assertions. The updates received from the WEBCO are included in Appendix I. Since no substantive audit work was performed, Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States were not followed. DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT DESCHUTES COUNTY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 2 2. Follow-up Results Figure I - How were recommendations implemented? The follow-up included eighteen (18) recommendations agreed to by management. Management in substance agreed with all but one of the nineteen recommendations. Figure I provides an overview of the implementation status of the recommendations. The details of the updated workplan are provided in Appendix I. With this follow-up, thirty-two percent (61%) of the recommendations have been completed. In November 2016, the WEBCO Board directed the WEBCO Director to develop options, plans, and conditions to terminate WEBCO for discussion and approval at the February 2017 WEBCO Board meeting. This includes: 1. Immediately begin a process that would explore the feasibility and facilitate a migration of all services Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 3 from WEBCO to other organizations / counties with particular focus on the capabilities of Central Oregon Health Council (COHC) and High Desert Education Service District (HDESD). Specific activities are expected to include: a. Meeting with appropriate constituencies and State of Oregon funding agencies to explore options, preferences, and timelines b. Meet with leadership of COHC and HDESD to identify matters of finance, governance, contract legal concerns, and programmatic suitability c. Explore legal transition approaches with WEBCO, member counties, and HDESD / COHC legal counsels 2. Develop all contractual, financial, and legal matters of consideration pertaining to such a service migration. 3. Research approaches to lingering roles of WEBCO to include recommendations regarding options of WEBCO dissolution or maintenance of WEBCO in an inactive residual status. 4. Develop a timeline and illuminate key actions steps to conclude this process by June 30, 2017. Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 4 3. Appendix Appendix I – Updated Workplan for Report #15/16-4 (Status as of December 2016) Ers Audit #15/16-4 workplan Ag r e e Di s a g r e e Implementation Status # Recommendations Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated Date of Completion WEBCO comments 1 It is recommended for WEBCO, with proper financial advice, develop an approach to addressing the weaknesses in developing accounting information for financial statement preparation. X X Oct-16 We have moved our financial statement accounting to an accrual based system. We are also segregating by program to permit enhanced programmatic financial accountability. 2 In addition to the prior recommendation, it might be useful to have significant fiscal matters reviewed with an established executive committee that would obtain and review pertinent facts and accounting treatment for recommendation to the Board. X X An Executive Committee has not been established due to the very small board (4 members). In the event WEBCO is not eliminated, we will establish an ad hoc financial executive advisory group for this purpose. Internal Auditor comment: The nature of this recommendation revolves around having management stakeholders involved in advising on management decisions. Given the organization is breaking up; this recommendation should be considered complete. 3 It is recommended the counties be billed/repaid for their respective obligations/overpayments from the settlement of the 2013 and 2014 sub-cap reconciliations. X X All remaining reconciliation matters have been resolved, approved by the board, and billed. We expect all financial transactions pertaining to the capitation arrangement to be resolved by January 1, 2017. Capitation arrangement with PacificSource terminated January 1, 2016. Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 5 # Recommendations Ag r e e Di s a g r e e Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated Date of Completion WEBCO comments 4 It is recommended for significant fiscal changes be assessed for fiscal impacts (and reviewed by an executive committee, if implemented) and be approved by the Board. X X All material fiscal changes will be board approved effective the start of the FY16-17 year. 5 It is recommended that WEBCO explore how it could accomplish and retain all accounting and reporting through one accounting system. X X Jul-17 The board has determined that it is not possible to financially support the added financial infrastructure, and has, instead, elected to delegate WEBCO program to other agencies, and dissolve the organization in FY 2017 6 It is recommended for WEBCO to consider the process for developing accrual adjustments and reporting. This should include reconciliation to beginning fund balance on the method of presentation. X X We have moved to an accrual based reporting of monthly financial performance, which reconciled to the beginning fund balance. 7 It is recommended that WEBCO staff document their accounting policies and procedures. These policies and procedures should be available to all employees and should include, in detail, the responsibilities of each employee. X X Jul-17 We have begun documenting our accounting policies and procedures starting with a credit card usage and approval policy. Remaining accounting policies are pending discussion of affiliation, and then potential dissolution. Delegated programs will assume the accounting practices of the new organization. Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 6 # Recommendations Ag r e e Di s a g r e e Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated Date of Completion WEBCO comments 8 It is recommended that WEBCO management develop some segregation and oversight around the billing, receivable and collection function. It is recommended for WEBCO to have an endorsement stamp to restrict deposit to their account. X X TBD WEBCO agrees with recommendation however due to planned dissolution, we have not implemented this recommendation due to very small staff size and very few number of receivables. Executive Director exercises oversight over function. 9 It is recommended for WEBCO management to improve the documentation process for disbursements. X X All disbursements are signed off by the Executive Directors, except disbursement to director, which are signed off by Board Chair. 10 It is recommended that disbursements be reviewed and authorized in total for each period of submittal. These disbursements should be reconciled back to what was disbursed. It is recommended for the executive director to sign off on credit card transactions (not their own). X X Per policy and practice, all credit card transactions are signed off by Director 11 It is recommended for any executive director disbursements or those with any potential conflict of interest be provided approved by an appropriate oversight body of the Counties. X X All Executive Director disbursements are now approved in writing by the board chair. Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 7 # Recommendations Ag r e e Di s a g r e e Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated Date of Completion WEBCO comments 12 It is recommended for WEBCO in coordination with the County departments determine how it can assure accountability for purchased prepaid gift cards. This could be through establishing sufficient safeguards for oversight and control of the prepaid gift cards or discontinuing this practice. Detailed receipts should be obtained for all purchases made by staff with prepaid gift cards. X X Jul-16 In the event prepaid gift cards are used, we will establish a policy, which assures that a written disbursement trail is, documented which reconciles with the aggregate card purchase. 13 It is recommended the fee withheld on sub-capitation incentives be reversed. The adjustments by county could be reflected in amounts owing from Counties on sub-capitation. X X The board retroactively approved the fee reduction at its March 10th meeting effective August 2015. 14 It is recommended that sub-capitation expenses be reviewed in total for agreement to actual call center costs paid. X Our practices now reflect the reconciliation of the call center costs and the invoices to the counties. Retroactive reconciliation has not been undertaken since we feel the financial effect not to be material. 15 It is recommended for WEBCO to develop and implement procedures for FY 16/17 to comply with local budget law under ORS 294.900. X X We have altered our practices to align with budget law obligations for public entities effective the FY 16-17 Fiscal year, including budget committee and hearings. Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 8 # Recommendations Ag r e e Di s a g r e e Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated Date of Completion WEBCO comments 16 It is recommended for WEBCO and the counties coordinate how resources are distributed to align with services to be provided. X X Effective the FY 16-17 fiscal year, the programs receive an allocation reflective of their consumption of allocated services. 17 It is recommended that decisions minimize the overlap of services, seek efficiencies and minimize overhead costs. This should require financial forecasts be developed for whether service payments under a revised fee structure and underlying resources (fund balances) can sustain the organization. X X Nov-16 The board held a strategic planning process to determine if this recommendation can be implemented. It has been determined that such reductions will be harmful to program effectiveness. Accordingly, the board has directed the Executive Director to begin establishing a plan to move programs to other organizations and to take steps to dissolve WEBCO as an organization. 18 It is recommended that WEBCO establish a formal policy on the level of unrestricted fund balance that should be maintained for GAAP and budgetary purposes. X X At its February 2016 meeting, the board established an Operating Reserve Policy and Guidelines Document establishing a policy for reserve retention and usage. Follow-up report of WEBCO #16/17-2 December 2016 Page 9 # Recommendations Ag r e e Di s a g r e e Co m p l e t e d Un d e r w a y Pl a n n e d Estimated Date of Completion WEBCO comments 19 It is recommended that WEBCO establish distributions in their organizational documents that would allow distribution of excess reserves identified. X X Jul-16 At its July Board meeting, the Board considered a policy to distribute excess reserve back to the Counties. At that meeting, the Board amended the Operating Reserve Policy to permit the distribution of excess reserve. Action on the distribution was held in abeyance pending the completion of the strategic plan process. The board will reconsider action pertaining to an excess distribution at its January meeting. ation with client departments. We feel it would be better to have something in-hand when we he discupolicy that has been vetted through client departments. I am hopef that we will have good information in time for the FY 18 Budget pr ocess.ndfor the delay. For whatever reason I had it in my mind that it was due today. {END OF REPORT}